WEBVTT - Best Bets for NFL Week 9: Top Picks and Predictions (Ep. 574)

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in everybody to Betting Bros. This time to play

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>short bets and it's meet Joey Paid Joe Piezabia and

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.880
<v Speaker 1>this is VP NFL. It's time to look ahead to

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the best bets for week nine as we look to

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:13.520
<v Speaker 1>our favorite games and moments to see wo gonna help

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:15.319
<v Speaker 1>you make some money. Don't forget to download the Betting

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Bros App wherever you get your apps and start betting smarter,

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:20.880
<v Speaker 1>not harder. Of course, my co host or here as

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>always Terrell Ferman Junior and the Undertaker himself Andrew Erickson. Gentlemen,

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we got some fun games to talk about today, and

0:00:28.120 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>both of you want to start with the Denver Bronco.

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.480
<v Speaker 1>So Terrell Furman, without further ado, let's kick things off

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 1>with bo Nix, who is clearly, you know, the greatest

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.519
<v Speaker 1>quarterback in the history of the league, right I think

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that's where he's ranking.

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I mean he may not be the

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 2>best passer, but he's a great cover of the spread,

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:48.080
<v Speaker 2>and he has a great coach that is putting him

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 2>up in great situations on the road to cover the spread.

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>And I mean there were some there were some people

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 2>out there that said, you couldn't lay points with bow Nicks,

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 2>and you couldn't lay double digits with Boone Nicks. And

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Boe Nicks absolutely handle business against Carolina Panthers, and I

0:01:00.120 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>mean he's just doing what is expected to be done,

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and that's it. Like everybody forgets it's okay to have

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 2>a game manager. It's okay to have a quarterback that's

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 2>not the best quarterback in the game. As long as

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 2>he's not an idiot, they can play really, really good

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 2>at the position. And bo Nicks has shown that he's

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>just not an idiot. He just might not have the

0:01:21.440 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 2>talent to make all the throws. The one in particular

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 2>on Thursday night where he threw lofted in between two

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 2>in between two players shows that, hey, he may not

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 2>be the best passer. But it doesn't matter because this

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Ravens defense is horrible. I mean they're horrible. They went

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 2>and got Deoncea Johnson and Ravens fans feel no better

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 2>because the defense is still really really bad. So if

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.120
<v Speaker 2>you give bo Knicks opportunities to throw the ball and

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 2>keep giving him different chances after chance after chance, which

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 2>this Ravens team has done. Not being able to cover

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the spread large at least large numbers like this over

0:01:55.040 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 2>the course of the year. Yeah. Absolutely, I'm all over

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 2>this Deno Broncos team. I've been taking this le Broncos

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 2>scene catching a big number on the road all season.

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I think this is another spot where Sean Payton coaches

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 2>this team up. The defense plays lights out, and Bonix

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.280
<v Speaker 2>just does enough to keep them in the game, and

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:12.399
<v Speaker 2>now the Ravens have to play from behind and try

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:14.600
<v Speaker 2>to secure a win. The Ravens don't care about covering

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 2>the spread. They're just trying to win games. So yeah,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:17.519
<v Speaker 2>I love the Broncos today.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, this is something Andrew and I talked about earlier

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.680
<v Speaker 1>in the week too. I think that Baltimore is going

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to play angry because of the fact that they just

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>let that game slip through their fingers literally several times

0:02:30.080 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this past week in Cleveland, so they will bounce back.

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.000
<v Speaker 1>They should get that victory here, but it is a

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>very large number. And Andrew, this is something we talked about

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>earlier on the week. If you missed that show, go

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:41.519
<v Speaker 1>look at the look Ahead. We kind of did a

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.200
<v Speaker 1>breakdown of all the games, but obviously this one in particular.

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.519
<v Speaker 1>So I'm where Trella is on this one too. I

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's a lot of points. You're getting ten in

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>some markets already, So where are you at here? Still,

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as we've gone a couple of days, you've seen the nine.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I even seen some ten now available.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's too many points. We learned this last week.

0:02:59.080 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Just take the take the teams that are getting so

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 3>many points with the.

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Bronco against the Tennessee type.

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Detroit are the ATS champions of the world under Danie Campbell,

0:03:10.560 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 3>so you always take them against the spread no matter what.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 3>In doubt, just take the Lions, doesn't matter. But for

0:03:15.320 --> 0:03:17.480
<v Speaker 3>the Broncos, I want to take them, especially on the road.

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Furman laid out the case Sean Payton and bo Nicks

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:21.959
<v Speaker 3>this year four to no record against the spread on

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 3>the road, three and one straight up, and that's despite

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 3>being a six point underdog in three of those four contests.

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 3>So the Broncos have been basically touchdown underdogs most of

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 3>the time on the road, and they not only covered

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 3>those games, they've won those games. So no, I don't

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 3>think that this is a spot, especially with the Ravens

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 3>coming off a loss that an upset special Joe, this

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 3>would not be my pick for you, but to cover

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 3>nine points for a team that hasn't lost a game.

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 3>They haven't played a game where they've lost by more

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 3>than a touchdown. Every game that they've played has at

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 3>least seven points that they have lost this season. The

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 3>Denver Broncos. So what do we saw last week against

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 3>the Carolina Panthers. They were putting up points, The game

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 3>was out of out of they already won the game,

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 3>and they're still trying to score points. So you think

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.640
<v Speaker 3>if they get down twenty one that they're just gonna

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 3>give up. No, they're gonna do whatever takes to cover

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 3>this spread. So that's what I like, putting my money

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 3>on teams that aren't gonna quit. And that's what you've

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 3>seen from the Denver Broncos with Bonnicks. And give credit

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:16.679
<v Speaker 3>to the defense. The Bronces of a really good defense.

0:04:17.120 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Can they give some trouble to Lamar in this offense?

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.840
<v Speaker 3>I think so? So again, I think there's just so

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 3>many points. The Broncos have done this on the road

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 3>repeatedly this season. So give me bon Nix.

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>On BP right now. I see Fandal's got at nine

0:04:29.560 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and a half. You can get it there ESPN Bet

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:33.719
<v Speaker 1>nine and a half so there are some bigger numbers

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>even if you're really into this and really want to

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>cover yourself. Let's get to the New Orleans Saints. You're

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully getting a return of Derek Carr this week, fingers crossed.

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:46.039
<v Speaker 1>That's good news for Crystal Lave. It's good news Tralviln Camara.

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>It's good news for the Saints. The only better news

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 1>is they're getting the Carolina Panthers. That's the perfect opponent

0:04:50.440 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>that you want that first game back for some of

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>these guys. So let's talk about this one, Terrell. The

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Saints number is minus seven and a half. Are you in?

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.679
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? I'm one hundred percent and on the New Orleans

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Saints because this Carolina team is horrible, Like it's horrible,

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 2>and they're throwing Pryce Young out there and they're not

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.960
<v Speaker 2>even trying to set him up to succeed. They trade

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:14.159
<v Speaker 2>away Deontay Johnson, which shows that they're just completely on

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 2>the tank train. They're not even trying, like you're throwing

0:05:17.160 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 2>a Xavier legged out there, Jonathan Mingo, like they have

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 2>no options for Bryce Young to be able to succeed

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 2>at playing well. And then guess what, Derek Carr, the

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 2>man the myth, the legend is back and he oh man,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 2>how many times have we seen the Derek Carr return

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 2>from injury game? I mean, this is They're absolutely this

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.160
<v Speaker 2>is the best spot. This is one hundred percent the

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.040
<v Speaker 2>best spot to fade the Panthers again. And I just

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 2>don't understand how the Saints are not a public team.

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Why are there people betting Panthers plus seven and a

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.839
<v Speaker 2>half year, why are there people still betting Panthers? The

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Panthers completely ruined the close your Eyes Special. There's no

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 2>reason to bet the Panthers this season. If you can't

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:55.800
<v Speaker 2>bet them as a closed your Eyes special, you can't

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:58.919
<v Speaker 2>bet them at all. Oh man, I'm fading. This is shorts.

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 2>This is way too short. Give me Derek Carr all

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 2>the way lay seven and a half ericson.

0:06:04.279 --> 0:06:07.480
<v Speaker 1>It's not you right betting the Panthers. We've established I.

0:06:07.440 --> 0:06:08.640
<v Speaker 4>Have practice restraint.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 3>The last couple of weeks, I've stopped betting on the

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 3>Panthers and I've I've I've felt much happier.

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I've already logged my bets for Alvin Kamara over

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>on Betting Pros. You can call me betting pros dot com.

0:06:20.520 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Last Joe or Now you can actually just search names Tooterrell, Furman,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Joe Piezapia, Andrew Erickson. You can find just search Torow.

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to go all the way to you.

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Just like to share and Madonna's there's only one Crow mclovin. Right,

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>let's get to your take on this game. Since you're

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>not on the Carolina side, thank goodness, how are you

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:47.160
<v Speaker 1>approaching Carolina and New Orleans? Andra?

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 3>I just like the under I just I mean Panthers

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 3>games typically go under because they can't score points on offense.

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 3>You look at their last twelve home games, eight of

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 3>them have gone under the projected total. So for me,

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm expecting some ross coming off of Derek Carr miss time.

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 3>This offense hasn't been the same since it was during

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:05.640
<v Speaker 3>weeks one and two. I know one of those games

0:07:05.640 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 3>is against the Carolina Panthers, but part of the reason

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 3>why the Saints were firing was brashichi heat. That was

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Derek Carr's big play specialists. They were driving the ball

0:07:13.480 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 3>down the field, splash plays. It was awesome. And ever

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 3>since then he's gone, they haven't been doing nearly as

0:07:19.480 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 3>much play action, not as much motion, just has the

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 3>offense hasn't been as creative, So I think that the

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.800
<v Speaker 3>Saints can kind of approach its game as we'll just

0:07:26.840 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 3>let the Panthers beat themselves, turn the ball over, we'll

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 3>run the ball with Kamara and Taysom Hill and Jimal Williams,

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 3>and we'll want this game. I just don't think they

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 3>need to do a lot. They're also playing on the

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 3>road too, so again, I just don't think that this

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 3>is a Saints Oh We're gonna post thirty five points

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 3>like they did in Week one, So for me, it's

0:07:43.120 --> 0:07:44.240
<v Speaker 3>just an easy underplay.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:46.440
<v Speaker 2>I would also like to throw out there for the

0:07:46.480 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 2>people because I'm a man of the people and I

0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 2>would love to give people bets and extra bets when

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.360
<v Speaker 2>I can. I just want everybody to know I bet

0:07:52.400 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Taysom Hill two touchdowns last week, which means that it's

0:07:55.080 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent points to hit this week. Just letting

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, actually let it know.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's go all the Taysom Hill all right, that's

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna piss a lot of fantasy people off, potentially, don't

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>forget everybody too. If you want to keep the discussion going,

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>go to our discord bettingpros dot com slash chat. It's free,

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it's fun, and if you're new to sports betting, or

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're somebody that's a season vet, it's a great

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>place to get involved with other handicappers, connect with fellow betters,

0:08:19.320 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can interact with all of us on there too.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Matt Parolt's on there all the time, always taking questions

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and giving out bets too. So go to Betting pros

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:30.679
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chat today, join our discord, and if

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to get involved in something fun. It's a

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>new month starting here November Betting pros dot Com slash

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:39.199
<v Speaker 1>NFL Contest. We're doing monthly prizes and even weekly prizes too.

0:08:39.240 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>You just have to make picks. You don't even have

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>to make bets. So if you're somebody who just wants

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to have some fun because betting is not legal where

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you live, or you want to make some of your

0:08:46.840 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>bets count because you're so good at it, you want

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to win some more free stuff, bettingpros dot Com slash

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>NFL Contest and that's the way to do it. So

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>download the VP app today and look for the NFL contest,

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and of course join our discord too now. Trell Furman

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>or should I just say trell pardon me, sir? You

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>were four and one last week.

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 2>So I was waiting for when you were gonna say it.

0:09:05.559 --> 0:09:07.599
<v Speaker 1>I got, I got, you know. I look, if I

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>praise you too much at the top, then the whole

0:09:09.720 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>show okay, all right, all right? So I wanted to

0:09:11.640 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 1>wait a little bit for in one last week. These

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>first two sound really good to me. Next one here, Now, look,

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>this is interesting because I, of course am overjoyed with

0:09:20.640 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots' performance last week. I'm you know, it's it's

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:29.079
<v Speaker 1>a one off. I texted Andrew right when the game ended,

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 1>my heart is full of joy. Those my exact words.

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 2>To him, and confirmed.

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>He confirmed my heart is full of joy. I don't

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>know if there were emojis, I can't remember, but this

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 1>week the Patriots, you've got some feelings on You might

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:47.240
<v Speaker 1>have to sell me on this one a little bit.

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear about.

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, well, if you want a trend, I have

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 2>a trend, and this is this is Dad Campbell absolutely

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 2>destroying teams every week he plays them and they don't

0:09:57.920 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 2>have a roster to play the next week because teams

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.240
<v Speaker 2>that are playing against the Lions the next week that

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:08.880
<v Speaker 2>they play are horrible. I mean it is horrible looking.

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 2>Since twenty twenty two, teams after playing the Lions are

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 2>fourteen twenty four and one against the spread. That is

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>thirty six point eight percent twenty point six percent ROI

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 2>taking the other team that is playing the Lions. And

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe that's because Dan Campbell came out in at press

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 2>conference and he said, we're gonna bite those kneecaps and

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna destroy teams, and they're actually doing it. They

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 2>may not get the win all the time, but you

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 2>you get the psychological win of knowing that you beat

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 2>up a team the week before and they just can't

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>play well after you. In fact, this season, teams are

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 2>oho and six straight up oh and six against the

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 2>spread after playing the Lions. And think about all the teams.

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:50.840
<v Speaker 2>You can go back, and you can look at my

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 2>New York Giants playing against the Seattle Seahawks, where nobody

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 2>had us against the Seattle Seahawks and they went outright

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:58.800
<v Speaker 2>as six point dogs on the road, like this is

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>something really legit. And then why are we laying three

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 2>and a half with the Titans. Just think about that

0:11:04.480 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 2>for a second. After everything everybody gave me about the Titans.

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Despite them having a great defense, you cannot lay points

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 2>with this team. They have horrible special teams. They give

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 2>up a block plant or a block kick for a

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 2>touchdown every single game. I mean, the best bet for

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 2>this game really should be the New England special teams,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 2>because if there's ever a special teams that's going to

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:25.160
<v Speaker 2>take advantage of bad special teams, it's gonna be a

0:11:25.200 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 2>New England Patriots special team. So special team defense touchdown

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 2>for them all the way. I think that Jacoby set

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Jacoby Brissett is going to do enough in this game.

0:11:34.880 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And I just don't trust Mason Rudolph in this Titans

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>offense to put up any kind of points on a really,

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>really good Patriots defense that I was high on all season.

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 2>So I think Calvin Ridley is going to have an

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 2>off day playing against Christian Gonzalez on the outside. Yeah,

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I am one hundred percent. I think that the Patriots

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:55.160
<v Speaker 2>are alive here to win this game out right, all right?

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Three and a half, that's the number you're getting. Now?

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 1>You like that hooked too?

0:11:58.280 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 4>Are you convinced?

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I think so? Yeah, I am. I've again It's like

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>it's there's still a two and sixteen and they're two

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen going on the road, and I just don't

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:13.199
<v Speaker 1>know if I'm like, I'm not like excited about it.

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I think Arrell's right, and I think the Lions hangover

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>proposition they've thrown out there is pretty convincing. I think

0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the under is the way I would approach this game

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>at thirty eight and a half. Personally, I'm a little

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm a little more confident in that than

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I am with the Patriots. I feel like this is

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>one of those four outcome kind of games and that

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.439
<v Speaker 1>typically doesn't make me feel warm and fuzzy. But are

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:34.199
<v Speaker 1>you convinced since we're talking about.

0:12:34.160 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 4>I just I just need Drake May to beat the quarterback.

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 4>I just.

0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 2>Number one the game.

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say, here's a question, Okay, Drake May

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>was the quarterback, would this number be Patriots one hundred percent? Yeah,

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:49.599
<v Speaker 1>one hundred percent. If Drake May was the quarterback of

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:50.559
<v Speaker 1>this week, what would that number be?

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 3>The Titans would still be favorite. So I would just

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 3>take the Patriots on the money line, even if.

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe it could be well, you could be two

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and a half.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Trell closer one.

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, but what I mean, I feel more confident

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:04.239
<v Speaker 3>about just betting on the Patriots.

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:07.480
<v Speaker 1>And yes, but he's also significantly better. That's in terms

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:09.079
<v Speaker 1>of moving the football right. But again, I don't think

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that I like Jacob. I've been a Jacoby Brissette guy

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>for a long time.

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 2>But Jacoby Brissette has more wins this season than Drake May.

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 2>I just want to throw that out there.

0:13:17.200 --> 0:13:18.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, he's playing Mark Herbs.

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 3>And technically last week Drake May started, So Drake May

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:26.679
<v Speaker 3>technic gout to win because he started, So technically.

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:30.439
<v Speaker 2>You're head, no, no, no, Jacoby got the save. Jacoby

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:32.840
<v Speaker 2>got the save the hybrid.

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:36.960
<v Speaker 3>I also, I also don't think Patrio Stevens is good,

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 3>so I disagree with Furman there. I think Patri Stefens

0:13:39.440 --> 0:13:41.920
<v Speaker 3>is horrible. They've they've given up thre hundred yards and

0:13:41.920 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 3>almost every single game this year.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 4>So that's my car.

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Right. Let's let's get to your third pick, Andrew Cincinnati

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas.

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Certainly a game where you know the defense might be

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>hard to come by a certain times. So, uh, do

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you think this game goes under or over the forty

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 1>six and a half.

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm leaning towards under forty six and a half with

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 3>this total, I have concerns about the Bengals with some

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 3>of the injuries they're dealing with.

0:14:03.120 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 4>No T.

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 3>Higgins and this offense just doesn't seem to operate at

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 3>the same level when he doesn't play. It's weird because

0:14:09.320 --> 0:14:11.400
<v Speaker 3>you think that, okay, Chase is going to just absolutely

0:14:11.440 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 3>eat and destroy whenever te Higgins miss his games. But

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 3>this year a lot of chases down games have actually

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 3>been when Higgins has not been playing. It's one of

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 3>these rare occurrences where he really gets that massive efficiency

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 3>boost because teams can't take him away as easily he needs.

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Hasn't been ruled out yet as well.

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, I'm just sending he opened the week with DMP so.

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>But I meant if he gets a limited in today

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday, yes we're recording this and limited on Friday,

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine he plays. So I think that's the

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>next forty eight hours are very important today. Andrew's point too,

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>So if you don't think Higgins is going to play,

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>sure put that in your mix of discussing it. But

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>as of right now, that's not official yet. I just

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 1>want to be clear for everybody watching and listening.

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, but Higgins also in a contract year. I don't

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 3>think he's going to play if he's not one hundred

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>and fifty percent ready to go.

0:14:57.480 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he's not. He's not pushing it.

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 3>And the other thing is Orlando Brown, junior tackle for

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 3>the Bengals, is also banged up, listed as day to day,

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 3>so tackle issues, wide receiver issues. The Raiders defense isn't great.

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I don't expect them to score a ton of points

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 3>playing on the road. Most of their road games last

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 3>five of eight have gone under the projected total. They've

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:19.680
<v Speaker 3>shown out the last two weeks against some lackluster offenses

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 3>that weren't full strength Rams Chiefs. They kind of kept

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 3>those games kind of close, But I mean, I don't

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 3>think they're be able to do that against the Cincinnai Bengals,

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 3>who have shown, at least when they've played bad quarterbacks,

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 3>those games have gone towards the under three and one

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 3>towards the under. In games that I would deem against quote.

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 2>Unquote bad you deem where it gets bad quarterbacks?

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 3>Oh, the bad quarterbacks. So Chobe Brissette, bad quarterback, Daniel Jones,

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 3>bad quarterback.

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 4>Ye, no offense, no no, no, no, se Shaun Watson.

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, quarterback.

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 3>And then the one that went over was Andy Dalton,

0:15:52.840 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 3>So that one went over, but that one went over.

0:15:57.280 --> 0:15:58.520
<v Speaker 3>But what you think that Dalton's good?

0:15:58.800 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean that was that was a that was the

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 2>spot that was against the ban I think you should

0:16:03.800 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>count that as I think we should count that one

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 2>as a three, don't. I don't know if we count

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the Dogs.

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 4>Get my point.

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Whenever they're not playing against the team that actually has

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 3>someone that can fight back punch for punch, the games

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 3>kind of go towards the under end. The Bengals defense

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 3>has played but better against bad qbs. So that's why

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I like the owner. Again, it's pretty high forty six

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 3>and a half for Raiders on the road. I feel

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.800
<v Speaker 3>like the Bengals just need I mean Bengals need to

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>win a home game eventually at some point. So, but

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 3>unless so, I would change my pick, probably towards the

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 3>Bengals against the spread if we get healthier news about

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.400
<v Speaker 3>Higgins and guys like Orlando Brown. But for right now,

0:16:36.480 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 3>those guys are out, I'd like the under.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get to the next game here on

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>our list. Terrell, you've got some thoughts about Minnesota hosting Indianapolis.

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Now right now, you're getting Indy at five and a

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>half there on the plus side points and Joe Flacco

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.160
<v Speaker 1>now taking over a quarterback. The Vikings, you know, start

0:16:54.160 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>out red hot, start out undefeated, then the bye week,

0:16:57.040 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and then a couple losses. So here we are, So

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the Viking trying to kind of put the pieces back

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 1>together a little bit. Can they do that against the

0:17:05.160 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Colts here and Joe Flacco?

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:08.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? And I mean I was on the rams if

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 2>you caught my short that I dropped here Thursday Night

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 2>football last week. I was on the rams, and I

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.679
<v Speaker 2>think that it's something about the Vikings offense that just

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:21.439
<v Speaker 2>doesn't feel right to me. It feels like they're able

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:23.719
<v Speaker 2>to get big chunk plays, but it's just more of

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 2>the Hey, consistent offense down the field, consistent running the football,

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 2>keeping the chains moving, all of that. They just feel

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.000
<v Speaker 2>very very uncertain of me. But what's not uncertain to

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 2>me is the fact that the Colts get up for

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 2>playing for Joe Flacco. Like this is like baseball when

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>you have a pitcher that you just really really rock

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 2>with you saying, hey, we're gonna play great defense behind you,

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Like we're gonna get up behind you. We're gonna make

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 2>sure you get this. Like they are playing up for

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:50.119
<v Speaker 2>Joe Flacco at Joe Flacco is now the starter. Like

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 2>all the Anthony Richardson bad juju that was around this

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.880
<v Speaker 2>team is gone, and they've been really, really good when

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 2>Joe Flacco is in the lineup. One let's mention Theolt

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 2>have covered all but one game this season. Somehow at

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 2>four and four. They've covered everything but one game this season.

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 2>And if you look at what they've done recently, Okay,

0:18:08.760 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 2>they lost against Texas, still covered that number. They won

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>the game against the Dolphins, they lost, They won the

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 2>game against the Titans, they lost the game against the Jags,

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 2>but guess what they got the cover. Like they've constantly

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.199
<v Speaker 2>been in these games. These have been one score games.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that, Yeah, you're probably gonna get a couple

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 2>of mistakes by Joe Flacco here, maybe an interception or so,

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 2>but he's gonna continue to push the ball downfield and

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.359
<v Speaker 2>continue to challenge his Vikings defense and that's enough for

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:38.639
<v Speaker 2>me for a cover. Are they gonna get the win outright?

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.160
<v Speaker 2>I think they can, Actually, I really think they can.

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Like they're in the dome that we've seen Joe Flacco

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 2>do this last year with the Browns where he just

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:48.119
<v Speaker 2>gets up for these spots on the road and is

0:18:48.160 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 2>able to go play really, really good football. I'm back

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 2>in Joe Flacco plus five and a half and sprinkle

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 2>on the money line. I think they're gonna be able

0:18:54.800 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to run the ball on his Vikings team, and Joe

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Flacco is gonna do what they need to be done.

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Deebro and I had a big argument on the FP

0:19:02.600 --> 0:19:05.160
<v Speaker 1>live stream when this news happened about the change of quarterback.

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:09.639
<v Speaker 1>And I'm completely on the Joe Flacco decision because you

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 1>are right now a five hundred team looking around at

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>the rest of this conference saying, why can't we get

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs again? Of course you can. So you know,

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the Jets and the Dolphins were supposed to be right

0:19:19.359 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 1>on the precipice of playoffs. They look toast already. Both

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>of those teams are two win teams. Why not give

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>yourself the best chance to win for the next six

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>weeks or eight weeks, whatever you gotten. And if the

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:31.719
<v Speaker 1>wheels fall off, okay, you want to go back to Richardson,

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>go back to Richardson, but you are in it right

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>now and This is a team and a coach that

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>got Gardner Minshew to lead a team into the playoffs

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>last year, So why not Joe Flacco? And I think

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Joe Flacco is very astute annually just finding the spot

0:19:44.840 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>is like, who's a really bad quarterback that eventually I'm

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>going to get a shot sooner than later. Here you go,

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>how about the Cleveland Browns and Deshaun Watson? Oh wait,

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>here you go? How about the Colts? Where does he

0:19:54.280 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>go next year? Trell Furman?

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:58.359
<v Speaker 2>Hopefully my New York Giants, because if he's going to

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:02.480
<v Speaker 2>play good, it's wait going to the Jets? Well it's

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 2>way better.

0:20:03.640 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there we go.

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Doubt he doesn't want anything to do with that dumpster.

0:20:07.520 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>And he went to the Jets too, and they should

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>they could you imagine if they get Flacco because remember

0:20:12.520 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they were four and four last year at one point,

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>had they just started Flacco with Garrett Wilson's like, they

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:18.440
<v Speaker 1>would have.

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:22.400
<v Speaker 2>Been okayoffs least teams to the playoffs. Like he leaves

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>teams to the playoffs. This is I'm all over the

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 2>cults here, like I think this is a great spot

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:29.320
<v Speaker 2>to back Flacco. And again we've seen him do this before.

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 2>This is now two years of date of we've seen

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 2>him being able to go up on the road and

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 2>play up in these spots so and at least cover

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the spread. So he hasn't lost a game by more

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 2>than five points all seasons.

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Elite Joe Flacco. That's right, Andrew, You and I

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 1>are feeling the same about this next game, about the

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Browns here, So let's talk about this. I want

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 1>to get your breakdown here because Cleveland another team that

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.600
<v Speaker 1>has a new lease on life, and they are at home,

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and they are underdogs, and I think you and I

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:00.479
<v Speaker 1>are in the same spot here. The Chargers are coming

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:02.159
<v Speaker 1>into town the four and three. I know Cleveland's two

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and six, but it's a different team without Watson playing quarterback.

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that two and six represents what this

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:11.640
<v Speaker 3>team is in any capacity, especially when they play at home.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.200
<v Speaker 3>They've covered seven or last ten home games, nine and

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 3>four on the money line at home. All of the

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:20.679
<v Speaker 3>trends are pointing towards the Browns here, showing up against

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 3>even a team that has a winning record. They've won

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 3>last four home games against teams that held a winning record.

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 3>They cover the spread six of the last seven home

0:21:27.280 --> 0:21:30.080
<v Speaker 3>games against teams that held a winning record. Why are

0:21:30.119 --> 0:21:33.560
<v Speaker 3>we afraid of the big bad Los Angeles Chargers. That's

0:21:33.680 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 3>who we're afraid of. They're going to take it to

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 3>the Browns as road favorites, a dome team playing against

0:21:38.640 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 3>a strong defense. I don't understand. I think the brown

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:43.879
<v Speaker 3>should be favorite here. They're playing at home, So I

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 3>like Browns plus two and a half Browns on the

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.520
<v Speaker 3>money line. Look, I think you hit the nail on

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.199
<v Speaker 3>the head Joe talking about this team has new life

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 3>with Jamis Winston injected into this offense. All they do

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:56.920
<v Speaker 3>is cover the spread at home as underdogs. They're four

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 3>and two straight up. I just this was the line

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 3>to meet talked about on the Early look Ahead show

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 3>that jumped out to me the most. Is the first

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 3>thing I bet heading into week nine, and after doing

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 3>more research, I just felt better about it. So here

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 3>we are back again on the Best Bets Show. Oh,

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 3>betting on the Cleveland Browns. Look last year wasn't aggressive

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 3>enough after they made after Flacco took over, and it

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.200
<v Speaker 3>was week after week, here we go again, Here we

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 3>go again. You're right, So if you weren't on the

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Browns with us last week. It's okay, there's still time

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 3>to get on the Browns bandwagon and join me.

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.560
<v Speaker 4>We got plenty of seats open. Let's go.

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>And also, you know, just to point out too, this

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.480
<v Speaker 1>is a Browns team that has Nick Chubb this year, Yes,

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.360
<v Speaker 1>right now, that team did not.

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 4>So they have their leaders that they want. Indight say they've.

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Got Nick Chubb. And Nick Chubb is starting to look

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty good last week. Again, he's the only guy who's

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 1>rushed for fifty yards against the Ravens all year. Is

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a tough matchup, I get it, but he looked pretty

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>good in some of those jump cuts we saw, so

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that is a huge win for the Browns getting him back.

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>He is the best player on their offense. All right,

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>let's get more on the Browns. By the way, spoiler

0:22:57.480 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 1>to come as we get through the show. Here, Terrell,

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>let's get your last pick for the week. And again

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it's something Andrew and I were already on in the

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>look Ahead show. And it looks like you are holding

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:07.600
<v Speaker 1>hands and running through the metal with us.

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you can't lay this big number with Patrick Mahons,

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 2>Anderiedd and Chiefs. They don't care like they truly do

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 2>not care, like, are you in the game? Sure? Did

0:23:15.600 --> 0:23:16.199
<v Speaker 2>you get the end?

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:16.359
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.359
<v Speaker 2>All right, fine, then that's perfectly fine. This is not

0:23:19.440 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the team that you want to lay double like over

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.400
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown with, And it's perfectly fine. They play really

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 2>good defense. But if you look on the Tampa Bay side,

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that they get up defensively as well. I

0:23:28.560 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 2>think they're gonna give Patrick Mahomes a lot of pressure

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 2>and they're gonna try to keep him off of his game.

0:23:32.880 --> 0:23:36.520
<v Speaker 2>But ultimately, what it is is the fact that again

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs do not care. Like the Chiefs do not care.

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna play smash mount football. They're not a team

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 2>that's going to try and out there to put thirty

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 2>forty plus points on the board like no, hey, we're

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna do enough. We're gonna control clock. We have Kareem Hunt.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.959
<v Speaker 2>Kareem Hunt's gonna run the ball for us really really effectively,

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 2>and we are gonna control time and possession and just

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 2>wear you down, wear you down defensively where you down

0:23:58.680 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 2>running the football, and pastch Home is going to make

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the plays that he needs to make to make sure

0:24:02.800 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 2>that we get to win. Like I am one hundred percent. Actually,

0:24:07.440 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 2>I really wish that I had put Tampa Bay plus

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:11.479
<v Speaker 2>eight and a half and Chiefs money line. You might

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 2>as well just take that and get you some plus

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 2>money because the Chiefs are winning this game, but they're

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 2>not covering this right.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Andrew, This is what we talked about too, the

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs inability so far to blow teams out, because that's

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 1>just not how the offense is structured anymore. There's no

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:26.199
<v Speaker 1>more Tyreek Hill around, you know, the run game. We're

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, pivoting to the guys like Kareem Haunt the

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>veterans right now. We'll see if Hopkins picks up the

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>playbook a little bit more involved potentially this week, but

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 1>again it's a hard sell. And Baker Mayfield loves being

0:24:36.040 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the underdog, so you know he gets up for these

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>games too. That's my big point with this. It's like

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>every time you tell Baker Mayfield no, that's when you

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>get the best version of Baker Mayfield. That's been our

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>mo all week on this game. And do anything else

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>you want to add to this.

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 3>Baker Mayfield playing in Kins City twice two or o

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 3>against the spread him, so you go, he's played well

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:57.159
<v Speaker 3>when he's had opportunities to play against Patrick Mahomes and

0:24:57.200 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 3>the Chiefs. Again he hasn't won out right, But again

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 3>we don't need the Buccaneers to win. We needed to

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 3>not lose by nine points. And the Chiefs this year

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:07.200
<v Speaker 3>have been kind of threatening the needle when it comes

0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 3>to covering a lot of these spreads. And last week

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 3>it showed up they didn't cover against the Raiders, and

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:12.840
<v Speaker 3>that was one of my bets, was on the Raiders

0:25:12.840 --> 0:25:15.399
<v Speaker 3>at home plus nine and a half and it was close,

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 3>but the Raiders came through. And I think we're gonna

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 3>start to see kind of regression where the Chiefs were

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:23.119
<v Speaker 3>covering all these spreads by the narrowest of margins and

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 3>now you're going to start to see, well, now they're

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 3>not going to be covering these spreads because the numbers

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 3>are just too big based on oh, well they're undefeated.

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:31.920
<v Speaker 3>But I think Furman just being so nonchalant about the

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 3>pick and the Buccaneers, that's exactly how the Chiefs feel

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 3>about covering spreads, like we don't care.

0:25:36.359 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, like what.

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 4>We just won.

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:42.920
<v Speaker 2>We did who's seven and zero? We are like this

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 2>is like this is not the spot you bet. Patrick

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Mahomes you bet Patrick Mahomes as a dog. You don't

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 2>bet him laying over a touchdown.

0:25:48.200 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Always as a dog, always, always, as always, the just

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>run run to the window to bet him as the dog.

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I made so much money last year in

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs too, and that it was crazy. And then

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I took a cash out of all my forty to

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>win the Super Bowl shares because they all made money.

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 1>And I doubled down on all of the Patrick Mahomes

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to win the Super Bowl and the m VP, and

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:10.159
<v Speaker 1>it was just a glorious the Andrew knows I was

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.600
<v Speaker 1>victory lap. I was so exhausted I passed out from

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the victory lapping. I mean so good.

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a very real question. Sure, what is the game

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 2>that they lose?

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>You know there will be a hiccup in there. Uh,

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>let's take the Bills. Let's play the game the Bills.

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 4>The Bills. Yeah, that's maybe they are they on the

0:26:30.200 --> 0:26:31.160
<v Speaker 4>road or at home.

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 2>On the road. So maybe on the road at the Bills.

0:26:33.480 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 2>But like Broncos, they're going to get a big number there.

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>The Broncos will give them problems. To be honest with you,

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>I think the Broncos will give them.

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 2>I think they're gonna get a big number and I'm

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna end up. I'm probably gonna be here next week

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 2>talking about how we're betting the Broncos again, Like, so, yeah,

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 2>the Broncos, they get Panthers.

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Not worried this game is dangerous. I think this game

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is dangerous. I think at Cleveland is going to be dangerous,

0:26:56.560 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 1>potentially depending on where the Cleveland's at. I don't fear Houston.

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>One of these two Denver games would bother me, especially

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>you know again, it's the last week of the season,

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>so they might not matter at that point. One of

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the second one is at Denver, but the at Buffalo

0:27:11.400 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>game is probably the best one. That's the one I

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>would think would be the most likely. But I would

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>not be shocked if the Week ten Tenver game crept

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>up on them in a weird way.

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 2>I wish I could parlay the Chiefs to lose at

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Buffalo and then also already have them to play them

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 2>again in the playoffs and beat them in the playoffs.

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 2>Like that would be amazing if I could just Hey,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.359
<v Speaker 2>if the Chiefs lose this game at Buffalo, let's just

0:27:34.400 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and put all this money and save it

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 2>from when they play them in the playoffs, because they're

0:27:38.960 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 2>going to lose to them in the playoffs.

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.479
<v Speaker 1>Find out. Let's get to the upsets special of the week.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.240
<v Speaker 1>And as I alluded to earlier, I feel really good

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:50.680
<v Speaker 1>about the Cleveland Browns. Now, those are words I don't

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>say very lightly or maybe ever in my entire life,

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>but I feel good about them. This week. They're at

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>home again, the Chargers are coming into town. Chargers are

0:27:59.000 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>a good football team. But am I afraid of the

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Chargers on the road. No, not necessarily so. I know

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:05.879
<v Speaker 1>Andrew took the points earlier, but I'm gonna take them

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.120
<v Speaker 1>straight up on the money line plus money plus one

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>oh six. Let's go give me those Cleveland Browns a

0:28:11.520 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>whole new look, Nick Chubb, Jameis Winston, good feelings all

0:28:15.760 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the way around for the dog pounds. So everybody's gonna

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>be hooting and hollering over there. And let's take that

0:28:21.720 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>into the same the parlay of the week here for

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Week nine in the NFL three leg parlay for you,

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's take the Cleveland Browns on the money line and

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>plus one oh six. Let's take the Rams on the

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>money line at minus one twenty six. Because now that

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Stafford's back with those weapons, I think they're going to

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>crush the Seattle Seahawks hopes and dreams. And then of

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:41.800
<v Speaker 1>course our favorite thing, the Buccaneers. Give me the Buccaneers

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>with the points at minus one ten, you put them together,

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you get six to one, boys and girls. That feels

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:48.800
<v Speaker 1>like a pretty good weekend. And the thing I love

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:50.560
<v Speaker 1>about this too, you got the one o'clock game with

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland Browns, So if they win, you're already in

0:28:53.360 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>business here and you can watch that Rams game real close.

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to cash out, maybe you get

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a cash out offer, you take it. You're already doing well.

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to even wait longer and you

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.160
<v Speaker 1>get the Rams to win, well, guess what you got

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the night game two here with the Buccaneers and the Chief.

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:09.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is a really fun all day parlay. Just

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>watch your money grow and maybe the temptation's there to

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>check out. It's up to you. But I'm a big

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>fan of this one this week, and hopefully you are

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. Tell us what you are in on for

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>weekend in the NFL. Drop your comments below, subscribe to

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast wherever you get your pods, and of course

0:29:25.200 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to the YouTube channel as well, and ring the

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>bell till it goes ding for notifications, and don't forget

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to use that Betting Pros app too. That'll do it

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for us, But the story of the game goes on

0:29:33.680 --> 0:29:37.720
<v Speaker 1>for Andrew Ericson and Just Terrell. I'm Joey P. We'll

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Kids.

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 5>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast. If you

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 5>love the show, the best freeway to support us is

0:29:44.280 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 5>by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts or Spotify.

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 5>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 5>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL. Also subscribe to our YouTube

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 5>channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Buls