WEBVTT - Episode Five: Just Don’t Call it A Diet

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:04.080
<v Speaker 1>So I really don't like the word diet. That word,

0:00:04.160 --> 0:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to me is just so negative and it's just, you know,

0:00:06.559 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the thoughts that come with that word are like deprivation, starving,

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and just not getting to have anything. That was the

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>voice of a YouTuber named Stephanie Rose. Stephanie posts this

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:24.520
<v Speaker 1>video almost four years ago about how she lost fifty

0:00:24.600 --> 0:00:28.960
<v Speaker 1>pounds in five months, and pretty early on in the

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>video she has basically a disclaimer about her weight lost story.

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Stephanie goes on to say that even though she lost weight,

0:00:40.120 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 1>she didn't really diet. I like to use the word

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:46.279
<v Speaker 1>journey because for me, this wasn't really a diet. I

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't really diet. This was more of a lifestyle change

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and a journey to become healthy overall, just saying, you know,

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I like the word journey. The word diet is very little,

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:01.240
<v Speaker 1>very don't like dieting. Stephanie sa is that to lose weight,

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 1>she started eating healthier, but she still didn't want to

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>call that a diet. Even though eating healthier is part

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>of dieting. Still, dieting sounded bad to her. Negative. It

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:22.560
<v Speaker 1>reminded her of suffering, and she didn't want to deprive

0:01:22.680 --> 0:01:27.559
<v Speaker 1>herself or starve herself. She just wanted to lose weight

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>and feel confident again. And Stephanie is not the only

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>person fed up with diets. It's this funny trend I

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 1>noticed recently. People aren't really using the word diet anymore,

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>even when what they're talking about is definitely dieting. Like

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>this British personal trainer named James Smith. He writes this

0:01:55.920 --> 0:02:00.320
<v Speaker 1>whole book called Not a Diet Book. It was alish

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in early on his website. Jam Smith calls himself a

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>disruptor of the billion dollar diet industry, but he also

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:14.120
<v Speaker 1>says that among the things the book will help people

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>do is change bad habits and lose fat. It's called

0:02:19.240 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>not diet books. It's not. It's more of an empowering book,

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>an education book, a liberation book to you fully understand

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the things that you need to so the rather you

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>work in with your diet, your diet works for you.

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.800
<v Speaker 1>What I'm hearing here is the not a diet book

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is actually a diet book. One more example. There's another

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 1>personal trainer. This one is a woman named Lucy Bergen.

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>She gained some weight during the pandemic, like a lot

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of us did. Then she starts working out intensely for

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a competition, and as part of that, she takes a

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>photo of herself every single day. Lucy ends up putting

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>all the photos together in a video. She's wearing the

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>same outfit in each photo. It's sort of a rust

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>colored bikini, and there's a calendar in the background with

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>exces over the dates. In the video, you can see

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.679
<v Speaker 1>the ex's stack up on the calendar as time passes.

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Six months of weight loss fly by in about thirty seconds,

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>and sure enough, as that happens, you can also see

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Lucy's body changing over time. She drops about thirty pounds.

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>In the beginning of the video, Lucy looks unhappy, she's

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.600
<v Speaker 1>grabbing her stomach and shooting the camera a thumbs down.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>By the end, she looks thinner. She's also dyed her

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>hair at some point from brown to blonde. It makes

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>her look almost like a different person. The whole video

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like a live action before and after photo,

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and people love before and after photos, so maybe you

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>can guess what happened when Lucy posted the video on

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the internet this morning on Take It Off Today, an

0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:20.920
<v Speaker 1>incredible transformation On TikTok her weight loss video went viral

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 1>with twelve million views. The Today Show has Lucy on

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 1>as a guest. They asked her what were you thinking

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>when you took these photos each day? And she says,

0:04:32.600 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I just get to find myself. That it was a

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>short term goal. It wasn't a diet. It was a

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 1>lifestyle change and that's what's so important. And I loved

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>you hear that it wasn't a diet. Lucy last weight

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>by working out and changing what she ate, but not

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a diet, a lifestyle change. I reached out to Stephanie

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:01.080
<v Speaker 1>James and Lucy about all this, but they didn't provide

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 1>any comment for this episode. There's a reason everyone is

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>shying away from using the word diet lately. After hundreds

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of years of dieting, people have suddenly grown tired of it.

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Diets are a drag and they don't work so well,

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:25.280
<v Speaker 1>so we're questioning them more than ever. Dieting has become

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bad word, the d word. But somehow,

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.120
<v Speaker 1>no matter how hard we try to ban it from

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>our collective vocabularies, we still can't seem to get away

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>from dieting. We're still trying to lose weight and show

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>off our before and after photos and tell people our

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>secrets to success. We're just following a non diet to

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 1>do it and refusing to fuss up that it is

0:05:56.520 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>actually a diet. Company is are getting in on the

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:06.159
<v Speaker 1>action too. One of the most prominent examples is now,

0:06:06.920 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>a popular new weight loss app that's been called weight

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:15.239
<v Speaker 1>Watchers for millennials. Newon says it uses psychology to help

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>people build new, healthier habits. But that's not why we're

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:25.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about Noon right now. We're talking about Noon because

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>new actually describes itself in its ads as you guessed,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it not a diet. It's different. It's something that I

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>can actually live with if I wouldn't even call it

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a diet. In this episode, I'm going to get into

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>why people are so done with diets, or at least

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>done with calling them diets anyway. The diet backlash starts

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>with one simple fact diets aren't fun. But there's more

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 1>going on here too. I'm also going to look at

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>how companies in the huge and very profitable diet industry

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>are responding, like new which is selling dieting without actually

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:16.280
<v Speaker 1>calling it dieting. Are they just tricking us? I'm Bloomberg

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>News Health reporter em A Court and from the Prognosis podcast,

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this is losing. So the word diet has gotten a

0:07:35.640 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>bad reputation. Twenty years ago, the South Beach Diet became

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a multi platform, multimillion dollar phenomenon with a book that

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:51.080
<v Speaker 1>had the word diet on it in huge block letters. Today,

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>fewer people are buying diet books, and fewer diet books

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.080
<v Speaker 1>are making bestseller lists, according to data from NPD E

0:08:00.200 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Book Scan and USA Today company is selling weight loss meanwhile,

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>are working over time to assure people that they are

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>anything but a diet. If you're counting calories, or cutting carbs,

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>or generally changing how you eat to lose weight, that's

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a diet. And there are lots of reasons to take

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>issue with dieting, especially the fact that most people really

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>can't maintain weight loss long term. But the word diet,

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>that's not exactly the issue. So I don't people want

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to diet anymore? I put the question to Darren Cipher,

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>who is a food and beverage industry analysts for the

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Market Research Company and p D Group. Well, simply put,

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 1>dieting is not fun and eating is Darren's right. Dieting

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>is not fun. And in many cases it could drive

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you crazy and not literally, but yeah, I could do

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>some interesting things with your moods. People think of dieting

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>now and they think of punishment, like our YouTuber Stephanie

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Rose said earlier, But dieting used to be well, maybe

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>not fun, but trendy. People used to all go on

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the same diets and complain about them at parties. It

0:09:21.720 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>was like a group activity. Somewhere along the line, though,

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>things shifted. NPD group has found that interest in dieting

0:09:32.160 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>has been declining of American adults say they're on a

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>diet today compared with and at one point about a

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 1>decade ago, as few as twenty of people were dieting,

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and Darren says people aren't just interested in how their

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>bodies look anymore, they're also interested in how they feel.

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>This notion of just feeling like your well is becoming

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>much stronger and much more important with consumers because it's

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>not just about the physical anymore. It's also about the mental. Wealthy,

0:10:11.840 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>and it's not just the dieting isn't fun. Ideas about

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.559
<v Speaker 1>what people's bodies should look like are becoming a bit

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 1>more inclusive, especially for women. I've always been battling this

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>idea that if I was skinnier, if I looked exactly

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the way I wanted to look, then so many of

0:10:29.520 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>my problems would go away and I would just be happier.

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>When the ideal body is portrayed as skinny, people try

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to lose weight. But the bodies we see are changing

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>at least a little. People in bigger bodies are getting

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>featured on the covers of magazines, in TV shows, on

0:10:50.160 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 1>social media, and even on some high fashion runways where

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>ultra thin models have long been the norm. The early

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Internet played a big role here, helping activists in the

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 1>fat acceptance movement get the word out about their cause

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>and use tools like blogging to build communities of like

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.720
<v Speaker 1>minded people. It's called the body positive movement. Body except

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in stemmed out of that, and it kind of widens

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the scope to um people of all racist gender expressions

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 1>sizes wildly. Eventually, culture started to catch up. In two

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand four, for example, the soap brand Dove made huge

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 1>waves with its campaign for Real Beauty. One of its

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:39.880
<v Speaker 1>most well known ads featured an artist drawing women, first

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:44.040
<v Speaker 1>based only on how they described themselves, and then based

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 1>on another person's description. When the sketches were displayed side

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>by side, it showed that the women didn't see themselves

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>very accurately. Do you think you're more beautiful than you? Say? Yeah?

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Companies began realizing they might actually sell more products to people,

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>especially women, by casting models and bigger bodies and expanding

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the sizes they carry, and media has been changing too.

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>She's already the first curving model to land the cover

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Sports Illustrated Swim Student issue, and now it

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.760
<v Speaker 1>seems she's ready for world domination she being the model

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Ashley Graham. This happened in TV shows like Girls recast

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the archetype of a female lead, with Lena Dunham sporting

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>crop tops alongside what she herself has described as belly rolls.

0:12:38.880 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Platforms with no gatekeepers like TikTok and YouTube have throw

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>us even more types of bodies into the spotlight. Today,

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 1>celebrities look a little less like the celebrities many of

0:12:51.520 --> 0:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>us grew up seeing, and some of them, like the

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>actress Jamila Jamil, are even making names for themselves by

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>calling out diet culture for being toxic. The diet industry

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 1>can just off, I'm going off to the diet and

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>details industry, and it doesn't exist anymore. Despite all this change,

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.199
<v Speaker 1>much of popular culture still looks the same in lots

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 1>of ways. The thin ideal remains incredibly prevalent. But we

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>are seeing bigger butts and underwear ads and even stretch

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>marks and plus size models on the covers of magazines.

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>We're all perfectly imperfect. Body positivity always and forever. The

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>authentic and real us focus on how you feel. Forget

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>what other people say. You are enough, exactly as you are.

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:43.199
<v Speaker 1>You don't need to change. And this may sound like

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 1>some kind of motivational speech, but it's actually an ad

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:54.800
<v Speaker 1>part of the underwear company aries body positivity campaign. Underwear

0:13:54.840 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>companies used to be practically the CEO of wanting us

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to change our bodies, but these days they've got a

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>new line, except yourself the way you are. Maybe some

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>of this is an increasing recognition that dieting doesn't work

0:14:12.480 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>so well, especially among younger people, people like me who

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>saw their parents diet and diet and diet some more

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>without ever really getting anywhere. We're also a lot more

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>aware of the dangers of diets these days, dangers like

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>eating disorders. Today we're talking about body image. According to

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the National Institute of Mental Health, one in five women

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>struggle with an eating disorder or disordered. Eating. Restricting how

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>much food you eat is actually a very common risk

0:14:44.640 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 1>factor for developing and eating disorder. People are talking much

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>more about these things than they used to, so there's

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot at play here. We've finally realized that dieting

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>isn't fun. People want to feel good instead and be healthy,

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:08.040
<v Speaker 1>which is more than a number on a scale. Body

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>ideals are changing, becoming a bit more inclusive, and there's

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 1>way more awareness about eating disorders, which are a risk

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of dieting. All this stuff sounds good, right, positive, We're

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>turning away from diets and more towards feeling good and

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>being healthy. But the diet industry had an answer for that,

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and it was wellness. Diets are out and wellness is in.

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.520
<v Speaker 1>In the same way that people used to all go

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 1>on the South Beach diet together, Now they're meditating and

0:15:45.520 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>taking over priced vitamins, sporting apple watches, browsing Goop's website,

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe even drinking those weird wellness shops they sell by

0:15:54.920 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>the checkout at Whole Foods. Dieting is restrictive by its

0:16:00.600 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>very nature, but wellness. Wellness means pursuing good health, and

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that's pretty vague. Wellness can be anything, anything you want

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>it to mean, or more realistically, anything marketers want it

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to mean. Wellness can even mean dieting. Tried now and

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I lost ten pounds, which to me was huge. Remember now,

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the weight loss app I mentioned earlier now very much

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>fits into this trend. Here's how it works. New maps

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>out how many weeks or months it will take to

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:46.280
<v Speaker 1>reach your goal weight, and then new tries to use

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>psychology and wellness concepts like mindfulness to help you eat

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>differently and also change the way you approach eating. When

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I went to the doctors, it was just a very

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>cut and dry move more eat less, that's it. Noon

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>taught me. It was more about why I was eating.

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>That helped me take the first few steps and find

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>that new path. You log your meals on the app,

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and it teaches you to recognize and eat less caloric foods.

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>But Noon is not a diet, or at least that's

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>what it says. Here's how NEWM advertises itself online. These

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.320
<v Speaker 1>are all direct quotes, by the way, But now stop

0:17:29.359 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the yoyo dining. Now stop dining get lifelong results. I'm

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>focusing on Noon here because it's a high profile window

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>into this trend. Noon and other companies understand that the

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>culture has changed. Surviving as a weight loss company in

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a world that at least wants to be done with

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>diets means taking a new approach. To understand how Noom

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>got here, we have to start at the very beginning.

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:05.400
<v Speaker 1>For now, that's two thousand eight, Ardem Pakov and S. J. Jong,

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>who are now the company's president and CEO. We're very

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>interested in helping people get healthier. The first product they built,

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.879
<v Speaker 1>in fact, wasn't a weight loss program, but technology for

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>an exercise bike. Get Ready one week, Put the bike

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and other early approaches looked promising at first, but then

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Artem and say you realized most people don't really exercise consistently,

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>so how many people could their bike really help anyway?

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>And it seemed like a broader issue that people don't

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.639
<v Speaker 1>really make the kinds of changes that would improve their health.

0:18:55.640 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>One thing seemed like the exceptions that rule. Though. That's right,

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>weight loss people just don't act if you say, hey,

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>let's get you healthier, but they do. However, when the

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>question is how do I lose this weight. You can

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>practically see the gears and Artem and Sager's minds turning

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>weight loss. Weight loss is their way in, it's their

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>business opportunity, and that gets you then to start caring

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:25.239
<v Speaker 1>about what you're eating, what you're exercising. You know how

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.679
<v Speaker 1>you're exercising, whether you're sleeping right, stressing right. Many of

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the things that help people lose weight are also good

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:35.679
<v Speaker 1>for them in other words, of course, that isn't always true,

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>and before you know it, that sort of becomes to

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>all consuming thing that really helps people get healthier Holistically,

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Artem likes to call weight loss trojan horse, if you will,

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to people's health. What he means is that weight loss

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>can get people to care about their health. Weight Loss,

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>in his mind, isn't the goal. It's a means to

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>an end. In the end is being healthier overall, not

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>just thinner. Of course, we also know from research that

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 1>people can improve their health without getting thinner, but this

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>is how Artem thinks about it. It's worth pointing out

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>too that his background is actually in software engineering. He's

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:26.080
<v Speaker 1>not a doctor or anything. In fact, newm is kind

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 1>of a classic Silicon Valley story these days. Of tech

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:35.280
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs trying to disrupt the health care space. But remember

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>there are tons of weight loss programs out there. Newm

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>saw an opportunity to set itself apart with psychology, the

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:50.280
<v Speaker 1>why and how of losing weight. Most diets are lacking

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>what what they really lack are the actual mechanism, the how.

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.320
<v Speaker 1>They're telling you what to do, but they're not telling

0:20:58.359 --> 0:21:01.159
<v Speaker 1>you how to do it. And that's just like having

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a car without wheels, where it won't go anywhere. Because

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the hard part is the how Noon launched their weight

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>loss app in and what Artom just described. It's an

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 1>approach that has really worked for now the app has

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>become really popular. How popular well, Noon told us that

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>it has millions of users, but they wouldn't be any

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>more specific. A little tidbit about that name. It's actually

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:41.159
<v Speaker 1>moon spelled backwards. Artem says. It's because the moon is

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 1>there at night, shining like a guiding light when your

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:50.600
<v Speaker 1>willpower is running low. And it sounded very calm and

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 1>peaceful and sort of psychologically oriented, so we wanted to

0:21:53.920 --> 0:21:56.000
<v Speaker 1>people to come in and sort of have this more

0:21:56.040 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 1>calming effects, sort of like an ulm, right, or the

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 1>moon indeed, maybe you're wondering how new works in practice.

0:22:06.680 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>Each time you open up the app, Noon gives you

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>little articles to read and quizzes to do. That's supposed

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to be how you learn and change your habits. I

0:22:16.880 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 1>actually tried new Mount for this episode. So as an

0:22:20.080 --> 0:22:23.160
<v Speaker 1>example today, the app had me set a shorter term

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>weight loss goal that would actually be achievable. Here's a

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 1>little snippet of that lesson. So your short term smart

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.679
<v Speaker 1>goal could be to limit yourself to a dessert every

0:22:32.680 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>other day. There was another lesson about making your calorie

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:41.440
<v Speaker 1>budget last. It's simple planning. The easiest way to stay

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:44.719
<v Speaker 1>within your calorie budget without going hungry is to plan ahead.

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Shall we design you a plan to tap below to

0:22:48.000 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>get started planning, like thinking about whether you prefer large

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:55.639
<v Speaker 1>meals or snacking that kind of thing, and then break

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>down your calories on a per meal and per snack basis.

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Then I took another lesson about how to prioritize your

0:23:02.840 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 1>goals based on what's actually realistic. The final one was

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>about how to buy yourself more calories to eat in

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a day. Did you know you can increase your calorie

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>budget every single day? It's not magic. It's exercise, but

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>do please let us know if you have found a

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>magical way to burn calories. Remember how Artem said earlier

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 1>that diets tell you to eat differently, but they don't

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:31.919
<v Speaker 1>tell you how, and so without that, it's like a

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 1>car without wheels. There's a car, but you cannot drive

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it anywhere without it having wheels. These lessons plus things

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>like tracking food weigh ins and working with new coaches,

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.359
<v Speaker 1>these are the how part the car wheels that are

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>supposed to help get you moving. You might have noticed

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>when we were going through the lessons before that the

0:23:55.960 --> 0:24:00.240
<v Speaker 1>tone of new is friendly, virgin on goofy person. Really,

0:24:00.320 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I found the tone a bit condescending. It came off

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 1>like pop psychology. Like one of the questions at the

0:24:07.040 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 1>beginning asked what do you need to succeed in weight loss?

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>It was a multiple choice format and I chose exercise

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for thirty minutes a day. Nope, the right answer. Simply

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>believe I was selling some friends about it over dinner

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>one day. Pizza Noom's app would call it a red

0:24:27.040 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>food and salad a green food. My friends I am

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>called it the goop of weight loss. It kind of

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 1>is down to the made up sounding name Goop, which

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>is the actress Gwyneth Paltrow's wellness company is known for

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 1>making questionable claims about their products having health benefits. Back

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to Noon. Behind all the psychology, nom is kind of

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>your typical weight loss app. New has a food log

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>with a calorie budget. NEWM breaks food down into red, yellow,

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 1>and green categories. Yes, like traffic light colors. And you

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.679
<v Speaker 1>can use the app to track things like exercise and

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>your weight. But somehow though it's not a diet. I

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>put that question directly to artem Pedacough. There's a big

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 1>difference between a typical diet and a weight loss program.

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm listening a lot of the diets that we're talking about,

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.000
<v Speaker 1>and then people have experience with our things that are

0:25:35.000 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>short term that are fads, you know, something like raspberry

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>keytones or cabbage soup or and our prescriptive eat this,

0:25:46.000 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>not that, And NEWM doesn't believe in any of those things.

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>So when they say new isn't a diet, what they

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>really mean is NEWM isn't a fad diet. But that's

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:02.119
<v Speaker 1>not what the marketing copy says. It says not a

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 1>diet period. Everyone who goes on NOUM goes on it

0:26:06.600 --> 0:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to lose weight, that's what it's for. This is Tracy Mann,

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>a psychologist who runs a health and eating lab at

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the University of Minnesota. I think people who go on it,

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>I believe that it's using different, sort of more scientific methods,

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean that you'll lose the weight and

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>keep it off. When I asked NOM about evidence of

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:34.639
<v Speaker 1>its long term weight loss results, a spokeswoman pointed me

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>to studies showing people can lose about five of their

0:26:38.680 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>body weight or more, a medically significant amount. Those were

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.679
<v Speaker 1>only a year long, though. NEUM is also working on

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a two year study that should finish next year, and

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it says that its methods have been studied and it's

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>always trying to find the best way to help people

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>back to the non die a trend. Tracy says that

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>this is the biggest change she's seen in the almost

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:10.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty years she's been working in this area. She believes

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that people are finally waking up to the problems with dieting.

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Something has sort of seeped into people's minds about diets

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not working. But again, people are not exactly giving up

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:27.159
<v Speaker 1>on weight loss here and so The change isn't to

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 1>not diet changes that people change how they talk about

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:34.679
<v Speaker 1>dieting and don't use that word. This isn't exactly the

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of change Tracy wants to see happen. She actually

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:43.679
<v Speaker 1>finds it really frustrating to completely superficial rebranding. It's almost

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:46.639
<v Speaker 1>a trick that brings me to another point about what

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:49.879
<v Speaker 1>NEWM is trying to do here. Artam told me that

0:27:50.000 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 1>NEWMS started off in wheat loss because they believe that's

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.800
<v Speaker 1>how you get people to play an active role in

0:27:55.840 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>their health. But if health is really the goal of

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 1>new why track calories at all? Why put food into

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:10.480
<v Speaker 1>categories like red, which everyone knows means stop. Here's what

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Andreas Michaelidis Nemes chief of psychology, had to say about that.

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Andreas is a psychologist. Things like our our calorie trackers,

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know those are meant to Those are

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:28.120
<v Speaker 1>meant to just increase your awareness of your daily habits,

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.919
<v Speaker 1>increase your awareness of of what you're eating. It's you

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>don't have to log every single meal to be in

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.959
<v Speaker 1>the program. It's not a mandatory log or you know,

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that's it. It's not about the food that you love

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm trying to say, because that screams to

0:28:43.640 --> 0:28:47.600
<v Speaker 1>me just like diet. Okay, But Newmes app does encourage

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you to log your food, Like when I pull it

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>up right now, it's telling me you haven't logged any

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>meals today. And isn't the whole point of logging your

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>meals to become more aware of the food you eat

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:03.960
<v Speaker 1>so you make healthier choices or at least less caloric ones.

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Newm has also been criticized for putting people on a

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred calorie diet, which is really on the low

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 1>end in terms of how many calories a person should

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>be eating. Noum says it used to put some women

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 1>on a twelve hundred calorie diet. It was the minimum

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of daily calories a person using the app could get,

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 1>but last year it increased that amount by about ten

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Newm says that although that number is safe and effective,

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>they changed it after feedback from customers. Then there's the

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.560
<v Speaker 1>traffic light system for foods Andrews says they use it

0:29:44.600 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>because it's simple and people like simple. Newmes. Whole thing

0:29:49.040 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is psychology, remember, and a traffic light system is easy

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep in mind when people go to the grocery

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>store or make themselves lunch at home. As for red

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>means top, this is what Andreas says about that maybe

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:06.040
<v Speaker 1>some people do we have that association, but it's very

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 1>clear that it's not a do not eat this. In fact,

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Andreas says red means eat less of this if you

0:30:13.440 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>want to lose weight, and to be fair, Noon does

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>make that clear in the app that red doesn't mean

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>cut chocolate cake out of your life forever, which is

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>good because chocolate cake is delicious. But it's worth pointing

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 1>out that this system doesn't exist in a vacuum. We

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:38.200
<v Speaker 1>lived our whole lives getting cues about food from all

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.600
<v Speaker 1>over the place. When I log a red food on Noon,

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like a bad person, like I screwed up.

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And maybe I might have felt that way anyway neum

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>or not, But NOWM isn't exactly changing the narrative, And

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I think most people are gonna try to avoid those

0:30:57.360 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>red foods and maybe twitch a little when they see

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a red food in the office pantry. Again, that's a

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>diet thing. Everyone knows. Red means stop. We do talk about,

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>by the way, you know, I always like transparency. We

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>do talk about. Is the red color the optimal one.

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>We've so far stuck because it's a traffic light. The

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.080
<v Speaker 1>simplicity of it has so far been overriding it. Those

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are exactly the kinds of things that we sort of

0:31:23.840 --> 0:31:29.479
<v Speaker 1>spend hours discussing internally. What's the perfect color for it?

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And is there another? Is there something else we can do?

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And you might see us change that in the future

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to lower that confusion. What other color are you thinking

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>about replacing it with? No, that's a that's a that's

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a I think it trade secret. Noon told me in

0:31:44.960 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>July that it is in the process of changing the

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>system from red to orange. Look. Noon is, at the

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 1>end of the day, a company. It was started by

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurs who brought technology to the world of weight loss,

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>putting the whole psychology thing aside. What makes this app

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a good business is the technology here. You can put

0:32:13.400 --> 0:32:18.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people through a standardized program relatively little expense.

0:32:19.840 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But calling a weight loss program anything but a diet

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>just seems disingenuous, like gas lighting, like new is trying

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to trick us like a trojan horse. I asked Artem

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>about that when we talked, Okay, I think it's a

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated. People have all kinds of feelings about that word,

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a k. A diet, and have all kinds of associations

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 1>with anything and have strong feelings about them in terms

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of either succeeding or failing or uh, you know, are

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.520
<v Speaker 1>having mixed success, and so you know, it's it's sort

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of a contentious word. So I think we have to

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be very careful when we use it. UM. I think

0:33:08.240 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 1>going back to UM, you know, going back to the

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>basics and the sort of the core principles here is

0:33:15.400 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>we think a lot of people are What I feel

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the worst about is a lot of people blame themselves

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for their lack of success and they said I was

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>given a diet and I failed. In other words, people

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>have had bad experiences with diets. The word brings up

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 1>feelings of guilt and shame, so we're battling that perception

0:33:36.160 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. That makes sense as a company, you

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:42.680
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't want people to have a negative association with your

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>product right off the bat, But logging a red food

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>in the new map brings up feelings of guilt and

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>shame too. Without having a more in depth understanding of

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the actual program, it's easy to say, oh, it's a diet,

0:33:56.160 --> 0:34:00.120
<v Speaker 1>because that's the category that I'm taking a picture or

0:34:00.120 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>of and putting it into that bucket, and that, you know,

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:04.479
<v Speaker 1>that kind of feels good. But the truth is is

0:34:04.520 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know if the category of what we

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:11.400
<v Speaker 1>do exists out there with other kinds of things. We really, really,

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>really believe that this is behavior change, not a diet. This,

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I have to admit, is where they lost me. Like, sure,

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll concede that people have a tendency to sort things

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>into categories, but I think it's pretty clear why people

0:34:29.560 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 1>are sorting this particular program into this particular category. In fact,

0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>NUMA has encouraged it. Since I started New, I've lost

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.200
<v Speaker 1>seventy pounds. I've lost ninety seven pounds with New I

0:34:42.320 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>lost on New. We've all seen these kinds of ads

0:34:45.920 --> 0:34:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a million times before. They're as much of a tired

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>cliche as before and after photos or diets claiming to

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>bring some original innovation to the table that no other

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>diet has ever done before. NEWM is capitalizing on that,

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>embracing it, not rejecting it, and NEWM is also capitalizing

0:35:08.200 --> 0:35:11.760
<v Speaker 1>on the diet backlash at the same time. Either way,

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>NEWM wins so If new isn't a diet, what is it?

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I pose the question to artem. It is a behavior

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>change program that helps you take control all of your

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>health through understanding what's up here. He's pointing to his head. Here.

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a holistic program. But let's you do that. Notice

0:35:34.680 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't say the words weight loss at all,

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>even though that's why people come to this new program

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to lose weight. NEWM even has you put in a

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>goal weight when you sign up. I'm not the only person,

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 1>by the way, who takes issue with how NEWM describes itself,

0:35:59.800 --> 0:36:03.359
<v Speaker 1>and specifically with the company's claim that it is not

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a diet. Noon came under pressure about this pretty recently

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and ended up responding we'll talk more about that in

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a moment, but first, it isn't just new Nothing is

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:23.839
<v Speaker 1>a diet anymore. Take weight Watchers, the iconic weight loss

0:36:23.880 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>company that's been around for about sixty years. Listen to

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what Gary Foster, the company's chief scientific officer, had to say. Well,

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 1>we started to hear around two thousand sixteen, but heard

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>even clearly and more consistently in two thousand eighteen, was

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that when people were thinking about their overall wellness and

0:36:42.239 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly weight in that context that they're thinking had changed

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>that formerly they were ready to metaphorically leave their life

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to lose weight. They were willing to do draconian owners

0:36:55.120 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>things like always eat this, never eat that, eat at

0:36:58.040 --> 0:37:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this time of day, but not at that time of day,

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.719
<v Speaker 1>eat high, this low that. Gary also calls this kind

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:08.479
<v Speaker 1>of mindset dieters prison. And that is how people think

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 1>about dieting right, not just as punishment, but as something

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.879
<v Speaker 1>you go do and then come back and resume your

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>real life. That's a diet myth we've talked about before.

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:26.560
<v Speaker 1>The South Beach diet that was so popular in the

0:37:26.600 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>early two thousand's was structured like that, you finished it

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and went back to your life. But the company then

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>known as Weight Watchers was hearing something different from people,

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and they said, I'm not willing to leave my life

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to lose weight, and you've got to address the whole

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:50.279
<v Speaker 1>met So no longer am I willing to eat in

0:37:50.360 --> 0:37:52.400
<v Speaker 1>wacky ways. I want to come out of this program

0:37:52.400 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>eating more healthy, not less healthy. I want to come

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.480
<v Speaker 1>out more active, not less active. I want to come

0:37:57.480 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>out with a more helpful mindset. And I'm want to

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.799
<v Speaker 1>come out sleeping better, so they were very clear that

0:38:03.520 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>weight loss is still an outcome they were seeking, but

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to do it within a wellness ecosystem. We

0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Watchers took that to heart. The company rebranded to ww

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:20.360
<v Speaker 1>literally taking the word weight out of its name. Gary

0:38:20.400 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>says the name change reflected something deeper, a pivot to

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>focusing on overall health, not just weight loss. At one

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>point when we were talking, Gary mentioned that people can

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:35.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like weight loss is punishment for something they've done wrong.

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like I have to go and make up

0:38:38.040 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for my past transgressions. That's diet talk. So I had

0:38:42.120 --> 0:38:47.400
<v Speaker 1>to ask the obvious question, does ww call itself a diet? No,

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not. We were just talking with Gary Foster, chief

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:04.800
<v Speaker 1>scientific officer at ww. WW formerly known as Weight Watchers,

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>is arguably one of the best known weight loss programs around.

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But Gary told us that the program is not a diet,

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and remember Noon doesn't call itself a diet either. In fact,

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>NOME says pretty clearly in its advertising that it's not

0:39:21.600 --> 0:39:26.400
<v Speaker 1>a diet. People don't love this, Like I said before,

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it feels like gas lighting. It also raises some other issues.

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 1>People who have eating disorders or a history of them

0:39:35.080 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>might come to NOM thinking it's a safe space, like

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 1>NOM itself saying it's not a diet. Reactions to NEWMS

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>advertising finally boiled over earlier this year. The whole thing

0:39:48.880 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to have been sparked by a tweet. Every new

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:54.960
<v Speaker 1>MAD is like, We're not a diet, We're an eating disorder.

0:39:55.880 --> 0:40:01.040
<v Speaker 1>That was Elena Stone, a twenty eight year old in St. Louis, Missouri,

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 1>reading that aforementioned tweet. Elena wrote it and what she

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:11.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote hit a nerve. Elena's tweet racked up around a

0:40:11.880 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred thirty five thousand likes and ten thou retweets. Was

0:40:17.239 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>just digging constantly all day noon, started trending on Twitter

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:25.719
<v Speaker 1>after that, and the company actually ended up responding. But

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:30.600
<v Speaker 1>first Elena's story. It turns out she had been hearing

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of new mads all over the place, YouTube

0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:42.680
<v Speaker 1>podcasts many times a day. It felt inescapable and actually,

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>she says, she's never used now, but a close family

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>member has what really uh got me upsets um. They

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:57.640
<v Speaker 1>always start with We're not a diet, but they absolutely are.

0:40:58.000 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Elena refers to herself as fat. She's used apps similar

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>to Neon in the past. Like my fitness pal, but

0:41:05.360 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>eventually she became pretty firmly anti diet. It's, you know,

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>for me, been a lifetime of being told what to eat,

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and I just don't want to do that anymore. I

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:17.960
<v Speaker 1>love food, I love cooking, I love baking, um, I

0:41:18.000 --> 0:41:20.560
<v Speaker 1>love cheese, I love coffee. You know, I don't want

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to be drinking up an eighth of a cup of

0:41:23.680 --> 0:41:26.960
<v Speaker 1>black coffee and choking down iceberg lettuce. Like that's not

0:41:27.040 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a life to me. The weave of anti NEWM sentiment

0:41:31.680 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>that Elena's tweet unleashed online didn't escape the attention of

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>new The company soon published a post on its website

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in response, and you can probably guess what it said,

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.960
<v Speaker 1>which is to say that its program is more than

0:41:51.080 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>just a diet. Now also said in the post that

0:41:56.320 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it takes eating disorders seriously and has several safeguards in place.

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.640
<v Speaker 1>People can't enter a below normal b m I as

0:42:06.640 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>their goal weight or join if they report an active

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>eating disorder or a history of disordered eating. NEWM also

0:42:15.600 --> 0:42:19.880
<v Speaker 1>says coaches are trained to spot issues users might be having.

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>So okay, we're over diets because they're not fun when

0:42:27.719 --> 0:42:33.160
<v Speaker 1>people lose weight. Now it's a lifestyle change, not a diet,

0:42:34.280 --> 0:42:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and companies like NEWM and WW are marketing us these

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:45.759
<v Speaker 1>non diets too, but they sure sound a lot like diets.

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>All the stuff does what's really going on here? At

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 1>the surface, All this can seem like positive change. At

0:42:57.320 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 1>the very least, fad diets seemed to be a thing

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of the past. People shouldn't be going to diet ors

0:43:03.640 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 1>prison black coffee and iceberg lettuce. Isn't a life like

0:43:08.000 --> 0:43:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Alina said, Maybe we should be thinking about health more

0:43:12.160 --> 0:43:16.840
<v Speaker 1>broadly than the scale, adding in exercise and eating our veggies,

0:43:17.560 --> 0:43:21.799
<v Speaker 1>sleeping better. The problem is that we're over dieting in

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:26.120
<v Speaker 1>name only. Remember that data from the Market Research Company

0:43:26.160 --> 0:43:30.959
<v Speaker 1>and p D Group that interest in dieting is declining. Well.

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>MPP Group also found that people still want to lose

0:43:34.480 --> 0:43:38.960
<v Speaker 1>weight even if they don't want to diet. What that

0:43:39.000 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>tells us is that we're not really over diets. Maybe

0:43:42.960 --> 0:43:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we want to be, but we're not. And the reasons

0:43:47.280 --> 0:43:51.760
<v Speaker 1>for that they're actually old reasons. They're the same reasons

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>diets have had a pull on us for hundreds of years.

0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Here's Peter Stearns, a history professor at George Mason University.

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:02.839
<v Speaker 1>We spoke to him in our second episode. I think

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 1>partly we're hoping that this will be easier than it

0:44:06.280 --> 0:44:09.920
<v Speaker 1>actually turns out to be. We humans love a quick fix,

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:14.759
<v Speaker 1>especially for something like wait that makes us uncomfortable. And

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.799
<v Speaker 1>then there are those other classic things that draw us

0:44:17.840 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 1>to diets, like wanting to look good and wanting to

0:44:21.280 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>be healthier. It's a combination of a cultural and a

0:44:24.760 --> 0:44:28.200
<v Speaker 1>medical issue, and too much emphasis on either one or

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the other oversimplifies the problem. So will we ever actually

0:44:33.960 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 1>be done with diets or will diets always be with us?

0:44:39.360 --> 0:44:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I put the question to Sabrina Strings, an associate professor

0:44:42.960 --> 0:44:48.959
<v Speaker 1>of sociology at the University of California, Irvine, A scary thought.

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Sabrina says that it's complicated. People are pushing back on dieting,

0:44:55.520 --> 0:44:57.960
<v Speaker 1>but then there are others who are still restricting what

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>they eat because they think it's better for them that

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:05.279
<v Speaker 1>they'll lose weight and be healthier. And so I think

0:45:05.400 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 1>what we often want to see is straightforward progress, but

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>life is a lot messier than that. And this is true,

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:17.440
<v Speaker 1>and we're talking about any form of oppression. As long

0:45:17.480 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 1>as weight is important in society, there will be an

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:25.000
<v Speaker 1>opening for dieting, even if it's called a lifestyle change

0:45:25.200 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 1>or wellness. And that makes sense because for all the

0:45:29.440 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>changes going on, there's still an intense focus on weight

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:37.160
<v Speaker 1>loss that we have in our culture. In fact, that's

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:39.799
<v Speaker 1>exactly what we're going to talk about in our next episode.

0:45:40.480 --> 0:45:43.759
<v Speaker 1>We're going to tackle the big billion dollar question of

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:48.280
<v Speaker 1>weight and health. After all, everyone knows that it's healthier

0:45:48.280 --> 0:45:54.640
<v Speaker 1>to be thinner, right right, Well, there's a lot more

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to it than that, and actually the evidence about weight

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and health is a whole lot sketcher than advertised. We're

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.399
<v Speaker 1>going to find out why the prevailing narrative isn't quite

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:09.160
<v Speaker 1>right and also what happens when someone dares to put

0:46:09.160 --> 0:46:12.799
<v Speaker 1>out research undermining the narrative. And so there's just like

0:46:12.800 --> 0:46:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this constant level of harassment, not just like a scientific discussion,

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>which is what I would have expected, but more like insults.

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 1>In short, things get nasty. Losing. It is written and

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:34.320
<v Speaker 1>reported by me em A Court and edited by Kristin V. Brown.

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Magnus Hendrickson is our senior producer, Stacy Wong our associate producer,

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and Blake Maples, our audio engineer. Our theme was composed

0:46:46.120 --> 0:46:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and performed by Hannis Brown. Thanks to francesco Leavy and Timnette.

0:46:52.239 --> 0:46:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to subscribe to Prognosis if you haven't already,

0:46:55.760 --> 0:46:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and if you like our show, please leave us a

0:46:58.480 --> 0:47:02.960
<v Speaker 1>review that helps others find out about it. Thanks for listening,

0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:17.440
<v Speaker 1>See you next time, h