WEBVTT - Fanatic About the Playoffs | Another Bonus Mailbag With Lauren and Devon

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>This podcast is part of the seventy sixers podcast network

0:00:04.000 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Search seventy sixers podcast wherever you get your pods. We

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:11.160
<v Speaker 1>did one of these last week. Why because the people,

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the populace, the great populace out there, they deserve a

0:00:15.120 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>platform when the pod line overfloweth we need to provide

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a forum to play voicemails in excess. So we are

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>here for what Devine and I started referring to last

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>week as a stripped down, unplugged version of the mail Bag,

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.800
<v Speaker 1>not on a Monday, not with some of the sound

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>and acoustic bells and whistles that we would normally edit in,

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>because we need to get it straight from the podline

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>out to the people. So that's what we're going to do.

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>First of all, guys, before we get into the podline,

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>grates to be back together the three of us for

0:00:47.080 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a Friday ish timeframe podcast. We haven't done one of

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:55.720
<v Speaker 1>these since the playoffs started. I can't remember. In fact, yeah,

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>was it pre playoffs? It might have been right as

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 1>we started to focus on the first round. Yeah, Lauren,

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I missed you. What's going on? I haven't seen I know.

0:01:04.360 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Great to see you, Great to see both of you.

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>It feels like old times. This is it's a regular

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:15.760
<v Speaker 1>season again. Yes, it's fantastic. Good to be back. I

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>totally was unaware of this until someone brought it to

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>my attention on Twitter the other day. I called for

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>submissions to the mailbag on the pod line, and I

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>dangled some merchant swag to entice the people, and then

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we got the notification and we heard the news that

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the pod line was full, so I had to go

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>back through clear out the mailbag. We apologize for that

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>if you called the first time around and you did

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>not get to get a message in It's always open

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>two on five four zero three seven sixty three seven.

0:01:45.600 --> 0:01:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Two on five four zero three seven sixty three seven.

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>But even though we did run into that technical glitch

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>this week, we still got some tremendous calls, questions, takes, comments,

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 1>and with the seven six are setting their sights on

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.080
<v Speaker 1>what they hope is taking a serious lead. On Friday

0:02:04.120 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta two to one in Game three of the

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:10.079
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Conference Semifinals, let us get to the mail bag.

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna go to the podline. We're gonna hear your

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>reactions to what happened in Game two, and also reactions

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and takes to what did not happen for the seventy

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 1>sixers on the NBA Awards circuit as of late. So,

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.920
<v Speaker 1>without further ado, here we go. Hey, my name's Mike,

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>and I am a huge Sixers fan. And one of

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the positives that I take away from Game two in

0:02:31.840 --> 0:02:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta series was not only the strength and dominance

0:02:35.360 --> 0:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>of Joe, but how well the bench played when it

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>finally decided to start clicking. And not only did Howard

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>get some really important rebounds and putbacks, but it was

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>really great to see shakemail Hun come into his own

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and wake up. And I think that just illustrates the

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>beauty of sports that you could have a guy you

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>know all but left for dead become the hero in

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a game that really depends on him. And so that

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:05.280
<v Speaker 1>is my takeaway from Game two. Was really really exciting

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to see Shake Milton have a good game, But we

0:03:08.720 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>can't take our eye off of what Joe Embiad is

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>accomplished and what he's doing in these playoffs simply because

0:03:13.520 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we're used to it. It is nothing short of amazing

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and go Sixers. Great points by Mike Lauren. We talked

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 1>about this the other day I think in the immediate

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 1>aftermath of Game two, my reaction was shake, shake, shake, shake, shake.

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But then when I woke up the next morning, I

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>was like, damn, Joel embiad did that again. Not I'm

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>with few selves. There was so much to love about

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>that game too, victory. That was a very poetic voicemail,

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, So shout out to that whole left

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>for dead situation. Beauty of sports. I am with that.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes I need to be reminded about the beauty of sports,

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>so I appreciate it. And yeah, Shake really did sort

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of show us just how important any member of any

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>team can be, and it was really cool to see

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>him come out the way he did. I also liked

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>um what the color said about coming back after halftime.

0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>We just learned from George Hall after Thursday's practice that

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>halftime was a bit of a tough time if you're

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>a if you're a Sixers player, particularly a Sixer's bench player.

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>He let us know that Doc was very honest with them,

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:22.919
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes that's what you need. Doc. He ripped some

0:04:23.000 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>things apparently, yep uh. George said that whatever whatever he did,

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever passion he was bringing to the locker room at halftime.

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 1>It worked and Shake certainly a big part of that

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>good It was needed, And Mike brings up another really

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:44.360
<v Speaker 1>good point about the bench overall deciding to finally get

0:04:44.360 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>it going, and I'm sure the doc rivers are ripping

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>if you will, had had a lot to do with it.

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>But even the part about Dwhite Howard, because I wasn't

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>quite sure how d White Howe would fit into this

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>series after we saw Game one and how he would

0:04:57.720 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily play into the rotation and that he would be

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>out of it totally or completely, but just curious to

0:05:03.600 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>see how we would play. But I believe it was

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>about ten minutes or so, ten plus minutes where he played,

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and he was really effective in Game number two with

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the second unit and what they were able to do

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>out there on the floor, the energy again defensively as

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>well as we all know with him on the floor.

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 1>It was really good to see Dwight Howard as well

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>as Shake Milton really come into come into his own,

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>get back into what we were accustomed to seeing from

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Shake Milton and to be able to have that punch

0:05:30.480 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>while we're seeing it from the other teams Atlanta specifically

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with what Gallinari and heard or were able to do

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>in game number two. You want to make sure that

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you're able to do that, whether it's Maxie Hill, Howard

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>or even Shake Milton and Cork Mos. It was good

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>to see it out there on the floor from the bench.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Much needed t stybled with some nice contributions in game two.

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Thought George Hill had a really good stretch all around

0:05:55.120 --> 0:05:57.520
<v Speaker 1>quality effort from the seventy six ers to get that

0:05:57.600 --> 0:06:00.799
<v Speaker 1>going and pull away from Atlanta to tie up the series.

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Back to the podline, Hey hello, it's yes. The major

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 1>adjustments I liked in game two yesterday war was bringing

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Shake Milton off the bench. I was a little skeptical,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>but I'm glad to see finally came through. Um. I

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>think the next adjustments we had to do going forward

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>is keep our bench down to only going using eight

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>to nine guys. Yeah, and just I love how Simmons plays.

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you could just shoot the ball a little bit more.

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Other than that, we got to series, I'd say we're

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna win the best out of six. So divine a

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of things. What do you think about the size

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of the rotation and how Doc's been using his bench.

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:41.720
<v Speaker 1>He played by a ear typically. I mean, when we

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>look at and we start to run it down ourselves,

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you can't you can't eliminate anyone because it seems like

0:06:47.440 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>everyone plays a role. Before Shake Milton was struggling, we

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>still had a policement both him and Tarry's Maxie, as

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 1>well as George Hill in the flow, in the mix.

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So I believe this is a play it by ear.

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I understand analytics of a lot of things with coaches

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and what the numbers tell you, but I also love

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the feel. So if you feel a game is going

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a certain way and you feel a certain player, Shake

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Milton in this particular scenario, is your team is in

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>need of something and Shake Milton is the one who

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:19.559
<v Speaker 1>maybe can give it to you. And later we learned

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about the conversations Joel Embiid had with Shake Milton, the

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>conversation that Rivers also had. Part of me with Shake

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Milton and just staying ready, the fact that he was

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in the gym ten pm at night working on the

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>things that he needed to the one on ones. Okay,

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe Doc felt some No numbers told him anything except

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for the ten pm at night. It was the feel

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of the game and what he could potentially add to

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the team when they when they needed something so badly,

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>he was the one. So as far as the rotation,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a field thing. Quirk Moles can hit

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a shot, Max he can bring the energy. Latistible is

0:07:52.520 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly in the mix. Howard and Hill also, and Furcon

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>can do what he does. I think it's a feel

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>thing and not necessarily a numbers thing. At this time, agreed,

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have that much to add, so that's why

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I was late to join, but I agree. I mean,

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it really cool to see that each member of the

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>bench does serve a pretty distinct purpose, and we've seen

0:08:16.120 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>each member of the bench prove that purpose so far

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs. Glad to hear that Doc Rivers is

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to be flexible with a bench. I

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 1>know that that might not be a popular take among

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the populist but I do think that it's a good system,

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and I look forward to seeing how it continues to rotate.

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Especially after a Game one loss. What would change in

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Game two? Adjustments were on the minds of a lot

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 1>of people who called in Game two Sixers victory last night,

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>what a thrilling one it was. Sixers even up the

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>series one one my takeaways from last night's game where

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>dwell embid what can you say, forty points, the first

0:08:51.280 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>ever Sixer to do that in a playoff game since

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>Allen Iverson. And you know what do the Sixers do different? Well,

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know they started the game with much more energy

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>coaching on Trey Young, obviously putting Simmons on him instead

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>of Denny Green and then subbing the tiftyble for Ben

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Simmons to get on Trey Young when Ben Simmons we

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>need a break. Shake Milton. I think he is last

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>night's hero as a good decision by Doc Rivers to

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>give Shake some confidence out there. Shake has been working

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>as tailoff as we know after games since he has

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:25.679
<v Speaker 1>been struggling so far in the playoffs. And you know

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>what a great tribute that was last night from the

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Fens to Shake Milton, and you know, hopefully this gets

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>him going as we continue into the later games in

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.439
<v Speaker 1>this series. Great points. Again, I think these are very

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>thorough comprehensive, cause Trey Young did not look like the

0:09:40.880 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>first half Trey Young from game one in game two

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 1>not at all. And Selts you said that Joel Embide

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>was sort of your morning after guy, that came to

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>mind in terms of someone you needed to give a

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit more shy to, and for me, I felt

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 1>like I was thinking about Shake and Joel equally after

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:58.560
<v Speaker 1>the game. And what really came to mind for me

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the morning after Game two was the defense on Trey Young.

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>The way that Ben Simmons sort of said that he

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>wanted more shots at Trey after game one. He wanted

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that challenge, he was reading for that challenge, and then

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>Doc Rivers gave him that challenge and he responded really,

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>really well. I think that the way that Ben Simmons

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and then obviously the help of Matisse Thybel guarded Trey

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>Young in Game two might be the most telling thing

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>we've seen in the series thus far, because those two

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to continue to be available. They're going to

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 1>continue to make his life difficult and unless Trey can

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>figure out, and maybe he will, but some ways to

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 1>change his game in a pretty big way. When you're

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>guarding being guarded by those two for the next whatever

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:39.840
<v Speaker 1>it is, three to five games, it's going to be

0:10:39.880 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>tough for him and it's going to continue to be

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>tough for him. Doc Rivers made the first adjustment with

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the coaching staff and defending Trey Young. And now we'll

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>see what the adjustment will be to help Trey Young,

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 1>if you will, from Nate McMillan and his staff the

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>game number three on Friday evening. Because you're right, Laura,

0:10:56.080 --> 0:10:59.360
<v Speaker 1>they did it. They did it. They did the necessary thing,

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.360
<v Speaker 1>which was this is your assignment. Go out there and

0:11:03.440 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>do what you can do. You're not always going to

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>stop him. You're not gonna contain him and shut him

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>out totally. He's still gonna have a very good game.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>He's a talented player, but he put a sixteen guys

0:11:14.559 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>on who can move the way that he does and

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.319
<v Speaker 1>has the length oftentimes lent to bothers smaller people. And

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>that's what we saw with both Thybo and Simmons, and

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.079
<v Speaker 1>still on occasion Danny Green with what he was able

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. And I also thought, I'll give credit to

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Tobias Harris a few times as well when he was

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>caught on the switch and he moved very well, and

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I thought he stayed I study, stayed grounded, he stay planned.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>He didn't go for the ball fakes and all getting

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>up in the air, allowing Trey Young to draw out

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the fouls and things like that, so I'll give him

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>credit too for also being in the mix, but it

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>was the right call to have Simmons on him at

0:11:46.440 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>majority of Game number two. Wish it was a little

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>more in Game one, but the adjustment was made. That's

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>what the series are for. To me. Perhaps the most

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>encouraging thing about Game two is that the obvious areas

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers needed to clean up what they started doing

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.079
<v Speaker 1>second half of Game one, they did for a longer

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 1>period of time in Game two, and wouldn't you know,

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in the end, their execution, their talent, their ability to

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>protect the basketball, in addition to some of the other

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>things we're talking about scheme up better stuff and put

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>better personnel and Trey Young. That all resulted in a

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>very much needed and nice dub Hi Brian and team

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>so round two. Game two was arguably one of my

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>favorite Sixers playoff games ever. It had everything Joel posting

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.199
<v Speaker 1>a crazy forty points in thirty five minutes with thirteen rebounds,

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Curry and Harris over twenty points each, and Shake. I'm

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:38.319
<v Speaker 1>so happy for shaking this team way to represent hard

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>work in the bench. But I still think you. Brian

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:43.600
<v Speaker 1>had the tweet of the week After last night's game,

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Bryan Clark tweeted asking if Ben Simmons played tonight in

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>your ask, Trey Young response was chef kiss brilliant way

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to silence the haters, Ben, I'm young was the best

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>game to adjustment in my opinion. Let's keep it team

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:02.800
<v Speaker 1>momenting up for the rest of the series. Goes sixers

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>and always keep up as always, keep up the great content,

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Bryant and team. Thanks for the opportunity to chime in,

0:13:10.679 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Mary Overfield. Mary always engages with the content. We appreciate that,

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>not just because she singled out my tweet. I actually

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:22.720
<v Speaker 1>think that the tweet and this is relatively breaking within

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the time that we came on to record this. The

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.640
<v Speaker 1>best tweeter of the week had to come from the

0:13:27.679 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>president of Basketball Operations of the seventy Sixers, alluding to

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a character portrayed by stephen A. Smith on General Hospital

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>and a comment that Stephen A made on John Clark's podcast,

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>The Takeoff about what stephen A thinks these seventy six

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Ers chances are in the postseason. Did we see this?

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I did not know us. I did not You have

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to tell us about this one. Break it to us. Yeah.

0:13:56.520 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>By the way. You have to give Mary her her answer,

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, on what you said as well with the

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>ash Tray Young that was very good. Yeah. I didn't

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>see that tweet either. I must I must have been

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 1>gonna sleep at the wheel, because that's a good one.

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Se Well, listen, Laurd everyone was going after Ryan Clark.

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So Seltz was just going to get lost in the

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 1>mix because that was a ridiculous statement. Yeah. I don't

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 1>usually clap back, but sometimes you just have to, you know,

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>especially from a defender by the way, right, Yeah, yeah,

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>that's right. It's a solid cornerback for many years. Like

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>come on, man, I mean, all right, your response. All right.

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So here here's the Daryl Morey tweet that I would

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>give my nod to if we're going to cast votes

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to Mary about who gets the tweet of the week.

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So John Clark, we love John Clark. Has his podcast

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>really very good to take off. Um check it out.

0:14:51.040 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Stephen A was quoted as saying I have the Sixers

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in seven against the Hawks, but I say that with

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>some degree of trepidation. Stephen A. Smith on Sixers Hawks

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>The ride ends there the beating the Brooklyn Nets. I

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 1>can assure you of that. Daryl Morey responds, I have

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>at stephen A. Smith's brick as the best at General Hospital. Character,

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but I say that with some degree of trepidation. The

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 1>ride stops at the at the Emmy's. I can assure

0:15:14.560 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you of that. That's pretty good. Yeah, absolutely, Daryl's clever.

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>We know that. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I'd like to talk

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to Daryl. We gotta make that happen. We gotta get

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>back on He needs to answer these calls, these male

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 1>bad questions. We've done it once before. We got to

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>do it again. That we can. But we can get

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that done, all right. Well, listen, Daryl Morey and myself,

0:15:48.640 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 1>we were not the only people coming to the defense

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of Ben Simmons, maybe not even defense, but pumping up

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Ben after his efforts in Game two. I'm so excited

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for the six series. You know. The only thing that

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm there is about right now that the Hawks are

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.120
<v Speaker 1>a much better team than I thought that they were

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be, and just their potential to get hot

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 1>like we've seen really, you know, has me a bit concerned.

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>But seeing the defensive matchups yesterday, seeing the Doc Rivers

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is willing to change that up put Ben Simmons on

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Trey Young, you know, continue his pattern of trapping. I

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>think that really, you know, really made a huge difference.

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing that I'm tired of was just

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the Ben Simmons slander. You know, the guy's gone out,

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>He's had a great playoff so far, and yeah, I

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like all we end up talking about day in

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and day out because that Ben Simmons doesn't do this.

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons doesn't do that. The guy's out there winning

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 1>ball games. He's out there doing everything he can to

0:16:47.840 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>help the team win. And I would love to see

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons get more praised for what he's doing on

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>this team. No secret that I agree wholeheartedly with that statement.

0:16:57.560 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that in some cases, Sixers fans, basketball fans

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>in general, are prone to be pretty harsh about what

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>guys don't do on the court and what I would prefer.

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to be harsh, that's fine, that's part

0:17:10.880 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of being a fan. But what I want, and I've

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 1>said this before, is that same energy when they do

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:17.520
<v Speaker 1>things well. If you're going to be upset with what

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Ben doesn't do, I'm gonna need you to come celebrate

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.160
<v Speaker 1>what he does do with the same If not greater

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>energy because he does some things incredibly, incredibly well. He

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>does a lot of things incredibly well. And I don't

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>think the Sixers get to where they are today in

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>this series, in this season without what Ben does extremely well,

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think we need to talk about it more period.

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with that certainly. Look at the stretch

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers played towards the end of the regular season

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:46.400
<v Speaker 1>without him. It was not pretty. How about this one.

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:51.280
<v Speaker 1>I need every Sixers fan out there to realize without

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons, we're not winning that game last night. Without

0:17:55.000 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons, we're not winning this series. Okay, I mean

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>all this Ben Simmons slammed. There's got to stop. Please, please, please,

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>for the love of God, to stop with the Ben

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Simmon slander. He brings so much more to the team

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 1>than scoring. I mean, if people don't realize this, then

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you guys know basketball or if

0:18:17.920 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>you're watching in a different sport, no clue, but you

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>guys need to too with that Ben Simmons slander. All right,

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>go Sixes. This is this is hardening to hear, just

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that it's the fan base coming to

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>the defense of one of the most important players on

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the team. I know that, I know we do all

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the sunshine here, I get it. But I like this.

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I think this is this is encouraging to hear that

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we have a vocal crowd supporting a player rather than

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>harping on things. And as someone who clearly enjoys myself,

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>clearly enjoys this game, there are things from time to time,

0:18:54.760 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about a full game season where I don't

0:18:57.680 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 1>like things that happen within a game, and that's just

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>how it goes. But what the one thing that I

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>love about what now you're hearing from the Philadelphia fan base,

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 1>is this too speaking of the Ryan Clark Park and

0:19:11.440 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about them. You can't. Yes, that's it right,

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>stay away from our this is this is family business. However, yes,

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 1>this is family business. You're an outsider. Mind your business, right,

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 1>And we don't like when others talk about We can

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:30.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about them, we can say whatever we want, we

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>can discipline our wrong. It's done with love. It's done

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>with love. But as soon as someone else from the

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>outside starts to attack one of our own, then there's

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>a problem. And that's what I love. From the Philadelphia

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>fan base, because there is. That's exactly what we're seeing

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. There are games look fifteen and fifteen but

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>only six points. They were a lot of people were

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>not happy with that. The fact that I've been played

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a phenomenal defensive gaming game number two but only took

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>three shots. There were people who not happy with that.

0:19:57.040 --> 0:19:59.119
<v Speaker 1>But then they realized it was like, oh, Ryan Clark's

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>coming at is no, no no, no no. Ben played well,

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Ben played well. It's all good. It's all good. So

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.199
<v Speaker 1>I love it. Keep it going, and Laren, you're right,

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there are so many games and self you mentioned at

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the four games at the towards the end of the

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 1>regular season that it's you also witness how different the

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>team is when he is not out there, and the

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>good things that he does, and the fact that he

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.880
<v Speaker 1>face guarded a six one point guard for a lot

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of the time that he was out there, thirty plus

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>minutes close to forty minutes that he was out there.

0:20:31.080 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>That's not easy. That's not easy. And he did it.

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:37.119
<v Speaker 1>And let's see how much more he's taken on this

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>person's challenge to do that. Now, the offense, that's the

0:20:39.680 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 1>whole other thing. But for what he did, they won

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the game, two teams scored one hundred and eighteen points.

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 1>People always have stuff to say about how many points

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 1>Ben scores. The team is scoring enough points, and he's

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 1>creating a heck of a lot of them. He does

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>arrest the free throws. I acknowledge you'd like see a

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit more of there you can't can looked at.

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Ben would say the same thing too, which

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is why I'm bringing it up. But by and large,

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>stay out of family business. Yes, I love that analogy.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a great one, divine perfect right. We

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 1>learned this week who the NBA's Most Valuable Player and

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Defensive Player of the Year are. Hey, Brian feeling really

0:21:22.960 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>confident in Joel and Benson's gone into this series here,

0:21:29.320 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Joel is just getting started. He's playing with the chip

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>on his shoulder now that he wasn't the MVC. I

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>think Benson is going to do the same thing Defensive

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year he was robbed. He's gonna show

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 1>he can shut down the number one and try young

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and then he can get down load with Collins and coppellitives.

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm feeling really good. I think we've keep the momentum

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:49.520
<v Speaker 1>rolling here, especially with Shake Milton coming off the bench

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Naxie. I think they're gonna be key players

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 1>here down the stretch. It's gonna be an exciting thing.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:22:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Let's do this. What was the slight that's stuck with you? Well, slight, man,

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be honest, slight might not be fair. I

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>think that Yokich worthy Gobert. You can make a case

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>which seventy six er, Joe or Ben do you feel

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:14.120
<v Speaker 1>had the stronger case or one that you think about

0:22:14.119 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more, whether it was with how the

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>voting turned out or just based on performance on the

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>court to win one of the two awards that he

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>was a finalist for. I'll go I think that Joel

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>probably understands that the reason he didn't win the MVP

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 1>was games played. Yohis played a ton of games, Joel

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>missed some games. I think if they both play full seasons,

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Joel wins MVP. So to me, the bigger snub, if

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna say, we're gonna say snub, is definitely for Ben.

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I like what Danny Green said on his podcast Inside

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>the Green Room that historically, Defensive Player of the Year

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:48.159
<v Speaker 1>is an award that goes to a big man because

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>of the statistical impact that you see nightly, that you

0:22:51.480 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>see over the course of the season that shouldn't be

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 1>understated or undervalued, but has historically been. What this award

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is based on what Danny said is in the modern NBA,

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>someone that can guard one through five is more impressive.

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>And whether or not those statistics come up the way

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>that they do for a go bear, maybe we need

0:23:08.920 --> 0:23:11.479
<v Speaker 1>to be reevaluating which statistics we're looking at, because if

0:23:11.520 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at someone like Ben Simmons and you tell

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>me that after the way he's guarded Trey Young and

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>big men alike, if you're telling me that that's not

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:21.479
<v Speaker 1>what a defensive player of the Year is, or at

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>least the most valuable defensive player in the league is,

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I totally disagree, and so hearing Danny say the way

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 1>that he said it, Obviously Danny and I both biased

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 1>in Ben's favor, but I think that he has something

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>worth noting there. I get how the statistics make a

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>case for go bet. They will continue to if he

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 1>continues playing this way. But if Ben continues playing the

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:44.440
<v Speaker 1>way that he's been playing, he's certainly the most valuable

0:23:44.480 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>defender in the League, and it's just a matter of

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 1>if that's the award or not. I agree with Lauren

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>on this one that the game's miss you can kind

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of understand why it went the way it did, unfortunately

0:23:56.600 --> 0:24:00.920
<v Speaker 1>for Joel Embi. Quite frankly, I'm a little happy at

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:03.199
<v Speaker 1>this stage knowing that it happened because he is the

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.639
<v Speaker 1>one that I believe that would definitely use it as

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>fuel going forward. But as far as as far as

0:24:09.320 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>to the question of which one, I think it is

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Simmons because of exactly what Green laid out, the one

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>through five versatility and how he does it, the amount

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of minutes that he plays, the fact that he doesn't

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:26.240
<v Speaker 1>he's not fatigued, and all of that, and let's highlight

0:24:26.280 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the one game that he had when they decided, oh,

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Simmons doesn't do anything offensively, let's play a center on him.

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.399
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, the center happens to be a

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>two time Defensive Player of the Year and Simmons goes

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>out there and give him forty two points. So I

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>look at this one and the modern NBA thing plays

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a big part of it, and that's not the slightest

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>center because there are times where we probably thought Joel

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>Embies should have won the award as well, but for

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>this seventy two game regular season, and which the seventy

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>six is worth at the top of the Eastern Conference,

0:24:57.560 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the same way that the Utah Jazz were the top

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of the way, basically from front to back for both teams,

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought Simmons was deserving of that. They were both

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:09.040
<v Speaker 1>deserving of the award. I actually thought Simmons should have

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>won it, but I knew what the ultimate outcome would be,

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>which is now Rudy Goberton being a three time Defensive

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Player of the Year. So I do hope he uses

0:25:18.200 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>as fuel like I believe in b would. I do

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 1>not feel like I'm qualified enough to be worthy of

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 1>a vote to cast in these types of ballots. I

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 1>feel like they should go to season to astute minds,

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:32.399
<v Speaker 1>people who have been around a while, who know this,

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>who talk to people, get solid information, all that stuff.

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So when I'm looking at this, I take my cues

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>from what I hear coaches and players say and read

0:25:43.320 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>what coaches and players say, and I think for me

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.200
<v Speaker 1>throughout the season and especially more recently as the year

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>round down and also now in the playoffs, you hear

0:25:53.359 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and see the opposing coaches talking about how incredibly versatile

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons is on defense, and I would love to

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.720
<v Speaker 1>see what the vote would have been if coaches had

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 1>cast their ballots for this, how the awards would have

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>turned out. I still think it would have turned out

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the same, most likely for MVP that Yokis would have

0:26:13.080 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>gotten it. I think it would have been a much

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>much tighter race, if not a different result. Head coaches

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:22.719
<v Speaker 1>voted for Defensive Player of the Year between Ben and Gobert,

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>So that is what I will say to that. And

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>just because it feels topical, kind of wild to see

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Clint Capella get more Defensive Player of the Year votes

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>than Joel Embiide, especially this week while we're watching them

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>go head to head. That was maybe the thing I

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>was most I thought my eyebrows were kind of gonna

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>detach from my forehead when I saw that one can't

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have two centers in the top five, No, no, has

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to go to one. Now look Simmons will be on

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.760
<v Speaker 1>the first team All Team Defense, as he should, and

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a great accomplishment. Again, but I thought the award, yeah,

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought it would go to Simmons this year. Well,

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought he was again worthy of the choice, no

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.440
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it, no databout and I agree. I hope

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that this is just a source of motivation and a

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:20.679
<v Speaker 1>cause for these guys to rally even further and prove

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>everyone wrong as soon as Friday, when the Sixers and

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Hawks do it up in Atlanta for a Game three, Listen,

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we got it. I'm the same Big Ben Simmons, the

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:40.520
<v Speaker 1>guy we gotta win. They's next two a HL and

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the series Canadas team hang around. Gotta beat them

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>yea and get some rest for the ECF because that's

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.920
<v Speaker 1>our goal gets to the East Ees, win that in

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>goose to the finals. So we got to beat this

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>team quick. I agree with the sentiment you do not

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.400
<v Speaker 1>want to let the Hawks hang around. I think I've

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>seen enough, at least at this point in time to

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>believe they are going to hang around. Not saying the

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Sixers can't end it in three games starting on Friday,

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it's going to be easy. So

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>my original prediction before this series was Sixers and six

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.919
<v Speaker 1>because I respect what Atlanta had done since the coaching change,

0:28:20.560 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>what they did and dismantling New York Knicks in round

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>one and believing that looking at their depth overall, the

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 1>amount of shooters that they had, and of course the

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>star player like Trey Young, that they were worthy of

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:34.239
<v Speaker 1>winning a game or two against the seventy sixers. Now,

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:37.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a like Lauren, how you like to

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.959
<v Speaker 1>say the benchmarks and you know, see see where things are.

0:28:42.040 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was happy with how they responded after

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 1>game one, round round one, I mean part of the

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>game one. Of course we didn't like the result. Started

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>off well in game two and then it kind of

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>went away. But they responded again to what the coach

0:28:56.280 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>decided to throw at them in the locker room. Now

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>let's see how they respond going on the road, hostile

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>environment on a Friday night in Atlanta where it's going

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a tough place to play, and listening to

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that crowd from the watching the television during round one,

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they really get into it. So how are they going

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to respond in that spot? And that's to the caller's point,

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>this is what it's all about and becoming a champion.

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:25.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't and Doc Rivers is told, with all due

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>respected to call other, the point that the caller made

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a ECF is the goal. ECF is not the goal

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>if you listen to Doc Rivers and the players, the

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>goal as a championship. So that's just another step to

0:29:35.120 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>where they need to be. Now this is another small

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>step but kind of big and going on the road

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 1>and not as you said, so us letting this team

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>hang around and letting that crowd really uplift their team

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and get get to where they want to go again.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>So a very huge, huge weekend for the seventy sixers

0:29:55.560 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta. All right, looking ahead games three a little

0:30:00.320 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>bit more. We saw the seventy six ers adjusting Game two.

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 1>What might the Hawks do in Game three? Yeah, this

0:30:06.720 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is David and a six Ers fan living in Boston,

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for whatever that might be worth. You know, last night

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>was working two is clearly evident that this team is

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>going to win, like getting stops and scoring officially in

0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 1>getting to a line. It's going to be tough for

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>them make it to the next tiunt against the Nets.

0:30:25.040 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 1>But that's a formula to win it the thickest. It

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:31.040
<v Speaker 1>knows what they're going to get from the bench. Thank you, formula.

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.560
<v Speaker 1>We have a formula. But I think everyone agrees. But

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>the Hawks showed even more than getting a win in

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>game one, and then I think they showed again in

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Game two when they took the lead eighty seventy nine.

0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:44.360
<v Speaker 1>They're they're gonna be irritants. I don't think they'll go

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>quickly or quietly. It's going to be a challenge either way.

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 1>It definitely is going to be a challenge. With the

0:30:51.720 --> 0:30:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Hawks, they felt like when you give them the

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>whole coin advantage and they feel like knowing that the

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>team plays so well on their home floor and they

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.240
<v Speaker 1>take game one and do it in the manner in

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>which they did by making twenty a franchise record, playoff

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>record twenty three pointers, they have to feel good about themselves.

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:09.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the job is always going the road. At

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>least get a split and you feel good, and I'm

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>sure that they do so. Again, Let's see what the

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Sixers do. Let's see how they respond to what's in

0:31:17.560 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>front of them with now this confidence at Lant's coming

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in with nothing on their shoulders, no pressure, just go

0:31:24.880 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>out there and play basketball. And the pressure is on

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the seventy sixers. And if you're going to be a champion,

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you have to face some adversity and once you

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:36.200
<v Speaker 1>do what you do in Game three, then you can

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 1>feel a little bit at ease, but not take your

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:39.920
<v Speaker 1>foot off your gas, off the gas for game four,

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>come back home next week and close it out in

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 1>game five. I love the swing factor swing games in series.

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>There are a couple. They could usually be games threes

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 1>or game fives, but I love those propositions, the chance

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>to swing the momentum of a series. Let's had a

0:31:58.040 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of points about the Sixers last right. I mean,

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Indeed's playing like v Pig. You know, he wasn't gonna

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:06.720
<v Speaker 1>get it to get place sixty games, but he's an

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>MVP top three player in the NBA right now. I

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>think people need to give the sentens all a break

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>about how he shot the bootball or lack of shooting

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on a Wednesday, but he completely shot down for the

0:32:25.240 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 1>most part, Trey. What's the Sixers needing because they don't

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.560
<v Speaker 1>really have anyone that can stop that shooting point guard.

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>And it was nice to see Shake kind of get

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>out of this shell and finally start scoring for Sixers

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>because nobody on the bench wanting the score the other night.

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>But I really like how they're playing, and I'll see

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 1>we can keep it going. Just Sixers. Lauren what do

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you expect to see from Trey Young in game three?

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Because obviously lots of people are going to look to

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>him and be like, Okay, we saw what happened second

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>half Game one, we saw what happen throughout Game two.

0:33:00.640 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of pressure for him to regain the

0:33:03.160 --> 0:33:05.520
<v Speaker 1>form that we saw first half of Game one and

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:09.240
<v Speaker 1>what he showed throughout that Nick series. Can he recapture

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>some of that? I'm gonna answer your question with a question.

0:33:15.360 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it depends on what are the Sixers going

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to do on defense? Can the Sixers replicate what they

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>did defensively in Game two? If they can, I don't

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>know if it matters what type of confidence or game

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Trey Young brings into Game three. Because of just how

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 1>well Ben Simmons was able to take a challenge, accept

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a challenge, and rise to the occasion, it was really

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>cool to watch. I'm looking forward to that matchup again.

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I know everybody is Trey Young. We know there's no

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.560
<v Speaker 1>shortage of confidence there, there's no shortage of talent there.

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 1>But as Color two colors Ago said, there's a formula

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>now and if the Sixers can stick to it, as

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>long as they're also producing on the offensive end. I

0:33:53.800 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like their chances. We're hearing thoughts, feelings, people's emotional state, temper,

0:34:00.080 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>your checks going into game number three of this series. Hey, Brian,

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:09.640
<v Speaker 1>this is Steve calling in. I just wanted to say,

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>six Ers and five, I'm not afraid of the Hawks.

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:14.439
<v Speaker 1>Game one didn't worry mean at all. We saw Game

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 1>two the better team war them out by the end

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of the game. Hawks are going to be no problem.

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I love the content you guys put out and we

0:34:22.960 --> 0:34:26.919
<v Speaker 1>just appreciate you. Trust the process. Listen, we're just happy

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 1>if you call and leave voicemails. You don't, it's not

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>a prerequisite that you you maybe maybe you give us

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a nice, warm, fuzzy we'll certainly take them, acknowledge them,

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>but not a not a prerequisite, but we do appreciate it.

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>So Stephen, there's no problem Hawks. This thing's over. I'd

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>like to agree. I don't know that I can. I

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:48.840
<v Speaker 1>try to. I try not to get too high or

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>too low. But that does sound nice and it does

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:54.960
<v Speaker 1>sound possible to me. Um, Like you said, Selts, game

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>three is big. Game three is a swing game. I

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.520
<v Speaker 1>think if the Sixers get Game three, well, I mean,

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>obviously they have to get game three in order to

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>win in five. But I do think that if they

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 1>get Game three boat that boats in the favor of

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a much shorter series. So I'm really looking forward to

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this one. I think, in particular, d that if the

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy Sixers use a similar blueprint and they're able to

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>win game three, that is, amongst other things, Joel dominates

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta again cannot come up with an answer for him,

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 1>and the Sixers frustrate Trey Young. I think if those

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 1>two things happen again and the Sixers win Game three,

0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna get real interesting in game four, because then

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I think the Sixers will have shown signs of having

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:38.840
<v Speaker 1>found the code to crack that situation, and they have

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the personnel to back it up. Sure, you figure it out,

0:35:43.040 --> 0:35:45.239
<v Speaker 1>and like we mentioned a little while ago, when with

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a series that scheduled for seven games, the adjustments. We

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:52.719
<v Speaker 1>know what the players, of course are about and what

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do, but it's also the chess game

0:35:54.680 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>between the two head coaches and the coaching staffs and

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.319
<v Speaker 1>how to figure out these little things. And they may

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:03.200
<v Speaker 1>have witnessed in the first two games. So one punch

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the other one punched back. It's even now, how do

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we respond? And I think the formula, as you mentioned,

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:10.360
<v Speaker 1>sels is and this is what I've talked about a

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>lot with the team in general, and why I thought

0:36:12.040 --> 0:36:15.600
<v Speaker 1>they were winning six and was because number one, you

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>have the best player in the series and Joel and

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>b clearly and they have no answer for him. On

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the other side, Trey Young is as good as he is,

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 1>he's still a young player and this is new to him,

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and you do have someone who can defend him, not

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>just one but two. Now you may not stop him,

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:36.120
<v Speaker 1>you can contain them. And if you do that, all right,

0:36:36.320 --> 0:36:39.279
<v Speaker 1>do you limit enough from the others where they're not

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>hurting you as much where the end result is a

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 1>loss for the seventy sixers. And I think if I

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 1>look at it that way, once again, the Sixers have

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the advantage with that because of the overall team that

0:36:52.160 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I think they are, which I still believe they are

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the better one. So if they do that can be

0:36:55.920 --> 0:37:00.439
<v Speaker 1>dominant self to your point, defensively, that's what they rely

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on to win games anyway, then they are in a

0:37:03.719 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>very good spot. In Game number three, and then the

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Hawks or in their heels at that point in

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:12.440
<v Speaker 1>game four. All Right, I think we're gonna end this

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:15.759
<v Speaker 1>if I have the right voicemail queued up on a

0:37:15.880 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>somewhat obscure note. But I do need some assistance and

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>helping arbitrate this situation, and I will turn to the

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>two of you I trusted podcasting partners in crime. Hey, Brian,

0:37:28.480 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>i's a go man. My name is Luke, Huge Sixers

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>saying here, definitely listen to your podcast. I love the

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of five minute updates that you guys have been

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:45.360
<v Speaker 1>doing here. I actually I'm the guy who created the

0:37:46.280 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>thrust the Process graphic that you may have seen on Twitter.

0:37:50.080 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 1>I've kind of been putting it out. I also had

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>it at a game one time, says behind the Sixers bench,

0:37:56.239 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's sort of the phrase thrust the Process as

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of taken off sense. So keep up the good work.

0:38:04.280 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I heard just sending out swag. That's true. I'd appreciate it.

0:38:09.520 --> 0:38:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Thrust the Process. Now listen, I think what we need

0:38:12.800 --> 0:38:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to arbitrate here. I feel like I saw that. I

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:17.760
<v Speaker 1>feel like I saw that in a couple of places

0:38:18.560 --> 0:38:21.399
<v Speaker 1>the fifth quarter. Our friends over the fifth quarter um

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>posted that T shirt out there in the logo and

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>the graphic. Luke claims to be the mind behind it.

0:38:30.600 --> 0:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>From one swag person, do we hook him up with

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>some swag? Well, when did he? When did he come

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:40.120
<v Speaker 1>up with this this thrust? The process, we'd have to

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 1>do a deeper dive on that. That would, yeah, true,

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Luke explain that. But after which thrust right was the

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:48.880
<v Speaker 1>first thrust that we saw this season in Orlando. It

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was the first thrust. I think it was, yeah, because

0:38:53.040 --> 0:38:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that's when we were like, oh, that's weird, new and

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and now it's become a thing. So um, I agree

0:38:59.800 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>with Lauren swag them up. I think we have to

0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>swag them up. We're in the giving spirit here. We've

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>done this before nothing else. I love. I love fan engagement,

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:16.800
<v Speaker 1>fan art, fan memes, fan graphics, I love all of it.

0:39:17.040 --> 0:39:19.479
<v Speaker 1>So of course, of course we gotta get the swag.

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>That's right. The culture we're trying to promote here is

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>if you call the podline and you put yourself out there.

0:39:25.840 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Not everyone's doing it. People do it. Hey, you know

0:39:28.440 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what we support that put yourself out there? He is

0:39:31.239 --> 0:39:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the question comment take or U a four to one

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:39.239
<v Speaker 1>one that you're behind a great little slogan surrounding one

0:39:39.239 --> 0:39:41.319
<v Speaker 1>of the new signature moves of one of the best

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>basketball players on the planet. Okay, we can reward that.

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Here's a slogan that I've been waiting for since the

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>middle of the season. I guess. Well, actually, no, pretty

0:39:49.719 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>much at the beginning of the season, when we knew

0:39:51.239 --> 0:39:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that this team was very good, the record would be solid.

0:39:54.280 --> 0:40:00.480
<v Speaker 1>This this swag has to be stay with me morning,

0:40:01.120 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>six of fans and six of fans only. Uh, where's

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:15.520
<v Speaker 1>that T shirt? Selves? Well, listen, you can make that one,

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and I'll make Jake Tapper engage us with my content,

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and then we can go into business. Hey, I'm just

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>saying far reaching, it really is. I know that we're

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:33.359
<v Speaker 1>not doing video on this one, but if we were,

0:40:33.400 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I would just put my mic down and see myself

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>out nothing. I have nothing to add. We'll just need

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:44.359
<v Speaker 1>our creative director, Lauren to give us the sign off

0:40:44.400 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and licensing for that. That's right. Yes, we were going

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to put Lauren Rosannut on the bottom of the T shirt,

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but you know, good morning, six of fans and six

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:57.600
<v Speaker 1>of fans. As long as I'm getting ten percent, it's fine.

0:40:57.800 --> 0:40:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Do whatever you're going You gotta ask for more ten

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:05.000
<v Speaker 1>percent please, yes, all right, I don't have to come

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>back to the counter, but gotta go. Gras look forward

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:13.879
<v Speaker 1>to it. Guys, we're gonna clap it up. Great mail bag,

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>great awesome. Thank you everyone for submitting, for calling, for

0:41:19.640 --> 0:41:22.399
<v Speaker 1>breaking the podline and forcing us to go in, clear

0:41:22.440 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>out some old messages and fix it. If we played

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 1>your voicemail again, we appreciate it. We'll be in touch.

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>You will hear from myself most likely to get your information.

0:41:33.200 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>If you do not leave it to send you some

0:41:35.600 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>gear and some merch, we'll do it again at some

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>point next week. Just keep filming the podline two and

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:45.800
<v Speaker 1>five four zero three seven six three to seven and

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>enjoy Game three. See you, guys, see you.