WEBVTT - Instant Reaction Earnings Roundup: Microsoft, Meta & Tesla Deliver Results

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 2>This is a breaking news update from Bloomberg, instant reaction

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 2>and analysis from our three thousand journalists and analysts around

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 2>the world.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.400
<v Speaker 3>Carol Masser along with Tim Stanovik live in our Bloomberg

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 3>Interactive Brokers studio. As we mentioned, those big three of

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.400
<v Speaker 3>the MAGS seven reporting right now, Meta is up about

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 3>four and a quarter percent. Microsoft down about five percent

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 3>off its after market lows. Tesla has also bounced back here.

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.120
<v Speaker 2>I want to bring in Bloomberg Intelligence Senior technology analyst

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 2>on orog Rana. He joins us in Bloomberg's Chicago bureau.

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Microsoft down five percent right now. Taking a look at

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 2>some of the headlines on arog dot crossed, I know

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you've only had a few minutes to actually look at these.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Second quarter Azure and other cloud revenue XFX was up

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight percent, meeting estimates. Second quarter revenue for the

0:00:59.880 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 2>company beat estimates at eighty one point two seven billion dollars.

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:09.160
<v Speaker 2>Second quarter intelligent cloud revenue beat estimates. We also saw

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 2>forty three hundred Microsoft three sixty five commercial seats grew

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 2>six percent. Forty five percent of commercial RPO was driven

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 2>by Open Ai commitments Commercial Remaining Performance Obligation six hundred

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and twenty five billion dollars. What's not to love here?

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Is it all about capex?

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 4>No? I think it's usually high expectations, and you know

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 4>the fact that they only met Azure growth rates, which

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 4>was thirty eight percent. I think that's probably weighing on

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 4>the stock because you know, one would have expected them

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 4>to blow out that number. It has been around thirty

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 4>nine percent the last couple of quotos, so I think

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 4>that's where a little disappointment could be. But that could

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 4>also be because of supply constraints. That's something we have

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 4>highlighted in our research before. But you know, if you

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 4>look at some of the other numbers, such as our

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 4>PO you mentioned above, six hundred billion, that's very impressive,

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 4>and we already know the capex was going to go up,

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 4>So I think in tandem, that's the only number that

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 4>sticks out that they didn't beat by a decent amount.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, So then I don't know, what do we

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.600
<v Speaker 3>want to dig into a little bit more deeper? It

0:02:06.640 --> 0:02:10.000
<v Speaker 3>does Microsoft's quarter includes net gains from investments.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 5>In open Ai.

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 3>Are we going to get a little bit more of

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 3>a picture about that and what's going on there?

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 4>I think the question I have is, you know, there's

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:19.959
<v Speaker 4>a big number that you know, that six hundred and

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 4>ninety six hundred plus billion RQO you mentioned, there is

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 4>a large portion of that comes from OPENINGI. So the

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 4>big question is, you know, how is Opening I going

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 4>to fund this thing? Do they have the capital to

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 4>actually fund let's say two hundred plus billion dollar commitment.

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 4>But other than that, what are other clients spending that

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.079
<v Speaker 4>are not Open EI? And you know, how is that

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.400
<v Speaker 4>business going? And if that wasn't the case, how should

0:02:42.400 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 4>we look at as your growth in the coming quarters.

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 4>I think those are the big questions that we need

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 4>answered right now.

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't remember where I saw this. I don't remember

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 2>if it was on a program yesterday. I think I might.

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 2>My brain is mush. I'm sorry on rock, but was it?

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 6>It was all.

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 2>About Claude from Anthropic competing with Copilot and Claude offering

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:08.880
<v Speaker 2>products and services at a fraction of the cost or

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 2>even free versus what companies are paying for. When it

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.400
<v Speaker 2>comes to Microsoft Copilot, how big of a threat is that?

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 7>Oh?

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 4>Actually, I mean to be very honest, right now, the

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 4>entire software sector has been absolute under threat because of

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot of what you are mentioning, whether it's claud

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.400
<v Speaker 4>or whether it's opening Eye tools, or whether it's open source.

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:32.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look at the valuations of software companies. They've

0:03:32.280 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 4>been completely destroyed over the last six to nine months,

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 4>and a large portion of that is driven by what

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 4>you just said.

0:03:40.360 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So interesting, Well, you know, yeah, I mean, so is

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 3>it in flux still safe to say, Ana Rag in

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 3>terms of who ultimately are going to be the leaders

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.760
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to this AI world or will there

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 3>be multiple big players.

0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 4>So we are absolutely influx right now as to who

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 4>will own the final product, and that's partially the reason

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 4>when you have these valuations go all over the place.

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 4>But I would you know, comfortably say, when it comes

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 4>to somebody like a Microsoft's cloud portfolio or Amazon's cloud

0:04:10.600 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 4>portfolio or Google's cloud revenue, I think these three companies

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 4>will dictate a large portion of that market share just

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 4>because they have the capital to do it, they have

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 4>massive market shares, and they have also the distribution. So

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 4>these three I think will remain the way it is,

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the industry will shift around. We still

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 4>think software has a place in this world and you know,

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 4>there will be some damage, but it's not going to

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 4>get completely blown up. And let's see how that shapes up.

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 2>What's the damage That will say in your view, what's

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 2>your production.

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 4>So if you are just selling a tool out there

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 4>in the public to an enterprise or a small business,

0:04:45.960 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 4>you may not get the same kind of premium that

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 4>you were before. Remember software a business with eighteen ninety

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 4>percent gross margin business. But if you can spin some

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 4>of that coded up, you know, using wipe coding or internally,

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 4>you may not need some of those tools out there. Now.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 4>We think, at least on the enterprise side, having a

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 4>core system of record something like you know, the one

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 4>that's sold by SAP or a workday they're far more

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 4>important and people are not going to rip them apart

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 4>and use white boarding tools internally out there. But if

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 4>you are a visualization software or some kind of connected

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:20.679
<v Speaker 4>in between, you may not need to have that software.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 4>So there is a lot that's going to happen over

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:24.280
<v Speaker 4>the next three to five years.

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Interestingly, you know, looking at Microsoft Meta this year and

0:05:27.880 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 3>last year, how the stock the stocks have done. They

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 3>definitely underperformed some of the other mags seven names and

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 3>certainly some of the other large.

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 5>Cap tech names. But I'm just curious.

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, the concerns have been about the AI spend

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 3>and whether it's going to pay off signs here for

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft analog that you're seeing that it does make sense

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 3>this spend that Microsoft is doing.

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.159
<v Speaker 5>The ROI is there.

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, Microsoft, it's definitely there. I Mean. The only

0:05:53.680 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 4>I would say, the long term hangarp is you know

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 4>what happens when the opening air relationship breaks through? I mean,

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 4>all goes up way. That's the only big risk for

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft in the long run. They'll have to figure out

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 4>their own LLM by then. But other than that, I mean,

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:09.599
<v Speaker 4>their cloud infrastructure product is pretty good and you know,

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 4>it's gaining market share and according to our calculations, it

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 4>will overtake Amazon in the next you know, let's say

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 4>three audios or so.

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 2>On a rock. Do they really have to figure out

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 2>their own LLM? I mean, how much of open ai

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 2>do they own?

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 4>But it just doesn't matter if they own or not,

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 4>because they have the IP rights only until I think

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.119
<v Speaker 4>it's twenty thirty two, one of those years, and after

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:32.720
<v Speaker 4>that they can't use those models after that, So remember

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 4>that part of it as well, not the financial part

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 4>will stay. But it's the actual engine that is driving copilot,

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 4>that's driving GitHub copilot or the Microsoft three sixty five

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 4>copilot that you talk about. You know, that's the intelligence

0:06:44.720 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 4>that goes into that model.

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 2>How do you do that? How do you do that?

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>From just a resources perspective, if you have if you

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 2>have spent so many billions of dollars supporting open ai

0:06:54.760 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>and chat GPT, well.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.480
<v Speaker 4>They have their own models that are going on. It's

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 4>just not as good as whether it's opening a lot

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 4>at this point, but they are putting a lot of

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.800
<v Speaker 4>effort behind it, and most of our leads that and

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 4>that's where we need to see what kind of ROI

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 4>do we see there and do they actually get their

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:11.360
<v Speaker 4>act together over the next few years.

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, I want to go over to IBM, which

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 3>actually outperformed Microsoft last year. It was up about thirty

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 3>five percent, and we are seeing this stock up about

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 3>eight point four percent following its earnings release. Here they

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 3>post revenue that topped estimates. They talked about software gains,

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 3>specifically at software unit revenue up twelve percent to nineteen

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 3>point seven billion in the fourth quarter, software business jumping

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 3>fourteen percent to just over nine billion dollars and the

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 3>company projecting that revenue will grow more than five percent

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 3>this year, and the company's CEO saying, quote, we enter

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six with momentum and in a position of strength.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if you've had a chance to look

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 3>at IBM an a rag walk us through what we're

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 3>seeing with this company.

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I was a bit surprised. Actually, the nine percent

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 4>number on the software side is a witch shocking. I mean,

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 4>for them to be, you know, total growth rate of

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 4>nine percent and software in double digits, I mean, we

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 4>were not expecting that. So there's a lot to feel

0:08:07.960 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 4>in that particular one and go back and see, you know,

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 4>which segments outperformed. Now there's a tiny bit of MNA there,

0:08:13.480 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 4>but even without that, I mean, I think this is

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 4>very good. And the big number for one us is

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 4>that the cash flow is going to go up by

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 4>a billion dollars next year. So I think IBM's turned

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 4>them around very well. I think the strategy is executing

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 4>well and Urvan's done a good job in this case.

0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:33.320
<v Speaker 2>The acquisitions red Hat Hashi Corp, Confluent. That's a big

0:08:33.360 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 2>part of the spend is that like looking to sort

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>of what Salesforce has done in recent years growing through

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>these acquisitions.

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 4>I think there's nothing wrong in growing through acquisitions if

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.160
<v Speaker 4>you don't pay enough for them. If you pay the

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 4>right amount, and in this case for IBM, every two

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 4>years they'd go out and buy something that would help

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 4>their gross margins, that would help their adjusted EBITA, that

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 4>would help their free cash flow, and they use that

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 4>cash flow to buy more. But they're already concentrated in

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 4>certain areas such as hybrid cloud or the ability to

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 4>make sure that the internal IEA infrastructure of a company

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 4>or the enterprises is something that they have a good

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 4>handle on and I think they're doing executing it very well.

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 3>Listen, there are bookings for their AI business at IBM

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 3>exceeded twelve point five billion.

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 5>Since mid twenty twenty three.

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 3>That's an increase from the nine and a half billion

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.079
<v Speaker 3>disclosed during its prior earnings report. A bit more than

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 3>eighty percent of the bookings come from the consulting unit,

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 3>with the rest in software. According to the CFO in

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 3>an interview, their AI exposure, I mean this is something

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 3>that has been I think helping the struggling along struggling

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 3>consulting division.

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 5>So are we seeing improvement.

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 4>But the consulting division only grew up one percent, So

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 4>even though they are getting a lot of that, as

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.920
<v Speaker 4>you said, eighty percent of those bookings from consulting, it's

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 4>not driving the entire division up because, as we know

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:57.439
<v Speaker 4>from some of the other vendors and we'll find out

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:01.319
<v Speaker 4>today also, the non AI spending is pretty bad right

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 4>now throughout the ecosystem, so people are cutting back on

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:08.559
<v Speaker 4>that and deploying those funds into AI related services, and

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.839
<v Speaker 4>that's something that's hurting IBM as well. But imagine, even

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 4>with consulting growing only one percent, the total compan growth

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 4>rate was nine percent, and I think that's something to

0:10:18.120 --> 0:10:18.680
<v Speaker 4>be proud of.

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior technology analyst Anna Ragrana, just

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 3>stay with us for a moment, because we do want

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 3>to bring in James chockmac partner and chief investment officer

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 3>at Clockwise Capital with about seventy million in assets under

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 3>management of fund that we often talk about owns and

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.720
<v Speaker 3>invest in a lot of these big cap names. I

0:10:36.760 --> 0:10:41.520
<v Speaker 3>want to go back to Microsoft, Jim, James, tell us

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 3>your take on what we got from Microsoft the stock

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:44.440
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 5>Data about four and a quarter percent.

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting.

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Right before earnings came out, I was getting the latest

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Bogie numbers for the Azure number, and you know, it

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>remained in the high thirties, around thirty nine percent, and

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of where the numbers landed right around there.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I was saying, I'm telling our team that,

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is a pretty lofty expectation, especially the

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>fact that you know it's retraced somewhat heading into the quarter.

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>So you know, a lot of I expectations on all

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>these companies, Microsoft right on up there with all of them,

0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>and the valuation it is where it is, with that

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>double digit times sales, you know you want it. It's

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>great that it's a subscription asset, it's a recurring revenue business.

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, you know, you've

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:31.679
<v Speaker 1>got to deliver the growth and it's all about the

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>growth relative to expectations. And in this case, it was

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>just inline on Microsoft.

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 2>James, you own Microsoft in your clockwise US core equity

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.160
<v Speaker 2>TF ticker time it's the sixth biggest holding, about four

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 2>point six percent of the fun It's down three point

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 2>six percent after hours four sixty four roughly would you

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:53.040
<v Speaker 2>buy at these levels out to your position.

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>No, No, I think what we're maintaining it. The way

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at it is, you know, we're about half

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the weight of where it is in the Nasdaq. You know,

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>we feel comfortable being underweight that, and that's on a

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>growth basis. We actually have hedges within the ETF as

0:12:09.880 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 1>well where we're short the NASDAC and the SMP, so

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 1>the net weight is actually closer to four percent, So

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, it is a top top ten weight within

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the fund. But you know, we think that you know,

0:12:22.880 --> 0:12:26.200
<v Speaker 1>where you want to be overweight is outside of big cap.

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're looking at small cap, We're looking at

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>continue to look at commodities. We think that's where the

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:31.599
<v Speaker 1>money is going to go.

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 3>James, We're going to broaden out. But safe to say

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 3>you're not that impressed with Microsoft.

0:12:35.040 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 5>It sounds it was.

0:12:37.480 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>It was a whole hump. You know, it's kind of

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>what we expected. It just didn't surpassed expectations. But does

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the results do not warrant to change in our view?

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 5>All Right, We're going to broad out.

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 3>In just a moment, I want to bring in anorog

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Rana back from our Bloomberg Intelligence team. He's senior tech analyst.

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 3>Just a final thought, James isn't impressed?

0:12:58.600 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 5>Should he be?

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, the thing is, think about it this way. The

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.800
<v Speaker 4>backlog is up and the capexis up, then why is

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 4>in growth accelerating? And I think that's the biggest question

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:11.320
<v Speaker 4>for all of us. I personally think it's a supply problem.

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:13.880
<v Speaker 4>But it's a temporary problem. But as you know, we

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 4>know right now people the trade is to sell software

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:19.920
<v Speaker 4>and buy semis and I think you know, I don't

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 4>see that changing tomorrow morning.

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, we're going to leave it there. Hey, listen,

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 3>we'll be checking out your research an ourang, Thank you

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 3>so much. Bloomberg Intelligence Senior technology analyst Anna rog Rana.

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.680
<v Speaker 3>James Schachmak though still with us right now. We want

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 3>to get more meta platforms. Bloomberg New Senior Technology reporter

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Kurt Wagner with us. He is author of Battle for

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.840
<v Speaker 3>the Bird, Jack Dorsey, Elon Musk and the forty four

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 3>billion dollar Fight for Twitter. So he's out there in

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg San Francisco bureau.

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 5>Take it away, meta.

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 3>What jumps out for you, because right now we're looking

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 3>at a stock that's up here in the aftermarket.

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.199
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean it's it's pretty much all good news,

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:54.720
<v Speaker 8>especially if you believe in this AI vision that Mark

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 8>Zuckerberg has the Q four holiday quarter sales where it

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:02.600
<v Speaker 8>beats the Q one projection, We're beat. The real, maybe

0:14:02.640 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 8>surprising thing was just how high the capital expenditures are

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 8>supposed to be in twenty twenty six. I think the

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 8>estimate was around one hundred and eleven billion metas forecasting

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 8>in between one fifteen and one thirty five billion. But again,

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 8>if you are a believer in this sort of AI

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 8>world that we're living in right now, that's an exciting thing.

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 8>I mean, this is a company that is going absolutely

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:29.160
<v Speaker 8>full steam ahead into AI, and you know, I think

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 8>those numbers reflect that.

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Not into the metaverse. We should note that meta shares extend.

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 2>They're getting to more than five percent right now. So

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of people out there, Kurt, who

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 2>who are believing this story. It's not like this though

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 2>every quarter. There have been quarters of late where meta platforms,

0:14:46.960 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 2>almost at Facebook comes out and says we're spending more

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.320
<v Speaker 2>money than you want us to spend and you and

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 2>then investors do not reward them for it. What is

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:57.080
<v Speaker 2>different this time.

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 8>Well, not just quarters of late, how about just last order? Right,

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 8>this is exactly what we talked about in Q three.

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 8>They didn't have these specific numbers, but they basically said, hey,

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:11.040
<v Speaker 8>our capex is going to increase meaningfully. In twenty twenty six,

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 8>the stock went down fourteen percent. Everyone was very concerned

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 8>with this added spending. And yet today when the numbers

0:15:18.520 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 8>come out and they're they're higher than estimate, sessimate's presumably

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 8>built in that commentary from last quarter, it doesn't seem

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 8>to be as much of a problem. My guess is

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 8>that they are seeing, you know, this Q one revenue,

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 8>for example, which is going to come in two three

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 8>four billion dollars higher than expected. They're just seeing this

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 8>ads business that is completely churning money out. And so

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.520
<v Speaker 8>if you feel that you have the money coming in,

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:49.800
<v Speaker 8>maybe you stomach those higher numbers than you would have expected.

0:15:50.120 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean on the live blog, you guys, I

0:15:52.640 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 3>think you put this out Kurt Family daily active people

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 3>three point fifty eight billion, an increase of seven percent

0:15:58.640 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 3>year over year, and then the average price per AD

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 3>increase by six to nine percent year over year for

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the fourth quarter and full year twenty twenty five, respectively.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 3>So I mean this is showing that they're investing in AI.

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 3>We're seeing it on the platform, we're seeing it in

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 3>the ad dollars.

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:13.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 8>I mean my guess is that we're going to jump

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 8>on this earnings call here in a minute or two,

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 8>and you're going to hear the company talk a lot

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 8>about how AI is impacting the ads business, because that's

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 8>what they need to do to sell this right now.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 6>Right, it's hard to say are they right?

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 5>But current is it?

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 4>Like?

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 5>Are we seeing it in the numbers?

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.600
<v Speaker 8>It is in part because you see that that rise

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 8>in average cost per AD, that's because people are getting

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 8>more granular, more targeted. They're spending less to create some

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.440
<v Speaker 8>of this ad copy because AI can do it for them.

0:16:44.600 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 8>There's a bunch of ways that AI can truly improve

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 8>the ads business.

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:50.200
<v Speaker 6>You just don't.

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 8>It's not as sexy, right, It's not as obvious, maybe

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 8>because a lot of it's happening incrementally behind the scenes.

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 8>That is a story in a narrative that this company

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 8>needs to sell. Because if you're just simply saying trust

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 8>us for building a fifty billion dollars data center in Louisiana,

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 8>and you'll see the returns of that in seven years.

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 8>That's the hard pitch.

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:09.680
<v Speaker 6>But if you say, hey, look, check it out.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 8>The ads business is growing quarter after quarter because of

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 8>these AD improvements, these AI improvements we're making. That's the

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.600
<v Speaker 8>narrative that they're going to want to sell to people today.

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Kirk Wagner, you got to go. You got some work

0:17:20.720 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 2>to do. I want you to I want to let

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 2>you get back to that work. Thanks so much for

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 2>joining us. That's Kurt Wagner, senior technology reporter who covers

0:17:27.359 --> 0:17:29.959
<v Speaker 2>social media. He's the author of Battle for the Bird Jackdoor,

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 2>c Elon Musk in the forty four billion dollar Fight

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 2>for Twitter's soul.

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 3>All right, right now, we're looking at Meta shares. They're

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 3>up about six point two percent as we speak. We've

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 3>got Microsoft down about three point six percent. Tesla is

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 3>up three and a quarter percent. And then check this out.

0:17:44.960 --> 0:17:47.480
<v Speaker 3>IBM been around for a while. It's up about eight

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 3>percent here in the aftermarket.

0:17:49.000 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 3>James Chokmak, we're talking with him, partner and chief investment

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 3>officer at Clockwise Capital with us from Miami.

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 5>He is not going anywhere.

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Ed Lulow also with as Bloomberg Tech a co host

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:00.479
<v Speaker 3>on Bloomberg Television. He's out there in the bog San

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 3>Francisco bureau. He has been glued to his phone and

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 3>computer watching all of the results since he did his

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 3>broadcast earlier on BTV. Hey, ed, what's jumping out? You know,

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't know where do you think we should start with?

0:18:12.800 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Whether it's Meta, Microsoft or Tesla.

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 9>I would start with Tesla, but only because you know,

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:21.239
<v Speaker 9>the story that jumped out wasn't the story we were

0:18:21.280 --> 0:18:24.119
<v Speaker 9>prepared for, and I think that it's important to be

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.920
<v Speaker 9>honest about that. And that is Tesla pulling the trigger

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 9>on a two billion dollar investment in Xai. If you

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 9>guys remember, this was a non binding shareholder resolution in

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 9>November as part of the annual shareholder meeting, and the

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 9>outcome was kind of weird because a lot of shareholders

0:18:40.560 --> 0:18:44.240
<v Speaker 9>abstained from voting. That told us that that even though

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 9>the board wasn't bound to the outcome, a lot of

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 9>shareholders were like, h do we really want to go

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 9>down that route?

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, Tesla's done it.

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.639
<v Speaker 9>Not only are they investing two billion dollars into Xai

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 9>through Xai's recent Series E round, but they now have

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 9>an agreement in prace what they call a framework to

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.840
<v Speaker 9>work on technology and product together. Okay, and it's this

0:19:03.000 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 9>like closer inter mesh of Elon Inc.

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Right, So, what's the sales pitch to investors in Tesla

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 2>as a car company, in Tesla as a robotaxi company,

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 2>in Tesla as a robot company that says, you know,

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.239
<v Speaker 2>this is in the best interests of shareholders to make

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 2>an investment in Elon's ai company XAI.

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 6>There are like ten different answers to that.

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:26.760
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the first thing to state is that this

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 9>was believe it or not a double check the Bloomberg

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 9>the first annual revenue decline that Tesla's ever had, so

0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 9>revenues overall revenues from all its divisions drop three percent,

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 9>and they blame that on lower vehicle deliveries and sales

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 9>and lower regulatory tax credits. So that's kind of interesting.

0:19:44.640 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 9>But this shareholder deck is about the future where Tesla

0:19:47.920 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 9>doesn't sell vehicles as its principal line of business. It

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 9>does physical AI through robotics and through robotaxi, and as

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.160
<v Speaker 9>it relates to XAI. There were definitely two schools of thought.

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.439
<v Speaker 9>There are the Tesla bulls that basically said if they

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:05.919
<v Speaker 9>invest in Xai, all of this stuff will happen quicker

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 9>because Xai is so good at the software side of AI.

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 9>They're very bullish Tesla shareholders that were like, whoa this,

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 9>Xai is a company that burns billions of dollars a quarter.

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 9>Do you want Tesla to be the entity that's propping

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 9>that up? If Tesla's already doing work internally on software.

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 9>So this was a really interesting deck. The quarter's numbers gone,

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 9>the quarter gone, I mean, it doesn't really mean anything

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 9>at this point.

0:20:31.520 --> 0:20:35.639
<v Speaker 3>James Chakmark come on in and you know, highlighting that

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 3>Tesla greet to invest about two billion in Elon Musk's

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Xai startup. We talked with you a little bit about

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 3>Tesla before, a small position in your fund. What's how

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.479
<v Speaker 3>significant do you think that is? Does it make it

0:20:51.520 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 3>more interesting the Tesla story here?

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean it'd add another element to the story.

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>But you know that's not why we're investors in it.

0:21:03.880 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that that's going to be something that's

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, factored in in a material way one way

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>or another at the at the current time. So you know,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at it from a long term standpoint. The

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>optionality on all those areas that you listed, from robotics

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to self driving, autonomous driving, and you know that's where

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the opportunities lie, and that's why we're invested in it.

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:31.680
<v Speaker 1>But at the valuations that it's at, and you know,

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.760
<v Speaker 1>question marks around you know, the demand side, and give

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it a macro backdrop. You know, we just think, you know,

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 1>it's prudent to be cautious with it, but still maintain

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a small position in the portfolio.

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 2>Uh, but keep that small position and not get not

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 2>make it any bigger.

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>At this time, I got to listen to the calls,

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:54.800
<v Speaker 1>see see what happens.

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:57.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, but you could hear you could hear something today.

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 2>You could hear something today that would make you change

0:21:59.160 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 2>your mind.

0:22:01.280 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>If and only if it provides a change in my estimates.

0:22:05.560 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Because really one of the things that I focus on,

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I prioritize is what is the degree of the change

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in the estimates and absolute terms, and also what is

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the percentage change and estimates and what is the percentage

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:23.119
<v Speaker 1>change in the rate of growth Because these companies with

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 1>these valuations, you have to be able to show the

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>sustainability of those growth curves. Without that sustainability then you

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.240
<v Speaker 1>come into questions about the sustainability of the valuations. And

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>with these valuations being where they are, not only from

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a stock perspective, but the market perspective. You know, one

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>little thing can cause things to break. I mean, you

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>saw what happened with Intel last week, down seventeen percent

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.880
<v Speaker 1>on that quarter. And you know this is a company

0:22:47.920 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that the White House is backing. So you know what,

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't take. It takes an instant, you know, to

0:22:57.080 --> 0:23:00.160
<v Speaker 1>break the valuation. Even though it takes a long time

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:01.439
<v Speaker 1>for that value, we should to expand.

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 6>So you gotta be careful, all right, We got to run.

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 3>Hey, James, thank you so much hanging around with us

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 3>for about forty five minutes. Really appreciate going through all

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 3>these earnings with you. James chock Mak, partner and chief

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 3>investment officer at Clockwise Capital, joining us from Miami. Still

0:23:16.040 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 3>with us, of course, our own Ed Ludlow, Bloomberg Tech

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 3>co host on Bloomberg TV. You know, Ed, I was

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.360
<v Speaker 3>thinking about what you were talking about with Xia.

0:23:25.880 --> 0:23:28.040
<v Speaker 5>What would you want to ask? What do you hope

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 5>is asked on the call with the company here?

0:23:30.720 --> 0:23:33.440
<v Speaker 9>Oh, just the why they decided to go ahead? What

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 9>like the more specific rationale was so you know, the

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 9>concerns were well stated, the worry that Tesla would be

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 9>kind of the cash cow to fund the loss making business.

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 9>But they have explained in detail, you know that there's

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 9>a plan for them to work both on products and

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:50.760
<v Speaker 9>technology sharing and that and that was you know, those

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 9>that were more sorry, guys, Chelsea have just taken the

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:55.080
<v Speaker 9>lead in the eighty four.

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 2>The only thing and the only thing, the only sorry,

0:23:59.000 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 2>your attention away.

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 9>That's if the boss if the bosses are watching, I'm

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 9>really sorry. My phone's going ballistic because it means we

0:24:06.400 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 9>qualify for the next phase automatically. Anyway, you know what

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 9>your guest was just talking about, though, Like the thing

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 9>that Tesla's done in the shareholder deck in a lot

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 9>more detail than it's done before, is talk about how

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:22.439
<v Speaker 9>these future products are currently contributing to top and bottom line.

0:24:22.640 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 9>Tesla has always done the plus and minus columns of

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:29.400
<v Speaker 9>revenue and profit, but actually they started giving a bit

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:32.119
<v Speaker 9>more data. So for example, as of the fourth quarter,

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:37.240
<v Speaker 9>there will one point one million FC paid subscribers active subscribers. Okay,

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:39.840
<v Speaker 9>and in the profit column they are saying that our

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 9>profit has been boosted by those revenues, by those software

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.560
<v Speaker 9>revenue sales, and so like extrapolate out to XAI.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 6>You can just envisage your world like I drive every

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 6>day using.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.960
<v Speaker 9>FSD to work, and in the cockpit of the car,

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 9>I use the Grock voice assistant to communicate like how

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.800
<v Speaker 9>do they monetize that you'd expect and to talk about

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 9>that kind of stuff on the cool I think.

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 2>This is this is okay, this is what I'm interested in.

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 3>Well, so let's wait. You know what, we want to

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 3>throw another voice into this. Do not go, Do not

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 3>leave us at Ludlow. We want you still here. I

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 3>think our own Steve Man, a Bloomberg Intelligence Global Autos

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.160
<v Speaker 3>and Industrials research manager, is here with us as well.

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 5>Steve, come on in too.

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 3>Hopefully you've been listening to what Ed has to say.

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 3>What what jumps out for you in this Tesla results?

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:34.400
<v Speaker 7>Well, I think on the car side, nothing nothing of surprise,

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 7>uh with you know, margins a lot better than we expected,

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 7>but that's only from higher production. But what's really interesting

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.680
<v Speaker 7>for us is really now you know, Elon must have

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 7>been talking a lot about rolling out Groobo Taxi. It

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 7>was just top but now it's kind of codified in

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 7>the in the presentation now that they're going to roll

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 7>out in nine cities beyond Austin. So I think a

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:03.959
<v Speaker 7>lot of the investors are expecting, you know, the timeline

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 7>of that scaling up on robo taxi, and I think

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 7>we're seeing that.

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 3>But the only thing is like, I'm going to go

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 3>to our live blog and Ed, come on back in here.

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm looking for it on the live blog. But how

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 3>that they have made promises before to kind of roll out, and.

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's like it just hasn't happened. That's part

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 2>for the course for Elon.

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 3>No, I know, and we used to have a clock thing,

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 3>I think on the Bloomberg like tracking, you know, Elon

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:29.359
<v Speaker 3>and his promises.

0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:32.040
<v Speaker 9>We did an episode of Wall Street Week last month

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:34.679
<v Speaker 9>on robotaxi, right, and the opening line was, you know,

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:37.359
<v Speaker 9>five years ago, Elon Musk promised that there would be

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 9>robotaxis all over public roads by the end of that year.

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 9>And here we are at the beginning of twenty twenty

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 9>six and in a very limited ten vehicle pilot. Tesla

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:51.679
<v Speaker 9>has just removed the safety monitor from those vehicles that

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:55.400
<v Speaker 9>are in Austin, Texas for ROBOTAXI WEAIMO, by comparison, has

0:26:55.440 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 9>many hundreds more than that on public roads, charging a

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 9>fair no human in in operation. The thing is that

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 9>your last guest deluded to this. You're like pressing him

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.800
<v Speaker 9>on why he had the conviction in this this thesis.

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 9>But for lots of people, it's the idea that Elon

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 9>Musk makes many projections and gives many timelines, and even

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 9>though he misses those dates, he often gets there in

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:19.800
<v Speaker 9>the end. And I suspect that I've said that sentence

0:27:19.840 --> 0:27:23.080
<v Speaker 9>toe debatam many hundreds of times before.

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 2>So Steve Man, come on back here? Does he? Does

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 2>he get there this time? With the ROBOTAXI rollout?

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Is?

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Are we going to be riding in robotaxis when we

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 2>go to visit places apart from Austin anytime soon?

0:27:34.880 --> 0:27:35.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I think the fact that he's, you know,

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 7>putting the plan on paper says a lot. You know,

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 7>from my perspective, it's not just talking anymore. He's making

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 7>a big commitment to the investors, and that's what the

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 7>investor are expecting. So yeah, nine cities, mostly down south.

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 7>I think it. Look, I think the rollout will continue

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 7>to be slow. I mean, and Tesla is a big name.

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 7>They don't have much room to make a mistake, so

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.119
<v Speaker 7>they're going to take it slow. They're probably going to

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 7>have safety drivers in those cities initially, similar to what

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 7>Weimo has done, and then startly removing those safety drivers

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 7>in once they gain confidence. But at the end of

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:25.960
<v Speaker 7>the day, the point is we're expecting scaling up of

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 7>that business and to drive a new revenue stream for

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.880
<v Speaker 7>the company, and looks like it's happening sooner than later.

0:28:32.960 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 3>It's fascinating. I feel a little managed Edla Low come

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 3>on in here. I mean, it's just amazing that we're

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 3>talking about Tesla and really not focusing on a less expensive.

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:46.800
<v Speaker 2>Callay, focusing on Chelsea versus Napoli.

0:28:47.000 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 5>No no, no, no no.

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 3>But I just know it's fine. It's part of what

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 3>we love about you. But I mean, it's just interesting

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 3>that we're like, Okay, it's these taxis and it's robots

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:00.200
<v Speaker 3>and it may take a.

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 5>While, but we're in. We're in.

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.520
<v Speaker 3>And we talked to Kathy Wooden. She's like, this is

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 3>the company going forward?

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 9>I mean, you know, I don't want to speak on

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 9>his behalf, but Steve's point is echoed by by many

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 9>that either are bullish or bearish on Tesla. They've put

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 9>this in the shareholder deck. It's in writing the explanation

0:29:19.480 --> 0:29:22.479
<v Speaker 9>of what they plan to do, plus some timeline in it,

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.160
<v Speaker 9>plus the impact to top and bottom line that you

0:29:25.160 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 9>know it's in there. Steve wrote in his January twelfth

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.400
<v Speaker 9>research without putting him on the spot, that twenty six

0:29:33.520 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 9>is the year that Tesla pivots to physical AI for

0:29:36.920 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 9>many people, that that is something that started in twenty

0:29:39.400 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 9>twenty five. But there is still an element with Tesla

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 9>right the stocks up less than three percent in after

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:49.240
<v Speaker 9>hours that Elon Musk will likely say something on the

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 9>call that will move the needle, and it's about, you know,

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 9>whether investors do or don't believe him. The one little

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 9>teaser that I will leave with you is there's a

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 9>line on the deck that talks about deeper vertical integration.

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:04.840
<v Speaker 9>And you know, Dana Hole, you know, messaged me right

0:30:04.880 --> 0:30:06.200
<v Speaker 9>away saying did you see that?

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 6>What do you think? That means? Don't know?

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 9>But Elon's talks about all kinds of things, building its

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 9>own chip fab. Where does SpaceX factor into this? One

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 9>of the most voted up retail questions because you know,

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 9>test of fields questions from retail investors is will Tesla

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 9>A shareholders get priority access to a SpaceX ipo.

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 6>All of these things keep people looking to the horizon.

0:30:28.600 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 2>It depends on where the planets are aligned, I think

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 2>is the.

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 3>It's great, this is on our live blog. We will

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 3>manage the businesses such that we ensure a strong balance sheet,

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 3>maintaining sufficient liquidity to fund our product roadmap, long term

0:30:41.320 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 3>capacity expansion plans, including further vertical integration, and other expenses.

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:49.560
<v Speaker 3>And as you said, Dana writes, would love more details,

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 3>and it sounds like you would would too.

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:54.200
<v Speaker 2>You didn't even mention you didn't even hear my planetary

0:30:54.200 --> 0:30:54.840
<v Speaker 2>alignment joke.

0:30:55.000 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh sorry, okay, ed laugh Johnnie Steve Mann final thoughts

0:31:00.520 --> 0:31:02.719
<v Speaker 3>from you thirty seconds here when it comes to Tesla.

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you guys talked about a little bit about the

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 7>two billion dollar investment in Xai. It totally makes sense

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 7>for me because, look, Grock is starting to be integrated

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 7>into Tesla vehicles. You know, especially in the navigational you

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 7>can tell groc basically, you know, I want to go home,

0:31:20.560 --> 0:31:22.880
<v Speaker 7>but in between I want to stop at Starbucks or

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 7>stop at the grocery store and actually will help you

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 7>navigate to those different points. And look that that you

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 7>know they're testing it out now, that system won't be

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 7>on the robotaxi because you know there's no driver there.

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 7>So it's if you take a step back and look

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 7>at this thing, this whole elon must AI thing. I

0:31:45.840 --> 0:31:48.920
<v Speaker 7>wouldn't be surprised if there's going to be more kind

0:31:48.920 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 7>of cross investments between the companies that are all going

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 7>to be tied together on this AI endeavor.

0:31:55.520 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 5>Wait, did I hear circular financing again? I don't know.

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 3>I don't know anyway, fascinating faster, Steve Man, thank you

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 3>so much. Bloomer Intelligence Global autos and Industrial's research manager

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 3>joining us here. Hey real quickly ed thirty seconds for

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 3>you go anywhere. Whether it's Meta which is rowling about

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:16.680
<v Speaker 3>nine percent in the aftermarket, Microsoft down five percent, Tesselas

0:32:16.720 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 3>up three percent, where do you want to go?

0:32:18.480 --> 0:32:19.920
<v Speaker 6>The stories are really straightforward.

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 9>Meta said that revenue growth strong, and then they boosted

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 9>the capex range for the year beyond consensus.

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 6>It's a simple formula. We're repeating.

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 9>Microsoft's Azure cloud unit growth thirty eight percent, in line

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 9>with estimate consensus, but at the top end, people were like,

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 9>where's my forty percent growth? And they told us about

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 9>their capital expenditures and those kind of exceeded, and still

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 9>the market was disappointed. It's a very high bar on

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 9>a simple formula that we've discussed. Endlessly spend more on

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:51.120
<v Speaker 9>AI investment in infrastructure, but show us very strong top

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 9>line growth as a direct result of it.

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 3>You rock, go back to the match, all right. Of course,

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 3>that's Ed Lovelow as OA is. He is co host

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 3>of Bloomberg Tech on Bloomberg TV. Catch him at eleven

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 3>am Wall Street Time Monday through Friday.

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 7>H m hmm.