WEBVTT - 46: Space Robots Are Helping Hedge Funds Invest

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>But knowledge to work and grow your business with c

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I T. From transportation to healthcare to manufacturing, c I

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.520
<v Speaker 1>T opers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>small and middle market businesses. Learn more at c I

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>T dot com put Knowledge to Work. Hello and welcome

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to another edition of the Odd Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway,

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>executive editor of Bloomberg Markets. My co host Joe Wisenthal

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is away, and so I have a replacement co host

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for you. I'm actually really excited about this. It's Matt Levine.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>He is, of course, the Bloomberg View columnist and quite

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:48.960
<v Speaker 1>possibly one of the funniest, most original financial writers out there.

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>So thanks so much Matt for joining us today. Thanks

0:00:51.680 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>for all right, Matt, Let's start this off with a

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>thought exercise. UM, let's say you're an investor and you're

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>interested in investing in the shares of a company. Let's

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:09.560
<v Speaker 1>say it's something like pet Smart. How do you actually

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>go about figuring out how well pet Smart as a

0:01:13.480 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>business is doing well? I probably go there with my

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>dog and see it all. Right, that sounds like a

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:25.319
<v Speaker 1>very systematic approach. Now, I probably read the financial statements right,

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.119
<v Speaker 1>look at the ten K you would look at their

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>publicly available earning statements. You would try to figure out

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in terms of their revenue trends, things

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>like that. If you were really fancy about it, you

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 1>might go there with your dog and try to see

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>how many customers are visiting. But that's not really going

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to help you if you only go to one pet Smart, Right,

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So what if you could do something different? What if

0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you could actually see how many people were visiting a

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>pet Smart or pet smarts across the country. What if

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you could see big data, as people like to put it,

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and figure out how well the pet smart business was

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>actually doing. It? Sounds like it would be pretty helpful,

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 1>all right. So on today's episode, we are going to

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 1>talk to a company that is helping investors do just that,

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and one of the ways they're doing it is by

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:19.359
<v Speaker 1>using satellite data. So having satellite imagery that looks at

0:02:19.440 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>things like factory activity, things like how many cars are

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>parked out in parking lots behind pet smarts and walmarts

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and other retailers around the world to try to gauge

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>how those businesses are actually doing. And I know you've

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>written a lot about data on Wall Street how people

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 1>use it. So I think you might be into this topic.

0:02:39.080 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>That sounds great. Alright, So without further ado, let's bring

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in our guest for today. It is James Crawford. He

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>is the founder and CEO of Orbital Insight. He's also

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>a former NASA scientist, so Matt, you can ask him

0:02:53.760 --> 0:03:11.160
<v Speaker 1>many robotics questions you might be into as well. All right, James,

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:13.760
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today. Hey tre Z,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>very happy to be here. Maybe just to begin, you

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 1>could walk us through what your company actually does, the

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of technology you employ, and how people like potential

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>pet smart investors might find it useful. Sure, over the

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.240
<v Speaker 1>last few years, there's been a tremendous growth in the

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.679
<v Speaker 1>number of satellites over our heads, and it's interesting that

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the enabler for that has been a lot of the

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>same technologies that bring you cell phones, So the miniaturization

0:03:40.200 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>of electronics, rapid reductions in the cost of launch, and

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>so just a lot more images are being taken now.

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Now taking the image that was only the first start,

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.000
<v Speaker 1>only the start, because once you take the image, it

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>just sits in on a disk somewhere until somebody actually

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>looks at it and we're getting to the point where

0:03:57.160 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>there's way more images and there are people that want

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>to stare at them. So, to continue your pet smart analogy,

0:04:01.720 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>if if you, if somebody were to deliver to you

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a million pictures of pet smart stores, you'd be a

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>long time looking through, flipping through all of them, trying

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 1>to decide how many cars were in each one of

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>them or what was going on in each picture. So

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>what we really do is we complete that supply chain,

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>if you will. We take the images from all the

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>different satellite companies, We run them through artificial intelligence software

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.119
<v Speaker 1>to count cars. We can count trucks, we can count

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>train cars, we can count ships, we can look at

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>agricultural fields see what the productivity is likely to be.

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 1>And then we aggregate up, add up all those numbers

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and deliver an analysis of you know, how different retailers

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:42.279
<v Speaker 1>are doing, what the corn yield in the US is

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>likely to be, or other interesting economic questions. And who

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>are your clients at the moment for this kind of data,

0:04:48.920 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and what data sets are most popular because you mentioned

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of different types of things just then,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>like agriculture, retail, manufacturing, economy, mix, what's most useful. So

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>we've been going through we're a startup or b around startups,

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 1>so we've been going through a prioritization exercise with our

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.600
<v Speaker 1>prospects of our customers and and and the first thing

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:15.120
<v Speaker 1>we built was the one you alluded to at the beginning,

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>which is the retail car counting. So we're now covering

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:21.039
<v Speaker 1>a hundred US retailers, providing daily updates on the number

0:05:21.080 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>of cars we're seeing in their parking lots. Now, it's

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>important to say we don't necessarily see every store of

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>every retailer every day. In fact, we see a small

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>fraction of each retailer every day. So you have to

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>look at a moving average over time to get some

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>statistically significant picture of what's going on the different retailers.

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 1>But but we we're pull in a lot of images

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of retailers. We've also been working on oil because there's

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.080
<v Speaker 1>there's so much debate right now about the price of oil,

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 1>and there's so much volatility in the price of oil,

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and trying to understand just a basic simple question how

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>much oil is sitting in all the storage tanks, so

0:05:55.680 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>all the oil that's been pumped out of the ground,

0:05:57.320 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>but not y ever find and that number goes up

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>when too much oil is being pumped and there's not

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:04.719
<v Speaker 1>enough demand. That obviously goes down if there's a lot

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>of demand. And so that's that's a really important, perhaps

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the single most important determinant of the direction of the

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>price of oil. And it's not well known. It's pretty

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:14.440
<v Speaker 1>well known for the US, but when you look across

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the world, it's not well known. So the other major

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>product that we're that we're shipping now is is tracking

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the oil inventory, the crude oil inventory, and then a

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of the other things I mentioned are all things

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.479
<v Speaker 1>that we're working on is earlier phase products that will

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 1>that will have available you in future quarters. So where

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>do where do ideas come from for things to kind

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:37.800
<v Speaker 1>of look for account Is that stuff that that you

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and your team comes up with, or is that client feedback.

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really a combination of both. Our Our favorite

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>thing to do and and we've done a fair amount

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>of this recently, is to get in a room with

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>some creative portfolio managers from large financial managers from either

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds or mutual funds or other folks um in

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>different places, some from wall streets. I'm from London, some

0:06:58.880 --> 0:07:01.359
<v Speaker 1>from Hong Kong and just brainstorm with them. You know,

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:03.119
<v Speaker 1>it's like we asked them, what are your data gaps?

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>What is it that you'd like to know about the

0:07:04.800 --> 0:07:07.200
<v Speaker 1>world that you don't know, what would help you make

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>better trading decisions? And then we we run that up

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:13.760
<v Speaker 1>against what is feasible in terms of what satellites can

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>see and what they can't see, um and we come

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>up with We've come up with a very long list

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of great ideas. This is the challenge of being a

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>startup as we have way more ideas for this than

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we have, you know, resources to actually build, but we're

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>knocking them down pretty fast at this point. And uh

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and working down the list of the of the really

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 1>top priority things we think we can measure so retail

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>like store car counting, it feels like a thing that

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>has that people have done for a long time. You know,

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>hedge bunds will send an analyst to their local mall

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and obviously you can do it on a on a

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>very different scale. Is there is there something that couldn't

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>have been done at all before that has made possible

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>by satellite technology. That's like, that's that's just a totally

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>new kind of data. It's a good question. In the

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>case of retail, I think I think scale is tremendously

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:07.200
<v Speaker 1>important when we do correlations with say SEC reported revenue UM,

0:08:07.240 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a tremendous increase in our ability to

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>predict that with scale. And if you have just a

0:08:12.360 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 1>few observations, if you just go down to look at

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>your local store, I can tell you you're not getting

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 1>a very good prediction because because a lot of these

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>chains have, you know, thousands of stores in them, and

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>so UM just working at scale and the satellites that

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.680
<v Speaker 1>have launched over the last few years, plus the artificial

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 1>intelligence to be able to count literally millions of parking

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>lots is really critical. It qualitatively changes the value of

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the signal. The oil signal is one that would be

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>very hard to do without satellites because these oil tanks

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>are located in every country in the world. So they're

0:08:44.280 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>in Singapore, they're in Hong Kong, they are all over China,

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>they're all over Nigeria, South America, Venezuela, the US, Europe,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:55.079
<v Speaker 1>and you're not going to be able to see them

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:57.719
<v Speaker 1>just driving past. It's it's when you can look from

0:08:57.760 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>above and you can actually see the shadows on the

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:01.480
<v Speaker 1>top of oil tank that you can actually get a

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.240
<v Speaker 1>sense of what's in them. People have in the past

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>flown helicopters over the major oilfields in the US to

0:09:07.720 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>measure crude oil inventory. But you're not going to fly

0:09:10.600 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>helicopters over all the oil fields in China, or even

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>all the oil fields in Europe and Africa and South America.

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think that might be an example of something

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that's just incredibly hard to do if you don't have

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the satellite coverage. You mentioned that when potential clients come

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to you with ideas for data sets, that feasibility is

0:09:29.440 --> 0:09:32.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that you consider. Are there any

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>other considerations that you have to take into account, like

0:09:35.200 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>privacy or trade secrecy, Like if a hedge one comes

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to you with with an idea saying, for instance, like

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they want to figure out the future price of hog futures,

0:09:46.480 --> 0:09:48.760
<v Speaker 1>so they want to look in the backyards of every

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.680
<v Speaker 1>American family and figure out whether or not they're buying

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>barbecue sets or something like that. Would you do it?

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting question. I don't think you could see that.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>So the so the legal limit for images in the

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>US is thirty centimeter pixels. That's about the size at

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the top of your laptop. So you can tell cars.

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You can see you know how many cars are parked

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in people's driveways. You can see how many cars are

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:16.200
<v Speaker 1>parked at Walmart. You can't really tell whether it's a

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Ford Fiesta or or a Mazda in three or something. Um,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you can roughly tell a car from a truck. I

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think you can tell whether somebody's got a barbecue set.

0:10:26.760 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Generally speaking, we work at such a such a broad

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>level of aggregation, so we look at We might look at,

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, how many questions similar to what you're asking.

0:10:36.320 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>You might look at how many solar panels have been

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>installed in all the roofs and all of Colorado, and

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>how fast has that grown over the last five years.

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.840
<v Speaker 1>UM that that tends to be the level of aggregation

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that we work. The imagery, UM doesn't. It's it's hard

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:53.559
<v Speaker 1>to get enough imagery to work at a very low

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 1>level of granularity. And you have what you said, some

0:10:55.840 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 1>sometimes privacy concerns, although our our resolution is so poor,

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's a major issue. So usually the

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>limitation is do we have enough imagery? And is the

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>imagery of sufficiently high resolution to see whatever it is

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that we want to count, and then we count it

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>as I say, very coarse levels of aggregation for investors.

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>But even if you're aggregating the data, if it's for

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>something like say manufacturing activity in China, where the government

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>publishes official statistics, it publishes p M, I is that

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people mistrust. I mean, I'm sure China

0:11:29.000 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily want a bunch of satellites pointed at it

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>saying actually, it looks like activity from your manufacturing sector

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is slowing a lot more than official figures suggest. Does

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that ever come up as an issue? No, not really,

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:48.200
<v Speaker 1>because the control of the satellites rests in the country

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that launched the satellites. So we are mostly using salaries

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and satellites from all over the world, but the majority

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of them are flown out of either the U S. Canada,

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.440
<v Speaker 1>or Europe, and then a few other countries as well.

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>But there's no because when you put a satellite and

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>lower thor of it, it necessarily passes over every square

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>foot of the Earth about every two weeks, that in

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:12.599
<v Speaker 1>each individual satellite. So the government of China can't control this.

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:17.559
<v Speaker 1>The only restriction the US government imposes generally is if

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:21.199
<v Speaker 1>there's areas where US troops are in active combat, satellites

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 1>that are run by US companies are not allowed to

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 1>distribute the imagery of those regions. But that's incredibly small

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the world. UM, So generally speaking, now this

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 1>is not a problem. It's it's a matter of providing

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>visibility for everybody. And we don't single out any particular

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>country in a particular industry. Um. You know, we're trying

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to understand, you know, very broad trends and and provide

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody a better insight into what's going on in the world.

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Is your product sort of reports and insight and analysis,

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>or are you, like in some cases like feeding raw

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.480
<v Speaker 1>data to algorithmic trading firms, Like like, are people coming

0:12:56.520 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to you for kind of like rass signals or for

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>for the higher level insight. It's it's actually so both, um,

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And it tends to be as your question implies, it

0:13:06.240 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>tends to be more the quantitative firms that want the

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>raw data, and um, a lot of the more fundamental

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 1>firms there are a little bit more interested in in

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>aggregator results charts and graphs that actually give them some

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>higher level insights into what the data is saying, how

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>much do you actually charge for this data? Yeah, unfortunately

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't. We don't give that out publicly, and it

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and it and it varies a lot by by them,

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>in the case of retailers, for instance, by how many

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>retailers um the individual customer wants to track. Okay, we

0:13:38.640 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>are going to take a short break for a message

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>from our sponsor. We'll be back in one second. But

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>knowledge to work and grow your business with c i

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>T from transportation to healthcare to manufacturing. C i T

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management services for small

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and middle market businesses. Learn more at c i T

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:03.319
<v Speaker 1>dot com put knowledge to Work. Okay, we're back with

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>James Crawford. He is the founder and CEO of Orbital Insight,

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and we are talking satellite data and analysis how investors

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>on Wall Street can actually use it. You know, James,

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I just asked you about the cost, and this gets

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>to I think one of the issues that people sometimes

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>have with these sorts of businesses, which is that we're

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>ultimately talking about proprietary data that sometimes you have to

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 1>pay a lot of money for that isn't accessible to

0:14:34.120 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 1>mom and pop or your average retail investor, and people

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>sometimes think that that's unfair. How do you respond to those?

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>So I guess I would say that having spent a

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of time with with the financial investors, hedge funds

0:14:50.720 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>as well as the mutual fund guys and in the

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>general financial community, that that the number of different data

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 1>sources these guys are working from in modern investing is

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>really pretty oppressive UM in terms of what they get

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>from social media, UM, what they get from folks like

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>or Square, from the credit card companies from US and UM.

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think it's difficult overall for individuals

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to compete with that on a on a retail name

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>by retail name basis. UM. I think that, and I

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's probably unfortunately or fortunately, depend on how you

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:26.240
<v Speaker 1>look at it, going to be more and more true

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>going forward that individuals are going to be primarily either

0:15:29.880 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in broad index funds or in funds that are managed

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:38.080
<v Speaker 1>by people that actually do aggregate up enough investment capital

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that they can pull in. There's pretty rich collection of

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>data because the folks we work with, it's not like

0:15:43.240 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they use you know, um SEC reports plus over inside data,

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll be pulling in literally dozens of different data sources

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to create mosaics of information to to inform their thinking

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>about these investments. Is your client based like does it

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>skew to sort of quantity? Sophisticated hedge funds are like

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 1>the big mutual fund complex is also using your data

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 1>along with other things actually actually both UM, We've we've

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>got a really nice mix of of of mutual funds

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>as well as quantit edge funds and fundamentals. We actually

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>have by account, we have more customers on the fundamental side,

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but we we get more revenue from from each of

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the quant funds just because they typically if they buy

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the data, will buy every single name. James, can you

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>give us an example of when your technology or analysis

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>UM really surprised you or a client, like, where it

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>found something really counterintuitive or something that you weren't expecting. UM.

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you one one recent example where it was

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it was really something. It was a little bit of

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:51.240
<v Speaker 1>a surprise. I was surprised at how clear it was.

0:16:51.280 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So we had we had heard some people say adotally

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that they felt like the Internet online shopping was affecting

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the lower grade malls more than the grade A malls.

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 1>The great A malls are typically the ones that will have,

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're shopping is an experience where they'll have

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 1>roller coasters in the mall, and them all will have

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 1>a hundred stores, and and they'll have Santa there at

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Christmas and so on, and whereas the bad C D

0:17:16.600 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>class malls are more like strip malls. So we we

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>had heard this speculation, but only as a speculation that

0:17:22.560 --> 0:17:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that there the Internet was really hurting the lower grade

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>malls were not really affecting the larger malls. And when

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:31.320
<v Speaker 1>we actually aggregated the data together for the last five

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>years for US malls, it just immediately jumped out that

0:17:35.160 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that the overall carcounts year on year kept going up

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 1>for the for the top rated malls, and and we're

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:45.239
<v Speaker 1>gradually sinking for the C and D class malls. And

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it's like, wow, I guess, I guess those guys there

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>when they were when they were thinking about that, they

0:17:49.040 --> 0:17:50.680
<v Speaker 1>knew what they're they knew what they were thinking about.

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Can you this is sort of a dumb question, but

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>can you can you tell me a little more about

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.359
<v Speaker 1>the process of like going from here's an idea that

0:17:57.400 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>we want to know how to count to having the

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:02.919
<v Speaker 1>sort of software to account it. So, you know, you

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about cars at mall parking lots, which

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is sort of a you know, colored rectangle on a

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>big black rectangle. Uh. Whenever I read articles about this

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing, there are always these beautiful geometric pictures

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 1>and then the caption says these are you know, terrorist

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>fields in China, And I sometimes wonder, how do you know?

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.639
<v Speaker 1>And like, is there sort of like is this a

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of primarily like the software can kind of figure

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>out what stuff is? Or is this human analysts looking

0:18:31.359 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>at pictures and trying to teach the software how to

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>match patterns? Or is it sometimes human analysts getting on

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a plane and saying, you know, what is this thing

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>that we're looking at and trying to go look at

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>it in person? Yeah? I actually I think that's a

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>great question. So, UM, we tend to start Let's say,

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>let's say somebody comes in and they want to track, um,

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the development of wind farms in China, just as a

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>random example. So um, we we would start just by

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>pulling up the images, um, and let's see what they

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>look like from space? What do these wind farms look

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>like from space? Is it is it clear when a

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>human looks at them, um, where the wind farms are. UM.

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>If it's not, then yeah, we may have to get

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a wind form expert on the phone and have them

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>look at the image and explain to us what these

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>things look like from above. So we get into the

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.359
<v Speaker 1>point where where we have a few humans who are

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>able to actually find the object we want to count.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Then we build what we call the labeled training set,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>where we have the humans actually go in and click

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the mouse on this thing that we want to find,

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>whether it's trucks or windmills or solar panels or whatever. UM.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.639
<v Speaker 1>We build a landing, a labeled training set, often consisting

0:19:37.680 --> 0:19:40.439
<v Speaker 1>of hundreds or if we if we're doing this as

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a really we want to get really high accuracy thousands

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>of images and UM. From that, the machine vision algorithms

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 1>can take over and they can learn, um, inductively from

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>those examples what this object looks like, and then we

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:57.760
<v Speaker 1>can count, you know, a billion of the thing, which

0:19:57.800 --> 0:19:59.439
<v Speaker 1>is what we did with cars. We trained it on

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a few thousand and images and then it counts that

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>we've now counted three point seven billion cars. The process

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that takes some work. Yeah, what's the accuracy rate on cars,

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 1>like how many like shopping car return areas or or

0:20:12.600 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, painted squares get counted as cars. Do you

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>have any idea We've actually gotten to be quite good

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at that because that's been something we've been working on

0:20:18.840 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>now for a couple of years. So we're about we're

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>about accurate on cars. So if you train up the

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 1>analysts and managed to pinpoint things as accurately as possible,

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>there are still limitations to the value of that data. Right,

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>So you can see how many cars are parked at

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.440
<v Speaker 1>shopping walls or at pet smarts or wherever, but you

0:20:40.640 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>can't actually tell how much people are spending once they're inside.

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.200
<v Speaker 1>That's right. There's always what we call con founders, things

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:50.879
<v Speaker 1>that things that confound you when you try to do

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>the analysis. So right, so, so not knowing exactly how

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>much people spend, not knowing whether they actually spend anything

0:20:56.920 --> 0:21:00.640
<v Speaker 1>at all are are major confounders. UM. In the case

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of retail, another confounder is if you have a multilayer

0:21:04.680 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>parking garage at some malls, for instance, you can only

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>see the top level UM, and if you have somebody

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>going into a mall, you don't necessarily know which store

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they're going to. UM that they may park by the Macy's,

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>but not actually shopping the Macy's, just walk straight through

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it and shop at some other store. That's what my

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>dad does. Yeah, there's a there's a there's a variety

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>of of con founders, and that's why you don't get

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if our data shows UM an increase

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 1>in in car accounts, it doesn't necessarily always mean there's

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 1>an increase in sales. That it simply gives you. Basically,

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it loads the dice in your favor if you're if

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 1>you're an investor, what do you think the future of

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 1>this business is like in five or ten years? Is

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it going to be an absolutely massive industry or does

0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 1>the fact that most of this is proprietary data is

0:21:52.400 --> 0:21:56.679
<v Speaker 1>sometimes expensive, does that limit its ability to scale up? No,

0:21:56.840 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. I think there's a I think

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's mendous opportunity. And the main reason

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we think that is that the availability of imagery is

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>only going up, So within one to two years we

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>expect to have daily imagery of the Earth at maybe

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 1>three to five meter pixels, so pretty course, but still

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the whole Earth every day. Five years out the kind

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of time frame you're talking about five to seven years out,

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>we expect to have you know, reasonably good resolution, you know,

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a meter or less per pixel of the whole world

0:22:25.200 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>every day, and then we can track I'm not only

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>retail traffic. We can track mining. We can track manufacturing.

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>We can track the car manufacturers. We can track ports

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and see port port work stoppages. We can see approximate

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.960
<v Speaker 1>input imports and exports are in different countries. We can

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>basically track the physical aspects of the economy at that

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at that level, and that becomes valuable um not only

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for investors, but also for governments, for non governmental organizations,

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>on for other Fortune five companies that are trying to

0:22:58.119 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>plan their supply chain and understand what's going on in

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the economy that surrounds them. We've also been working a

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>lot recently with non governmental organizations. We've been working with

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the World Bank on poverty mapping so that we can

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.040
<v Speaker 1>help them understand um where poverty is and where it

0:23:13.080 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 1>isn't and how it's changing. Because a lot of these

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>places they can only do surveys poverty surveys once a decade,

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>and obviously our world is changing faster than that, so

0:23:22.480 --> 0:23:27.199
<v Speaker 1>we actually think over time this becomes a foundation of

0:23:27.240 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>the economic analysis, of understanding the physical aspects of the

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 1>world to track economies for all kinds of purposes. And

0:23:34.440 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I do think that over time, the individual what we

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>call signals, the individual signals like just car accounts are

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>just truck counts, do get do get cheaper? And then um,

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>what people are actually buying is and actually using is

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>an aggregation of all these different things that we're able

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to count going forward in that future. Are you sort

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of still the like analysis layer or at some point

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.880
<v Speaker 1>our hedge funds saying I want the data. I want

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:02.600
<v Speaker 1>to just you know, millions of images, and I want

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to make my own proprietary signalism, my own proprietary analysis

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of it. I don't think they would. I don't think

0:24:08.880 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 1>there would be the mileage for for them to take

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the images. I think they some of the quant funds

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>are already looking at a pretty granular level at the counts.

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>So so some of the quant funds will actually take

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, address date count and that's essentially the data

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>that we give them and they work from there. So

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I could see that going forward, But the analysis is

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is something that we use the same analysis routines for

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the government customers, investors, insurance companies, energy companies, you know,

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>all of our all of our customers, we use the

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 1>same image analysis and a lot of the same data

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>analysis routines. So I think there's a lot of economies

0:24:44.760 --> 0:24:47.640
<v Speaker 1>of scale for us in that. But at the same time,

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you write, some of these quant funds, especially get pretty

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 1>granular in the data they take from us. Okay, I

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>think that's a good place to leave it. James Crawford

0:24:55.840 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of Orbital Insight, thank you so much for joining us. Absolutely,

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:14.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks for all your great questions. All Right, Matt, that

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:18.879
<v Speaker 1>was your first episode of Odd Lots. How did you

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>find it? I thought that was fun. I've always been

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>interested in these in these sort of imaging and and

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.399
<v Speaker 1>proprietary data companies for some of the reasons you alluded to.

0:25:29.520 --> 0:25:31.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, I write a lot about insider trading, and

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>one thing I always wonder about is why people get

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>so upset about the lack of a level playing field

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>between retail investors and professional investors. And as James said,

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are so many sources of data that

0:25:44.800 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>professional investors can rely on, you know, flying helicopters over

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>oil fields, flying satellites over oil fields. It seems silly

0:25:51.800 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>to worry about any any one source of data. Yeah,

0:25:55.320 --> 0:25:57.919
<v Speaker 1>there was one thing he said that kind of depressed me,

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 1>where it was basically like retail hell investors don't have

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>any hope of competing with the big guys in terms

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of information flow, and so everyone, you know, mom and

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>pop are just going to increasingly herd into passive investing

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in index funds. Like that kind of worries me a little.

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Oh not me. I think that's I think that's been

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>true forever. I think if it's your job to invest,

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>and you have the tools to invest, you're going to

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>be better at it than someone who's doing it as

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:26.639
<v Speaker 1>a as a hobby or is something they just you know,

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:28.639
<v Speaker 1>do in their spare time. I don't think that you

0:26:28.680 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>have to herd the passive funds, though, I mean you

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 1>can hurt you know, if you're a mom and pop investor,

0:26:34.520 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 1>you can invest in the mutual funds that it sounds

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>like use his data, you know, alongside the hedge funds.

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the point is not passive versus active,

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>or or retail versus professional. Really, it's that you know

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>there is a professional management layer that that decides where

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:54.479
<v Speaker 1>to invest money, and as a retail investor, you can

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>have access to it. I guess where I get uncomfortable

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is the differentiation or lack of differentiation between access to

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:07.840
<v Speaker 1>information and intelligent analysis. Like one guy can get ahead

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>just because he has better access to information flow, whereas

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>another guy falls behind because even though he's super super smart,

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't have that data that I think that's

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:23.199
<v Speaker 1>what depresses me about the whole thing. I hear you,

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of data in the world, right,

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's more being generated all the time, and

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it seems it seems a little hopeless to say we're

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:34.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna we're gonna give everyone all the same data at

0:27:34.160 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the same time. Because you know, I understand what you're saying.

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>But what would you do with all this satellite data?

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:41.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, would you analyze it? If you're a retail

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:44.119
<v Speaker 1>investor and you have to work a day job. Yeah,

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>alongside my day job at Bloomberg, I would be looking

0:27:47.200 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>at satellite images for hours and hours and hours on end.

0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>That sounds that sounds totally like something I would do.

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt, thank you so much for joining us today.

0:27:56.600 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>That was really good fun. Thankfully, we'll have you on

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>again some point that all right, I'm Tracy Alloway. You

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.360
<v Speaker 1>can find me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway. And I'm

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>Matt Levine of Bloomberg View and you can find me

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Matt underscore Levine. Thanks for joining us, everyone,

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>take care, Put knowledge to work and grow your business

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 1>with c i T. From transportation to healthcare to manufacturing.

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 1>C i T offers commercial lending, leasing, and treasury management

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>services for small and middle market businesses. Learn more at

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.680
<v Speaker 1>c i T dot com. Put Knowledge to Work