WEBVTT - Girl Duran & Arianna Jones

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds. We are on vacation, but that doesn't

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:12.400
<v Speaker 1>mean we don't have a great show for you today.

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>The nerd Wich newsletter and New Republic contributor Gil Duran

0:00:17.280 --> 0:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>stops by to talk about why some Silicon Valley leaders

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>are advocating an anti democracy agenda. But first we have

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>next Gen executive director Arianna Jones about how we get.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Young voters out to vote for Dems. Welcome to Fast Politics.

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Ariana, thanks so much for having.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Me so explain to us what you do and what

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 2>your organization does.

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm the executive director here at next Gen America, which

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 3>is an organization that works primarily on college campuses. So

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 3>we combine year round organizing with issue education, voter registration,

0:00:55.200 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 3>and get at the vote efforts. I'm really focused on

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 3>building trust and participation over time and not just parachuting

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 3>in election season.

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>So what does that mean exactly?

0:01:05.040 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Forming student clubs on campuses, making sure that we're having

0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.959
<v Speaker 3>conversations about the issues long term, not just right when

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 3>it matters, and we are asking them to show up

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 3>at the polls and ensuring we're connecting the dots to

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:16.759
<v Speaker 3>their everyday lives.

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Give us some of the clubs that your organization starts,

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:22.759
<v Speaker 2>like what they are, what they're called, etc.

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.679
<v Speaker 3>It's primarily like an organizing tool. We provide the students

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 3>with the opportunity to learn organizing tactics and skills, leadership skills,

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 3>and then we ask them to go out and have

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.520
<v Speaker 3>conversations with their fellow students and discuss just the things

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 3>that are affecting them and connecting the dots and making

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 3>sure that they get registered to vote obviously and that

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:44.679
<v Speaker 3>they know you know, what dates to show up in.

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Your job, do you talk to a lot of students, Yeah.

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Try to as much as possible. That's the only way

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 3>you can stay relevant, right is to directly speak to

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 3>them about what's concerning.

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Them, what is concerning them. Yeah.

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 3>So the Yale and Harvard polls just came out this

0:01:58.040 --> 0:02:00.840
<v Speaker 3>past week. It's pretty much aligned, which is that young

0:02:00.840 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 3>people think the country is on the wrong track. They

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 3>have high economic insecurity, they have low confidence that they

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 3>will be better off than their parents. Really importantly, trust

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 3>in institutions broadly is very low, but sort of confusingly

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:18.520
<v Speaker 3>in light of that, support for democracy remains high. So

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, we also saw in that pool that there's

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 3>been you know, a drop off and overwhelming disapproval of Trump,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:27.119
<v Speaker 3>which is an update to what we had seen previously.

0:02:27.320 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 3>But ultimately, I mean, what we've learned about young people

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:31.959
<v Speaker 3>through the course of those polls too, is that because

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 3>of that distrust in institutions, they are responding more to

0:02:36.000 --> 0:02:39.519
<v Speaker 3>concrete policy and issue based you know sort of efforts

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 3>versus partisan branding. So that's something I think we need

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 3>to keep in mind moving forward.

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd love you to explain to us we're young people

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.799
<v Speaker 1>more open to trump Ism than previous Republican president.

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think we have to like take a

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 3>step back and start with what this generation has slipped through. Like,

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.520
<v Speaker 3>if you really nail it down, it's repeated institutional failure. Right,

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 3>There's been school shootings, student debt, housing and stability, climate

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:09.079
<v Speaker 3>and action. They were basically told, hope, be resilient, wait

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:10.679
<v Speaker 3>your turn. And I also think at the end of

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 3>the day, they're a generation that's been brought up with

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 3>cell phones in their hands, so they're also extremely fluent

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 3>in you know, marketing performance presentation. So I think you know,

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:24.519
<v Speaker 3>when they hear polished messaging unlike maybe previous generations, combined

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 3>with a lack of feeling real power, it feels hollow.

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 3>And I think there's been a response to that. But

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 3>I think you know, when it comes to this sort

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 3>of narrative that there's been a right word shift. You know,

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 3>it wasn't proven true in the twenty twenty five elections.

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 3>You know that doesn't really support that story.

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 2>But was it proven true in the twenty four elections.

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.360
<v Speaker 3>I think that's the reason this narrative persists is because, yes,

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 3>I think what we're witnessing is it's volatility. It's not realignment, right,

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 3>So it's essentially saying that they are up for grabs

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 3>and it's up to us to work for it. It's

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 3>not going to be a guarantee. It's not like they

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 3>come over to the Democratic side and they stay there

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 3>because they're leading with issues. I think their participation, their engagement,

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 3>has to be earned, and I think you know what

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.120
<v Speaker 3>we saw obviously the narrative about their being a right

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 3>wood shift. I think specifically with young men, it's more

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 3>in my mind, a cultural one than a political one,

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 3>and there was sort of a gap or a void

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 3>that I think also, at the end of the day,

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 3>it's really important to address the fact that this is

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 3>the loneliest generation. We often talk about loneliness as a

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.600
<v Speaker 3>public health crisis, right, which I think is important. It's

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 3>also a political condition in my mind, because you know,

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 3>this is a connected generation. They've had these cell phones

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 3>and the internet, so it's not about access. They have

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 3>access to each other. It's about the absence I think

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 3>of real community. I mean, they also have the conditions

0:04:39.720 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 3>that were you know, growing up in formative years during COVID,

0:04:43.000 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 3>where they basically had their social lives put on pause.

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:49.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that's something that's left, you know, avoid where

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 3>people feel untethered. At the end of the day, people

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 3>who don't feel like they belong somewhere or don't feel

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 3>invested in they are more likely to be targeted.

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 2>For trump ism and extremism.

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I've talked to people who said there's a disconnect

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're sort of like, there's pre pandemic kids and

0:05:07.839 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic kids, and the pre pandemic kids tend to

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit more normally left leaning, and the

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 1>post pandemic kids are angry about school closures and so

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they become more right wing.

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Is that true or not so much?

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 3>I would have to look at the data to make

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:27.280
<v Speaker 3>a declarative statement on that, just guess. I would guess yes.

0:05:27.279 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I would also say that we're coming up on a

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 3>generation that they were not necessarily politically aware during Trump's

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 3>first term, right. So I think the other thing, too,

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 3>is that we were trying to message to folks who

0:05:37.480 --> 0:05:40.200
<v Speaker 3>hadn't experienced any of those realities in their day to

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 3>day or necessarily when they were independently sort of operating,

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:46.120
<v Speaker 3>expecting them to understand those implications too. So I think

0:05:46.120 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 3>there's an element there of, you know, education that wasn't

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 3>focused on providing them with an alternative, that was focused

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 3>on the issues that matter to them.

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>So you have kids who were mad about school closures

0:05:55.560 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and they voted for Trump or they became right leaning.

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.960
<v Speaker 1>They saw them on the podcast as they bought the sneakers,

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>they like the crypto. You think that group still exists

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>or you think they've sort of dissipated because like we've

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 1>seen Trump people like the Barstool Sports guy, Like we've

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>seen those people express some regret. So do you think

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 1>that is fanning out to include other young people or.

0:06:18.760 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 3>Now for sure. I mean, I think this was definitely

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.919
<v Speaker 3>highlighted in both the Harvard and Yale polls. The support

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:27.000
<v Speaker 3>for Trump among young people dropped significantly. I think the

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 3>problem is that that doesn't automatically translate into loyalty to

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 3>the Democratic Party. So it just tells us that they're

0:06:32.920 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's not that necessarily that they're vaulting to

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 3>the other team, but they're just I think, withholding trust altogether.

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Isn't everyone like that?

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 1>I understand that Democrats can take those candidates for granted.

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>I understand what you're saying, but I also just wonder, like,

0:06:47.400 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>aren't all voters basically you get them for a little

0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:53.719
<v Speaker 1>bit and then they leave you if you don't do

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>what they want you to do.

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I would say yes, but I think there's

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 3>been sort of a sense that there are certain demographics

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:01.960
<v Speaker 3>blocks that are taken for granted. I mean, I think

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 3>ultimately you look at, for instance, millennials. You know, there

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 3>was a reason that there were books written in the

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:10.000
<v Speaker 3>Obama era that essentially claimed Democrats were going to have

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 3>success for the next couple of decades. Right. The reality

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 3>is is, I think this is also a generation we

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 3>can't also divorce the reality that this is a generation

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.679
<v Speaker 3>that's consuming differently, meaning like they're a completely fractured media environment.

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.200
<v Speaker 3>There's no more shared collective truth. There's all of these elements,

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, coming at play, hitting together at a perfect

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 3>storm that just makes them a unique block that I

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:31.559
<v Speaker 3>don't think we've dealt with before.

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Frankly, how do you see that fragmenting in the poem line?

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think it's about like where people are

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 3>getting their information. I think it's also you know, this

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.000
<v Speaker 3>is where the right wing sort of where we talk

0:07:43.040 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 3>about the manisphere, we talk about the channels of cultural

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 3>communication that the writs had success in. There was a

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 3>void essentially there, and it was a place that you know,

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.760
<v Speaker 3>was meeting them where they were. So I think it's

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 3>also a question of just making sure that we're not

0:07:56.800 --> 0:07:59.679
<v Speaker 3>behind the ball on finding where they are and meeting

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 3>them there.

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right.

0:08:01.080 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But then if you're in a situation like this where

0:08:04.160 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you have Trump has advertised to make things cheaper, things

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>are not cheaper, things are more expensive. You read a

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>conservative news source that tells you, so you're a Fox newsperson,

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:16.679
<v Speaker 1>but things are more expensive and you were told Trump

0:08:16.800 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to make things cheaper at some point, don't.

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:21.040
<v Speaker 2>You lose the faith?

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Like readers are not idiots, right, don't they eventually pick

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>that put that together?

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:29.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, No, they're feeling the reality that you mentioned. I mean,

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 3>like you can only talking points yourself out of the

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 3>economic reality that they're facing right now. So much right

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, the bank account doesn't lie.

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 3>The talking points might, but I think folks are feeling

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 3>that in a real way where again there isn't as

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 3>much loyalty built up where they're going to stick around

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 3>to be told that the sky is green when it

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:47.199
<v Speaker 3>is blue.

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that works for Democrats advantage? Does that

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>work for like a truth advantage? Do you think it

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:53.680
<v Speaker 1>has no effect?

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I think young people are smart, right, Like,

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, we have to treat them,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:00.160
<v Speaker 3>you know, with respect that they are intelligent enough to

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 3>see when there is one thing being said and one

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 3>thing actually happening. And I think that you know, this

0:09:05.120 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 3>is kind of why the approach with us is. You know,

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 3>the lesson I get out of all of this is like,

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 3>it's not about us having better slogans or ads. It's

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.160
<v Speaker 3>about just speaking plainly, naming the problem and inviting them

0:09:17.160 --> 0:09:18.960
<v Speaker 3>into the work, because I think again, part of the

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:21.720
<v Speaker 3>issue that we're having right now is that people fight

0:09:21.760 --> 0:09:24.480
<v Speaker 3>harder for something that they help build rather than something

0:09:24.520 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 3>that they're sold. And they also don't need to be

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 3>convinced that things are broken. I think part of our

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 3>messaging has been focused on the brokenness. They very much

0:09:32.520 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 3>are experiencing that, and they already know it. And I think,

0:09:34.600 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, one of the things they're desperate for is

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 3>getting a sense to whether they'll be let in to

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 3>help fix it and accounted for in the discussions about

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 3>how to help fix it. But I mean, I think

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 3>this is an opportunity for Democrats, honestly. I think that

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, obviously, when it comes to the economics of

0:09:48.000 --> 0:09:50.480
<v Speaker 3>it all, the plan that will be most beneficial to

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 3>young people will be on that side. It's just a

0:09:52.960 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 3>question of having a direct, not sleek, heavily produced discussion

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 3>about it.

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>When you talk to these kids, what do they say, like,

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:02.840
<v Speaker 1>what do they care about? Do you feel like the

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:04.240
<v Speaker 1>polling is reflective?

0:10:04.400 --> 0:10:08.000
<v Speaker 3>The polling is definitely reflective of what their top concerns are.

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's the economy at the very top, affordability,

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.559
<v Speaker 3>minimum wage, you know, obviously, and there are still other

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of more what you would probably call cultural issues,

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 3>like they're obviously reproductive care, free speech. But I mean,

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:22.200
<v Speaker 3>I think at the end of the day, the biggest

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 3>thing they're focused on right now, and I think the

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 3>thing that is giving folks the most anxiety is the

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 3>economic reality that they're about to step into.

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they equate that.

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 3>I think twenty twenty five proofs that they are beginning

0:10:32.040 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 3>to CNN up those stops.

0:10:33.240 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems like women never really went maga with the

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 1>same speed that men did.

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 2>I love you to talk us through that.

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 3>I think this is one of the things I get

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 3>concerned about when the narrative is primarily focused on the

0:10:45.800 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 3>young men that have been a pendulum swing now once

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 3>in twenty four and back again in twenty five, is

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 3>that it leaves out a very important block of folks

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 3>who've kept us afloat, which is young women who have

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 3>been loyal to the party and consistently shown up. So

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 3>I also want to make sure that in the course

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 3>of whatever happen next, we don't forget to speak with

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 3>them directly and continue to earn their votes as well.

0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, no, young women did not have the same

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 3>reaction as the young men did.

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Did they seem much more activated, these young people

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>than they did a year ago? And if so, are

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 1>they doing more political activation?

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:19.079
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>And I think one of the reasons why, like Next

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Gen continues to go on campus. I mean, obviously there's

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot that we can do, particularly with this group

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.680
<v Speaker 3>of folks online, and that's an important arm or element

0:11:29.720 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 3>of this. And you know, algorithms are really good at

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:36.080
<v Speaker 3>mobilizing attention in the attention economy, but they're not as

0:11:36.080 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 3>good at building trust. You know, organizing creates real world community,

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 3>which again I think a lot of these folks are

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 3>lacking in the current climate, you know, the most lonely generation, right,

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 3>So that isolation again makes them more vulnerable to you know,

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 3>greevance politics, conspiracies, whatever it may be. So the goal

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 3>of having this in person community building is to also

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 3>provide them with a space to socialize. I mean, this

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 3>was one of the in my I mind, one of

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.319
<v Speaker 3>the biggest benefits of the Mandani campaign. And there was

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 3>a great New York Times article about this where they

0:12:05.240 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 3>wrote about how it became a social tool, not just

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 3>a political one. And I saw the same thing I

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 3>worked on. Bernie saw the same thing. People weren't just

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.840
<v Speaker 3>showing up to canvas. They need friends. They found purpose,

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 3>They experienced what collective action actually feels like, which if

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 3>you've never experienced it, you can't imagine getting things done

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 3>collectively right, collective action, So you know, it wasn't just

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 3>asking for something, it was providing something and giving them something,

0:12:28.960 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 3>which I feel like is extremely important. And building that

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 3>bridge and giving them those social tools in social spaces

0:12:34.920 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 3>as well is really important, just because again it's if

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 3>we call it a public health crisis, we should also

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 3>be addressing that when we're talking about young people as well.

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.480
<v Speaker 2>When you're interfacing with these kids, like, what are the

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 2>things they want? What are the things there besides jobs?

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, yes, jobs, but a seated at the table. I mean,

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 3>I think that's number one, right when it comes to

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 3>agency over their own future. I mean, I think at

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 3>the end of the day, they're working with them and

0:12:58.640 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 3>not working on them would probably be one of the

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 3>things I would recommend and that they are looking for.

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, I mean it's jobs. It's those jobs having

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 3>wages that are going to actually provide them with what

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 3>they need in dignity and a stable life. A lot

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 3>of these folks. I mean, like, you know, there's a

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 3>lot of young people that take care of family members

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.600
<v Speaker 3>that are you know, sick or not able to take

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 3>care of themselves. Affects their perspective on healthcare, you know,

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:23.360
<v Speaker 3>even the things that you don't think necessarily affect them

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 3>in college at the time, for instance, healthcare they can

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 3>stand their parents potentially until they're twenty six, but that's

0:13:29.040 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 3>not necessarily the lived reality for a lot of these people.

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 3>So I would say at the forefront right now, it's

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, economics of jobs, but I would say there's

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 3>also an element here of accountability. I think there's a

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 3>big desire for accountability across the board, and I think

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 3>that's across you know, all age demos right now, as

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.080
<v Speaker 3>folks are looking for, you know, people to be held accountable.

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, accountability. Does that mean like Democrats need to prosecute

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>the Trumpers.

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 3>I've been more at a basic level, it's they've gotten

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.120
<v Speaker 3>a lot of promises made to them and then have

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.199
<v Speaker 3>not seen the materialize, and then are being asked to

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 3>get on board and continue to support right. I think

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day. That's another factor that

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>we have to be honest with ourselves about, is there's

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 3>an element there of if folks are not delivering, there

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:14.959
<v Speaker 3>should also be accountability. I mean, I think across the

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 3>board there is a sort of lawlessness that it feels

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 3>like is happening right now.

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, thank you, thank you so much, Aana, thank

0:14:21.920 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you really appreciate it. We have exciting news over on

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>our YouTube channel. The second episode from our Project twenty

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Series is out now. It's a reimagining where we examine

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 2>what went wrong with democrats approach to politics and how

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 2>we can correct it and deliver changes to help people's lives.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>The first episode dove into the very sexy topic of

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 1>campaign finance reform, and our second episode deals with an

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 1>even sexier topic, antitrust and regulation. We look at how

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:03.280
<v Speaker 1>antitrust and regulation can protect American citizens and make America

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>thrive in an era of rampant corruption and predatory crony capitalism.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.360
<v Speaker 1>We talk to the smartest names in the field like

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Lena Kahan, Elvero Bedoya, Elizabeth.

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 2>Wilkins, and Doha Mechi.

0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Republicans were prepared for when they got the levers of power.

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 2>We need democrats to be too, So please head over

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 2>to YouTube and search Mollie John Fast Project twenty twenty nine,

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.760
<v Speaker 2>or go to the Fast Politics YouTube channel and find

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:36.960
<v Speaker 2>it there and help us spread the word.

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Gil Duran is a contributor to The New Republican the

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.400
<v Speaker 1>author of the newsletter and upcoming book The nerd Reich.

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Fast Politics, Gil, thanks for having me. Your

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 2>book is called The nerd Reich.

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So we've been talking about these guys I feel like NonStop,

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>but also not in the kind of depth we probably

0:15:56.360 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>need to be. So get me going on how you

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>started this book, where you got when you started.

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 2>At what was the moment?

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, my book will be published in August twenty twenty six,

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 4>but it's based on work I've been doing over the

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 4>past year and a half looking at how a cult

0:16:09.680 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 4>of venture capitalists has become completely radicalized into an anti

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 4>American ideology that calls for the creation of these weird,

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 4>little corporate run territories around the world that some call

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 4>network states. People have talked about the Dark Enlightenment, the

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 4>whole Curtis Jarvin ideology.

0:16:25.720 --> 0:16:27.800
<v Speaker 5>And they've talked about the neo reactionary movement.

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 4>The network state is a part of that, and it's

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 4>sort of like the business plan for making it a reality.

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 4>I started working on it in San Francisco because three

0:16:35.560 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 4>years ago I was the editorial page editor of the

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco Examiner, and I noticed that there was this

0:16:41.200 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 4>strange sort of right wing radicalization taking place among the

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 4>venture capitalists in our city who were partnering with Republicans

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 4>to fund these recall elections, most of which were wholly unnecessary,

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 4>but they really kind of created this whole panic in

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco among the voters around the need to save

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco from a doom loop that was being driven

0:17:00.440 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 4>by liberal progressive policy. It didn't make a whole lot

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 4>of sense, and it was there that I first got

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.240
<v Speaker 4>the inkling that there was something going on that was weird,

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.119
<v Speaker 4>that didn't make sense. Because I've spent most of my

0:17:10.200 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 4>career in democratic politics. I know what democrats sound like,

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 4>I know what they believe. These guys were not Democrats.

0:17:15.640 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 4>They were something else, say, as they say in Silicon Valley,

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 4>a worse third thing.

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 2>This is very interesting because I thought you were going

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 2>to go to like recall actions et cetera. But you're

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 2>actually saying that the group that they were rallying against

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 2>weren't actually Democrats, they were something else.

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 4>Oh No, the group they were rallying against were Democrats.

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 4>The guys who were pushing the recall, one of whom

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 4>was David Sachs, Yes, the Other worlds favorite, Yeah, Gary

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 4>tannet y combinator. They were pushing these ideas. For instance,

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 4>they really demonized Chase A. Boudin, the district attorney, who

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 4>hadn't really done anything wrong. He'd barely been in office

0:17:50.680 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 4>less than a year, but they pick on one or

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:54.480
<v Speaker 4>two crimes that happened. And by the way, crime is

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 4>always happening in a city. There's always going to be

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:58.879
<v Speaker 4>a crime, or so he was prosecuting these crimes, but

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 4>they created the sort of more or panic, we have

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 4>to get rid of this guy. And one of the

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 4>things they were calling for was basically a return to

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 4>mass incarceration policies, which California had largely abandoned ten years

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 4>earlier as part of an era of reform. And the

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 4>people pushing that reform were not Chase A. Boudin, who

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 4>was still in law school at the time. It was

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Jerry Brown, it was Gavin Newsom, it was mainstream Democrats.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 4>And so the line they were pushing that we need

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 4>to go back toward harsh policies was clearly right wing,

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:26.840
<v Speaker 4>was clearly out.

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 5>Of step with mainstream democratic policies.

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 4>But what really clued me in was that Gary tan

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:33.840
<v Speaker 4>who's the CEO of y Combinator, former employee, early employee

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.199
<v Speaker 4>of Palenteer, the guy who designed the Paleteer logo. And

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.120
<v Speaker 4>I didn't know all this at the time, by the way,

0:18:38.160 --> 0:18:40.520
<v Speaker 4>I was very wet behind the ears, didn't know who

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:42.439
<v Speaker 4>these guys were, just knew there was something weird. He

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 4>kept talking about something called the network state, And when

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 4>I finally looked into that, because this local activist kept

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 4>pushing me to do it, I realized that that was

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 4>sort of the key to understanding this entire body of

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 4>radical thought that was emerging as a force in Silicon Valley.

0:18:57.040 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 2>So let's start by talking about the recollections, because it's

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 2>so interesting that that is sort of where David Sachs

0:19:03.080 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 2>got involved in politics. Is that where David Sacks got

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 2>involved in politics?

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.560
<v Speaker 4>He's always been involved to some degree. Early on at

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 4>Stanford he wrote a book with Peter Teale that diversity myth,

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 4>so he was always trying to position himself as some

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.119
<v Speaker 4>kind of pundit or political type. But it was in

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 4>San Francisco during the recall fever, and even before San

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 4>Francisco actually, you know, remember there was a recall of

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 4>Gavin Newsom because he ate dinner at the French Laundry,

0:19:27.080 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 4>and this galvanized people who were against the COVID.

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 2>Shutdowns, even though it didn't work.

0:19:32.040 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, well, SAX had put money into that, a lot

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 4>of money, which was stupid because anybody familiar with politics

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 4>knew that the polls showed that thing was going down

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.200
<v Speaker 4>in flames. It was great for the media to play

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.280
<v Speaker 4>it up. It was really humiliating for Newsom, but it

0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 4>wasn't gonna win. What it did, though, was it normalized

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 4>the ideas that were, if we're unhappy with our politicians,

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 4>we should recall them. And that had a lot more

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 4>luck in San Francisco, where a movement had sprang up

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 4>to spread panic over everyday crimes and problems in the

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 4>city and to blame four particular elected officials and remove

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 4>them from office, which succeeded. But they're still crime and

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 4>they're still homelesses in San Francisco, but there's nobody paying

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 4>everybody to scream about it all the time. Now now

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.199
<v Speaker 4>they claim it's sort of everything's better, even if it's not.

0:20:12.280 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 4>And that's kind of how it works. If you have

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 4>enough billionaires show up and make everybody upset and call

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 4>for people's heads, it'll work.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 5>And if in the absence of that kind of mechanism.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 4>So what you had was these venture capitalists becoming the

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 4>loudest voices in San Francisco politics and sort of emulating

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk in a way, like being angry, being loud,

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 4>calling for people to be pushed out of office, et cetera.

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 2>Did they emulate him or did he emulate them?

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 4>It seemed to me like he was emulating them, because

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 4>I was in Sacramento during the pandemic and got to

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 4>watch Elon's radicalization into anti government and control in real time,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.119
<v Speaker 4>and suddenly it seemed like once I got to San Francisco,

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.200
<v Speaker 4>all of these guys had become Elon, Like they were

0:20:54.200 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 4>all using their money and their Twitter accounts to sow discord,

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 4>spread and really pushed these right wing ideas. So that

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 4>was what clued me in when I was writing about

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 4>this last year, I thought this would be a threat

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.200
<v Speaker 4>maybe four or five years down the road. I was like,

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 4>Silicon Valley's doing this thing where they're going to try

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 4>to take over politics. We just saw them do this

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 4>in San Francisco, where they were partially successful, partially not successful.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 4>Successful enough, however, and unfortunately what happened was Vance got

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 4>on the ticket, and then I realized, wait, Vance is

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 4>one of them. And I wrote an early story that

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.520
<v Speaker 4>tied Vance to Curtis Jarvin to Peter Tiel explained how

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:31.160
<v Speaker 4>Vance had been quoting Jarvin and Lo and behold here

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.359
<v Speaker 4>we are. I feel like last year people looked at

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 4>me kind of strangely, like why is Gill going down

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.560
<v Speaker 4>this deep rabbit hole and freaking out about Silicon Valley. Now,

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.399
<v Speaker 4>I think everyone's caught up with the early signs of

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 4>what we were seeing, and I wish I had been

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 4>wrong about it. But I think that the radicalization we're

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.720
<v Speaker 4>seeing is only just the beginning. We're not even a

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 4>year into this. They have a lot worse plans to

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 4>try to put in place here.

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean they have a lot worse plans,

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, I want to go back for a

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 1>minute about San Francisco. So where does David Laurie, the

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>new mayor, figure into all of that?

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:03.919
<v Speaker 2>Is he a product of that or not really?

0:22:04.240 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Because you guys keep having new mayors just for people

0:22:07.520 --> 0:22:10.480
<v Speaker 1>who are not completely read in on San Francisco politics

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, you keep having the voters of San Francisco

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>reject the mayor.

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, yeah, we had London Reed before and she was

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 4>in there for a while, but she largely got caught

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 4>up in that rejection cycle. They you know, they got

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 4>rid of three members of the school board, they got

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 4>rid of the DA. I thought at the time it

0:22:28.080 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 4>was foolish for Breed to support the recalls, which she

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 4>pretty much did, because, in my experience, is the mayor

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 4>who's going to get blamed for everything in the city.

0:22:35.800 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 4>That was another weird thing about this. Never, in my

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 4>entire experience working in politics for over a decade, has

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 4>anyone ever blamed the DA for anything happening in the city.

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 4>That was an entirely new thing they made up. So

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 4>Breed ends up losing her election despite trying to appease

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.719
<v Speaker 4>these tech guys, pivoting completely one pin eighty against her

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 4>previous position. She had been a real champion for harm

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 4>reduction in dealing with the opioid over those crisis, which

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 4>we know from data and research is the only thing

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 4>that really works the same life and give people off drugs.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:03.399
<v Speaker 4>And she completely flipped to being let's lock them up.

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 4>We're going to put him in jail. It was really

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:08.119
<v Speaker 4>disturbing to watch someone flip so completely. So Lurie was

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:11.240
<v Speaker 4>not the chosen candidate of these tech guys. They wanted

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 4>Breed to win because she had shown she would completely

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 4>do what they wanted, but luri kind of came out

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 4>of nowhere. Unfortunately, he seems to be following in Breed's

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 4>footsteps by catering to these guys. For instance, Luriy, who

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 4>you know claims to have some progressive bona fides, comes

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 4>from philanthropy, won't criticize Trump. He's decided that his response

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:33.359
<v Speaker 4>is the mayor of San Francisco in an unprecedented era

0:23:33.440 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 4>of fascism, is to just be quiet and not have

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.680
<v Speaker 4>any opinion on what's happening nationally. At the same time,

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 4>he's pursuing a lot of the policies these tech guys

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 4>called for, like using jail sales and threats to crack

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.119
<v Speaker 4>down on drug overdose addiction, which nothing has been tried

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 4>more than these failed tactics in San Francisco. You know,

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 4>I wrote a column with the Examiner going back sixty years.

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 4>Everyone's always cracking down on the tenderloin. Everyone's always about

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 4>to clean it all up, and it just never happens

0:23:58.000 --> 0:24:00.399
<v Speaker 4>because they try these failed things. So Lurie, I don't know,

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 4>he doesn't have much experience. It's only a year in

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 4>People seem happy so far. I think they're kind of

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 4>tired of rejecting the politicians for a minute. But give

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.400
<v Speaker 4>them another year or two. All it takes is one

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 4>big crime or another surgeon homelessness, and everyone will be

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 4>searching for the new strongman to clear up the problem

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 4>with magical fake solutions.

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>So basically, tech bros have sort of taken over the

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:26.959
<v Speaker 1>government by using money and as a sort of carrot

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>stick on I mean the local government sort of.

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 4>They had some success, but San Francisco is a very

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.880
<v Speaker 4>hard place to try to control. People have their own ideas.

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.520
<v Speaker 4>For example, one of the people who got put into

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:42.719
<v Speaker 4>office was a guy named Joel Ingardio, who was one

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 4>of these pro tech guy types. But then he took

0:24:44.960 --> 0:24:48.679
<v Speaker 4>a position that pissed off the voters. He closed this

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.480
<v Speaker 4>great highway on the western edge of San Francisco to

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:54.120
<v Speaker 4>create a park. He voted for this thing, supported it,

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 4>and he just got recalled from office and they were

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 4>very upset by that. And now there's a more progressive

0:24:58.880 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 4>person in there. So it's an ever shifting situation. You

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:05.119
<v Speaker 4>can't just ever just get control all at once, and

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 4>the voters are can be very fickle. And also the

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 4>block of people who ousted in Guardio or people who

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 4>voted for the recalls, so it's the same group of voters,

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 4>and that's what the tech rows are discovering. Actually, politics

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 4>is a little complicated and complex, and it's never over,

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 4>and you could just make one mistake and suddenly you

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 4>lose a whole part of your base. And so they're

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 4>not as smart as they think they are. So I

0:25:26.560 --> 0:25:29.240
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't give them credit for having all control. They had

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 4>a victory, and they're learning the hard way that it's

0:25:31.920 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 4>not so simple. The other big lesson they would learn

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.080
<v Speaker 4>if they get capture all control is that now you're

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 4>responsible for all the problems which will continue to manifest.

0:25:38.920 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 4>You know, every politician runs to clean everything up and

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 4>it never gets all cleaned up somehow.

0:25:42.960 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of the micro But then they have these

0:25:45.000 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of macro plans, these larger plans for authoritarianism.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that gets us back to the network state idea.

0:25:52.000 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 4>And the network state idea was developed by An andresen Horowitz,

0:25:55.480 --> 0:25:59.119
<v Speaker 4>former general partner who was also the former chief technology

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:02.360
<v Speaker 4>officer of Coinbase, a guy named Bologistrina vasen.

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 2>Oh I know who he is.

0:26:03.280 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, he came with this idea that democracy's done and

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 4>we need to prepare for what comes after it. The

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 4>United States is an outdated software system and we need

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.119
<v Speaker 4>a new government style for the twenty first century. And

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 4>the network state is this idea that tech oligarchs should

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 4>use their wealth and their influence to a takeover existing

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 4>governments where they can and b create these new territories

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 4>all over the country and the world where they will

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 4>be free of regulation, free of law, free of taxation,

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.440
<v Speaker 4>free of democracy, where they can start their own countries.

0:26:34.640 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 4>And in Bilogi's homespun theory, this is going to become

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:41.159
<v Speaker 4>the new governing model after the United States collapses in

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:45.160
<v Speaker 4>the twenty first century. These networked states run by tech

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.679
<v Speaker 4>oligarchs that will not be democracies, will be the new

0:26:49.000 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 4>superpower in the world. Now, it's a Kakamami theory in

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 4>many ways, but over half a billion dollars allegedly has

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 4>been invested in creating these things, with investment from people

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 4>like Sam Altman, Teal Mark Andresen and a whole coterie

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:06.800
<v Speaker 4>of interrelated venture capitalists who definitely seem to see this

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 4>as applausible alternative to reality.

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, is this all just pie in the sky or

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>do any of these people have sort of have they

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>made moves to make this real? I mean, obviously in

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco they make you real.

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:18.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's one place in Honduras called Prospera that's pretty

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.400
<v Speaker 4>famous on the island of Rotan, and it was kind

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 4>of put in place during a point in Honduras's democracy

0:27:28.200 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 4>was under great challenge. There was a president Juan Orlando Fernandez,

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.480
<v Speaker 4>who was very supportive of the creation of his thing.

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.919
<v Speaker 4>Gave these tech bros this zone where they can conduct

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:40.760
<v Speaker 4>unregulated medical experimentation and treatments and things like that. And

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 4>this is the drug trafficking ex president who Trump just pardoned,

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.399
<v Speaker 4>which raised questions about whether these tech guys had something

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 4>to do with it. I'm not sure if they did,

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 4>but Roger Stone, in a memo supporting the pardon, said

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 4>that we can save this freedom city. That's what they're

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.960
<v Speaker 4>calling these things, freedom cities. There's also plans to build

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:00.280
<v Speaker 4>something called Praxis, a I think, a city of half

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:03.160
<v Speaker 4>a million somewhere. It was going to be in the Mediterranean,

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 4>there was going to be in Greenland, that it was

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 4>going to be in Santa Barbara than it was going

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 4>to be now they're in South Africa looking around. But

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.399
<v Speaker 4>that guy Dryden Brown claims to have five hundred and

0:28:12.440 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 4>twenty five million dollars in financing to do this, so

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 4>there does seem to be a move toward making it real.

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:20.840
<v Speaker 4>The more important part for us, though, is that Trump

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 4>in his campaign plan for twenty twenty four, had a

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.920
<v Speaker 4>plan to build ten so called freedom cities. These would

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 4>be zones that would be given to corporations on federal

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 4>land to build these new regulation free zones. And this

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.080
<v Speaker 4>is exactly how of the Network State playbook to start

0:28:37.080 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 4>creating these zones that over time can negotiate for sovereignty

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 4>from their host government. And if you look around, this

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 4>is happening in Canada it's happening in the UK and England.

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 4>There's this rush of investors, inventor capitalists to create zones

0:28:52.120 --> 0:28:54.720
<v Speaker 4>where they don't have to play by the rules of democracy.

0:28:54.840 --> 0:28:57.960
<v Speaker 4>At a time when democracies are challenged and when the

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 4>wealth inequality is spiraling out of control, they want. They

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.520
<v Speaker 4>call it exit, like you would exit a company after

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 4>you get enough out of it, like brexit.

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's their own version of Brexit's the texit.

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 4>They want to get out. We got our money, we

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 4>want to get out and do our own thing. There's

0:29:11.600 --> 0:29:13.200
<v Speaker 4>no reason why we should be connected to you.

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 5>You're going to fail.

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 4>That's their attitude, and it's pretty shocking to see them

0:29:17.160 --> 0:29:19.360
<v Speaker 4>say it out loud. But Bolasystring of Austin's written a

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 4>whole book about this, and you can read it online

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 4>for free.

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 5>It's called The Network State.

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 4>There's even a one sentence version of it, so if

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 4>any of this sounds crazy, you can look it up yourself.

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 4>And that book's been praised by Mark Andriesen and Brian Armstrong,

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:33.520
<v Speaker 4>the CEO of Coinbase and novel Rabicon. To billionaire investor,

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, these are crazy ideas, but when you have

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 4>billionaires backing them, they become threateningly dangerous and real.

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, And also they've had some success with Vance.

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about I mean, they put one of

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:47.240
<v Speaker 1>their guys in as vice president.

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 5>Right, definitely. JD.

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Vance is almost entirely a creation of Peter tel. Ever

0:29:51.720 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 4>since he got out of law school, his whole career

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 4>has pretty much been supported, funded, bankrolled by Peter Til.

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 4>He became a venture capitalist for a few years, was

0:30:00.880 --> 0:30:04.680
<v Speaker 4>pretty lackluster at that, didn't really do anything massive. And

0:30:04.720 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 4>then when he decided to run for office, he was

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 4>bankrolled by Peter TiO, who's spent fifteen million dollars to

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.560
<v Speaker 4>get him elected and also made peace between Vance and

0:30:12.600 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 4>Trump because Vance had previously referred to Trump as America's

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 4>hitler and as an opioid and as someone who's morally

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 4>unfit to hold office, and that's sort of his origin story.

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.600
<v Speaker 4>They got one of their own guys in office, somebody

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 4>who quotes Curtis Jarvin approvingly. Jarbin's idea of purging the

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 4>government and making it into an authoritarian system that serves

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:37.000
<v Speaker 4>the dictator. Yeah, it's pretty horrifying. And people didn't really

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 4>write about that last year, and they didn't write about

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 4>it until this year, which is shocking because people should

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:43.640
<v Speaker 4>have known about that before the election. I feel like

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 4>if Curtis Jarvin was black and Kamala Harris was quoting him,

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 4>we would have heard about it NonStop until she was

0:30:48.640 --> 0:30:50.240
<v Speaker 4>pushed off the ticket. It would have been a national,

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 4>international scandal. But Vance just completely skated on that. It's

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:54.320
<v Speaker 4>pretty shocking.

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:58.479
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if you could just tell us sort of

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 2>what you think, if you're a person listening to this

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.920
<v Speaker 2>and you're horrified, what you would say they should do.

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 4>Become more aware of this stuff, and I'd say, urge

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 4>your politicians to start speaking out against the radicalization of

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 4>the Silicon Valley. One of the problems we have is

0:31:13.360 --> 0:31:16.160
<v Speaker 4>that politicians won't take these guys on. Everyone's afraid of

0:31:16.160 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 4>Silicon Valley or worse, they want the billionaire money for

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 4>their campaigns. For a long time, Democrats have told themselves

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:25.000
<v Speaker 4>a story that Silicon Valley is about innovation and it's

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 4>about the future, and we really need them.

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 5>That has changed.

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Silicon Valley right now is mostly about fascism until further notice,

0:31:31.680 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 4>and if the politicians won't speak out against it, people

0:31:34.760 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 4>won't become more aware of it. What's happening is that

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 4>there is a growing awareness. The Financial Times did a

0:31:38.920 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 4>big story over the weekend about the network state plans

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:43.680
<v Speaker 4>and the trying to build these cities, and it seems

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:46.160
<v Speaker 4>like the I did a little sentiment analysis, people are

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 4>mostly horrified and shocked by this, and online some of

0:31:50.000 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 4>the people who are involved in it, like Paulsishrina Boston,

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 4>have been in a bit of a panic and they're

0:31:55.440 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 4>afraid there's going to be a backlash to tech and

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 4>it's crazy plans. So everything we can do to encourage

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 4>that backlash is very important because a lot of politics

0:32:03.560 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 4>of psychological warfare, and I feel like a lot of

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 4>people have been feeling like it's over, We're a fascist country,

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 4>nothing we can do. That's not true at all. Trump

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:13.080
<v Speaker 4>is failing. His poll numbers are thinking he doesn't have

0:32:13.120 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 4>the guts to go full authoritarian, even though some of

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 4>these tech bros are urging him to do that. And

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 4>the more we can scare them into realizing they're going

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 4>to fail and they should be afraid of consequences, the

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 4>better off will be. So urge your politicians to talk

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 4>about it, Urge your favorite journalists to write about it.

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 4>People need to understand the degree to which tech fascism

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 4>is guiding the Trump project right now. It's a crucial

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 4>partner with this destructive attack on our democracy, and we

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 4>can't let it slide.

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah no, I think that's really important. Thank you, Gil,

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>That's it for this episode of Fast Politics. Tune in

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday to hear the best

0:32:55.280 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>minds and politics make sense.

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Of all this chaos. If you would enjoy this podcast,

0:33:01.280 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 2>please send it to a friend and keep the conversation going.

0:33:05.160 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening.