1 00:00:08,520 --> 00:00:11,119 Speaker 1: Hey, Daniel, I got a tough question for you. Oh goody, 2 00:00:11,200 --> 00:00:13,320 Speaker 1: that's what I live for. All right. Well you might 3 00:00:13,400 --> 00:00:18,480 Speaker 1: regret that, but here it is. Is physics real or pretend? Boom? 4 00:00:18,480 --> 00:00:21,319 Speaker 1: Oh my gosh. Wow. I don't even know how to 5 00:00:21,520 --> 00:00:23,680 Speaker 1: begin to answer that. What you don't have an answer? 6 00:00:23,800 --> 00:00:26,160 Speaker 1: You mean it could all just be made up? Well, 7 00:00:26,200 --> 00:00:29,560 Speaker 1: you know, physics tries to describe the universe, but it 8 00:00:29,640 --> 00:00:32,800 Speaker 1: might all just be like a convenient mathematical story in 9 00:00:32,840 --> 00:00:36,040 Speaker 1: our head. Yes, math is pretty convenient, I think. I 10 00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:39,600 Speaker 1: guess my next question is then our physicists real or 11 00:00:39,680 --> 00:00:42,479 Speaker 1: are you also made up? I'm not sure. I mean, 12 00:00:42,800 --> 00:00:46,360 Speaker 1: I'm definitely making it up as I go. Well, at 13 00:00:46,400 --> 00:01:03,960 Speaker 1: least you're keeping it real or pretending to Yah, hi 14 00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:06,040 Speaker 1: am or Hey, I'm a cartoonist and the co author 15 00:01:06,080 --> 00:01:09,720 Speaker 1: of Frequently Ask Questions about the Universe. Hi, I'm Daniel. 16 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:13,119 Speaker 1: I'm a particle physicist and a professor at U c Irvine, 17 00:01:13,280 --> 00:01:16,560 Speaker 1: or at least I pretend to be. Do you have 18 00:01:16,600 --> 00:01:19,480 Speaker 1: to dress up also like Halloween? Do you have a 19 00:01:19,480 --> 00:01:22,880 Speaker 1: professor costume you put on every morning? Yeah? I'm wearing 20 00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:27,160 Speaker 1: my professor costume right now. Sure, jeans and sandals right right. 21 00:01:27,200 --> 00:01:29,640 Speaker 1: I guess socks are not part of the costume. Ever. No, 22 00:01:29,760 --> 00:01:33,120 Speaker 1: I believe strongly in the toe liberation movement. Toes should 23 00:01:33,120 --> 00:01:36,480 Speaker 1: be able to breathe. You're a big t LM fan activist. 24 00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:38,720 Speaker 1: I'm m sure how we got started talking about my 25 00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:42,160 Speaker 1: toes already on the podcast. Well, to stands for a 26 00:01:42,240 --> 00:01:44,800 Speaker 1: theory of everything, right exactly, And you want to let 27 00:01:44,800 --> 00:01:48,920 Speaker 1: your theories breathe. Hopefully that's so they don't smell, you know, 28 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 1: if nobody wants a stinky theory, Hey, I'll take any 29 00:01:51,520 --> 00:01:55,000 Speaker 1: working theory. I don't care what it smells like. Oh really, 30 00:01:55,640 --> 00:01:58,000 Speaker 1: you might regret saying that. Also, Welcome to the stinky 31 00:01:58,080 --> 00:02:01,360 Speaker 1: cheese theory of the universe. We are pretty cheesy, Daniel, 32 00:02:01,440 --> 00:02:03,960 Speaker 1: But anyways, Welcome to our podcast, Daniel and Jorge Explain 33 00:02:04,040 --> 00:02:06,640 Speaker 1: the Universe, a production of I Heart Radio in which 34 00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:10,600 Speaker 1: we explore the real universe that may actually be out there. 35 00:02:10,880 --> 00:02:14,960 Speaker 1: All those crazy quantum particles frothing and bubbling and waving 36 00:02:14,960 --> 00:02:18,800 Speaker 1: and interfering and weaving together to make an incredible experience 37 00:02:18,840 --> 00:02:22,200 Speaker 1: for me and for you, one chock full of bizarre 38 00:02:22,240 --> 00:02:25,960 Speaker 1: effects and strange mysteries. Mysteries that we hope to be 39 00:02:26,000 --> 00:02:28,840 Speaker 1: able to unravel with the little brain made up of 40 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:33,600 Speaker 1: its own quantum particles, the universe trying to understand itself. 41 00:02:33,680 --> 00:02:35,560 Speaker 1: And here we are, a tiny little part of the 42 00:02:35,600 --> 00:02:38,400 Speaker 1: universe trying to explain the rest of it to you. Yeah, 43 00:02:38,400 --> 00:02:40,840 Speaker 1: it is a mystery is universe. It's huge, It's full 44 00:02:40,880 --> 00:02:45,400 Speaker 1: of incredible and sometimes unbelievable things where you go, what 45 00:02:45,680 --> 00:02:48,200 Speaker 1: is that for real? Or is that just made up 46 00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:50,280 Speaker 1: by physicists and physics is just sort of like a 47 00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:53,200 Speaker 1: never ending stream of moments like that where we're like, 48 00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:56,160 Speaker 1: how could that be possible? How could it be that 49 00:02:56,200 --> 00:02:59,280 Speaker 1: the universe is actually this way? Think about when people 50 00:02:59,320 --> 00:03:03,600 Speaker 1: discovered the Wow, the universe might be describable by physical laws, 51 00:03:03,639 --> 00:03:06,680 Speaker 1: maybe it's all like clockwork, like deterministic. That must have 52 00:03:06,680 --> 00:03:09,760 Speaker 1: been an incredible moment to feel like our brains could 53 00:03:09,800 --> 00:03:12,680 Speaker 1: describe the universe in a way that predicts its future. 54 00:03:12,880 --> 00:03:14,680 Speaker 1: And then the rug was pulled out from under that 55 00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 1: big idea when we discovered the universe maybe not predictable, 56 00:03:18,280 --> 00:03:23,359 Speaker 1: maybe not deterministic, and even crazier more bonkers realization. It 57 00:03:23,440 --> 00:03:25,480 Speaker 1: kind of says to me, Daniel, like this is keep 58 00:03:25,480 --> 00:03:27,280 Speaker 1: getting it wrong, Like if you got it right the 59 00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:29,200 Speaker 1: first time, you don't need to have your mind blown 60 00:03:29,240 --> 00:03:32,360 Speaker 1: so many times, but just keep a striking out. It 61 00:03:32,400 --> 00:03:34,960 Speaker 1: seems physically is definitely wrong. The goal is to make 62 00:03:35,000 --> 00:03:38,560 Speaker 1: it less and less wrong over time, right, is to 63 00:03:38,640 --> 00:03:42,000 Speaker 1: make it writer and writer as we go. We hope 64 00:03:42,040 --> 00:03:44,760 Speaker 1: to be asymptotically approaching the truth. But you know, we 65 00:03:44,800 --> 00:03:47,520 Speaker 1: may never get there. We may never find a theory 66 00:03:47,560 --> 00:03:51,160 Speaker 1: that we say, this is it. It works, it's satisfying, 67 00:03:51,360 --> 00:03:53,920 Speaker 1: it's simple, We're done. Sounds like a great model for 68 00:03:53,960 --> 00:03:57,040 Speaker 1: your department. Just trying to get it less wrong. I 69 00:03:57,080 --> 00:03:59,440 Speaker 1: think that's a pretty good goal, right, to be the 70 00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:03,440 Speaker 1: least wrong. We're trying to be humble also, right there. 71 00:04:03,480 --> 00:04:06,520 Speaker 1: Some humility is important in academia, right right, because it's 72 00:04:06,560 --> 00:04:10,240 Speaker 1: so rare, right, but like it never happens, it's pretend well. 73 00:04:10,240 --> 00:04:12,840 Speaker 1: It's one of my favorite qualities actually, in my collaborators. 74 00:04:12,880 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 1: I work with some of the smartest people on the planet, 75 00:04:14,640 --> 00:04:16,320 Speaker 1: but the ones who are most fun to work with 76 00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:19,279 Speaker 1: all the ones that still have some humility, that know 77 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:22,640 Speaker 1: that anybody can make mistakes. Nice, and it is an 78 00:04:22,720 --> 00:04:25,640 Speaker 1: interesting universe in which to guess how it might all 79 00:04:25,680 --> 00:04:27,720 Speaker 1: be working and the way we do that is by 80 00:04:27,839 --> 00:04:31,279 Speaker 1: asking questions about the universe. We wonder how it all works, 81 00:04:31,320 --> 00:04:33,760 Speaker 1: why things are the way they are, and how did 82 00:04:33,800 --> 00:04:35,880 Speaker 1: it all come to be. Yeah. An important part of 83 00:04:35,920 --> 00:04:38,839 Speaker 1: figuring out how the universe works is asking why is 84 00:04:38,839 --> 00:04:42,120 Speaker 1: it this way and not some other way? Why does 85 00:04:42,160 --> 00:04:44,840 Speaker 1: the universe follow this law? Why doesn't it follow this 86 00:04:44,960 --> 00:04:47,239 Speaker 1: other law which would seem to make much more sense 87 00:04:47,320 --> 00:04:49,760 Speaker 1: to us. It's a deep part of being human to 88 00:04:49,920 --> 00:04:52,560 Speaker 1: ask these questions about the universe, to try to understand 89 00:04:52,640 --> 00:04:55,160 Speaker 1: what the rules are and what our place is in 90 00:04:55,240 --> 00:04:58,200 Speaker 1: those rules. Yeah, because we are all part of the universe, 91 00:04:58,240 --> 00:05:00,240 Speaker 1: and as humans we seem to be born I asked, 92 00:05:00,240 --> 00:05:02,920 Speaker 1: But the question asking gene do you think it's embedded 93 00:05:02,960 --> 00:05:07,120 Speaker 1: in our genetic instructions? Daniel, This sort of propensity, this 94 00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:10,719 Speaker 1: tendency to ask questions about the universe, about the things 95 00:05:10,720 --> 00:05:12,600 Speaker 1: around this, I don't know. It makes me wonder about 96 00:05:12,600 --> 00:05:15,800 Speaker 1: the nature of intelligence and whether asking questions and curiosity 97 00:05:16,000 --> 00:05:19,120 Speaker 1: is all tied up with intelligence, whether it's an evolutionary trait, 98 00:05:19,160 --> 00:05:21,719 Speaker 1: you know, whether curiosity didn't kill the cat. It fed 99 00:05:21,800 --> 00:05:24,080 Speaker 1: the cat because the cat was wondering, like, is that 100 00:05:24,120 --> 00:05:26,960 Speaker 1: thing tasty? And crunched on it. And sometimes the answer 101 00:05:27,080 --> 00:05:29,760 Speaker 1: is yes, maybe it killed the curious cats, but then 102 00:05:29,800 --> 00:05:32,160 Speaker 1: it's saved like the curious monkeys. You know, maybe it's 103 00:05:32,160 --> 00:05:37,000 Speaker 1: a double edged sword. Curiosity save some species, but uh, 104 00:05:37,279 --> 00:05:39,360 Speaker 1: it's some of them that didn't quite make it right 105 00:05:39,360 --> 00:05:43,040 Speaker 1: because we don't have intelligent cats running around. Cats are 106 00:05:43,040 --> 00:05:45,400 Speaker 1: pretty intelligent, you know, not as intelligent as dogs, but 107 00:05:45,480 --> 00:05:49,120 Speaker 1: you can definitely identify curiosity in other species, right. You 108 00:05:49,120 --> 00:05:51,760 Speaker 1: can tell when your dog is curious about something, or 109 00:05:51,800 --> 00:05:54,440 Speaker 1: even a rat can sniffing around trying to understand what 110 00:05:54,600 --> 00:05:56,800 Speaker 1: something is. Of course, we'll never know what it's like 111 00:05:56,880 --> 00:05:58,760 Speaker 1: to be a rat or a cat or a bat, 112 00:05:58,880 --> 00:06:01,040 Speaker 1: just like we'll never know what it's to be another person, 113 00:06:01,160 --> 00:06:03,560 Speaker 1: but it does feel like being curious is part of 114 00:06:03,600 --> 00:06:05,800 Speaker 1: being alive. We might not be able to answer that 115 00:06:05,880 --> 00:06:08,840 Speaker 1: question until we meet aliens and discover whether or not 116 00:06:08,960 --> 00:06:11,520 Speaker 1: they are also curious about the universe, right, and whether 117 00:06:11,600 --> 00:06:16,480 Speaker 1: they have alien cats who who don't ask questions? And also, Daniel, 118 00:06:16,480 --> 00:06:18,919 Speaker 1: did you just say cats are dumber than dogs? Cats 119 00:06:19,080 --> 00:06:23,000 Speaker 1: definitely dumber than dogs. Absolutely, that's lost half of our 120 00:06:23,040 --> 00:06:27,560 Speaker 1: audience right now. Cat lowers are are pretty fierce. I 121 00:06:27,600 --> 00:06:30,560 Speaker 1: love cats. Cats are wonderful, they're great pets. Let me 122 00:06:30,560 --> 00:06:33,560 Speaker 1: ask you this, Can cats learn? Can cats be trained? 123 00:06:33,839 --> 00:06:37,440 Speaker 1: Pretty sure that you can, right, It's certainly possible to 124 00:06:37,480 --> 00:06:40,359 Speaker 1: teach your cats stuff. I think dogs definitely show a 125 00:06:40,480 --> 00:06:43,320 Speaker 1: larger capacity for learning, so I think they're more intelligent. 126 00:06:43,360 --> 00:06:45,000 Speaker 1: I'm not expert in this stuff, so if you feel 127 00:06:45,040 --> 00:06:48,320 Speaker 1: strongly about cats being intelligent, please write to Jorge and 128 00:06:48,320 --> 00:06:51,560 Speaker 1: tell him all about it. Yes, my email is Daniel 129 00:06:51,640 --> 00:06:54,640 Speaker 1: at Daniel and horrhe dot com. And well, regardless of 130 00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:58,000 Speaker 1: whether cats are smarter or dumber than dogs, humans definitely 131 00:06:58,000 --> 00:07:00,280 Speaker 1: are pretty smart. And we've been asking questions about the 132 00:07:00,360 --> 00:07:03,760 Speaker 1: universe since we were cave men and women and cave children. 133 00:07:03,920 --> 00:07:06,039 Speaker 1: Because we have questions about the universe, right, it's sort 134 00:07:06,040 --> 00:07:08,560 Speaker 1: of a fascinating thing that we all wonder about. How 135 00:07:08,560 --> 00:07:11,080 Speaker 1: does it all work? Yeah, And that's all that science is. 136 00:07:11,120 --> 00:07:13,480 Speaker 1: It's just a bunch of folks asking questions. It's people 137 00:07:13,520 --> 00:07:16,440 Speaker 1: for whom the questions were the most important thing in life. 138 00:07:16,960 --> 00:07:19,120 Speaker 1: And every little piece of science that comes out every 139 00:07:19,120 --> 00:07:21,400 Speaker 1: time you read a news article about like the life 140 00:07:21,400 --> 00:07:25,040 Speaker 1: cycle of newts, or how plants grow, or why rocks 141 00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:28,760 Speaker 1: look a certain color, that's because one person decided that 142 00:07:28,800 --> 00:07:31,960 Speaker 1: was the most important question in the universe when they 143 00:07:31,960 --> 00:07:35,080 Speaker 1: had to devote years of their life to understanding. Though, 144 00:07:35,160 --> 00:07:38,600 Speaker 1: these questions really do drive knowledge forward, and it sounds 145 00:07:38,600 --> 00:07:41,119 Speaker 1: like somebody needs to read that article Are Cats Smarter 146 00:07:41,200 --> 00:07:43,600 Speaker 1: than Dogs? Sounds like great clickbait. But it's not just 147 00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:46,440 Speaker 1: scientists that ask questions. It's everyday people, people like you. 148 00:07:46,480 --> 00:07:49,600 Speaker 1: They are listening to this podcast, and sometimes our listeners 149 00:07:49,640 --> 00:07:52,720 Speaker 1: send us their questions and sometimes we even answer it 150 00:07:52,760 --> 00:07:55,280 Speaker 1: on the podcast. That's right. We want to hear about 151 00:07:55,400 --> 00:07:58,520 Speaker 1: your questions about the universe. Maybe something we said on 152 00:07:58,520 --> 00:08:01,600 Speaker 1: the podcast that you didn't understand, or follow up question 153 00:08:01,640 --> 00:08:04,360 Speaker 1: to something we discuss, or something you read about in 154 00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:06,920 Speaker 1: the news, or just something you've been thinking about as 155 00:08:06,920 --> 00:08:09,680 Speaker 1: you stare up at the night sky. You have questions 156 00:08:09,720 --> 00:08:12,840 Speaker 1: about the universe, we have answers. Please write to us 157 00:08:12,880 --> 00:08:15,880 Speaker 1: two questions at Daniel and Jorge dot com. We answer 158 00:08:16,000 --> 00:08:18,560 Speaker 1: every message and we will answer yours. So today on 159 00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:27,239 Speaker 1: the podcast, we'll be tackling listener questions Number twenty nine. 160 00:08:28,080 --> 00:08:31,560 Speaker 1: Is it real or pretend edition? Is that the real 161 00:08:31,600 --> 00:08:33,880 Speaker 1: title or is that just the pretend title. Well, if 162 00:08:33,880 --> 00:08:35,800 Speaker 1: you're a cat. Then that's the real title of your dog. 163 00:08:35,880 --> 00:08:37,480 Speaker 1: Then you know, you can make up whatever you're like. 164 00:08:37,600 --> 00:08:42,800 Speaker 1: Oh now you're giving dogs extra rights. Oh man, you're 165 00:08:42,800 --> 00:08:45,320 Speaker 1: you're a real catterpressor here. You know. I used to 166 00:08:45,320 --> 00:08:47,280 Speaker 1: be a cat person because we had cats for many, 167 00:08:47,320 --> 00:08:49,520 Speaker 1: many years. Then I had kids and my kids are 168 00:08:49,520 --> 00:08:52,360 Speaker 1: allergic to cats, and the kids wanted to get a dog. 169 00:08:52,600 --> 00:08:55,720 Speaker 1: Now I find myself a dog person, so still love cats, 170 00:08:55,760 --> 00:08:58,760 Speaker 1: but presently have a dog in the family. I see, 171 00:08:58,800 --> 00:09:00,600 Speaker 1: you have to pick a side, you know, your kids 172 00:09:00,679 --> 00:09:03,480 Speaker 1: or cats. You chose their kids. I think that was 173 00:09:03,559 --> 00:09:06,000 Speaker 1: the right choice. I mean, also in parenting. I'm just 174 00:09:06,040 --> 00:09:10,640 Speaker 1: trying to get it less and less wrong every year. Yeah, yeah, 175 00:09:10,720 --> 00:09:13,120 Speaker 1: am high. But we do have some awesome questions here today. 176 00:09:13,120 --> 00:09:14,720 Speaker 1: And there does seem to be a sort of theme 177 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:17,920 Speaker 1: about things being real or pretend. There's a lot of 178 00:09:17,920 --> 00:09:21,360 Speaker 1: sort of if scenarios here, like what happens if this happens, 179 00:09:21,440 --> 00:09:23,520 Speaker 1: And that's an important part of doing science, you know, 180 00:09:23,559 --> 00:09:27,920 Speaker 1: considering hypotheticals, testing your ideas by considering what might happen 181 00:09:27,920 --> 00:09:30,079 Speaker 1: in this scenario, what might happen in that scenario. It's 182 00:09:30,080 --> 00:09:32,040 Speaker 1: a great way to do physics. You know, somebody tells 183 00:09:32,040 --> 00:09:34,280 Speaker 1: you about how something works, don't just digest it and 184 00:09:35,200 --> 00:09:37,600 Speaker 1: think about the consequences. What about this scenario, How does 185 00:09:37,640 --> 00:09:40,040 Speaker 1: that fit with this other idea? I learned that's the 186 00:09:40,040 --> 00:09:42,200 Speaker 1: way you can weave all these ideas together into a 187 00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:45,640 Speaker 1: complete and holistic understanding of the universe, which, of course 188 00:09:45,840 --> 00:09:47,880 Speaker 1: is the goal of physics. Yeah, because that's kind of 189 00:09:47,920 --> 00:09:51,080 Speaker 1: what science is. Right. It's like you never stop asking questions. 190 00:09:51,240 --> 00:09:52,920 Speaker 1: Even if you find an answer, you can get a 191 00:09:52,960 --> 00:09:56,840 Speaker 1: look for the other question. It's a very annoying habbit. Yeah, 192 00:09:56,920 --> 00:09:59,120 Speaker 1: but it means you always have something to do. And 193 00:09:59,160 --> 00:10:01,920 Speaker 1: even if you think you understand something in one circumstance, 194 00:10:02,000 --> 00:10:03,840 Speaker 1: like you think you know what your dog will do 195 00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:06,440 Speaker 1: if you feed it a treat, you might wonder what 196 00:10:06,520 --> 00:10:08,520 Speaker 1: will my dog do if the treat is inside a 197 00:10:08,520 --> 00:10:10,559 Speaker 1: box where he can't smell it, but he can see 198 00:10:10,559 --> 00:10:13,600 Speaker 1: the treat. These questions help you understand more deeply what's 199 00:10:13,600 --> 00:10:16,960 Speaker 1: going on inside your dog's head. Yeah, I guess are 200 00:10:17,000 --> 00:10:20,640 Speaker 1: you saying dogs or physicists also? Or physicist dogs? Where 201 00:10:20,679 --> 00:10:23,360 Speaker 1: is this analogy going? Launching a whole new podcast called 202 00:10:23,400 --> 00:10:26,840 Speaker 1: The Physics of Dogs. Oh man, you give me the 203 00:10:26,880 --> 00:10:32,559 Speaker 1: dog physicist coming to the Discovery Channel next season, We're 204 00:10:32,559 --> 00:10:34,480 Speaker 1: going to take a bite out of black holes, give 205 00:10:34,520 --> 00:10:36,200 Speaker 1: me a real treat. All right, Well, we have some 206 00:10:36,240 --> 00:10:39,679 Speaker 1: awesome questions through today, some of them about aliens, some 207 00:10:39,760 --> 00:10:43,240 Speaker 1: of them about black holes going too fast, and also 208 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:48,040 Speaker 1: some about giant space collisions that are maybe mind blowing 209 00:10:48,120 --> 00:10:51,200 Speaker 1: or hard to imagine. So our first question comes from Avanni, 210 00:10:51,320 --> 00:10:55,360 Speaker 1: who is six years old. Hello, my name's Avanni. Anni 211 00:10:55,600 --> 00:10:59,480 Speaker 1: said to my question is a re a ling lot Bretton. 212 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:02,480 Speaker 1: All right, Sorry if Annie I said you were six, 213 00:11:02,480 --> 00:11:05,680 Speaker 1: but you're nearly six, which is even more impressive than 214 00:11:05,720 --> 00:11:08,480 Speaker 1: you're asking these questions. It's a great question. I love 215 00:11:08,520 --> 00:11:11,040 Speaker 1: this question, such a basic question but also such a 216 00:11:11,080 --> 00:11:14,559 Speaker 1: deep philosophical question. Yeah, Annie wants to know our aliens 217 00:11:14,640 --> 00:11:18,719 Speaker 1: real or pretend? Boy, I feel like we could have 218 00:11:18,760 --> 00:11:21,880 Speaker 1: a whole podcast series just on that question. You know, 219 00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:25,480 Speaker 1: there's so many wrinkles. They're like, is anything real? Is 220 00:11:25,480 --> 00:11:30,199 Speaker 1: it all just pretend? What does it mean to pretend? 221 00:11:30,640 --> 00:11:32,480 Speaker 1: What does it mean to be an alien? You can 222 00:11:32,520 --> 00:11:35,320 Speaker 1: go down a real rabbit hole here. Yeah. A big 223 00:11:35,400 --> 00:11:39,439 Speaker 1: part of doing physics is coming up with pretend scenarios 224 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:42,680 Speaker 1: and asking like, well, could that be real? How do 225 00:11:42,720 --> 00:11:45,120 Speaker 1: we know? Often before we see things out there, we 226 00:11:45,160 --> 00:11:47,720 Speaker 1: do come up with the idea for what might be 227 00:11:47,840 --> 00:11:51,120 Speaker 1: out there. So, you know, before the Higgs particle was observed, 228 00:11:51,480 --> 00:11:53,439 Speaker 1: was it real or was it pretended? Was just an 229 00:11:53,480 --> 00:11:55,920 Speaker 1: idea in our minds until we found it? And have 230 00:11:56,000 --> 00:11:59,160 Speaker 1: you figured that out yet? We pretend to. Yeah, absolutely, 231 00:11:59,320 --> 00:12:01,280 Speaker 1: But you know, actually, my daughter, I think when she 232 00:12:01,440 --> 00:12:03,960 Speaker 1: was around five or six, she asked me this almost 233 00:12:04,040 --> 00:12:06,719 Speaker 1: the same question, like the aliens were real or not? 234 00:12:06,880 --> 00:12:08,520 Speaker 1: I guess when you're that age, you get a lot 235 00:12:08,559 --> 00:12:11,520 Speaker 1: of like stories about aliens or movies about aliens or 236 00:12:11,559 --> 00:12:14,040 Speaker 1: shows about aliens, and you're like, and you're probably in 237 00:12:14,080 --> 00:12:16,480 Speaker 1: your little brain you're thinking, is this for real? Or 238 00:12:16,640 --> 00:12:20,400 Speaker 1: is this just like you know, dragons and unicorns? Yeah? 239 00:12:20,400 --> 00:12:23,360 Speaker 1: I think it comes from seeing fictionalized portrayals of stuff. 240 00:12:23,400 --> 00:12:25,120 Speaker 1: But you know, you might ask, like, well, why are 241 00:12:25,160 --> 00:12:28,160 Speaker 1: aliens in fiction? Why do we tell stories about aliens? 242 00:12:28,160 --> 00:12:30,320 Speaker 1: Why are they in the movies? Why are they on 243 00:12:30,400 --> 00:12:33,319 Speaker 1: the brains? Right? They're on the brains because we wonder 244 00:12:33,440 --> 00:12:35,720 Speaker 1: if they are real, because we think about them as 245 00:12:35,720 --> 00:12:38,480 Speaker 1: a way to explore this question of are we alone 246 00:12:38,679 --> 00:12:41,480 Speaker 1: in the universe? Right, So it's an important part of 247 00:12:41,520 --> 00:12:45,080 Speaker 1: doing science is coming up with these pretend scenarios. Oh boy, 248 00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:47,080 Speaker 1: I thought you were going to say it's because they're real, 249 00:12:48,160 --> 00:12:50,560 Speaker 1: Like if there's some kind of conspiracy going on here, 250 00:12:50,920 --> 00:12:53,080 Speaker 1: I want them to be real obviously, Like I would 251 00:12:53,120 --> 00:12:55,559 Speaker 1: love to talk to aliens about physics and learn all 252 00:12:55,600 --> 00:12:57,440 Speaker 1: sorts of things about how to look at the universe 253 00:12:57,480 --> 00:12:59,720 Speaker 1: from a different perspective. But of course we don't know 254 00:12:59,760 --> 00:13:02,240 Speaker 1: if they're real. I guess is that the basic answer 255 00:13:02,320 --> 00:13:04,160 Speaker 1: that you would give a body is that we don't 256 00:13:04,200 --> 00:13:06,720 Speaker 1: know if aliens are real or pretend. Yeah, we don't 257 00:13:06,760 --> 00:13:10,280 Speaker 1: know currently they are just pretend. But why do we pretend? 258 00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:12,960 Speaker 1: We pretend because we hope that they are real, and 259 00:13:13,080 --> 00:13:16,000 Speaker 1: to discover them, we need to pretend that they are real. 260 00:13:16,080 --> 00:13:18,120 Speaker 1: We need to think about what they might be like 261 00:13:18,520 --> 00:13:20,800 Speaker 1: in order to know how to look for them. We 262 00:13:20,840 --> 00:13:23,640 Speaker 1: need to imagine different scenarios for how they might communicate, 263 00:13:23,679 --> 00:13:25,800 Speaker 1: how they might live, how they might think, so that 264 00:13:25,840 --> 00:13:28,400 Speaker 1: we are prepared to discover them, so we know where 265 00:13:28,440 --> 00:13:30,800 Speaker 1: to look and how to look for them. Yeah, so 266 00:13:30,840 --> 00:13:33,120 Speaker 1: that I guess, or pretend, Like the things you see 267 00:13:33,120 --> 00:13:36,440 Speaker 1: on TV right now, everything you see about aliens is 268 00:13:36,440 --> 00:13:39,720 Speaker 1: pretend somebody just made that up, but we actually don't 269 00:13:39,760 --> 00:13:42,040 Speaker 1: know if they are real or not, meaning that they 270 00:13:42,120 --> 00:13:44,800 Speaker 1: could be real. Yeah, they could be real. Aliens are 271 00:13:44,800 --> 00:13:48,040 Speaker 1: pretend the same way string theory is pretend like it's 272 00:13:48,080 --> 00:13:51,439 Speaker 1: a hypothetical, it's a possible scenario. We don't know if 273 00:13:51,440 --> 00:13:54,600 Speaker 1: it describes our actual universe. We play around with it 274 00:13:54,640 --> 00:13:57,080 Speaker 1: to see like does this make sense? Could it be real? 275 00:13:57,600 --> 00:13:59,520 Speaker 1: Sort of two steps in the question, they're right, like 276 00:14:00,040 --> 00:14:02,959 Speaker 1: could this be real? Is it allowed by the laws 277 00:14:03,000 --> 00:14:05,319 Speaker 1: of the universe as it explained the kind of things 278 00:14:05,440 --> 00:14:08,240 Speaker 1: we see, So we can ask questions like how could 279 00:14:08,240 --> 00:14:10,640 Speaker 1: else could you make life? And could life evolve in 280 00:14:10,679 --> 00:14:14,079 Speaker 1: other places in the universe? Is that consistent with our understanding? 281 00:14:14,160 --> 00:14:16,600 Speaker 1: And then, of course there's the second, totally severate question, 282 00:14:16,679 --> 00:14:19,800 Speaker 1: which is are they actually real. We might live in 283 00:14:19,840 --> 00:14:23,880 Speaker 1: the universe where aliens are possible but don't exist. Could 284 00:14:23,880 --> 00:14:26,200 Speaker 1: be that the universe allows for life to start at 285 00:14:26,240 --> 00:14:28,920 Speaker 1: other places, but that it just didn't. Well maybe for 286 00:14:28,960 --> 00:14:31,920 Speaker 1: somebody like Vanni. You can step us through, like why 287 00:14:32,280 --> 00:14:35,160 Speaker 1: do we think that aliens could be real? We've only 288 00:14:35,200 --> 00:14:37,080 Speaker 1: been to one planet Earth with life in it. What 289 00:14:37,200 --> 00:14:39,680 Speaker 1: makes us think that there could be other planets with 290 00:14:39,840 --> 00:14:41,880 Speaker 1: aliens in them. It's a great question, and I think 291 00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:44,400 Speaker 1: an important thing to remember is that something we've been 292 00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:47,720 Speaker 1: learning over the last few hundred years is that where 293 00:14:47,720 --> 00:14:50,880 Speaker 1: we are in the universe doesn't seem to be very special. 294 00:14:51,040 --> 00:14:54,000 Speaker 1: Like we're just in one little spot in one galaxy, 295 00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:58,400 Speaker 1: among billions and billions, maybe trillions, maybe an infinite number 296 00:14:58,440 --> 00:15:01,200 Speaker 1: of galaxies. So there's a huge wage universe out there, 297 00:15:01,560 --> 00:15:04,280 Speaker 1: and nothing about where we are seems to be very 298 00:15:04,280 --> 00:15:07,400 Speaker 1: special so far, Like the kind of star we have 299 00:15:07,640 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 1: is not that unusual star, and there's billions of stars. 300 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:13,560 Speaker 1: The kind of planet we have, we've recently discovered that 301 00:15:13,600 --> 00:15:16,960 Speaker 1: there are lots of these kinds of planets, planets made 302 00:15:16,960 --> 00:15:19,600 Speaker 1: out of rock, not too far and not too close 303 00:15:19,640 --> 00:15:22,800 Speaker 1: to the Sun. That water is everywhere in the universe. 304 00:15:22,840 --> 00:15:26,520 Speaker 1: It's not too complicated, and so we can imagine ways 305 00:15:26,680 --> 00:15:29,440 Speaker 1: for life to have started on other planets. In fact, 306 00:15:29,520 --> 00:15:32,800 Speaker 1: it seems like there may have been many, many opportunities 307 00:15:32,880 --> 00:15:35,360 Speaker 1: for this to happen. We don't think that the chemicals 308 00:15:35,360 --> 00:15:38,320 Speaker 1: that we find here on Earth are unique or special, 309 00:15:38,400 --> 00:15:41,360 Speaker 1: and so it's not that hard to imagine life starting 310 00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:44,840 Speaker 1: in other places or maybe even many many other places 311 00:15:44,880 --> 00:15:47,280 Speaker 1: in the universe, right, I think the ideas that there 312 00:15:47,280 --> 00:15:49,400 Speaker 1: are a lot of planets out there, and a lot 313 00:15:49,440 --> 00:15:51,320 Speaker 1: of planets out there are sort of like the Earth. 314 00:15:51,440 --> 00:15:53,240 Speaker 1: They sort of maybe even look a lot like the 315 00:15:53,320 --> 00:15:56,960 Speaker 1: Earth with water and like a nice atmosphere, nice clouds 316 00:15:56,960 --> 00:15:59,280 Speaker 1: in the sky. And so those are the kinds of 317 00:15:59,280 --> 00:16:02,200 Speaker 1: planets that least what we know about of life. There 318 00:16:02,240 --> 00:16:04,920 Speaker 1: could be other living things in those planets. There could be, 319 00:16:04,920 --> 00:16:07,560 Speaker 1: and here we're just talking about life as we know it. 320 00:16:07,640 --> 00:16:10,440 Speaker 1: You conditions similar to Earth that might make life in 321 00:16:10,480 --> 00:16:13,120 Speaker 1: a way that's similar on Earth. And you know, an 322 00:16:13,120 --> 00:16:16,120 Speaker 1: important part to pretend though, is thinking about different aliens. 323 00:16:16,320 --> 00:16:19,680 Speaker 1: Rarely in movies do you see aliens looking exactly like humans, 324 00:16:20,040 --> 00:16:23,120 Speaker 1: Because we think that probably some aspects of life here 325 00:16:23,120 --> 00:16:26,320 Speaker 1: on Earth are basically random, that just evolution happened to 326 00:16:26,360 --> 00:16:28,520 Speaker 1: follow this path, and it could have followed another path. 327 00:16:28,920 --> 00:16:31,280 Speaker 1: We don't really know, like what are the spectrum of 328 00:16:31,360 --> 00:16:35,359 Speaker 1: possible options. What else could have evolved and have been intelligent. 329 00:16:35,640 --> 00:16:38,240 Speaker 1: It's hard to think outside of this box because we're 330 00:16:38,240 --> 00:16:40,680 Speaker 1: just so used to life on Earth, and it's possible 331 00:16:40,720 --> 00:16:42,840 Speaker 1: that life on other planets looks a little bit different 332 00:16:42,840 --> 00:16:46,320 Speaker 1: from life on our planet, or could be fundamentally radically 333 00:16:46,520 --> 00:16:49,320 Speaker 1: mind blowing lee different in ways that are hard for 334 00:16:49,440 --> 00:16:51,960 Speaker 1: us to even imagine. Right, But I guess even though 335 00:16:52,000 --> 00:16:54,480 Speaker 1: there are a lot of planets out there, and a 336 00:16:54,480 --> 00:16:56,440 Speaker 1: lot of them that looked like the Earth, we sort 337 00:16:56,440 --> 00:16:59,800 Speaker 1: of don't know if what makes you know living things 338 00:17:00,320 --> 00:17:03,440 Speaker 1: happened in a planet like that is special or whether 339 00:17:03,520 --> 00:17:06,159 Speaker 1: that's common too, Like there might be a Brazilian planet 340 00:17:06,240 --> 00:17:08,639 Speaker 1: like the Earth out there, but maybe like our planet 341 00:17:08,720 --> 00:17:11,080 Speaker 1: is the only one where things just happened to come alive. 342 00:17:11,119 --> 00:17:13,680 Speaker 1: That's a possibility, right, That's definitely a possibility because there's 343 00:17:13,720 --> 00:17:16,240 Speaker 1: a gap in our understanding. I said earlier that we 344 00:17:16,320 --> 00:17:19,199 Speaker 1: think the chemistry of Earth is probably not unique. But 345 00:17:19,240 --> 00:17:21,359 Speaker 1: what we don't understand is how you get from the 346 00:17:21,440 --> 00:17:24,359 Speaker 1: chemistry of Earth to life on Earth. How do you 347 00:17:24,400 --> 00:17:28,120 Speaker 1: go from a primordial soup of like building blocks of 348 00:17:28,160 --> 00:17:32,560 Speaker 1: life to actual life, self reproducing objects that can build complexity. 349 00:17:32,640 --> 00:17:35,440 Speaker 1: We do not understand that step, like we don't understand 350 00:17:35,440 --> 00:17:38,600 Speaker 1: how it happened here precisely, which means that we can't 351 00:17:38,600 --> 00:17:41,560 Speaker 1: say how likely it is to happen somewhere else, and 352 00:17:41,560 --> 00:17:44,200 Speaker 1: our ignorant ranges from like, oh, it can be pretty common. 353 00:17:44,280 --> 00:17:45,919 Speaker 1: You get it like half the time. If you have 354 00:17:45,960 --> 00:17:48,320 Speaker 1: a primordial soup and it sits around for a few 355 00:17:48,320 --> 00:17:51,680 Speaker 1: million years slashing on alien shores, that fifty percent of 356 00:17:51,680 --> 00:17:53,840 Speaker 1: the time you get life. You know. Arguments in favor 357 00:17:53,840 --> 00:17:56,040 Speaker 1: of that are that it didn't take that long on 358 00:17:56,119 --> 00:17:58,520 Speaker 1: Earth for life to start. We think, you know, less 359 00:17:58,520 --> 00:18:01,160 Speaker 1: than a billion years after the Earth began. We think 360 00:18:01,160 --> 00:18:03,119 Speaker 1: there might have been like a little micro On the 361 00:18:03,119 --> 00:18:05,320 Speaker 1: other hand, it could be super duper rare. It could 362 00:18:05,359 --> 00:18:08,280 Speaker 1: be that it takes trillions and trillions of planets for 363 00:18:08,320 --> 00:18:10,960 Speaker 1: it to happen. One time. We could be the only 364 00:18:11,119 --> 00:18:14,160 Speaker 1: life in the entire universe because it's just so rare. 365 00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:16,520 Speaker 1: We just don't understand the mechanism for that. So we 366 00:18:16,560 --> 00:18:19,520 Speaker 1: don't have any idea how rare or how common that 367 00:18:19,640 --> 00:18:22,000 Speaker 1: crucial step is. Right, And I guess if I'm a 368 00:18:22,080 --> 00:18:24,480 Speaker 1: six year old or nearly six year old like Evanni, 369 00:18:24,600 --> 00:18:26,760 Speaker 1: I might be wondering right now, like how can we 370 00:18:26,800 --> 00:18:28,760 Speaker 1: not know if there are aliens out there? Like can't 371 00:18:28,760 --> 00:18:30,800 Speaker 1: we just look at them or good to them or 372 00:18:30,800 --> 00:18:33,960 Speaker 1: see them from Earth? Yeah, we do know something, right, 373 00:18:34,040 --> 00:18:36,879 Speaker 1: if there were aliens everywhere. If there were aliens on 374 00:18:37,000 --> 00:18:41,040 Speaker 1: Mars and on Venus and building civilizations around Jupiter, then 375 00:18:41,080 --> 00:18:43,040 Speaker 1: we would have seen them. So we know the universe 376 00:18:43,160 --> 00:18:46,080 Speaker 1: is not like overwhelmed with life. It's not like brimming 377 00:18:46,160 --> 00:18:49,320 Speaker 1: with life. Even if they were like really fancy aliens 378 00:18:49,320 --> 00:18:52,280 Speaker 1: and one star over, we might have seen messages from them. 379 00:18:52,280 --> 00:18:54,520 Speaker 1: We might have heard from them already. So in our 380 00:18:54,560 --> 00:18:57,040 Speaker 1: little vicinity, it seems like, you know, there isn't any 381 00:18:57,080 --> 00:18:59,280 Speaker 1: other life that we have found yet. There are still 382 00:18:59,359 --> 00:19:01,840 Speaker 1: some places in the Solar System we haven't looked, and 383 00:19:01,880 --> 00:19:04,000 Speaker 1: there are lots of ways for alien life to be 384 00:19:04,080 --> 00:19:06,919 Speaker 1: like kind of nearby but not that close, and us 385 00:19:06,920 --> 00:19:09,560 Speaker 1: to not have seen it. But so far our neighborhood 386 00:19:09,560 --> 00:19:12,480 Speaker 1: seems sort of abandoned except for us, right at least 387 00:19:12,520 --> 00:19:14,480 Speaker 1: for now, right Like, it could also be that there 388 00:19:14,520 --> 00:19:17,720 Speaker 1: were aliens here or around a long time ago, but 389 00:19:17,760 --> 00:19:19,720 Speaker 1: they're not anymore. Or it could be that there will 390 00:19:19,760 --> 00:19:22,040 Speaker 1: be aliens in our neighborhood in the future, just not 391 00:19:22,200 --> 00:19:25,080 Speaker 1: right now. Yeah, the universe is a very long trajectory. 392 00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:27,840 Speaker 1: Our life cycles and the whole history of humanity on 393 00:19:27,960 --> 00:19:31,080 Speaker 1: Earth is just a blip in the cosmic history. So 394 00:19:31,119 --> 00:19:33,800 Speaker 1: it might be that aliens lived around a nearby star 395 00:19:33,960 --> 00:19:36,159 Speaker 1: for a billion years and then died out and we 396 00:19:36,280 --> 00:19:39,200 Speaker 1: just missed them. Or they might arise in two billion 397 00:19:39,280 --> 00:19:41,479 Speaker 1: years and last for a trillion years. But we're just 398 00:19:41,520 --> 00:19:44,080 Speaker 1: a little bit too early. There's lots of ways for 399 00:19:44,160 --> 00:19:46,479 Speaker 1: us to not see aliens. All right, Well, then, I 400 00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:49,439 Speaker 1: think the answer for Evanni is that the universe is 401 00:19:49,520 --> 00:19:53,800 Speaker 1: so big that aliens are probably real, but so far 402 00:19:53,920 --> 00:19:57,040 Speaker 1: we just have to pretend that their pretend because we 403 00:19:57,119 --> 00:19:59,560 Speaker 1: haven't seen any or talked to any yet so far, 404 00:20:00,240 --> 00:20:03,320 Speaker 1: and that pretending about aliens is an important way of 405 00:20:03,440 --> 00:20:06,960 Speaker 1: actually discovering them, thinking about what they might be like. Yeah, 406 00:20:07,000 --> 00:20:09,240 Speaker 1: it's part of using your imagination, which is a big 407 00:20:09,280 --> 00:20:11,880 Speaker 1: part of using your curiosity, which is a big part 408 00:20:11,960 --> 00:20:14,600 Speaker 1: of signs. And maybe, Vonnie, you'll grow up and be 409 00:20:14,680 --> 00:20:17,440 Speaker 1: the one to discover aliens. All right, Well, let's get 410 00:20:17,440 --> 00:20:20,679 Speaker 1: it to our other questions here about fast moving black 411 00:20:20,720 --> 00:20:24,400 Speaker 1: holes and also white hole coalitions. But first let's take 412 00:20:24,440 --> 00:20:40,359 Speaker 1: a quick break. All right, we are answering listener questions 413 00:20:40,359 --> 00:20:43,239 Speaker 1: here today, and Daniel, are we for real answering them 414 00:20:43,320 --> 00:20:45,199 Speaker 1: or just pretending to answer them? I'm not sure. I 415 00:20:45,200 --> 00:20:50,400 Speaker 1: know the difference anymore. Your life is a blur. You're 416 00:20:50,400 --> 00:20:54,440 Speaker 1: doing fiction, you're doing physics. What is real? Man? I'm 417 00:20:54,440 --> 00:20:56,679 Speaker 1: really pretending to do my best. All right, Well, we 418 00:20:56,760 --> 00:20:58,560 Speaker 1: have our second question here of the day, and this 419 00:20:58,600 --> 00:21:01,680 Speaker 1: one comes from Jeff, and he's wondering what happens when 420 00:21:01,720 --> 00:21:04,639 Speaker 1: heavy things go really fast? Hi, Daniel and horror. Hey, 421 00:21:04,800 --> 00:21:06,520 Speaker 1: my name is Jeff, and I've got a question for 422 00:21:06,560 --> 00:21:09,960 Speaker 1: you about high energy photons, black holes, and relativity. I've 423 00:21:09,960 --> 00:21:11,600 Speaker 1: heard that if you can get enough energy in a 424 00:21:11,640 --> 00:21:14,359 Speaker 1: small enough volume, a black hole conform. Right, if you 425 00:21:14,440 --> 00:21:17,159 Speaker 1: had a laser that could shoot ultra high energy photons, 426 00:21:17,400 --> 00:21:19,840 Speaker 1: those photons could become black holes. But what would an 427 00:21:19,840 --> 00:21:22,320 Speaker 1: observer are moving close to the speed of light relative 428 00:21:22,359 --> 00:21:24,480 Speaker 1: to that laser c bec as those photons and that 429 00:21:24,480 --> 00:21:27,640 Speaker 1: reference frame would have less energy. They shouldn't observe these 430 00:21:27,640 --> 00:21:30,800 Speaker 1: photons becoming black holes. It sounds kind of paradoxical. I'm 431 00:21:30,800 --> 00:21:32,920 Speaker 1: sure I'm missing a subtle point somewhere. But if you 432 00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:35,160 Speaker 1: could help shine a light on it, that would be appreciated. 433 00:21:35,480 --> 00:21:38,199 Speaker 1: All Right, that is a pretty mind blown question. I'm 434 00:21:38,240 --> 00:21:41,720 Speaker 1: gonna pretend that I understood it, but I think what 435 00:21:41,840 --> 00:21:44,919 Speaker 1: he's asking, Jeff is asking, is that black holes form? 436 00:21:45,119 --> 00:21:47,919 Speaker 1: Because when you have enough energy in one spot, And 437 00:21:47,960 --> 00:21:49,600 Speaker 1: so if you take a little rock and you get 438 00:21:49,600 --> 00:21:51,879 Speaker 1: it going really fast, doesn't it get a lot of 439 00:21:51,960 --> 00:21:55,240 Speaker 1: kinetic energy? And if it has enough kinetic energy, doesn't 440 00:21:55,240 --> 00:21:57,399 Speaker 1: it at some point become a black hole because of 441 00:21:57,400 --> 00:22:00,240 Speaker 1: its kinetic energy. Yes, it's a really good question gen 442 00:22:00,840 --> 00:22:04,679 Speaker 1: about like whether observers in different frames, moving at different 443 00:22:04,680 --> 00:22:08,280 Speaker 1: speeds all see a black hole made at the same time. 444 00:22:08,480 --> 00:22:11,280 Speaker 1: Do they agree about whether something is a black hole 445 00:22:11,480 --> 00:22:15,760 Speaker 1: or not? And it's a great question because energy is relative, right, 446 00:22:15,880 --> 00:22:18,640 Speaker 1: Like if I'm holding a rock, I see it having 447 00:22:18,680 --> 00:22:21,320 Speaker 1: no velocity, so it has no kinetic energy. Whereas if 448 00:22:21,359 --> 00:22:24,359 Speaker 1: you're running by at se the speed of light because 449 00:22:24,359 --> 00:22:26,320 Speaker 1: you're really fast, you measured that rock to have a 450 00:22:26,320 --> 00:22:28,960 Speaker 1: lot of velocity relative to you, and so a lot 451 00:22:28,960 --> 00:22:31,720 Speaker 1: of energy relative to you. So you see that rock 452 00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:35,080 Speaker 1: is having more energy. So in principle, you could say, oh, 453 00:22:35,119 --> 00:22:37,320 Speaker 1: that rock has enough energy to form a black hole, 454 00:22:37,400 --> 00:22:39,520 Speaker 1: and I could say no, it doesn't have enough energy 455 00:22:39,520 --> 00:22:41,320 Speaker 1: to form a black hole. But you know, one of 456 00:22:41,400 --> 00:22:43,359 Speaker 1: us would have to be right, because either it's the 457 00:22:43,400 --> 00:22:47,000 Speaker 1: black hole or it's not right. Because velocity is relative, right, 458 00:22:47,040 --> 00:22:48,800 Speaker 1: it depends on how you measure it. And so does 459 00:22:48,840 --> 00:22:51,600 Speaker 1: that mean then that kinetic energy is also relative, Like 460 00:22:51,640 --> 00:22:55,080 Speaker 1: it doesn't really exist. Kinetic energy is definitely relative. And 461 00:22:55,080 --> 00:22:58,359 Speaker 1: there's an important difference between things being conserved and things 462 00:22:58,400 --> 00:23:02,280 Speaker 1: being invariant, right, Like something's invariant if everybody measures it 463 00:23:02,280 --> 00:23:05,040 Speaker 1: and gets the same answer. Like everybody measures the speed 464 00:23:05,080 --> 00:23:06,879 Speaker 1: of light to be the speed of light, no matter 465 00:23:07,119 --> 00:23:09,920 Speaker 1: what frame you're in, how fast you're going, etcetera. Not 466 00:23:10,000 --> 00:23:13,080 Speaker 1: everybody measures velocity to be the same number. If you're 467 00:23:13,160 --> 00:23:15,840 Speaker 1: moving relative to me, then you have a different measurement 468 00:23:15,840 --> 00:23:18,640 Speaker 1: of my velocity, and so a different measurement of my energy. 469 00:23:19,000 --> 00:23:21,760 Speaker 1: Right now, in your frame, energy is conserved and in 470 00:23:21,880 --> 00:23:24,919 Speaker 1: my frame energy is conserved. But we actually measure different 471 00:23:24,960 --> 00:23:28,280 Speaker 1: amounts of energy. So energy is conserved that is in 472 00:23:28,359 --> 00:23:31,520 Speaker 1: flat space, right, But it's not invariant, So different people 473 00:23:31,560 --> 00:23:34,639 Speaker 1: measure different amounts of energy. Yes, it's relative. So I 474 00:23:34,680 --> 00:23:37,320 Speaker 1: think that's the paradox that Jeff pointed to, is that 475 00:23:37,400 --> 00:23:39,600 Speaker 1: you're they're holding a rock to you. The rock has 476 00:23:39,720 --> 00:23:42,280 Speaker 1: no energy, right, it's just sitting there in your the 477 00:23:42,320 --> 00:23:44,040 Speaker 1: palm of your hand. But for me, that I'm going 478 00:23:44,040 --> 00:23:47,000 Speaker 1: at seventy the speed of light zooming past you. I'm 479 00:23:47,040 --> 00:23:49,880 Speaker 1: seeing you from my point of view. I'm seeing you 480 00:23:49,960 --> 00:23:52,680 Speaker 1: and the rock have a ton of energy, right because 481 00:23:52,840 --> 00:23:55,320 Speaker 1: you have fast and you're moving really fast relative to me. 482 00:23:55,400 --> 00:23:58,560 Speaker 1: So I'm thinking, oh, my goodness, there's so much energy there. Well, 483 00:23:58,560 --> 00:24:01,040 Speaker 1: first of all, I can't believe Daniels wiming fast, but 484 00:24:01,240 --> 00:24:03,600 Speaker 1: there's so much energy there. The black hole should be 485 00:24:03,600 --> 00:24:06,080 Speaker 1: forming there. I mean, it would be a really short moment. 486 00:24:06,119 --> 00:24:09,679 Speaker 1: There would be like, well, oh, aready gone. I wouldn't 487 00:24:09,680 --> 00:24:12,720 Speaker 1: wonder about it too long. It's a really fun question, 488 00:24:12,720 --> 00:24:15,000 Speaker 1: and it gives us an opportunity to understand a little 489 00:24:15,000 --> 00:24:18,240 Speaker 1: bit more about general relativity. The short answer is that, remember, 490 00:24:18,240 --> 00:24:20,639 Speaker 1: a black hole is curvature of space, and that it 491 00:24:20,720 --> 00:24:23,880 Speaker 1: forms when you have enough energy density in a certain location. 492 00:24:24,320 --> 00:24:27,040 Speaker 1: But it's not that simple exactly. It's not just like 493 00:24:27,320 --> 00:24:30,919 Speaker 1: more energy density means more curvature and eventually you hit 494 00:24:30,960 --> 00:24:33,520 Speaker 1: a threshold and you get a black hole. It's more 495 00:24:33,560 --> 00:24:36,359 Speaker 1: complicated than just like a certain amount of energy density. 496 00:24:36,359 --> 00:24:39,800 Speaker 1: It's not just like one number that controls the solution 497 00:24:39,840 --> 00:24:44,240 Speaker 1: to Einstein's equations. Einstein's equations are a big, complicated nightmare, 498 00:24:44,440 --> 00:24:47,600 Speaker 1: and different pieces of it feed in slightly differently. It's 499 00:24:47,600 --> 00:24:49,760 Speaker 1: not just like you measure the energy density. This is 500 00:24:49,760 --> 00:24:53,119 Speaker 1: this thing called the stress energy tensor. And kinetic energy 501 00:24:53,200 --> 00:24:56,640 Speaker 1: feeds in differently from potential energy, which feeds in differently 502 00:24:56,680 --> 00:24:58,840 Speaker 1: from other kinds of energy. So it all sort of 503 00:24:58,920 --> 00:25:01,720 Speaker 1: dances together and to get a solution, Well, I guess 504 00:25:01,760 --> 00:25:06,080 Speaker 1: maybe the basic question is does kinetic energy bend space? Also? 505 00:25:06,359 --> 00:25:08,919 Speaker 1: Like I have a rock moving really fast, is that 506 00:25:09,040 --> 00:25:12,080 Speaker 1: kinetic energy bending the space around the rock as it's moving? 507 00:25:12,200 --> 00:25:14,520 Speaker 1: Or even if I just have a like a photon 508 00:25:14,600 --> 00:25:17,720 Speaker 1: which has sort of momentum, right, kinetic energy, is that 509 00:25:17,800 --> 00:25:21,639 Speaker 1: photon bending space also? It can? Right? It does contribute, right, 510 00:25:21,680 --> 00:25:24,240 Speaker 1: It's not like the universe just ignores kinetic energy. It 511 00:25:24,320 --> 00:25:27,560 Speaker 1: does contribute to the effects on space, right. But it's 512 00:25:27,600 --> 00:25:29,800 Speaker 1: not trivial. It's not like you can just add up 513 00:25:29,840 --> 00:25:32,320 Speaker 1: all the energy and say here you have enough to 514 00:25:32,400 --> 00:25:36,080 Speaker 1: have a black hole. Ein sense equations, remember, are very complicated, 515 00:25:36,119 --> 00:25:39,200 Speaker 1: so it's not easy to say, here's this configuration. Now 516 00:25:39,200 --> 00:25:41,480 Speaker 1: we know exactly what happens. And in fact, it's really 517 00:25:41,480 --> 00:25:45,159 Speaker 1: a nightmare to solve E sense equations For anything with 518 00:25:45,280 --> 00:25:47,200 Speaker 1: kinetic energy. I mean, it's a nightmare to solve it 519 00:25:47,240 --> 00:25:51,040 Speaker 1: in almost any circumstances. We've only ever solved Einsteins equations 520 00:25:51,119 --> 00:25:55,199 Speaker 1: under a few very specific, very simple situations, like a 521 00:25:55,280 --> 00:25:59,639 Speaker 1: huge amount of mass at rest or the universe filled 522 00:26:00,000 --> 00:26:03,080 Speaker 1: comogeneous le wouldn't matter. We haven't even solved different simple 523 00:26:03,119 --> 00:26:06,440 Speaker 1: things like two objects orbiting each other. Right, that's too 524 00:26:06,440 --> 00:26:09,359 Speaker 1: complicated for us to figure out. And so to solve 525 00:26:09,400 --> 00:26:12,080 Speaker 1: these problems, what we typically do is we use a trick. 526 00:26:12,200 --> 00:26:14,000 Speaker 1: We say, well, this problem is too hard to solve. 527 00:26:14,119 --> 00:26:16,199 Speaker 1: We don't know how to solve the problem of I 528 00:26:16,240 --> 00:26:18,080 Speaker 1: have a rock moving past me with a lot of 529 00:26:18,160 --> 00:26:20,959 Speaker 1: kinetic energy. I can't solve that one. But can I 530 00:26:21,000 --> 00:26:23,960 Speaker 1: solve a different problem that I know has the same answer. 531 00:26:24,080 --> 00:26:26,719 Speaker 1: So one thing we know about general relativity is that 532 00:26:26,760 --> 00:26:30,560 Speaker 1: it is invariant. Everybody should agree about what happens. But 533 00:26:30,680 --> 00:26:34,199 Speaker 1: whether there's a black hole, regardless of your coordinates, how 534 00:26:34,280 --> 00:26:38,080 Speaker 1: you choose your reference frame, how you organize spacetime, right 535 00:26:38,320 --> 00:26:41,600 Speaker 1: where you put your axes shouldn't matter. Everybody should agree 536 00:26:41,640 --> 00:26:43,560 Speaker 1: about whether or not there is a black hole. So 537 00:26:43,600 --> 00:26:46,639 Speaker 1: that's a short answer. Jorge and I can't disagree about 538 00:26:46,920 --> 00:26:49,240 Speaker 1: whether the rock forms into a black hole. It's not 539 00:26:49,280 --> 00:26:51,119 Speaker 1: like he could see a form of black hole and 540 00:26:51,160 --> 00:26:53,879 Speaker 1: I don't. We have to agree. We know that the 541 00:26:53,880 --> 00:26:56,679 Speaker 1: equations of general relativity are invariant, so we say, well, 542 00:26:56,720 --> 00:26:58,800 Speaker 1: let's solve the problem in the easier case where I'm 543 00:26:58,840 --> 00:27:00,879 Speaker 1: just holding the rock and I can ask the question, 544 00:27:01,160 --> 00:27:03,200 Speaker 1: doesn't have enough mass to form a black hole? Yes 545 00:27:03,280 --> 00:27:05,600 Speaker 1: or no? And then we say, well, Jorge must see 546 00:27:05,640 --> 00:27:07,639 Speaker 1: the same answer. We don't know how to solve the 547 00:27:07,640 --> 00:27:10,120 Speaker 1: equations for Jorge, but we know what the answer has 548 00:27:10,160 --> 00:27:13,000 Speaker 1: to be, meaning that because you don't see a black 549 00:27:13,040 --> 00:27:15,560 Speaker 1: hole in the ruck in your the palm of your hand, 550 00:27:15,600 --> 00:27:17,760 Speaker 1: then I shouldn't see a black hole when I'm moving 551 00:27:17,920 --> 00:27:20,840 Speaker 1: past you se of the speed of light. You're saying, 552 00:27:20,840 --> 00:27:23,720 Speaker 1: we should all come out with the same observation exactly. 553 00:27:23,760 --> 00:27:26,040 Speaker 1: And if we were better at math and we knew 554 00:27:26,080 --> 00:27:28,359 Speaker 1: how to solve that problem in the case of an 555 00:27:28,359 --> 00:27:30,840 Speaker 1: object moving really really fast, then we would get the 556 00:27:30,880 --> 00:27:32,800 Speaker 1: same answer. We know that that's true because we know 557 00:27:32,880 --> 00:27:36,080 Speaker 1: that general relativity is invariant, that no matter what frame 558 00:27:36,119 --> 00:27:38,040 Speaker 1: you solve it and you do get the same answer. 559 00:27:38,400 --> 00:27:40,960 Speaker 1: We just can't work through the details of that math 560 00:27:41,160 --> 00:27:43,160 Speaker 1: right now, because we don't know how to solve these 561 00:27:43,160 --> 00:27:46,440 Speaker 1: equations in every possible scenario. Though typically we just say, well, 562 00:27:46,560 --> 00:27:48,919 Speaker 1: let's solve it an easier case and then argue that 563 00:27:49,000 --> 00:27:51,359 Speaker 1: the answer must be the same in this other case. 564 00:27:52,200 --> 00:27:55,520 Speaker 1: It sounds like a pretend argument. But I guess is, 565 00:27:55,600 --> 00:27:57,680 Speaker 1: why do you why does it have to be that way? 566 00:27:58,160 --> 00:28:01,240 Speaker 1: You know, like, why couldn't do you see no black hole? 567 00:28:01,440 --> 00:28:03,239 Speaker 1: But to me it looks like you are holding a 568 00:28:03,240 --> 00:28:07,000 Speaker 1: black hole, you know, like it maybe somehow it sort 569 00:28:07,040 --> 00:28:09,320 Speaker 1: of looks like it nothing can escape there. But to you, 570 00:28:09,440 --> 00:28:11,399 Speaker 1: it does seem like something can escape from your the 571 00:28:11,440 --> 00:28:13,360 Speaker 1: palm of your hand. Why couldn't that be true? Well, 572 00:28:13,359 --> 00:28:15,560 Speaker 1: remember what the condition for a black hole is. We're 573 00:28:15,600 --> 00:28:18,119 Speaker 1: talking about an event horizon, talking about our region in 574 00:28:18,160 --> 00:28:20,840 Speaker 1: space where nothing can ever leave. So it would be 575 00:28:20,880 --> 00:28:24,399 Speaker 1: a paradox, right, if you see an event horizon, but 576 00:28:24,760 --> 00:28:27,800 Speaker 1: I don't. Right, that means that I could see a 577 00:28:27,800 --> 00:28:31,320 Speaker 1: photon leave this rock and strike you. But you're saying 578 00:28:31,320 --> 00:28:34,320 Speaker 1: that no photon could ever leave that rock and strike you. Right, 579 00:28:34,440 --> 00:28:36,720 Speaker 1: Those two things are in contradiction with each other. And 580 00:28:36,800 --> 00:28:41,120 Speaker 1: remember that there's lots of relativity. In relativity, right, people 581 00:28:41,160 --> 00:28:44,960 Speaker 1: can disagree about the order of events, for example, but 582 00:28:45,000 --> 00:28:47,200 Speaker 1: you know whether two things strike each other, for example, 583 00:28:47,200 --> 00:28:50,280 Speaker 1: whether that photon reaches Jorge or not are things that 584 00:28:50,320 --> 00:28:53,080 Speaker 1: all observers do have to agree on, all right, So 585 00:28:53,120 --> 00:28:55,160 Speaker 1: then what's kind of the answer here? If we both 586 00:28:55,200 --> 00:28:57,360 Speaker 1: have to see a black hole not forming in the 587 00:28:57,360 --> 00:28:59,360 Speaker 1: palm of your hand, then does that mean that my 588 00:28:59,600 --> 00:29:04,160 Speaker 1: velac city is irrelevant, like kinetic energy doesn't go into 589 00:29:04,240 --> 00:29:07,040 Speaker 1: really the formation of a black hole. Because I feel 590 00:29:07,040 --> 00:29:09,000 Speaker 1: like that's kind of what you're saying, is that me 591 00:29:09,120 --> 00:29:12,880 Speaker 1: moving fast is irrelevant, and therefore it can't affect whether 592 00:29:12,960 --> 00:29:15,400 Speaker 1: or not a black hole forms or not. That's right, 593 00:29:15,400 --> 00:29:17,000 Speaker 1: and that sort of makes sense. You know, if I'm 594 00:29:17,000 --> 00:29:19,600 Speaker 1: sitting here holding a rock and you're running by me 595 00:29:19,720 --> 00:29:23,520 Speaker 1: a mile away, how could you're running by me make 596 00:29:23,640 --> 00:29:26,200 Speaker 1: my rock implode into a black hole? Right? It doesn't 597 00:29:26,240 --> 00:29:28,160 Speaker 1: even make sense. And then whether or not a black 598 00:29:28,200 --> 00:29:31,040 Speaker 1: hole existed would depend on like everybody else's speed in 599 00:29:31,040 --> 00:29:34,000 Speaker 1: the universe. It shouldn't make sense, right, Your intuition tells 600 00:29:34,040 --> 00:29:35,680 Speaker 1: you that it's either a black hole or it's not. 601 00:29:36,040 --> 00:29:38,560 Speaker 1: And no matter how fast where he runs, he can't 602 00:29:38,560 --> 00:29:41,520 Speaker 1: turn my rock into a black hole. Well, I hate 603 00:29:41,560 --> 00:29:44,800 Speaker 1: to run, so that wouldn't happen anyways. I think what 604 00:29:44,840 --> 00:29:47,760 Speaker 1: you're saying is that you know, the formulas that say 605 00:29:47,800 --> 00:29:50,080 Speaker 1: what makes a black hole or what turns into a 606 00:29:50,120 --> 00:29:52,920 Speaker 1: black hole somehow sort of cancel out the effects of 607 00:29:53,000 --> 00:29:56,000 Speaker 1: kinetic energy. Because you said earlier that kinetic energy does 608 00:29:56,080 --> 00:29:58,440 Speaker 1: bend space, so you would think that it would help 609 00:29:58,480 --> 00:30:01,320 Speaker 1: form a black hole, but equations of the black hole 610 00:30:01,400 --> 00:30:05,240 Speaker 1: are such that it actually sort of ignores the kinetic energy. Yeah, 611 00:30:05,280 --> 00:30:08,000 Speaker 1: it all gets woven in a very complicated way that frankly, 612 00:30:08,040 --> 00:30:10,680 Speaker 1: we don't even really understand how to solve in an 613 00:30:10,680 --> 00:30:13,840 Speaker 1: exact way. We have like numerical solutions to this stuff, 614 00:30:14,080 --> 00:30:16,640 Speaker 1: but most of the solutions to general relativity are done 615 00:30:16,720 --> 00:30:19,880 Speaker 1: using these kind of assumptions like that everything is invariant, 616 00:30:19,880 --> 00:30:21,680 Speaker 1: that you get the same answer in every frame, so 617 00:30:22,000 --> 00:30:24,120 Speaker 1: let's find the one where it's easiest. And we do 618 00:30:24,200 --> 00:30:25,720 Speaker 1: this all the time in physics. You want to solve 619 00:30:25,720 --> 00:30:28,280 Speaker 1: a problem where like a ball is rolling down a plane, 620 00:30:28,440 --> 00:30:31,080 Speaker 1: then you choose axis that make that simple. You know 621 00:30:31,080 --> 00:30:33,640 Speaker 1: where your x axis is like aligned along the plane 622 00:30:33,760 --> 00:30:36,360 Speaker 1: rather than with the ground, because it makes the maths simpler. 623 00:30:36,400 --> 00:30:37,960 Speaker 1: So we're always doing this kind of thing where we 624 00:30:38,000 --> 00:30:40,520 Speaker 1: transform the problem to be a simpler one that has 625 00:30:40,600 --> 00:30:43,160 Speaker 1: the same answer. Cool. All right, Well, it sounds like 626 00:30:43,200 --> 00:30:45,600 Speaker 1: you're waving your hands with some math here a little bit. 627 00:30:45,680 --> 00:30:49,000 Speaker 1: But it sounds like the answer is that to answer 628 00:30:49,080 --> 00:30:52,160 Speaker 1: Jeff's question, is that fast moving objects do have extra 629 00:30:52,240 --> 00:30:55,200 Speaker 1: energy because of their kinetic energy, depending on who measures it, 630 00:30:55,240 --> 00:30:58,680 Speaker 1: But that kinetic energy can't affect the formation of whether 631 00:30:58,800 --> 00:31:01,240 Speaker 1: or not it forms a black hole exactly. And Jeff 632 00:31:01,280 --> 00:31:04,360 Speaker 1: actually asked his question in terms of photons, but the 633 00:31:04,440 --> 00:31:07,120 Speaker 1: same kind of principles apply. You know, you have enough 634 00:31:07,200 --> 00:31:09,280 Speaker 1: energy to form the black hole or you don't, and 635 00:31:09,320 --> 00:31:12,120 Speaker 1: it's the same in every frame. Well, we have one 636 00:31:12,160 --> 00:31:15,640 Speaker 1: more question here today, and it's about what happens when 637 00:31:15,720 --> 00:31:19,760 Speaker 1: white holes collide with black holes, and I'm guessing it's 638 00:31:19,760 --> 00:31:21,600 Speaker 1: not just that they form a gray hole. We'll get 639 00:31:21,640 --> 00:31:24,280 Speaker 1: into the real answer here and not to pretend one. 640 00:31:24,480 --> 00:31:39,080 Speaker 1: But first let's take another quick break. All right, we 641 00:31:39,120 --> 00:31:43,680 Speaker 1: were answering listener questions and I feel like I've got 642 00:31:43,720 --> 00:31:45,840 Speaker 1: in my mind blown twice already. First of all, that 643 00:31:45,880 --> 00:31:49,080 Speaker 1: there's a nearly six kid thinking about aliens in the universe. 644 00:31:49,120 --> 00:31:52,720 Speaker 1: That's amazing. That's awesome. And also that black holes don't 645 00:31:52,760 --> 00:31:55,560 Speaker 1: depend on how fast you're moving. Yep, black holes are 646 00:31:55,680 --> 00:31:58,640 Speaker 1: mind blowing and they're really fun hypothetical questions to think 647 00:31:58,640 --> 00:32:01,000 Speaker 1: about to make sure that you want understand how they 648 00:32:01,000 --> 00:32:02,760 Speaker 1: work and what the rules are and how it all 649 00:32:02,800 --> 00:32:06,680 Speaker 1: comes together. It's really useful to think about crazy hypotheticals. Alright, well, 650 00:32:06,680 --> 00:32:08,880 Speaker 1: we have one more question here, and this one comes 651 00:32:08,920 --> 00:32:12,720 Speaker 1: from Carson Hi di Hore. Carson, here, I have a 652 00:32:12,800 --> 00:32:16,200 Speaker 1: question about black holes and white holes. Could you please 653 00:32:16,280 --> 00:32:19,959 Speaker 1: explain what would happen if the two were to quiet? 654 00:32:20,280 --> 00:32:23,960 Speaker 1: And thanks for answering all my questions. Alright, awesome question, Carson. 655 00:32:24,280 --> 00:32:26,440 Speaker 1: That is a great question because I also wonder if 656 00:32:26,440 --> 00:32:29,719 Speaker 1: I thought this myself. Carson's question is what happens if 657 00:32:29,760 --> 00:32:32,320 Speaker 1: I take a black hole and I make it crash 658 00:32:32,480 --> 00:32:36,200 Speaker 1: or collide with a white hole? It is a wonderful question. 659 00:32:36,280 --> 00:32:38,360 Speaker 1: I really love this. When I first got this question, 660 00:32:38,360 --> 00:32:41,080 Speaker 1: I thought, WHOA, I've never even thought about that. How 661 00:32:41,120 --> 00:32:43,720 Speaker 1: have I never considered what might happen in this scenario? 662 00:32:43,880 --> 00:32:45,120 Speaker 1: So I have to go off and think about a 663 00:32:45,160 --> 00:32:47,880 Speaker 1: little bit. And I also reached out to a quantum 664 00:32:47,880 --> 00:32:50,800 Speaker 1: gravity expert who will chime in a little bit later on. 665 00:32:50,880 --> 00:32:53,440 Speaker 1: You can just pretend that you came up with that information. 666 00:32:54,040 --> 00:32:56,400 Speaker 1: I can't pretend to be a quantum gravity expert as 667 00:32:56,440 --> 00:32:59,160 Speaker 1: hard as I try. Well, what happens when a white 668 00:32:59,200 --> 00:33:01,240 Speaker 1: hole collects with a black cool That's a great question, 669 00:33:01,360 --> 00:33:04,200 Speaker 1: and so let's step through this. What is exactly a 670 00:33:04,200 --> 00:33:06,880 Speaker 1: white hole? So a white hole is a really weird 671 00:33:07,000 --> 00:33:09,800 Speaker 1: theoretical object, and it's one of these things where it's 672 00:33:09,840 --> 00:33:12,200 Speaker 1: not even really well to find what it is. There's 673 00:33:12,240 --> 00:33:15,440 Speaker 1: sort of like a few white hole kind of ideas 674 00:33:15,560 --> 00:33:18,640 Speaker 1: out there that all sort of fall in this general category. 675 00:33:18,960 --> 00:33:21,080 Speaker 1: So the answer to the question depends a little bit 676 00:33:21,160 --> 00:33:23,840 Speaker 1: on what a white hole is. And it's sort of 677 00:33:23,880 --> 00:33:26,960 Speaker 1: like three different ideas that might be worth thinking about 678 00:33:26,960 --> 00:33:29,200 Speaker 1: for what a white hole is. I guess, first of all, 679 00:33:29,320 --> 00:33:31,400 Speaker 1: is this a real thing that physicists, a fuel that 680 00:33:31,520 --> 00:33:34,280 Speaker 1: really exists, or is this just like it's possible in 681 00:33:34,360 --> 00:33:37,280 Speaker 1: the equations but we don't really have sort of dug 682 00:33:37,320 --> 00:33:39,520 Speaker 1: into it to get the sense whe whether or not 683 00:33:39,760 --> 00:33:41,720 Speaker 1: it can't exist in the universe. Are you asking me 684 00:33:41,760 --> 00:33:44,160 Speaker 1: if white holes are real or pretend? Yeah, Well, I'm 685 00:33:44,200 --> 00:33:46,680 Speaker 1: asking if the theory is real or pretend. So white 686 00:33:46,720 --> 00:33:49,280 Speaker 1: holes do exist in the theory. We don't know if 687 00:33:49,280 --> 00:33:52,320 Speaker 1: white holes are real in our universe. And as you'll 688 00:33:52,320 --> 00:33:54,200 Speaker 1: hear about, some of the parts of the theory are 689 00:33:54,200 --> 00:33:57,680 Speaker 1: a little bit speculative and a little bit fuzzy, So 690 00:33:57,840 --> 00:34:00,520 Speaker 1: we're not sure whether white holes. Nobody's ever seen a 691 00:34:00,600 --> 00:34:02,640 Speaker 1: white hole, but there are parts of the theory that 692 00:34:02,720 --> 00:34:04,920 Speaker 1: suggests that they might be real. And if that sounds 693 00:34:04,960 --> 00:34:08,320 Speaker 1: pretty speculative, remember that until a few decades ago, black 694 00:34:08,360 --> 00:34:10,520 Speaker 1: holes were in the same category. They're in the kind 695 00:34:10,520 --> 00:34:12,120 Speaker 1: of thing that we're in the theory, and a lot 696 00:34:12,160 --> 00:34:15,400 Speaker 1: of people thought, well, that would never actually happen in reality. 697 00:34:15,480 --> 00:34:17,719 Speaker 1: And now we're pretty sure black holes are real, that 698 00:34:17,800 --> 00:34:20,320 Speaker 1: they are out there. The white holes might be real, 699 00:34:20,520 --> 00:34:22,719 Speaker 1: or they might just be pretended. We're not sure. But 700 00:34:22,760 --> 00:34:24,959 Speaker 1: that's where we are with white holes, is that we're 701 00:34:25,040 --> 00:34:28,080 Speaker 1: like three decades behind black holes, because I feel like 702 00:34:28,080 --> 00:34:30,520 Speaker 1: black holes, we thought they were maybe met real or 703 00:34:30,560 --> 00:34:33,520 Speaker 1: maybe not. Then we sort of saw evidence of their presence, 704 00:34:34,040 --> 00:34:36,520 Speaker 1: and then only until very recently do we have actual 705 00:34:36,560 --> 00:34:38,799 Speaker 1: pictures of them. Were still in the maybe they're not 706 00:34:38,880 --> 00:34:42,239 Speaker 1: real phase, right, we're never with black holes because the 707 00:34:42,239 --> 00:34:44,399 Speaker 1: only way we know they are real is by looking 708 00:34:44,400 --> 00:34:46,759 Speaker 1: at the stuff that's nearby them, and black holes are 709 00:34:46,760 --> 00:34:48,799 Speaker 1: sort of like the only thing that fits that bill 710 00:34:49,200 --> 00:34:52,160 Speaker 1: until recently now we have some like alternative theories or 711 00:34:52,200 --> 00:34:54,400 Speaker 1: like what might be going on inside black holes is 712 00:34:54,440 --> 00:34:58,000 Speaker 1: maybe they're not actually gr black holes. And we'll talk 713 00:34:58,000 --> 00:35:00,239 Speaker 1: about that actually in a minute. But yeah, white holes 714 00:35:00,280 --> 00:35:03,920 Speaker 1: are behind black holes. Black holes we thought of, you know, 715 00:35:04,000 --> 00:35:06,200 Speaker 1: in the early part of the nine hundreds, and then 716 00:35:06,239 --> 00:35:10,520 Speaker 1: discovered indirectly fifty years later. White holes weren't really thought 717 00:35:10,560 --> 00:35:13,319 Speaker 1: about until like the sixties or seventies, when people who 718 00:35:13,320 --> 00:35:16,279 Speaker 1: are understanding the nature of general relativity a little bit 719 00:35:16,320 --> 00:35:19,160 Speaker 1: more deeply. So, yeah, they're bout fifty years behind black holes, 720 00:35:19,239 --> 00:35:21,120 Speaker 1: all right. So you were saying, there are three kinds 721 00:35:21,160 --> 00:35:24,319 Speaker 1: of white hole ideas or possibilities. What are they? So 722 00:35:24,360 --> 00:35:26,960 Speaker 1: the simplest one to think about is the endpoint of 723 00:35:27,000 --> 00:35:30,360 Speaker 1: a wormhole. A wormhole is like a connection between two 724 00:35:30,400 --> 00:35:33,560 Speaker 1: points in space where you can enter in one spot 725 00:35:33,560 --> 00:35:36,560 Speaker 1: and come out somewhere else. And this is possible because 726 00:35:36,640 --> 00:35:39,799 Speaker 1: general relativity tells us not just the space can do 727 00:35:39,880 --> 00:35:43,160 Speaker 1: things like wiggle or bend in the presence of mass. 728 00:35:43,200 --> 00:35:46,120 Speaker 1: It can also be like connected in weird ways. You 729 00:35:46,160 --> 00:35:48,440 Speaker 1: can like stitch it together to say, this point in 730 00:35:48,480 --> 00:35:52,160 Speaker 1: space over here is actually also next to that point 731 00:35:52,200 --> 00:35:54,600 Speaker 1: in space. Meaning instead of just being able to go 732 00:35:54,680 --> 00:35:58,360 Speaker 1: like up, down, left, right, side to side to adjacent points, 733 00:35:58,560 --> 00:36:01,480 Speaker 1: now one of those adjacent points is actually like somewhere 734 00:36:01,480 --> 00:36:04,480 Speaker 1: else in space, but also at the same time adjacent 735 00:36:04,560 --> 00:36:07,160 Speaker 1: to this point in space. So these wormholes can sometimes 736 00:36:07,200 --> 00:36:10,120 Speaker 1: be like a black hole linked to a white hole. 737 00:36:10,400 --> 00:36:12,640 Speaker 1: We fall into the black hole and you get spat 738 00:36:12,680 --> 00:36:14,759 Speaker 1: out the white hole on the other side. It's like 739 00:36:14,800 --> 00:36:17,080 Speaker 1: they almost like the opposite of a black hole. Yes, 740 00:36:17,400 --> 00:36:20,040 Speaker 1: so conceptionally a white hole is the opposite of a 741 00:36:20,040 --> 00:36:22,719 Speaker 1: black hole. Where a black hole has an event horizon 742 00:36:22,880 --> 00:36:26,160 Speaker 1: where nothing can escape, a white hole as an event 743 00:36:26,160 --> 00:36:29,799 Speaker 1: horizon where nothing can enter. It's like you've arrange the 744 00:36:29,840 --> 00:36:32,440 Speaker 1: shape of space in such a way that nothing can 745 00:36:32,440 --> 00:36:35,840 Speaker 1: ever cross that event horizon going in, the way in 746 00:36:35,840 --> 00:36:38,280 Speaker 1: a black hole, nothing can ever cross the event horizon 747 00:36:38,360 --> 00:36:41,200 Speaker 1: going out. Or a white hole, it's like the opposite, 748 00:36:41,239 --> 00:36:43,279 Speaker 1: I guess, meaning like if you shoot a photon at 749 00:36:43,280 --> 00:36:45,799 Speaker 1: a white hole will just bounce back. You will never 750 00:36:45,920 --> 00:36:49,040 Speaker 1: reach the event horizon exactly and maybe turn around and 751 00:36:49,040 --> 00:36:51,160 Speaker 1: come back. Well, the answer to that depends a little 752 00:36:51,160 --> 00:36:53,359 Speaker 1: bit on the form of the white hole that you're 753 00:36:53,360 --> 00:36:56,799 Speaker 1: talking about. In some theories it will fall forever towards 754 00:36:56,880 --> 00:37:00,000 Speaker 1: the event horizon but never actually cross it. All right, Well, 755 00:37:00,280 --> 00:37:02,279 Speaker 1: what's the second kind of white hole? So the second 756 00:37:02,320 --> 00:37:04,480 Speaker 1: kind of white hole sort of like a pure gr 757 00:37:04,600 --> 00:37:07,080 Speaker 1: white hole. It comes from looking at the solutions to 758 00:37:07,160 --> 00:37:10,320 Speaker 1: Einstein's equations. So you have like a big massive stuff, 759 00:37:10,520 --> 00:37:13,239 Speaker 1: so much stuff that you could get a black hole, right, 760 00:37:13,239 --> 00:37:15,879 Speaker 1: that's a solution to the equations. Turns out that general 761 00:37:15,880 --> 00:37:18,880 Speaker 1: relativity has this symmetry in it that every solution to 762 00:37:19,000 --> 00:37:23,439 Speaker 1: general relativity also works backwards in time. General relativity doesn't 763 00:37:23,440 --> 00:37:26,920 Speaker 1: seem to prefer one direction in time. Like the description 764 00:37:26,960 --> 00:37:30,719 Speaker 1: going forward and description going backwards both are solutions to 765 00:37:30,920 --> 00:37:33,680 Speaker 1: Einstein's equation. So what that means is that, like, if 766 00:37:33,719 --> 00:37:35,880 Speaker 1: you have a massive stuff that can give you a 767 00:37:35,920 --> 00:37:39,680 Speaker 1: black hole where nothing can ever escape the event horizon, 768 00:37:40,120 --> 00:37:42,239 Speaker 1: then it also can give you a white hole. And 769 00:37:42,360 --> 00:37:46,000 Speaker 1: like the opposite solution, the time reverse solution of a 770 00:37:46,040 --> 00:37:49,360 Speaker 1: black hole is also a solution to the equations. So 771 00:37:49,400 --> 00:37:51,360 Speaker 1: I put a big blob of stuff in the universe. 772 00:37:51,680 --> 00:37:54,120 Speaker 1: It can give you a black hole where space has 773 00:37:54,160 --> 00:37:56,680 Speaker 1: been so everything falls in a crosses the event horizon 774 00:37:56,719 --> 00:37:59,000 Speaker 1: and never leaves. But it could also give you a 775 00:37:59,000 --> 00:38:02,600 Speaker 1: white hole, the opposite structure of space that nothing can 776 00:38:02,640 --> 00:38:05,960 Speaker 1: ever enter the event horizon. Wait, what it would be 777 00:38:05,960 --> 00:38:07,719 Speaker 1: because you have a lot of stuff. But would it 778 00:38:07,760 --> 00:38:09,560 Speaker 1: be random if it turns into a white hole or 779 00:38:09,600 --> 00:38:11,160 Speaker 1: a black hole like could be like a flip of 780 00:38:11,160 --> 00:38:15,239 Speaker 1: a coin. We don't really understand whether these solutions are physical. Right, 781 00:38:15,360 --> 00:38:17,600 Speaker 1: this is like a solution to the equation, but we 782 00:38:17,640 --> 00:38:20,080 Speaker 1: don't really understand, like does that mean these things can 783 00:38:20,160 --> 00:38:23,080 Speaker 1: actually exist? We've never seen one. It's sort of like 784 00:38:23,120 --> 00:38:25,799 Speaker 1: when you're solving an equation in math and you have 785 00:38:25,920 --> 00:38:28,520 Speaker 1: like an x squared equal to nine, X could be 786 00:38:28,600 --> 00:38:31,480 Speaker 1: three or x could be minus three, right, And sometimes 787 00:38:31,560 --> 00:38:34,200 Speaker 1: that makes sense and sometimes it just doesn't. Right. Sometimes 788 00:38:34,280 --> 00:38:36,799 Speaker 1: that's like a non physical solution, so you just ignore it. 789 00:38:37,160 --> 00:38:39,640 Speaker 1: We don't know if this is like a physical solution 790 00:38:40,200 --> 00:38:43,040 Speaker 1: or a non physical solution. One problem with this time 791 00:38:43,040 --> 00:38:46,200 Speaker 1: reverse scenario is that requires the black hole or the 792 00:38:46,200 --> 00:38:49,160 Speaker 1: white hole to be eternal for it to always be there. 793 00:38:49,360 --> 00:38:52,400 Speaker 1: For the time reversal solution to exist, it has to 794 00:38:52,520 --> 00:38:56,040 Speaker 1: like exist all the way back to negative infinity, otherwise 795 00:38:56,040 --> 00:38:58,200 Speaker 1: the symmetry would be broken. Right, the black hole is 796 00:38:58,239 --> 00:39:01,400 Speaker 1: formed at some moment by a collapsing star, for example, 797 00:39:01,480 --> 00:39:04,200 Speaker 1: that's how many black holes are formed, then the solution 798 00:39:04,280 --> 00:39:07,279 Speaker 1: doesn't work backwards in time anymore. That was required the 799 00:39:07,280 --> 00:39:10,680 Speaker 1: start to like uncollapse somehow. So it's like the opposite 800 00:39:10,680 --> 00:39:14,160 Speaker 1: of a black hole mathematically, but we don't know that 801 00:39:14,200 --> 00:39:16,680 Speaker 1: could be physically possible. We don't know if that could 802 00:39:16,680 --> 00:39:19,680 Speaker 1: be physically possible, and it requires this weird thing called 803 00:39:19,680 --> 00:39:22,560 Speaker 1: an eternal black hole, which we also don't know if 804 00:39:22,560 --> 00:39:25,040 Speaker 1: it's physically possible at all. So it's sort of like, 805 00:39:25,200 --> 00:39:27,560 Speaker 1: you know, it's a theoretical playground. It's like, here's something 806 00:39:27,600 --> 00:39:30,640 Speaker 1: the math does and it has a cool name and 807 00:39:30,760 --> 00:39:33,399 Speaker 1: weird physical effects, but we don't really know if that's 808 00:39:33,440 --> 00:39:35,440 Speaker 1: real or if it could appear in our universe, and 809 00:39:35,480 --> 00:39:38,160 Speaker 1: there's no physical way we know of to create this thing, 810 00:39:38,239 --> 00:39:42,040 Speaker 1: this backwards in time eternal black hole. All right, And 811 00:39:42,080 --> 00:39:44,680 Speaker 1: then there's one last kind of white hole here that 812 00:39:44,760 --> 00:39:47,440 Speaker 1: has to do with quantum physics. Yeah, one issue is 813 00:39:47,480 --> 00:39:50,359 Speaker 1: that we think that general relativity is not complete, right, 814 00:39:50,400 --> 00:39:52,960 Speaker 1: It can't really describe the universe as we know it. 815 00:39:53,360 --> 00:39:56,000 Speaker 1: We don't think that singularities are real. We think that 816 00:39:56,040 --> 00:39:59,000 Speaker 1: the infinity predicted by general relativity is like a failure 817 00:39:59,040 --> 00:40:01,560 Speaker 1: of the theory and that if things get actually that 818 00:40:01,680 --> 00:40:04,920 Speaker 1: compact quantum effects takeover. But we don't have like a 819 00:40:05,000 --> 00:40:08,680 Speaker 1: quantum theory of gravity. We don't know how gravity interacts 820 00:40:08,719 --> 00:40:11,240 Speaker 1: with quantum mechanics. But we did talk on the program 821 00:40:11,280 --> 00:40:14,839 Speaker 1: once about a possibility, possibility that maybe black holes don't 822 00:40:14,880 --> 00:40:18,560 Speaker 1: actually have singularities at their heart. Maybe the curvature of 823 00:40:18,600 --> 00:40:22,920 Speaker 1: space creates time dilation, so like time moves really really slowly, 824 00:40:23,040 --> 00:40:26,160 Speaker 1: and what we're seeing is a star collapsing and super 825 00:40:26,320 --> 00:40:29,840 Speaker 1: slow motion. It's going to collapse to some point and 826 00:40:29,840 --> 00:40:32,680 Speaker 1: then it's gonna bounce back and explode again, and it 827 00:40:32,760 --> 00:40:35,120 Speaker 1: just hasn't happened yet because the black holes are in 828 00:40:35,200 --> 00:40:38,080 Speaker 1: super slow motion. So this is the idea of a 829 00:40:38,200 --> 00:40:41,360 Speaker 1: dark star and like the quantum version of a collapsing 830 00:40:41,400 --> 00:40:44,560 Speaker 1: black hole that's gonna eventually bounce back. It just hasn't 831 00:40:44,600 --> 00:40:46,880 Speaker 1: happened yet, right. I remember we talked about this, is 832 00:40:46,920 --> 00:40:48,959 Speaker 1: that like it's the idea that maybe even black holes 833 00:40:48,960 --> 00:40:52,160 Speaker 1: are don't exist, like maybe black holes aren't real, Like 834 00:40:52,280 --> 00:40:54,839 Speaker 1: you never get to the actual black hole. You only 835 00:40:54,880 --> 00:40:57,800 Speaker 1: have super dense star that is never going to collapse 836 00:40:58,000 --> 00:41:02,239 Speaker 1: to a singularity. It's gonna blow it before it collapses. 837 00:41:02,440 --> 00:41:04,759 Speaker 1: And you're saying, I think that that explosion, when it 838 00:41:04,800 --> 00:41:08,160 Speaker 1: finally collapses, maybe a long time for now, you can 839 00:41:08,200 --> 00:41:10,160 Speaker 1: call that a white hole. Exactly. This would be a 840 00:41:10,200 --> 00:41:13,040 Speaker 1: transition from a black hole to a white hole because 841 00:41:13,040 --> 00:41:15,400 Speaker 1: at that moment things would spray out. So you have 842 00:41:15,400 --> 00:41:18,520 Speaker 1: this incredible source of energy, incredible source of radiation, and 843 00:41:18,600 --> 00:41:21,080 Speaker 1: the curvature of space would be inverted so much so 844 00:41:21,120 --> 00:41:23,239 Speaker 1: that it would effectively be a white hole. So I 845 00:41:23,280 --> 00:41:25,120 Speaker 1: reached out to one of the authors of that paper, 846 00:41:25,239 --> 00:41:28,600 Speaker 1: Francesco the Dotty. She wrote together actually with Carlo Rovelli, 847 00:41:28,640 --> 00:41:30,440 Speaker 1: who has been a guest on our podcast as an 848 00:41:30,440 --> 00:41:33,560 Speaker 1: excellent science writer, to ask her about what would happen 849 00:41:33,920 --> 00:41:37,120 Speaker 1: if a black hole hit a white hole and the 850 00:41:37,200 --> 00:41:40,520 Speaker 1: kind that she thinks about these quantum gravity white holes. Right, 851 00:41:40,600 --> 00:41:45,239 Speaker 1: here's the audio professor Francesco the Dotty talking about quantum gravity. Okay, 852 00:41:45,360 --> 00:41:49,080 Speaker 1: so we have to divide this question into two pieces, 853 00:41:49,120 --> 00:41:53,560 Speaker 1: because it really depends whether we are talking about microscopic 854 00:41:54,280 --> 00:41:59,319 Speaker 1: of macroscopic black holes. So let's imagine it's possible to 855 00:41:59,440 --> 00:42:03,480 Speaker 1: have a too macroscopic object, one a black hole and 856 00:42:03,600 --> 00:42:07,359 Speaker 1: one it's a vital and let's imagine that they are 857 00:42:07,400 --> 00:42:11,439 Speaker 1: turning around one the other, very much like the black 858 00:42:11,440 --> 00:42:15,680 Speaker 1: cobinaries that we are now proving with the gravitational ways 859 00:42:15,719 --> 00:42:20,120 Speaker 1: telescopes like Lisa and so on. So in that case, 860 00:42:20,520 --> 00:42:24,680 Speaker 1: what I would expect is just to have emerging between 861 00:42:24,719 --> 00:42:28,160 Speaker 1: these two objects that is quite similar to what I 862 00:42:28,160 --> 00:42:31,080 Speaker 1: would observe for the merging of two black holes. Then 863 00:42:31,800 --> 00:42:35,080 Speaker 1: probably I'm not sure what the calculation would give exactly, 864 00:42:35,400 --> 00:42:40,040 Speaker 1: but we have a prediction for the inkdown face. So 865 00:42:40,080 --> 00:42:44,080 Speaker 1: after the two black holes merges, there is a specific 866 00:42:44,600 --> 00:42:47,640 Speaker 1: wave form that we observe in gravitational ways. There could 867 00:42:47,680 --> 00:42:53,240 Speaker 1: be differences for a black and a white all margin, 868 00:42:53,719 --> 00:42:57,799 Speaker 1: but I expected something very similar and there is don't 869 00:42:57,800 --> 00:43:00,400 Speaker 1: know why I expect something similar is because was in 870 00:43:00,440 --> 00:43:05,720 Speaker 1: the moment in which a whitehall get perturbed by another 871 00:43:05,800 --> 00:43:10,640 Speaker 1: object like a black hole, then very quickly the whitehall 872 00:43:10,960 --> 00:43:16,279 Speaker 1: turns back into a black hole. So basically the two 873 00:43:16,280 --> 00:43:19,720 Speaker 1: objects that would be emerging would be just two black holes. 874 00:43:19,960 --> 00:43:25,680 Speaker 1: A completely different story is the case of two microscopic 875 00:43:25,960 --> 00:43:29,799 Speaker 1: black and white oats. First of all, it's more complicated 876 00:43:30,040 --> 00:43:35,919 Speaker 1: too created such a situation because being a microscopic well, 877 00:43:36,320 --> 00:43:40,440 Speaker 1: it's not so easy maybe to create abounded the pair 878 00:43:40,600 --> 00:43:45,920 Speaker 1: that would merge like in the microscopic case. And the 879 00:43:45,960 --> 00:43:48,520 Speaker 1: other complication is that in the moment in which you 880 00:43:48,640 --> 00:43:52,880 Speaker 1: have microscopic objects is not so clear the distinction between 881 00:43:53,440 --> 00:43:56,239 Speaker 1: the black and the white one in the sense that 882 00:43:56,320 --> 00:44:00,000 Speaker 1: you can have objects are so small that are basically 883 00:44:00,320 --> 00:44:03,840 Speaker 1: at the Plank scale, the Planck scale, those objects behave 884 00:44:04,080 --> 00:44:07,839 Speaker 1: like quantum objects. They are kind of quantum particle that 885 00:44:07,960 --> 00:44:10,800 Speaker 1: have at the same time a black and the white 886 00:44:11,040 --> 00:44:14,320 Speaker 1: nature like particles. So that could be in a superposition 887 00:44:14,400 --> 00:44:16,439 Speaker 1: of spin up, a spin down, or if you want 888 00:44:16,480 --> 00:44:20,600 Speaker 1: to like the shooting get that could be alive and 889 00:44:20,680 --> 00:44:23,560 Speaker 1: at the same time. So those objects that can be 890 00:44:23,640 --> 00:44:26,200 Speaker 1: black and white at the same time. So what you 891 00:44:26,239 --> 00:44:30,080 Speaker 1: are marging are in fact a gray hole and another 892 00:44:30,160 --> 00:44:33,680 Speaker 1: gray hole together. All right, thank you, professor Franchise Dirty 893 00:44:33,880 --> 00:44:36,120 Speaker 1: it sounds like she's saying there are two scenarios here 894 00:44:36,280 --> 00:44:38,760 Speaker 1: that can happen when a white hole, or a theoretical 895 00:44:38,800 --> 00:44:42,160 Speaker 1: white hole hits a probably real black hole. Yeah, exactly, 896 00:44:42,239 --> 00:44:44,359 Speaker 1: and one of them is actually the joke that you made, right, 897 00:44:44,400 --> 00:44:48,560 Speaker 1: you might actually get a gray hole. Really, oh, I 898 00:44:48,600 --> 00:44:51,080 Speaker 1: should get the Nobel price. Then the idea is if 899 00:44:51,080 --> 00:44:54,800 Speaker 1: their macroscopic, they're like big classical objects, then they spiral 900 00:44:54,800 --> 00:44:57,560 Speaker 1: in together. Then when they touch the black hole will 901 00:44:57,560 --> 00:45:00,359 Speaker 1: convert the white hole into another black hole, and you'll 902 00:45:00,360 --> 00:45:02,840 Speaker 1: get like a really big black hole. Basically the black 903 00:45:02,840 --> 00:45:05,600 Speaker 1: hole eats the white hole and becomes a super black hole. 904 00:45:05,880 --> 00:45:09,239 Speaker 1: What the black hole winds, basically the black hole winds exactly. 905 00:45:09,440 --> 00:45:12,800 Speaker 1: And if they're microscopic, if they're super duper tiny, because 906 00:45:12,840 --> 00:45:15,200 Speaker 1: you know, there's nothing stopping you from having a tiny 907 00:45:15,200 --> 00:45:18,600 Speaker 1: black hole or a tiny white hole, then their quantum objects. 908 00:45:19,000 --> 00:45:21,319 Speaker 1: Then quantum effects take over and they can be in 909 00:45:21,360 --> 00:45:23,759 Speaker 1: this weird superposition where like each one could be like 910 00:45:24,480 --> 00:45:26,719 Speaker 1: chance of being a black hole or chance of being 911 00:45:26,719 --> 00:45:28,919 Speaker 1: a white hole, which is crazy, and that's what she's 912 00:45:28,920 --> 00:45:32,200 Speaker 1: calling a gray hole. Wait, so it kind of depends 913 00:45:32,200 --> 00:45:34,920 Speaker 1: on the sizes of these white and black holes. If 914 00:45:34,960 --> 00:45:37,960 Speaker 1: they're really big, she said that the black hole would win. 915 00:45:38,160 --> 00:45:39,799 Speaker 1: I guess, but why does it have to win. Why 916 00:45:39,840 --> 00:45:42,160 Speaker 1: can't it just kind of switch together? Why does the 917 00:45:42,200 --> 00:45:45,080 Speaker 1: black hole win? Because white holes are fragile objects. They're 918 00:45:45,080 --> 00:45:48,040 Speaker 1: like not as stable as black holes in her conception 919 00:45:48,120 --> 00:45:50,320 Speaker 1: of them. So but basically, a black hole is still 920 00:45:50,400 --> 00:45:53,239 Speaker 1: collapsing star. It's like sucking all matter and it doesn't 921 00:45:53,239 --> 00:45:56,600 Speaker 1: really matter what's your throw in there, another star, another 922 00:45:56,680 --> 00:45:59,759 Speaker 1: black hole, even a white hole. Really like, what if 923 00:45:59,800 --> 00:46:02,520 Speaker 1: I like a really really really big white hole and 924 00:46:02,520 --> 00:46:05,840 Speaker 1: a tiny little black hole. Couldn't the white hole overwhelmed 925 00:46:05,880 --> 00:46:08,279 Speaker 1: the tiny little black hole or what? The tiny little 926 00:46:08,280 --> 00:46:10,960 Speaker 1: black holes still win. We're in the macroscopic region where 927 00:46:11,000 --> 00:46:13,879 Speaker 1: we're ignoring quantum effects, and she's saying the black hole 928 00:46:13,880 --> 00:46:16,080 Speaker 1: would win, that it would convert a white hole into 929 00:46:16,120 --> 00:46:18,600 Speaker 1: another black hole. Well, no matter like how big or 930 00:46:18,640 --> 00:46:20,680 Speaker 1: small each of them are, as long as you're above 931 00:46:20,760 --> 00:46:23,359 Speaker 1: quantum properties. Yeah, and then the other scenarios, if we're 932 00:46:23,440 --> 00:46:26,000 Speaker 1: tiny enough, the quantum effects take over. And again this 933 00:46:26,080 --> 00:46:28,760 Speaker 1: is speculative because she's using the theory of quantum gravity, 934 00:46:28,800 --> 00:46:30,520 Speaker 1: which we don't know if it's true or not. It's 935 00:46:30,560 --> 00:46:33,320 Speaker 1: just like something we're thinking about. In that scenario, you 936 00:46:33,360 --> 00:46:35,719 Speaker 1: could even stranger quantum effects, whether it be in a 937 00:46:35,719 --> 00:46:39,320 Speaker 1: weird superposition of being a black hole or a white hole. Interesting, 938 00:46:39,360 --> 00:46:41,439 Speaker 1: and this is if the white hole on the black 939 00:46:41,480 --> 00:46:44,800 Speaker 1: hole are are really tiny, small enough, the quantum effects dominate. 940 00:46:44,800 --> 00:46:47,320 Speaker 1: You know, we're talking about like particle size black holes 941 00:46:47,320 --> 00:46:49,440 Speaker 1: and white holes. All right, well, I guess that answers 942 00:46:49,440 --> 00:46:53,680 Speaker 1: the question then for Carson. Basically, Jorge was right. If 943 00:46:53,239 --> 00:46:55,799 Speaker 1: the black hole in the white hole are small enough, 944 00:46:55,840 --> 00:46:58,520 Speaker 1: then you get a little, tiny gray hole. But if 945 00:46:58,520 --> 00:47:01,239 Speaker 1: they're big, then the black hole always wins and the 946 00:47:01,280 --> 00:47:04,759 Speaker 1: whole thing turns into a giant black hole exactly, So 947 00:47:04,760 --> 00:47:06,960 Speaker 1: it's not really much of a collision. I guess it's 948 00:47:07,000 --> 00:47:09,279 Speaker 1: more like the black hole will always eat the white hole. 949 00:47:09,400 --> 00:47:12,480 Speaker 1: That's the prediction, at least according to the quantum gravity expert. 950 00:47:12,600 --> 00:47:14,800 Speaker 1: All right, well, thank you Carson for that great question, 951 00:47:14,840 --> 00:47:16,720 Speaker 1: and thank you to all of our listeners who send 952 00:47:16,880 --> 00:47:19,160 Speaker 1: in their questions. We love to answer them here on 953 00:47:19,160 --> 00:47:21,279 Speaker 1: the podcast. We'd like you to think about the way 954 00:47:21,280 --> 00:47:23,200 Speaker 1: the universe works, the way it might work, the way 955 00:47:23,239 --> 00:47:25,680 Speaker 1: we pretend that it could work, and then to ask 956 00:47:25,719 --> 00:47:28,200 Speaker 1: the questions about whether or not they are real. So 957 00:47:28,239 --> 00:47:29,839 Speaker 1: if you have a question, feel free to send them 958 00:47:29,840 --> 00:47:31,719 Speaker 1: to us. We might answer it here on the podcast, 959 00:47:31,920 --> 00:47:35,040 Speaker 1: or Daniel's dog will answer the question. Apparently it's a 960 00:47:35,040 --> 00:47:37,239 Speaker 1: pretty smart dog. You can be pretty rough sometimes with 961 00:47:37,320 --> 00:47:39,400 Speaker 1: these answers. Well, we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for 962 00:47:39,480 --> 00:47:49,759 Speaker 1: joining us, see you next time. Thanks for listening, and 963 00:47:49,760 --> 00:47:52,480 Speaker 1: remember that Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe is a 964 00:47:52,560 --> 00:47:56,000 Speaker 1: production of I Heart Radio. For more podcast For my 965 00:47:56,080 --> 00:47:59,680 Speaker 1: heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, 966 00:47:59,800 --> 00:48:02,120 Speaker 1: or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.