WEBVTT - The GOP and Polls and a Postpartum Breakthorugh

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:05.119
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Opinion podcast count US Saturdays

0:00:05.120 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>at one in seven pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:13.760
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:19.239
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Bloomberg Opinion I Amy Morris. This week we

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 2>look at the impact of the price wars in electric

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:26.840
<v Speaker 2>vehicle motors in the US and China. Plus suicide is

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>a leading cause of maternal mortality in the US. But

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 2>now a remarkable breakthrough the very first pill for postpartum depression.

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Will it be enough? But first we begin with politics

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.120
<v Speaker 2>and what the polls are telling us. And the answer

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 2>is not a lot. Reuter's IPSOS poll says about half

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.280
<v Speaker 2>of all Republicans say they will not vote for Donald

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Trump if he's convicted of a felony. But maybe we

0:00:53.760 --> 0:00:56.920
<v Speaker 2>should take those polls with a grain of salt. GOP

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>presidential candidate and North Dakota Governor Douggham tells ABC that

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 2>voters are not paying attention to Trump's legal issues.

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 3>When we're out talking to voters in Iowa New Hampshire,

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 3>they're not asking about the indictments. If they want to

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 3>they can turn on a cable news network and watch

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 3>that seven by twenty four. But then what they are

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.119
<v Speaker 3>asking about is inflation.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 2>North Dakota governor and presidential hopeful Doug Burgham. Let's dig

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.800
<v Speaker 2>into all of this with Bloomberg opinion columnist Jonathan Bernstein.

0:01:24.360 --> 0:01:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's just start from the very beginning. Are people thinking

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 2>about the twenty twenty four election?

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 4>Yet?

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 5>It depends on which people you're talking about. If you're

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 5>talking about Republican Party actors, you know, people who make

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:41.040
<v Speaker 5>a living in politics, who are you know, passionate about politics? Oh? Absolutely,

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 5>they've been thinking about it for years. If you're talking

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 5>about the bulk of most voters, no, you know, it's

0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 5>they involved in baseball, pennant races or least you know,

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 5>preseason football, the actors strike, whatever, you know, getting their

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.560
<v Speaker 5>kids to school on time, picking the kids up from daycare,

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 5>all that kind of stuff. You know, they're not thinking

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 5>about politics very much right now. It's you know, August,

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 5>a year before the election.

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:09.680
<v Speaker 2>So when they are thinking about politics, do they trust

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.560
<v Speaker 2>polls anymore? Remember after twenty fifteen and twenty sixteen, everything

0:02:13.600 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 2>from Brexit to the presidential election, that seemed like the

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 2>polls just missed so much, so did have people started

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 2>looking at polls and just sort of rolling their eyes

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and saying, ah, this isn't right.

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 5>We wouldn't know unless we could test the polls to

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 5>find out how people think. Right, The truth is that

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 5>the polls missed by a little bit, and people notice

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 5>a lot. It's a close election, and the polls are

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:45.880
<v Speaker 5>wrong about the outcome. You know, we've had elections where

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 5>the polls were accurate but were maybe five points off,

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 5>but it was a ten point win, so nobody cares.

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 5>You know, people don't trust the polls, but the polls actually, overall,

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 5>as you know, as a they're reasonably accurate. We can't

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.400
<v Speaker 5>get exact numbers. Polls, after all, are only a snapshot

0:03:04.440 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 5>of where we are. So polls right now don't tell

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 5>us anything about what's going to happen in a presidential

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 5>race more than a year from now. They're not. We

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.400
<v Speaker 5>can't do that because people if you ask people about it,

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 5>they're going to give an answer, because people tend to

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 5>be able to do that, but it's not predictive of

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 5>what they're going to actually do over a year from now.

0:03:24.120 --> 0:03:27.360
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be a foregone conclusion that Trump is

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 2>the air apparent to this nomination process. He's way out

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 2>in front in the polls, and that's kind of the

0:03:35.120 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 2>point of your whole column is, maybe don't take the

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 2>polls about Donald Trump so seriously just yet.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 5>Right, It turns out that nomination point can be somewhat

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 5>predictive this far out, but with huge caveats. The probably

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:53.560
<v Speaker 5>is with anything about Trump right now. The reason that

0:03:53.600 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 5>we can trust polls generally is because posters, who are

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 5>very good at what they do, they can construct models

0:03:59.320 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 5>based on on previous iterations, previous election cycles. There's never

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 5>been a presidential candidate who's facing sets of felony charges.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:14.440
<v Speaker 5>So it's just hard to model that we you know,

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:19.360
<v Speaker 5>by all standard indications, absolutely Trump is well out in front,

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 5>not just in the polls, but also by endorsements from

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 5>important Republicans, you know, all all the ways that you

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 5>would tell who's winning the nomination. Trump looks like he's winning.

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 5>Does that mean he's a lock to win? I don't

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:38.680
<v Speaker 5>think so, because I don't think we can predict how

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 5>this plays out over time. Maybe trials that happened even

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 5>as soon as the Iowa caucuses, you know, which are

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:47.120
<v Speaker 5>coming up in January.

0:04:47.640 --> 0:04:52.080
<v Speaker 2>And as you had said, there are those Republicans, those

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 2>more high level, top tier Republicans in the party who say, yeah,

0:04:56.400 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 2>if he's convicted, I'm not going to cast my vote him,

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 2>or as things are going right now in the courts,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 2>I just don't think Donald Trump is good for our party.

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't necessarily mean they can be held to that, especially

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 2>considering that we haven't even had the first debate yet.

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're gonna have debates, We're going to have campaigning,

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 5>but the big thing that matters the most is going

0:05:21.560 --> 0:05:25.120
<v Speaker 5>to be events and how voters react to that, on

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 5>how party actors react to that, and a lot of it.

0:05:29.279 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Even they don't know yet how they will actually react

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 5>to some of these things. Now, so far he's been indicted,

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 5>that has not you know, people have not abandoned him,

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:42.479
<v Speaker 5>and that's a good indication that it's not going to

0:05:42.520 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 5>happen soon. But we still don't know because it's something

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 5>that's unprecedented. So it's a little hard to guess how

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 5>people's reactions will go as evidence comes out, as perhaps

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.840
<v Speaker 5>you know, we go to trial. There's just some uncertainty there.

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Have we seen anything like this before, for when it

0:06:00.600 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 2>comes to trying to figure out where things are headed,

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>what the trend is going to be with polls. What

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean is clearly what we're talking about is the

0:06:08.800 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Trump candidacy, and that there is something particular about his

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 2>campaign Trump supporters that can put his poll numbers into question,

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 2>whether you're talking about his legal issues or the devotion

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 2>that a lot of his supporters have for him no

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 2>matter what he does. I'm wondering if we've seen that

0:06:27.120 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 2>before anywhere in the history of this country.

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 5>I don't think there's anything comparable in that you have

0:06:34.960 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 5>separate out the nomination side and the general election side. Okay,

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 5>nominations are always vulnerable, or at least they are always

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 5>potentially valiable. So we've seen, you know, candidates go from

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 5>big leads to collapsing overnight. We've seen, you know, in

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 5>just the last cycle, Joe Biden had a big lead

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 5>in the polls and then got clobbed in the first

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.839
<v Speaker 5>couple events, and then you know, and then Bernie Sanders

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 5>had a big lead and then suddenly Biden came back

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 5>and you know, one one very comfortably. So you know,

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 5>where the polls predictive, well sort of, they were the

0:07:11.680 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 5>original ones turned out to be, but not so changes

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 5>can like that can happen very quickly. And because you know, yes,

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump's core supporters really like him, but they're Republicans,

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 5>they probably like the other candidates too, or at least

0:07:29.120 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 5>potentially like them. Maybe at the moment they don't. They

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 5>may not have heard yet about some of the other

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 5>candidates who they may eventually come to like. Now, if

0:07:36.440 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 5>you talk about general election, that's much less valuable. If

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:46.000
<v Speaker 5>then we're talking about well, maybe Trump if he's unpopular

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 5>and he you know, when you're talking about general action,

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 5>Trump is very unpopular. That could cost Republicans two three, five,

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 5>We don't know points compared to a generic Republican candidate,

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 5>and you know, but the move but there is going

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 5>to be around the margins. He's not going to lose

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 5>all his support overnight, because Republicans are going to at

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:07.520
<v Speaker 5>the end of the day look at it and say, well,

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.840
<v Speaker 5>even those who are unhappy with Trump are going to say, well,

0:08:10.880 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 5>but the alternative is even worse, and so they're going

0:08:13.360 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 5>to wind up most of them are going to wind

0:08:15.800 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 5>up back with Trump, of course, if they if he

0:08:17.840 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 5>lose this five percent versus a generic Republican he's in

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 5>huge trouble for actually win the election.

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I would like to shift gears before we let

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 2>you go, Jonathan about something on the Democratic side, and

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.480
<v Speaker 2>that is the investigation into Hunter Biden. It is moving

0:08:32.520 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 2>along with some momentum as well as the move to

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:40.959
<v Speaker 2>impeach President Biden, which dovetails with that investigation. I'm wondering

0:08:41.000 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 2>about where the GOP's mindset is, if they really believe

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 2>this is bound to help them in twenty twenty four.

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 5>Perhaps do they believe that they have something there. You know,

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 5>it's hard to get into into anybody's mind. What I

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.600
<v Speaker 5>can say about it is it's good programming for Republican

0:08:57.640 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 5>aligned media, and those people are very very important within

0:09:01.960 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 5>the Republican Party coalition. For individual members of the House.

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 5>If you push impeachment of Joe Biden, regardless of evidence, logic,

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 5>even a theory that would be impeachable, you're going to

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 5>get invited onto all the talk shows. And so there's

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 5>strong internal Republican reasons to push this, which have very

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 5>little to do with twenty twenty four or with actually

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 5>getting rid of Biden.

0:09:29.920 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the reason I'm asking is because in recent years

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 2>we've seen impeachment movements right the Clinton White House the

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump White House, but both times it helped the incumbent.

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 5>I don't think it helped Trump in twenty twenty.

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 2>You don't.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.360
<v Speaker 5>I mean, after all, he lost, and Trump basically remained

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 5>unpopular throughout his presidency, but before the pandemic, when the

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 5>economy was very good, he was unusually unpopular for a

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 5>situation with prosperity. In Bill Clinton's case, it probably helped

0:10:02.960 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 5>him a little bit, but Bill Clinton was mainly helped

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 5>by peace and prosperity. The other thing is you have

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 5>to separate the push for impeachment with the actual scandal.

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 5>In Clinton's case, the actual scandal was a huge, big

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.560
<v Speaker 5>story in nineteen ninety eight. I think that the Joe

0:10:18.559 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 5>Biden story as of right now is not a huge

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:25.520
<v Speaker 5>scandal on its own. It's a huge story because Republicans

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 5>in the House are pretending it's a big story. Perhaps

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 5>they'll eventually come up with evidence or something. So it's

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.520
<v Speaker 5>really impeachment on its own. Is the story not what

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 5>Biden has done?

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion columnist Jonathan Bernstein, And coming up, we're going

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 2>to take a look at price wars between the US

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and China over electric vehicle motors and batteries and who

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 2>has the edge. Now you're listening the Bloomberg Opinion.

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Opinion podcast counts Saturdays at

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>one in seven pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Opinion i Amy Morris. Price wars

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 2>continue over electric vehicle motors in China and the US,

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 2>and usually they could be either creative or destructive. They've

0:11:28.080 --> 0:11:30.559
<v Speaker 2>been dealing with a higher cost structure that subsidies in

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 2>manufacturer losses, cancer mount but that's starting to change. We

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 2>want to learn more now. Bloomberg Opinion columnist David Fickling

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:40.400
<v Speaker 2>also covers energy and commodities, and he's going to set

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 2>us straight. Now, let's first talk about the price wars

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 2>over EV motors, electric vehicle motors. Who has the edge?

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 2>What are you seeing now?

0:11:48.480 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, yeah, as you said, I think there's two types

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 6>of price wars out there. The destructive ones, which are

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 6>the ones that we classically think about often think a

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 6>good metaphor is like the airline industry if you had,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, if you have Nighted and Delta going into

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:03.600
<v Speaker 6>a price war with each other, it will be very

0:12:03.679 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 6>value destructive. You're teaching consumers to pay less for their

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:11.880
<v Speaker 6>tickets essentially, and neither side really benefits. On the other hand,

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 6>if Southwest goes into a price war against Delta, you're

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 6>in a different You're in a different sort of environment

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 6>because of course Southwest has a fundamentally lower cost structure

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.640
<v Speaker 6>and that and they're going to win from that. You know,

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.960
<v Speaker 6>if you look at the airline industry, the you know,

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.679
<v Speaker 6>the higher the airlines are the highest valuations are mostly

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 6>discount carriers because they have a they've got a lower

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 6>fundamental cost structure. Now, the reason I think this is

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:42.000
<v Speaker 6>relevant to the auto industry is that until very recently

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 6>and really at this point now, the product with the

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.400
<v Speaker 6>lower cost structure is a gasoline or diesel powered cars.

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 6>It's fundamentally cheaper than than a battery electric car. But

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 6>that has been changing because the most expensive bit, which

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 6>is you know, can be you know, a third or

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 6>more of the cost of the electric car is the battery.

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:06.559
<v Speaker 6>And as battery manufacturing goes through the roof, as it's

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 6>expanding at this very rapid right. The costs are coming

0:13:09.240 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 6>down quite dramatically. Now we've had a bit of a

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 6>we've had a bit of a bump with the commodity

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 6>price inflation of the last few years, but the overall trajectory,

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 6>if you plod it out in a graph, is still

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 6>going down. And we're very close to the point, and

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.960
<v Speaker 6>now I think in China passing the point where they're

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 6>actually going to be fundamentally cheaper on price, and that

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 6>makes a big difference to everything.

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 2>The batteries themselves also are a bit of a disincentive

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.560
<v Speaker 2>for those who don't want to spend half an hour

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 2>charging their car when they're on a road trip, or

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:45.079
<v Speaker 2>who are concerned about the weight of it changing the

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.680
<v Speaker 2>structure of the car and changing the speed of the car.

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 2>And it's inten that sort of thing. Is all of

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 2>that baked into this, Yes it.

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:58.560
<v Speaker 6>Is, And I mean the article I was writing was

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 6>talking about how electric cars in China are now becoming

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 6>cheaper than gasoline cars, and of course how you measure

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 6>that is is a little bit difficult because they are

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 6>fundamentally different products, So so how do you measure that

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 6>they are competitive? And the point that you're raising there,

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.199
<v Speaker 6>I think is an important one because one thing that

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 6>we've seen from quite early on you'll know, the phrase

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.320
<v Speaker 6>range anxiety. This is something that people, you know, worry

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 6>a lot about. Is the battery going to last me

0:14:26.560 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 6>long enough to go on a long road trip. Am

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 6>I going to be spending half an hour charging when

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 6>I'm you know, rushing to a family dinner or something

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 6>like that. And one thing that we've seen as the

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 6>cost you would measure the cost of electric car batteries by,

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, the cost per killer what hour. As the

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 6>cost per killer what hour has gone down, we've generally

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 6>actually seen the batteries getting bigger. So the actual cost

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 6>of your battery is not getting is not going down

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 6>the cost you know, because the killer what hours are

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 6>going up at the same time that the cost birgear

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 6>what hour goes down. And that's because the car makers

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 6>have been trying to address range anxiety. And you know,

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 6>at this point, a typical electric vehicle will will will

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 6>give you, you know, it'll give you sort of four hundred

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 6>k's on a good charge, So what was that two

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 6>hundred and fifty miles, But of course that's in ideal conditions.

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 6>And now they've you know, now they've addressed range anxiety

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 6>and ideal conditions. Well, what happens if it's cold, what

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.000
<v Speaker 6>happens if you've got the air conditioning running? And so

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 6>so in some ways they've been you know, you know,

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:37.440
<v Speaker 6>trying to go up and down escalator against this. But

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 6>if you look, now, you know two crucial models. I

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 6>think the you know, obviously, the Tesla Model three is

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 6>a car that's got a sort of demonstrated ability to

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:52.720
<v Speaker 6>you know, to to sort of compete against that range anxiety.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.560
<v Speaker 6>And it is its competing on price with a lot

0:15:55.600 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 6>of the sort of you know, the sort of premium

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 6>mid size sedans, the sort of BMW three series oud

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 6>ea for you know, Mercedes C class. It's now cheaper

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:07.840
<v Speaker 6>than those cars in China.

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Now, how is it, David, that China has seemed to

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 2>crack the code? And how far behind is the US

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 2>in this competition to make these batteries more efficient the

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 2>car is more efficient.

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 6>If you compare the US and China in what sort

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 6>of electric vehicles are being designed, they're they're extremely different.

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 6>If you if you look at the market, of course,

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 6>you know the thing we all know about the US

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 6>market is that well, in both the US and China,

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 6>SUVs are very dominant, but of course trucks and you know,

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:42.440
<v Speaker 6>light trucks in the US, pickups are extremely dominant. So

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:48.160
<v Speaker 6>the advantage for US car makers, and we've seen it

0:16:48.200 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 6>with the you know, the Ford F one fifty lightning

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.120
<v Speaker 6>and obviously, like you know, Teszler's attempt with this cyber

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 6>truck and riving the lights is to try and get

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 6>into that sort of large, larger vehicle market, large you know,

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 6>light truck or suv market, and that's the sort of

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:10.200
<v Speaker 6>that's the area where there's lightly the earliest crossover point

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:14.439
<v Speaker 6>where electric vehicles become cheaper than gastine. They're clearly not

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 6>there yet. It's probably sort of two or three years

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.640
<v Speaker 6>away at this point. In the US China, the sort

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.479
<v Speaker 6>of core of the market is a little bit different.

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 6>There's the SUVs are still big, as they are everywhere,

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 6>but these sort of like mid size sedans again, like

0:17:28.400 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 6>you know, some of these you know vw ones that

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 6>we that we've been talking about, those are you know,

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 6>those are to some extent the core of the market.

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:40.439
<v Speaker 6>And because there's the range, anxiety is a little bit

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 6>less because the population is that much denser, people are

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 6>less spread out. A lot of these cars have been

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 6>are starting to get into the market that are sort

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 6>of coming in a sort of cheaper price point. And

0:17:51.359 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 6>of course, the one other thing is a crucial supply

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 6>chain thing. Of course, you know, China has has already

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 6>built a vast battery supply chain, the Chinese battery makers,

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 6>they've built the capacity for the batteries, but they're having

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:08.040
<v Speaker 6>trouble getting export markets sufficient for them, so all that

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 6>capacity is stuck at home, and that's pushing prices down.

0:18:11.160 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm wondering if these price wars and it this competition

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 2>is helping to spur this growth and development that you're seeing,

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:20.240
<v Speaker 2>and it sounds like there's more room for it.

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:23.960
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, it's I think fundamentally you have to

0:18:23.960 --> 0:18:27.239
<v Speaker 6>come back to looking at the market share, and you know,

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:29.880
<v Speaker 6>go back a few years. I think in twenty nineteen,

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:33.439
<v Speaker 6>the Chinese government set a target for twenty five percent

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 6>of the market to be new energy vehicles by twenty

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 6>twenty five. I remember reading just i think three years ago,

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:45.120
<v Speaker 6>quite a bullish report from Deloitte, reckoning that you'd get

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 6>about a third of China's electric vehicle Sorry, a third

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 6>of the Chinese car market would be electric by twenty

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.479
<v Speaker 6>twenty nine to twenty thirty by the end of this decade. Now,

0:18:53.720 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 6>in June, these new energy vehicles were thirty seven percent

0:18:57.000 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 6>of sales. If you look at how they've risen, it

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 6>is really taken the market by storm. And if you

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 6>look at the best selling cars in China again in June,

0:19:10.280 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 6>seven out of ten of them were batteri or plug

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 6>in hybrid models. So and that really changes the whole

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 6>dynamic in significant ways because these are no longer exotic products.

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 6>These are extremely familiar products to everyone. And one thing

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 6>that we've you know that a lot of carmakers have found.

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:29.400
<v Speaker 6>We talked about range anxiety and many of those issues.

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:31.680
<v Speaker 6>You know, it tends to be an issue for people

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 6>who haven't bought an electric car yet for owners of

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 6>electric cars, it's not. It doesn't really trouble them very

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 6>much at all. So and this is why the issue

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 6>of the sort of you know, the price competition and

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 6>the price war is so important. Like you reduce the

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 6>barrier to people buying their first electric car similar to people,

0:19:50.240 --> 0:19:53.320
<v Speaker 6>you know, buying their first discount airline ticket, people find

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 6>they're actually quite open to it once they once they

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 6>get a chance.

0:19:57.880 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 2>David Fickling is a Bloomberg Opinion covering energy and commodities.

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:04.760
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up, we're going to learn more about a

0:20:04.800 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 2>new postpartum depression pill and how it is becoming a

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 2>vital tool in women's healthcare. Don't forget We're available as

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 2>a podcast on Apple, Spotify or your favorite podcast platform.

0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:20.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Opinion. As many as half of women

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:25.520
<v Speaker 2>with postpartum depression go undiagnosed, and suicide is a leading

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 2>cause of maternal mortality in the US. But now a

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:34.239
<v Speaker 2>remarkable breakthrough, the very first pill for postpartum depression. But

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 2>will it be enough. Let's talk about it with Bloomberg

0:20:37.080 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 2>Opinion columnist Lisa Jarvis, who covers biotech, healthcare and the

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 2>pharmaceutical industry. Lisa, let's talk about postpartum depression. Something I

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 2>get the impression isn't talked about very much at all

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:53.080
<v Speaker 2>in this country. How many women experience postpartum depression?

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Ray Amy, Well, thanks for having me, and we know

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 4>that as many as one in seven women experience postpartum

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 4>depress and one of the things that's worth noting is

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 4>that many of those women are experiencing depression even before

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 4>during their pregnancy, and during that period it's going undetected

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:14.840
<v Speaker 4>and undiagnosed and untreated, and that can carry over into

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 4>the pregnancy itself. And so you know, we know that

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 4>the postpartum period is just one of enormous change. Anyone

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 4>who's had a child knows that all of your relationships

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 4>change in an instant with your partner, your parents, your peers,

0:21:28.920 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 4>even your own body. The social pressure to have a

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 4>perfect connection with your baby is great, and meanwhile, you're

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 4>often very isolated because you're taking care of a newborn,

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 4>and on top of that, you're sleep deprived. So a

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 4>lot of people struggle during that period. And you're right,

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 4>it's just not talked about enough.

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Now. A lot of people would assume that, oh, it's

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 2>just hormones, my body is readjusting from pregnancy to being

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 2>a new mom, or like you said, I am just

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>not getting enough sleep. Does that tend to mask what

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 2>people might think is just oh, I need a nap,

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.280
<v Speaker 2>versus ooh I might need to talk to someone.

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, first, I think it's important to recognize your's a spectrum.

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:14.719
<v Speaker 4>You know, there's kind of the baby blues, and then

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.119
<v Speaker 4>there's something that gets more serious and then you know,

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 4>of course, there have been cases that we've all read

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:22.560
<v Speaker 4>about that are really, you know, horrifying and terrible for

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 4>families where women have an extreme version of this. But

0:22:26.040 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 4>I think it's when you know, you're kind of noticing

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 4>that you're struggling to feel happy in this period that

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 4>you know doesn't have to be perfect, but generally people

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:39.119
<v Speaker 4>are you know, who aren't depressed, are like, have the

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 4>surge of hormones that makes them, that fuel them to

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 4>get through those sleepless period And so I think the

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 4>most important thing is if you're having any struggles to

0:22:48.480 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 4>talk to your provider. One thing again that anyone who's

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 4>had a child knows is that the instant the baby arrives,

0:22:55.680 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 4>all of the attention shifts from the mother's health, the

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:02.480
<v Speaker 4>pregnant mother's health, to the newborn, right and rightfully so,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 4>but at the same time, that leaves a lot of

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 4>women who go without care during that period. And we know,

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 4>your first follow up visit isn't until six weeks after

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 4>having your child, and so that's a long time, and

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:19.119
<v Speaker 4>a lot happens in six weeks as in your post

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:21.960
<v Speaker 4>pregnant period. That's an eternity for a new mom.

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 2>So is that why they've never had drugs before to

0:23:25.560 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 2>help new moms out when they're going through this.

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 4>I wish that were the reason, but unfortunately, I think

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 4>a lot of the reason has to do with the

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.360
<v Speaker 4>fact that this problem wasn't getting the attention it deserved,

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 4>in part because you know, for a long time, drugs

0:23:39.920 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 4>were really primarily studied in men, and the way that

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 4>this drug works is by mimicking a hormone that you

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 4>know all of us have, but is in effect after pregnancy,

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 4>and I think it just was a mechanism that went undetected.

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 4>But you know, basically, the mice that are used in research,

0:23:59.119 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 4>and even when theris the kind of anti common antidepressants

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 4>that a lot of people take, we're studied, almost all

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 4>of those were studied in either mail mice or you know,

0:24:11.240 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 4>in men in the clinic. So I think it just

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of left women underserved and the problem underrecognized.

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So now that there is this breakthrough, this very first

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 2>pill for postpartum depression, would this then change how women

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:28.760
<v Speaker 2>might be treated, diagnosed, monitored for postpotum depression.

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 4>That's my hope. You know, we've had options in the past.

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.160
<v Speaker 4>The same company Stage Therapeutics that developed this drug has

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 4>another drug that they got approved in twenty nineteen, but

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.199
<v Speaker 4>it's challenging. You have to go into the hospital and

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 4>have this almost seventy two hour infusion, so that's very

0:24:48.560 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 4>tough for a new mom. You know, even when you're

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 4>in an extreme situation where you're feeling depressed to leave

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.600
<v Speaker 4>your family for three days in order to get treatment.

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.560
<v Speaker 4>You know, it does act quickly, but it just really

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 4>was a ba and in addition to its cause, was

0:25:01.760 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 4>a barrier to people using it. SSRIs have been an option,

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 4>but they can take months. So I do think yes,

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.840
<v Speaker 4>having something that in two weeks could make a lot

0:25:09.880 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 4>of people feel better and take it home would really

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 4>change things. The other thing that could change things is

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 4>that AKAG, which is the big society for obstitricians and gynecologists,

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 4>recently in June changed their recommendations for screening women for depression,

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 4>and so they now recommend during the period where you're

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 4>considering having a child, several times while you're pregnant, and

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 4>then several times in the thought every single postpart and

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 4>visit that your provider screening you for depression, so which

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 4>could really help. I think in total it brings more

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 4>recognition to the problem, which I hope means more women

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 4>getting help.

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Let's get into the pill. Well, how does it work.

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 2>What's it called?

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's called surround known and it's it mimics a

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:58.040
<v Speaker 4>natural hormone. So it's actually a new class of antidepressants

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:01.840
<v Speaker 4>or you know, a new class of psychiatric drugs than

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 4>what we have in the past. And you you take

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.879
<v Speaker 4>it for two weeks, and which is different, right, I

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:12.239
<v Speaker 4>think most people who take an SSRI would take that

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 4>for months or perhaps for life, you know, and it

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 4>works pretty fast to help you, you know, potentially modulate

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 4>the hormones that could be affecting your mood post pregnancy,

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 4>and so, you know, the idea is that after that

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:32.640
<v Speaker 4>two weeks, hopefully you're feeling better and you go back

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 4>to your normal life. That might not be the case

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.199
<v Speaker 4>for all people. Hopefully you're you know, also getting some

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 4>talk therapy, and then eventually, if it really is you know,

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 4>a severe case, it might be that you then later

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 4>go on to SSRIs, but you have this immediate intervention

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 4>that can help you during that really challenging, you know,

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 4>early early period after having a child.

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm also curious about if it would somehow impact breastfeeding, appetite,

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 2>weight gain, weight loss. Is there any downside or are

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 2>there side effects people should know about?

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they should, I mean, you know, I think one

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.640
<v Speaker 4>of the you know, it's it's a double edged sword

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 4>because some people don't want to take any medication when

0:27:09.600 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 4>they're breastfeeding, and that's one of the deterrens actually to

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 4>people getting treated, is that if they take an SSRI,

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 4>even though we know that it's reasonably safe to do

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 4>so well breastfeeding, they don't want to do that for months.

0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:22.919
<v Speaker 4>In this case, I think it hasn't been studied in

0:27:22.920 --> 0:27:25.240
<v Speaker 4>breast milk, we don't have enough information to say, like

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 4>you could breastfeed while you're taking the drig. We do

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 4>know that one could for two weeks so called pump

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 4>and dump, you know, you could continue to breastfeed, you know,

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.840
<v Speaker 4>dump the milk and then go back to breastfeeding your

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 4>child after, which I think is a better option for

0:27:41.119 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 4>a lot of women. It's work, but you know, at

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 4>the same time, let's you kind of have both things.

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 4>You're at home, you're with your infant, and then one

0:27:48.240 --> 0:27:50.800
<v Speaker 4>of the side effects is that it can just you know,

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:53.240
<v Speaker 4>cause drowsiness, and so that the FDA did put a

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 4>black so called black box warning on the on the

0:27:56.560 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 4>pills that they would not like you to drive for

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 4>twelve hours after taking the pills, which you know, that

0:28:02.600 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 4>is a limitation and that's tough. I do recall during

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 4>my early days and months after pregnancy that you know,

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 4>I was home a lot. So that may not be

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 4>a limitation for everyone. That's a barrier.

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 2>So now we have talked a lot about how this

0:28:16.560 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 2>is not being talked about, right I'm wondering though, if

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.479
<v Speaker 2>part of the issue is what is expected of the

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:26.200
<v Speaker 2>mom or what is what she is expecting of herself.

0:28:27.119 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>You're not expected to be sad or depressed or or

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 2>have you know, questionable thoughts and you may not say

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 2>anything if you're actually going through this as a new mom.

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Is that also part of this?

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? I mean, I think that's one of the reasons

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 4>it goes undetected, is that, you know, it's hard to

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 4>talk about. We all have, you know, social media and

0:28:48.680 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 4>new moms on social media showing us what the perfect So, yeah,

0:28:54.240 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 4>a notion of motherhood is and that you're supposed to

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.600
<v Speaker 4>be just so barney to your new infant. That's not

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 4>everyone's experience, and I think that can be really hard

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.280
<v Speaker 4>to say that that's not what's happening for you, and

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.840
<v Speaker 4>that makes it difficult. And so I think this hopefully

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 4>helps people recognize it's really common. There's help. You should

0:29:15.240 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 4>get help, because we also know that it can affect

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 4>your baby if you're not bonding with your baby. I

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 4>mean not to put make anyone feel guilty about something

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 4>they can't control, but I think you know it just

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 4>it's a good reminder that, like helping yourself helps your

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 4>whole family.

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 2>And you mentioned it in your column, but I'd like

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 2>you to say it out loud. This could also help

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.240
<v Speaker 2>elevate the conversation about postpartum depression.

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:36.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:40.200
<v Speaker 4>I think it just really could help lift some of

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.960
<v Speaker 4>the stigma women feel, you know. I mean, we want

0:29:43.000 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 4>people to get treated. We want people. The other thing

0:29:45.680 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 4>is this is the start of your new family. A

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.400
<v Speaker 4>lot of people experience this during their first child, you know,

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 4>their first pregnancy to start your new family. Want you

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.120
<v Speaker 4>to start out your new family on the best possible foot,

0:29:56.160 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 4>So get the help you need.

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Lisa Jarvis is a Bloomberg opinion covering biotech, healthcare, and

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 2>the pharmaceutical industry. This is Bloomberg.

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Opinion podcast. Catch us Saturdays

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 1>at one and seven pm Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Opinion. I'm Amy morris By. Now

0:30:32.440 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 2>you've probably heard that Zoom is asking its employees to

0:30:35.960 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 2>return to the office, and perhaps you reveled in the

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 2>irony with a declaration of remote work is dead. But

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 2>hold on, this is not necessarily the end of an era.

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:48.080
<v Speaker 2>In fact, if you look a little deeper, it may

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:51.360
<v Speaker 2>just be the beginning. Bloomberg Opinion. The editor, Sarah Green

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 2>Carmichael joins us now. Sarah set as straight Zoom bringing

0:30:54.960 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 2>folks back to the office. But this isn't necessarily the

0:30:58.320 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 2>ironic headline we all thought it was.

0:31:00.800 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 7>No I can see why. It's a headline that raced

0:31:03.000 --> 0:31:05.240
<v Speaker 7>around the world, But the reality is that Zoom is

0:31:05.320 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 7>only asking employees within fifty miles of the office to

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 7>come in twice a week. That is much much less

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.960
<v Speaker 7>than many other companies return to office policies, so it's

0:31:15.000 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 7>hardly the end of an era here.

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 2>You talked about in your column a Harvard professor conducted

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 2>a field experiment suggesting that having people in the office

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 2>two days every week may be the sweet spot. Explain

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 2>that to me.

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:28.720
<v Speaker 5>Sure.

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 7>This was a fascinating field experiment by Harvard Business School

0:31:32.040 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 7>professor Rog Chowdery, and it's the gold standard and research.

0:31:36.200 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 7>It was a randomized, controlled experiment with real workers, and

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:42.040
<v Speaker 7>what they found is that when people came in just

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 7>one or two days a week, they thought that was

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:48.680
<v Speaker 7>the sweet spot for both productivity and collaboration. People who

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:51.520
<v Speaker 7>came in more than that didn't necessarily show any more

0:31:51.560 --> 0:31:55.960
<v Speaker 7>collaboration or productivity, and people who never came in experienced

0:31:56.000 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 7>more loneliness and isolation. So it seems that one or

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.480
<v Speaker 7>two days a week is just fine.

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Would the move to bring employees into the office more

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 2>frequently than just two days a week? Is that driven

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 2>by employers? I mean, most would prefer their staff to

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 2>be in house more often than two days a week.

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Are they the ones who are really behind this?

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's really the employers. The managers, the senior executives

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 7>who are pushing for more than that. But we've seen

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:26.240
<v Speaker 7>that over the past year, despite a lot of headlines

0:32:26.240 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 7>about this company or that company changing their remote work policy,

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 7>that actually levels of days worked at home have basically

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:37.640
<v Speaker 7>been flat over the past twelve months. And executives I've

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 7>talked to about this say that while they have sort

0:32:40.160 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 7>of asked people to come in and they have sort

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:43.959
<v Speaker 7>of said, hey, we're going to keep track, we're going

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 7>to take attendance, that they actually feel like they can't

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:49.720
<v Speaker 7>force people to come in, And as of yet, there's

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 7>not really disciplinary action for employees who are coming in

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.160
<v Speaker 7>less than executives were like. So there's not a whole

0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.959
<v Speaker 7>lot executives this far have been willing to do. And

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 7>that's still a very tight labor market.

0:33:01.000 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Remember before the pandemic, there was this big move afoot

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 2>to create a three day weekend. There was a really

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 2>big move to have more flexible hours. Now this was

0:33:12.040 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 2>in twenty eighteen and twenty nineteen. It seems almost like

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.600
<v Speaker 2>that kind of went poof when everybody was relegated to

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 2>their own homes to do their work. And now I

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 2>haven't heard a great resurgence of that. Where is that movement?

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 2>What's going to happen to our work week?

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 7>I'm really glad you asked about that, because the place

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 7>the movement is alive and well is actually in Europe.

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 7>Several European countries have conducted experiments with the four day week.

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:42.920
<v Speaker 7>Almost all of the companies that have undertaken these experiments

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 7>so that they were so positive they're just going to

0:33:45.040 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 7>keep going. Now, there was some selection bias there, obviously,

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 7>companies only opted in if they were willing to do

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 7>the experiment thought it might work for them. But it's

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 7>been enormously popular. Maybe the difference is that in Europe,

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 7>you know, among other differences with America, in European work

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.080
<v Speaker 7>life balance, but in Europe, people have returned to office

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:06.000
<v Speaker 7>in higher numbers. And that could be because they have

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 7>maybe smaller apartments, they have potentially shorter commutes. But whatever

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 7>the reason, you know, that's where we really see both

0:34:13.800 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 7>return to office and more four day work week experimentation happening.

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.359
<v Speaker 2>So could it gain traction in the US?

0:34:19.400 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 3>You think?

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 7>I doubt it. I would like to see it, and

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 7>I think that there's going to be some tech companies

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 7>and maybe smaller companies that want to be able to

0:34:27.440 --> 0:34:30.800
<v Speaker 7>hire top talent and cannot pay a premium that will

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 7>use it. And I've definitely known people who've worked out

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 7>their own flexible arrangements, you know, through HR always. But

0:34:38.280 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 7>I think in terms of mass adoption of a four

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 7>day week in the United States, it's just really hard

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 7>to see that in a sort of work obsessed society

0:34:45.600 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 7>like ours.

0:34:46.280 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Opinion editors Sarah Green Carmichael and that does it

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:52.560
<v Speaker 2>for this week's Bloomberg Opinion. We are produced by Eric

0:34:52.600 --> 0:34:54.880
<v Speaker 2>mollow and you can find all of these columns on

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:59.040
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg terminal, and we're available as a podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 2>or your favorite podcast platform. Now stay with us. Today's

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:05.839
<v Speaker 2>top stories and global business headlines are just ahead. I'm

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Mammy Morris and this is Bloombird.