WEBVTT - Sell Low on Tank Bigsby? | Fantasy Football Running Back Trade Candidates for Week 11 + Buy, Sell, or Hold (Ep. 1441)

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>What's up, friends, and welcome into week eleven Buy selling

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Trade right here on Fantasy Pros. It is the Fantasy

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Football Podcast. I'm Chris Welsh. That is Andrew Erickson. No

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>worm today when dad's away, the kids played. I think

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that's what they say. We will try to keep things

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:20.079
<v Speaker 1>under control. When we don't have our leader putting us

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in the right direction. We might talk a little bit

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>about Jalen Waddle. Yes, if you followed me and ericson

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and are Shenanigans over on Vetting Pros. This week, we

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>got some Monday night football to talk about, and we

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>have got running backs buy sell in trade. That's right.

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be talking about the guys we got to

0:00:36.800 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>get the ones we got to throw out, and we've

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>also got some buy sell holds just called debates there

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>at the end, mister Andrew Erickson, buddy, you and I

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>were all in. Are We've been going down with the

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Titanic dolphinship. As we have said, we had that great

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>gift shout out to Darth nug our Boy on the

0:00:54.680 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros discord. We were all in on Monday Night

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>football for Jalen Wattle ladders. We got fifty five yards

0:01:04.480 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on the first drive two legs of the ladder. Unfortunately

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>legs were cut off. After that, we did not hit

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the next levels. I missed. I think I had three

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>other levels to go. I missed the rest of those.

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:24.040
<v Speaker 1>What do we do with ourselves when we go all

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>in on Jalen Waddle and they just PuF They poofed

0:01:28.319 --> 0:01:29.919
<v Speaker 1>the offense poofed for us.

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Yep, you go back to the process, right. We try

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 2>not to be super results driven. We're all about the

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 2>process here on fannay Spro's on betting Pros, and the

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 2>process was sound. They were going out of their way

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:42.839
<v Speaker 2>to target Jalen Waddle. Two was thrown at the Wattle

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 2>when he was covered, which is why he was getting intercepted,

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>but he was also targeting Jalen Wattle.

0:01:47.560 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 3>I kind of knew it was over when.

0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 2>Wattle had to drop just a very easy catch that

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 2>he just flat out dropped, and I kind of it

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 2>was on the replay, looked like he said, oh, like

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 2>the lights were in my eyes. So first it's the

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 2>sun in guys eyes, and now it's the lights in

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.680
<v Speaker 2>people's eyes. We got to figure should we wear sunglasses?

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 3>Get the visor?

0:02:06.400 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 1>JANDL Wattle, those old school advisors.

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 2>The advisor so that the light is no longer eyes.

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:15.120
<v Speaker 2>You can make these catches. But look obviously start out

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.400
<v Speaker 2>great for Janallen Wattle. Disappointing. Disappointing overall, kind of for

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins skill players. I get they ended up winning

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.120
<v Speaker 2>the game because the Rams could not find the end zone.

0:02:24.160 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 2>All they did was just tick field goals every single

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.240
<v Speaker 2>time they seem to get close to scoring. So for me,

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I guess I want to post a question to you,

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:34.360
<v Speaker 2>wel Dolphins rest of season? Are we buying are we

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 2>trying to get? I mean, Tyra Gill again cut the touchdown,

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>but not a lot of the yardage again, just four targets.

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 2>To me, the only guy on the Dolphins that I

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:43.600
<v Speaker 2>really want to hitch my wagon to is a Jan

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 2>and everyone else seems kind of expendable at this point

0:02:47.160 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 2>with a schedule that I don't love for the Dolphins.

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be playing in colder weather, They're supposed to

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 2>better at home. I get the Raiders and Patriots or

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 2>some nice matchups coming up, so maybe in the short

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 2>term they're okay to hold on to. But in the

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.800
<v Speaker 2>fantasy football playoffs, like are Dolphins gonna be winning championships.

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 3>I am not super hopeful.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a great point, and the fun with a gift,

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was something we talked about they made

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the gift that we had said that Ericson and I

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>have been very pro like, hey, it's the best time

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to buy these Dolphins. They're going to explode. Da da

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>da da da. We've been going down with this ship

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's really kind of come into a head here

0:03:21.040 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that Like, I think Agen's kind of a no brainer.

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>They didn't use him enough in this game, which is

0:03:25.240 --> 0:03:28.360
<v Speaker 1>just wildly crazy. Raheem Moster kind of took a lot

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of those receiving yards. But you know where we're at

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 1>right now. I cannot get over the play calling of

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins. It's crazy to me. We talked about this

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>on Out of Bounds, the show we have on a

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Discord podcast that we do here on the channel, where

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>it was like piece of po was asking who's the

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest villain so far of the fantasy football season. I

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>said McDaniel because it's like, what happened to this offense?

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It's completely deteriorated too. Is it something we don't know

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>about overall? Is it the play calling. Is it the districk?

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what it is overall, but like they

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>don't throw the ball deep anymore. We also found out

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>that Tyreek Hill has a bad risk and I think

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that's going to carry over Jalen, I do think this

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>gave us a little bit of an idea into what

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this team could be the rest of the way. If

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>there is some babying of Tyreek Hill, they're going to

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>go to Wattle early and often, well maybe not often early, yes,

0:04:19.520 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>but not often after because of the play calling. So

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to your original question, who do I want? I want

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a chance. I actually if Tyreek Hill had had a

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.279
<v Speaker 1>good game, I think I might have been in the

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.920
<v Speaker 1>cell category. I don't think you can sell Wattle at

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>this point. So from a real what can you get

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>for them? I don't know. Do I want to hold

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>on to them or buy them? Not really. I could

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>buy them super low maybe, but I don't know. I

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>really don't know what the trade value cost is. And

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a really tough space because I think this is

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>the week where trade deadlines are going to be ending,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.559
<v Speaker 1>so people have got about a week to figure this out.

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I think Tyreek Hill might be the riskiest of all

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of them to buy because of his cost, Wattle still

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.840
<v Speaker 1>is dirt cheap, and I don't know. Actually, maybe you

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and I could see a glimpse of positivity in that

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>he did get some early targets and maybe if they

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 1>can figure out how to throw the ball in mass,

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that can change and work favorable for him. I don't

0:05:11.760 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to work super favorable for Tyreek Hill.

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>They're really using Malik Washington more in this game. You know, JOHNA.

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Smith has seen that slight uptick, So I think Tyreek Kill,

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately for us, is kind of a cell Wattle at

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>dirt cheap as a buye and a Chan is a

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>really only no brainer on this team.

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I agree.

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 2>I think Hill you can still probably sell because we

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 2>look at where he ends up in ECR. He's still

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:34.920
<v Speaker 2>a guy that is being ranked deside the top ten.

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Whether that's right or right or wrong, it's still kind

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:40.279
<v Speaker 2>of it does look wrong, but he still has the

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.920
<v Speaker 2>name cache A. He still did catch a touchdown, so

0:05:43.080 --> 0:05:45.159
<v Speaker 2>it's not like he just went out and did absolutely nothing.

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean he almost. I think he's still scored more

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:47.719
<v Speaker 3>points and j W.

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Got a touchdown. I think he has like first touchdown.

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Because he got the touchdown. But again, besides Week one,

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 2>he has really not had any big games. With two

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:59.120
<v Speaker 2>of them, he's still an older wide receiver. We knew

0:05:59.120 --> 0:06:01.800
<v Speaker 2>that he probably wasn't going to repeat how efficient he

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 2>was last season. And something to keep in mind about

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 2>with last year, they were forced feeding him because they

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.479
<v Speaker 2>want to get him two thousand yards. Obviously that's no

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 2>longer in play whatsoever this year, So he's banged up.

0:06:13.240 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 2>If he's playing that more of that decoy role, then yes,

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna see, Hey, Jalen Wattle may actually end up

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 2>being a better factor. But I'm not confident enough in

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:22.040
<v Speaker 2>that to go out and say, hey, like go buy

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 2>jayl the waddle again, just singing it all day, and

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.360
<v Speaker 2>because he's on all my teams anyway, so I think

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 2>he's just a hold for right now and Hill, Yeah,

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 2>I think that I'd be cool trying to trade him away.

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And by the way, recapping at the beginning, if

0:06:33.480 --> 0:06:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you didn't know what a ladder is, it's called the

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:38.679
<v Speaker 1>ladder bet where you bet levels of a player going

0:06:38.760 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>up in their yard, something we like to do from

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:42.840
<v Speaker 1>time to time. If you check us out over on

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Betting Pros, Eric's and myself piece of PA. We do

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.839
<v Speaker 1>the prop show and ladder. Betting logic was right. We

0:06:48.880 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>did hit the two most important legs, which is the

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.479
<v Speaker 1>safety net. Everything else you kind of lower your bets

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and you try to go higher or logic was right. Eh,

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>what can you do? What you could do is you

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>can go check us out over on Betting Pros for

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>our FP listeners FP free. If you go, you can

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:08.159
<v Speaker 1>get a one month premium access to Betting Pros. You

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>can download the app, go over to Bettingpros dot com

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and just like Erickson's got on top of his banner,

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 1>here you can put an FP free and get access

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>to all of our premium features on Betting Pros, the

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Awesome Feed, the Awesome Analysis, the prop Analyzer, the cheat

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>sheet for props, and more. You can turn some of

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy knowledge into bets and you get a free

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>month of doing it over on Betting Pros. So do

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it today, FP free. Join us in some ladders that

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we can do. We only it was like a step ladder.

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>This one was we didn't get the full length of it.

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>We just you know, went up changed the light bulb.

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>We didn't get to put the star on the Christmas tree.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>You Christmas tree guy? Right now? Are you firmly Christmas tree?

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>After Thanksgiving or before?

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.119
<v Speaker 2>I would if I had the space in my current

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 2>living arrangement to have and to have space for a

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Christmas tree. We have a very very small, you know,

0:07:56.360 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 2>fake tree that we put up. It doesn't take very

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 2>long to deck rate, which is kind of nice. But

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:04.160
<v Speaker 2>I do miss the days of being with my family

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.640
<v Speaker 2>in my parents' home where they have a big Christmas tree,

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 2>get to decorate it.

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Nostalgia.

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm into that.

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm into that, and hopefully once I have it a

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 2>home to call my own, we can have a big

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 2>Christmas tree too.

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:15.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, guess what We're gonna ladder something and

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>get you a home next week. So ladder bets for

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>next week and maybe some fantasy championships, and sometimes that's

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 1>going to come in the play of the players to buy.

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>So it is running backs to buy on the high,

0:08:26.760 --> 0:08:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to sell on the low, or sell on the high

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and buying the low, however you want to do it.

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the running backs that we are going

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to buy for this week. We got a couple young

0:08:35.480 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>dogs in it and Eric said, I'm gonna let you start.

0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Which running back are you looking to buy.

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking to buy Tyrone Tracy, running back for the

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 2>New York Giants, rookie running back. He had a great

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 2>game this past week against the Carolina Panthers. It was

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it was essentially perfect except for up with

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 2>pill yes, yes, the backbreaking fumble and overtime. He was

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 2>a very emotional on the sidelines. You could see, I

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:00.440
<v Speaker 2>mean just it tears your heart out for a young

0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 2>player that again had a great game, had over one

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred rushing yards, scored a touchdown, trying to help his

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 2>team win. Again, he was the engine of the Giants

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 2>offense and to come up short there. I just want

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 2>to point to how great his usage has been this season,

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 2>how e fishing he has been this season. I mean,

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.320
<v Speaker 2>he played eighty percent of the snaps. It took one

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 2>game where they didn't have Devin Singletary for him to

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 2>convince the entire coaching staff and Brian Dable that hey,

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 2>Tyrone Tracy is the guy in this backfield. So I

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 2>think that as a player that people scooped off of

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 2>the waiver wire, I still don't think that his value

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 2>has quite caught up to the actual production of what

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 2>he's been able to do consistently putting up one hundred

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:41.319
<v Speaker 2>plus rushing yards, averaging over five yards per carry, explosiveness.

0:09:41.360 --> 0:09:43.520
<v Speaker 2>This was a guy that we loved last year. Again,

0:09:43.559 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 2>he's been barely been playing running back. He used to

0:09:45.880 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 2>play wide receiver at the calls level and switched the

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 2>running back his final year, and now he's bowling out

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 2>at running back in the NFL. So we see rookies

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>all the time, see post bumps in terms of usage,

0:09:56.559 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 2>in terms of production after their bye week, I mean,

0:09:58.120 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>we're already seeing with Tyrone Tracy. So the fact that

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 2>they go into the bye week kind of scheme things

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 2>up a little bit even more For Tracy, who I

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 2>think still has another level to his game based on

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 2>how well he can be used as a receiver in

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 2>the passing game. I think he's gonna finish the season really,

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:13.800
<v Speaker 2>really strong. So when you look at the schedule, I

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 2>like it a lot. Again, they're on a bye week

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 2>this week, so just another reason why, Hey, you can

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 2>buy Tracy because it's not going to the Tracy manager

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:22.559
<v Speaker 2>may not see his value rest of season because hey,

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 2>this week he's getting score zero points the rest of

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 2>the schedule for the Giants, Buccaneers, Cowboys, Saints, Ravens, Gross Falcons,

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:33.719
<v Speaker 2>and Colts. So really I only see one matchup in

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 2>there where I'm hesitant to pull the trigger on Tracy

0:10:36.840 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 2>with the Baltimore Ravens. But besides that, I think it's

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 2>pretty smooth sledding for Tyrone Tracy. So he is a

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 2>buy for me as one of these running backs. That Again,

0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 2>when I was writing up the forecast this week, there

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 2>were a ton of running backs I'm done with this guy,

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm ready to sell this guy, and they were all

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>kind of in the range of a Tyrone Tracy. So

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the guy you should try to go after.

0:10:57.559 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 2>With some of these running backs that are definitely trend

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>in the wrong direction, I think Tyra Tracy's going in

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 2>the reverse.

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, an interesting one because one of the

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>things I was going to say to you is like

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of tough off of a big game. Maybe

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it tapers down just a bit because of the fumble.

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>A little bit of Devin Singletary in there as well,

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that could get into people's minds. The big value is

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the bye week is the hymn not playing and there

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity that you could take advantage of someone

0:11:21.559 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that's like I got to get to the playoffs. This

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is the trade deadline. This is it. Maybe you can

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>trade a little bit lower value than what it normally

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>would cost for a back that's going to go over

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>one hundred or something like that. But the guy and

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>I think we might have talked about this last week.

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>But if you remember my cell last week was Tony

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Pollard off of a huge volume, and that kind of

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>fell apart this week. Do you think you could still

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>trade Pollard to get Tracy or do you think that's

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.320
<v Speaker 1>too far gone because I mean, it was only one

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>bad game with Pollard, you know, I think it is

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in people's brain. So, but do you think you could

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>straight up trade Pollard not again, running back for running back?

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Blahlah blah. Sometimes that doesn't work. But would you do

0:11:58.440 --> 0:11:59.240
<v Speaker 1>you think you can do it?

0:11:59.760 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 3>I think so.

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean I have them ranked back to back in

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 2>terms of my ECR Rest of season rankings, so I

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:09.640
<v Speaker 2>think they're in that same tier of running back and

0:12:09.720 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 2>I think enough, yes.

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 3>I would I would Okay, okay, yeah, I would do it.

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I have Tracy again back to back but Tracey's on

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 2>top ahead of Tony Pollard because in the rest season rankings,

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I am trying to capture, you know, the market value

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 2>of the said player. So even if I'm more down

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:24.800
<v Speaker 2>on the player, I still want to capture, Hey, what

0:12:24.880 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 2>is this guy worth in a trade? Because not everyone

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 2>sees Tony Pollard as a depreciating asset. Well, all of

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 2>our listeners do, because you talked about it last week correctly, Welsh,

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.840
<v Speaker 2>that hey, it's time to sell Tony Pollard. And then

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 2>every other show I listened to is like, you gotta

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.000
<v Speaker 2>sell Tony Pollard. So you started the end of Tony

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Pollard offensive avalanche, the avalanche of Tony Pollard. But yeah,

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that Tracy would be one of the byes.

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 2>And again when I look at my rest season rankings,

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm able to look at tabs and it's Tracy by

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>and then all the running backs below him are sell.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Would you do you want Tracy or Brian Robinson junior rest.

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Of seas So this one I will still go with

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 2>Brian Robinson. I have one spot ahead of Tyron Tracy,

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 2>just because I think Robinson is probably even cheaper to

0:13:08.880 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 2>get because he's hurt and he's missed a couple of games,

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>but again he was my bye last week. I think

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 2>both guys are good buyes. But he has a great schedule.

0:13:16.720 --> 0:13:19.560
<v Speaker 2>Talked about his playoff schedule. It's rarely favorable. And something

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 2>else to keep in mind is someone always try to

0:13:21.080 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>keep in the back of my head when it comes

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.199
<v Speaker 2>to running backs. A lot of times we see the

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 2>running backs that are the front runners in the first

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 2>half of the season, they fall off in the second half.

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 3>Of the season.

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:33.199
<v Speaker 2>It's just hard to keep up that type of pace

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>when you're getting a ton of volume. I know one

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 2>of the things that maybe I didn't consider enough last

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 2>year was with Travis etn Right. He was a player

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:43.479
<v Speaker 2>that start out the season top five running back, was unstoppable,

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and he fell off in the second half, and I

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.040
<v Speaker 2>didn't account for that enough when I was ranking him

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.079
<v Speaker 2>in redraft. This season, we've obvious seen him play out

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 2>where he's been a very big disappointment this year. So

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 2>I know Pollard kind of looks like that type of

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 2>player where hey, really strong, start starting to fall off

0:13:58.320 --> 0:14:00.400
<v Speaker 2>here in the second half. And I think that when

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 2>we talk about some our running backs to sell, we

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 2>have some similar feelings with some running backs that may

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:05.839
<v Speaker 2>fall off in the second half as well.

0:14:06.400 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm a firm believer in this and I co sign

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>so I'm not, you know, adding it a whole bunch

0:14:11.600 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 1>of Let me ask you one more though, Tracy or

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:18.679
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Swift? Tracy, Okay, that's right that I didn't know.

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>I was careful. I wouldn't don't want to ask you

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to say another guy that wasn't Tracy, but I felt

0:14:23.480 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>this one was too good. I mean, even in like

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the weekly ranks, like Swift is still

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>out there, but that bears offense. I mean, they just

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>fired Waldron and we really don't know what it's going

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to look like, and things seem to be kind of

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>falling apart. You would assume they're going to be passing more.

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But Swift versus Tracy, if you were living in it's

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 1>probably something more equivalent to like wide receiver running back

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.000
<v Speaker 1>trade for wide receiver running back. Maybe someone would value

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Swift a little bit more so you can get added

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>benefit to getting Tracy and a higher wide receiver for

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>giving Swift and a lower wide receiver. Just a little

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 1>trade idea that you can do. Of course, you can

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>use the trade analyzer to play around with all of those,

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So I like it all right. My running back to

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>buy same scope, I am also taking a running back

0:15:05.600 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that is on by this week my bye or my

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 1>running back to buy is Bucky Irving. So a couple

0:15:12.040 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>of the young dudes. Bucky Irving coming off of a

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>really good game against the forty nine ers, thirteen carries,

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>seventy three yards, average around five and a half per rush,

0:15:20.760 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>and I think the bye week is actually going to

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>become a really important thing for them to reestablish what

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>this backfield looks like, and I truly do believe it

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.040
<v Speaker 1>needs to begin will be more Bucky Irving. Fun fact,

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Bucky has only had less than ten touches with this

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>team in one game all season long. In one game,

0:15:40.800 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he's averaging over five yards per carry and seven yards

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.720
<v Speaker 1>per reception. So even on the lower baseline of him

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>getting the ten touches, you're looking at a fifty to

0:15:50.040 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>sixty yard uptick coming off of a bye week where

0:15:53.440 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>we could see more of an established run. You're gonna

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>get Mike Evans back. In theory, they need to control

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>more possession of time. He can play both sides of

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>running and receiving. Also, by the way, he had the

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>most misstackles in Week ten. That's just something that he

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>does such a great job of forcing miss tackles getting

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>yards after contact. He had two more mistackles than the

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 1>next running back. And in the playbook of Andrew Ericksson

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on Fantasy Pro's Rest of Season Schedule Strength of Schedule

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>number one, he is the number one for RBS in

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>strength of schedule rest of season in favor of him,

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So he got a favorable matchup in general, a guy

0:16:34.840 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, like I said, the underlying stats of

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 1>he's forcing miss tackles, he's great between the offensive lineman,

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to help establish just more clock control.

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the carries need to uptick for Bucky Irving.

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>He has had nine carries or more in three of

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the last four games. Actually, if I go through it,

0:16:54.560 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it's actually been five of the last six games he's

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>had at least nine carries. And like I said, with

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>the touches he has had every game but two, he

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 1>has had two or more receptions, and he has had

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>three or more receptions in four straight games. So he's

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>catching the ball, he's running, he is efficient as all

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>can be. I think this is going to slightly uptick.

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>He had sixteen touches this past week, and he has

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:21.760
<v Speaker 1>actually gone over twelve in three of the last four.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>He's just such a good back. This is the type

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 1>of guy you get more in the back half of

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the season and coming off of the bye. I think

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that is a major thing that is going to get

0:17:30.720 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>established with this team. So because he is in a

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>shared backfield and they're on buy, I think it's a

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 1>prime opportunity to go get Bucky Irving for your playoff run,

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:43.639
<v Speaker 1>for that great strength of schedule. Give me some Bucky Irving.

0:17:43.680 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about buying It's not low, but

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>it's just buying on a week you know where he

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>is not in any eye. He's not helping anybody at

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the trade deadline. What do you think about just Bucky overall?

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 2>I think he's a great pick and he's someone that

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.880
<v Speaker 2>I definitely strongly considered as well as a buye. Again,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 2>some of these rookie running backs, these guys are league

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 2>winners at this time in the second half of the season.

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 2>We see it all the time with some of these rookies,

0:18:07.160 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 2>So I like that we're kind of seeing eye to

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 2>eye with let's buy these rookie running backs when there's

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 2>some ambiguity about you know, at least with Bucky Well,

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 2>Shod White's still there, right, So you're never going to

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 2>necessarily have to pay so much because Bucky Irving's not

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 2>playing an eighty percent snapshare, which is so obvious to

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.159
<v Speaker 2>reing related to fantasy production. But what is obvious is

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 2>he's the best running back on the Bucks. That is

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:31.080
<v Speaker 2>as clear as day. The schedule is not only great

0:18:31.080 --> 0:18:34.159
<v Speaker 2>for running backs but for the Buccaneers overall. So I

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>think that this is a smash spot to go after

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Bucky Irving Shad White. Eventually, he's just not gonna keep

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 2>scoring touchdowns and an absurd clip and if he's not

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 2>scoring them, who is Bucky Irving?

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 3>So I love this.

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Call and there you go, so two running backs that

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:51.159
<v Speaker 1>are on the by So you got to get a

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit tricky and make sure you've got players that

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>can play out there. But those are the guys that

0:18:55.160 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>were buying. Who are we selling? Well, we're gonna hit

0:18:57.600 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>this right after we tell you about our ruins over

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>at DraftKings because the NFL season is rolling along and

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the contenders are separating from the pack. The one thing

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 1>that has not changed this season DraftKings Sportsbook and official

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>sports betting partner of the NFL, which is the number

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:15.919
<v Speaker 1>one place to bet touchdowns. Fade to the corner of

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the end zone, running back breaks through the line and

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:22.720
<v Speaker 1>gallop sixty yards to score. Yeah, we don't care how

0:19:22.800 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 1>they get them. We want to bet on touchdowns and

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>DraftKings has got you covered this past week on Monday

0:19:28.920 --> 0:19:32.320
<v Speaker 1>Night football. How about the first touchdowns score my league

0:19:32.400 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Washington about a thirty five to one. You can play

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:40.960
<v Speaker 1>with first touchdowns two plus touchdowns anytime. Touchdowns. They got

0:19:41.000 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>you covered. And here's the reason for new customers to

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:46.040
<v Speaker 1>do a touchdown dance of their own. Bet five dollars,

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:49.600
<v Speaker 1>get one hundred and fifteen bonus bets if your bet wins.

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Score big on DraftKings Sportsbook, the number one place to

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.639
<v Speaker 1>bet touchdowns. By downloading the Draftking sports Book app and

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>use code Fantasy pros. That's Code Fantasy pros for new

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>customers to get one fifteen bonus bets if your bet

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 1>wins when you bet just five bucks only on DraftKings.

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 1>The crown is.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 4>Yours gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 4>York called eight seven seven eight ope and WY or

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 4>text hope and Y four six seven three six nine.

0:20:15.280 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 4>In Connecticut. Help is available for problem gambling called eight

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 4>eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 4>visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Boothill Casino when resorting Kansas twenty one and over. Agent

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 4>eligibility varies by jurisdiction, Void and Ontario. Bonus bets expire

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance. Four Additional

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 4>terms and responsible gaming resources see dknng dot co. Slash

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:37.880
<v Speaker 4>ft ball.

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Running backs to sell, let's jump in and oh, wouldn't

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>you know it? We might have talked about this guy

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Rickson. Which running back do you want to sell?

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 3>DeAndre Swift? I want to sell DeAndre Swift? I want

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:54.440
<v Speaker 3>to Honestly, you need to sell all the.

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 2>Bears all You just need to get rid of every

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 2>single bear except Raalmaduon's I still cam as a rookie.

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 3>But besides Romadin.

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Dynasty not in redraft? Like what like what before you're

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna going to this which bear could you comfortably start

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in the coming weeks? Give me one Bear where you're like, yeah,

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>we got it.

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, it's it's still Swift, right, he's because he's starting

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.199
<v Speaker 2>running back. But at the same time that's why, but

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that's why you can trade him for something, right, Who's

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 2>going to give you anything for DJ Moore?

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 3>No? Nothing like no one's going.

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 2>To give you anything for those So that's why I

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.479
<v Speaker 2>look at Swift as he still has the most value,

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 2>and even if because I would expect that we see

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:38.000
<v Speaker 2>a bump in terms of usage, in terms of production

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:39.840
<v Speaker 2>of the offense now that they have fired Chaine Waldrim.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 2>We see this all the time, but it's very short

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 2>term because usually what happens is, yes, they celebrate, Hey

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>he's gone, the offense plays better, we're back, and then

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 2>they go back to not being great again. Like that's

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 2>usually what happens. And no team has a more difficult

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 2>schedule the rest of the way than the Chicago Bears

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 2>this Patriots matchup. The reason I'm talking about the Bears

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:00.840
<v Speaker 2>last week was because I thought, Okay, they're going to

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 2>pop off against the Patriots, this is the opportunity to

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 2>sell high. Well, they blew it. So I'm not taking

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.000
<v Speaker 2>any more risks with these Bears. Players rest of season.

0:22:09.080 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>So DeAndre Swift to meet talked about this being one

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 2>of the most difficult schedules the rest of the way.

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 2>So Packers at home this week, Vikings at the Lions,

0:22:17.119 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 2>at the forty nine, Ers at the Vikings, the Lions

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 2>and the Seahawks.

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 3>So unless you can.

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Get to the Seahawks matchup, I hate all these matchups

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 2>the rest of the way for the Chicago Bears any

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 2>way you look at it in the Strength of Schedule tool,

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:33.240
<v Speaker 2>whether it's for the running backs, the quarterbacks, the receivers,

0:22:33.520 --> 0:22:36.840
<v Speaker 2>it's just a mess. So I think right now, considering

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 2>Swift has been really strong for the majority of the

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 2>first half of the season, and even against the Patriots

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 2>again he's still put up a decent Statlan didn't score.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 2>But I think that maybe there'll be some more optimism

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 2>about the Shane Waldron firing that you can still get

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 2>a decent return on a DeAndre Swift. But the thing

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 2>that Shane Waldron again, he's gone, you know. But with

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 2>him being gone, you know, it doesn't change all the

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 2>injuries on the Bears' offensive line. He's not the new

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 2>off its accordated to the intrum. Isn't just going to

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 2>come in wave his magic wand and be like, well,

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 2>the offensive line is fixed, but we're good to go.

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't really see that happening. So I think for me,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 2>Deander Ship is going to be the sell high running

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 2>back if you can even really sell high.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And you know, one of the things too, is

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>like I don't think changing out the offensive coordinator is

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.399
<v Speaker 1>going to like completely fix Caleb Williams's tentiveness. Like, I

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 1>think you have to restructure the offense. That's one of

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the things why he deserved to be fired. I don't

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>think they structured this offense and the decision makings to

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 1>properly account for the tentiveness of Caleb Williams. I actually

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 1>talked about the on the show. If you watch Hard

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Knocks too, I think that maybe we just didn't see

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it all. But the babying of Caleb Williams like oh,

0:23:44.280 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>guld you some coffee? Like you okay? You know, like

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just like no, like treat them like a rookie,

0:23:48.160 --> 0:23:50.440
<v Speaker 1>like let's get some stuff, and like what do you think, Caleb?

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it was a very weird situation in Hard

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Knocks when you watch is how Caleb was treated overall

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in that offense, and I don't know that you can

0:23:58.320 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 1>go and kind of restructure everything at this point in

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the season to make everything better and fixed. Maybe I'm wrong.

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Swift is probably a goods get out from It's kind

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of like what we talked about with the Dolphins, right

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>It was like, hey, listen, are these guys are going

0:24:12.200 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to be nothing Burgers? No, But it's like, I don't

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>think I want to go into the playoffs with these

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>type of players that are just completely just in and out.

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:23.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'd almost are like Martin was running back show,

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 1>but Marvin Harrison, you know, just these players that just

0:24:26.000 --> 0:24:28.359
<v Speaker 1>do nothing and then show up big. The problem is

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bears have not shown up, but all Swift has

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.080
<v Speaker 1>had some big games. I just don't know what that

0:24:32.160 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>running game is going to look like. If you have

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>some running back ish depth, you know, maybe you know,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Darnell Mooney. If you're pushing for another positional side like

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Darnell Mooney for DeAndre Swift is probably fair. If you

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.879
<v Speaker 1>can go higher than a Darnell Mooney, I think that's gonna,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, feel a lot better. Maybe one of the

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Jets wide receivers or something like that. Assuming you're trading

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>out of positional stuff. But I think I'm with you

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.960
<v Speaker 1>on that, on that cell train, the running back that

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I am selling and moving out from is JK. Dobbins.

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I have done this a couple times

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>with mister JK. Dobbins. Going back to that strength of

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 1>schedule playbook, I think something to pay attention to again,

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 1>fifth worst absolute fifth worst on the books here. I

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>think he's got a Kansas City matchup in there that's

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.119
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle of the playoffs. Six of his

0:25:22.240 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>last seven games, he's averaged under four yards per carrie.

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 1>We've also seen the carries tick down. What do we

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.200
<v Speaker 1>see this week? We saw Gus Edwards back in the fray.

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>That's actually the scary thing because the efficiency of JK.

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Dobbins just not really there. Hasn't had these huge He's

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.159
<v Speaker 1>had a couple explosive plays, but he's not a consistently

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>explosive guy. So the reason I point out, what is it,

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:48.160
<v Speaker 1>six of seven games averaging under four yards per carry

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 1>with a few receptions. Needs volume. It's not an efficient offense.

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 1>He needs volume. Gus Edwards back healthy, gave him ten carries.

0:25:56.440 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure that that's going to continue to play.

0:25:58.880 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>I think he is kind of where down getting back

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 1>into you know, as the season goes, all goes on. JK.

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Dobbins has had the brunt of everything, not much balance

0:26:09.119 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>like we thought would have been with Gus Edwards. I

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to be pairing back. I think it's

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine he's going to go over fourteen fifteen

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.240
<v Speaker 1>carries per game, gets a couple of receptions, Gus Edwards

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>might start vulturing. I just don't like what I'm seeing

0:26:21.760 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>out of JK. Dobbins. A schedule doesn't really speak super

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 1>well to it. So I think this is a guy,

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:29.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe in the same trajectory as DeAndre Swift, of a

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.280
<v Speaker 1>player that I would try to move off of going

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.480
<v Speaker 1>into the playoffs. If you're trading running back for running back,

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a tougher question. But again, positionally, could you target

0:26:38.920 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Darnell Moonies of the world. There's a

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.879
<v Speaker 1>real possibility people are dying for running back depth out there,

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and I think Swift and Dobbins are at the tippy

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>top of running backs that we're trying to sell, even

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:52.480
<v Speaker 1>though I think Pollard was a poster child. But you

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:54.720
<v Speaker 1>know that game just knocked his value down. I'm not

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:57.800
<v Speaker 1>so sure that swifter Dobbins have had a big, swiftly

0:26:58.520 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>knockout from under them as far as their value goes.

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about moving off at Dobbins? You

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>agree or disagree?

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 3>I agree, Yeah, I've actually found myself.

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 2>You know, Dobbins is a player that I've traded away

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 2>in a couple of leagues the last couple of weeks.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.960
<v Speaker 2>Not because I knew that Gus Edwards is going to

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:15.199
<v Speaker 2>come back, but he was a player that you know,

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 2>had value, and I thought, hey, like I need to

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 2>address other positions of need on my team. I'm going

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 2>to sell JK. Dobbins because I have Tyrone Tracy on

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 2>my bench. I have Bucky Irving on my bench because

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 2>I was trying to pick up those guys, and Dobbins

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 2>at the time seemed, hey, who's the most expendable player?

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:31.040
<v Speaker 3>It was JK.

0:27:31.119 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 2>Dobbins, based on the schedule, based on you know, now

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 2>we know that Edwards is going to be involved. The

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.120
<v Speaker 2>fact that it wasn't even Edwards that vultured Dobbins last

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 2>week was Hassan Haskins that ended up getting the vulture touchdown,

0:27:41.200 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 2>so that's problematic for him rest of seasons. So again,

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 2>he's not a player that you expect to be a

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 2>nothing burger, but the efficiency, like you said, the one

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 2>hundred yard games haven't been there since the start of

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 2>the year, and I think right now is the time

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 2>to move off of Dobbins, because yes, even if his

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 2>value doesn't totally hit zero, it's going to continue, I think,

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 2>to kind of dip and decline until soon nobody wants JK. Dobbins,

0:28:03.600 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 2>and then you're starting him because you don't have any

0:28:05.560 --> 0:28:07.680
<v Speaker 2>other options when you want to be trying to buy

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:10.879
<v Speaker 2>those ascending assets like we're looking at with the Tyrone Tracys,

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 2>with the Bucky Irvings, where we think their production is

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.439
<v Speaker 2>going to go up, where as with Pollar or excuse

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 2>me Pollar, with Polar Dobbins and DeAndre Swift, we feel

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:21.320
<v Speaker 2>like their production is going to go down the rest

0:28:21.359 --> 0:28:21.840
<v Speaker 2>of the season.

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you could somehow push moving Swift

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>for a Tracy and move a Dobbins to get a

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Bucky Irving, I don't think those are the worst things

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>in the world of moving off of those. One of

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the little slight thing I would throw out is I

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 1>get a lot of questions sometimes sometimes it's actually just

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.080
<v Speaker 1>really good to know who people are trying to move

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>out from, even if you are not, because I know

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes like you'll hear these guys, you're like, well, I

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have them, What does it matter? It's good to

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.680
<v Speaker 1>know the market value because guess what, You're going to

0:28:50.720 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>get a trade offer in your inbox for these players,

0:28:53.440 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>and then that is going to start Should I be

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:57.880
<v Speaker 1>making this trade? You want to know who people are

0:28:57.880 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>moving out from, and you know that kind of give

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 1>you the slick nature of maybe what they're listening to.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>When you start to see Dobbins and Swift in trade

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>offers that you're like, hey, I didn't know that this

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>was going on. So even if you don't have these players,

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty beneficial. We've got a couple debates to go through.

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>But first, hey, guys, low testosterone effects about thirty percent

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of adult men in America. Are you feeling the drag

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of fatigue, noticing a dip in muscle mass, or sensing

0:29:24.120 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a slump in libido? If so, it's time to get

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>your testosterone levels tested. If you have low t KAISA

0:29:30.840 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Trex is an FDA approved pill that's changing the game

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>in testosterone replacement therapy. In fact, Kaisa Treks restore testosterone

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>levels in nearly nine out of ten clinical study participants,

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and its unique formulation bypasses the liver to avoid liver damage.

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It's time to break free from injections, pellets, and gels.

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Choose Kaisa tres and take a step toward being the

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:56.280
<v Speaker 1>hero of your life again. To see if you qualify,

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>visit kaisatrecks dot com and take the low T quiz today.

0:30:00.160 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>That's kyz at r e x dot com. By prescription only,

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Kaisatrex is a controlled substance and can be a target

0:30:08.720 --> 0:30:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of abuse. Kisatrex is not for use in pregnant women

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 1>or men with prostate or breast cancer. Safety and efficacy

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in those younger than eighteen is not known. Tell your

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>doctor about all medical conditions and medications. Serious side effects

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>include increased blood pressure, worsening prostrate symptoms, increase risk of

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>prostate cancer, blood clots in the legs or lungs, decreased

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>sperm count, liver problems in large or painful breasts, and

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>breathing problems while you sleep. Common side effects include swelling

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of the ankle's feet or body, increased red blood cell count,

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>and increase in prostate specific antigen or PSA levels. PSA

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is a test used to detect prostate cancer. Report these

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.120
<v Speaker 1>symptoms to your doctor, call your doctor. To learn more

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:55.760
<v Speaker 1>about Kisatrex. For questions and more information, visit www dot

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>kisatrex dot com or call one eight three three nine

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:04.520
<v Speaker 1>four nine five zero four zero. The debates. Let's talk

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>about some RB debates my presence. This is always Worm's thing,

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>So I got to steal these this week ericson Buy, Sell, hold,

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb, Tank Bigsby, Rico Dowdell. Those are the three

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 1>going to buy.

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 2>Nick Chubb got the Saints this week, so it's a

0:31:21.240 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 2>good matchup for him out of the bye week.

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:24.800
<v Speaker 3>No, the play and the playoffs have a couple of

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:26.040
<v Speaker 3>good matchups two for him. Nick Chubb.

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.320
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about it as a buy on on this program,

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 2>so I'm gonna continue to buy Nick Chubb. Tank Bigsby

0:31:31.280 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 2>is probably going to be the cell for me. The

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Jaguars are not going in the right direction. They don't

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 2>have Trevor Lawrence potentially, and I'm not even sure if

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Bigsby is the RB one in his backfield anymore. He's

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.880
<v Speaker 2>dealing with an ankle injury. So the one saving grace

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 2>with these Jaguars was they have a couple of decent

0:31:45.800 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 2>matchups in the playoffs. But now Bigsby may not be

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>in a position to take advantage of said matchups. That

0:31:51.760 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 2>being said, Rico Dawdell another player that's dealing with a

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 2>lot of injuries and a team that's also going down

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 2>the toilet, they actually might be a worse position than

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Jacksonville were all Dallas. But I feel confident Doubtle is

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 2>going to be the guy that's going to least lead

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the backfield. They've got favorable matchups in the playoffs Bengals, Panthers,

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Buccaneers and the Philadelphia Eagles. And I just enough with

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 2>his Ezekiel Elliott nonsense, we hit this as I.

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Thought we were done. When I saw him back out

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>there getting significant carries, I was like, here we know

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>it was the grand theft. Auto mean here we go again,

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Like what are we doing?

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 2>So right now? And Rico also is a player that

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.479
<v Speaker 2>you can start. Theoretically, you can't start Tank Bigsby here

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.960
<v Speaker 2>in week eleven, whereas Doubtell, Hey, he has volume, he

0:32:37.000 --> 0:32:39.720
<v Speaker 2>can catch. I mean if, if anything, he's boosted in

0:32:39.720 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the passing game, because all Cooper Rush can do is

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 2>check the ball down. So Rico will be able to

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 2>be the hole for me sell Tank Bigsby and by

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:48.120
<v Speaker 2>Nick Jubb.

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>So I agree. I think I agree with this if

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:54.360
<v Speaker 1>if Cooper Rush wasn't the quarterback, I might like buy

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Doubtle off of that and maybe hold Chubb. The only

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 1>caveato throat is you've done this from time to time

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>as you also consider their value, because I will take

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this more literal like, oh, I'm buying into this player,

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm selling off of this player. I'll just hold. But

0:33:08.720 --> 0:33:11.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you have taken it like, well, you know this

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.520
<v Speaker 1>guy's value is why I want to sell him. I'm

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>saying all that to say, like, I don't think Tank

0:33:16.720 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Bigsby has any value right now. The Jaguars are a disaster,

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a mess. Eten is out there. So the idea of

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>like selling on Bigsby is selling to nothing. So maybe

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you could transform this into saying, like, you know Bigsby

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is the hold. Maybe you sell Chubb with you know,

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Jerome Ford and just overall value and you buy Rico.

0:33:38.440 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you could maybe twist it something like that,

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm gonna go with yours. I agree with yours,

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're just talking about the rest of season,

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm out on Tank, and I know I was the

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>buy Tank guy. Jacksonville's a disaster. Tank doesn't play third

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:55.720
<v Speaker 1>downs Eten looks like he's ticking back up. They had

0:33:55.720 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that red zone, that goal line carry that was primed

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.800
<v Speaker 1>for Tank and it wasn't. I'm out on him. I

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>hate the Cowboys situation. Chubb is getting more carries, so

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 1>like I'm in agreement there. But you know, from the

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>value standpoint, I mean, do you agree with that at

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>least that like the Tank is like a nothing burger

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 1>right now?

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean he's gonna get dropped because he's playing

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 2>the lines this week on the road and he's bye

0:34:17.280 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 2>week and then the Texan's tight. But like that's what

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:21.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean. He has no valet and you can probably

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:24.319
<v Speaker 2>drop him in shallow leagues. Who's gonna go Who's going

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 2>to run to the waiver wire to pick up Tank?

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Makes me noboddy? So you just have to remember to

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 2>think about Hey, Week fifteen, Jets Week sixteen Raiders, think

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.120
<v Speaker 2>back to Tank meets me, but for the foreseeable future,

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 2>for the next month, he's not really worth a lot

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:40.280
<v Speaker 2>or if anything at all.

0:34:40.640 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately, not all right the last one, This is a

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a deeper one Odric estimate. Taja Spears,

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Gus Edwards buy Sell Holt.

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 3>Buying Adric Estime. He's taking over the backfield.

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 2>Finally, Sean Payton finally follow what he was actually saying

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:57.799
<v Speaker 2>to the media for the past month, that he's gonna

0:34:57.800 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 2>give us to any more touches. Even though it took

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:01.600
<v Speaker 2>it was so funny to look at back of that game.

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Marvin Mims was the first Broncos player to get two.

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Carries in that.

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Sean Fayn continues to just troll everybody that falls and

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 2>never Broncos for fantasy football purposes in any way, shape

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 2>or form. That being said, Esimate looks like the lead

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 2>back at least on early downs, and I just love

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:20.319
<v Speaker 2>him as a prospect. I think that he's a good

0:35:20.400 --> 0:35:24.720
<v Speaker 2>running back, so I like him getting this opportunity. Spears

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 2>is probably the sell for me because he's just now

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.080
<v Speaker 2>eating into Tony Pollard. But I don't know if Spears

0:35:30.160 --> 0:35:32.359
<v Speaker 2>is now okay, well, now he's a startuple asset. Well,

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:34.840
<v Speaker 2>he also doesn't have a great schedule that Tony Pollard

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:37.040
<v Speaker 2>also has to endure, and he also has a Tony

0:35:37.040 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Pollard problem, which means I don't see how productive he's

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:43.319
<v Speaker 2>going to be unless Pollard gets hurt. And then with

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:46.280
<v Speaker 2>Gus Edwards, I think I probably just hold him because

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.319
<v Speaker 2>again touchdown equity, he's really really cheap right now and

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 2>you're probably getting him off of waivers and JK. Dobbins

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 2>were to get banged up, well, then he looks like

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 2>he's stepping in as the main running back for the Chargers,

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 2>and at least it seems to me he might be

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:00.560
<v Speaker 2>the guy they try to use a little bit more

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 2>at the goal mine. So that's how you benefit from Chargers' touchdowns,

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 2>would be with with Gus Edwards. So I'm going to

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 2>buy Es to MA hold Gus Edwards and sell toa

0:36:08.840 --> 0:36:10.920
<v Speaker 2>Jay Spears just kind of sell the Titans backfield.

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, man, you're kind of flipping me a little bit

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:18.640
<v Speaker 1>because my original assessment was estimate is the buy Spears

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:21.719
<v Speaker 1>is the hold and Edwards is the sell. Maybe I

0:36:21.760 --> 0:36:24.520
<v Speaker 1>can't just sell all the Chargers like I'm trying to do.

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:27.759
<v Speaker 1>One of the things with Gus Edwards and why I

0:36:27.800 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>had a caveat with JK. Dobbins was Gus Edwards and

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:32.239
<v Speaker 1>what he does of the goal line. We got how

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:35.399
<v Speaker 1>many touchdowns he has this year? No nut, he has none.

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:38.000
<v Speaker 1>He has zero touchdowns. That's forty eight carries. But he

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.360
<v Speaker 1>also has no touchdowns at all. That does feel like

0:36:41.440 --> 0:36:45.360
<v Speaker 1>that can change. I still feel like I'm not interested

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.680
<v Speaker 1>from the overall value perspective in Gus Edwards, and I

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like he is going to eat into Dobbins, like

0:36:51.600 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Dobbins needs volume and he's kind of inefficient. Edwards is

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>also inefficient, so it's just a bunch of inefficient facts.

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>What I like about Spears is what he can do

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>in the passing game, but he also just like it's

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 1>too bad all of these backs are just like eating

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>into each other and also not great offenses. I think

0:37:08.680 --> 0:37:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lean on the side though, I'm gonna go

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 1>with you with estimate, because I do think there's kind

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of a like clay thing, like we could mold this

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:17.520
<v Speaker 1>into anything. Like he had a bunch of carries. Javonte

0:37:17.520 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 1>has not worked. Maybe they'll keep going to him. I

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:23.080
<v Speaker 1>don't love the offense, so Spears as much as I'm

0:37:23.120 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 1>selling on Pollard, it was more about the value of

0:37:25.320 --> 0:37:27.240
<v Speaker 1>where he was at. Poller's not going to go away.

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Dobbins is going to go away, but

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 1>I just I think it's just a bunch of you know,

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 1>running backs rushing for two and a half yards all

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>game long. So I'm gonna end it with estimates. The

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:40.280
<v Speaker 1>buy spears as the hold and Gus Edwards is the cell.

0:37:40.440 --> 0:37:42.680
<v Speaker 1>What do you guys think? Put it in the chat below,

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>let's see who you're buy selling and who you're holding.

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>You also can join us on our live streams. We've

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>got a weekly trade live stream on YouTube where you

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>can come and ask specific trade questions every Wednesday at

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:55.919
<v Speaker 1>three pm Eastern And for those listening on the pod

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>YouTube dot com slash Fantasy pro subscribe click the bell

0:37:58.960 --> 0:38:01.440
<v Speaker 1>get notified so you don't miss any of it. Those,

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>my friends, are the running backs that we are by

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>selling and holding for Andrew Ericson. I'm Chris Welsh. Thank

0:38:06.640 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>you guys so much for hanging out with us, and

0:38:08.200 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we will talk to you next time right here on

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros.

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.600
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Football Podcast.

0:38:14.760 --> 0:38:17.280
<v Speaker 5>If you love the show, the best freeway to support

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.480
<v Speaker 5>us is by leaving a positive review on Apple podcasts

0:38:20.520 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 5>at fantasypros dot com slash review or on Spotify.

0:38:24.160 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 3>Follow us on x

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:28.719
<v Speaker 5>Instagram, and TikTok at fantasy Pros, and subscribe to our

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 5>YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Fantasypros.