Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom much. Attorney General Barr says
Speaker 1: the lockdowns are an enormous threat to civil liberty. CDC
Speaker 1: director says that masks may be more effective than a vaccine.
Speaker 1: Minneapolis has a crime problem, and Big ten Football's back.
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton initially decoding the news and disseminating information with
Speaker 1: assionable intelligence, Make no mistake Americans great, You're a great
Speaker 1: American again. This is the Buck Sexton Show. Former CIA
Speaker 1: analysts can speak to three hours without a phone call.
Speaker 1: Try doing that sometimes. No. Welcome to Buck Sexton Show. Everyone.
Speaker 1: Great to have you here as always, Thank you so
Speaker 1: much for joining an honor and a privilege. As we
Speaker 1: bear down on this election and things are just going
Speaker 1: to keep heating up, I've got to say I'm already.
Speaker 1: I'm ready for the fight. I'm I'm like a guy
Speaker 1: that can't wait to run out of the tunnel to
Speaker 1: a backflip on the field and start dunking and throwing
Speaker 1: touchdowns and all those fun things. Right. I want to
Speaker 1: get into this battle. I want to get into this fight.
Speaker 1: And let's start right now with what the Attorney General.
Speaker 1: As you know, I think probably the most competent, most
Speaker 1: effective member of the Trump cabinet. And he gave his
Speaker 1: speech last night that's got the liberals all upset. He
Speaker 1: hit on some key issues. But let me break down
Speaker 1: just a couple them for you, because this, this really matters.
Speaker 1: This goes to the philosophy right now, the underlying philosophical contest,
Speaker 1: debate fight between the right and the left as it
Speaker 1: pertains to the deep state and the weaponization of prosecutors'
Speaker 1: offices and the increase of tyranny that we've gone through
Speaker 1: this year. There is a iranical impulse on display in
Speaker 1: this era of COVID. There's no question about that. That's
Speaker 1: what's happening right now. That's what's really going on. And
Speaker 1: the Attorney General finally said enough is enough. Now let
Speaker 1: me start with his view of these lockdown measures. Now,
Speaker 1: keep in mind, keep in mind that we just had
Speaker 1: a federal judge tell the governor of Pennsylvania, Tom Wolfe, no,
Speaker 1: you can't just keep doing this. You can't extend indefinitely.
Speaker 1: Think of the power we've given governors. Think of the
Speaker 1: power we have allowed state level officials to have. It's
Speaker 1: as though we have we have no constitutional protection. We
Speaker 1: don't even have administrative or process protections, just the stroke
Speaker 1: of a pen. Yeah, I'm the governor, and I say
Speaker 1: you got to stay home, you have to stay in
Speaker 1: your domicile, you have to shelter in place. We usually
Speaker 1: accept these things in extremes like a hurricane or and
Speaker 1: we know it's gonna pass pretty quickly and it's limited duration.
Speaker 1: What we've seen is lockdown has turned into an extension
Speaker 1: of emergency measures to make them quasi permanent. What the
Speaker 1: heck is this limitations on how many people can gather together?
Speaker 1: What are those based on? Well, whatever the governor thinks
Speaker 1: or is moron, health advisors, your Pennsylvania, California, they're all
Speaker 1: coming up with this. Look. Even Texas was put in
Speaker 1: restrictions in place that I was saying, what the heck
Speaker 1: are they doing? You know, give me liberty or give
Speaker 1: me death? Very quickly turned into give me a promise
Speaker 1: of safety and a face mask. Right away, friends, it's
Speaker 1: time to take back our liberty. This was wrong. What's
Speaker 1: happened here was wrong. It did not even make a
Speaker 1: safer which is always the problem with this bargain that
Speaker 1: the government inflicts on us. They pretend it's a bargain,
Speaker 1: it's really a prescription, but it's do we go along
Speaker 1: with it willingly? And in this instance, unfortunately, the answer
Speaker 1: was yes, we did. We said, sure, a slight reduction
Speaker 1: in COVID nineteen, a slight reduction in the infections maybe
Speaker 1: theoretically from all these measures. Remember I'm not talking about
Speaker 1: a reduction for a week or two. I'm looking at
Speaker 1: the totality of cases. The measures were meant. The only
Speaker 1: way that God is to agree to this was to
Speaker 1: tell us that it was about hospital capacity, so we
Speaker 1: can't have too many cases all at once, guys. And
Speaker 1: then they just somehow seamlessly transition into well, we're just
Speaker 1: gonna stop this disease by ruining businesses and taking away
Speaker 1: your freedom. We're going to stop the disease. It's not possible.
Speaker 1: And everyone who had looked at this problem set before
Speaker 1: of a pandemic had said a lockdown like this probably
Speaker 1: won't work and it'll be catastrophically costly. Sixty percent of
Speaker 1: businesses that have closed are now permanent closures, according to
Speaker 1: YELP data, sixty perc. We don't even really know what
Speaker 1: the long term consequences of this are going to be.
Speaker 1: And it's as though we've We've put a bandage over
Speaker 1: the wound, and no one's really seen how bad is
Speaker 1: the bleeding. Well, until we remove the bandage, we're not
Speaker 1: even gonna know. I asked the Attorney General when he
Speaker 1: was on the show. I tried to get to sir,
Speaker 1: are we going to see any legal effort to remedy this?
Speaker 1: Why is in the Department of Justice suing states? But
Speaker 1: I understand why they would say, oh, well, now, now
Speaker 1: the federal government is using the legal process. This is
Speaker 1: what the left, the Democrats, would say, using legal process
Speaker 1: to advance Trump's reelection prospects at the advance of killing
Speaker 1: at the expense of killing Grandma. And that would be
Speaker 1: the whole argument. That's everything that they would say. And unfortunately, politically,
Speaker 1: that's a very powerful argument because we have a lot
Speaker 1: of fearful, stupid people who believe whatever the mainstream media
Speaker 1: tell them to this day, which is remarkable, remarkable, even
Speaker 1: when you look at NBC and ABC News, this war
Speaker 1: armed over liberal crap, millions and millions of people. You know,
Speaker 1: more people watch that than any show on Fox News
Speaker 1: as Monster as the Fox News ratings have been recently
Speaker 1: enormous ratings and Tuckers shows got a four million people
Speaker 1: a night watching that show on Sunits. It's amazing how
Speaker 1: many people actually want the truth. This isn't that a
Speaker 1: fascinating When they have that option, they do turn to that.
Speaker 1: But there are a lot of people that want to
Speaker 1: be told what they've been told in the past. A
Speaker 1: lot of people watch those other channels and they don't
Speaker 1: understand what's really happening in this country. As a result
Speaker 1: of it, the Attorney General certainly understands where was the
Speaker 1: justification for all of us? I see people saying, oh, buck,
Speaker 1: what about seatbelt laws? Now we're going to play this
Speaker 1: game where we're going to pretend that shunning down entire
Speaker 1: industries on a whim, That making restrictions on businesses that
Speaker 1: are destroying their ability to operate, That telling people that
Speaker 1: they have no freedom of movement or associate that that's
Speaker 1: like telling somebody to wear a seepo. You know, I
Speaker 1: think you actually could probably make a case about sebo
Speaker 1: laws and how they shouldn't be federal in any way.
Speaker 1: But that's not the point. The point here is that, yes,
Speaker 1: you know, we're a reasonable people, and if we're told, hey, guys,
Speaker 1: there's a huge hurricane coming in. We're gonna need everybody
Speaker 1: to get out of this one area for a day
Speaker 1: or two. Most people, not everybody. Most people will go
Speaker 1: along with that, assuming they can go back to their
Speaker 1: homes afterwards. But imagine if we had a hurricane coming
Speaker 1: and by the way, thoughts and prayers go down to
Speaker 1: people along the Gulf coast. I know they've been hit
Speaker 1: very hard. But imagine if there was a nationwide hurricane
Speaker 1: coming across the country and they said, okay, everyone, you
Speaker 1: just need a shelter in place for two days, and
Speaker 1: then they said, well, no, it's gonna be more like
Speaker 1: twenty actually, gonna be more like three months, make it six,
Speaker 1: make it not. There's a difference, there isn't there. We
Speaker 1: can all see, we all understand, and that's exactly what
Speaker 1: has happened here. And you need to be aware of this.
Speaker 1: People that push for these lockdowns, the people that push
Speaker 1: these policies dishonestly, that kept changing their mind on what
Speaker 1: the science says. Oh, the science changes month the month. Apparently,
Speaker 1: that's how important the science is to these lockdowners. They
Speaker 1: will never admit they were wrong. They will never admit
Speaker 1: that this was a catastrophic mistake. They'll never admit that
Speaker 1: Masks didn't do anything. Now, maybe Masks did something fine,
Speaker 1: Maybe they reduced transmission five percent. Who knows. I don't know,
Speaker 1: but they don't know either, and they act like they
Speaker 1: can change their mind. And we're not supposed to ask
Speaker 1: any questions. I mean, like a bunch of sheep, people,
Speaker 1: just go along with this. The CDC director, we're gonna
Speaker 1: get into this in a little bit. He's saying stuff
Speaker 1: in direct contradiction to what he was saying months ago
Speaker 1: and looks at you like, if you don't just go
Speaker 1: along with what he says, now, there's something wrong with you.
Speaker 1: Here in New York, we're being told get ready for
Speaker 1: a second lockdown this winner, and it's gonna be been
Speaker 1: worse because there's gonna be flu. You know what I
Speaker 1: think's gonna happen. You're gonna have a lot of people
Speaker 1: that think they have flu that then say they have COVID,
Speaker 1: and then you're gonna have panic spreading because it's or
Speaker 1: rather I think they have COVID, they really have the flu.
Speaker 1: And there's gonna be all kinds of problems within the
Speaker 1: data sets and everyone's gonna go there is no rational
Speaker 1: explanation for what has gone on in places like New
Speaker 1: York that have been so so hard hit by this
Speaker 1: virus and now have effectively almost no COVID other than
Speaker 1: we basically let this thing burn through the whole city,
Speaker 1: and then after the city had been burned by this virus,
Speaker 1: we turn around and said, oh, well, now let's make
Speaker 1: sure that we have no one allowed to use any fire,
Speaker 1: no one, no one allowed to use any electrical appliances. Good.
Speaker 1: It's already burned through, So you get the downside without
Speaker 1: any of the upside. Do you think they'll ever admit that.
Speaker 1: You think the scientific community is ever gonna say, yeah,
Speaker 1: you are right. Look at them on Russia collusion. Look
Speaker 1: at the eagal community and how many people that are
Speaker 1: esteemed professors at Harvard Law are go on various cable
Speaker 1: news channels to opine about the law who still talk
Speaker 1: about Russia collusion like it happened because people are lunatics.
Speaker 1: You think they're ever gonna say, yeah, you know, we
Speaker 1: cost millions and millions of people their jobs, their livelihoods,
Speaker 1: bankrupted them, took away their freedom, put them under tremendous
Speaker 1: psychological durests. You know, exacerbated their alcoholism or exacerbated their
Speaker 1: drug abuse problems by separating them from their families. Told
Speaker 1: people they couldn't even say goodbye to loved ones except
Speaker 1: the a skype if they were lucky because of our
Speaker 1: policies for the lockdown. You think they're gonna turund and say,
Speaker 1: whoop sees, that was all a mistake. No, So just
Speaker 1: be clear on this right now. They will It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter what the numbers actually say. They will never admit this,
Speaker 1: the same way that the people that believe California is
Speaker 1: on the you know the state of California is on
Speaker 1: fire because of climate change now because it's so terrible now,
Speaker 1: ten like, we don't remember what they said twenty years ago,
Speaker 1: and how we would already be in a place where
Speaker 1: climate change was supposed to catastrophically hit us now in
Speaker 1: ways that it hasn't. They just it doesn't matter. They're
Speaker 1: never going to admit they were wrong. So don't ever
Speaker 1: expect that day of recognition to come. But at least
Speaker 1: we can speak the truth here. At least we can
Speaker 1: know the truth about what has happened to this country
Speaker 1: and that there was no political will to stop it.
Speaker 1: Nobody was willing to say, what are we doing here now?
Speaker 1: The President told me in May he said no second lockdown,
Speaker 1: and he kept his word. There was no federal lockdown.
Speaker 1: We have Biden running around saying we need a national
Speaker 1: mask mandate, and the President left it to the states,
Speaker 1: which under the circumstances, was the right thing to do.
Speaker 1: But what are the states done with this? What makes
Speaker 1: them think they have this right? Cuomo and Newsome and
Speaker 1: you know, whitmerr and these governors lecture the American people
Speaker 1: about how it's our fault if things are still bad
Speaker 1: because we didn't do enough of what they told us,
Speaker 1: and the things they've been telling us to do making
Speaker 1: us do are idiotic. BLM protests are great, that's fantastic.
Speaker 1: You want to hang out with your friends in a
Speaker 1: group of more than ten people outdoors in the middle
Speaker 1: of summer. Who friends? They were sending police in California
Speaker 1: after loan paddle borders in the friggin ocean. You think
Speaker 1: that's about health. It's amazing how quickly we forgot what
Speaker 1: we believed our ideological heritage as a nation was all
Speaker 1: about individual liberty and freedom. It's amazing how we just
Speaker 1: so quickly abandoned it, and I'm glad that now there
Speaker 1: are some voices, including the Attorney General, who are speaking
Speaker 1: out saying this is unacceptable, this is wrong. This even
Speaker 1: goes beyond just the Trump election, although I do think
Speaker 1: that's a critical part of restoring our our liberties. I
Speaker 1: don't think the President has been perfect on COVID, of course,
Speaker 1: not mistakes have been made. I know he's better than
Speaker 1: what the Democrats would have done, a lot better, And
Speaker 1: I know that if you put Democrats in charge, they're
Speaker 1: going to act like there's a COVID pandemic so that
Speaker 1: they can use that crisis when they're in power, even
Speaker 1: if there aren't the numbers to justify it at all,
Speaker 1: which there aren't now in a lot of places in
Speaker 1: the country already, they're going to use that to their advantage.
Speaker 1: They're they're going to continue and even if necessary, man
Speaker 1: you facture elements of the COVID crisis into twenty twenty
Speaker 1: one for their own purposes, to exaggerate it, to pretend
Speaker 1: it's worse than it is, so that they can have
Speaker 1: Look at all this power, power that we have allowed
Speaker 1: the state to have, that we should wrest from them
Speaker 1: with every ounce of our being. We should pull it
Speaker 1: from their grubby little fingers. You're in the freedom und
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. Putting a
Speaker 1: national lockdown, stay at home orders is like house arrest.
Speaker 1: It's the it's you know, other than slavery, which was
Speaker 1: a different kind of restraint. This is the greatest intrusion
Speaker 1: on civil liberties in American history. The man is speaking
Speaker 1: the truth there. You could argue about the interment of
Speaker 1: the Japanese during World War Two, and I think that
Speaker 1: if he thought about that, he might say, Okay, fine,
Speaker 1: it's the third greatest intrusion of civil liberties in our history.
Speaker 1: But it's right up there, and this affects far more people,
Speaker 1: while admittedly less specifically individually agreedis that affects far more
Speaker 1: people across the nation than the interment of Japanese, although
Speaker 1: of course the Japanese Americans that that was also racist.
Speaker 1: But this is a catastrophic, a catastrophic blow to our
Speaker 1: individual liberties. And where have been the voices against this?
Speaker 1: I even started to have people reaching out to me saying, Buck,
Speaker 1: you're talking about this lockdown thing too much. There's other things. No,
Speaker 1: this is the most important thing. This has been this
Speaker 1: year the most important thing, because they can't protect you.
Speaker 1: They're they're not saving your life. So put that aside
Speaker 1: and look at the numbers. You think the government's doing
Speaker 1: a great job of saving lives. They can't do. The
Speaker 1: virus is gonna virus. There's nothing they can do to
Speaker 1: stop the virus from spreading within the population to a
Speaker 1: level at which the virus won't spread anymore because there
Speaker 1: will be herd immunity, which some of us have been
Speaker 1: saying from the beginning, we're doing a herd immunity strategy.
Speaker 1: We're just calling it a million other things and changing
Speaker 1: every month. We're just running around with our hair on fire,
Speaker 1: desperate to say it's something else, but it's not. But
Speaker 1: it's just simply not. Where were people calling this out?
Speaker 1: I remember in those early weeks, Oh my gosh, the
Speaker 1: blue check lives. You just want you just want people's
Speaker 1: grandparents to die. You just don't care about the older.
Speaker 1: Bring it just for bringing up the lack of evidence
Speaker 1: that lockdowns would even be effective, and the certainty, the
Speaker 1: certainty that they would be economically devastating and devastating to
Speaker 1: our liberties. What is Ask yourself this question and It's
Speaker 1: one that I've posed before on this show. What are
Speaker 1: the outer limits of the ability now that a government
Speaker 1: official or a government official who's elected has when it
Speaker 1: comes to a declaring an emergency and curtailing your rights?
Speaker 1: You think that what are those limits? I don't know.
Speaker 1: Is there a time duration? Is there is there even
Speaker 1: a need for legislation? No governor could declare tomorrow a
Speaker 1: climate emergency in California and say no one can use
Speaker 1: any electricity with some exceptions, I'm sure they'd make right.
Speaker 1: No one can use any water in their homes right now,
Speaker 1: only bottled water. And you know, everybody has to start
Speaker 1: changing the way that they go about their day to
Speaker 1: day lives until we say the climate emergency is over. Oh,
Speaker 1: unless you're an essential work or you have to stay home.
Speaker 1: We're not going to make everybody tell you tell a work.
Speaker 1: Why is there no authority? You want to say, Buck,
Speaker 1: that's crazy, and it is. But they have the authority
Speaker 1: to do that. Now, my friends, if the government has
Speaker 1: the authority because it says so to tell you to
Speaker 1: stay in your home on pain of arrest or fine,
Speaker 1: to tell you you cannot gather with other human beings
Speaker 1: that you cannot engage in otherwise lawful activity, that you
Speaker 1: have to shut down your business and suffer the economic
Speaker 1: consequences that you have bills that you must pay while
Speaker 1: being unable to make the income necessary for paying them
Speaker 1: because of government mandate. What do you think they can't do?
Speaker 1: And mind you, over ninety nine percent of the people
Speaker 1: they're making do that are zero risk to public health,
Speaker 1: do not have the disease, are not spreading it to anybody?
Speaker 1: Where Where are the limits to their power and authority? Friends,
Speaker 1: there isn't a limit lockdown in your homes if they
Speaker 1: want you for years, and some of them are even
Speaker 1: talking about extending this deep into next year. So let's
Speaker 1: not just pretend it's theoretical. Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: buses and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeart Radio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: How do you know there's something wrong here with the
Speaker 1: narrative about COVID, about lockdowns, about what it's done to
Speaker 1: our liberties? What's the what's the first obvious sign? What's
Speaker 1: the first evidence you could point to? You're not allowed
Speaker 1: to ask questions. That's always the mark of a tyrant.
Speaker 1: The mark of somebody who wants to take away your freedom.
Speaker 1: The first thing you'll often encounter is that you're not
Speaker 1: allowed to ask questions right when you're in a meeting
Speaker 1: in the office. And if at the end of it
Speaker 1: they just say no questions, they walk out. If they've
Speaker 1: made a major announcement of some kind, usually that's that's
Speaker 1: letting you know this is the way it's going to be,
Speaker 1: So shut your mouth and do what you're told, right,
Speaker 1: no questions, not allowed to ask any questions, or if
Speaker 1: you already know that, if you were to pose a question,
Speaker 1: it would be at your professional peril, and you know
Speaker 1: you got a problem. Our government has been making all
Speaker 1: kinds of claims, and it's mostly at the state level,
Speaker 1: and also the permanent bureaucracy of the CDC and the
Speaker 1: NIH and they've been making all kinds of claims for
Speaker 1: which any reasonable person, reasonable person would have questions. I
Speaker 1: ask these things publicly. I bring these up, and I
Speaker 1: get hatred from people people have been for for months
Speaker 1: writing And I'm not whining. I don't care they're losers,
Speaker 1: but I just mean, think of the mentality. I'm merely
Speaker 1: asking for answers that any normal person who had not
Speaker 1: been brain washed with fear and loathing of Trump. Right,
Speaker 1: it's always the one two punch. Be scared, COVID is
Speaker 1: gonna get you, and oh my gosh, it's all Trump's fault. Right.
Speaker 1: They terrify the population and then they mobilize that terror
Speaker 1: against the sitting president. That's the whole game. That's what
Speaker 1: it's been all year. That's what they're doing. But I
Speaker 1: do have some questions that I want answers to as
Speaker 1: I sit here technically under I am doing this show,
Speaker 1: and I am still technically under mandatory state order to
Speaker 1: stay in my home. I am not allowed to go
Speaker 1: outside according to state law, unless it's for a medical need.
Speaker 1: I mean, you know other countries they did this thing.
Speaker 1: Maybe one person per households can go get food per
Speaker 1: day or something. You know. The little the little libs
Speaker 1: just all go along with this. Whatever we're told, whatever
Speaker 1: the government says, must be good. We're responsible. Okay, Well,
Speaker 1: let's talk about what the government has been telling us.
Speaker 1: This was yesterday the CDC director Redfield, who I mean,
Speaker 1: this is just mind blowing that this guy says this, buddy,
Speaker 1: but he does. You need to hear. This is what
Speaker 1: he told the United States Senate yesterday about masks versus
Speaker 1: vaccines play one. I'm not going to comment directly about
Speaker 1: the President, but I am going to comment as the
Speaker 1: CDC director that face masks. These face masks are the
Speaker 1: most important powerful public health tool we have, and I
Speaker 1: will continue to appeal for all Americans, all individuals in
Speaker 1: our country, to embrace these facecoffings. I've said it, if
Speaker 1: we did it for six, eight, ten, twelve weeks, we'd
Speaker 1: bring this pandemic under control. These actually we have clear
Speaker 1: scientific evidence they work and they are our best defense.
Speaker 1: I might even go so far as to say that
Speaker 1: this face mask is more guaranteed to protect me. Again
Speaker 1: that when I take a COVID vaccine, because the imminogenicity
Speaker 1: may be seventy percent, and if I don't get an
Speaker 1: immune response, the vaccine is not going to protect me.
Speaker 1: This face mask will. So I do want to keep
Speaker 1: asking the American public to take the responsibility, particularly the
Speaker 1: eighteen to twenty five year olds where we're seeing the
Speaker 1: outbreak in America continue to go like this because we
Speaker 1: haven't got the acceptance to personal responsibility that we need
Speaker 1: for all Americans to embrace this face mask I might
Speaker 1: even go so far as to say that this face
Speaker 1: mask is more guaranteed to protect me against COVID than
Speaker 1: when I take a COVID vaccine. He said, Wow, you
Speaker 1: realize that the vaccines will have gone through many months
Speaker 1: of thousands and thousands of individuals who are being monitored
Speaker 1: the whole way to task for safety and efficacy. And
Speaker 1: have we done any experiment like with masks that you're
Speaker 1: aware of? That is, I just want to see where's
Speaker 1: the data? Okay, But before before I get into my
Speaker 1: problems with even that statement, I'm not a I'm not
Speaker 1: a medical doctor, as we all know, and I don't
Speaker 1: have a background in biology, biochemistry or science. But then again,
Speaker 1: neither do any of these lives making all these decisions. Really,
Speaker 1: I mean at the political level. That was what the
Speaker 1: CDC director said yesterday. Here is the same CDC director
Speaker 1: in his own words, six months ago, play three, should
Speaker 1: you wear a mask if you're healthy? No, that was
Speaker 1: six months ago. I just I want them to identify
Speaker 1: for me where the massive leap in scientific knowledge occurred.
Speaker 1: What are they using as the data to show that
Speaker 1: six months ago? Something as straightforward as should you wear
Speaker 1: a mask if you're healthy. The answer was a definitive
Speaker 1: no from the same CDC chief who now is telling
Speaker 1: you I accident masks may be a better protection for
Speaker 1: you than even a vaccine. Is what? Now? Okay, that's
Speaker 1: that's as clear a contradiction as you're going to find. Right.
Speaker 1: And this is supposed to be about science. This is
Speaker 1: not politics where people are always just changing their predictions
Speaker 1: and making it up as they go along. Why is that?
Speaker 1: Where is this evidence? Where where is the basis for
Speaker 1: this change? And I asked that question honestly, every study
Speaker 1: that I have seen on the internet so far, and
Speaker 1: I don't mean that people are making up on the internet.
Speaker 1: I mean that's published for people to read, that is
Speaker 1: from a peer of view journal, whether it's in the Lancet,
Speaker 1: one of the most esteemed medical journals in the world,
Speaker 1: or different different European health and virology and institutes coming
Speaker 1: forward with their own act fual testing actual data on this.
Speaker 1: Everything that I've seen says that it might work a
Speaker 1: tiny bit, but it probably does almost nothing. Now I
Speaker 1: may be missing something, and I am always I want
Speaker 1: to learn more and I want to be right. I
Speaker 1: want to know the truth always. That is the central
Speaker 1: promise of what I do here every day. I want
Speaker 1: to know what's true. But you see, we have a problem, friends,
Speaker 1: because there are a whole lot of people who don't
Speaker 1: want to know what's true, because of the stakes involved
Speaker 1: with all of this. You have two major competing forces
Speaker 1: against truth about the lockdown, truth about this policy that
Speaker 1: has been inflicted on us, that's effectively stolen a year
Speaker 1: of our lives from everybody in this country. And one
Speaker 1: way or another, or one way or another, you have
Speaker 1: the election and the need to blame everything on Trump,
Speaker 1: but you also have, for many people, the equally powerful
Speaker 1: need to avoid accountability from within the federal bureaucracy for
Speaker 1: pushing disastrous policies that have been terrible for the American
Speaker 1: people and and ineffective. All right, it's one thing if
Speaker 1: you at least get something for your pain. It's not
Speaker 1: clear at all we've gotten anything for our pain. Some
Speaker 1: of us have been warning from the beginning about this.
Speaker 1: Some of us were raising alarm, asking, we were drowned out.
Speaker 1: We were shouted down, Oh, you're not a scientist. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but the scientists change their mind every quote. Scientists change
Speaker 1: their mind about every two weeks. So what am I
Speaker 1: supposed I'm supposed to think that Now it's like science
Speaker 1: ex cathedra pronouncements. Now it's inviolate. You can't even wonder
Speaker 1: if maybe there's something else going on here. It's truly,
Speaker 1: it's truly astonishing. Friends. I don't know what else it's
Speaker 1: going to take other than I think that we've reached
Speaker 1: a point now where the American people in their own way,
Speaker 1: and you know, if they feel they feel ready to
Speaker 1: take whatever consequences come. You're you're looking at it at
Speaker 1: a need to just refuse. You're looking at a need
Speaker 1: for there to be mass non compliance, intentional non compliance
Speaker 1: for businesses, for people that are saying, oh okay, and
Speaker 1: by the way, I'm not saying, you know, go cough
Speaker 1: on people in a nursing home and be a lunatic.
Speaker 1: But when you're talking about specific policies, no, I'm not
Speaker 1: going to put a mask on to walk from a
Speaker 1: restaurant table to a bathroom when I've been sitting indoors
Speaker 1: in a restaurant for an hour and a half breathing,
Speaker 1: and do it because it makes people feel better that
Speaker 1: there's something being done that's dumb. And these are mandates,
Speaker 1: These are required by law. I've got to tell you,
Speaker 1: it's it's been a failing. It's been a failing of conservatives.
Speaker 1: Up to this point. We've lost the code narrative battle.
Speaker 1: We've lost it. It doesn't mean that we can't push
Speaker 1: back now and hopefully turn this around. But the left
Speaker 1: was able, with their larger and more numerous megaphones, to
Speaker 1: drown out the voices of reason in this and to
Speaker 1: even get Republicans to submit and comply and go along
Speaker 1: with it. And for what So you can now have
Speaker 1: the CDC director act, Like, what do you mean? You
Speaker 1: don't realize masks are the greatest thing ever. But it's
Speaker 1: not just masks, it's all this stuff, the masks and
Speaker 1: the remember all the stuff about just wash your hands.
Speaker 1: And that was we were told at one point that
Speaker 1: was the most the most important tool in fighting this,
Speaker 1: and then we were told the most important tool was
Speaker 1: social distancing, and then we were told the most important
Speaker 1: tool was face mask. And all the while, people are
Speaker 1: watching their bank accounts go to zero, their businesses get
Speaker 1: destroyed and boarded up, their mental health deteriorate, their physical
Speaker 1: health deteriorate millions and millions of them, But government employees, bureaucrats,
Speaker 1: the rich, the elites, the people who tell awork with
Speaker 1: no problem for them. It just turned into a big
Speaker 1: you know, hang out in your pajamas, watch Netflix, eat
Speaker 1: your mac and cheese, and you know, express your contempt
Speaker 1: for anybody that has a problem with having their business
Speaker 1: shut down. Oh, they don't care enough about people. This
Speaker 1: is a very dark chapter of this nation's history and
Speaker 1: it's still being written right now. And if we lose
Speaker 1: this election, they're going to do this again in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one because they love the power and control. The
Speaker 1: party that does not, at its core, want more than
Speaker 1: anything else, to just constantly be dictating everything to you
Speaker 1: about every aspect of life. The party that doesn't want
Speaker 1: to do that is has been in power, and this
Speaker 1: is what we've gone through this year. Can you imagine
Speaker 1: what happens if the executive branch goes into the hands
Speaker 1: of Biden and the lunatics around him that are making
Speaker 1: the marionette dance to the prescribed tune. I'm just so
Speaker 1: these are part of the stakes that we face now.
Speaker 1: I was thinking that they're going to open the country
Speaker 1: after Biden wins. Oh no, friends, no, no, no, We
Speaker 1: haven't paid a high enough price, according to the Libs,
Speaker 1: not for COVID for our election of Donald Trump in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. No, they have to. They have to purge
Speaker 1: our sins even more through continued control, manipulation, usurpation of
Speaker 1: our rights in the name of keeping us safe, in
Speaker 1: the name of you being responsible and considerate of your
Speaker 1: fellow Americans. That's what they're going to tell you. I
Speaker 1: think it was a month ago that I wear a
Speaker 1: mask to protect you, is what they were saying, right,
Speaker 1: And now the CDC director today just switched it. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, masks are great protection for you. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: which is it? That just changes? Why are you asking questions?
Speaker 1: Don't ask questions? Not allowed? You see, friends, it's long
Speaker 1: past time to say enough is enough here. But that
Speaker 1: means that they're going to be consequences for fighting back.
Speaker 1: Tyrants don't give pack, tyrants don't give back power willingly
Speaker 1: has to be taken. You're in the freedom hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. So what's Joe Biden
Speaker 1: going to do if the American people make the very
Speaker 1: foolhardy mistake of putting him in power to deal with
Speaker 1: all of this? Well, here's what he says we can
Speaker 1: expect in just the next couple of months play fourteen.
Speaker 1: He still won't accept any responsibility, he still won't offer
Speaker 1: a plan, and last night he repeated what he said
Speaker 1: so many times before that even if he continues to
Speaker 1: offer only failing indifference, someday the virus is going to
Speaker 1: go away by America. Even if he does nothing, it's
Speaker 1: going to go away by America. It won't go away
Speaker 1: like America. In fact, even if it get able to
Speaker 1: get a vaccine will not be available for most populations.
Speaker 1: Are well into the twenty twenty one you know, so
Speaker 1: we're heading into a very dangerous autumn. The fact that
Speaker 1: the University of Washington model, which the White House is
Speaker 1: previously touted, projects and cases and deaths are going to
Speaker 1: spike this November, and an additional by two hundred and
Speaker 1: fifteen thousand Americans they say, you're going to die. Begin
Speaker 1: the spike in November, but by the first of the year,
Speaker 1: two fifteen thousand will be dead. Additional, that's more than
Speaker 1: the already died. We need leadership right now to prevent
Speaker 1: that from happening. Here is this complete imbecile telling the
Speaker 1: American people vote for me, or two hundred thousand more people.
Speaker 1: And it wasn't it was two two hundred and fifteen thousand,
Speaker 1: because you know, the HM models have been so accurate
Speaker 1: that the Hime models are laughably wrong, laughably wrong, and
Speaker 1: have been all along. But and he says, oh, the
Speaker 1: president tatted. Yeah, they touted the until they saw that
Speaker 1: they were all wrong. Two hundred and fifteen thousand Americans,
Speaker 1: he says, will die unless you vote for him. Is
Speaker 1: it possible to think of more ballfaced, reckless demagoguery than
Speaker 1: this put me in power? Or a couple of one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand of you will more will die? And does
Speaker 1: any intelligent person really believe that? What is what is
Speaker 1: Joe Biden going to do to stop this virus? But
Speaker 1: I tell you this is this is a big it's
Speaker 1: a shift in my thinking. Now. I had thought that
Speaker 1: we would be allowed our lives back starting November fourth,
Speaker 1: if Biden wins, because that's an easy way to all
Speaker 1: of a sudden get the economy up and running, and
Speaker 1: oh it's a brighter day. No no, no, no, no,
Speaker 1: you're gonna have to earn it. The lives are gonna
Speaker 1: make you earn it. America. They're not done telling you
Speaker 1: how many jumping jacks to do. They're not done telling
Speaker 1: you when you're allowed to stop your run or stop
Speaker 1: the burp bees or stop whatever. Oh no, they've got
Speaker 1: a lot more instruction for you going forward. There's gonna
Speaker 1: be instruction for your health during the COVID pandemic. That
Speaker 1: involves climate, that involves gun control, that involves you name it, right,
Speaker 1: massive expansions of government in the healthcare system, right taking
Speaker 1: Obamacare and buy executive fiat, piecing at all, piecing more
Speaker 1: of it back together, and building an even larger mess
Speaker 1: within the healthcare system. They've got all kinds of plans.
Speaker 1: They're not just going to let us go back to
Speaker 1: a normal life. They don't want that. They don't trust.
Speaker 1: They don't think that people should be making their own decisions.
Speaker 1: That's central to the ethos of the Democrat Party, right.
Speaker 1: They have like a communist politburrow mentality. They really do well,
Speaker 1: we'll put all the really good smart people in charge.
Speaker 1: We'll crush the individualistic types who want to get ahead
Speaker 1: and have their own lives and make their own choices,
Speaker 1: and then we'll give enough to the rest of the
Speaker 1: masses that they'll keep us in power. There we go.
Speaker 1: That's going to be the plan with COVID. They're gonna
Speaker 1: leverage the crisis even more. They're not gonna let this
Speaker 1: crisis go to waste. Right, Thanks for listening to the
Speaker 1: bus sess and show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Let's
Speaker 1: continue this. What would the Democrats do if Biden wins
Speaker 1: and let's say they keep the House and the Senate.
Speaker 1: Let's say the Senate days in Republican hands, just for
Speaker 1: wargaming purposes. What will they do? Well, you'd see a
Speaker 1: lot of rules by executive fiat. And this is why
Speaker 1: it's so damning, it's so dangerous that we've allowed the COVID,
Speaker 1: the COVID response to be just whatever any executive authority
Speaker 1: and government decides it wants to do. At the state level,
Speaker 1: at least they can do. Man, they tell you tell
Speaker 1: you that, you know, five people in a bar's okay,
Speaker 1: But five people in a bar, but ten at a
Speaker 1: you know, at a store, some stores open, other stores close.
Speaker 1: Some business is essential, others not. I mean, just making
Speaker 1: whatever determinations they want with real consequences for people. This
Speaker 1: isn't due process. Look at all the left wing judges
Speaker 1: Obama appointees, almost all of them, who will use the
Speaker 1: Administrative Procedures Act to shut down some Trump executive order
Speaker 1: about something he's completely within his rights to do. Where's
Speaker 1: the administrative procedure for a governor that's one day saying
Speaker 1: schools are open, the next day schools are all closed,
Speaker 1: or they're gonna be half open and half clothed, or
Speaker 1: your business has got I mean what, I know, everyone's scared.
Speaker 1: Everyone's scared, so we don't want to do anything about it.
Speaker 1: You know, life is scary, there's always fear, there's always risk.
Speaker 1: I thought we were a country that really understood that.
Speaker 1: I've been very disappointed in this. What would Biden do well?
Speaker 1: He says there's going to be a national mask mandate
Speaker 1: Play thirteen. A question whether I can mandate over state
Speaker 1: lines that every single state has to comply. Our legal
Speaker 1: team thinks I can do that based upon the degree
Speaker 1: to which there's a crisis in those states and how
Speaker 1: bad things are for the country, and if we don't
Speaker 1: do it, what happens. But I would make the case.
Speaker 1: I'd make the case why it's necessary. I'd have a
Speaker 1: scientist to raid to lay out in detail why, and
Speaker 1: I would go to every governor, and I'd go to
Speaker 1: governor's relating Republican and Democratic governors, and I'd say, we
Speaker 1: have to have this national mandate. We must do it.
Speaker 1: A national mandate, federalized mask policy. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: this should be setting off alarm bells in everyone's head.
Speaker 1: What So the government now can make a mandate that
Speaker 1: they say is necessary for health that's completely unproven for
Speaker 1: I mean, if they can do this, they can. They
Speaker 1: can mandate people have to take you know, mandate people
Speaker 1: have to take ssrries so they don't get too depressed.
Speaker 1: Mandate people can have to take whatever whatever vaccines they
Speaker 1: want you to take. Never mind just like a few
Speaker 1: that are long, long tested and proven. U they you know, what,
Speaker 1: what can they not do in the name of public health.
Speaker 1: They can lock you in your home, stick a needle
Speaker 1: in your arm, take away your property, and tell you
Speaker 1: that you can't breathe normally. Oh oh yeah, sure, we're
Speaker 1: the live free or diet country. Sure we are. I
Speaker 1: think we've all woken up from that that it's a
Speaker 1: self delusion and certainly not the case. Our legal team
Speaker 1: thinks based on what, oh, the commerce caause. I know
Speaker 1: people will say this, right, because Libs think that the
Speaker 1: commerce caause means whatever they want it to mean. Joe
Speaker 1: Biden was in fact part of the Violence Against Women
Speaker 1: Act at which initially was saying, well, we're gonna make
Speaker 1: violence against women a federal crime because of its effect
Speaker 1: on commerce. Violence against women is horrible and it's illegal
Speaker 1: in all fifty states. But it's not a commerce issue.
Speaker 1: I mean, if that's a commerce issue anything, but that's
Speaker 1: what they do. They say everything is and whatever they
Speaker 1: want to do something, it's a commerce issue. This is
Speaker 1: the continuing constitutional distortion we have because the Wicker v.
Speaker 1: Filburn decision. Oh, you can't just grow wheat for your
Speaker 1: own usage, even if it doesn't cross state lines, because
Speaker 1: if you're not buying it, then it's a fact, you know,
Speaker 1: if you're not buying it from other people, and it's
Speaker 1: affecting the commerce between states. So there you go, even
Speaker 1: you're not being in the market as you being in
Speaker 1: the market. Right, that's what they were. That's where that
Speaker 1: came from. Though one of the worst Supreme Court decisions
Speaker 1: in terms of its lasting effects of all time. I mean,
Speaker 1: it's not quite Roe v. Wade, but it's you know,
Speaker 1: it's not quite Dread Scott, but it's it's a really
Speaker 1: bad Supreme Court decision. Now we have Biden saying and
Speaker 1: he thinks there's legal team things that can mandate this,
Speaker 1: and we're at the end, at the end of the pandemic.
Speaker 1: That's what the other thing is. So now we're gonna
Speaker 1: have a mask mandate for how long? Who determines how
Speaker 1: many cases is acceptable? No? I know, friends, I could
Speaker 1: see here and just be like, Trump is awesome. Let's
Speaker 1: look at polls. Yeah, he's gonna win another A lot
Speaker 1: of shows they are doing that every day. This really matters,
Speaker 1: this discussion which has been forestalled, this debate which a
Speaker 1: lot of people, even on the right, have been unwilling
Speaker 1: to really engaging because people all they get so upset
Speaker 1: when someone says they're anti science. All the people they'll
Speaker 1: call me anti science. I know more and am smarter
Speaker 1: than so I don't really care. It doesn't bother me.
Speaker 1: I don't sit there go oh they think I'm anti science.
Speaker 1: But I guess I'm lucky in that regard. If we
Speaker 1: impose universal masking. What will be the upside? Talk about
Speaker 1: magic thinking. Here, here's here's what Biden says, two hundred
Speaker 1: and fifteen thousand people. I mean, he's really he's got
Speaker 1: all the numbers for your two hundred fifty thousand people
Speaker 1: will die if you don't elect Biden. If you do
Speaker 1: elect Biden, here's what he claims will happen. Play twelve.
Speaker 1: The same university. The model shows the University of Washington.
Speaker 1: Model shows it if if there's universal masking, these desks
Speaker 1: could be projected, desks could be cut in half. We
Speaker 1: could stay between now and the end of the year.
Speaker 1: One hundred thousand lives. Let's assume they're off by half
Speaker 1: on all of this, fifty thousand lives, one hundred and
Speaker 1: fifty thousand dead. Donald trumpshone director of CDC, told us
Speaker 1: that wearing a mask is a single most important step
Speaker 1: we can take to curd this virus. So let's let's
Speaker 1: just unpack this for a second. He's saying, well, let's
Speaker 1: say we're off and fifty thousand lives. I mean they're
Speaker 1: off by a lot more than that. They're fifty thousand lives,
Speaker 1: So you're gonna be a universal mask mandate to say,
Speaker 1: fifty thousand lives. That's the claim, right, how many people
Speaker 1: die every year from influenza thirty to seventy thousand about
Speaker 1: that something like that, twenty to seventy thousand, depends on
Speaker 1: the year. So we're gonna wear masks every year now, right,
Speaker 1: We're gonna wear masks forever. This is the standard that
Speaker 1: they created. And I know people shot, that's not the flu,
Speaker 1: and they say this, that's not what morons say, because
Speaker 1: they're missing the point. No one's saying it's the flu.
Speaker 1: We're saying the principle is you can enforce these arbitrary
Speaker 1: and stifling inconveniences on human beings at will, because if
Speaker 1: it saves just one life, is now our health policy,
Speaker 1: well then that's gonna extend to a whole lot of it.
Speaker 1: That's gonna extend to you know, red meat, that's gonna
Speaker 1: extend to climate change. That's gonna extend to a whole
Speaker 1: lot of things. And if you think the Libs won't
Speaker 1: do it, you haven't been paying attention to the last
Speaker 1: twenty years. All right, ten years ago, it was no
Speaker 1: one's saying that. A twelve year old boy who says
Speaker 1: he's a girl is going to be in a locker
Speaker 1: room with your twelve year old girls at school. That's crazy.
Speaker 1: And then about four or five years ago was what
Speaker 1: do you mean you don't think that a girl who
Speaker 1: was born male shouldn't be allowed at the age of
Speaker 1: twelve or thirteen to undress. I mean, they just they
Speaker 1: just keep rolling. We keep getting rolled on all this stuff. Well,
Speaker 1: you guys aren't going to do this thing, right, Well,
Speaker 1: we'll concede this ground, but you won't do this next thing,
Speaker 1: will you? Oh no, they will, they will. They keep
Speaker 1: doing it. The only thing that stops them from doing
Speaker 1: exactly what they want is when we win. Is when
Speaker 1: our side steps in and says, no, we're in power now,
Speaker 1: we're not gonna let you do at least that thing
Speaker 1: you want to do, which is why the election is
Speaker 1: in fact so important. Right now, one hundred thousand lives saved. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you're going to have and even if it was fifties,
Speaker 1: he said, you're going to have to wear a mask
Speaker 1: now for the rest of your life outdoors as long
Speaker 1: as Democrats insanities in charge. And I guess we've been
Speaker 1: losing tens of thousands of lives every year because we
Speaker 1: weren't willing to make this very easy, straightforward step. This
Speaker 1: is all emotion, friends. Their argument doesn't make any sense
Speaker 1: unless they think that you should wear a mask all
Speaker 1: the time, you know, and then then we do get
Speaker 1: into the wire, isn't they Remember these are the arguments
Speaker 1: we're having at the very beginning, and then just the
Speaker 1: panic porn from the media rewhelmed all the rational voices,
Speaker 1: the organs we had the beginning. Okay, you could save
Speaker 1: tens of thousands of lives a year by making the
Speaker 1: speed limit fifteen miles an hour, twenty miles an hour,
Speaker 1: tens of guaranteed tens of thousands of lives. But people say, no,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna take my chances and go sixty five or
Speaker 1: seventy or eighty. Nah, sorry, I'm not going to do that.
Speaker 1: This is really though, This is one of the fundamental
Speaker 1: question we face right now. Is the government allowed to
Speaker 1: tell you what to do in ways that are only
Speaker 1: justified if you think that every little action of yours
Speaker 1: is somehow in the government's purview. Is we all have
Speaker 1: to confront this now. This is where we are as
Speaker 1: a country, This is what we have been led to here,
Speaker 1: and yes, it has happened on President Trump's watch, and
Speaker 1: he is a Republican and this is a very challenging
Speaker 1: set of circumstances. And I know that he has been
Speaker 1: just completely boxed in advisors and and you know people
Speaker 1: around him who are supposed to know more about this.
Speaker 1: But it's time for the it's time for the backlash
Speaker 1: against the lockdown. Friends, the big one right now, you're
Speaker 1: in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. You know, somehow lost in all of this
Speaker 1: is who is most responsible at a state level for
Speaker 1: the worst outcomes. As I've said to you, the highest
Speaker 1: approval rating governors for dealing with COVID are somehow in
Speaker 1: the states that have had the worst record when it
Speaker 1: comes to deaths per capita dealing with COVID. This is
Speaker 1: purely medium manipulation. This is pure propaganda. That's the only reason.
Speaker 1: There's no other way. Right. If people are running a
Speaker 1: race and they're supposed to get the finish line first,
Speaker 1: and the people who get the finished line last are
Speaker 1: given the gold medal, you'd say, what the heck is
Speaker 1: not all about? That's what's happening here with Governor Murphy
Speaker 1: in New Jersey, Governor Cuomo in New York, Governor Wolf
Speaker 1: in Pennsylvania's people did a terrible job, but we're being
Speaker 1: told all they did a great They did a great job,
Speaker 1: or at least that's what their own populations have been
Speaker 1: led to believe, which is truly stunning, and it's honestly
Speaker 1: upsetting that people could be that wrong on all this stuff.
Speaker 1: But that's where we are. The President points this out. Obviously,
Speaker 1: it upsets liberals. Play eighteen. If you look at what
Speaker 1: we've done and all of the lives that we've saved,
Speaker 1: and I'm going to ask that a graph be put up,
Speaker 1: and now it's up. This was right at the beginning.
Speaker 1: This was our prediction that if we do a really
Speaker 1: good job, we'll be at about one hundred and one
Speaker 1: hundred thousand to two hundred and forty thousand deaths. And
Speaker 1: we're below that substantially. And we'll see where it comes out.
Speaker 1: But that would be if we did the good job.
Speaker 1: If the not so good job was done, you'd be
Speaker 1: in one point five million. I remember these numbers so well,
Speaker 1: and two point two million. That's quite a difference. So
Speaker 1: we're down in this raco and that's despite the fact
Speaker 1: that the Blue States had had tremendous death rates. If
Speaker 1: you take the Blue States set, we're at a level
Speaker 1: that I don't think anybody in the world would be at.
Speaker 1: We're really at a very low level. But it's true
Speaker 1: if you take New York even out of the equation,
Speaker 1: it pretty dramatically drops down those COVID numbers. If New
Speaker 1: York had Texas or Florida numbers, you would see twenty
Speaker 1: or thirty thousand people. A twenty thousand people, I should
Speaker 1: say alive. If New York just did as well as Florida,
Speaker 1: twenty thousand lives saved, just a straight per capita head
Speaker 1: to head comparison. But cuomos out there lecturing people and
Speaker 1: blaming Trump all the time, And then you have the
Speaker 1: usual apparatus of media morons. Steve Schmidt, he's the captain
Speaker 1: of team media moron. He really is a He is
Speaker 1: telling you that that Trump is the worst ever because
Speaker 1: of this place seventeen. This is a catastrophe that was
Speaker 1: completely totally preventable, and if anything, Bob Woodward is underplaying
Speaker 1: his description of it. It is a catastrophic leadership failure.
Speaker 1: But more than that, there's no equivalent in the country's
Speaker 1: history to it, it is the greatest malfeasance in the
Speaker 1: history of the United States. You realize that this moron
Speaker 1: just went on TV there and said that it was
Speaker 1: the greatest catastrophe and was he said, totally entirely preventable.
Speaker 1: Why didn't Germany, Italy, Spain, the UK, Brazil, Mexico, India, China.
Speaker 1: Why didn't they prevent if it's entire preventable. Is it
Speaker 1: possible to say anything dumber than this guy says on television?
Speaker 1: You know, but he plays a role, really, that's what
Speaker 1: you see. He's almost like an actor. He just found
Speaker 1: his job is to go on TV be like I
Speaker 1: used to be a Republican and now I just say
Speaker 1: Trump is the worst ever at everything ever. And there
Speaker 1: are more on Libs who sit at home who are like, yeah,
Speaker 1: this is good, Yeah, this works. Unbelievable, unbelievable. Oh then
Speaker 1: there was the big kerfuffle yesterday about how the CDC
Speaker 1: director is saying that we might not get vaccine to
Speaker 1: people until the third quarter of next year. How does
Speaker 1: that make any sense? I mean, here's what the president's
Speaker 1: telling people about what's really going on from the top
Speaker 1: of the government. He's seeing all the information. He's seeing
Speaker 1: all the data play nineteen. We're attracted deliver and distribute
Speaker 1: the vaccine in a very, very safe and effective manner,
Speaker 1: and we think we can st sometime in October, so
Speaker 1: as soon as it is announced, we'll be able to start.
Speaker 1: It'll be from mid October on, maybe a little bit
Speaker 1: later than that, but we'll be all set. So as
Speaker 1: soon as it's given the go ahead. They're doing trials
Speaker 1: as you know, and as soon as it's given they
Speaker 1: go ahead, we will get it out defeat the virus.
Speaker 1: We've manufactured all of the necessary supplies so that as
Speaker 1: soon as the FDA approves the vaccine, and as you know,
Speaker 1: we're very close to that, we'll be able to distribute
Speaker 1: at least one hundred million vaccine doses by the end
Speaker 1: of twenty twenty, and a large number much sooner than that.
Speaker 1: Not everybody's going to have to get this vaccine, and
Speaker 1: not everyone's going to get this vaccine. But once you
Speaker 1: have the vulnerable population inoculated people with pre existing conditions
Speaker 1: or comorbid conditions. You have the elderly and those with
Speaker 1: hypertension and obesity, along with being over the age of
Speaker 1: sixty five. Once a large portion of that population is
Speaker 1: inoculated and therefore is pretty much safe from this. We're
Speaker 1: we're gonna we're gonna be fine. Right then this thing
Speaker 1: people are acting like this never, this never goes away.
Speaker 1: Why why are we even entertaining that as a notion
Speaker 1: of course this is going to go away. Ah, But
Speaker 1: you see, panic, fear, anger, emotions. These are things that
Speaker 1: Democrats are very good at manipulating. And these are the
Speaker 1: things that they need to manipulate if they're going to
Speaker 1: defeat Donald Trump in this election. So that's what they're
Speaker 1: going to do. And this is why you're hearing very
Speaker 1: clearly from the very top of the Democrat apparatus that
Speaker 1: you know, you can't really here here we actually have
Speaker 1: we have Biden saying at play five, let me be clear,
Speaker 1: I trust vaccines, I trust scientists, but I don't trust
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. At this moment, the American people can't either
Speaker 1: can't trust the president on this, can't trust him, which
Speaker 1: means you can't trust the FDA. So in the same
Speaker 1: breath you'll have Biden say, listen to what the CDC
Speaker 1: director says, but don't listen to what the FDA says, Now,
Speaker 1: keep in mind the CDC director has to do some
Speaker 1: cya for the CDC here because they said don't wear masks,
Speaker 1: another saying wear masks, and ultimately they view this as
Speaker 1: why not make people take the extra precaution? No one,
Speaker 1: you know, no one's gonna be able to really hold
Speaker 1: you all that responsible for taking the extra precaution with
Speaker 1: the FDA. If people are taking this vaccine and it
Speaker 1: doesn't work and or people are getting sick from it,
Speaker 1: they're gonna know that's a big problem. But Biden is
Speaker 1: happy to dabble in anti vax conspiracy here. Put aside
Speaker 1: whether you think this vaccine is rushed or not, just
Speaker 1: for a second. The only reason Biden is pretending that
Speaker 1: he has can turns is because it's bad for Trump.
Speaker 1: If the American people are safe from this virus. That's
Speaker 1: the only reason. It's not about actual vaccine stuff. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to The bus Essence Show podcasts. Remember to
Speaker 1: subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you
Speaker 1: get your podcasts. I'm calling on and Biden to step
Speaker 1: promoting his anti vaccine theories because all they're doing is
Speaker 1: hurting the importance of what we're doing. And I know
Speaker 1: that if they were in this position, they'll be saying,
Speaker 1: how wonderful it is. They're recklessly endangering lives. You can't
Speaker 1: do that. And again, this is really a case that
Speaker 1: they're only talking to just started talking a little bit negatively,
Speaker 1: and that's only because they know we have it, or
Speaker 1: we will soon have it. And the answer to that
Speaker 1: is very soon. It's true. I'm seeing people on the
Speaker 1: right confuse, and I want to I want to be
Speaker 1: very clear about this confuse asking questions about whether a
Speaker 1: condensed scene schedule poses actual risks and thinking that that
Speaker 1: is what is motivating questions from Biden and the Democrats
Speaker 1: right now. They don't care what they haven't seen the data,
Speaker 1: they don't know anything about this. They're already saying, can't
Speaker 1: trust it, can't trust it. And it's not because they
Speaker 1: have a problem with vaccines. It's because or any particular vaccine.
Speaker 1: It's because they don't want people to think that we're
Speaker 1: getting through this and we're going to be better and
Speaker 1: that Trump managed to get a vaccine done in record time.
Speaker 1: I remember I was on the Bill Mars Show in February,
Speaker 1: right before the Penn Like it was right before the
Speaker 1: pandemic really hit. You know, I went to the I
Speaker 1: remember going to the going to the airport, and you know,
Speaker 1: the airport was pretty much empty, but people were realizing, oh,
Speaker 1: we're about to get We're about to get hit really,
Speaker 1: you know, pretty hard with this thing. And I said,
Speaker 1: they said that he lied about how we're gonna get
Speaker 1: a vaccine quickly. And I said, well, they are thinking
Speaker 1: that they're gonna be able to get one fastest, and
Speaker 1: all the audience was all laughing, and of course what
Speaker 1: I said was true, and they're a bunch, you know,
Speaker 1: that audience is full of idiots, but it is true
Speaker 1: that this is a record pace for getting a brand
Speaker 1: new vaccination from testing to trial to market. And they
Speaker 1: don't want the president to receive any benefit for that either.
Speaker 1: But I do think just and I want to I
Speaker 1: want to switch the law and order issue. But I
Speaker 1: want everyone to be clear on this because I've had
Speaker 1: this shift in thinking, no, they're they're The pandemic doesn't
Speaker 1: end November fourth. They're gonna they're gonna stretch this thing
Speaker 1: out and use it as long as they can. They're
Speaker 1: gonna use this thing. They like that people are scared
Speaker 1: and we'll do what they're told right now. They're not
Speaker 1: going to let this go. They're gonna have you know,
Speaker 1: a hundred cases of COVID in a state in eight months,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna say, oh, boa bop, we gotta you know,
Speaker 1: we gotta institute some changes right away. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: just it's madness. They don't care about the jobs that
Speaker 1: are lost small business owners. They don't care about small
Speaker 1: Just use Amazon. Just use Amazon and pay your taxes.
Speaker 1: So we've got a lot of you know, civil servants,
Speaker 1: bureaucrats sitting at home doing nothing. You know, sorry, sorry, America,
Speaker 1: you're not allowed to have your own American dream and
Speaker 1: who were not allowed to have your small business work
Speaker 1: for a company that you started, or work for a
Speaker 1: small family company that you've been a valued employee or
Speaker 1: for years and years. You know. Nope, you better work
Speaker 1: for a big national cham with massive cash reserves and
Speaker 1: political influence, or sit at home and collect whatever unemployment
Speaker 1: check the Democrats decide you're worthy of. Those are your options.
Speaker 1: That's what they want you to know, all right. On
Speaker 1: the law and order issue, this is one of my
Speaker 1: one of my oh my gosh moments yesterday there's a
Speaker 1: story about Minneapolis, and you're not gonna unbelieve this. It
Speaker 1: turns out that the Minneapolis City Council, remember Minneapolis where
Speaker 1: George Floyd happened, the riots and the broad and they
Speaker 1: were defunding police, and they had people who are supposed
Speaker 1: to be like anti violence knock cops, you know, some
Speaker 1: kind of anti violent specialists or something like that. And
Speaker 1: now now the Minnesota, Minnesota City Council is worried about
Speaker 1: rising crime rates. Oh my gosh, wait a second, hold
Speaker 1: the phone, everybody. You mean that when you throw your
Speaker 1: police force under the bus, and when you work toward
Speaker 1: defunding them, your city becomes more dangerous, more violent, you
Speaker 1: have more problems. That's that's crazy. Of course, it's entirely predictable.
Speaker 1: And there's there's really nothing you can say about this
Speaker 1: other than the people that are now um expressing any
Speaker 1: kind of surprise at the Minnesota City Council or in
Speaker 1: the Minnesota City Council about this are honest Minneapolis, I
Speaker 1: should say, are honestly so either so dumb or so
Speaker 1: dishonest that their opinions about anything really can't matter very much.
Speaker 1: They're alarmed by the crime surge after defunding police. That's
Speaker 1: the headline of the New York Post. Wait, but I
Speaker 1: thought all I thought we were going to envision a
Speaker 1: world without cops. I thought we were going to create
Speaker 1: a society, or we don't even need police. Remember the
Speaker 1: autonomous zones and all this other lunacy out there. This
Speaker 1: is lunacy. It's all coming from the Democrat Party, all unhinged,
Speaker 1: all untethered from what really works in the real world.
Speaker 1: It's totally absurd. So you have the Minneapolis City Council
Speaker 1: members who just two months ago moved to eliminate the
Speaker 1: police department. According to the New York Post, here sounded
Speaker 1: the alarm this week about a surgeon crime seen by
Speaker 1: their constituents. Council members press police Chief Medaria Arodondo about
Speaker 1: the upticking crimes, including daylight carjackings. Oh that sounds pretty horrible, robberies,
Speaker 1: assault shootings, and street racing. Residents are asking where are
Speaker 1: the police, said council member Jamal Osman, noting that constituents
Speaker 1: calls to Minneapolis police departments have gone unanswered. That is
Speaker 1: the only public safety option they have at the moment,
Speaker 1: and they're saying they're nowhere. To be seen. Council President
Speaker 1: Lisa Bender accused police of intentionally not enforcing laws. This
Speaker 1: is not new, but it's very concerning in the current context. No,
Speaker 1: it turns out if you cut police budgets and there
Speaker 1: aren't enough of them and they aren't allowed to do
Speaker 1: their jobs because of systemic racism, everybody suffers. Black people suffer,
Speaker 1: White people suffer, Asian people suffer, Latino people suffer everyone
Speaker 1: when the police are cut down from what they need
Speaker 1: to be and are even as importantly not allowed to
Speaker 1: do their jobs because sometimes wrestling a criminal to the
Speaker 1: ground can involve force that does not look pretty on video.
Speaker 1: And sometimes people try to stab cops or go for
Speaker 1: a gun or go for something in their waistband and
Speaker 1: they need to get shot. That is also a reality
Speaker 1: of the world we live in. That's it. That's justice.
Speaker 1: There's no way around this. But the Libs thought they
Speaker 1: could figure something out. They figured that there's some way
Speaker 1: they could get around having cops, they could get around
Speaker 1: all of this, and they were They were wrong. So
Speaker 1: now we're seeing it. Now we're seeing what ends up
Speaker 1: happening when you decide that you're big problem is really
Speaker 1: the police. The president still calling on everyone or everyone
Speaker 1: on the Democrat side to stop this nonsense. Play twenty two.
Speaker 1: The anti police crusade from the Democrats and the radical
Speaker 1: left and radical left Democrats also has to stop. The
Speaker 1: left wing war on cops puts our officers in danger
Speaker 1: and our communities at very grave risk. Yeah, that's the truth.
Speaker 1: Libs can pretend they can scream about justice and the
Speaker 1: protests and it's mostly peaceful and systemic racism. They've run
Speaker 1: an experiment that is so stupid and so reckless that
Speaker 1: soon nobody will be able to make a case with
Speaker 1: a straight face who has above two digit IQ that
Speaker 1: defunding cops was anything other than emotionally based lunacy. You're
Speaker 1: in the hud This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: There's another big component of law in order that we
Speaker 1: should talk about today, and that has to do with
Speaker 1: the weaponization of prosecutors and the deep state and the
Speaker 1: bureaucracy for political lens. This is the whole Russia collusion nonsense.
Speaker 1: The appointment of the Special Council that never should have happened.
Speaker 1: It was a clear partisan hit job. Everybody knows it,
Speaker 1: everyone could see it. Yet it was not stopped a
Speaker 1: big failing of Jeff Sessions, among others, and Bill Barr
Speaker 1: spoke more about this. Let me first just say, the
Speaker 1: same way that the people that push for lockdowns will
Speaker 1: never admit that they were catastrophically wrong, costly, stupid, and counterproductive,
Speaker 1: the same people that will never it It doesn't matter
Speaker 1: what study you show that they can't. Could you imagine
Speaker 1: they won't subject themselves to that rage. But those same individuals,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, In the same way that those individuals will
Speaker 1: never admit that they were wrong, the deep staters, They're
Speaker 1: never gonna say I'm sorry. They're never gonna say, maybe
Speaker 1: I shouldn't have tried to undo the results of an election. No,
Speaker 1: quite the opposite. They think they deserve bigger book advances.
Speaker 1: They think that they're heroes of the Republic. How else
Speaker 1: are they going to sleep at night? Right, So they
Speaker 1: totally believe this BS And a perfect example of this
Speaker 1: is Peter Struck, he of the insurance policy in Kate's
Speaker 1: Trump Won investigating President Trump, the guy who sat down
Speaker 1: and completely just like a slimy, unctious, disgusting swamp creature
Speaker 1: that he is set up General Flynn Right. Struck, Oh
Speaker 1: it went along with that whole thing here. If this
Speaker 1: guy's fingerprints are all over the worst Deep States of
Speaker 1: him and Komey and McKay abe all over all the
Speaker 1: worst stuff with the Russia collusion, nonsense, they throw Brennan
Speaker 1: in there, You've really got a row of idiots. But
Speaker 1: here he is telling everybody that he thinks he's one
Speaker 1: of the good guys. Of course, play two twenty five
Speaker 1: years from now. How does history see you? I think
Speaker 1: it's sees all of us as patriots who were working
Speaker 1: as hard as we could to defend America against a
Speaker 1: Russian threat, against a Russian attack on our elections that
Speaker 1: helped elect the forty fifth president of the United States,
Speaker 1: Patriots defending against the Russians, picking Donald Trump. I voted
Speaker 1: for Donald Trump. Is that because the Russians made me
Speaker 1: do it? What really is the claim here? But they're
Speaker 1: never going to stop in some ways the other than
Speaker 1: the assault on our liberties. The speech that Attorney General
Speaker 1: Barr gave last night, I think it was at Hillsdale,
Speaker 1: was very powerful on how prosecutors not only are politicized
Speaker 1: now weapon in ways that should be deeply troubling to
Speaker 1: all of us. And it's always in favor of the Democrats.
Speaker 1: I can sit here and rattle off the top of
Speaker 1: my head a whole bunch of politically motivated prosecutions that
Speaker 1: Democrats did, that Democrats pushed for. I don't have that
Speaker 1: on the right that people would say, if they really
Speaker 1: tried hard, they'd say, well, what about the Special Council
Speaker 1: investigation of Bill Clinton. It's like, well, Bill Clinton was
Speaker 1: breaking the law. So there's that Bill Clinton was somebody
Speaker 1: who ended up completely disgracing any notion of the President
Speaker 1: of the United States acting with legal decency. I'm not
Speaker 1: even talking about being a good guy. And he did
Speaker 1: break the law. So there's that. There's that component of
Speaker 1: it too. But you look at what the philosophy has
Speaker 1: become of a bureauqu see that exists without oversight. Where
Speaker 1: did that all of a sudden come into the picture.
Speaker 1: You keep hearing, you know, career line prosecutors or career
Speaker 1: civil servants in the DOJ, non party. This is the
Speaker 1: same bullcrap game they play with journalists. Non partisan journalists
Speaker 1: say therefore it must be true career people in journalism.
Speaker 1: That doesn't mean anything, doesn't mean anything. What matters is
Speaker 1: their conduct. What matters is their mindset, their philosophy, the
Speaker 1: way that they approach all this stuff. That's what actually matters.
Speaker 1: That's what the real issue is. And the Attorney General
Speaker 1: had some great lines and all this here's from his
Speaker 1: speech last night. Indeed, aside from the importance of not
Speaker 1: fully decoupling law enforcement from the constraining and moderating forces
Speaker 1: of politics, devolving all authority down to the most junior
Speaker 1: officials does not even make sense as a matter of
Speaker 1: basic man management. Name one successful organization or the lowest
Speaker 1: level employees. Decisions are deemed sacrosanct. There aren't any letting
Speaker 1: the most junior members set the agenda. Might be a
Speaker 1: good philosophy for a Montessori preschool, but it's no way
Speaker 1: to run a federal agency. Good leaders at the Justice
Speaker 1: Department at any organization need to trust and support their subordinates.
Speaker 1: But that does not mean blindly deferring to whatever those
Speaker 1: subordinates want to do. You hear this in the media,
Speaker 1: they'll say, Oh, but people in the DOJ, you know,
Speaker 1: that work for bart don't like his decision tough, they
Speaker 1: work for him. It's not the other way around. This
Speaker 1: is what people seem to forget. But you know, the
Speaker 1: department or the agency is held as being more important
Speaker 1: than the person at the top charge with making sure
Speaker 1: that it functions well, who is a political appointee. For
Speaker 1: a reason. It's part of the separation of powers and
Speaker 1: accountability processes that we have built into the system. This
Speaker 1: is a feature, not a bug. Friends, It's supposed to
Speaker 1: be like this. Say, oh, but he intervened in a prosecution.
Speaker 1: The Attorney General, if he sees injustice being done by
Speaker 1: the Justice Department, has every right, in fact, has a
Speaker 1: mandate to intervene. He goes on, though, to say that
Speaker 1: there's really a mentality the doj of stretching the law
Speaker 1: beyond comprehension in bad faith to crush people, particularly Republicans
Speaker 1: who are political opponents of the deep state Democrat left.
Speaker 1: That's what's happening. That is what is occurring across the country.
Speaker 1: He goes on, quote, all the supervision in the world
Speaker 1: will not be enough without a strong culture across the
Speaker 1: Justice Department of fairness and commitment to even handed justice.
Speaker 1: That is what Justice Jackson described as the spirit of
Speaker 1: fair play and decency that should animal the federal prosecutor.
Speaker 1: In his memorable turn of phrase, even when the government
Speaker 1: technically loses its case, it has really won if justice
Speaker 1: has been done. We want our prosecutors to be aggressive
Speaker 1: and tenacious in their pursuit of justice, but we also
Speaker 1: want to ensure that justice is ultimately administered dispassionately. We
Speaker 1: are all human, Like any person, a prosecutor can become
Speaker 1: overly invested in a particular goal. Prosecutors who devote months
Speaker 1: or years of their lives to investigate in a particular
Speaker 1: target may become deeply invested in their case and assured
Speaker 1: of the rightness of their cause. When a prosecution becomes
Speaker 1: your prosecution, particularly if the investigation is highly public or
Speaker 1: has been acrimonious, or if you're a confident early on
Speaker 1: the target committed serious crimes, there is always a temptation
Speaker 1: to will a prosecution into existence, even when the facts,
Speaker 1: the law, or the fair handed administration of justice do
Speaker 1: not support bringing charges. You're darn right, anybody having a
Speaker 1: little muller probe tingle right there, and anybody's starting to
Speaker 1: feel like, wait a second, why is General Flynn still
Speaker 1: facing a prosecution again from a judge after prosecutors decided
Speaker 1: there should be no case at all. This is what
Speaker 1: the attorney Ghal was talking about thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Bus Sesson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. Buddy
Speaker 1: David Harsani from National Review back in the mix. He
Speaker 1: joins us not to talk about the peace deals and
Speaker 1: also some deep state action. We got our man, David
Speaker 1: join us. David, thanks so much, always a pleasure. Thanks
Speaker 1: for having me. So I want to start with the
Speaker 1: change that people should have now in their thinking about
Speaker 1: consensus foreign policy, and how anytime there's an issue of
Speaker 1: foreign policy where all the smart people are just supposed
Speaker 1: to think a sir thing people should have their concerns.
Speaker 1: Here is John Kerry, Obama's second Secretary of State, in
Speaker 1: the most drippingly condescending an arrogant tone possible, telling everybody,
Speaker 1: I mean, there's no peace deals with Israel in the
Speaker 1: Middle East that don't go right through the Palestinian authority
Speaker 1: play for there will be no separate peace between Israel
Speaker 1: and the Arab world. I want to make that very
Speaker 1: clear to all of you. I've heard several prominent politicians
Speaker 1: in Israel sometimes saying, well, the Arab world's in a
Speaker 1: different place. Now. We just have to reach out to
Speaker 1: them and we can work some things with the Arab world,
Speaker 1: and we'll deal with the Palestinians. No, no, no, and no.
Speaker 1: I can tell you that reaffirmed even in the last
Speaker 1: week as I have talked to leaders of the Arab community.
Speaker 1: There will be no advance and separate peace with the
Speaker 1: Arab world without the Palestinian process and Palestinian peace. Everybody
Speaker 1: needs to understand that that is a hard reality. There
Speaker 1: is no way, David that John Kerrey then the second,
Speaker 1: you know, the most recent Democrats Secretary of State said,
Speaker 1: I mean, as everyone's been pointing out, this aged about
Speaker 1: as well as you know, raw hamburger meat left in
Speaker 1: the trunk of a car in Dallas in July. But
Speaker 1: what say you. I think you said it very well there.
Speaker 1: But we have to remember that this is just one
Speaker 1: of the comments. John Kerry has made dozens of similar,
Speaker 1: you know, you know, very confident comments about how the
Speaker 1: Middle East would never have peace if there wasn't first
Speaker 1: to Palestinian state, if Israel didn't first capitulate to Hamas
Speaker 1: and the PLO that he said that Israel would be
Speaker 1: isolated economically if they didn't you know, first make a
Speaker 1: deal with the PLO. Meanwhile, of course Israel is one
Speaker 1: of the top investment destination there is there are in
Speaker 1: that region, and now they're going to have to relationships
Speaker 1: with very wealthy Arab nations. He's completely wrong, and of
Speaker 1: course he's just echoing the consensus. I love that in
Speaker 1: that clip, the you know behind him, it says Brookings Institute,
Speaker 1: where you know, tons of minds have been wrong for
Speaker 1: dozens of years, and we keep listening to that. We're
Speaker 1: expected to listen to them. We have them in government,
Speaker 1: we have them on MSNBC and CNN, you know, confidently
Speaker 1: explaining to us what's going on there. They've been wrong
Speaker 1: in every way. I noted this in a column this week.
Speaker 1: But Jared Kushner has been has done more in four
Speaker 1: years for peace than everyone at Brookings has done in
Speaker 1: a hundred years for peace. And that's just the fact
Speaker 1: that there's no way around it anymore. And anyone who
Speaker 1: argues that the prism of all foreign policies should be
Speaker 1: conducted through the Palestinian authority in the Middle East is
Speaker 1: no longer. It's just not a credible person anymore. And
Speaker 1: I think of Thomas Friedman, for example, who for me,
Speaker 1: it's just always been a creation of the liberal media.
Speaker 1: I mean, here's a guy who was such a huge
Speaker 1: proponent of how I mean Palestinian it became trendy when
Speaker 1: I was, you know, in college and in high school
Speaker 1: to think of the most important challenge in the world
Speaker 1: was finding a way to make the Palestinians happy enough
Speaker 1: that they would stop threatening to destroy Israel. That that
Speaker 1: was it, right, There was no other policy challenge as
Speaker 1: important as getting the Palestinians and Helmas and the plos
Speaker 1: you point out the Palestinian authority of pain to finally
Speaker 1: say we're going to stop destroying Israel, and nothing else
Speaker 1: was worth even discussing in the region. This was a
Speaker 1: an ossified consensus for years and years. And it's just
Speaker 1: such a reminder the people that say this stuff and
Speaker 1: right these are they don't know what the hell they're
Speaker 1: talking about. No, and I don't listen. I'm not some
Speaker 1: big brain or anything like that. But I mean, it
Speaker 1: was clear from the early nineties on that this was
Speaker 1: not going to work. It never works. The Palestinian authority
Speaker 1: is just incapable of making a deal with Israel. That
Speaker 1: is something that's acceptable to both sides. They want to
Speaker 1: write a return, which is suicidal for Israel. They want
Speaker 1: to go back to the sixty seven lines, which is
Speaker 1: not the suicidal for Israel. They want to create a
Speaker 1: little mini terror state next door, which is not going
Speaker 1: to happen. So what why this is so historic, I
Speaker 1: think is that they've circumvented that whole discussion. Within the
Speaker 1: agreement that these nations made the other day, it mentions
Speaker 1: nothing about a Palestinian state, and mentions nothing about a
Speaker 1: right of return and the usual things that are always
Speaker 1: part of these agreements. And more than that, the Arab
Speaker 1: League itself would not even condemn the deal in any way.
Speaker 1: So the Palestinians, who basically had veto power over the
Speaker 1: foreign policy in the region, no longer have that, and
Speaker 1: that that is what's super important. You know, for Obama
Speaker 1: and for the carry types, everything's about Iran. Everything is
Speaker 1: about making a deal with Iran. You know. I saw
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Goldberg, who's been as wrong as anyone on the
Speaker 1: Middle East, say, look at this, Israel's just making deals
Speaker 1: for a with authoritarians, and this is just about it,
Speaker 1: all about that. As if Palestinians and Iranians aren't authoritarians,
Speaker 1: and he's been you know, pining for a deal with them.
Speaker 1: You have to deal with certain people, and they're not
Speaker 1: the best people. But I'd rather have bad people who
Speaker 1: are on my side than bad people who aren't and
Speaker 1: you know, dealing with them. So I think, I think
Speaker 1: it's a really historic deal. I'm not sure people fully
Speaker 1: comprehend that, who haven't been around a long time, unfortunately. Right.
Speaker 1: And the other the other talking Pointmage that was was
Speaker 1: pretty amazing, is well, Israel's gotten a deal now with
Speaker 1: two countries it's never been at war with. These are
Speaker 1: countries that pretend that Israel doesn't exist, that won't allow
Speaker 1: and Israeli passport to fly through. I mean, like there's
Speaker 1: enormous animosity and restrictions that had existed between these countries previously.
Speaker 1: But you know, whatever works for the new site, whatever
Speaker 1: gets some clicks. That is the most insane and stupid
Speaker 1: thing to say of all the talking points I've seen.
Speaker 1: I mean, we've never been at or with Russia either. Right,
Speaker 1: It's uh, you know, it's the Gulf nations. They create,
Speaker 1: they helped create the Palestinian the PLO, and they helped
Speaker 1: create Hamas and they've been They were funding from nineteen
Speaker 1: even before nineteen sixty seven, they were funding terrorism against
Speaker 1: Jewish civilians around the world. To me, that sounds like
Speaker 1: like a war of some sort. You can call whatever
Speaker 1: you know, whatever, use whatever you word you like. But
Speaker 1: more than that is a sea change in how people
Speaker 1: are going to deal with each other. If some countries
Speaker 1: in the our world have friendly relationships with Israel and
Speaker 1: Jewish people, that is going to that is going to
Speaker 1: probably spread. When people do business together, they form relationships together,
Speaker 1: they form cultural cultural bonds together. I mean, this is
Speaker 1: this is really important in that aspect, and that's not
Speaker 1: obviously just written out in an agreement. It's just more
Speaker 1: about the spirit of where the world is headed, rather
Speaker 1: than this ridiculous idea that or they weren't going to
Speaker 1: launch weapons at each other. No, they weren't, because no
Speaker 1: one launches weapons at Israel nearby anymore. Because it doesn't
Speaker 1: end well, David, I also want to talk to you
Speaker 1: about it. I know you wrote a column about this recently.
Speaker 1: This should have gotten a lot more attention in my view.
Speaker 1: First of all, you know, I'm a little annoyed to
Speaker 1: myself because well, matt has kind of predated my institution
Speaker 1: of this rule. But now I know that anyone that
Speaker 1: the media elevates from within the like nonpartisan ranks of
Speaker 1: government service. Anyone the media tells you is amazing is
Speaker 1: almost always an egomaniac. And at some level there's there's
Speaker 1: a real problem, right, I mean, at some level this
Speaker 1: is sort of a fraudulent narrative that we've been handed
Speaker 1: at something I'm not saying entirely, but there's something off,
Speaker 1: There's something, you know. We were told that James Komy
Speaker 1: was like the greatest law man in the history of
Speaker 1: the world. We were told that Robert Mueller was the
Speaker 1: ultimate FBI guy. We were told. But I remember this,
Speaker 1: and so it's not even always a strictly partisan thing.
Speaker 1: Petreus was the most brilliant and you know, fantastic strategic
Speaker 1: mind ever. Yeah, when he wasn't you know, you know,
Speaker 1: wedding with his biographer on the desk in Afghanistan while
Speaker 1: people are fighting and dying for him. I mean, there's
Speaker 1: a lot of stuff going on here. And never mind
Speaker 1: also the classified information leak that he engaged in. But
Speaker 1: Mattis was always treated like this warrior monk almost like
Speaker 1: a saint of the Marine Corps. And I do hear
Speaker 1: from people in the military say that they really liked him,
Speaker 1: but there were some warning signs about him maybe getting
Speaker 1: a little too big for his britches, so to speak,
Speaker 1: thinking that his mandate extended beyond and that he would say,
Speaker 1: and this is written about in the wool War book,
Speaker 1: and no one denies this, that they may need to
Speaker 1: take collective action against the sitting president. That should set
Speaker 1: off a lot more alarm bells from people that I
Speaker 1: think we've seen so far. Yeah, but you know, because
Speaker 1: it's against Trump and its resistance, worn it's fine that
Speaker 1: no one's going to say anything. But that little snippet
Speaker 1: in the book, it's a chapter there that you know,
Speaker 1: the whole book frames Maddis is some kind of great hero.
Speaker 1: Was constantly concerned about, you know, what's going to happen
Speaker 1: to America and etc. You know, they like are always
Speaker 1: putting like he goes to the National Cathedral to pray
Speaker 1: for America. There's a whole scene of that. You know,
Speaker 1: as you know in Washington that's a huge tourist spot,
Speaker 1: not a place you slip away to pray for the country.
Speaker 1: But what Anyways, aside from that, Yeah, collective action with
Speaker 1: the city, you know, with high level member, you know,
Speaker 1: high ranking members of the administration. And then why because
Speaker 1: he didn't like decisions that Donald Trump was making re Assyria,
Speaker 1: probably mostly Syria, Russia, etc. So that's not up to him.
Speaker 1: He's a general, and we in this country, the military
Speaker 1: answers to civilians. Donald Trump was very clear that he
Speaker 1: wanted to get out of Syria. He mentions it numerous
Speaker 1: times during the twenty sixteen campaign. So why, First of all,
Speaker 1: it was matthis so surprised that that was happening. A
Speaker 1: and B. Even if he was surprised, he should have
Speaker 1: left the administration, which he did, and then taken it
Speaker 1: to the media. Not plotted or whatever word you want
Speaker 1: to use. Behind the scenes. Now, I don't know if
Speaker 1: anything came of those conversations, but it's not a heroic
Speaker 1: thing to say you're going to take collective action to
Speaker 1: undermine an duly elected president. We still not don't know
Speaker 1: of a single vote that was changed by the Russians
Speaker 1: or anyone else to make him president. He was voted
Speaker 1: in by the American people. And I don't like everything
Speaker 1: he does either, but the idea that generals should be
Speaker 1: deciding where we go and where we don't go. I think,
Speaker 1: as you mentioned before, is a good indication at deep state,
Speaker 1: even though they try to sort of embarrass you when
Speaker 1: you use that word, but because it sounds conspiratorial, but
Speaker 1: it actually does exist. You know, to some extent, there
Speaker 1: are people in the administration, in the executive branch who
Speaker 1: plotted against the president that they're supposed to serve. And
Speaker 1: that's not normal and this probably never hasn't happened in
Speaker 1: a very long time in to this extent. And I
Speaker 1: also note that not not only were they trying to
Speaker 1: manufacture in the case of Russia collusion, the Muller probe
Speaker 1: crimes a president committed that he didn't. They also seem
Speaker 1: to think that there's some special exception to service in
Speaker 1: the executive branch where you can override the president who's
Speaker 1: doing something completely everyone agrees legal or you know, within
Speaker 1: the bounds of his authority from a du but you
Speaker 1: just don't like it. You know better that you know
Speaker 1: Betterism within the National security apparatus is stunning, and as
Speaker 1: somebody who worked in that apparatus and knows that it
Speaker 1: is full of morons, by the way, not everybody, but
Speaker 1: a lot of them morons all over the place. That's
Speaker 1: very unsettling, actually, that that notion that this is so widespread,
Speaker 1: whether it's Lieutenant Colonel Vinman or call me lieutenant colonel sir,
Speaker 1: right that guy, or it's Maddest or it's you know,
Speaker 1: just go down the list of these people, all these
Speaker 1: different FBI and DJ figures. You know, what was this
Speaker 1: Rosenstein with the twenty fifth Amendment based on what it's
Speaker 1: like there's a permanent bureaucracy in place that runs the
Speaker 1: country almost, it seems. And and and now because it's
Speaker 1: Donald Trump is president, you know, they are given sort
Speaker 1: of what we have to treat them with this reverence
Speaker 1: that I've never seen Democrats treat soldiers before, or or
Speaker 1: even civil servants. Civil servants are just working. It's just
Speaker 1: a job. They're supposed to do a good job, and
Speaker 1: they're supposed to listen to their boss like everyone else does.
Speaker 1: And if they don't like it, they should quit and
Speaker 1: then make their case to the American people. But they
Speaker 1: don't do that. They leak things to reporters, who of
Speaker 1: course have showed either no skepticism or a part of
Speaker 1: this and undermine the presidency, delegitimized elections. It's a really
Speaker 1: dangerous thing to be doing just because they don't like
Speaker 1: what Donald Trump is up to in foreign policy, which incidentally,
Speaker 1: I want to say I was very skeptical of it
Speaker 1: before he became president. But I just don't see how anyone,
Speaker 1: any clear minded person can say that this four years
Speaker 1: in foreign policy hasn't been better than wasn't better than
Speaker 1: the eight years that preceded it. Even though Germans and
Speaker 1: French and Swiss don't like us or whatever or don't
Speaker 1: like him, I don't really care. I think that the
Speaker 1: world he has not that's involved in a new conflict
Speaker 1: is the first president maybe since Jimmy Carter, and things are.
Speaker 1: I think the American American foreign policy was handled better
Speaker 1: than it was before. But that's up to voters, not
Speaker 1: up to Mattis or any other general. David Arsagny everybody
Speaker 1: Nashview dot com for his latest David, stay safe, stay
Speaker 1: free down there in DC. Man, good to talk to
Speaker 1: you too. Thank you you're in the Freedom Hud. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. I almost forgot
Speaker 1: one of my favorite things that Bob Barr has been
Speaker 1: in fuego this week. One of my favorite things that
Speaker 1: he did has mentioned that he thinks that they should
Speaker 1: consider that federal prosecutor should consider. It is on the books,
Speaker 1: It is a law, and it is good law. It
Speaker 1: is applicable still charging people who were plotting to destroy
Speaker 1: federal buildings with sedition. Oh wait a second. Here's a
Speaker 1: Democrat senator who's, of course very upset about this. Is
Speaker 1: Merkley play. I'm astounded. If people are engaged in property damage,
Speaker 1: and I condemn violence on all fronts, they should be
Speaker 1: charged with property damage. But what I read into an
Speaker 1: Attorney general bars comments is he wants people who are
Speaker 1: protesting in opposition to the administration to be charged with sedition.
Speaker 1: I don't know that it's that clearly laid out, but
Speaker 1: that was the impression I took from it. This is
Speaker 1: a part of imperial presidency, an authoritarian approach where you
Speaker 1: undermine the legitimacy of the press. You absolutely make disagreeing
Speaker 1: with the administration a crime. Charge them with sedition. It's
Speaker 1: I think the attorney generals or the various prosecutors who
Speaker 1: wait in and shared that news, they're professionals who were
Speaker 1: just astounded that our top law enforcement person would would propose, really,
Speaker 1: what is politicizing protest? It's not protests more. We're talking
Speaker 1: about people who were destroying things. That's not protest, lighting
Speaker 1: buildings on fire, attacking police, breaking glass windows. That's not protest.
Speaker 1: That's rioting. And if it's an organized riot activity and
Speaker 1: it goes after a federal building and is meant to
Speaker 1: undermine the federal government, it would fall under statutes covering
Speaker 1: sedition the attempt to overthrow in part or in whole,
Speaker 1: the federal government. Ah, sedition. The Democrats are guilty of sedition.
Speaker 1: That's real, that's truth. Not all of them, the ones
Speaker 1: who are doing this stuff, the ones who are engaged
Speaker 1: in this attempt to burn down of they're trying to
Speaker 1: burn out a federal courthouse in Portland. I mean that
Speaker 1: was a night after night activity and saying that they
Speaker 1: want to top the state. I think that counts. I
Speaker 1: think that that raises to the level. You know, there're
Speaker 1: a couple of hundred people who are in federal customed
Speaker 1: right now and they're facing some really serious federal charges,
Speaker 1: as they should. It's not all fun and games anymore,
Speaker 1: is it, lib rioters, It's not not not all just
Speaker 1: one big, big ha ha. Look at us. We're gonna
Speaker 1: throw bags of urine at the police. Hah Yeah, you
Speaker 1: might end up spending three four five years in federal prison.
Speaker 1: That that'll really put a put a damper on your
Speaker 1: riot fun activities. This is this is great. I think
Speaker 1: this is fantastic. Oh authoritarian regime. Please, these people are
Speaker 1: doing criminal acts. Very no one's just no one's talking
Speaker 1: about legal protest. There hasn't been a single protester who's
Speaker 1: been harassed in the least who's not breaking the law
Speaker 1: by federal prosecutors. They're not going after them. They're not
Speaker 1: they're not making problems for them. No one cares protests
Speaker 1: all day, go for it, right. This is about people
Speaker 1: who are engaged in criminal acts in violation of the
Speaker 1: law and holding them accountable. And that needs to happen.
Speaker 1: And because it's going to, unfortunately for the Libs, mean
Speaker 1: that some of their favorite little little paramilitary street soldier
Speaker 1: types are going to end up maybe spending a long
Speaker 1: time in a federal penn Too bad, Libs. Thanks for
Speaker 1: listening to The Bus Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on
Speaker 1: Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Speaker 1: Big Ten Football is back, producer, Mark's what's going on here?
Speaker 1: You probably know more about this one than I do.
Speaker 1: I believe they just decided they're coming back to play
Speaker 1: after originally around August deciding they would not play a
Speaker 1: football season in the fall. I think they tried to
Speaker 1: say they would play it in the spring. I believe
Speaker 1: the idea is now to get it going around Halloween,
Speaker 1: maybe a little bit before that. And the President's taking
Speaker 1: some credit for this one. I guess he was encouraging them,
Speaker 1: and now we're hearing that he's going to push it
Speaker 1: even beyond the Big Ten? Is the Big Ten? Is
Speaker 1: that the best? You know? The SEC? You told me this,
Speaker 1: I remember this time I listen. The SEC is the
Speaker 1: best football conference, Yes it is, but the Big Ten
Speaker 1: is one of the better ones as well. It's one
Speaker 1: of the big five football conferences and was one of
Speaker 1: the two that was not going to play this season,
Speaker 1: them in the Pac twelve that had decided to not play.
Speaker 1: Who is your Did you watch college football? I mean,
Speaker 1: as a New Yorker, no, because there's not really a
Speaker 1: good try around here. That's what I was saying. I mean,
Speaker 1: how good is Rutgers. They're not very good. They're in
Speaker 1: the Big Ten. They joined the Big Ten. That was
Speaker 1: like their big move to try and advance their athletics.
Speaker 1: But they're just awful. So do they get their butts
Speaker 1: kicked by the other Big Ten teams pretty much all
Speaker 1: the time. I mean, they won a couple of games
Speaker 1: here and there, but they're not very good. M Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm pretty sure the y the ny U football team would, uh,
Speaker 1: but I don't think they actually have a football team. Rather,
Speaker 1: I don't even think I have one. I think I
Speaker 1: know Columbia does. I don't think any Columbia does. I
Speaker 1: don't think m YU does. I know there's some other
Speaker 1: schools that have gotten rid of their their football teams.
Speaker 1: That's I grew up. Yeah, I grew up in New
Speaker 1: York City, So you know, football is not a big
Speaker 1: sport here to play a lot of people watch it,
Speaker 1: but it's not a sport that a lot of people.
Speaker 1: If you live in the Five Boroughs, there's not a
Speaker 1: lot of football leagues. Believe they're people are diets. But
Speaker 1: there's no college football, and yes, there's no college football.
Speaker 1: And then because there's no college football, you just have
Speaker 1: less of uh, you know, you have less of a
Speaker 1: draw for it. Yeah, it's lacrosse is huge in Long
Speaker 1: Island in New Jersey. I know that, and it's it's
Speaker 1: big in the South too. Um, I don't. I feel
Speaker 1: like there are a lot of places out west where
Speaker 1: they don't really play much lacrosse, but they too busy
Speaker 1: skiing or something. Anyway, Big ten is back everybody. So
Speaker 1: if you like college sports, which hey i'll give. I'll
Speaker 1: give college football a watch, they're not. I don't see
Speaker 1: them kneeling, So there's that. I don't see them doing
Speaker 1: any of that nonsense just out of curiosity. Do you
Speaker 1: think they're not gonna kneel? That's a good I don't
Speaker 1: think the college sports will be kneeling, do you You
Speaker 1: don't know. I have no idea. I really it's just
Speaker 1: a general question to put out there for the audience
Speaker 1: because I don't know if the schools are gonna let them.
Speaker 1: I don't know what the athletes are gonna do. I
Speaker 1: guess we'll see. Um, none of the big schools have
Speaker 1: really played yet. Yeah, I don't know. I don't know.
Speaker 1: That's it. I hadn't even I was unaware of that.
Speaker 1: I haven't even thought of that. I think it's an
Speaker 1: interesting point. All right, let's get to oh eight before
Speaker 1: I get to this. You know, I finished season one
Speaker 1: of Cobra Kai just same, producer Mark, going on season
Speaker 1: two right now. Where are you, buddy? I have not
Speaker 1: started yet. There's a lot of sports on. That's true.
Speaker 1: All right, roll call, I hit it. The show ain't
Speaker 1: over yet, folks, keeping it real, It's time for roll Call.
Speaker 1: Bro call everybody, Facebook dot com, slash buck Sexton Team
Speaker 1: buck at iHeartMedia dot com. If you want to email us,
Speaker 1: we love that one. Please send us the emails and
Speaker 1: if you're not already follow me on Instagram. Posted it
Speaker 1: to Lula Photo this morning, so you get that going on. Yeah,
Speaker 1: so please do oh and make sure you pass the
Speaker 1: buck At someone to listen to our podcast. We very
Speaker 1: much appreciate that. So no matter our new podcast book, Oh,
Speaker 1: producer Mark, what is what? We're calling it? The Best
Speaker 1: of buck Daily? Correct? That is correct, guys, Just so
Speaker 1: you all know, I think it's important. Thank you, producer
Speaker 1: Mark for the reminder. You can now listen to a
Speaker 1: best of Daily show. Now. That is the show from
Speaker 1: the day just condensed down. We thought it'd be fun
Speaker 1: for folks. If you want to listen to the whole show,
Speaker 1: you always have that option, same feed. You don't have
Speaker 1: to change it and subscribe to anything different. But if
Speaker 1: you're like, look, I've only got thirty five forty minutes
Speaker 1: to listen today, you can listen the Best of Buck
Speaker 1: Daily because we pick from a couple of the hours
Speaker 1: so that you get more topics in a shorter period
Speaker 1: of time and it feels a little bit more like
Speaker 1: a complete but condensed show. So you can listen to
Speaker 1: the Best of Buck Daily, same show, just a shorter
Speaker 1: version of it, because he felt like people might appreciate
Speaker 1: that format, that that little style change. But if you
Speaker 1: want to listen to the full show every day, you
Speaker 1: can certainly do that too. On demand. The iHeart app
Speaker 1: Spotify is fantastic way to listen, and also Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: So that would be what I would ask you to
Speaker 1: check out, all right, Thank you for the reminder, Producer
Speaker 1: Mark Josh Howdy Buck. I grew up watching Hakim Elijah
Speaker 1: on School, Patrick Ewing with the Dreamshake. I love watching
Speaker 1: the Houston Oilers and Texans, no matter how bad their
Speaker 1: teams were. The return of football was magical the NBA
Speaker 1: playoffs were thrilling. I have not watched any NBA or
Speaker 1: NFL game since they returned. The stench of hypocrisy is
Speaker 1: too much to endure. I cannot watch. Also, Das Boot
Speaker 1: is definitely the most realistic submarine movie. I concur with
Speaker 1: previous fans, but Crimson Tide is my favorite because Gene
Speaker 1: Hackman is the best. I thank you and producer Mark
Speaker 1: for providing fresh air in the Freedom Hut with all
Speaker 1: the communist stench out there, shields high from KALBJ Austin. Well, Josh,
Speaker 1: you know, my one of my brothers is actually currently
Speaker 1: in the process of moving to Austin. I'm very tired
Speaker 1: with my family and my brothers, my sister and my parents,
Speaker 1: and so once he's down there, I'm I am absolutely
Speaker 1: one hun making it down to Austin to visit him.
Speaker 1: And so I don't know what we'll do, but for
Speaker 1: KALBJ folks, we might. We might just put put up
Speaker 1: the bat signal. Maybe we'll tell the station to let
Speaker 1: people know we'll be at a barbecue joint one night
Speaker 1: and people want to come hang out. We can all
Speaker 1: have a drink and you know, catch up or something.
Speaker 1: So that's because I've been wanting to get down to
Speaker 1: Austin and see all the kalbj folks for a long
Speaker 1: time now. So that's that's gonna happen. It's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: Uh So yeah, there we go. Um And as for oh,
Speaker 1: but as for Elijuan Schooling Patrick Ewing, I'll never forget
Speaker 1: when it was the Rockets and the Knicks in the finals.
Speaker 1: And yeah, Elijuan was just a better player. So Ewing
Speaker 1: has a bigger name. I think in people's minds, he
Speaker 1: just people know Patrick Ewing. Moreau at his peak was
Speaker 1: a better center than Patrick Ewing was. Just it just was. Yeah, anyway,
Speaker 1: I agree. I agree with you, except I think the
Speaker 1: reason Ewing's more well known is because Georgetown number one,
Speaker 1: because he played for the Knicks. No, I think I
Speaker 1: think that's true. But but Hakima LaJuan was was a
Speaker 1: better center and in his in his heyday, because I'm
Speaker 1: trying to think if he was when he was at
Speaker 1: his peak, I don't think Shack was really I think
Speaker 1: Shack might have been in his Orlando Magic phase. He
Speaker 1: wasn't yet in the Lakers dominance phase. But there was
Speaker 1: a time in Hakim Elajwan, I think was the best
Speaker 1: center in the NBA. So, I mean that guy, he
Speaker 1: just had way more, way more of an offensive arsenal
Speaker 1: compared to you. I mean, look, Patrick Hing was seven
Speaker 1: feet tall at a time when there weren't a lot
Speaker 1: of seven footers in the league, and his go to
Speaker 1: move was a fade away jump shot, which is the
Speaker 1: lowest percentage shot in the NBA. So you're the tallest
Speaker 1: guy on the floor and you want to go for
Speaker 1: the lowest percentage shot. Hakim was big into the drop step.
Speaker 1: Hakim had a lot of moves around the rim to
Speaker 1: get to the rim, whereas Patrick was always like, give
Speaker 1: it to me on the elbow of the paint and
Speaker 1: let me do a two step drop fade away and
Speaker 1: see what happens. And that's why people like me who
Speaker 1: grew up as super fans of the Knicks, believe it
Speaker 1: or not, just never got our champion, never got our championship,
Speaker 1: never got one. You are a team that you love
Speaker 1: that sucks. Yeah, the New York Mets, Come on. Uh.
Speaker 1: I thought I was trying to talk about him once
Speaker 1: a week because the Rangers were like a dynasty for
Speaker 1: a while. The Rangers, the Rangers didn't win a Stanley
Speaker 1: Cup for fifty four years. Between nineteen forty and nineteen
Speaker 1: ninety four, when they had Mark Messiers, they won one championship.
Speaker 1: Oh one, Okay, I thought they won for a few years.
Speaker 1: All right, all right, I was wrong about that one.
Speaker 1: I was wrong about that one. But yeah, yeah, basically
Speaker 1: every gonna be every team really good. Now you're gonna
Speaker 1: be coming on the show. Be like. Steve Cohen is
Speaker 1: a genius. I love him. He's changed the game. Also,
Speaker 1: the food of the for the food of the stadium,
Speaker 1: I actually think the food there is pretty good for
Speaker 1: what I'm told already Field has the best food in baseball. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you're you're gonna be. You're gonna be at like the
Speaker 1: caviar station watching a Dream Team play thanks to Steve Cohen,
Speaker 1: I hope. So yeah, it makes me don't what even
Speaker 1: is it? Fish eggs? No, I don't like caviar. We're
Speaker 1: gonna make producer Mark try it sometime. They will make
Speaker 1: a little video. Rich Rights. I love watching it with
Speaker 1: Tucker and now just found your podcast succinct, quick pace
Speaker 1: and so very insightful. Thanks for all you do well,
Speaker 1: Rich that's great. We love to hear about people who
Speaker 1: get discovery of the Buck Sexton Show. As I've said
Speaker 1: to you, you know, I don't. I don't have you know,
Speaker 1: millions of dollars of investor money that I spend on
Speaker 1: Facebook and all these things. The way this show grows
Speaker 1: is people listening to it are like, oh, this is
Speaker 1: better than the other podcasts out there on politics, and
Speaker 1: people who listen to it and like it tell people
Speaker 1: that's it. We grow by. We grow by word of
Speaker 1: mouth that is our primary mechanism, or word of text
Speaker 1: or email. I guess, but you telling people. So when
Speaker 1: I say passed the book, the future of the show
Speaker 1: is in your hands. Those of you listening and who
Speaker 1: appreciate what I do cost you nothing helps us a lot,
Speaker 1: and I can't thank you enough for those of you
Speaker 1: who do it. You know, get a family member, get
Speaker 1: a friend, tell them like, hey, have you listen? Especially
Speaker 1: with this election cycle, If someone really wants to know
Speaker 1: what the primary issues are, they should be listening to
Speaker 1: this show. I'm not going to be shy about saying
Speaker 1: that they should listen to this show. Brad Hey, Buck
Speaker 1: and producer Mark this idea of Joe Rogan hosting a
Speaker 1: debate between President Trump and Sleepy Joe is excellent. Trump
Speaker 1: should get together with Joe Rogan and set a date.
Speaker 1: It's up to Biden to show up. If Biden doesn't show,
Speaker 1: they can do an interview and spread reason to all
Speaker 1: of Joe Rogan's fan base. Also, the debate needs to
Speaker 1: be in person. Sleepy Joe can be in his own
Speaker 1: plexiglass aquarium on stage, but no zoom calls where his
Speaker 1: team can feed him teleprompted answers. Keep up the good
Speaker 1: work as always, Shields, I Brad, that was funny. Thank you.
Speaker 1: I think Joe Rogan would be great. I've said that before.
Speaker 1: I think it would be much more interesting to have
Speaker 1: a non traditional interviewer and broadcaster handling one of these. Look,
Speaker 1: you can still have the usual talking points contest debate
Speaker 1: with you know, fake Tapper or one of those one
Speaker 1: of those jerks pretending to be even handed in all this.
Speaker 1: But I really do believe that it would be a
Speaker 1: more interesting watch, a more illuminating experience for the people
Speaker 1: who designed But and then the problem with it is
Speaker 1: that them may the media, the legacy media companies will
Speaker 1: see that and say, WHOA hold on a second, you
Speaker 1: know how long for this world are we? They need
Speaker 1: those built in advantages, right. If CNN doesn't get to
Speaker 1: moderate a presidential debate, if it all of a sudden
Speaker 1: turns into who has the biggest audience? Why is anyone
Speaker 1: watching CNN? Right? They need these built in advantages, and
Speaker 1: so they will not part with them easily. And there's
Speaker 1: a lot of pressure that has brought to bear on
Speaker 1: behalf of NBC and CNN and these different by the
Speaker 1: companies that are above them, that own them, that run them. Right,
Speaker 1: So keep that in mind too. You're in the freedom hud.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. More roll
Speaker 1: call here JJ Right, hey Buck, Just a quick comment
Speaker 1: about how the commedies have taken over absolutely all industries.
Speaker 1: I follow several authors here on Instagram, and a couple
Speaker 1: of them shared a breaking news story that the country's
Speaker 1: largest printing presses are really backlogged thanks to COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: Because of this, nearly all of the books later for
Speaker 1: release during late fall and early winter have been pushed
Speaker 1: back three to six months. And yet we're all supposed
Speaker 1: to believe it's pure coincidence that dozens of anti Trump
Speaker 1: books are somehow all making their way onto bookshelves with
Speaker 1: six weeks left until the election. I also noticed that
Speaker 1: my local target now has its own dedicated anti racism
Speaker 1: and cap in the book section. It would make me
Speaker 1: laugh if it weren't also truly despicable. Thanks guys for
Speaker 1: all you do keeping a safe and warm at night.
Speaker 1: That's how we roll. We keep Team Bucks safe and
Speaker 1: warm at night with the freedom hunt and JJ. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm look the public. The major publishers are as LIB
Speaker 1: dominated as Netflix and the news media and all the
Speaker 1: rest of it. So the libs run publishing, the libs
Speaker 1: run media, The libs are in charge of all that
Speaker 1: stuff unfortunately, and so it wouldn't be the least bit.
Speaker 1: In fact, I would go so far as to say
Speaker 1: it would be surprising if we found out that that
Speaker 1: wasn't happening, right, if they weren't stacking the deck in
Speaker 1: favor of Biden with the books that are getting published,
Speaker 1: I'd say, Wow, really, that's crazy. I would just expect it, alrighty,
Speaker 1: Diane rights Buck, I have two questions I'm hoping you
Speaker 1: can answer them. First, what is the drop dead date
Speaker 1: for deams to potentially replace Biden? And Second, well, I
Speaker 1: believe there's no precedent. Could Harris debate Trump. We're definitely
Speaker 1: at a time where we all need to keep our
Speaker 1: shield high. Thanks for all you do, Diane. I mean,
Speaker 1: I don't really know the technicality of I just know
Speaker 1: that I don't think they couldn't get them on the ballot. Now,
Speaker 1: they couldn't get someone to replace Biden the ballot. It
Speaker 1: so no, they're not going to replace Biden at this stage.
Speaker 1: You can, you can put that one out. I appreciate
Speaker 1: your thinking outside the box, but I don't think that's
Speaker 1: going to happen. And as for Harris debating Trump, that
Speaker 1: wouldn't happen either, because that would be effectively an admission
Speaker 1: that Biden. Everything that we're saying about Biden being too
Speaker 1: old and you know, not of sound mind is true,
Speaker 1: and that would hurt him, so that they can't do
Speaker 1: that either. But you are right in thinking that what
Speaker 1: has been normal in the past it's not necessarily what's
Speaker 1: going to be in the future. So do keep your
Speaker 1: keep your eyes open for things that one would assume
Speaker 1: are untenable and possible would never happen, and then all
Speaker 1: of a sudden they happen. Because we're living in this
Speaker 1: crazy time where Democrats have no accountability. Douglas Buck, we
Speaker 1: have to stop talking about the popular vote for the presidency.
Speaker 1: There is no such thing as the popular vote for president.
Speaker 1: Hillary did not win the popular vote. A national popular
Speaker 1: vote is not an alternative way to elect the president.
Speaker 1: There are not two types of votes that determine the presidency.
Speaker 1: Like it or not, understand it or not. Only the
Speaker 1: popular votes in each state and then the Electoral College
Speaker 1: determine the election. We must stop referring to the popular
Speaker 1: vote as if it were some legitimate, legal, alternate way
Speaker 1: of determining who should be president. It is misleading the
Speaker 1: American people and leading division and chaos. Oh look, Dougas,
Speaker 1: I totally agree with you. I mean, I think the
Speaker 1: popular vote. People bring it up. I always tell you
Speaker 1: it's very It's It's exactly my analogy. You know. If
Speaker 1: I'm playing somebody in tennis and I say, oh, if
Speaker 1: it's been two hours, I'm ahead, I win, and they
Speaker 1: say no, it's it's best three out of five sets. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it doesn't matter that I'm ahead two hours. In that
Speaker 1: the US Open match on Sunday went I think over
Speaker 1: four hours. So to declare yourself the winner after two hours. No,
Speaker 1: it doesn't work. If you're playing basketball and you know
Speaker 1: the score is eighty two to eighty after the fourth quarter,
Speaker 1: you don't get to say no the games to one
Speaker 1: hundred if you've played the four quarters right. It's exactly
Speaker 1: the same concept with the electoral College. You're running the
Speaker 1: race you're running. You're not running a race for something else,
Speaker 1: So you're you're completely correct in that. I agree with you.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't get drawn into that team. Tomorrow's Friday. Wow.
Speaker 1: This week has flown bye. Please pass the buck. Check
Speaker 1: us out at bucksexton dot com. Make sure you're following
Speaker 1: me on Instagram, posting more and more there every day
Speaker 1: buck Sexton Until next time. Team, you have your orders,
Speaker 1: Sit back, relax, come out to the coast, have a
Speaker 1: few laughs, Shields high.