WEBVTT - Impeachment Outrage Meter at 11--Does it Matter?  Lanhee Chen Talks to Armstrong & Getty

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>It's wrong for president of the United States to seek

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>help from a foreign power in a presidential election. That's

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:11.239
<v Speaker 1>not okay. So let's be frank, and national nightmares upon us.

0:00:11.280 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>The basic rules of our democracy are under attack from

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the president again tonight, with a series of admissions by

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>the President that all but assures his impeachment and the

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>House of Representatives, but assures his impeachment in the House

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>of Representatives, A national nightmares upon us. His Chuck Todd

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>just realized. Nobody ever holds anybody to anything crazy they've

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>said in the past, so he's grandstanding. Lan he Chen

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 1>is the David and Diane Staffy Research Fellow with the

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Wover Institution, Director of Domestic Policy Studies at Stanford University,

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>host of the podcast Crossing Lines with lanh Chen joins us, Now,

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>lan he how are you, sir? I'm doing fine. Top

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of the day. To you, you wouldn't think it would

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 1>be possible that we could have another conversation with you.

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Where we're at like a higher volume of stuff than

0:00:57.480 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we have in the past, But it just keeps going there. Well, yeah,

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean the volume keeps going up, but it's not

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>clear to me that it's really affecting how anybody feels,

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean, that's the staggering thing about all

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.839
<v Speaker 1>of this is that the outrage meter uh continues to rise.

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And you know, people who think that the president is

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a crook still think the president is a crook. People

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:22.959
<v Speaker 1>who think the president is a savior still think the

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>president is a savior. And it's not entirely clear to

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:29.759
<v Speaker 1>me that evidence that comes out of this current inquiry.

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, unless there's like a dead body somewhere, it's

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.760
<v Speaker 1>not clear to me that that any of this matters

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>to how anybody feels. And it's such an amazing thing

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>that that's where we are in our political system. I've

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>been saying that all week long. I've yet to see

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>a pundit I like, or a person in my personal

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>life change sides. And until I see at least one

0:01:48.080 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>person actually changed their mind on this stuff yet to

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that point on here, I think there are two constituencies.

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Number One, the truly persuadable is the traditional Democrats who

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>voted for Trump and all so the crowd that a

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 1>lot of friends of Armstrong can getting you're in. They

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>say Trump's a loose cannon. He does stuff that just

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>gets in his own way. But I love what he's doing.

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>And now he shouldn't have said what he said about

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the Ukraine. That was dumb. But I'd rather have him

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>than anybody else. You've got to move those people, don't you. Yeah,

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I think so. I mean, you know, there's two different

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>theories about why Trump won the election. In one is

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that you had a bunch of people who said, you know,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll give something a try that we've never tried before

0:02:31.800 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and see how it goes, and and and and so

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>it was truly sort of a new kind of voter

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that came in that crossed over to vote for him.

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And the other theory is just look, Democrats didn't show up.

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>And so, you know, depending on which those theories you

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>believe in, that's going to drive how you think this

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>next election is going to turn out. But but to

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>get to the Trump constituency for a minute, I think

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>you're absolutely right. I think there are a lot of

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>people who look at all this and say, yeah, I

0:02:55.800 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>don't particularly care for the guy. I do think he's

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of a jerk, he's probably a little crooked, But

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, we have a three

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent unemployment rate, the economy in the

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>US is doing a heck of a lot better than

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>anywhere else in the world. And there are a number

0:03:08.760 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of things, from Supreme Court nominations to regulatory reform to

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>health care policy where you think, you know, I do

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>like what he's done, so you hold your nose and

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 1>pull the lever form again. I think that dynamic is

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>absolutely there. Yeah, and I wonder I'd like to hear

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>your opinion on where Nancy is on this at this point,

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Nancy Pelosi, if she really wants impeachment or not, because

0:03:29.919 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>if it comes down to a choice between Trump and

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren, Trump is gonna win, and she might know that.

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe at this point she thinks our only hope

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to get him out of here is impeachment. I don't

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 1>know what she's thinking. I think she is giving herself

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>some optionality. I think she's going to see how this

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>inquiry plays out. She's gonna see where the evidence goes.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>I think what she also wants to do, quite frankly,

0:03:52.560 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is to give the progressive base what they want for now,

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in the hope that if this thing crashes and burns,

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>she's got enough time net year to resolve or to

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to to figure out how she can at least keep

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the house or at least figure out some way to

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>complete the to ensure the Democratic Party doesn't completely crash

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>and burn. So it may be the case that she's

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of giving them a little bit of rope now

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and seeing where it goes. But I don't think she's

0:04:17.839 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>completely committed to this thing. And answer your question, I

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think she believes a hundred percent and impeachment. I

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:26.479
<v Speaker 1>think she is sort of she she's signaling to the left,

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving you what you want for now, let's see

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>where it goes. But she could very easily pull the

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:33.680
<v Speaker 1>plug on this if she wants. How do you like

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>her whole she's so sad and peripheral, being drugged through

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>this horrifying situation angle. Yeah, I mean, I don't think

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>anybody honestly believes it, and everyone's cut everyone. Everyone sort

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>of knows that Donald Trump was going to get impeached

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>from day one. That was always what the Democrats wanted

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.039
<v Speaker 1>to do, and it was a question of you know,

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>a friend of mine put it well, he said, you know,

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the verdict doesn't change, it's the charge that changes. So

0:04:58.720 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they have to figure out how how to change the

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>charge to match the verdict. And I do think some

0:05:03.960 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of that's going on here. And and by the way,

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Adam Schiff is a particularly good frontman

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for this whole thing's statement. Not to say that they've

0:05:13.080 --> 0:05:15.359
<v Speaker 1>got better front men or front women, but he's not

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.239
<v Speaker 1>very good. Well, he told a four pinocchio lie yesterday.

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.920
<v Speaker 1>According to The Washington Post, Lanie Chan is online from

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the Hoover Institution in Stanford University a Lanie the White

0:05:24.000 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>House in the last twenty four hours is announced that no,

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>we're not cooperating with any of this stuff because it's

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 1>not a real impeachment. You haven't had a vote. Um

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so so then then then, now, what do you think

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>of that maneuver? Yeah, I mean at some point that

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a problem. At some point they are going to

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>have to cooperate, or at least appear as though they're cooperating.

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Because the challenge is that as bad as what the

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:48.559
<v Speaker 1>Democrats are are doing is optically in a lot of ways,

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.400
<v Speaker 1>what would be worse would be for the White House

0:05:50.400 --> 0:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>to appear not transparent, because then it appears like you're

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.279
<v Speaker 1>hiding something. So well, they make it loud and clear,

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we will be as transparent as your picture window as

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>soon as they have a vote. I think it's a

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>good strategy. Yeah, I mean and I and I think

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats. You know, it does force the Democrats to

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>go on record, It forces them to do the procedural

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>elements they need to do. But you know that, here's

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.159
<v Speaker 1>the challenge. If you say that, you better be willing

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>to be transparent when happens. And That's what I'm not

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>sure about. Is there any chance if this uh, you know,

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we're leaving out the dead body scenario, you throughout you know,

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we know now that it would I could

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:27.839
<v Speaker 1>see the House saying, yeah, we got to impeach the guy.

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>They pass it along to the Senate, and the conventional

0:06:29.920 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 1>wisdom is Republicans have the votes to keep it from happening.

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>But is there there's a crowd there? You know Romney, well,

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>if he felt like there are other Republicans that would

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:41.560
<v Speaker 1>vote to remove Trump, I could see him saying, yeah,

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 1>let's do it, let's get him out of here, start over.

0:06:43.800 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Are there are a number of Republican senators that in

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>secret would absolutely jump on board if they could get

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>together to Toss Tromp. Yeah, I thought about this a lot.

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>I you know, the problem is you've got to get

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to sixty seven and I so it's going to take

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.680
<v Speaker 1>more than just a few. I mean, you would need

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>it at you know, fourteen fifteen Republican senators to sort

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of say, yeah, let's get rid of this guy. You know,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I can count maybe four or five for electoral or other,

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, personal reasons and are um you know, I

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 1>think I think I think Susan Collins is you know,

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>could be wobbly. Um, I think, uh, you know, for

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>some for for electoral reasons, someone like Corey Gardner in

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Colorado or Tom Tillos in North Carolina. Those guys have

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>really tough re election campaigns. But you don't think there

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>are enough in secret that if they if they got

0:07:31.360 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the nod, the secret handshake, they'd go along with it. No,

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't. I don't buy it. I think

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>that I think the President really has a lot of

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>people in the Senate who aren't just with him grudgingly.

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think they they have to embrace him

0:07:45.160 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>more than grudging. Well, then you really get to the

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>what's the point angle? I mean, what are you going

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to get out of it. Democrats, if you go through

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this whole impeachment thing knowing he's going to stay in office. Well,

0:07:55.640 --> 0:07:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just to make a point. I think

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's to make a political point, and I think it's

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to have an opportunity to to try and dominate the

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:06.680
<v Speaker 1>news cycle with negative information about Trump. The problem is

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that theory is flawed. You cannot dominate a news cycle

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 1>by definition that Donald Trump is in And so now now, now,

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>what you're trying to do is you're trying to do

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>something which clearly no one's been successful at so far.

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:23.200
<v Speaker 1>And I think this whole thing comes down to a

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 1>giant political and messaging exercise, and and and and that

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>is I hate to say it, but that is the

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:33.360
<v Speaker 1>core of politics. Now, well, I was going to say

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>it pains me, pains me to say this out loud,

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>but there are some politicians who will give the base

0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>what they want, even if it's a bad idea. You

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 1>think I've recently come to that realization. Now interrupted you

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>you can make the point better than I could. No,

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, my point is simply that I think, you know,

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats and people who don't like Trump have been

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about impeachment for so long that this is kind

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of where we're gonna end up. And and you know, look,

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe they just need to get it out of this system,

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. But the reality is to return to

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:09.199
<v Speaker 1>the original place our conversation departed from. It's not changing

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>anybody's minds, and I'm not sure how effective it is

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 1>unless it's changing people's minds because because we've got an

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>election next year, and the only way that Donald Trump

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.880
<v Speaker 1>gets removed from office is at the ballot box. And

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>if that doesn't happen, all this other stuff is moved.

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>There's a good book out now, and you're a professor,

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>you teach this sort of stuff, so you might be

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>completely aware of this. But we did this once before.

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.079
<v Speaker 1>There are enough people that hated Andrew Johnson. They just

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 1>wanted to get rid of him from the beginning, and

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>they just kept throwing stuff up against the wall and

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>went through the whole impeachment thing and they just didn't

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:42.720
<v Speaker 1>have a good thing to stick to boot him our office.

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>They just wanted him gone. They just basically didn't like them.

0:09:45.720 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>And and that's I think we're gonna do it again. Well,

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you can argue that's what happened with Bill Clinton. Um,

0:09:50.800 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you know I fairly or not. I mean, Bill Clinton

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>actually did perjury himself. But you know, some say that

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>really that impeachment exercise is really about people just didn't

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>like Bill Clinton. Um. And you could say the same

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>thing about Johnson. You can say say the same thing

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>about Trump. Now with with Trump, they're arguably is a

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit more here that people look at and say,

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of that doesn't seem right to me, that

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem you know, it doesn't seem like that

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.439
<v Speaker 1>you should have done that. But the thing people forget

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is you cannot conflate the legal side of this with

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the political side of this. Impeachment is not about the law.

0:10:23.880 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Impeachment is about politics. It's never been about the law.

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>It's never been about trying to hold him responsible for

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a crime. It's strictly about politically, does the Congress believe

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>he's committed these high crimes and misdemeanors that are worthy

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of removal from office, And that is a political, not

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a legal matter. La Chen David and Diane Stiff, your

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:47.040
<v Speaker 1>research fellow, Hoover Institution Director Domestic Policy Studies at Stanford Line.

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>He great to talk to you. Thanks a million, gonna

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>be you guys. Thanks. That's really good and you can't

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.719
<v Speaker 1>say that enough. It's a political thing. It's not a

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:55.199
<v Speaker 1>legal quick making your legal arguments. Well, I accept the

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>legal arguments to move people politically. Paul Wise, I'm not

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>sure they do anymore. That's that's a good point. I

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:06.320
<v Speaker 1>think they did in the past talking about this standard playbook. Yeah,

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:09.240
<v Speaker 1>everything is different, though, you gotta establish it to run

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to shut up the pass. Wow, it's gonna be an

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>interesting a couple of months. Think