1 00:00:00,560 --> 00:00:03,640 Speaker 1: It's wrong for president of the United States to seek 2 00:00:03,680 --> 00:00:08,160 Speaker 1: help from a foreign power in a presidential election. That's 3 00:00:08,200 --> 00:00:11,239 Speaker 1: not okay. So let's be frank, and national nightmares upon us. 4 00:00:11,280 --> 00:00:13,800 Speaker 1: The basic rules of our democracy are under attack from 5 00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:17,320 Speaker 1: the president again tonight, with a series of admissions by 6 00:00:17,360 --> 00:00:19,639 Speaker 1: the President that all but assures his impeachment and the 7 00:00:19,640 --> 00:00:23,439 Speaker 1: House of Representatives, but assures his impeachment in the House 8 00:00:23,440 --> 00:00:27,400 Speaker 1: of Representatives, A national nightmares upon us. His Chuck Todd 9 00:00:27,480 --> 00:00:31,160 Speaker 1: just realized. Nobody ever holds anybody to anything crazy they've 10 00:00:31,200 --> 00:00:35,080 Speaker 1: said in the past, so he's grandstanding. Lan he Chen 11 00:00:35,600 --> 00:00:38,000 Speaker 1: is the David and Diane Staffy Research Fellow with the 12 00:00:38,000 --> 00:00:42,400 Speaker 1: Wover Institution, Director of Domestic Policy Studies at Stanford University, 13 00:00:42,400 --> 00:00:44,920 Speaker 1: host of the podcast Crossing Lines with lanh Chen joins us, Now, 14 00:00:45,000 --> 00:00:47,360 Speaker 1: lan he how are you, sir? I'm doing fine. Top 15 00:00:47,360 --> 00:00:48,920 Speaker 1: of the day. To you, you wouldn't think it would 16 00:00:48,960 --> 00:00:53,159 Speaker 1: be possible that we could have another conversation with you. 17 00:00:53,240 --> 00:00:57,400 Speaker 1: Where we're at like a higher volume of stuff than 18 00:00:57,480 --> 00:01:02,720 Speaker 1: we have in the past, But it just keeps going there. Well, yeah, 19 00:01:02,800 --> 00:01:05,040 Speaker 1: I mean the volume keeps going up, but it's not 20 00:01:05,160 --> 00:01:08,360 Speaker 1: clear to me that it's really affecting how anybody feels, 21 00:01:08,680 --> 00:01:10,880 Speaker 1: you know. I mean, that's the staggering thing about all 22 00:01:10,920 --> 00:01:14,839 Speaker 1: of this is that the outrage meter uh continues to rise. 23 00:01:15,440 --> 00:01:17,640 Speaker 1: And you know, people who think that the president is 24 00:01:17,640 --> 00:01:20,680 Speaker 1: a crook still think the president is a crook. People 25 00:01:20,680 --> 00:01:22,959 Speaker 1: who think the president is a savior still think the 26 00:01:22,959 --> 00:01:26,120 Speaker 1: president is a savior. And it's not entirely clear to 27 00:01:26,200 --> 00:01:29,759 Speaker 1: me that evidence that comes out of this current inquiry. 28 00:01:29,800 --> 00:01:32,760 Speaker 1: I mean, unless there's like a dead body somewhere, it's 29 00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:35,760 Speaker 1: not clear to me that that any of this matters 30 00:01:35,800 --> 00:01:38,440 Speaker 1: to how anybody feels. And it's such an amazing thing 31 00:01:38,520 --> 00:01:40,479 Speaker 1: that that's where we are in our political system. I've 32 00:01:40,480 --> 00:01:42,040 Speaker 1: been saying that all week long. I've yet to see 33 00:01:42,040 --> 00:01:44,800 Speaker 1: a pundit I like, or a person in my personal 34 00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:48,040 Speaker 1: life change sides. And until I see at least one 35 00:01:48,080 --> 00:01:51,240 Speaker 1: person actually changed their mind on this stuff yet to 36 00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:53,960 Speaker 1: that point on here, I think there are two constituencies. 37 00:01:54,080 --> 00:01:58,040 Speaker 1: Number One, the truly persuadable is the traditional Democrats who 38 00:01:58,120 --> 00:02:01,560 Speaker 1: voted for Trump and all so the crowd that a 39 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:04,559 Speaker 1: lot of friends of Armstrong can getting you're in. They 40 00:02:04,600 --> 00:02:07,600 Speaker 1: say Trump's a loose cannon. He does stuff that just 41 00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:11,160 Speaker 1: gets in his own way. But I love what he's doing. 42 00:02:11,360 --> 00:02:13,160 Speaker 1: And now he shouldn't have said what he said about 43 00:02:13,160 --> 00:02:14,920 Speaker 1: the Ukraine. That was dumb. But I'd rather have him 44 00:02:14,960 --> 00:02:19,600 Speaker 1: than anybody else. You've got to move those people, don't you. Yeah, 45 00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:22,440 Speaker 1: I think so. I mean, you know, there's two different 46 00:02:22,480 --> 00:02:26,800 Speaker 1: theories about why Trump won the election. In one is 47 00:02:26,840 --> 00:02:28,480 Speaker 1: that you had a bunch of people who said, you know, 48 00:02:28,520 --> 00:02:31,200 Speaker 1: we'll give something a try that we've never tried before 49 00:02:31,800 --> 00:02:34,520 Speaker 1: and see how it goes, and and and and so 50 00:02:34,560 --> 00:02:37,320 Speaker 1: it was truly sort of a new kind of voter 51 00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:39,600 Speaker 1: that came in that crossed over to vote for him. 52 00:02:39,880 --> 00:02:42,520 Speaker 1: And the other theory is just look, Democrats didn't show up. 53 00:02:43,160 --> 00:02:45,640 Speaker 1: And so, you know, depending on which those theories you 54 00:02:45,720 --> 00:02:48,120 Speaker 1: believe in, that's going to drive how you think this 55 00:02:48,200 --> 00:02:49,840 Speaker 1: next election is going to turn out. But but to 56 00:02:49,880 --> 00:02:52,200 Speaker 1: get to the Trump constituency for a minute, I think 57 00:02:52,240 --> 00:02:53,720 Speaker 1: you're absolutely right. I think there are a lot of 58 00:02:53,720 --> 00:02:55,760 Speaker 1: people who look at all this and say, yeah, I 59 00:02:55,800 --> 00:02:58,000 Speaker 1: don't particularly care for the guy. I do think he's 60 00:02:58,040 --> 00:03:00,240 Speaker 1: kind of a jerk, he's probably a little crooked, But 61 00:03:00,280 --> 00:03:01,560 Speaker 1: at the end of the day, we have a three 62 00:03:01,600 --> 00:03:04,360 Speaker 1: and a half percent unemployment rate, the economy in the 63 00:03:04,480 --> 00:03:06,440 Speaker 1: US is doing a heck of a lot better than 64 00:03:06,440 --> 00:03:08,760 Speaker 1: anywhere else in the world. And there are a number 65 00:03:08,760 --> 00:03:13,680 Speaker 1: of things, from Supreme Court nominations to regulatory reform to 66 00:03:14,320 --> 00:03:16,920 Speaker 1: health care policy where you think, you know, I do 67 00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:19,200 Speaker 1: like what he's done, so you hold your nose and 68 00:03:19,240 --> 00:03:21,280 Speaker 1: pull the lever form again. I think that dynamic is 69 00:03:21,360 --> 00:03:24,280 Speaker 1: absolutely there. Yeah, and I wonder I'd like to hear 70 00:03:24,320 --> 00:03:26,680 Speaker 1: your opinion on where Nancy is on this at this point, 71 00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:29,880 Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi, if she really wants impeachment or not, because 72 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:32,160 Speaker 1: if it comes down to a choice between Trump and 73 00:03:32,160 --> 00:03:35,840 Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren, Trump is gonna win, and she might know that. 74 00:03:35,960 --> 00:03:38,200 Speaker 1: Maybe maybe at this point she thinks our only hope 75 00:03:38,240 --> 00:03:39,880 Speaker 1: to get him out of here is impeachment. I don't 76 00:03:39,880 --> 00:03:44,240 Speaker 1: know what she's thinking. I think she is giving herself 77 00:03:44,320 --> 00:03:47,040 Speaker 1: some optionality. I think she's going to see how this 78 00:03:47,120 --> 00:03:49,640 Speaker 1: inquiry plays out. She's gonna see where the evidence goes. 79 00:03:50,120 --> 00:03:52,400 Speaker 1: I think what she also wants to do, quite frankly, 80 00:03:52,560 --> 00:03:55,560 Speaker 1: is to give the progressive base what they want for now, 81 00:03:56,080 --> 00:03:58,640 Speaker 1: in the hope that if this thing crashes and burns, 82 00:03:58,680 --> 00:04:02,360 Speaker 1: she's got enough time net year to resolve or to 83 00:04:02,360 --> 00:04:04,920 Speaker 1: to to figure out how she can at least keep 84 00:04:04,960 --> 00:04:07,600 Speaker 1: the house or at least figure out some way to 85 00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:11,240 Speaker 1: complete the to ensure the Democratic Party doesn't completely crash 86 00:04:11,280 --> 00:04:13,360 Speaker 1: and burn. So it may be the case that she's 87 00:04:13,360 --> 00:04:15,600 Speaker 1: sort of giving them a little bit of rope now 88 00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:17,800 Speaker 1: and seeing where it goes. But I don't think she's 89 00:04:17,839 --> 00:04:19,760 Speaker 1: completely committed to this thing. And answer your question, I 90 00:04:19,760 --> 00:04:23,000 Speaker 1: don't think she believes a hundred percent and impeachment. I 91 00:04:23,040 --> 00:04:26,479 Speaker 1: think she is sort of she she's signaling to the left, 92 00:04:26,520 --> 00:04:29,280 Speaker 1: I'm giving you what you want for now, let's see 93 00:04:29,279 --> 00:04:32,080 Speaker 1: where it goes. But she could very easily pull the 94 00:04:32,080 --> 00:04:33,680 Speaker 1: plug on this if she wants. How do you like 95 00:04:33,760 --> 00:04:37,000 Speaker 1: her whole she's so sad and peripheral, being drugged through 96 00:04:37,040 --> 00:04:41,080 Speaker 1: this horrifying situation angle. Yeah, I mean, I don't think 97 00:04:41,080 --> 00:04:45,120 Speaker 1: anybody honestly believes it, and everyone's cut everyone. Everyone sort 98 00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:47,440 Speaker 1: of knows that Donald Trump was going to get impeached 99 00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:49,880 Speaker 1: from day one. That was always what the Democrats wanted 100 00:04:49,880 --> 00:04:52,039 Speaker 1: to do, and it was a question of you know, 101 00:04:52,320 --> 00:04:54,600 Speaker 1: a friend of mine put it well, he said, you know, 102 00:04:54,680 --> 00:04:58,680 Speaker 1: the verdict doesn't change, it's the charge that changes. So 103 00:04:58,720 --> 00:05:01,520 Speaker 1: they have to figure out how how to change the 104 00:05:01,640 --> 00:05:03,880 Speaker 1: charge to match the verdict. And I do think some 105 00:05:03,960 --> 00:05:06,000 Speaker 1: of that's going on here. And and by the way, 106 00:05:06,000 --> 00:05:09,440 Speaker 1: I don't think Adam Schiff is a particularly good frontman 107 00:05:09,560 --> 00:05:13,080 Speaker 1: for this whole thing's statement. Not to say that they've 108 00:05:13,080 --> 00:05:15,359 Speaker 1: got better front men or front women, but he's not 109 00:05:15,480 --> 00:05:18,239 Speaker 1: very good. Well, he told a four pinocchio lie yesterday. 110 00:05:18,240 --> 00:05:20,920 Speaker 1: According to The Washington Post, Lanie Chan is online from 111 00:05:20,920 --> 00:05:24,000 Speaker 1: the Hoover Institution in Stanford University a Lanie the White 112 00:05:24,000 --> 00:05:26,000 Speaker 1: House in the last twenty four hours is announced that no, 113 00:05:26,080 --> 00:05:28,120 Speaker 1: we're not cooperating with any of this stuff because it's 114 00:05:28,120 --> 00:05:30,520 Speaker 1: not a real impeachment. You haven't had a vote. Um 115 00:05:30,600 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 1: so so then then then, now, what do you think 116 00:05:32,520 --> 00:05:36,520 Speaker 1: of that maneuver? Yeah, I mean at some point that 117 00:05:36,600 --> 00:05:38,160 Speaker 1: there's a problem. At some point they are going to 118 00:05:38,240 --> 00:05:40,880 Speaker 1: have to cooperate, or at least appear as though they're cooperating. 119 00:05:41,320 --> 00:05:45,200 Speaker 1: Because the challenge is that as bad as what the 120 00:05:45,240 --> 00:05:48,559 Speaker 1: Democrats are are doing is optically in a lot of ways, 121 00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:50,400 Speaker 1: what would be worse would be for the White House 122 00:05:50,400 --> 00:05:52,840 Speaker 1: to appear not transparent, because then it appears like you're 123 00:05:52,880 --> 00:05:56,279 Speaker 1: hiding something. So well, they make it loud and clear, 124 00:05:56,400 --> 00:05:59,520 Speaker 1: we will be as transparent as your picture window as 125 00:05:59,560 --> 00:06:01,440 Speaker 1: soon as they have a vote. I think it's a 126 00:06:01,560 --> 00:06:04,479 Speaker 1: good strategy. Yeah, I mean and I and I think 127 00:06:04,480 --> 00:06:06,760 Speaker 1: the Democrats. You know, it does force the Democrats to 128 00:06:06,800 --> 00:06:09,440 Speaker 1: go on record, It forces them to do the procedural 129 00:06:09,440 --> 00:06:11,880 Speaker 1: elements they need to do. But you know that, here's 130 00:06:11,880 --> 00:06:14,159 Speaker 1: the challenge. If you say that, you better be willing 131 00:06:14,160 --> 00:06:16,880 Speaker 1: to be transparent when happens. And That's what I'm not 132 00:06:16,880 --> 00:06:20,000 Speaker 1: sure about. Is there any chance if this uh, you know, 133 00:06:20,080 --> 00:06:22,920 Speaker 1: we're leaving out the dead body scenario, you throughout you know, 134 00:06:23,000 --> 00:06:25,920 Speaker 1: the stuff we know now that it would I could 135 00:06:25,920 --> 00:06:27,839 Speaker 1: see the House saying, yeah, we got to impeach the guy. 136 00:06:27,880 --> 00:06:29,880 Speaker 1: They pass it along to the Senate, and the conventional 137 00:06:29,920 --> 00:06:33,840 Speaker 1: wisdom is Republicans have the votes to keep it from happening. 138 00:06:33,839 --> 00:06:36,880 Speaker 1: But is there there's a crowd there? You know Romney, well, 139 00:06:37,240 --> 00:06:39,680 Speaker 1: if he felt like there are other Republicans that would 140 00:06:39,720 --> 00:06:41,560 Speaker 1: vote to remove Trump, I could see him saying, yeah, 141 00:06:41,640 --> 00:06:43,599 Speaker 1: let's do it, let's get him out of here, start over. 142 00:06:43,800 --> 00:06:46,000 Speaker 1: Are there are a number of Republican senators that in 143 00:06:46,080 --> 00:06:49,840 Speaker 1: secret would absolutely jump on board if they could get 144 00:06:49,839 --> 00:06:53,080 Speaker 1: together to Toss Tromp. Yeah, I thought about this a lot. 145 00:06:53,160 --> 00:06:55,120 Speaker 1: I you know, the problem is you've got to get 146 00:06:55,120 --> 00:06:57,960 Speaker 1: to sixty seven and I so it's going to take 147 00:06:57,960 --> 00:06:59,680 Speaker 1: more than just a few. I mean, you would need 148 00:06:59,760 --> 00:07:03,719 Speaker 1: it at you know, fourteen fifteen Republican senators to sort 149 00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:06,240 Speaker 1: of say, yeah, let's get rid of this guy. You know, 150 00:07:06,320 --> 00:07:10,040 Speaker 1: I can count maybe four or five for electoral or other, 151 00:07:10,160 --> 00:07:13,800 Speaker 1: you know, personal reasons and are um you know, I 152 00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:16,040 Speaker 1: think I think I think Susan Collins is you know, 153 00:07:16,080 --> 00:07:19,640 Speaker 1: could be wobbly. Um, I think, uh, you know, for 154 00:07:19,720 --> 00:07:22,320 Speaker 1: some for for electoral reasons, someone like Corey Gardner in 155 00:07:22,360 --> 00:07:25,760 Speaker 1: Colorado or Tom Tillos in North Carolina. Those guys have 156 00:07:25,840 --> 00:07:28,480 Speaker 1: really tough re election campaigns. But you don't think there 157 00:07:28,480 --> 00:07:31,360 Speaker 1: are enough in secret that if they if they got 158 00:07:31,360 --> 00:07:34,480 Speaker 1: the nod, the secret handshake, they'd go along with it. No, 159 00:07:34,920 --> 00:07:36,680 Speaker 1: I just I don't. I don't buy it. I think 160 00:07:36,680 --> 00:07:38,680 Speaker 1: that I think the President really has a lot of 161 00:07:38,720 --> 00:07:42,600 Speaker 1: people in the Senate who aren't just with him grudgingly. 162 00:07:42,680 --> 00:07:45,160 Speaker 1: I mean I think they they have to embrace him 163 00:07:45,160 --> 00:07:47,160 Speaker 1: more than grudging. Well, then you really get to the 164 00:07:47,280 --> 00:07:50,000 Speaker 1: what's the point angle? I mean, what are you going 165 00:07:50,040 --> 00:07:51,600 Speaker 1: to get out of it. Democrats, if you go through 166 00:07:51,640 --> 00:07:55,560 Speaker 1: this whole impeachment thing knowing he's going to stay in office. Well, 167 00:07:55,640 --> 00:07:57,360 Speaker 1: I think it's just to make a point. I think 168 00:07:57,360 --> 00:07:59,080 Speaker 1: it's to make a political point, and I think it's 169 00:07:59,120 --> 00:08:02,920 Speaker 1: to have an opportunity to to try and dominate the 170 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 1: news cycle with negative information about Trump. The problem is 171 00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:10,160 Speaker 1: that theory is flawed. You cannot dominate a news cycle 172 00:08:10,160 --> 00:08:14,800 Speaker 1: by definition that Donald Trump is in And so now now, now, 173 00:08:14,800 --> 00:08:16,360 Speaker 1: what you're trying to do is you're trying to do 174 00:08:16,480 --> 00:08:19,840 Speaker 1: something which clearly no one's been successful at so far. 175 00:08:20,080 --> 00:08:23,200 Speaker 1: And I think this whole thing comes down to a 176 00:08:23,320 --> 00:08:28,080 Speaker 1: giant political and messaging exercise, and and and and that 177 00:08:28,200 --> 00:08:30,440 Speaker 1: is I hate to say it, but that is the 178 00:08:30,480 --> 00:08:33,360 Speaker 1: core of politics. Now, well, I was going to say 179 00:08:33,720 --> 00:08:35,880 Speaker 1: it pains me, pains me to say this out loud, 180 00:08:35,920 --> 00:08:39,600 Speaker 1: but there are some politicians who will give the base 181 00:08:39,679 --> 00:08:42,120 Speaker 1: what they want, even if it's a bad idea. You 182 00:08:42,200 --> 00:08:47,120 Speaker 1: think I've recently come to that realization. Now interrupted you 183 00:08:47,120 --> 00:08:50,160 Speaker 1: you can make the point better than I could. No, 184 00:08:50,240 --> 00:08:52,320 Speaker 1: I mean, my point is simply that I think, you know, 185 00:08:53,520 --> 00:08:56,600 Speaker 1: the Democrats and people who don't like Trump have been 186 00:08:56,600 --> 00:08:59,160 Speaker 1: talking about impeachment for so long that this is kind 187 00:08:59,160 --> 00:09:01,920 Speaker 1: of where we're gonna end up. And and you know, look, 188 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:03,600 Speaker 1: maybe they just need to get it out of this system, 189 00:09:03,679 --> 00:09:06,240 Speaker 1: whatever it is. But the reality is to return to 190 00:09:06,280 --> 00:09:09,199 Speaker 1: the original place our conversation departed from. It's not changing 191 00:09:09,240 --> 00:09:13,040 Speaker 1: anybody's minds, and I'm not sure how effective it is 192 00:09:13,240 --> 00:09:17,000 Speaker 1: unless it's changing people's minds because because we've got an 193 00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:19,880 Speaker 1: election next year, and the only way that Donald Trump 194 00:09:19,920 --> 00:09:22,880 Speaker 1: gets removed from office is at the ballot box. And 195 00:09:22,960 --> 00:09:25,840 Speaker 1: if that doesn't happen, all this other stuff is moved. 196 00:09:26,880 --> 00:09:28,760 Speaker 1: There's a good book out now, and you're a professor, 197 00:09:28,800 --> 00:09:30,120 Speaker 1: you teach this sort of stuff, so you might be 198 00:09:30,120 --> 00:09:32,280 Speaker 1: completely aware of this. But we did this once before. 199 00:09:32,720 --> 00:09:35,079 Speaker 1: There are enough people that hated Andrew Johnson. They just 200 00:09:35,080 --> 00:09:36,520 Speaker 1: wanted to get rid of him from the beginning, and 201 00:09:36,559 --> 00:09:38,480 Speaker 1: they just kept throwing stuff up against the wall and 202 00:09:38,480 --> 00:09:40,520 Speaker 1: went through the whole impeachment thing and they just didn't 203 00:09:40,520 --> 00:09:42,720 Speaker 1: have a good thing to stick to boot him our office. 204 00:09:42,760 --> 00:09:45,240 Speaker 1: They just wanted him gone. They just basically didn't like them. 205 00:09:45,720 --> 00:09:48,520 Speaker 1: And and that's I think we're gonna do it again. Well, 206 00:09:48,559 --> 00:09:50,760 Speaker 1: you can argue that's what happened with Bill Clinton. Um, 207 00:09:50,800 --> 00:09:54,000 Speaker 1: you know I fairly or not. I mean, Bill Clinton 208 00:09:54,040 --> 00:09:57,560 Speaker 1: actually did perjury himself. But you know, some say that 209 00:09:57,640 --> 00:10:00,440 Speaker 1: really that impeachment exercise is really about people just didn't 210 00:10:00,440 --> 00:10:03,120 Speaker 1: like Bill Clinton. Um. And you could say the same 211 00:10:03,120 --> 00:10:04,880 Speaker 1: thing about Johnson. You can say say the same thing 212 00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:07,679 Speaker 1: about Trump. Now with with Trump, they're arguably is a 213 00:10:07,720 --> 00:10:10,480 Speaker 1: little bit more here that people look at and say, 214 00:10:10,800 --> 00:10:12,679 Speaker 1: that's kind of that doesn't seem right to me, that 215 00:10:12,679 --> 00:10:14,400 Speaker 1: it doesn't seem you know, it doesn't seem like that 216 00:10:14,440 --> 00:10:17,439 Speaker 1: you should have done that. But the thing people forget 217 00:10:17,640 --> 00:10:20,320 Speaker 1: is you cannot conflate the legal side of this with 218 00:10:20,360 --> 00:10:23,480 Speaker 1: the political side of this. Impeachment is not about the law. 219 00:10:23,880 --> 00:10:27,480 Speaker 1: Impeachment is about politics. It's never been about the law. 220 00:10:27,520 --> 00:10:29,760 Speaker 1: It's never been about trying to hold him responsible for 221 00:10:29,800 --> 00:10:35,040 Speaker 1: a crime. It's strictly about politically, does the Congress believe 222 00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:38,360 Speaker 1: he's committed these high crimes and misdemeanors that are worthy 223 00:10:38,400 --> 00:10:40,640 Speaker 1: of removal from office, And that is a political, not 224 00:10:40,679 --> 00:10:43,480 Speaker 1: a legal matter. La Chen David and Diane Stiff, your 225 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:47,040 Speaker 1: research fellow, Hoover Institution Director Domestic Policy Studies at Stanford Line. 226 00:10:47,080 --> 00:10:48,840 Speaker 1: He great to talk to you. Thanks a million, gonna 227 00:10:48,840 --> 00:10:50,640 Speaker 1: be you guys. Thanks. That's really good and you can't 228 00:10:50,679 --> 00:10:52,719 Speaker 1: say that enough. It's a political thing. It's not a 229 00:10:52,760 --> 00:10:55,199 Speaker 1: legal quick making your legal arguments. Well, I accept the 230 00:10:55,840 --> 00:10:59,160 Speaker 1: legal arguments to move people politically. Paul Wise, I'm not 231 00:10:59,160 --> 00:11:02,680 Speaker 1: sure they do anymore. That's that's a good point. I 232 00:11:02,679 --> 00:11:06,320 Speaker 1: think they did in the past talking about this standard playbook. Yeah, 233 00:11:06,480 --> 00:11:09,240 Speaker 1: everything is different, though, you gotta establish it to run 234 00:11:09,280 --> 00:11:11,880 Speaker 1: to shut up the pass. Wow, it's gonna be an 235 00:11:11,880 --> 00:11:13,880 Speaker 1: interesting a couple of months. Think