WEBVTT - Julia Pollack Talks Jobs

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 2>Hey, we talked about the market, the US jobs market

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 2>earlier with Michael McKee. It's sluggish, not rapidly deteriorating. And

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.320
<v Speaker 2>we did see that data that came out saw traders

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.119
<v Speaker 2>refraining from boosting bets on your term fed rate cuts,

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 2>setting stocks lower and bonds wavering. So we're not you know,

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 2>it's not like all of a sudden traders are saying, Okay,

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:29.480
<v Speaker 2>we're going to get more rate cuts because of that

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 2>labor data we got this morning.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:33.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, a reduction is fully priced ined by mid next year,

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 3>you should not. But we're not seeing those bets go up.

0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 2>No, exactly. I'm curious to see what our next guest

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:42.520
<v Speaker 2>has to say specifically about the US labor market. Let's

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:44.600
<v Speaker 2>head to the Bloomberg News bureau in DC to someone

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 2>well known to our Bloomberg audience. She was formerly chief

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 2>economist over at ZIP Recruiter. She is Julia Pollock and

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 2>she's chief economist for the US Department of Labor. Julia,

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:58.120
<v Speaker 2>good to have you back here on Bloomberg. How worried

0:00:58.200 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>are you about rising out employment.

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not so. This report overstates understates the strength of

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the labor market right now because there are two huge

0:01:10.319 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>temporary distortions at play in the data here. The first

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is one hundred thousand or more federal workers who took

0:01:16.600 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the fork and came off payrolls and some of them

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 1>have gone into temporary frictional unemployment. And the second big

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>distortion in this report is the Schumer shutdown, which forced

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred thousand federal workers off the job. But it

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>also led to weakness in the private sector because it

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>forced work stoppages for federal contractors and led to temporary

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>layoffs there. So I expect the unemployment rate to jump

0:01:38.920 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>back down very soon.

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 3>What about the youth unemployment right and rising youth unemployment?

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:45.679
<v Speaker 3>Are you concerned about that?

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the unemployment rate is exactly where it

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>was when President Trump first took office in his first term,

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and he has a track record of bringing it all

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>the way down to three point five percent. We have

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a bigg ti challenge this time because of the Biden

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>inflation hangover, which forced the Fed to slam the brakes

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>on the economy, and that has hurt marginal workers the most.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>But we are setting the stage for a huge comeback

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.520
<v Speaker 1>in twenty twenty six and beyond with the One Big

0:02:17.560 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 1>Beautiful Bill Act, which has hugely stimulative policies, and you'll

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>see those macro stimulative effects build into twenty twenty six.

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>They are things like like expensing fast and accelerated, full

0:02:33.480 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and accelerating expensing for business investments, no tax on tips,

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>no tax on overtime, no tax on social security.

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 2>So, Julia, if I may just jump in just because

0:02:42.600 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 2>we only have about five minutes left here. So it

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 2>sounds to you like that there's and we've heard this

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 2>certainly from guests here on Bloomberg, more liquidity coming into

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.120
<v Speaker 2>the market, things to support economic growth. It sounds like

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 2>you said that the labor picture is actually better than

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.359
<v Speaker 2>what the data showed. So it sounds to me then

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 2>that the FED is correct, Jay Powell is correct in

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>being or you know, actually, forgive me, what your sounding

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 2>like you're saying is that maybe the FED doesn't need

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.799
<v Speaker 2>then ultimately to be cutting rates. That things actually look

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 2>pretty rosy for twenty twenty six.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 1>So I think the reason that employment growth, the job

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>growth slowed so dramatically between mid twenty twenty two and

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.720
<v Speaker 1>mid twenty twenty four is that rates were high and

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.279
<v Speaker 1>The longer rates stay restrictive, the more of the economy

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>gets hurt, the more businesses have to refinance it double

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the rate, the more families go out there and try

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to buy a home and find that it's just unaffordable.

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So rates right now are still restrictive, and they are

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>still a problem for much of the economy.

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 2>But you said you were You said you weren't concerned

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 2>about rising unemployment, So I'm a little confused.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, the Fed has a duel mandate full employment on

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, and and price stability, and this president

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>has shown that his policies deliver both. In the first

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration, we had non inflationary growth. And you can

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>do that with policies that don't throw fuel on the

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:21.479
<v Speaker 1>fire of demand and restrict supply, but do the exact opposite.

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>So through deregulation, through reshoring incentives, we're going to see

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>this labor market take off again and in a non

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>inflationary way.

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Well, on the resharing part of this motivation for reshoring,

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 3>on shoring, imposing tariffs to bring back the Midwest to

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 3>revitalize what many consider the American dream, Secretary Vessett has

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 3>said it's been harmed by global trade. The manufacturing industry,

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 3>though it keeps shedding workers, when can we expect a

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 3>data to reflect progress that the administration is trying to

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 3>make in restoring that American dream.

0:04:57.000 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So the economy shed manufacturing jobs for about two year,

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>years before President Trump took office. Again, this latest report

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>shows the largest increase in construction jobs in over a year.

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's really the front end of those investments in

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>mining and energy and manufacturing, and there is signal that

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing job growth will pick up.

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.719
<v Speaker 2>So okay, you know, you look at the labor market,

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:30.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean in terms of initiatives that will potentially help

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 2>the US labor market. You know, the conversation around artificial

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 2>intelligence at your j Powell even addressed it and saying

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 2>it hasn't impacted US jobs yet. So I'm just curious,

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 2>how are you factoring that into as you look at

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 2>some of the upcoming moves the President ramping up in

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>terms of hiring people to really focus on technology AI

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 2>specifically in the administration, so looking to make more investments

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 2>so that the US certainly has a dominant role. Just

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 2>how then you factor that into your estimates for the

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 2>impact on the US labor market.

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Well, the AI boom is driving huge demand for workers

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>in the skills trades, in advanced manufacturing, and of course

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>workers with AI skills, and it is our job at

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the Labor Department to ensure that US workers are prepared

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for those jobs of the future. For the first time,

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:26.080
<v Speaker 1>labor policy and education policy of pulling in the same direction.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>We've aligned labor and education for the first time ever,

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>and we are now focusing very heavily on getting workers

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>access to job connected training that sets them up for

0:06:40.200 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in demand jobs and that doesn't push them to expensive

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>degrees that leave them with nowhere to go.

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk personnel a little bit. We're curious about why

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 3>it's taken so long to make another nomination as BLS commissioner.

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 3>Is your name in the ring? Is your hat in

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 3>the ring?

0:06:57.200 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. You'd have to ask the President

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that would you.

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 3>If you were asked, would you serve as that well?

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I think there is a tremendous amount of work to

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>do there tracking AI's labor impact, improving the timeliness, the granularity,

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the accuracy of the data I have at the Labor

0:07:19.280 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Department made it my priority to push forward a very

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>aggressive labor market data modernization agenda that puts workers and

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 1>learners first and gives them more access to the data

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 1>collected on them. So right now, I love partnering with

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the BLS on all of those kinds of initiatives, and

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I am happy to serve in whatever role the presidencies fit.

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 3>If we're thinking just thirty seconds, but if we're thinking

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 3>about previous commissioners, how will this nominee or this next

0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 3>commissioner be different just twenty seconds?

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:07:55.320 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea, but I think that whoever comes

0:07:57.400 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in has a very clear mandate. I'm the president to

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>put workers and learners at the center of what we do, UH,

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>to change the data paradigm to a real time data paradigm,

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and to make sure that the data is accurate and

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>has the utmost integrity.

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>All right, Julia, thank you so much. Julia Apollo, Chief

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Economists for the US Department of Labor,