WEBVTT - Who was Dorothy Parker, really?

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff you should know, a production of I

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh,

0:00:13.280 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's Chuck and Jerry's here too, and this is

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:22.599
<v Speaker 1>stuff you should know. Yeah, all right, what are you

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>laughing at? Chuck? You made your first joke right out

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of the gate. What was it? You know? You just

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>did it. I'm not gonna do it. Oh the little

0:00:32.120 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>jazz hands, Yeah, that's what I pictured. That was not

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a joke. I was dead serious, all right, speaking of jazz, Chuck,

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 1>how about that jazz age? Oh, look at you don't

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>anti paca. So you requested this when Livia helped us

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>out with it? What? What? What? Why? What? I have

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>no idea why. Dorothy Parker popped into my brain. There

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>wasn't anything. I had seen the movie a long time

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>ago with the arth Dorothy Parker story. Yeah, Dorothy Parker

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in the Vicious Circle was the name of the movie.

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Great Alan Rudolph film starring Jennifer Jason Lee, j J.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:11.760
<v Speaker 1>L as Uh, Dorothy Parker. Great cast rounded it out,

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Cambell Scott, Matthew Broderick, others. Campbell Scott was this. It

0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>was not quite that old, but it was. I think

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 1>it was late nineties or early odds, although he was

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>just in something I saw recently. Yeah, he's in like

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a Marvel movie or something. I think. Okay, is he

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>a good guy or a bad guy? I don't think

0:01:34.640 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he's a bad guy. Um, I like Campbell Scott though

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>you know that's Georgeie Scott's son, right, I did not

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>know that for real. Yeah, he's one of those I

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think that somehow that's not the most common knowledge despite

0:01:48.640 --> 0:01:52.640
<v Speaker 1>having the name in profession. If I didn't know, it's

0:01:52.680 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>not common knowledge. He doesn't really look like him, so

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>not at all. Uh. Yeah, I have no idea why

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Dorothy Parker popped into my head. I really don't. So

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of it's kind of understandable because I'm trying

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to describe her. Dorothy Parker is

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>one of those very rare people who was so witty

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that that is what she's remembered for. She worked prolifically

0:02:20.720 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>through the through Prohibition, basically through the twenties to the

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>early thirties, um, and apparently like basically in step with it,

0:02:29.080 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and then that was it. Like her, her her writing

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>really fell off after that. She did some screenwriting but

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>her body of work is not super extensive. If you

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>asked her, it wasn't that great. But she was so

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>witty and so she's sharp and funny. Um that that

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>she's still she just became a literary legend because of it. Yeah,

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I think this quote from the New York Times kind

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>of says it all. Uh. Most writers are known for

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.959
<v Speaker 1>the works they lead on. Dorothy Parker is best known

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>for having lunch and this was I resist. I'm not

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:10.040
<v Speaker 1>going to say that. I'm not going to compare her

0:03:10.080 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to people these days that are famous without really having

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>done much, because that's a different category. She was a writer,

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.639
<v Speaker 1>and she was a very talented writer. She just wasn't

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily prolific. Um. I don't think she loved to write

0:03:26.440 --> 0:03:28.839
<v Speaker 1>from what I've gathered, Like I can't crawl into her head,

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>but all the stuff I've read, it didn't seem like

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it was like her favorite thing in the world. Like

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>she you know, she was a poet, but she wouldn't

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.080
<v Speaker 1>even call them poems. She called them versus. She didn't

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>know it. Yeah, she was always she's always kind of

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>undercutting her own work, and I think in a self

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.760
<v Speaker 1>deprecating way, which was maybe just sort of part of

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the stick of being Dorothy Parker. Well, I said, I

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>read a Esquire article from written by Wyatt Cooper, who's

0:03:57.200 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Anderson Cooper's dad. Oh okay, called, um, I think whatever

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you know about Dorothy Parker is wrong. Something along those

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>lines anyways on the internet. Really good. Yeah, there's like

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of ellipses in there, uh in the title

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:17.960
<v Speaker 1>um but he he kind of pegged it as she

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 1>had that same kind of um uh fear of inadequacy

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that any writer has, but hers just got worse and

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:28.680
<v Speaker 1>worse to the point where it paralyzed her and she

0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>just couldn't write any longer. Yeah. She also was quoted

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>as saying she, um, she would write five words and

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>then change seven, which in and of itself is a

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.720
<v Speaker 1>great line, which is what she's known for, Yeah, known

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>for hum Dinger's zingers one liners. Um. Yeah. And that

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:51.279
<v Speaker 1>whole quote about having lunch is a reference to her

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>membership in the Algonquin Roundtable, which was basically basically a

0:04:55.040 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 1>lunch bunch of these great literary minds all coming together

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in the Algonquin Hotel that have lunch, and it became

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>really famous and really beloved, and she's probably the most

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>famous of that whole group. Right, And that is the

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:14.080
<v Speaker 1>vicious circle of the movie title. It was also called

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the Vicious Circle, Yeah, the Algonquin roundtable was right. Yeah.

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>And it was named because they were all having lunch

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:23.800
<v Speaker 1>one day and I'm sure someone nearby said, look at them,

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>that is a vicious circle. That was great. Hopefully we'll

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to get across kind of what we're trying

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>to stay here, because this is going to be one

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>of the most challenging episodes ever because we have to

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:42.760
<v Speaker 1>get across why she was so why she's worth doing

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>an episode on. You know, It's it's more like other

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>people could be like, oh, well they figured out the

0:05:48.080 --> 0:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>double helix of DNA, or you know, they they invented

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the race car something like that. She was as kind

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of a short lived writer who had a really great

0:05:59.440 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>way in like, we have to flesh it out more

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>than that. All Right, you seem doubtful. You're not saying,

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>what does she ever do that was so great? Right? No,

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm questioning our ability to get across why she

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>was so great. That's my that's that's my trepidation. Okay, Well,

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she would like if she was alive today,

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>she would be the person that was most well known

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>for like Twitter. Oh yeah, she would be good at that.

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>She'd be really good at that. All right, So let's

0:06:28.400 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 1>jump back in her life. Um her. She was born

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>in down the Shore in New Jersey too. She was

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>born Dorothy Rothschild. Uh. This makes me immediately sidetrack quickly.

0:06:40.880 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 1>Her nickname was dot or Dottie. Uh. And I cannot

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.080
<v Speaker 1>hear the name Dotty without thinking of one of my

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>favorite comedy bits of all time, stand up bits, which

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>is Gary Goldman's bit on abbreviating the states. Have you

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ever seen that? No, I don't know who carry Goldman

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is Goldman g L M A N. He he's really tall,

0:07:00.960 --> 0:07:05.480
<v Speaker 1>he's like six six. He's a comedian. But just everyone should,

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 1>but you, especially because you like stand up, just go

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>go after this and and find Gary Goldman's state abbreviations

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.119
<v Speaker 1>bit because it was fan fantastic. And there's a character

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in the bit named Dotties. I always think of that.

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>But she was born in to a father who was Jewish.

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He was in the garment district. He worked in the

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>garment district. Henry rothschild and her mother was Scottish American.

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Her name was Eliza, And like I said, she was

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>born down the shore of New Jersey, but mainly I

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>grew up on the upper West side of Manhattan, right. Um.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>And she had a lot of tragedy surrounding her. Yeah,

0:07:44.440 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I saw, I saw her missing thropy was chalked up

0:07:48.520 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to this early just about of tragedy. Yeah, okay, what

0:07:53.680 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>would you say, missanthropy? No, alright, so, um, she she

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>is kind of adopted this persona which is you would

0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>call it kind of emo today a little bit, but

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 1>like a really funny, sharp emo person maybe a little bit,

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>especially when she was young. She described herself as um,

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a plain, disagreeable child with stringy hair and agenda write poetry. Um.

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>And that tragedy began when she was four years old

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 1>when her mom died. Apparently that was just that just

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>shaped her immediately, which something like that will. She also

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>said that her father was terrible to her, possibly physically abusive,

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>although some of the biographers of her aren't sure if

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that's true, and Olivia points out that that's an uh

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>long running ongoing thing about whether stuff she said about

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:47.240
<v Speaker 1>herself was true or not, and then the converse of that,

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>she frequently denied saying some of the quips that were

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>attributed to her. Yeah, it's pretty interesting, like uh. She

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:58.080
<v Speaker 1>seemed like the kind of person that would she loved

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to spin a yarn and if the facts were fudged

0:09:01.840 --> 0:09:03.959
<v Speaker 1>because it made for a better story, then that's fine.

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>But it kind of makes it difficult to parse out

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the person from the persona and that was certainly the case.

0:09:11.240 --> 0:09:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, some people aren't so sure about the dad. Uh.

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>She apparently also had a pretty evil stepmother situation. She

0:09:19.920 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>referred to her stepmother as the housekeeper, which I think

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty funny. I also saw she would call her

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 1>hey you, hey you. Uh. Stepmom died in nineteen o three,

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 1>so Dorothy was still just nine years old, and also

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.840
<v Speaker 1>had an uncle um that was apparently pretty close to

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the family that died on the Titanic. Her dad died

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.440
<v Speaker 1>shortly thereafter, and if I do the math right, I

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>think she was like nineteen or twenty when she was

0:09:45.840 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>basically kind of she seems like left alone in the

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>world for the most part, although she did have a sister,

0:09:50.640 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't I didn't see much about how close

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.160
<v Speaker 1>they were. I didn't even see that she had a sister. Yeah,

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that was a sister in there somewhere. So when her

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>dad died, her dad was very prosperous um as a

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>garment in the garment industry. So it was her uncle. Apparently, Um,

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>he did not invest wisely and so when he died,

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>he didn't leave much for her. So that was the

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>first time that she had to go get a job.

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And her first job was um playing piano in a

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>dance school, which is kind of a cool first job,

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>but apparently she hated it because it was like actual work. Yeah.

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the one thing that maybe a through line here

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>is that I don't think she loved to work super hard.

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.720
<v Speaker 1>She did not. She said she doesn't like rich people,

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>but she she thought she'd be a darling at it

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:43.680
<v Speaker 1>right exactly, Um, things changed for her. Nineteen fourteen, she

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>sold her first poem to Vanity Fair magazine. It was

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>called any Porch, and this sort of began her career

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:55.680
<v Speaker 1>as kind of a high society satirist. UH paid twelve

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 1>bucks for that poem, which is about three hundred bucks today,

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>which was a lot of money for a poem even today.

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean good luck at three for a poem. Uh.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>And then a gentleman came into her life name a

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>very formative figure named Frank Crown and Shield, and he said, Hey,

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I like to cut of your jib, pretty talented writer.

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you a full time staff job here

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at Vogue Magazine, and I'm gonna pay ten bucks a week,

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>which is not bad pay at the time, even though

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>apparently Parker said she spent most of that on her housing,

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like eight of ten right to her room and board. Yeah.

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>So Crown and Shield he was the editor of Vanity Fair,

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>but Vogue was like a sister magazine to Vanity Fair,

0:11:38.760 --> 0:11:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I believe. Yeah, they were all Conde Nast publications, so

0:11:42.559 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>he was or she was Crowning Shields protege from what

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I understand. And she went to work for a woman

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 1>named Edna W. Woodman or woman. Uh yeah, woman Chase.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.559
<v Speaker 1>She was a female editor in chief, which was very

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>rare at the time. Um and uh, Dorothy Parker got

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>her first job writing captions, and she would get bored

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>easily because captions are supposed to be pretty normal and

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 1>boring is prosaic the correct word. Uh, I don't know Okay,

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>let's just go with prosaic because it seems like it's

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the right word. But um, so she very quickly started

0:12:19.840 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to trust try to slip in Remember when we used

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>to write for house stuff work, so we try to

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>slip in hilarious things into into um, like cut lines,

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the captions under photos. Dude. I thought of us a

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:34.760
<v Speaker 1>lot during this because that's all. We did that all

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the time, to try and make things a little more interesting.

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think both of us had editors that were

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>constantly saying, like, what are you doing? You can't do that?

0:12:42.120 --> 0:12:45.000
<v Speaker 1>So so she would she was doing basically the same thing.

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>So she became kind of a a thorn and Edna

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Chase's side. Um, but not enough that she was fired

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 1>at this point. She actually was um. Uh. She was

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>promoted basically after P. G. Woodhouse Um, the humorists stopped

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>being the drama critic for Vanity Fair. They turned to

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Dorothy Parker to become that to fill that role to

0:13:05.360 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 1>review plays. And she was only twenty four at the time. Uh.

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And by that time she'd been married a year to

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy named ed Edwin Pond Parker, the second stockbroker. Yeah,

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>he was. He enlisted in the army, as a lot

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of guys did back then. What fault in World War One? Um?

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>And like you said, when she was twenty four, she

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>was this play uh or theater reviewer and was was

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>known sort of for doing the same thing in the

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>reviews of making sort of biting, cutting remarks about high society.

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh one kind of funny one she was writing about

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a play and she said, not even the presence in

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the first night audience of Mr William Randolph Hurst could

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.560
<v Speaker 1>spoil my evening. So a lot of great punch lines.

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>She she was pretty good at, like setting someone up

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>to think they may be getting a compliment and then

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>cutting their legs up from under them. That was actually

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>her whole thing. Like she was supposedly fairly soft spoken,

0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of quiet, you might even callers shy at first,

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but also really complimentary, like really kind, and then she

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>would kind of build you up until you weren't even

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>paying attention to anymore because you were just so drunk

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>on the praise she was giving you, and then bam,

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>she cut your legs out. You probably didn't even notice,

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>but everyone else in the conversation and listening in is

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>having a good laugh. That was her her whole jam.

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's really important to say her purpose wasn't to

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>be mean. There was a real purpose to her um

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>her like biting criticism, and it was usually um a

0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>bullying self gratification, acceptance of praise, um worshiped from the

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>lower classes. Like that's why she didn't like high society types.

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>She also didn't like feign graciousness, like high society types

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>who were so nice that they they gave their housekeeper

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>an extra hour, u to go home early one one

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>week and now they feel really great about the selves.

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Those kind of things, like just all the stuff that

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.240
<v Speaker 1>just kind of makes somebody gross that she was surrounded

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>by in her life. That is what really kind of

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>drove her the craziest. And that is what she would attack.

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>And it didn't matter who you were, didn't matter what

0:15:12.760 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 1>your station in life. Although I don't believe she punched

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>down very often. Um, you were, you were subject to

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that criticism if you kind of allowed yourself to behave

0:15:22.320 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that way. Yeah, she probably would have been a stand

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>up comedian today now that I think about it, Like

0:15:28.800 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a little bit of mis maasl in this, you know,

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>But that wasn't really a job that women had back then.

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't a job period, I don't think at the time. No.

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And there was one other criticism I want to point

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>out that she wrote in I don't remember where she

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>wrote it, but she was criticizing I think an actress

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>in a play and she said that um, as a

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 1>source of entertainment, she ranks somewhere between a sprig of

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:58.720
<v Speaker 1>parsley and a single ice skate. That's just good stuff,

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>that's not even it's is smart, you know, like who

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>would think of a single ice skate is conveying like

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>just how not fun something is? Like, it's just brilliant stuff.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>And she was full of that. Yeah, she pushed too

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:15.640
<v Speaker 1>far though, as people like that often do, lost her

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>job in nineteen twenty. I think it was sort of

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a you insulted the wrong person kind of thing. There

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>was a column where she was reviewing a play. She

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>accused the playwright basically of plagiarizing himself. And then what

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the real deal was though, the real sort of last

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 1>straw was that was an actor, an actress named Billy

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Burke in there, who was criticized and sort of likened

0:16:38.880 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>to this risque vaudeville star, which was not like a

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>good you know, comparison to make at the time. But

0:16:46.360 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>that actress was the wife of Florence Zigfield, who put

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money into advertisements with Vanity Fair, and

0:16:53.880 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a good friend of Nast of Conde Nast, and that

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>was kind of it. So apparently she got the new

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 1>news at the Plaza hotel, and a legend has it

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.239
<v Speaker 1>she ordered the most expensive dessert on the menu, then

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>left and took it with her. Right. So, oh, I

0:17:09.520 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>don't even think she took it with her. I think

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>she left before it came, just long enough to to

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 1>waste it. Oh I saw that she took it with her.

0:17:16.000 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Oh did she awesome? Um? So uh, let's even even better. Um.

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 1>There's one other thing I want to point out about

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>her criticism, or two other things, chuck. First of all,

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 1>after she was fired from Vanity Fair, she that was

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.199
<v Speaker 1>not the end of her critic critic career, like she

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>went onto to be a book reviewer for The New Yorker. Um,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>but her her criticism, her columns, she had no training whatsoever.

0:17:41.960 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 1>She didn't she didn't like take any kind of classes

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>or education on criticism like technique in theory and all

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:53.720
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. All of her reviews were just totally subjective.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>But she was so funny and so entertaining and so

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>insightful that she became like an instant sensation. And then

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the other thing I want to say about it, from

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 1>what I can tell, is that her criticism was not

0:18:04.200 --> 0:18:07.120
<v Speaker 1>always negative. That if you actually produced like a really

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.360
<v Speaker 1>good or a really good book or something like that,

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 1>she could use that same wit too for praise as well.

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>And I read that there was there's some book that

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>she reviewed. Um, she was saying, to say of it

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.120
<v Speaker 1>here as a magnificent novel is rather like gazing into

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the Grand Canyon and saying, well, well, well, quite a slice. Yeah.

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean she was a legitimate uh critique or she

0:18:30.800 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>put she put forth legitimate critique, right, And if it

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 1>was praise, it was praise. If it was negative, which

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it more often was, it was negative. She

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't like crud. Well, I don't even think it more

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>often was negative even. I think that's the stuff that

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:47.199
<v Speaker 1>gets pulled because she's Dorothy Parker. I see that's a

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>really good point, Chuck. I think you might be right.

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they were like, hey, this is supposed

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a real turd. Let's put Parker on it,

0:18:53.320 --> 0:18:55.880
<v Speaker 1>because like she'll just she'll prop a new and it'll

0:18:55.920 --> 0:19:01.360
<v Speaker 1>be great. I hate that word so much. Yes, it's terrible.

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.200
<v Speaker 1>It's terrible. It's even worse because it's spelled with to you.

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>It looks bad on paper print and it even evokes

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>the color brown somehow, somehow. Uh yeah, I think we

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>should take a break. We should revisit that word. M hm, no, okay,

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:52.880
<v Speaker 1>all right, we'll be right back. Learn it's stuff with Joshua, alright,

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Mr turd. So when when she got fired from Vanity Fair,

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there were two employees, Robert Benchley and Robert E. Sherwood,

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 1>who were such friends with her that they actually quit

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>and protest because apparently she wasn't wrong with her with

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:13.080
<v Speaker 1>her um her criticism that got her fired and she

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>was just fired because she insulted a very high ranking

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>friend of the publisher. So um, they actually quit and protesting.

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is to inspire a couple of people

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>to quit because you were fired, is really saying something

0:20:28.080 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>like it's almost like a trope, you know, but if

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you stop and think about it in reality, somebody being

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>like so long paycheck, so long, steady works. I'm I like,

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 1>this person should not have been fired, and I'm I'm

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 1>taking my talents away from you because you don't deserve

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>them because you fired this person. That's a really big deal.

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>If someone fired you, I would quit. Thank you, same

0:20:49.600 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>to you. Okay, you hear that, everybody you hear that bosses? Yeah,

0:20:56.640 --> 0:20:59.000
<v Speaker 1>hopefully that we don't. We don't get tested, but yeah,

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>we have been fired by this point. If we were

0:21:01.720 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>going to at all, you would think so. But hey,

0:21:04.160 --> 0:21:07.159
<v Speaker 1>there's always the future. Uh So, now we get to

0:21:07.160 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>the point where we can talk about the vicious circle again,

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>which was the round table. Generally lunches, although they lunched

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for many hours at the Algonquin Hotel, which is I

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>believe it's still there in New York, right, and still

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the Algonquin. Yeah, I want to stay there sometime. I

0:21:23.080 --> 0:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>gotta check out. But it's it's now the Algonquin by Hyatt.

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>That's funny and probably true. Uh So, this was a

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>period of time over about a decade or so that

0:21:39.040 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 1>first started in June of nineteen nineteen, when they all

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.800
<v Speaker 1>got together for lunch to welcome home their friend Alexander

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Woolcott from his World War One correspondence job. They roasted him,

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:55.479
<v Speaker 1>they got drunk. Uh, they had a good time, and

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>they said, hey, let's come back tomorrow and we don't

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>have to have a special occasion to get together and

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:04.439
<v Speaker 1>drink scotch at lunch. And it kind of became like

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:09.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of a a Studio fifty four uh booth scene

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:14.240
<v Speaker 1>where you know, where you see Mick Jagger with uh

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>Andy Warhol and like Mickey Dolan's from the Monkeys and

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like a painter, you know. It was people from all

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>different walks of life, like Harpo Marx might be there.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 1>There might be a fiction writer like Edna Ferber, or

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a sportswriter like Heywood Brown, or columnists or screenwriters or playwrights,

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>and it was just like it kind of became the cool,

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like a certain kind of cool crowd was hanging out

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.920
<v Speaker 1>at this round table. Yeah. Especially it was especially considered

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:49.560
<v Speaker 1>cool among the intelligentsia, right, smart and literary types generally,

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>So it became like a worshipful gathering um. And people

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:56.760
<v Speaker 1>knew about it because a lot of these people were

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 1>columnists and like you know, the New York Times and

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>later on the New York Parker and like these big publications,

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>and they would write about like equip that that Dorothy

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Parker said apparently like um, she would say something at

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 1>lunch one day and to be in the New York

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Times the next day. I think why Cooper was the

0:23:13.720 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>one that said she was probably the most quoted woman

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 1>of the nineteen twenties. Um because she was so funny,

0:23:19.359 --> 0:23:21.639
<v Speaker 1>but also because she was in a position to be

0:23:21.720 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 1>so exposed. Um. But that the Algonquin roundtable, the fact

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:29.400
<v Speaker 1>that it became the stuff of legend, the more legendary came,

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the I think the more um kind of disgruntled by

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:38.159
<v Speaker 1>the whole idea Dorothy Parker became. I think if Dorothy

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Parker heard that, she would say, name one other woman

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>who was even quoted in the nineteen twenties, dear oh man,

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:49.159
<v Speaker 1>and I go uh her uh uh. They became so

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of popular and famous just for these lunches in

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>this round table that the manager of the hotel, Mr

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Frank Case started seating them in a very sort of

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>public area in the rose room, so people could just

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of come by and watch them have lunch and

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 1>talk smack to each other. Yes, so, um, they like

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>you said, like, these lunches would also go by the way,

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, Greta Garbo, how about that? Okay, Um,

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>these lunches would turn into dinner and in very short

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>order after Um there the initial meeting in June Prohibition

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>started so that scotch they were sipping turned into bootleg

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>scotch that they had to kind of surreptitiously drink. But

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they were all super drunk from lunch onward, and they

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>would go to people's houses and have cocktails. Afterward, they

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>would vacation together. They became like really good friends. It

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 1>sounds fantastic. It does sound fun, for sure, Um. But

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>even more um important I would say, is that a

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>lot of them came to collaborate. It was like a

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>really productive group. And so not only did some like

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>get together and write like screenplays together or plays, they

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:02.280
<v Speaker 1>would actually use one another characters in their books or

0:25:02.320 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>their plays. Like Um, Alexander Walcott. He was like the

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>stock acerbic, um course, um character who was kind of

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the center of the man who came to dinner. It

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>was based on him. There are plenty of characters in

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>different plays that you never heard of that were based

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>on Dorothy Parker, Um, they just used each other as

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:26.160
<v Speaker 1>inspiration in addition to collaborating with one another directly. And

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:29.280
<v Speaker 1>as you would think, Dorothy Parker also sort of undercut

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the importance of the whole algonquin vicious circle. She was

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>quoted as saying that round table thing was greatly overrated,

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:39.440
<v Speaker 1>full of businessmen and publicity people and hangers on and

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of second rate writers, saying did you hear

0:25:42.080 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 1>what I said the other day? So I get the

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:46.679
<v Speaker 1>impression that it's a little bit of both. It may

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:48.919
<v Speaker 1>have been a little over played, but I think she

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:52.919
<v Speaker 1>also sort of vastly underplayed what was going on in

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>that sort of self deprecating way. Again, well, I I

0:25:56.080 --> 0:25:57.960
<v Speaker 1>also saw that she said it was just a bunch

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 1>of loudmouth showing off save being their gags for days,

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 1>waiting for a chance to spring them. So um, I that,

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think it kind of ties into that idea

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of like, you know, just being grossed out by people

0:26:10.640 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>heaping praise onto other people and then those people accepting

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:17.199
<v Speaker 1>all that praise and basking in it. And then the

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>more that that happened, the more she was like forget this.

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>So um, yeah, I'm sure it's like you said, it

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>was both, but I feel like that was the reason

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 1>she kind of distanced herself from it through criticism. Yeah,

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I get the impression, and this is I may just

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 1>be reading too much into this that she she didn't

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>love the Spotlight, uh, and she was sort of in

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>it because she was just so smart and funny. I

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>think she definitely hated phonies, yes, and that sort of

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, ties into the upper crust thing. Um. She

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>probably would have loved Catcher in the Rye. When was

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that written the fifties. She's I'm sure she was alive

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:57.720
<v Speaker 1>while it was published. She died in nineteen sixty eight.

0:26:57.760 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Spoiler alert, yeah, sixty seven. She also it wasn't just

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the round table. I think Livia took great pains to

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of talk about other people in nonliterary people that

0:27:10.520 --> 0:27:13.880
<v Speaker 1>she hung out with, um, as well as other writers

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that just didn't you know, like she was a friend

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of Ernest Hemingway. But I don't think Ernest Hemingway was

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:20.439
<v Speaker 1>one to like sit around a round table and like

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>crack jokes and stuff like that. He had like elephants

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>to shoot, So Hemingway was a buddy. Um. I think

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he supposedly, uh at Scott Fitzgerald ended up basing a

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 1>lot of the Great Gatsby parties after what happened in

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the social circle at the Algonquin. So you know, I

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>think she had an influence on other writers as well,

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, for sure, um yeah. And she was very

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>quoted and also misquoted. Uh, And I think she inspired

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:52.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people, for sure. Let's talk should we

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.959
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the great quotes? Sure? Al right,

0:27:56.080 --> 0:28:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Well one of them was someone said a aparently like

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:04.320
<v Speaker 1>used the word horticulture in a sentence, and she said,

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>you can lead a horticulture, but you can't make her think.

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's off the dome. Like she was

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>known for just being that quick, you know, right, Yeah,

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a big part of it. And that's why she

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>was saying, like people would be saving their gags for days,

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>just waiting for a chance to spring him. She did

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:20.919
<v Speaker 1>not do that. It just came into her head, like

0:28:20.960 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 1>she was just that sharp. Um my favorite is this?

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>You're ready? So Calvin Coolidge, the president, apparently he was

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>very famously quiet and um she uh, she was told

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>about the death of Calvin Coolidge, and she whispered, how

0:28:35.720 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 1>do they know. Yeah, it actually took me a second

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>to figure that one out, and then once I got it,

0:28:40.560 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>it was that's a really good one. Yeah, I like

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that one too. But she was also, like you said,

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>misquoted or not only misquoted, but I think other quotes

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>were attributed to her that she said that she never said. Um,

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a very famous one, uh from iron Rand's Atlas Shrugged.

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Supposedly she said it is not a novel to be

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.240
<v Speaker 1>tossed aside lightly. It should be thrown with great force,

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a great quote. But she said that she

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:09.719
<v Speaker 1>never said that. Nor did she say the first thing

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I do in the morning is brush my teeth and

0:29:11.400 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>sharpened my tongue. Yeah, that's a little too, like she's

0:29:15.680 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>joining in the celebration of yeah. And she wouldn't do that.

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I could. I could have spotted that a mile away

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and been like nay, yeah. And and it seems like

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.400
<v Speaker 1>she got very annoyed at being having things attributed to her,

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:32.360
<v Speaker 1>because that's part of the phoniness. Yeah, which is why

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I think she would just deny saying stuff a lot

0:29:34.760 --> 0:29:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of times too, even if she did, Yes, so, um,

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what the other And also, like you said, too, I

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>think she was kind of creating this um fiction that

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>was more entertaining than reality in some cases, like a

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>character like I still think there's probably a lot of

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>people who don't really understand who or maybe every no

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 1>one knows who the real Dorothy Parker was. Even Dorothy

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Parker might not have known, but she probably did, although

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you who really did know? Again? Is um

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Whyatt Cooper Anderson Cooper of sixty Minutes in CNN and

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>New Year's Fame. Um His dad wrote that Esquire article

0:30:15.800 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, I'm finally prepared to share the title. It's

0:30:19.440 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>whatever you think Dorothy Cooper was, like she wasn't, and

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>it is what did I say? Cooper? Oh my god,

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I got it wrong? Okay, and I even have it

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>written down as Cooper. That's why I got it wrong.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So that title I just said, but replaced Cooper with Parker.

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's one of the most insightful articles I've ever

0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>read about anybody. So even if Dorothy Parker didn't understand herself,

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 1>why A Cooper understood her? Like It's a really good,

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting article that doesn't necessarily follow any timeline. It's just

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:58.719
<v Speaker 1>like why Cooper is kind of like oh yeah, and

0:30:58.760 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>one other thing about her was this, and then he

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.880
<v Speaker 1>back it up with like three different stories that are

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>also hilarious or maybe a little sad or something like that. Um. Yeah,

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a really really good article. I would recommend anybody

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:11.600
<v Speaker 1>go read it, even if you couldn't care less about

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Dorothy Parker. Well, hopefully they will after the end of this. Uh.

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>She after she went away from Vanity Fair by getting fired,

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a nice way to say it. She never worked

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>like a regular staff job again. She became a very

0:31:26.520 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 1>successful freelancer. She wrote for all kinds of magazines that

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>were popular at the time, Saturday Evening Post, Ladies Home Journal.

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>When The New Yorker was founded by her friend Harold

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>ross In think you mentioned earlier, she became a regular columnist,

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>doing reviews, short stories, her poems again what she called versus.

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Between twenty six and thirty three she did publish books

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>of poetry. She published three books of poetry and two

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>short story collections, and one of which was the best seller.

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Enough was a poetry collection which was a best seller

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and sold really well. And uh, where I'm trying to

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>find where it was. She won a couple of big

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>prizes to didn't she She won the Oh Henry Story

0:32:10.720 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Prize in nine for one. UM. Oh, I can't remember

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:19.000
<v Speaker 1>what it's called big Blonde about what a character I

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>saw described as a serial mistress? Uh in decline and

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>um she attempts suicide. Um. And apparently there was a

0:32:27.040 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>like one, a pretty prestigious prize. UM. She wrote very

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>frequently about uh. Love, especially modern love in the sense

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of in the twenties, they were just starting to deal

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>with this idea of like, wait a minute, men and

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.920
<v Speaker 1>women are like working in the same places, and you know,

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of interacting more now and are you might equal? No,

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't seem right, But how does that translate into dating?

0:32:53.680 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, everybody kind of moved from the farm to

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the city and they were trying to figure it out.

0:32:57.560 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And so that was one of Dorothy Parker's favorite um

0:33:00.680 --> 0:33:06.160
<v Speaker 1>topics of of writing both verse and short stories as well. Yeah,

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 1>she eventually would get I think, kind of just leave

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>poetry behind. She stopped because she said that she didn't

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>think she was getting any better, which is man. That

0:33:17.040 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is admirable. Yeah. Yeah, to not just like run something

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 1>into the ground like we're doing. I think we're still

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:29.400
<v Speaker 1>getting better here and starts yeah, man, I think I

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 1>think this has been a great year. Actually, okay. Uh.

0:33:35.880 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>In fifty six she talked about just again, sort of

0:33:40.400 --> 0:33:43.160
<v Speaker 1>her reputation being overblown. She said it got so bad

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that audiences began to laugh before I opened my mouth.

0:33:46.560 --> 0:33:49.560
<v Speaker 1>So her reputation preceded her in a way that she

0:33:49.680 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>wasn't comfortable with, and I think she didn't feel like

0:33:53.000 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it was earned. Um. I have a suspicion that she

0:33:56.640 --> 0:34:01.320
<v Speaker 1>might have been deeply uh, she's some blanking what's the

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:06.959
<v Speaker 1>word when you don't feel good about yourself? Um? Insecure? Sure.

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these things that happened with her in

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the way she betrayed herself kind of makes me think

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:13.960
<v Speaker 1>she might have been insecure in her in her writing

0:34:14.000 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and with sort of getting attention as somebody who was

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>doing good things. If I can't if if no one

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 1>minds me. Going back to the same well of whyatt Cooper,

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>he basically said, she seemed to prefer misery. That's why

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I compared to like an emo person earlier, like um.

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.200
<v Speaker 1>He gave a great example where um, you'd be hanging

0:34:34.239 --> 0:34:36.919
<v Speaker 1>out of her house and she'd get a phone call

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>from a friend and she'd tell the the help like,

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 1>tell tell them I'm not home. And then later on

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in that same visit, she complained about how that exact

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.640
<v Speaker 1>same friend never called anymore interesting, So like it was

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>a self imposed kind of thing, Like she seemed to

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:58.759
<v Speaker 1>just feel more comfortable isolated, but tried to make it

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 1>so that it wasn't her own choice. Yeah, I don't

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:04.880
<v Speaker 1>understand why. I don't know if it was to get sympathy,

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem to have been. It's she was just

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of bizarre in that way. All right, should we

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:14.400
<v Speaker 1>take a second break, Yes, yes we should. All right,

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>so we'll take that break and we'll be back to

0:35:16.080 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about from this point forward. In Dorothy Parker's life

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 1>learnt with Joshua John So Chuck, one of the things

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>that she did very sensibly after she kind of abandoned

0:35:56.640 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>poetry and short story writing was to go to Hollywood

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and become a screw writer. And she did that, um

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.399
<v Speaker 1>through kind of marrying a guy named Alan Campbell, an

0:36:06.400 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>actor back in he was ten years younger than she was,

0:36:10.400 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and um, they ended up being screenwriting partners together after

0:36:13.640 --> 0:36:16.520
<v Speaker 1>he moved her out to Hollywood. Yeah, so her just

0:36:16.600 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to tie up her first husband's situation. Uh. He came

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 1>back from the war apparently was an alcoholic and drug addict,

0:36:24.080 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and they were separated. She had an abortion, uh, and

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 1>they got divorced. So he died of a drug overdose

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.560
<v Speaker 1>at the age of thirty nine. Uh. And that's when

0:36:33.600 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>she met the new guy. And the new guy Alan Campbell,

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>and uh, like he said, went to Hollywood to write movies. Um.

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:45.920
<v Speaker 1>She was became pregnant at the uh. And it's still,

0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of old to get pregnant now, but

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly at the time. Being pregnant at forty two

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>years old in the nineteen thirties was a tough situation,

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:58.520
<v Speaker 1>and she did have a miscarriage that devastated her. UM.

0:36:58.560 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>But she was she sort had an on again, off

0:37:01.000 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>again relationship with this guy. They were the kind that

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:07.960
<v Speaker 1>would get divorced and then reconcile and then remarry and

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>then split up again, then move back together again. But

0:37:11.200 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they had a pretty prolific partnership wherein he would and

0:37:16.520 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of writing partners still kind of have this arrangement.

0:37:18.920 --> 0:37:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Someone might be really good at nailing dialogue and the

0:37:21.760 --> 0:37:25.720
<v Speaker 1>other partner might be really good at structure and character

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.880
<v Speaker 1>development stuff like that. So he would develop the structure

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:31.239
<v Speaker 1>of a script and sort of sketch out scenes, and

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>she would come in with her you know, rapiers wit

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and come up with all that clever dialogue and got

0:37:38.239 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money and attention and awards or at

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>least nominations. She was a co writer on A Star

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Is Born, the first one from and they were making

0:37:48.960 --> 0:37:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a hundred over a hundred thousand dollars a week a week.

0:37:53.160 --> 0:37:57.200
<v Speaker 1>That's so much money. It's just just screenwriting. And they

0:37:57.239 --> 0:37:59.879
<v Speaker 1>were having a blast doing it. They get drunk every day,

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>they were everybody. Yeah. Yeah, they were friends with everybody

0:38:03.719 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>in their neighborhood and it was just it sounds like

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>a really grand time. Um. And then unfortunately, Alan Campbell died. Um.

0:38:13.480 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>They think it might be a suicide, although she apparently

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:19.439
<v Speaker 1>decided that that was not the case, so she got

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>it listed as an accident on his death certificate. And

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:25.200
<v Speaker 1>right after that, she's like, I'm I'm going back to

0:38:25.280 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>New York. She said, New York is the only place

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to be in the whole country. Um, I'm guessing California

0:38:30.560 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>was a little too painful. After the death of Alan Campbell.

0:38:33.480 --> 0:38:35.560
<v Speaker 1>But I also think like she just preferred living in

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:39.640
<v Speaker 1>New York. Anyway, there was another thing that happened to

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:41.959
<v Speaker 1>her that probably prompted her to move to New York,

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>and that was her activism. Like she's known for her

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>quips and her sharp wit um and you kind of

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have to dig in a little further before you realize

0:38:50.760 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like she was actually like a legit died in the wool,

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>lefty activists who really cared about things like racism and

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>civil rights long before this was on the radar of

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>most people. Yeah, she was one of the founders of

0:39:07.160 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the Screenwriters Guild. Very pro union, as you probably shouldn't

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>be surprised by this point. Uh, very anti Nazi early on.

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>This is like, you know, before the long before the

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Americans were involved in World War Two. Uh. She you know,

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 1>she had a half Jewish father, and I think it

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>seems like sort of struggle over the years with her

0:39:27.680 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Jewish heritage, but came out hard against Uh Lenni Riefenstall

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:36.480
<v Speaker 1>when she visited Hollywood and was sort of and this

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>was in I think, uh and basically said like, no,

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>you shouldn't take meetings with her. You shouldn't take meetings

0:39:42.840 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>with any Nazis, and like all these agents need to

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:48.359
<v Speaker 1>just close their doors to them, basically, and I thought

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't admire her anymore. She founded an anti Nazi league,

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, hats off to her right. So she also

0:39:56.920 --> 0:40:00.799
<v Speaker 1>helped raise money to defend the Scottsboro Boys, were nine

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>black teenagers in Alabama who were unjustly convicted and sentenced

0:40:05.080 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 1>in the rape of two white women. UM and there

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>was a really big um push by the American Communist

0:40:14.560 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Party to to basically rescue these boys from this unjust system.

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:23.799
<v Speaker 1>And she was at the very least Communist adjacent, if

0:40:23.840 --> 0:40:26.600
<v Speaker 1>not an outright sympathizer. I think a lot of her

0:40:26.680 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>interests in viewpoints really kind of dovetailed with the Communist

0:40:30.200 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Party in America at the time. UM. And she was

0:40:33.239 --> 0:40:37.960
<v Speaker 1>also virulently anti fascist. And for all of this, combined

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:41.560
<v Speaker 1>her anti fascism, her UM work for civil rights, her

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:45.399
<v Speaker 1>kind of sympathy for UM, the Communist Party UM got

0:40:45.400 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>her essentially first informally blacklisted and then pretty much officially

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>blacklisted in Hollywood starting in the forties. Yeah, so before

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the blacklist, there was something called the Red Channels, which

0:40:58.320 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 1>was a pamphlet that kind of said, hey, you know,

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you may not want to hire these people if you're

0:41:03.160 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 1>in broadcasting. Yeah, it was put out real quick, chuck

0:41:05.960 --> 0:41:09.160
<v Speaker 1>by a right wing um publication that was um called

0:41:09.239 --> 0:41:11.919
<v Speaker 1>counter Attack, I believe, and it was made by three

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>former FBI agents who just basically created dossiers on everybody

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.200
<v Speaker 1>in Hollywood to root out who were the communists. And

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of them were accused just for contributing to like,

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, civil rights causes or things like that. I

0:41:26.040 --> 0:41:28.360
<v Speaker 1>was just about to point that out. That is again

0:41:28.440 --> 0:41:33.040
<v Speaker 1>pre blacklist. It should not surprise you that she eventually

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 1>was officially blacklisted for a short time. She was also

0:41:36.760 --> 0:41:40.879
<v Speaker 1>on the FBI watch list Edifile honor. Uh. They called

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>her a concealed communist and you know, just go back

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>and listen to our McCarthy asm episode, uh if you

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.760
<v Speaker 1>want to learn anything else about the House of Unamerican

0:41:49.800 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Activities Committee. She did go before them in fifty five

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and took the fifth and the FBI eventually would clear her,

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>uh being a security threat. But I think, you know,

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any of those people were ever completely

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:05.480
<v Speaker 1>off the list, if you know what I mean. No,

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 1>for sure. And if you got on that list, if

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you were in that pamphlet, it doesn't matter how big

0:42:10.160 --> 0:42:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of a starre you were, you just could not find work.

0:42:12.080 --> 0:42:14.439
<v Speaker 1>All of us are you get fired from your current job?

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:17.799
<v Speaker 1>It was crazy, Um, but that's what happened, and it

0:42:17.880 --> 0:42:20.600
<v Speaker 1>was part of that McCarthy era. So she moved back

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to New York and um, she I saw that. She

0:42:24.480 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>basically lived out the last act of her life in

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a very surprising manner as a little old lady. Basically, Yeah,

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:36.839
<v Speaker 1>she died at a seventy three and uh, I think

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 1>she left all her her money to Reverend Martin Luther

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>King and then once he died, that went to the

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Inn Double a c p. Uh. There's a New Yorker

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:49.200
<v Speaker 1>article that um kind of indicates like, no one knows

0:42:49.200 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly how much money that ended up being for the

0:42:51.719 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Double a CP, but I think it was a lot.

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:58.439
<v Speaker 1>And um, this is sort of a not so fun

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 1>way to end this. But one of her good friends,

0:43:00.960 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Lilian Hellman, was a playwright some when she knew for

0:43:04.000 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>a long long time was designated as her executor for

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>her will in a state but was mad because she

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>wasn't left any money and so she basically threw all

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 1>her stuff away the way, all her papers, all of

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:19.839
<v Speaker 1>the you know, manuscripts that she had been working on

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:23.479
<v Speaker 1>in her life. And uh, Dorothy Parker did not want

0:43:23.520 --> 0:43:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to have a big deal made about her death, wanted

0:43:25.880 --> 0:43:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a quiet cremation, and she, against her wishes, organized a

0:43:30.200 --> 0:43:34.279
<v Speaker 1>big public memorial. It's it seems like just in defiance

0:43:34.640 --> 0:43:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of her wishes because she was mad about being h

0:43:37.640 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess left out of her will slightly. In Hellman's defense,

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:45.800
<v Speaker 1>she largely supported Dorothy Parker during her old age years

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen to sixty seven, so I think she expected

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to kind of be repaid. But still, it's definitely not

0:43:51.719 --> 0:43:56.160
<v Speaker 1>worth going against somebody's wishes, you know. So Dorothy Parker's

0:43:56.280 --> 0:43:59.280
<v Speaker 1>ashes had a really interesting afterlife. She had no heirs,

0:43:59.320 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>no family, so um, they were left at the crematorium

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:06.840
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen sixty seven to nineteen seventy three, when the

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:09.680
<v Speaker 1>crematorium finally got fed up of storing it and just

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 1>mailed them to the address of her former lawyer. But

0:44:13.840 --> 0:44:17.280
<v Speaker 1>her lawyer had retired, but his partner was still in business.

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Her partner didn't know anything about this, didn't know what

0:44:19.800 --> 0:44:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to do with the ashes, didn't know who to contact,

0:44:21.640 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>so he just put her in his desk drawer, and

0:44:24.560 --> 0:44:29.680
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen seventy three to Dorothy Parker spent uh in

0:44:29.719 --> 0:44:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a desk drawer in her former lawyer's office. She'd probably

0:44:33.480 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 1>think that's funny. I think so, But if she were

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.319
<v Speaker 1>in there, she would have been really bored too. Yeah. Uh.

0:44:39.560 --> 0:44:41.719
<v Speaker 1>They would eventually move though. If you go to New

0:44:41.800 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>York now you can go up to the Bronx to

0:44:44.480 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Woodlawn Cemetery, where a tour guide and big fan of

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 1>hers eventually put her ashes. Was given her ashes. He

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:56.239
<v Speaker 1>didn't steal them. And there's a little small plaque with

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 1>a phrase that she apparently proposed for her epitat, which is,

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:05.239
<v Speaker 1>excuse my dust, it's just beautiful. It beat Shakespeare's epitaph, right,

0:45:06.160 --> 0:45:09.800
<v Speaker 1>what was Shakespeare's? It was some clumsy, ham fisted curse

0:45:10.000 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>that people are like. Shakespeare wouldn't have written that gas grass?

0:45:13.680 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Or what was it that no one rides for free?

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, Chuck. Since Chuck said that hilarious quip, that

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:23.839
<v Speaker 1>means this is the end of the Dorothy Parker ep

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:25.239
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to know more about her, go

0:45:25.360 --> 0:45:28.879
<v Speaker 1>reader stuff. It's really good and uh fun. And since

0:45:28.880 --> 0:45:30.719
<v Speaker 1>I said it's really good and fun, that means it's

0:45:30.760 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 1>time for a listener mail. I'm gonna call this a

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:38.399
<v Speaker 1>counterpoint to another listener mail. We got the email from

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the teacher that talked about p b i S positive

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:46.359
<v Speaker 1>behavioral Interventions in support. Oh yeah, and uh apparently there's

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:51.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of controversy surrounding that, because Jennifer here says this, Hey,

0:45:51.320 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 1>guys have been listening for years. I learned so many

0:45:53.480 --> 0:45:56.520
<v Speaker 1>cool things after the Casino bombing episode. However, you read

0:45:56.560 --> 0:45:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a letter from a gentleman who wrote about using p

0:45:59.239 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>b i S and classroom. I taught school for thirty

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:05.800
<v Speaker 1>years and finally left, as did hundreds of my colleagues

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:09.840
<v Speaker 1>because p b i S has destroyed public education. Teachers

0:46:09.880 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 1>can be kind of students without a PBS program in place.

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:17.160
<v Speaker 1>My co teacher was permanently disabled by a student. It's

0:46:17.160 --> 0:46:20.640
<v Speaker 1>my feeling that once you're an adult in society, uh,

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:23.959
<v Speaker 1>society while hand you consequences, and students may not be

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 1>taught how to be prepared for that with p b

0:46:27.239 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>i S schools. Thanks for stating that it may or

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:32.080
<v Speaker 1>may not work in your own home, Chuck, I was

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:35.640
<v Speaker 1>required to take two college classes on this, so it's

0:46:35.680 --> 0:46:38.239
<v Speaker 1>not that I don't understand it. Keep giving us great

0:46:38.280 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>knowledge of millions of topics, and that is from Jennifer. Awesome.

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you Jennifer for the counterpoint. There may be a

0:46:44.880 --> 0:46:47.560
<v Speaker 1>good episode in there, now that I see this, Yeah,

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you might be right, Chuck. Anytime it was

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:52.960
<v Speaker 1>controversy like that, we're on let's do it. Every time

0:46:52.960 --> 0:46:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I hear point or counterpoint, I'm reminded of that that. Um,

0:46:57.760 --> 0:47:02.000
<v Speaker 1>apart from Airplane where there they're debating the whole thing

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>where the I think it's airplane too maybe where the

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:08.360
<v Speaker 1>guy goes let them crash, I don't remember that line.

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:12.160
<v Speaker 1>That's good. Um, Yeah, it's way funnier in the movie

0:47:12.160 --> 0:47:14.359
<v Speaker 1>than what I just did. If you want to get

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in touch with this, like Jennifer didn't offer a counterpoint,

0:47:17.719 --> 0:47:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you can send it to Stuff podcast at iHeart radio

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Stuff you Should Know is a production of

0:47:26.120 --> 0:47:29.439
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio. For more podcasts my heart Radio, visit

0:47:29.480 --> 0:47:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the iHeart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to your favorite shows.