WEBVTT - Huawei’s Surprise Chip Raises Stakes in Tech Clash

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:07.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Blueberg Intelligence, the podcast

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>that pulls back the curtain on global business so you

0:00:10.680 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>can invest better across the Pacific Rim. I'm Tom Corbett

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on assignment in the US.

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 2>And I'm John Lee. US LED sanctions on Chinese technology

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>firms were designed to be a retaining wall, putting a

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>barrier between China and the critical components needed to make

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 2>the most advanced smartphones.

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>However, Huawei drew a collective gasp when it revealed its

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>latest smartphone, the May sixty Pro, is powered by a

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Chinese homegrown processor. It became proof that China had narrowed

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the gap with the West, giving tech tensions new urgency.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 2>A Western sanctions too little, too late? And how does

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.320
<v Speaker 2>this compare to Apple's latest iPhone.

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:57.200
<v Speaker 1>Here to discuss all things tech related is Dan Hutchison,

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>vice chair of Tech Insights. He joins us from San Jose, California. Dan,

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>great to have you.

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Thanks John Tom for having me here. I'm really excited

0:01:06.400 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 3>to be here on this podcast.

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 2>Dan, your company did a pair down of Huawei's new smartphone,

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 2>the Mate sixty. What surprised you the most about these findings?

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, the thing that was the most surprising. We kind

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:22.520
<v Speaker 3>of expected that it was going to be a seven

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 3>nanimeter chip, and what surprised us the most was just

0:01:25.800 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 3>the level of Chinese technology that was in there. You know,

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 3>the motive one that on the APU was all Chinese technology.

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Dan, can you put that into Layman's terms? What

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 2>is a seven nanimeter chip? And why is it so important?

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Okay. The funny thing about it is is that,

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, explaining what a nanometer is really crazy. It's

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 3>it's like a thousand a Salven's the thickness of human hair.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 2>But the smaller the better, right, faller about it, right?

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 3>And so so what it means is is that the

0:01:57.920 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 3>smaller the better means you can pack more transistors into

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 3>a piece of silicon, so you get more performance your

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, your computer can do more. And so it's

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.240
<v Speaker 3>a it's a basic metric of technology, and we go

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 3>down in every two years you try to double the

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 3>density of what's on the chip. And that's the old

0:02:17.680 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 3>More's law.

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.920
<v Speaker 1>So, Dan, prior to the May sixty being unveiled, the

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 1>overarching sentiment was that China was further behind on this

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>technology than it really was. You've been watching the chip

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 1>industry for decades, what surprised you the most when you

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>learned about the chip in the May sixty.

0:02:35.440 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 3>The most interesting thing about the chip in the May

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 3>sixty was that well, one was that it was not

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.720
<v Speaker 3>a five animeter, which the chip and the prior generation

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 3>phone had a TSMC five animetor part in it, so

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 3>it was kind of backed up, and that it was

0:02:50.400 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 3>a smick chip. The big surprise was that it was

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 3>a non EU of EA chip because they don't have

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 3>access to those tools. And yet it was a pretty

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:05.919
<v Speaker 3>clean looking set of dimensions, the layout of the chip itself,

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 3>it all looked really clean and it looked as easily

0:03:09.320 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 3>as good as what TSMC did when it did it's

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 3>seven nanimeter non and U of E chip.

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And the West was not expecting that was.

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 3>It now the West there's a certain arrogance, I think

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 3>in the West in which we think we can throw

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 3>these rolls out there and that the other side will

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 3>it just won't make any progress. And in fact, with

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 3>any technology, if you know it could be done and

0:03:32.000 --> 0:03:35.320
<v Speaker 3>you're throw enough talent at it, you can make progress.

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>And then how does the chip performance compared to say,

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 2>other smartphones? Such as maybe like the latest Samsung or

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 2>the latest sell me, well, it's.

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Not going to be as good as a phone that

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 3>has a current generation three N animeter chip. Like what

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 3>we just we're just tearing down the Apple iPhone fifteen

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 3>and we saw a micron hit the record for d

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 3>ram density, which was around a twelve nanimeter twelve thirteen

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 3>animeter n.

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 2>In terms of specs technology, How many years is the

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:14.119
<v Speaker 2>Huawei Mate sixty pro behind the latest iPhone?

0:04:14.520 --> 0:04:18.080
<v Speaker 3>It's about four years. And if you look at the

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:20.479
<v Speaker 3>next generation that'll come out in a year or so.

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 3>You know, if we look at the two animeter, they're

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 3>probably about five years behind the very leading edge of

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:31.840
<v Speaker 3>what's you know, being developed today. But we also expect

0:04:31.839 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 3>that they're developing their own five nanimeter a part which

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 3>we expect we'll be here in about two more years.

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 2>The chips at power Huawei's latest phone are made by

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:47.560
<v Speaker 2>SNICK or Shanghai Manufacturing International Corporation. Do you think that

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 2>SNIK is actually making money producing these chips?

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, there's two sides of me on that, Okay, okay.

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 3>One side says that there's no way you would do

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:01.240
<v Speaker 3>a phone and try to produce its scale unless you

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.720
<v Speaker 3>knew the chips were priced right. And there's no way

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 3>if you had a fab of that capability that you

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 3>try to do this unless you believe you could yield.

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 3>My sense is looking at the SEMs and some of

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.799
<v Speaker 3>our people that told me looking at the SEMs, they're

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.520
<v Speaker 3>really good and clean, and I would expect their yields

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 3>to be somewhere in the sixty percent range. They need

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.880
<v Speaker 3>to get to eighty percent to be world class. But

0:05:26.920 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 3>it's really a question of how well their yield management

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 3>is working, and to know that, we really have to

0:05:31.600 --> 0:05:33.719
<v Speaker 3>have access to their pro yields and look at the

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 3>wafers that sort of thing, which that's not going to

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 3>happen anytime soon. So that's the one side of me

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 3>that says, you know, they wouldn't do this unless they

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>really knew they could make money at it. The other

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 3>side of me says, well, they're communist country and they

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 3>could do what they want to in market still matter.

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I remember a friend of mine who had been in

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:01.159
<v Speaker 3>a Russian fab told me in the eighty because he's

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 3>in a country that they could go back and forth

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 3>cel to the US, sell to Russia. At the time

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:09.240
<v Speaker 3>and he'd been in a Russian fab and he was

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 3>watching an operator smoke cigarettes and flick the ashes that

0:06:12.680 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 3>she was moving away first, and he says, aren't you

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 3>worried about yield? And the fab manager looked at us

0:06:18.400 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 3>as yield that's a capitalist concept, and a government like

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 3>the size of China, which is the second largest economy

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 3>in the world, can do what they want to and

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 3>there's no way for anyone on the outside to really

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 3>know what's happening there.

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 2>When it comes to profitability, yep, and semiconductors has been

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 2>chosen as a critical industry for China.

0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 3>So absolutely absolutely, and so you know, you have those

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 3>two sides of it. And so the fact is is

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:50.719
<v Speaker 3>that the profitability question may not matter. I mean, either

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 3>they are or they don't care. In that sense, it

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter. And eventually, the other thing with semi auctors

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 3>is the more you make, the better you get at

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 3>the higher yields go. So even if they're not profitable now,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 3>they will be at some point as long as they

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 3>have that government support.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 2>So basically, if you keep on throwing money at the

0:07:08.240 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 2>problem will eventually sort itself out.

0:07:10.200 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And what does Huawei's progress tell you about the

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>effectiveness of the sanctions and their prospects for success going forward.

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think unlike some people that say, oh, the

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 3>sanctions aren't working, I looked at it and saw all

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the sanctions are doing what originally everybody thought they were

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 3>supposed to do, which was not to put Huawei out

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 3>of business, but to keep them a couple of generations behind,

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 3>you know, keep them about for you know, two generations

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 3>is four years.

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 2>And then what can always do to narrow the gap

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 2>going forward?

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, they don't have access to EUV tools, so you

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 3>know extreme.

0:07:49.520 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Moment, the equipment made by ASML right been.

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 3>Made by SML, and they don't have access to the

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 3>emergent tools that they bought. Plus there's an older jenneration

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 3>of emersion tool that's still available to them, and the

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 3>immersion tool actually allows them to continue to move forward

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:10.760
<v Speaker 3>as long as they do multi patterning. And the problem

0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 3>with multi patterning is is that it does add inaccuracy

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 3>in the overlay and in the actual dimensions of the

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 3>ship itself. So the result of it will be that

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 3>you get a lower yielding device, it doesn't perform as fast,

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 3>and it consumes more power than what you would like

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.680
<v Speaker 3>it to than what you have with the EUV tool,

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 3>but you can still pull it off.

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 2>Then I also saw your report on the MAT sixty

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 2>ten down and that your company also found some memory

0:08:42.760 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 2>trips made by sk heinez inside these phones. They weren't

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be inside these phones, were they.

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 3>No, they weren't. Let me correctly. Was not my report personally.

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 3>There were a lot of really good people working at

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 3>this and you know, and I've been kind of following

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 3>what they've been writing about really closely and looking at

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 3>their SEMs and the pictures they've been coming at. So

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 3>I should kudos to them for what they did. The

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 3>sk Heinex chips, the memories generations back, they weren't current notes,

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 3>so it doesn't look like they actually acquired them directly

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 3>from Heinex, and according to the sanctions, Heinex can't sell

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:27.599
<v Speaker 3>to Huawei. There's a myriad of ways that because of

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 3>the commodities, those chips can work their way through the

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 3>supply chain, and Huawei could have picked them up without

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 3>them being directly coming, especially since there's a lot of

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 3>memory right now. There's a huge clut of memory coming

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 3>because the memory producers overproduced during the shortage. They kind

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 3>of drank the kool aid about how great this shortage

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 3>was and it was going to last.

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence. By the way,

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>If you like what you hear, and we hope you do,

0:09:56.920 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>please rate us on Apple podcasts, st Google podcasts, or

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>wherever you may be listening to us. Of course, more

0:10:04.600 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>stars are better. Your feedback matters, and we love hearing

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:14.439
<v Speaker 1>from our listeners. Dan Hutchison. One of Apple's defining qualities

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>has been its ability to innovate, to come up with

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a new idea and just dazzle the world and power

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:25.560
<v Speaker 1>its sales to new heights. Is there a perception do

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you think that Apple is starting to come up against

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a wall in its ability to generate

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that wow factor with new products? And if yes, how

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>much are technological limitations at play here?

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.320
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Well, technological limitations are becoming far more at play

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 3>the thing about Apple, And realize that this is probably

0:10:47.960 --> 0:10:52.120
<v Speaker 3>more in my opinion, but you know, you can't discount

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 3>the immense ability of stee jobs. And typically what I've

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 3>seen in the companies I followed is a good strategy

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:03.560
<v Speaker 3>to last for about five ten years tops before it

0:11:03.640 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 3>kind of taps out when it comes to the market.

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 3>And Steve had this amazing ability to look at technology

0:11:10.840 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 3>that was out there piece it together into something that

0:11:14.080 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 3>was really amazing and fantastic. And I don't think Apple

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 3>struggled to duplicate that. He just had an innate sense

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 3>of what was really great. And those kind of people

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 3>are really hard to find, you know historically, you know,

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 3>when you look at companies that make themselves and Apple's

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 3>struggling to reinvent itself, which the whole thing with the

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 3>App Store and the Apple TV that's coming along, but

0:11:41.800 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 3>it's also something that there's plenty of other competitors out

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 3>there doing the same thing.

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Once Apple has changed the world, what can to do

0:11:48.640 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>for an encore.

0:11:49.640 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's a very difficult thing. And if we talk

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 3>about this, how Apple led with the iPhone, with the

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 3>Mac and everything, but it midst the cloud and it missed,

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, the impact of what the cloud was doing,

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 3>in which we saw other companies like Google and Facebook

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 3>and Amazon come along. So really, sometimes the innovation comes

0:12:13.640 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 3>from other places, and that's really where we look forward to.

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 3>And I think in the whole artificial intelligence arena, that's

0:12:21.679 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 3>a whole spectacular area for massive innovation. It's also an

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 3>area where China has a very strong leadership position.

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 2>And talking about innovation, Apple just release its new iPhone

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 2>fifteen and the buzz seems to be the adoption of

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 2>a USB C port. Is this really the major breakthrough

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 2>for this phone or is there more to it than that?

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 3>No, I think that was that's like expected. Everybody has

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 3>been telling them, you need to come up with their comments,

0:12:51.679 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 3>so you know, but they wanted to sell more cards

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and make their devices more unique, and you know, that

0:12:57.640 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 3>was always the downside of Steve Jobs, right, was is

0:13:01.720 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 3>he wanted everything to be done his way and he

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 3>wanted absolute control over it. And so I just don't

0:13:07.200 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 3>see any value in fact. For me is a photographer.

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 3>The more exciting part about the iPhone fifteen is the

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 3>new cameras that come with it and the ability that

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:22.319
<v Speaker 3>they've done. And the Apples phones have really become driven

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 3>by what their cameras could do, and I'm surprised that

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 3>that didn't generate more excitement.

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>What about the Age seventeen Chip Dan Hudgson, You've just

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that consumers seem to gravitate more toward the gadgets

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and the gizmos, the cameras. Is the A seventeen chip,

0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything really game changing in there?

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, the big game changer for it's going to be

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.280
<v Speaker 3>that you'll get longer battery life and you will get

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 3>more performance. But I also think it's probably somewhere near

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 3>where the PC hit where we're beginning to see less

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 3>and less performance. So in terms of you know, does

0:13:58.559 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 3>your call go through all that the same when you

0:14:01.559 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 3>really see the performance is things like in the artificial

0:14:06.760 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 3>intelligence application to the image processing for the camera itself,

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 3>and so you get much better stabilization, much lower light,

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 3>much more realistic images, and things like that. The camera

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 3>has become the big reason to upgrade.

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Then there's been some excitement that the new iPhone with

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 2>the A seventeen chip could be a breakthrough for gaming.

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 2>I know that you know some versions of Resident Evil

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.120
<v Speaker 2>have arrived on the iPhone. Do you think this is

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 2>a major game changer?

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, if you look at kids and everything,

0:14:38.440 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 3>they're all using their phones and their iPads for gaming,

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 3>and they're not using laptops or computers. And this is

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 3>the big advantage of this chip. I come back, I

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 3>mentioned the performance and you see it in the AI

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 3>processing for images. You're also going to see it in

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 3>the speed and reactiveness and gaming, which at the end

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 3>of the day, in gaming, that's those slight incremental school

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 3>games give you an advantage in where you're playing a

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 3>driving game or you're on the battlefield.

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 2>So what's next for the iPhone in terms of spekes,

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the next breakthrough technology?

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 3>To be honest, I think we're going to see more

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 3>of the same.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 2>The improvements in the camera, you know, and.

0:15:18.440 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 3>It's improvements in the camera. You're going to get a

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 3>faster chip that works better. The gaming will improve, and

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 3>their whole goal is simply to give people enough incremental

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 3>advantage to buy a new phone and to stay in

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 3>their world garden, because that's becoming more and more. Where

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 3>the money for Apple comes is the access to the

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 3>TV and also just the fantastic usability of its products

0:15:42.880 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 3>compared to other products that are out there in the world.

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>They've had me for ten years in counting.

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they've had me since the first iPhone.

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Dan Hudgson, what do you think Steve Jobs would say

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>if he could see the Apple of today, the iPhone

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>of today, and and the ecosystem. Any thoughts on what

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 1>he would think if he could see all that today.

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 3>I think he'd probably asked the question of what have

0:16:11.640 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 3>you guys been doing? How did you miss Ai? And

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, they need to come

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 3>up with another product, And they're kind of bifurcated, you know,

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 3>because they've got hardware products that they're known for and

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 3>the usability of those hardware products are known for. But

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.040
<v Speaker 3>they haven't gone they haven't improved on those. The focus

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 3>has all been on the app store and the applications,

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.320
<v Speaker 3>the TV trying to get into the movie business, the

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 3>content business, compete with Netflix, those sorts of things that

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 3>really just keep you looking at their screens.

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 2>What about the virtual reality headsets? It made a lot

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 2>of news last year. Do you think that could be

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 2>a major driver for Apple going forward?

0:16:54.200 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 3>I seriously doubt that the headset can be a major

0:16:56.960 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 3>driver for anyone and been a real doubter on the headset.

0:17:02.240 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 3>And here's my thinking about the headset. Well, one is

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 3>you're not going to carry it with you. In fact,

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 3>most people won't carry a laptop anymore. They'll just carry

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 3>their phone and maybe an iPad. But now that the

0:17:13.600 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 3>iPad has gotten as heavy as a laptop with a keyboard.

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:19.719
<v Speaker 3>You wind up choosing one or the other, right if

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 3>you have to. But most of the time you just

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 3>take your phone because it's such a universal device, right.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 3>And the other issue you have is the usability of

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 3>those devices. The market is driven by the ability of

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 3>people to either have screen time for it or to

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 3>take it with them. The reason why the auto market

0:17:41.240 --> 0:17:44.280
<v Speaker 3>is so huge and why it drove the last century

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.680
<v Speaker 3>it is because it has about a five percent utilization.

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:50.960
<v Speaker 3>You buy a car and you drive it to work,

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 3>you park it all day, you drive it home, you

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 3>park it all night. And so if everybody has to

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 3>have one and they don't use it as much, that's there.

0:18:00.160 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 3>Maybe that's the case with the headsets and with the

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 3>virtual reality, but you know, you kind of have to

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 3>come back to how do they get people to move

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 3>towards that over just using their phone or something else

0:18:14.160 --> 0:18:15.119
<v Speaker 3>for their reality.

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 2>So, Dan, you mentioned that Apple appears to have missed

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 2>the step in terms of cloud. They also seem to

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 2>have missed AI revolution. Which companies are leading the innovation?

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 3>Do you think, well, in terms of the cloud, I mean,

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 3>clearly you've got Microsoft and Amazon leading the whole cloud

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 3>space and when it comes to AI, how can you

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.920
<v Speaker 3>say the word AI and not mentioned in videos name

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.520
<v Speaker 3>yes and what they've been able to do. And then

0:18:45.720 --> 0:18:49.479
<v Speaker 3>you've also got Intel and A and D trying to

0:18:49.520 --> 0:18:51.919
<v Speaker 3>come back and dig their way out of the PC

0:18:52.160 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 3>trough if they've been in with their AI chips, but

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 3>they've got a long ways to go because while they

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 3>were focusing on AI, Wang kind of snuck in and

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 3>stole the party.

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 2>And what about some of the Asian companies. Is TSMC

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 2>still leading in terms of the logic chips and do

0:19:09.800 --> 0:19:11.719
<v Speaker 2>you think you see this continue going forward?

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Absolutely? The thing when you get in the lead of

0:19:15.200 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 3>the semiconductor industry, you have so many advantages because of

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 3>the scale you have. That said, it's really up to

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:26.040
<v Speaker 3>the engineers to continue to make the innovations. And it's

0:19:26.080 --> 0:19:29.399
<v Speaker 3>so easy to trip up and to fall behind. Intel

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 3>did this in the nineteen eighties, TSMC did it in

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 3>the late nineties two thousands, they started to slip behind,

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 3>and really they had slipped systematically behind until twenty eight

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:43.800
<v Speaker 3>and animeter and that was when they started to catch

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 3>back up again. So it's really a question of can

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 3>they continue to innovate, and that may become a limit

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.840
<v Speaker 3>for them because the labor shortage of technical talent in

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan is becoming really short. Because they've grown so much,

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 3>they've become so big, it's harder for them to hire and.

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 2>I Samsung, like Tronics, dominates in memoratips, but they've also

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:09.080
<v Speaker 2>made a lot of investments into the logic space. Does

0:20:09.119 --> 0:20:11.879
<v Speaker 2>Samsung all oppose any threat to TSMC?

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 3>If we had the TSMC executives here talking honestly, they

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 3>would probably tell you that their biggest worry is Samsung yep.

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 3>And just because of the raw resources and their ability

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 3>to throw money at it and their ability to use

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.439
<v Speaker 3>the scale from memory and then apply that to logic,

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 3>and that's really the big issue for them. The hard

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 3>part for Samsung is they're really good at making memory,

0:20:43.480 --> 0:20:47.159
<v Speaker 3>and memory is a very different animal to logic in

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:49.199
<v Speaker 3>terms of what you're building and how you build it

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 3>because memory is a pure commodity and logic is not

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 3>a commodity. All of those designs go to a particular

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:02.520
<v Speaker 3>end system and they're totally dependent on where their customer,

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 3>how what the volume they want to buy. And if

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 3>they say, oh, we don't want those wafers and they're

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 3>halfway into production. You're kind of host where in memory,

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 3>whatever you make you can only sell. So it makes

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 3>it a much more difficult market in terms of managing

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 3>your fabs and managing the losses they trace around the fabs.

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 3>And that's something that TSMC has been a real master of.

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 3>And the old model for TSMC, why they were so

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 3>successful was the intersections in type, you know, and y

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 3>TSMC came out winning versus in memory. The intersections. Everybody

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 3>stops at the stop light and waits. That's the way

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:44.119
<v Speaker 3>a memory fab works, and in a boundary fab it

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 3>has to work like an intersection in type, where the

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 3>only rule is you don't hit the fender of the

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 3>car next to you.

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Organized chaos.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Dan, you've been covering the chip industry since the

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 1>late nineteen seventies nineteen seventy eight. I think what in

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>those forty years of covering this industry surprises you the

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>most about the way the industry has evolved, technology, the

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>overarching economic and political implications. What stands out in your

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>mind when you look back over your career and gaze

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:18.359
<v Speaker 1>over that landscape.

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I would have to say more recently, Number one

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 3>is that Washington finally figured out that chips were important

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 3>and that all of those smart things.

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>They were a little late to that game.

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they were a little late to that game. I mean,

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.479
<v Speaker 3>there was some real visionaries in Japan in the nineteen

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 3>seventies that saw this late sixties early seventies that saw

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.680
<v Speaker 3>this and really pushed Japan. But then they had their

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 3>own issues. And that kind of leads to the thing

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 3>that I think it really surprised me the most is

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:52.120
<v Speaker 3>how difficult it is to lead this industry. And all

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:56.920
<v Speaker 3>of the leaders have succeeded by being global, by being

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 3>at the best at what they do, and by selling

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:01.600
<v Speaker 3>to the best companies that are out there, and by

0:23:01.640 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 3>buying from the best companies that can supply them. And

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 3>Japan tried to create its own vertical supply chain, and

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.840
<v Speaker 3>that was really the seeds of its own destruction, because

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.480
<v Speaker 3>the weakness in those layers were the weakness of the

0:23:14.480 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 3>whole chain. Well, if you look at the companies that

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 3>wound up succeeding, like Tokyo Electron, Advantest JSR, they succeeded

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 3>because they really went global and went after the companies.

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 3>TSMC has succeeded because they built a global set of customers.

0:23:33.680 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 3>And what we've seen is is that you know, just

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 3>because you lead the market today doesn't mean you're going

0:23:38.880 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 3>to lead the market in five or ten years. We've

0:23:41.080 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 3>seen this complete churn of companies. When I got in

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 3>the industry, Texas Instruments and Motorola were the two top

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 3>companies in the world, and the Japanese were on the rise,

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.119
<v Speaker 3>and Intel was in the I don't think Intel was

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 3>even in the top ten yet. So there's been this

0:23:55.840 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 3>constant change, and the companies that win are the ones

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.160
<v Speaker 3>that go global and then run faster than everybody else.

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 3>It's all about running faster.

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And this raises an interesting question about China in its

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:13.119
<v Speaker 1>quest to develop kind of its own home grown technology,

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure or ecosystem. Do you think it can succeed sustainably

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>doing that or will it have to go global as well?

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:24.639
<v Speaker 3>Well? It doesn't matter what I think, but the history

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 3>of it has been that you have to have a

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:31.040
<v Speaker 3>global source supply chain, you have to think global, and

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.400
<v Speaker 3>trying to do it vertically is a path to failure.

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 3>So based upon that history, I think the odds for

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 3>trying to have a complete vertical supply chain and then

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:46.239
<v Speaker 3>lock everything into China. Are really the seeds of it

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 3>walking down the same path of Japan.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Walk down that Apple and it supplies a moving more

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 2>production away from China to India. Have you had a

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.640
<v Speaker 2>chance to look at an India made iPhone?

0:24:58.840 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 3>I know we're working on that, but I don't think

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 3>we've made that contrast yet. We're definitely interested in figuring

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 3>out one out. And you know, of course we've read

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 3>all the stories and India is a difficult challenge. That said,

0:25:14.880 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 3>China was always a difficult challenge. The products that come

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:23.920
<v Speaker 3>from China in the before Apple got there were noted

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 3>for very poor quality. So I think they can bring

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 3>India back. India is definitely a very different challenge though,

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 3>because you don't have the kind of governmental control over

0:25:36.240 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 3>the society there, over the business, that sort of thing

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 3>in India that you have in China. So India still

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 3>has a long ways to go. And then some of

0:25:44.080 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 3>the infrastructure issues like the ability of power, ability to

0:25:48.960 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 3>get deliveries on time, those sorts of things are constantly

0:25:52.840 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 3>a problem in India that you don't see in China.

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:58.919
<v Speaker 2>Dan, is there any questions that you'd like us to

0:25:58.960 --> 0:25:59.440
<v Speaker 2>ask you.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 3>I think the one question that's kind of interesting here

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 3>that the few people have asked me that you asked

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 3>me of a question that missed and it sort of

0:26:06.480 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 3>came to me, and that is is is this phone

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:16.480
<v Speaker 3>stabilizing or destabilizing to the geopolitics? And my sense is

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 3>that now that China's making progress again, it actually sort

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 3>of brings more stability to the battle between the US

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 3>and China over it, and you know, they can see

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 3>that they're making progress. I'm hoping that this actually helps

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:35.440
<v Speaker 3>to really get us more towards a peaceful solution to attentions.

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Our guesst has been Dan Hutchison, vice chair with Tech Insights.

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking China, Huawei, chips, tech and the future.

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It's been remarkable and insightful conversation and Dan, we look

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>forward to hearing more from you.

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:54.199
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you for having me here. It was a

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 3>real pleasure to be Tom and John, you know, the

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 3>both of you and really just sort of sus these issues.

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>The pleasure has been ours. I'm Tom Corbett on assignment

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>in the US, and.

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm John Lee. This podcast has been edited by Clara

0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Chen and you've been listening to the Asia Centric podcast