Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunch, Hunter Biden and an
Speaker 1: FBI money laundering probe. NBC News tries to make more
Speaker 1: disinformation happen, the Final Lockdown, Push Lives try to blame
Speaker 1: Trump for everything, and Red Farve and Lil Wayne go
Speaker 1: for Trump. This is the Buck Sexon Show, where the
Speaker 1: mission or mission is to decode what really matters with
Speaker 1: passionable intelligence. Make no mistake America Great Here, Great American Again,
Speaker 1: The Buck Sexon Show begins. He's a great guy. No welcome,
Speaker 1: my friends. Mere days away from the big one election day,
Speaker 1: over eighty million people voting early anticipation could not be
Speaker 1: any higher. I cannot remember an election in my lifetime
Speaker 1: where there was such such a focus on this from
Speaker 1: so many people in so many quarters. I think in
Speaker 1: part because we're all stuck more than ever at home,
Speaker 1: no distractions of big groups and concerts and crowds and
Speaker 1: things like that, less sports, less connectivity with each other.
Speaker 1: So what do we have this intense focus on our politics?
Speaker 1: And also the truth is that our politics might end
Speaker 1: up either freeing us or making us even more locked
Speaker 1: down and miserable. So that's a big choice that we
Speaker 1: face right now, and that's something that's gone on here.
Speaker 1: I want to start with the Hunter Biden money laundering
Speaker 1: allegations though this just came out yesterday, and a hat
Speaker 1: tip to James Rosen over at Sinclair for being a
Speaker 1: guy that broke this story, says the FBI, at least
Speaker 1: FBI sources have confirmed to him that there was in
Speaker 1: twenty nineteen, an open money laundering investigation of Hunter Biden. Now,
Speaker 1: now this is big for a lot of reasons. And
Speaker 1: let me first just say that there is zero interest,
Speaker 1: zero interests in the media and touching any of this.
Speaker 1: In fact, NBC News has put forward some sixty some
Speaker 1: odd page disinformation fake intelligence thing that they're debunking. The
Speaker 1: fake intelligence, they say, no one's even heard of this
Speaker 1: or seeing this before. But their claim is, well, because
Speaker 1: we found something on the internet that isn't true about
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. Clearly that means that what you guys all
Speaker 1: think you have with this verified laptop and the emails
Speaker 1: and the photos and the on the record sources saying yeah,
Speaker 1: that's me, that must be disinformation. Two. Yeah, NBC News
Speaker 1: putting out disinformation to say their fight disinformation, which is
Speaker 1: pretty much where we are now with the journalists in
Speaker 1: this country. In fact, journalism is never going to recover
Speaker 1: from what the journals have done to it. That's where
Speaker 1: we find ourselves. Doesn't matter who wins a selection, it's
Speaker 1: not going to change. We see who they are, we
Speaker 1: know what they're doing, and this Hunter Biden situation has
Speaker 1: broken any any last defense they have of well, we
Speaker 1: still try to present just the facts. We still try
Speaker 1: to be honest with people about what's going on and
Speaker 1: not bring our partisan bias to it. So here's why
Speaker 1: the money laundering situation so fascinating. First of all, it
Speaker 1: makes perfect sense when you see what we already know
Speaker 1: that there would be. There would be on the record
Speaker 1: sources talking about millions and millions of dollars changing hands
Speaker 1: with a Chinese company setting up LLCs. What exactly was
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden supposed to be paid for here? Consulting services?
Speaker 1: I mean, how different is this really from the Chinese
Speaker 1: Communist Party saying we're going to start buying Hunter Biden's
Speaker 1: finger paintings at a million dollars a pop, because that's
Speaker 1: about what Hunter Biden's consulting is worth. So clearly something
Speaker 1: is up. We've known that all along. This is not
Speaker 1: the market speaking, this is an influenced peddling scheme. And
Speaker 1: as I have been saying, how is this not illegal?
Speaker 1: At least someone involved in all of this must have
Speaker 1: been engaged in quid pro quo corruption. The answer to
Speaker 1: the question, as you already know, is it's not illegal
Speaker 1: because they won't charge it, or at least they haven't
Speaker 1: been willing to yet. And that's how the Democrats play
Speaker 1: the game. The law is just a function of who's
Speaker 1: in charge and what you can get away with at
Speaker 1: any point in time. That's what the law is really about.
Speaker 1: There's no underlying foundational right or wrong. There's no greater
Speaker 1: goal or greater good. It's who's got the power to
Speaker 1: get what they want when they won it. But think
Speaker 1: about this. The United States Congress, with the Democrat majority
Speaker 1: in the House, of course, on a party line vote
Speaker 1: impeach the President of the United States, and then Senate
Speaker 1: Democrats plus Mitt Romney Rhino voted to remove President Trump
Speaker 1: from office because he requested a foreign counterpart look into
Speaker 1: allegations that there was corruption going on with Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: They said this was all fake. You remember this. They
Speaker 1: pushed this whole impeachment narrative by promising the American people,
Speaker 1: the Democrats, the journals, the mainstream media. They promised, They
Speaker 1: assured us. There's nothing there, There's no corruption whatsoever. He
Speaker 1: was trying to get the Ukrainian government to manufacture corruption allegations.
Speaker 1: Here's the problem, friends, that never made any sense. It
Speaker 1: was always an obvious lie. But now we can prove it,
Speaker 1: because what you really have is the president of the
Speaker 1: United States talking to a foreign counterpart on the phone
Speaker 1: and asking about something that not only should have been
Speaker 1: investigated by Ukrainian authorities, but was under investigation already by
Speaker 1: US federal authorities. Sorry, there's no exemption for hunter. Biden
Speaker 1: gets to break the law because it would look bad
Speaker 1: for Daddy. It doesn't exist, and yet this information did
Speaker 1: not come out. I will ask you this, and we
Speaker 1: all know the answer, but it's worth posing the question anyway.
Speaker 1: What do you think would have happened if Donald Trump
Speaker 1: Junior was under federal investigation for money laundering while Donald
Speaker 1: Trump was running or while Donald Trump was president? Do
Speaker 1: you think that that ormation would have stayed under wraps?
Speaker 1: Do you think that would have been kept quiet? No?
Speaker 1: As we know, there are deep state democrat and leftists
Speaker 1: out there who will break their oath to the Constitution
Speaker 1: to attack this president. They will disclose classified information, they
Speaker 1: will violate the privacy of American citizens using the intelligence
Speaker 1: apparatus to do so. As we saw with General Flynn
Speaker 1: and the leaks that were published in the Washington Post
Speaker 1: about his phone call. Again, another phone call, nothing wrong
Speaker 1: with it, he said nothing wrong and he did not lie.
Speaker 1: Yet he's still facing prosecution. Yet he's still facing this
Speaker 1: Kafka esque nightmare of a judge who won't allow the
Speaker 1: prosecution to end the case. It's also transparent, now, isn't it.
Speaker 1: It's also very clear whatever it takes it if he Trump, however,
Speaker 1: they have to lie. However, they have to change the
Speaker 1: subject when that's necessary, whatever they have to do to
Speaker 1: stop President Trump. The mainstream media, the Democrat Party entirely
Speaker 1: justifies it. Whatever works. Hunter Biden was under FBI money
Speaker 1: loaning investigation, and they impeach the President of the United
Speaker 1: States based upon the premise that he was creating. He
Speaker 1: was fabricating the possibility that the then vice president's son
Speaker 1: was going around the world collecting millions of dollars for
Speaker 1: nothing other than a bribe. Let's use the b word, folks,
Speaker 1: It was a bribe. Get your dad to like us,
Speaker 1: get your dad to do what we want, get your
Speaker 1: dad to be in our pocket. Here's a million bucks,
Speaker 1: here's five million bucks, ten million, whatever it is. Yeah,
Speaker 1: venal corrupt people. Friends, that's who they've offered up to
Speaker 1: take over for Trump. And remember, the biggest pitch they
Speaker 1: give you for Joe Biden is you can trust him.
Speaker 1: He's a good guy. He's an honorable he's an honorable guy.
Speaker 1: That's just all a fraud. That's all branding, it's all
Speaker 1: pr as I've been telling you along. Joe Biden's just
Speaker 1: about Joe Biden. Everything else is a distraction. Everything else
Speaker 1: is a complete myth. And now we see it with
Speaker 1: the Hunter Biden FBI investigation. I must just say this
Speaker 1: money laundering. If you get caught doing it, penalties are
Speaker 1: very severe. And when you're moving money from overseas into
Speaker 1: newly constituted LLCs and taking consulting fees, and that's all,
Speaker 1: that's all the kind of stuff that raises red flags
Speaker 1: when they're doing financial audits, when they're doing a forensic
Speaker 1: analysis of your financial activity. Something I know a bit
Speaker 1: about from my days working in the counter terrorism beat.
Speaker 1: When you start looking at bank accounts and money, one
Speaker 1: of the ways you get people is on their financial crimes.
Speaker 1: And there's a lot of ways that this can go
Speaker 1: very badly for somebody who happens to come under the
Speaker 1: eye of the federal government on this issue. And then
Speaker 1: there's the other possibility, and one that I don't think
Speaker 1: we'll find out before the election, but it completely it
Speaker 1: would add up, wouldn't hunter Biden's under investigation for money laundering.
Speaker 1: You don't think that there's any way that maybe they
Speaker 1: created a dummy LLC, just a straightforward limited liability corporation
Speaker 1: for consulting services from China or from Ukraine or wherever.
Speaker 1: Notice how it's always these countries too that are shady
Speaker 1: and corrupt and have opposition to us interests at heart.
Speaker 1: You know, it's not he's not doing these consulting agreements
Speaker 1: with the French. You know he's not doing them with Canada.
Speaker 1: But if you were going to try to funnel money
Speaker 1: to the big guy, you know what you'd have to do.
Speaker 1: You'd have to create pass throughs in LLC's. You'd have
Speaker 1: to engage in money laundering to hide the source of
Speaker 1: money to get it to him. And if you thought
Speaker 1: that nobody would ever look into your stuff, and that
Speaker 1: the guy you were passing money to was either going
Speaker 1: to be the most powerful man in the world or
Speaker 1: close friend of the most powerful people in the world,
Speaker 1: you might even engage in a bit of recklessness. You
Speaker 1: might even have a bit of hubrists about what you
Speaker 1: could get away with. You might even be Hunter Biden.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. It was a wonderful birthday present for Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton to confirm Anyycomey Barrett to the Supreme Court. Monday
Speaker 1: died on her birthday. Oh, I'm sure she was so grateful. Cocaine.
Speaker 1: Mitch led the Hillary no, throwing a brush back pitch
Speaker 1: to Hillary. There let her no, that's right, still not
Speaker 1: President Hillary. I like when Mitch gets a little feisty.
Speaker 1: I like when Mitch decides to let it rip a bit. Friends.
Speaker 1: The only way we get justice, the only way we
Speaker 1: get to a place here where there's accountability for all
Speaker 1: the lies that have been told in the media, is
Speaker 1: if we win. We won with Amy Coney Barrett, and
Speaker 1: we need to win both the presidency and the Senate
Speaker 1: majority need to keep it or else, it's gonna be
Speaker 1: a tough four years. I'm not gonna lie to you.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be rough. It's not gonna go the way
Speaker 1: it should for this country right now. And it's in
Speaker 1: part because the elites are entirely unrepentant about any of this.
Speaker 1: Even Bernie Sanders out there, who's worth a few million
Speaker 1: dollars himself, he's admitting that, Yeah, you know what, the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party is the party of coastal elites. Play too
Speaker 1: if you're making a very important point that is not
Speaker 1: made often enough to be honest with him, and that
Speaker 1: is I think it is fair to say that in
Speaker 1: many ways the Democratic Party has become a party of
Speaker 1: the coastal elites, folks who have a lot of money
Speaker 1: up the middle class, people who are good people, who
Speaker 1: believe in social justice in many respects. But I think
Speaker 1: for many, many years, the Democratic Party has not paid
Speaker 1: the kind of attention to working class needs that they
Speaker 1: should have. See, the Democrat Party is controlled by people
Speaker 1: who don't care about working class people, aren't working class people,
Speaker 1: and want to do whatever they can to make sure
Speaker 1: that they don't suffer from any of the social maladies
Speaker 1: that they inflict on working class people, whether it's they're
Speaker 1: defunding the police, or unrestricted illegal immigration or all these
Speaker 1: different things. They want to make sure that they get
Speaker 1: to live in very wealthy enclaves. Watch CNN or MSNBC
Speaker 1: at night and think that they're good people because they
Speaker 1: care so much about the poor people. And they just
Speaker 1: convinced the poorer people, the people who are low wage
Speaker 1: or low income or whatever whatever the preferred nomenclature is
Speaker 1: of the moment. They want to convince people that are
Speaker 1: in the struggle, let's say that, say that, I say
Speaker 1: that respectfully, people that are struggling to make it happen,
Speaker 1: make it all come together. Democrats want to convince them
Speaker 1: that they care about them. Really for the benefit of
Speaker 1: Democrat power, and also because the people that run that
Speaker 1: party like to feel good about themselves. They have no connection,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter to them. They don't live in poor neighborhoods,
Speaker 1: they don't live in high crime areas. But what they've
Speaker 1: managed to do is convince a substantial portion of the
Speaker 1: low income Americans. Remember, most low income Americans are white.
Speaker 1: I think that's often left out and discussions about this.
Speaker 1: But they've managed to convince a large portion of low
Speaker 1: income Americans who are non white that they must vote
Speaker 1: against Republicans just because Republicans are racist. That's the real pitch.
Speaker 1: Republicans don't like you for who you are, a vicious lie,
Speaker 1: but that is what they've done. The identity politics that
Speaker 1: they rely on is toxic but useful for them, right,
Speaker 1: And so that's where we continue to be with all
Speaker 1: of this. That's why Bernie Sanders even recognizes, you know,
Speaker 1: the wokeness this is going to be. This is a
Speaker 1: self fulfilling prophecy for the Democrat Party where no one
Speaker 1: is going to be acceptable to the inner circle of
Speaker 1: a Democrat Party. It's going to just keep consuming itself,
Speaker 1: kind of like the Soviets and the Politboro under Stalin,
Speaker 1: and no one is going to be left wing enough
Speaker 1: if they get their way, and so they're just going
Speaker 1: to go through these constant spasms, these moments of panic,
Speaker 1: things like the BLM rise this year. Oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: you know, all the left wing oh anything for BLM
Speaker 1: and corporate America, everyone bending the knee. Does that help
Speaker 1: working class pep? Did BLM make any neighborhood say for him?
Speaker 1: And that's really the biggest political contribution you could say,
Speaker 1: this year from the Democrat Party. That and terrifying everybody
Speaker 1: beyond reason about COVID nineteen. So BLM, that's a movement
Speaker 1: that's supposed to be about helping the oppressed. It's supposed
Speaker 1: to be about defending those who can't defend themselves. Very
Speaker 1: worthy goals if that's in fact what's going on. Did
Speaker 1: that happen, No, it didn't happen. What really did occur
Speaker 1: as the result of BLM, people who are paid a
Speaker 1: lot of money to be in newsrooms or on air conditioned,
Speaker 1: comfortable TV sets with lots of lighting and hair and
Speaker 1: makeup assistance and everything, talked a lot to other people
Speaker 1: who can work remotely at home and still get their
Speaker 1: paychecks and you know, have plenty of money to spend
Speaker 1: on the fanciest lattes to convince them that you know,
Speaker 1: they're the good people because they care about BLM. That's
Speaker 1: the whole system. It's all a charade. Didn't do anything,
Speaker 1: And poor neighborhoods, minority minority majority neighborhoods that have high
Speaker 1: crime rates didn't do anything for them. It helped them.
Speaker 1: And in a sense, that's just a microcosm or that's
Speaker 1: just another piece of I think very compelling evidence about
Speaker 1: what the Democrat Party has become today. Well, Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: either there talking about jobs and helping people and all
Speaker 1: this stuff. They're gonna take more stuff from you, give
Speaker 1: it to some other people, make sure they get their
Speaker 1: votes as a result of that. Tell people that, you know,
Speaker 1: the Republicans don't like them because of their ethnicity, their race,
Speaker 1: their religion, whatever it may be. Identity politics, the spreading
Speaker 1: the virus of spiteful identity politics, which is what Democrats do.
Speaker 1: It's also destructive. It's really quite ironic that the Biden
Speaker 1: campaign's slogan is build back better, because like so many
Speaker 1: things you see from Democrats, they're telling you the exact
Speaker 1: opposite of what the truth will be. No, they're not
Speaker 1: gonna build back better. They're just gonna take more from
Speaker 1: you and give it to other people and then make
Speaker 1: sure that they get their vote in the process, and
Speaker 1: that's all that matters, and not even make their lives better.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, at the iHeart Radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. But we are ready.
Speaker 1: I feel very confident that Joe Biden will be elected
Speaker 1: president on Tuesday, whatever the end the count is. But
Speaker 1: on the election that occurs on Tuesday, he will be elected.
Speaker 1: On January twentieth, he will be inaugurated president of the
Speaker 1: United States. So while we don't want to be over
Speaker 1: confident or assume anything, we have to be ready for
Speaker 1: how we are going to go down a different pens.
Speaker 1: What the heck does that mean? He's going to be
Speaker 1: elected no matter what the final hey, He'll be That
Speaker 1: doesn't matter if he wins, he will win. He will
Speaker 1: be elected no matter what the final vote counters. Did
Speaker 1: you catch that? It kind of got lost there and
Speaker 1: a big gold Chardonnay glass with Nancy? What was that?
Speaker 1: No matter what the fin will vote, Telly is he'll
Speaker 1: be the Joe Biden will be the president. Matt. Your
Speaker 1: imagine if Trump said that it would be its own
Speaker 1: new cycle for twenty four hours, or if anyone who
Speaker 1: supported Trump said that. But that's where things are these days, friends,
Speaker 1: And you know they're boarding up stores right now in
Speaker 1: DC as we speak. That's how much Democrats care about democracy.
Speaker 1: I just want to know, is this a little bit
Speaker 1: like the sports team fans who will riot and light
Speaker 1: cars on fire when their team wins and when their
Speaker 1: team loses. I mean, do Democrats riot no matter what
Speaker 1: after this election? I'm thinking probably. And the bigger point
Speaker 1: for me is, okay, why is that okay? Why is
Speaker 1: it normal for us to just assume, and everyone does
Speaker 1: assume that there'll be Biden voters. People of the left,
Speaker 1: whether Antifa, which as I say, is I believe in
Speaker 1: mental illness Antifa or BLM activists or whatever the radicals
Speaker 1: are calling themselves in that moment they're going to destroy
Speaker 1: stuff in a place like DC. If stores are going
Speaker 1: to be looted, it's not going to be anybody wearing
Speaker 1: MAGA hats. Why is it the Trump supporters are just
Speaker 1: more lawful, more law abiding in their public actions. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm asking that question rhetorically. I could go into I
Speaker 1: think details about why that Isn't think the left is
Speaker 1: the party of the mob. I think they believe in
Speaker 1: moral relativism and me me me, and emotion over reason,
Speaker 1: and there's a lot, but we just accept it, and
Speaker 1: they act like that's not something we should point out.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't stand back and say hold on a second,
Speaker 1: they're boarding up stores in preparation for the election in
Speaker 1: case Trump wins, and then we know there's going to
Speaker 1: be violence in mayhem in the streets. But vote for
Speaker 1: that party. Vote for the party that seem so comfortable
Speaker 1: with the lunatics who are entirely within its confines that
Speaker 1: everybody just goes. I guess there's going to be some
Speaker 1: rioting if Trump wins. You know, what can you do?
Speaker 1: It's the price of democracy. Hm. I disagree, But this
Speaker 1: brings us to our recurring conclusion here, which is that
Speaker 1: the left has absolutely and completely lost its mind. They
Speaker 1: are nuts, right though, the far left, the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: in particular, is just bonkers, simply and utterly bonkers, and
Speaker 1: they're not going to rain them in. So what happens
Speaker 1: in a Biden presidency, Well, I think we all know
Speaker 1: it becomes the stealth AOC left wing of the party presidency,
Speaker 1: with Joe Biden mouthing the usual pablem you know, putting
Speaker 1: out the usual nincome popery about we're gonna build a
Speaker 1: million jobs and we're gonna do this other thing and
Speaker 1: you know, no joke, man, period, no joke. Yeah, it's
Speaker 1: gonna be a really inspiring presidency. So that's what we're facing,
Speaker 1: and you also will have the prospect of the same
Speaker 1: media apparatus, the apparatus of the MSM that have made it.
Speaker 1: I mean, it is beyond any not even a reason,
Speaker 1: it's beyond an unreasonable doubt that they're Democrat partisans. We
Speaker 1: couldn't have any more proof at this point. It couldn't
Speaker 1: be any more clear. They've shown us. I mean, they've
Speaker 1: effectively signed sworn declarations we are you know, CNN should
Speaker 1: be DNCNN, right. I mean, these places are completely in
Speaker 1: the tank for Democrats actively working toward their reelection. They
Speaker 1: should be paid employees of the Biden campaign at the
Speaker 1: New York Times, at CNN, these are places that should
Speaker 1: just be honest about what they're doing. But they won't
Speaker 1: do that. They won't do that because I still like
Speaker 1: to pretend, even though nobody who's intelligent and informed believes
Speaker 1: these places are honest anymore. There's a weird joy that
Speaker 1: the left wing Democrat audience gets over from watching news
Speaker 1: organizations that are just feeding them what they want all
Speaker 1: the time and telling them that it's neutral. See I
Speaker 1: watched the neutral stuff over at MSNBC. I watch the
Speaker 1: real journalism on ABC News. These places are all jokes.
Speaker 1: And I think the Internet would have already broken many
Speaker 1: of these institutions if they could not count on the
Speaker 1: assistance of the tech giants too. It's unfortunate, I mean, really, Conservatives,
Speaker 1: I wish, I wish we would understand the game that
Speaker 1: we're in here. I wish we'd understand that we've got
Speaker 1: to start controlling institutions too. Any institution that is not
Speaker 1: controlled by conservative interests will please keep it fair, will
Speaker 1: be far left. That's because they purge because like all
Speaker 1: authoritarians and totalitarians, they can abide other thoughts. Oh, what's
Speaker 1: the latest example of this Glenn Greenwald, who is a
Speaker 1: left wing guy, and not I mean a little bit,
Speaker 1: I mean Glenn Greenwald. You have never heard somebody say
Speaker 1: so many favorable things about Palestinian radical terrorism. Who's a
Speaker 1: mainstream journalist as he will grant Glenn Greenwald, right, I
Speaker 1: mean this guy. He's a man of the left, there's
Speaker 1: no question about it. And you do get the sense
Speaker 1: that he kind of hates the US federal government as
Speaker 1: a general proposition. That's said, he does do what he
Speaker 1: says he will do, which is chase down stories that
Speaker 1: are of interest and print them regardless of which party
Speaker 1: will be affected. Now I'm not saying he does a
Speaker 1: perfect balance, but I don't think anybody could do a
Speaker 1: perfect balance. He's still a man of the left, but
Speaker 1: he will write things and he will say things that
Speaker 1: Libs do not want to hear. It should be noted
Speaker 1: that there are there are journalists on the left, Glenn Greenwald,
Speaker 1: Matt Tayeebee. You know, there are a handful of them
Speaker 1: who they disagree with you and me on almost everything.
Speaker 1: I mean ninety five percent of stuff, maybe more. But
Speaker 1: they were willing to just look at the insanity of
Speaker 1: the Russia collusion farce and say, guys, there's no there there,
Speaker 1: We got nothing here. There's no evidence for this. It's
Speaker 1: just relying on a lot of innuendo from Democrats working
Speaker 1: in the federal government as nonpartisan intelligence professionals, to then
Speaker 1: journalists who quote each other about the nonpartisan, anonymous sources
Speaker 1: that are leaking them information when they never even see
Speaker 1: the information and they don't know there's no verification. And
Speaker 1: the whole Russia collusion thing was the self immolation of
Speaker 1: journalism in America, and a couple of people on the left.
Speaker 1: Greenwald was one of them, were willing to say that,
Speaker 1: they were willing to be honest about it, and for
Speaker 1: that they should be commended credit where it is due,
Speaker 1: as you know, one of my mantras here on the show,
Speaker 1: they deserved they deserved the you know, the high five
Speaker 1: for that. Well, Greenwald founded this far left publication called
Speaker 1: The Intercept, and they've published some very nasty stuff. And
Speaker 1: you know, I think that I have a slightly different
Speaker 1: take on this whole thing than everybody else, and I'll
Speaker 1: get into that in a minute. A variation, not not
Speaker 1: a overwhelmingly different takeaway, but a variation on it. It
Speaker 1: turns out that when Greenwald wanted to print something recently
Speaker 1: at The Intercept, which he is a founder of and
Speaker 1: which was funded by a left wing billionaire named Pierre
Speaker 1: Omidyar founded eBay, it turned out that when he was
Speaker 1: doing this right, when he was trying to write an
Speaker 1: editorial last week or two on Joe Biden and the
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden, it was really about the Hunter Biden emails.
Speaker 1: The people that are the managing editors at The Intercept,
Speaker 1: a far left publication that's supposed to be unafraid straight journalism,
Speaker 1: truth to power stuff, that's the mission of the organization. Well,
Speaker 1: what Greenwald found out is that that's a fraud and
Speaker 1: that that's not welcome on the left. And he had
Speaker 1: these these editors. Remember he's the founder of the publication.
Speaker 1: This should be like someone coming on the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show and telling me what I can talk about on radio,
Speaker 1: Like that's not going to fly. He's the founder, but
Speaker 1: he's being told by his editors, you can't write that.
Speaker 1: And he's published the exchanges, and it couldn't be anymore clear.
Speaker 1: The rationalizations, the you know, the what you see are
Speaker 1: people who are like, you can't write that because that'll
Speaker 1: hurt Joe, and we need Joe to win. That's it.
Speaker 1: And this gives you a window into the mentality that
Speaker 1: exists at every media publication that is about news in
Speaker 1: the country that is not identified as at least right
Speaker 1: of center. Every single and there aren't that many right
Speaker 1: of center publications. Every single news publication in the country
Speaker 1: that is not right of center has that same intel,
Speaker 1: every single one of them, without fail. There are people,
Speaker 1: if not everybody, the majority, the decision makers will shut
Speaker 1: down a story because it hurts Joe. Yeah, because they're
Speaker 1: all doing one thing, and one thing only, trying to
Speaker 1: get this guy elected, and they view that as their purpose.
Speaker 1: Because think about how much value there really is and
Speaker 1: what many of these news organizations do. I'm just going
Speaker 1: to take you in a little bit of inside baseball
Speaker 1: here for a second. Allow them do just aggregation. They
Speaker 1: do reprints of ape stories, they change the headline, they
Speaker 1: throw a couple of photos up, and they share it
Speaker 1: out on social media. Their real value, add is in
Speaker 1: editorial and in commentary. That's the truth of most news
Speaker 1: media organizations these days. But they're not honest about that
Speaker 1: because then they're just competing with other people, and it's well,
Speaker 1: who's a better polemicist, and they have to be held
Speaker 1: to account for what they write as opinions instead of oh,
Speaker 1: I'm just reporting, man, I'm just doing my reporting. But
Speaker 1: it's not true. What I think is so interesting here
Speaker 1: from the perspective of Greenwald, who's now left. He resigned
Speaker 1: from the publication he founded because of the group think
Speaker 1: and the willingness to prostrate themselves on the left entirely
Speaker 1: for the support of Joe Biden. Well, he should be
Speaker 1: commended for that, but I also would note you know,
Speaker 1: the left is where this is happening. This does not
Speaker 1: happen on the right in this way. And there's a
Speaker 1: reason for that, because the left wing of American politics
Speaker 1: has embraced in authoritarian view and they've been taught to
Speaker 1: weaponize institutions and government as just instruments of raw power
Speaker 1: without any good faith or without any sense of shared
Speaker 1: principle with the other side. They have been going scorched
Speaker 1: dirt for a long time and that's the only thing
Speaker 1: they know how to do. Now. They don't know how
Speaker 1: to have a conversation in between two sides that both
Speaker 1: have valid points of view. They only have you stop
Speaker 1: because your words are like violence. You can't say that
Speaker 1: that's sexist, that's racist, that's fill in the blank? Is
Speaker 1: it well? I mean, do we ever get to is
Speaker 1: it a fact? Is it true? Is it an opinion?
Speaker 1: Is it policy? You know, No, it's sexist, it's xenophobic. Hm.
Speaker 1: That's all. That's all that It comes down to. No
Speaker 1: name calling and deep platforming and doxing and punishing ideological opponents.
Speaker 1: This leads to bad outcomes when when you see the
Speaker 1: nature of the individuals and the ideas at the heart
Speaker 1: of say, the French Revolution, It's not surprising that about
Speaker 1: fifteen to twenty thousand people were taken to the guillotine,
Speaker 1: a vast majority of whom did nothing to anyone. Right,
Speaker 1: It's not surprising when you see when you understand the
Speaker 1: nature and character of the people and the ideas at
Speaker 1: the heart of the Soviet Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution that
Speaker 1: led to the Soviet Union's nothing surprising about that. And
Speaker 1: when you see what the left wing of American politics
Speaker 1: has turned into today, just this this vicious preening, you know, Idy,
Speaker 1: you see Brigade, it's not surprising at all. And so
Speaker 1: there's a part of me that says, well, good for
Speaker 1: Greenwalt for walking away from what from the fact that
Speaker 1: the place is a fraud. But also maybe there's some
Speaker 1: less be taken here about how if you're going to
Speaker 1: be a left wing journalist, you're going to be surrounded
Speaker 1: with frauds all the time, because that is actually the
Speaker 1: culture of the left. Now, it's not an exception, it's
Speaker 1: the rule. Maybe there's a little bit more that one
Speaker 1: should look into here. And also the ideas that all
Speaker 1: those people hold problematic. You're in the freedom hud, this
Speaker 1: is the buck Sex and Show podcast that many people
Speaker 1: who I love in my life, and yeah, I come
Speaker 1: from a red state, have lived in several red states.
Speaker 1: There are a lot of friends who I had to
Speaker 1: really get rid of because they are so nonsensical when
Speaker 1: it comes to this issue. They have the whole every
Speaker 1: single talking point that they hear on state TV and
Speaker 1: that they hear from this president, they repeat it and
Speaker 1: they are blinded by it. And I just come when
Speaker 1: I said to you the other night, there's no way
Speaker 1: they can't believe it. They can't you know, I was
Speaker 1: just goosing you in a way, right, you know, they
Speaker 1: say I was, you know, breaking your You knows that continue. So,
Speaker 1: but here's the thing, I had to get rid of
Speaker 1: them because they are too far gone. I try, and
Speaker 1: I try, and I try. They'll say something really stupid
Speaker 1: and then I'll show them the science and I'll give
Speaker 1: them in the information and they still repeat those talking
Speaker 1: points and all the while the state was a hotspot.
Speaker 1: You only see this on the Democrat side. Really, you
Speaker 1: only hear about it, at least the Democrat side. People
Speaker 1: that say I had to cut someone out of my
Speaker 1: life because they would not share my politics. The fact
Speaker 1: there have been a series of these TikTok videos of people.
Speaker 1: One guy was even made a TikTok video about how
Speaker 1: his dad was dying and he was going to have
Speaker 1: to cut his dad out of his life even though
Speaker 1: his dad was dying towards the very end because he
Speaker 1: was a Trump supporter. And then the big moment of
Speaker 1: happiness and this guy lights up toward the end of
Speaker 1: his little video is but my dad told me recently
Speaker 1: that he vote for Joe Biden. And it's like, well,
Speaker 1: now I love my dad again. This person's a psychopaths.
Speaker 1: That's weird. That's not normal, all right. People have different
Speaker 1: views of a lot of things for a whole bunch
Speaker 1: of reasons. Your personal relationships, the way you treat people
Speaker 1: around you, the way you conduct yourself in your day
Speaker 1: to day life. That's what really matters. One vote out
Speaker 1: of one hundred and fifty million that are one hundred
Speaker 1: and sixty million that are going to be cast, means nothing.
Speaker 1: Now that said, go vote for Donald Trump, don't don't
Speaker 1: pay attention to it. But you know what I mean
Speaker 1: morally ethically speaking, when you're talking about family members, and
Speaker 1: every year the Democrats have these it only happens to
Speaker 1: the Democrats said, how to talk to your crazy conservative uncle.
Speaker 1: But first, why is the conservative is the uncle? Conservatives
Speaker 1: are like the moms and the dads. Okay, that's why
Speaker 1: it's always the uncle. But no offense to the uncle's
Speaker 1: out there. I'm one, so I'm in the uncle category
Speaker 1: without a kid of my own yet. But they always
Speaker 1: have this this need to act like they're There's some
Speaker 1: tremendous forbearance that they have to engage in just to
Speaker 1: have people around them that don't agree with them. I
Speaker 1: actually rather like having conversations with people that don't agree.
Speaker 1: I like arguing, even with my own siblings about you know,
Speaker 1: how I think a movie is terrible that they think
Speaker 1: is great, or that I think a person is really
Speaker 1: cool that they think is awful. Whatever it is. Exchange
Speaker 1: of ideas is about intellectual vitality. The left wants none
Speaker 1: of that conformity, the false security of consensus. They're obsessed
Speaker 1: with it. It is central to left wing thinking. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the bus seton show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. Hey, let's check in on bro Cuomo
Speaker 1: for a while, a Ka Fredo over at c n
Speaker 1: N the journalists or a commentator. I don't know, we
Speaker 1: should ask, We should ask CNN media relations, that bunch
Speaker 1: of jerks. But your erie is I gotta tell you
Speaker 1: this is going to be kind of excited when Cuomo
Speaker 1: starts talking like this play clib five. His messages take
Speaker 1: reality with the pandemic as reality. That's why he's been
Speaker 1: hesitant out on the hustings because it's a weird mixed message.
Speaker 1: If you bring people into a group where they can
Speaker 1: get exposed, how are you about recognizing the pandemic. That's
Speaker 1: why his crowds look like this in Florida today. You
Speaker 1: got a masked up their distance. Some are sitting in
Speaker 1: their cars. Is a new era, right, I mean, we
Speaker 1: know rallies are not a good thing, so it's like
Speaker 1: the era of the drive in rally. Now. Trump is
Speaker 1: literally sir reality, it is surreal. If he wins. It
Speaker 1: is a figurative middle finger to math and to covid
Speaker 1: an acceptance of the is what it is recklessness as
Speaker 1: this virus continues to wreck us and is an extended
Speaker 1: middle finger. But it's mostly to the media. The lives
Speaker 1: of the Democrats. So he was close. He was close,
Speaker 1: But I love it to math. Also, where was where
Speaker 1: was the extent of middle finger commentary from Cuomo? When
Speaker 1: there were thousands, hundreds of thousands of people when you
Speaker 1: add up all the different cities gathering together all summer
Speaker 1: for BLM protests? Remember that? Oh but but that was important. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's delusional, It was destructive, and it was based in lies.
Speaker 1: But important, they tell you. Yeah, that's pretty fun, isn't it.
Speaker 1: They act like we don't remember this. They relate to
Speaker 1: believe the left wing talking points on COVID. You just
Speaker 1: have to not have a memory. That's very important. You
Speaker 1: have to forget what you've been told for the last year,
Speaker 1: what they've been saying, and what has been actually happening
Speaker 1: all around you. That's that's something that you must do.
Speaker 1: For example, I mean Chris Cuomo continues here with his
Speaker 1: version of why people don't want to wear masks. Play six. Look,
Speaker 1: vote your conscience, vote for Biden, vote for Trump as
Speaker 1: long as it's fair and they're counted. Works for me.
Speaker 1: But please don't see defying masks as a way of
Speaker 1: showing support for Trump. Don't get yourself sick to show
Speaker 1: a sign of support. And look, the same people who
Speaker 1: want to come after me for going for runs without
Speaker 1: a mask, and look, that's fair, that's fair. I don't
Speaker 1: wear the mask. People should call me out on it.
Speaker 1: I'm okay with that. But the same people are neglecting
Speaker 1: to tell you that this president is putting you in jeopardy.
Speaker 1: That's the true hypocrisy. Now he doesn't seem to understand
Speaker 1: here that for a whole lot of us, I don't
Speaker 1: want to wear a mask because I don't want to
Speaker 1: wear a blanking mask, That's why. And the reasons are
Speaker 1: that it is annoying, uncomfortable, and I don't think it
Speaker 1: does very much to protect me in a whole lot
Speaker 1: of circumstances where I'm currently required. In fact, I know
Speaker 1: it is pointless in many of circumstances in which I'm
Speaker 1: currently required to wear one. So it is a it
Speaker 1: is a demand of subservience to anxiety control and stupidity
Speaker 1: out there that has overtaken the public. That's what it's
Speaker 1: actually not about Trump. I would not want to wear
Speaker 1: a mask, even if by the way Trump has been
Speaker 1: saying wear masks, he tells people wear a mask, He's
Speaker 1: been saying it for months, and I still the only
Speaker 1: reason I do it because I don't want to get
Speaker 1: into fistfights every five minutes trying to go about my
Speaker 1: life in New York City. If I'm gonna be indoors
Speaker 1: with people who are at high risk and it makes
Speaker 1: them feel better, fine, sometimes yeah, because even then a
Speaker 1: minor benefit of limited transmission I think could be you know,
Speaker 1: and it's also less of an imposition. The problem is
Speaker 1: they keep making the imposition more and more. Right, it
Speaker 1: was wear a mask if you're sick, and then it
Speaker 1: was wear a mask only indoors for extended period of time.
Speaker 1: And then do you know how contact tracing works? They
Speaker 1: only ask you because I had to go through this
Speaker 1: in New York City. They'll only ask you about people
Speaker 1: you've been around. This is if you have COVID for
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes or more indoors. So if you walk past somebody,
Speaker 1: or if you stand in an elevator with somebody, that
Speaker 1: that doesn't count. So the contact tracers that we were
Speaker 1: supposed to rely on to, I remember when they talked
Speaker 1: that that was necessary to get this under control. Let's
Speaker 1: talk about math. Yeah, you got what a couple of
Speaker 1: thousand contact tracers trying to chase down fifty one hundred
Speaker 1: thousand cases a day. Good luck with that. Nobody should
Speaker 1: have thought that that was a serious plan. But they
Speaker 1: did think it was a serious plan. See, I remember
Speaker 1: the things that they've told us, and I've also seen
Speaker 1: how this has been used as a political weapon at
Speaker 1: every opportunity, in ways that are disingenuous and ways that
Speaker 1: I think also are destructive by pushing the balance here,
Speaker 1: because yeah, there should be a balance between public health
Speaker 1: and public freedom. By pushing the balance entirely in favor
Speaker 1: of public health at the spence of our most basic
Speaker 1: freedoms and changing that risk calculation so dramatically, they've also
Speaker 1: caused a lot of really horrific consequences downside, these number
Speaker 1: of people dying from undiagnosed cancer from drug overdoses, just
Speaker 1: the way that our public health, mental and physical health
Speaker 1: has been deteriorating during all of this, and they want
Speaker 1: to keep this thing going. They think this is great.
Speaker 1: Fauci thinks this is a good move. You know. The
Speaker 1: only reason we weren't in this sort of like you know,
Speaker 1: every man for himself, you know, do your best attitude
Speaker 1: from the every beginning of this was because they told
Speaker 1: us that hospitals, we're going to be overwhelmed. That was
Speaker 1: how they got us into this. Oh, now we're going
Speaker 1: to have the collective, like the hive mind, determine what
Speaker 1: you can do, who you can see over Thanksgiving, and
Speaker 1: and had this this continuing. Okay, yeay, the cases went
Speaker 1: down for a bit, but it's only it's not because
Speaker 1: a lot of people got infected. And this is just
Speaker 1: the way the virus is transmitting, you know. Then the
Speaker 1: cases come up. Oh, it's because you're not doing enough.
Speaker 1: You're not doing enough, and then they make us do
Speaker 1: all these annoying things, and then it keeps spreading, it
Speaker 1: keeps spreading. But then after a few months, oh, the
Speaker 1: cases start going on. Well, it's because you finally listen
Speaker 1: to us. That's why the cases are going down. And
Speaker 1: then the virus doesn't really spread that much in an area,
Speaker 1: and everyone's still living with these restrictions, and then all
Speaker 1: of a sudden it goes up. Oh you're not you know,
Speaker 1: we see how this goes. I remember what they were
Speaker 1: saying and what they've told us in the past and
Speaker 1: what they're saying now, and it doesn't add up. But
Speaker 1: you see, they think that people like me have problems
Speaker 1: with this stuff as some show of fealty to Trump.
Speaker 1: I don't give a what about the Trump view on
Speaker 1: whether I should and or the Republican view or anything
Speaker 1: else about whether I should mask sitting down in a restaurant,
Speaker 1: like as in going to sit down and then sit
Speaker 1: there and eat for two hours without a mask on.
Speaker 1: I don't care what anyone that's that's idiotic. I don't
Speaker 1: care what. I don't care what Fauchie's I don't care
Speaker 1: what anyone says. That's the dumbest policy. And that is
Speaker 1: the policy in New York City, and I think it's
Speaker 1: the policy in other places too, probably in Los Angeles
Speaker 1: where they had the mask up between bites of food.
Speaker 1: You know, that's also the kind of mentality that leads
Speaker 1: us to have people who are supposedly health experts, and look,
Speaker 1: the health community and a lot of doctors have looked
Speaker 1: like complete jackasses throughout this whole thing. A lot of them,
Speaker 1: not all of them, a lot of them, you know,
Speaker 1: wear a mask during sexual relations. Now. Look, I mean,
Speaker 1: whatever you do with the you know, the husband or
Speaker 1: the missus beyond closed doors is your own business. But
Speaker 1: I'm saying, and we're a surgical mask to protect you
Speaker 1: from COVID while you're doing the horizontal mambo. There are
Speaker 1: real articles, you can find them where that's actual medical
Speaker 1: guidance that's out there. We're supposed to think that that's
Speaker 1: not dumb beyond words. Look, when people get really scared,
Speaker 1: they do stupid things, they say stupid things, and they're
Speaker 1: very easy to control. And that's what has been happening.
Speaker 1: And Democrats have liked this. What they really don't want
Speaker 1: is for you to spend time thinking about how much
Speaker 1: they've been wrong in the past, what they used to say,
Speaker 1: because a normal person who's not in the grip of
Speaker 1: fear would listen to what they were saying. Now with
Speaker 1: keeping in mind that they've said stuff before that wasn't
Speaker 1: wasn't exactly making a whole lot of sense, was it. Yeah,
Speaker 1: here you go, we have fourteen play it, but just
Speaker 1: you and me wearing these masks. Doctor Fauci and what
Speaker 1: Doctor shook It have said is that could actually sometimes
Speaker 1: be more harmful to you than not wearing a mask,
Speaker 1: because if it's not fitted right, you're gonna fumble with it.
Speaker 1: You're gonna be touching your face, which is the number
Speaker 1: one way you're gonna get diseases unclean hands touching your face.
Speaker 1: In terms of wearing a mask, are advice is clear
Speaker 1: that wearing a mask if you don't have an infection
Speaker 1: really reduces the risk almost not tall, So we didn't
Speaker 1: us advise that. Well, it's important for folks to know
Speaker 1: that face mask are not recommended for the general public.
Speaker 1: There are two things people should know. Number One, if
Speaker 1: you wear a face mask and you're not wearing it properly,
Speaker 1: you're going to be more likely to touch your face
Speaker 1: and you can actually increase your risk of getting a
Speaker 1: respiratory disease like coronavirus or flu. Right now, people should
Speaker 1: not be woid. There's no reason to be walking around
Speaker 1: with a mask when you're in the middle of an outbreak.
Speaker 1: Wearing a mask might make people feel a little bit better,
Speaker 1: and it might even block a droplet, but it's not
Speaker 1: providing the perfect protection that people think that it is.
Speaker 1: That guy we are told you had, doctor Fouch at
Speaker 1: the end, has been working against infectious disease and pandemics
Speaker 1: for what the last forty years. That was what he
Speaker 1: said earlier this year. Now he looks at you like
Speaker 1: you're some kind of troglodyte if you don't immediately strap
Speaker 1: on that mask all time. I mean, what else do
Speaker 1: you need to know? Folks? But they've convinced themselves because
Speaker 1: the left politicizes, the Democrats politicize everything. They really think
Speaker 1: that the opposition to mask. Who's like, yeah, because Trump
Speaker 1: doesn't like masks. No, because we pay attention and a
Speaker 1: lot of this stuff is dumb. And I don't want
Speaker 1: to wear a mask. I don't want to be in
Speaker 1: the gym alone wearing a mask, which is what happens
Speaker 1: these days. I don't want to be on a treadmill
Speaker 1: wearing a mask. You know all you have to do.
Speaker 1: And this has happened to me a couple of times.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna be honest about it. You have one or
Speaker 1: two really wet sneezes with one of those surgical masks on,
Speaker 1: you change your mind on wearing masks all the time
Speaker 1: real fast. They think it's all about politics. That's because
Speaker 1: that's how they view everything. I want this to end.
Speaker 1: If Joe Biden came out and he was like, look,
Speaker 1: I think everybody should do this for their own safety.
Speaker 1: But we're not going to mandate this. It's not the
Speaker 1: government's role. There's not the science to back up taking
Speaker 1: this position anyway, and we know that as a policy
Speaker 1: it just aggravates people, exacerbates divisions, and it hasn't worked
Speaker 1: in Europe. So do whatever you want to protect yourself.
Speaker 1: But none of this, Like you can't go into this
Speaker 1: place if a private business wants to, fine, but that's
Speaker 1: not what we have. We have government mandates for businesses.
Speaker 1: No more of that. I'd say, Yeah, I like what
Speaker 1: Biden saanging on masks, That's where I mean. He said, Oh,
Speaker 1: he'd never switch his mind like that. Listen to Fauci. Listen,
Speaker 1: know he switched his tune on this one. You know
Speaker 1: what a mask? Maybe it works a little bit, Yes,
Speaker 1: maybe it works a little bit, not enough to annoy
Speaker 1: the crap out of everybody with these stupid mandates and
Speaker 1: this virtue signaling. I'm asking all the time. If you're
Speaker 1: in a room with somebody who's shedding this virus, and
Speaker 1: you both have little pieces of cloth on your face
Speaker 1: and you're breathing in the same same air for you know,
Speaker 1: an extended period of time, you're at risk. End of story.
Speaker 1: So all this stuff. Oh, but I'm wearing a mask
Speaker 1: on and you're a respirator. If you want to go
Speaker 1: around that it has mat suit and have something that's
Speaker 1: actually filtering out particles so small that it would include
Speaker 1: the virus before you can breathe anything in, and it's
Speaker 1: keeping it from being able to get to your eye
Speaker 1: out of Sure, but you know, do you want to
Speaker 1: live in like a scene from the movie Outbreak for
Speaker 1: the rest of your life? I don't think so, but
Speaker 1: I just I'm sorry, I just can't help. But notice
Speaker 1: they think that this is like, yeah, maga Trump, I'm
Speaker 1: not wearing a mask. No, it's a dumb idea, and
Speaker 1: I don't want to do it because I actually think
Speaker 1: about things irrespective of what the political party decides. You're
Speaker 1: in the freedom mind. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Governor. A few people haven't a better understanding
Speaker 1: of how to manage the pandemic than you do. What
Speaker 1: is your prediction for the country as we head into winter?
Speaker 1: You know, I think it's what the scientists said. The
Speaker 1: difference that we've made in New York because we followed
Speaker 1: the science from day one. We followed the fact. This
Speaker 1: is a virus. It doesn't respond to politics, right, Just
Speaker 1: listen to the scientists. They said in the fall, it
Speaker 1: was going to get worse. They said, the weather gets colder,
Speaker 1: people move indoors. You have schools opening up, to colleges
Speaker 1: opening up, which have been a real problem. So it
Speaker 1: was going to get worse, and we prepared for it.
Speaker 1: Testing is the best thing that a state can do.
Speaker 1: The country should be doing. This is like asking the
Speaker 1: captain of the Titanic for advice on Iceberg avoidance. Notice
Speaker 1: the way that the view bunch of Democrat propagandists who
Speaker 1: don't read a lot sitting there. Their position is that
Speaker 1: Cuomo is some kind of a hero for how he
Speaker 1: has handled this. This is the guy who and this
Speaker 1: is a classic moment of Democrat gaslighting, the worst single
Speaker 1: decision making and response to COVID, the most wrong in
Speaker 1: with the most catastrophic consequences of anyone. And I would argue,
Speaker 1: in the western world, perhaps on the globe, Cuomo's the worst,
Speaker 1: the governor of New York, the absolute worst, and yet
Speaker 1: he's treated like he somehow has managed to figure this out,
Speaker 1: He's managed to pull this all together. It's crazy, my friends,
Speaker 1: I mean it's completely absurd, but it is where we
Speaker 1: are right now. It's where we are right now. They'll
Speaker 1: just make this stuff up. And then you've got the vaccines.
Speaker 1: You're noticing you're not hearing a lot about vaccines these days.
Speaker 1: You're not hearing much discussion about where the vaccine status
Speaker 1: may be. So I want to share this with you.
Speaker 1: Here is the vice president. Play ten. We reinvented testing.
Speaker 1: We saw to the manufacturer and distribution of billions of
Speaker 1: supplies of PPE. We developed medicines notice therapy US that
Speaker 1: are saving lives, and we are on track to have
Speaker 1: the first coronavirus vaccine before the end of this year
Speaker 1: with millions of doses for the American people. So there
Speaker 1: you have the guy in charge of all that. There
Speaker 1: you have the guy who's you know, running the coronavirus
Speaker 1: Task Force. And here we have a situation where the
Speaker 1: Left is going to claim that it's not true that
Speaker 1: he doesn't know exactly what's going on somehow. Play thirteen.
Speaker 1: This is basically, let's call it halftime in the game. Right,
Speaker 1: we went through the first phase, we had a brief
Speaker 1: respite before the fall, and now we're going to have
Speaker 1: the fall and the winter, and then vaccination, which is
Speaker 1: a whole, long, difficult process that the federal government hasn't
Speaker 1: even started to focus on. It's not about finding the vaccine.
Speaker 1: You then have to administer three thirty million doses, right,
Speaker 1: You don't have to administer three hundred and thirty million doses,
Speaker 1: you moron, If they get if they get thirty million
Speaker 1: doses of this out a tenth of that to the
Speaker 1: people who are at highest risk because of their age
Speaker 1: and comorbidity, that the death toll from this virus, assuming
Speaker 1: the vaccine works as advertised, is gonna plummet. And for
Speaker 1: everybody else it's like a bad flu, or even less
Speaker 1: than that. In some cases, it's less than a bad flu. Right,
Speaker 1: it's just like having a virus you don't even know
Speaker 1: you have. You have to get every man, woman and
Speaker 1: child vaccinated against this right away. But so does he
Speaker 1: not know that? No, it's just here's another chance, here's
Speaker 1: another chance to take a shot at the federal government.
Speaker 1: Here's another chance to you know, take a take a
Speaker 1: swing at the Trump administration. It looks a cheap shot.
Speaker 1: Can you imagine what are what are we going to
Speaker 1: be doing? If Trump wins and then the vaccine is
Speaker 1: out there, and then the Democrats are going to be
Speaker 1: involved in so much undermining of vaccine safety. They're gonna
Speaker 1: be anti vacs only on this vaccine. Oh oh, I
Speaker 1: don't know about this. And look for those of you
Speaker 1: that have real, real concerns about the safety of this,
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about you, because this is a fast
Speaker 1: vaccine that they've pulled together. I'm saying they will be
Speaker 1: opposed to this only because good for Orange man bad.
Speaker 1: That's all that matters. Nothing else, whether people will die
Speaker 1: because they don't get the vaccine, because the media is
Speaker 1: going to be engaged in all this fearmongering that is
Speaker 1: irrelevant to them. Thanks for listening to the Bush Past.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeart Radio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. It's the final countdown,
Speaker 1: the last days before the big day, and we wanted
Speaker 1: to hear from the campaign just to get updates on
Speaker 1: what's going on, what they're up to, how the President's
Speaker 1: going to be making his case here. And for that
Speaker 1: we've got our friend Steve Cortez in the mix. Steve
Speaker 1: is a senior strategist for the Trump campaign. He's out
Speaker 1: there making the case, and he's got his finger on
Speaker 1: the pulse of just what Trump twenty twenty is up to.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much, Steve for joining. Appreciate it. Hey,
Speaker 1: you bet buck happy to be here. So how we looking, Steve?
Speaker 1: Give us the give us the real deal. I mean, look,
Speaker 1: I know you and I both know Trump is we
Speaker 1: hope gonna win? Right, Okay, skip that for a second.
Speaker 1: What's happening right now? Yeah, no, listen, let me give
Speaker 1: you reasons to be hopefully. I'm not just not just
Speaker 1: slugan here. I like our momentum right now. And listen,
Speaker 1: we're taking nothing for granted. I believe all of these
Speaker 1: swing states are still in play and it's going to
Speaker 1: come down to game day turnout. And when I say
Speaker 1: game day, I really mean these should say game days
Speaker 1: because it's through the weekend. Really. But here's why I
Speaker 1: like our momentum. Number One, there's economic momentum in the
Speaker 1: country that's really pretty fantastic. We just continue to get
Speaker 1: out day after day, just an absolute daylose of data,
Speaker 1: all of it pointing to an economic renaissance in this country.
Speaker 1: This country is surging and roaring back to life economically.
Speaker 1: It's because of the Trump policies. It's the Trump boom
Speaker 1: two point on and the American people site in all polling,
Speaker 1: I have problems with a lot of public polling, but
Speaker 1: all polling far and away, that is the number one
Speaker 1: issue on voters minds. It's also where I think we
Speaker 1: have the most compelling case to make. So that's the
Speaker 1: affirmative case for Trump and the and the other reason,
Speaker 1: by the way that you're speaking of polling. Even though
Speaker 1: I don't like the numbers that a lot of public
Speaker 1: polling come up with because I believe that their inputs
Speaker 1: are wrong and they're skewed against us, I do think
Speaker 1: that momentum matters in polling. In other words, if it's
Speaker 1: tightening versus widening, that does matter, as long as they're
Speaker 1: not changing the methodology right. And if we look at
Speaker 1: the real CUIP politics averages of these swing states, all
Speaker 1: of them are tightening. So those averages still show us
Speaker 1: losing those swing states. Now I don't believe we are,
Speaker 1: but regardless they show us, they show us losing by less.
Speaker 1: They show these races tightening, and I think that is accurate.
Speaker 1: And then the other reason is quite frankly, the word
Speaker 1: is getting out about the Biden China pay to play scheme.
Speaker 1: This is the biggest story of the campaign. I mean, clearly,
Speaker 1: this is a bombshell story. The fact that the Biden family,
Speaker 1: which I really call it cartel because that's what it
Speaker 1: operates like, that they have been selling influence and access
Speaker 1: all over the world for years, but including to the
Speaker 1: two most dangerous enemies of the United States, Russia and China.
Speaker 1: And to get really specific, that much has proven, by
Speaker 1: the way, I mean, that's not supposition, right, It has
Speaker 1: proven that Hunter was being paid and other family members
Speaker 1: being paid lavishly by the Chinese commerce. Part now is
Speaker 1: what is credibly alleged, and I want to be precisely
Speaker 1: my words buckeye, because we can't quite prove it yet,
Speaker 1: but there is very much, very credible evidence to suspect
Speaker 1: and to believe that Joe Biden himself was involved in
Speaker 1: this scamp, in a dirty money deal with the CCP,
Speaker 1: that he was personally involved in executing it and in
Speaker 1: the proceeds. That question has of course not been asked
Speaker 1: of him in any legitimate way than by President Trump.
Speaker 1: The campaign hardly addresses the issue because they hardly campaign
Speaker 1: at all. But and despite the efforts of corporate media doing.
Speaker 1: It's just making a willful decision and to ignore the
Speaker 1: biggest story in the country. With a nice assist from
Speaker 1: big text suppressing the story, the story is getting out
Speaker 1: and it is helping us. And we're seeing that in
Speaker 1: some internal numbers. The negatives on Joe Biden are going off.
Speaker 1: The American people are realizing he's not the nice guy
Speaker 1: from Scranton that the corporate media wants you to believe.
Speaker 1: He's a dirty Washington politician who spent fifty years in
Speaker 1: the swap and much of that time screwing over American
Speaker 1: workers and taking dirty money from communist China. We're speaking
Speaker 1: of Steve Cortez Trump twenty twenty campaign advisor, senior advisor
Speaker 1: for strategy and a former c ann contributor alumni just
Speaker 1: like me. So Steve, we've got that. It's it's like
Speaker 1: we've both survived some kind of a war. So we've
Speaker 1: always got that in common. Right. Yeah, crazy place over there, Man,
Speaker 1: It just kept getting crazier too. But we'll have that
Speaker 1: conversation another day. Steve. Let's talk about the Hispanic vote
Speaker 1: in this There have been some reports news reports that
Speaker 1: Hispanic voters there's there's two dynamics playing out. One they're
Speaker 1: not showing up for Biden in places like southern Florida
Speaker 1: Miami Dade County as much as had been hoped. And two,
Speaker 1: some of them may be breaking for Trump in larger
Speaker 1: numbers than had been anticipated. What can you tell us
Speaker 1: about that? Yes, listen, No, that is absolutely having correct
Speaker 1: on both counts. And by the way, again, I don't
Speaker 1: love public holling, but just to cite some of the
Speaker 1: latest Fox News national poll, and I'm not sure to
Speaker 1: picking a good poll because that poll didn't make us
Speaker 1: look good, but within that poll, the Hispanic number was
Speaker 1: pretty outstanding. They show up forty two percent nationally among Hispanics.
Speaker 1: We believe we're doing slightly better than that, and we
Speaker 1: do think we're gonna have a shot at actually winning
Speaker 1: this Hispanic ball, but certainly north of forty in our view,
Speaker 1: we're not Again, we're not being cocky about it. We've
Speaker 1: got to earn those votes all the way to the
Speaker 1: finish line. But a couple things are going on. Number
Speaker 1: one is Hispanics are statistically the most entrepreneurial demographic in America.
Speaker 1: We love to start up new businesses. Mom and pop
Speaker 1: operations that we hope become bigger than that. And this
Speaker 1: president has been amazing for entrepreneurs, particularly it comes to deregulation.
Speaker 1: Tax cuts were key, but I think for entrepreneurs it's
Speaker 1: the regulatory really that is really the jet fuel for
Speaker 1: entrepreneurial zeal in this country. And Hispanics know that they
Speaker 1: know what was happening during the first three years before
Speaker 1: the China virus, and they know what's happening again right
Speaker 1: now in this country. I'll give you one other quick
Speaker 1: staff that I think is related. Pickup trucks sales just
Speaker 1: hit an all time high in the month of September,
Speaker 1: which is pretty astounding when you consider you know that
Speaker 1: just five months ago this country was locked down, right,
Speaker 1: So the fact that we're back up, we've reclaimed the
Speaker 1: pandemic losses and truck sales and surge to a new
Speaker 1: high and pickup trucks is amazing. And the reason I'm
Speaker 1: connecting that to Hispanics is pickup trucks are used for work.
Speaker 1: They're used for the trades. A lot of Hispanics work
Speaker 1: in those kinds of businesses, construction, landscaping, all those sorts
Speaker 1: of things. People who work with their minds and their hands,
Speaker 1: the people Hillary Clinton decries as the deplorable. So the
Speaker 1: Hispanic population, I particularly Hispanic men, are really rallying to
Speaker 1: President Trump. And then specific to Florida, you know, as
Speaker 1: you mentioned Day County, Florida's Hispanics are different in that
Speaker 1: so many of them come from Venezuela and Cuba, that
Speaker 1: they are keenly aware of the dangers of socialism right
Speaker 1: because either they or their ancestors fled from those brutal
Speaker 1: regimes in Venezuela in Cuba. And when the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: Democratic Party lurches to the left and starts to dance
Speaker 1: with socialists like Bernie Sanders and AOC, that may be
Speaker 1: very pleasing in faculty lounges and cafes in Brooklyn, but
Speaker 1: it's not cool in South Florida. It is not okay
Speaker 1: with Venezuelans and with Americans of Venezuelan and Cuban descent
Speaker 1: down there. So I think they have really hurt themselves
Speaker 1: with that community, and we're benefiting. Speaking of Steve Cortez,
Speaker 1: Trump twenty twenty campaign senior adviser for strategy, So Steve,
Speaker 1: there's only a few days left here. What is Look,
Speaker 1: I know the presidents, he's just he's going all out.
Speaker 1: You know, he's at that point in the race where
Speaker 1: he's the legs are kicking and he's given it all
Speaker 1: these god, as is everybody else who's a part of
Speaker 1: his campaign team, yourself included. If he's going to focus
Speaker 1: in though, on one or two things in those swing
Speaker 1: states where based on what we've seen so far, based
Speaker 1: on what the data is telling the campaign, he could
Speaker 1: still he could still move the needle. What is it, right, Yeah, listen,
Speaker 1: I think it's the economy. And to get even more
Speaker 1: specific than broad economy, I would say income. And I've
Speaker 1: spoken to the President about this and he's armed with
Speaker 1: some statistics on the You can break down the Guara
Speaker 1: of Labor statistics when they do their monthly payroll reports.
Speaker 1: Most people obviously just folks on the national but they
Speaker 1: break it down actually all the way to the metro area.
Speaker 1: So let me give you a specific example. Today, he's
Speaker 1: going to Rochester, Minnesota. Rochester, Minnesota, the income gains there
Speaker 1: as of the September report, our year over year thirteen
Speaker 1: percent average wage gains in Rochester Minnesota. That's pretty incredible
Speaker 1: when you consider that this Most of this year has
Speaker 1: been marred by COVID, right, And that's a tough comparison
Speaker 1: because you're comparing to September of twenty nineteen. It's year
Speaker 1: over year. The economy was humming last fall, right, and
Speaker 1: nobody had even heard of the China virus yet. So
Speaker 1: it's a tough comp Not only were we beating it,
Speaker 1: but were beating by double digits. I mean, that's real
Speaker 1: money in people's pockets. That's hundreds of extra dollars every
Speaker 1: single week for working class folks that they have gained
Speaker 1: in the last year. The more I think the President
Speaker 1: points that out and points out that that is all
Speaker 1: at risk if you elect Joe Biden, He's going to
Speaker 1: influt the largest tax hike in American history by a
Speaker 1: mile on this country. He would also take us black
Speaker 1: back to a place of economic submission to China and
Speaker 1: again in Minnesota, Minnesota. According to the Economic Policy Institute,
Speaker 1: which is a left leaning think tank, Minnesota lost eighty
Speaker 1: eight thousand manufacturing jobs to China once they entered the
Speaker 1: WTO in two thousand and one. Joe Biden was a
Speaker 1: principal architect of those terrible trade deals that allowed China
Speaker 1: to abuse our American workers, including in Minnesota. So I
Speaker 1: think we make that kind of granular case as he's
Speaker 1: barnstorming in the country. This is what you have gained,
Speaker 1: this is what's at risk. I think it's compelling, and
Speaker 1: I think that will get people to the polls. Steve,
Speaker 1: if you had to tell us one place where you
Speaker 1: think if I'm putting you on the spot here, but
Speaker 1: don't worry, We're only well only this is what we do.
Speaker 1: We'll only bring it up again if you're right. But
Speaker 1: if there's one place where you think people could be
Speaker 1: a little surprised, not necessarily just that Trump wins, but
Speaker 1: by the margin of victory that you know, is there
Speaker 1: one area where you think we could get a surprise
Speaker 1: that defies expectations. One state. I mean, I'm having to
Speaker 1: put myself out there. I'm gonna stick with Minnesota. I
Speaker 1: think not only gonna win Minnesota, I think we're gonna
Speaker 1: win at hand. Minnesota has not been won by Republican
Speaker 1: since nineteen seventy two. That's the year I was born,
Speaker 1: and I'm not a young man buck. By the way,
Speaker 1: that was also the year that Joe Biden was elected
Speaker 1: in the Senate think about that. I mean, I'm a
Speaker 1: middle aged guy. He was elected when I was in
Speaker 1: diapers in nineteen seventy two. But anyway, I believe we're
Speaker 1: gonna win Minnesota. Let me give you a couple of
Speaker 1: reasons why. One is ilhan Olmar. I can't tell you
Speaker 1: how despise she is in that entire state outside of
Speaker 1: her district, and she has been really useful for us
Speaker 1: to point out just how radical left the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: Democratic Party is, to convince Minnesota's that this is not
Speaker 1: your parents, your grandparents Democratic Party, this is not the
Speaker 1: Walter Mondale Party. This is a very ilhan Olmar's party.
Speaker 1: They are driving the bus as far as policy. And
Speaker 1: then the second thing, I mean, it's tragic, but it's
Speaker 1: the reality. It's just the riots. The riots in Minneapolis
Speaker 1: were so terrible, they caused so much damage in this
Speaker 1: country and really frankly scared, legitimately scared, rightfully scare a
Speaker 1: lot of people, particularly Minnesota. And so I think those
Speaker 1: two factors, in addition to the affirmative case that we're
Speaker 1: making on the economy, tell me that we're gonna make
Speaker 1: history in Minnesota. And I don't think we're gonna just
Speaker 1: eke it out. I think we're gonna we're gonna win.
Speaker 1: That's a bold prediction. Steve Cortez, we like we like
Speaker 1: that stuff though. Here. Thanks so much for joining me us.
Speaker 1: Steve Cortez, Senior visor for the Trump campaign. Everybody, Steve,
Speaker 1: we'll talk to you soon. Thanks. Buck, you're in the hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. It is up,
Speaker 1: it is out, the Real Dracula Podcast, just in time
Speaker 1: for a Halloween, my friends. As promised. So for those
Speaker 1: of you who are listening on one of our wonderful
Speaker 1: affiliate stations all across the country, We've got one hundred
Speaker 1: and eighty stations, give or take. I know some of
Speaker 1: you probably maybe don't listen to podcasts. This is only
Speaker 1: available right now on podcast, so it's a great way
Speaker 1: to introduce yourself to that medium. And look, it's about
Speaker 1: Vlad the Third, Vlad Chepesh, who is quite a figure
Speaker 1: from history. Yes, a sadistic, mass murdering, impaling maniac in
Speaker 1: some ways, but also a pretty effective military commander and
Speaker 1: a guy who lived in an incredible time and fought
Speaker 1: against the Ottoman Turks and maybe saved Europe. You could
Speaker 1: make the argument at least was a part of saving
Speaker 1: Europe from Ottoman conquest. Amazing story, and I think you'll
Speaker 1: really enjoy this podcast. So you just go to wherever
Speaker 1: you want to listen to podcast. The iHeart app is
Speaker 1: a great one. Spotify, super easy, type in the buck
Speaker 1: Sexton Show and then just remember it'll say Shields High
Speaker 1: the real Dracula under the buck Sexton Show feed when
Speaker 1: you go to it, and then you just get's free.
Speaker 1: It's totally free. I just I just want you to listen.
Speaker 1: And I there's some violence described, impalements and so on,
Speaker 1: so you know, I don't know if it's little kid acceptable,
Speaker 1: but I think I think you're twelve or thirteen year
Speaker 1: olds and up can definitely listen to it. And it's
Speaker 1: all real history. I mean, it's it's the actual story.
Speaker 1: It's I did a tremendous amount of research. I've got
Speaker 1: several books on lad the Impaler that I read in
Speaker 1: order to prepare for this. So um, I think you'll
Speaker 1: really enjoy it. And for the adults, you gotta know
Speaker 1: this story. You'll never think of Dracula whenever it's like
Speaker 1: IVANDL suck your blood. You know that whole thing. Um,
Speaker 1: you'll you'll never really uh look at them the same way.
Speaker 1: You know, you'll never really think of the Dracula figure.
Speaker 1: And I get into a little bit of the stri
Speaker 1: which is the Romanian peasant folklore about demons from the area,
Speaker 1: and there's all these sort of scientific explanations for where
Speaker 1: this notion of vampires and came from. It might be
Speaker 1: from decaying bodies because they didn't understand that decay process,
Speaker 1: and it looks like blood has been sucked out of
Speaker 1: the dead. But anyway, there's there's a lot there. And
Speaker 1: then the name Dracula itself. It in contemporary Romanian language.
Speaker 1: At the time, it wasn't called Romanian, but you know
Speaker 1: the various dialects that were being spoken in because you
Speaker 1: had a lad Jepesh would have been speaking. He probably
Speaker 1: spoke German. He would have spoken, you know, various Eastern
Speaker 1: European regional dialects. Romania as a country did not exist
Speaker 1: at the time, which is where Wallachia is the province
Speaker 1: and it's really a principality of Hungary, so we would
Speaker 1: have spoken Hungarian, you would have spoken Turkish, spoken some German.
Speaker 1: Because of the Saxon transplants from Germany into into this area. Anyway,
Speaker 1: It's just really cool and I think you'll enjoy. It's
Speaker 1: only about forty five minutes or so too perfect listening.
Speaker 1: So while you're making dinner this weekend and putting out
Speaker 1: the pumpkins and letting the kids carve some stuff, if
Speaker 1: you want to listen the real Jackula, and please team
Speaker 1: do share it because we want more and more people
Speaker 1: to know about the Shield's High History podcasts. I already
Speaker 1: have one Siege of multipodcasts done and we're gonna do
Speaker 1: another to another to complete the Siege, and then we're
Speaker 1: gonna move to two part Lepanto podcast and then maybe
Speaker 1: Siege of Vienna one, Siege of Vienna two, and then
Speaker 1: we're gonna move on to a different era of history.
Speaker 1: So I want to make sure we move around a
Speaker 1: little bit, and I think we'll probably go to ancient
Speaker 1: ancient Greece and maybe then ancient Rome. I got a
Speaker 1: lot of I got a lot of ideas, So you
Speaker 1: can also give me your thoughts on which on what
Speaker 1: you'd like for the Shields The Shields High podcast, great battles,
Speaker 1: great military, you know, historical stories. So I hope you
Speaker 1: enjoy it, folks. We got it done as promised. And
Speaker 1: it's like I said, just all you have to do
Speaker 1: is go to the various podcast platforms out there and
Speaker 1: it's totally free to listen to it on demand whenever
Speaker 1: you want. Please share it with a friend. Alrighty, we
Speaker 1: also have some other stuff to get to here. What
Speaker 1: are the Democrats do when their plans don't work? They
Speaker 1: just blame everybody other than themselves. No accountability, that's one
Speaker 1: of their favorite things. No accountability at all. Perfect example,
Speaker 1: this would be the worst mayor in America, Bill de Blasio.
Speaker 1: Here he is, and why we haven't gotten more stimulus
Speaker 1: money play eighteen clee. I had this conversation even with
Speaker 1: President Trump back in the spring when I was communicating
Speaker 1: with him pretty regularly during the worst of the New
Speaker 1: York City crisis, and I said to him, if you
Speaker 1: would speak up for a stimulus, he would move the
Speaker 1: Senate with you. We'd be done here. He's never done it,
Speaker 1: you know. The last few weeks he suddenly got a
Speaker 1: little interested because he needed to get reelected. But no, look,
Speaker 1: if President Trump had said from the beginning, a stimulus
Speaker 1: is the way forward, if he had learned a lesson
Speaker 1: of Franklin, Delano Roosevelt and other great leaders. We would
Speaker 1: already have that stimulus. This city and a lot of
Speaker 1: other places would be in the middle of our comeback
Speaker 1: right now. He did not provide the leadership. He literally
Speaker 1: wouldn't even comment on it for weeks on end. That
Speaker 1: was the lost opportunity. Blasio is it an unrepentant liar,
Speaker 1: as you know. And the idea that if we just
Speaker 1: had a stimulus, new York City would be doing great
Speaker 1: is crazy because New York City is dying. Because he
Speaker 1: insists on the maximum, we have restrictions in New York
Speaker 1: City that no one else, even in New York State has.
Speaker 1: We're just treated like the worst of the worst here
Speaker 1: with the COVID lockdowns. But he also is leaving out
Speaker 1: that the reason there's not a stimulus packages because Nancy
Speaker 1: Pelosi wanted a whole bunch of Democrat grab bag stuff.
Speaker 1: They wanted a whole bunch of things that have nothing
Speaker 1: to do with the stimulus. But it is something that
Speaker 1: everybody should remember as we get ready to go to
Speaker 1: the polls that at a time of so much economic
Speaker 1: and emotional and psychological suffering for the country and frustration,
Speaker 1: I mean the word for me, really, I just feel
Speaker 1: frustrated by all this stuff, like it really grates on me.
Speaker 1: The Party of Nancy Pelosi thought that it was more
Speaker 1: important to score political points than get help to people,
Speaker 1: and I hope they remember that in this election. I
Speaker 1: hope they remember that. That's what the priority list was.
Speaker 1: That's it, Pelosi. Thanks for listening to the Bust the
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. It's Harsanye time, everybody,
Speaker 1: our buddy David Harsanye in the mix once again to
Speaker 1: tell us about everything that's going on right now and
Speaker 1: also going to make all the right predictions for next
Speaker 1: week's enormously important election. He's a senior writer at National Review.
Speaker 1: If you want to read his stuff there, which you should,
Speaker 1: go to National Review dot com. Mister David, good to
Speaker 1: have you back, sir. Always a pleasure to be here. Buck.
Speaker 1: So we often on the right, those of us in
Speaker 1: conservative media, talk about media bias. It's kind of the
Speaker 1: way that things are because we are outnumbered really ten
Speaker 1: to one or something close to that by people on
Speaker 1: the other side of the political spectrum. So this is
Speaker 1: not a new conversation, and it's when it's one that
Speaker 1: it's a it's a war. Though it's an ongoing intellectual exchange.
Speaker 1: I should say about why does this happen? Why is
Speaker 1: the country in the circumstance where you've got into one
Speaker 1: people from one political party that pretend that they're not
Speaker 1: but they are. In the media. Okay, is this actually
Speaker 1: and I don't really mean this what we've seen from
Speaker 1: the suppression of the of the New York Post story
Speaker 1: to today and the way they've ignored the Hunter Biden stuff,
Speaker 1: and also yesterday I see an n MSNBC no stories
Speaker 1: at all on thirty three point one percent GDP growth
Speaker 1: in the third quarter, just ignoring it like it didn't
Speaker 1: even happen. Is this the most egregious it's ever been?
Speaker 1: Or is it just like because we're an election we
Speaker 1: feel that way. No, it's the most egregious has ever been.
Speaker 1: It's it's corrupt. I mean I think that the whole media.
Speaker 1: I mean, there are still a few reporters here and
Speaker 1: there who I like and I think try to do
Speaker 1: a good job, but in general, I just think political
Speaker 1: media is completely corrupt. And they are trying to help,
Speaker 1: you know, a candidate win Joe Biden, Donald Trump, because
Speaker 1: they have convinced themselves he's completely evil, he's a Nazie
Speaker 1: that now they have license to essentially act as defenders
Speaker 1: of democracy by running for the other candidates. And there's
Speaker 1: nothing we can do about it. You're not going to
Speaker 1: get to the pressure. It's too overwhelming even for good
Speaker 1: reporters in that kind of environment to write the stories
Speaker 1: that are necessary. We always blame the reporters, but it's
Speaker 1: also about the editors and the lack of oversight and
Speaker 1: what they do and the lack of professionalism. And it's
Speaker 1: just finished. So you have to build up your own
Speaker 1: organizations and start doing your own reporting, even though it's
Speaker 1: really hard to do that, it's very expensive to do that.
Speaker 1: There is no other way for Republicans or conservatives to
Speaker 1: really get their message out right. And you've let into
Speaker 1: exactly what I wanted to ask you about next, which
Speaker 1: is is this something that now people recognize is irreparable
Speaker 1: and therefore is there a willingness to understand the only
Speaker 1: way to really handle this. And we could talk about
Speaker 1: pulling Section two thirty all day and from the tech companies.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's the panacea that a lot of
Speaker 1: people believe that it is. I think that that will
Speaker 1: lead to a lot of problems on its own. You maybe,
Speaker 1: on balance it's the way to go, but it's definitely
Speaker 1: not gonna It's not like all of a sudden, Twitter
Speaker 1: is not gonna be run by a bunch of woke
Speaker 1: twenty five year olds. I mean one thing. I mean,
Speaker 1: I remember David at a media company I worked with
Speaker 1: at one point. I will not out that media company
Speaker 1: by name. It's not the one I work, not when
Speaker 1: I work for Now, I will say that the actual
Speaker 1: owner and I were talking at one point, and he
Speaker 1: was expressing his concern about twenty three twenty four year
Speaker 1: old employees who are super woke effectively staging like a
Speaker 1: walkout and a coup and trashing what had been built
Speaker 1: by the owner over many, many years. I don't think
Speaker 1: people will understand that that's actually the dynamic that's playing
Speaker 1: out in a lot of these institutions, including legacy media institutions. Now, yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, this is a big This is a big,
Speaker 1: bigger and deeper discussion. But you know, and I sound
Speaker 1: like an old I'm gonna sound like an old man now,
Speaker 1: But in the old days when I started out, you know,
Speaker 1: I started at the Associated Press, working overnight, writing headlines
Speaker 1: and cut lines. Right, I didn't. No one gave me
Speaker 1: like a column when I was twenty two years old
Speaker 1: to start you spouting off on stuff. You have a
Speaker 1: lot of young people, I think, who haven't actually like
Speaker 1: reported on a story, or haven't gone through the steps
Speaker 1: to build up the confidence and the writing technique and
Speaker 1: the confidence in the sense that you can't be bullied.
Speaker 1: You can't. You know, it's easy to create an echo chamber,
Speaker 1: as Ben Rhodes day is, because you when you have
Speaker 1: peopleho aren't that educated on a topic or haven't been
Speaker 1: out there, are easily cowed. So there are a lot
Speaker 1: of problems with all of that. It's not like everyone
Speaker 1: is a communist who works there, even though what you're
Speaker 1: saying about woke people seems to be true and many
Speaker 1: legacy media places. But you also have just people aren't
Speaker 1: confident enough to have good opinions and to fight back,
Speaker 1: or to be contrarian or to be independent. And that's
Speaker 1: also a problem. Now, David, you I'm sure know about
Speaker 1: the Glenn Greenwald Walk out and you know, Glenn Greenwald,
Speaker 1: he's I will say this, he's an interesting character, and
Speaker 1: he he does stick to his guns on things when
Speaker 1: he's taking incoming, and I respect that. I think he's
Speaker 1: almost like comically wrong on a number of things, but
Speaker 1: that's okay. He would feel the same way. I'm sure
Speaker 1: about pretty much everything that I say. I think that
Speaker 1: he has very I think he has very poor judgment.
Speaker 1: And what's interesting to me is on the right, we
Speaker 1: have this impulse to say, oh, well, look, how we
Speaker 1: haven't you know, finally someone who's brave enough to speak
Speaker 1: out against, you know, what's going on at a left
Speaker 1: wing publication. But I just feel like this is what
Speaker 1: the left is now, and so anybody who turns around
Speaker 1: and says, wait a second, you're gonna censor me, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's what the left is. That the belief that the
Speaker 1: left is where journalism and speaking truth to power really
Speaker 1: happens is a fantasy. So it's very hard for me
Speaker 1: to feel a whole lot of sympathy. I mean, look,
Speaker 1: I feel human sympathy for anyone who loses their job
Speaker 1: at cleanse a millionaire, he's fine, But anybody sympathy I
Speaker 1: feel like this is who you guys are now, So yeah,
Speaker 1: of course they're gonna censor you because that's what the
Speaker 1: left is. Well yeah, I mean the journalists out there,
Speaker 1: media reporters at CNN, let's just say, are the leading
Speaker 1: proponents of censorship right now in American life. The journalism
Speaker 1: professors out there are the leading proponents of censorship in
Speaker 1: American life. These are the people who want to censor
Speaker 1: views they disagree with or that they find um, you know, ugly,
Speaker 1: And that is an incredible turnaround from what it used
Speaker 1: to be. So yeah, I mean that's right. I mean
Speaker 1: Glenn Greenwald, who I obviously disagree with on almost everything,
Speaker 1: you know, I still respect him. I mean, it's if
Speaker 1: you stand by your principles, it's something to respect, I mean.
Speaker 1: And what I like about him other than you know,
Speaker 1: the specifics about what he says, is that he's willing
Speaker 1: to challenge his own side, and you know, he's willing
Speaker 1: to take positions that will make him unpopular. So that's yeah.
Speaker 1: But I mean, listen, you're right, he's probably has a
Speaker 1: lot of money and it's not as a big a
Speaker 1: deal for him, which comes back to what I was
Speaker 1: saying before. If you're a young person who's making thirty
Speaker 1: thousand dollars or something. They're going to have a tough
Speaker 1: time being brave like Glenn Greenwald is brave. In fact,
Speaker 1: they won't be brave, and you can't really blame them, right,
Speaker 1: So that's a big problem. Yeah, we're speaking to David
Speaker 1: Harsani at National Review dot com. David, we're going into
Speaker 1: this election and it's fun to make all these predictions.
Speaker 1: It's almost a Catharsis now because we've got all this,
Speaker 1: you know, just the osmosis that occurs, all the incoming
Speaker 1: you have of you know, different ideas and who's right
Speaker 1: and what's going to happen, and it's just everywhere. Right,
Speaker 1: We're in this sea of election noise going into this
Speaker 1: What do you think really matters and what do you
Speaker 1: think is really going to happen. I just want to say,
Speaker 1: through the years, I've pretty much been right on every
Speaker 1: presidential election, you know, except last time I was very wrong.
Speaker 1: So I'm a little I'm gun shy on even like
Speaker 1: not making predictions, which I typically wouldn't do, but even
Speaker 1: saying what I think might happen, because, let me be
Speaker 1: honest with you, I read a story about how Biden's
Speaker 1: gonna have a landslode. I'm like, yeah, it seems like
Speaker 1: it definitely happened. Then I read about our Trump's gonna win,
Speaker 1: I'm like plausible, you know, like I could see the
Speaker 1: whole range of outcomes happening and all of that. But
Speaker 1: I will say that there are a lot of things
Speaker 1: that don't make sense to me when I look at
Speaker 1: the polls, especially national polls, and I look anecdotally admittedly
Speaker 1: to what's going on outside in America and how excited
Speaker 1: people are and the enthusiasm for Donald Trump, even in
Speaker 1: places like the suburbs of Maryland where I live, and
Speaker 1: the lack of excitement over Joe Biden. So I don't know,
Speaker 1: maybe there's a big silent majority out there who's going
Speaker 1: to vote for Biden. But I could easily see Trump.
Speaker 1: I mean, I should say I wouldn't be surprised if
Speaker 1: Trump win's Arizona in Pennsylvania and that's the election. I mean,
Speaker 1: I think I think Pennsylvania Obviously, I'm not saying anything,
Speaker 1: you know, really surprising here. I think every when's Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: is gonna win the election. And I just when I
Speaker 1: look at the polls and I look at the spreads.
Speaker 1: I think that can happen. But i'm because of coronavirus,
Speaker 1: because of everything that's going on, because of you know,
Speaker 1: what the media is doing right now. I don't trust
Speaker 1: posters that much either. Well, this is what I was
Speaker 1: gonna I want to ask you. I want to drill
Speaker 1: that. That That was what I was going to ask you, David.
Speaker 1: I swear I didn't give them the questions beforehand, folks,
Speaker 1: But what I was going to say is, given what
Speaker 1: we've seen from the media, where were their credibility? It's
Speaker 1: a joke, right, I mean CNN, Fake Tapper, Stelter, you know, Lament,
Speaker 1: the whole crew. It's it's preposterous. So they're not journalists.
Speaker 1: They should be. I really believe that in an honest world,
Speaker 1: they would just be getting checks from the Biden campaign
Speaker 1: at this point, Like I think that would be fair. Um,
Speaker 1: then that would be more honest. And we're told that
Speaker 1: fact checkers in the you know, the fact checking organizations,
Speaker 1: they're neutral arbiters, and then we just see fact check
Speaker 1: after fact check. That's laughable. It'll be you know, um,
Speaker 1: mostly true. Yes, Joe Biden did say he wanted to
Speaker 1: ban fracking comma. But you know Trump is orange Man
Speaker 1: bad and it's like, well, what is that has nothing
Speaker 1: to do it? Like they're laughable. Why do we think
Speaker 1: that polling companies, I know, they can't be wrong by
Speaker 1: that much because then that undermines so the same way
Speaker 1: that you know, CNN can't say that, you know, China
Speaker 1: invaded New York City yesterday, right, like there are some
Speaker 1: limitations on what even a propaganda outfit can do. But
Speaker 1: why do we think the same pressures that exist for
Speaker 1: fact checkers and for journalists don't exist for polling companies
Speaker 1: at some level on this one issue at this time
Speaker 1: of the Joe Biden election. Well, my friend Molly Hemingway
Speaker 1: was saying this yesterday. I think she's right that you'll
Speaker 1: see every presidential election right before you know, the last polls,
Speaker 1: everything will tighten so that they can be within the
Speaker 1: plausible you know, spread of saying that, well, you know
Speaker 1: we're pretty close. You know, they always come together. No
Speaker 1: one really very if you make definitive you know, definitive
Speaker 1: election predictions in that way, I don't know, I guess
Speaker 1: because posters who are right, I don't know. Actually, I
Speaker 1: think posters who are right, are respected and will be
Speaker 1: listened to and probably make more money right in the end.
Speaker 1: But even as I say that, I'm thinking to myself,
Speaker 1: most people just want posters who tell them what they
Speaker 1: want to hear. And so I don't know. I think, yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, who are the posters. Who are the posters
Speaker 1: who were so right in twenty sixteen that they, you know,
Speaker 1: made millions more dollars and you know everyone's I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm not saying they don't exist. I'm just saying I
Speaker 1: don't know who they are. Yeah, I mean I could.
Speaker 1: I feel like I could guess just as well as
Speaker 1: most posters. I mean, I would say Trump's gonna win Texas, right,
Speaker 1: I'll put that in the red I don't really even
Speaker 1: need to call anyone. But then I wonder, do I
Speaker 1: know that because of posters, or do I know that
Speaker 1: because of history. I find polling interesting because it tells
Speaker 1: me about trends. I look at a trajectory, right of
Speaker 1: how the line moves, I think that that is kind
Speaker 1: of interesting. But even that, when you look at the
Speaker 1: Pennsylvania poles from twenty sixteen, the trajectory is going up
Speaker 1: for Hillary the whole time, and like two weeks before
Speaker 1: it just slams down. And you see the same thing
Speaker 1: in Arizona right now with Biden. So what do polls?
Speaker 1: Why am I watching polls from months and months after end?
Speaker 1: It was really only the last week of polling matters
Speaker 1: at all. I don't know. I saw a story in
Speaker 1: Politico that you know that Democrats are kind of nervous
Speaker 1: right now because turnout it's not very high in Miami
Speaker 1: in places like that. I see Biden going to Michigan, Minnesota,
Speaker 1: and Wisconsin last week before an election where he's been
Speaker 1: in hiding for most of the time. I don't know.
Speaker 1: Maybe it means nothing, but it doesn't to me. That
Speaker 1: doesn't intimate that they think they're going to be blowing
Speaker 1: anyone out. All right, David, for the record, and we
Speaker 1: promise if you're wrong, we'll pretend this conversation didn't happen,
Speaker 1: although hundreds of thousands of people across America are going
Speaker 1: to hear it. Who's gonna win? No, man, I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna do it. Come on, come, onger, who do you
Speaker 1: think it's gonna I'm actually I'll say this, I'm probably
Speaker 1: gonna be completely wrong, but I'm more bullish on the
Speaker 1: Senate for Republicans. For some reason, I feel like they
Speaker 1: are going to pull it out in in in Iowa,
Speaker 1: and they will pull it out in North Carolina. And
Speaker 1: I think I see like a fifty one a seed
Speaker 1: majority for Republicans probably um. But with the presidency, I'm
Speaker 1: not sure. I think I think, yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 1: All right, he's officially I don't know. Oh, I've said
Speaker 1: it's gonna be Trump man, It's Trump. Trump's gonna win this. There.
Speaker 1: I'm I'm a believer. I'm a Trump leaver, all right.
Speaker 1: David Harsani everybody day. We'll have you back when we
Speaker 1: see what the final tally is. Here go check out
Speaker 1: his latest Nashview dot com. David, have a great weekend,
Speaker 1: you too, Thank you. You're in the Freedom Hud. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. I am out there,
Speaker 1: probably doing more than I should, but I'm always masked.
Speaker 1: And yesterday I had the some of the autoworkers who
Speaker 1: I thought, we're gonna go back to Joe Biden. We're
Speaker 1: very clear with me. Last night they were voting for
Speaker 1: President Trump. And I think what we're seeing now is
Speaker 1: that on the ground, people have to turn up their vote.
Speaker 1: As you noted, President Trump's coming back on Friday. My
Speaker 1: grapevine tells me he'll probably get back again before election day.
Speaker 1: Democrat Debbie Dingle. There, I had some autoworkers I thought
Speaker 1: we're gonna go for Biden told me they were going
Speaker 1: to vote for Trump last night. Yeah, I certainly hope
Speaker 1: it's a lot more of this. It would be. I
Speaker 1: want to get ahead of myself here, But oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: it would be so amazing if the Libs were all
Speaker 1: totally wrong about all this stuff again. Wouldn't it be
Speaker 1: so fun if, after they've been telling us for months
Speaker 1: Joe Biden's gonna win, look at how far ahead he
Speaker 1: is in the polls. It's like they've learned nothing from
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. It's like they want to relive that all
Speaker 1: over again and remember that that timeless meme of it's
Speaker 1: a young woman with a like a kind of a
Speaker 1: nit hat on with glasses who's screaming at the sky.
Speaker 1: And I will not try to recreate the scream, but
Speaker 1: it really felt like that was the that was the
Speaker 1: encapsulation of the entire Democrat mindset after the Trump victory
Speaker 1: the last time around. It's gonna be like that times
Speaker 1: a hundred this time, because they've thrown everything they've got
Speaker 1: at this and if Joe Biden can't beat Donald Trump
Speaker 1: in a once in a century pandemic year, the Democrats
Speaker 1: have got a problem. They got a problem. So I
Speaker 1: think the stakes for them emotionally as well as politically
Speaker 1: are incredibly high. And I also think that if we're
Speaker 1: looking for some of the early signs of why there
Speaker 1: may be some trouble here from their side of things,
Speaker 1: and I know there's some other there's some republic all
Speaker 1: you have to do, if you want to be nervous
Speaker 1: all weekend right now, is look at a lot of
Speaker 1: the polls. They're going to have Trump way behind in
Speaker 1: key states and in so many states that he can't win.
Speaker 1: But I don't believe that stuff. I think Trump's gonna win.
Speaker 1: And if you're looking for reasons that makes sense for
Speaker 1: why Trump could still win this thing, all you have
Speaker 1: to do is start looking at some of the some
Speaker 1: of the other data points and some of the anecdotal
Speaker 1: stuff that's coming up. And he even hears one from
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi because remember mail in voting, They were expecting
Speaker 1: that mail in voting was going to be there their savior.
Speaker 1: But why would Nancy Pelosi be telling people no, no no,
Speaker 1: go vote in person as well. I've got a theory
Speaker 1: on this. Play eight play clip eight mark. So again,
Speaker 1: this weekend shall be very interesting to see how many
Speaker 1: more people will vote in advance. I hope that people
Speaker 1: will not depend on the mail, because they have done
Speaker 1: all they can to just antel the postal system. But
Speaker 1: I salute our postal workers are letter carriers than those
Speaker 1: who are making the best of the situation. But even
Speaker 1: the Postal service is saying it's too late now to
Speaker 1: mail a first class piece of mail to take more
Speaker 1: than five or six days to get reach its destination.
Speaker 1: Is that speaks for itself. Trump dis mailed the postal
Speaker 1: service that's alive, and Nancy still tells that lie because
Speaker 1: she doesn't care about the truth. I don't know, maybe
Speaker 1: I'm reading into the tea leaves here a little too much,
Speaker 1: but I do think that they don't like the in
Speaker 1: some of the key places. I'm sure the mail in
Speaker 1: voting in California is, you know, completely through the roof
Speaker 1: and everything, but I feel like it's some of these
Speaker 1: other places they're not seeing the the early numbers they
Speaker 1: want to see. Maybe I'm just gonna tell myself that
Speaker 1: so I can get a good night's sleep this week
Speaker 1: and I'll not worry too much about the selection. But
Speaker 1: you know what, all folks, we're all gonna get a
Speaker 1: good nights sleep. To my matter what, We're gonna make
Speaker 1: it through one way or the other will be all right,
Speaker 1: because we're not a bunch of lib whimps that are
Speaker 1: gonna cry for Karry doesn't win whatever, We'll be all right.
Speaker 1: But Trump's gonna win. Thanks for listening to the bus
Speaker 1: seson show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, if
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcasts. The
Speaker 1: show ain't over yet, folks, keeping it real, It's time
Speaker 1: for roll call Facebook dot com, slash Buck Sexton if
Speaker 1: you want to send us your roll call thoughts, or
Speaker 1: team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com if you'd like to
Speaker 1: email them on the gram the Instagram, that is. You
Speaker 1: should be first of all following me Buck sex and
Speaker 1: please and if not for my political political wit and wisdom,
Speaker 1: then for the Telula photos. The just proliferation of Telula
Speaker 1: photos because she's such a cute little French bulldog and uh, yes,
Speaker 1: let's get to a roll call here at the moment.
Speaker 1: But I always like to check in on the man
Speaker 1: behind the scenes, you know, the man behind the guy
Speaker 1: making the things happen. Producer Mark. Uh, sir, how what's
Speaker 1: what's going on with the weekend? And exciting for you
Speaker 1: and missus? Mark? Just kind of arresting and approaching the
Speaker 1: week ahead as we go, aware the next week is
Speaker 1: going to be like faster, producer Mark, faster, yea more
Speaker 1: and more. I'm aware. That's why I'm just gonna have
Speaker 1: a RESTful weekend, watch some football, let's hit what's the like?
Speaker 1: You you have time to plan it out and you
Speaker 1: can you can have let's say, do take out any food?
Speaker 1: What is that when when you're like, I'm going all
Speaker 1: in and I'm gonna just tear it up with takeout,
Speaker 1: Like I don't care about anything other than the maximum indulgence.
Speaker 1: What's your go to? You'll probably be surprised by this,
Speaker 1: but I love Greek takeout. You can't replicate it at
Speaker 1: home very well. I absolutely love it. Oh. I lived
Speaker 1: in Greece for about six six or eight weeks um
Speaker 1: long time ago. When I was in college over the summer,
Speaker 1: and I pretty much lived on I really didn't have
Speaker 1: any any money at the time, and I pretty much
Speaker 1: lived on hiros, which people refer to here as gyros, yes,
Speaker 1: but in Greece they call them hiros. Uh. There. I
Speaker 1: mean it's it's like warm, delicious bread which I used
Speaker 1: to be able to eat, of course, wrapped with like
Speaker 1: the sliced meat from I don't even know what you
Speaker 1: call it, like the sliced meat from the big spinning
Speaker 1: meat cone. It's usually lamb. Yeah, no, but I know
Speaker 1: I mean that, I mean what I mean what the
Speaker 1: Greek word for it is um. It's schwerma is what
Speaker 1: you call it in um in Arab and Arabic, in
Speaker 1: like Lebanese and Near Eastern cuisine. But the see, this
Speaker 1: is what happens. We finished the show that I'm hungry,
Speaker 1: and then they would take French fries, a little bit
Speaker 1: of of a tomato and lettuce shredded, and then French
Speaker 1: fries stuffed in to this like hot bun. They put
Speaker 1: it in, and then they put a big thing of
Speaker 1: Greek yogurt, like a big dollup of Greek yogurt sauce. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's eky sauce, and it's so good. It's so good,
Speaker 1: I tell you, it's like, Oh, it's a great regional cuisite, Sawich.
Speaker 1: I'm actually thinking about Greek. Is that your go to? Yes,
Speaker 1: that would be that and some lemon potatoes or some rice,
Speaker 1: the pea bread. I go for suvlaki, which is the chunks.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, I love it. All right, all right, Well,
Speaker 1: hopefully you'll get some of that this weekend. Buddy, you
Speaker 1: gotta stock up. Hope next next week you're going to
Speaker 1: be stuff in a hot pocket in your mouth. While
Speaker 1: I'm saying, Mark, it's coming down to two states, so
Speaker 1: I get ready for it. I'm very excited, very exciting stuff.
Speaker 1: Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton for our rollcall first
Speaker 1: up here and Matt oh and please go to Bucksexton
Speaker 1: dot com. We got stories posted there now every day noon.
Speaker 1: Improved site Bucksexen dot com. Uh, we got to be
Speaker 1: pushing it more. I want you go into it, check
Speaker 1: it out. I'm writing an editorial this weekend. It'll be
Speaker 1: posted on Monday on Bucksexton dot com. So we're gonna
Speaker 1: make sure that that's more a part of what what
Speaker 1: we're doing. What you're seeing here. So that's that's where
Speaker 1: I want things to be. I mean, like, for example,
Speaker 1: right now, if you were to go to bucksexton dot com,
Speaker 1: you would see stories and it's a lot of its
Speaker 1: stuff that I cover here in radio, but it gives
Speaker 1: you the written in depth with some of the links
Speaker 1: and some of the background. So Bucksexen dot com is
Speaker 1: going to become our one stop shop for all things
Speaker 1: freedom hunt. But you know here we got Bobolynsky question
Speaker 1: by FBI as material witness in an ongoing investigation on
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden. That's on Bucksexen dot com right now, so
Speaker 1: please do go check out that story. And like I said,
Speaker 1: there'll be more and more stuff there all the time.
Speaker 1: And here we are, we've got Matt first up your buck.
Speaker 1: Right now, I'm reading The Devil and Call Marks by
Speaker 1: Professor Paul Kengor. It is an excellently detailed deep dive
Speaker 1: into Marks and other leaders that followed his ideology. As
Speaker 1: a bonus, the brief forward is by our own dear
Speaker 1: Michael Knowles. My question to you is how is it
Speaker 1: possible the average random Marxist, as in someone with no
Speaker 1: political power, just to lame Rando can't see that Marxism, Communism, etc.
Speaker 1: Are literally just exploitation of the worker in order to
Speaker 1: give power to the state. It's right there in Marks
Speaker 1: and Angle's ten point plan. Furthermore, how can they quibble
Speaker 1: over Marks's intentions with private property when again they're right
Speaker 1: there in black and white. I think blind denial and
Speaker 1: communism go hand in hand. Thank you so much for
Speaker 1: your great work with producer Mark. I learned so much
Speaker 1: every day from you, guys. I pass the buck when
Speaker 1: I can shield's eye. Well, Matt, thank you so much
Speaker 1: for your support and for your very kind note. And
Speaker 1: I would say this about Mark. First of all, most
Speaker 1: of the people that are Marxists in America wouldn't agree
Speaker 1: that they're Marxists. They don't even really know what their
Speaker 1: belief system, what their ideology is. They just know who
Speaker 1: they oppose. Right now, they oppose Trump, but in other
Speaker 1: contexts it's about what they're against much more than what
Speaker 1: they're for. And what they're for is usually a very
Speaker 1: broad slew of concepts that fall under the Marxiste umbrella.
Speaker 1: But they don't understand the philosophy. They certainly don't understand
Speaker 1: the history of Marks and Angles and the rise of
Speaker 1: socialist systems and socialist ideology around the world. They just
Speaker 1: don't know. But remember, socialism is really more a religion
Speaker 1: than an ideology of economics, because ultimately it's all rooted
Speaker 1: in what is good for the collective and who's determining
Speaker 1: what is good the people who are running the socialists system,
Speaker 1: right the priests within the socialist system, so to speak.
Speaker 1: And it also is contrary to human nature. It is
Speaker 1: all rests upon a belief that if human beings do
Speaker 1: not benefit from putting themselves to the discomfort of additional
Speaker 1: labor and stress and effort, they will continue as if
Speaker 1: they were being rewarded for those things because it's for
Speaker 1: the good of the collective. That's not how human beings think.
Speaker 1: That's not how nature works. That's not how this functions.
Speaker 1: So yeah, there, there you have it. That's not how
Speaker 1: we are. I mean, in a state of nature, someone's
Speaker 1: gonna be like ants, Buck, what about ants? They'll die
Speaker 1: to protect the queen. People watch a lot of those
Speaker 1: nature shows. Eric, in the spirit of hope and debate,
Speaker 1: I thought i'd share a brief bit of light on
Speaker 1: this date of FedEx and ups. I work for logistics
Speaker 1: company and manage probably twenty partial carrier shipments per day.
Speaker 1: Along with other modes. Currently, FedEx Ground and UPS ground
Speaker 1: services are losing shipments at a rate of two or
Speaker 1: three per week. Issues include boxes being delivered without their contents,
Speaker 1: case open contents fell out, FedEx tape, tapes them back
Speaker 1: up and delivers them. The contents fall out and they
Speaker 1: notify us the contents the packages are missing, the shipping
Speaker 1: goes missing completely and tracking update stop at random note
Speaker 1: in the system, or the shipment goes missing for a
Speaker 1: month and then shows up at the shipper. Had Tucker
Speaker 1: consulted me, I would have told him, I'm making a
Speaker 1: copy in handling the original, handing the original to a
Speaker 1: trusted person, and flying the copy out to LA. Why
Speaker 1: would you send the originals via FedEx or UPS a
Speaker 1: plane ticket from lad New York Because about two hundred
Speaker 1: bucks right now, more than shipping VA FedEx first class.
Speaker 1: So a few things. Because we had updates on this
Speaker 1: eric that came in late last night and I did
Speaker 1: not include on this show. They found the contents of
Speaker 1: that Tucker Biden documents package, and Tucker did an update
Speaker 1: last night on his show about it, and it seemed
Speaker 1: it seemed like where we left this is they found it,
Speaker 1: but then the company wouldn't say how this disappeared. And
Speaker 1: then beyond that, another layer to add into all of
Speaker 1: this is that a Tucker and his team did make
Speaker 1: xeroxes or they didn't have copies, because that just felt like, okay, well,
Speaker 1: how could you know? I mean, come on, right, if
Speaker 1: someone gives you documents of that effective perhaps a presidential election,
Speaker 1: I mean, you're gonna make xeroxes. They did make xeroxes.
Speaker 1: So it was really just more about what our friend
Speaker 1: ned Ryan said, which is the belief that perhaps somebody
Speaker 1: was monitoring communications either at Fox or with Tucker. And
Speaker 1: that's a scary thought. Now, is that what really happened?
Speaker 1: It seems like maybe this just was a thing that occurred,
Speaker 1: and I don't know, but it did. It did smell fishy.
Speaker 1: It smelled fishy, And all you have to do is
Speaker 1: leave some scrat out on the table for a few
Speaker 1: days and you're gonna be saying, what's that funky smell? Chris?
Speaker 1: Hey there, Buck, Hey there, Buck read the English book.
Speaker 1: I just want to drop a line and say, I
Speaker 1: really enjoy the real Dracula Shields High podcast. Thanks for
Speaker 1: doing it, keep them coming, and thanks for continually doing
Speaker 1: what you do. Shields High Well, Chris, thank you appreciate
Speaker 1: your writing in the best thing you could do, though,
Speaker 1: is get five friends to listen to the Shields High
Speaker 1: Podcasts of Dracula. Be like, yo, you should just listen
Speaker 1: to this. Even if you're not into you don't have
Speaker 1: to say yo, but even if you're not into podcasts
Speaker 1: in general, or you don't listen to talk radio, it's
Speaker 1: just like a like a fun thing to put on
Speaker 1: in the background while you're doing some work or you're
Speaker 1: you're you know, I don't know. I was gonna say
Speaker 1: folding laundry or cleaning up the kitchen and impaling someone.
Speaker 1: Impaling someone, Yeah, I mean, at least you'd be like,
Speaker 1: I'm not the only one. Look at how many people
Speaker 1: of lad impaled back in the day, which I still
Speaker 1: don't even I describe the mechanics of impalement. It feels
Speaker 1: like it feels like a lot of work. I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna say, you got a hoist, say you stick the
Speaker 1: spear through somebody, and they're different entree points from Helmemt.
Speaker 1: We don't have to get into that on the National
Speaker 1: Show right now. But you stick this spear through somebody
Speaker 1: and then you flip them up, so they're kind of
Speaker 1: like a human kebab. Now we're talking about food again.
Speaker 1: And and this was a common practice in this part
Speaker 1: of you know, in this part of the world that
Speaker 1: in the Ottoman Empire, they think it comes from the
Speaker 1: Asian steps, so from the nomadic horse people, similar to
Speaker 1: what they have with the Mongols. That was where it
Speaker 1: was first practiced because they were they were fans of
Speaker 1: really horrific punishments, not only as deterrence for people because
Speaker 1: of how painful and horrible they were, but also because
Speaker 1: of the symbolism that they would then have of a
Speaker 1: human being stuck through and elevated up in the air,
Speaker 1: you know, in Agony on this pole on the spear.
Speaker 1: But I'm just saying, it feels like it'd be a
Speaker 1: lot of work. I mean, in Dracula and Pale, thousands
Speaker 1: of people, that's that's a lot of Now he wasn't
Speaker 1: new it in himself, but he was ordering people to
Speaker 1: do it, and you know they are easier ways. I mean,
Speaker 1: I kind of understand why they went with the guillotine
Speaker 1: after all, and this is a very maccabre discussion. But
Speaker 1: all right, um, skipping past crazy town here, Josh conservatives
Speaker 1: a conservative media, and he just started beating the drum
Speaker 1: about him peaching Biden on day one of his presidency.
Speaker 1: At presidency should he win the election, leftist must live
Speaker 1: by the rules they've created. Well, Josh, I don't know, man,
Speaker 1: I can't even I can't even bring myself to think
Speaker 1: right now about what we're gonna do if Biden wins.
Speaker 1: I you know, we'll be okay. I don't mean that.
Speaker 1: I just mean I don't have the mental energy to
Speaker 1: get into how we're gonna be flipping and be the
Speaker 1: hashtag resistance all of a sudden. You know, we gotta
Speaker 1: see oh he guys, yeah, it goes. But yeah, I mean,
Speaker 1: even now I'm peaching Biden, I don't know do we
Speaker 1: want to do? Do we What does that really accomplished?
Speaker 1: We're not going to remove him from office. We're gonna
Speaker 1: try to use their tactics against them, well to what end?
Speaker 1: And we don't want to just be no better than them.
Speaker 1: So that's always a consideration, I think with all of
Speaker 1: this too. Anyway, Josh, right, Oh, nope, that was Josh Glenn.
Speaker 1: Hey Buck, I'm from Massachusetts and I always vote in
Speaker 1: personal election day. This year I had no choice but
Speaker 1: to vote early. I found that you will fill out
Speaker 1: the ballot, put it in an envelope and seal it,
Speaker 1: and they hold it until election day when they'll open
Speaker 1: it and someone will put it in the machine for you.
Speaker 1: In a blue state like Massachusetts, should I be concerned
Speaker 1: that they can easily see my vote and discard it
Speaker 1: if they want to love the show? Keep up the
Speaker 1: good work, Glenn, I don't think you should be concerned
Speaker 1: about that, But I mean, I don't know it's gonna
Speaker 1: tell you the truth, I don't know, I mean, probably
Speaker 1: won't happen. Does somebody really want to risk maybe going
Speaker 1: to prison to get rid of your ballot? Now, the
Speaker 1: answer is not. Nobody would ever do that. But I
Speaker 1: think I think very very few people would do that.
Speaker 1: Even even some pretty crazy Democrats would realize that that's
Speaker 1: just not a especially in Massachusetts. My friend, Remember it's
Speaker 1: massachuse it's going blue. I hate to be the bearer
Speaker 1: of bad news here, but Massachusetts is going blue, and
Speaker 1: there's so much of it, like Massachusetts is in other
Speaker 1: these places. There's so much about it I love. And
Speaker 1: then there's its politics, and I just want to have
Speaker 1: a sit down with everybody Massachusetts and be like, why
Speaker 1: are you driving your card of Vota Democrats? You're in
Speaker 1: the Freedom Heart. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast
Speaker 1: More rot Call And let me just say that The
Speaker 1: Mandalorian season two is out this weekend and I'm excited.
Speaker 1: We're watching that. So good, so good, And I like
Speaker 1: my show Barbaron there's a German shop about the barbarians
Speaker 1: who are German. Believe it's a nuts so like, oh,
Speaker 1: excuse me, ancient Rome, why are you showing up here
Speaker 1: and trying to cut off all of our heads unless
Speaker 1: we do all these things for you, we don't like
Speaker 1: this and then you'll have to. Really, it's all of
Speaker 1: it's the subtitles, so the yelling at each other AND's
Speaker 1: a German like ash snell blah blah and all this stuff,
Speaker 1: and you're like, oh, that's so much more believable. Is
Speaker 1: that the German barbarians actually speaking the German back in
Speaker 1: the first century BC or a D or whenever. This
Speaker 1: is so yeah, there you go. All right. Those are
Speaker 1: my two shows for the Weekend Barbarians and Mandalorian season two.
Speaker 1: I just I'm really hoping they don't. Mandalorian season one
Speaker 1: was so good that there's a part of me that
Speaker 1: worries that it will be kind of like True Detective,
Speaker 1: which was amazing in season one, and in season two
Speaker 1: it was like they were just sticking a red hot
Speaker 1: poker in the center of my brain. It was so bad.
Speaker 1: So we'll see Peter's up here, he'd says. Buck Mark
Speaker 1: deserves a pay raise. Thank you both for producing the
Speaker 1: most intelligent podcast in downloading a most entertaining and intelligent
Speaker 1: love impersonations. Your cuomo is over the top. You need
Speaker 1: to roll out some extra Hillary before a Halloween treck
Speaker 1: a treat. As an aside from the documentary The Boy
Speaker 1: in the Plastic Bubble, check that one out. It's about
Speaker 1: a young boy in the nineteen seventies who was diagnosed
Speaker 1: with a rare immune disorder. He spent his entire life
Speaker 1: within the confines of a pressure sealed plastic enclosure, cut
Speaker 1: off from direct contact with other humans, who was only
Speaker 1: allowed outside wearing a pressure ized spacesuit. He died before
Speaker 1: his thirteenth birthday. Medical intervention kept him alive but cut
Speaker 1: off from life, and I have to imagine he was
Speaker 1: pretty miserable. I think medical science has basically adopted this
Speaker 1: approach as a model for combating COVID. Again. Love your show,
Speaker 1: Keep calm, carry on. Thank you so much, Thank you
Speaker 1: so much. Tyler writes, Hey Buck, I'm a multiple time
Speaker 1: film that has spent most of my adult life and
Speaker 1: never been partial any political party. I spent a lot
Speaker 1: of time opposing police and authorities vall swords. For the
Speaker 1: last few years, Trump has been a huge part of
Speaker 1: my daily life and I stumbled across your show and
Speaker 1: has been the soundtrack to every work morning. People like
Speaker 1: you and producer Mark have helped me see how insane
Speaker 1: I was taking from our amazing country instead of pushing
Speaker 1: for the best I can do to help improve the
Speaker 1: life of others. Thank you for exposing the truth and
Speaker 1: you're sharing your impeccable impressonations. I am especially like joy
Speaker 1: be ha hilarious, Keep on, keeping on and shields high.
Speaker 1: Hey man, Tyler, that's inspirational. Man. Good for you, God
Speaker 1: bless stay in the fight, never too late to turn
Speaker 1: things around and become the person you've always been meant
Speaker 1: to be. And it sounds like you've done exactly that,
Speaker 1: So God bless high five everybody rest up this weekend
Speaker 1: Shields high