Speaker 1: You're in the Freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on
Speaker 1: social media at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Speaker 1: Welcome friends to the Buck Sexton Show. You know that
Speaker 1: it's going to be quite a day when the President
Speaker 1: of the United States, with his eighty million plus followers,
Speaker 1: retweets a question you ask about masks. You know that
Speaker 1: it's going to be one of those days that all
Speaker 1: of a sudden, the left, the lockdown lives, the loons, science,
Speaker 1: They're coming at you from all corners, and I'm having
Speaker 1: one of those days. So I want to dive into
Speaker 1: this a little bit because when you have the leader
Speaker 1: of the free world think that what you've said is
Speaker 1: worth sharing to everybody, and it causes a stir. There's
Speaker 1: already a story up in the Daily Mail about it,
Speaker 1: so this is getting a whole lot of a whole
Speaker 1: lot of activity. I think it's looking at this, it's
Speaker 1: worth understanding really what the debate is because on the
Speaker 1: same day that this has sparked kind of a fury online,
Speaker 1: Governor Cuomo of New York has said that you are
Speaker 1: not allowed to go indoors for the sole purpose of
Speaker 1: using the restroom one at a time in a restaurant
Speaker 1: with outdoor dining that is still for the time being allowed.
Speaker 1: So you can eat outdoors by law in New York City,
Speaker 1: but you cannot pee indoors by law in New York City.
Speaker 1: But because of Mayor Dublasio, you can in fact relieve
Speaker 1: yourself on the street in New York City without getting
Speaker 1: a criminal summons. That was a nice change to things
Speaker 1: that he put into place, As if it didn't smell
Speaker 1: like an open sewer here enough already? When is it
Speaker 1: too much? When do people realize that the things they
Speaker 1: are making us do at the elites who do not
Speaker 1: take these rules seriously for their own purposes but love
Speaker 1: to inflict them on all the rest of us. When
Speaker 1: do we realize that this is crazy, That there are
Speaker 1: risks in life, that there are things that are going
Speaker 1: to be continuing problems for us, including this COVID virus.
Speaker 1: But we shouldn't just obey everything the government says because
Speaker 1: they say so. How could I argue against this og
Speaker 1: There are so many ways. The Tests and Trace Corps
Speaker 1: in New York City only tests and Trace for people
Speaker 1: who have been indoors exposed to somebody with COVID for
Speaker 1: fifteen minutes or more. How many of you need fifteen
Speaker 1: minutes in the bathroom at a restaurant, Probably not very many.
Speaker 1: So what are they really saying? You mask up when
Speaker 1: you go to the bathroom. You have to wear a mask.
Speaker 1: I mean if you get up from the table. I
Speaker 1: have been in restaurants where they have made people who
Speaker 1: got up to go to the they're sitting there without
Speaker 1: a mask on. Because this all makes a lot of sense,
Speaker 1: But you put them ask on when you go to
Speaker 1: the bathroom. But somehow that's not, say even one at
Speaker 1: a time from the outside to inside. Not safe enough.
Speaker 1: Don't pe indoors, pe on the street. That's Cuomo's COVID
Speaker 1: policy right now. That's where we are, And I just
Speaker 1: want to know how much more humiliating does it get
Speaker 1: before everyone realizes that. I know some of you saying, oh, buck,
Speaker 1: but it's not as bad in my part of the country.
Speaker 1: What do you think a Biden administration's gonna do? What
Speaker 1: do you think you think they're gonna let this go?
Speaker 1: Or they're gonna federalize as much of this as they
Speaker 1: possibly can. They're gonna pressure states. You don't think they'll
Speaker 1: threaten withhold federal funding unless your state kicks in some
Speaker 1: of these more extreme mandates too, Think again. The Obama
Speaker 1: administration threatened to withhold funds from Department of Education budgets
Speaker 1: unless a state complied with its transgender primary school policy.
Speaker 1: Remember gender bathroom musice. We're gonna pull public school funding
Speaker 1: unless this state in question concedes, unless they unless they
Speaker 1: give up and do what we tell them to do.
Speaker 1: And you don't think they'll do that in a Bide administration.
Speaker 1: If you think this is a New York only problem,
Speaker 1: I'm here to tell you this whole thing was pretty
Speaker 1: much a New York only problem back in February March.
Speaker 1: How long has it been now almost a year. And
Speaker 1: so that brings me to how much more are we
Speaker 1: going to take of this? Because we're we're heading for
Speaker 1: at least six more months of it up down? How
Speaker 1: much more? How much more are we going to suffer through?
Speaker 1: That's right. They make these arbitrary decisions and they'll pull
Speaker 1: they'll pull your liquor license, which shuts down a restaurant.
Speaker 1: You can't make a profit, you can't survive without it.
Speaker 1: Let's pull your liquor license if you let people go
Speaker 1: to the bathroom, but we're masking up when you go
Speaker 1: to the bathos. I thought masks were really effective. I
Speaker 1: can't mask up and go to the bathroom. I thought
Speaker 1: I should be fine. Nope, not allowed because they say so,
Speaker 1: oh yeah, where's the science on this? Where's the science
Speaker 1: on all these people outdoors wearing masks all the time.
Speaker 1: Just wondering, does anyone want to try to explain to
Speaker 1: me if it's one percent in restaurants, thousands and thousands
Speaker 1: of restaurants that have had indoor dining for months now,
Speaker 1: and that's what they think the COVID spread is, might
Speaker 1: be a little more, might be a little less. What
Speaker 1: is it outdoors? Probably close to zero? But everyone wearing
Speaker 1: masks anyway, and if you don't, people look at you
Speaker 1: like you're a crazy person. This is a cult. Now,
Speaker 1: this has gone beyond There are times and just to
Speaker 1: be very clear, there are circumstances where in a clinical
Speaker 1: setting in a hospital around elderly relatives, there are times
Speaker 1: when I think, yeah, a little extra precaution is called for.
Speaker 1: We have gone way beyond that, and we're not even
Speaker 1: allowed to talk about this anymore, and that then brings
Speaker 1: me to so, like I said, we are at the
Speaker 1: point now where they are actually humiliating us. They are
Speaker 1: humiliating American citizens. They're making us do stuff that is absurd,
Speaker 1: is appalling, and is demeaning to protect us because doctor
Speaker 1: Fauci says so, because the fouch. He's like, hey, no
Speaker 1: Christmas for you, no New Years, no January, no February,
Speaker 1: maybe March. You can start to breathe fresh air, go
Speaker 1: outside for a minute, maybe a minute, not more. What
Speaker 1: exactly has this guy contributed to this? What breakthrough is?
Speaker 1: He responds before, what brilliant policy has he advocated for?
Speaker 1: And then that brings me to the mask mandate whige
Speaker 1: And this is what President Trump. This is what President
Speaker 1: Trump retweeted this morning, which is why I have blue
Speaker 1: check journal small over the place. I also love it.
Speaker 1: I love it when they when they refer to me
Speaker 1: as stupid, and I just kind of laugh because I
Speaker 1: think we all know that I'm smarter than you live journal,
Speaker 1: Like everyone who knows anything actually understands that. So don't
Speaker 1: I wouldn't go there. I would go I would find
Speaker 1: another place for the battle, you know, make fun of
Speaker 1: my name, which they all like to do. That's fine whatever.
Speaker 1: I mean, people that do that are so pathetic and
Speaker 1: not clever that it's it's actually amusing to me. But
Speaker 1: this is the tweet that has gotten now you know,
Speaker 1: the daily mails writing it up at everyone's all. Oh
Speaker 1: my gosh. So a fellow I don't even know this guy,
Speaker 1: but he just shared an interesting graphic. His name is
Speaker 1: his Twitter handle is ian MSc and he shared he
Speaker 1: shared data from our world in data, so that was
Speaker 1: the source on it. And it is about mask mandates,
Speaker 1: and he wrote, while Denmark already had a mask mandate
Speaker 1: for public transit, they expanded mask requirements on ten twenty
Speaker 1: nine to cover all indoor public spaces. So let's see
Speaker 1: how that's working out for them. So on August, Denmark
Speaker 1: had a very very low level of cases. Right, very
Speaker 1: low level of cases per million is the way the
Speaker 1: graphic is shown. And you're at basically twenty five cases
Speaker 1: per million. All twenty five cases per million, let's say,
Speaker 1: all through the summer, so very very few, can deme
Speaker 1: Denmark only has about it, I think of ten million
Speaker 1: people something like that. I gotta check on the population actually,
Speaker 1: but they had very low cases and then all of
Speaker 1: a sudden they got I'm sorry, five million. Sweden is
Speaker 1: ten million, Denmark is five point eight million, So they
Speaker 1: had very few cases. And then they put a public
Speaker 1: mask mandate in an August twenty second and you get
Speaker 1: into September and all of a sudden, the cases have
Speaker 1: basically at least doubled or tripled, maybe quadrupled. And then
Speaker 1: you get to October twenty ninth, and then they have
Speaker 1: an all indoor spaces mask mandate, and then you get
Speaker 1: to present and they've gone from about let's call it,
Speaker 1: twenty cases per million to five hundred and twenty five
Speaker 1: plus cases per million. So if this was a stock,
Speaker 1: you would have made a lot of money. Tragically, this
Speaker 1: is a chart of COVID cases, which means there are
Speaker 1: fatalities attached to it. So you know what's going on here.
Speaker 1: This is getting much, much, much worse after mandates are
Speaker 1: putting place. Now, all I said, I didn't. I didn't
Speaker 1: because because also I don't want to get banned again
Speaker 1: on I've just been dealing with my bands last few weeks.
Speaker 1: All I said is I asked the experts this question
Speaker 1: in earnest, what would this graph of COVID cases look like?
Speaker 1: Without mask mandates. Mask work is the mantra you're not
Speaker 1: allowed to say anything else on Twitter, and that is
Speaker 1: a fact. But how well do mandates work? I asked
Speaker 1: the question. In response, I showed data, and I ask
Speaker 1: a question, how well do mandates work? And all I
Speaker 1: get from all over the blue check and otherwise, and
Speaker 1: I don't read the non blue check lib psychos that
Speaker 1: come after me. All I get over the internet is
Speaker 1: mask denier. You know, Oh my gosh, this person so
Speaker 1: stupid doesn't understand the science. I see you're saying, Okay,
Speaker 1: smart asses, why is it that Florida doesn't have a
Speaker 1: mandate or any mandates about masks? New York and California do.
Speaker 1: And they're roughly equivalent right now, and overall, Florida has
Speaker 1: been much better off against COVID. Now they'll say, oh,
Speaker 1: because New York is more densely populated. Okay, Well, let's
Speaker 1: look at the cities. Let's go city by city. Oh,
Speaker 1: New York City is more densely populated even than Miami
Speaker 1: or Tampa or something. Okay, let's compare it to California. Then,
Speaker 1: where they've been the mask the masters of masking, right,
Speaker 1: they've been all about it. They're Gavin knewsothing, I mean,
Speaker 1: not really right behind closed doors. He doesn't care. He
Speaker 1: goes to French laundry. It's all a joke to him.
Speaker 1: But we're not supposed to pay attention to that. I
Speaker 1: asked this question. You know what they say? They show me.
Speaker 1: They show me Denmark and they say, look at Denmark,
Speaker 1: look at Sweden. Sweden's much worse off than Denmark is.
Speaker 1: And I say, okay, that's interesting. What about Belgium do
Speaker 1: you want to do? So run the same I've really
Speaker 1: I asked them this and I try to go back
Speaker 1: and forth. Okay, smart ass. So you show me Denmark.
Speaker 1: Denmark's doing a little better than Sweden, is that's true.
Speaker 1: Belgium's had a mask mandate in place. How's how's Belgium doing? Oh,
Speaker 1: the worst per capita fatality in all of Europe? Actually
Speaker 1: in Belgium. That's really interesting, isn't it. How's the UK doing,
Speaker 1: How's Italy doing? How's Spain doing? Hmm? Interesting, isn't it?
Speaker 1: Is it all because of Donald Trump and the anti
Speaker 1: maskers who like Donald Trump or support Donald Trump? Is
Speaker 1: that what's causing Europe to have the problems that it does. Now,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of room for debate here. And I've
Speaker 1: been saying this, you know, I'm consistent. I've been saying
Speaker 1: this all along. Maybe it's five percent, maybe it's ten percent.
Speaker 1: I don't know, maybe it's fifty. Although that if masks
Speaker 1: had a fifty percent reduction in this spread of this
Speaker 1: virus when used in actual human usage, right, you think
Speaker 1: of a not to get to graphic here. There are
Speaker 1: prophylactic devices out there. There's always the perfect usage hashtag science.
Speaker 1: Perfect usage and human usage. These they're not the same thing.
Speaker 1: And a lot of people that end up with the
Speaker 1: human usage end up having babies or you know, end
Speaker 1: up getting pregnant. Whereas the perfect usage is ninety nine percent,
Speaker 1: the human usage is down in and I'm not trying
Speaker 1: to you know, you guys all know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 1: It's more like, I think in eighty five range or something.
Speaker 1: That's a big difference. Okay, let's look at masks. Do
Speaker 1: we think we have perfect usage or human usage? Okay,
Speaker 1: we have human usage, so we know that it's not
Speaker 1: going to be perfect, So we know it's less than
Speaker 1: one hundred percent effective. How effective is it and under
Speaker 1: what circumstances. Is it at that efficacy? And why can't
Speaker 1: we see this shown on our chart? Why is it
Speaker 1: that I ask questions like and I'm actually asking And
Speaker 1: when they come at me with something else, I love
Speaker 1: when they pick they'll they'll show you a graph from
Speaker 1: May to July or May to August of masking, and
Speaker 1: they'll say, see, look at how we flatten the curve.
Speaker 1: And I say, why are you stopping in August. We're
Speaker 1: in We're in December. Let's see the rest of the graph. Oh,
Speaker 1: the rest of the graph goes up like a hockey stick.
Speaker 1: Why'd you leave that out right? This is this is
Speaker 1: where we are now. You're not allowed to ask, You're
Speaker 1: not allowed to find out. Shut up, do what you're told.
Speaker 1: Go go use the street as the toilet instead of
Speaker 1: the one inside the restaurant for your safety. What's next?
Speaker 1: I mean, you got, oh, you got a lot of things.
Speaker 1: You got mandatory vaccination coming your way. That's going to
Speaker 1: be nationwide, by the way, under a Biden administration, you're
Speaker 1: going to have a continuation of lockdowns and mass policies
Speaker 1: even after you get vaccinated. How much is enough? How
Speaker 1: much just too much? When do we decide we're not
Speaker 1: going to do this anymore. I don't know a lot
Speaker 1: of people are there. There's a combination of a couple
Speaker 1: of things. People who love to control others, people who
Speaker 1: are just terrified and can't think rationally about any of this,
Speaker 1: And I feel sympathy for them. But there's a lot
Speaker 1: of them out there, and people who are just desperate
Speaker 1: to not be wrong, to look dumb because they're so smart,
Speaker 1: and a lot of them are journos coming at yours
Speaker 1: truly today. Thanks for listening to The Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: Get the latest news and information from Buck by heading
Speaker 1: to Bucksexton dot com. Does it make you feel better
Speaker 1: that Kamala says they're not going to punish people under
Speaker 1: a Biden administration for not wearing masks or not doing
Speaker 1: all these mandates the way that we're supposed to. Does
Speaker 1: it make you feel better? It shouldn't make you feel better.
Speaker 1: It's not true. If they want to, when they find
Speaker 1: a way too, they will punish people. How crazy are
Speaker 1: someplaces getting over this? You know, I was supposed to
Speaker 1: go the one vacation I have all year. I was
Speaker 1: going to go to the Caribbean, the one vacation I took.
Speaker 1: I would have taken this whole year. I know a
Speaker 1: lot of you no one's gone on vacation this year,
Speaker 1: but it was the only one that I had planned,
Speaker 1: even before the pandemic, because I can't take off the
Speaker 1: time from this show. And I was going to go
Speaker 1: to the Caribbean because I want to lie on a
Speaker 1: beach and stare at the sky and you know, read
Speaker 1: books that aren't about politics or history, or actually probably
Speaker 1: read history books. That's not the point. The point is
Speaker 1: that I didn't go because I wanted to stay in
Speaker 1: the US, because I knew that there was going to
Speaker 1: be crazy stuff because of COVID. And here's an example
Speaker 1: of it. An eighteen year old student from Georgia and
Speaker 1: her water sports athlete were sentenced to four months in
Speaker 1: prison by a court in the Cayman Islands because she
Speaker 1: slipped out of her wristband monitor to watch him compete
Speaker 1: at a local race instead of quarantining after arriving from
Speaker 1: the US. Schuyler Mack and her boyfriend, Jetskier van je
Speaker 1: Ramgeet were jailed immediately after their sentences were handed down.
Speaker 1: On Tuesday, an island judge issued a four month term.
Speaker 1: This was a flagrant breach as could be imagined. Court
Speaker 1: Justice Roger Chappell told the court it was born of
Speaker 1: selfishness and arrogance. Now out you might want to you
Speaker 1: might want to know something here. They weren't even positive
Speaker 1: for the virus. They violated the policy, the mandate of
Speaker 1: if you arrive on her island you have to quarantine,
Speaker 1: and then got sent to prison for four months. Now.
Speaker 1: I know you're saying, oh, that's not how many of
Speaker 1: you would like to spend four months in a Caymanian jail.
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you, I'm sure it is not pleasant
Speaker 1: four months in prison. Because she's a healthy person at
Speaker 1: almost no risk, who does not have the virus. I'm
Speaker 1: sure I would. I would bet you all the money
Speaker 1: that you would want to bet right now that she
Speaker 1: doesn't have COVID. But she broke the mandate, so she
Speaker 1: goes to prison. That bet is off now, by the way,
Speaker 1: because I can't make bets on her. Yeah. And then
Speaker 1: there's a guy from Ireland. There's a guy from Ireland
Speaker 1: who road a jet ski to go see his beloved.
Speaker 1: He doesn't even know how to swim. The guy must
Speaker 1: have really wanted to see her, and he took a
Speaker 1: jet ski across I don't know if he went to
Speaker 1: or came from Ireland, but he took a jet ski
Speaker 1: across the Irish Sea to see his girlfriend. Broke quarantine rules.
Speaker 1: He's going to jail. Two, he's going to jail too.
Speaker 1: They are locking people up now for this stuff. Do
Speaker 1: you think that they're going to do more or less
Speaker 1: of that in the months ahead? Do you think there'll
Speaker 1: be more or less of this in a Biden administration.
Speaker 1: I'm just wondering. I feel like we should have the conversation.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast from more buck Head to Bucksexton dot com
Speaker 1: and remember to subscribe to the podcast. Is there going
Speaker 1: to be a COVID funding bill out there? Are we
Speaker 1: going to get this omnibus package? What's the hold up?
Speaker 1: What's happening with that? Plus more on lockdowns? And I
Speaker 1: want to also put on your radar folks, immigration illegal
Speaker 1: immigration that is expected to spike big time in the
Speaker 1: months ahead. We'll get into all that with our friend
Speaker 1: Congressman Andy Biggs from Arizona. Congressman, thanks for coming back,
Speaker 1: but it always good to be with you before I forget.
Speaker 1: Have a merry Christmas, good holiday season. Thank you, sir
Speaker 1: Sam Sam. Do you a merry Christmas? Tell me this
Speaker 1: how how is your state doing? I want to get
Speaker 1: into the omnibus and the spending, but you know I
Speaker 1: don't want to have This is a show that I
Speaker 1: want people to be able to listen to any and
Speaker 1: all across the country as they do, and I want
Speaker 1: them to know how it's going in different places in Arizona.
Speaker 1: What are you seeing right now with the handling of COVID, Well,
Speaker 1: so it's it's the threats of more lockdowns, the threats
Speaker 1: of mask mandates. We have a tremendous mask wearing compliance.
Speaker 1: Everybody's complying. But guess what. We have an increase in
Speaker 1: in the COVID positive detection. You've got an increase in hospitalizations,
Speaker 1: but you still have lots of headroom both in the
Speaker 1: emergency department and regular rooms UH. And you have an
Speaker 1: increase in UH fatalities. But as it's called the Maricopa
Speaker 1: method of counting in some states have adopted it, and
Speaker 1: as if you die within sixty days of having tested
Speaker 1: positive for COVID, regardless of the reason, they will count
Speaker 1: that as a COVID death, that seems to be not
Speaker 1: a scientific approach to finding out the cause of death. Congressman, Well, book,
Speaker 1: we left science a long time ago in this uh,
Speaker 1: this coronavirus deal. We really did um. And if you
Speaker 1: ask any questions, if you're heterodox in any way from
Speaker 1: the public health orthodoxy, you're going to be brandy the heretic.
Speaker 1: They're gonna try to cancel you. They're gonna come after you.
Speaker 1: And I've experienced that NonStop for months because I asked
Speaker 1: questions and well, well yeah, and what is the do
Speaker 1: you guys haven't do you have a just an indoor
Speaker 1: mask mandate? There outdoor mandate? What's the status? Well, it's
Speaker 1: it's here's part of the confusion. It's different wherever you go.
Speaker 1: But but it's certainly when you go indoors. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's a beautiful thing. You can go up to the
Speaker 1: host desk at a restaurant with your mask on. You
Speaker 1: got to wear it till you sit down maybe ten
Speaker 1: fifteen feet from there, maybe twenty five feet from there,
Speaker 1: and then you just pop it off, take off the mask,
Speaker 1: and you know what it's it's it's it's unbelievable belief.
Speaker 1: It is, It makes no sense at all. But anyway,
Speaker 1: this is what we're this is the world we're in
Speaker 1: right now, Congressman, people do want to know what's happening
Speaker 1: with a COVID relief package before you tell us, Before
Speaker 1: you tell us, and you know, by the time sim
Speaker 1: people hear this, there may be there may be a
Speaker 1: deal done. Right, a lot of people listen on demand,
Speaker 1: But before you tell us, what could happen? Why hasn't
Speaker 1: there been the hundreds of billions of dollars of aid
Speaker 1: to the American people passed by the Congress, given that
Speaker 1: the government is the cause of the economic shutdowns. Well,
Speaker 1: so before the election, there was legislation by Republicans that
Speaker 1: would have finished spending the PPP money, which was from
Speaker 1: the original bill. They could have gone out months ago,
Speaker 1: but Nancy Pelosi did not want President Trump to have
Speaker 1: a victory, so for political purposes, she shut that bill
Speaker 1: down and prevented it. Now you've got it just like
Speaker 1: every time they've done it, instead of doing the bill
Speaker 1: where you're targeting people and you're getting accountability because we
Speaker 1: know that there's been fraud out there. Anytime you put
Speaker 1: that kind of money out in public life. You're going
Speaker 1: to get some fraud, You're going to get some people
Speaker 1: who really need it. But instead of taking the stuff
Speaker 1: that we all agreed on, which was benefits, they've they've
Speaker 1: larted it up again. So there's going to be all
Speaker 1: kinds of things. There's going to be direct payments to
Speaker 1: people again. There's going to be you're going to get
Speaker 1: the unemployment boost by three hundred dollars per week through March.
Speaker 1: And if there's one thing small business told me consistently,
Speaker 1: was pleased, don't do that because we've got jobs we
Speaker 1: can't get people to come back to. And they didn't
Speaker 1: did pass it for political purposes, solely because Pelosi wanted
Speaker 1: to say, Look, you know, Trump didn't get this done.
Speaker 1: Speaking of Congressman Andy Biggs of Arizona, Congressman, you're you
Speaker 1: got a big border there along with Mexico, and you're
Speaker 1: you're starting to see some interesting stories in the news
Speaker 1: about a surge. I've already seen it. It's not getting
Speaker 1: a lot of news attention, but it's out there. Caravans
Speaker 1: starting to move up from Central America. What's going on? Yeah,
Speaker 1: so there's one moving right now, there's several others forming
Speaker 1: cartels are advertising again for caravans. You know, these NGOs
Speaker 1: are advertising for caravans and what to do when you
Speaker 1: get up here. Almost seventy thousand apprehensions in November. It's
Speaker 1: going to be higher than that, pretty close to one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand in December. But it's the gataways that are important.
Speaker 1: More drugs, drugs are coming across again. It's all going up,
Speaker 1: and it all boils down to what Joe Biden has
Speaker 1: said his administration is going to do. And I just
Speaker 1: got off. We're talking with a border patrol agent before
Speaker 1: you and I got together, and I said, well, what's
Speaker 1: going on? I said, well, I just interviewed. First of all,
Speaker 1: I said, just south of the border right now, there's
Speaker 1: a gang, not a gang necessarily, but a group of
Speaker 1: probably two to three hundred people staging to come across
Speaker 1: the border, but they can't. An individual yesterday, and this
Speaker 1: agent asked the person, why did you come across? He said,
Speaker 1: Biden said, there's no deportations. And Biden said that there's
Speaker 1: not going to be. You're not going to be detained.
Speaker 1: And because you have no deportations, you have no detention planned,
Speaker 1: you have one hundred date moratorium, and there's a promise
Speaker 1: of amnesty, there's promise to support the sanctuary cities. There
Speaker 1: is now no reason not to come. It's sound logic
Speaker 1: from their perspective, because I do think that under a
Speaker 1: Biden administration that there is going to be a huge
Speaker 1: push for amnesty. I think that that's going to be
Speaker 1: the top of the Democrat agenda because they'll say this
Speaker 1: is very centrist, you know this is it'll be like
Speaker 1: comprehensive immigration reform two point zero under Barack Obama. That
Speaker 1: I think that's exactly what we're going to see. And
Speaker 1: so it does make sense for illegals to try, from
Speaker 1: their perspective, to try to come across the border now.
Speaker 1: And I think we're going to see an enormous problem
Speaker 1: because you're also going to have a likely Democrat administration here,
Speaker 1: I mean he is the president elect. Does of now
Speaker 1: where they're determining that they're not going to want to
Speaker 1: enforce the laws against people that are showing up, They're
Speaker 1: going to try to use the loopholes to say, oh,
Speaker 1: we're enforcing laws, but we're still allowing a lot of
Speaker 1: legal entries to stay in the United States. Um Congressman.
Speaker 1: I also, I'm just wondering do you have do you
Speaker 1: have any thoughts that you can share on the state
Speaker 1: of play with with Arizona, with any do you have
Speaker 1: any hope for any of the remaining legal challenges either
Speaker 1: in your home state or anywhere else right now with
Speaker 1: regard to this election and getting some answers, And I
Speaker 1: know you can't predict the future, but I'm wondering, are
Speaker 1: you done well? I think in Arizona what's happened is
Speaker 1: the state Senate has issued subpoenas for um DOC the ballots,
Speaker 1: envelopes and machines, so they and they have a forensic
Speaker 1: audit team ready to commence immediately. And the problem is
Speaker 1: whether the Maricopa County, which is over five minute people
Speaker 1: in a line share of Arizona voters in it, will
Speaker 1: actually respond favorably to the subpoena. In fact, their meeting
Speaker 1: and they didn't take a position yesterday when they met,
Speaker 1: and hopefully they will give those we can have the audit.
Speaker 1: What's the audit's done, It'll put this to bed at
Speaker 1: least in Arizona. Was there a lot of fraud? Was
Speaker 1: there no fraud? And believe me, you've got by far,
Speaker 1: most Republicans think there were fraud, by far, most Democrats
Speaker 1: believe there was no fraud, and the Independence it's kind
Speaker 1: of split evenly that there was fraud. So you really
Speaker 1: got to put it to bed. And I'm putting my
Speaker 1: trust in Arizona in this for insicout it because that's
Speaker 1: what every state should have done, was a true for Insicota.
Speaker 1: It will tell you where fraud took place, if any
Speaker 1: took place at all. Are we going to find out?
Speaker 1: I mean, just just again in Arizona, which is one
Speaker 1: of the states that's been right right in the center
Speaker 1: of this storm. Did people double vote? Did dead people vote?
Speaker 1: I mean, well, are you confident, Congressman, that I'll be
Speaker 1: having you back on this show in the new year,
Speaker 1: at some point early on in the new year, and
Speaker 1: you'll be able to tell us, guys that there was
Speaker 1: as number of found either illegal aliens voting or double votes,
Speaker 1: dead people voting, etc. Or do you think that they
Speaker 1: may be able to cover this up even with the
Speaker 1: request for the audit. I am confident that if we
Speaker 1: can begin that audit today or tomorrow, that in a
Speaker 1: week or two you and I can have a conversation,
Speaker 1: and we will know the extent of the veracity or
Speaker 1: lack of veracity in Arizona's election. All right, Congressman Nanny Biggs,
Speaker 1: Arizona Congressman. Always appreciate it. You and yours having merry Christmas.
Speaker 1: Thanks so much for joining us. Thank you, Thanks so much. Buck,
Speaker 1: appreciate it. You're in the Freedom Hut. This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following
Speaker 1: him on social media at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter,
Speaker 1: and Instagram. But I think there's been a misinterpretation somehow
Speaker 1: by some that said that you have to cancel fall
Speaker 1: family that that's a very important clarification. It sounds like
Speaker 1: the same advice you were given at Thanksgiving. You know,
Speaker 1: ten people in a house, no more than two families
Speaker 1: that are trying to come together. So you have not
Speaker 1: deviated from that, to be to be more clear, I
Speaker 1: think there has been misinterpretation. I've heard and seen tweets
Speaker 1: saying about she says canceled trip to Christmas nonsense. I've
Speaker 1: never said that. I've never said that. I've never said that.
Speaker 1: I've just said, don't see your loved ones, don't celebrate
Speaker 1: with any other human being. Don't gather congregate settings. But
Speaker 1: I've never said cancel Christmas. Have a great Christmas by
Speaker 1: yourself without family or loved ones, especially those of you
Speaker 1: who are at very low risk from the disease or
Speaker 1: have already had the disease. Don't in any way change
Speaker 1: your mitigation, avoid human compact and really of human contact
Speaker 1: for the whole winter, but definitely for Christmas. But have
Speaker 1: a very merry Christmas alone. Don't go buy a tree.
Speaker 1: That's risky. You don't need a tree. Stay home alone
Speaker 1: by yourself, have a great Christmas. Yeah, there you go. Yay.
Speaker 1: I'm glad. I'm glad we've I'm glad we've established what's
Speaker 1: really going on then that we know that he never
Speaker 1: really said. He never really said that cancel Christmas. Just
Speaker 1: just don't see other human but just don't actually spend
Speaker 1: a holiday with other people and stay locked in your
Speaker 1: home and only only go out for food and be
Speaker 1: terrified when you do it. I think it's really really
Speaker 1: great advice from from doctor Fauci. And you know what else,
Speaker 1: he's got great advice about how to keep restaurants open.
Speaker 1: Oh no, he has terrible advice about that, because they're
Speaker 1: closing all over the place, aren't they? Here's fifteen. What
Speaker 1: we really need to do is make sure when we
Speaker 1: say limit restaurant capacity or close restaurants or close the bars,
Speaker 1: that has to be accompanied relief, financial relief. And yet
Speaker 1: it's not. And so these restaurants are getting destroyed. And
Speaker 1: for what exactly? Why can't let me ask you this,
Speaker 1: Why can't doctor Fauci come out and say, outdoor dining,
Speaker 1: it's been proven, is not a considerable transmission risk. Therefore
Speaker 1: outdoor dining should not be banned anywhere. Why can't Fauci
Speaker 1: say that? Someone tell me? Why? Think about how much
Speaker 1: that would help thousands and thousands of businesses in New York,
Speaker 1: in California, in Michigan, in Illinois, in New Jersey, in Massachusetts.
Speaker 1: Go down the list, just just that, just and you say, oh,
Speaker 1: buckets too cold. And on those places they could set
Speaker 1: up outdoor heaters. If there was an outdoor heater in
Speaker 1: my neighborhood outside of some of my favorite local restaurants,
Speaker 1: they had chairs out on the street. And I was
Speaker 1: told that, you know, and I just knew that I
Speaker 1: was gonna bundle up. I actually did this. I ate
Speaker 1: outdoors over the Thanksgiving break, it was freezing, but I
Speaker 1: was on a balcony and I wore my jacket with
Speaker 1: a few friends and we ate dinner. If it meant
Speaker 1: that I could actually be around other human beings and
Speaker 1: keep a local business going that I love, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is why people live in cities, so they can
Speaker 1: walk to their favorite restaurant. This is why we've made
Speaker 1: the choices we have a lot of. You say, why
Speaker 1: do you live in the city. By the way, you're
Speaker 1: looking more and more right about your indignation in my
Speaker 1: unwillingness to leave New York thus far in life. But
Speaker 1: why can't founch? You say, why can't founch? You say,
Speaker 1: open all the schools. It's no risk, low risk. I
Speaker 1: should say open all the schools. That's the right policy.
Speaker 1: Outdoor dining is safe. Why won't he say those things?
Speaker 1: If I felt like there was any good faith from
Speaker 1: the other side about these issues, I would respond in
Speaker 1: a far less aggressive manner. But there is no good faith.
Speaker 1: It's more and more and more lockdown, tighten the screws,
Speaker 1: no more freedom. I've told you that. I mean, I
Speaker 1: think that are in certain situations. I mean, they keep
Speaker 1: calling me an anti masker. It's don't you see this
Speaker 1: is the equivalent of when someone points out that the
Speaker 1: Green New Deal is insane. It you're a climate denialist.
Speaker 1: You don't think the climate change is real. No, I
Speaker 1: think climate change is real. I just don't think it's
Speaker 1: a catastrophic problem the way that it's being portrayed. And
Speaker 1: I also know that the way they think they're going
Speaker 1: to address it is laughable. That's not the same thing
Speaker 1: as saying I don't think climate change is real. But
Speaker 1: that's what the that's what they do. They try to
Speaker 1: set up a false choice binary and then just bash you.
Speaker 1: Same thing here on the masks. I'm not an anti
Speaker 1: masker who's been telling me. I've been telling you all along,
Speaker 1: and ninety five masks properly fitted and used in a
Speaker 1: clinical setting are one hundred percent a good idea for
Speaker 1: preventing RESPIRT. All of the data shows this, there's no question. Okay.
Speaker 1: I'm not someone who walks around saying, oh, but the
Speaker 1: virus is like this thing and we don't know, and
Speaker 1: it doesn't you don't know. But I'm just saying, well,
Speaker 1: let's look at what works. Let's look at what's actually happening.
Speaker 1: What is real human behavior? I love this, I'll say.
Speaker 1: I'll tell people. I'll say, outdoor mask mandates, why do
Speaker 1: we have them? And the responses I'll get from people
Speaker 1: that think that they're public intellectuals will be along the
Speaker 1: lines of it, because people are congregating indoors without masks,
Speaker 1: if that's where we're spreading it. And then I want
Speaker 1: to say to them, so, why do we have outdoor
Speaker 1: mask mandates? Listen to what I am saying? But they don't.
Speaker 1: He's a mask and I'm a daily Mail refers me
Speaker 1: as anti mask. I'm not anti mask. That's a lie.
Speaker 1: They're lying. I'm anti masking, sir? Yes, do I think
Speaker 1: you should mask when you're alone in the shower? I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't know what kind of stuff people are into,
Speaker 1: But the answer is no. Does that mean I'm anti mask? Notice?
Speaker 1: How many debates have you seen on this issue anywhere
Speaker 1: that are worth hearing anywhere? None? None. Journalists, social media companies,
Speaker 1: the Democrat establishment are enemies of free speech. Now. They
Speaker 1: are openly advocating for censorship. They always have these these
Speaker 1: trite and just moronic things. I'll say, like, well, we
Speaker 1: don't want censorship, we just want to prevent false ideas
Speaker 1: from being out there. Oh okay, well that's not censorship.
Speaker 1: What would the sense What would the censors have said
Speaker 1: about about the buckster here saying open up the schools
Speaker 1: in August the data shows us it's safe. Was that?
Speaker 1: Should I have been censored even more on that? Because
Speaker 1: I was? I was shadow banned on the social media accounts?
Speaker 1: So should I've been even more censored because I was? Right?
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get
Speaker 1: the latest news and information from Buck by heading to
Speaker 1: buck Sexton dot com. This importance bolic vaccination of the
Speaker 1: Vice President of the United States and the Surgeon General
Speaker 1: of the United States, which is something we want to
Speaker 1: be symbolic to tell the rest of the country the
Speaker 1: time is now to step to the plate and when
Speaker 1: your time comes, to get vaccinated. Because when we're speaking
Speaker 1: to you here today, I often say it is really
Speaker 1: bitter sweet. The bitterness is the fact of what the
Speaker 1: Vice President mentioned. We still are in the middle of
Speaker 1: a very difficult situation with record numbers of cases, hospitalizations,
Speaker 1: and deaths. But the sweetness is the light at the
Speaker 1: end of the tunnel, which I can tell you as
Speaker 1: we get into January, February, March and April, that light
Speaker 1: is going to get brighter and brighter, and the bitterness
Speaker 1: is going to be replaced by the sweetness. And we
Speaker 1: all hope and I think this is doable that by
Speaker 1: the time we get to several months into this year,
Speaker 1: we will have enough people protected that we start thinking
Speaker 1: seriously about the return to normality. And that's up to
Speaker 1: all of us to step forward and get vaccinated. Now.
Speaker 1: Isn't it interesting that the people that are allegedly mass
Speaker 1: deniers like me, and as I've said, I'm not a
Speaker 1: mass denier, that as a slur, it's a slander. I've
Speaker 1: gone through this. I've had to defend myself against social
Speaker 1: media companies when I point out I've I've never said
Speaker 1: don't wear a mask. I've never said there's no usage
Speaker 1: for them. I've just pointed out the inconsistencies the government
Speaker 1: overreach and ask the questions about level of effect of
Speaker 1: efficacy that nobody else seems will not nobody either, A
Speaker 1: few barons and obviously God bless the guy's very brave.
Speaker 1: M's a he's a unique fellow. He's a little eccentric,
Speaker 1: he's very brave. On this point he has been and
Speaker 1: you know that's all. That's all that I do, and
Speaker 1: they're vilifying. I mean, people actually reach out to me
Speaker 1: and they think that I'm I'm responsible for like human
Speaker 1: death or something just because I say, and someone tell me,
Speaker 1: how much does it reduce if you go, if you
Speaker 1: were to anyway? You know you all know this, but
Speaker 1: I just want to make make it very clear. They're
Speaker 1: only a handful of us that really take this stuff,
Speaker 1: take the heat on this on a regular basis, and
Speaker 1: you know I'm one of them. In the public eye,
Speaker 1: I'm one of them. There's about it. There's like maybe
Speaker 1: a dozen or two of us that are getting really
Speaker 1: hammered on this on a regular basis. So vaccine, somehow,
Speaker 1: I'm an amount a vaccine denier, and some of you
Speaker 1: think that I'm probably too pro vaccine in this instance.
Speaker 1: I do think that what we've seen on the data
Speaker 1: shows that for a lot of people who had high
Speaker 1: risk this is that this is an absolute must and
Speaker 1: it's absolutely worth the trade off and the risks. And
Speaker 1: that's what medicine is all about, risks and trade off
Speaker 1: and freedom, and that's what it's supposed to be. Not
Speaker 1: do this or else. But the vaccine, as you've already seen,
Speaker 1: is not going to be an answer for us to
Speaker 1: get back to normal because what about mutations? Will there
Speaker 1: be COVID mutations then we won't have a vaccine necessarily
Speaker 1: that works against that at all. So how can they
Speaker 1: let us go back to normal? I'm also going to
Speaker 1: say this, and I know that they've they've created this
Speaker 1: flu bro thing where it's not the flu you're eat.
Speaker 1: Why aren't we going to have lockdowns and masks in
Speaker 1: plays for flu season next year? What they will say,
Speaker 1: if they're being honest, is because fifty thousand people a
Speaker 1: year dying from the flu, giver take is acceptable, and
Speaker 1: masks are annoying and lockdowns destroy the destroy people's financial
Speaker 1: and economic lives. So we're not willing to do that.
Speaker 1: So fifty thousand a year we can take. That is
Speaker 1: the only real answer. They don't have another answer, and
Speaker 1: I want to be very clear about that. So the
Speaker 1: people that are all it's about every life, save every life,
Speaker 1: don't care what you're freedom. See, they don't feel that
Speaker 1: way about They will not mark my words. We can
Speaker 1: go back to the show in twelve months and I'll
Speaker 1: be saying why aren't we masking up for the flu? Guys,
Speaker 1: we might be masking up for COVID, but it won't
Speaker 1: won't be for the flu. And they'll say, oh, because
Speaker 1: we can manage that. But what they mean by man,
Speaker 1: it's just that you know, fifty sixty seventy thousand people
Speaker 1: in the United States will die from the flu, so
Speaker 1: that's manageable apparently every year by the way, right, So
Speaker 1: all right, just making my point there on the vaccine.
Speaker 1: You're starting to see some really ugly stuff here coming
Speaker 1: from the left, and you need to be aware of it.
Speaker 1: You need to be you need to be made informed
Speaker 1: on what is being said by the left right now
Speaker 1: about who gets this vaccine and when. This was in
Speaker 1: the New York Times and hat tipped to Noah Rothman
Speaker 1: and David Harsanyi for putting this in my timeline. Harold Schmidt,
Speaker 1: an expert in ethics and health policy at the University
Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania, said that it is reasonable to put essential
Speaker 1: workers ahead of older adults given their risks and that
Speaker 1: they are disproportionately minority. Goes on to say older populations
Speaker 1: are whiter. Doctor Schmidt said society is structured in a
Speaker 1: way that enables them to live longer, instead of giving
Speaker 1: additional health benefits to those who already had more of them.
Speaker 1: We can start to level the playing field a bit.
Speaker 1: Did you catch that? Start to level the playing field
Speaker 1: by getting the vaccine sooner to minorities than to white people,
Speaker 1: because we need more white people to die to level
Speaker 1: the playing field. That is what is being said in
Speaker 1: the pages of the New York Times. Renew the quote
Speaker 1: an expert in ethics and health policy at an Ivy
Speaker 1: League University University of Pennsylvania. Wow, health policy experts, these
Speaker 1: people get way too much credit. We are far too
Speaker 1: quick to listen to them. This is social justice now
Speaker 1: mixed with a kind of eugenicist approach. We need racial balancing.
Speaker 1: This fellow is saying. This is his argument. Want to
Speaker 1: be very clear, so when media matters tries to clip this,
Speaker 1: we can tell them to go stuff it. We're very clear.
Speaker 1: This is Harold Schmidt saying that we need to engage
Speaker 1: in a balancing out of the death rate so that
Speaker 1: more white people will die because, as a general proposition,
Speaker 1: white life expectancy in America is higher than certain other
Speaker 1: minority groups. So we need to we need to essentially
Speaker 1: do some socialist redistribution of years of life on government whim.
Speaker 1: You can't get this vaccine unless the government says you can.
Speaker 1: Government's in control. They're making these arguments out loud. I'm
Speaker 1: going to the page is of the most elite liberal
Speaker 1: journalism place in the country, the New York Times, and
Speaker 1: they're printing this stuff. And this is not the only
Speaker 1: example of this. This is not the only instance. You
Speaker 1: find a lot of this out there. People say, well,
Speaker 1: it should because it disproportionately harms the minority community, it
Speaker 1: should go to minorities first. So skin color, according to
Speaker 1: this analysis, becomes an advantage in getting ahead of the
Speaker 1: line of a virus that will kill people in large
Speaker 1: numbers still in the months ahead. And let's understand here
Speaker 1: that there are a lot of other ways that you
Speaker 1: could slice this data and probably come up with a
Speaker 1: much better I mean, what is the primary indicator of
Speaker 1: risk from COVID age? What is the next indicator of
Speaker 1: risk from COVID comorbidity? And the primary one of those
Speaker 1: is obesity. Age and city are the biggest risk factors
Speaker 1: for we know this, the biggest risk factors for this
Speaker 1: disease out there that we've been able to identify. So
Speaker 1: are we when we're saying that the minority population is
Speaker 1: more affected by this? Are we not taking into account
Speaker 1: the other indicators of how we could get more of
Speaker 1: the at risk population in general, including members of the
Speaker 1: minority population. But shouldn't we have you know, it's it's
Speaker 1: people over seventy five, first day, over seventy five, first
Speaker 1: in line, over sixty five, first in line. Isn't that
Speaker 1: a fair way to do this? No, they're they're arguing
Speaker 1: for they're arguing for giving it to minorities sooner than
Speaker 1: other people based upon what exactly? Because the average life
Speaker 1: I mean, the average life expectancy of of Asian Americans
Speaker 1: I believe exceeds that of white Americans. So are we
Speaker 1: going to have a are they are they calling for
Speaker 1: a racial hierarchy for the speed of vaccination, that there
Speaker 1: are some people of some races that should get the
Speaker 1: vaccine first. Is that really what I just want to
Speaker 1: know if that, because that is the argument that Harold
Speaker 1: Schmidt seems to be making here, and you will hear
Speaker 1: more and more of this in the weeks and months ahead.
Speaker 1: We want to talk about dividing people. You want to
Speaker 1: talk about showing us how much government is willing to
Speaker 1: play god. Harold Schmidt at UPEN wants to level the
Speaker 1: playing field. So, you know, you want certain people to
Speaker 1: have to wait, you know, maybe maybe you have to
Speaker 1: wait for the vaccine a couple extra months, sorry, because
Speaker 1: of the history of oppression in this country, and so
Speaker 1: we need to balance it out. He says, pretty scary
Speaker 1: stuff and something that that this is a mentality that
Speaker 1: has increasingly widespread among the Democrat elites. You should be
Speaker 1: a very you should be aware of it.