WEBVTT - Markets, Inflation, And Golf

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets podcast

0:00:15.560 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>called Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. All right, Montlet's bring

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.279
<v Speaker 1>our next guest, Rebecca Felton, senior and market strategist for

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Riverfront Investment Group and her claim to fame. She is

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:32.159
<v Speaker 1>a fellow Spider Matt from the University of Richmond, my

0:00:32.280 --> 0:00:34.839
<v Speaker 1>alma mater, so we can't go wrong there, and Rebecca,

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Um boy, the

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>wall of worry out there for an equity investor is

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn high, and now you add to it over

0:00:44.720 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of months geopolitical risk. How are you

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>guys thinking about the market right here? Well, good morning

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to you both, and thank you for having me. Um.

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're we're cautious somewhat just because of all

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>of the headwinds that we face in terms of headlines,

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>but we have recently actually put some money back to

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>work and we're still a little bit overweight equities because

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we think the fundamentals are so strong. What are some

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of the sectors that you think folks should have some

0:01:11.360 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>exposure to hear? If you, in fact in strates are rising,

0:01:15.400 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>growth is slowing, how do you think about that? Well,

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we are sticking on the growth category with our technology overweight,

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically software and services, because you do have consistency of

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>earnings and revenue growth there, and even if you've got

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to higher multiples, we're willing to pay up for it. Um.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.280
<v Speaker 1>We've also added back to our energy exposure, so we're

0:01:36.280 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 1>trying to sort of barbel that growth with some sicklicality.

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 1>So we have gone a little overweight energy. And we've

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>also gone overweight financials in our longer horizon portfolios because

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you do have the play into higher net interest margins

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and you've also got better loan growth, so we're sticking

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>with some large cat banks there too. Are you worried

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.880
<v Speaker 1>about a recession? We had a survey from our end

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Live blog and about half of the people we survey

0:02:02.600 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to expect a recession in three Well, it is. It

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>is a great question, and you know, one of the

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 1>things that We always say our mantras process over prediction,

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>so we don't think we have a better crystal ball

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>than anyone else, and arguably that the worries are growing

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:20.600
<v Speaker 1>every day as to whether or not we cannot navigate

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a soft landing and avoid a recession. UM. So uh,

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.680
<v Speaker 1>we would agree that that the probabilities are are rising,

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.120
<v Speaker 1>but we are still not saying that we expect to

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 1>have one next year. Rebecca, We're going to really start

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>kicking off big time earning season next week. What do

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you think is critical for this market? How are you

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:42.760
<v Speaker 1>thinking about this earning season? Well, I guess the good

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>news is there's a lot of companies have already guided lower.

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Right when you look at the number of companies UM

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:51.399
<v Speaker 1>that have pre announced, the majority of those pre announcements

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>have been lower guidance. So we believe the bar is

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.480
<v Speaker 1>set low. Growth for the quarter is expected to come

0:02:57.480 --> 0:03:00.760
<v Speaker 1>in at a low single digit level, so it should

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 1>be a quarter where the surprises maybe to the upside,

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and we're optimistic about that in terms of actual earnings growth,

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>But of course we expect there to be more caution

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 1>around wage pressures, supply chain disruptions and that sort of thing.

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>So the key will be to watch margins. So far

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.720
<v Speaker 1>they have held in above average up around twelve, so

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>we're hopeful that the companies will still have pricing power

0:03:24.080 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and be able to deliver on those margins, which is

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be key to keeping multiples up here at

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>these levels. But you think we're going to continue to

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>see supply chain problems, continue to see chip shortage, continue

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to see commodity inflation. Do you stay away from companies

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that are hit by that? Well, I mean we are,

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing some signs of easing, but of course the

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>situation in in in Ukraine Russia that has that has

0:03:48.640 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>caused some aggravation in those supply chains again. Uh so

0:03:53.840 --> 0:03:57.520
<v Speaker 1>again we've increased our our level of cyclicality in terms

0:03:57.560 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of energy. Also, we've got an avoid an industrial specifically

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure place, so some of those areas are going to

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe be um impacted by these types of things. But

0:04:08.440 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>we're going to take away and see attitude before we

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:15.200
<v Speaker 1>start adjusting positions dramatically versus where we are. Rebecca, how

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>do you and your firm, Riverfront Investment Group, how do

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you think about E s G investing? Does that factor

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>into your analysis at all? It seems to be gaining

0:04:25.080 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of momentum with a lot of different types

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>of investors. Well, absolutely, it's gaining traction that when you

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>think about how what we do, you know, we we

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>are products are global as allocation products. So anytime we

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>want to think about thematic investing, it has to be

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:46.600
<v Speaker 1>against the backdrop of that global allocation theme. But then

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.119
<v Speaker 1>you also have to remember that E s G means

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>something different to every investor, so it's really hard, I think,

0:04:52.080 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>for us to to go down that path in a

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>global diversified strategy, So we're sticking with sort of true

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>sector plays and that sort of thing, rather than really

0:05:01.080 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>playing in what would be called traditionally an E s

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>G world. At what point do you, um, how, how

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 1>how or when do you expect inflation to come back down? Well,

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's what job number one for the FED right now.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>They're going to do whatever they have what is the wordings,

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>will do whatever it takes um but it's probably still

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be until the back half of this

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>year or maybe even into three given the pressures that

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 1>we've already discussed in terms of supply chain disruptions, higher

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>uh net energy costs for folks um and those sorts

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>of things, and also the wage pressures. Right, the wages

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>are going higher, so it's probably going to be maybe

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we'll still be talking about inflation this time next year,

0:05:47.279 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>but I think that ultimately the FED will succeed. We

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>may not like the ride, but they will be successful

0:05:52.120 --> 0:05:55.359
<v Speaker 1>in terms of accomplishing that mission. These of you the

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>policy changes that they're going to make. Hey, Rebecca, thank

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. We always appreciate getting

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts. Rebecca Felton, Senior market strategist, Riverfront Investment Group.

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:11.919
<v Speaker 1>They are located in lovely Richmond, Virginia. Let's check in

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>with Seth Carpenter, chief Global economists from Morgan Stanley. All Right, Seth,

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>d dollars for a trucker. That sounds inflationary to me.

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about inflation in this marketplace? When

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>you hear news that again Walmarts can pay their truckers

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:31.040
<v Speaker 1>up the hundred ten thousand dollars. Absolutely, that does sound inflationary. UM.

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, though, the trucker shortage is a

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>long standing trend. In fact, the pre dates COVID, and

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the fact that now they're realizing that one way to

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>get people to work for you is to pay them

0:06:41.800 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. Is not overly surprising. But I

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 1>think more broadly, you're right. I mean, there there is

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>a tight labor market. I think there are no two

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:52.279
<v Speaker 1>ways about it. There continues to be very strong aggregate

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>demand and at the end of the day, something's got

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to give. And we have, of course seen not only

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:59.280
<v Speaker 1>strong wages, but we've also seen, as everyone knows, a

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of inflation. I have to say also, and then

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.239
<v Speaker 1>we'll get off the trucker thing. It is a difficult job.

0:07:05.680 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>It is an important job, and it is not a

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>job that you want to just give to anyone, right

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:15.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's dangerous, a big rig in the hands of,

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, someone who doesn't know how to control it.

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>So I'm glad they're finally getting paid more. They deserve it,

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>they earn it, and they should. Um all right, let's

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>get onto the broader economy because um we did a survey.

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Paula just sent you the story. The umly blog did

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a survey set and half of the respondents said they

0:07:33.920 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>expect a recession. Ine Now, considering what we heard from

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Lyle Brainerd and everybody else at the FED, UM it

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>makes more and more sense. Buller just told us he

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 1>thinks they need to raise to three percent, So, um,

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>what do you think? Yeah, so you know, I'm not

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 1>going to say that a recession in three is our

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>baseline at all, um, But I think some of the

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>complinents that you're talking about their do ray at the risk.

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 1>So the FED is in a challenging circumstances situation. They're

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to in effect land a jet on an aircraft

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 1>carrier during a storm, and they've only seen one training

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>film before, right, So it's a very very difficult situation

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to be in. Um. And moreover, the amount by which

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be tightening policy, the speed with which

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:22.400
<v Speaker 1>they're tightening policy, I think is going to be directly

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:26.800
<v Speaker 1>influenced by how strong they see the economy. And right now,

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 1>look at the last Non Front Perils Report, for example,

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>it's clearly very strong right now. So they're on there,

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 1>They're they're clearly asked to start going. So then what

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>would cause us to have a recession next year and

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>not at all our baseline? Cage? But I think I

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 1>could see a few things happening. First, is the FED

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:47.079
<v Speaker 1>getting a little bit overly enthusiastic, and they're going to

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>start running off their balance sheet. We've got some details

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>from that in the Minutes yesterday. But I have to say,

0:08:52.120 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>even after my fifteen years there at the FED spending

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time thinking about the FED balance sheet,

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if anybody tells you they know for sure exactly how

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that un of the balance she is going to affect

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:03.680
<v Speaker 1>markets in the economy, I think they're either lying to

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>you or they're lying to themselves. So there's some possibility

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of of a policy you know, hiccup there. I think

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.360
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, as they start hiking, especially if

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>they front load the hiking, if Heaven forbid, things get

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>worse with the Russian invasion of Ukraine and we have

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:22.319
<v Speaker 1>what we've detailed as the cut off scenario where all

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>energy stops flowing to Europe for example, you could see

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Europe slip into recession. That's got to spill over to

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the US. And if the set is already front loaded

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:32.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the hikes and let the unwinded the

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:35.680
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet go with some unintended consequences. I think that's

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>the sort of constellation of the events that that gets

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>you a recession in early how material is that risk

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>to you seth and that energy risk for Europe leading

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to a recession. UM. Right now, the oil still flowing,

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the dollars and euros are still going into Russia, but

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>boys are growing call to kind of tone that down

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>or limit that it doesn't seem more really tenable. YEA,

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So I completely agree. I mean, I'm not a political scientist,

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>and I cannot forecast where this conflict is going. But

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>but I absolutely subscribe to the way you're reading things,

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.839
<v Speaker 1>which is things are worse now than they were two

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>or three weeks ago. I think the calls for starting

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to cut off with oil with a coal rather so

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it shows you that when maybe we're on that path

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in that direction, the discussions about dollars versus rubles and

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>which accounts are frozen, I think adds to the to

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>the tension. So I think it's got to be a

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>scenario that we take very very seriously. How about this, UM,

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>where's your our start right now? I'd rather start off

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>with how big the aeror bands are around that our star.

0:10:48.160 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the FED has there's the nominal terms at

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>about two and a half. I guess I would very

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>slightly take the under on that but boy, the ability

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to be certain about where that is is very hard

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:01.959
<v Speaker 1>to come by. And I'll just highlight one thing. I mean,

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in one version of the world, the FED having a

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 1>really big balance sheet, all else equal, just makes financial

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.599
<v Speaker 1>conditions easier, which means our star has got to be

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>higher to get the same amount of neutrality. On the

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>other hand, the act of shrinking the balance sheet pushes

0:11:15.880 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>spreads wider and tightens financial conditions. And so as you're

0:11:18.880 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>shrinking the balance sheet, maybe that says our star is

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit lower. Um. I think anybody would be

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 1>an idiot to try to say that they know for

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>sure where it is and and and drive with that knowledge. Instead,

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>where I suspect Powell and company are going is they're

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be driving by feel a little bit sort

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of like what we saw in Alright, thanks so much

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Seth Carpenter, chief Global Economists from Warring Stanley.

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's hep mobile banking. You know, Matt, I

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>am a whiz now at mobile banking. I deposit checks,

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.600
<v Speaker 1>transfer money, wire transfers. I do it all, uh, and

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling pretty good about that. And that's all learned

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>in the last two years let check of a lovely

0:11:57.280 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>in situ chair CEO and founder of BM Technologies help

0:12:00.920 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>banks and folks, you know, kind of get into the

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>digital game on the banking side. Lovely, thanks so much

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. Am I representative of the average

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>person out there? I E I've gotten a lot more

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>tech savvys relates to my banking So absolutely, thank you

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>so much for having me. And just to begin a

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit about b M Technologies, just as a reminder,

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>we are one of the largest digital banking and banking

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>as a service providers in the country today um and

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and really one of the first neo banking fintech to

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>go public, to be profitable and now as to actually

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>embrace a bank charter. Um. So to answer your questions,

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, COVID in that period definitely

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>accelerated the use of technology, not just in financial services

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but really across the board. Um. And then couple that

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 1>with a surgeon deposits from stimulus, it was definitely, you know,

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>a good good time for for banks and for consumers

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to start engaging with them in any way. So what

0:12:57.520 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>does this mean, Lovely and we can do at b

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 1>M Technology do can I use you as a consumer.

0:13:03.160 --> 0:13:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Um or do companies use you to help embed you know,

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>banking services in their online presence or do you work

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 1>with with banks directly? What what is it? Who's your client? Yeah?

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of all of the above. Um And

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.840
<v Speaker 1>so we have you know, a unique digital banking platform

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that allows us to directly go to consumers and offer

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>them a more compelling banking experience from the products, to

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the features, to more affordable products that but also the

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>same digital banking platform that's cloud based, that's a PI enabled.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:39.120
<v Speaker 1>The beauty of it is that we could license that

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to others and we allow and enable large brands to

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>offer financial services as well, and not just from a

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>technology standpoint, but you know, as you know, banking is

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>regulated and there's a lot in the back end to

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:54.959
<v Speaker 1>really operate and support a bank, and all of that

0:13:55.040 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>we also provide as well today and lovely and I

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>know you know, the banks of a talking about for

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.960
<v Speaker 1>years the capital investments they're making in their technology platforms.

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it lowering the cost is allowing them to increase

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.920
<v Speaker 1>their profit margins if they really make the investment for

0:14:11.920 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 1>digital You know, we've been saying for years that banks

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>continue to invest in in in technology and product enhancements,

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't always correlate to a better customer experience.

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It's how is it done and is it done well

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 1>with the customer in mind? And so you don't rapidly

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>see as as larger banks are investing billions and dollars

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that correlates to more and more happy customers. Um. But

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that being said, it's a good move forward. I think

0:14:39.760 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that you know, consumers are demanding more as it relates

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to crypto in terms of having that being part of

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>their financial planning and assuming that banks would have an

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for them to get involved in that. They're demanding

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>more of a rebundling of financial services. I shouldn't have

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to go to robin Hood for one thing, so by

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:02.080
<v Speaker 1>for another thing, but really going under one umbrella at

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>one platform to get all of my financial needs um.

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>And and lastly, you know, really a push for financial

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>inclusion so that I don't just need to go to

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a bank branch to get my my banking done. But really,

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>if there's a brand that I truly trust, I value,

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I have an emotional connection with, can I go there

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and get my banking needs met? And that's what we're

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>doing with our banking as a service and and b

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>M Technology is partnered with T Mobile, for example, to

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>launch the T Mobile Checking account. Interesting stuff. Yeah, I'm

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>doing it. I'm doing it. I feel like I am

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>TECHT savvy. Now on my consumer financials gardner? What's that

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>during this program? I paid my gardener? There you go,

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 1>look at you. Lovely to do Chair, CEO and founder

0:15:43.560 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>of b M Technologies, New York Stock Exchange list a

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>b M t X. It is day one of the

0:15:53.320 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Master's tigers on a second hole. Even par so, we

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>thought a good time to talk about the business of golf.

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Friendy Pich, CEO of PGA Superstore, He's gonna join us

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and talk us about the retail side of the game

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>of golf. Plus, Barry Ridholtz joins us because it's Thursday

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and he always talks to us on Thursday, so we'll

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>see what his thoughts are on these markets. But first

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>let's go to Greig Jarrett's gonna blow our business flash.

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Greg Well stocks continue to retreat. Paul investors are digesting

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the possibility of even more aggressive monetary tightening by the FED,

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 1>and are monitoring the war in Ukraine. Sp Right now

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is down six tenths and percent down twenty five. That

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>DO was down eight tenths of a percent, down two

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred sixty seven, and the NaNs acts down eight tenths

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of a percent, down a hundred sixteen. The Tenure is

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>down eleven thirty seconds. The yield is two point six

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>four percent. West Texas Intermediate Crude continues to descend. It's

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>down one point four percent. Seven of barrel Comics gold

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is up six tenths of a percent at nine twenty

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and ounced the dollar five, the euro dollar nine oh won,

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the British pound, the dollar thirty sixty. Harvard plans to

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>sell green bonds to finance construction of a new science

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.679
<v Speaker 1>and engineering complex for renovation of an existing dorm. The

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 1>richest U S College is planning to sell eight hundred

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 1>million dollars of taxable bonds three D you know, which

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>will be designated as green, according to documents posted to

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>Muni o S. That is a Bloomberg business flash. Bloomberg

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Markets continues now. Paul Sweeney and Matt Miller. All right,

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>great Jered, good stuff there, you know, Matt. When the

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>pandemic hit March of Lockdown, one of the few things

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you could do is kind of go out on the

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>golf course and play golf and rounds of golf at

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:37.840
<v Speaker 1>my club in New Jersey. Roup almost fifty there in

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>just a you know, amazing surgeon. Has to be good

0:17:41.800 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>for the game of golf. Let's talk about the business

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of golf. Randy piche CEO of p g A Tour Superstars, Randy,

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here again. Rounds of

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 1>my club, we're up. Is that kind of what we

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:57.120
<v Speaker 1>saw around the country. Yes, very very much, and thank

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you first of all for having me on the show.

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.120
<v Speaker 1>But you are absolute of the writing in the rounds

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>of golf. Um, the industry saw five hundred and twenty

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>nine million rounds of golf played last year. Um that's

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>nearly a five percent increase from which was also the

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:17.080
<v Speaker 1>highest ever recorded. Uh So we are at an all

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>time high in in rounds played, and as you said,

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 1>at your club, you're seeing that and various clubs around

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the country are seeing a surge like has never been

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>seen before in the golf industry. So, uh, it's it's

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.239
<v Speaker 1>it's really fun to to see it. And I know

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that our world is experiencing a lot of pain right

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 1>now between wars and what you just announced in the market,

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of bad going on in the world,

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:45.239
<v Speaker 1>but um, people are are looking for a little bit

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of an escape from time to time. And that's what

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>our our business and our our great game provides. So

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 1>it's really fun to to be to be able to

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:57.720
<v Speaker 1>be a part of that. How important is Tiger's participation?

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Extremely important? So so you probably uh remember back in

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>in n when he first won the Masters, um and

0:19:07.920 --> 0:19:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the surge that the golf, the game of golf saw

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:15.160
<v Speaker 1>between nine and two thousand, when Tiger was at his peak, um,

0:19:15.240 --> 0:19:18.119
<v Speaker 1>and prior tow we had never seen a surge like

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that in golf. Um and and this is equal to that.

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And um the human side of the story of Tiger

0:19:26.040 --> 0:19:29.879
<v Speaker 1>that he actually almost lost his life number one, We

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>start with that, uh, but he was he was more

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>likely to lose that leg than he was to to

0:19:36.000 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>have the leg. So to to see him out here

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>even just walking around a golf course, let alone competing

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>as I'm watching him hit his third shot into a

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:50.439
<v Speaker 1>par five year and fakes, but he ties for the

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>lead in the Masters. Just to be able to say

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>that in fourteen months after that horrific accident for Tiger

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.679
<v Speaker 1>Woods to be ties for the lead is something that

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>um a normal story at the Master's obviously, this is

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the biggest tournament of the year. Um, a normal feel

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>good story at the Master's reaches certain news outlets when

0:20:12.760 --> 0:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Tiger is in the Masters and contending in a normal year,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a bigger story that my wife, who's just marginally

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.359
<v Speaker 1>interested in golf talks about. It's talked about in places

0:20:23.400 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>and on networks. Uh that it's not talked about in

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>other places. But with the accident and the comeback story

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>added to that, this has larger than life. And you

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 1>know the fact that we're sitting here watching his second

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>hole of a seventy two whole tournament and talking about

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it is is really incredible. And and lots of other

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>people are as well. We've gotten text messages the Tigers

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>now teeing off and what do you think he's gonna do?

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.239
<v Speaker 1>And it's it's the talk of the golf world. So

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:54.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of fun, um and it helps business

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and it helps people be interested in golf, which is uh,

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>which is the most important thing. Yeah, it's interesting. Uh,

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:02.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're you're in here a Bloomberg We're all over.

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned for updates of the Master's Tournament every hour

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>throughout the weekend on Bloomberg Radio, and a special edition

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>of Masters Tonight coming up at eleven pm Eastern. Randy

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>talked to us about supply chain. If I want to

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.159
<v Speaker 1>go buy a new set of clubs or golf shoes,

0:21:14.240 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>are they going to be in the store. Yeah, so

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question we have. We have struggled like

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>like others have initially on the supply chain. But the

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 1>best part about us is we've gotten very, very creative.

0:21:26.800 --> 0:21:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh So, Number one, we've we've we have great relationships

0:21:30.600 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>with our manufacturers, as you can imagine, but we've done

0:21:33.560 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>things that are a little bit out of the norm.

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So we had a manufacturer but you probably know, by

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>the name of titlist Um, and they make wedges called

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Boki wedges, and they were out of grips, and what

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we told titleists, we worked to deal with them. They

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>sold They sent us wedges that were ungripped, and we

0:21:50.760 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>told customers that came in, you pick out any grip

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>in our store and we'll put it on at no charge.

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 1>And customers were happier we're able to have products, so

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>we're doing things that are very unique. UM. And for

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the first time since the pandemic started, we are back

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:09.880
<v Speaker 1>to the inventory levels that are above what our plans are. UM.

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's really really good news, UM that that we're

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.199
<v Speaker 1>still we're we're doing better now than we ever have. UM.

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to tell you that there are no

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>lead times out there for certain special orders, but it's

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>gotten a lot better. UM. And and as I said,

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>we're the leader in the marketplace that's that's able to

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>to do things that are really really unique UM. And

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I just got off the phone with our call center

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 1>UM and the calls for things that are follow ups

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>on special orders are way down UM, which is an

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>anecdotal way to say that special order lead times are

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>coming down. UM. So it's a it's great news for

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody that our manufacturers have stepped up and and we're

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly the leader in the category and in being able

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:56.119
<v Speaker 1>to get customers product quicker than what they're expecting today.

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.679
<v Speaker 1>Quite frankly, all right, Randy, thanks so much for joining us.

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Randy Piche there chief operating officer the p g A

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Tour superstore, and he has a ton of experience in

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the industry with posting formally at sports Authority and sacks,

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. So it's great to get his insight on

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>the merchandizing and supply chain side of these things. In

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:20.119
<v Speaker 1>terms of sporting events, I gotta say, Paul, for me,

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the Masters is the greatest sporting event that I've ever

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>been to. It's just so much fun. And I've been

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 1>to other big deals like the super Bowl, but nothing

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is like Augusta. I appree with pent. I've been to

0:23:31.080 --> 0:23:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the Masters once. I was fortunate enough to do that,

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>and again, I've been fortunate to go to a lot

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of other big sporting events, but it's just special. Even

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're not a golf fan, there's just a special

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>filling there, and uh, the place itself is just immaculate.

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:50.240
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:23:54.280 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller three pt on false Sweeney I'm on

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 1>catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radient