WEBVTT - Former CIA Ops Chief: In the Long Game, Maduro Goes

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney. Along

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>with my co host Lisa Brahma Waits. Each day we

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:10.399
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for you

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and your money. Whether at the grocery store or the

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>trading floor, find a Bloomberg penl podcast on Apple podcast

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as at

0:00:18.079 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. It's hard to pinpoint the biggest hot

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>spot that we ought to be paying attention to, Paul Sweeney. Luckily,

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>we have Jack Divine here to go through them all

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>with us. He is the founding partner and president of

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the ark And Group, also former chief of the CIA's

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>worldwide operations, joining us here in our Bloomberg Adder Active

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>Broker's studios. Jack, we love having you. Thank you for

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>being here. I want to start with Venezuela because a

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of people are pinpointing the fact that it's become

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of a proxy location for a battle for supremacy

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>between Russia and China on one hand and the US

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 1>on the other. And I'm wondering, from your perspective, how

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>valid is it to view the conflict in Venezuela currently

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>through that lens at Lisa. As you know, I'm a

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Cold warrior, unreformed if you will, and if you if

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you stay in a game long enough, it repeats itself.

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So when I look at Venezuela to day with my

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>background having spent so many years in the struggle with

0:01:18.880 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the Russians and the Cubans, I mean, this is a

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>very familiar pattern. And they see a vulnerability on our

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.959
<v Speaker 1>flank and in our sphere of influence, and they push

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:31.559
<v Speaker 1>it for maxim advantage. Now, I think most Americans haven't

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>been following over the past several years just how important

0:01:35.240 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Russia's financial support has been to Venezuela. And on again

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the professional side, the part that I'm quite familiar with,

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>having supported the Cuban intelligence group and being able to

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:52.000
<v Speaker 1>monitor the opposition and how to counteract. It's very reminiscent

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Cold War. Having said that, the second part

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of that play is we have always resisted uh those

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>adventures into this hemisphere, and I the strong action of

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sanctioning Venezuela is all part of this bigger chess chess game,

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and I do think we have to keep rushing Cuba

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>from gaining another foothold in the region. So, Jack, given

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>your long experience in that region of the world, what

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>is your sense of how this plays out? It seems

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>like when the um there's a lot of support for

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>we have two presidents now, I mean, I guess my

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>sentence is very quickly. How do you think this will

0:02:32.280 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>play out? I think it's a very complicated situation. We

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:42.960
<v Speaker 1>tend to underestimate how far a country has to fall

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>before there's an eruption of of a regime change. So

0:02:49.600 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>when you look at the dynamic, I mean the inflation

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and UH in Venezuela, the shortages it is the lack

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>of UH sufficient protection for the city, a sence, the

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>autocratic nature of of the Madero government. They're at a

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>very low point UH in the process. That doesn't mean

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that it's going to be resolved quickly. Actually was reading

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>an article today in which one of the opposition leaders

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>had one of our vulnerabilities here, if we think that

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a short game, we're probably gonna be you know,

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna dissipate our energy. So this is a sustained,

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>sustained effort. I don't think it's over anytime soon. And

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>as you know, the key, or at least many analysts

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>would say the key is where does the military come down?

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>But the military is not a united, monolithic group. You

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>have military leadership and then you have the private and

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:45.840
<v Speaker 1>sergeant that's living with inflation shortages and his family. So

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the military doesn't have a lock on it. And the

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 1>question is at what point in this process does the

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.200
<v Speaker 1>system break? And it is uh. I always say it's

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a game of chicken that the manages it, but there

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is this is going to be a move and counter move.

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I think for some period of time over the long

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>play Madero goes not sustainable. I want to I want

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to shift gears a little bit. The way that we

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>get a sense of how to engage most effectively is

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.360
<v Speaker 1>through our intelligence operations, both in Venezuela and elsewhere in

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the world. And I want to just check in with

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you about something that we've talked about over the over

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the past few years, which is morale at the CIA

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 1>right now, Given the fact that we still are getting

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>leeks about things out of the CIA and the fact

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>that there does seem to be some dissonance disagreements within

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>the administration right now, can you give us a read

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:45.600
<v Speaker 1>how are things just internally. My experience in the agency

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>is that morale is often directly correlated to how important

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the agency is in the scheme of things in our

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>policy and how much is an administration using the CIA

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>that is really the ingredient. As a population has probably

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:09.919
<v Speaker 1>split fifty two Republican Democrats, switching is part of America,

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's not so politicized in that regard today, whether

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you have a Republican president or a Democratic president. The

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>CIA is a really critical piece of the action. So

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I at the working level as opposed to uh, we're

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:29.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing it played out some policy level disputes, but the

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>rank and file is more interested in doing doing the job.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 1>Now At the policy level, UM, I mean the mission

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of the CIA engraved on its wall, and we've talked

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>about this before. Its product is just tell the facts

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the way they are, and when it gets in trouble,

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it deviates from that. So policymakers need to understand that

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and live with it. And the best ones understand that

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>that is a strength. And so I think, um, looking

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>at the situation today, UM, I think, um, you know

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone's looking that there will be a fight between the

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>intelligence community and policy makers. I think that's not good

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:11.560
<v Speaker 1>for this country. UM And, I think over time, good

0:06:11.640 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>objective intelligence prevails and most presidents events eventually succumbed to

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the to the importance of relying on it. So, how

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the so you're saying that the UM some the commentary

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>from President Trump at administration detigrating UH the intelligence agencies.

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>You're thinking your senses that these agencies can withstand that

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the near term, focus on the long term.

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, I may be an optimist, but my experience

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>leads me to believe the truth does prevail, that reason

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>does prevail. UM And I think when you look at

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the assessments, you know, there's things that are said in

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the public forms, other things were said in the back room.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the intelligence being shocked. I know. Let

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>me differently, I know the intelligence community really considers Iran

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and evil empire. Right. It's you know, my career, I

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 1>was in charge of Iranian operations at one point. There's

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>no school of thought inside the agency that Iran is

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>a good nation and the part of the brotherhood U. So,

0:07:12.080 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the dispute is whether or not the specific

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>ingredients of the UH of the treaty worked out with

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>them on nuclear uh development is being adhere to, and

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I think the senses it is they would point out

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>if pressed, and I believe it's probably even in the

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>record that you know, this is not an ironclad agreement,

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the nuclear agreement, so there is room for developing missiles.

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:47.320
<v Speaker 1>There's sights that can't be worked, so it's it's not

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>as clean as may be portrayed publicly. So I think

0:07:51.240 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the sea is very much awared about all of these

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 1>things and understand the motivations. But if you look at

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the technical point A, point B, they haven't broken it.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Chack Devine, we love having you on. Thank you so

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Jack Devine, founding partner and

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>president of the ark And Group, also former chief of

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>CIA's Worldwide Operations author of Good Hunting, A Spy Master's Story.

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting to get this perspective because the intelligence community

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>is so pivotal in national security and has been under

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>under a lot of scrutiny of late. The US retail

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 1>industry continues to undergo tremendous disruption brought about by e

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>commerce writ large and perhaps Amazon dot Com in particular,

0:08:46.240 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and no US name has been more impacted, arguably than Sears,

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the venerable Sears Brandon the United States to help us

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of passed through what is going on in retail

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>these days, particularly with Sears. There's been some more news.

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>There's Bert Flickinger. Burg is a manager director at Strategic

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Resource Group. Bert joins us in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio. Bert.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>We love to have you here. Thank you very much.

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us the latest on what is going

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on at Sears? It looks like Eddie Lambert one another

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>round of to keep this company afloat. My question to

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>you is what is going on? What's the latest Paul

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and Lisa. Another really regrettable example of bankruptcy Judge Bob

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>drain who was a big Wall Street partner let letting

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:35.599
<v Speaker 1>Lampert's lawyers, who making thousands of dollars per hour, just

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 1>run rough shot. In my professional view, with a lot

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>of experience in this area, run rough shot over the

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:46.599
<v Speaker 1>creditors Um, including the vendors, the workers, the landlords, and

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Lampert is epitomized retail and aptitude throughout his career, and

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and for drain Um to not have the right person

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>with Lampert, with his advisers, with the law firm wild

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>gotchall without the right skills. How to you know? It's

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>an institutionally an excuseable view. So Sears has been an

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>absolute mess for a while, and certainly that's been reflected

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:16.559
<v Speaker 1>in the fact that the shares are trading under a

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar until very recently they've surged. They've actually almost doubled

0:10:20.120 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>from sixty cents to a dollar in the past two sessions.

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:25.559
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just wondering what could Sears do at this

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 1>point to rejuvenate itself, Lisa key question you're asking, And

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.679
<v Speaker 1>here's where Lampert fails to have a good grasp for

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the obvious. He had e commerce right in front of him.

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:42.199
<v Speaker 1>As you've presently pointed out a number of times, the

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Sears catalog couldn't have been converted to e retail to

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>compete with Amazon, but it could have been effective. Kurt Avalon,

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>who was one of the founders of Takeoff e Retail,

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>was the chief merchant for Lampert. Uh Lampert let him

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>leave the company. Avalon's done ninety e retail micro fulfillment

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.880
<v Speaker 1>centers were body sized, mechanized eight thousand square feet, can

0:11:07.920 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>do a million a week. That would have saved Sears.

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.360
<v Speaker 1>The guys sitting in the executive suite with Lambert, and

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Lambert doesn't want to invest in sales circulars, doesn't want

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to rental, and Revinal the store raises prices with impunity,

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>sees the solution to save the company, lets it go.

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>What do we do here? We bring back Bob Mettler,

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Arthur Martinez, the dream team that saves Sears twenty years ago,

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and the boards Tip two is to do it and Lambert,

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>in my views, has has too much ego to do it.

0:11:40.679 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And the American taxpayers are going to pay a very

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.440
<v Speaker 1>painful price for this one. So is Lambert's play here,

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.439
<v Speaker 1>in your opinions, simply a real estate play of the

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>stores and so on and so forth. I just don't

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>see away how he recovers anything remotely close to what

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he I'm sure originally planned. Polish is you referenced, well,

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a real estate play to start with Marty

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Whitman when they controlled Kmart almost twenty years ago. In

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that bankruptcy combined with Sears real estate play and huge

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>fees to Lampard and his company in addition to him

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:19.319
<v Speaker 1>demification for him not to have litigation liability, and in

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>my view, he should be investigated and if investigated, pay

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the commercial consequences. So that sort of takes us to

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole concept of shopping malls and the role of

0:12:31.360 --> 0:12:34.439
<v Speaker 1>them going forward. And honestly, this was called into relief

0:12:34.520 --> 0:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>by j Z Penney, which decided to stop selling major

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>appliances as well as furniture in some US stores this week.

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>As Bloomberg News reported yesterday, I'm just wondering, you know,

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.360
<v Speaker 1>what will be the role of shopping malls, just how

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>much of the carnage has already happened versus needs to happen,

0:12:51.160 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 1>Lee Lisa, what's happening in the US will be much

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>worse than what's happening overseas. And our worldwide work for

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 1>arbitration tribunals Paris, Dubai, we had to do a worldwide

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>study of research luxury to mid mid tier to downstream

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>and what we see in London is Selfridge's store the

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>year three years ago in a row. Harvey Nichols digit

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>digitized the experience, so they get young consumers. It's almost

0:13:19.160 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>like going to a Disney property and they get all

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>kinds of graphics one would see on her his mobile phone.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>What the Parisian retailers do when Bloomberg is not correctly

0:13:30.840 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 1>reporting the yellow vests um rioting in the streets. The

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:40.079
<v Speaker 1>retailers in South Korea, Japan here know how to evolve

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>with the future investing malls to make them exciting. Here. Uh,

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>they're they're dead elephants, just waiting to be restructured by

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>private equity firms. Some of the private equity firms are

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.679
<v Speaker 1>good in our view. I don't think uh Lambert's private

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>equity firm in anybody's view, is constructive. So you still

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>think that there is a role for bricks and mortar retail,

0:14:01.840 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 1>but is your view that has to be much more

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>closely tied in and aligned with the digital e commerce offering.

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.960
<v Speaker 1>That is that the life the life raft for bricks

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and mortar exactly as you stated, Paul. And here's the

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>example Sears four in Hamburg, where the Buffalo bills played

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 1>close to the Canadian border. Like all the Sears Canadian

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>border stores should be doing lots of business. It's not.

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.080
<v Speaker 1>But Amazon moved in to Niagara Falls Boulevard with a

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>combination Amazon Whole Food Store where they blew up the

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>whole on Niagara Falls Boulevard and mall replaced the Bontan

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>bankrupt department store with an Amazon Amazon Whole Foods. That

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 1>store is supposed to do one point to five million

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a week. That store is now doing less than two

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand a week a year after its opening, is

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>going to close like the Amazon bricks and mortar stores.

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So the retail a cop apocalypse or ice ages affecting

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>everybody from Sears to Amazon. Because while Bezos and my views,

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>most brilliant person who's ever worked in retail, when he's

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>running the show, he's great. But now he's going to

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the show and all these side shows that he's personally

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:13.600
<v Speaker 1>distracted with his divorce. So Amazon's failing in bricks and

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>mortar as his seers and the guys with the great

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>leaders will win. So let's talk about who's actually doing

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a good job of adopting brick and mortar to the

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>modern era in the United States. Uh, look at what

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Frank Blake did to completely turn around Home Depot before

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>he became chairman of Delta doing doing tremendous job off price.

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh is you've referenced well a number of times, Lisa,

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's Ali's bargain stores on the low end or

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Burlington or t j X or Ross off price. Customers

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>want to shop primarily on price Chris Baldwin. But this

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.640
<v Speaker 1>has something to do with the experience, right, Uh, the

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>experience and and price. So it's a combination, uh, treasure hunt.

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the experience home DEEPO is a great

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>experience in store online uh. And if and if you

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>look at a number of others from the department stores

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>and luxury start with South Korea, then then go to London, Paris, Uh,

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 1>you go to Dubai uh and and throughout the PRC

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in Japan. A lot of great in store experiences, but

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the retailers are looking at everything in cap as access

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and expense rather than an investment to profitably drive sales. Yeah,

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely gonna be a big challenge. How do you invest?

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Will also watched declining sales and adopt to a modern

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>era both in brick and mortar as well as on

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>their online platforms. But Bert flickant Jer, thank you so

0:16:39.880 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>much for being here. As always, Bert flickint Jer, Managing

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>director at Strategic Resource Group. You know, definitely a big

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>existential question facing retail. How big can the brick and

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>mortar presence be? How do you fight against Amazon dot Com.

0:17:09.600 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So trade talks on off, on again, perhaps off again.

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:15.879
<v Speaker 1>Now we know that President Trump is not going to

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>be meeting with jumping ahead of that March first deadline.

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Why what happened? It's hard to know, but we knew.

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>The one person is keeping track of it very closely.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike McDonough, chief economist for Financial Products at Bloomberg LP,

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in our Bloomberg Atta Active Brokers studios. Mike,

0:17:30.920 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>what happened? Why are the talks now off before the

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:36.959
<v Speaker 1>March first deadline? I mean, are they all right? Well?

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>There we go? It seemed like, I mean, the Trump

0:17:41.400 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>she meeting may apparently be postponed, but they're still having

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>talks next week. So I mean, it's really hard to

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>decipher what this means. I mean, I think, why are

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>we hearing about all this? Why? Why the chatter? Why

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the it seems like someone asked him a question and

0:17:55.720 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of a random press conference are just discussion he

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 1>was having. I'm not really sure how we we we

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 1>got the information. It was actually a little bit confused

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.480
<v Speaker 1>by that yesterday. It was not a formal pronounced and

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I noticed the earliest headline I could

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>see was at eleven thirty, and I think the um

0:18:12.560 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, the mark was actually selling off before that.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>So the whole thing kind of confused me. But so

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>let's take a step back. Um, you know, I I

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know what this says about a potential deal. I

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>do think that President Trump's bar for a deal has

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>come down quite meaningfully because of what's been happening in

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the markets and concerns that the economy has been slowing.

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if it's come down

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 1>so far. It may actually be at odds now with

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the people negotiating the trade deal primarily what I mean

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>by that is Lighthouser, so you know, we could have

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a conflict there. Uh So I'm still optimistic we're going

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>to reach some sort of deal. I think we'll get

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the best possible deal, which will not be what Trump

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>had originally proposed, but we will. He will get some

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 1>uh consolations. I think that we'll have some tangible stuff

0:18:56.880 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to the deficit, and I think we'll

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>have promise is for some of the more difficult challenges,

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the intellectual property opening up an investment in some Chinese sectors,

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and I think right that the difficult thing is going

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 1>to be uh what kind of measures are put in

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>place to enforce those? And I think that's probably where

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the negotiations are centered right now. And I think the

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Chinese are realized now and are more willing to to

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>give more concessions as well. So I do think a

0:19:20.720 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>deal is possible. This delay of of the She Trump

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>meeting is confusing because he said that it will be

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>finalized at a meeting between us. If they don't meet

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>by the deadline, what happens. Do we get the tariffs?

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:34.879
<v Speaker 1>Do we not get the tariffs? I suppose we'll know

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>more next week when the the meetings do happen, not

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 1>between uh She and Trump, but between more junior negotiation. So, Mike, again,

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it's do you have a sense of who's more incentive

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>to get a deal done? I think we hear about

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:51.760
<v Speaker 1>China's economy slowing. Obviously we know that that. Maybe we've

0:19:51.800 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 1>had some people come in here saying it's slowing materially

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.719
<v Speaker 1>more than the government is letting on, I e. They

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>may be more incentive to do a deal. Do you

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>buy into that? Well? I think you know, looking at

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>last year, you had a problem where it was their

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>deleveraging agenda that was causing the slowdown in the country.

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>Trade wasn't really a factor. Yet you still have the

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>issue with the deleveraging agenda slowing down growth more than

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>they anticipated. And then you add on top of that trade.

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that does put a lot of pressure on China.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>But I think if you look at you know, when

0:20:20.240 --> 0:20:24.120
<v Speaker 1>President Trump started this um with China, US GDP growth

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.520
<v Speaker 1>was over three percent, the markets were rallying, everything was

0:20:26.560 --> 0:20:29.480
<v Speaker 1>looking great. In the US, things don't look as good now.

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>Sentiment is collapsing. If you look at one measure in

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the University of Michigan and the percent of people who

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>um randomly make good comments about government economic policy, it's

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>at the lowest it's ever been. During the Trump presidency,

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you had the shutdown, So there's some erosion and confidence

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>in the economic agenda in the US. So Trump needs

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>some wins, and this could be a nice, good, easy

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>win that could bring some confidence back. Which brings us

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>back to the confusing head scratcher of yesterday when we

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>got the headlines at President Trump was not going to

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 1>be attending a meeting with President of China and just

0:21:01.080 --> 0:21:03.119
<v Speaker 1>to put this in a perspective about why we're focusing

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>on it if we don't really have a lot of

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>clarity there. Arguably that's what sunk the NASDAC and the

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.280
<v Speaker 1>DOO in particular, and sort of led the week into

0:21:12.520 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>a rather negative tone, right. I mean, this actually did

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>have a market effect. We saw it happen when the

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>headlines hit. We saw stocks taken a further leg lower

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>in the US. So my question is, if they are

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>not talking, or if President Trump doesn't meet with Jim Ping,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>could we still get a deal ahead of that March

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>first deadline? I think anything Obviously it is possible, but

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, though it seems unlikely, but maybe we could

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>get an extension of the deadline to accommodate the meeting.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And what would I mean, would that be considered a

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:50.920
<v Speaker 1>win for who? Fair enough? My point is that is that,

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that enough of the market thank you?

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean I think I think thank you

0:21:55.240 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>for understanding. Maybe if you if you get that extension,

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that would imply a deal is basically has

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>been reached and it's a formality that they need to

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>meet and then sign the deal. So I think that

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:07.959
<v Speaker 1>the market would look at that as a positive. If

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>there I'm not talking about like another three six month extension.

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about saying we're going to extend this deal

0:22:14.520 --> 0:22:16.760
<v Speaker 1>another couple of weeks or whatever to accommodate a meeting

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>between President and President Trump to finalize some of the

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>loose ends our promises enough, like if they promised on technology,

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>that's not enough. No, And I think that's that's one

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of the key points right now is they're trying to

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>figure out what enforcement mechanisms they could put in place

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that they could track over the next two years on

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:35.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the uh following through with some of the

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>more difficult challenges. I mean, you know, you know, it's interesting.

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Mike McDonald, Thank you very much. We always

0:22:42.119 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your your insights here. Mike is the chief economist

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>financial Products from Bloomberg LP. He joins us in our

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven three oh studios. Uh. You know, I don't know,

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>color meet pessimistic, but that you know, I think some

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:54.919
<v Speaker 1>of the big issues that have to be addressed here

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 1>on the trade deal are the very hard issues about technology,

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>about intellectual property. It's about soybeans, paulbeans, but at some

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>point they're gonna have to get down to brass tacks

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and go to those very tough issues which are really

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>economically material. We have seen the price of iron or

0:23:25.920 --> 0:23:29.600
<v Speaker 1>surge by more than twenty five over the past ten sessions,

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>catching a lot of people's attention. But you know, it's

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.159
<v Speaker 1>catching even more people's attention, at least the attention of

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike McLoone, that is corn and crops and the fact

0:23:37.480 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>that we are finally going to get some information for

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the first time in two months about just how well

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.840
<v Speaker 1>US farmers have been doing over the past couple of months.

0:23:43.880 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Mike mcloan joining us here in our Bloomberg at Active

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Broke Studios Commodity Strategy for Bloomberg Intelligence. So what's up

0:23:49.840 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 1>with this, with this report that we're about to get. Well,

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 1>we haven't had data from us d A for two months,

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>so everybody is waiting for the market's stuck in a

0:23:57.040 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>range and it's waiting for the data to night fear

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the market more likely kind of do what iron Ore has.

0:24:02.040 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, commodities have been pretty beat up, the dollar

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>has been very strong, and then you just get a

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:08.680
<v Speaker 1>little piece of news like what happened with the ballet

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and the market just has the path of least resistance

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>seems to be up, and I think that's might be

0:24:12.720 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the more of the case today with with um, the

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.119
<v Speaker 1>grains and eggs. So what commodities in particularly are you

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>most looking forward to seeing data? You just I just

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit I need this data to help

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>me form my opinion because it's been two months and

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of altility. Which what are some of

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the data points you're most looking forward to today? Well,

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned corn, corn, soybeans, and we eat The key

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>issue has been soybeans. We all know there's this way

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:36.719
<v Speaker 1>too much supply soy means because of the trade war UM,

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 1>and we all expect the thing. It's already priced in UM.

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>But I'm kind of watching corn because corn has the

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>best balance, and all the estimates are that all the

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that we had last year, yields of probably declined a

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit. The production estimates have probably come off a

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit, and so corn is gonna be the one. Also,

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.719
<v Speaker 1>once we think we can virtually guarantee next year we're

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna get a lot more corn planting. It's just a

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>question of how much it's marketed, and we don't export

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>a lot of corn. We use a lot, actually use

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.960
<v Speaker 1>most are cornel for ethanol. Interesting, So, Mike, given the

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>fact that you've done this for decades and you've been

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:09.720
<v Speaker 1>intimately connected with just how volatile things can get, look

0:25:09.760 --> 0:25:12.399
<v Speaker 1>into your crystal ball. If we get a positive reading

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>out of this FDA report or USDA usd A report,

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:19.360
<v Speaker 1>how much could you see the price of corn rice

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>right now? My estimate is for to five percent and

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>it's simple analysis session just well overall, maybe take a

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>few said. But even if the data is neutral, if

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>you look at the futures curve, because there's really not

0:25:30.320 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of data, the futures curve is switched towards

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>more towards backwardation, which means the fritures curve is expecting

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:37.719
<v Speaker 1>demand to pick up versus supply. And then you look

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:39.960
<v Speaker 1>at one other key factor, the Brazilian real Remember we

0:25:40.000 --> 0:25:41.920
<v Speaker 1>had the big election last year. It looks like the

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:46.360
<v Speaker 1>realist bottom. So these two factors are turning positive. In addition,

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>we all know what's going to happen when this trade issue.

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 1>It's got to go back. It's not gonna get as

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>bad as last year. We should see some mean version

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>which mean to me means this data has to be

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.679
<v Speaker 1>really bare, so the market is more likely to go higher. So, Mike,

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>let's switch from the softer commodities to the hard of stuff.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Commodities are arguably iron ore. How surprised are you know,

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.680
<v Speaker 1>as Lisa mentioned, you know a big move up in

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>iron ore of the last tent tent sessions doing part

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess in large part to the supply disruption from

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>valet in Latin America. UM, How surprised are you with

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the volatility of that commodity given what is you know,

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess a meaningful supply disruption. Yes, it was significant.

0:26:23.000 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>It's just like natural gas last year. The path of

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 1>least resistance with some of this news is up because

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what commodities are doing in their bottom I mean

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the significance of iron ores. It's just not widely traded.

0:26:33.280 --> 0:26:36.360
<v Speaker 1>There's no real active futures UM. And for me as

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a strategist, it's also not highly correlated to industrial metals.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>It's ironic, but it isn't, so I just kind of

0:26:42.880 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>keep it as a as an Ey'm the backburner, and

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.159
<v Speaker 1>I watched copper and I watch aluminium, but iron ore

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>as an indication where things are going. It's not going down, yeah,

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>but I mean I understand that it's it's might be

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.719
<v Speaker 1>thinly traded, but it's still is a commodity, that it's

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>an essential ingredient in any infrastructure spending, and frankly that

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>is often used as a gauge of global economic growth.

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, is there a bigger kind of message

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to take away here that as a slid disruption and

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a major producer of iron ore could cause really, I

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>mean twenty seven increase in the price and ten sessions.

0:27:12.880 --> 0:27:15.920
<v Speaker 1>This is traumatic. I have to temper my enthusiasm to

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>be bullish commodities because obviously I'm a commodity guy. But

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>I look at this year, is this is an indicative

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of where markets are going with just little tweaks. It's

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>much easier for them to go up with little things

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>like this, and that this is a you know, this

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is a canary and the coal chef. But you look

0:27:30.119 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>at copper, it's just bottom from a good level. Aluminiums

0:27:32.600 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>just bottom from a good level. We're going to see

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>corn today, and all these demands supply demand factors are

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>switching positive. In addition, the key factors of US though,

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.479
<v Speaker 1>if the dollars peaked from that sixteen year high last year,

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:46.440
<v Speaker 1>which I think it has, that's a pretty strong tail

0:27:46.480 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>wind for all commodities. In addition, we get these little

0:27:49.000 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 1>supplied rustions. But key thing remember about slight disruptions are

0:27:52.280 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>usually short term events, and they come back. What's your

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>number one commodity right now? Real? Ten seconds? Good Gold,

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>unfortunate Gold. I have to I have to give my credit.

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 1>He's been making a very popular and a very good

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 1>gold call for two or three months. I heard it

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:12.639
<v Speaker 1>just kind of in the background in the office about

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>his gold. I read his reports and uh, spot on,

0:28:15.600 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>spot on. So gold, safety, safety, and gold. Mike mcglowan,

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much, Mike, as a commodity strategist for Bloomberg

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence joining us today in our Bloomberg Interactive Broker studio

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>here in New York. Thanks so much, Mike. So again Gold,

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 1>But I go, I can see gold in the space

0:28:32.680 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and gold, so again, gold in the market that is

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 1>down two hundred sixty points on the Dow. Gold does

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>not sound so bad. We've got the you know, people

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the economic outlook, certainly in the back half

0:28:42.760 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of the year, So why not gold so Mike, we'll

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll take it. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:28:52.560 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney,

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney, I'm Lisa bram Boyd's

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio