WEBVTT - The Changing Narratives Pushing Bitcoin

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So the big question is this, how do investors like

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>us get access to the ideas, information, and most importantly,

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the right people that give us the tools and information

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to make conformed and educated decisions to have success.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the question, and this podcast will give us

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the answers. This is Mark Moss, your host. Let's get

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.120
<v Speaker 1>this started here. Everyone, Welcome to another episode of the

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Market Disruptors podcast. Today I am joined by Nathaniel Whitmore.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>He's the author of Long Read Sunday and The Crypto

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Daily three on three, both on Twitter. I've been following

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>for a long time and you should check it out anyway.

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to have you, Nathaniel. Welcome, Thank you, thanks

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 1>so much for having me. I'm excited to be here. Yeah,

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.560
<v Speaker 1>so I'm happy to talk to you as well. We've

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've been following your stuff for for a year.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You put out really good curated information um on Twitter.

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:55.959
<v Speaker 1>But why don't you tell everybody who you are, kind

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of what your background is and and how you got

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>here what you're doing? Yes, sure, so that I was

0:01:01.400 --> 0:01:04.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of joked. There's like two parts to the how

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I got into crypto story. The first is kind of

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.559
<v Speaker 1>the obvious one at first glancewers that I spent about

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a decade in Silicon Valley. Uh, kind of bouncing back

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.479
<v Speaker 1>and forth between venture capital roles and operator roles. UM

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>one of those as I was helping a company, I

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>advised a company that went through UM why I combinated

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 1>at the same classes coin Base. That company was sort

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of a helps fortune five hundreds understand new technologies through

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>educational videos, consulting partnerships, etcetera. And like they were making

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:36.119
<v Speaker 1>videos about bitcoin for Coca Cola, kind of private videos

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 1>ordered by Coca Cola and like. So so that's kind

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>of the the easy or clear part in some ways.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>But then before that, actually my whole kind of background

0:01:46.120 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of where I came from was much more focused on

0:01:47.920 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>social impact and kind of global social change. So, uh,

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 1>right after a university, I basically stuck around my university

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>for a few years to design programs to send kids

0:01:57.440 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 1>all over the world who wanted to make an impact

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.400
<v Speaker 1>and kind of partner with local organizations and figure out

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>how to do that and uh, and a lot of

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 1>what that the goal of that program was is to

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 1>show just how hard it is. Right, there's a huge

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>amount of energy that comes especially from young people who

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>want to go out and make a difference, but then

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 1>get to wherever it is that they want to go

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>or they want to have an impact, and find that

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>there's just huge structural problems. Uh that um that you know,

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>at best, they're going to kind of nibble around the

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.359
<v Speaker 1>edges of the problems and it's not bad, but it's

0:02:28.400 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily what they're going for. And so it's interesting,

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Like it actually took me leaving Silicon Valley so my

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:35.799
<v Speaker 1>wife and I live in the Hudson Valley now, um

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and breaking kind of away from from Silicon Valley to

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>almost like re contextualized bitcoin and crypto in general, but

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly Bitcoin outside of the Hayman's narrative which had dominated

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it from you know, when we were in it with

0:02:49.919 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>coin Base and when we're making those videos for Coca Cola.

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Like if you look at uh in Silicon Valley in particular,

0:02:57.680 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is just one of a lot of different kind

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of like fast mobile money type things, right, Like it

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>was this cool thing that you could use to order

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>coffee at Cooper Cafe and Palo Alto when you were

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>pitching a VC, Like literally that's that's what it was.

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>For for for me kind of being in it and

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>now admittedly it wasn't my main focus, and I was

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty um tunnel visioned on the company that I was

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>working on that time. But when I left and got

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.519
<v Speaker 1>out of it and I started to actually have space

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to to dig back into it, it turns out that

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>for me, at least, it's it related much more to

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>that first set of things that I had done before

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley that were about large scale global structural change,

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's kind of what pulled me all the way

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:37.760
<v Speaker 1>back in. So for the last few years, I've been

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of all in on on bitcoin and crypto, UM

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and UH, and that manifests in a couple of different ways.

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>As you said, I do the Long Read Sunday, which

0:03:45.800 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>is kind of a curation of the week's top tweets UM.

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I recently started a thing called Crypto Daily three at three,

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>which is a kind of livestream video that also turns

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>into a podcast. It was three minutes on three topics

0:03:56.840 --> 0:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>each that I'm seeing a lot of conversation about UM,

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>and then kind of behind the scenes, I'm also consulting

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and helping companies figure out what their narratives are in

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the context of the market and producing content around that.

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's a lot of sucking in a huge amount

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of information, trying to make sense of it all, and

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>then spinning it back out in a lot of different ways. Yeah. Cool,

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's it's been been really helpful for sure

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people, including myself. So it's interesting

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.320
<v Speaker 1>how you you had kind of the social impact piece

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>before going to Silicon Valley and and Silicon Valley I

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>guess brought you into bitcoin, but it was it was

0:04:28.920 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a job, and like you said, you went from the

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>payment the payment space to then seeing the actual change

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin um can can do. I think that's part

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of going down the rabbit hole. I think, right, we

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:43.120
<v Speaker 1>all kind of find that a different way, but you

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>had that background. That's really cool. Um, do you think

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that's normal for most people like to kind of come

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in for the money aspect, which is kind of more

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>like the surface, shallow surface area that then they kind

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>of get sucked into seeing the overall change. I think

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you have. I think a lot of it was based

0:05:00.760 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>on how you find out, who you find out from,

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, what your own context is. But I do

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>think and I think there's actually a relevant point that, um,

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, for for as much as we can kind

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of like rip on the crypto industry for you know,

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>just the massive almost like casino style games of some

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of these you know, uh coin offerings in seventeen early

0:05:23.360 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and all these things. There are a lot of people

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:28.559
<v Speaker 1>who found their way in exactly to your point, through

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>like being excited about the market opportunity, being excited about

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:37.919
<v Speaker 1>kind of a generational uh, you know, financial opportunity, and

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>who found that there was much more to it than that,

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, maybe what made it such a generational

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>financial opportunity was actually broader than just you know, what

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the asset was going to be valued on day to day.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>So I do think that there's a closer, there's a

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>more there's more value to people coming in because they

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>want the money than in a lot of spaces, you know. Uh.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>And I think that there's a lot of a there's

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>a conversion process that to a lot of people where

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>whatever they thought it was coming in, even if they

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>were just excited about the money, they found a lot

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>more even if they stay excited about the money, right, Yeah,

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for sure, I uh, you know, I say that the

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>reason why bitcoin is hard for most people to understand

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is because you know, there's so much maybe six seven

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>different disciplines that you have to get and which is

0:06:18.920 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>why there's kind of that rabbit hole you kind of

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>learned about each one. But I love the fact that

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think five six, seven years ago, people

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.039
<v Speaker 1>weren't really interested in money, people weren't interested in economics.

0:06:30.080 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Nobody used the word feat, nobody would throw around the

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>words Austrian economics, right, and so now today it's creating

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>all this awareness and like you said, it sucks people

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in on the money. Um, it's kind of the old

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>bait and switch put in a good way. Uh. So

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I like that now. I mean you mentioned how you

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned how you saw you know, in Silicon Valley and

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and it was kind of all about the payments. Um.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>I think even recently we still here, we we were

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>hearing more about the payments. But that's kind of shifting.

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>And I know you talk a lot about like narrative

0:07:00.800 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and narrative marking, So UM, tell me kind of where

0:07:04.160 --> 0:07:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you think that narrative started to switch, uh, and kind

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>of where it's at right now. So you have a

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you have a couple of things. There's there's almost like

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the silicon value question, which I actually think is interesting

0:07:14.840 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 1>because of its kind of role and prominence in the

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 1>tech world and the amount of money flowing through it.

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>But then there's also just the more general question of

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 1>when that payment's narrative shifted. Um, so maybe let's actually

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about the payments narrative first. I mean, I think

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.440
<v Speaker 1>it's been a for for I think there's a lot

0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of people out there who would argue that they were

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>always kind of telling the digital goal of the store

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 1>value story, the you know, even now the something that

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 1>we can get into, which is I think I think

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we're shifting again from those things to something that's much

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>more of a kind of generational hedge against the fundamental

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>paradigm shift in the economic system, which is like a

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>superstore value, you know. But so I think there's a

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks who that narrative has always been there

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for some people. I think that, um, there was a

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>ton of money spent on on kind of marketing the

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>idea of it as a payment channel, uh, you know,

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and and honestly like well intentioned right like Square was

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:12.200
<v Speaker 1>accepting you know, Square merchants were making it. You're able

0:08:12.200 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to uh to accept bitcoin that wasn't a wasn't because

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>they you know, didn't care about the other narrative or whatever.

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Just it made sense of their business. They were excited

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 1>about the cooin. I think obviously now everyone kind of

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>knows how long Jack Dorsey has been thinking about it,

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.679
<v Speaker 1>watching it, understanding it. But when you have a major

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.760
<v Speaker 1>company like that who is enabling that to be the

0:08:32.800 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>way that most people interact with it, that's what they're

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 1>going to hear about it. That's what we're gonna think

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. And also coincides at the time of kind

0:08:39.040 --> 0:08:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of the rise of Venmo, the rise of other type

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of mobile money solutions UM and the idea of just

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 1>being easier, like everything was being convenient, you know, or

0:08:47.960 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>becoming more convenient in in a totally different way. And

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>so it did kind of fit inside that, at least

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. UM. I think over the last few years

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously shifted. UM. I think it was really reinforced.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of the things that was interesting about

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the I c O boom was that it allowed bitcoin

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.599
<v Speaker 1>to define itself oppositionally, or maybe a better way to

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>put it is for bitcoiners to define itself as different

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in some way and I think that wasn't just about

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of a fair launch model or anything like that.

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 1>It was more about what the goals of the system were.

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>And you saw, like if you look at the beginning

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen maybe even bridging back into the Silicon Valley

0:09:23.160 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>side of this question, you saw kind of the emergence

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of a recognition that we were kind of having two

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>different conversations at once. There was the money crypto and

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the tech crypto side, and um, you know, there there's

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:37.520
<v Speaker 1>something to make the argument that they're incompatible or and

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>there's something who only care about one or the other. Um,

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there's also a lot of people who can

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>see that they kind of they just have different ambitions

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and different aims. And so if you kind of take

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the Silicon Valley side, what the way that they're looking

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 1>or I don't want to say, I don't want to

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>pay it with such a broad breast strokes, because obviously

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a ton of people in Silicon Valley who are

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>passionate and kind of deep money decliners as well. But um,

0:10:03.559 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley is really interested in the paradigm shift from uh,

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 1>these companies which are supposed to disintermate the disinder mediate

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and instead became the most powerful gatekeepers that

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we've ever seen, right, Like Amazon is basically the most

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>powerful gatekeeper we've ever seen from a retail perspective around

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the world. I mean, it makes the Walmart that encouraged antitrust,

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of rumblings in the nineties and earlier

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousands look ridiculous by comparison, um and uh, and

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 1>you kind of see that across other domains and disciplines

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>as well. I Mean, a lot of the conversation about

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook that's really unresolved as it relates to how big

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and how powerful it is that we've never seen anything

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that has this many users, this much data that

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>it has access to. We don't have any precedent for

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>how it's supposed to behave or what it's supposed to do.

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>And so Silicon Valley, I think is is really interested

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>in kind of the decentralized technology alternatives to those types

0:10:56.760 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of things, because that's what Silicon Valley does is it

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>creates technolo aologies that respond to the problems of today's

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:04.839
<v Speaker 1>systems and tries to do them in a different way

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that's faster, better, cheaper, more efficient, whatever, so, but only

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 1>if they can pull a profit from it. Well, there's

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>a whole different conversation about what extense of looking value

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:17.960
<v Speaker 1>has been interested in pulling a profit or or been

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>interested in a tenure game to let retail care about

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>whether it pulls a profit once it goes public. Yeah,

0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>so that the maybe we can get into that. But

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>that's a whole different conversation. But I think that as

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 1>it relates to bitcoin during during this boom, as everything

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>was about tokenizing everything, tokenizing the world, decentralizing everything, Bitcoin

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>and bitcoiner has got to say really strongly and really firmly, like,

0:11:40.600 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not what we're here for. We're here to change

0:11:44.559 --> 0:11:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the money system, and decentralization is actually for us about

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>censorship resistance. Uh, you know, the permissionless nature of this

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>asset um, the fact that it's not going to change

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's money supply, and it's it's monetary policies,

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and then it's a it's a bulwark against kind of

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the rampant money printing that we're seeing. And so I

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 1>feel like actually, in some ways, the breakout success, at

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>least in the short term, of this other category of

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>assets gave bitcoin a chance to really define itself as

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.439
<v Speaker 1>something different. And I think that if you look at

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>what the story that was being told behind the scenes

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>as people were recruiting institutions and new people to come

0:12:21.920 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>in during the bear market. During they were talking about

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.480
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin and its role as a as a hedge,

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:33.400
<v Speaker 1>not about tokenized assets. Yeah, so you know that. It's

0:12:33.440 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because you know, we're talking about narrative marketing

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and so you had, like you said, uh, Square for example,

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>coming out and talking about bitcoin as a payment mechanisms.

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>We had companies that were promoting it hoping that people

0:12:46.960 --> 0:12:48.480
<v Speaker 1>would use it and then they would be able to

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>gain market share and make a profit or whatever they're doing.

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll talk about making profit, but um bitcoin is a

0:12:55.040 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>decentralized company that nobody runs, and there's nobody there, and

0:12:57.559 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody there to push a narrative, right, There's nobody

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>there to um say what it's supposed to be or

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.640
<v Speaker 1>tell people about it. So really it seems like maybe

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to the community, people like you or me,

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>who are putting out content to try and help push

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that narrative. So do you think that's why there's kind

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 1>of that difference. Yeah, I mean bitcoin is a very

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>unique phenomenon in I mean in history from a lot

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of different vectors. But I think that the one dimension

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of that is that it's a company less force, right,

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:29.559
<v Speaker 1>and that that we've never seen anything like that. Um,

0:13:29.559 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>there is no bitcoin marketing department, there is no bitcoin

0:13:32.120 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>pr department. What it has kind of it's kind of

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>like a it's kind of like a decentralized narrative, a

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.440
<v Speaker 1>decentralized force right where I'm talking about bitcoin and what

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it means to me, but you're talking about bitcoin of

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what it means to you, yep. And And that's I

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>think why the narrative battles around bitcoin can be so

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>fever pitch is that there's no one who uh, there's

0:13:53.200 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>no one that comes back to that. There's there's individual

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>voices authority based on who happens to follow them, right,

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:01.720
<v Speaker 1>But it really is the kind of like a large group,

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a very messy kind of social consensus process.

0:14:05.520 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, you know, this is kind of represented

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>in forks, but I think it's the My instinct is

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that the longer that uh, you know, bitcoin itself continues

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 1>to get to to differentiate and kind of the further

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the forks fall by the wayside in terms of where

0:14:20.960 --> 0:14:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they fit in the market, the more you'll see within

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the big tent of bitcoin, even different interpretations of what

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin are, what why it matters, what it means, You

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.040
<v Speaker 1>will see, you know, you'll probably see battles over things

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>like rehypothecation and what are and aren't you know, financial

0:14:35.480 --> 0:14:38.920
<v Speaker 1>products that we're okay with on top of bitcoin, even

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>though again no one gets it aside, and that's kind

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of the beauty of it. So you know, it's definitely

0:14:43.480 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a particular type of narrative battleground around bitcoin. Um

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think that that's you know, only going to

0:14:48.880 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>increase over time. So it seems like maybe in the

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 1>beginning we had the squares and whatnot talking about it

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.280
<v Speaker 1>as a payment source and may and and the companies

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that can build products around it to to make money are

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.600
<v Speaker 1>going to going to invest money to push whatever narrative

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>they want. Um And now it looks like almost it's

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the Wall Street taking over that narrative. Right We have

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>E Trade, TD, merrit Trade, Fidelity, on and on and

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>on New York Stock Exchange. Now they're all picking up

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and so now uh, they're gonna probably try to push

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that bitcoin is a financial instrument narrative. Yeah, well it's interesting.

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>So so they definitely are right. They want bitcoin to

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>be a financial instrument. They wanted to be, um you know,

0:15:28.120 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>set up in ways that they can uh sell, right,

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>and and they're the particular narratives around it, I think

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>will be a little bit based on what it is

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to sell. Are they selling a custody solution

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>or they selling futures product, um, you know, all of

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.960
<v Speaker 1>those things will shape the particular uh you know way

0:15:45.000 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that they frame it. However, I think one of the

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>things that's really interesting is that there is a convergence

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>of a narrative from the bitcoin community alongside the kind

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street big financial institution narrative, which is this

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 1>idea of bitcoin as a non correlated asset, right as

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>a hedge against um, what's expected to be kind of

0:16:08.600 --> 0:16:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a rise of money printing, right uh and modern monetary

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>theory and all these sort of things. Um. There they

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>are now the kind of again painting with a broad brush.

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Financial institutions are are kind of framing it in that

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>way to their clients, to their customers, and even if

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just internally so far as how they think about it,

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and um, that's really interesting to see and I think

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>very powerful. Uh that that's the way the narrative is

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of shifting in terms of what bitcoin represents to

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>that larger financial world. Interesting. So you think the when

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the bitcoin community, I mean we're really

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>just talking about the the developers and the people in

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the space, you know, Twitter, the Bitcoin Maximus and whatnot.

0:16:54.000 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So you're thinking that the maximalists are are continued to

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.320
<v Speaker 1>push their narrative of really the store of value and

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>that it is again hedge against the money printing, and

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you think Wall Street may pick that up and help

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:07.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of run that run that marketing torch a little bit.

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that they are picking that up. I think

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:11.919
<v Speaker 1>there's there's two pieces of it that they're picking up.

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you look so um Ral Paul, who started

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Real Vision, uh he used to be kind of a

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>macro equities trader. Um has been on to two podcasts

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 1>this week discussing this. So one was Stefan Lavere is

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:25.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously a bitcoin focused podcast, and they were talking about

0:17:26.040 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of this, uh, this idea of a generational turning

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of um, in terms of where where we

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>are in the financial cycle and kind of the you know,

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>equities being at their their kind of highest price ever,

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and what's likely to happen in the bond markets and

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>how you know, as things shift, as there's kind of

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>uh no more debt to be had, you know, things

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>are going to change, and all of a sudden, boomers

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to find uh, their their you know, equities

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>worth so much less than than they were planning on. Right,

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>And then you have all these millennials who are looking

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>at you know, the most expensive equities ever, the most

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 1>expensive real estate ever. And why wouldn't you take a

0:18:03.160 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of asymmetric bet on something like bitcoin and cryptocurrencies? Um?

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So you have, on the one hand, just that it

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 1>as a pure, uh pure market play type, which is

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the not necessarily the narrative that bitcoiners

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 1>are pushing. But it's something that gets to this other

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>point was why is this a generational hedge? Um? Why

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 1>is it such a non correlated asset? It's it comes

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:32.160
<v Speaker 1>back to this idea of something that is digitally scarce, right,

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and that is kind of uh, you know, knowably provably scarce,

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:38.480
<v Speaker 1>and all of a sudden when you start having that conversation,

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it really paints itself in opposition to uh, two policies

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that we see, you know, both both happening, but also

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 1>that are seemed to becoming more in vogue. And so

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:51.479
<v Speaker 1>you kind of have this convergence of on the one hand, uh,

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 1>just a generation who's like, well, I can't buy these

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 1>things to to create and preserve wealth in the long

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>run because there's got they've got nowhere to go but

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.120
<v Speaker 1>down Now. The other their hand, they're like, well, there's

0:19:01.119 --> 0:19:03.119
<v Speaker 1>this other thing that seems like it might be a

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 1>good bet or a good hedge, but why And it

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 1>comes back to again a lot of the core ideas

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 1>of um scarcity that that have people so excited. So

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's this really interesting thing that's happening where

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not that just all of a sudden people are

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.520
<v Speaker 1>all Austrians who really care about scarcity and sound money.

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 1>It's that in the context of what else is in

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the market and these larger market forces, it's it's painting

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>itself in a much more appealing light, right Yeah, I think, yeah, definitely,

0:19:30.080 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 1>not everybody wants to paint themselves as Austrian or even

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>cares to know what that means. But I think, like

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I think sound money might have skipped a generation or

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.879
<v Speaker 1>two right where. I think if you went back in

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:43.359
<v Speaker 1>the early nineteen hundreds, I mean, people were still really

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:46.919
<v Speaker 1>tuned into gold. Um, as the US got off of

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 1>gold and kind of went into the paper, maybe that

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>was lost a little bit and and uh, and there's

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of generations don't really care about it. And

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>now kind of like maybe you see an African continent

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.160
<v Speaker 1>where they skipped landline phones and went straight to mobile phones.

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this generation skipping the gold sound money going straight

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to a bitcoin sound money, um and not really knowing why.

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>Maybe that's interesting. Now, Um, what about other narratives in

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace? So obviously that's bitcoin, but now we have

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 1>crypto currency, right, so, um, what do you see about crypto?

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>About the crypto narrative? I mean, do you think it

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.160
<v Speaker 1>seems to be kind of spinning off of the bitcoin

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 1>narrative and now it's all these other things big blockchain,

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>not bitcoin sort of. So I think that it's pretty

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>undeniable to me that even if you're really excited about

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>all of the different assets, um, the conversation that has

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>jumped mainstream is specifically about bitcoin. Uh, it really much

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 1>more than general crypto assets, with the exception of liber

0:20:45.080 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and stable coins, which maybe we'll come back to in

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a minute. Um, but that's there. You know, they've been

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>three hearings, two in the Senate, one in Congress over

0:20:53.520 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks, basically two and a half weeks,

0:20:56.160 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and the word ethereum hasn't come up. No one's mentioned eos,

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, no one's gotten into the industry and um.

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that doesn't That just reflects uh,

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>partially what they're hearing about it, and partially kind of

0:21:09.720 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>where again that this is. It's it's in the context

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>of this larger financial system questions and this growing concern

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>about what the future of the financial system looks like

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and where money fits in and all these things, right,

0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And so basically they want to have the money, uh,

0:21:26.040 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the money crypto conversation, not the technology crypto conversation. So

0:21:29.880 --> 0:21:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that that's actually a knock on anything else.

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>It's more just shows the comparative maturity of the bitcoin

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>narrative and the demand and the interest from kind of

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the larger mainstream financial and political world to understand how

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it might fit now. I guess they don't care if

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 1>if supply chain management figures out a better way to

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 1>run their computer system on blockchain, right, that doesn't affect.

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, one of the things that happened at the

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.679
<v Speaker 1>hearing this week with the the Senate Banking Committee, So

0:21:57.880 --> 0:22:00.240
<v Speaker 1>two weeks ago we had two hearings that were about

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Libra specifically UM. This week we had a hearing that

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:07.919
<v Speaker 1>was theoretically about cryptocurrency regulation writ large. Turns out it

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>was still about Libra UM and Libra is really the

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>thing that's got them uh concerned and paying attention, but

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it was theoretically about kind of cryptocurrency regulation in general.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that was actually interesting is

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that there were some who, like some of the folks

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 1>who are more I guess you would say, maybe positively

0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>inclined towards this. We're kind of trying to lead the

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:31.680
<v Speaker 1>witnesses who are speaking to to the Senate Banking Committee

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to to show what what other use cases for blockchain

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>their were outside of money, because they didn't want the

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 1>entire technology to be just assumed to be going after

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>to trying to recreate money in some ways, which is

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>more politically contentious than to your point, changing the way

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that supply chains run. Um. So yeah, so again it's

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>there's there's this this kind of larger thing. And I

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>point out that because I think it has such a

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to shape a lot of our discourse within

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the crypto industry about what matters and what we're paying

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 1>attention on. But I don't think it diminishes all the

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.360
<v Speaker 1>other kind of narratives that are flowing through. Um. They're

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit more still a battle for how

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>we who are in the industry are interested and uh

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and what sort of bridges into the larger mainstream world

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.640
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at. Right, So yeah, what's interesting about this

0:23:16.760 --> 0:23:20.240
<v Speaker 1>is again, right, there's so many different areas to focus on,

0:23:20.280 --> 0:23:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and one is kind of philosophy maybe if you will,

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>or or economics and money. They all kind of converge,

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and it's like what is money, right if you really

0:23:29.400 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>want to dig into it, And so you talk about

0:23:31.920 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>all these other like cryptocurrencies and maybe they're like utility token,

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>so it's a token that I'm able to use on

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>that system, But that's all money, right, Like it's all

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>about value and how I store value, how I use value,

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>how I trade transfer value? And if I just you know,

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>airline reward points or talking reward points, that's all that's

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.560
<v Speaker 1>all money, it's value um. And so they want to

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.959
<v Speaker 1>separate that from money and like blanket like cryptocurrencies, But

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>how can they stop somebody from creating value, creating a

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:05.760
<v Speaker 1>coupon and allowing you to use that coupon on a

0:24:05.800 --> 0:24:09.200
<v Speaker 1>system that's a cryptocurrency. And so I kind of envisioned

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:11.359
<v Speaker 1>this this world where money as we know it just

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>changes and they can contry to try to control the dollar,

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>but money becomes uh you know, decentralizing. Everyone creates it, transfers,

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it uses it. So they can try to separate that narrative,

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>but at some point it seems like they it keeps

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>coming back together. Do you think, Yeah, sure, I think

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that the point that you're making, which is

0:24:29.520 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>right on, is that you're seeing a little bit of

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>a separation at least kind of linguistically or conceptually of

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.560
<v Speaker 1>value and money, right And a lot of what I

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>think the folks, uh you know, who are like maybe

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>in the ethereum community or thinking about things like non

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 1>fungible tokens and all these things is they're they're trying

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to make value programmable. They're trying to make a value

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>primitive for applications where it's really easy to move this

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>little bucket of value over this this place and back again.

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Um and to have that be kind of programmatically determined

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.160
<v Speaker 1>or happen automatically if some set of conditions are met.

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we're used to thinking about the only

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>way that we kind of denominate that is through money, right,

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, value is uh is represented uh in

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, dollars or cents or whatever it is. Um

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And and really cryptocurrencies for a lot of these ecosystems

0:25:17.480 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>represent just a different kind of unit of account for

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the value that's being distributed through these communities. UM. I

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>think the thing is that's That's one thing I think

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:27.960
<v Speaker 1>that's good is that we're starting that I think is

0:25:28.000 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a good separation is the aspiration of different programmable values

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and what they are, what their implications are. UM. I

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.600
<v Speaker 1>think you're starting to see a lot of experiments. Uh.

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, the kind of air in some ways of

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the like tokenized the world type things is

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>more specific micro communities that are having a go at

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>how value might move between users of their their products,

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>uh in in different ways. So you have you know

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of activity around games with non fungible tokens

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.960
<v Speaker 1>where there's kind of true digital ownership, but theoretically true

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>digital ownership of assets. UM. You have uh, you know,

0:26:05.640 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>some communities like Scent that are trying to see if

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>they can create different value primitives that incentivized content creation,

0:26:12.359 --> 0:26:15.640
<v Speaker 1>content sharing, information sharing in different ways. UM. I think

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 1>those things have such a huge way to go to

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:23.520
<v Speaker 1>uh to prove that there's um, well, one that the

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.120
<v Speaker 1>architecture of the systems is right. The two that it's

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.399
<v Speaker 1>like they have two challenges in some ways. One is

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, is is the it is kind of the

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 1>way that we allow users to exchange value enough of

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a hook to get them here to actually spend time

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>in this community versus all their other options. And then

0:26:38.600 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to what's the right unit account? Should it be ethereum,

0:26:40.960 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>should it be you know, our native token? Should it

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>just be bitcoin? Should it be USD Yeah? I think

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:48.639
<v Speaker 1>but I think we I think we already kind of

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have a working framework. So for example, I took my

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>kids to Dave and Busters, and I have to pay

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>money to play the games and I have to put

0:26:56.560 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>money in the machine and I get credits on a card,

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>but then we don't use all credits, and I leave

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and like, I'm not going back to David Busters maybe ever.

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 1>And now I have all these credits on this card.

0:27:05.040 --> 0:27:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Those are to those could be tokens, and like why

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 1>couldn't I trade those tokens for your airline reward points?

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>Right totally? So we have like we're used to the

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>system where we gain reward points, we we we gain credits,

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>what token whatever? They could be tokens, but like why

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>does that value have to stay locked in that silo

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and why couldn't it be transferred? And so all the sudden,

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Dave and Busters decide, well, hey we're gonna make them

0:27:28.000 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>a token. Um, but now that's illegal. Uh sorry, it's

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a cryptocurrency, it's money. It's illegal. But it's like it's

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Yeah, well that's I actually think it

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>was a mistake to run away from the like souped

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>up airline miles narrative in some ways for these tokens

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:44.879
<v Speaker 1>like it so that the reason that people rejected that

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>narrative that they tried to in some ways is that

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 1>it it may be diminished the total upside that people

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 1>were imagining as they were buying tokens and kind of

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>like pre launch of anything. However, I don't think it's

0:27:57.480 --> 0:27:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing to have, I mean exactly, to your point,

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:05.000
<v Speaker 1>creating liquidity and secondary markets around an ecosystems currency is

0:28:05.040 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 1>a really nice economic value add type activity. And to

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>your point too, we're we are used to having to

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>convert whatever the dominant currency is into this little ecosystems

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>currency for the sake of our experience there, whether it's

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>David Busters or I mean, how Starbucks. I don't know

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's still true, but a couple of years ago

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>there was more like Starbucks is basically the biggest mobile

0:28:24.920 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>money provider by a lot, over Apple, over PayPal, over Venmo.

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, from from an actual like how much was

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on American accounts um than than anyone else Starbucks card

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>Starbucks exactly, Like and it's that's just Starbucks has shown

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's a market there. I it blows me away

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon hasn't done this yet. The average Americans spent

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>something like seven a month on Amazon literally, Like it's

0:28:50.800 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>crazy how high it is. Maybe that's the average prime member.

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure, I don't, don't call me on that,

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's an it's an enormous amount of money, right,

0:28:57.720 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Like why not just leave if you're if you had

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a ten percent discount on Amazon Bucks and you knew

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 1>on average, Amazon just showed you what the average you

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>spent was, you know, in any given month, and they

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>made it desperately easy to just convert it at any time,

0:29:08.960 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like people would leave it there. So

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:12.560
<v Speaker 1>all of these things, I think, to your point, are

0:29:12.600 --> 0:29:15.840
<v Speaker 1>there there. They feel almost like totally inevitable, you know,

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>with the exception of if there's if there's a regulatory

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>barrier put up that that that eliminates them. But they're

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>not the same. They're not what bitcoin is trying to do.

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's fine, you know they're they're not what bitcoin

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do, but they kind of they I

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>think they all work together. So I believe in a

0:29:32.760 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin becoming a store of value, becoming an exchange,

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>moving on to becoming a unit of account um. And

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you asked kind of earlier like what are

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they all pegg too? And I think we have to.

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I think in a hundred years,

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 1>history books will be written about this period that we're

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.960
<v Speaker 1>living in right now and it will be this transitional period,

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and people go, what the heck were they thinking? Like

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they had this free floating value. There was no peg, right,

0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>there was no unit of measurement, standard unit of measurement.

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>So uh, like, you know, we have an inch, we

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.760
<v Speaker 1>have a degree of fahrenheit, right, we have a meter

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a weight, but we don't have a standard unit of

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>measure for value. And I think we'll have to get

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>back to that, and I think bitcoin sits there eventually. Yeah,

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and that's that that is the central the

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>set of folks who are in Congress in the Senate

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>who have played out the endgame scenario of these things.

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:25.080
<v Speaker 1>That's their fears that that's becomes bitcoin instead of the

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>US dollar, although actually they're much more scared that it's

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 1>libra um, that that it becomes libra not the U.

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>S dollar. Um. It's been interesting to watch just how

0:30:34.560 --> 0:30:38.480
<v Speaker 1>much the size and scope of the power, the size

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and scope of the audience that Facebook has is the difference.

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it was really fascinating to watch a couple of

0:30:45.560 --> 0:30:48.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks ago when uh so even before when I'm uh

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>fed shared er on Powell was testifying, not about Libra

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>or anything specifically, but he was asked about it. He

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>was asked about bitcoin, and he said, you know, did

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>someone asked him? I think it was Brad Sherman, who's

0:30:59.480 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the Farnia congressman who has been kind of the most

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>antagonistic Um. Yeah, he uh, I think he was the

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>one who asked Chairman Powell, you know, could you see

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a world in which bitcoin replaced the US dollar? What

0:31:11.560 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>would that mean? And he basically said, you can conceive

0:31:14.800 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of theoretically scenarios in which uh, there are multi you know,

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>multiple currencies, and we've seen that before. However, you know,

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in his estimation, that's not really how people were thinking

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>about it. They were thinking about it more as a

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>digital store values of digital gold, um and uh. And

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and interestingly, it seems to have been the case that

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>those folks really picked up on that and they kind

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>of went within They're like, okay, at least from now,

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and this could change in a minute. Like the thing

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>that we have to be worried about with bitcoin isn't

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that it replaces our financial system. It's it's easy as

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it relates to terrorism and and uh, you know, money

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 1>laundering and things like that. But with this Libra thing, Uh,

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Libra is a different story because you know, there's no

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>founder even of of bitcoin, there's no there's no committee

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that looks like a central reserve. Libra is a different story.

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Libra has uh an antagonist, It has an arch villain

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>that we already know that we already don't like that

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we already do on trust and and it also has

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>two billion people. It has a built in biggest country

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in the world, you know, by a lot of people. Um,

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that's much more scary. So you know, Libra is basically

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to say that it's it's also not aspiring to

0:32:21.920 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 1>to be kind of a you know, a global reserve currency,

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and people are like bs, like, you can't not when

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you're so big. They've put themselves into a very difficult

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>situation because uh, he says uh. They say, well, how

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 1>do we know you're not gonna still use information? Oh well,

0:32:39.920 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we're decentralized, but how are you going to comply with

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>us laws? Oh well, we're gonna control all that, Like,

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:49.200
<v Speaker 1>so we're controlled enough to you know, we we're we're

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:50.959
<v Speaker 1>centralized enough to give you all the control you one,

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>but we're decentralized enough to you don't have to worry

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:54.600
<v Speaker 1>about us, and like they're caught in between this two

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the two uh, these two places that are difficult. But

0:32:57.080 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to jump back into the narrative for a minute,

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and let's talk about the government narrative. Right, So, as

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>you just mentioned, you said that really the narrative they're

0:33:06.680 --> 0:33:12.120
<v Speaker 1>pushing is this terrorism, drug dealing, illicit activities, um, and

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:16.200
<v Speaker 1>so maybe it's a narrative warfare maybe almost right. So

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is like, hey, and Brad Sherman actually a year

0:33:20.040 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>ago kind of got this right where he's like, hey,

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>people see this as a way to undermine the US

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>dollar and take away the power. And so I guess

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the two narratives are, yes, bitcoin is a way to

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>hedge against the US dollar. But the government is saying

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we understand that Trump says that the US dollar stronger

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 1>has ever been talking out of the side of his mouth.

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:47.000
<v Speaker 1>But the narrative they're pushing the warfare is terrorism drugs right, yeah,

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean mean warfare is the substance of politics, right,

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>that is what uh politicians do. It's can you have

0:33:56.240 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the catchiest way to to to tear something to reduce

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:03.920
<v Speaker 1>something into a thing that you either want or you

0:34:03.960 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want, right. I mean, Reagan's welfare queens was like

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:12.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the most powerful destructive political memes of all time.

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>And you can go through every like it's totally regardless

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 1>of administration and political party. Um, memes are I mean,

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that's what That's what the whole thing is because digging

0:34:21.760 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>into substances so hard, nuances so hard, and memes are

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>kind of best when they reduce nuance. And uh, and

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>right now there's definitely a political battle. I mean in

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>some ways, Facebook is kind of almost providing this body

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.759
<v Speaker 1>shield for the rest of the crypto industry in some ways,

0:34:38.800 --> 0:34:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, it could quickly turn and all of a sudden,

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:43.759
<v Speaker 1>all the fire that's Levit did it gets Levit did everything, uh,

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:47.000
<v Speaker 1>level that everything else. Um, So it's not necessarily a

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>good thing, but yeah, it's it's total meme warfare. And

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got you've got the the there's kind of a

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the antagonistic memes right now are um, you know, it's

0:34:56.239 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 1>it's criminal money. Uh. The antagonistic memes are it's trying

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to dethrone the U. S. Dollar that they haven't figured

0:35:04.080 --> 0:35:06.040
<v Speaker 1>out a way to say that that sounds credible and

0:35:06.080 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>that well, they also can't they can't even tell each

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:12.960
<v Speaker 1>other that. Like you can see, like Brad Sherman's there,

0:35:12.960 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>a couple others are there. It's almost inconceivable too. I

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>think most of these elected officials that there could be

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a world in which a thing created by an anonymous founder,

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>run by a network of volunteers, you know, that doesn't

0:35:30.280 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>have any formal company structure could actually provide a global threat.

0:35:34.360 --> 0:35:36.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, they just don't buy it. That's why that's

0:35:36.680 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>why they kind of threat to the US dollar meme

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>has shifted over to Facebook and too, liber so aggressively

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 1>because they can maybe imagine that more. They can imagine that,

0:35:46.719 --> 0:35:50.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if if there's a run on currency,

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, in this basket of currencies, that it sucks

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars you know, out of the US dollar system. So um, yeah,

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's fascinating. So like how we fight back. The

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>community fights back against those two memes. So for example,

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the narrative they're pushing, the meme they're pushing is that

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 1>it's it's finances terrorism or it's for drugs drug dealers, right,

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's like, well, I think as you start to

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:20.359
<v Speaker 1>find out about free money, maybe you start leaning more

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 1>towards uh libertarian type views and maybe you go, well,

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>why does anybody tell me what I can and can't

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.800
<v Speaker 1>put it in my body? Why are drugs even illegal?

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Why don't we just end the violence overnight, make them legal,

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.200
<v Speaker 1>spend a fraction of the money in in education and

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>training and rehab, and call it a day, right, Like

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this war on drugs doesn't work a trillion dollars down

0:36:43.160 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the tubes, and so maybe that narrative just bees destroyed overnight,

0:36:46.400 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 1>like who care? Why are why are drugs? Wire drug

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>dealers even a problem? And then the next narrative terrorism

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:55.839
<v Speaker 1>will terrorism? I mean, who's the US supplies terrorism? US

0:36:55.880 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>supplies the weapons, the US shift pallets of money in

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the night to I ran, US bombs

0:37:01.800 --> 0:37:04.279
<v Speaker 1>every day. That causes people to want to come bomb US,

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and they could just in terrorism if they wanted. So

0:37:06.400 --> 0:37:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the two narratives are pushing are really caused by the US,

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:11.680
<v Speaker 1>not the people, and those should just those shouldn't even

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 1>be conversations. Yeah, I mean, unfortunately, I think those that's

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of a non a nuanced, non nuanced type of

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.319
<v Speaker 1>meme that like I would love, man, if we could

0:37:21.320 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>go to those conversations and have those I would I

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>would happily put like my little bitcoin hat on the

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>shelf just for a second so we could have those conversations.

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's the that's the battle line almost right, that's

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>the that's the US fighting back. The bitcoiners are saying, hey,

0:37:34.880 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to sound money, but the US is saying,

0:37:37.040 --> 0:37:39.839
<v Speaker 1>will it's drugs and terrorism. So like that's kind of

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 1>the battle line. I think that there's there's a I mean,

0:37:43.840 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>it can be if you choose to fight that. I

0:37:45.800 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>think that when it comes to those two particular issues,

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they're good answers. Uh, they're good answers within the existing

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:56.239
<v Speaker 1>UM political framework, right, Like even if those are you know,

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:58.640
<v Speaker 1>we would aspire to have those things changed, which I'm

0:37:58.719 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm all for UM. You still have you know, one,

0:38:02.360 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 1>people don't really understand that bitcoin is anonymous but not private, right,

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 1>so you have that at least until you know, coin

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>joints and things become totally normalized, we have a window

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:13.879
<v Speaker 1>at least where people, once they learned, they're like, oh,

0:38:13.920 --> 0:38:17.319
<v Speaker 1>actually that this is you know, law enforcement who sophisticated

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:19.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily act to view this as a as a

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>total negative. There's you know, it's more trackable in some

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:25.719
<v Speaker 1>ways than cashed um too. You have uh, you know,

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:29.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto companies are and bitcoin companies are already regulated, right

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:31.359
<v Speaker 1>you have k y C and a m L and

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:34.359
<v Speaker 1>all the exchanges who choose to participate in in the US. Like,

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>so it's interesting right there. I think that they're one

0:38:36.560 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of the narratives right now. Are One of the things

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that I'm watching is kind of the d Americanization of crypto.

0:38:40.600 --> 0:38:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Is companies like Circle move their operations from you know,

0:38:43.680 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Boston to Bermuda um and Finance, you know, pulls out

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 1>or kind of blocks people. Geo blocks users starting in

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:53.600
<v Speaker 1>September to give a much more kind of newtered version um.

0:38:53.640 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 1>The interesting thing is, yeah, the interesting thing is that,

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>uh a lot of those exchanges, at least the ones

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>that are based in the US, kind of made of lee.

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Their issue isn't compliance with m L and k y C.

0:39:04.520 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>They just kind of know that that's the law of

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the land and you're not getting around that. Maybe there

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:09.200
<v Speaker 1>was a period where could do that, but if you

0:39:09.239 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>want to do that, you're going somewhere else or you're

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>doing a decentralized exchange or something you're looking at a

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally different model. The reason that circle pulled out of

0:39:16.800 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of you know, of the US, or at least mostly

0:39:19.520 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>had more to do with the fact that they don't

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>know if the I R S, the c f TC

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 1>or you know, UH, the SEC is going to come

0:39:25.440 --> 0:39:27.720
<v Speaker 1>after them on the basis of what a crypto acid

0:39:27.800 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is because it's not determined, right, you have different definitions

0:39:30.200 --> 0:39:33.800
<v Speaker 1>by every different group. So I think that the terrorists

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>and money financing narrative is it's almost lazy on the

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>part of governments. It's the easiest to kind of get

0:39:39.719 --> 0:39:41.799
<v Speaker 1>rid of UM. I will say that I think that

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that just being like but also maybe the most powerful

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's fear. It's fearmongering, right, so people are wanting

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to give up freedom for safety. Yeah, I think I

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:53.359
<v Speaker 1>just maybe this is being overly optimistic, But I just

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.399
<v Speaker 1>don't think that that's I don't think that's the really

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing that they can hang their hat on. I mean,

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:01.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe like the thing that's the most scary about it.

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>And UH is the the extent to which UM, the

0:40:05.719 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>extent to which elected officials are willing to talk about

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:14.920
<v Speaker 1>UH talk about the possibility of things like major terrorist attacks,

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>UM in in the context of giving them permission to

0:40:19.520 --> 0:40:22.040
<v Speaker 1>do things like band bitcoin or do things like uh

0:40:22.080 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>like force encryption. So it's a little bit different, but

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worth noting and something I'm paying attention to.

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.919
<v Speaker 1>So Attorney General William Barr has been talking a lot

0:40:31.080 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>recently about backdoor encryption basically and forcing applications like what's

0:40:35.560 --> 0:40:39.960
<v Speaker 1>app to have you know, law enforcement backdoors um instead

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of you know that basically destroys end to end encryption

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh. And he gave a whole speech about it.

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:47.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it was last week maybe at n y U.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>The whole thing is like thirty minutes on just this

0:40:49.800 --> 0:40:53.080
<v Speaker 1>topic and he basically the way that he concluded was

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, you know, we can have this

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:58.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation now, but as soon as uh, as soon as

0:40:58.480 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a terrorist attack that was land on WhatsApp, like

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:02.840
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna just do this anyways, and that's going to

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:04.960
<v Speaker 1>be our justification. You didn't say it in quite that

0:41:05.000 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 1>brazen terms, but basically, so you know it is uh

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the part that scares me. Could also be done

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:16.439
<v Speaker 1>word of mouth, and maybe we could ban that too, Yeah, Bannon, Yeah,

0:41:16.440 --> 0:41:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's been in communication channels hard. I mean, but this

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:22.720
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be this balance between security and privacy is

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>is the I think the biggest, most important kind of

0:41:26.360 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>like mega trend of the next I mean, it's gonna

0:41:29.280 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>society is going to be shaped by the push and

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.120
<v Speaker 1>pull between these forces, you know, over the next five

0:41:35.200 --> 0:41:38.480
<v Speaker 1>or ten years, for the next fifty years. But it's uh,

0:41:38.600 --> 0:41:40.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's it's been going on for hundreds

0:41:40.719 --> 0:41:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of years, right, So I think the quote is maybe

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:47.000
<v Speaker 1>not known in the origin. Ben Franklin or Thomas Jefferson

0:41:47.040 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 1>said that those willing to give up freedom for safety

0:41:49.680 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>deserve neither. So like it's been a couple hundred years

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that people have been willing to trade off their freedom

0:41:55.600 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>or their liberty for safety. Uh. Well, this is why,

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the the framers of the Constitution, the Bill

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of Rights, knew that this was a challenge. They knew

0:42:05.520 --> 0:42:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that the first thing to go in situations of tyranny

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:12.040
<v Speaker 1>was basically, your rights go out the window for under

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:15.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea of protection. That's why they enenthrined so many

0:42:15.000 --> 0:42:18.319
<v Speaker 1>of these rights, uh, you know, in in in the

0:42:18.360 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Bill and the Constitution, so I think, um, yeah,

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:24.359
<v Speaker 1>it's it's not new. What's new is obviously it's you know,

0:42:24.440 --> 0:42:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the the changes in technology are so different and create

0:42:28.800 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>such a different type of surveillance opportunity that it's kind

0:42:31.960 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 1>of a it's not just a shift in magnitude, it's

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:38.640
<v Speaker 1>a shifting kind of where the where the conversation is now. Yeah. Yeah,

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 1>in cryptocurrency or cryptography is our weapon to fight back

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:46.600
<v Speaker 1>against that tea, hopefully if it doesn't get taken out.

0:42:47.080 --> 0:42:49.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, so much good, so much good stuff. We

0:42:49.000 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>could keep going on and on and on, but I

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 1>know we're already past our time, so uh, we'll have

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to wrap it up at that point and maybe somewhere

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 1>down the down the road we'll get back on again.

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 1>But thanks so much for taking the time. Um. I

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>guess uh. I normally ask where people can follow you.

0:43:05.280 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>They should definitely be following you on Twitter. Uh what

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>should people be looking at if they want to keep

0:43:09.840 --> 0:43:12.160
<v Speaker 1>up with you? Yeah, that's Twitter is the best place

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:15.160
<v Speaker 1>at n LW. It links out to everything that you

0:43:15.160 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>could want to find. Um. To reiterate, I guess I

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.600
<v Speaker 1>do uh. A weekly newsletter that's kind of weekly newsletter

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 1>and direct to Twitter kind of newsletter long read Sunday

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of a curation of all the best essays

0:43:26.760 --> 0:43:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and threads I've seen. And then every day at three

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.800
<v Speaker 1>pm I'll do a live stream of three topics three minutes,

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:35.480
<v Speaker 1>just the conversation that I'm seeing that day. It turns

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:38.240
<v Speaker 1>into a podcast that gets distributed by email. But basically

0:43:38.239 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 1>if you go to Twitter at n LW you can

0:43:40.680 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>find all of this there. Yeah, good stuff. All right,

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for the conversation. We'll talk soon. Thanks Mark. Hey,

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 1>if you like this episode of the Market Disruptors Podcast,

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:54.160
<v Speaker 1>please help us take this to the top of the

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:57.120
<v Speaker 1>podcast charts. Just please do me a favor and rate,

0:43:57.160 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>review and subscribe. Taking fifteen seconds to just leave a

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:03.080
<v Speaker 1>quick review goes a long way in helping us reach

0:44:03.120 --> 0:44:06.640
<v Speaker 1>more people and disrupt more markets. I really appreciate you listening,

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'll see you next time on the Market Instructors Podcast.

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>M