WEBVTT - Ep. 105: Chairman Rob Bishop

0:00:06.000 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>This is the me eat your podcast coming at you shirtless,

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>severely bug bitten, in my case, underwear listening podcast. You

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>can't predict anything, all right, I'm gonna go so far

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>as to say we've got a very special guest in

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that he's arguably the most influential voice on public lands,

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:42.559
<v Speaker 1>wildlife management, and natural resources management in the country. I'm

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>talking about US Congressman Rob Bishop from Utah, who chairs

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the House Natural Resources Committee. Now, I usually go way

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>out of my way to not burden listeners with my

0:00:55.480 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>political views outside of those areas where politics sort of

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 1>intersect with the concerns of hunters and anglers and wildlife.

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Meaning I'm not going to go expound on my views

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>around capital punishment or legalized weed. But I have no

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>hesitation about giving my political input when it comes to

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>things like public lands, conservation funding, and attacks on science

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>based wildlife management. Over the life of the Mediator podcast,

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I've definitely stacked the deck in my own favor, so

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>to speak, by giving voice to a load of guests

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 1>who share my basic stance on these issues in that

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I support our federally managed public lands, I support robust

0:01:40.440 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>protections for game and fish, habitat and wilderness, and I

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>support state management of wildlife that allows for a sustainable

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>harvest of resources. And we've definitely taken some heat for that,

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>perhaps rightfully so by listeners who feel that I haven't

0:01:56.440 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>been entirely fair to other viewpoints. Well, we are taking

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>steps to fix that right now by sitting down for

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a conversation the Chairman Bishop. We have differing views on

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the issues that will be discussing today,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 1>but I'm excited to hear from him, and I'm thankful

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>that he's willing to take the time to sit down

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>and talk through a handful of issues that we all

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>feel are very important for us and more importantly, for

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:28.639
<v Speaker 1>future generations of Americans. One of the things I want

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to start out with is to discuss the Land and

0:02:31.919 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Water Conservation fund um and before doing that, I'd like

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>to open up to Chairman Bishop two, can you really

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>quickly lay out sort of the scope of the Natural

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Resources Committee and what your primary goals are within the committee. Well,

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that surprised me because when I

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:55.000
<v Speaker 1>first got to Congress, I was concerned about public lands.

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Utah is a public land state, but the scope of

0:02:58.600 --> 0:03:01.639
<v Speaker 1>what my committee does is so much broader than that.

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 1>It sometimes is almost it's daunting of what kinds of

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>things I cover with. So anything that deals with public lands, parks, forest,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.480
<v Speaker 1>all of those are in the scope of my committee.

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Anything that deals with energy development that is on public lands,

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 1>or anything that's energy development offshore is all under my jurisdiction.

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Anything that deals with water development or water water maintenance,

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>not just in the West, but actually anything that will

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>be done by b O R actually becomes under my jurisdiction.

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I have control of all the territories, which means, uh,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:39.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, all of a sudden, for someone

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>from northern Utah, Puerto Rico became extremely important to me.

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>So I get Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands and Guam

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and Marianna's and American Samoa. Those are now part of

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>my portfolio, which I'm grateful, especially in the winter because

0:03:54.360 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's when I should be visiting those places

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.320
<v Speaker 1>or on the others. And and anything native of American

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that's in that's in our portfolio. So it's a wide area.

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Anything that deals with fishing anywhere, commercial or recreational, it's

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>my portfolio. So how long have you served in the

0:04:11.240 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives far too long. Uh, this is my

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:19.640
<v Speaker 1>eighth term, right, yeah, so it will be sixteen years

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>next January. And in doing that, how long did you

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>serve before you became involved in the Natural Resources Committee?

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:28.279
<v Speaker 1>And how long how do you get to where you

0:04:28.320 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>achieve chairmanship of the committee on the House in Congress,

0:04:32.640 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 1>because it actually goes back earlier than that. I I

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>served here in Utah and the state legislature, and I

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>was there for sixteen years. Also, you came out of

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>education originally, right. I've always been a teacher, history teacher,

0:04:43.279 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>and in in Utah it's, uh, it's like forty five

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:48.040
<v Speaker 1>calendar day, so it's a part time legislature. So I

0:04:48.080 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was teaching all the way. I was going through that,

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and as a teacher, I was not necessarily as involved

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>in that. But at the end, especially when I was

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Speaker of the House here, I had a couple of

0:04:56.920 --> 0:04:58.760
<v Speaker 1>members who came up to me that that got me

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>involved in land issues where I thought, yeah, I mean,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:03.920
<v Speaker 1>some of these people are being screwed over and it's

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>not right. All of a sudden became deeply involved. So

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:11.440
<v Speaker 1>the my speakership, we established the Western States Coalition to

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Treme bring other Western states in to try and get

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the discussion on how the federal government deals

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:20.640
<v Speaker 1>with land issues um and that spurred my involvement in it.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>So when I went to Congress, I wanted to be

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>on resources from the very get go. Because the Utah

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.880
<v Speaker 1>se Utah's controlled by the federal government. You gotta be

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>on the public lands on the Resource Committee. That becomes essential.

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And except for the one term I was on the

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Rules Committee and they did not let me do both,

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I was I've always been on the Resource Committee. Now,

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>unlike the Senate, where chairmanships come up totally by seniority,

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 1>they have limits on the Republicans in the Senate limit

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>their chairman's of six years, but it's the next senior member.

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 1>The seniority plays a role, but it's not the only

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>role that's been played in it. So when I went

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>back into the Resources Committee to get a sub committee chairmanship,

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>they jumped me over a couple of people, and I

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>also jumped over a couple of people to become chairman

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of the committee. Is that because of having an expertise

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>or just because having a vested interest based on where

0:06:14.560 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you're coming from. I thought because I was so lovable.

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. It was the expertise. I had

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 1>almost been like groomed by the chairman before me. I

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of things in his in his place.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So I had served for what was it like six

0:06:33.200 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>terms on the committee before I became chairman. Um. I'd

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>served in a lot of different subcommittees. I knew the issues,

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:44.039
<v Speaker 1>probably as well as anyone who was on there, and

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and I had what leadership at the time thought was

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the temperament to be the chairman of that committee. If

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you're good with that, are you ready to dive into

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>land and water Conservation fund? I'd love to, OK, So

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>what I want to do I want to have I

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>want to give people a background on what it is,

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.719
<v Speaker 1>and then you get but then you get to you

0:07:05.760 --> 0:07:08.400
<v Speaker 1>get to add color to that. If you feel like

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm missing something important here, no, I'm glad you're doing that,

0:07:11.040 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>because most people have no clue of what land even

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>those that are involved in it don't know what landing

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Water Conservation Fund actually is. Yeah. So the Landing cut

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Water Conservation Fund is a fund that draws its revenues

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>from offshore oil and gas leases. Off Shore is defined

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.720
<v Speaker 1>like it's like a very specific mileage from shores, right

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>mm hm fifty or two nine miles nine Okay, I'm sorry.

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>States get to control nine miles out. Everything else is federal.

0:07:38.920 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>It's in majistic so like the Gulf of Mexico has

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of offshore a lot of offshore land. So

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>this fund provides matching grants to state and tribal governments

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for the acquisition and development of public parks and other

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:57.960
<v Speaker 1>outdoor recreation sites. Um I was surprised to hear when

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I first started looking into this that every county in

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the country has had a project funded under the Land

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 1>of Water Conservation Fund, things like boat launches, public access sites,

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and access for anglers and river users, and also oftentimes

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>purchasing easements to give public access to what would otherwise

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 1>be landlocked public lands. Now the thing used to be

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>funded for a long time, like I used to have

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like it had like a ten year twenty year funding cycles,

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but recent it's fallen into kind of stop gap measures

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and it is now set to the programs now set

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to expire at the end of September two thousand eighteen.

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And I know that like if you if you follow

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of the politics of hunting and fishing. You hear

0:08:48.600 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of noise about how we need to get

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>in there and renew the renew the fund, but there's

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>snags in the in the process, and it's not done

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to everyone's satisfaction. Can you kind of explain a little

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>bit about out what sort of shortfalls you recognize in

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the Land of Water Conservation Fund. That might kind of

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:09.920
<v Speaker 1>explain how something that seems so straightforward and just great

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>for everyone, how something like that does become problematic or

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>controversial or have limited support. Yeah. Um, And it goes

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>back to when this was originally developed, so that the

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>plan came back in in the mid sixties. The idea

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>was as you said, to allow well, actually it was

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Land of Water Conservation Fund was divided into two sections,

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>so in that time was supposed to go to local projects,

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 1>which is what you just said. So recreation areas, parks,

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>access and easements. We're all supposed to be funded by

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the six of the money that was appropriated, and that

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>would be determined by local interests. So people at the

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>local level would decide what kind of recreation they want.

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>They would go after grants, and it could even be

0:09:56.120 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 1>used for like community swimming pools. Right, Yeah, whatever the

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>locals wanted was supposed to go to the state of

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the federal government to buy in holdings in parks and

0:10:06.280 --> 0:10:10.079
<v Speaker 1>other areas, so things that were totally surrounded, there's they

0:10:10.080 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>could do that. It has morphed as that time went on,

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>so that instead of going to these funding programs that

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>most of the people who talked to me love and

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.079
<v Speaker 1>like and support, that was down to as little as

0:10:23.120 --> 0:10:26.240
<v Speaker 1>twelve and ten percent. The rest of it went to

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the federal government for buying in holdings, which I'm sorry,

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>over the years, the amount of money the federal government

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>has had, they could have bought every in holding like

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>four or five times if they really wanted to. So

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>instead that money that went to the federal side, that

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>has gone to basically buying up more land, and unfortunately

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>in not a nice way. So instead of the Department

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of Interior or the Fourth Service sitting down and saying, okay,

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 1>what kinds of areas would be beneficial to us. In

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the testimony our committee came came had we had former

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>employee is the Department of Material who came and simply

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>said what they do is sit around and say what

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>land is owned by a special interest group that we

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>want to reward by buying their stuff. So what has

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>happened on the federal side, not the state side, but

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the federal side, is that groups will go out there

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and they'll buy property from private owner, they'll sit on

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it for a short period of time, and then sell

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>it a nice profits of the federal government using land

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and water conservation funds and it has become a funding

0:11:28.480 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>mechanism for special interest groups to keep up their lobbying

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.680
<v Speaker 1>and their litigation efforts. So to me, the Land and

0:11:35.679 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Water Conservation Fund has has morphed into something it was

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>never supposed to be and never intended. And that's why

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I was literally surprised at the feedback that came when

0:11:45.760 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, maybe we should take that money and do

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>something useful with it actually helps people out. There are

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of groups that just came and glued and

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.400
<v Speaker 1>started spreading out what I think is misinformation because I

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>was attacking their funding source and I don't think federal

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>government should be a revenue source for special interest groups.

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what has become. So what what we

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>were trying to do, and normally programs are authorized for

0:12:11.120 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>seven years that's what I'm supposed to do with seven years.

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>The last reauthorization was done for three years, primarily so

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I could be around when it's going to be reauthorized again.

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>But what we try to do is say, okay, let's

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>put some parameters in here. Let's divide the money back

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:32.239
<v Speaker 1>up again fifty fifty, so still goes for the funding projects,

0:12:32.240 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 1>not the twelve eight percent last couple of years, and

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.320
<v Speaker 1>go to the federal governments for getting in holdings, but

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>some parameters on what those in holdings have to be,

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 1>like actually in holdings or an area that butts uh

0:12:47.520 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>federal land. Like I have a personal experience with this

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>with with some relatives I knew about a piece of property.

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Please i'd I'd love to hear it. Yeah, who will

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>be nameless because you know, I want to go to

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 1>family re unions again. They had a piece of property

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>which was not terribly productive, very steep. They sold it

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 1>to one of the special interest groups will be nameless

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for but can you give me a sense of like

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>what sort of special interest group? Well, like, like what

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>what an environmental group that that that practices conservation and protection.

0:13:25.040 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They sat on it for a few months and and

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>like they sold it for six figures. It's a relative

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and the first figure was not a one. They they

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>sold it and then they sat on it and then

0:13:35.640 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>gave it back to the UH. This was to forest

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>for service land for service to use London Water Conservation

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Fund and made a nice, healthy profit for themselves by

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:49.480
<v Speaker 1>doing it supposedly as mule deer habitat. The problem is

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>um there's no vegetation on the thing, and it was

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>surrounded on three sides by homes, so you know, the

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>community up there would have a fact. They did, like

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they came to me and say, can we get this

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>piece of property for for a city cemetery so we

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:08.840
<v Speaker 1>can finally use and make it useful. As it was

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sold as mule deer habitat, it was totally useless. There

0:14:12.600 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>was no vegetation. Mule deer didn't go there. It was

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>just land that was controlled by the Fourth Service. Ultimately,

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we finally did legislation, although it took how a long time,

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>like six years to finally get it through, just to

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>transfer this acreage back to the city so it could

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:31.840
<v Speaker 1>be put into useful production. Now, that's that's the kind

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>of that's the invitation I had to finding out about

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>how Land and Water Conservation Fund works on the federal side,

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but please realize on the state side, I'm off four it.

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great idea. It was originally authorized

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>to be up to nine hundred million dollars can be

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>spent on that. It has never been funded more than

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>four fifty million dollars. Usually it's around three hundred million dollars.

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>And put that in some kind of perspective, Um, like

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the Robertson Pittman Fund Pittman Robertson Fund that generates a

0:15:04.480 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars a year from Sportsman's Land and Water Conservation

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Fund is three million, and if we are justifiably as

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it was originally intended to be, half of that would

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>go to to recreation opportunities that were that were desired

0:15:21.720 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>by local people. So what I simply said, Okay, let's

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>keep the half. Um people can't use imminent domain on

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>these on these properties, which I think is fair. Keep

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the half for them, and that includes the easements that

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>you talked about. Is probably the most popular element of

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that I can imagine, because I mean, like yeah, I

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>mean I think the Eastman's are hugely important to people

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>who are coming from the perspective that I hear from

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the most of people who are trying to who have

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a goal to increase access opportunities on public lands. They're

0:15:53.680 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>extremely important for those who do want access. They're also

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:00.200
<v Speaker 1>extremely important opportunities for especially those in rural rural areas.

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>They want to maintain agriculture while they're around, so they

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 1>grant the easements, they can maintain their property, but it's

0:16:07.000 --> 0:16:10.600
<v Speaker 1>still will be there for agricultural purposes, and they have,

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's also some of those easement takes place

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:19.560
<v Speaker 1>in urban areas to like on the Baltimore the highway

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:22.080
<v Speaker 1>between Baltimore and Washington is actually owned by the Park

0:16:22.160 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Service and they have easements on it, and they're part

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of this LWCF funding for those easements. So with that

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>no domain. But then take the other half that goes

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to federal government and say, let's make sure that we

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.040
<v Speaker 1>can do something useful with that money. The federal side

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of the money. The federal half, for example, we have

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a seventeen billion dollar backlog in the Park Service. Let's

0:16:46.000 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 1>put some of that money into actually solving our our

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>park service. Fish and Wildlife and BLM also have double

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>digits in the millions of dollars in back billions dollars

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, in backlog in their areas. Put them money

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in there. We do payment in lieu of tax is

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:04.199
<v Speaker 1>to states so that they can actually provide services on

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>the county level where there is massive amount of federal

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>land that has always been We're doing better than when

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I first came here, but that's around four million years.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Put some to boost up that. At the same time,

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's take the federal side of the money and not

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 1>just spend it to reward special interest groups, but put

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it on programs that actually help people. That's what I'm

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. But but it would steer money away

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>from acquisition. Uh yeah, but I'm telling you that acquisition

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I think has pretty well been steered away already. So

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>but I want to move on to other stuff. I

0:17:39.600 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>just want to make sure I understand something. When it

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.480
<v Speaker 1>originally came out, was it not where the percentage is

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>not codified by law. It was just sort of loose understanding.

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Originally it was sixty and then they how did it drift?

0:17:50.119 --> 0:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>They removed its Congress later on about eight nine years

0:17:54.920 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>after that, simply removed it so that the understanding was

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.680
<v Speaker 1>they would continue on with that six S forty split,

0:18:00.720 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 1>but they wanted to give some flexibility to both sides.

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>The flexibility was basically the stuff that actually gives and

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:10.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry the flexibility was actually moved over to the

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:13.920
<v Speaker 1>federal side from the local. But also when you say

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>the local access, especially to some of your listeners, that

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>comes through the state side, the local funding, not through

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the federal acquisition of the land, does not mean there's

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be access for any kind of recreation

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:31.280
<v Speaker 1>that takes place. It's simply acquisition acquisition of land. Um.

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you really want to have have any process

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that actually helps with the access for sportsman's that usually

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to the state side funding of that program, which

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to maintain. Actually, I want to maintain the

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 1>entire program if you could, if you could actually put

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the boundaries that I want so that I know the

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>money is going to solve problem problem problems, I would

0:18:53.560 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>really like to go on lobby to make sure that

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>we could spend all nine million of it. In fact,

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 1>some of the things we said is the money, as

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>you said, comes from offshore energy development. That's the money

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that keeps going in there. We have an aging workforce.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the workforce that works on offshore is really

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>becoming uh, they're all reaching retirement age. We don't do

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>anything to try and train people to go into those good,

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>high paying jobs. Most as as Americans are retiring on

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.639
<v Speaker 1>those off shore projects, most of them are being replaced

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>by people from South American, a lot of Brazilians that

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.400
<v Speaker 1>are coming up for them. So I said, why don't

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you take some of that money and put it into

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>into colleges, get programs to try and train environmental and

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:45.920
<v Speaker 1>um and uh petroleum not petroleum engineers. There's there's a name,

0:19:45.960 --> 0:19:48.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a word. Don't ever become my age. I'm sorry.

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Names and nouns go first. And this is this is

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>the time it happened. Do some of that get make

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:56.919
<v Speaker 1>the money useful. But you mean, so by that, are

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:02.399
<v Speaker 1>you suggesting that by training oil profess artionals and engineers, geologists, whatever,

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that you would be facilitating more extraction, which would be

0:20:07.280 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>allowing more money to feed in or just like just

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:14.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like finding a whole new purpose for the funds. No,

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean no, the fund could actually if you're trying

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to solve problems on the federal side, you could solve

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:23.720
<v Speaker 1>more of those problems. But the idea is this is

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the ghost is laying the golden egg,

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So feed it, make sure it says vibrant so it

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>can actually put money into that. That's one of the

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.440
<v Speaker 1>things that think he has emphasized as he's been Secretary

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of Interior that there used to be a whole lot

0:20:35.960 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of revenue that was coming in from from extraction industries

0:20:40.320 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>that funded programs within the Interior Department that over the

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:48.639
<v Speaker 1>last ten years has dissipated to almost almost virtually nothing.

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Put it back in there. Make sure that you can

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>do a whole lot of money with the royalties that

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>are coming off those programs. So it's it's the extraction

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>industry is going to exist regardless, it's just will Americans

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>be part of it. Will they actually have good paying

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 1>jobs out of it, or will they all go to

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.240
<v Speaker 1>foreign workers coming in there? And can we actually boost

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the long long activity so we can get more money

0:21:10.160 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>to actually do better things for people. It is a

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>funny thing that that I find, like when you when

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 1>you sort of sniff out your internal like self hypocrisies,

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>uh personally would be like if you do if you

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>look at you want to vibrant, well funded land and

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>water conservation fund because you like the things that it

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>delivers to and in my case, like the deliverers of

0:21:34.520 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>people that I think of as being like me, hunters

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.479
<v Speaker 1>and anglers who use boat launches and exers. Sites like

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that I want, right, But then I look and I'll

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes have a little bit of a suspicion or a

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:49.199
<v Speaker 1>leeriness about offshore oil operations, and you do find in

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>there there's there's a tension between those two ideas because

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.159
<v Speaker 1>that's where that money comes from. Yeah, they've funded your

0:21:55.160 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>boat ramp, so why Yeah, you know, I recognize that

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it wants up being a company, It wants up being

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a world that's like a bit more complicated than you'd

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>like it to be, and and some of the things.

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, it depends on where your listeners are living.

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Especially out here in the West, there is so much land,

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>there's so much space that their idea that there has

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a competition between preservation, access and development, preservation,

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>recreation and development. That's a phony concept. There is plenty

0:22:28.840 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>of area to do all three of those. There can

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.119
<v Speaker 1>be development, there also can be a whole lot of

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>recreation and there can be conservation at the same time.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>What what I would rather like to do is make

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>sure that we have a wiser way of how we're

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.080
<v Speaker 1>defining where those lands are, so that people know where

0:22:44.080 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>they can so businesses know where they can actually develop,

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and people know where they can recreate and what will

0:22:49.960 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>be set aside strictly for conservation and protection UM, which

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.320
<v Speaker 1>which usually excludes people who want to recreate. When you

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>have those kinds of lands, there there's enough for all

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. The same thing out in the ocean, there's

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of times for fishing rights as well as

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the economic development that can take place. There's lots of

0:23:09.040 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>various That's a that's a good moment there to jump into.

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 1>The next subject I'd like to talk about with you,

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and this one has been a real hotbed issue, is

0:23:19.280 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>to get into monuments. You probably take a talking about monuments,

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>or maybe maybe you love talking about monuments UM. Either way,

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna ask a bunch of questions about him. And

0:23:30.400 --> 0:23:32.920
<v Speaker 1>again I want to jump in and give a little background,

0:23:33.920 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and you can color that background if you feel like

0:23:36.040 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>missing something. So when we talk about a monument designation,

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not in educating Chairman Bishop about this. I'm educating

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:46.440
<v Speaker 1>you the listener. We talk about a monument designation. This

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the Antiquities Act, which was signed in

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the law by President Theodore Roosevelt, and famously his first

0:23:53.920 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>monument designation was Devil's Tower, which had you know, tremendous

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>cultural archaeological significance. And there it was especially for Spielberg

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 1>especially yeah, because uh, close encounters, Close Encounters ends the

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Devil's Tower. I've been there, um, did not see any spaceships,

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but it is it is a beautiful site. And initially

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the Antiquities Act was used for things like I mentioned earlier, battlefields, um,

0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 1>places of archaeological significance, cultural significance, and over time people

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>started to rethink, reimagine um. People might use less flattering,

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>less flowery terms for this transition, but to think on

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>more landscape scale issues. And we had in in you know,

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 1>the last handful of administrations, we've had some big landscape

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>scale monument designations. And these are things that a president

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>can just declare through proclamation and create a monument, not

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>without action. Now, the reason it's became very newsworthy recently

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>is President Obama and towards the very end of his

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>term and gone in and done a couple of large

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>monument designations in Utah, including the Bearsier's National Monument. About

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a year later, President Trump came in into a proclamation

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that eliminated the majority of the Bearsier's National Monument, so

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.440
<v Speaker 1>put it back to where it was before it had

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>become a monument, just sort of set back the clock

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 1>on the majority of that land, and also simultaneously cut

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the Grand Staircase Escalante National Monument in about half. So

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>moving the land designations back to where they began. I

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 1>think that they want of being like a lot of

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 1>confusion where you heard people say that, um, your land

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>had been stolen or various things like that, but it

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>just land management decisions or landman designations were just set

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>back to where they had been earlier. The reason that

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>shook everybody up really bad is that doesn't happen. So

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>President Kennedy made like a minor change to Bandalier Monument

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in New Mexico. But in the modern era, no president

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 1>had acted to go in and reduce a national monument

0:26:18.640 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 1>through executive action, even though people create monuments through executive action.

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.479
<v Speaker 1>Am I cool? So far from your perspective? Is this

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Am I saying stuff that's making you cringe as I

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.760
<v Speaker 1>say this? Well, yeah, but you're okay, go ahead, Oh okay, No,

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into the parts just before we

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>get into the next part. I want to Yeah, I

0:26:38.560 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>want to hear like like, um, like I'm a history teacher. Okay,

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 1>so there's a there's an element of history that's attached

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to it, like I know, I would love to I

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>would love to hear your perspective and this and if

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm and if I'm trying to do the most like

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to do the most even keeled walks through

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 1>of the monuments, you're doing very well at that, by

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the way. Okay, um, because I'm gonna get to the question.

0:26:57.400 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna get to the question now and then

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and and then you can go in and wait wait,

0:27:01.960 --> 0:27:04.399
<v Speaker 1>let's go back through the history first. So okay, it

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:08.960
<v Speaker 1>did start nineteen o six, and it was that perfectly,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and it was to protect the reason it was called antiquities.

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It was to protect antiquities, specifically Indian ruins and Indian sites.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:21.280
<v Speaker 1>So it had to be a specific thing and it

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>had to be a specific man made structure that was

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>supposedly there. So that's why a lot of people get

0:27:28.520 --> 0:27:31.399
<v Speaker 1>upset with landscapes, especially when you're doing it on water,

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 1>because I'm sorry, a fish is not an antiquity. So

0:27:34.680 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>if that's what you're trying to preserve, you're expanding what

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the Antiquities Act was supposed to be. So the Antiquities

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Act was put in there, and the debate on the

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Antiquities Act was whether it would be basically a half

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>a square mile or a square mile, and then someone said, well,

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe you want to have more than actually six

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>forty I think is a square mile. Maybe you want

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>to get like the eight hundred and they said, okay,

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred acres. So let's not put a specific language

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in there, will say smallest footprint possible. But that which

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is still a slippery term. Yes it is. That's the

0:28:10.800 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>problem because it still means it's still a legal requirement

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>has to be the smallest footprint possible. But acres is

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different than the one point three million

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:25.680
<v Speaker 1>acres of bears ears, just just slightly. But it also

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:28.840
<v Speaker 1>had to be about something specific. That's why this idea

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of landscapes was not in what the original presence did

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>Most presidents have done it, but they also did it

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>very very very discreetly. Most presidents have done a monument designation,

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>but but for the bulk of them, the average was

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>five thousand acres or less for every monument monument that

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:48.200
<v Speaker 1>they did, so you did not get. And eleven of

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>them did reduce the size of monuments, so there is

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 1>precedent in doing that too. I think the last one

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>was not Kenny. I thought the last one was Eisenhower,

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 1>but I may be wrong on that. Who actually reduced

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the size of Well, the bandalier was like an adjustment

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of border. Did it well? And if it reduced it,

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>then there has been some reductions too, And and in fact,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>technically that's what Prump did. He adjusted the boundary. Yeah,

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>so the issue was and and many presidents didn't do

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it at all. So from Reagan and Bush one and

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Ford nothing they never they didn't do anything, didn't designate

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>anything at all. The change came with basically for the

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>last five presidents, maybe four the last six. Jimmy Carter

0:29:35.320 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>was the first one, went up to Alaska, and I

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>saw him once to an interview where he said, I

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.240
<v Speaker 1>know the people in Alaska didn't like what I was doing,

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>but I had the power to do it, so I

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>did it anyway. He used antiquities and took half the

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>state and then smiled about it in the way only

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>he can do. Yeah, I mean, but but he had

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of work done in Alaska at

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that time. I mean, if you factor in like the

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>Native Claim settlement, I mean, there's a tremendous amount of

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>st happening there, but that a lot of the deferred

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>decisions that were being Yeah, but that was all done

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.400
<v Speaker 1>legally by legislation. Ultimately, not what he did on the

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Antiquities Act. Then Clinton did at big time didn't happen

0:30:12.960 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>again until Clinton. Clinton did it just in his reelect.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.760
<v Speaker 1>And that was the Grand Staircase Escalanti, which is the

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>first time you had a president who, in the internal

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:25.760
<v Speaker 1>memos that they were sending back and forth, clearly realized

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that they did not have tradition on their side in

0:30:29.720 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>what they were about to do, and they couldn't claim

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>that there really was an antiquity that needed to be preserved.

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>They also had to realize that they could not have

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>any input whatsoever by the law. Is if if Clinton

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:47.479
<v Speaker 1>had asked the Interior Department to give him recommendations about stuff.

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:50.840
<v Speaker 1>It would have triggered NEPU, which would require open public

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>meetings and a very long process. So what it had

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to be as a gotcha moment, the president had to

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.719
<v Speaker 1>announce something without any kind of input whatsoever. It had

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to coming from him or you, or you trigger NIPA,

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and the Antiquities Act is not allowed as as an

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.920
<v Speaker 1>access point for them. And then Clinton did the first

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>win in Utah, and then he did about eighteen of

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.600
<v Speaker 1>them somewhere in that area, just as he was in

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>his last two years of presidency. Bush only did a couple.

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>He did six total, but the one was was on

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:23.959
<v Speaker 1>for water and that one was a whopper two that

0:31:24.040 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>was huge. And then Obama came in there and once

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>again in his last term, as he was going out

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of the office, then he went he went bananas with them.

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 1>All he did twenty three or twenty two or twenty

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>three total monument designations, including Bears Ears, which we were

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to do with some other process. So that's why

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>what has happened with Antiquities Act is it's not being

0:31:46.520 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>used as it was intended to be used. That's why

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I always say it's an abuse of the Antiquities Act,

0:31:51.920 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 1>not a use of the Antiquities Act, because it's not

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>about a specific antiquity. It's not the smallest footprint possible,

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>and you can't claim that there is an impending damage

0:32:01.560 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that was taking place. And that's the other reason why

0:32:03.600 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>they gave the power to Roosevelt. If there was something

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that's about to be destroyed, let the president make a

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>quick declaration. And then the idea was always Congress would

0:32:11.360 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>go back then and codify it, which they make a

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>big deal about, like Zions, Grand Canyon. All those were

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>antiquities designations originally. Then Congress though, went back in there

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and made them into parks and expanded all of them too.

0:32:25.080 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>That was how it was supposed to have been done.

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:30.720
<v Speaker 1>It has not been done in either the Clinton lesser

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to extent with George W and especially the Obama years.

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's the history of it, and that's that kind

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>of is your unease with it is that it's sort

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of drifted off purpose. But but it it also specifically

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>does not allow for any kind of public input. If

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you do that, it triggers NIPA, So that has to

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>be a gotcha moment has to be something that surprises everyone.

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>And that's what most of the people in these areas

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>who live around those their complaining about, Like you, you

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:02.040
<v Speaker 1>just did this to me and I didn't have a

0:33:02.120 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>chance to say anything about it. Now they often say, well,

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>we did have that process. But to be honest, if

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a real process where you're talking about maps

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>and talking so salad, you can go down to the

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Bearrisier's area and say I'm going to have a meeting,

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>come and tell me what you think about this entire

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>area very general. But if you had a map of

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>specifics and say is this where the line should be,

0:33:24.320 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that triggers an NEPA process. You can't do that. That

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>has got to be a gotcha moment. There needs to

0:33:30.680 --> 0:33:32.520
<v Speaker 1>be reform of the ACT. I don't want to do

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>away with antiquities Act per se. I want to put

0:33:35.440 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>some sidebars on there. So once again, it insists that

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:42.440
<v Speaker 1>there is some kind of of public input and it

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:44.760
<v Speaker 1>allows the people who live in those areas to have

0:33:44.920 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>some kind of real say in how it is developed

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and what is going to be developed in those areas.

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>And and there's also you know, one of these other

0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:55.600
<v Speaker 1>things I'm getting off topics. I haven't even allowed to

0:33:55.640 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 1>ask the question yet. I apologized for that. No, no,

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you're but you already you already entered it on the question.

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But um, oftentimes these are said, as we're making these

0:34:03.040 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 1>monuments to protect these areas, it has to be federal

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>land in the first place. So in Bears Ears it

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>was all federal land. It had the same federal protections

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 1>on all these lands. When you made it a monument,

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you didn't add any other protection except that you allowed

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>a land manager to go in there and make decisions

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:26.640
<v Speaker 1>on how this area that's now protected would be used. Oftentimes,

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's the problem we've had in other monuments that

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:33.240
<v Speaker 1>were created. Oftentimes that protection is to deny access to people,

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>and so motive access, no any kind of access you

0:34:39.239 --> 0:34:42.880
<v Speaker 1>can and and what the proclamation says doesn't even have

0:34:43.320 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to be obeyed to be honest with you, So when

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Clinton had Grand Staircases said there would be no reduction

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>in grazing, there's a total reduction graze, reduction in grazing,

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>even though that's what the proclamation said. But how the

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 1>land managers then decide to impute that language is the problem.

0:34:59.040 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's one of the problems I had that, especially

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>why when we were trying to deal with lands in

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 1>in eastern Utah as well as this area. I tried

0:35:07.480 --> 0:35:12.080
<v Speaker 1>to codify specifically what those access rights would be and

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 1>put them in there. That says, you know, if if

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the if the land manager decides that something needs to

0:35:17.200 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>be closed, they have to provide an alternative opportunity in

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:24.480
<v Speaker 1>something that is of equal value. So you can't take

0:35:24.480 --> 0:35:27.240
<v Speaker 1>away the access or opportunity rights. And that doesn't happen

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:30.640
<v Speaker 1>any of these designations. If the land is just federal

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>BLM land, the default is always open access. Anyone go

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in there, you can, you can recreate to your heart's content.

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>It's when you start designating titles to it, like monuments.

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>That's when you actually authorize the land manager to come

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in there and put specific restrictions, and that happens. That's

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>the one thing I don't that's another I'm rambling. I

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>used to teach speech. I'll get a complete sentence out

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>here eventually. That's one thing I want to do in

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>my committee is actually codify all this stuff, so you

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>put into law what will be accessible and how it

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>will be accessible. So, for example, in Bear's Ears, the

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>natives Native Americans who abut that area are basically the

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.280
<v Speaker 1>white maca Utes and the Novajos. They go in there

0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>for um, for gathering a firewood. It's a ceremonial purpose,

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:22.160
<v Speaker 1>as well as some of them sell it for just

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>substance substance purposes. They go in there by truck. That's

0:36:27.040 --> 0:36:30.959
<v Speaker 1>what they want to do. The proclamation, Obama, you said

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>nothing about it, he said you. Actually, it didn't restrict anything.

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:36.320
<v Speaker 1>It didn't say anything about it. But it allows the

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:38.440
<v Speaker 1>land manager to go in there later on and say

0:36:38.840 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you should have a truck going into

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:45.440
<v Speaker 1>my monument, and he could then stop that process. So

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to do in our legislation is saying now

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>these activities will always be legal, and they will be

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:54.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed by the land manager, including going in there with

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 1>a truck to get the firewood going in there. Verb

0:36:57.520 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you have to do that because if you don't spec

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>scifically state that access and opportunity rights, some land manager

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 1>eventually down there will say we'll make will make an

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>arbitrary decision that actually cuts off that kind of access. Okay,

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that's that's what bothers me. All right, you brought up

0:37:13.160 --> 0:37:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a ton of things that I need to a little

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>bit back up because I want to hit on a

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>couple of points. We haven't yet drawn a distinction between

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>when you declare a monument who administers the monument, because

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.400
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of confusion I think where people feel

0:37:26.440 --> 0:37:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that the bears ears. In Grand Staircase monuments, there was

0:37:30.280 --> 0:37:33.440
<v Speaker 1>some sort of restriction on hunting, for instance, But generally

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the monuments that are ministered by the BLM and monuments

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:40.239
<v Speaker 1>administered or handed over to the Forest Service, they have

0:37:40.320 --> 0:37:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a multiple use doctrine and so part of that multiple

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>use is usually includes hunting. So we haven't seen a

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>loss there. I think that the nervousness that people have

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is what could happen with nationally like monuments that administered

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 1>by National Park Service, where they have like a bigger

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.879
<v Speaker 1>tool kit to restrict activities there. There are only two

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 1>National Park Service monuments that allow any kind of hunting activity,

0:38:02.600 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and I think six six yeah have some kind of

0:38:06.040 --> 0:38:11.920
<v Speaker 1>snowble billing activity. But BLM traditionally is supposed to be

0:38:12.040 --> 0:38:15.040
<v Speaker 1>much more flexible. What I'm trying to say is there's

0:38:15.080 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing that guarantees that and any land manager can change

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and make arbitrary and capricious decisions. That does the restriction

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 1>unless you put in statue. And that's why I think

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.239
<v Speaker 1>it should be done not by an antiquities designation, but

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>letting Congress pass a law that says we are guaranteeing

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in law these activities will be allowed. Yeah. I think

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that it would make a lot of people feel more

0:38:37.560 --> 0:38:41.200
<v Speaker 1>comfortable to have those things put in place. And I

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:42.919
<v Speaker 1>think one of the things that winds up killing people

0:38:43.000 --> 0:38:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is the uncertainty about what's going to come in the future,

0:38:46.160 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and that sort of generates the rumor mill. And and

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that's that's kind of the weird part about this that

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:54.760
<v Speaker 1>if it's not monument designated as a monument, the fallback

0:38:54.920 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 1>is you've got it open access. As soon as you

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>designated as a monument, then I'll of a sudden you

0:39:00.640 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>bring up the opportunity of putting restrictions on it. So

0:39:04.480 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 1>the designation of itself does not necessarily add protection to

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the land. It actually can put in restrictions on the land.

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to revisit for a minute something uh that

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned earlier, and I want you to kind of

0:39:30.040 --> 0:39:33.680
<v Speaker 1>reconcile it with what we're talking about now, is early

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.239
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about the Land and Water Conservation Fund, and

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you had said you were talking about like original intents

0:39:40.000 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and how because needs change and situations change, you wanted

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>to kind of change that original attempt to match the future.

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 1>What would you say if someone brings up to you,

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:53.840
<v Speaker 1>um that that the antiquities that could be something that

0:39:53.880 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>evolves in morphs over time to match up with our

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>needs today the same way that you would suggest the

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Land and Water Conservation Fund, Like like, how do you

0:40:00.760 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 1>cord of balance out those two ideas which someone might

0:40:03.560 --> 0:40:06.160
<v Speaker 1>point out and think that it could be regardless like

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 1>mildly hypocritical. Now, the Land No Antiquities Act is words,

0:40:11.680 --> 0:40:14.720
<v Speaker 1>and the words have meaning. If you want to change

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:17.399
<v Speaker 1>the focus of the Antiquities Act to do what they're

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:21.400
<v Speaker 1>doing right now, change the law, words have meaning and

0:40:21.400 --> 0:40:25.319
<v Speaker 1>words have impact. So I want if if I'm just

0:40:25.360 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 1>sitting here saying, Okay, that's what the word tells me

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to do, but gee, I think I'd like to do

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 1>something else, I'm sorry that that is not the way

0:40:35.239 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the rule of law happens, and that's not the way

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you have civilized society works together. So if indeed you

0:40:40.560 --> 0:40:44.760
<v Speaker 1>want to have the Antiquities Act doing landscape preservation. Change

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>the law to allow that to take place, and that

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:50.200
<v Speaker 1>will that will then have people being able in public

0:40:50.239 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>to debate whether that's a good idea or not. How

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>far do you think that idea would get uh, depending

0:40:56.640 --> 0:41:02.600
<v Speaker 1>on actually Okay, personally, I hope that doesn't get to

0:41:02.719 --> 0:41:04.680
<v Speaker 1>that point because I don't think it was ever intended

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:08.839
<v Speaker 1>for land landscape preservation. And as I think I've also

0:41:08.880 --> 0:41:12.880
<v Speaker 1>said earlier, giving those designations doesn't mean you actually improve

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the land like there is if indeed, President Obama was

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>saying he wants to have more protection for these artifacts,

0:41:21.800 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 1>his proclamation doesn't do that. You had one, You had

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 1>one BLM officer for a million miles when he had

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:31.240
<v Speaker 1>made his proclamation. There is still one for a million miles.

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>What we're trying to do in the law. But Curtis

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>introduced saying, Okay, we're gonna have BLM contract with local

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:40.800
<v Speaker 1>officials to have a minimum of ten people there to

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>protect those areas. Now, that's what you should be doing,

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.799
<v Speaker 1>and that's what a proclamation doesn't do. That's what the

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Antiquities Act doesn't do. If you really want to do

0:41:49.840 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff, change the law to allow that

0:41:52.239 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 1>to take place. If you also think, I also think

0:41:55.520 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>not everything is going to be defeated in Congress. I

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>know that's that's the viewpoint even I have right now.

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>But there are a lot of these things that can

0:42:03.960 --> 0:42:08.520
<v Speaker 1>go through. Like um I am. I am, allegedly by

0:42:08.520 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the things I have read about myself hating

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of wilderness. I created wilderness in my first MAXO is

0:42:14.400 --> 0:42:17.040
<v Speaker 1>the third term, but I had a specific reason for

0:42:17.080 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>creating it. The first bill I let go through when

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I became chairman was a wilderness bill. And in Idaho,

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not opposed to that. I just want the process

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>to be done correctly, and I wanted to make sense,

0:42:29.360 --> 0:42:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and I want there to be some kind of balance.

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.759
<v Speaker 1>So if you were gonna impose let's say you for

0:42:34.800 --> 0:42:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a minute, you didn't have participate in government. You could

0:42:36.520 --> 0:42:38.880
<v Speaker 1>just do things by fiat if you wanted. If you

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>were going to come in and impose the sort of

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>discipline you'd like to see around the Antiquities Act, what

0:42:47.040 --> 0:42:50.280
<v Speaker 1>would it look like actually have a bill that we introduced.

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It would be what I said, let the President designate

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>five thousand acres or less at will at whim, especially

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.960
<v Speaker 1>if there's an emergency basis. But if it's going to

0:43:00.120 --> 0:43:02.799
<v Speaker 1>be bigger than five thousand acres, then you have to

0:43:02.840 --> 0:43:07.720
<v Speaker 1>have an e I S. This is HR three. Have

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>have an environmental impact statement, you have to go through

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the Kneeper process. And if it's going to be more

0:43:13.560 --> 0:43:16.400
<v Speaker 1>than eighty six thousand, and we picked that number specifically

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.160
<v Speaker 1>because that's the average that Teddy Roosevelt did in all

0:43:19.200 --> 0:43:22.759
<v Speaker 1>of his stuff. You have to involve the local, local, state,

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and local governments, so they have to be involved in

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:28.239
<v Speaker 1>it to what extent they have to. They have to

0:43:28.280 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>prove it, they have to sign off on it. If

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be bigger than that acres, then involve

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 1>local governments so they actually have a sign off on it.

0:43:36.960 --> 0:43:40.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's fair and that's appropriate. In addition

0:43:40.239 --> 0:43:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to that, if you're going to shrink it down, we

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:44.560
<v Speaker 1>went through the same kind of process in reverse. If

0:43:44.560 --> 0:43:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be a big shrink it, you've gotta

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:48.319
<v Speaker 1>have local government sign off on it. If it's going

0:43:48.360 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a small shrinkage, the president can do that

0:43:50.600 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>by simply designating so I their sideboards. At some point,

0:43:56.440 --> 0:43:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't just go in there and say I'm going

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:01.359
<v Speaker 1>to take that entire map and this big section. I'm

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:03.640
<v Speaker 1>going to do it because I want to without at

0:44:03.719 --> 0:44:06.520
<v Speaker 1>least letting people have some kind of say in it

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:10.480
<v Speaker 1>who lived there, affecting their lives and their and their futures.

0:44:12.239 --> 0:44:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel that there was like some lesson learned

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>in what we've seen here kind of that you were

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>involved for a long time and before Obama came in

0:44:21.840 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and did Bears Ears, you would have been involved for

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:28.279
<v Speaker 1>a long time and trying to strike a compromise and

0:44:28.320 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>make it and perhaps have made him feel that it

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:35.239
<v Speaker 1>wasn't necessary. When you look at like, you don't you

0:44:35.239 --> 0:44:39.280
<v Speaker 1>don't like no, I was like, what was the looking

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>at it now like looking at what happened now? Like,

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you feel went wrong? Was it a lack

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>of compromise on two sides? A lack of compromise on

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:52.319
<v Speaker 1>one side? Like like what led to the current what

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>led to the current problem or what led to the

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>hostilities around Bears Ears? From from a mile high perspective, UM,

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I think we're talking to out a couple of different things.

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:06.600
<v Speaker 1>So there was always a group that wanted to do Um,

0:45:06.640 --> 0:45:08.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry Bears Ears. In my estimation was still a

0:45:08.800 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>political statement that was made, not necessarily conservation statement, and

0:45:13.160 --> 0:45:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in fact, calling it bears ears instead of giving it

0:45:15.360 --> 0:45:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a Native American name kind of emphasizes this was this

0:45:19.239 --> 0:45:22.680
<v Speaker 1>was something that's going to be cute and sellable. But

0:45:22.719 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 1>I've never I've never thought of the marketing implications. Well,

0:45:27.560 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>there are certain groups that got involved and put the

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 1>money up, and that's what they said, can we trust

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 1>working with the Indians? And I don't know, I don't

0:45:34.640 --> 0:45:37.080
<v Speaker 1>want to have a Navajo name in there. We change

0:45:37.200 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 1>or Trump changed it. In our legislation, we continued that

0:45:39.719 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 1>just sasta, which is the Navajo word for bears ears.

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I like that a whole lot more. But what I

0:45:45.680 --> 0:45:47.120
<v Speaker 1>think you were referring to us, I was trying to

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>do what we call the public Lands Initiatives by going

0:45:49.560 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>into the seven eastern counties in Utah, getting everyone to

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:55.759
<v Speaker 1>sit down the table and come up with some kind

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>of compromises. Both sides will point to the other one

0:45:58.680 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is having broken that. And in part it was a

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:04.760
<v Speaker 1>unique experience because these are groups that had never compromised before,

0:46:05.239 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and so far they haven't still, but the tipping point

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:12.839
<v Speaker 1>and and and once again I did those three things

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do. I want to say land can

0:46:14.600 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 1>be designated for economic development, for recreation, and for conservation.

0:46:19.719 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>And actually I thought I was really kind of cool

0:46:22.160 --> 0:46:23.840
<v Speaker 1>with the numbers I was coming up with. So for

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>every one acre of economic development and recreation, I put

0:46:28.760 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 1>four acres aside simply as wilderness conservation. I thought those

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:37.399
<v Speaker 1>were who could complain about those numbers. Obviously everybody did.

0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 1>But the tipping point was when I said, Okay, if

0:46:41.200 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we come up with this compromise, no more screwing around

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 1>with these lands in which antiquities has got to be

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:50.560
<v Speaker 1>off the table for these seven counties. If we make

0:46:50.600 --> 0:46:53.000
<v Speaker 1>this deal, you can't go back in there. And then

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:55.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't say, okay, thank you for the wilderness. Now

0:46:55.719 --> 0:46:58.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go after the recreation and economic lands

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and we'll make those world us too. So it has

0:47:02.080 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to be we're done, We're finalized, no more discussion, no

0:47:04.800 --> 0:47:07.760
<v Speaker 1>more litigation. You gotta agree to that. And that's where

0:47:07.840 --> 0:47:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the environmental groups that were on the at the table

0:47:10.760 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>basically said screw you and walked away. Now I was told,

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is totally anecdotal, but one of the groups

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:22.160
<v Speaker 1>were in varying degrees of cooperation, and that on both sides.

0:47:22.160 --> 0:47:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Some of my counties were really great to cooperate, some

0:47:25.320 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 1>for a pain. It does the same thing on the

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:30.879
<v Speaker 1>environmental NGOs that were there. Some of them were nice.

0:47:31.080 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 1>I like them. Some of them. You know, I can

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:36.719
<v Speaker 1>still turn around. You can get their their cutlery out

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of my back if you want to. But one of

0:47:38.840 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 1>them came to me and said, Rob, I feel sorry

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:42.200
<v Speaker 1>for you because you were sincere in what you were

0:47:42.239 --> 0:47:44.319
<v Speaker 1>trying to do. But some of the groups on our

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:48.239
<v Speaker 1>side never intended to cooperate. They were there to watch us.

0:47:49.680 --> 0:47:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Um and I I feel bitter about that entire process

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:55.720
<v Speaker 1>because we were trying to come up with the solution

0:47:55.760 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>that I thought would be fair and truly a compromise,

0:47:59.160 --> 0:48:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and everyone just said screw it. And then when when

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he did the Bearsier's proclamation, that was it. That was

0:48:07.040 --> 0:48:09.239
<v Speaker 1>like the final straw. We're not going go and go

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:14.320
<v Speaker 1>back into that route again. UM. I also feel frustrated

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:17.480
<v Speaker 1>because there was language I was asking from Department of

0:48:17.520 --> 0:48:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Interior and other the groups and they never gave it

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:22.480
<v Speaker 1>to me. They kept saying we'll get it to you,

0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:24.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll get it to you. It never happened, and and

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:26.919
<v Speaker 1>then said, well, I never came up with the bill.

0:48:26.960 --> 0:48:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't actually push my bill forward while I was

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 1>waiting on you guys to give me the language you promised.

0:48:32.040 --> 0:48:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I I feel somewhat disenchanted about that process too. Do

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you have any concerns about the the legality of what

0:48:45.520 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Trump did when he when he shrunk the monuments? But you,

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but you'd like to see it explaining greater detail or

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:57.160
<v Speaker 1>codified in some other way that that settle some of

0:48:57.160 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>these disputes down in the future. If I'm condifying how

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you do it, it seems only fair you codify how

0:49:02.760 --> 0:49:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you undo it at the same time. And then once again,

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:09.480
<v Speaker 1>let the people's representatives their voice. I'm told when I

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:12.319
<v Speaker 1>read the Constitution, let them actually make those kinds of

0:49:12.360 --> 0:49:16.280
<v Speaker 1>decisions in open and in legislation. Do you have anything

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:19.920
<v Speaker 1>else you want to add on on the subject of

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:24.120
<v Speaker 1>monuments specifically, No, But I'm glad you went into that

0:49:24.200 --> 0:49:26.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of detail, because there are a whole lot of

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>what I consider still to be misinformation. There are a

0:49:29.640 --> 0:49:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of groups that are out there trying to equate

0:49:31.600 --> 0:49:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a monument with a park as if it's the same thing,

0:49:34.440 --> 0:49:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're right, it's not. It's totally not. And you also,

0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm pleased to do this because most people don't don't

0:49:40.920 --> 0:49:45.240
<v Speaker 1>differentiate between a Park Service monument and a BLM monument.

0:49:45.920 --> 0:49:49.960
<v Speaker 1>They are different, they are different creatures. So I think

0:49:50.000 --> 0:49:52.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody's gotten. I mean, I want to see everybody, people

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.160
<v Speaker 1>who follow these issues have recently got recently gotten like

0:49:55.200 --> 0:49:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a sort of a crash course where they wanted to

0:49:58.360 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 1>or not. I mean, in the last months, there's been

0:50:01.120 --> 0:50:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who have come to like struggle

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:05.600
<v Speaker 1>with these definitions. That's that's true. And and you can

0:50:05.640 --> 0:50:08.719
<v Speaker 1>play around at least what is conservation, what is protection?

0:50:09.360 --> 0:50:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You can play around with that all the time. And

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you're right. I get frustrated because, like I said, this

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:17.399
<v Speaker 1>goes back to me the Carter administration. At first, when

0:50:17.440 --> 0:50:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I was a state legislator here in Utah, we were

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:23.319
<v Speaker 1>talking about this stuff. Um, it's it's frustrating that we're

0:50:23.320 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 1>still talking about this stuff and having a lot of

0:50:25.239 --> 0:50:28.480
<v Speaker 1>misinformation about what it is, especially some of those phrases

0:50:28.520 --> 0:50:31.359
<v Speaker 1>like you know, when when the when it came out

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:35.879
<v Speaker 1>there that Trump stole your land. Yeah, I'm sorry, give

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:38.560
<v Speaker 1>me a break, it was federal first, it's federal now.

0:50:39.520 --> 0:50:43.360
<v Speaker 1>If anything, he gave you greater access opportunity by reclassifying

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:46.640
<v Speaker 1>it simply as federal land and not monument land. You know,

0:50:46.719 --> 0:50:49.799
<v Speaker 1>I'll be honest with you. I was, Um. I was

0:50:49.840 --> 0:50:52.719
<v Speaker 1>disappointed by the decision, but I was equally disappointed by

0:50:52.760 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the way some people were explaining what was going on,

0:50:56.800 --> 0:50:59.040
<v Speaker 1>even people who I might agree with their general motives.

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:02.319
<v Speaker 1>I thought that the the the stole your land was

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:05.520
<v Speaker 1>a real reach and misleading, and it was kind of

0:51:05.520 --> 0:51:10.680
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing to come from, um, you know, to to come

0:51:10.680 --> 0:51:12.640
<v Speaker 1>from the side of an issue that I was sympathetic

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:17.120
<v Speaker 1>two and I felt that it Uh, I don't know,

0:51:17.280 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like right now, but it is simple in

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:25.080
<v Speaker 1>itsels Yeah, But in the in the in the plarity

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:29.439
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing, I see oftentimes from both sides things

0:51:29.480 --> 0:51:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that embarrassed me about how inaccurate they are. So hopefully

0:51:35.920 --> 0:51:38.879
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll in our chat here clear up a couple

0:51:38.920 --> 0:51:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of these things for a couple of people. Dude, you're

0:51:40.520 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 1>living in the life of you know, the land of Twitter.

0:51:43.800 --> 0:51:48.839
<v Speaker 1>And I'm very proud that well, my committee tweets. I'm

0:51:48.880 --> 0:51:51.200
<v Speaker 1>still proud. I've been I've been outed by Hill mag

0:51:51.440 --> 0:51:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Hill paper back there in the Yeah, as the only

0:51:55.560 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>member that actually has a Twitter account who has never

0:51:57.920 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 1>tweeted a single character, and now they've outed me I'm

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 1>taking as a challenge. I'll be damned if I'm actually

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:06.880
<v Speaker 1>going to do when ever. Ever, so so people that

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>follow you are they don't have an exciting morning when

0:52:10.080 --> 0:52:11.960
<v Speaker 1>they open it up now, And I don't think I

0:52:11.960 --> 0:52:14.480
<v Speaker 1>can be snarky now. My staff thinks I can easily

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>do that, but I'm going to have to use that

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in some other traditional form. What what per sorry did?

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:24.200
<v Speaker 1>But what percentage of your colleagues do you feel, like, say,

0:52:24.239 --> 0:52:28.200
<v Speaker 1>tweet on a daily basis? I don't know, but there's

0:52:28.239 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a whole well first, whether they tweet or they have

0:52:31.520 --> 0:52:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a staff or tweet for them. Actually, I have no

0:52:36.239 --> 0:52:40.239
<v Speaker 1>clue I would. I would guess like two thirds. Okay, well, yeah,

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I was just you saying it's the age of you know, Twitter,

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:45.200
<v Speaker 1>So I was wondering, you know how prevalent it is.

0:52:46.320 --> 0:52:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Look I when I was first elected blogs. No, that's

0:52:52.480 --> 0:52:54.759
<v Speaker 1>making me sound really old. I'm not going to go there.

0:52:55.920 --> 0:52:58.879
<v Speaker 1>But I've seen the evolution of social media coming through there,

0:52:59.200 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and I still use legal pads so let me just

0:53:02.600 --> 0:53:04.359
<v Speaker 1>leave it at that where you can generate big, long

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:08.959
<v Speaker 1>and complicated thoughts. Oh yeah, yeah, I have all sorts

0:53:09.000 --> 0:53:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of files of my writing. It's cool. I want to

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 1>bump along too, and it monuments falls under public lands

0:53:14.920 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, but I want to just jump jump into

0:53:17.080 --> 0:53:20.160
<v Speaker 1>like kind of like general thoughts around public lands. Again.

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lay a little bit out and and you

0:53:23.080 --> 0:53:29.399
<v Speaker 1>can go on that. There are poles to suggests that

0:53:30.080 --> 0:53:34.560
<v Speaker 1>sev seventy two of hunters in the American West, and

0:53:34.880 --> 0:53:38.440
<v Speaker 1>that that area, like the Inner Mountain West, includes your

0:53:38.440 --> 0:53:43.680
<v Speaker 1>own constituents here in Utah use public lands um. All

0:53:43.719 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>across the country. The numbers shrink significantly when you reach

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:49.280
<v Speaker 1>over to the eastern US, but you still find thirty

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:54.640
<v Speaker 1>six of hunters in America use public lands. UM. Think

0:53:54.840 --> 0:53:57.799
<v Speaker 1>everyone's sitting at the table knows it's critically important for

0:53:57.800 --> 0:54:02.320
<v Speaker 1>sportsman and Utah sportsman. Now, a lot you're no stranger

0:54:02.360 --> 0:54:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to this. A lot of folks will tell you that

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the Utah Delegation has been you know, the tip of

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the spear and calling for the transfer of public lands

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to the states, or oftentimes you're here pushing for the

0:54:18.680 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 1>privatization of public lands. Can you lay out like lay

0:54:22.040 --> 0:54:25.880
<v Speaker 1>out your biggest Yeah, I use the term REALI your

0:54:25.880 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest sort of mile high perspective on what you generally

0:54:30.239 --> 0:54:36.360
<v Speaker 1>think about when you think about public lands, federally managed

0:54:36.360 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 1>public lands, like what sort of your your guiding principles

0:54:40.000 --> 0:54:47.839
<v Speaker 1>and how we distribute, manage, organize the public lands estate. Yeah.

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:50.680
<v Speaker 1>I only recoil at the word privatization because no one's

0:54:50.680 --> 0:54:53.279
<v Speaker 1>ever talking about that. That's one of the that's one

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:55.160
<v Speaker 1>of the words. That's one of the words has a

0:54:55.160 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>connotation you throw out when you want to make a

0:54:57.640 --> 0:55:00.799
<v Speaker 1>cute public statement. Okay, So I give me a minute out.

0:55:00.840 --> 0:55:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Because states, all states have had federal land grants, have

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 1>gotten have unloaded a lot of their lands. I think,

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean Utah maybe from from original from what the

0:55:17.280 --> 0:55:21.360
<v Speaker 1>state originally held through actually like for from land grant

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 1>from federal down to state it is gone, honestly, I

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:29.000
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to stay gone, but is no longer held

0:55:29.040 --> 0:55:33.440
<v Speaker 1>by the state. Um, that's accurate. In California they sold

0:55:33.440 --> 0:55:35.920
<v Speaker 1>off most of their stuff, and Texas got rid of

0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:40.360
<v Speaker 1>virtually all of their state land. I don't know because

0:55:40.480 --> 0:55:42.880
<v Speaker 1>they they don't have any federal So I don't get

0:55:42.920 --> 0:55:46.319
<v Speaker 1>involved in that at all. Um. But it depends on

0:55:46.320 --> 0:55:48.360
<v Speaker 1>how you actually write the bill. So for the p

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:51.160
<v Speaker 1>L I I was doing for Eastern Utah, everything that

0:55:51.200 --> 0:55:53.759
<v Speaker 1>I was transferring to the state, we always had the

0:55:53.800 --> 0:55:55.480
<v Speaker 1>caveat put in there that had to be held for

0:55:55.560 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 1>public purpose, which simply meant you can't sell it, you

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:02.480
<v Speaker 1>can't privatize it. And so why is that point missed?

0:56:03.840 --> 0:56:08.440
<v Speaker 1>No one wants to hear it. I keep saying it.

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:11.799
<v Speaker 1>So you tell me, I don't really know. So so

0:56:11.920 --> 0:56:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you're you, you will tell me now that you will say,

0:56:14.040 --> 0:56:16.279
<v Speaker 1>like if you look like, forget what happened in the past,

0:56:16.400 --> 0:56:18.600
<v Speaker 1>forget what might have happened with you know, in different states,

0:56:18.600 --> 0:56:21.520
<v Speaker 1>what they did a school, trust lands and things. You're

0:56:21.560 --> 0:56:26.279
<v Speaker 1>comfortable with the idea that if this day going forward,

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:29.120
<v Speaker 1>your coming with the idea that federal lands that would

0:56:29.160 --> 0:56:32.440
<v Speaker 1>be handed over to the states, you'd be comfortable with

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:36.040
<v Speaker 1>some sort of compromise saying that these would always stand

0:56:36.320 --> 0:56:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in the public domain so they could be used. Yeah,

0:56:39.800 --> 0:56:41.360
<v Speaker 1>is there a differences so they could be used in

0:56:41.400 --> 0:56:49.600
<v Speaker 1>public domain? Ah? No, public purposes has to be if

0:56:49.880 --> 0:56:52.200
<v Speaker 1>you use public purpose language, that means has to be

0:56:52.239 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 1>government controlled in some way, and it has to be

0:56:54.560 --> 0:56:57.160
<v Speaker 1>used for a public purpose, which is not the same

0:56:57.200 --> 0:57:01.799
<v Speaker 1>thing as yeah, like purposes. It's the phrase I want

0:57:01.840 --> 0:57:04.839
<v Speaker 1>to put in there because ultimately I look at it

0:57:04.880 --> 0:57:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is land land, just land has to be able there

0:57:10.120 --> 0:57:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to help people. And I actually think that in most cases,

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the states do a better job in maintaining the land

0:57:18.200 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and helping people than the federal the federal government does.

0:57:22.160 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, states don't have a seventeen billion dollar backlog

0:57:25.920 --> 0:57:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in the maintenance of their state parks, and especially in Utah,

0:57:29.720 --> 0:57:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Coral Springs down in southern Utah and the place outside

0:57:32.640 --> 0:57:35.800
<v Speaker 1>of Moab, all of those were lands that either we

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:38.280
<v Speaker 1>were given to the state or they went into a

0:57:38.360 --> 0:57:42.000
<v Speaker 1>state partnership with them. The state occupied them and did

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:45.080
<v Speaker 1>them and used them so they could become really recreation

0:57:45.160 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 1>opportunities and destination spots that the federal government simply wasn't doing.

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:51.800
<v Speaker 1>They either didn't have the desire or they didn't have

0:57:51.840 --> 0:57:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the money or the manpower to do it. They allowed

0:57:54.560 --> 0:57:58.640
<v Speaker 1>either in the case at Moab, the county to manage

0:57:58.680 --> 0:58:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it and run it as a great record Asian destination spot.

0:58:01.840 --> 0:58:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And in Cannab Kane County area, it was the state

0:58:05.120 --> 0:58:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that took it over and ran is a very well

0:58:06.880 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 1>run state park. I think states can do that, but

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:11.640
<v Speaker 1>that is the issue. What you want to do is

0:58:11.720 --> 0:58:15.480
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the land is managed for the greatest

0:58:15.560 --> 0:58:20.000
<v Speaker 1>access for people. And that's why sometimes a lot of

0:58:20.040 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the conservation efforts that are out there simply to designate

0:58:23.480 --> 0:58:25.919
<v Speaker 1>lands as monuments or whatever you want to or even

0:58:25.920 --> 0:58:30.040
<v Speaker 1>as wilderness, it stops that kind of access. That's why

0:58:30.160 --> 0:58:31.960
<v Speaker 1>when I was going through the p l I process

0:58:31.960 --> 0:58:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in eastern Utah, the idea was, let's designate the areas

0:58:35.680 --> 0:58:39.240
<v Speaker 1>that could be specifically their primary purpose, their focal purpose,

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:43.360
<v Speaker 1>their number one priority purpose. Especially once again, I'll get

0:58:43.360 --> 0:58:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a complete sentence out here eventually, I'm sorry. A lot

0:58:46.920 --> 0:58:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of people talk about multiple use. It's a great thing,

0:58:49.320 --> 0:58:52.520
<v Speaker 1>which is good, but multiple use also can give you

0:58:52.560 --> 0:58:56.280
<v Speaker 1>some problems when somebody's use of what their version of

0:58:56.320 --> 0:58:58.520
<v Speaker 1>what is multiple use is more important than their version

0:58:58.560 --> 0:59:00.840
<v Speaker 1>of multiple use. So what I was trying to do

0:59:00.840 --> 0:59:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is say, Okay, give me the areas in which the

0:59:03.080 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 1>primary use should be for recreation opportunities. That means in

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:11.200
<v Speaker 1>bike trails, that means in hiking trails, motorized trails, we

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:13.720
<v Speaker 1>even took some specific book cliffs. That's what I was

0:59:13.760 --> 0:59:15.440
<v Speaker 1>looking for in the book cliffs, to make sure that

0:59:15.440 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that was always set aside specifically for hunting and fishing,

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and make that as the number one most significant issue.

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And if you then can put in other areas with

0:59:26.440 --> 0:59:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that that doesn't take away from that primary issue of recreation, fine,

0:59:30.800 --> 0:59:32.600
<v Speaker 1>but that has to be the primary area. And then

0:59:32.720 --> 0:59:35.760
<v Speaker 1>put in other areas the primary purpose will be for development.

0:59:36.160 --> 0:59:39.000
<v Speaker 1>If you can do recreation around the development, fine, but

0:59:39.120 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 1>make sure there's a primarial and there's plenty of land

0:59:41.400 --> 0:59:44.920
<v Speaker 1>for all of that. So whether if the federal government

0:59:44.920 --> 0:59:48.440
<v Speaker 1>will actually do that, I'm cool with that. But what

0:59:48.520 --> 0:59:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I have said on history, I have seen that federal

0:59:51.400 --> 0:59:56.439
<v Speaker 1>land managers oftentimes make arbitrary and capricious decisions in which

0:59:56.440 --> 0:59:59.920
<v Speaker 1>they actually close the access to those areas without every

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>are trying to talk to people, and they don't. They

1:00:02.440 --> 1:00:04.520
<v Speaker 1>don't care. They don't give a damn whether it hurts

1:00:04.520 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>anybody or not. Having four areas that have always had

1:00:08.280 --> 1:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a triathlon running their forest land and all the sudden

1:00:10.520 --> 1:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>they side, we're not going to do that anymore because

1:00:12.560 --> 1:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to. And they didn't ever give a reason,

1:00:15.280 --> 1:00:18.680
<v Speaker 1>or they give an alternative access to it. Well, okay,

1:00:19.000 --> 1:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I've used I have very seldom seen state and local

1:00:21.640 --> 1:00:25.760
<v Speaker 1>governments do that. And besides, if you're a person there

1:00:25.800 --> 1:00:28.479
<v Speaker 1>and it's owned run by the counties, run by the state,

1:00:28.520 --> 1:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you have a better chance of getting to that person

1:00:31.480 --> 1:00:34.840
<v Speaker 1>who's making that decision and voicing your objection than if

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>it's run by the federal government. If you don't like

1:00:37.120 --> 1:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>what d O I did, you can come back here

1:00:39.360 --> 1:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and throw rocks at their windows, but there's very little

1:00:41.320 --> 1:00:44.280
<v Speaker 1>access that you actually have to say I don't like

1:00:44.360 --> 1:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>how you're managing my lands. And a lot of the

1:00:47.120 --> 1:00:49.480
<v Speaker 1>bills that were coming through us our decisions have been

1:00:49.480 --> 1:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>made by federal land managers that legislators and their constituents

1:00:53.640 --> 1:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>just think they screwed us. They weren't supposed to do that.

1:00:56.800 --> 1:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>They took away an opportunity, and not just in the West.

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>We past one in Michigan where the federal land managers

1:01:03.520 --> 1:01:08.160
<v Speaker 1>decided to cut off voting activities and recreation activities on

1:01:08.200 --> 1:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the shore of this area just because even though the

1:01:11.600 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>locals didn't want it, it it had always been there. The

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>locals were upset about it. We actually had to pass

1:01:16.400 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a piece of legislation that said, no, we reinstate those

1:01:19.360 --> 1:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>kinds of activities. I have found the federal government has

1:01:22.680 --> 1:01:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a more cavalier attitude about lands than state and locals do.

1:01:26.360 --> 1:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>But once again, for me, it is are we using

1:01:29.320 --> 1:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>the lands actually to be a benefit and actually helping people?

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And that includes sportsman's, sportsmen, hundreds and fishers. They are

1:01:37.160 --> 1:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>extremely important to me. That's also why actually sportsman's are

1:01:41.560 --> 1:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>having I think an undue burden to try and make

1:01:44.040 --> 1:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that we keep these lands open. I said the

1:01:46.480 --> 1:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Pittman Robertson that comes up with a billion dollars. You

1:01:49.160 --> 1:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>guys are funding that land and water conservation which is offshore.

1:01:52.880 --> 1:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>That's three million dollars. I mean you are spending. And

1:01:57.320 --> 1:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>another reason, without mentioning any kind of names, their group

1:02:00.120 --> 1:02:01.600
<v Speaker 1>out there that make a whole lot of money on

1:02:01.680 --> 1:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>federal lands. But actually, besides their taxes that they their

1:02:05.680 --> 1:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>corporate taxes, they spend, they don't put an extra dime

1:02:08.480 --> 1:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>into the maintenance of those public lands, but they insist

1:02:11.720 --> 1:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>those public lands to be open to actually fatten their

1:02:13.840 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>bottom line. That bothers me too. You've mentioned a number

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of times the maintenance backlog on federally managed public lands

1:02:23.120 --> 1:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and not having the resources to manage the land that

1:02:25.360 --> 1:02:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you do have. I'm sure you're familiar with if I

1:02:27.440 --> 1:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>want to this idea, but I like to bring it

1:02:29.400 --> 1:02:30.959
<v Speaker 1>up to get your feedback on or how you feel

1:02:30.960 --> 1:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>about it. Is Oftentimes you'll hear people articulated as a

1:02:35.160 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>design to fail situation. And there's an analogy I've used

1:02:39.160 --> 1:02:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and and and I'll use it here. So it's a

1:02:42.000 --> 1:02:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a far reaching analogy, but I think it kind

1:02:43.680 --> 1:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>of explains it. Like in my home, we have a dishwasher,

1:02:47.320 --> 1:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>dishwashing machine. I have sort of an aesthetic fundamental dislike

1:02:51.400 --> 1:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of the thing. My wife likes it a lot. I

1:02:55.080 --> 1:02:57.600
<v Speaker 1>will argue that it's not as efficient and not as

1:02:57.640 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>effective as hand washing, okay, and she will argue that

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>hand washing is not as efficient and not as effective

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>as usual the dishwasher. So I have like a fundamental

1:03:06.840 --> 1:03:10.520
<v Speaker 1>distrust and dislike of the contraption. If I were to

1:03:10.560 --> 1:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>go in and damage the machine internally so that it

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:17.479
<v Speaker 1>would clearly stop working well, and I could then later

1:03:17.560 --> 1:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>point out and say, you see, it doesn't work as

1:03:20.720 --> 1:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>well as this, I think that some people would look

1:03:23.800 --> 1:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>at the federal backlog on maintenance the lands, and would

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>say that there are people who have a sort of

1:03:28.720 --> 1:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>fundamental dislike of federally managed public lands and they do

1:03:32.200 --> 1:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>their best to strip them of funding so that they

1:03:36.640 --> 1:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>can then point to how poor of a job they're doing.

1:03:40.720 --> 1:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel that there's that that's that that argument

1:03:43.600 --> 1:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>has merit or do you not think that that could

1:03:46.160 --> 1:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>in some way explain it? Like? Um? Like now, actually, well,

1:03:56.560 --> 1:03:59.320
<v Speaker 1>first of all, I understand because my dishwasher at home works,

1:03:59.480 --> 1:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>my win in my apartment in Washington doesn't, so I

1:04:01.760 --> 1:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>do everything by hands. So so you're you're you're intimately

1:04:04.760 --> 1:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>familiar with both strata and I haven't fixed it, so

1:04:06.840 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll be happy with that dishwasher. Um, I'm not going

1:04:11.000 --> 1:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to discount the validity of the argument that you're making.

1:04:13.680 --> 1:04:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it has it could they I don't know

1:04:15.960 --> 1:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>how to verify that, nor do I know how to

1:04:18.000 --> 1:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>quantity quantify it. I also do think, though, that a

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of the backlock has come from decisions that are

1:04:24.440 --> 1:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>being made that are counterproductive. Um. For actually, and they're

1:04:33.720 --> 1:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>how do I put this once again? For example, a

1:04:36.160 --> 1:04:39.160
<v Speaker 1>park if we're talking about that, to me to fulfill

1:04:39.200 --> 1:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the person. The purpose of a park people have to

1:04:42.040 --> 1:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>go there and see it and experience it. There are

1:04:45.320 --> 1:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>some people within the Park Service that don't believe people

1:04:48.000 --> 1:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>should be seeing their parks. They have this idea that

1:04:51.120 --> 1:04:54.840
<v Speaker 1>parks should be conserved. That's their purpose, not to experience it,

1:04:54.880 --> 1:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>but to conserve it. So they will put roadblocks and

1:04:58.120 --> 1:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>make it more difficult for people to go in there.

1:05:01.280 --> 1:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we do enough to try and attract

1:05:03.680 --> 1:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>people into the national parks. We put roadblocks, we put

1:05:07.000 --> 1:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>fees that are silly. We put restrictions on how you

1:05:09.400 --> 1:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>access it. You can't take bottled water into whatever it is.

1:05:14.760 --> 1:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>They put restrictions on that. I think that's the bigger problem.

1:05:17.960 --> 1:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I also think that some of the money has been

1:05:20.320 --> 1:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>misused that goes into the Park Service as well. So

1:05:24.080 --> 1:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in the A. Bomb administration when they did the big

1:05:27.560 --> 1:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>increase in federal funding at the very beginning of his administration,

1:05:30.320 --> 1:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of new money went to the Park Service.

1:05:32.960 --> 1:05:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Most of that Park Service money, to my to my mind,

1:05:36.120 --> 1:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>went to administration and to buy new uniforms and to

1:05:38.920 --> 1:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>higher new administrators. As to opposing, as opposed to putting

1:05:42.520 --> 1:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>into a park, we have tried with the Centennial Fund

1:05:46.280 --> 1:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that we passed last year to try and change that

1:05:49.160 --> 1:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>dynamics so that we have real businessmen who are now

1:05:52.200 --> 1:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>part of that fund that are trying to leverage private

1:05:55.520 --> 1:05:59.120
<v Speaker 1>money to come in there and buy things to add

1:05:59.160 --> 1:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to parks and and cut down on that maintenance and

1:06:01.520 --> 1:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>do things. But they also are clearly right that if

1:06:05.240 --> 1:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>if you are a private money, private person, you want

1:06:08.000 --> 1:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to put personal money into a project, there are some

1:06:10.920 --> 1:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>projects you want to see. You want to see roads

1:06:13.920 --> 1:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and campgrounds. You're not going to put personal money into

1:06:16.720 --> 1:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a sewer system. That's just not sexy enough. But if

1:06:21.520 --> 1:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>we actually have those things working together so that the

1:06:23.840 --> 1:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Centennial Fund can be leveraging corporate money and private donations

1:06:28.000 --> 1:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to get the outward display, the money Congress appropriates the

1:06:31.600 --> 1:06:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Park Service can be put into the internal functions that

1:06:34.920 --> 1:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>are not sexy and exciting to do it. And if

1:06:37.440 --> 1:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we get them working together now that's with the new

1:06:40.360 --> 1:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Centennial Fund, and I like the process that's going the

1:06:43.440 --> 1:06:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the person who's cheering that fund right now, as well

1:06:46.280 --> 1:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>as the new Park Service interim director. Our sympaths are

1:06:49.840 --> 1:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>are are sympathetic, they see eye to eye, and they're

1:06:52.160 --> 1:06:55.600
<v Speaker 1>working towards that that to me can help solve the problem.

1:06:55.640 --> 1:06:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't necessarily think they're trying to script the

1:06:59.600 --> 1:07:01.480
<v Speaker 1>parks them. So we can say a hot sea, I

1:07:01.560 --> 1:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>told you so, although I can buy that, especially if

1:07:05.760 --> 1:07:08.840
<v Speaker 1>there's somebody that believes having visitors coming to the park

1:07:08.920 --> 1:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is not what I want. I want to close it

1:07:10.720 --> 1:07:13.080
<v Speaker 1>all down so it will always be preserved in my park.

1:07:13.160 --> 1:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>And once again, we have have anecdotal examples, but they

1:07:17.880 --> 1:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>are real examples of land managers in parks that simply

1:07:21.440 --> 1:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>said I don't want people in there because it's too

1:07:23.600 --> 1:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>noisy for the rest of my park. Well, what do

1:07:28.480 --> 1:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you say to people, Well, let me approach this a

1:07:31.360 --> 1:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>different way. I agree with you from the things that

1:07:36.080 --> 1:07:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen in my lifetime. I agree with you that

1:07:37.720 --> 1:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>people will take a something they perceive as necessary and

1:07:42.640 --> 1:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>they will look at the available tools that are all

1:07:46.760 --> 1:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>there to achieve it. So if someone says we are

1:07:49.000 --> 1:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>running out of undisturbed landscapes, or we're running out of

1:07:52.960 --> 1:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>pieces of habitat for for wildlife species that are very

1:07:56.160 --> 1:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>sensitive to habitat loss or habitat destruction, and they recognize

1:07:59.880 --> 1:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the problem, and then you have to go and look

1:08:02.560 --> 1:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, what tools are at my disposal, and

1:08:05.080 --> 1:08:06.760
<v Speaker 1>when you look, you might wand it being there, there's

1:08:06.800 --> 1:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing tailor made for what I'm after. So I will

1:08:09.440 --> 1:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna take this this Antiquities Act and try to

1:08:13.120 --> 1:08:16.559
<v Speaker 1>apply that to get what I'm after, or I'm going

1:08:16.600 --> 1:08:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to take you know, the park mandate and apply that

1:08:20.479 --> 1:08:22.800
<v Speaker 1>to achieve what I'm after. Do you feel that there's

1:08:22.840 --> 1:08:26.519
<v Speaker 1>a better way for people who are trying to address

1:08:26.680 --> 1:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>those concerns? Clearly I do, and and it once again,

1:08:33.920 --> 1:08:37.599
<v Speaker 1>um well, the thought that came to mind recently is

1:08:37.800 --> 1:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the person who's now in charge of fish and wildlife

1:08:41.080 --> 1:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>came from state government, and state government's goal was to

1:08:44.880 --> 1:08:50.840
<v Speaker 1>actually actually enhance wildlife, and they realized that to do

1:08:50.960 --> 1:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that you had to get the hundreds and fishers to

1:08:54.640 --> 1:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>be paying those fees to put the money into the

1:08:57.720 --> 1:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>enhanced wildlife. So if you get more fees, you can

1:09:00.479 --> 1:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>get better wildlife. If you have better wildlife, more people

1:09:03.240 --> 1:09:05.960
<v Speaker 1>will be hunting and fishing, and therefore it can work

1:09:06.040 --> 1:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>together you solve that problem. On the federal level, I

1:09:09.880 --> 1:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily see that actually happening. And sometimes and and

1:09:14.000 --> 1:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that's probably a good reason why the states are in

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>charge of wildlife because I think simply see they do

1:09:19.280 --> 1:09:21.719
<v Speaker 1>a better job. I see a lot of people saying,

1:09:21.800 --> 1:09:24.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, if I want to enhance wildlife, let's just

1:09:25.040 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>carve it out so no one ever touches it or

1:09:26.960 --> 1:09:29.200
<v Speaker 1>talks to it, and make sure that those people who

1:09:29.200 --> 1:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>could benefit by by you know, hunting and fishing, they

1:09:33.960 --> 1:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>don't get a chance to actually put in any input,

1:09:36.160 --> 1:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't get a chance to actually fund that process.

1:09:39.360 --> 1:09:41.760
<v Speaker 1>And if we did it differently, so on the federal level,

1:09:41.800 --> 1:09:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we were also saying, let's try to learn how that

1:09:44.040 --> 1:09:48.080
<v Speaker 1>we can enhance wildlife by allowing people who hunt and

1:09:48.120 --> 1:09:51.720
<v Speaker 1>fish to pay into the fund that enhances it and

1:09:51.800 --> 1:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>make sure and that that also has to say is

1:09:53.920 --> 1:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got to get the kind of wildlife that people

1:09:56.120 --> 1:10:00.559
<v Speaker 1>want hunting fish and I don't think that's wrong. Wildlife

1:10:00.800 --> 1:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>does pretty well. You know. I think that we had

1:10:04.800 --> 1:10:06.160
<v Speaker 1>a conversation with some of the other day. I think,

1:10:06.280 --> 1:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the year I was born, there were about

1:10:08.000 --> 1:10:12.240
<v Speaker 1>one point five million turkeys in the US. There are

1:10:12.280 --> 1:10:17.320
<v Speaker 1>now seven million turkeys. The explosion of turkeys, and they're

1:10:17.320 --> 1:10:19.479
<v Speaker 1>all in my neighbor. They come in my yard and

1:10:19.520 --> 1:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>eat my grapes all the time. The explosion of turkeys

1:10:22.479 --> 1:10:25.760
<v Speaker 1>created like a whole new population of hunters who are

1:10:25.880 --> 1:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>paying into the fee structure to support hunting. So it

1:10:28.240 --> 1:10:32.720
<v Speaker 1>is it's like enhancing wildlife is enhancing spending on wildlife.

1:10:33.240 --> 1:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's pretty clear. But I think that

1:10:36.040 --> 1:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a problem of frustration some people have and I want

1:10:38.360 --> 1:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>to move on to other ideas, but a problem of

1:10:40.800 --> 1:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>frustration I think people have is what do we do

1:10:43.280 --> 1:10:46.600
<v Speaker 1>about if if we as a nation have does this

1:10:46.720 --> 1:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>society that we want to set aside that we want

1:10:49.280 --> 1:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to save some places and just have it be to that,

1:10:52.080 --> 1:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>do we want the most pristine landscapes to remain intact?

1:10:59.680 --> 1:11:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that people are going to continue to try

1:11:02.320 --> 1:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to strive to find tools to make that happen. And

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and the question would simply be is how much of

1:11:08.680 --> 1:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the land you want to have that classification? I think

1:11:11.240 --> 1:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>wilderness is what wilderness is one or two percent of

1:11:13.800 --> 1:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>the country. But you can also the land regenerates itself.

1:11:17.640 --> 1:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>You leave something alone long enough, it reverts back to

1:11:20.840 --> 1:11:24.880
<v Speaker 1>wilderness characteristics. The deck on my apartment will eventually become

1:11:24.880 --> 1:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>wilderness if I don't do anything with it long enough.

1:11:28.520 --> 1:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So it doesn't mean that it has to be. It

1:11:30.800 --> 1:11:34.200
<v Speaker 1>has to be. Now you can reclaim land and use

1:11:34.280 --> 1:11:36.720
<v Speaker 1>that and it can be regenerated into that process. So

1:11:36.960 --> 1:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to get recreation off of something in

1:11:39.920 --> 1:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>order to eventually reclaim it as wilderness. You don't have

1:11:42.840 --> 1:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to get economic development off is something in order to

1:11:45.880 --> 1:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>eventually someday reclaim that as pristine land that you can

1:11:49.120 --> 1:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>recreate on or use for wilderness. I still think it

1:11:54.280 --> 1:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>can be a win win situation. The Outdoor Industry Association

1:12:00.280 --> 1:12:02.479
<v Speaker 1>recently pulled, I mean, as you I'm sure you all know,

1:12:02.960 --> 1:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>recently pulled their trade show from Utah due to what

1:12:06.760 --> 1:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>they perceived to be anti public lands position. Um, it's

1:12:11.000 --> 1:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred seven seven billion dollar industry. Do you have

1:12:19.120 --> 1:12:21.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean glad to see him go? Think it was

1:12:21.560 --> 1:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a misunderstanding, a mischaracterization. No, I'm obviously not glad to

1:12:25.960 --> 1:12:28.000
<v Speaker 1>see them go, because there are a lot of small

1:12:28.920 --> 1:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>um industry personnel that that that show was very beneficial

1:12:33.760 --> 1:12:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to them. The problem I have, obviously is I think

1:12:37.120 --> 1:12:39.519
<v Speaker 1>there were a few very rich companies, big companies that

1:12:39.560 --> 1:12:42.879
<v Speaker 1>were motivating that they were making a lot of demands

1:12:42.920 --> 1:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>all the time on the state of Utah, which I

1:12:44.720 --> 1:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>found funny but I wasn't in state government, so I

1:12:47.280 --> 1:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't have to deal with that at all. I do

1:12:49.920 --> 1:12:52.639
<v Speaker 1>think that some of the rich companies that motive that

1:12:52.640 --> 1:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that mandated that move UM had provided misinformation. I feel

1:12:59.400 --> 1:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>personally used by some of them. I think they have

1:13:01.479 --> 1:13:05.799
<v Speaker 1>lied about my state as well, and and I'm somewhat

1:13:05.840 --> 1:13:10.960
<v Speaker 1>bitter about that. But you know, with any private sector,

1:13:11.800 --> 1:13:13.599
<v Speaker 1>you have a right to do whatever you want to do,

1:13:14.160 --> 1:13:16.639
<v Speaker 1>and I think you, as much as anyone would respect

1:13:16.680 --> 1:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that right. I acknowledged that right. I don't know if

1:13:20.760 --> 1:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I respect aledge Uh. I wanna play a definition game. UM.

1:13:29.160 --> 1:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>We talked, like in the sports community, we talked a

1:13:31.400 --> 1:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>ton about access, and we've talked a lot about it

1:13:33.320 --> 1:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>just sitting here today. Traditionally, my understanding of the word

1:13:38.800 --> 1:13:42.760
<v Speaker 1>had been UM that access was if I were to say,

1:13:42.800 --> 1:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>like an increase in access for for hunters and anglers,

1:13:45.760 --> 1:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>increase and access for sportsmen, I would mean that lands

1:13:50.360 --> 1:13:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that you couldn't practice your discipline on, that you couldn't

1:13:53.840 --> 1:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>hunt and fish on in the past, would be made

1:13:58.439 --> 1:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>available for those activities. So an increase in access would

1:14:02.240 --> 1:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>be that you're opening up places where you're allowed to

1:14:06.760 --> 1:14:11.599
<v Speaker 1>do the activities. I feel that now people are taking

1:14:11.640 --> 1:14:14.919
<v Speaker 1>people are looking at this idea that people love access,

1:14:15.160 --> 1:14:17.600
<v Speaker 1>and you find people coalesced around this idea that we

1:14:17.680 --> 1:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>need more access because oftentimes when you go out and

1:14:20.280 --> 1:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>pull people who are coming into hunting and fishing, they

1:14:22.920 --> 1:14:27.960
<v Speaker 1>will cite access as a significant barrier to entry. Many

1:14:27.960 --> 1:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>people name it as the primary barrier to entry, meaning

1:14:31.200 --> 1:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a place to go. Um by people taking the taking

1:14:35.200 --> 1:14:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the fact that people like the word access and applied

1:14:37.600 --> 1:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it to different things, And now I think part of

1:14:40.000 --> 1:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>the conversation around access is almost like a like we

1:14:43.640 --> 1:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>had a misunderstanding and the access might in fact just

1:14:46.960 --> 1:14:51.040
<v Speaker 1>mean increasing the ways in which people can access land,

1:14:51.360 --> 1:14:55.400
<v Speaker 1>building new roads, removing restrictions on travel restrictions, and that

1:14:55.640 --> 1:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is access enhancement. Do you have a working definition of

1:15:02.640 --> 1:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>public access, like like what it means to you and

1:15:05.000 --> 1:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>how you view it? Isn't it the same thing that

1:15:08.040 --> 1:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>opening open Having more area sometimes requires the ability of

1:15:12.800 --> 1:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>getting people into those areas. Yeah, so let's let's take this.

1:15:16.280 --> 1:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>It still opens more areas for their their use. Yeah.

1:15:18.880 --> 1:15:20.479
<v Speaker 1>So I would view if I was going to go

1:15:20.520 --> 1:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>look and say, like what would be a great access story,

1:15:23.960 --> 1:15:27.439
<v Speaker 1>I would look at what recently happened in New Mexico

1:15:27.960 --> 1:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>where we had a wilderness area that was landlocked. So

1:15:33.080 --> 1:15:35.559
<v Speaker 1>you have a small wilderness there a significant wilderness area

1:15:35.680 --> 1:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that the public literally could not get into because they

1:15:39.439 --> 1:15:42.720
<v Speaker 1>would have to trespass and leaving the public road, they

1:15:42.720 --> 1:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>would have to trespass to get in there. A landowner

1:15:48.560 --> 1:15:53.200
<v Speaker 1>who owned one of the buffer the barrier pieces donated

1:15:53.200 --> 1:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>as property to the federal government. It came with certain caveats,

1:15:57.720 --> 1:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>um some the the senators from New Mexico, Heinrich and

1:16:01.680 --> 1:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you'd all worked with Secretary Zinky, and we got a

1:16:07.439 --> 1:16:10.519
<v Speaker 1>new piece of land added to the federal estate that

1:16:10.640 --> 1:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>provides access into the wilderness area. No one changed the

1:16:13.680 --> 1:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>travel restrictions within the wilderness area. It's it's a non

1:16:16.320 --> 1:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>motorized wilderness area. But now Americans can park their car

1:16:22.400 --> 1:16:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and hike in and access this wilderness area, the Sabanosa

1:16:26.080 --> 1:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Wilderness Area. So in my mind, I would look like

1:16:28.680 --> 1:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that is a beautiful access story. I like that one

1:16:34.960 --> 1:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch um. That would be like a definition

1:16:38.280 --> 1:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>of access. And I feel that or I feel that

1:16:44.800 --> 1:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>some people are taking access and meaning just trying to

1:16:47.439 --> 1:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>remove travel restrictions on land that already is technically accessible

1:16:52.120 --> 1:16:53.839
<v Speaker 1>to hunters of fishermen, and I think that that causes

1:16:53.840 --> 1:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a certain amount of tention because people will look and

1:16:56.240 --> 1:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>feel that we have a finite amount of space that

1:17:00.479 --> 1:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>is off limits to mechanized use in vehicle travel, and

1:17:05.520 --> 1:17:09.880
<v Speaker 1>they are working hard to try to preserve those intact spaces.

1:17:10.840 --> 1:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel that there's merits of wanting those spaces?

1:17:15.040 --> 1:17:21.240
<v Speaker 1>If I understand your question, yeah, you do, Uh, I

1:17:21.280 --> 1:17:23.120
<v Speaker 1>think so. I mean the example you gave in New

1:17:23.160 --> 1:17:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Mexico cool. I don't have a problem with that whatsoever. Um.

1:17:29.400 --> 1:17:32.519
<v Speaker 1>We did have when when we lost a majority and

1:17:32.560 --> 1:17:35.559
<v Speaker 1>went in minority, there were a couple of hearings we

1:17:35.600 --> 1:17:38.679
<v Speaker 1>had in the Resource Committee again in which they brought

1:17:39.240 --> 1:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>some union people out because they thought they would be

1:17:42.439 --> 1:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>very positive about conservation concepts, and they were. But what

1:17:46.920 --> 1:17:49.599
<v Speaker 1>they quit doing that quick soon because they found out

1:17:49.640 --> 1:17:52.559
<v Speaker 1>that when you had economic development, like like an oil

1:17:52.640 --> 1:17:54.879
<v Speaker 1>rig or something that was an oil well that was developed,

1:17:55.680 --> 1:17:58.400
<v Speaker 1>they had to have roads that went into there. And

1:17:58.439 --> 1:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they had some new roads developed opened

1:18:00.960 --> 1:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>up a whole area that was not part of the

1:18:03.320 --> 1:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>economic development for hunting and fishing that wasn't there before.

1:18:07.120 --> 1:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Because they didn't have the road. So oddly enough, these

1:18:10.280 --> 1:18:13.759
<v Speaker 1>union members were very positive about the economic development aspect

1:18:13.800 --> 1:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>because it allowed them to actually get into areas that

1:18:17.120 --> 1:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have before. And I think that's the same

1:18:18.840 --> 1:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>thing you're saying, isn't it. Well, Uh, apologies on me

1:18:23.160 --> 1:18:26.360
<v Speaker 1>a little bit opaque, but it's not my intention, and

1:18:26.479 --> 1:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>it's compared to some of the other things we talked about.

1:18:28.800 --> 1:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>It's probably a little bit not something you hear as

1:18:32.000 --> 1:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>much about, but it has to do with I don't

1:18:36.120 --> 1:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>feel that. I feel that a little in a little

1:18:37.880 --> 1:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>bit way, we're twisting the intent of access enhancement to

1:18:41.960 --> 1:18:46.799
<v Speaker 1>make it be that we're trying to increase vehicle traffic

1:18:47.120 --> 1:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and motorize use in areas where it wouldn't have been

1:18:49.880 --> 1:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>in camouflaging that as an achievement of access enhancement, but

1:18:56.520 --> 1:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that you don't seem particularly like inspired and talking about that, um,

1:19:01.520 --> 1:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and i'd like to ask you can we're running out topic.

1:19:04.080 --> 1:19:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Were going into one last idea for a minute. I

1:19:06.720 --> 1:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>gotta think about what you just said, because I don't

1:19:09.200 --> 1:19:11.640
<v Speaker 1>know whether I agree with you or not, but I

1:19:11.640 --> 1:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>don't disagree with you yet. Okay, maybe we'll return to

1:19:14.680 --> 1:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it next time. Um, can you give me mile high

1:19:19.320 --> 1:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>perspectives on the Endangered Species Act? It's had some remarkable successes,

1:19:26.479 --> 1:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>had some remarkable failures. It leads to a lot of tensions.

1:19:31.800 --> 1:19:33.120
<v Speaker 1>What are some of the things that you would like

1:19:33.160 --> 1:19:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to see happen with the e s A As we

1:19:35.720 --> 1:19:39.519
<v Speaker 1>increasingly talk about modifying it. There's been talking about Altright

1:19:39.560 --> 1:19:42.840
<v Speaker 1>appealing it. Do you have a general guiding principle when

1:19:42.880 --> 1:19:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at the Endangered Species Act? Yeah, frustration because

1:19:46.360 --> 1:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they don't know how to fix it. The problem is

1:19:49.240 --> 1:19:51.800
<v Speaker 1>right now with most of the species that are put

1:19:51.840 --> 1:19:54.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Endangered Species Act, the goal is simply to

1:19:55.080 --> 1:19:58.559
<v Speaker 1>control land area around it. It is not to improve

1:19:58.640 --> 1:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the species. We is why the success rate of this

1:20:02.200 --> 1:20:05.599
<v Speaker 1>program is probably one of the lowest of every program.

1:20:05.840 --> 1:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Were you actually I got a good baseball store that

1:20:09.280 --> 1:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>goes even better than that? But Um, the bottom line,

1:20:13.880 --> 1:20:16.640
<v Speaker 1>because I know you're running out of time, is I

1:20:16.680 --> 1:20:20.759
<v Speaker 1>would love the Endangered Species Act to be better written

1:20:20.840 --> 1:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>so that what we do is having matrix that were

1:20:23.400 --> 1:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in there on what it takes to actually rehabilitate a

1:20:26.000 --> 1:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>species and then moving towards that. I don't think we're

1:20:30.400 --> 1:20:32.360
<v Speaker 1>doing that enough in fact, that we're not doing that

1:20:32.439 --> 1:20:35.320
<v Speaker 1>at all right now, it's it's simply to control an

1:20:35.360 --> 1:20:39.479
<v Speaker 1>area as if that will magically rehabilitate the species. That's

1:20:39.479 --> 1:20:42.599
<v Speaker 1>not the same thing. I wish it was function more

1:20:42.640 --> 1:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>as how you actually do the job, as opposed to saying, okay,

1:20:46.280 --> 1:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>we list this as a species. Let's hope if we

1:20:49.479 --> 1:20:52.160
<v Speaker 1>leave it alone and we'll get better. That doesn't work.

1:20:52.360 --> 1:20:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, earlier I mentioned people that are trying to

1:20:55.120 --> 1:21:00.400
<v Speaker 1>do landscape preservation reach out and try to find tools

1:21:00.600 --> 1:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>and apply those tools to get the job done, even

1:21:04.479 --> 1:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if the tool isn't intended to be that way. And

1:21:08.080 --> 1:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you feel that the ESA is is being used like

1:21:10.680 --> 1:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that as well. Yeah, Yeah, clearly that happens. Sometimes Sometimes

1:21:17.400 --> 1:21:19.120
<v Speaker 1>it just happens that we don't know how the hell

1:21:19.120 --> 1:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>do I actually rehabilitate the species, but it's listed anyway.

1:21:23.240 --> 1:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you feel like, uh, in short term, what

1:21:26.000 --> 1:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing do you feel that we're going to

1:21:27.960 --> 1:21:32.920
<v Speaker 1>see movement on e s A modifications or or rewriting

1:21:32.920 --> 1:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the essay or clarifying the essay. I hope we could

1:21:35.920 --> 1:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>clarify it in some way to add those those those

1:21:38.840 --> 1:21:41.599
<v Speaker 1>modifications so you can find out so it can actually

1:21:41.640 --> 1:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>be successful and you can monitor and you know where

1:21:43.920 --> 1:21:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get that success. To be honest, I

1:21:47.040 --> 1:21:48.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know how to write that into the language of

1:21:48.880 --> 1:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the bill, which is why it is frustrating to me.

1:21:52.280 --> 1:21:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So I have I have sarcastically said you might as

1:21:54.280 --> 1:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>well just get rid of it all and start over again. Um.

1:21:58.360 --> 1:22:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean I really want to get rid of

1:22:00.080 --> 1:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it and start over again. It's just I don't know

1:22:02.120 --> 1:22:04.840
<v Speaker 1>short of doing that, how you start, how you fix it.

1:22:05.680 --> 1:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>I've seen where you've said that, and I've asked people

1:22:08.160 --> 1:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>what you might mean by that, and they've said that

1:22:12.000 --> 1:22:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you were saying that it needs work, and you were

1:22:15.120 --> 1:22:19.519
<v Speaker 1>starting at an extreme, hoping to find some solution in

1:22:19.520 --> 1:22:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the middle ground. Now sometimes I just say stuff for

1:22:23.040 --> 1:22:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the fun of it. Do you have any uh we've

1:22:28.160 --> 1:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>touched on a lot. Do you have any final thoughts

1:22:30.080 --> 1:22:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to add in? It's been great to I

1:22:31.640 --> 1:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>mean admittedly, I mean I've been you know, reading your

1:22:34.120 --> 1:22:40.639
<v Speaker 1>name for so long. Um, that's ominous. It's uh, it's

1:22:40.640 --> 1:22:45.040
<v Speaker 1>been great to hear from you how you know, how

1:22:45.120 --> 1:22:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you kind of how you think and how you approach

1:22:47.200 --> 1:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the world. And I think that people really appreciate it.

1:22:49.640 --> 1:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>But do you have any final things you want to

1:22:51.680 --> 1:22:55.040
<v Speaker 1>touch on or add on now? I I appreciate the

1:22:55.120 --> 1:22:58.880
<v Speaker 1>chance to discuss things, um and and the way you've

1:22:58.920 --> 1:23:02.960
<v Speaker 1>presented them and given me the opportunity to talk about it. Oftentimes,

1:23:03.240 --> 1:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>um as much as I said, you know, words have meaning,

1:23:07.000 --> 1:23:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they can also be confusing, and sometimes we're not really

1:23:11.920 --> 1:23:15.439
<v Speaker 1>talking at an issue, we're talking around it and using

1:23:15.479 --> 1:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the same words with a different meaning to it all together.

1:23:18.720 --> 1:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a lot of the problem that

1:23:20.680 --> 1:23:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we have in the issues that deal with lands and

1:23:22.840 --> 1:23:26.240
<v Speaker 1>public lands. We all have a common goal, but we

1:23:26.280 --> 1:23:29.479
<v Speaker 1>have different meanings of how you achieve that common goal.

1:23:31.400 --> 1:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>So some it's easy to talk about this stuff. In fact,

1:23:35.280 --> 1:23:37.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe that's one of the issues. I mean, we've gone

1:23:37.080 --> 1:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>through it. I haven't really gone through that many different topics,

1:23:40.400 --> 1:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>but you've gone into in depth with it. It's like,

1:23:42.880 --> 1:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>what an hour and a half in depth. Usually it's

1:23:46.280 --> 1:23:50.080
<v Speaker 1>sound bites, it's tweets. Sorry. Usually I don't get a

1:23:50.160 --> 1:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>chance to talk this this level, this intensity of how

1:23:53.920 --> 1:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we can try and solve some of these issues or

1:23:56.400 --> 1:23:59.120
<v Speaker 1>bring people together. I don't get that kind of opportunity.

1:23:59.120 --> 1:24:00.840
<v Speaker 1>This is kind of a union because I appreciate you

1:24:00.880 --> 1:24:03.160
<v Speaker 1>doing it. Oh, I appreciate you coming on. And I

1:24:03.200 --> 1:24:08.400
<v Speaker 1>think that as much as different people in different organizations

1:24:08.439 --> 1:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>have um wildly different perspectives on how to solve some

1:24:13.439 --> 1:24:16.959
<v Speaker 1>of these problems, I think it says a lot for

1:24:17.120 --> 1:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>our times and a lot for the country that we

1:24:19.120 --> 1:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>have the luxury of being able to have a conversation

1:24:24.479 --> 1:24:30.600
<v Speaker 1>around public lands and wildlife. Um, that we still have

1:24:31.040 --> 1:24:33.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it, and it's very beautiful, and we're all,

1:24:34.439 --> 1:24:37.640
<v Speaker 1>hopefully all of us are deeply invested in seeing that

1:24:37.640 --> 1:24:41.559
<v Speaker 1>those things continue into the future. So thank you for

1:24:41.600 --> 1:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>your time. I know you're very busy, man. I appreciate

1:24:44.080 --> 1:24:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you sitting down with us to discuss these issues. Thanks

1:24:47.040 --> 1:24:47.719
<v Speaker 1>for the invitation.