WEBVTT - It's Like Nordstrom Without the Clothes

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm Pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com Nordstrom. Yesterday,

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the department store chain announced that it would open a

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:41.040
<v Speaker 1>new quote neighborhood hub shop. In other words, this is

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be a store that's smaller and has no merchandise,

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to open this on October three in

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>West Hollywood, California. Did not go over well with investors.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>The shares fell about three on the news. And here

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to talk about this whole concept of window shopping with

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>no merchandise that could be potentially the new front of

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>retail is Punam Goyle. She is our own analysts that

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>covers Senior. She's our own retail analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and she joins us. Now, Punam, you know, I actually

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>thought this was not a terrible idea kind of moves

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to the whole experience, kind of uh focus that a

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of retailers are looking to do. What's the problem here?

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>What was what were investors responding so viscerally to? You know,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if the response yesterday was to this

0:01:27.640 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>directly or maybe something else, but I agree with you

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's actually a neat concept. It's one

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>that more retailers should start thinking about how to drive

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>people in their stores and how to shrink their stories.

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a three thousand square foot store versus their

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>typical hundred and forty thousand square foot store, that's uh,

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, a big difference. And these three thousand square

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>footstores can go anywhere. Well, and Punam, can you give

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>us a sense of what these stores might look like,

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>what the experience would be walking in for a customer? Sure? So,

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, you walk into these stores, you get a refreshment,

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's beer, wine, coffee, whatever it is. You said,

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>A personal stylist greets you. There's eight big dressing rooms.

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>They talk to you, they understand what you like, and

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>then they have you try on a few things, and

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>whatever you like, you can either come back and pick

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.800
<v Speaker 1>it up later or it can be shipped directly to you.

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>So they'll have merchandise there, but that merchandise is not

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>for sale. Immediately you walk out bagless. I'm just trying

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 1>to wrap my head around this punam. And I understand,

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, Lisa thinks it's not a terrible idea, that's

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a great endorsement. Um, But you know, drinking wine, personal tailors.

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>How is all this scalable? How do you do this

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.919
<v Speaker 1>with a company that's a fifteen billion dollars in sales?

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>You do it because you can have so many of

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.119
<v Speaker 1>these stores. So nord Storm is coming to New York

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 1>City in full price store, a flagship store, a flagship store.

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>So why can't and this is really you know, me

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>thinking very out there. Why can't they add a three

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand square foot store in Soho and use the flagship

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>store to fill that demand. They have a hundred and

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty two full line stores. They can go into major

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>shopping destinations and add these smaller stores and use their

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>hubs to fill the demand. So totally, I actually I

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.079
<v Speaker 1>totally see this, PIM because if you think about it,

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>I enjoy a glass of wine. I want to talk about,

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:27.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, what the latest trends are, and try things

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>on and make sure things fit all right before you

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:31.720
<v Speaker 1>order it online. And uh, you know, not only that,

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but putam, is there any discussion about creating other aspects

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of the experience. I mean, I know that like, for example,

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the M and M store in Times Square had a

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>very kind of playful environment, or the old fo Schwartz

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 1>with the the clock and the how did that do? Yeah,

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and just but that's okay. Well no, I was gonna say,

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, to go back to your point about you know, Okay,

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.839
<v Speaker 1>so that norths To opens the flagship store in New York,

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and so they're going to do a smaller square foot

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe a five thousand, three thousand square foot store in Soho. Well,

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the reason they're not going to make any money there

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>is because it costs four point three million dollars a

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>year for a five thousand square foot storefront in Soho.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:17.880
<v Speaker 1>It's expensive. Everywhere you want to go, it is expensive.

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But just think about the traffic that they get into

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>those stories and the sales they can get out of

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that three thousand square foot box. I mean, look, I

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know exactly what these stores are gonna look like,

0:04:26.440 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>but I would be more than happy to go in

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>for a petty manny and um, look for some clothes

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 1>while I'm doing that, and try him on, and then

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>walk out and have it sent to my home and

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:37.159
<v Speaker 1>walk out without a bag because you don't want to

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>carry a bag everywhere you go anymore. For all the

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>men out there, a manny petty is a manicure pedicure.

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>And I agree with you, But I also think that

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>there has to do uh there there There has to

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>be an advertising element of this as well, right, I mean,

0:04:49.720 --> 0:04:51.599
<v Speaker 1>if you think about at the four point three million

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>dollars that it costs to have that space, if they

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have incredible foot traffic, if they have an experience that

0:04:57.360 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>gets the word at the word out, that seems to

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>be a destination for people, I mean, that's that's advertising.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>That's worth it for them, right. Yeah. Not every three

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:08.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand square foot store will cost them that much money.

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:11.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean there are other areas, densely populated areas that

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they could go into with these smaller footprints that maybe

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>don't cost that much money. All right, So let's let

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>all kidding aside. Though, how many do they intend to have?

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Any idea how many of these new kinds of formats

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>do they intend to open? And what precludes the competition

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 1>from opening another small three thousand square foot space right

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.359
<v Speaker 1>next door. So so far one, Um, no announcements of

0:05:36.360 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>anything further than that. There maybe one in Toronto, but UM,

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.599
<v Speaker 1>it's just you know, they haven't announced anything further. I

0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 1>think they're going to test and try, see how it goes,

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.159
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll hear more. As far as competition, why not,

0:05:49.400 --> 0:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, why isn't everyone thinking of something similar or different?

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>We saw colds just uh, I think over a week

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ago announced at Amazon coming intent of their stores to showcase,

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>ace test and try Amazon branded goods. So people are

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>thinking retailer, they're thinking outside the box. They're trying to

0:06:06.120 --> 0:06:10.640
<v Speaker 1>find ways to drive traffic and use the box more productively. Well,

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's fascinating. And I imagine that they'll

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.360
<v Speaker 1>also have people who help, uh style different outfits and

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>looks for people, so there'll be more of that kind

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of tailor experience as well. Right, Yeah, and then and

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>then you get a fitted to. They have a tailoring

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>service on siting. I mean that's just you know, one

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.480
<v Speaker 1>stop shop if you're a north Strom shopper or our

0:06:28.800 --> 0:06:31.599
<v Speaker 1>north Strom potential shopper that you know would be interested

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in clothes from the ore Shoes put them Goyle, thank

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. Put him. Goyle, a

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>senior retail analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, talking about this new

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>window shopping no merchandise store concept and uh, it's interesting. Nonetheless,

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting to see retailers think outside the box and

0:06:48.520 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>try to uh come up with new experiences in a

0:06:51.920 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>time when people really do order so much online. Mark

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Usco has had some harsh words for certain e t

0:07:09.920 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>F s. He called one slice of the funds one

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>of the worst things ever created. Now he's starting his

0:07:17.000 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>own e t F. Marc Usco joins us now Marcusco

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>as chief executive officer and chief investment officer of Morgan

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>creekt Capital Management, which oversees almost three billion dollars in

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Mark, So, what convinced you to

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>plow into this territory that you've had such criticism for

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>about in the past few years. Well, at Lisa, you know,

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to note that I've actually never

0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>been a critic of E t F as a structure. Yeah,

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I think DTF structure is is quite a

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>good one. What I was critical of is is certain

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>strategies and the one that I did call, you know,

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe the worst invention perpetuated against investors in a long time.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>With this idea of low volatility, where you buy stock

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:04.280
<v Speaker 1>only based on the volatile e of its price, no

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>regard to fundamentals, no regard to how the company performs.

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>It seems like a really bad idea to buy something

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>no matter what the prices and whatever the value is.

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So the structure of ets IS is a really good one,

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think the biggest reason for us to to

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:23.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of crossover is we've been involved in the alternatives

0:08:23.960 --> 0:08:27.600
<v Speaker 1>world for a very long time, and that basically meant

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that the SEC said, you know, if you weren't wealthy,

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't have access because of all the restrictions against

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the credited investors and qualified purchasers. So this is the

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>way to bring our styles and strategies that we think

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>are really good ways to manage capital, honed in our

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>endowment experience, into the world of the average investor. So, Mark,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>will this exchange traded fund? Will it be passive or active?

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>It'd be active, And I think that's a really important point,

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, although I get kind of buggy on this

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:03.839
<v Speaker 1>on this word to PIM and that the word passive

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a misnomer and that these things aren't passive, right.

0:09:08.320 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, most of the stocks in the sp SP

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 1>weren't there thirty years ago. There's been I think turnover.

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:19.479
<v Speaker 1>It's just slow active and they're really momentum based strategies

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>because of the capitalization waiting in most of these index ones.

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.079
<v Speaker 1>So I don't really like the term passive, but you

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>know passive is indexing, and that all the other things.

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:30.719
<v Speaker 1>This will definitely be active in the sense that it's

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>going to take our best ideas that we come up

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>with once a year in our our primary themes, and

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>then trade within the year around those those best ideas

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.679
<v Speaker 1>and try to deliver. You know, we think alpha because

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to us, alpha is smart. You know, there's this whole

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 1>thing called smart beta. Beta actually is dumb, not meaning unintelligent,

0:09:52.240 --> 0:09:54.880
<v Speaker 1>but it's rule based. Alpha is where the smart part

0:09:54.880 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>of asset management is. So mark you set the best

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ideas once a year. Correct, Yes, those are the big themes,

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>so kind of ten big themes that we think have

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, about a fifty fifty chance of happening. But

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>if they do happen, they'll present up you big upside

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 1>return opportunities. You know, this year, a good example would

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have been short the dollar. Everybody thought the dollar was

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:20.079
<v Speaker 1>going up this year. In fact, of those surveyed on

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg and other places thought the dollar was going up.

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>So if you were short the dollars this year, you've

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>made a lot of money. And if you were long

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the rem and B, which was the opposite of what

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>most people were doing last year. So Mark, currently, what's

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>one of your best ideas? So you know, well, short

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the dollars is still you know, one of our our

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>top ten ideas. Uh. We also like the idea that

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that interest rates are going to continue to go down,

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>not up. Uh. You know, everybody thought interest rates we're

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna rally really hard after the Trump victory, and and

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:52.839
<v Speaker 1>they did for a few weeks. And they started the

0:10:52.920 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>year at two sixty an hour down to to sixteen.

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.679
<v Speaker 1>And that's a surprise to everybody. But are probably our

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest one is this wealth transfer from the developing world.

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Two I started from the developed world to the developing world.

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>And we think emerging markets are are going to continue

0:11:09.360 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to be the place to be. They're gonna have a

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.600
<v Speaker 1>decade of dominance for the next ten years. And while

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we think the US market is going to struggle to

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>make any return, um basically be flat for a decade,

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.319
<v Speaker 1>just like from two thousand to two thousand and ten,

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:25.440
<v Speaker 1>we think emerging markets could could compound in the high

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>single digits, even low double digits. Hey, Mark, what happens

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>if one of these ideas goes bust? Well, you know

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>they will, right, I mean, we're not gonna get them,

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>all right. Uh, And that's why it's going to be

0:11:36.520 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>an actively managed et F. It's great question. Um, so

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that you know, we we think one of the strengths

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of of the endowment model. You know we've lived our

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>our whole careers is is the risk management. Focus on

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>risk management, focus on protection of capital first, growth of capital. Second.

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you take care of the losses, the

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:58.960
<v Speaker 1>gains take care of themselves. The stop loss on each

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>of the positions. I mean, do you say to yourself,

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, if this is that, if this goes down

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>more than seven in the next six months, I'm out

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of here. Again, really important question. We don't we don't

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like those rules based stop losses because what we think

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that does is is it. It tends to what people

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>do is they buy high and they sell low. We

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>rather try to only buy things when there's a margin

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:27.559
<v Speaker 1>of safety, so that some decline in price is actually

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>okay and actually gives you an opportunity to buy more

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>of something as long as you're below fair value. So

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it turns out that you you know,

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>made a miscalculation on fair value or you know, just wrong,

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:41.320
<v Speaker 1>or the trend changes, you know, then you've just got

0:12:41.320 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to step to the side. And that that's really more

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of a judgment call. And that's where I think the

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>difference between active management and passive management really comes to

0:12:49.040 --> 0:12:53.360
<v Speaker 1>bears is the whole concept of judgment. Passive has no judgment.

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not allowed to have judgment. It has to buy whatever.

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, the rule says it's going to buy no

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>matter what the price, no matter what the value. Well,

0:13:01.280 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see what happens, right, We're gonna see where

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>your et F is gonna come out, and we'll we'll

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>check in with you to see whether this new uh

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of actively managed e t F will grow to

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 1>fruition as you describe. Thanks very much, Mark Usko, Chief

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Executive Officer, and Chief Investment Officer, Morgan Creek Capital Management.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in John Butler to learn more

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>about the Apple launch. John, in your world, is this

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you know? Is this like Christmas, Thanksgiving and I don't know,

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.120
<v Speaker 1>New Year's all rolled into one. Well, it's a big

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Christmas this year, PIM because we get an extra iPhone

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 1>under the tree. Um, Apple for the first time in

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a long time, is coming out with a product line extension,

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's a perfect year to do it because it

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:59.120
<v Speaker 1>is the tenth anniversary of the iPhone. The latest rumor

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 1>and there have been a lot rumors about what it's

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be called, but apparently it's it's going to

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>be called the iPhone ten and Um it's at the

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>very high end of the market, so a lot of

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>people are talking about the high price, the thousand dollar

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.320
<v Speaker 1>plus price point. But I think I think it comes

0:14:16.360 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 1>with a pretty significant redesign. They're taking the home button off.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a LED screen, so which are beautiful screens by

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, Samsung uses O lead and you get black

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>or blacks and whiter whites. Um, and it's gonna be

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a large screen, larger than the iPhone seven plus by

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>about point three inches, so they're the screen sizes are

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>getting up there, and I think Apple is positioning it

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to compete with Samsung's new Note eight, which has actually

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of demand for that, so it seems

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like they have some stiff competition. It does, and it's

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>priced at n fifty dollars, so it's at a similar

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 1>price point. It's discounted basically, right. But you know, John,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I personally have this visceral reaction to the

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>frenzy that Apple is able to whip everyone up into.

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Can any other company creates such a glut of just

0:15:13.200 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>natural advertising, just everyone talking Apple phone, Apple phone, Apple

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>phone all the time? I mean, why is there such

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:24.360
<v Speaker 1>an excitement over this? The roots are in Steve Jobs.

0:15:24.480 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Like Steve Jobs, you know, with the initial iPhone announcement

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, that was really something. I mean, it

0:15:33.200 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was a brand new device. He had basically taken what

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>was up to that point a consumer electronics device and

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>turned it into this appealing accessory. And in the years

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that followed, of course Jobs did a great did a

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:52.760
<v Speaker 1>tremendous job, no pun intend. Well, do you think that

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>this new iPhone will elevate the product to a new level,

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>so they can even be considered a somewhat new innovation, right,

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 1>because that's that's been one challenge for Apple is that

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>they really haven't come up with a new hit. They

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.360
<v Speaker 1>have not come up with a new hit. What they're

0:16:09.400 --> 0:16:13.920
<v Speaker 1>looking to do, Lisa is broaden the category a little bit.

0:16:14.000 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>So they're going to the ultra high end. There are

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a premium phone player, but they've never had a true

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>match for the Note Samsung Note eight now um, and

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>so I sort of view this as an important event

0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>because you're getting in a typical refresh by the way

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you get to new phones. We're now getting three, including

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>this high end phone. So I think it's a big deal.

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think all the excitement is reflective of the

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>power of the Apple brand. They really do have a

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>great global brand. Yeah, they also know how to leverage it.

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, they also do two hundred and

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>three billion dollars in sales a year, So do anything

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>that a company of that size does, you're gonna want

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to it. So the challenge now for

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple is they need to go from hardware innovations to

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>can tell people to upgrade the more software and so

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>what I'm looking for in today's event is what are

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we getting in the way a new content, new services,

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>um adjacent product markets. I hear we're getting a new

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>watch that is going to be completely free of the iPhone,

0:17:17.080 --> 0:17:20.240
<v Speaker 1>which this one will tell time terrific. It may tell time.

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>That's we'll see what I mean. I mean, I understand

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.919
<v Speaker 1>this whole you know ecosystem with Apple and so on,

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.400
<v Speaker 1>But I I thought that the challenge that Apple really has,

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>never mind the one thousand dollar price tag, but is

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:35.439
<v Speaker 1>getting people in China to buy their products. It's getting

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>people in China, which is matured, and now it's getting

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in India, which I think is a long shot. We

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>did a report taking a close look at that market.

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>The monster portion of that market is at the low

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>end price below two fifty dollars. I think Apple doesn't

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:55.159
<v Speaker 1>stand a chance personally. But you know, it's interesting that

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.919
<v Speaker 1>you focus on content. I wonder how much of this

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>is also geared at creating customer data. There's been a

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk about one big benefit that Google and

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook have over Apple and the long term is that

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>they have amazing access to all of the customer data.

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>Amazon also, where's Apple in this nowhere yet. But that's

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>where the content comes in, right, because if you're producing

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>original programming, or even if you're not producing your own programming,

0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you can benefit from the ad dollars and targeted ad

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 1>dollars at that based on what you know about your

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:38.439
<v Speaker 1>user base. So when you heard Verizon originally give the

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:42.880
<v Speaker 1>hard sell on leveraging content at A O, L and Yahoo,

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.840
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about leveraging what they know about their

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.159
<v Speaker 1>wireless customers, A T and T is probably going to

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing, and Apple is in a great

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>position to do the same. So again I'm looking for

0:18:55.840 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>new a new maybe streaming video service coming this afternoon. Um,

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.239
<v Speaker 1>they've made some big hires out of Sony, so they

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.880
<v Speaker 1>have a great content team. Where's it going now, that's

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the big question. Just to follow up on what you

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.080
<v Speaker 1>said about A T and T and Verizon, the chief

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>executive of A T and T, Randall Stevenson, today saying

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:18.720
<v Speaker 1>expect the time, want to deal to close by the

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>end of the year. And oh yes, if you're interested

0:19:21.880 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in HBO, it'll be free to all wireless customers that

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>have an unlimited plant. So there that's an answer to

0:19:30.560 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>T Mobile coming out the other day giving free Netflix

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:38.400
<v Speaker 1>to people, and so, not to go off on a tangent,

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>but with the talent, But that's the same kind of

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>thing you're talking about with Apple. Yeah, it's okay, you

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 1>got the device, you're gonna need the content. Yeah. For

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the telcos, they're dealing with the same market maturity, and

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.959
<v Speaker 1>it's led to pricing pressure and wireless. How low can

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.679
<v Speaker 1>you go on price before you hurt yourself? And what

0:19:54.720 --> 0:19:59.000
<v Speaker 1>do you do instead? You add value to that commoditized

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>service and their owing it with content And so a

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 1>T and T is merely responding to what T Mobile

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.639
<v Speaker 1>did by giving Netflix away for free for T Mobile

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>one subs on family plants. How far away are we

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:16.119
<v Speaker 1>from peak content? I don't cover content, so that's a

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>tough call, but it's something I'm watching. It's getting to

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be an awfully crowded market. But it's interesting to see

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.680
<v Speaker 1>where content is going. It's moved from long form sit

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>in front of the TV in your living room and

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>watch it for an hour, to short form watching it

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 1>on a smartphone. So in that sense, the ball is

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>moving into Apple's court, not away from it. Yeah, we're

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>all a d D now, John Butler, thank you so

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Always a pleasure to speak with you.

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 1>John Butler has senior Telecom Services and Equipment analyst for

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence, talking all things Apple, Apple, Apple, Apple, the

0:20:49.280 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>new iPhone. Let's turn our attention now to infrastructure and

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>utilities when it comes to the aftermath of Hurricane Irma.

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Joining us as Kit Connledge, he is our senior Industrials

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and Utilities analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. He joins us here

0:21:16.480 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>on our eleven three oh studio. Kit, thanks for coming in.

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Maybe just give us an update. I was looking at

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 1>some headlines that said that about six and a half

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 1>million customers are without electricity, but you brought your spreadsheets

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>and you've got more detailed. Well, the it looks to

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>me like the latest from the grid operator in Florida,

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>UH indicates that we're damned to about five and a

0:21:39.280 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>half million outages now. So uh, they're obviously getting to

0:21:44.880 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>the low hanging fruit first, let's put it that way.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So the further south you were, the quicker the hurricane

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 1>went through. So those guys are getting fixed now pretty readily.

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Presumably the keys are going to have a hard time

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>getting fixed, but there's not that many electric connections and

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the keys. So um as you fix up Marco Island

0:22:06.000 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and up the west coast than FPL completes this, it's work.

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 1>But the North Central Florida, Florida Power and Light is

0:22:14.480 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the one and North Central Florida, where Duke Power Florida

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is has still a higher percentage of their outages remaining.

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Can you give us a sense of the scope of

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>what it will take to get power online. Are we

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 1>talking about down to power lines that need to be

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.120
<v Speaker 1>just put up and re strong or is there more

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>substantive damage to the infrastructure. From what I've seen, the

0:22:37.720 --> 0:22:43.480
<v Speaker 1>utilities haven't really determined yet how much uh real deep

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 1>seated uh problem they're going to have with the infrastructure.

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:51.120
<v Speaker 1>It uh you know, the initial things they're indicating seem

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>to be maybe not as bad as could have been expected.

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of the power plants, which obviously are uh,

0:22:58.080 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>if you will, most important, uh don't seem to have

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 1>been affected. And then you have these things that you

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>uh you call the substations, which are like billion dollar

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 1>installations that connect high power lines to low power lines.

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 1>They were raised and they shouldn't have been flooded. That

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>was the purpose of all this work they did in

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years. We'll see how well that turns

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>out well and then a kid going forward. This is

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be expensive. And I'm just wondering what the

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 1>financial condition of UH next eras Flora, Florida Power and

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 1>like which you were talking about, Tampa Electric, Duke Energy,

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Florida Southern Companies, Gulf Power, and Georgia Power. I mean,

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>how how are they going to afford this? Well, that's

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a very fair question. I would say that for next year,

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and Duke and and the Southern companies subsidiaries and Southern

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>got hit in Georgia Power as well. Of course. UH.

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Those are all companies in the range of fifty billion

0:23:55.000 --> 0:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>market caps. So even uh, you know, a bill in

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the billions for them, and even assuming they had trouble

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>collecting it from the ratepayers, which in theory they're allowed

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to do, UH, there's no existential threat to those kind

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>of companies. UM. Tampa Electric has a smaller UH company,

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>so there may be something there. They're a subsidiary of Amero,

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>which is a Canadian company. Can't Uh. This is going

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to require, as you mentioned, a lot of work. It's

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna require a lot of people. One estimate by the

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>chief executive of Southern Company, Thomas Fanning. He said that

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>they might need between fifty and sixty thousand workers from

0:24:40.560 --> 0:24:43.520
<v Speaker 1>all over the US and Canada in order to actually

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 1>rebuild the Florida infrastructure. From from what I've seen the

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>companies across the country UH putting out and press releases.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 1>They're flocking in literally from all over the country and

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>probably from Canada as well. UH. It's it's a good

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>thing for the utilities from out of town to do. UH.

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Turnabout is fair play if something happens to them they

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>want There's a lot of uh of cooperation and the

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>utility industry for these kind of natural disasters. They're not

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>direct competitors here. Once their power lines are down, then

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody wants to help. Plus they get paid for it,

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>so it's it all adds up pretty well. But everybody

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.639
<v Speaker 1>knows in the industry that it's important to the local

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>utility to get the power back on. And if you

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>wait more than a week, uh, people start grumbling. And

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:44.120
<v Speaker 1>it's not obviously always in your control, but they can

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>empathize because they've all been through this that if you

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>have problems getting everything connected rapidly, UH people are going

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to start to complain and that's always bad for utility.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Kit Conneledge, thank you so much for joining us. Kick

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 1>connel Edge is senior Industrials and Utilities Utilities analyst for

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:05.959
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Intelligence if I can speak today, joining us

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>in our Bloomberg eleven three oh studios here in New York.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.000
<v Speaker 1>And while it wasn't as bad as we thought, Hurricane

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Irma did cause devastation in the Keys, and the Pentagon

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 1>is now saying that ten thou people still may need

0:26:19.640 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to be evacuated from that region. Thanks for listening to

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.159
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg p m L podcast. You can subscribe and

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:35.680
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>before the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide on

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.