WEBVTT - The TikTok-ification of TV is Coming

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:10.479
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Strictly Business, the podcast in

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>which we speak with some of the brightest minds working

0:00:12.760 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>in the media business today. I'm Andrew Wallenstein, chief media

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst with Variety Intelligence Platform. Got no guests this week,

0:00:21.360 --> 0:00:24.319
<v Speaker 1>and I'll tell you why, because I, as one of

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the raining media gurus coming to you each week on

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Strictly Business, could not do another interview for this podcast,

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:36.360
<v Speaker 1>dear listener without talking about a profound transformation I've recently

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>undergone with my own personal media habits. There's just no

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>other way to say it. TikTok has broken my middle

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>aged brain. Stick around, and I'll explain why. Welcome back

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>by I record this day's after President Trump issued in

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>executive order granting a seventy five day extension on the

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>TikTok ban in order to facilitate a sale to an

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:11.520
<v Speaker 1>American company. There is so much to say about the

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.839
<v Speaker 1>implications of all this from a business perspective, a cultural perspective.

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know what, you won't hear any of that

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>from me on this edition of the podcast, because, as

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I said, I cannot in good conscience sit here any

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>longer like it's just another episode and pontificate per usual

0:01:28.600 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>about all things media with guests until I've come clean

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>about what has hit me with the force of a

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>religious experience in recent months, and maybe a spiritual metaphor

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>is the best way to explain what I'm trying to convey.

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>After fifty years of faithful devotion to TV, I've converted

0:01:47.080 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to TikTok.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Somehow, the controversial app has become my primary media destination

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>every day instead of television. And when I say television,

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean both pay TV and some description streaming TV

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>shows and movies have taken a backseat to TikTok's never ending,

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 1>algorithmically targeted feed of short form videos. The advertising is

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:13.799
<v Speaker 1>so light touch I barely notice it, and best of all,

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it's totally free, yet I'd probably pay for it if

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I had to. And though I am pathetically late to

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the party and just too darn old to be captivated

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>by TikTok in the first place, I must share what

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>this experience has been like because it's left me with

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>some observations about not just this powerful platform, but the

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.679
<v Speaker 1>future of media in general. I know it's a lot

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to take in, and I'm as surprised to hear these

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>words coming out of my mouth as anyone, because prior

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to my conversion, I've always found something dystopian about the

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>whole notion of TikTok. User generated clips shot rapid fire

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>into my cerebral cortex, shredding my attention span. But what

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>can I say? That sweet sweet algorithm has worked its

0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>magic on my mind over enough time to cast a

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>spell on me. I've come to love meme culture and

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the relative absence of mainstream media culture on the platform.

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>And there's just so much more that I'll get into here.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>But before I pontificate any further, let me just acknowledge

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>this much. I totally get it. If your reaction to

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.959
<v Speaker 1>what little I've said so far is okay, boomer, thanks

0:03:31.000 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>but no thanks, not interested in insights from the last

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>oldest TikTok adopter on Earth? Why don't you come back

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>next week? Some hot takes on what MySpace or for

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>inster was like too, And I get it. That's a

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>totally valid reaction, though I should point out first I'm

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not a boomer. I'm Generation X old, but not that old.

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>If you want to just bail right now before I

0:03:54.840 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>unpack this any further, I could accept that you won't

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.200
<v Speaker 1>hurt my feelings. I'm sure there's a fresh four our

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.640
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rogan interview that's a better use of your time.

0:04:03.680 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>But for those of you who have stuck around first,

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>thanks for giving me a chance. I should also clarify

0:04:10.960 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not like I suddenly discovered TikTok in twenty twenty

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.159
<v Speaker 1>five after crawling out from under whatever rock I was

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>living under. I've had the app on my phone for

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:23.599
<v Speaker 1>several years for the occasion when someone mentioned something I

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see on TikTok, I'd use the app to

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.359
<v Speaker 1>check it out, always wondering, considering its vaunted algorithm, whether

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>it was akin to taking a hit from a crack pipe.

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>But I would dip in, dip out, figuring I was

0:04:36.600 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>old enough to be impervious to its charms until this year.

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>What drew me to TikTok long enough to get sufficiently

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>seduced this time around came late last year, when the

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>political drama around the app's existence was at its high point.

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I was curious to get a first hand sense of

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.279
<v Speaker 1>how the crisis was being felt by the TikTok Faithful

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and truth be told. While I was struck by the

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>creativity and passion of many on the platform. I wasn't

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>impressed anymore by what I was seeing on TikTok than

0:05:09.040 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I was on any other social platform. You have to

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>understand I've been following digital native content trends for nearly

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 1>two decades, dating back to the earliest days of YouTube

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 1>and the earliest flowerings of the creator economy, back before

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it was called the creator economy, before they were even

0:05:27.520 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>called influencers. And I followed these trends as the momentum

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>move from one platform to another, whether it was Vine

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:39.200
<v Speaker 1>or Switch or Snapchat, each had their own quirks and idiosyncrasies.

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But through it all, I always prided myself on keeping

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a kind of anthropological detachment from it all. I admired

0:05:47.200 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>from a distance, but never really got drawn in personally.

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 1>But now, in twenty twenty five, the truth is the

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>programming experience of TikTok has been so thoroughly co opted

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>by rival copycat products like Instagram reels and YouTube shorts

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>that when I talk about TikTok, I'm not really talking

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>about TikTok per se. It's format that algorithmically targeted torrent

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of short form videos curated by my thumb swiping with

0:06:16.279 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>such reptilian efficiency, it almost feels like my hand is

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>operating independently from my brain. I call it the clip

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 1>scroll format. TikTok created it, but apparently couldn't patent it.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>That said, TikTok's algorithmic magic may be more powerful than

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the other platforms, at the very least deserves credit for

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>pioneering the format that's become so addictive. Addiction. Yeah, that's

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>a word I must admit I shouldn't be using loosely

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to TikTok or any social apps. There

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>are serious concerns about the power they have, particularly with

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>its youngest users. Not to mention the serious concerns about

0:06:55.800 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the potential espionage risk that TikTok app presents, I'd be

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>remissing not referencing these dangers. And yet I must admit

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>none of that stop me from falling head over heels

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>in love with TikTok. And here's what may be the

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>most tragic part of all. I see that the hours

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I spend on TikTok now each day clearly come at

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the expense of the time I used to spend watching TV.

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I just don't watch. I just don't watch a half

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:29.760
<v Speaker 1>hour or hour long shows at the volume that I

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>used to. When after enjoying the first season of Severance recently,

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>I found myself bored with season two. Even amid all

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that hype, I wondered if my TV taste buds were

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>somehow permanently broken. Well, at least I'm still watching White Lotus,

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.120
<v Speaker 1>though I think that's about the only TV show I've

0:07:48.120 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>been watching these days. But here's the thing. It's hard

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>not to give TikTok credit for stealing the wind from

0:07:54.880 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 1>TV sales, because when I reflect on TikTok's bounty, I

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>see the seeds of so much what I had previously

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>gotten from TV, super served by TikTok. Let me start

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>with a counter intuitive example. I've really gotten to enjoy

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>keeping up with what the biggest memes are on TikTok.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>The one that I cannot seem to get out of

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.880
<v Speaker 1>my head right now is people dancing to a rap

0:08:20.920 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>song called you Gotta cut It, cut It, cut It,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.880
<v Speaker 1>cut It, cut It, cut It, cut It, cut it,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 1>cut it Now. Maybe hip hop isn't your cup of tea,

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>but I promise, if you let this earworm in your brain,

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.079
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna burrow so deep in there you'll never get

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it out. But let me get back to my point.

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>How is something like memes, which are so particular to

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:49.439
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and not television, end up displacing my TV habit? Well,

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>this is why I think. Part of what has made

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>memes so compelling to me is that in our increasingly

0:08:56.280 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 1>fragmented culture, where so many people are experiencing different and

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 1>content a far cry from decades ago when the TV

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.080
<v Speaker 1>was the great unifying force that could bring together tens

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>of millions of people on any given night, These memes

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and the way people play on them are as close

0:09:12.679 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to unifying our culture in its own interactive way. They

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:20.320
<v Speaker 1>make me feel connected to a larger culture and so

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you got to cut it and just feels more important

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to me right now than say, white lotus. Now, I

0:09:26.920 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>know what you're thinking, Andy, This kind of mean play

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>has been around on other platforms long before TikTok, So

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>what makes so special here? And to that, I say,

0:09:36.880 --> 0:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's just different. On TikTok the level of creativity employed

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and the memes feels higher. And for those who disagree

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:46.760
<v Speaker 1>with that, okay, But here's where I think there's no

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 1>argument the TikTok ux is just a superior delivery mechanism

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 1>than any other social platform. Maybe it's the same old content,

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:59.960
<v Speaker 1>but it's different now. And I'll tell you what else.

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's something particular to my feed, certainly not something

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I set out to cultivate. But the mainstream Hollywood galaxy

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>of stars has such a muted presence in my feed.

0:10:12.559 --> 0:10:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Don't get me wrong. I follow the accounts on TikTok

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of dozens of actors, performers, singers, whatever, and I know

0:10:19.760 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like a knock against mainstream Hollywood entertainment culture,

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.600
<v Speaker 1>but it's not meant to be. There's plenty I like

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>about the culture that I get everywhere else, But on

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:36.199
<v Speaker 1>TikTok it feels like the algorithm just intuitive that I

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>would prefer to turn the dimmer down on the celebrity

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:43.560
<v Speaker 1>industrial complex. They don't loom nearly as large on TikTok,

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:47.760
<v Speaker 1>which doesn't have the top down entertainer elite separated by

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the unwashed mass audiences. It's a more democratic medium where

0:10:52.520 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 1>the distinction between the entertainer and the audience doesn't really exist.

0:10:56.440 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>It's such a refreshing differentiating thing that makes the app

0:11:00.320 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>just a fascinating world to inhabit, and into the vacuum

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of all the oxygen that the celebrity industrial complex typically

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>sucks up steps in this explosion of homegrown talent on

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the platform. Now, I wouldn't blame you if you started

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to get an ick feeling right about now thinking about

0:11:18.679 --> 0:11:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the brand name creators out there, from mister Beast to

0:11:22.520 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the Paul Brothers. I'm just not a huge fan of

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>these types, because there's something off putting to me about

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>how sweaty that class of entertainers comes off, constantly shilling

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 1>for themselves with they're desperate hit the subscribe button pitches

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and shilling for whatever brand is paying them. But that's

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>not who populate my TikTok feed. Those who do are

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>mostly thousands of not famous at least yet, people who

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>may not be household names, but they've got talent. Watching

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>TikTok makes you feel like what many of us already

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.239
<v Speaker 1>suspect about Hollywood. It's not as if their most successful

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.839
<v Speaker 1>performers possess some kind of rare talent that separates them

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>from the masses, like the way you say your average

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>pro athlete is world's better than ninety nine percent of

0:12:09.240 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the population. Now, TikTok gives the lie

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to that notion by exposing that there's many many people

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>out there with comparable levels of talent to the lucky

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>group that makes it through the Hollywood machine and onto

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:27.440
<v Speaker 1>our screens. And these many, many people just needed a

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:32.560
<v Speaker 1>discovery mechanism powerful enough to elevate them. And that's where

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>TikTok comes in. If you had to pin me down

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to defining in one word, what gives TikTok gets a llure,

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to use a very scientific term, the vibe. Okay,

0:12:44.120 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll need a few more words to capture what

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that vibe is. It's like everyone on TikTok is in

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>a dance circle, taking turns, making each other laugh at

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the center with the silly jig. It's like you're inviting

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.840
<v Speaker 1>let me try something else. It's like you're invited to

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 1>this gigantic potluck dinner where many people have taken it

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 1>upon themselves to generously share the content they've cooked up,

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:11.319
<v Speaker 1>and you have this endless buffet that just gets shotgunned

0:13:11.360 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>into your mouth in perfect little snackable bites. I myself

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 1>don't contribute content, preferring to stay what they call, in

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Internet parlance, a lurker. But that's not unusual. A Pew

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Research Center study last year found that just twenty five

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of the most active people on the platform produced

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight percent of its content. Let me try to

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>capture what I love about TikTok using a TV metaphor

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>of sorts. Imagine if Saturday Night Live was a medium

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 1>onto itself. Instead of about twenty performers Lauren Michael's pluck

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>from obscurity, there's about one thousand more cast members just

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:53.160
<v Speaker 1>cranking out comedic vignettes on their own instead of relying

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.319
<v Speaker 1>on Lauren's taste and sketches, which frankly is a mixed

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 1>track record. That's a subject for another podcast. You could

0:13:59.840 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>just curate your own group from a vast sea of

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 1>talent that you didn't know existed. And like SNL, some

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>of the comedy comes from some pretty classic categories, like

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 1>celebrity impressionists. But on an average episode of SNL, you're

0:14:14.160 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>lucky if you'll see more than two impressionisms at work.

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.600
<v Speaker 1>On TikTok, you could sift through two hundred of them

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>in a minute, and the quality differential from what you

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>see on SNL. It's not that slim.

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 3>Look.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I love James Austin Johnson's Trump impression on SNL. He's

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a genius. But you know what, someone who calls herself

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:40.360
<v Speaker 1>d doo dah on TikTok, she's not bad herself. If

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to find a random what looks to be

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>high school student with just three thousand followers whose Trump

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.720
<v Speaker 1>impression in her own words is quote if he was

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a baby or had inhaled helium, well here for yourself,

0:14:56.240 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>baby Trump.

0:14:57.080 --> 0:15:01.160
<v Speaker 3>On the way to the airport. I like my suitcase, frankly,

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:05.360
<v Speaker 3>but I've seen like very big ones in China, frankly,

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:08.240
<v Speaker 3>and I'm thinking that I want my mommy to buy

0:15:08.240 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 3>me a bigger ones. I'm not very statisfied.

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>What can I say? The sight of a girl who

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.040
<v Speaker 1>can't be a day over sixteen doing a Trump impression

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>kills me every time. Now, the thing to keep in

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>mind here is d doo dah isn't some rare hidden

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>gem on TikTok. More like a dime a dozen. You see,

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is like a metal detector for sucking all the

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>needles from the haystack. The algorithm sees what you like

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and seamlessly hits you with like ten more of the

0:15:36.160 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>same thing. And I understand these people that I'm finding

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok. They're not new or exclusive to the platform.

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 1>They may even have bigger followings on other platforms where

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:51.240
<v Speaker 1>they got their start before moving to TikTok. I'm sure

0:15:51.240 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I've seen their videos years ago, but the point is

0:15:54.400 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that TikTok is the platform that made this experience sticky.

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been on Instagram YouTube for many years and have

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>never felt anything like the rabbit hole drop that TikTok

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 1>delivers every time out. And there's a lot of different

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 1>types of comedy to choose from. I've gotten into this

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>whole cottage industry of teachers who like to imitate their

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>young students. And I'm a dad, so there's like five

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred men out there contributing dad jokes into my feed

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in an endless supply. And as a married man, I

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>also enjoy the entire genre of couple's humor, where real

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>life husband and wives who fancy themselves comedy duos dissect

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>relationship pitfalls pretty endlessly. I think my favorite is a

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>well known TikTok pairing Alex and John, who have millions

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of followers.

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 3>John, are you serious? What can you not pick this up?

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:47.760
<v Speaker 2>They're not in the way.

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 3>It's lazy, John. We both live here, Okay, it's a mess.

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Pile of your clothes, Well that's different. They're on a chair,

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.400
<v Speaker 3>so they're elevated out of the way.

0:16:57.520 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 2>It's a pile of shit, just like mine.

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 3>It is not a It is an organized mess, and

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:02.920
<v Speaker 3>I know where everything is.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 2>I just can't admit that we're the same. And it

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:06.679
<v Speaker 2>just kills you to know that we both have a

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 2>pile of shit. But for some reason you think your

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 2>pile of shit is better than mine.

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 3>But it's not fine. I won't talk about your pile

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:14.680
<v Speaker 3>of shit if you don't talk about mine.

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Honestly, you watch these two long enough and you'll understand

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.800
<v Speaker 1>why comparisons to TV classics like I Love Lucy and

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>The Honeymooners aren't so far fetched. Whether the comedy is

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty minutes or in the case of Alex and John,

0:17:30.119 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>sometimes like thirty seconds, the connection is pretty clear. And

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to bring this back to what I was saying about

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>TikTok as a TV substitute, this is a perfect example

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Alex and John feel to me like the kind of

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.679
<v Speaker 1>couple centric sitcoms I used to watch all the time

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.439
<v Speaker 1>but just don't see on TV anymore. I mean, forget

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>about couple sitcoms. I don't find myself watching sitcoms at all. Really,

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And have you seen a comedy in a movie theater lately?

0:17:57.520 --> 0:17:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Come to think of it, I think you could draw

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 1>an even broader conclusion that the vast array of comedy

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you can overdose on TikTok comes at the expense of

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the rest of media. I just don't think it's a

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>coincidence that comedy could not seem more dead in film

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and TV right now, while on TikTok it's alive and well.

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Now I realize I've been painting a picture in this

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast of TikTok standing apart from the rest of culture.

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.119
<v Speaker 1>But after the break I'll get into why that's not

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>an accurate picture entirely. We are back with my endless

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 1>jeremiad about the state of television and the triumph that

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>I think TikTok has had its expense. And look, it's

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>not that pop culture as we know it is absent

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 1>from TikTok. Now TikTok is very much in dialogue with culture,

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but instead of just being like another TV channel or

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>movie theater or streaming service or the performer and programs

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>djor distribute their content, TikTokers meet these brands on their

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.600
<v Speaker 1>own terms, and those terms are typically through the filter

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of fan worship or ridicule. Like any other social platform,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it's where the water cooler conversation happens, even though the

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>content that spurs the conversation isn't available on the platform.

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:23.959
<v Speaker 1>For instance, if there's one TV show I've Stuck with

0:19:24.040 --> 0:19:27.959
<v Speaker 1>its White Lotus, but no episode is complete without watching

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:32.160
<v Speaker 1>all the satirical reactions each episode prompts, the most famous

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>of which is mining maximum yucks out of every heavily

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>accent accented utterance from Parker Posey's mouth. But it's not

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.640
<v Speaker 1>just about sharing the post, it's each user putting their

0:19:44.680 --> 0:19:48.159
<v Speaker 1>own unique spin on it, like this one set to

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:49.640
<v Speaker 1>auto tune.

0:19:49.480 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 2>Like I love tsunami, no hyper no bis no, And

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 2>then you know, we just played on that, so it

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:06.399
<v Speaker 2>just started to grow and grow.

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>To take it a step further, I'll take you back

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to a recent episode of this podcast in which I

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>interviewed the head of research at Warner Brothers Discovery, who

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>shared research suggesting that while social video consumption is drawing

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>away eyeballs from studio content, it's also very much a

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>valuable promotional driver to that content off platform, like back

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>on a Netflix or at your local cineplex or what

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.560
<v Speaker 1>have you. These are fan accounts I follow that spit

0:20:40.600 --> 0:20:43.719
<v Speaker 1>out nothing but clips of TV shows I enjoyed ages

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>ago but had no plans to revisit. Like community and

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 1>entourage that make me reappreciate enough to increase the likelihood

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>of me revisiting an episode. But I think TikTok serves

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>an additional function as something of a highlight reel for

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>content I'm just not going to follow back to the

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>TV because the excerpted clips from that programming is how

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>I want to consume it. With all due respect to

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the great late night comedians like Colbert and Kimmel and

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>John Stewart, on and on, I'm not going to sit

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 1>down for a long form linear TV experience. I want

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the best moments from those shows sliced and diced in

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>my feed, or I'm just not going to watch it

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 1>at all. Sorry. And the same goes for news content.

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Whether it's coming from twenty four hour news networks or newspapers,

0:21:31.240 --> 0:21:34.480
<v Speaker 1>all of them have TikTok accounts. But I will say that,

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.399
<v Speaker 1>unlike with comedy, where I find myself enjoying lots of

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:40.800
<v Speaker 1>new personalities and in addition to a highlight reel of

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 1>establishment figures, with news, I find myself sticking to the

0:21:44.800 --> 0:21:47.200
<v Speaker 1>tried and true brands. I know there's a lot of

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>amateur commentators and analysts doing their thing on TikTok, but

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it just doesn't do it for me, and I don't

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>want to forget to acknowledge that TikTok has been home

0:21:56.520 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>to lots of different experimentation and narrative driven storytelling but

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>in short form formats. But like news, nothing really is

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>stuck with me yet, though I have a feeling maybe

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>that's just a matter of time. Take the Chinese microdrama Fomenon,

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>for instance. They maintain a healthy presence on TikTok, though

0:22:15.440 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that's really just a promotional platform for driving consumers off

0:22:19.520 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>platform to apps of their own, like Real Short and

0:22:22.520 --> 0:22:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Drama Box. Look. I find most of this content unwatchable.

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>It's just not my cup of tea. But when you

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:32.440
<v Speaker 1>see this ferment of creativity. You have to wonder whether,

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 1>as unthinkable as it sounds, there's an inevitability to TikTokers

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>cracking the code on the kind of content it will

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>feel more directly competitive with traditional dramas. Maybe the closest

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>thing to that is a whole genre of what I'd

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>call confessional videos, where real people of all kinds candidly

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>share from the struggles in their lives on TikTok, and

0:22:55.280 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>they interact with the fan bases they build there. It's

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>pure monologues, but they have that voyeuristic frison you get

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:08.399
<v Speaker 1>from watching good reality TV. There's so much more I

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>get out of TikTok. We'd be here all day if

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I drilled too deep into any one of the many

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 1>categories of content that float my boat. Like I'm an

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>avid road biker, so I watch videos of bikers in action.

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Been playing a lot of basketball lately, So I watch

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 1>instructors break down all sorts of shooting mechanics used to

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 1>DJ but back in my younger days, And so I

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 1>have endless appetite for watching amateur spinners honkered over their MPCs,

0:23:34.920 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>pounding out homemade beats. But this infinite variety also works

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>against TikTok. I believe you see. The algorithm is like

0:23:46.720 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>this machine gun with incredible aim, mowing down every interest

0:23:50.960 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>I have. But here's the thing. Sometimes I'm in the

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>mood for biking videos. Sometimes I want to listen to

0:23:57.960 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>the DJs. Sometimes I want memes. But TikTok doesn't hand

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>me a menu of my favorite subjects and ask me

0:24:05.680 --> 0:24:08.840
<v Speaker 1>which one I like. As powerful as its algorithm is,

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it insists on pushing everything I like to me indiscriminately

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in one feed. As amazing as TikTok has been its

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.439
<v Speaker 1>sucking the wind out of TV, it falls short for

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>me by not taking TV's more channel centric approach. It's

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:30.359
<v Speaker 1>made me visualized. TikTok is like one big, unprecedentedly powerful pipe.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:32.919
<v Speaker 1>At one end of the pipe, it draws from a

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>veritable ocean of content choices, somehow hoovering out of that

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>ocean just the things I like with astonishing speed and accuracy.

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>But what's not remarked upon as much is the other

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:49.800
<v Speaker 1>end of the pipe is just this hydrant blast when

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.199
<v Speaker 1>what I'd rather have as a ux that knowing what

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd like separates each droplet, so to speak, into separate categories. Yes,

0:24:58.800 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 1>I could go into TikTok account settings and adjust the

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>topic bars, but those aren't my topic labels, And even

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:09.000
<v Speaker 1>if they were, why not bring that topic orientation to

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the front of the TikTok ux instead of hiding it away.

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:17.520
<v Speaker 1>But in the scheme of the bounty TikTok brings, maybe

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that's just a quibble. When I'm thumbing constantly, it reminds

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>me of something I don't do anymore on TV, channel flipping.

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>But what decades ago is treated as a nuisance. The

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.639
<v Speaker 1>experience of channel flipping, I think, is going to be

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a mode of viewing in its own right. When the

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:41.840
<v Speaker 1>tiktokification of TV truly begins, the manic thumb swiping that is,

0:25:41.880 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the modern day version of channel flipping or surfing, will

0:25:45.560 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>be something we'll actually happily spend time doing, perhaps as

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 1>much time as we spend on a long form show. See,

0:25:53.600 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to put my nostra damas hat on here.

0:25:56.640 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I mean, call me a zealot for

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>my newfound religion. But this format TikTok and its copycats

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 1>are employing, this isn't just a format for a particular

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of social app I'm convinced this is the evolution

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of what the personal video experience will be, certainly much

0:26:15.440 --> 0:26:19.160
<v Speaker 1>more so than a TV's electronic programming guide or the

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:22.439
<v Speaker 1>tile soup of choices you have to navigate on the

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>spot of your choice. I've come to the conclusion that

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:29.400
<v Speaker 1>for better or for worse, this is where it's all

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>going where whether you're watching on your phone, and this

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:37.119
<v Speaker 1>is where you want to question by sanity larger screens

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like your living room TV. Yep. Maybe that's the most

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>surprising realization I've had as a TikTok user, that this

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.720
<v Speaker 1>format it pioneered, that seems so inextricably tied to the

0:26:48.760 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>mobile device, seems to me not mobile specific at all.

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I fully anticipate the TikTok format, right down to all

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>its wonderful esthetic particularity, will seep so thoroughly into TV

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in the coming years that I won't even be surprised

0:27:05.520 --> 0:27:08.760
<v Speaker 1>if living room walls start to get adorned by screens

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that will hang vertically instead of horizontal. The phone could

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>become a remote control for swiping, or maybe the remote

0:27:17.560 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>control as we know it will lose more than a

0:27:19.640 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>few buttons to make room for a thumb swipe, and

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the PayTV and svod UX's will take their cue from

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>this too. As the line between short and long form

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:36.720
<v Speaker 1>video increasingly blurs, perhaps the typical TV future will be

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 1>more like NTV moving from one music video sized program

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.280
<v Speaker 1>to another than the current thirty or sixty or one

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty minute blocks of movie or TV show.

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying are going to go away, but they

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:54.719
<v Speaker 1>will seed significant ground to the short form videos in

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:58.480
<v Speaker 1>viewing time. It would be pretty star contrast from today's

0:27:58.600 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 1>video platforms, which are entirely separated by the size of

0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the content, though YouTube is clearly leading the charge in

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>erasing that distinction. Though TikTok's bread and butter maybe short

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>form today, I wonder are we really that far away

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:17.959
<v Speaker 1>where it will exceed that current ten minute cap it

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 1>has on video and start to home in on Netflix's territory.

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, that could also go vice versa, and we've

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>seen streaming services do some experimentation with short form content,

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:33.200
<v Speaker 1>though nothing notable to date. But I think where this

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.480
<v Speaker 1>is all going is that the short form content, it

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:41.160
<v Speaker 1>won't just coexist with long form content on the same platforms,

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>but it will become a springboard into long form. This

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:48.560
<v Speaker 1>takes me back to the Warner Brothers research I spoke

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>about earlier. I just think this is going to become

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a big driver, but I think it'll get mechanized, so

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to speak. Like you'll watch a clip of White Lotus

0:28:58.320 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>if you like it, it will have a button linking

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you to a long form episode two, and I'd say

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 1>that would go for the rest of TV two. But

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there will be a lot of TV program

0:29:10.400 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>brands that will actually minimize or cease to exist in

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>any long form container. The advertising market will catch up

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>to a point where, say Stephen Colbert's show will cease

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to exist as an hour long show, existing instead is

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a series of short form segments. I really believe this

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen just as soon as the advertising

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:38.440
<v Speaker 1>market catches up. Speaking of advertising, as we head towards

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the upfront season in the TV industry, there is a

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of talk about YouTube as the new TV, and

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>rightfully so. The notion that TV viewing has exceeded mobile

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>viewing in the US, as the company recently announced, that's

0:29:52.000 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a staggering achievement. Truth be told, I cannot understand why

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>TikTok hasn't made a stronger bid for TV domination, like

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>team up with a TV manufacturer to make a linked

0:30:03.240 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>line of TikTok TVs. I wonder whether that's going to

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>end up a fatal flaw too late to correct. If

0:30:11.680 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 1>TikTok is not careful they're inviting one of their copycats

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 1>to seize that opportunity. As much as I've said so far,

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I'm really just scratching the surface of

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:25.960
<v Speaker 1>how TikTok's clip scroll format will become the future. Hell,

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't even addressed the e current e commerce element

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok, which end up which may end up the

0:30:33.240 --> 0:30:37.600
<v Speaker 1>most game changing contribution the act makes, given the early

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:42.600
<v Speaker 1>success of TikTok Shop, breathless as I'm being look, I'm

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>mindful of the fact that I'm just six months into

0:30:45.120 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>my TikTok experience. Perhaps there's a honeymoon period and in

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>time I will tire of the clip scroll format, or

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:54.760
<v Speaker 1>something better that's not even on the market yet will

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>come along and revolutionize the video delivery space all over again. Yeah,

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at you.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 3>I guess.

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately, the thing I can't get over is I underestimated

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the power of TikTok. Honestly, my perception of the app

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:13.760
<v Speaker 1>coming into this was antiquated. I realized in retrospect, colored

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>by what seems like the endless reign of the Damelio

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:20.360
<v Speaker 1>sisters from like, I don't know, seven eight years ago,

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>they were the app's first stars. I just assumed that

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>was kind of the sensibility of TikTok going forward, like

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just a bunch of clips of weird dances. But

0:31:31.320 --> 0:31:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's what made my immersion in this app

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:38.239
<v Speaker 1>all the more unlikely. And what was I doing on

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:41.200
<v Speaker 1>this app at my age? I'm so preoccupied by that,

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I researched TikTok demographic data just to see

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>how unusual that was. Research firm Data Reportal estimates that

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.520
<v Speaker 1>four point three percent of TikTok users are men between

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the ages of forty five and fifty four. So, no,

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess I don't have a lot of company. Maybe

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this is my version of a midlife crisis. I mean,

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>most middle aged men by a convertible or get an earring.

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I use TikTok. I'm not sure what's more pathetic, But

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 1>now I choose to look at it differently. I rationalize

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that I'm really more like an early adopter among the olds,

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the first wave of a broader demographic shift that will

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>transform the demographic makeup of these clip scrolling apps, maybe

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 1>drive more product evolution that makes these platforms even more

0:32:27.720 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>welcoming to Generation X and even the boomers. For now, though,

0:32:33.280 --> 0:32:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm just one old man who happens to have become

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 1>TikTok's newest fan.

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening. Be sure to leave us a review

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 3>at Apple Podcasts or Amazon Music. We love to hear

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:51.200
<v Speaker 3>from listeners. Please go to Variety dot com and sign

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 3>up for the free weekly Strictly Business newsletter, and don't

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 3>forget to tune in next week for another episode of

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 3>Strictly Business.

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>T