Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. The war of words
Speaker 1: between Trump and the squad continues on CNN. Puts a
Speaker 1: white nationalist on TV just so he can attack Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: Ilhan Omar doesn't exactly apologize for her anti Semitism, and
Speaker 1: a bunch of Republican women explain to a CNN journalist
Speaker 1: what Trump means and leaves her speechless. Not a Moore
Speaker 1: coming up on the Buck Sexton Show. Bucks SEXTONSI decoding
Speaker 1: the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make no
Speaker 1: mistake American Great, You're a great American again. This is
Speaker 1: the Bucks Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts, Remember I can
Speaker 1: speak for three hours without a phone call. Try doing
Speaker 1: that sometimes it is buck Sexton and its states is
Speaker 1: running concentration camps on our southern quarder never again mean something.
Speaker 1: If this organization is as fascist as you have called it,
Speaker 1: you have said it's fascist, then why don't you adopt
Speaker 1: the stamps to eliminate it. Your colleague who was at
Speaker 1: the border with you, compare the facilities to a concentration camp.
Speaker 1: Do you agree with that comparison? Absolutely? No. Will say
Speaker 1: the lights and let you go. Wait. Well, playing the
Speaker 1: fire a car in the parking lot was torched. An
Speaker 1: invest airsay the suspect for flares at appropwate tank client
Speaker 1: that they could explode. They took down an American flag
Speaker 1: and a Colorado state flag and instead, you see in
Speaker 1: some of this video, they raised a Mexican flag. Will
Speaker 1: you condemn the antifat tack in Washington over the weekend?
Speaker 1: Will you condemn Antifa for the attack in Washington? Welcome
Speaker 1: to the Buck Sexton Show. Leftism running amuck. That's what
Speaker 1: we got going on across the country. And now you
Speaker 1: know it, I know it. That's what we have here
Speaker 1: with these various spats between members of Congress and the president,
Speaker 1: and the media and the president that the radical left
Speaker 1: has got some got some problems here, folks. One of
Speaker 1: them is that they can't run against Trump on his record.
Speaker 1: They can't do it. There's no record to run against.
Speaker 1: What are they gonna say? Stop with the stop with
Speaker 1: the low unemployment numbers, stop with all the economic growth,
Speaker 1: the GDP numbers, the winning against China so far in
Speaker 1: this trade war, the not starting a major war unlike
Speaker 1: your two predecessors. Really you're well, actually you're I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't know how far back at the go. If
Speaker 1: we're really gonna talk about not starting a war as
Speaker 1: a president, you gotta go back quite away, folks. Clinton
Speaker 1: had his military adventures in Eastern Europe, George hw had
Speaker 1: Persian Gulf War one. You know you got you gotta
Speaker 1: go back to Reagan. Really, So here we are. Here,
Speaker 1: we are now with the Democrats showing us who they are.
Speaker 1: And the problem that they're going to face is I
Speaker 1: don't think they can walk away from this. I don't
Speaker 1: know how they're going to be able to walk this back.
Speaker 1: Pelosi has got to be on edge because she's smart
Speaker 1: enough to know, she's savvy enough. Dare I say it
Speaker 1: to understand that this left wing lunacy that has overtaken
Speaker 1: her party is a loser come twenty twenty. That AOC
Speaker 1: may play pretty well in a very liberal queen's congressional district,
Speaker 1: but that doesn't mean that the rest of the country,
Speaker 1: in any way, shape or form, wants to be taken
Speaker 1: down the pathway of AOC's policies. So what does Pelosi
Speaker 1: do Well, they have this vote, this condemnation vote the House,
Speaker 1: but are yesterday two hundred and forty to one hundred
Speaker 1: and eighty seven for a non binding resolution that says
Speaker 1: the Chamber strongly condemns Trump's racist comments that have legitimized
Speaker 1: and increased fear and hatred of New Americans and people
Speaker 1: of color. You know what you're going to see in
Speaker 1: the next few days that were willing to bet nonsense,
Speaker 1: nonsense stories out there about how the president, the president's
Speaker 1: rhetoric has incited all kinds of hate crimes, and they'll
Speaker 1: say there's been a spike in hate crimes under Trump.
Speaker 1: And then if you read the fine print and look
Speaker 1: at the FBI data, what you'll find is that there
Speaker 1: really isn't a spike at all. That the spike that exists,
Speaker 1: most likely, if there is anything, is against Jews in
Speaker 1: particularly major cities, and those anti Semitic tacks tend to
Speaker 1: come from Oh that's right, not right wing white nationalist,
Speaker 1: but from minorities who are anti Semitic. But they'll lie
Speaker 1: about it. They'll say there's a spike in hate crimes
Speaker 1: and it's terrible things happening all because of Trump, because
Speaker 1: they have to run against Trump as a social indicator
Speaker 1: of who you are. Oh, if you vote for Trump,
Speaker 1: you're a bad person. Oh, if you vote for Trump,
Speaker 1: you're a racist because if it's oh, you vote for
Speaker 1: Trump because he's not good at the job. A lot
Speaker 1: of people who just want a president that is in
Speaker 1: a sense transactional, that is the CEO of the United
Speaker 1: States government, not that is some make believe superhero that's
Speaker 1: going to save us from the rise of the seas
Speaker 1: and all the other stuff that Obama said. Running against
Speaker 1: Trump on his record won't work. It's not going to work,
Speaker 1: and they must know that, so they're stepping this stuff up.
Speaker 1: But there's also and that's why with the with that
Speaker 1: rnc AD we started the show off with tells you
Speaker 1: what the reason it's so effective is you can see
Speaker 1: that there's a there's a ferocity, there's a desperation in
Speaker 1: what they are, what they're trying to accomplish now, and
Speaker 1: what they're willing to say, what they want to do.
Speaker 1: And I thought this was really interesting where you had
Speaker 1: Rashida to leib and it's not just directed all a
Speaker 1: Trump though. I mean, you really can tell that the radicals,
Speaker 1: the Democrat Jacobins, they really do think that they also
Speaker 1: need to keep the old Lady Pelosi in line a
Speaker 1: little bit too. I mean, this was a stunning thing
Speaker 1: for a Democrat member, a freshman Democrat member of Congress
Speaker 1: to say about the Speaker of the House. But here's
Speaker 1: what Rashida to Leib said about Nancy Pelosi play fourteen keef. Sorry,
Speaker 1: but shouldn't it be a face to face No, I'm
Speaker 1: very protective with all due respect, she doesn't need protection.
Speaker 1: I want to know if you are the new member,
Speaker 1: not the speaker. No one has every right to sit
Speaker 1: down with her in any moment, anytime, with any of us. Yeah,
Speaker 1: she is Speaker of the House. She can ask f
Speaker 1: am meeting to sit down with us for clarification. The
Speaker 1: fact of the knowledge is, and I've done racial justice
Speaker 1: work in our country for a long time, acknowledge effect
Speaker 1: that we are women of color. So when you do
Speaker 1: singles out, be aware of that and what you're doing,
Speaker 1: especially because some of us are getting death resk. Wow,
Speaker 1: what does it feel like, Pelosi? You got a freshman
Speaker 1: Democrat Rashida Talib and the rest of the squad here
Speaker 1: saying that when you criticize us, you're effectively putting our
Speaker 1: lives in danger because we are women of color. Oh well,
Speaker 1: that's how do you get around that standard, then how
Speaker 1: do you have a debate with these women or how
Speaker 1: do you publicly rebuke them and not get labeled not
Speaker 1: just in this case, kind of racist, but also that
Speaker 1: you are endangering their lives due to your racism. Is
Speaker 1: this is not make believes that this is not faking it.
Speaker 1: There is a real animus here toward Pelosi, and you
Speaker 1: have to wonder why is that? What is it about Nancy?
Speaker 1: What is about Nancy Pelosi that the squad dislikes so much?
Speaker 1: She has been a progressive Democrat since before they were born?
Speaker 1: Why all of this throwing Pelosi under the bus and say,
Speaker 1: here I am it sounds like I'm defending Nancy Pelosi.
Speaker 1: But why do they take this tone? Why would they
Speaker 1: say about the most powerful woman in the United States government,
Speaker 1: which is what Nancy Pelosi is right now, whether you
Speaker 1: like it or not, that's the truth. Why would they
Speaker 1: take the position then she's a racist who's endangering their lives.
Speaker 1: They're not saying it explicitly, but that is the implication
Speaker 1: of their words. That is what they're saying. I'll leave
Speaker 1: it to you to fill in the blanks here on
Speaker 1: what what is it about Nancy Pelosi? That bothers them
Speaker 1: so much. There's a lot of answers we could throw out,
Speaker 1: but there are some that certainly come to mind. And
Speaker 1: that same ploy that will be that is being used
Speaker 1: against Trump. Oh it's you know, he's a racist, so
Speaker 1: you can vote for him. We're seeing this now with
Speaker 1: Democrat on Democrat friendly fire, so to speak. You can't
Speaker 1: speak out against the so called squad of congresswomen without
Speaker 1: if you, if you happen to be not a person
Speaker 1: of color, without subjecting yourself to the allegation that you're
Speaker 1: being a racist. And this is this is one of
Speaker 1: the what they forget. One of the reasons that Trump
Speaker 1: got elected is that we are all sick of people
Speaker 1: throwing the term racist around when it's not true. American
Speaker 1: society is tired of it. All the people who don't
Speaker 1: do that are sick of it. The people do it
Speaker 1: like it because they think they sound smart and cool
Speaker 1: and they're you know, righteous, But the rest of us
Speaker 1: look at this and say, this is just disgusting and
Speaker 1: it has to stop. And the Democrats are finally you know,
Speaker 1: getting a little bit of their own of their own
Speaker 1: medicine on this one isn't going to change their behavior.
Speaker 1: But excuse me if I don't allow myself a little schadenfreude,
Speaker 1: a little enjoyment at at Pelosi's pain here. But the whole,
Speaker 1: the whole opposition of Trump has gone from he's a
Speaker 1: trader working for the Russians. Do oh, he's a racist,
Speaker 1: just like that, almost like the Democratic Party, the media
Speaker 1: working concert and this was this was a plan all along.
Speaker 1: What is the dumbest thing that the left has gotten
Speaker 1: upset about in recent months. I mean, there's a lot,
Speaker 1: there's a lot to choose from. You have the Betsy
Speaker 1: Ross flag on sneakers. Colin Kaepernick said, note to that.
Speaker 1: You had Donald Trump as president the United States having
Speaker 1: a hatriotic rally on the fourth of July on the
Speaker 1: mall where there was, oh my gosh, a military flyover
Speaker 1: and some tanks in a procession. I think they were
Speaker 1: armored personnel carriers too. People completely freaked out about that. Oh,
Speaker 1: if you say that men cannot get pregnant, now you're
Speaker 1: a bad person. That's another one. I'm not sure you'll
Speaker 1: get banned from social media quite yet for that, but
Speaker 1: it is definitely a possibility that were you to say
Speaker 1: that men cannot get pregnant, you will be in all
Speaker 1: kinds of trouble with the left wing mob. But this
Speaker 1: may be the dumbest of all. It's tough, it's a
Speaker 1: close call. But of the stupidest things that the left
Speaker 1: have gotten upset about in recent days, the Chris Pratt
Speaker 1: T shirt scandal of twenty nineteen has got to be
Speaker 1: high up on the list. We have reached peak left
Speaker 1: wing stupidity. I think I don't know if they can
Speaker 1: get any dumber or if they can get any crazier.
Speaker 1: So if you don't know who Chris Pratt is, he
Speaker 1: is the guy from Guardians. He's the lead leading man
Speaker 1: from Guardians of the Galaxy. He's also well known for
Speaker 1: being on the show Parks and Wreck, which has an
Speaker 1: actor that some people say kind of looks like me.
Speaker 1: I say, no, if I look like anyone, I look
Speaker 1: like Ron Swanson, even though I don't have a mustache.
Speaker 1: But the guy's got great hair and he loves America
Speaker 1: and freedom. But Chris Pratt's become a pretty well known actor.
Speaker 1: He's also in he was in Zero Dark thirty anyway,
Speaker 1: so he's kind of become big time. Oh in the
Speaker 1: Jurassic Park movies, the recent ones which are garbage, unwatchable garbage.
Speaker 1: But don't mean to splow that for you. So what
Speaker 1: did he do? What did he wear? Did he wear
Speaker 1: a T shirt with profanity on it? Was he seen
Speaker 1: in public with a T shirt with oh, I don't know,
Speaker 1: some kind of hateful language. Nope, he had a Gadsden
Speaker 1: flag T shirt. That's right now. A Gadsden flag will
Speaker 1: get you in trouble on social media, and people will
Speaker 1: want you to face consequences, and they'll threaten to call
Speaker 1: your sponsors and all kinds of bad, bad things will happen.
Speaker 1: Don't tread on me. Remember the Gadson flag with the
Speaker 1: coil with a coiled rattlesnake on a what looks like
Speaker 1: an American flag early version of the American flag. Right.
Speaker 1: Christopher Gadsden was a brigadier general in the Continental Army.
Speaker 1: Born in Charleston. Lovely city that I think about relocating too. Sometimes.
Speaker 1: It'd be on my layby, on my top five off
Speaker 1: if I leave New York. Charleston's definitely a place I'd
Speaker 1: consider moving to. But the Gadsden flag in recent years
Speaker 1: has been used by the US men's soccer team by Metallica.
Speaker 1: It was prominently displayed in different ways when I was
Speaker 1: at the Blaze. Libertarians are fond of it. The Tea
Speaker 1: Party used it a lot. People that defend the Second
Speaker 1: Amendment like it. But according to the quote Equal Opportunity,
Speaker 1: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission of the US, it is also
Speaker 1: sometimes interpreted to convey racially tens messages in some contexts
Speaker 1: end quote and people went on to say, uh that
Speaker 1: that this is that this has been adopted, that the
Speaker 1: gazon flag has been adopted by white nationalists. At some point,
Speaker 1: we've gotten so stupid that that if someone sees a
Speaker 1: white nationalist walking around wearing a white T shirt, we're
Speaker 1: going to see someone say, oh, my gosh, did you
Speaker 1: see this other guy who you know was a famous
Speaker 1: person who was walking around with a white T shirt on,
Speaker 1: just like that white nationalist wears. I mean, how much
Speaker 1: dumber can this get before the left is embarrassed by
Speaker 1: its own stupidity. Maybe they're not, Maybe it is not
Speaker 1: possible for them to be embarrassed by their own stupidity.
Speaker 1: Maybe they're so in love with themselves and so delusional
Speaker 1: about how great they are that they really think that
Speaker 1: even when they say things that a first grader knows
Speaker 1: make no sense, they shouldn't back down from it. If
Speaker 1: the Gadsden flag, which has absolutely no specific connotation of
Speaker 1: racism or anything having to you know, has nothing to
Speaker 1: do with white nationalists, It is just something from American history.
Speaker 1: If that is racist, the White House is racist. Oh,
Speaker 1: that's right. The Washington Post wrote something about that. They
Speaker 1: wrote a headline this past week, the White that Donald
Speaker 1: Trump said something racist in the White House comma which
Speaker 1: was built by slaves? What does what does that have
Speaker 1: to do with anything from that news cycle? I mean,
Speaker 1: this is you know, I have to wonder, at what point,
Speaker 1: if you're walking around with a one dollar bill, are
Speaker 1: you carrying an emblem of white supremacy because George Washington enslaves.
Speaker 1: Where does this end? What are the I have to
Speaker 1: keep asking this question, what are the outer reaches of
Speaker 1: left wing stupidity here? At what point have they just
Speaker 1: become so obtuse and so worked up over nothing that
Speaker 1: they exhaust themselves? I don't know. Maybe we never reach
Speaker 1: that point. Maybe there is no stage at which the
Speaker 1: left is honest enough and self aware enough that they
Speaker 1: stop flipping out over things that no normal person would
Speaker 1: ever flip out over don't tread on me as not
Speaker 1: a white nationalist symbol. It's just not. We all know this.
Speaker 1: Everybody knows this. And just because one group might at
Speaker 1: one point decide that they want to use a thing,
Speaker 1: it does not mean that they can fully appropriate it
Speaker 1: for themselves and no one else ever gets to use
Speaker 1: it again. You know, a lot of bad people have
Speaker 1: done a lot of things under a lot of flags.
Speaker 1: Stretching back for a long time doesn't mean that every person,
Speaker 1: for all the rest of eternity, who ever rides under
Speaker 1: that flag is a bad person. It's almost hard to
Speaker 1: critique the absurdity here because it's so it's so bizarre,
Speaker 1: it's so insane that it makes you wonder, are they
Speaker 1: just trolling us at this point? Are they doing this?
Speaker 1: Because but no, there see they're they're not self conscious enough,
Speaker 1: they're not strategic enough in their thinking to push us
Speaker 1: on these issues merely to see what the rights reaction
Speaker 1: will be. They really do this stuff. They really do
Speaker 1: want bands, they do want no Betsy Ross flag, no
Speaker 1: Gadsden flag. You know, ultimately, what this gets you to
Speaker 1: is that the left has taken a position that American
Speaker 1: history is itself racist, That the history of America is
Speaker 1: the history of a racist eight, that we are a
Speaker 1: racist country and we are a racist people. And the
Speaker 1: only way to purge those historical sins is to give
Speaker 1: power over to an identity that is soaked in identity
Speaker 1: politics and a kind of modern sectarianism courtesy of the left.
Speaker 1: That's it. That's the only way we ever get get
Speaker 1: rid of the sins of the past. We have to
Speaker 1: give them power to make things right today, and to
Speaker 1: abuse power, and to treat people on the basis of
Speaker 1: skin color today in ways that the left sees fit.
Speaker 1: Those are the only answers they give us. Until then,
Speaker 1: they'll keep the crazy going. A lot of us are
Speaker 1: sick and tired of this country of America coming last
Speaker 1: to people who swore an oath of office. Sick and
Speaker 1: tired of our military being denigrating, Sick and tired of
Speaker 1: the customers import to patrol people that protection people I
Speaker 1: was with who are overwhelmingly Hispanic, by the way, McCallen, Texas.
Speaker 1: Sick and tired of them being no, you don't understand
Speaker 1: because you didn't go being criticized, being docsed by a
Speaker 1: bunch of Hollywood d listers who have nothing else to
Speaker 1: do but sit on their asses on Twitter all day
Speaker 1: and try to docks brave men and women who are
Speaker 1: diving into the rio grand to save people who are drowning,
Speaker 1: who are taking other people's babies into custody and diapering
Speaker 1: them and feeding them and looking the other way while
Speaker 1: people are running across with drugs. That's going on. Good
Speaker 1: for Kelly and Conway. Here, the people on the front
Speaker 1: lines of this border crisis, they're not the problem, folks.
Speaker 1: They're the heroes. They're the ones who are doing the
Speaker 1: hard work day in and day out. And these preening,
Speaker 1: grandstanding journos and Democrats in Congress need to wake up
Speaker 1: and stop with all the nonsense and stop with all
Speaker 1: the games and trashing the people that are trying to
Speaker 1: do everything they can to make the situation as livable
Speaker 1: and as safe as they can. For people who are
Speaker 1: making the active decision to break our laws and just
Speaker 1: skip the immigration line just come into the country. The
Speaker 1: people that are trying to deal with that are not
Speaker 1: the problem. They're trying to solve the problem. The media,
Speaker 1: the Democrats, those who have been lying about this issue
Speaker 1: and refuse to do anything construct him on it. They
Speaker 1: are the problem. And you know that the media is
Speaker 1: not representative at all of where the American people are
Speaker 1: on the issue of immigration enforcement. They're not. There's a
Speaker 1: political poll which I thought was this is a classic
Speaker 1: left wing media moment here, So a political is a
Speaker 1: left wing site in case he didn't know, And they
Speaker 1: start off this with their own political Morning Consult poll.
Speaker 1: It says a slim majority of voters support the mass
Speaker 1: deportation raids previewed by President Trump last week. Well, it
Speaker 1: turns out that fifty one I mean they say a
Speaker 1: slim majority. Yeah, that's a slim overall majority. Fifty one
Speaker 1: percent support the raids, but only thirty five percent opposed
Speaker 1: the raids. So a way of looking at this is
Speaker 1: a lot more people support the raids than oppose the raids.
Speaker 1: And this is in keeping with what we see over
Speaker 1: and over where the perception that the people that are
Speaker 1: bringing you the news have about the popularity of their
Speaker 1: immigration positions is far from the reality that generally speaking,
Speaker 1: individuals across this country are more likely than not to
Speaker 1: want stricter enforcement immigration, to want less illegal immigration, to
Speaker 1: want more deportation. All the polls showed that you think
Speaker 1: it would be just oh well, that's a winning issue, right,
Speaker 1: But the Democrats try to avoid it and slice the
Speaker 1: issue down to so many little pieces that they can
Speaker 1: manipulate the perception of what's really going on. Oh, by
Speaker 1: the way, you want another another interesting poll is that
Speaker 1: a majority of Mexicans polled recently think that Central America
Speaker 1: who come into their country should also be deported. So
Speaker 1: are the is the majority of the Mexican people that
Speaker 1: wanted to port Central American migrants when they when they
Speaker 1: enter into their country um illegally or when they claim
Speaker 1: it they're seeking refuge in the United States? Are they
Speaker 1: all racist too? Because it seems to me that every
Speaker 1: country in the world, every every citizenry in the world
Speaker 1: wants their elected representatives to reflect their will about secure
Speaker 1: boarders and about who comes in and who doesn't. I mean,
Speaker 1: I feel like I have to fill out so much
Speaker 1: paperwork and crap to go to a lot of different
Speaker 1: countries all over the world, and you know, to deal
Speaker 1: with visa issues and everything else. And that's because that's
Speaker 1: what that country makes me do if I want to
Speaker 1: go visit. But now, all of a sudden, if a
Speaker 1: country wants to have any control over this, it's it's well,
Speaker 1: if we want to have any control over this, we're bad.
Speaker 1: I don't know. Maybe maybe maybe the Mexican population is
Speaker 1: racist against the un American population, but also maybe they
Speaker 1: just don't want people illegally entering their country. Isn't that possible?
Speaker 1: Isn't that one version of what's going on here that
Speaker 1: the Democrats, as much as they would like to say otherwise,
Speaker 1: that's one way to go, right, That's one way to
Speaker 1: look at this. You know it, folks, some of you
Speaker 1: have been asking me why haven't I used this face
Speaker 1: app thing? This is a total departure for a second here.
Speaker 1: But so you have this face app which makes your
Speaker 1: face look old, so you can see what you look
Speaker 1: like when you Let me just tell you, no one's
Speaker 1: gonna look as good when they're older as they look
Speaker 1: in these face apps. For the most part, it just
Speaker 1: turns your hair a little gray and puts a couple
Speaker 1: wrinkles on your face. But unfortunately, father time can be
Speaker 1: a little more a little more cruel than that. But
Speaker 1: this is this is amazing. It turns out that the
Speaker 1: face app which you're seeing all over social media right now.
Speaker 1: I'm sure you're seeing it on Facebook and use this
Speaker 1: AI to make you look older or swap your gender.
Speaker 1: It is owned by Russia, and in fact, quote, numerous
Speaker 1: people have pointed the fact these photos can be used
Speaker 1: by face app, and not just to make you look different.
Speaker 1: It's from the independent. The terms give the app the
Speaker 1: ability to use those photos in just about any way
Speaker 1: without giving anything back to the users who created them.
Speaker 1: Quote you grant face app a perpetual, irrevocable, non exclusive,
Speaker 1: royalty free, worldwide, full paid, fully paid, transferable, sub licensable
Speaker 1: license to use, reproduced, modify, adapt, published, blah blah blah,
Speaker 1: blah blah. That they can do anything anything they want
Speaker 1: with your photos once you use them, once you use
Speaker 1: their app. And you know this is a Russian company,
Speaker 1: so oh my gosh, Russian interference, Oh my gosh. Who
Speaker 1: knows what they're gonna do with all this data. But
Speaker 1: I think also people are recognizing that no one have
Speaker 1: you prouser, Mike, have you done this one yet? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Actually was checking out as you were talking about out it.
Speaker 1: Look at that, dude, Everyone's all over this. I'm not
Speaker 1: doing it. I'm not I'm not giving the Russians this face. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm not doing it. I just saw. I was looking
Speaker 1: at it. I was on Instagram, and like, you know,
Speaker 1: every athlete, everybody's doing it everywhere, and I was just
Speaker 1: like thinking about how ridiculous it was. It does seem
Speaker 1: to me to be a little bit of like a
Speaker 1: vanity vanity play too. It's like, I'm just gonna post
Speaker 1: what what old me looks like for everyone. Like the
Speaker 1: first one I saw, I was like, oh, that's funny.
Speaker 1: I'm like that's sort of cute, you know, And then
Speaker 1: like everybody start doing it. I was like, this is stupid. Yeah,
Speaker 1: well there's you know what, producer, Mike, I've learned something
Speaker 1: in life. Yeah, there are a lot of stupid people
Speaker 1: out there. There are. Yeah, something new every day. Yeah,
Speaker 1: don't use the face app folks, unless you want some
Speaker 1: guy named Saragey to be able to use your photos
Speaker 1: to sell well, whatever they're selling in Russia these days.
Speaker 1: I think that's probably, you know, to sell the S
Speaker 1: four hundred missile system. I have no idea whatever they've
Speaker 1: got going on there, but I mean, if you also,
Speaker 1: let's all just see how we age. Let's all hope
Speaker 1: we get the age. You know, that's what I want
Speaker 1: to say. I want to I hope I last as
Speaker 1: long as this face app would make me look if
Speaker 1: I would use it, which I will not. Well, the
Speaker 1: president not a racist. President not a racist, And I
Speaker 1: think the tone of all of this is not good
Speaker 1: for the country. But it's coming from all different ideological
Speaker 1: points of view. That's the point. To single out any
Speaker 1: segment of this, I think is a mistake. They've been
Speaker 1: just kind of rhetoric from a whole lot of different sources,
Speaker 1: all across the ideological spectrum in our country. I think
Speaker 1: Mitch's onto the onto something here. I mean, it's very
Speaker 1: overheated time right now in our politics. People are saying
Speaker 1: all kinds of crazy stuff all over the place. It's
Speaker 1: gotten very nasty, it's gotten very personal. But ultimate the
Speaker 1: president is not a racist. You know. They really want
Speaker 1: to get people to admit that. You know why, because
Speaker 1: if you if they can get you to admit that
Speaker 1: he said something that was race well then the next
Speaker 1: step is, well, only a racist would say something racist.
Speaker 1: And the step after that is if you vote for
Speaker 1: a racist, then you are a racist. This is all
Speaker 1: about power, It's all but winning the election They don't
Speaker 1: really think that they're going to change anyone's mind about
Speaker 1: anything Trump. As Donner said, beyond beyond you know, with
Speaker 1: this racism claim, beyond just maybe making it unpalatable for
Speaker 1: some to vote for him. No one's gonna say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: because Trump said something racist, I'm no longer a Republican. No,
Speaker 1: but if Trump said something racist, then maybe you can't
Speaker 1: vote for him in the next election. Ah. Now we
Speaker 1: see what the takeaway is supposed to be. And I mean,
Speaker 1: I think Mitch McConnell gets it. The President is absolutely
Speaker 1: not not a racist. But this is coming from all
Speaker 1: over the place, and there's just a general climate right
Speaker 1: now of political insanity. I mean, you have the most
Speaker 1: the most left wing, hardcore progressive idealogues the Democratic Party
Speaker 1: getting tons of media attention, running around and setting the
Speaker 1: ideological agenda for their party and really being the most
Speaker 1: prominent voices in their party right now. And that also
Speaker 1: means that on the issue of the border, the far
Speaker 1: left of the Democratic Party is open borders. That is
Speaker 1: just the truth they can try to say. Otherwise, they
Speaker 1: can claim that that's a smear and that's not right
Speaker 1: of it, but we all know it is true. The
Speaker 1: far left of the Democratic Party is open borders, and
Speaker 1: they would admit it if you asked them, which is
Speaker 1: quite a shift, quite a shift from where it used
Speaker 1: to be, quite a shift from Obama back in What
Speaker 1: do we have is back Obama back in twenty fourteen
Speaker 1: Play five. Our message absolutely is don't send your children
Speaker 1: unaccompanied on trains or through a bunch of smugglers. We
Speaker 1: don't even know how many of these kids don't make
Speaker 1: it and may have been waylaid into sex trafficking or
Speaker 1: killed because they fell off a train. We have no
Speaker 1: way of tracking them. So that is our direct message
Speaker 1: to the families in Central America, do not send your
Speaker 1: children to the borders. If they do make it, they'll
Speaker 1: get sent back. More importantly, they may not make it.
Speaker 1: That's what Obama used to say as the head of
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, de facto head of the party. And
Speaker 1: yet now here we are with AOC and to leave
Speaker 1: and all the rest of them, the squad, and all
Speaker 1: the rest of the Democrats who don't believe in any
Speaker 1: enforcement in our southern barred don't believe it. There should
Speaker 1: be anything that has to be that that must result
Speaker 1: in deportation unless you're a really violent criminal, and even
Speaker 1: then it's probably because we did something wrong. We probably
Speaker 1: made you that way, So it's our fault violent criminals.
Speaker 1: You have a Democrat party that has completely lost it
Speaker 1: on this issue. I mean, it's just way over the line.
Speaker 1: And you have a Republican party that I think has
Speaker 1: finally woken up to just how completely insane the left
Speaker 1: really is, how far this has gone. I mean, Steve
Speaker 1: Scalize points out that for all their complaining about ice
Speaker 1: and about customs and border patrol, the squad voted against
Speaker 1: funding for the people down there. What does that tell you?
Speaker 1: Play six Just yesterday here at this very microphone, you
Speaker 1: saw some of my colleagues say falseliness leading things from
Speaker 1: this microphone. You see Omar continue to use terms like
Speaker 1: people drinking out of toilets. It's not happening in any
Speaker 1: of those detention facilities. She voted, by the way, against
Speaker 1: the very funding to help our government provide humanitarian relief
Speaker 1: for those families that are coming across the border illegally.
Speaker 1: Our border patrol agents were buying diapers with their own
Speaker 1: money because they had run out of money, and she
Speaker 1: voted against that very funding. That's right, she goes around
Speaker 1: saying that people drink drinking out of toilets. Let's understand
Speaker 1: that that was never even the claim. The claim was
Speaker 1: and it was a lie. But the untruthful claim that
Speaker 1: AOC made was at border patrol told women to drink
Speaker 1: out of the toilet. That doesn't mean that they actually
Speaker 1: drank out of toilet. But now that's been turned into yeah,
Speaker 1: they're drinking out of toilets. See, the truth doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: It's just about it's about the outrage machinery on the
Speaker 1: left getting something else to rev them up. It's about
Speaker 1: the extremists and the Democratic Party being able to seize
Speaker 1: in their own minds, the moral high ground for just
Speaker 1: a few minutes, just a few days, a few news cycles. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: the situation the border continues to deteriorate, and the squad,
Speaker 1: if they really cared about what's going on here, you
Speaker 1: would think that the squad would focus much less on
Speaker 1: trying to bash Jnald Trump and much more on trying
Speaker 1: to solve the crisis at the border. But then you
Speaker 1: get into the very difficult issue. They don't want to
Speaker 1: solve the crisis at the border. Why would why would
Speaker 1: they want to solve the crisis at the border. There's
Speaker 1: nothing about the border crisis that really bothers them. They
Speaker 1: think that they benefit from it politically. It's a headache
Speaker 1: for the Trump administration, and it's an issue that they
Speaker 1: can raise money off of and do a lot of
Speaker 1: oral grandstanding off of, and they think that's all great
Speaker 1: and fine. Speaking of this squad and Omar, by the way,
Speaker 1: you know, there's been plenty of talk about whether Trump
Speaker 1: should retract what he said about the squad, you know,
Speaker 1: go back where you came from in his tweet. And
Speaker 1: there's been far less questioning of Ilhan Omar among some
Speaker 1: of these other members of Congress about things that they
Speaker 1: have said. And I see, I do believe, and this
Speaker 1: is this is not just for the versus of throwing
Speaker 1: some mud at the other side. I really do believe
Speaker 1: that Ilhan Omar has a problem with Israel and a
Speaker 1: problem with Jews. I think that's I think that's true
Speaker 1: when Somalia is a very anti Semitic place. So start
Speaker 1: with that. You would not want to be true story,
Speaker 1: if you would not want to be Jewish walking around Mogadishu,
Speaker 1: that is for sure, you would not be safe, and
Speaker 1: you know. When she was asked by Gail King if
Speaker 1: she if she regrets any of the things that she says,
Speaker 1: she was totally. I mean she said anti Semitic stuff.
Speaker 1: She just has ilhan Omar has made anti Semitic statements.
Speaker 1: And when it's time for her to say, oh, I'm
Speaker 1: gonna walk that back, do you think she does it?
Speaker 1: Does she say, yeah, you know I could have. Does
Speaker 1: she even say, I, you know, I could have phrased
Speaker 1: things differently and I'm sorry for the offense I cause
Speaker 1: it's something like that. Nope, there's what she says. Thirteen.
Speaker 1: Oftentimes there are things that you might say might not
Speaker 1: hold the weight for you but to someone else. Right,
Speaker 1: the way that we hear, um and consume information is
Speaker 1: very different than how the next person might. So you
Speaker 1: don't regret your words either. I do not, But I
Speaker 1: have gotten the I am grateful for the opportunity to
Speaker 1: really learn how my words made people feel, and have
Speaker 1: taken every single opportunity they have gotten to to make
Speaker 1: sure that people are understood that I apologize for it.
Speaker 1: And would you like people would never get them there
Speaker 1: that you were not anti semitic? Oh, certainly not. Yes,
Speaker 1: would you like to make that clear. Yes, I mean
Speaker 1: and that nothing I said, at least to me, was
Speaker 1: meant for that purpose. Now, nothing that she said was
Speaker 1: meant to be anti Semitic. Now does does Donald Trump
Speaker 1: get the same leeway? Nothing that he said was meant
Speaker 1: to be racist? How about that? Maybe it didn't come
Speaker 1: out perfectly, maybe it didn't, But nothing he said was
Speaker 1: meant to be racist. Nothing she said was meant to
Speaker 1: be anti Semitic. Can we at least have all sides
Speaker 1: playing by the same rules, you know? So she's sorry
Speaker 1: for the offense cause, but her words weren't anti semity.
Speaker 1: I mean they were and she's done a multiple times.
Speaker 1: But sure, you know, okay, I didn't mean to be
Speaker 1: an anti semit I just said anti Submitic stuff a
Speaker 1: bunch of times. And I mean very clearly and very explicitly.
Speaker 1: I mean, nothing that Donald Trump said, even about go
Speaker 1: back to where they came from. There's an implication that
Speaker 1: could be racial, but there's nothing specifically racist in his
Speaker 1: in the words that he used, in what he said.
Speaker 1: I know people would quibble with this, but that's that's
Speaker 1: the truth. And here we are fighting over a fight.
Speaker 1: We'll be right back. What do everyday, folks think about
Speaker 1: what Donald Trump tweeted over the weekend that got the
Speaker 1: media so upset, And what are just the people who
Speaker 1: live in America think, What do Republicans think? What do
Speaker 1: what do Republican women think about it? I mean, these
Speaker 1: are all very very valid and interesting questions, to be sure,
Speaker 1: because from what we've heard now with this vote on
Speaker 1: the House floor to condemn Trump, and as though that
Speaker 1: does anything, it's all for optics, although it really is
Speaker 1: a step toward impeachment. As we've been discussing. That's they're
Speaker 1: trying to create a feeling of some process that pushed
Speaker 1: them toward impeachment. They don't want to impeach him, but
Speaker 1: they just have to do impeach them. They don't want to,
Speaker 1: but there's no choice but to impeach him. Yeah right.
Speaker 1: I mean you have CNN pull together a number of
Speaker 1: eight Republican women here, and this is supposed to be
Speaker 1: a journalist. You're just asking questions and getting answers, but
Speaker 1: you can just tell how upset. I don't even know
Speaker 1: who the CNN journalist is, how upset she is, because
Speaker 1: here you have eight Republican women who were supposed to
Speaker 1: sit there in all nod in agreement, I would assume
Speaker 1: that Donald Trump is a racist. And here's how the segment.
Speaker 1: Here's how the segment goes play eighteen. How many of
Speaker 1: you don't think what the President said was racist? Raise
Speaker 1: or him? He was saying that if they hate America
Speaker 1: so much, because what we're seeing out of them and
Speaker 1: hearing out of them, they hate America. If it's so bad,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of places they can go. I'm a
Speaker 1: brown skinned woman, I am a legal immigrant. I agree
Speaker 1: with him. I don't think that's racist to say that's
Speaker 1: not at all real. Actually, I think that's just it's
Speaker 1: a demonstration of how their ideology feels over even though
Speaker 1: they're American now so to speak, they're not acting American.
Speaker 1: They I'm glad that the President said what he said,
Speaker 1: because all they're they're doing is they're there. It's they're
Speaker 1: inciting hatred and division, and that's not what our country
Speaker 1: is about. It's it's not about that at all. And
Speaker 1: it isn't this amazing to just hear some some articulate
Speaker 1: and thoughtful Republican women, including one who there you heard
Speaker 1: is a minority and an immigrant herself, say that they
Speaker 1: know that Trump wasn't saying I don't like these people
Speaker 1: or they're not American because of their skin color. That
Speaker 1: would be racist. What he's saying was based on what
Speaker 1: they are saying. I wish they would just get out
Speaker 1: of here because they obviously don't like this place that much.
Speaker 1: That was the intent of what he said. This is
Speaker 1: what they are say. Now these women seem to intuitively
Speaker 1: understand is the CNN journalist is completely flummixed by this
Speaker 1: and tries to dig in further, essentially like no, no no, no, guys,
Speaker 1: you understand what he said is racist, and they'll look
Speaker 1: at her like, no, they don't. They don't buy it.
Speaker 1: They don't believe it. They do not think that is
Speaker 1: an accurate description, no matter how much the CNN journalist
Speaker 1: is completely and utterly horrified, shocked at the opinions that
Speaker 1: she's getting here played nineteen. He didn't say anything about color.
Speaker 1: We know the president is not racist. He loves people
Speaker 1: from you know, hispanics of black people all across the
Speaker 1: heated a black woman for two years. Two of his
Speaker 1: wives are immigrants. He is not a xenophobic racist. But
Speaker 1: the first the black billion there is endorsing President Trump.
Speaker 1: How can you call him racist? Who do these ladies
Speaker 1: sound a little bit like? I know? I like to
Speaker 1: do that on the show, I say, who does this
Speaker 1: person sound like but kind of like yours? Truly, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is not a racist. They all want to say
Speaker 1: he is. They all want to because then they want
Speaker 1: to undermine his policies and his message, in his heart,
Speaker 1: in his mind. Donald Trump is not a racist. He's
Speaker 1: just not. This guy grew up in New York. I
Speaker 1: know people that knew the family very well. I knew
Speaker 1: the kids a little bit growing up. The Trump's are
Speaker 1: not racists. They're just not. It's a complete, an utter
Speaker 1: fabrication to say that Donald Trump thinks less of people,
Speaker 1: hates people based on their skin color. It's just not true.
Speaker 1: It's not It's not part of this guy's ethos. It's
Speaker 1: not part of you know, you don't grow up in
Speaker 1: Queens and then moved them in Hattan and live in
Speaker 1: New York City and do the things this guy has done,
Speaker 1: have been around the people he's been around, and work
Speaker 1: with the people he's worked with, and do all these
Speaker 1: things and harbor true bigotry. You just you just don't.
Speaker 1: He's not that guy. And everyone who knows him, knows that,
Speaker 1: and these women on this CNN panel, they know it.
Speaker 1: And the CNN journalist is just like, whooh, just can't
Speaker 1: handle it all. You know, you cannot handle it at all. Uh.
Speaker 1: The whole segment was like ten minutes long. I couldn't
Speaker 1: play it off for you all the air, but it was.
Speaker 1: It was fascinating. Tierra, go back, But but what about
Speaker 1: the fact that you know it's but what he said
Speaker 1: is so racist. They're all like, nah, we know what
Speaker 1: he meant. Yeah, obviously he shouldn't have. He shouldn't have
Speaker 1: mixed up in his mind that they weren't born that
Speaker 1: only one of them was born abroad and the rest
Speaker 1: were born here. Yeah, that's a that's an error of fact.
Speaker 1: But he's not saying that they You know, if he
Speaker 1: were a racist, he would also have to think, for example,
Speaker 1: doctor Ben Carson is somehow less American. That would be racist. Right, Clearly,
Speaker 1: no one thinks he thinks that. It's about the ideas
Speaker 1: these women the so called squad have. It is not
Speaker 1: about their skin color. And that is as much as
Speaker 1: they try to take the words of Donald Trump and say, oh,
Speaker 1: but look at what he did, or look at what
Speaker 1: he said. They're all saying, no, we understand what he
Speaker 1: meant and the intent behind his words. Play twenty. These
Speaker 1: congressmen who said they ran for congress ran for office
Speaker 1: because they explicitly love this country. You're saying they hate
Speaker 1: this country. Yes, do you ever brought these questions up?
Speaker 1: It's clearly that they're very manipulous to accuse instead of
Speaker 1: extracting the truth. It's a tactic because when you say,
Speaker 1: you know, don't you think he's racist, you're accusing us.
Speaker 1: You're accusing hill. Do you think it's just a coincidence
Speaker 1: that these four congressmen that the president is going after
Speaker 1: none of them are white. I don't think it matters.
Speaker 1: It's idiotic. But they're saying, so it doesn't matter matter
Speaker 1: whether they're white, man, woman, brown, yellow, anything. I wish
Speaker 1: that there is a white one. Why are they not racist?
Speaker 1: How come here't befriended one of their white female congresswoman
Speaker 1: colleagues and her joy as they won't a good point
Speaker 1: my white people, Come on, they're racist? How many of
Speaker 1: you still plan to vote for President Trump? Absolutely? Absolutely,
Speaker 1: I wanta tell you that this this woman who said
Speaker 1: you're accusing us, it's a very astute observation, because that
Speaker 1: is exactly what this whole panel was about. It was
Speaker 1: about a CNN journalist getting toether a bunch of women
Speaker 1: to be like, so, ladies, we know you voted for Trump,
Speaker 1: but let's just talk about what a racist he is.
Speaker 1: How about what do you think about Donald Trump's comments?
Speaker 1: Do you think it is fair to characterize them as racist?
Speaker 1: Donald Trump's a racist? Right? They understand what's going on here.
Speaker 1: There was a lot of a very astute observations from
Speaker 1: this panel, these these women, and you know, this is
Speaker 1: what the he doesn't understand. Is it just because people
Speaker 1: don't sit around all day staring into mirrors and waiting
Speaker 1: for their hit on TV or waiting for their their
Speaker 1: you know, their crappy column at the at the Post
Speaker 1: or something Washington Post or the New York Times or
Speaker 1: Slate or Salon or wherever to get published. Just because
Speaker 1: people don't do that doesn't mean that they don't understand
Speaker 1: this stuff as well. This is and this is the
Speaker 1: journalists hate this. Journalists like to believe that they have
Speaker 1: some special knowledge. No, that is not true. Most journalists
Speaker 1: I know are deeply incurious, don't read many books and
Speaker 1: don't know squat about squat. All they do is try
Speaker 1: to suit at the cool kid table and get access
Speaker 1: to the powerful. That's all they do. And these women
Speaker 1: know a lot more than most of the journalists, if
Speaker 1: not all of them that I know at CNN. Oh,
Speaker 1: but Pelosi doesn't care about any of this. By the way,
Speaker 1: Pelosi still clings to this. This is after their their
Speaker 1: whole floor vote. Yet no one's even gonna no one's
Speaker 1: even gonna remember this, this floor vote in a week,
Speaker 1: maybe not even in a few days. How many people
Speaker 1: even today cared about the congressional vote of censure against
Speaker 1: you know, along party lines and all but four Republicans.
Speaker 1: What is wrong with those Republicans? Has guy will heard
Speaker 1: weak sauce? Total weak sauce? I don't know what his
Speaker 1: problem is. Had him on the show before too a
Speaker 1: long time ago. Yeah, yeah, because we had the Langley
Speaker 1: Langley family thing in common. But I don't know. He's
Speaker 1: outside the Freedom Hunt family right now, My friends, I
Speaker 1: don't know what that guy's deal is. Just just just
Speaker 1: be a Democrat. You have no problem with the overrunning
Speaker 1: of the border, you think that Trump is the worst
Speaker 1: thing ever. Just become a Democrat like the rest of them.
Speaker 1: But Pelosi's sure that this is racism in place seventeen.
Speaker 1: That language that the president used was not posited beneath
Speaker 1: the dignity of the president, beneath the dignity of the
Speaker 1: people who was criticizing. And by the way, we were
Speaker 1: a that he's spoke in such a way about members
Speaker 1: of Congress, but we're offended that he says that about
Speaker 1: people across the country all the time, go back where
Speaker 1: you came from, and that, by its definition, those words
Speaker 1: are racism. To go look in the ap and other
Speaker 1: places where they define certain words, that's what that is.
Speaker 1: But we weren't saying that he was racist. We were
Speaker 1: saying that the words that he used were racist. So
Speaker 1: that was as gentle as it could be. I was wondering,
Speaker 1: when people have told Irish and Italians, you know, go
Speaker 1: back where you came from, is that all? Is that racist?
Speaker 1: Or is that just xenophobic? Or because nationality and race
Speaker 1: are not the same thing, and nation state and race
Speaker 1: are not the same thing. But that's way too in
Speaker 1: depth analysis for Pelosi. She just wants to smear the president.
Speaker 1: So that's what that's about. A group of the President
Speaker 1: supporters are cheering on these attacks. A c and Sarah
Speaker 1: Sidin reports white supremacists to back President Trump are taking
Speaker 1: to social media to celebrate those tweets. Go back where
Speaker 1: you came from, of course, is something they've been saying
Speaker 1: to other people for decades. Hail Trump, Hail are people,
Speaker 1: hail victory. White nationalist Richard Spencer, who hailed Trump when
Speaker 1: he was first elected, is among those who are turning
Speaker 1: on Trump. Many white nationalists will eat up this red
Speaker 1: meat that Donald Trump is throwing out there. I am
Speaker 1: not one of them. I recognize the con game that
Speaker 1: is going on. They say Trump's is all talk and
Speaker 1: no action on maintaining. Folks at CNN who are putting
Speaker 1: this guy Richard Spencer on air there are there are
Speaker 1: a disgrace. I mean, look, Spencer is scump. Okay, let's
Speaker 1: we know this. You know this, I know this. We
Speaker 1: don't need to get into that. What the heck is
Speaker 1: CNN doing? That's Jake Tapper, mister, oh so serious? My
Speaker 1: brand is everything journalism. Man. Guy's a jerk. What is
Speaker 1: he doing putting a white nationalist on his show just because? Oh?
Speaker 1: Anything to own Trump? Huh? Anyone who goes on air
Speaker 1: to smear Trump, gets a platform at CNN. Last week
Speaker 1: or the week before, it was e. Gene Carroll, that
Speaker 1: looney lady that made the stuff up about Trump in
Speaker 1: her book, which you couldn't sell any copies of the
Speaker 1: book anyway. This week it's white nationalist Richard Spencer who's
Speaker 1: get an airtime on Jake Tappers. I mean, Jake Tapper
Speaker 1: should be ashamed, should be ashamed. But this is the
Speaker 1: game they play, folks. Whenever they think they can smear
Speaker 1: a Republican by association or by insinuation, what do they do. Oh,
Speaker 1: they dust off David Duke or they bring out Richard Spencer.
Speaker 1: I'll tell you something, I've never even met a white nationalist.
Speaker 1: And I've met geehattest terrorists, okay, plenty of them. I've
Speaker 1: never met a white nationalist. Well, where where are they all?
Speaker 1: There's like two hundred of them in the country. It
Speaker 1: feels like, I mean, who are these people the media
Speaker 1: is always talking about. It's the most overhyped, exaggerated thing ever.
Speaker 1: And it's not like that. You see. Here's a big
Speaker 1: difference as well between what you see in the left
Speaker 1: one you see in the right. You know, when you
Speaker 1: ask ilhan Omar, when you ask the far left about
Speaker 1: Hamas or about al Qaeda, there's this, well, they're bad,
Speaker 1: but their methods are bad. But I but I understand
Speaker 1: some of their rage or you know, there's always this
Speaker 1: kind of what they don't really you ask any conservative,
Speaker 1: I know, what do you think of true neo Nazis?
Speaker 1: What do you think of a white supremacist? What do
Speaker 1: you think of some guy who has a swastika tattooed
Speaker 1: on his forearm and walks around saying that people of
Speaker 1: certain ethnicities and religions are you know, subhuman. Every conservative
Speaker 1: I know is like, I want to punch that guy
Speaker 1: in the face, and he's a terrible human being that
Speaker 1: nobody should listen to. Every single one of them says
Speaker 1: that they don't say, oh, well that guy, you know,
Speaker 1: I mean some of his idea. No, no, But they
Speaker 1: have to create this, you know, this this sense of
Speaker 1: equivalency where they're a dicals on our side, just like
Speaker 1: there are radicals on their side. In fact, the radicals
Speaker 1: on their side don't even really count. So that's why
Speaker 1: Tapper just debases his already incredibly boring show. I mean,
Speaker 1: he has these political panels on Some of the dumbest
Speaker 1: political panels on TV are on Tapper Show and a
Speaker 1: regular basis, The people that go on there just it's
Speaker 1: that they have nothing insightful to say about anything. It's
Speaker 1: just all Trump bashing all the time, you know. And
Speaker 1: I guess that's what makes the CNN audience feel like
Speaker 1: they're really getting their news dump for the day. But
Speaker 1: how is this non platforming instead of deep platforming a
Speaker 1: white nationalist? How is this not Jake Tapper and CNN
Speaker 1: and CNN corporate deciding to elevate the voice of a
Speaker 1: white nationalist as long as it is also damaging to
Speaker 1: Donald Trump, which it's not even damaging to Donald Trump really,
Speaker 1: because no one cares what these idiots have to say.
Speaker 1: As Donald Trump says, they're losers, they aren't. They're losers.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe maybe there's still time for some of
Speaker 1: them to redeem their souls if they turn away from
Speaker 1: their ways. But they're losers. They're bad people. And I
Speaker 1: don't know a single conservative. I mean, and I hang
Speaker 1: out with a very right wing MAGA crowd a lot
Speaker 1: of the time here in DC. I don't know a
Speaker 1: single conservative who does not find Spenser and any of
Speaker 1: these other actual white nationalists to be completely beneath contempt.
Speaker 1: I do not know one, but Jake Tapper puts them
Speaker 1: on TV National TV, not in primetime because Tapper's not
Speaker 1: interesting enough to be in primetime at CNN, which tells
Speaker 1: you a lot, but you know, puts some puts them
Speaker 1: on TV to make a make a point about how
Speaker 1: they love what Trump had to say. You know, how
Speaker 1: often do you hear about how the American Communist Party,
Speaker 1: which really exists, endorses the Democrat president every election cycle?
Speaker 1: How much do you hear about that from the mainstream media.
Speaker 1: It's true, it happens every election cycle. Last election cycle,
Speaker 1: it was the American Communist Party endorses Hillary Clinton, or
Speaker 1: maybe they endorsed Bernie No, no no, they endorsed Hillary. It
Speaker 1: was in the general So no, they endorsed Hillary Clinton.
Speaker 1: Is that is Do they make a big deal it? No,
Speaker 1: because we all know the American I mean, the real
Speaker 1: Commies are the socialists, and the real socialist are the Democrats.
Speaker 1: So you know, the the American Communist Party is really
Speaker 1: for a bunch of koops. It's a bunch of weirdos.
Speaker 1: But we all understand that. We don't take them too seriously.
Speaker 1: The real collectivist threat comes from the actual modern Democratic
Speaker 1: Party these days, but you don't hear about it because
Speaker 1: they don't want to talk about it. How could see
Speaker 1: it and justify this? I really, you know, their anchors
Speaker 1: never weighed into unfriendly territory. You will never see a
Speaker 1: CNN anchor outside of the role of playing anchor anywhere
Speaker 1: where they have to defend themselves or their network ever.
Speaker 1: I mean, I can't even when was the last time
Speaker 1: you saw somebody in a position to debate Tapper or
Speaker 1: Cuomo or any of these guys, not on their own show,
Speaker 1: because that's different. They get to set the tone, they
Speaker 1: get to set the timing, they get to ask the
Speaker 1: first questions, they get to end the segment when they want.
Speaker 1: They have the elements they want. This is like when
Speaker 1: people call in they think they're gonna argue with you
Speaker 1: on a radio show. It's like a dear caller. The
Speaker 1: chances of you winning that fight are with any radio hosts.
Speaker 1: I'm not talking about with me. Any radio hosts are slim.
Speaker 1: They can drop your mic down, they can talk over you,
Speaker 1: they can end the call whenever they want, and you're
Speaker 1: in their house. They're not in yours. So when was
Speaker 1: the last time, though, you saw any of these CNN
Speaker 1: anchors put themselves in a position where they have to
Speaker 1: have a real exchange of ideas, where they didn't have
Speaker 1: a team around them propping them up and making sure
Speaker 1: that no one says anything mean to them. I can't
Speaker 1: think of it. They never Oh, they're just journalists. That's
Speaker 1: why they don't debate. Yeah, right, they're completely lying about that.
Speaker 1: They're activists. We all know their activists. And what Tapper
Speaker 1: did is is a disgusting thing, putting this guy on
Speaker 1: TV to say that, oh, look at how much this
Speaker 1: white nationalist loves Trump. You're still putting a white nationalist
Speaker 1: on your channel, on your show. Now, if a conservative,
Speaker 1: let's just play out this thought experiment for a second,
Speaker 1: if a conservative had Richard Spencer appear on his show,
Speaker 1: If anyone in the Fox prime time line up, if
Speaker 1: anyone at won America or any of these channels had
Speaker 1: Richard Spencer on their show, and let him just have
Speaker 1: his say, not even to cross examine him, just have
Speaker 1: his say, Let him say whatever he wants. The calls
Speaker 1: to boycott that person, to kick kimmer her off the air,
Speaker 1: would be deafening, and we all know it. But there's
Speaker 1: a huge double standard because the Libs have lost their
Speaker 1: minds in the era of Trump, including Tappy Tap Tapper.
Speaker 1: Early Saturday morning, the Ice Detention Center in Tacoma, Washington,
Speaker 1: came under attack by one man armed with an assault
Speaker 1: rifle and throwing incendiary devices at cars and building. By
Speaker 1: the time officers arrived, police say Willem van Spronson had
Speaker 1: already burned one car to the ground and was trying
Speaker 1: to ignite a large propane tank next to the building.
Speaker 1: When he refused to drop his assault rifle, he was
Speaker 1: shot and killed. The sixty nine year old allegedly sent
Speaker 1: out a manifesto hours before his death, calling the detention
Speaker 1: center an abomination and the attack his opportunity to make
Speaker 1: a difference, saying I am Antifa. One local Antifa group
Speaker 1: is now praising their fallen comrade as a martyr and
Speaker 1: calling on its members to take action, writing in a
Speaker 1: Facebook post, we cannot let his death go unanswered and
Speaker 1: may his death serve as a call to protest and
Speaker 1: direct action. What do you call an organized group that
Speaker 1: has an ideology, a stated ideology that will use violence
Speaker 1: to achieve that ideology, I'm pretty sure you'd call a
Speaker 1: terrorist group. And I might know something about this because
Speaker 1: I worked in the counter Terrorism Center the CIA. I'm
Speaker 1: pretty sure you'd call that a terrorist group. So here
Speaker 1: we have Antifa with a member of Antifa who I
Speaker 1: believe was also highlighted in a CNN documentary about Antifa
Speaker 1: who trying to blow up a building and kill a
Speaker 1: bunch of people in the federal government. And there are
Speaker 1: other people who are praising him for this and saying
Speaker 1: there should be more action taken like this or direct action.
Speaker 1: They leave it somewhat open to interpretation. And yet we
Speaker 1: won't hear them talked about it as a domestic terrorist organization,
Speaker 1: won't we even though any terror organization will tell you
Speaker 1: that they do stuff that's not terrorism, right, is hesbel
Speaker 1: a terrorist organization? They do a lot of you know,
Speaker 1: good charity work too. They've got a lot of people
Speaker 1: in Hesball is basically a government, but you know, there
Speaker 1: are a lot of people in Hesball and Hamas that
Speaker 1: you know, hand out food and water and medicine to
Speaker 1: their constituents. And but they also stand for something that
Speaker 1: is violence, and violence that is supposed to affect politics
Speaker 1: and they have people that do act in that name.
Speaker 1: So their terrorist organizations, right, so is Antifa terrorist organization.
Speaker 1: And we should ask this question, why has this gotten
Speaker 1: so little attention in comparison to Oh it is what
Speaker 1: Trump said racist? We almost had we could have been
Speaker 1: a mass casualty terror tank The guy was trying to
Speaker 1: blow up the propane tanks the side of the building.
Speaker 1: Who knows what would have happened. I'm not the only
Speaker 1: one who thinks this is not getting any attention. I mean,
Speaker 1: you know, CNN can't be bothered. CNN can put a
Speaker 1: white nationalist on TV, but they can't be bothered to
Speaker 1: dig into this. Oh no, not at all. Play clip
Speaker 1: nine like what happened alone kind of lone wolf viol extremists.
Speaker 1: They're very hard to prevent. And why is this happening?
Speaker 1: We know why it's happening. Is that the rhetoric that's
Speaker 1: out there from our own elected leaders, the vile rec
Speaker 1: they're attacking the minimum of ice, they're tacking the women
Speaker 1: of CBP. It's unjust, it's unfair, it's misinformed and outright
Speaker 1: sometimes there's lying to the American people, and it's undoubtedly
Speaker 1: fueling this well man women of CBP, for example, a
Speaker 1: lot of people know this year loan they've rescued almost
Speaker 1: four thousand individuals, individuals trying to illegally enter this country.
Speaker 1: There's CBP Chief Mark Morgan who's just saying that this
Speaker 1: stuff that they're the Democrats have been claiming about ice
Speaker 1: and about border patrol is reckless and it's dangerous. You know,
Speaker 1: we get into this back and forth whenever someone who
Speaker 1: is affiliated with what is considered that nationalism or you know,
Speaker 1: ultra right wing white nationalists, whatever it may be, all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, everything every Republican has ever said is
Speaker 1: directly responsible for that. This is the game of left plays.
Speaker 1: AOC says this, all these Democrats will say, oh, well,
Speaker 1: this one crazy loon who has no support, who has
Speaker 1: no one praising them online or you know, in on Twitter,
Speaker 1: who when it did some terrible things shot up a
Speaker 1: church or a temple or something, that is on the
Speaker 1: heads of all the Republicans, all the Conservatives, anybody who's
Speaker 1: opposed to the left wing agenda this country. We're supposed
Speaker 1: to sit here and take that, even though it's complete nonsense,
Speaker 1: it's utter garbage. But when they're saying that the US
Speaker 1: government is operating concentration camps, which and saying that it's
Speaker 1: never again it is supposed to mean something explicit comparisons
Speaker 1: to the Nazi Nazi concentration camps and the holocaust of
Speaker 1: six million Jews eleven million people in those camps. Why
Speaker 1: isn't that considered overheated rhetoric that could lead to violence.
Speaker 1: I've said this before. There are some things that, if
Speaker 1: I believed were true, would bring me to consider taking
Speaker 1: up violence. If I really thought the government was operating
Speaker 1: concentration camps and murdering children, what would I'd be unwilling
Speaker 1: to do to stop that? There's very little I'd be
Speaker 1: unwilling to do to stop that. Just like, as I
Speaker 1: used to say, in the era of Black Lives Matter,
Speaker 1: it was different. It wasn't just a political dispute. The
Speaker 1: rhetoric was that cops were murdering young black men for sport,
Speaker 1: for fun. That is what Black Lives Matter was saying,
Speaker 1: doing it out of sheer malice, just pure racism. That's
Speaker 1: why these cops were shooting black black young black men
Speaker 1: across the country. If I really thought that were true,
Speaker 1: would I take up arms against the police. Certainly think
Speaker 1: about it. Of course these things are wildly untrue, right.
Speaker 1: They might as well say that space aliens are landing
Speaker 1: and we all need to take up arms against them.
Speaker 1: But the Democrats treat this as discourse that should be respected. Truth,
Speaker 1: even in some of these media outlets. At AOC is
Speaker 1: speaking truth. This woman's a moron and a dangerous one
Speaker 1: because she's arrogant, she's ignorant, and she is far too powerful.
Speaker 1: Let's be honest in a world where appearances in social
Speaker 1: media and Instagram or just way too important to everybody,
Speaker 1: far too important. Look, it affects conservative media too. I'm
Speaker 1: always amazed at some of the people that some of
Speaker 1: the folks out there say, oh, hell, you know so
Speaker 1: and so is really doing a great job. I was like,
Speaker 1: because you know he wears funny t shirts or because
Speaker 1: she's pretty, that's why you want to listen to what
Speaker 1: they have to say about the Constitution. But yeah, people
Speaker 1: are unentitled to whatever they want to watch and here.
Speaker 1: But it's gotten a lot of a lot of griffers
Speaker 1: out there in conservative conservative media, now, that's for sure.
Speaker 1: I think if you're listening to this show, I will
Speaker 1: I will say without without any sense of well humility
Speaker 1: is the wrong word you use here, but without any
Speaker 1: sense of self effacing. If you're listening to this show,
Speaker 1: then you know who the grifters probably are, because this
Speaker 1: is about as anti grifters you're going to get. Nonetheless,
Speaker 1: they won't be honest about this, these Antifa terrorists. They
Speaker 1: won't talk about about how the rhetoric that they use
Speaker 1: is inflammatory to the point where violence if one believes
Speaker 1: what AOC says would be justifiable. If we were operating
Speaker 1: concentration camps, violence against our government would be justifiable. But
Speaker 1: we aren't. So these lies that they are telling, while
Speaker 1: they do it mostly to mobilize their insane left wing base,
Speaker 1: the lies that they tell can have very real consequences.
Speaker 1: The lies that they tell can really harm people. But
Speaker 1: they give this no attention whatsoever. They have no interest
Speaker 1: in tracking this down and finding out why Antifa does
Speaker 1: what it does and how much support it gets from
Speaker 1: these various news networks that, if nothing else, try to downplay.
Speaker 1: Just how odious and offensive the rhetoric of some of
Speaker 1: these members of Congress are that lead right to this
Speaker 1: Antifa guy saying that, yeah, we're operating concentration camps. Well
Speaker 1: that's a very bold charge, a lie, but a powerful
Speaker 1: enough charge that it's something that can lead to the
Speaker 1: situation that we saw unfold. How much have you seen this?
Speaker 1: Talk about the news? Folks really think about this attempted
Speaker 1: terrorists attack by an Antifa guy, quoting AOC's Concentration Camps line,
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, you mean that you haven't You haven't seen
Speaker 1: that anywhere? Really? Maybe you've seen it on Fox a
Speaker 1: couple of times. That's it. Oh wow, what a shock.
Speaker 1: I think no one's surprised even in the least. They
Speaker 1: should express remorse for not giving a hearing in a
Speaker 1: case in which half the jury cheated and lied to
Speaker 1: the judge. So with respectfully, you know, I don't know
Speaker 1: what they expected today. They would remorse have change the
Speaker 1: statutory minimum of life in prison, of course them, I don't.
Speaker 1: I don't know that. Why are the rules different from
Speaker 1: watching Busmer? He wanted justice, that's what he was burning today.
Speaker 1: His lack of was getting justice. I gotta say this
Speaker 1: lawyer for El Chapo, he's got some some utzpah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's that's the problem. That the judge was too hard
Speaker 1: on El Chapo because he didn't show remorse for what
Speaker 1: he did. This guy was arguably the most powerful drug
Speaker 1: baron in the world, ordering the assassinations of countless rivals,
Speaker 1: the murders of people who got in the way, or
Speaker 1: they just wanted to make an example of murders of police.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's the head of his Sinaloa cartel, as
Speaker 1: as bad a dude as Trump would say, as bad
Speaker 1: an ombrey as he will find anywhere, and he got
Speaker 1: life plus I was life plus forty or something. I mean,
Speaker 1: he's gone away forever. But as lawyer wants you to
Speaker 1: know that he didn't get a fair shot. Some of
Speaker 1: these lawyers, I gotta tell you, I always want to know,
Speaker 1: like what they if they ever thought when they're in
Speaker 1: law school, I'll be the guy who, after the worst
Speaker 1: drug kingpin in the world gets rightly sentenced to life
Speaker 1: in prison, it should probably get the electric chair or
Speaker 1: something else, but maybe a firing squad. I'm actually I
Speaker 1: think if you're going to do, if you're if you're
Speaker 1: going to execute people, I think firing squad. I don't
Speaker 1: know why we have to overcomplicate this with the I
Speaker 1: don't like that we make this a medical procedure where
Speaker 1: you do the lethal injection and now what drugs do
Speaker 1: we use anything else? I think firing squad. I think
Speaker 1: that's where Life plus thirty producer might just told me
Speaker 1: Life plus thirty. So I think firing squad's a much
Speaker 1: better way for this to to go. And I think
Speaker 1: Choppo should have gotten a firing squad, you know, one
Speaker 1: more one more cigarette and audios El Chapo. But unless
Speaker 1: his lawyers said, oh, they're going to appeal to Yeah,
Speaker 1: this guy's gonna in supermax until he you know, in
Speaker 1: thirty years, they don't. He doesn't wake up in the morning,
Speaker 1: and that's going to be that h Richard Donohue, the
Speaker 1: US Attorney for the Eastern Diictions in New York, has
Speaker 1: had had a different take on what happened today with
Speaker 1: the El Chapo hearing Play eleven. He means that never
Speaker 1: again weill Kuzman for poison, overall borders making billions, will
Speaker 1: innocent lives are lost, the drug violence in drug addiction,
Speaker 1: Never again will Buzmon do those things. That is true.
Speaker 1: To keep in mind that this year, I believe or
Speaker 1: for twenty eighteen, they have the numbers in from the
Speaker 1: CDC and overdose deaths were down five percent. According to
Speaker 1: preliminary data, which is the first time in ten years
Speaker 1: I think that's happened. So we still have a drug
Speaker 1: a drug epidemic, and we've got terrible problems with overdoses,
Speaker 1: but for the first time in a long time, it
Speaker 1: seems to be at least trending in a better direction,
Speaker 1: where it had just been getting more and more every year.
Speaker 1: But there's also so anyway, all Chopo is gone, and
Speaker 1: you know, there was that whole Sean Penn thing too.
Speaker 1: I really wish I need to look into that a
Speaker 1: little bit more. You know, he was gonna go interview him, right,
Speaker 1: Wasn't that what happened? And then they ended up finding
Speaker 1: him and all kinds of crazy stuff. They followed him
Speaker 1: and didn't they followed him, right? Isn't that what happened?
Speaker 1: It was crazy. I actually heard a really good story
Speaker 1: about that recently from from Nio and Grio, who's been
Speaker 1: on our show. I heard a podcast where he specifically
Speaker 1: talked about that subject, and uh, he has some insight
Speaker 1: on that. Maybe we should get him on sometimes. Yeah, dude,
Speaker 1: can we can we reach out to yone? He's on
Speaker 1: our show a few times all he's awesome. Yeah, he's
Speaker 1: got that super chill British accent where he's like, yeah, buck,
Speaker 1: I've been in like ten wool zones, I've seen everything.
Speaker 1: It's crazy, man. You know he's really into the chill. Yeah,
Speaker 1: he's really interviewed and done some really good deep dives
Speaker 1: into the cartels, and its interviewed. A lot of dangerous
Speaker 1: people play that. Yeah, man, let's get him on, let's
Speaker 1: reach out. Tell me when I ask him about El
Speaker 1: Chappo story and what it means, I want to ask
Speaker 1: him what it means now that El Chapo's in prison
Speaker 1: because he's all over the cartel situation. So and then
Speaker 1: he's going away for life. You know who's now rising up?
Speaker 1: I think there's the Nuevo Nuevo Alisco generation cartel. Is
Speaker 1: this super ultra violet one that's trying to take more territory.
Speaker 1: And all this stuff's going on. People don't even pay attention.
Speaker 1: Mexico at its highest murder rate ever last year, thirty
Speaker 1: three thousand murders. I think it was thirty three thousand murders.
Speaker 1: There's only three hundred and sixty five days in a year, folks,
Speaker 1: thirty three thousand murders in Mexico, that is a lot,
Speaker 1: and those aren't what they do in the US. Those
Speaker 1: are They always include they talk about gun violence, and
Speaker 1: they include suicides and accidents. No, no, no, that's murders
Speaker 1: we're talking about. In Mexico. People actually just killing other
Speaker 1: human beings. It's completely out of control down there. But
Speaker 1: we don't see much of we don't see much of
Speaker 1: it talked about here. Oh, speaking of out of control
Speaker 1: and murders, I mentioned to you yesterday this big indictment
Speaker 1: of I think over over twenty people and MS thirteen,
Speaker 1: and I mentioned to you that, well, the horrific murders,
Speaker 1: the other hacking people up cutting out their hearts. They
Speaker 1: murdered a homeless guy who was living in a park
Speaker 1: because they said the park was their territory. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're these MS thirteen gang members do act like savages.
Speaker 1: I mean they act like people who have absolutely no humanity,
Speaker 1: no decency whatsoever. And you know, there's there's like so
Speaker 1: little media coverage of this Trump called I mean, he
Speaker 1: calls the monsters. I mean, I think that's absolutely right.
Speaker 1: I think that's how we should refer to them. But
Speaker 1: here's what he says. Played twelve, the monsters. We've been
Speaker 1: removing MS thirteen by the thousands during my administration, and
Speaker 1: I tell my people much easier to go the other route.
Speaker 1: But I say, focus on the criminals, Focus on the
Speaker 1: people that are killing people. You know, the immedia still
Speaker 1: thinks that Trump's focus here is always it's it's somehow
Speaker 1: rooted in racism. It's wrong, it's bad. You know one
Speaker 1: thing that I said to you yesterday when I was
Speaker 1: looking over that list of the MS thirteen gang members,
Speaker 1: and it was I will tell you I was I
Speaker 1: was making something of an assumption, But I said, you know,
Speaker 1: I wonder how many of them are illegal? I wonder
Speaker 1: how many of them are legal? Who wants of the
Speaker 1: twenty two MS thirteen gang members in California who are
Speaker 1: just part of this federal gang and racketeering and murder indictment,
Speaker 1: how many of them are in the country illegally? Out
Speaker 1: of the twenty two, nineteen of them are illegal aliens
Speaker 1: in the United States? Nineteen of twenty two, folks. Does
Speaker 1: that surprise anybody? Oh? But I thought, all the illegals
Speaker 1: who are here make this country better and safer and
Speaker 1: smarter and more productive. And they're better than Americans, and
Speaker 1: if you don't see that, you're an evil racist and
Speaker 1: you're a bad person. Right. I thought that. I thought
Speaker 1: that's what we're all supposed to Isn't that what we're
Speaker 1: all supposed to believe? Should it matter to us that
Speaker 1: nineteen of twenty two MS thirteen gang members clearly broke
Speaker 1: US law to get into this country and then murdered
Speaker 1: people who would otherwise be alive had these gang members
Speaker 1: not been able to violate immigration law to get into
Speaker 1: this country. And I just also wonder when are we
Speaker 1: allowed to really have a discussion about this where objecting
Speaker 1: to gang bangers who cut out people's hearts after hacking
Speaker 1: them to death with machetes in public parks. We just
Speaker 1: don't want that because that's horrible and it's evil. It's
Speaker 1: not actually rooted in racism xenophobia. We don't want anyone
Speaker 1: of any race cutting out hearts and hacking people to pieces.
Speaker 1: I think that's pretty straightforward. But what do you do
Speaker 1: you make it to the general You're on the debate stage.
Speaker 1: He's lying, he's saying we're doing great, that's his brand,
Speaker 1: We're stronger than ever. He starts making fun of your age,
Speaker 1: your mental state starts going after you in ways that
Speaker 1: this is. I mean, come on, Donald, come on, Matt,
Speaker 1: how many pushups do your pal? You know, you know,
Speaker 1: come on, run with me, Matt, Joe Biden, everybody, come on,
Speaker 1: come on, man, how many push ups you want to do? Here? Man?
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is he's so passed his whatever prime he had,
Speaker 1: and so clearly not going to be the Democrat nominee.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I don't know who's still giving him
Speaker 1: money and thinking that that's a good investment in the
Speaker 1: political future of this country. But there are still people
Speaker 1: out there. Biden is not going. I've been saying it
Speaker 1: all along. He's by the end of the summer, he
Speaker 1: will no longer be the front runner. I stand behind that.
Speaker 1: I think it's maybe it won't be till October, but
Speaker 1: do you give it one more debate and Biden wall
Speaker 1: of a sudden and once he once he's not in
Speaker 1: the one spot, there's no reason to vote for Biden anymore.
Speaker 1: As soon is he isn't the front runner, the rest
Speaker 1: of it all collapses because his inevitability and electability is
Speaker 1: the only thing he really has going for him. That
Speaker 1: and his connections to Barack Obama, whom, as I've noted
Speaker 1: many times before on the show, is unwilling to come
Speaker 1: out and formally endorse Joe Biden, which I have to
Speaker 1: tell you I think says a lot about Joe Biden
Speaker 1: might say a lot about Barack Obama too, But Biden
Speaker 1: is not someone that can get his former former president
Speaker 1: that he served under to support him openly, and he
Speaker 1: says he doesn't want him to. I do not believe
Speaker 1: Barrock would do it, because Barrock was always always about Barack.
Speaker 1: He just does not strike me as as a deeply
Speaker 1: loyal fellow to the group around him in the White House,
Speaker 1: except for Valerie Jarrett and you know, maybe a couple
Speaker 1: of others. But Biden's run around saying all kinds of
Speaker 1: crazy stuff, including on on healthcare, and he sticks to
Speaker 1: the Obamacare lies as though nothing has happened in the
Speaker 1: last ten years or so last eight years, I guess,
Speaker 1: but he sticks to this stuff. Play three. How many
Speaker 1: of you have when you were working like your and
Speaker 1: you may still be working many of you, how many
Speaker 1: of you like your employer based healthcare? Did you think
Speaker 1: it was adequate? Now? If I come along and say
Speaker 1: finish you can't have it anymore. Well, that's what medicare
Speaker 1: for all of those You cannot have it, period number one.
Speaker 1: There was a hiatus spot in between. By the way,
Speaker 1: how long it's going to take. So I leave people
Speaker 1: the option. If you like your healthcare plan, your employer
Speaker 1: based plan, you can keep it. If in fact you
Speaker 1: have you can keep it. That is obviously not true,
Speaker 1: and you know we've been through this before. What he's
Speaker 1: saying is that even if they you know, even if
Speaker 1: they were to try to set up more people with
Speaker 1: a public option, I mean, they're they're just going to
Speaker 1: keep going with this lie. But the moment that your
Speaker 1: employer can expect that you can get on a public option,
Speaker 1: you are no longer going to have employer sponsored health insurance.
Speaker 1: The moment that your employer is going to say a
Speaker 1: hold on a second, you mean that you can just
Speaker 1: go to the government and they'll they'll pay for all
Speaker 1: your healthcare. Why would they pay Well, you know, private
Speaker 1: plans cannot exist in a Medicare for all world. So
Speaker 1: you know his healthcare plan he's saying is you know,
Speaker 1: you can keep it. But the moment they open a
Speaker 1: public option, which they're all talking about, that's it's all over,
Speaker 1: because on the public option is going to become the
Speaker 1: only option, because who's gonna pay for your private health
Speaker 1: insurance when they can just say go on the public option.
Speaker 1: I don't want to deal with this. And of course
Speaker 1: you won't be able to keep your private insurance, just
Speaker 1: like you wouldn't be able to keep your plan. They
Speaker 1: keep saying that, you know, they can radically transform the
Speaker 1: healthcare industry without making any disruptive changes, but of course
Speaker 1: that's not true. And then oh, there's also the issue
Speaker 1: of how they're gonna pay for it. We have Bernie
Speaker 1: Sanders on yesterday saying forty trillion dollars four zero trillion, Baby,
Speaker 1: that's a lot, even even in Bernie dollars. You know
Speaker 1: this isn't This isn't you know rubles in nineteen ninety two,
Speaker 1: This is US dollars is real money. Well, you gotta
Speaker 1: bring up the Honeymoon the Soviet Union book, Well, are
Speaker 1: you gonna do it? I think it was actually nineteen
Speaker 1: eighty nine he went to Soviet Union. But nonetheless it
Speaker 1: was very nice. There, shortest breadlines I've seen in a
Speaker 1: long time in a functioning socialist country. But even Kamala
Speaker 1: Harris has problems explaining how her healthcare plan would be
Speaker 1: paid for. I mean, Bernie's just saying it's gonna be
Speaker 1: paid for by you know, magic fairy dust or something.
Speaker 1: I mean, essentially printing money. Bernie the only way, and
Speaker 1: just give it time. You'll hear them start to talk
Speaker 1: about modern monetary theory. The only way that Bernie and
Speaker 1: the gang can get their stuff paid is if they
Speaker 1: just start printing money, which is going to hurt those
Speaker 1: at the bottom end of the spectrum much more than
Speaker 1: those at the top, because if you have assets, when
Speaker 1: there's money printing, that goes on. Whether it's digital or
Speaker 1: actual currency doesn't matter. When you have asset inflation. The
Speaker 1: people that are at the top but own assets, they
Speaker 1: do okay, right. If you own a lot of real estate,
Speaker 1: you own a lot of stock, because your assets, the
Speaker 1: numbers go up on those. If you are a wage earner,
Speaker 1: no numbers do not go up for you. Your expenses
Speaker 1: go up, your housing and medical and healthcare expenses will
Speaker 1: all go up, but your wages won't necessarily go up. Nope,
Speaker 1: they still get paid what you get paid, and that's
Speaker 1: where you get even more revolutionary. Fervor from people to
Speaker 1: feel like they're being left behind. That's worth and this
Speaker 1: is a lot of the class warfare stuff that works
Speaker 1: for Democrats is driven by exactly that process of artificially
Speaker 1: low interest rate, inflating asset bubbles, taking on a tremendous
Speaker 1: amount of debt, and now the debt is disproportionately among
Speaker 1: those least capable of paying it, those in the bottom
Speaker 1: a bottom quarter of the income scale in this country,
Speaker 1: and students who have no income really, and they come
Speaker 1: out of with student loans. And then you also have
Speaker 1: a lot of subprime borrowers, particularly in the auto market.
Speaker 1: But so, how does Kamala Harris say that she's going
Speaker 1: to pay for her government takeover of healthcare? Which she's
Speaker 1: not even sure what she's for, but she'll figure it
Speaker 1: out when the polls tell her play for You just
Speaker 1: said that you were not in favor of a middle
Speaker 1: class tax hike, yes, correct, How do you propose to
Speaker 1: pay for your version of Medicare for all if it
Speaker 1: resembles what Senator standards. Part of it is going to
Speaker 1: have to be about Wall Street paying more. It's going
Speaker 1: to have to be about looking at how we and
Speaker 1: what we tax in terms of financial services. That's part
Speaker 1: of it. But the other part of it is to
Speaker 1: understand that this is about an investment which will reap
Speaker 1: a great return on the investment. If we can't only
Speaker 1: look at this issue in terms of cost without thinking
Speaker 1: about benefit. Huh So, just give the government more of
Speaker 1: your money and the government will somehow transform the healthcare
Speaker 1: system to give you better healthcare without doing anything to
Speaker 1: make the healthcare system better. This is not an exaggeration.
Speaker 1: This is the promise that Democrats are making you. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's gonna cost you more. They're gonna take more your
Speaker 1: money in taxes. Whether they admit that or not, it is.
Speaker 1: They're going to have to raise your taxes. So they're
Speaker 1: gonna raise taxes on people. They're gonna raise taxes on
Speaker 1: the middle class, there, taxes on everybody. But their promise is, oh,
Speaker 1: just give us your money, and then the healthcare you
Speaker 1: get from the government when you no longer direct where
Speaker 1: those dollars go will be better than what you're getting
Speaker 1: right now. No way, no way, not possible. Remember, Obamacare
Speaker 1: really largely dealt with the unensured individual market and hasn't
Speaker 1: touched employer sponsored plans. If they touch employer sponsored plans,
Speaker 1: then the whole system gets dramatically altered, and they're going
Speaker 1: to destroy it. They will destroy the Democrats across the board,
Speaker 1: will destroy your healthcare. I assure you. The president of
Speaker 1: Planned Parenthood, doctor Lena wyn is out. She has been
Speaker 1: pushed out of that abortion organization, the biggest abortion organization
Speaker 1: in the country. And very interesting reporting coming from inside
Speaker 1: of Planned Parenthood or about the inner workings of Planned Parenthood,
Speaker 1: that tells us much about the circumstances of that organization.
Speaker 1: You know, I interviewed doctor When a while ago, and
Speaker 1: I was told that there were concerns about having me
Speaker 1: do that interview because I'm an enemy of choice, which
Speaker 1: I've always thought was an interesting interesting phrase. Choice. What
Speaker 1: kind of choice, folks? Why can't we just have them
Speaker 1: say abortion if abortion is not a problem, if abortion
Speaker 1: is a medical procedure. You know, I am pro appendectomy
Speaker 1: when needed, I don't and I'm not afraid to say it.
Speaker 1: You know, if you need to have your appendix out,
Speaker 1: I say have your appendix out. I don't say I'm
Speaker 1: pro choice, the choice being you can have an appendectomy.
Speaker 1: Why why can't they just say they're a pro abortion
Speaker 1: if it's just a medical procedure, because we know that
Speaker 1: the whole movement is full of lies and misdirection and
Speaker 1: all kinds of obscuring of what's really going on. Because
Speaker 1: if people knew, they would reject it, if they really
Speaker 1: thought about it, they would reject it. But doctor Wynn
Speaker 1: wasn't pushing abortion enough. That's why they pushed her out.
Speaker 1: Now they it was considered a victory for them from
Speaker 1: a pr perspective to have an MD, a medical doctor
Speaker 1: at the head. Before that, it had been Cecile Richards,
Speaker 1: who was just a stone cold pro abortion political operative
Speaker 1: and fundraiser. That's that was all. She was just about
Speaker 1: raising all that cash and making sure the politicians were
Speaker 1: in her pocket and the media was on her side,
Speaker 1: and that was it. And that's that's really what Because
Speaker 1: Planned Parenthood is actually a political organization. It's not a
Speaker 1: healthcare organization. It's the political advocacy arm of abortion. It
Speaker 1: also provides abortion. So you know, people say that, you know,
Speaker 1: the NRA is just all these gun sellers that want
Speaker 1: to make money. No, the NRA is just in favor
Speaker 1: of Second Amendment rights. And then there are gun sellers
Speaker 1: that these are not the same things. Planned Parenthood is
Speaker 1: both the lobbyist and the salesperson, like Planned Parenthood is
Speaker 1: both in favor of politically and the provider of day
Speaker 1: to day But doctor Wynn released in email with the following,
Speaker 1: remember this is the head of Planned Parenthood. I'm leading
Speaker 1: the organization sooner than I'd hoped because of philosophical differences
Speaker 1: about the direction and future of Planned Parenthood. I came
Speaker 1: to Planned Parenthood to run a national healthcare organization and
Speaker 1: to advocate for the broad range of public health policies
Speaker 1: that affect our patient's health, ensuring access to quality, affordable healthcare,
Speaker 1: the full spectrum of reproductive healthcare before, during, after pregnancy, etc.
Speaker 1: The new board leadership determined the priority of Planned Parenthood
Speaker 1: moving forward is to double down on abortion rights advocacy.
Speaker 1: The landscape changing dramatic in the last several months, and
Speaker 1: the right to safe, legal abortion under attack like never before.
Speaker 1: I understand the shift in the board's prioritization. I'll do
Speaker 1: everything I can to make sure there's a smooth transition. Folks.
Speaker 1: This woman who was the head of Planned Parenthood was
Speaker 1: pushed out of Planned Parenthood because she was advocating to
Speaker 1: use Planned parenthood as actual healthcare centers, meaning that they
Speaker 1: would do abortions but also do real health care work.
Speaker 1: And that's a problem, you know why, because Plant Paradode
Speaker 1: doesn't care about all that other stuff. That's a cover
Speaker 1: that's a cover story, all that other Oh, the mammograms
Speaker 1: and the STI screen, that's not what they're about. That's
Speaker 1: not why they exist. Plenty of other places can do that.
Speaker 1: So she wasn't on mission, on task enough for them,
Speaker 1: because the mission of planed Pardode is to provide abortions,
Speaker 1: to conduct the abortion procedure, and to fight ferociously in
Speaker 1: the public realm for the right to an abortion at
Speaker 1: all nine months of a pregnancy for any reason and
Speaker 1: no reason, to work with the media, leftist media and
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party to make this the one unassailable right
Speaker 1: that the left holds sacred. And it gets even a
Speaker 1: little bit stranger than this. I mean, as if that's
Speaker 1: not enough, So yeah, you have you have to be
Speaker 1: not very bright. I think the plan Parrodode is not
Speaker 1: really first and foremost concerned with abortion. I mean, of
Speaker 1: course it is right, that's there'll be no problem with it.
Speaker 1: Otherwise there is no constituency the Republican Party is not,
Speaker 1: in fact, trying to stop women from getting access to
Speaker 1: you know, contraceptives, or stop women from getting mammograms or
Speaker 1: you know that that is that is a lie. That
Speaker 1: is just a falsehood. It's propaganda that they spread. The
Speaker 1: other reasons why they went after I mean, this is
Speaker 1: this is fascinating. This is reporting from BuzzFeed when quote
Speaker 1: sometimes went through Plant Parenthood's press releases deleting the world
Speaker 1: word sexual from the phrase sexual and reproductive health. She
Speaker 1: also resisted using abortion as a standalone, preferring abortion care
Speaker 1: or other phrases entirely so that she was trying to
Speaker 1: soften this and make this all about women's healthcare. And
Speaker 1: the problem with Planned Parenthood's eyes is that Planned Parents
Speaker 1: not really about women's healthcare. And everybody knows that, right,
Speaker 1: It's all a facade, it's all a lie. It's about abortion.
Speaker 1: But the other part that I found just fascinating and
Speaker 1: was that she was getting in trouble for two sources
Speaker 1: told BuzzFeed News Here you Go that when refused to
Speaker 1: use trans inclusive language, for example, refusing to say people
Speaker 1: instead of women and telling staff that she believed talking
Speaker 1: about transgender issues would quote isolate people in the Midwest
Speaker 1: for a period of a few months when sometimes went
Speaker 1: through planned paranoids press rule. Yeah, and that's where she
Speaker 1: removed some of the other words. Folks. That's right, because
Speaker 1: she's talking about women's health, on women's reproductive rights. But
Speaker 1: they want to make it people's health and people's reproductive
Speaker 1: rights because they think that men can be women and
Speaker 1: therefore men can have babies. If you think that I'm
Speaker 1: making that up, I take you to this morning when
Speaker 1: I wake up and I look at look at my Twitter,
Speaker 1: I look at what's going on here and Sky News. Okay,
Speaker 1: the British broadcaster, big cable broadcaster has a story. This
Speaker 1: is the headline. Man who gave birth loses anonymity in
Speaker 1: his bid to be registered as father on birth certificate.
Speaker 1: All right, this is a woman who has taken hormone therapy.
Speaker 1: That that's a woman gave birth to a baby, and
Speaker 1: that woman now wants to be called a man through
Speaker 1: hormone therapy therapy. But guess what, a man did not
Speaker 1: give birth to a baby. That is not a thing
Speaker 1: that happened. And I don't know how much crazier the
Speaker 1: liberals are going to get that they keep doing this,
Speaker 1: they keep burning their hand in the stove in the
Speaker 1: same place. We'll say, men cannot get pregnant, and they'll say, yes,
Speaker 1: they can, And then we have to say, are you morons?
Speaker 1: They're that blinded by the rhineology. Of course, men cannot
Speaker 1: get pregnant. This is as basic. This is as basic
Speaker 1: a fact as exists in the world. There is no
Speaker 1: more clear factual statement. Men cannot get pregnant. Men cannot
Speaker 1: have They do not have a womb and cannot have baby.
Speaker 1: It does not exist. So here we are. But the
Speaker 1: head of Planned Parenthood, who is an MD, refuses to
Speaker 1: ignore science, and they push her out because Planned Parenthood
Speaker 1: is a rancid, left wing, evil political organization that does
Speaker 1: a medical procedure and makes a lot of money off
Speaker 1: of it. Right, That's what it is. That's what Planned
Speaker 1: Parenthood's all about. They do abortions for profit, and they
Speaker 1: want to make sure they can continue to do that. Look,
Speaker 1: there are some things that I'm very confident of. One
Speaker 1: of them, and I've said it to you before, I'll
Speaker 1: say it to you again, is that there will be
Speaker 1: future generations will look back on what has been going
Speaker 1: on in the era of rovweight in this country, and
Speaker 1: they will look in on it. They will look on
Speaker 1: it with revulsion. They will not believe how barbaric we
Speaker 1: were over this period. And I know life Buck, I wasn't,
Speaker 1: but yeah, I mean, it's the law of the Land
Speaker 1: of America, folks. It is the law in this country,
Speaker 1: in all fifty states, thanks to one of the worst
Speaker 1: Supreme Court decisions in all history, if not if not
Speaker 1: the worst, the most completely upside down in its legal thinking,
Speaker 1: just making up, just making it up, just completely formulating
Speaker 1: a law out of tech that does not exist anyway.
Speaker 1: Plan doctor Wynn is out. I'm sure they've got some
Speaker 1: crazy abortion extremists in there now, so fuck up. Air
Speaker 1: Force warns against storming Area fifty one as Facebook event
Speaker 1: reaches one point five million attendees. What the heck is
Speaker 1: going on here, folks? You got over one point five
Speaker 1: million people that's say that they're going to storm Area
Speaker 1: fifty one as of septem They're gonna do it on
Speaker 1: September twentieth, and people are saying that quote we will
Speaker 1: meet up, he's from the Facebook page. We'll meet up
Speaker 1: at the Area fifty one Alien centat tourist attraction and
Speaker 1: coordinate our entry. If we Naruto run, we can move
Speaker 1: faster than their bullets. Let's see them aliens. Naruto refers
Speaker 1: to the running style of the Japanese anime character Naruto
Speaker 1: Uzooo Zumaki. Air Force spokesperson Laura mc andrews has told
Speaker 1: ABC News the United States Air Force is aware of
Speaker 1: the Facebook post. The Nevada Test and Training Range is
Speaker 1: an area where the Air Force tests and trains combat aircraft.
Speaker 1: As a matter of p we do not discuss specific
Speaker 1: security measures, but any attempt to illegally access military installations
Speaker 1: or military training areas is dangerous. I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: think anyone's really that dumb that they're going to try
Speaker 1: to do this. But you say this and then some
Speaker 1: people do really, really stupid things. I don't know how
Speaker 1: many of you know Tank Sinatra on Twitter and Instagram.
Speaker 1: He's a social media influencer. He wrote that Area fifty
Speaker 1: one is just Coachella for conspiracy theorists. So if Aera
Speaker 1: fifty one is supposed to be where there are aliens,
Speaker 1: right that they tried to UFOs and stuff like that.
Speaker 1: Producer Mark, do you know anything about Area fifty one?
Speaker 1: You know things I know it was in a couple
Speaker 1: of video games, but what's the best video game that
Speaker 1: AERA fifty one is in. I think he was in
Speaker 1: a Simpsons game, I want to say. And it was
Speaker 1: definitely in Grand Theft Auto. You've got five stars immediately,
Speaker 1: huh if you entered it. I mean, other than that,
Speaker 1: I don't really know what is What are the conspiracies
Speaker 1: about Area fifty one. It's all UFO stuff, right, yeah.
Speaker 1: I believe like there's aliens hid in there, spaceships or
Speaker 1: stuff like that. At least that's what people say. I mean.
Speaker 1: This is the Yeah, this is from from the Wikipedia,
Speaker 1: so who knows how accurate it is, but it's the
Speaker 1: highly classified US Air Force facility in the Nevada Test
Speaker 1: and Training Range. Officially, the facility is called Homey Airport
Speaker 1: or Groom Lake. I was unaware of that. Let's see here.
Speaker 1: According to Wikipedia, it's um the IRREDU. Let me see
Speaker 1: Groom Lake. The history is unclear. Oh the YouTube program
Speaker 1: they operated there? Yeah, so they tested some some sensitive
Speaker 1: aircraft there, folks. I really don't think that means they've
Speaker 1: got little space eliots locked up ed two smoke contators.
Speaker 1: Take me to your leader. I don't think that that's
Speaker 1: a thing. I don't. I don't believe that that's the case.
Speaker 1: But producer Mark, do you believe in do you believe
Speaker 1: in actually trustrial life? Yeah? Of course that's where the
Speaker 1: Men in Black or hidden right. See now you're just
Speaker 1: now you're just being smarmie. You know. I was going
Speaker 1: to take you there and and say you should let
Speaker 1: me know what you think. I never got his into
Speaker 1: the X Files, as I probably should have. I feel
Speaker 1: like I wish that show wasn't as dated as it is,
Speaker 1: because maybe I'd go back and check it out again.
Speaker 1: But I think that because I saw some episodes of
Speaker 1: it and it was really good and it's a cool
Speaker 1: concept for sure. Men in Black. They made some additional
Speaker 1: Men in Black movies and it just it just became
Speaker 1: too noisy and too commercial, man too much, too much
Speaker 1: away from the original. The recent one that was within
Speaker 1: two months was just terrible. Oh, I'm sure, I'm sure
Speaker 1: anything with that will Smith just I mean, Hollywood can't
Speaker 1: seem to just make cool new concepts. They just love
Speaker 1: to churn out, you know, the the fifth iteration of something,
Speaker 1: even after the three or four before it were pretty terrible.
Speaker 1: But you know, what do I know? But I will
Speaker 1: say this for the folks who care, which is probably
Speaker 1: very few of you. Bad Blood, which is a great book.
Speaker 1: But this is actually the Netflix series about the Risudo
Speaker 1: crime family in Montreal actually pretty good. I thought it'd
Speaker 1: be a bunch of guys evading the Mounties and being
Speaker 1: super polite to each other, like, oh, ay, you know,
Speaker 1: but you know, oh don't you know? Oh, I'm sorry, Ay,
Speaker 1: But it turns out that the Rasido crime family was
Speaker 1: a real serious syndicate up in Montreal. Who knew Montreal.
Speaker 1: It's some rough stuff going on. It's a good series
Speaker 1: on Netflix. Check it out. Hey, Team Buck, it's time
Speaker 1: for roll call. Well, Team tomorrow, I'm out. I'm doing
Speaker 1: a little bit of an international travel for a couple
Speaker 1: of days. Can't give you much more on it than
Speaker 1: that it's it's gonna be very interes interesting though. I
Speaker 1: can tell you that it will involve the border, but
Speaker 1: being on the other side of the border. And that's
Speaker 1: what I've got for you right now. It's gonna be
Speaker 1: I'm gonna have some stories for you tomorrow. We will
Speaker 1: have my friend Raheem because some in and on Friday
Speaker 1: Ben Winegardner from New York Winegarden. Did I say Winegardner?
Speaker 1: I'm in wine Garden. Ben won't mind. He's a buddy
Speaker 1: of mine. So we'll have great guest host for a
Speaker 1: couple of days. I will be back on Monday pretty much,
Speaker 1: coming right off the plane and heading right into the studio.
Speaker 1: That is the plan for right now. So there we
Speaker 1: have it. How But yeah, I'm gonna go do some bucks,
Speaker 1: gonna go make some stories happen. I'm gonna go do
Speaker 1: some things, talk to the folks. Will be It'll be
Speaker 1: good times. I wish I could say more, but for
Speaker 1: right now, we'll have to leave it right there. Facebook
Speaker 1: dot Com, slash buck Sexton, that's how you send me
Speaker 1: a message here for roll call Happy. Who's your hellos?
Speaker 1: From Richard? I think it was Sun Sue who said
Speaker 1: that when two enemies are attacking each other, wait till
Speaker 1: they are done, then destroy the weekend winner. I can
Speaker 1: see what Trump is doing with the socialist squad. I
Speaker 1: just wish he had waited till they were done attacking
Speaker 1: each other first. These people are nuts. Shield's eye. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I do think that there was a little bit of
Speaker 1: an interruption of the intramural fighting among the various Democrats here,
Speaker 1: Pelosi and the whole squad around her and all the
Speaker 1: rest of it. I do think that that was a
Speaker 1: real phenomenon, right, Pelosi and the squad and then everyone
Speaker 1: around that. But Trump's gonna Trump. And here we are
Speaker 1: a few days into this, and there's been such an outcry,
Speaker 1: such an uproar, probably the biggest uproar over anything Trump
Speaker 1: has said or tweeted in a very long time, maybe
Speaker 1: since Charlottesville. Really, I think you could probably make that case.
Speaker 1: And he's not backing down at all. And in fact,
Speaker 1: he says that people who want to believe, people who
Speaker 1: want to act in good faith know what he meant
Speaker 1: and know that he did not mean it as a
Speaker 1: racist comment. And that's what the president believes, and that's
Speaker 1: what people who believe the president believe. And those who
Speaker 1: hate the President and think that everything he says is
Speaker 1: racist and everything he does is terrible, guess what, they
Speaker 1: don't believe him, and they think that he was a
Speaker 1: racist before he said this. So what's amazing here is
Speaker 1: that nothing really changes, right, nothing really gets This doesn't
Speaker 1: move the needle. It's a big fight, but it's like
Speaker 1: the unstoppable force against the immovable object. It's the Hulk
Speaker 1: and the Thing. I guess I don't know what the
Speaker 1: mark who wins the Hulk or the Thing? Those are
Speaker 1: different universes completely, Yeah, but what do you mean? They're
Speaker 1: both big, strong superheroes. All right, I guess i'd pick
Speaker 1: the Hulk. I picked the Hulk too, right, Yeah. The
Speaker 1: Thing versus Colossus, I guess i'd picked the Thing. I
Speaker 1: really I feel like Colossus because he's Russian and he's
Speaker 1: got the cool accent. All right. John Shields hie a
Speaker 1: real news fan for two years. I try to debate
Speaker 1: people on Obama's policies. Mostly they answer any question by
Speaker 1: changing the subject or calling you racist. Now, if you
Speaker 1: ask them to discuss Trump's policies, they change the subject
Speaker 1: or call me and Trump racist. It must be really
Speaker 1: hard to be a person on the left and live
Speaker 1: in that world. From John. Yeah, John, it's I don't know.
Speaker 1: Leftist is gonna be leftists. That's the way it is. Erica.
Speaker 1: As to which order to have kids or dogs, you
Speaker 1: can successfully have dogs with babies and puppies with kids,
Speaker 1: but the combination of puppies and babies is too much work.
Speaker 1: You don't want too in that depend entirely on you
Speaker 1: for their poop and p in the house at the
Speaker 1: same time. Erica, I think you are giving me sage advice.
Speaker 1: I think that what you're onto here, I dig it.
Speaker 1: I think that's probably true. So you'd want to either
Speaker 1: wait till the puppy is in the young dog phase
Speaker 1: before you have the kid, or you have the baby
Speaker 1: and then the baby becomes a toddler and then you
Speaker 1: get the puppy, but you don't want to be dealing
Speaker 1: with all the cleanup crew situation with both of them.
Speaker 1: I think that's true. Matthew Rights. The podcast volume is
Speaker 1: fine via iTunes that pulls direct from the RSS. Some
Speaker 1: podcast apps cash a version of the podcast and distribute
Speaker 1: that copy. Good luck with producer Mike on fixing the
Speaker 1: issue well, Producer Mike preuser Mark. We don't have any
Speaker 1: way to fix it yet, but we're hopeful that if
Speaker 1: there's a problem that we'll get fixed. Adam Buck, I'm
Speaker 1: afraid we're heading for a civil war. Both sides are
Speaker 1: not listening, and it seems to come to blood. It's
Speaker 1: going to come to blood eventually. The tree of liberty
Speaker 1: must be refreshed with the blood of tyrants and patriots
Speaker 1: shields high Adam, don't. I don't think so, my friend.
Speaker 1: I think that we're in a nasty political period, but
Speaker 1: there's still enough that binds us all together as Americans
Speaker 1: that we would we would rightfully feel a revulsion at
Speaker 1: the thought of harming any of our fellow Americans over
Speaker 1: political belief So I don't think we're heading there, and
Speaker 1: I certainly hope, in the strongest sense of the word,
Speaker 1: I certainly hope that that will never be the case.
Speaker 1: But it is rough out there right now. It is
Speaker 1: not easy. Things politically right now are as tense as
Speaker 1: they have been. Rob rights, Amen, mister Sexton, Well amen
Speaker 1: to you, Rob. Rob keeps it short and sweet. I
Speaker 1: like your style, mister Rob. Kristen hey Buck, I love
Speaker 1: your show, but I really do hate it when you
Speaker 1: play sound bites of dems instead of just telling us
Speaker 1: what was said. I hate hearing these people speak and
Speaker 1: avoid it at all costs. When watching a show on
Speaker 1: TV they come on, I fast forward, but I can't
Speaker 1: do that with your podcast. Just tell us what they
Speaker 1: said instead of giving us their horrible speaking voices. Well, Kristina,
Speaker 1: it's I can appreciate that you don't like some of
Speaker 1: the folks that we play the audio from in the air,
Speaker 1: but you have to think of it like that's my
Speaker 1: evidence for you know, I'm presenting the evidence for then
Speaker 1: what I'm going to analyze and for me. Yeah, sometimes
Speaker 1: i'll write it. I'll do what we call the verbate,
Speaker 1: and I will read it rather off of a script or.
Speaker 1: But generally I think it's it adds more of the
Speaker 1: dynamic to hear from a better dynamic, to hear exactly
Speaker 1: what they said and how they said it. So yeah,
Speaker 1: that's you know. I don't know if we can get
Speaker 1: around that, Chris, And I'll try to limit it. I
Speaker 1: try never to subject, you know. Sometimes I'll jump in
Speaker 1: and say, oh, I'm done, I'm done, you know, and
Speaker 1: I'll stop it because I know that it's too brutal
Speaker 1: for you to hear these leftists screeching and you know what,
Speaker 1: don't you just give all your money to charity? Why
Speaker 1: are you so greedy? Why are you so mean? Blarney
Speaker 1: doesn't give much money to charity, but he wants to
Speaker 1: be a socialist, so it doesn't have to because he's
Speaker 1: got your money, and it can only handle so much
Speaker 1: of it, though, And I should probably work at a
Speaker 1: Mary Ann Williams impersonation just so I could be like, yes,
Speaker 1: and then the spirits and the world shall come together
Speaker 1: and buy my book. She has this really affected, strange
Speaker 1: way of talking sometimes that I'm trying to get better
Speaker 1: at it. But oh yes, our spirits as a nation
Speaker 1: will come together as a country, and it's all very wow,
Speaker 1: all very stage to me, Laurel. Right, Heybox, just want
Speaker 1: to let you know I still care about the debt
Speaker 1: sadly though our leaders don't, Laurel. I know our leaders
Speaker 1: don't really care about the debt. And then the problem
Speaker 1: with the debt is that no one wants to care
Speaker 1: about it until it's too late. And when it's too late,
Speaker 1: guess what, it's too late. So I don't know what
Speaker 1: to say about it, other than sometimes I'll bring it
Speaker 1: up on the show. Republicans, the Republican Party is supposed
Speaker 1: to care. And anyone who gets frustrated at me who
Speaker 1: used to be a member of the Tea Party or
Speaker 1: was in the Tea Party movement, I'd have to ask
Speaker 1: them what has changed other than things have gotten worse
Speaker 1: with our debt. The financial situation of the country is
Speaker 1: worse now than it was in twenty twelve, twenty eleven.
Speaker 1: It's worse, but people don't like to hear that. Ronnie rights.
Speaker 1: It was a total pleasure meeting you during our DC vacation.
Speaker 1: One of the highlights of the trip. Thank you for
Speaker 1: your radio show. We met your friend. She was a
Speaker 1: nice lady too. All right, Ronnie, thank you, Thank you
Speaker 1: so much, my friend. I oh, that's right, you were
Speaker 1: you saw me at the Trump Thanks for coming by
Speaker 1: to say hi, Ronnie, you and the missus. It was
Speaker 1: it was the highlight of my day getting to meet you.
Speaker 1: So thank you, Thank you so much. Um, here we go, well,
Speaker 1: here we go. Um. Somebody's writing in about Shields High.
Speaker 1: That's kind of a surprise. It's been a while, I know,
Speaker 1: I haven't. People are like, when's it coming back? Buck?
Speaker 1: Oh gosh, I don't know when. When I can just
Speaker 1: focus on these things? Oh oh, I knew this was
Speaker 1: gonna happen. Penny writes in Airdale terriers are awesome. Meet
Speaker 1: Lincoln and Reagan and she sent me her, yes, her
Speaker 1: very cute Airdale terriers. See whenevery whenever you call out
Speaker 1: a dog breed that that dog owner is like, well,
Speaker 1: my dog is amazing, and you're right, these are cuter
Speaker 1: airdales than I've tended to see in the past. I
Speaker 1: will say that, but yep, there's that you see. No
Speaker 1: matter no matter what kind of dog it is, I
Speaker 1: could say that I am not a fan of you know,
Speaker 1: the the demon dog spawn from the underworld and people.
Speaker 1: Somebody would send me like a a dog with horns
Speaker 1: and a forked tail or whatever, and the whole thing
Speaker 1: or pitchfork and the spiked tail, not forked tail. Well,
Speaker 1: I guess forked tail might be scary too. Let's say,
Speaker 1: my hell dog is amazing. Let's see here. Carrelean, writes Buck.
Speaker 1: I looked into this. This doctor Goo fellow you mentioned
Speaker 1: the other day. His area of interest is an organ transplantation.
Speaker 1: The human uterus has been successfully transplanted into a woman,
Speaker 1: resulting in a full term, successful pregnancy. In theory, this
Speaker 1: could be done to a biological male. Doctor Goo as
Speaker 1: an MD, but does not practice medicine because he was
Speaker 1: kicked out of his residency program. He is not on
Speaker 1: track to try it this time anytime soon. I am
Speaker 1: a practicing surgeon, and I think the idea of this
Speaker 1: is all totally nuts. But don't be surprised if someone
Speaker 1: tries this in our lifetime. I didn't interesting, I didn't know.
Speaker 1: I didn't first of all. While it's a lot about
Speaker 1: doctor Goo that I did not know, and the guy
Speaker 1: seems like a wacko, and yeah, we should not be
Speaker 1: implant you Tory into men just to sort of see
Speaker 1: what we can make happen. So but the Left is
Speaker 1: totally nuts on this stuff these days, and they really
Speaker 1: have no interest in dealing with dealing with reality. They'd
Speaker 1: much rather create some alternate reality where they get to
Speaker 1: call all the shots and tell us what to do
Speaker 1: all the time. So that's where it is. Team, that's it.
Speaker 1: I'll be traveling internationally, like I said, tomorrow, so my
Speaker 1: man Raheem Kassam will be. He is taking over the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hut. I mean, we're giving him the keys, We're
Speaker 1: letting him rock out here in the hut. So hopefully
Speaker 1: I come back and Raheem isn't throwing a giant beach
Speaker 1: party in my living room. But we'll see. So the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hunt will be will be operational tomorrow and Friday,
Speaker 1: we'll have Raheem and Ben Weingarten in, so please do
Speaker 1: tune in and I'll have some great stories for you
Speaker 1: all on Monday about all the stuff that happened abroad.
Speaker 1: Until then, my friends, shields Hot