Speaker 1: Stay right here for our final news roundup and information overload.
Speaker 2: Welcome back to our three of The Sean Hannity Show
Speaker 2: on Greg Jarrett filling in for Sean, who has the
Speaker 2: day off. I'll be back tomorrow. By the way, we
Speaker 2: invite you to join us. Then you can follow me
Speaker 2: on x formerly Twitter at Greg Jarrett. That's Greg, by
Speaker 2: the way, with two g's at the end of Greg,
Speaker 2: two rs and two t's. Also, you can follow my
Speaker 2: columns on my website, Thegreg Jarrett dot Com. I have
Speaker 2: a new column out. It's also on Foxnews dot Com
Speaker 2: entitled new CIA report finally reveals the secret plot to
Speaker 2: take down President Trump. And I invite you to read
Speaker 2: that particular column today propitious only because perhaps we learned
Speaker 2: yesterday that the Department of Justice and the FBI have
Speaker 2: launched a criminal investigation into John an And former CIA director,
Speaker 2: and James Comey, former and disgraced FBI director. And you know,
Speaker 2: we've talked about it over the last couple of hours,
Speaker 2: but we want to turn our attention to something else
Speaker 2: that's been going on. You may have noticed that there
Speaker 2: was a hearing today on Capitol Hill the Oversight Committee
Speaker 2: looking into the mental decline of Joe Biden during his
Speaker 2: four years in the White House before he was ever elected.
Speaker 2: Back in twenty twenty, I warned that cognitively Joe Biden
Speaker 2: was incompetent. It was obvious to anybody paying attention, whether
Speaker 2: it was senility or dementia or something else, he was
Speaker 2: not right in the head, to put it plainly, And
Speaker 2: yet with his you know, hiding in the basement strategy
Speaker 2: during the pandemic, Americans really didn't see what the rest
Speaker 2: of us had witnessed. And he was elected, and almost
Speaker 2: from the outset it was readily apparent that things were
Speaker 2: growing worse month by month, year after year, till finally
Speaker 2: at the June debate just before the election, an utter meltdown.
Speaker 2: Very little of what Joe Biden said made sense, prompting
Speaker 2: Trump at one point to say, I don't even know
Speaker 2: what he said at the end of that answer, I
Speaker 2: don't even think he understands. It was truly embarrassing, And
Speaker 2: the more that clip is played, the more mortifying I
Speaker 2: think it is for most Americans to look back and say,
Speaker 2: wait a minute, this guy was sitting in the Oval
Speaker 2: Office making decisions for the fate of our nation. And
Speaker 2: I think we all know what was going on going on.
Speaker 2: He was president in name only. His inner circle was
Speaker 2: making crucial decisions for the nation. And one of the
Speaker 2: things that they were deciding was executive orders that were
Speaker 2: being issued under his name but not his signature, as
Speaker 2: well as pardons and commutations. An autopen was being used.
Speaker 2: And understand that an autopen has been used by a
Speaker 2: vast number of American presidents for decades. It is perfectly
Speaker 2: legal provided I emphasize that word, there is knowledge and
Speaker 2: consent by the president. Well, what happens if you have
Speaker 2: a president who is so cognitively disabled he's not capable
Speaker 2: of consent, or, in the alternative, if people around him
Speaker 2: don't believe that he is cognitively aware, that they don't
Speaker 2: bother to seek consent, and so on their own they
Speaker 2: make the decision to use the autopen. And understand, under
Speaker 2: the law, just as it is with Wills and Estates,
Speaker 2: you cannot delegate as president the authorization to use the autopen.
Speaker 2: You can't say I hereby give John Smith a complete
Speaker 2: decision making an authorization when and where and how to
Speaker 2: use the autopen. Can't do that. Only the president can
Speaker 2: provide consent and provided he's capable of it and has
Speaker 2: knowledge of the documents that are being signed under his name.
Speaker 2: And recently, during another hearing near A Tandon, who was
Speaker 2: a White House Chief secretary and operated the autopen, said well,
Speaker 2: I don't actually know who authorized me to use the autopen.
Speaker 2: I'd put in a request and somebody in his inner
Speaker 2: circle would grant approval, and then I would use the
Speaker 2: autopen to sign all of these documents. Now, if that's
Speaker 2: the case, those documents are null and void because only
Speaker 2: the president can direct with consent, the use of the autopen. Well,
Speaker 2: there was another hearing today on Capitol Hill before the
Speaker 2: Oversight Committee, and the White House physician Kevin O'Connor was
Speaker 2: called to testify. And what happened He played the fifth.
Speaker 2: James Comer's first question was, were you ever told to
Speaker 2: lie about the president's health? O'Connor pleaded the fifth. He
Speaker 2: wouldn't answer that question. Then there was another question, did
Speaker 2: you ever believe President Biden was unfit to execute his duty?
Speaker 2: Same result, and his attorney then explained, and you know,
Speaker 2: try to understand this, because I can't understand it. He said,
Speaker 2: we're invoking the fifth because of the doctor patient privilege,
Speaker 2: and the privilege means we don't have to answer your questions,
Speaker 2: so we're invoking the Fifth all right. The privilege has
Speaker 2: nothing to do doctor patient with the Fifth Amendment privilege,
Speaker 2: So they conflated the two. Now, what do I think
Speaker 2: was going on? I think the answer to the question,
Speaker 2: were we ever told a lie about the president's health
Speaker 2: would have been yes. But that would implicate the good
Speaker 2: doctor in a conspiracy that could result in criminal charges.
Speaker 2: And to avoid those criminal charges, he's invoking his Fifth
Speaker 2: Amendment right against self incrimination. Joining me now to talk
Speaker 2: about it is Mike Howell, who is the president of
Speaker 2: the Oversight Project and he's really been a leading figure
Speaker 2: and uncovering the auto pin scandal. Mike, thanks for being
Speaker 2: with us. So what do you think about what happened
Speaker 2: today with doctor O'Connor.
Speaker 3: Well, I think your breakdown was terrific. I'll add a
Speaker 3: couple more thoughts to it here. First, you're absolutely right.
Speaker 3: The Fifth is what you claim if you have an
Speaker 3: articuaal fear of actually being prosecuted for criminal activity, and
Speaker 3: so that should raise a lot of red flags. You
Speaker 3: have doctor quaiming the Fifth in a congressional testimony when
Speaker 3: he's being deposed under subpoena. In an interview, he tried
Speaker 3: dodging at the last minute what was going on in
Speaker 3: the doctor's office at the White House where the criminal
Speaker 3: activity that he's afraid to testify about, and his assertion
Speaker 3: of the doctor patient confidentiality is more of a comsplay.
Speaker 3: He wants to publicly argue that he's falling back on
Speaker 3: that long held privilege which doesn't apply here, because it
Speaker 3: sounds better than saying I'm afraid of being prosecuted because
Speaker 3: something may have happened that is prosecutable. And had he
Speaker 3: just claimed the patient doctor privilege, what would have happened
Speaker 3: is Chairman Komer would have over ruled that privilege and
Speaker 3: if he didn't answer the question, held him in contempt.
Speaker 3: So what happens next with the fifth is the House
Speaker 3: has a big decision to make. They can immunize the doctor,
Speaker 3: offer him immunity to get around his fifth Amendment because
Speaker 3: you can't be prosecuted if you're granted immunity by the House,
Speaker 3: and then he's forced to answer. And so that's the
Speaker 3: next dep we would like to see the House take.
Speaker 2: You know, So I was going through in my head,
Speaker 2: my legal head as a lawyer Ford forty five years now,
Speaker 2: I hate to admit that what would be the criminal
Speaker 2: culpability and the only thing I can think of relative
Speaker 2: to the doctor is conspiracy that involves fraud and forgery,
Speaker 2: because signing a pen without authorization, an autopen without authorization
Speaker 2: is forgery, which is a crime. And if others were involved,
Speaker 2: you know, they would be arguably co conspirators. Now, with
Speaker 2: respect to the doctor, I don't think he knew that
Speaker 2: anybody was using an autopen. He was simply, you know,
Speaker 2: there to provide medical treatment. But you know, I just
Speaker 2: don't think he wanted to go down that rabbit hole.
Speaker 2: And his lawyer may envision potential conspiracy crimes beyond what
Speaker 2: I've just identified.
Speaker 3: What do you think, Yes, there certainly are crimes beyond
Speaker 3: just the individual that was using the autopend and you
Speaker 3: nailed the one we've been talking about, which is forgery.
Speaker 3: There's also an impersonation of a federal official fraud in
Speaker 3: those types of crimes. But when you get out to
Speaker 3: the next layer you get the conspiracy charges. Another one
Speaker 3: that we've flagged as misprisonment of a felony basically, when
Speaker 3: you know a felony is happening and you don't report
Speaker 3: it and you violate basically your duty reports, there could
Speaker 3: be some criminal culpability there. But this wasn't just a doctor.
Speaker 3: He was beyond that. He was a close family contact,
Speaker 3: and he clearly issued a lot of public statements that
Speaker 3: were contrary to the truth. And so I think his
Speaker 3: relationships with the Biden and therefore kind of his knowledge
Speaker 3: about the president's decline and how that was handled politically
Speaker 3: them way beyond just the usual patient doctor relationship of
Speaker 3: what happened in the physician's room. He was more part
Speaker 3: of the inner circle than he was squarely just a
Speaker 3: medical professional.
Speaker 2: You know, this strikes me as similar to Woodrow Wilson,
Speaker 2: the president who suffered a terrible, debilitating stroke and was
Speaker 2: completely and utterly incapacitated in his wife, I think it
Speaker 2: was his second wife was the de facto president along
Speaker 2: with Wilson's inner circle. And of course there were no
Speaker 2: television cameras back in the days, you know, no social media,
Speaker 2: no twenty four hour news network, and so it was
Speaker 2: and there was a very complicit media back then, which
Speaker 2: was particularly limited in stroke in scope by technology and
Speaker 2: so you know, that was all hidden from the American
Speaker 2: public back then. But I must say that it seems
Speaker 2: that Biden's inner circle was quite adept and scrupulous at
Speaker 2: trying to hide you know, Joe Biden. They tried him
Speaker 2: out occasionally to read a teleprompter, but he'd wonder all
Speaker 2: over the stage, and he was lost, and he struggled
Speaker 2: even to read a teleprompter. You know, as I look
Speaker 2: back on it, and even though I wrote call Him
Speaker 2: after call Him and post podcast after podcasts describing his
Speaker 2: sinility in his dimension, warning about it even before he
Speaker 2: was elected, and more so after he was elected, the
Speaker 2: media were winning accessories to the cover up, weren't they.
Speaker 3: Oh? Oh, they absolutely were. And that's why what Jake
Speaker 3: Capper and Alex Thompson did with their book Original Sin,
Speaker 3: where they essentially monetized their own cover up, is one
Speaker 3: of the worst things I've ever seen in the media space.
Speaker 3: But you laid it out with the Wilson example. You know,
Speaker 3: after JFK was assassinated, we had four presidents assassinated about
Speaker 3: one hundred years and two presidents that were incapacitated, including Wilson.
Speaker 3: So what the country did is recognize we need a
Speaker 3: clear playbook for how to deal with these types of issues,
Speaker 3: and that is the twenty fifth Amendment. And the fourth
Speaker 3: section of the twenty fifth Amendment contemplated the exact situation
Speaker 3: we were in during the Biden years, where the people
Speaker 3: closest to the president, the vice president, in the cabinet,
Speaker 3: could by a vote transmit to Congress their recognition that
Speaker 3: the president was incapacitated. But the story of the Biden
Speaker 3: administration is the willful failure to invoke that specific provision
Speaker 3: to deal with this specific situation for whatever political reason.
Speaker 3: And we can, you know, venture a guest, that's what
Speaker 3: it is. But ultimately it is that they preferred an
Speaker 3: incapacitated president, and the media preferred that outcome too, because
Speaker 3: the counter to that would have been a massive scandal
Speaker 3: and you know, the ruining of his presidential campaign and
Speaker 3: gets who that would have helped. The truth would have
Speaker 3: helped President Trump, who won anyways, And so that is
Speaker 3: a massive constitutional abuse. The Constitution depends on you know,
Speaker 3: men and women of a character actually adhering to the
Speaker 3: text of our core documents, and instead we had a
Speaker 3: failure to do that, and also a failure to abide
Speaker 3: by the most basic constitutional rules that we have, which
Speaker 3: are there as one person who is president, who we
Speaker 3: as the sovereign citizens, vest with special super and awesome
Speaker 3: powers and authority. They did not do that. We were
Speaker 3: out of the constitutional order big time for four years.
Speaker 3: You know.
Speaker 2: The flaw with the twenty fifth Amendment, and I've always
Speaker 2: believed this is that it demands honesty and integrity in
Speaker 2: elected or public officials, most of them appointed, that they
Speaker 2: just don't have. And to expect them to turn on
Speaker 2: the president, cabinet officials who were appointed by the president,
Speaker 2: the vice president who was selected by the president, is
Speaker 2: expecting too much from what I know of politicians. Mike,
Speaker 2: thanks very much for being with us. Really appreciate it.
Speaker 2: We're gonna pause, take a quick break. We'll be right
Speaker 2: back with more of the Sean Hennity Show.
Speaker 1: Tallig Baldwin's favorite radio talk show host is on the
Speaker 1: air right now, right mister Baldwin, Sean Hennity.
Speaker 2: Makes me laugh every time. I'm Greg Jared filling in
Speaker 2: for Shawn last half hour. A lot of your phone
Speaker 2: calls coming up. We've been talking a great deal about
Speaker 2: the news that the DOJ and FBI have launched a
Speaker 2: criminal investigation into the nefarious James Comy and John Brennan
Speaker 2: arising out of the Trump Russia collusion narrative, which, when
Speaker 2: you think about it, was a conspiracy in and of itself.
Speaker 2: It was fabricated by Hillary Clinton, funded by her campaign,
Speaker 2: weaponized by Callmi, Brennan, the whole gang to frame Trump
Speaker 2: for something he didn't do. They knew from the beginning
Speaker 2: that the dossier was garbage. The FBI debunked it at
Speaker 2: the outset. They secretly fired Christopher Steele, who wrote the dossier.
Speaker 2: They fired him for lying, but they kept all of
Speaker 2: that hidden. They peddled the fairy tale. Brennan even accused
Speaker 2: Trump of treason. And then remember the day the Special
Speaker 2: Council Report came out and found no evidence of collusion, conspiracy.
Speaker 2: It was all a hoax, which was the title of
Speaker 2: my book that came out before the Special Council Report,
Speaker 2: the Russia Hoax, and the sequel book, witch Hunt. There's
Speaker 2: almost nothing in this new CI report incriminating Brennan and
Speaker 2: Comy that wasn't already in chapters two and four of
Speaker 2: witch Hunt, which I invite you to read or reread,
Speaker 2: and on television the day of the Mulla report. Brennan
Speaker 2: sheepishly conceded, and I'm quoting here, I must have received
Speaker 2: bad information. No, John, you helped invent the bad information
Speaker 2: along with Hillary Clinton and Christopher Steele and Komy and Clapper.
Speaker 2: So one of the worst cases of corruption ever and
Speaker 2: the dirtiest trick in political history in my judgment, and
Speaker 2: the media they were witting accessories. They bear equal blame because,
Speaker 2: driven by their hatred of Trump, they were complicit. They
Speaker 2: can victed him in the court of public opinion with
Speaker 2: no real credible evidence. So let's go to our phone lines.
Speaker 2: Joining us now from North Carolina is John. Hi, John,
Speaker 2: how are you doing fine?
Speaker 4: Greg? Thanks for being on. Hey, that was a great
Speaker 4: first hour opening you did. It was very nice. Thank you,
Speaker 4: thank you, And that prompted me to give you a
Speaker 4: call because I called you when you were feeling I
Speaker 4: believe you were feeling in for Sean back in Trump's
Speaker 4: first period back and it must have been eighteen nineteen
Speaker 4: something like that. Yeah, and Bill Barr had just been
Speaker 4: appointed Department of Justice head by Trump. And the question
Speaker 4: that I posted to you back then was do you
Speaker 4: think Bill Barr is going to do anything about this
Speaker 4: and you're your answer was, yeah, I think he's a
Speaker 4: stand up guy.
Speaker 2: Yeah.
Speaker 4: Now, I'm not trying to blame you or fault you
Speaker 4: for it, except except now what we're into, how many
Speaker 4: years later and much more exposure to what's going on
Speaker 4: if you kind of follow the footprints, so to speak.
Speaker 1: Yeah, And I.
Speaker 4: Don't think anything's gonna come This is kind of from
Speaker 4: your first hour question. I don't think anything's going to
Speaker 4: come out of this, even with you got your cash, Pateel,
Speaker 4: you got Dan Bongino, you got Pam BONDI. I it
Speaker 4: would be nice, but I just because of what's been
Speaker 4: going on and my question to you on Bill Barr
Speaker 4: back then, at the end of the day, I think
Speaker 4: what's going on in the country is so deep and
Speaker 4: the forces at play here are so powerful many we
Speaker 4: probably have never even heard of that they are subverting
Speaker 4: the United States of America. They are going to they
Speaker 4: are going to control her and do whatever. And when
Speaker 4: people like I'll use an example recently with Dan Bongino,
Speaker 4: who I followed and liked and I trust the guy.
Speaker 4: I think he's very honest. But Bongino made no qualms
Speaker 4: about how important truth was, and you know, he was
Speaker 4: probably one of the most strongest personalities pushing investigation on
Speaker 4: all this stuff. And then from his surprise and mine
Speaker 4: and my delight, he got picked up by the FBI
Speaker 4: and as soon as he got in there. And I'm
Speaker 4: not blaming him either, I'm not saying he's a fault.
Speaker 4: I think he realized and I think Bill, actually Bill
Speaker 4: O'Reilly brought this up a couple of days ago. Bongino
Speaker 4: got in there and realized I had no idea what
Speaker 4: was at play. And now he's been I think he's
Speaker 4: been told. I think Patel, it's like they've either been
Speaker 4: told directly or indirectly on the side, or they figured
Speaker 4: it out that this is bigger than you ever ever thought.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't know. You know, John, obviously my crystal
Speaker 2: ball fell to the ground and shattered on Bill Barr.
Speaker 3: Oops.
Speaker 2: But look, you know he was and is a stand
Speaker 2: up guy. He's a fine, fine lawyer. But I think
Speaker 2: he was undermined by the deep state, which to this
Speaker 2: day is live and well. And you know, it's very
Speaker 2: hard to overcome and sort of discover the truth behind
Speaker 2: all of the lies and the cover up that has
Speaker 2: been going on for years in years now. You know,
Speaker 2: obviously I've known Dan Bongino for years, cash matel, I've
Speaker 2: known for years. And whether or not they can overcome
Speaker 2: the obstruction that is endemic in the deep state, which
Speaker 2: still operates, I don't know.
Speaker 5: Now.
Speaker 2: Obviously, it's going to take a grand jury to issue
Speaker 2: an indictment, whether it be Brennan or Komi or somebody
Speaker 2: else relative to the Russia hoax. But I do think laws,
Speaker 2: you know, we're violated, as I mentioned in the first hour,
Speaker 2: if it's not as something as simple as false statements
Speaker 2: eighteen USC. One thousand and one, or perjury or deprivation
Speaker 2: of rights under color of law and a conspiracy associated
Speaker 2: with that, and I think those things are all on
Speaker 2: the table. But it would take a US attorney in Washington,
Speaker 2: d C. Currently Jeanine Piro, to present compelling evidence based
Speaker 2: on probable cause to a grand jury and to issue
Speaker 2: an indictment. But from there, think of the uphill battle.
Speaker 2: I mean, this is Washington, d C. John Durham, the
Speaker 2: Special Council had the goods on Denchenko, who was the
Speaker 2: main source for Christopher Steele in where did den Chenko
Speaker 2: get his information from a Hillary Clinton crony and it
Speaker 2: was all a lie, a collection of lies. And yet
Speaker 2: Denchenko walked, Why because it's Washington, d C. Where you know,
Speaker 2: Donald Trump gets like five percent of the vote, and
Speaker 2: so there's a built in bias there that favors any
Speaker 2: defendant that arises out of the Russia hoax. So you know,
Speaker 2: I always try to be an optimist, but Washington DC
Speaker 2: has turned me into a pessimist. So we'll wait and see.
Speaker 2: Let's go to our next caller. Thank you, John for
Speaker 2: your called. David joins us from Colorado.
Speaker 6: Hi David, Hi, Greg, David in Colorado. You know, first
Speaker 6: time caller ever to a radio talk show, but a
Speaker 6: long time listener. And you know, I'm listening and I
Speaker 6: appreciate what you said in the first hour, if you will,
Speaker 6: and talking about the hoax and all that good stuff.
Speaker 6: But what I'm seeing over the past till thirty years
Speaker 6: that I'm just what you were just saying, We're not
Speaker 6: going to win in the deep state and our judiciary subverted.
Speaker 6: And do you really believe that anyone's ever gonna get
Speaker 6: prosecuted even though they have the goods on them.
Speaker 2: You know, I would want to see the evidence before
Speaker 2: I could ever weigh in on you know, the merits
Speaker 2: of a prosecution. You know, remember, probable cause gets you
Speaker 2: to a prosecution, but beyond a reasonable doubt is the
Speaker 2: very high threshold for a conviction. And as I say
Speaker 2: in Washington, d C. I mean, you know, it strikes
Speaker 2: me as an impossibility, right, given the political nature, the
Speaker 2: makeup of the jury, there there is a built in
Speaker 2: bias that comes comes to play. I'll give you an
Speaker 2: example in New York where you know, Donald Trump was
Speaker 2: prosecuted criminally on the most absurd legal case, allegations based
Speaker 2: on laws that don't even apply, and yet he was convicted.
Speaker 2: I mean, so I'm not saying that the criminal justice
Speaker 2: system is corrupt. What you know, what I am saying
Speaker 2: is that it is dependent upon people because people serve
Speaker 2: as jurors and grandeurs, and you know, they bring with
Speaker 2: them all of their own personal prejudices and political biases,
Speaker 2: you know, warts and all. And it does have a
Speaker 2: tendency to infect the system. And you know, it's not
Speaker 2: a perfect system because you know, democracy and a constitutional
Speaker 2: republic is not perfect either. You know, it's it's like
Speaker 2: Winston Churchill who said, you know, democracy is the worst
Speaker 2: form of government in the world except for all the others. Yeah,
Speaker 2: he's sort of right about that. David, Thanks very much.
Speaker 2: Let's go to Wayne of Pennsylvania. Hi, Wayne, how are you?
Speaker 2: Do you have a question or a comment?
Speaker 5: Yes, Greg, Hey, thanks for my call. You were just
Speaker 5: talking about Biden the past several years. I'd like to
Speaker 5: talk about Biden the past several months. Pepper comes out
Speaker 5: with a book, Tell All the Story about Biden, and
Speaker 5: then we get an announcement Biden has stage four cancer.
Speaker 5: Now a week or two after that announcement, Biden is
Speaker 5: speaking to two women and he's like right in their face,
Speaker 5: speaking to these two women. And then we see him
Speaker 5: recently on the beach, and then there's a buzz about
Speaker 5: maybe running nick for president. Now, if someone is going
Speaker 5: through chemotherapy, can you tell me is the doctor that
Speaker 5: made this announcement or whoever made the announcement that he
Speaker 5: had stage four cancer? Can we believe that? No?
Speaker 2: I mean, I don't believe it. That's just my own
Speaker 2: personal opinion. I think it was known for a long
Speaker 2: time and it was concealed and covered up. And you know,
Speaker 2: in terms of Joe Biden thinking he can run for
Speaker 2: president again, and he's you know. I mean he's in
Speaker 2: Lalla Land and you know, his family to me, is
Speaker 2: guilty of elder abuse, you know, to trot him out
Speaker 2: the way they do. You know, Jill brought him out
Speaker 2: on the View. What was that about five or six
Speaker 2: weeks ago? And the guy was comatose and he was
Speaker 2: struggling to put a subject with a predicate and answer
Speaker 2: questions in a coherent way, and Jill had to jump
Speaker 2: in and answer the questions for him. You know, if
Speaker 2: I'm the producer executive producer of the View, I mean,
Speaker 2: I've got to be appalled at myself for even allowing that.
Speaker 2: It's like bringing a camera crew into a nursing home,
Speaker 2: for God's sakes, and you know the View was wrong
Speaker 2: to do it. Jill Biden, I mean, if you want
Speaker 2: to find a villain, Jill Biden is the poster child
Speaker 2: a villainy. And on that happy note, I will take
Speaker 2: a quick break back with more of your calls. On
Speaker 2: the other side, I'm Greag Jared filling In on the
Speaker 2: Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 1: Exposing government weighs down abuse of your liberties every day.
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity is on right now, Greg Jared.
Speaker 2: Filling In for Sean Hannity almost out of time, but
Speaker 2: I do want to go to Connie, and Florida has
Speaker 2: been standing by only Connie because you and I agree.
Speaker 2: What a great author Daniel Silva is.
Speaker 4: Yes, yes, and it didn't include what's his name from
Speaker 4: Long Island.
Speaker 2: I don't know you got me, but you know what.
Speaker 2: The main character in a lot of his books is
Speaker 2: Gabriel alone, and in my next life I want to
Speaker 2: come back as Gabriel, who's a really cool guy but
Speaker 2: tortured soul. So do I really want that? Lynda is like,
Speaker 2: are you nodding your head? Or we torture enough giving
Speaker 2: you commercial break times? Yeah? I am tortured in so
Speaker 2: many different ways. I can't even go into it. But
Speaker 2: it's been fun. I'll be back tomorrow hosting for Sewn
Speaker 2: on The Sean Hannity Show. Many thanks for being with us,
Speaker 2: Have a great day, See you tomorrow.