WEBVTT - Lyft Reports Earnings, Looking Ahead To Uber 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. We had Lift earnings

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>last night, UM which had guidance that was subdued, UM

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 1>eclipsing the first ever profit, sort of milestone, and now

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:36.639
<v Speaker 1>we have and the shares are down significantly, and now

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we have Uber coming out after the bell tonight. So

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>let's bring in man deep seeing senior tech industry analysts

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence, to talk about, you know, what we

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:48.919
<v Speaker 1>saw yesterday and what we expect tonight. I know that

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Lift had its first profit and it's popular maybe amongst

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the kids. For me, I'm doing like eighty dollars and

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Uber rides a day here and I feel like they

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>better knock it out of the park tonight. Well, so

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the good thing about you know, this space is at

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.839
<v Speaker 1>least they're just two competitors. It's a duopoly Uber and Lift.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>You contrast that with food delivery where you've got you know,

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>five or six vendors trying to compete, uh for I

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>would say a pretty small market at this point of time.

0:01:23.120 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 1>So the print we saw it Lift had, you know,

0:01:26.440 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>it was a mixed bag in the sense that the

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>bright spot was profitability, as we alluded to. But I

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>think the whole pricing aspect of it is kind of

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>worrisome because at the end of the day, how much

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:40.960
<v Speaker 1>can you pass on to the customers and then it

0:01:41.000 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>starts to weigh on the volume growth, so especially LIFT customers.

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Isn't Lift kind of a discount Uber? Isn't that the idea? No?

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I I think these companies have sort of rationalized the

0:01:52.360 --> 0:01:56.120
<v Speaker 1>pricing so they're not trying to compete on prices or

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>undercut each other. It's and and that's why I mentioned

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 1>about a police So the good thing is you can

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>have you know, two competitors, one with sixty percent share,

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>the other one with and still both can do well.

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 1>But to your point about the food delivery space being

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>more crowded, Uber's in that too. It has Uber Eats,

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder, you know if Lift it's kind of

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 1>like correlated with the reopening in a positive way, and

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>right demand going up, is that going to be bad

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for Uber because Uber eats demand maybe going down? Yes,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Uber definitely has a tougher comp when it comes to

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 1>food delivery, and you're not gonna see that sort of

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>growth which we saw during the pandemic. So if will

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:37.480
<v Speaker 1>offset there, you know the pickup in ride sharing, and

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that's why they are now kind of doubling down in

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>the freight space with this recent acquisition of Transplace. So

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, Uber wants to be that diversified player,

0:02:47.800 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the scale player. But there aren't many revenue synergies between

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>these businesses, Like their synergy between ride sharing and food

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>delivery is minimal. Like these are both commodity services. You know,

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>user still gravitate towards the Lewis price options. So I

0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>just feel Uber has a tougher kind of task in

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.519
<v Speaker 1>terms of convincing investors that yes, the three businesses make

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>sense under one umbrella, and you know there will be

0:03:14.200 --> 0:03:16.800
<v Speaker 1>more profitable as a result of that. But we'll see.

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:20.639
<v Speaker 1>What is who takes lift rather than Uber? I take

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>it because my credit card gives me ten times points

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on Lift. But that's basically my only rational Is there

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a lift black. Can you are you going to be

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>able to get into an escalate or whatever with the

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>lift or is lift because I've always thought lit was

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just like some dude's regular car, so I'm gonna go

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>out and get in somebody's Corolla. Rather, they have tiered pricing,

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they have tiered service levels, and uh, that's the business models.

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>So they want, you know, users who are not that

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>price sensitive to pay up and for the service, and

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>so they are launching and that there's not a huge

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>differentiation to Uber when it comes to the actual core business. Yeah,

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean they are both copying each other. Anytime one

0:04:02.280 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>comes up with a better feature of the other ones copies.

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>But again, the point is they're just two. In food,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you've gotten five or six vendors all doing the same least.

0:04:10.880 --> 0:04:12.720
<v Speaker 1>We have five or six in Berlin, you know, and

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>more specifically for pizza, I think it's called slice, Yes

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:20.960
<v Speaker 1>it is. We also have a ton of different grocery services.

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you had this in New York,

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:25.760
<v Speaker 1>but I can order groceries pretty much anything you would

0:04:25.760 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>get at the grocery store and have it at my

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 1>door in ten minutes time. I mean, they are super fast,

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that New York is probably too trafficky for that. You

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>can do it in two hours, I know with Amazon

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and Holdings, but yeah, I mean, it takes just kind

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of a long time to get anywhere in Manhattan and

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan at least, um I want to pivot from talking

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.360
<v Speaker 1>about groceries and food delivery to just talking about workers

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and finding drivers. It's incredibly difficult for these companies right now.

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>How much of a headwind does that create for Uber

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and Lift going forward? Yeah, so Lift mentioned last night

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>they spent about you know, five million on driver incentives,

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and that was a contra revenue to their top line.

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess at the end of the day, they're all

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.839
<v Speaker 1>competing for that same worker pool, so they have to

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, shell out the incentives because these are not employees.

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think right sharing is still a better business

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>from a driver's perspective. In the case of food delivery,

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:26.679
<v Speaker 1>you're getting paid lore compared to you know, the right sharing.

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:31.239
<v Speaker 1>So from a worker perspective, I think right sharing is cleaner.

0:05:31.279 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>But you put more on the line, don't you, because

0:05:33.080 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you have to actually lease a car. And I remember

0:05:35.160 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>when Uber first started, the company was only taking ten

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen percent of the fair. And then you know,

0:05:42.720 --> 0:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>after you've got your GMC yukon denally XL and we're

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>paying a thousand dollar least, all of a sudden the

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 1>company said, hey, we're gonna take of your fair and

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>it seemed incredibly unfair to me and I wouldn't as

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>a driver, want to be put in that position. After

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I signed a lease, all of a sudden you tell

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 1>me I'm gonna make less and less money. Yeah, so

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:06.119
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right. They can't raise the take rates

0:06:06.240 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and you will see a pushback. And there is that

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:12.599
<v Speaker 1>regulatory aspect that obviously it's always a wild card, you know,

0:06:12.720 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>where you could see more regulation. But at the end

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of the day, they have pulled capacity and they have

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the demand and that is the value out of a marketplace.

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know the fact that there are just two

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>marketplaces is good for right sharing as an industry. And

0:06:27.960 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>if you've said two things in the past, like minute one,

0:06:30.040 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>regulation and two, these aren't employees that we're talking about.

0:06:33.000 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>This is the gig autonomy. But that's creating some problems

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:38.760
<v Speaker 1>for uber and lift as well. How how great is

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory risk on that front? That's a big risk.

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean with these companies, the fact that they weren't

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>profitable at least now they're showing profitability. And the cost

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.359
<v Speaker 1>side is always kind of in focus because of the

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 1>high variable costs in this business. So anytime you have

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the prospect of more regulation, it will increase costs and

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>that is not good for you know, sustaining the profitability.

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>So clearly it is a big threat. But at least,

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, as long as they can maintain the top

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>line growth and with you know, economies opening up, demand

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>coming back, I think they should be good at least

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>for the next one or two years. No one knows

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the kind of the growth rate three or four years

0:07:20.560 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>down the line. I think the business models will evolve.

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>I noticed the other day I wrote down I took

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the subway down to Grand Central station as I was

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 1>heading out to Bronxfie to look at houses, and it

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was empty. There was almost nobody on the subway. It

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>was unbelievable. On the four or five six here usually

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it's packed. Yes, so they have taken share from a

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of the public transportation, and the use cases for

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>these companies keep evolving. I mean, the whole aspect of

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>right sharing, like there isn't any sharing right now. Hopefully

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>at at some point it will come back. But you know,

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 1>these companies have evolved, and I think the use cases

0:07:56.880 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>will emerge and that should help you know, at these uh,

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.119
<v Speaker 1>these companies to maintain relevance. All right. Our producer Charlie

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Bulmer writs in that his seven train this week was

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>more packed than it's ever been, So maybe I was

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>just very off peak as I headed down to Grand Central.

0:08:12.840 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Man Deep, thanks very much for joining us. Man Deep Sing,

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>senior tech industry analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, talking to us

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>about Uber out after the bell. This is Bloomberg. I

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>am just looking forward to what we got going on

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>today and we have a lot. Let's bring in Jennifer

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Epstein right now, political reporter from Bloomberg News. We've got

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>her on the line from Washington, d C. To talk. Well,

0:08:36.920 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of talk about, but I guess Jennifer.

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:43.319
<v Speaker 1>The first issue is the Biden administration. The c d

0:08:43.440 --> 0:08:47.560
<v Speaker 1>C eviction moratorium. It looked like it was over, and

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:50.199
<v Speaker 1>now it looks like they're extending it until October thirteenth.

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Although the President himself said there's not really very strong

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>constitutional grounds for this Yeah, it's actually October three or

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>two months from yesterday, UM, when the CDC Director um

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>signed this order, and it's trying to be a bit

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 1>more narrow and really focused on the rise of the

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>delta variant, and what the CDC Director says is the

0:09:13.440 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>public health threat that comes with people potentially being evicted

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>from their homes and then you know, ending up in

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>shelters or on the streets, um, where there could potentially

0:09:23.360 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>be more spread of the virus and you might see

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>in if people were living in their own homes. But

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.560
<v Speaker 1>why do they care enough today and not like Saturday? Like,

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>why not deal with this before? Yeah, well, it certainly

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>seems like this did come up as a bit of

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a surprise for the administration. As much as they had

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>known the deadline was coming, they were also very focused

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>on on the infrastructure bill, and you know, it's really

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>they seem to have also been caught a bit by

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>surprise by the very rapid spread of the delta variant

0:09:56.440 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and all of that sort of created this pressure. And

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:01.680
<v Speaker 1>then at the same time time you had these uh

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>small group of House Democrats really backed by the entirety

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:09.959
<v Speaker 1>of the House Democratic Caucus saying uh in the last

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>few days at the end of last week. This is

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>something that has to be done. You have to help

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>these people out, um, you know. And so the administration

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>found a way to do it. It just took them

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a bit longer than I think that advocates and and

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>other outside people would have liked to have seen. And

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>it may not be constitutional. I mean, we can always

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.439
<v Speaker 1>find way to do things. If it's not constitutional. It's

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>just really not helpful, is it. Yeah. Well, the President

0:10:36.000 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>I think is somebody who was very cautious about those things.

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's sort of why he was reluctant to just

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>go out and announce an extension last week. Uh and

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of back in the Supreme Court, uh to it,

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. And and he he doesn't, you know, always

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have the best filter for things, and so he kind

0:10:56.160 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of said that yesterday that this is something that might

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:02.920
<v Speaker 1>not pass muster in the courts, but it's something that

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the administration kind of had no choice politically but to

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>try out. At the very least, they've bought a little

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>bit of time, a couple of days, a couple of

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>weeks while this works its way uh in court. And

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and and the other issue here is really that the

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Treasury Department's efforts to get out over forty billion dollars

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in rental aid have been uh pretty slow so far

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>because it's something where treasurism worth working with state and

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>local governments, and that has all just taken a lot

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of time to get up and running. This money from

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the Recovery Act that passed in March, and they were

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>only able to get one point five billion of that

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 1>out uh two renters in the month of June. So

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're hoping that that rationale that that's taken

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>so long, which is something uh that Justice Kavanaugh did

0:11:51.080 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>mention when he was part of uh uh the Supreme

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Court uh weighing in on this. He was not actually

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a part of the the um major the majority ruling

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 1>on this, but uh that that is something that that

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they are hoping that that maybe they can kind of

0:12:12.440 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>thread the legal legal argument there and have that uh

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.760
<v Speaker 1>way of getting ahead of so speaking of legal arguments

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:21.959
<v Speaker 1>and what a president does or does not have power

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to do, obviously, at the end of the day, this

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>issue comes back to the pandemic. That is why there

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>are millions of people facing the potential loss of their home.

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Is there anything else that President Biden has it in

0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>his power to do. In terms of the vaccination front, Yes,

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>he's finally mandated that that federal workers need to get

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:43.160
<v Speaker 1>vaccinated or be tested all the time. But is there

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>anything else? Yeah, I think the administration is continuing to

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:50.680
<v Speaker 1>look for more things to do. Um. They're looking for

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>other areas of the federal government besides sort of the

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>executive branch employees um who are covered by by the

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>order last week, to uh, potentially more public health kind

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of workers who are not necessarily a part of that

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>initial order. I think the administration is also uh just

0:13:12.000 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at at the the approval process for the vaccines.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, it seems like, uh we saw Dr Fauci

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>last night saying that could be just two weeks away

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>from fives or getting final approval um with with the

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>sd A. And that's something where um, the administrative the

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>White House is going to stay out of that because

0:13:33.960 --> 0:13:36.599
<v Speaker 1>they don't want there to be any appearance of of

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>political pressure on these public health agencies. UM. But that itself,

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 1>I think would would be a pretty significant move forward

0:13:45.080 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>because there are lots of people at least right now

0:13:47.600 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>who are saying, I don't want to do anything until

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 1>that A fully approves it, so that in of itself

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 1>could be a pretty big um move forward. And then UM,

0:13:57.120 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I think the administration is just

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna kind of the for any little uh, you know,

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>pocket of people it can get to, uh to try

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to to try to get more people back to native Jennifer,

0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks for spending some time with us. Jennifer Epstein is

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News political reporter coming to us out of Washington,

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>d C. Now, there has been a ton of M

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and A activity today alone. Um, we saw a big

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>uh deal in the telecom space with Apollo. We saw

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:32.440
<v Speaker 1>UM a big deal in soccer La Liga. Ten percent

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>of that I went to CVC. Um we saw a

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>huge like a seventeen billion dollar deal. What was that?

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>We saw um VC no VC properties buying MGM Growth

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Properties seventeen point two billion dollars. And but you were

0:14:49.320 --> 0:14:51.760
<v Speaker 1>pointing out Square and after pay started the week off

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with a bang on Monday, the biggest acquisition ever for

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>an Australian company twenty nine billion dollars. And I think

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:59.440
<v Speaker 1>since the beginning of July you said more than like

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>five billion, fifty billion dollars and deals have been done,

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's a great time to bring in uh Thad Malik.

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>He is the chair of Global Mergers and Acquisitions, the

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 1>practice Global Mergence Acquisition Practice at Paul Hastings and he

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>can talk to us about you know, this this incredible

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>growth that thanks for joining us. Um Is this peaking now?

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Is this going to slow down? Or are we just

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna look at you know, record M and A activity

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>this year? Yeah? Thanks Matt and Kaylee. Nice to be here.

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Appreciate the opportunity right now. It's interesting, you've got pretty

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>much the perfect confluence of events for continued activity. You

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>alluded to some of it earlier in terms of rate reviews,

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of what people are seeing in terms of rates,

0:15:42.040 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>but more importantly, markets don't really like uncertainty when it

0:15:45.360 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>comes to M and A and so with some of

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic challenges waning and with the vaccinations increasing, that's

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>gotten people a little less uncomfortable about what's coming down

0:15:56.880 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the road. And it's pretty much the perfect influence of

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a ends. I think you're going to start to see

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a shift and you're starting to

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>see this on the anti trust side, Folks are starting

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>to focus a little bit more than they have in

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the past, And just yesterday the FTC indicated that the

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>crush of deals is so large that they're not able

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to get through their review in thirty days for some deals,

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>and so that puts people in a little bit of limbo.

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>But for now, I'd say we have a wary eye

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>trained on horizon. But things are still trending positive. But

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not even just that the deal approval process could

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>be slow. The Biden administration has signaled that it wants

0:16:31.120 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot tougher on competition in general. How

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 1>how much of a headwind is that to the M

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>and A market. I think it's going to be a

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>particular headwind for those that are in industries that they

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>fixed their sights on. The regulators tend to follow a

0:16:43.760 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty well worn path. They try to communicate a little

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>bit of where they're they're coming, and you see some

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of that in his executive order, and particularly for the

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>large tech companies and those that are perceived to have

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>large market presence. I think that scrutiny is going to continue,

0:16:58.320 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think you can add on top of that

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>prank like some of what you're seeing in terms of

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the sciffiest review, the foreign review of key industries and

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>deals in that space. So I think that is going

0:17:08.080 --> 0:17:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a continuing challenge right now, that's probably the

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest potential disruptor that folks are looking at, but more

0:17:15.840 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>could be coming. Well. Taxes is the other right um,

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 1>at least, I'm not sure which way that pushes things,

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>because we've seen a number of deals already, some very

0:17:26.200 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>big deals due to the fact that private ownership saw

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe a jump in capital gains coming and wanted to

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>get out ahead of it. Absolutely, and one of the

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>things that they've learned, I mean in the past when

0:17:39.000 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>this has happening, in particular for the private equity sponsors,

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>there's been a surge of activity to try to beet

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the increase. And one of the issues that they've been

0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>discussing is whether they make that sort of retroactive so

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.159
<v Speaker 1>to a certain extent that's got people a little I

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say destabilized, but again cautious about what

0:17:55.800 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>they're looking at. So in particular for the sponsors, that

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>becomes a very pressing concern. What's the hottest industry right

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>now for murger activity? Basically anything technology related, whether you

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.879
<v Speaker 1>call it digitization or digitalization, however you refer to it.

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>People are recognizing, particularly with the work from home dynamics,

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:19.920
<v Speaker 1>that they need to upgrade their systems and capabilities and

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.639
<v Speaker 1>anything related to technology, whether that's improving your supply chain,

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>whether that's improving your metrics, finding new ways of generating

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:33.960
<v Speaker 1>revenue from data that your your products push off, anything

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that's related to that. There's a recognition that you need

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>to be moving forward and oftentimes buying it is cheaper

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>than building it and certainly faster. Does it help that

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>there is no interest rate risk here? I mean not

0:18:48.760 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>only are rates low negative to low, but they're never

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:58.959
<v Speaker 1>going up again. Well, they the cycles tend to move

0:18:59.000 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 1>in cycles, so as some point there will be the

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>inevitable sort of come up and but no, certainly right now.

0:19:04.280 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a significant driver again for the sponsors in particular

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>with rates being low, they can reset their expectations in

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of deals. And there's a lot of activity right now.

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's what we're seeing on the service provider

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 1>side from the investment banks. What the FTC did, which

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>is basically recognize what the service providers have been seeing.

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of activity trying to get pushed through

0:19:25.440 --> 0:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>right now as quickly as possible, because people don't want

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>to get caught, you know, catching the follow knife, so

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>to speak, when the inevitable cycle turns. All right, Dad,

0:19:34.040 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us time to talk about

0:19:36.720 --> 0:19:38.440
<v Speaker 1>and it was great having you. Hopefully get you back

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>on soon. Daddy's Malik there is the chair of Global

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Mergers and Acquisitions at Paul Hastings talking to us about

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>this m and a market which has just been incredible.

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the deals I forgot to mention

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.919
<v Speaker 1>was Betsy Cohen did another back deal today and I

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>think she's done at least twelve billion dollars worth of

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Financial Services Act deal. So when you bring spacks into it,

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>it just is an incredible market um and the growth

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.200
<v Speaker 1>has been um pretty outstanding. M A go by the way,

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it's one of my favorite functions on the Bloomberg terminal

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a great way to see. For example, you

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:15.879
<v Speaker 1>can click on forgo for the league table and you

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>can see how many deals have been done year to

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>date or in the last month of Tetra highly recommen

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:28.359
<v Speaker 1>using it. M A go. This is Bloomberg Now to

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:32.959
<v Speaker 1>bringing Kate. Hello Global chief investment officer at Russell Investments

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit about E S G investing

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to us Kate, it's interesting because there are a few

0:20:38.720 --> 0:20:43.320
<v Speaker 1>different ways investors can go with E S G And

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess it depends. Do you have to decide if

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you want to UM chase returns or make a difference. Yeah.

0:20:54.560 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's UM the blend of financial, non financial

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>and regulatory drivers that are making people kind of go

0:21:02.680 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in one direction versus another. Yeah. I think increasingly the

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.800
<v Speaker 1>ability to kind of prove out that you leading in

0:21:10.840 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 1>certain directions you can have a positive or at least

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>not a negative impact on returns UM will start to

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of play through UM. But I do think there,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, your needs to be kind of that balanced

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 1>focus of that primary objective. What is it? Is it

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:30.679
<v Speaker 1>about having the impact or is it about returns just

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>so you can calibrate how much you go in one

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>direction versus the other? Do we have enough data to

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 1>make E S G investments? I feel like a lot

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of this stuff has been pretty opaque. But is that changing? Yeah, Yeah,

0:21:43.760 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great question. UM. And I think

0:21:45.920 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the climate side, the data availability and some

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.399
<v Speaker 1>of the approaches for kind of testing the impact of

0:21:53.560 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 1>climate on different sectors or different types of metrics is

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>getting a lot better and it's accelerating really quickly, and

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>so I think a big area you know, needs to

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>be to really stift through those different data options, test out,

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the impact it's having on asset pricing, because

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we might not see that for quite some time, but

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of scenario kind of test your way

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>into different paths that you know it could take. But

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:21.119
<v Speaker 1>the data is starting to know much better quickly, particularly

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on the climate side. Before we get it deeper there,

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>I want to understand outsourced ce io UM investment solutions.

0:22:29.920 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>What exactly is that? Yeah, so it's largely defined benefit

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>plans and diamonds and foundations and hospital the systems that

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 1>are looking to outsource their investment program. In most cases

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 1>it's because they, you know, want to focus on their

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:49.880
<v Speaker 1>core competencies, maybe want to up there with mandrink game

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.439
<v Speaker 1>and or just have a partner to help navigate the

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>market and the in terms of actually what we do

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>or what the O G I oh kind of universe says,

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really about delivering a total solution that's customized

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>to particular outcomes, and so it's not just stout being

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a benchmark. The often it's focused on like the fundergradition

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for a pension or particular income needs. You know that

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.919
<v Speaker 1>in endowment is listening to achieve or volatility requirement, and

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 1>so you're having some flexibility and how you try to

0:23:15.320 --> 0:23:17.920
<v Speaker 1>solve those problems. It's part of that kind of O

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:21.800
<v Speaker 1>C I O solution. How do you approach investing with

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>climate specifically in mind, especially considering the green spending we're

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>getting out of the bipart as an infrastructure plan as

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.720
<v Speaker 1>well as the Democratic only plan that will likely be

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:35.119
<v Speaker 1>pushed through before or after at some point, how do

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 1>you how do you think about what may benefit the most? Yeah,

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think you still need to take a fairly

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 1>long term view on how this is going to impact

0:23:44.840 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>capitalication and um and returns and asset pricing. But as

0:23:49.560 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you start to see some of these policies, you know,

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of shifts an actual spending linked to it, it

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 1>does make it easier to start to think through the

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>winners and losers, you know, with some of the bills

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>that are coming through at least in the U S side,

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure spin and things like that that might mean a

0:24:06.440 --> 0:24:08.439
<v Speaker 1>little bit more E. S G. Just helps them think

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>about how you might want to allocate and where there's

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that tackle allocation element is is starting to be decided. Um,

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I think that there's like there's just

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:19.520
<v Speaker 1>small pieces to hind the earlier point. All of this

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is still early stages, and so you know, you still

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>need to maintain diversification in terms of how you're approaching

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, toping the portfolio, because it's not clear on

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:31.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of where this is going, and so having the

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>frameworks and the and the tools to really kind of

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>understand the impact and be able to measure it. I

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's gonna be really important along the way speaking

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:42.680
<v Speaker 1>of diversification, diversity and inclusion. I mean the idea intuitively

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>makes sense to me. Um. I was once talking to

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Mindy Grossman, who used to be the only woman on

0:24:47.760 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the board at Nike, and they apparently in a giant

0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>board meeting all turned to her and asked, how can

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>we sell more shoes to women? And the obvious answer is, duh,

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>you need to have more women on the board. Um.

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>And and that's you know, I think it makes makes

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.719
<v Speaker 1>sense just innately, but um, do we have enough data

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 1>in in asset management that shows how important diversity is

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 1>in returns. Yeah, there has been a good amount of

0:25:14.200 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>work done both in terms of your boards, but also

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>like investors and where you get um whether it's you know,

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>gender related or other forms of diversity. You know, more

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of balanced and consistent returns um when you actually

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.720
<v Speaker 1>have more balanced and perspectives. And so I think that

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, still your consistently work that needs to

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>be done to prove that out. But you know, you

0:25:35.600 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>even see, you know, there's there's some work that's been

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>done multiple times. DA saying that women tend to be

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit less action oriented in a good way.

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.199
<v Speaker 1>I they don't feel the need to overtrade the portfolio

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and try to your stick to the thesis and stick

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>to the end of the view that they have and

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>more carefully think about making sifts. And so I do

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think that their support in the asset management worlds for

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>having that kind of diverse idea and actually impacting and

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be able to have more sistant and persistent returns. Kate,

0:26:02.920 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we only have about twenty seconds left, but just to

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>get your view on the market more broadly, would you

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>want to be getting defensive or more risk on here.

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>We're so constructive over over the next twelve months. We're

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>very focused on that kind of pandemic recovery trade. We're

0:26:16.000 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>risk neutral right now, um just because of some of

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the volatility, but we're leaning in the cyclicals. So there

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it says a little bit more constructive on the markets overall. Right, right,

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:27.439
<v Speaker 1>great to get some time with you, Kate, Thanks so

0:26:27.520 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Kate al Hillou spent years at

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan at Goldman, success at Management, now Global Chief

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 1>Investment Officer at Russell Investments, giving us her insight on

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.360
<v Speaker 1>E S G as well as diversity and inclusion, which

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>are you know, more than just buzz buzzwords now, I

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think investors are are actually demanding these things. This is Bloomberg.

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.479
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 1>subscribe and listen to interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.719
<v Speaker 1>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three. On Fall Sweeney, I'm

0:27:03.760 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.