WEBVTT - Ask HTM - Work Provided Life Insurance, Compounding Returns with a 401k True-Up, & Selling a Home to an iBuyer #721

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Had of Money. I'm Joel and I am Matt,

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and today we are answering your listener questions. That's right, buddy,

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>This is a listener Questions Monday episode that we've got

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:31.680
<v Speaker 1>lined up for you. We hope everybody out there had

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful weekend, but we've got five awesome questions to

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>get to. A listener is wondering if the work provided

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>life insurance that her and her husband receive, if that's

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be enough. We're going to talk about that.

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:46.519
<v Speaker 1>Another listener is he's got a four to one K

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>true up option. That's something that is offered, but he

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>wants to know if this actually means that he's not

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>leaving money on the table, not tune up, but true

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>up true. We'll get into did I say true up?

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>No, you said true But I know people might hear

0:00:58.840 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>that and they're like, I don't even know what that is.

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about that, and then another listener she is

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>selling her house or she wants to, and she's wondering

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>if she should go the take the iebuyer route. So

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>we've got that question plus a couple others on today's episode.

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, before we get to that, man, I wanted

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to quickly mentioned, have you heard of EU two six one.

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It's a law in the new COVID variance that sounds

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>like no, although I can see why you say that. No,

0:01:24.720 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>but there's BA two six one. But so this is

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a law in Europe that basically says that you get

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 1>paid if a flight is delayed or canceled and by

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a certain by a certain amount of time. So there's

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>different rules about got that euro European feel to it? EU? Okay, yeah, exactly.

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>And so there were a couple people in my life

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 1>recently who mentioned flight cancelations on a trip to or

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>from Europe, or at least a substantial delay, and I

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>was like, hey, you might want to check this out

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and file acclaim with the airline because you might be

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>entitled the compensation. And you're like, oh, yeah, what twenty

0:02:03.520 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty bucks and it's like no, no, no, no, hundreds and

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>hundreds and hundreds of dollars. So nice. Yeah, this is

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>one of those things that a lot of people don't

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>know about. And by the way, the statute of limitations

0:02:13.240 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is like years long for some of these, So if

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you're like, man, two years back, I got screwed on

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this flight. And it doesn't have to be in inter

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>European flight. It can be a flight to and from Yeah, exactly,

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:26.799
<v Speaker 1>so look at the details. So if you fancy like that,

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>like all of Joel's friends are, make sure to jets

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>threading up for parents and all the likes. Right, but

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>the folks are just talking about bicycling from point A

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to point B to to the grocery store. Right, We'll

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>put a link to an article that tells helps you

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 1>understand how to get compensation for EUT six to one

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 1>if you had a substantial delayer at cancelation. But it's

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool, Like my sister did this a few

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>years ago, got paid more in the compensation than the

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>flight cost her because she got such a dirt cheap deal,

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>so it's yeah, it's pretty sweet. They pay actual replacement cost,

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>not depreciated cost of that ticket. And we've talked about

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 1>how these are. There are similar benefits that credit cards offer,

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>but of course you have to know about that and

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.680
<v Speaker 1>have used the right credit card or even have the

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>credit card. So this kind of size steps all of that,

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>or it does not come down to payment. It's even

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>if the European law. Even if you did, you could

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>double dip essentially. And oh that's what the credit card

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and the EU six one. Yah, they're separate. Yes, it makes

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:20.959
<v Speaker 1>makes sense that you should be able to. That is

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>one of those things we're interesting. It would not be cheap.

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be frugal to take advantage of the

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>credit card benefit, the trip cancelation shirts, but also under

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>your your legal right as someone taking a trip to

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>or from Europe, like get the money. Oh and by

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, Matt, I don't think we've mentioned this yet.

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have a listener hang here in Atlanta and

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>our boy home city this coming Friday. We teased it

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>was it last week or a couple of weeks ago,

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's official. This is the official announcement. Yeah, so,

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>if you live locally and you want to see our

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>ugly mugs drink beer together, please come out to Inner

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Voice Brewing. We'll be there from four to eight pm.

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's incentivize folks as well. Let's we'll have a few

0:03:57.880 --> 0:03:59.839
<v Speaker 1>pairs of our how to Money socks on hand. Sure, yeah,

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you beer, we'll see but yeah, we hope to see

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you there at Inner Voice How To Money Hang meet

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>your fellow listener this Friday from four to eight. All right,

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>let's introduce the beer that you and I are going

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>to enjoy today. This is a brew by Common Space.

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>It's called Chubby Unicorn, and we will give our thoughts

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>on this guava milkshake IPA at the end of the episode.

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>That's right, But let's get to the subject of Handmatt.

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>We're answering listener questions. We've got a good slate of

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>them today on the show, and if you have a question,

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>we would love to hear from you. It takes all

0:04:30.240 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of three minutes to pick up your question, to talk

0:04:33.160 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>it into your phone into that voice memo app, and

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>then to send it our way. You can find the

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>specific instructions for how to do that at howtomoney dot com.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Slash ask can't wait to hear from you, and this

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>listener wants to know whether or not they should sell

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>their home to an entity instead of a human.

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Hello. My name is Rosemary and I currently live in

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 2>Central Texas. We were moving due to my husband's job.

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 2>After much deliberation and against common wisdom, we have decided

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 2>to sell our home, which we have only owned for

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 2>two years. Where are the pros and cons of selling

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 2>your home to an eyebuyer such as open door risk

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 2>going through a traditional real estate agency. When might you

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 2>choose one option over the other? Thank you?

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's kick this thing off, Rosemary, thank you

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>so much for your question. And by the way, congrats

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>on the new job there for your husband. I hope

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>it's just a fantastic opportunity as well as a promotion. Right,

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you are yeller earning more. But I'm also hoping

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>too that you get to move somewhere great, right, Yeah,

0:05:28.600 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean Texas is great, but tex is great. I mean,

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if you're wanting to move on from Texas, where would

0:05:33.279 --> 0:05:35.159
<v Speaker 1>you hope to be going? I don't know, I mean Atlanta,

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Bay, Yeah, I mean probably right. The water's just fun.

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty great here. But you're you're talking about selling

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>your house, and lucky for you, even after own owning

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that house for just a couple of years, it's likely

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that you're still going to come out ahead. Right, In

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a normal time period, that could really come back and

0:05:52.560 --> 0:05:55.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of bite you. But just given the lack of supply,

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 1>given the soaring prices that we've seen since you made

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that purchase, I'm pretty sure that you're probably still going

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>to be doing Okay, Yeah, obviously it comes down to

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>your personal situation here, but at least it's not like,

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>let's say it was six o seven that you made

0:06:07.920 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the purchase and then if you're looking to sell two

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>years after that, that would put you in a pretty

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.960
<v Speaker 1>painful position and be called taking a bath, right for ure.

0:06:16.240 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, definitely fortunate for Rosemary that even despite

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>despite those transaction costs that are so heavy involved in

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>buying and selling and taking out a mortgage and all

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, it would typically mean that you would lose

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>money over such a short term ownership cycle. But that's

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen to you, Rosemary. But let's talk

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 1>about eye buyers, and first, what is an iBuyer Maybe

0:06:35.680 --> 0:06:39.159
<v Speaker 1>let's define the terms. Well, simply put, their big companies

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.839
<v Speaker 1>that are willing to instantly and that's what the eye

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:44.360
<v Speaker 1>stands for. By the way, in eye buyers, they will

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.559
<v Speaker 1>instantly buy your house from you in order to turn

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>around and sell it themselves on the open market. Open

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Door and offer Pad they are two of the largest

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>players out there there. You mentioned you mentioned open door,

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Rosemary in your question but Zillow and Redfin they had

0:06:58.760 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a large percentage of the market before they ended their

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>eye buying programs, and basically they had a tough time

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>buying homes at scale, right, and during the pandemic when

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:08.200
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of money slashing around, they were

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>overpaying for houses. They literally bought high and sold low,

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>which is the exact opposite of what you want to

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>do really with any investment, right. And so since then,

0:07:15.640 --> 0:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>eye buying is kind of wised up, so you're really

0:07:18.520 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you're much less inclined to get an amazing offer today.

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Two three years ago you might have seen Zelo give

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you more money than you would have gotten if you

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>put it on the open market. But now purely because

0:07:29.080 --> 0:07:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of the novelty of it, because it was a new thing,

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it hadn't necessarily been proven. They were still trying to

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 1>figure things out. They're trying to establish market share, and

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>so they're like, hey, cool, and they I guess they

0:07:37.960 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>didn't really they hadn't other due diligence, they hadn't figured

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>out what it took to buy and sell homes effectively

0:07:43.640 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>without losing money. And then they realized, wait a second,

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>it's actually gonna be really hard to pull this.

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 3>Off a lot.

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's a lot of factors that go into account,

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, like how do you account for the incessant

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>barking dog that's next door? If you're just looking at pictures,

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>which is how a lot of the eyebuyers do it,

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>it's oftentimes light unseen. But the future of the just

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>eye buying industry is uncertain. It seems like that they're

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of building the plane while they're flying it. I

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>really like the idea of eye buyers, but the reality

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 1>just has played out a little differently. It sounds really good,

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but the end result isn't necessarily awesome, and that's largely

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 1>because they are acting as another middleman who's looking to

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>get paid. So that means the offer that you're likely

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>going to receive it's going to be typically lower than

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.280
<v Speaker 1>what you would get with a traditional listing. They are

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>looking for their piece of the pie, they're looking for

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>their cut. Some folks might think that selling via an

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:36.000
<v Speaker 1>eyebuyer is actually going to reduce fees, which is going

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.160
<v Speaker 1>to maybe make the offer more competitive. In reality, like

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.319
<v Speaker 1>why not go digital? That is not the case, because

0:08:42.400 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the fees can be similar, if not more than the

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.680
<v Speaker 1>fees that a typical realtor would charge. And so why

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>would you go with an option where you're essentially going

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to get hit with the same fees, but with us

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>with an inferior service. Right With at least with the realtor,

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got somebody, like a real person. It feels like

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>a customized, bespoke, tailored care that you're receiving. But with Eyebuyer, man,

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 1>that seems like the path to take if you're not

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>looking for service, right, Like I mean, just Iyebuyer even

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>in the name itself, like it makes me a think

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of eye Robot or whatever the movie and is robots

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. Well, you said service, But most people when

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>they're in there to sell me an iyebuyer, they're not

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for service. They're looking to sell it immediately, right.

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>They don't care about like whether someone's going to hold

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.079
<v Speaker 1>their hand and walk them through the details and help

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>them get their house in order so they can get

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>top dollar. They want to be done, They want the

0:09:27.240 --> 0:09:30.640
<v Speaker 1>transaction over completed, they want their cash, right, And so

0:09:30.679 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that is what ibuyers do. Well. They are the convenience play,

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the convenience pick. But we're talking to one of the

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.040
<v Speaker 1>other big downsides of using an eyebuyer is that you're

0:09:40.080 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 1>asking one single entity to make an offer for your house.

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You're skipping the open market, right and the competition that's

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>generated when home is publicly listed, When it's put on

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the MLS. That's when everybody and their sister sees your

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>listing on Zilo and says, Oh, that's a cute one

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 1>on a cute street. I think I want to go

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.199
<v Speaker 1>take a look at that. When you sell directly to

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>an eyebuyer, you miss those eyeballs and you miss the

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>potential interest from people you know. And even though obviously

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>home buyers they're not lined up the sidewalk to see

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a house like they were back in twenty twenty one

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>early twenty twenty two, still just a few competing offers, right,

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is all you really need to ensure that you're getting

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the absolute best price. Having at least two or three

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>interested parties looking at the house making offers on the

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>home is going to ensure that you're getting what it's

0:10:23.000 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>actually worth on the market. You don't get that with

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 1>an iBuyer. You're getting literally just the one offer and

0:10:28.200 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>got one buyer. That doesn't help you the iebuyer. That

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't help you know whether or not that is what

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 1>the house would actually go for if you were to

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>put it up for sale. Plus, not all homes qualify

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:41.199
<v Speaker 1>because eye buyers aren't available in all markets. They're available

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of more in the southern United States, less in

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the northern regions. So yeah, they are in Texas, but

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>they might not be where a lot of our other

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.440
<v Speaker 1>listeners who listen Matt where where they are. It depends

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>on the property too, because I think oftentimes they're looking

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.959
<v Speaker 1>for uniformity because that's how they're able to easily from

0:10:57.000 --> 0:10:59.199
<v Speaker 1>a digital standpoint, determine the value of a home. And

0:10:59.240 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>if you have a piece of property that's on a

0:11:01.440 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of land or that's that's a really unique home,

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>either A, they your house may not be eligible to

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>be purchased by an eyebuyer, or b you might get

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>severely lowballed because they're not really taking that into account

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>as much as some of the other things that a

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:16.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks are looking for. I fear has like

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a water slide from the second story down to the pool,

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and you got like a grotto or something, you might

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>get qualified. I don't know they might not even want

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to play with you. But like you said, folks who

0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:28.839
<v Speaker 1>are wanting basically like cash now, which is a part

0:11:28.880 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of why we don't like this whole like the eyebuyer

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>industry or sort of that mentality is it seems like

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>almost like a desperate ploy to unloading your house quickly,

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>which isn't how you should be approaching selling your home.

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the speed which you could sell your house,

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>how it's streamlined, that's certainly one of the advantages to

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:48.599
<v Speaker 1>going with an eyebuyer, But it's also just going to

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>be so much easier, right because like maybe some folks

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 1>actually like they do have the time, right, it's not

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>about how quickly they can do it. They actually have

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>the time, but they just don't want to deal with

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the hassle of it. They don't want to put up

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>with the headaches of schedule, the appointments, of hiding all

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of their personal stuff so that potential buyers can envision

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>their own stuff there in the house. It's the easy button.

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 1>But you are paying a price for this convenience, and

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, we hope for your bottom line that you

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 1>are able to take the time to actually do some

0:12:16.360 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of these things. To do the legwork. There are meaningful

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.559
<v Speaker 1>dollars on the line, and we until the industry gets

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe more competitive or more efficient to where the eyebuars

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>are taking less of a cut, we're not really in

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 1>favor of going the taking the eye buy route. Sure, yeah,

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean a pawn shop will buy your stuff instantly too,

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 1>and they're not, but they're just not gonna pay you

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>as much as you can get exactly. Typically if you

0:12:37.800 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>list it yourself on Facebook, marketplace, or if you sell

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it on eBay, there are all sorts of ways where

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you can, you know, sell that an asset that you

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 1>have on a shorter truncated timetable, but typically that means

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:51.080
<v Speaker 1>they're going to make less money for it does feel

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.959
<v Speaker 1>like the pawn shop of realtors. Like I think maybe

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the slight negative connotation again, not that the pawn

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 1>shops are serve purpose. They're a legit business and the

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ability to go in there and man, I don't have

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the time, I just need to unload some stuff and

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>in order to have some cash on hand. It serves

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>both parties well, But who stands to make a profit

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The person that's there in the middle, and that's what

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Eyebuyer is looking to do. Yeah, I mean we've all

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>seen pond Stars. We know what happens there. Okay, I

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>actually haven't seen Pundstas. Oh really, you've never seen one

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>episode of it? I don't think so. I mean I

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>understand the premise. Next, you're gonna tell me you never

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>saw one episode of Orange County Choppers or whatever that was. Oh,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I know, I definitely Okay, Yeah, they're always fighting and yeah,

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:29.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff at each other. There's like two of the most

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>popular reality TV shows of all time, that and like

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Deadliest Catch, Right, But I think Insummation Rosemary, we would

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>say that it can't it can't hurt to get a

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>quote from Open Door, from offer Pad to see if

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 1>they're in the ballpark. But get a quote from both right,

0:13:41.120 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>and you might get a solid offer, you know, with

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:45.959
<v Speaker 1>just a few clicks. But hiring an experienced agent who

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 1>knows the ins and outs of your neighborhood could net

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you thousands of dollars more, if not tens of thousands

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of dollars more, and putting in some of that work

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>up front, whether it's you know, taking out some ugly

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>wallpaper and painting a neutral color or something like that,

0:13:59.280 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 1>all those sorts of things that an agent is going

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to give you the tips on, Hey, spending a few

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:06.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand here could mean many more thousands right when it

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>comes to putting your home on the market and getting

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 1>those offers. So I would talk to an agent once

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>you have those offers in hand from the eye buyers,

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and say, hey, how much more can we get? Like

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and if it's not worth the hassle to make an

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>extra couple grand, then you take the eyebuyer offer. But

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>if you say, actually, the agent things we can get

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 1>fifteen to twenty grand more, it's worth the extra time,

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>the extra effort. It doesn't hurt to at least bark

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>up that high buyer tree, but in nl likelihood you're

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>going to do better go in the traditional Totally agree. Yeah,

0:14:34.040 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>it can be a great data point essentially to help

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you to decide what it is that you should be

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>doing moving forward. And given the criticism that we have

0:14:43.600 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>presented on the podcast about realtors and the fees that

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>they present or the fees that they charge, I think

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks might be thinking, oh, man, I'm

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>surprised that mandol aren't down with eyebuyers because it seems

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>like it kind of automates things that kind of it's

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a more efficient marketplace, but it's not really like that's

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that you're holding to a single buyer.

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>If it was more like a sophisticated marketplace where buyers

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>are being put directly in touch with sellers and you

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>are able to automate a lot of the stuff there

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in the middle to where there's not necessarily a middleman

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>there and like taking a cut as opposed to just

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>software that's kind of running in the background, that sounds

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:21.440
<v Speaker 1>more attractive to me, Like I'm more hopeful for that

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to just another player that's in between you

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and your money. We're just saying we're not talking about

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>widgets here, We're not talking about tennis shoes, we're not

0:15:29.120 --> 0:15:31.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about T shirts. Right. This is a complex market,

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the market of real estate, and it varies from street

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to street. And like you said, madikuild a dog barking

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>across the street, a troublesome house that's right next door, Well,

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that can make all the difference in what you're getting

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in what buyer see and what they're willing to offer.

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:48.560
<v Speaker 1>And so I just don't know if I buyers are

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:52.160
<v Speaker 1>ever going to be able to compete in a hyper

0:15:52.160 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 1>customized business like real estate. But we've got more questions

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to get to, including one about tossing bonus money into

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a retirement accoun Does that make sense and will it

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>help him avoid more tax? We'll get to that and

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>more right after this. We are back and we will

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>get to that four when kay question here in a minute,

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>But first let's hear from a listener who is actually

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>she heard us answer a question and now she's got

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>another question. It's a question of a question. Take you

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>back off of a question. We'll get to that one

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>right now.

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 4>Hi, Matt and Joel. My name is Megan and I'm

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 4>a longtime listener of the podcast from Portland, Oregon. Recently,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 4>when listening to one of the Ask how to Money episodes,

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 4>you are answering a listener question about term versus whole

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 4>life insurance, and it got me thinking about something that

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 4>I'd love to get your advice on. Currently, my husband

0:16:47.640 --> 0:16:50.080
<v Speaker 4>and I are both twenty nine and working full time

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:53.120
<v Speaker 4>with no kids. We both have insurance built into our

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 4>work benefits where we would get one point five times

0:16:56.040 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 4>our income upon death of either of us. We have

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 4>a healthy savings account and no debt beside our mortgage,

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 4>and since we don't have any dependents, we have always

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 4>thought this would be sufficient in the unlikely event that

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.399
<v Speaker 4>we'd need it. However, we do plan to start a

0:17:09.440 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 4>family in the next few years and are wondering should

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 4>we go ahead and established term life insurance now since

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 4>we're younger and healthy in case something were to happen,

0:17:17.840 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 4>so that we can ensure that we get it for

0:17:19.480 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 4>a good price, knowing that we'll eventually need it. Thanks

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.399
<v Speaker 4>so much for your thoughts and love listening to the podcast.

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt, speaking of efficient markets, life insurance is

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a much more efficient market than versus in real estate.

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Oh they're going to say universal whole life. Oh oh yeah, Yeah,

0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot more you know, all the actuary, actuary

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>exactly what an actuarial table, actuarial. There's more standardization. You

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>can shop for it with multiple providers online in a

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>simple sitting. And so we're big fans of term Life

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>by the way, in case you didn't know, if you're

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 1>like I think I need some life insurance, term life

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is is the way to go. We'll actually put a

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>link to an article I wrote about that on the

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 1>website in the show notes. But before we tackle this

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>new term life policy, let's talk about work provided life

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>insurance policies for just a second, because a lot of

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>folks they might be thinking that, well, one and a

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>half times your income, that's plenty, right if something happens

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>to either of you, And the truth is it might be,

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but it does depend on the specific details.

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:16.639
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like you've both done a good job thinking

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.000
<v Speaker 1>through the particulars, which is great. But for others who

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>might be in a similar boat, consider what your debt

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>obligation is as a couple. If one of you dies,

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>would the other be able to continue to pay the mortgage.

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you make a substantially less you're a teacher

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and the other ones software. The other person's a software engineer.

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>That changes the dynamics, Right, if it's split fifty to fifty,

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it's like a kind of a simpler dynamic to think about.

0:18:39.960 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 1>But and I know, like there's obviously a lot of

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>emotions involved in this. This can be kind of like

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:47.719
<v Speaker 1>a morbid exercise. Would you be able to get back

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>to work after a couple of weeks or do you

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>think you need more months to mourn your law sentens.

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:52.679
<v Speaker 1>We don't know that right until we go through it.

0:18:52.920 --> 0:18:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So it's the kind of thing that's unlikely to happen,

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 1>but it's worth envisioning so that you're properly prepared so

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:03.239
<v Speaker 1>that you you feel can feel comfortable that you have

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>enough insurance in the case of that worst event happening. Yeah,

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>and it depends on just some of the different personal

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>finance goals that you might have as well, because I

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 1>think when you, like earlier on in your careers, you

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 1>may not have a ton of expendable additional income where

0:19:19.800 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>you might say, well, it wouldn't hurt to go ahead

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and get an additional policy, But if one is being

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>provided for you at work, and if that's enough, then

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, why spend the additional money every single month

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>for a policy that you don't necessarily need. If you've

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>thought through some of these some of those questions that

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>joli in that workplace policy, typically it is one x

0:19:37.240 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>or one and a half x your income that's given

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>as a free perk. Buying more through your workplace plan

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't typically make more sense because, especially if you're healthy

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and twenty nine years old, you're going to be able

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>to get a much better deal shopping the open market.

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.359
<v Speaker 1>So I wouldn't necessarily add to it at work. I

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 1>would if you do end up believing or realizing that

0:19:55.280 --> 0:19:58.080
<v Speaker 1>you need more, you're going to want to shop on

0:19:58.119 --> 0:19:59.960
<v Speaker 1>the open market as opposed to going through that work

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 1>place playing more. Yeah, but with that being or a

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>perk that your employer might offer, totally take take advantage

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:07.479
<v Speaker 1>of that thing. But I get the free style. Keep

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in mind though, that it's workplace provided, employer provided perk,

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>So once you were to move on from that job,

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that thing is not going to be coming with you,

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>which is the opposite. Of course, if you get your

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>own individual term life policy, that's good for you, know,

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>no matter who it is that you work for. But yeah,

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>important things to think through. And this is and this

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is coming too from a guy that got term life

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>before we had kids, Like, this is something that we

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:33.920
<v Speaker 1>did because we kind of thought through some of those

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>some of those different things. And Kate she was she

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>just has like I guess, lower risk tolerance level and

0:20:40.400 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>she was thinking, man, okay, I guess early on it

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>became clear that I was becoming more of the main breadwinner,

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and we had purchased a home. We hadn't had kids yet,

0:20:49.359 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>but we did have a house. And I think it

0:20:51.359 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was about two years after we had that house that

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>we had had this discussion and she was thinking, Man,

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I would still love to be able to stay in

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 1>this house where you did. I don't know if I

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>would be able to be able to afford the mortgage.

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>And so that's literally something that we went ahead and did.

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>That was like a solid two years, I think before

0:21:07.920 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>we even had kids. And so for us, it was

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:12.480
<v Speaker 1>more of a peace of mind, a way to mitigate risk,

0:21:12.560 --> 0:21:15.719
<v Speaker 1>even though it was going to be highly unlikely that

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that was going to happen. But every young couple who

0:21:18.000 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have kids in their twenties or whatever is going

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:23.679
<v Speaker 1>to have different things to think through. Right, they might

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 1>not own a home, but they might live exactly, they

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>might live in an airstream and say, listen, our costs

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>are really low and so the one X is plenty, right,

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>that's more than enough. Or maybe you've got like a

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a ton of family that are fairly well off and

0:21:36.560 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they've got basements and additional rooms or wings of the

0:21:39.240 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>house that you can live in. These are all things

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>to consider as you are trying to trying to decide

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 1>if you should go ahead and go out on your

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:47.359
<v Speaker 1>own and kind of get your own policy. But that

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>being said, like you don't need to be in a

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>rush to go out there and secure your own term

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>life policy, Like this is something that I would maybe

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>put on your medium term financial to do list, but

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>not something that needs to happen right away, because you're

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>asking about getting a policy early on, while you're young,

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>before it gets really expensive. Well, premiums they go up

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 1>over time as you get older, yes, but they don't

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>adjust a ton at all from your twenties to your thirties.

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>You might end up literally paying just a few extra

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>dollars every single month, but you will also be covered

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>for a few extra years on the tail end, which

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>are the most expensive years to be insured for more

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>important years. Yes, absolutely, So you're kind of rolling the

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>dice here in one sense, right, Like you're hoping that

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>there's not going to be like a medical catastrophe that's

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.560
<v Speaker 1>going to change those dynamics. But I think it's totally

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>fine to wait two or three more years, even waiting

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 1>but until you have kids before getting out there and

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>getting your own additional policy. Like literally, it depends where

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:43.919
<v Speaker 1>you look it up. But I saw one table and

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it showed that between the ages twenty five and thirty five,

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:51.200
<v Speaker 1>you are literally only paying two dollars more two dollars

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four dollars a year by waiting a decade a

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>decade of not paying for paying annual premiums on a

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 1>policy that you are you know, unlikely going to need,

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>especially in these early years when you're like, I'm just

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to max out a rothier area, just trying to

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 1>get the match on my four oh one K. You

0:23:07.680 --> 0:23:11.160
<v Speaker 1>could maybe cut back from your investing to have more insurance.

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>But these are the kind of hard decisions that people

0:23:13.800 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in their twenties have to make. I still remember Matt

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>people being told by really smart people, hey, you need

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 1>more term life insurance, and I was like, but I

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to become, you know, financially independent, and

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I need to sock more money into

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>investments and that, Yeah, I get the value in that insurance,

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:31.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think I can wait a couple more years.

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>And so that might be the key here. Too. Possible

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>to over ensure you don't want to you don't want

0:23:36.080 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>to overdo it towards keeping you from achieving some of

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 1>those other things that you're getting after, right, So those

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.679
<v Speaker 1>are the trade offs, Like everything comes with the trade off, right,

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>Like that's that's the reality behind everything in personal finance.

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And so in a couple of years, you'll probably want

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>to grab a thirty year term policy, megan, but shop around,

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>like when you get to that point. Policy Genius is

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>one of our favorite spots to get quotes. Costco members

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>should also get quotes there are too. And the reason

0:23:56.160 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you only need a policy, by the way, for three

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 1>decades instead of for life, instead of getting like a

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 1>whole life policy, is because we're hoping that the need

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:05.920
<v Speaker 1>for life insurance is going to evaporate by the time

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the kids that you're playing on having the theoretical kids

0:24:08.760 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>by the time they're grown, right, and that you've been

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>saving and investing for such a long stretch that at

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 1>that point in time you don't need the coverage. You

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:19.400
<v Speaker 1>could pay a bunch more. You can get life insurance

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>for the rest of your years, but should be better

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>off with the term policy and the much smaller premiums

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 1>that accompany it, which would allow you to funnel even

0:24:26.240 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>more money towards better financial goals, like investing even more.

0:24:29.880 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It's a virtuous cycle. Yeah, and like we said, as

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>far as like your kids being out of the house,

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 1>like that gives you a solid twelve years to have

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 1>like multiple failures to launch in order for those for

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:43.159
<v Speaker 1>those kids to get out of there before you know,

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>obviously they're no longer dependent on you. Yeah. So really

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not like an easy slam dunk decision. But

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>if you think through all those things and you say,

0:24:49.960 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>wait a second, kind of like Matt and Kate, I

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:53.919
<v Speaker 1>feel like we need a little bit extra coverage, and

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>really it's not that expensive and we're meeting all of

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.920
<v Speaker 1>our other our other financial goals anyway, so let's go

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead and make the purchase. It's really only going to

0:25:01.000 --> 0:25:03.199
<v Speaker 1>be nineteen dollars a month or something like that. But

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.680
<v Speaker 1>then again you might say, no, no, that would keep

0:25:05.760 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>us from being able to achieve this, this and this,

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and so actually we're going to hold off for a

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>couple more years. I think you could really make a

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>pretty good argument either way. Yeah, but bottom line, know

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that it does not get significantly more expensive hardly at all. Like, really,

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>it really starts ticking up once you hit forty. But hey,

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>let's get to our next question. This is from a

0:25:26.320 --> 0:25:29.080
<v Speaker 1>listener who, bottom line, is wanting to make sure that

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.679
<v Speaker 1>he's not leaving money retirement dollars on the table at

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year via his four o one K.

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's hear it, Hi, Matt and Joel.

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.959
<v Speaker 3>My name is Gavin and I'm from late To, Utah.

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 3>I am a recent newcomer to the How To Money

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 3>family and I've been listening for about a month now

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.119
<v Speaker 3>and I love the simplicity that you guys bring to

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 3>the complex world of finances. I am thirty four years

0:25:48.480 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 3>old and have four children, and I work in a

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 3>sales role for a construction company. For my role, I

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 3>qualify for an annual bonus. We are paid weekly and

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 3>the company offers a four to one K match in

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 3>order to maximize my weekly take home pay for day

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 3>to day expenses. I've been making no contributions to my

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.920
<v Speaker 3>four oh one K weekly, but will calculate to take

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 3>enough out of my bonus to make sure that for

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 3>the year I've contributed enough of a percentage to get

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 3>the match. Also, I did confirm that my company does

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:21.119
<v Speaker 3>a true up. An extra benefit that I've seen to

0:26:21.160 --> 0:26:23.560
<v Speaker 3>do this is that because I'm contributing to my four

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:25.959
<v Speaker 3>oh one K and the funds come out pre tax,

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 3>my taxable amount, which being a bonus attacked at a

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 3>higher percent, is less. So I'm saving a good amount

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 3>on my bonus taxes by doing this. My question is,

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 3>by only contributing one time per year, am I losing

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 3>the long term benefits of compounding interest in my four

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 3>oh one k? Thank you guys, have a great.

0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Day, Matt. I love that Gavin said that how to

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>money family. Honestly, it is like a family, isn't it.

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel that in our Facebook group we've got ten

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 1>thy seven hundred member or something like that now, and

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:00.240
<v Speaker 1>people are always addressing each other in these like terms

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of affection, which is so sweet, and does everybody refer

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to each other as brother? And yeah that might get

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>a little creepy, right, but maybe not quite to that

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 1>same place. Is kind of weird, right, exactly? No, But

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it really is like it's this community we're trying to

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>build of people who are like minded, and you want

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.440
<v Speaker 1>to see other people achieve success too, So I think

0:27:19.480 --> 0:27:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of it in some ways as a family, and I

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Maybe you're the godfather of it, but what

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>does that make you? Godmother? Maybe fairy godmoma? Yeah, I

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 1>will say that, all right, go with that. But Gavin,

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad to have your round. Man, thanks for listening

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast, and congrats on getting the full match

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on the four to one k even though you've got

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>four kiddos at home. Matt, that's like a bigger hurdle

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to jump over. Yeah, it maximizing those retirement accounts per

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:48.600
<v Speaker 1>personal experience. Welcome to the four kids club, right, You've

0:27:48.600 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>got that. Not easy. He's the mama bird right like

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>or daddy bird. He's got those mouths defeat. It's not easy.

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And so I'm glad that you've confirmed that your company

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>does a true up. By the way, not every plan

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>offers this, and so I can come back to bite

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you if, let's say you don't contribute for a few

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>paycheck cycles, but you're trying to invest money in bigger

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 1>chunks later in the year in order to try to

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>get that full match. Well, if your employer's plan goes

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:12.959
<v Speaker 1>the true up path at the end of the year,

0:28:13.000 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>like Gavin's does, you'll be fine. Right, you receive the

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>full matching dollars you otherwise would have received if you

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>had invested like normal, like clockwork along the way. But

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 1>if your employer does not offer the ability to true up,

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you will have missed out on some of those free

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.720
<v Speaker 1>matching dollars. So this is just an important detail to

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:33.120
<v Speaker 1>make sure that you're aware of with your employer if

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not committing money to your four one K regularly

0:28:37.000 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>throughout the year. Yeah, And basically the reason that the

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>true up is necessary is employers basically are lazy, and

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.239
<v Speaker 1>so oftentimes the way the match is calculated is they

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>base it on your annual salary, and so at the

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>beginning of the year, they say, okay, if we provide

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a six percent match based on your salary, this is

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>how much we would contribute. This is how much we're

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>going to match every single paycheck. But if there are

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>some gaps, and I totally get it, Gavin, if you're

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like, I'm not totally sure if we're how

0:29:05.520 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>aggressively we're gonna invest this year, I got four miles

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to feed you. There might be times when you're just like,

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>all right, things are looking kind of tight, so you

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 1>skip out on some of those contributions. But basically, when

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you contribute to your four and K, it acts as

0:29:18.080 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a trigger for your employer to come to match with

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>their matching contribution. And so what that means is that

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>if you invest at the end of the year with

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>a lump sum and you don't have that true up.

0:29:28.960 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>If let's say you just invest over three paychecks towards

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the end of the year, well you're only you're only

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>going to get that match on those three paychecks, and

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>the whole rest of the year you're missing out. And

0:29:39.600 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 1>so what's actually interesting is that this works both ways too.

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's say you are a very aggressive investor and you're like, oh,

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I want to I want to get I want to

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>get invested as soon as possible, and so you invest

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>let's just say the first three months of the year. Well,

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you're literally putting like ninety percent of your paycheck aside

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to hit the limit. Yeah exactly. And were you to

0:29:57.760 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>do that, then each one of those page you would

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>get the match that was calculated there for each paycheck,

0:30:03.560 --> 0:30:06.640
<v Speaker 1>divide it out like over the entire year. But once

0:30:06.680 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>you stop contributing to your four win K because you've

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>hit your maximum contribution limit, well, your employer. Again, it's

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to be triggered, and so they're not going

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to be matching it with dollars because they aren't calculating

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.719
<v Speaker 1>it on a per pay cycle basis. Some employers do that.

0:30:20.760 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just it's more work, and I understand it. It's

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>a pain in the butt for them to basically calculate

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>how much you're deciding to contribute for that pay cycle

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>to your four oh one K. But from an employee standpoint,

0:30:32.280 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that would be the easiest route because then you literally

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 1>they're matching dollar. You know, they're matching how based on

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>however much that you're putting aside. But unfortunately that's just

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not how the majority of employers do it. Yeah, so

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>you just have to know before you kind of figure

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>out how what like what your contribution cycle is going

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to look like. You want to know the details of

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>whether or not your employer's plan does. You want to

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.200
<v Speaker 1>know the details contribution matching or not. And so if

0:30:55.240 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>your employer doesn't, let's say, offer the true feature, you'd

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>be well served to do whatever you in to make

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 1>sure that you regularly invest right at least up to

0:31:02.600 --> 0:31:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the match with every single paycheck not waiting let's say

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:06.840
<v Speaker 1>until the end of the year, like Gavin's doing, right,

0:31:06.880 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And his question is basically whether or not taking this

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>route and investing in a lump sum at the end

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of the year is okay because his employer is still

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 1>going to contribute those matching dollars. And I would say

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the simple answer is yes, Like, as long as you're

0:31:17.040 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>getting the full match, which you are because your employer

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 1>does the true up, then you're totally fine, no worries, right,

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and more than anything, like more than anything, we don't

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.320
<v Speaker 1>want you leaving matching contributions on the table because as

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>long as you're contributing enough to get the full match,

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.760
<v Speaker 1>when and how you do it is really less of

0:31:35.760 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a consideration. It's more minores. Right. But that being said,

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>if you and this is what we talk about here

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 1>on how to Money, we get a little nerdier with it.

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>If you really want to optimize those dollars that you're

0:31:47.720 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>waiting to invest until December towards the end of the year,

0:31:51.440 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>well they obviously won't be invested in the market quite

0:31:53.280 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>as long. And since the stock market goes up essentially

0:31:55.960 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>three of every four years, you're actually going to be

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>investing at a less than opportune time. The reality is

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that the sooner that you can get your dollars invested,

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:06.959
<v Speaker 1>the sooner you can get your dollars into your four

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>O one K, the better off you're going to be

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>because that gives those dollars more time to experience the

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:16.000
<v Speaker 1>magic of compounding returns. And it may be more or

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>less on a given year, but year after year. Again,

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about compounding here. It's not just the fact

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that it happens once. We're talking about the fact that

0:32:23.840 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it just snowballs, right, it builds upon itself. Twenty five

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>percent of the time, you're gonna come out ahead, like

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:30.479
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty two. If you wait until December, you're like, whoo,

0:32:30.680 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Like I actually I actually made out like a bandit

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>by waiting. But most of the time that's not going

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to make it exactly. So that would mean, then, you know,

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>rather than waiting to invest at the end of the year,

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>investing regularly with every paycheck, that would be a better pick.

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to get really nerdy with it,

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the superior option is going to be to invest. Invest

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>as aggressively as possible and as early in the year

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 1>as possible. But again, you know, we're talking about optimization here.

0:32:55.520 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 1>We're not really talking about what's right or wrong. But

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.600
<v Speaker 1>either way, if by waiting to invest either at the

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>squeeze it in at the beginning or if you squeeze

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>it in at the end of the year, either way, Gavin,

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>for you, you're going to be made whole and you're not

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>leaving any dollars on the table. Yeah, we're not trying

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to put pressure on you because again, you've got four

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>miles to feed, So it's not like start mex it

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 1>out in January, right, I mean, but this is something

0:33:17.200 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>worth noting that by delaying, you're not optimizing to the

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>fullest extent that you could. By the way, you mentioned

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a common misconception gap that I wanted to clear up,

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>which is that bonuses are taxed at higher tax rates,

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>which is actually not true. It kind of feels like

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it because more taxes withheld from bonus dollars that are

0:33:33.080 --> 0:33:35.200
<v Speaker 1>paid out. Typically we're talking about a flat twenty two

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:39.239
<v Speaker 1>percent that the employer holds back in taxes when they

0:33:39.240 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>pay out a bonus, not to mention social Security, State taxes, Medicare,

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So it can feel like, wait, I just got a

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.200
<v Speaker 1>ten thousand dollars bonus. Why is it like fifty five

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:49.959
<v Speaker 1>hunderzo in my account? Like, I don't understand. I mean,

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>everything gets sorted out though, when you file your taxes,

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and so, if your effective tax rate is lower than

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty two percent, that's going to shake out in the

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>form of a tax refund for you when you file

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>your taxes. In this and so, bonuses are awesome, and

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you're even more excited to get yours this year

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.360
<v Speaker 1>knowing that it's not actually taxed at a higher rate. Man.

0:34:06.400 --> 0:34:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I hear that from people all the time. They're like, oh,

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a misconcepts love getting a bonus, but man, the

0:34:11.200 --> 0:34:14.120
<v Speaker 1>taxes suck on it, and it feels like it. But

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna probably come out ahead when you file your taxes.

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:18.919
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna get some money back here. Yeah, I mean

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it kind of comes back again to just some of

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the most common paths that employers take, which is when

0:34:25.360 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>they apply the standard twenty two percent tax rate on

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>bonuses earned like that it's the potentially easiest path for

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>them to take, but it isn't the most optimized for

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you for your own personal finances. Similar to the true

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.359
<v Speaker 1>up method or the option. The fact that that's there.

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>It's to be able to make up for the fact

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that they're not doing things perfectly optimized, which if you

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>live in a perfect world, of course everything would be

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 1>perfectly optimized. But employers got other things don't worry about.

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.799
<v Speaker 1>But Gavin, we think that you're going to be set.

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.839
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate you listening to the podcast, Joel. We've got

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 1>two additional questions that we're going to get to, and

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 1>speaking of podcasts, like, we're gonna get a little meta

0:35:02.920 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with it. We're going to talk about the medium of

0:35:05.760 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>podcasting itself plus one other right after the break. All right, Matt,

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>in just a second, we're gonna help a listener out

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 1>who has been crushing it with his own podcast, creating

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:25.359
<v Speaker 1>great content for a lot of years. But how does

0:35:25.400 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>he scale. We'll get to that one in just a second,

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>but let's first get to a question from a listener

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 1>who's wondering if you should build a new house and

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 1>then rent it out.

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 5>Hey, guys, this is Keith from the Oregon Coast calling

0:35:34.719 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 5>in again. I'm curious what your guys' thoughts are on

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 5>the build to rent option as far as real estate investing.

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 5>I have several just bare ground properties that are paid off,

0:35:50.520 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 5>utilities are in ready to build on. And I'm also

0:35:53.840 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 5>a builder, so I guess I'm able to build brand

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:03.080
<v Speaker 5>new houses and then just rent them out as opposed

0:36:03.080 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 5>to like a spec house for you sell them. So yeah,

0:36:06.920 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 5>I'm just I don't hear a lot about this option,

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 5>but it seems like it could be pretty good long term. Alternatively,

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 5>I could just take the money I would use to

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:22.880
<v Speaker 5>do that. I'd probably get it from pulling a heelock

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.840
<v Speaker 5>out of my house and put it down payment on

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:29.399
<v Speaker 5>the duplex or quad or something. Yeah. I don't know,

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.399
<v Speaker 5>But what's your guys thoughts on this, Matt?

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>At least this time, Keith got a question that isn't

0:36:34.200 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like peering into my soul right the counseling relational Yeah,

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>his wife is like picking them apart after coming a counseling.

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>At some point, you, Keith, and I need to commiserate

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>on the on the Organ Coast over Beers about the

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know how difficult it is to be to be

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>married to or to be in a relationship with a therapist.

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:54.839
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to invite myself not to sit in

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>on your conversation but to drink beer and to go

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>hiking and laugh at us. But Keith, we really like

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>your question because normally we would be a little more

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:07.239
<v Speaker 1>cautious of this approach, right, building something from scratch and

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, with this long kind of drawn out plan

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in order to have an investment property. But you specifically

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 1>check a bunch of boxes. You own the land, so

0:37:16.400 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>check the utilities are already in the ground. That's another check.

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome, like the opposite of like when people are

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to sell you lakefront property. I know it's like

0:37:23.400 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for ten grand, you can get this lake front spot.

0:37:25.560 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's somebody we know that will provide septic and yeah, yeah,

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>all that. But Keith is also the builder, and I

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>think if any of those details were different, our advice

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>would likely be different as well. Like if Joe Shmoe

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>was asking about just buying random dirt in a far

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 1>off location, like no, like a country song that is,

0:37:45.239 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that would be our advice. We'd say, yeah, probably not.

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>But it sounds like, you know, Keith, he's got to

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>know how and he's got the ability, I think to

0:37:52.520 --> 0:37:56.719
<v Speaker 1>pull this off. It makes me think that we've got

0:37:56.760 --> 0:37:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a friend and maybe this is like ten, twelve, thirteen

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 1>years ago something like that. He in town purchased a

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>plot of land in the goal for him was to

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>build his house on that property, but unfortunately it didn't

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the American dream. It did not work out for him.

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Whether I think it was a combination of maybe not

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:16.239
<v Speaker 1>having done quite as much due diligence, but also I

0:38:16.239 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>think maybe some slight dishonesty on the part of the cellar.

0:38:18.840 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 1>But bottom line, it was basically FEMA flood maps made

0:38:21.120 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 1>it unbuilt, could not build there, and I don't I

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 1>think he ended up he might still own the piece

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of property, or maybe he donated it, and I think

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>he had to donate it for tax that was like

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the best way she's gonna lost money, much less than

0:38:31.680 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>bottom money, and this area think it ended up end

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 1>up being like thirty thousand dollars, maybe that he'd originally

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>originally paid for that. So Keith, for you, we think

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>this could be an excellent route and an excellent path to

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:46.360
<v Speaker 1>take for everybody else out there, listen to why we

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:48.799
<v Speaker 1>think Keith is well suited to do this, because he

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 1>truly is.

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 5>He is.

0:38:49.800 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're right. A lot of other people who would

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:52.319
<v Speaker 1>say I want to buy some land and I want

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 1>to build on it. There's this a lot you need

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 1>to consider before you go that route, and utilities are

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>are definitely one consideration. But this is of like Keith's

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>superpower here, right, He'd likely to be able to build

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>this house for far less than what someone else in

0:39:04.760 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the area would pay for a new home, given the

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>connections that you have and the sweat equity that you

0:39:09.120 --> 0:39:10.920
<v Speaker 1>would likely be able to put in. Keith, it means

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 1>like maybe you're doing the tiling right, maybe you're even

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>installing some of the electrical I don't know, but those

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 1>factors are critical when you're trying to figure out if

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a sound decision, because the cost of building

0:39:21.640 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>has gone up substantially, but still have rents in home

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 1>values and so as long as the numbers make sense

0:39:26.560 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 1>for you and you're not taking on crazy high interest

0:39:29.080 --> 0:39:31.120
<v Speaker 1>debt to pull this off, it seems like a sound

0:39:31.160 --> 0:39:34.240
<v Speaker 1>decision to us. And it also makes me think, Matt,

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>he mentioned buying a duplex or a triplex. Well, Keith,

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what if when you build this house a hybrid approach,

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>you build a duplex or a trilex, but you build

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a next one that's I had a neighbor across the

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>street back when we lived in town as well, and

0:39:46.239 --> 0:39:48.200
<v Speaker 1>he built a really nice duplex. He lived in one

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:51.280
<v Speaker 1>half and he rented out the other. He eventually moved

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>away from that from that part of town. He lives

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.279
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere now when he rents out both and this has

0:39:55.320 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>been like a money maker for him hand over fists

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>for a whole lot of years. So if you the

0:40:00.200 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>next duplex, I think maybe that is the best of

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 1>both worlds. That's right. Also, before we keep talking about

0:40:05.880 --> 0:40:08.320
<v Speaker 1>real estate, Keith, he didn't mention any of his specifics,

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but this is also assuming that Keith, that you are

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>already maxing out your retirement accounts, which are going to

0:40:14.040 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>be the easy button when it comes to growing your

0:40:16.239 --> 0:40:18.880
<v Speaker 1>net worth. But just because it's easy like that doesn't

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:21.080
<v Speaker 1>mean that investing in the overall market that that is

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.800
<v Speaker 1>an inferior option. And because in many ways it's actually

0:40:24.800 --> 0:40:26.799
<v Speaker 1>going to be the superior option, right, Like you're going

0:40:26.840 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 1>to be more diversified, it can be fully automated, you

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.760
<v Speaker 1>don't have to worry about managing the properties. And of course,

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.080
<v Speaker 1>like there's the chance that you may not quite get

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the juicy returns like you would with real estate. But

0:40:38.160 --> 0:40:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean that you should skip investing of course

0:40:41.600 --> 0:40:44.799
<v Speaker 1>in boring tax advantaged accounts. And keep in mind too,

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like one of the things you said was you haven't

0:40:47.480 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 1>heard many folks talk about taking this path. And I

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think the reason that is is because oftentimes you have

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>real estate developers. You've got developers, right, and they are

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the ones who are like choosing the sites and figuring

0:40:58.320 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>out how many houses they're going to kind of c

0:41:00.000 --> 0:41:03.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm on to put on the land. And then you've

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:07.279
<v Speaker 1>got property real estate managers. They're typically specialized in what

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it is that they do. From a business standpoint, that

0:41:09.480 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>makes a lot of sense. But as an individual, Keith,

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>if you want to be scrappy and are willing to

0:41:15.080 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>learn and do both of these things, man, you've got

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the ability to see this thing through from soup to nuts,

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>right like you are. You've got the plots of land,

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you can figure out like how it is maybe even

0:41:25.600 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that you want to orient the house is on the property,

0:41:27.400 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>Like you have an ability to create some awesome places here.

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>But then see it through right like get it ready,

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.800
<v Speaker 1>show it, manage it. And with that in mind, again,

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 1>like Joel said, this is it's almost like a it's

0:41:39.200 --> 0:41:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a superpower, but it's almost like an unfair advantage that

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 1>you have compared to anybody else who's looking to get

0:41:44.760 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>into real estate. Yeah, so put it to use. And

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:48.080
<v Speaker 1>especially if you're going to live in half of it,

0:41:48.120 --> 0:41:50.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe you say, oh, for two years, I'm willing

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to live in the property, and maybe that's going to

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>make this and even better, make it even make more sense, right,

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:58.120
<v Speaker 1>make it even better investment. But assuming you're good to

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.400
<v Speaker 1>go right and you're ready to put that superpower use,

0:42:00.440 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really important to make sure that you're performing your

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>due diligence right. Gathering the data, running the numbers is

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a really important step in this whole process. You got

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:09.560
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how much is this going to is

0:42:09.600 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 1>this house or multi family resident's going to cost me

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:13.799
<v Speaker 1>to build? And what are you likely to be able

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 1>to get in rent for it? Is there a dearth

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:19.719
<v Speaker 1>of rental units where you currently live? Like, knowing all

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.680
<v Speaker 1>good information to be looking up in those local dynamics

0:42:22.680 --> 0:42:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are crucial in the real estate right and local zoning

0:42:25.360 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 1>as well. Like, so the fact that you mentioned that

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the utility is already in the ground, I picture a

0:42:29.320 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>development of a bunch of houses, and maybe zoning may

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:36.320
<v Speaker 1>not allow for multi family, or maybe there's an hoa

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that keeps you from being able to rent that out.

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:39.759
<v Speaker 1>These are obviously all things that you want to make

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:41.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that you have a good grasp on. Yeah. Yeah,

0:42:41.480 --> 0:42:42.880
<v Speaker 1>And I love that he's taking a long term by

0:42:42.880 --> 0:42:45.480
<v Speaker 1>the way. I think it's really important because you got

0:42:45.520 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to know the local dynamics. But you also got to say,

0:42:47.520 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, how long am I willing to hold

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>on to this? And it sounds like Keith is willing

0:42:52.520 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to make this decision and build this house and manage

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>it as a rental for years and years to come.

0:42:57.239 --> 0:42:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And so if the numbers make sense from the get go,

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the longer your ownership timeline, the better it's going to

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:03.759
<v Speaker 1>perform for you over the years. When we had Chad

0:43:03.800 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>carsonon recently, what did he say that owning a house,

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>owning rental property over the long term? Eventually it starts

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>out as a part time job and it turns into

0:43:11.200 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 1>a blue chip stock, and so the pain on the

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:15.440
<v Speaker 1>front end can pay off in the back on the

0:43:15.480 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>back end in a meaningful way. So Keith, if yeah,

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:20.960
<v Speaker 1>if the numbers make sense, even in the infancy of

0:43:21.000 --> 0:43:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the project, then I think it's it's only going to

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 1>get better over the years. It really makes sense down

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the road, assuming there's not something terrible that happens next

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:33.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, next door or down there. But Keith, we

0:43:33.880 --> 0:43:36.839
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your question and we really like how you are

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this potential real estate investment. Joel, let's get

0:43:39.920 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 1>to our last question. This is from Doug and he

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:44.719
<v Speaker 1>has an affinity for the eighties.

0:43:45.360 --> 0:43:50.520
<v Speaker 6>Hey, Matt, Joel Doug here from Philadelphia, and I have

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 6>a question for you that is not a money question.

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:56.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm pretty good on that front and have been listening

0:43:56.760 --> 0:43:59.200
<v Speaker 6>to you guys and taking your advice now for.

0:43:59.320 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 3>Almost a year.

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:03.400
<v Speaker 6>This is more of a podcasting question. There are a

0:44:03.400 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 6>lot of different money podcasts out there, and you guys

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 6>seem to have built quite an audience for yourself. I

0:44:09.560 --> 0:44:14.440
<v Speaker 6>have a podcast on eighties movies, sort of a comedy podcast,

0:44:14.520 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 6>and then looking to sort of breakthrough or build an audience.

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:20.279
<v Speaker 6>I mean, it's just a hobby. I know there are

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 6>services out there that will help promote your show. Blah

0:44:23.000 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 6>blah blah. I certainly don't want to spend money. Is

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:30.720
<v Speaker 6>there any advice that you have any sort of outlets

0:44:30.920 --> 0:44:33.239
<v Speaker 6>or maybe how you guys got started. It's something that

0:44:33.360 --> 0:44:35.799
<v Speaker 6>I really haven't heard you guys talk about. And I

0:44:35.880 --> 0:44:38.400
<v Speaker 6>know that this is not a money question, So if

0:44:38.440 --> 0:44:41.800
<v Speaker 6>it doesn't make the show, I totally get it. But anyway,

0:44:41.840 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 6>thank you so much, shameless plug. The podcast is good times,

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 6>great movies. I don't know you can cut that out.

0:44:48.520 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 6>You don't need to play that if you don't want to.

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 6>All right, thanks guys. I really enjoy the show, Doug.

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:56.120
<v Speaker 1>We're not cutting it out. That totally gets to stay

0:44:56.320 --> 0:44:58.080
<v Speaker 1>for everybody to hear so that they can check out

0:44:58.120 --> 0:45:00.239
<v Speaker 1>your podcast. People should go listen. I wouldn't listen to

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of episodes and and you know, of course

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the one I look for Matt, what's my favorite eighties movie?

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Alf alf? Was he in a movie that would actually

0:45:09.160 --> 0:45:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have been a good pick. That's a good guess. But

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 1>no Blood Sport with John Damn? Oh classic Forest Whitaker.

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean that that's a class he was like, because

0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to hunt down John clop band. Yeah really,

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, the Underground Fighting Arena, remember that, dude. I

0:45:22.120 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>just remember Jean Claude vandam doing the splits and yes,

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it was like a cultural phenomenon, right, Like basically, as

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:30.279
<v Speaker 1>a kid, you knew that if you could do the

0:45:30.320 --> 0:45:33.440
<v Speaker 1>splits like like him, somehow you'd get just as ripped.

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Somehow you'd be able to kick everybody's butt. And it's

0:45:36.680 --> 0:45:38.840
<v Speaker 1>just science. I've managed to never do any of the

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 1>above things. But yeah, actually Doug covered blood Sport in

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.759
<v Speaker 1>episode ninety five, So if you're interested in hearing more

0:45:44.800 --> 0:45:46.520
<v Speaker 1>about what an epic movie that is, go back and

0:45:46.560 --> 0:45:48.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to that. Well, we'll do it in the show notes.

0:45:48.239 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, he's blinded at the end, and he's like, yes,

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:55.399
<v Speaker 1>John Lee, Oh it's so good. But Doug, we're glad

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:56.839
<v Speaker 1>you're getting you show off the ground. And he's been

0:45:56.840 --> 0:46:00.000
<v Speaker 1>at it for like two hundred something episodes, but he's

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that's right. There are a lot of personal finance podcasts,

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and there are a lot of good ones out there too.

0:46:03.440 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 1>We're really thankful that How to Money listeners listen to

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:09.120
<v Speaker 1>this show and that they trust us. And so I

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:10.759
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly, Matt, I don't know if I could

0:46:10.760 --> 0:46:14.959
<v Speaker 1>boil it down to like how or why people listen

0:46:15.000 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to us these seven steps, Right, We're not going to

0:46:17.480 --> 0:46:19.480
<v Speaker 1>have that per se. Hopefully it's because we have a

0:46:19.520 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>passion for the topic. Hopefully it's because we're decently well

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 1>versed in it, and hopefully it's because we're trustworthy as well. Yeah,

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we've resonated with a specific audience, but also we've been consistent,

0:46:30.560 --> 0:46:32.279
<v Speaker 1>right because one of the things, Doug, I'm sure that

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you've noticed is that the podcasting space is crowded. So

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about Europe Joel at the beginning of

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:40.480
<v Speaker 1>the episode. It's kind of like Europe in July, which

0:46:40.520 --> 0:46:43.120
<v Speaker 1>is why you should travel during shoulder season. But it

0:46:43.239 --> 0:46:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is totally true that there are basically millions of podcasts

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>out there who are vying for listening time, but a

0:46:48.200 --> 0:46:51.359
<v Speaker 1>huge percentage of this podcast that exists, well they've only

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.799
<v Speaker 1>released one single episode, and then another massive chunk have

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 1>only released something like ten episodes. So with you being

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the hundreds, consistency clearly isn't a problem. That's like

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:06.239
<v Speaker 1>step one, right, Yeah, it goes there, but I know

0:47:06.320 --> 0:47:08.279
<v Speaker 1>for us that was sort of one of the first

0:47:08.320 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 1>things that we focused on was to be incredibly consistent,

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:14.600
<v Speaker 1>not only with making sure that we that we did it,

0:47:14.640 --> 0:47:16.839
<v Speaker 1>but just the same time every week as well. Because

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:20.720
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to create something regular that listeners were looking

0:47:20.760 --> 0:47:23.160
<v Speaker 1>forward to. They knew that, like, oh, at the time

0:47:23.280 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>was Wednesday. That's when our first episode. When when we

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:28.360
<v Speaker 1>only had one episode, we would release them on Wednesdays.

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:31.240
<v Speaker 1>But you want to start building in that regularity. And

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 1>as you are starting to build up that base of listeners,

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:36.120
<v Speaker 1>what they used to call it in the world of

0:47:36.200 --> 0:47:39.080
<v Speaker 1>radio was appointment listening. Right, Oh, okay, it's like, oh,

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:41.359
<v Speaker 1>at six oh eight, you know when to tune in, Yeah,

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>your favorite host is going to come on and they're

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:45.239
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about this or whatever like, And so

0:47:45.480 --> 0:47:48.400
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what we wanted was, Hey, every week,

0:47:48.560 --> 0:47:51.799
<v Speaker 1>you get used to listening and learning, and you kind

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:53.880
<v Speaker 1>of keep doing it because hopefully it's helping you and

0:47:53.920 --> 0:47:56.200
<v Speaker 1>it's fun. It's a part of your routine, right exactly.

0:47:56.440 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 1>And Matt, we also learned a lesson pretty early on

0:47:58.880 --> 0:48:01.400
<v Speaker 1>when people thought they were turning into a personal finance podcast,

0:48:01.440 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 1>and we talked about beer for like ten minutes at

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the beginning. You remember that I do. Yeah, Well, early

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:07.960
<v Speaker 1>early on we also called it poor not poor. Yeah,

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:11.279
<v Speaker 1>like you poor beer not poor bro, which is also

0:48:11.360 --> 0:48:13.680
<v Speaker 1>just a confusing name, also a tong twister. We had

0:48:13.680 --> 0:48:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to change over the marketing to appeal to the audience

0:48:16.719 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that we're looking for as well. But obviously we're fans

0:48:19.000 --> 0:48:20.839
<v Speaker 1>of craft beer and we included in the show. It's

0:48:20.880 --> 0:48:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a part of our vibe. But over time we found

0:48:22.920 --> 0:48:24.520
<v Speaker 1>more subtle ways to we've been into the show, and

0:48:24.560 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>so for instance, asking our guests about their craft beer equivalent.

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:28.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a great way for it to be baked into

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the show, But dominating the initial most important ten minutes

0:48:31.840 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>of our conversation with beer talk not so great, especially

0:48:34.640 --> 0:48:36.719
<v Speaker 1>when people are like looking for money, advice and the

0:48:36.760 --> 0:48:39.640
<v Speaker 1>practical help in that department. So of course you don't

0:48:39.640 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 1>want to neuter your show and remove all personality from it,

0:48:42.560 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 1>but finding a way to garner feedback where you're listening

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to any critiques can help you to refine your podmat

0:48:47.719 --> 0:48:51.160
<v Speaker 1>We had an email address specifically dedicated to that, right.

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:53.400
<v Speaker 1>It was it was like how tomoney dot com slash

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:55.400
<v Speaker 1>get better. I don't know the yeah, the rl chep

0:48:55.480 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that alive or not, but that was the way people

0:48:57.120 --> 0:48:59.399
<v Speaker 1>could submit negative feedback and say like, listen, you guys

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>suck on this. You really need to approve on this,

0:49:01.280 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 1>or constructive criticism. I can't believe you said this always helpful,

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>and so we try to listen from that feedback and

0:49:06.600 --> 0:49:10.560
<v Speaker 1>make adjustments because yeah, we're learning on the fly too. Yeah. Yeah,

0:49:10.600 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we are always trying to create a better product at

0:49:13.239 --> 0:49:15.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day. And that being said, like

0:49:15.480 --> 0:49:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to take this opportunity if you have some

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:20.000
<v Speaker 1>feedback for us, totally let us know. I think we

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:22.200
<v Speaker 1>still have that page up. If I think Ford slash

0:49:22.239 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 1>get better or do better. Maybe that was it, but

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:27.879
<v Speaker 1>either way, just email us. Email us at howtomneypod at

0:49:27.880 --> 0:49:30.120
<v Speaker 1>gmail dot com. It goes to both Joel and I.

0:49:30.320 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>We always read those emails. But Doug mentioned some of

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>those different services that you can pay to promote your show. Obviously,

0:49:36.640 --> 0:49:38.800
<v Speaker 1>don't do that because a lot of those are scams.

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you're aware of that. Just today I dove

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:46.080
<v Speaker 1>into the what are the message requests in Instagram which

0:49:46.120 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I only look at like once every quarter. Basically I'm

0:49:50.120 --> 0:49:53.040
<v Speaker 1>missing like eighty percent of them. They're so there's like

0:49:53.200 --> 0:49:56.880
<v Speaker 1>something like thirty promotion things where it's just like for

0:49:56.960 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 1>ten dollars, you get one thousand or one hundred new

0:49:59.200 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, one hundred new all of that kind of stuffs.

0:50:01.560 --> 0:50:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Every like friend request I got on LinkedIn is the

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:06.880
<v Speaker 1>same thing exactly. And you know your follower count or

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:09.239
<v Speaker 1>those downloads that you know they might go up, but

0:50:09.320 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that might just be the product of bots. So I

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:14.960
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't trust any of those actual you know, those requests,

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:18.080
<v Speaker 1>those Internet scam artists who promise to raise the profile

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:20.120
<v Speaker 1>of your show. And I also want to mention that

0:50:20.200 --> 0:50:23.879
<v Speaker 1>you're probably narrow casting with the content of your show, right.

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:26.680
<v Speaker 1>This isn't a problem though, given what it is you

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about, given the length of your show, it's just

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 1>likely I think that you're going to have fewer, yet

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:36.839
<v Speaker 1>more rabid listeners and fans of good Times what was it, Great,

0:50:37.000 --> 0:50:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Good Times? Great Movies. Yeah, So I'm not sure if

0:50:39.200 --> 0:50:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you're looking to monetize the podcast, but if you are

0:50:42.320 --> 0:50:46.439
<v Speaker 1>taking the route of Patreon or buy my Coffee, these

0:50:46.520 --> 0:50:49.799
<v Speaker 1>can be great ways, Like those platforms can help to

0:50:49.960 --> 0:50:52.760
<v Speaker 1>just turn some of those diehard listeners into some actual

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:55.960
<v Speaker 1>money where you're able to monetize the show gradually. It

0:50:55.960 --> 0:50:57.960
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to be this all or nothing kind of thing.

0:50:58.120 --> 0:51:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I think there are ways for folks to come to

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:03.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of dabble and kind of start offsetting some costs

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and maybe maybe eventually you're, oh, man, are we actually

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 1>generating an income? That would of course be an awesome thing.

0:51:10.520 --> 0:51:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the real way to have the most successful

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:14.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast is to pivot into a crime show, because that's

0:51:14.960 --> 0:51:17.000
<v Speaker 1>what people love and listen to the most. And that's

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>what actually Matt and I are going to do starting

0:51:18.560 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>next week. We're ditching the personal finance that we're gonna create.

0:51:21.760 --> 0:51:23.880
<v Speaker 1>We're going to commit the crimes. Yeah yeah, and then

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna detail it along the way. We're gonna document it.

0:51:26.000 --> 0:51:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be it's gonna be insane. We're gonna hide

0:51:28.040 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in the woods in trees, and we'll be on the

0:51:30.719 --> 0:51:34.160
<v Speaker 1>run for hopefully years. But the quietly podcasting like Blair

0:51:34.200 --> 0:51:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Witch style about right, that would actually think about it,

0:51:37.440 --> 0:51:39.839
<v Speaker 1>that would crush because if you were creating a show

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in real time and in the new run, yes you're

0:51:43.080 --> 0:51:46.080
<v Speaker 1>on the run, But then I guess you would get deplatformed,

0:51:46.120 --> 0:51:48.000
<v Speaker 1>right like they would, because they wouldn't want that going

0:51:48.040 --> 0:51:50.839
<v Speaker 1>out unless somehow you had control over your platform, you know,

0:51:50.920 --> 0:51:54.880
<v Speaker 1>like if you were you know, Elon musk Rich, you

0:51:54.880 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 1>can control the means of which you're communicating with folks, right, Well,

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:00.480
<v Speaker 1>so enough of that, and if you or you'd have

0:52:00.520 --> 0:52:02.719
<v Speaker 1>other ways to promote your podcasts, for sure, But and

0:52:02.960 --> 0:52:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I of course I'm joking, But the real reality is

0:52:05.480 --> 0:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>there's certain genres and certain types of podcasts that just

0:52:09.120 --> 0:52:12.440
<v Speaker 1>have more purchase with a broader audience, right, And so

0:52:13.040 --> 0:52:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I think a personal finance podcast it's not going to

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:18.240
<v Speaker 1>be as listened to as one of the more popular

0:52:18.239 --> 0:52:21.200
<v Speaker 1>long form interview or crime podcasts. That's okay, But it's

0:52:21.239 --> 0:52:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the thing that we want to create. And so you're

0:52:23.200 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 1>creating the thing you want to create, and that's the

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:27.520
<v Speaker 1>most important part you Yeah, I think if you're this

0:52:27.640 --> 0:52:29.600
<v Speaker 1>far into it, you have found your people. Yeah, and

0:52:29.640 --> 0:52:31.960
<v Speaker 1>that is what's important. Yeah. Yeah. And the other thing,

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Seth Godin talks about the minimum viable audience,

0:52:34.719 --> 0:52:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think you have to figure out, Okay, what

0:52:36.160 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is that for me? If I've got fifteen hundred, eighteen hundred,

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:42.759
<v Speaker 1>two thousand people listening every single episode I create? Well,

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:46.239
<v Speaker 1>would I show up to a lecture hall if two

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand people wanted to listen to me talk about eighties movies?

0:52:48.560 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Heck yeah I would, right, because I'm that passionate about

0:52:51.000 --> 0:52:52.319
<v Speaker 1>it and to see that many people in one place,

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:54.239
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes we look at it as numbers on a

0:52:54.280 --> 0:52:57.080
<v Speaker 1>screen when these are real human people digesting our content,

0:52:57.080 --> 0:52:58.840
<v Speaker 1>which is super cool. So think about it like that

0:52:58.880 --> 0:53:01.399
<v Speaker 1>and then also realize, actually, there's a lot of people

0:53:01.640 --> 0:53:03.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking to, a ton of people who really like

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:05.799
<v Speaker 1>and care about the same thing I care about, and

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>so I love that. Doug called it a hobby, like

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the number one rule of podcasting is that

0:53:11.600 --> 0:53:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you should do it if you feel compelled to get

0:53:13.200 --> 0:53:15.279
<v Speaker 1>a message out into the world. You've got to love it,

0:53:15.520 --> 0:53:17.839
<v Speaker 1>and it's okay to want to grow, but don't forget

0:53:17.880 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the reason you started it and why you take the

0:53:19.680 --> 0:53:23.640
<v Speaker 1>time every week to continue creating. So, Matt, the way

0:53:23.680 --> 0:53:25.440
<v Speaker 1>we started was like literally we said, hey, we're going

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to be triple A at everything. We're not going to

0:53:27.360 --> 0:53:28.960
<v Speaker 1>be pro level because that would take too much time,

0:53:28.960 --> 0:53:30.879
<v Speaker 1>too much effort. But as long as we're hitting triple

0:53:30.880 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 1>A marks, as long as we're professional, doing our best,

0:53:33.280 --> 0:53:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're being consistent, like you said, and then we

0:53:36.280 --> 0:53:38.399
<v Speaker 1>try to get on another podcasts to kind of raise

0:53:38.440 --> 0:53:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the profile of our show and help other people find

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:43.239
<v Speaker 1>out and were not just podcasts that did the exact

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:45.919
<v Speaker 1>same thing we did kind of tangential podcast right. Yeah,

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:47.400
<v Speaker 1>But that being said, we didn't do a ton of that,

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:50.640
<v Speaker 1>like like literally maybe just like a few, like a handful,

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:53.160
<v Speaker 1>but slowly over time we did build up an audience.

0:53:53.200 --> 0:53:55.399
<v Speaker 1>And I guess I'm thinking of marketing like it makes

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>me like early on we made coozies, but we didn't

0:53:58.000 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 1>even send those out to listeners. I think we just

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 1>gave them up to our friends because we thought it

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>was cool, Like we were just nerdy and it was

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:06.520
<v Speaker 1>something that we enjoyed. But that's kind of what Joel's

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:08.879
<v Speaker 1>speaking to, like, make sure that it's fun for you.

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry too much about the marketing side of things. Obviously,

0:54:13.239 --> 0:54:14.880
<v Speaker 1>with it's like so we were able to grow the

0:54:14.880 --> 0:54:17.320
<v Speaker 1>show and then you know, we're with iHeart Now and

0:54:17.360 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 1>so they do a lot of the marketing for us

0:54:18.920 --> 0:54:21.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. But at the end of the day, don't

0:54:21.560 --> 0:54:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I honestly wouldn't even worry too much about that because marketing.

0:54:24.280 --> 0:54:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I heard this quote where they said that basically marketing

0:54:27.320 --> 0:54:31.160
<v Speaker 1>wins the day, but quality content wins the year, Like like,

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:33.759
<v Speaker 1>marketing is good for the short run, but unless you're

0:54:33.800 --> 0:54:37.440
<v Speaker 1>creating a quality product. It doesn't really matter what the

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:39.719
<v Speaker 1>marketing plan is. It depends on what it is that

0:54:39.760 --> 0:54:42.239
<v Speaker 1>you're creating. And so Doug, I think focusing on the

0:54:42.360 --> 0:54:44.879
<v Speaker 1>quality of the show, don't forget that. That is what

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you need to be focused on, you know, first and foremost.

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 1>And you're supposed to worry about the marketing and the

0:54:50.760 --> 0:54:52.480
<v Speaker 1>scaling and growing side of things. And Dugs is the

0:54:52.520 --> 0:54:54.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of show where people it's going to get word

0:54:54.280 --> 0:54:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of mouth trash right, people who are like I love

0:54:56.120 --> 0:54:58.440
<v Speaker 1>eighties movies and they know their best friend loves eighties

0:54:58.480 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 1>movies and they're like, you got to listen to this

0:54:59.719 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 1>pot cast. I'm listening to that. That's gonna be the

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:04.480
<v Speaker 1>best way for it to grow. I think you could

0:55:04.520 --> 0:55:06.240
<v Speaker 1>get on you know, try to get on another podcasts.

0:55:06.239 --> 0:55:08.799
<v Speaker 1>You can, you can work on other ways to grow

0:55:08.840 --> 0:55:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and to find your audience, and you can put a

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:12.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of effort into that, But do you have the

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:15.600
<v Speaker 1>time and the like the biggest thing, focused the majority

0:55:15.600 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of your time on creating something great that you like creating,

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be the most sustainable. It makes me think

0:55:19.960 --> 0:55:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a we have a listener Matt who writes

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 1>about a newsletter about fitness, and that's this thing when

0:55:25.280 --> 0:55:27.880
<v Speaker 1>it comes to fitness is like, do what's sustainable. You

0:55:27.960 --> 0:55:29.920
<v Speaker 1>might like be able to go hard seven days a

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:32.279
<v Speaker 1>week for two weeks, but then you're gonna burn out,

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:35.239
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna stop. And so whatever workouts you choose, make

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:36.800
<v Speaker 1>sure it's something you want to replicate, you want to

0:55:36.880 --> 0:55:38.800
<v Speaker 1>keep doing. And that's kind of I found that to

0:55:38.840 --> 0:55:40.040
<v Speaker 1>be true in my own life. If I try to

0:55:40.080 --> 0:55:42.359
<v Speaker 1>do something that I hate, I'm probably gonna like, you're

0:55:42.360 --> 0:55:45.239
<v Speaker 1>gonna burn out. Yeah, exactly. All right, Doug, we wish

0:55:45.280 --> 0:55:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you the best man, and hopefully you get millions of

0:55:48.440 --> 0:55:51.080
<v Speaker 1>downloads just from this Sweet Heat of Money podcast est

0:55:51.239 --> 0:55:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the Sweet HTM plug. The boys gave me a HTM

0:55:54.320 --> 0:55:57.080
<v Speaker 1>bumps what we'll call it. That's right. The beer you

0:55:57.080 --> 0:56:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and I enjoyed, Joel was chubby unicorn again. This was

0:56:00.960 --> 0:56:03.680
<v Speaker 1>a guava milkshake. I pa by common Space. What were

0:56:03.680 --> 0:56:05.600
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts? You know, it's funny on the on the

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:08.120
<v Speaker 1>can it says it came with it had guava puree

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in it, so I expected it to be a little thicker.

0:56:10.040 --> 0:56:13.200
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't. Oh yeah, it was a little sweet, little

0:56:13.280 --> 0:56:17.480
<v Speaker 1>vanilla smoothie vanilla smoothness to it, and so I would

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:19.960
<v Speaker 1>say with yes, some of that guava note, but not

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:22.560
<v Speaker 1>as much as I expected. Yes, so the guava lent

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it that like guala passion fruit, like tropical flavors, like

0:56:26.520 --> 0:56:29.279
<v Speaker 1>it makes me think of like not Skittles, but the

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:31.200
<v Speaker 1>tropical skittles yea, where you know, I don't know, it's

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:33.759
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to explain kind of that softness that you

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>get with some of the tropical flavors. But we definitely

0:56:36.080 --> 0:56:38.560
<v Speaker 1>had that going on in conjunction with the fact that

0:56:38.640 --> 0:56:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I assumed there was lactose in this considering it was

0:56:40.719 --> 0:56:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a milkshake milkshake I pa, but with it being an

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:46.560
<v Speaker 1>ipa that also it wasn't overly sweet because you had

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the bitterness from the hops that worked really well. And

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:51.680
<v Speaker 1>actually really dug this one, and I dug the label too.

0:56:51.920 --> 0:56:53.800
<v Speaker 1>It's got the unicorn on there, and we were joking

0:56:53.800 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 1>before we hit record that, uh is it weld works?

0:56:57.160 --> 0:56:59.880
<v Speaker 1>They They've got like a lot of unicorn imagery with

0:57:00.040 --> 0:57:02.440
<v Speaker 1>their brand, and so it might be them. Somebody's got

0:57:02.440 --> 0:57:04.879
<v Speaker 1>the ninja versus unicorn. All Yes, yeah, I think that's

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:06.520
<v Speaker 1>what works. I could be wrong. No, I don't think

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:08.680
<v Speaker 1>it is. I think it's it's half acre or something

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:10.480
<v Speaker 1>like that. Maybe. Oh, I don't know. I should We

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:12.920
<v Speaker 1>should not. We should. We're craft beer experts, Matt, we

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 1>should know. But they've got multiple beers that are all unicorn,

0:57:15.520 --> 0:57:19.120
<v Speaker 1>unicorn based whatever. So I hope Common whoops almost dropped

0:57:19.640 --> 0:57:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Common Space doesn't get shut down because they got the

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Unicorn on there. Hope they don't get the cease and desists.

0:57:24.360 --> 0:57:26.240
<v Speaker 1>There's plenty of There's plenty of room out there for

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:27.760
<v Speaker 1>just like there's plenty of room for all the different

0:57:27.760 --> 0:57:30.040
<v Speaker 1>podcasts out there, there's plenty of room for unicorn and

0:57:30.080 --> 0:57:34.480
<v Speaker 1>craft beer. I love a good like fruited milkshake IPA like.

0:57:34.520 --> 0:57:37.200
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorites of all time is the strawberry

0:57:37.280 --> 0:57:41.560
<v Speaker 1>milkshake IPA from I Want to Wrecking Bar. Oh, yeah,

0:57:41.680 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that is a delicious one. But yeah, this one was

0:57:44.080 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 1>solid and it's Yeah. If you like sours any like IPAs,

0:57:47.400 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>put them together, this is what you get, right, that's right.

0:57:50.520 --> 0:57:52.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll make sure to link to any of the different

0:57:52.640 --> 0:57:55.960
<v Speaker 1>resources we mentioned during this episode up on the website

0:57:56.000 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and in our show notes at howtomoney dot com, and if

0:57:58.960 --> 0:58:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you are not yet a subscriber to the how to

0:58:01.040 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Money newsletter, make sure that you are howdomoney dot com

0:58:03.760 --> 0:58:07.120
<v Speaker 1>forward slash newsletter. You can see some of the previous

0:58:07.160 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>issues there to get a sampling, but go ahead and

0:58:09.200 --> 0:58:12.280
<v Speaker 1>sign up to ensure that you don't miss the next

0:58:12.680 --> 0:58:16.520
<v Speaker 1>newsletter that goes out on Tuesday, right tomorrow morning. But buddy,

0:58:16.600 --> 0:58:18.520
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be it for this one until next time.

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Best Friends Out, Best Friends Out,