WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: June 23rd, 2026

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordert. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.280
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. We'll begin this out

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 2>with stock sliding as the tech sell off deepens. Judian

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.200
<v Speaker 2>and Manual I've ever core remains constructive writing. We'll remain

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 2>steadfastly bullish, led by a I names and themes. Stocks

0:00:45.640 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 2>remain on course for seventy seven point fifty, and the

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>nine K ballcase is still operational. Julian joins us now

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 2>for more. Julian, good morning, Good Mornings. That's somewhat contrarian

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 2>after the few days we've had.

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, first I want to say is, given the sports intra,

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 3>we should start talking about MESSI again, which we were

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 3>doing prior to the time.

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 4>It makes some SI for that a little bit like fine, fine.

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 3>So I liken this to the beginning of the year

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 3>when you started to have the accumulated worries around software

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 3>and the initial concerns around debt, which obviously the debt

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 3>pile has gotten much larger, which earnings are supporting, and

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 3>you got this intense negativity around technology stocks, and we

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 3>felt like we were contrarians coming into the beginning of

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty six sticking with the call, and frankly, you know,

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 3>we saw the progression into the most hedged position we

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 3>had ever seen in thirty years at the lows in March,

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:51.720
<v Speaker 3>and the market isn't hedged to that degree, to be sure, but.

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 5>The skepticism is there.

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 3>And frankly, when you think about it, you're just sort

0:01:55.640 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 3>of transitioning this wall of worry away from the maligne

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 3>of of high oil and into the potential concerns around

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 3>supply and less transparent monetary.

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 2>So you say, the bill case is operational. Yet we

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 2>started the program by pointing out a couple of names,

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the likes of Microsoft and Meta deep into baar markets. Now,

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 2>can you have nine K on the S and P

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:22.079
<v Speaker 2>operational so to speak? Without those names participating in any way,

0:02:22.120 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 2>shape or form.

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Mathematically you can't, okay, And when you look at it,

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 3>the chip names, you know, have done a great deal

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 3>of the heavy lifting. You will need a refreshed attitude

0:02:37.720 --> 0:02:41.959
<v Speaker 3>towards the mag seven and we think that that comes

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.639
<v Speaker 3>in time. And if you look at it, over the

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 3>course of this bull market, now almost three years old,

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 3>there have been certain periods of time where essentially earnings

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 3>and price have you know, caught up to each other.

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 3>And we think that's one of these periods in these

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.800
<v Speaker 3>larger aimes, and that you will have price start to

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 3>advance once more.

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>What will it take for people to have a refreshed

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>attitude about the hyperscalers.

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 3>It will likely be a little bit more churn, a

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 3>little bit more volatility, a little bit more negativity, and

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:18.360
<v Speaker 3>then ultimately.

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:19.480
<v Speaker 4>The proof of the pudding.

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 3>That was the proof of the pudding that caused this

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 3>furious rally to begin with. In April and May, earnings

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 3>you're going to see good earnings.

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Are we starting to see the beginnings of pushback from

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the adults in the room, the bond investors, saying hold

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>on a second, and we're talking about this particularly with SpaceX,

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily leading off the entire selloff, but not helping

0:03:40.160 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly this company that just ipo'd coming back to mark

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of twenty billion dollars, it's investment grade even though it's

0:03:45.400 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>been burning cash and has a prospect of getting to

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the moon literally and beyond how much is this the

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>beginning of something that's important to watch.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Well, again, this is the point where we will figure

0:03:57.760 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 3>out how supply and demand interact, because clearly the message is,

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 3>well you iPod and maybe you should have waited at

0:04:07.320 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 3>least till you got included in the Nasdaq one hundred

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 3>before marketing debt. But here we are, and to us again,

0:04:18.120 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 3>when you look at the market action, it's just a

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 3>much more significant, volatile churn. And again with that name

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 3>in particular, you're still comfortably above the IPO price. So

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, you know, they may send people to the

0:04:34.720 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 3>moon and to Mars, but stocks don't go to the

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:39.720
<v Speaker 3>moon and Mars indefinitely.

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.400
<v Speaker 2>For now, at least we've done another four percent in

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 2>the pre market headline, I'll be talked about small caps

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:47.200
<v Speaker 2>record highs. What's going on there? The small caps move,

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 2>which is where the air performance has been so fine

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 2>y today.

0:04:50.000 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 3>So during the course of the entirety of this bull market,

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 3>small caps have been the default short for active managers,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 3>and that really kind of faded as the year started again,

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 3>partly is a function of the concern around technology that

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 3>started the year, but more preciently about this fact that

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 3>we may be having agitation about where the short end

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:20.120
<v Speaker 3>of the interest rate curve is going to go.

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.839
<v Speaker 4>But guess what, the long end is.

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 3>Incredibly well anchored around four point fifty and oh, by

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 3>the way, the labor market is it's suggesting, and all

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 3>of those are positives for small caps, as is the

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 3>price of oil. And then last point here is that

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:43.479
<v Speaker 3>again this tends to be around the Russell rebalance, the

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>time where you get your maximum small cap out performance.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.360
<v Speaker 3>We wouldn't be surprised by a little bit of reversion

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:51.479
<v Speaker 3>as the third.

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 2>Quarter starts IBM and the pre mar ket by four percent.

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 2>We have a new whale in the tech sector and

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 2>it's the US goverment. How are you thinking about that?

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, look again, there's the concept of picking stocks and

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 3>getting national champions, and you've seen it with a number

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:18.560
<v Speaker 3>of names, you know, very old line US technology names.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 3>In the bigger picture, anointing winners and losers has its

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 3>own issues in terms of the government level. But frankly,

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.159
<v Speaker 3>the fact that the government is, as you know, forcefully

0:06:34.240 --> 0:06:38.720
<v Speaker 3>behind the Ai revolution as it is is a positive

0:06:38.839 --> 0:06:40.679
<v Speaker 3>in our mind for investors broadly.

0:06:40.720 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, we see this administration do it with Intel and

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 7>a number of rare earth mineral companies. Do you just

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 7>have a list of potentially the next company the US

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 7>government might take a stake in, and then it's the stock.

0:06:51.560 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 4>Is off to the moon.

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.119
<v Speaker 3>We did that a number of months ago. I would

0:06:56.120 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 3>say it was very well received and certainly work. But

0:07:01.160 --> 0:07:05.279
<v Speaker 3>again I think we're far enough along. And again this

0:07:05.400 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 3>is also part of the investment problem in general, that

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 3>when you look at the major sectors, it's now fifty

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:13.920
<v Speaker 3>eight percent of the S and P five hundred, the

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 3>top ten stocks forty percent of the S and P

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 3>five hundred. That there is a little bit of psychological

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 3>crowding out in trying to find companies with smaller market caps.

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 7>The heavy hand of the US government. Does it distort

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 7>the market?

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 3>Classical economics would tell you that it does, okay, But

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 3>again I go back to this idea that the bigger

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 3>picture in terms of you know, making sure that the

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 3>US is front foot versus the rest of its global

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 3>competitors in technology is a positive.

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>There's also a sense that there's a rolling ball of

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>money that is racing to the next corner, the next

0:07:52.800 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>big thing that could potentially take off as this build

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>out and tech continues, and that people aren't sure what

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate goal is with the ultimate form of AI

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to take in terms of the way its

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>displayed throughout economies. At the same time, it's just racing

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to get there. Whether we see it in eske Heinex

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and Samsung or whether we see it in the semiconductors

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. How does that destabilize markets? I mean,

0:08:13.640 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 1>how much is that something that you're watching?

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, it just shows you that volatility works both to

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 3>the upside and the downside. And actually for us, this

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 3>is very interesting And the reason we don't think we're

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 3>in a bubble right now is because for the last

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 3>six weeks, clients have been asking how do we hedge AI?

0:08:33.400 --> 0:08:35.600
<v Speaker 3>How do we deal with the fact that the AI

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 3>trade is everything and now dominates emerging markets. It's changed

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 3>the relationship of gold is a hedge. It's changed the

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 3>relationship of bonds as a hedge versus stocks, And our

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:49.839
<v Speaker 3>answer is, actually, this is a very interesting time.

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 4>On a day to.

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 3>Day basis, there's a larger universe of stocks in the

0:08:54.320 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 3>S and P five hundred that are moving inversely to

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 3>the S and P day in and day out. We

0:08:59.520 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 3>call them negative beta names that really act as a

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 3>portfolio diversifier.

0:09:05.360 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 4>People are looking.

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 3>For reasons to hedge yet stay invested.

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Are stocks the best hedge to stocks versus bonds being

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a good hedge to stocks in.

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 3>This environment, well, in an environment where we're concerned about

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 3>higher inflation broadly on a sustained basis, history tells you

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 3>that stocks are the best.

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 4>Can you disrupt those stocks? Where do we find those stocks?

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 3>They are across you know, an entirety of industries. Energy obviously,

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 3>in the narrative of this entire year has basically been

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 3>energy moving inversely to the S and P five hundred.

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 3>But you see it in consumer names, you see it

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:50.600
<v Speaker 3>in utilities, and of all the strange places you actually

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 3>see it and select financials. In our mind, that is

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:55.840
<v Speaker 3>definitely different behavior.

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what do you make of that?

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 2>The bank's troid because thin were meant to be the

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 2>big beneficiaries of all of this technology.

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 3>I think again what it is is sort of a preference.

0:10:07.120 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I remember years ago at a different shop, our oil

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 3>analyst said to me, in the midst of a massive

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 3>rally in oil, when are my stocks going to start rallying?

0:10:17.200 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 3>And I said, they're going to start rallying when they

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:24.719
<v Speaker 3>start selling technology. Okay, And so when I think of financials,

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:28.080
<v Speaker 3>that's likely going to be the outcome when we take

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 3>some chip. If you look at yesterday, financials traded very

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 3>well in a negative tech tape, and that's kind of

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 3>the narrative.

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Stay with us multiple index surveilance coming up after this.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about a different asset, clous Let's talk about crew.

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>The President announcing funds from lifted and rounding and sanctions

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 2>will be put in scrow to be used exclusively to

0:10:57.840 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 2>buy us goods.

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 6>If the sanctions go out, money is going to be

0:11:01.800 --> 0:11:05.000
<v Speaker 6>put into this country. All that money's coming back and

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:08.199
<v Speaker 6>the former purchases of food which they desperately needed. Can

0:11:08.240 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 6>you assure that you're radios won't use profits from oil

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 6>sales to rebuild the new Sargy.

0:11:12.679 --> 0:11:14.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, they're not supposed to be doing that.

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 6>So I will say, but they're supposed to use money

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 6>to buy food for their people.

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 2>Roun now has sixty days to sound oil on the

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 2>international market. Crewed this morning seventy seven on Brent, seventy

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 2>three on WTI. Joining us now to discuss the former

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 2>White House senior advisor and partner at TWT Group, Amos Hawkstein.

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.240
<v Speaker 2>Amus will start Broadway. We can get into details. What's

0:11:35.280 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 2>your reaction been to how this has played out over

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 2>the last week.

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, quite remarkable because the MoU in itself is little

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 8>more than really I mean, it's almost like a surrender.

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, if you think about where we started a

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:55.839
<v Speaker 8>few months ago, and what policy has been for the

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 8>last several decades, and where we are today, we have

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 8>basically said, for sixty days, we are removing massive amounts

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:09.200
<v Speaker 8>of sanctions off oil, gas and petrochemicals and refined products.

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:12.040
<v Speaker 8>You can sell it anywhere in dollars, which haven't done

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 8>that in many, many years. They can also get some

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 8>access to unfrozen their own unfrozen assets, you know, six

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 8>to twelve billion dollars depending on which report you here.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:27.120
<v Speaker 8>They get other benefits, and all they have to do

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 8>was to open the straits and agree to talk. So

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:32.440
<v Speaker 8>we haven't actually agreed to anything on the nuclear but

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 8>we have agreed that missile ballistic missile program and support

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 8>for proxy terrorist groups in the region are not on

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 8>the table and not part of the negotiations. And we've

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:49.520
<v Speaker 8>given them the huge political win of now being the

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:54.760
<v Speaker 8>decision makers in Lebanon, which is quite astonishing. So this

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 8>is what we've done. We've given them all. This whole

0:12:57.200 --> 0:13:01.319
<v Speaker 8>document is incentives and agreements to give an things with

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 8>the hope that we'll get something out of it at

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.240
<v Speaker 8>some point during the sixty days. And the clip that

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 8>you showed a little bit earlier with the president talking

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 8>about buying food and medicine, I think he's confusing two

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:14.880
<v Speaker 8>different types of revenues. The food and medicine is really

0:13:14.920 --> 0:13:17.319
<v Speaker 8>I think what they're trying to do with the unfrozen

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 8>assets in cutter the six to twelve billion dollars the

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 8>oil revenues. They can sell and do with that revenue

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:24.239
<v Speaker 8>whatever they want.

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.920
<v Speaker 7>When it comes to that oil revenue, almost where do

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 7>you think your run and crude will be going? Is

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:32.560
<v Speaker 7>this just legitimize the Chinese buyers or will they actually

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 7>find new customers?

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 5>I assume that.

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:40.559
<v Speaker 8>At first it will just be the Chinese customers with legitimacy,

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 8>and probably Indian consumers as well, and then the rest

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 8>of the market will wait and see and to see

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 8>how long this lasts. Because the worst thing is you

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 8>unsanction something, the Americans and the Iranians get into some tiff,

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 8>you know, some a few a week from now, three

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 8>weeks from now, five week from now, and suddenly what

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 8>you bought that was unsanctioned is suddenly sanctioned again. So

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 8>I think people will take some time to figure that out,

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 8>except of course, some trading houses that will buy a

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 8>whole bunch of Iranian crude and blend it and then.

0:14:13.559 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 5>They'll be able to sell wherever they want.

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 8>So I think you're going to see sort of a broadening,

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 8>but it'll be a gradual broadening.

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 7>I know they're not a monolith, but do you have

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 7>an understanding of where the GCC is on this, given

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 7>the fact that it is pretty remarkable, as you said,

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 7>to see this U turn from this administration to allow

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 7>Irani and oil to legally hit the market. We haven't

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 7>seen this in four decades.

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, this is again. I think that you're right, the

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 8>golf is not a monolith. Clearly the political winner in

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 8>the Golf is Cutter, where they are setting, to some degree,

0:14:46.560 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 8>setting American policy. They're in charge of American Middle East

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 8>policy right now in quite an extraordinary way. They are

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 8>quite gifted at this, and I think that there are

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 8>others in the Gulf who are looking at this and saying,

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 8>wait a minute, we didn't like, we don't really like

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 8>Cutter foreign policy, and now it's running American foreign policy.

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.600
<v Speaker 8>Iran was a threat to us, the United States convinced

0:15:09.640 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 8>us to join them in conflict. Now they're emerging stronger

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 8>politically at home, right I mean, you can't imagine anybody

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.720
<v Speaker 8>going out and demonstrating against the regime right now. Help

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 8>is definitely not on the way, and so they're left

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 8>with a neighbor next door that is angry and vengeful

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 8>and is going to be very well funded. And if

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 8>they are very well funded, you're talking about it. If you

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 8>talk about their sales on oil sales alone and petrochemicals,

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.040
<v Speaker 8>you're probably talking about revenues of about a billion a week.

0:15:43.120 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 8>So those countries in the Gulf are are looking at

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 8>this with great concern, and they're going to have to

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 8>invest in their own defense in the long term, thinking

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:56.560
<v Speaker 8>that the United States has become extremely short term thinking.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 8>You know, that's kind of how they view us at

0:15:59.160 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 8>the moment.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking at oil prices because that's what the

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>market is looking at, and there are somewhat agnostic, as

0:16:04.360 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 1>John has mentioned many times about exactly how oil is

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>getting from one place to another and the potential geopolitical implications,

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>at least in the short term, saying, look, at least

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>barrels of oil are going through the strait of removes.

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that this is an accurate reflection of

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the potential risk of an additional closure? Because if there

0:16:22.880 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>is true control buy orn over the strait of removes,

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>should there be a higher premium to potentially offset against

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the risk of something like this happening?

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 8>Again, Look, I think if we were talking about five

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 8>years ago, ten years ago, yes you would talk about

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 8>risk premiums and so on.

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 5>But the market at the moment is.

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 8>Basically saying, I have a lot of news that I

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 8>want to look at on the tech side, how much

0:16:45.840 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 8>CAPEX is coming in on AI and data centers and

0:16:49.520 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 8>blockbuster IPOs and space. That's what I want to focus on.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:55.760
<v Speaker 8>So energy really is judge.

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 5>Us do I have?

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 8>Is this something that's going to drag me down or not?

0:16:58.120 --> 0:16:59.760
<v Speaker 8>If it's not going to drag me down, I don't

0:16:59.760 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 8>want to talk about it. Everything is fine. I don't

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.680
<v Speaker 8>want to hear people tell me about risk premiums. And

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.480
<v Speaker 8>so that's where we are reality wise in the market.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 8>Do we have a risk in of course, because the

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 8>one thing that's come out of this conflict is Iran.

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:14.879
<v Speaker 8>As I said on your show a few weeks ago

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.199
<v Speaker 8>before this agreement, No matter how this war ends, no

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.160
<v Speaker 8>matter what agreement we reach, Iran sees it as they

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.000
<v Speaker 8>control the Straits, and control of the straits does not

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 8>necessarily mean a toll. It could just as well mean

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.960
<v Speaker 8>I decide that tankers need to give me forty eight

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 8>hours notice. I can decide that I don't like a

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 8>certain company. Your tankers are not going through those kinds

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:37.680
<v Speaker 8>of things. So yes, there's a risk, but I don't

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 8>think the market is there to look at it.

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 5>The second piece of that.

0:17:40.600 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 8>Is, while oil prices are coming down, there's still you know,

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.959
<v Speaker 8>Brent's still at seventy seven, WTI at seventy three in

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 8>December of this you know, this past year of December January,

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 8>before the winds of war started blowing, we were at

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 8>fifty six to sixty dollars.

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 5>So we're still.

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:01.800
<v Speaker 8>Trading at a significant premium to where we were before

0:18:01.840 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 8>the wins of war in December. So I think if

0:18:04.760 --> 0:18:07.399
<v Speaker 8>the prices start coming down further, which I think they will,

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 8>at some point you'll start saying, okay, can they really

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 8>go back to where they were in December? And that's

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 8>where we'll see probably a five to ten dollars risk

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:18.520
<v Speaker 8>premium that will be that will be put into the market.

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:19.880
<v Speaker 4>Even Amos managed to get the.

0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Tech tried in the you know well, I mean, I

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>think that there's a bit of frustration at least when

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>people look at the geopolitics saying this actually matters tremendously,

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but they can't get anyone to care because everyone's saying, ooh.

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 2>Space almost I'd love to find a word with you

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 2>on that. There was some discussion that the rebuilt effort

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 2>would be so costly, so expensive for nations across the Gulf,

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 2>that they'd be distracted from spending all this money on

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:46.159
<v Speaker 2>tech on AI. When there has been some excitement, particularly

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>over the last year about softign A on the amount

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 2>investment that would come from that particular part of the world.

0:18:51.080 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 2>What should we be tracking now, where's the money going?

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 2>Where isn't it going?

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 5>So I never agreed with that.

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.439
<v Speaker 8>With that notion, I think countries like you e And

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 8>Saudi and others are really looking at tech as a

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 8>long term diversification away from oil in their national economy

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 8>and budgets that has become more acute, not less. They're

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.280
<v Speaker 8>going to be spending money one on diversification of their

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 8>energy sector away from the Strait of Hormuz, so building

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 8>out infrastructure, which sounds expensive but really isn't. It's a

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 8>few billion dollars here and there to build out this infrastructure.

0:19:25.160 --> 0:19:27.960
<v Speaker 8>And the second piece is to double down on their

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 8>investments in tech, and most of that is going to

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:32.639
<v Speaker 8>be in the United States, because where else are you

0:19:32.720 --> 0:19:35.479
<v Speaker 8>going to invest? There's a ceiling for them in how

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:36.320
<v Speaker 8>much they can invest.

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:36.680
<v Speaker 5>In China.

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 8>They're continuing to invest there, but there's a ceiling.

0:19:39.720 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 5>Europe is non existent.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 8>Or there's a little bit of play here and there,

0:19:43.440 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 8>but it's really small amounts of dollars, and so the

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 8>bulk of it will have to come to the United States.

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 8>And I got to say I've been to UA in Saudi.

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 8>The buildout that's happening there is going to continue to

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 8>expand the question will be not how much they want

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:03.520
<v Speaker 8>to spend. What will companies, American companies, European companies want

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 8>to build data centers in the golf or will they

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 8>be more hesitant as a result of this. But I

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 8>think you're going to see more money coming in to

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:14.359
<v Speaker 8>invest in this sector, and I think it's going to

0:20:14.400 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 8>be mostly in the tech sector, some of it in healthcare,

0:20:18.520 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 8>and other in sports and other entertainment sectors around the world,

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 8>but mostly again, I think in the United States.

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 4>Stay with us.

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 2>More Bloomberg surveillance coming up after this. Let's move on

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.760
<v Speaker 2>to talk about tech SpaceX the ill and muscled companies

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 2>shedding roughly four hundred billion dollars in Monday session alone,

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 2>the second largest single session drop in market value on record.

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Matt Wiheiler of Wellington Management writing, it's unique in that

0:20:52.119 --> 0:20:54.080
<v Speaker 2>it's one of the few companies that can talk about

0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 2>a future that doesn't exist and get credit for it

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 2>in their price. This is exactly how test the stock behaves.

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Joined to snaff and walmac and wanting good to see

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:02.440
<v Speaker 2>it good morning.

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.199
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me. Does that make it difficult to

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 4>bet against the al Musk?

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 9>It definitely makes it difficult to bet against Elon Musk.

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 9>When I think about the companies out there that can

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 9>go public and be trading at a two trillion dollars

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.320
<v Speaker 9>plus market cap, there are very few that could do

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 9>it with the current financial stats that SpaceX is delivered.

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 2>You check in the story how close are we to

0:21:20.680 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 2>the reusable technology the advancements that we need to justify

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>this market cap.

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.439
<v Speaker 9>You know, I'm not a huge SpaceX expert, but what

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 9>I think they have delivered is reusable rockets at scale,

0:21:31.080 --> 0:21:33.200
<v Speaker 9>and I think they've proven a lot of that, which

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:36.000
<v Speaker 9>is in fulfillment of the vision, with the next step

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 9>being vision of having orbital data centers.

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 4>And when you look at the analyst reports and you.

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.639
<v Speaker 9>Look at how SpaceX is trading, obviously a lot of

0:21:42.640 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 9>embedded value in that orbital data center story.

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Massiosha, son of SoftBank, came out overnight and was talking

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.879
<v Speaker 1>about how he doesn't see data centers in space as

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.639
<v Speaker 1>the likely path of traveling said, it's really about the

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>next couple of years and who wins the data center

0:21:56.760 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>build out on Earth as an investor in anthropic someone

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>who has been a participant in this whole space, in

0:22:03.400 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>this race for AI.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:05.520
<v Speaker 4>Do you agree with him?

0:22:06.040 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 9>I do think there is a question around the long

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 9>term viability of orbital data centers. And I am not

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.840
<v Speaker 9>an expert when it comes to the physics, the math

0:22:15.119 --> 0:22:17.400
<v Speaker 9>and the numbers of getting these things up in the sky.

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.160
<v Speaker 9>But I think that the Softbaing point is right, which

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 9>is today we are in a compute constrained environment for inference.

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 9>There is more demand for this inference, compute for AI

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.360
<v Speaker 9>analysis and AI workloads, and there is supply of that,

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 9>and that ultimately is what's driven a lot of the

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:36.640
<v Speaker 9>performance in the market today, as we've seen the chip

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.639
<v Speaker 9>maker's rally, as we've seen companies in the AI space

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:43.000
<v Speaker 9>in the public market like Nvidia, like Microsoft.

0:22:42.480 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 4>Like Facebook.

0:22:43.119 --> 0:22:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but is there's starting to be some pushback in

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:49.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of the cost of that buildout of capacity. Torsenk

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I was mentioning him earlier of Apollo talked about AI

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>as a risk and says, what happens if companies start

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>limiting their token budgets meaningfully because they're only seeing weak

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 1>return on investment, and this is something that people are

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>pointing to the idea that tokens are getting restricted. How

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:03.919
<v Speaker 1>much is this a risk factor for you as an

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>investor in some of these top names.

0:23:05.920 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 9>I mean, it's definitely something we think about, but ultimately,

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:10.159
<v Speaker 9>I think you have to look at two things. The

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 9>first thing you have to look at is what the

0:23:12.119 --> 0:23:15.920
<v Speaker 9>companies purchasing and spending this capital are saying, and whether

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.480
<v Speaker 9>it's SpaceX with their recent bond issue and their IPO

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 9>or Google with their recent equity rays, these companies are

0:23:23.320 --> 0:23:26.040
<v Speaker 9>saying that there is ROI here. It is sufficient for

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.040
<v Speaker 9>me to raise additional funds to go do these buildouts.

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 9>And that's not because they are necessarily fueling others. It's

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 9>also they see internal demand for this. So I think

0:23:35.000 --> 0:23:36.399
<v Speaker 9>that's one thing you have to look at. And I

0:23:36.400 --> 0:23:38.800
<v Speaker 9>think the second thing you have to think about is

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 9>is perhaps they're over spending in tokens today, almost certainly.

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 9>But does that mean that AI does not deliver ROI

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 9>across a wide.

0:23:47.800 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Variety of use cases.

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 9>I definitely don't think so, and I think that the

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 9>proof will be in the years that play out. Does

0:23:54.080 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 9>Anthropic end up going from I don't know, two thousand

0:23:57.240 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 9>percent year over year growth like they've been tracking today,

0:24:00.280 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 9>you know, five hundred or seven hundred percent.

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:06.159
<v Speaker 1>But Microsoft has recently tap deep seek Chinese models.

0:24:05.880 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 4>To try to offset some of the cost.

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Why is that not the path of travel for a

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of these companies.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 9>I think that when you think about how the economics

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 9>will flow in the model builders themselves, I think it's

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 9>our opinion, or certainly my opinion, that the frontier model

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 9>is the open AI, the anthropics, the leading models out

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 9>there will capture a lot of the revenue. But does

0:24:25.040 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 9>that mean that everything needs to run at the frontier

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 9>model level? Absolutely not. Is there a role for deep seek?

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 9>Is there a role for open source? Absolutely? And I

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.480
<v Speaker 9>think that's how the market will bifurcate. Is there'll be

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.199
<v Speaker 9>a lot of value in the large language models at

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 9>the leading edge, and they'll also be valued accrude to

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.879
<v Speaker 9>the open source and Chinese models.

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:46.120
<v Speaker 7>When we look at SpaceX. So who's really the competitor

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 7>right now? Is it the anthropics or is it the

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 7>blue origins.

0:24:49.680 --> 0:24:52.959
<v Speaker 9>I think it's probably more the blue origins. And if

0:24:52.960 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 9>you actually look at the economics of the business today

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 9>and you look at how much capital the company is

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 9>bringing in a lot of their competition is actually the

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 9>core we even hyperscalers of the world. If you look

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 9>at their economic agreements with Anthropic and with Google that

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 9>accounts for almost twenty four billion dollars of annualized revenue

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 9>that is coming from just leasing out their data center.

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 4>Compute might just find me.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.359
<v Speaker 2>You're an investor in Anthropic, can make a your reaction

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:21.959
<v Speaker 2>to how you'd characterize the messaging coming from leadership Anthropic,

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 2>which some people say is AI doomerism and it is

0:25:24.800 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 2>not helpful to the whole landscape right now, what's your

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:28.400
<v Speaker 2>take on it?

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 9>My take on that is that it may be perceived

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.920
<v Speaker 9>as numerism, But if you look at how this administration

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:36.879
<v Speaker 9>is acting, and if you look at some of the

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 9>reports that came out yesterday, perhaps the dumerism isn't as

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 9>extreme as people had thought. I think there was reporting

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.560
<v Speaker 9>yesterday that perhaps the latest Anthropic model was able to

0:25:47.600 --> 0:25:50.479
<v Speaker 9>breach some classified systems, and that is what resulted in

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 9>the administration putting a lockdown on the fable release that

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:55.160
<v Speaker 9>Anthropic had.

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 4>Now I mentioned when this goes pumplic, you'll be sun

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 4>of the stock. Right.

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:00.359
<v Speaker 2>It's that fat to say you hold Anthropic now when

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the stock goes public, we hold anthropic still.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 4>We as a firm, as.

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 9>A one point three trillion dollar asset manager, have lots

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 9>of different pockets of capital, some of which may be

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 9>selling anthropics, some of which may be bokay.

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 4>So complicated, complicated.

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 2>I'm trying to understand how you think about this in

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 2>the future, because clearly now in private markets, it's got

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.119
<v Speaker 2>a great valuation. It's come in public, there's a lot

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 2>of stories that are the hype around it. And what

0:26:21.080 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>helps the hype sometimes are these kind of declarations that

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:25.160
<v Speaker 2>it's going to wipe out thirty percent of white collar work.

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 2>You don't have to deal with the regulatory response just

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 2>now because they've created so much value in private markets.

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 2>You've been a part of that value creation. How are

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:35.280
<v Speaker 2>you thinking about the prospect of regulation down the road.

0:26:35.359 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Is that a story you want to navigate with that

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:38.800
<v Speaker 2>company or something you want to take your hands away

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 2>and say you're on your own now.

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 4>Thanks all to right.

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think it's definitely a complicated piece of the

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:45.800
<v Speaker 9>mosaic across all the AI landscape, and I think the

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 9>trade off ultimately comes down to how much regulatory flex

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 9>does the government want to have in this space versus

0:26:52.840 --> 0:26:56.240
<v Speaker 9>how much free market and leadership position we want to take.

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:58.639
<v Speaker 9>And I think that's the tension we're seeing today. And

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 9>if you look back a week ago, I think there

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 9>was some reporting that perhaps the US government may start

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:05.880
<v Speaker 9>taking positions in some of these companies like they did

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.480
<v Speaker 9>at Intel, and I think that potentially could be a route,

0:27:09.520 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 9>although I don't know.

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Do political realities in your mind dictate one or the other.

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:15.679
<v Speaker 2>Is it easier to say in China we're going to

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 2>be market leaders and focus on that, and in the

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 2>US you just have to face the political reality that

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 2>you need to control this thing because the people they

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 2>are voting are the people losing their jobs.

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think that if you can trust the China

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:29.720
<v Speaker 9>approach versus the US approach, I think you can mandate

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 9>that we're going to be a leader and that we

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 9>are going to win there, but that doesn't mean that

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 9>you deliver on being the winner in leading there. And

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 9>I think that's what makes the US development of AI

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 9>quite unique is that we have multiple free market economy

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.880
<v Speaker 9>participants trying to build the best models, and so far

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 9>that have resulted in US having.

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 4>A lead in the models.

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.119
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Survandans podcast, bringing you the best

0:27:51.119 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 2>in markets, economics, antient politics. You can watch the show

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg TV weekday mornings from six am to

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 2>nine am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify,

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 2>or anywhere else you listen, and as always, on the

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app hmm