Speaker 1: You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get more from Buck by following him on
Speaker 1: social media at buck Sexton on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram.
Speaker 1: Welcome friends to the Buck Sexton Show. They've been telling
Speaker 1: us no evidence, and then some people found a dictionary
Speaker 1: and looked up and it turns out that swore in
Speaker 1: affidavits under penalty of perjury duke count as evidence. They've
Speaker 1: been telling us no irregularities, and then we see thousands
Speaker 1: of votes messed up by the software or found in
Speaker 1: a bag or a ditch or a biden somewhere that
Speaker 1: weren't counted in Georgia. We've been seeing these issues even
Speaker 1: though along we've been told don't pay any attention to it. Now,
Speaker 1: keep in mind, in states like Georgia, margin of victories
Speaker 1: less than fifteen thousand votes. Less than fifteen thousand votes, friends,
Speaker 1: this is very tight. This is a very thin margin
Speaker 1: of victory. But they've been telling us all along, Oh,
Speaker 1: even if there's a little bit of a little bit
Speaker 1: of a problem here or there, some fraud, a little
Speaker 1: sprinkled in there, a little irregularity peppered in here, not
Speaker 1: going to change anything. But then yesterday and these hearings
Speaker 1: in Georgia. We saw video. I watched the whole twelve
Speaker 1: minute video presentation by the Trump team, and it certainly
Speaker 1: looks very fishy. You have people dismissed, told that they
Speaker 1: need to go home, it's the end of the end
Speaker 1: of the election day counting, and then some people stay behind.
Speaker 1: Then they pull out suitcases from under a table and
Speaker 1: start doing something it looks a whole lot like counting.
Speaker 1: And they've got three machines that are able to go
Speaker 1: during that period of time, and they estimate that those
Speaker 1: machines could do a couple of thousand, a few thousand
Speaker 1: ballots an hour, and they got two hours to work
Speaker 1: with with no one else there. And this is all
Speaker 1: on camera, which they believe would be enough for someone
Speaker 1: to count in invalid, illegal votes such that it would
Speaker 1: cause the state of Georgia to go for Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Now that is the allegation, and I have seen the video,
Speaker 1: and the video is certainly very concerning, very interesting. Why
Speaker 1: would any counting I've seen also the explanation that the
Speaker 1: most common explanation offered up and it's including from apparently
Speaker 1: a election official in the state of Georgio who says, oh,
Speaker 1: these are called cutters, and they're removing they're just removing
Speaker 1: the absentee ballots from the envelopes. Okay, why would that
Speaker 1: happen with no one else there? Why would this happen
Speaker 1: after hours? This is the standard practice. And then they say, oh,
Speaker 1: there were no ballots really in the suitcases. They were
Speaker 1: just empty suitcases or empty bins or something. It's not compelling.
Speaker 1: The explanation for this so far is not Okay, I
Speaker 1: can kind of see how that would happen. No, Instead,
Speaker 1: you look at this and you say, hmm, that's very suspicious,
Speaker 1: isn't it. That seems concerning to me. But sure enough,
Speaker 1: mainstream media wants nothing to do with it. They simply
Speaker 1: don't care. They tell us that this is already debunked.
Speaker 1: That's one of their favorite words. Anytime there's a debate
Speaker 1: that they don't want to have, they use the word
Speaker 1: debunked to claim that it's already over with. Well, now,
Speaker 1: finally Governor Kemp of Georgia has come out and he
Speaker 1: has said that there should be a signature audit. Now,
Speaker 1: let me point something out to you. When we were
Speaker 1: initially having these fights, we were having these debates before
Speaker 1: the election even happened about how mail in ballots would
Speaker 1: be so susceptible to fraud. You know what the response was, Oh,
Speaker 1: be quiet, you idiots. There's signature matching. That's our fail safe.
Speaker 1: So you can't just mail something and there's signature matching.
Speaker 1: And that was in the months leading up to the election.
Speaker 1: What the pro mail in ballot media, Democrats, Libs were saying.
Speaker 1: But then we found out after the election. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: I remember, the whole signature matching thing. Didn't happen, didn't
Speaker 1: didn't do it? What do you mean, maybe did at
Speaker 1: some places, maybe not another's, But no, why wouldn't you
Speaker 1: have an audit looking for a signature match here? There's
Speaker 1: no reason, there's a there's an understandable public controversy, there's
Speaker 1: there's reason to believe something bad has happened here, and
Speaker 1: we have at least some prayer of finding out what
Speaker 1: really went on here by checking to see if signatures match.
Speaker 1: Now are what are the risks for the people involved
Speaker 1: in all this? You have to remember that they keep saying, Oh,
Speaker 1: this Republican official or that Republican official. Could you imagine
Speaker 1: if you were in charge of elections for the State
Speaker 1: of Georgia. You were involved in that process, and you've
Speaker 1: been saying all along it was fine, and then you're
Speaker 1: proving to be a fraud and an idiot. That wouldn't
Speaker 1: look very good, would it. But more than that, and
Speaker 1: here's the part of it that I think they're they're
Speaker 1: particularly concerned about. Here's the part of it that that
Speaker 1: really worries them. All we have to do is find
Speaker 1: one clear cut case of fraud in one of these states,
Speaker 1: and the whole conversation changes. All of a sudden. You
Speaker 1: have a situation where when they tell us that there's
Speaker 1: there's no reason to look at this, it's already over
Speaker 1: and done. Stop being a conspiracy theorist, Stop stop looking
Speaker 1: at this crazy stuff online. Now the president says that
Speaker 1: they didn't match. Now the signature matches is what they
Speaker 1: would have to do in this case for the absentee ballots,
Speaker 1: right mail in ballots, that's where the signature match was
Speaker 1: supposed to be applied. And we keep hearing no evidence
Speaker 1: of fraud, no evidence of fraud. But every time we
Speaker 1: try to look into allegations based on evidence, they say,
Speaker 1: shut it down, end it all. That's because they know
Speaker 1: if we find one case that they can no longer
Speaker 1: pretend is not absolutely proven, real, ironclad. The game plan
Speaker 1: has to shift. What do they say then about was
Speaker 1: sending about Nevada, at about Arizona? What do they say
Speaker 1: about these other states? What do they say about Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: where we still have very real concerns and there are
Speaker 1: serious allegations out there. They don't have an answer. They're
Speaker 1: hoping to shame you and shut you down so that
Speaker 1: we do not hold the line. And it matters right
Speaker 1: now here. We are in December, We've got a little
Speaker 1: over a month before an inauguration, and these weeks ahead
Speaker 1: are absolutely critical. We need to support those who are
Speaker 1: going for answers here. We need to support those who
Speaker 1: are willing to present the evidence, win or lose. They
Speaker 1: are warriors for the cause here. They're doing the right thing,
Speaker 1: and we need to understand that everything on the left,
Speaker 1: everything on the left, is at stake right now because
Speaker 1: not only would their dream of the end of a
Speaker 1: Trump prison It's not like they're excited about Joe Biden
Speaker 1: or say, I mean, no, one's that dumb, but at
Speaker 1: the end of the Trump presidency that makes them so jubilant.
Speaker 1: That's why there's this sense of joy all across left
Speaker 1: wing America. But not only would that be at stake
Speaker 1: if we establish that there was cheating in this election
Speaker 1: the Democrat brand, there will be long term ramifications for
Speaker 1: that one. When we get into arguments about elections going forward,
Speaker 1: we'll say, really, cheaters, you want to try and cheat again,
Speaker 1: and don't ever forget in this process that while while
Speaker 1: they're asking for good faith, while they're telling all of us,
Speaker 1: while the media is doing everything they can to just
Speaker 1: bludgeon you into submission with all these stories about nothing proven.
Speaker 1: Fact check, it's not true. Fact check, they're lying. Fact
Speaker 1: check no evidence. They spend three years pretending that the
Speaker 1: president of the United States, the actual president of the
Speaker 1: United States, Donald J. Trump, was an asset of the Kremlin,
Speaker 1: a traitor to his country, a Russian spy who stole
Speaker 1: the twenty sixteen election. They are in no position now
Speaker 1: to point at me or you or anyone else and say,
Speaker 1: how dare you dabble in these conspiracy theories. No, we're
Speaker 1: just fact checking. We'll call it that. They like that better,
Speaker 1: I think than searching for truth or looking for looking
Speaker 1: for clues. We'll just say we're fact checking as well,
Speaker 1: was this election stolen? Fact check? That's what we're doing.
Speaker 1: And whenever they offer up the no evidence claim, will say, well,
Speaker 1: the no evidence claim has been debunked. Turn it back
Speaker 1: around on them, use their weaponized phrases as a means
Speaker 1: of shutting down their efforts to shut you down. It
Speaker 1: will drive them nuts. And as long as we continue
Speaker 1: to hold the line on this, as long as we
Speaker 1: continue to do we need to hear, to get the
Speaker 1: evidence presented and to bring it before a judge, because
Speaker 1: even if a judge doesn't rule in our favor, at
Speaker 1: least then it's official record, the evidence presented in court.
Speaker 1: We can all cite it. We all know it's there.
Speaker 1: It's public, and we'll hear the presentations as we have
Speaker 1: been in these oversight committees of these state legislatures. Well,
Speaker 1: we'll hear what the Trump team has found so far.
Speaker 1: And I'm for the first time, you know, I have
Speaker 1: not been overhyped on this, and a lot of people
Speaker 1: that are running around saying Trump won, it's one hundred percent,
Speaker 1: we're going to prove it. I think that they're they're
Speaker 1: getting ahead of themselves in terms of whether we can
Speaker 1: prove it. But this in Georgia. This is the first
Speaker 1: time I've said we need to dig in on this
Speaker 1: fraud and see what's really going on here, because I
Speaker 1: think we may have it. They're calling it a smoking gun.
Speaker 1: It's not quite there yet. I got to look through
Speaker 1: all all the different explanations and all the different peculiarities
Speaker 1: of Georgia state election law. But it certainly looks fishy,
Speaker 1: and anybody seeing it, anybody who's told what's going on here,
Speaker 1: they would think the same thing. So all that nothing
Speaker 1: to see here, just move on gets a little bit
Speaker 1: harder for the Libs, doesn't it. And then when you
Speaker 1: add to that that the Democrats change laws in places
Speaker 1: like Pennsylvania in an unconstitutional fashion. We still very much
Speaker 1: are in this fight. It is not over, and we're
Speaker 1: not going to give up until we decide it's time
Speaker 1: for us to move on to the next fight. And
Speaker 1: we're not there yet. So Georgia is on our minds.
Speaker 1: This signature match audit should absolutely happen. There's no reason
Speaker 1: for it not to. Governor Kemp has come forward saying
Speaker 1: just that it's good to hear from the guy who's
Speaker 1: kind of quiet for a while. It's seeing there, and
Speaker 1: it's essential as well going into the January fifth run
Speaker 1: off for the Senate, that everyone understand that we're watching
Speaker 1: every move in Georgia and the GOP better have their
Speaker 1: poll watchers and their lawyers. They better get their ground
Speaker 1: game ready to go, get those election troops, so to speak,
Speaker 1: all in line and ready to watch what's happening and
Speaker 1: make sure that it's all legitimate and legal and none
Speaker 1: of these shenanigans happened again. Because I can assure you
Speaker 1: of this, whatever the Democrats got away with on this
Speaker 1: election day, they will try the next one. Whatever it is,
Speaker 1: it'll happen again. Thanks for listening to the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Get the latest news and information from Buck
Speaker 1: by heading to Bucksexton dot com. You're not called early
Speaker 1: on for a signature audit. Obviously a Sectary of State
Speaker 1: for the laws and the Constitution would have to order
Speaker 1: that he has not done that. I think it should
Speaker 1: be done. I think, especially with what we saw today,
Speaker 1: it raises more questions. There needs to be transparency on that.
Speaker 1: I would again call for that, and I think in
Speaker 1: the next twenty four hours hopefully we'll see a lot
Speaker 1: more from the hearings that the legislature had today, and
Speaker 1: we'll be able to look and see what the next
Speaker 1: steps are. So what are they going to say. What
Speaker 1: are they going to say when it comes time for
Speaker 1: this audit, when it's actually happening and we find that
Speaker 1: there are some signatures that don't match. If that, if
Speaker 1: that happens, what are they gonna say, Oh, it was
Speaker 1: a good faith mistake. I just want you to be
Speaker 1: prepared for it right now. It was a good faith error.
Speaker 1: People just we wanted every vote to count. They're not
Speaker 1: signatures specialists or whatever. Trust me, Trust me, they're gonna
Speaker 1: find some way to tell you. They're gonna find some
Speaker 1: way to make it seem like this was no big deal.
Speaker 1: So here's the truth about Georgia. This is a ap said.
Speaker 1: When a voter requests an absentee ballot on a paper application,
Speaker 1: he or she must sign it. Election officials compare that
Speaker 1: signature to the signature and voter registration files before a
Speaker 1: ballot is sent. When those ballots are returned, the required
Speaker 1: signature on the outer envelope is compared to the signature
Speaker 1: in the voter registration system. Well, Trump is saying, because
Speaker 1: a lot of people saw this, that did not happen.
Speaker 1: Didn't happen. They're supposed to be comparing the signatures. They
Speaker 1: didn't compare the signatures. Hey, you know, I gotta count everything. Sorry,
Speaker 1: whatever comes in. Democrats know that if they eliminate election safeguards,
Speaker 1: if they take the things that are put in place,
Speaker 1: that are agreed to by both sides, and then they
Speaker 1: change them so that it's just possible to flood the
Speaker 1: zone with whatever it benefits them. Why why is that?
Speaker 1: Is there something about being a Democrat that means that
Speaker 1: you prefer the convenience of mailing something in as opposed
Speaker 1: to showing up in person and voting. No, I don't
Speaker 1: think there is, So why do democrat It's recognized. Just
Speaker 1: think about it this way. What about mail in ballots?
Speaker 1: Mass mail in ballots for anyone who wants one and
Speaker 1: everyone is so obviously an enormous benefit to Democrats. They
Speaker 1: knew this. I mean, Nancy Pelosi was gleeful. And I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna say it, Republicans should have fought harder on
Speaker 1: this earlier on, but we got so beaten down by
Speaker 1: the COVID panic narrative, and oh my gosh, you can't
Speaker 1: expect people to stand in line to vote. People are
Speaker 1: in line to the grocery store all the time. They're
Speaker 1: going to big box stores. All this stuff about lockdowns
Speaker 1: acts people act like they're actually stuck in their homes
Speaker 1: and don't go anywhere. That's not true. No one does that,
Speaker 1: or very few people do that. No, they go out
Speaker 1: and they do things that they have to do. And
Speaker 1: to vote once a year for a vast majority of
Speaker 1: people wouldn't seem like such a big imposition. They could
Speaker 1: have done it so that people were in and out
Speaker 1: in a speedy amount of time and there's no real
Speaker 1: risk of no high risk, I should say, a virus transmission.
Speaker 1: But the Democrats knew if you make this just a
Speaker 1: free for all, ballots coming in from all over the place,
Speaker 1: don't know where, don't know who, just send them all
Speaker 1: out in the mail, millions and millions of live ballots
Speaker 1: all over the place. They knew it would benefit them.
Speaker 1: Why is that? We all know the answer? They say
Speaker 1: things like there's no fraud. Why would they say that?
Speaker 1: That's obviously untrue. It's propaganda. If there's no fraud, then
Speaker 1: how can we investigate it? Right? People say, ah, I
Speaker 1: heard from a really trusted source that there's no fraud.
Speaker 1: We all know it's not true, but that is their approach.
Speaker 1: That is what they will do, that is what they
Speaker 1: will say. And the implications of all this are enormous.
Speaker 1: If we catch them in one serious fraud, even if
Speaker 1: it's not enough to overturn the election, think about this.
Speaker 1: If we catch them in one serious fraud in any
Speaker 1: of these states, then it will be that they'll be
Speaker 1: wounded in terms of their credibility, their ability to fool
Speaker 1: Americans of good faith and goodwill into believing the Democrats
Speaker 1: aren't somehow a corrupt political organization. That's gonna be a
Speaker 1: lot harder. So I want to find the fraud, even
Speaker 1: under any circumstances. I want to know what was done here.
Speaker 1: I want to know what happened because I don't believe
Speaker 1: it Democrats who claim the current president is a Russian
Speaker 1: asset and a fascist, I don't think it's above them
Speaker 1: to cheat. Just gonna put this out there. You're in
Speaker 1: the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast.
Speaker 1: For more Bucked, head to Bucksexton dot com and remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe to the podcast. What is Joe Biden's Genius
Speaker 1: Plan to Save America? From the virus. Anybody got any ideas,
Speaker 1: I got one the same thing. Biden's got a fever.
Speaker 1: And the only prescription is more masking. Play one. It
Speaker 1: is important that we, in fact, the president and the
Speaker 1: Vice president, we set you know, the pattern by wearing masks.
Speaker 1: But beyond that, where the federal government has authority, I'm
Speaker 1: going to issue a standing order that in federal buildings
Speaker 1: you have to be masked. In transportation, interstate transportation, you
Speaker 1: must be masked in airplanes and buses, etc. And so
Speaker 1: it's a it's a matter of and I think my inclination,
Speaker 1: Jake is on the first day I'm inaugurated, to say,
Speaker 1: I'm going to ask the public for one hundred days
Speaker 1: to mask, just one hundred days to mask, not forever.
Speaker 1: One hundred days. And I think we'll see a significant
Speaker 1: reduction if we occur that that occurs with vaccinations and masking,
Speaker 1: to drive down the numbers considerably because we haven't been masking.
Speaker 1: You abject moron, That's really what the plan is. Harmer.
Speaker 1: Ask you know, I was walking around, I broke my
Speaker 1: foot on my I'm here here, here, you go here.
Speaker 1: He actually answered that, why why did he break his foot?
Speaker 1: Play for I wear the big boot most of the time,
Speaker 1: but wanted coming out here. It's just kind of clumsy,
Speaker 1: so they gave me this little thing to work. How
Speaker 1: how is your foot? And what happened. What happened was
Speaker 1: I got out of the shower, I got a dog,
Speaker 1: and anybody's been around my house, nose dropped a little
Speaker 1: pup dropped the ball in front of me and for
Speaker 1: me to grab the ball. And I'm walking through this
Speaker 1: little alleyway to get to the bedroom. And I grabbed
Speaker 1: the ball like this and he ran and I was
Speaker 1: joking running after him to grab his tail. And what
Speaker 1: happened was that he slid on a throw rug and
Speaker 1: I tripped on the rug he slid on. That's what happened.
Speaker 1: Oh man, not not not very exciting story your next
Speaker 1: president at the Democrats get their way? Friends, Yeah, hey,
Speaker 1: I was out there, a little little dog run around
Speaker 1: and a man the rug, and you know, I was
Speaker 1: moving and my weight was going and wonder, you know,
Speaker 1: this is this is who's going to be the leader
Speaker 1: of the free world. That Democrats get their way. It's
Speaker 1: pretty amazing. But back to the mask mandate though, Can
Speaker 1: you get on a plane right now without a mask, No,
Speaker 1: you cannot. Can you go into a private business in
Speaker 1: states that like New York and California have lockdowns and
Speaker 1: are going through their worst ever right now they have
Speaker 1: the worst ever number of cases in those states, and
Speaker 1: some of them, not all of them. Is that is
Speaker 1: it obvious to anybody why this is happening? Did they
Speaker 1: understand why this is happening? Because the masks certainly haven't
Speaker 1: stopped it. So I'm just wondering, is that anybody have
Speaker 1: a theory of the because they can keep telling us mascot, mascot,
Speaker 1: mask up. But remember if you had an infection and
Speaker 1: a doctor told you at the beginning, oh, don't take
Speaker 1: anything for that, you don't, you don't need anything, don't
Speaker 1: take anybiotics, don't take anti virals, don't take anything. You'll you'll,
Speaker 1: you're you're fine, And then you found out that, oh no,
Speaker 1: the doctor came back a few weeks later. Turns out
Speaker 1: I know that you almost died from that infection, but
Speaker 1: we were totally wrong about that one. Would you trust
Speaker 1: that person as much? Would you believe them going forward?
Speaker 1: I think you'd have a tough time with it on
Speaker 1: masking alone. Foucci doctor Fauci told us all don't wear masks.
Speaker 1: In fact, there was a period there I remembered in
Speaker 1: New York where you had to be careful if you
Speaker 1: were an N ninety five mask, you might get ND
Speaker 1: ninety five shamed because people would say, why are you
Speaker 1: wearing up? That's for healthcare workers, to which I think
Speaker 1: anybody would want to respond, I don't want to get
Speaker 1: the virus. And it's in life. Ultimately, we are in
Speaker 1: a kind of everyman and woman for himself situation. I
Speaker 1: know the lives like to pretend that we don't all
Speaker 1: know that, but no one cares about your health. But you,
Speaker 1: maybe your spouse, your immediate family, but no one cares
Speaker 1: about it as much as you do. No one. You
Speaker 1: care about your own health more than anyone. And being
Speaker 1: told you can't wear a more effective mask that you're
Speaker 1: able to get your hands on because it is meant
Speaker 1: for healthcare workers just goes to show you the mentality here. Oh, okay,
Speaker 1: why is it better that? Why should it just be
Speaker 1: for healthcare workers? Because it's better? Obviously, how much better?
Speaker 1: I'm going to tell you that if you look at
Speaker 1: the science, a properly fitted N ninety five mask is
Speaker 1: substantially better than the bandanas that people wear and the
Speaker 1: loose kerchiefs still put around their face and say yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm masked up. Yeah, yea. Here we are still being
Speaker 1: told this one hundred days, one hundred days to mask.
Speaker 1: How many hundreds of days have we already done this?
Speaker 1: You know what the definition of insanity as we all know,
Speaker 1: And that's exactly what Biden's telling us to do here.
Speaker 1: That's exactly what's going on. He wants you to just
Speaker 1: keep listening to the same stuff that hasn't worked. Somebody
Speaker 1: tell me what would it look like right now? I mean,
Speaker 1: this is this is the model that I want to see.
Speaker 1: If we didn't wear masks at all, have we just
Speaker 1: went around living our lives and everyone doing their own cases,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, doing their own protective measures. What would it
Speaker 1: look like? You don't ever hear that number. You don't
Speaker 1: ever get a sense of what that number would be,
Speaker 1: because what's I think today we have I'm trying to
Speaker 1: see the latest the latest number of cases two and seven,
Speaker 1: two hundred and seventeen thousand cases roughly on December third,
Speaker 1: confirmed cases two hundred and seventeen thousand without masks, what
Speaker 1: would that number be. I'm really curious two million, five million,
Speaker 1: you know, because if if the number without masks would
Speaker 1: be two hundred and twenty thousand or two hundred thirty thousand, um.
Speaker 1: I think they can back the blank off. I think
Speaker 1: they can leave us to heck alone because it's not enough.
Speaker 1: But they won't tell you because they don't know. Instead,
Speaker 1: what they do is they put Biden forward. And here's
Speaker 1: my fear. You know, I've been I've been very consistent
Speaker 1: on this, and a lot of conservatives got a little
Speaker 1: hic oh. But I I like, I think I know
Speaker 1: the science. I mean, you know masking, And there are
Speaker 1: a lot of them, a lot of corporate conservatives out
Speaker 1: there who are starting to get a little week right
Speaker 1: around you know, July, when there was the surge over
Speaker 1: the summer, I saw people were getting a little Oh.
Speaker 1: I think we should we should listen to Fauci. I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna not gonna name any names because it's you know,
Speaker 1: I think people some of them just came to it
Speaker 1: in good faith. And you know how much you mask work,
Speaker 1: I'll tell you. I don't know. We'll find out in
Speaker 1: a few years. Probably that's when they'll actually do the
Speaker 1: real studies to see and that's when you'll be able
Speaker 1: to look at do an honest compilation of the data.
Speaker 1: Maybe it's maybe it's more effective than I think it is,
Speaker 1: but we know it's not really effective. That's what that's
Speaker 1: absolutely certain. Okay, it's it definitely isn't like I'm wearing
Speaker 1: a mask. I don't have to worry. In fact, most
Speaker 1: of the people getting infected think they're wearing a mask
Speaker 1: almost all the time they're supposed to. So what does
Speaker 1: that tell you? But I will say this, I understand
Speaker 1: the Biden hundred day order. There's a little bit of
Speaker 1: a deviousness to this from a political standpoint. Just think
Speaker 1: about it before I tell you, think why would Biden
Speaker 1: have this renewed call for a thing we are already doing.
Speaker 1: But setting the setting the parameters at one hundred days, Well,
Speaker 1: how long is it going to take to distribute the vaccine.
Speaker 1: It will be the middle of December when they say
Speaker 1: the first doses will come out. And if they do
Speaker 1: this the right way and they get it to senior citizens,
Speaker 1: they get it to the vulnerable population, then you're going
Speaker 1: to see within thirty days the death numbers start to
Speaker 1: go down and then as they get it out to
Speaker 1: millions more people. When and I've actually asked doctors this
Speaker 1: and people that work in the hospital system, I've said,
Speaker 1: when do you think, based on the logistics, distribution and
Speaker 1: everything else about this vaccine, when will we really see
Speaker 1: the numbers? You know, the when will this get under control?
Speaker 1: January February March. Everyone knows that within about ninety days
Speaker 1: of the vaccine's distribution, the caseload. Because see, I do
Speaker 1: believe in science. I think the vaccine is going to work.
Speaker 1: I believe the data behind the vaccine. If you don't
Speaker 1: want to take it because you think it's got terrible
Speaker 1: side effects and everything else, that's a discussion. But I'm
Speaker 1: telling you this. If they've put this out and they
Speaker 1: say it's ninety five out of one hundred, you're not
Speaker 1: going to get COVID. I think it's ninety five out
Speaker 1: of a hundred, you're not going to get COVID. So
Speaker 1: I do believe in the science when it actually is
Speaker 1: rooted in data. But I also understand politics. So what
Speaker 1: happens here, because we know the vaccine is going to
Speaker 1: be the masking is not the effective tool. Vaccines will
Speaker 1: be but they want to create in the public mind
Speaker 1: a perception of masking that coincides with the curve, if
Speaker 1: you will, of the vaccine, so that all these people
Speaker 1: they're desperate to think they believe the science and they've
Speaker 1: been doing the right thing. I guarantee you and proos
Speaker 1: of mark we should mark down this show because I'm
Speaker 1: going to have to replay this in March. This one
Speaker 1: part that I'm telling you we need to mark this down.
Speaker 1: I guarantee you. What you'll see is that as the
Speaker 1: numbers come down of infections and hospitalization and deaths going,
Speaker 1: you know, it'll start in January and then go and
Speaker 1: then get better in March. I mean, get better in February,
Speaker 1: and then in March, it'll be clear we've basically got
Speaker 1: this thing under control. As that happens, they will say
Speaker 1: that masking was a critical part of it and that
Speaker 1: they were proven it's because we listen to Biden for
Speaker 1: the hundred Days. They will conflate these two things together
Speaker 1: because that's necessary for their narrative. They lack like, yeah,
Speaker 1: the the vaccine helped, but you know we didn't get
Speaker 1: into that many people. It's really the masking. The hundred
Speaker 1: Days of masking that did it, guaranteed, guaranteed, because so
Speaker 1: much of it is really people who just they want
Speaker 1: to think they're smart. I can't tell you how many
Speaker 1: people I come across who I know in the media
Speaker 1: blue checks were Libs, and I know they're not very bright.
Speaker 1: I know they've managed to maneuver themselves into different jobs
Speaker 1: and positions in the media because of their background, or
Speaker 1: because you know, they know the right person, or they've
Speaker 1: leveraged identity politics. Well, you know there there are plenty
Speaker 1: of people in the media that are just straight up dumbasses,
Speaker 1: including on the right, but many more on the left,
Speaker 1: per capita. And I can just tell you this right now.
Speaker 1: They want to believe they're smart so badly, and they
Speaker 1: want to believe it. They've been right all along on
Speaker 1: this one. And all you have to do to understand
Speaker 1: why that's unlikely, why that's unlikely to be the case,
Speaker 1: is that the fauci esque call for masking is that
Speaker 1: it's obvious and the science proves it. But he's never
Speaker 1: addressed how it could be obvious and the science proved
Speaker 1: it now, But it wasn't at the beginning when we
Speaker 1: thought this was a much more fatal disease than it
Speaker 1: actually turned out to be. People forget that now. The
Speaker 1: initial IFR was an individual fatality rate was estimated at
Speaker 1: three to five percent, which is very close to the
Speaker 1: Spanish influenza. Yeah, much worse than what we actually have,
Speaker 1: which is more like a point they say, I think
Speaker 1: point three. I think it's probably more like point zero
Speaker 1: three or point zero zero three if you look at
Speaker 1: all the cases, cases that we miss. But nonetheless, what
Speaker 1: dramatically change? How could something go from being obviously untrue
Speaker 1: to obviously true based on science in a period of
Speaker 1: a few months. They don't have an answer for that,
Speaker 1: do they. People don't like to think that they've been fooled,
Speaker 1: that they're not as smart as they think they are,
Speaker 1: that all of their smugness is embarrassing. So notice this,
Speaker 1: I'm telling you my prediction on this will come true.
Speaker 1: You will see it. It'll be very apparent. The vaccine
Speaker 1: will bring this to a close. And if Biden is
Speaker 1: the president, it will be it was our vaccines and
Speaker 1: our unity around masking that got us through this. Even
Speaker 1: though as I see it here talking to you, we
Speaker 1: look at the cases, we look at the fatalities, Masking
Speaker 1: hasn't done as a policy a damn thing to stop
Speaker 1: this virus. You know it, I know it. Look at
Speaker 1: what's happening around you today. You're in the Freedom Hut.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get more from
Speaker 1: Buck by following him on social media at buck Sexton
Speaker 1: on Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. Do you attribute any of
Speaker 1: this surge that we're seeing in the last couple of
Speaker 1: days directly too Thanksgiving and the travel and the get
Speaker 1: togethers that did happen. Maybe a little bit of a blip, Savannah,
Speaker 1: but we don't expect to see the full brunt of
Speaker 1: it between two and three weeks following the Thanksgiving So
Speaker 1: I think we have not yet seen the post Thanksgiving peak.
Speaker 1: That's the concerning thing, because the numbers in and of
Speaker 1: themselves are alarming, and then you realize that it is
Speaker 1: likely we will see more of a surge as we
Speaker 1: get two to three weeks past the Thanksgiving holiday. And
Speaker 1: the thing that concerns me is that a butt's right
Speaker 1: on the Christmas holiday is people start to travel and
Speaker 1: shop and congregate. So that's the reason why we plead
Speaker 1: with them to please as best as you can. Uniform
Speaker 1: wearing of masks, keep distances as to the best possible
Speaker 1: way you can avoid crowds and congregate settings, particularly indoors.
Speaker 1: And if you are indoors in that circumstance, always wear
Speaker 1: your mask. Where your mask, it's all this guy's got
Speaker 1: for you. Stay away from human beings. Wear your mask.
Speaker 1: You think you're gonna be able to do that? Stay
Speaker 1: away from human beings? Are you going to do that?
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not worried about it. I'm in New
Speaker 1: York City. I go into an office every day, I'm traveling.
Speaker 1: I'm getting into strange strangers vehicles here to go to
Speaker 1: where I have to go. I'm going into crowded stores.
Speaker 1: I'm doing all these things. I'm not worried. I'm not crazy.
Speaker 1: If I'm sick, I'm staying home. If I if I
Speaker 1: thought I had COVID, I would quarantine myself two weeks,
Speaker 1: no question, wouldn't go anywhere, right, But there are only
Speaker 1: so many precautions you can take before you're just living
Speaker 1: a life of fear. And that's what they want you
Speaker 1: to do. And understand that there will be in twenty
Speaker 1: twenty one, regardless of who the president is, there's going
Speaker 1: to be a renaissance in this country. There's going to
Speaker 1: be a sense of relief and release that will be
Speaker 1: like the end of a war that had like a
Speaker 1: draft and a lot of us going to fight. But
Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's as it's the same as that.
Speaker 1: But I'm saying it's gonna be. There's gonna be people
Speaker 1: dancing in the streets at some point, Man, there's gonna be.
Speaker 1: It'll be almost it'll be almost as exciting as the
Speaker 1: Biden victory for the lives in New York. Right. There
Speaker 1: will come a day when we realize this thing is
Speaker 1: behind us, and there are gonna be tremendous fights over
Speaker 1: who should get credit for it. He'll notice not a
Speaker 1: lot of talk about how it was the Trump administration
Speaker 1: that got a vaccine done in less than a year,
Speaker 1: helped bring a vaccine to market in less than a year,
Speaker 1: when usually it's four to five years, four to five years.
Speaker 1: Could you imagine, I mean, if we had to do
Speaker 1: four years of this, I'm already thinking that I might
Speaker 1: just have to I might have to go full civil
Speaker 1: disobedience and get arrested for mask refusal. I'm I'm considering it.
Speaker 1: But see, the thing is I don't want to make
Speaker 1: anyone else. I'm polite. I don't want anyone else to
Speaker 1: worry around me. It's not about that. It's about the
Speaker 1: state mandate. It's not I have no problem with anyone
Speaker 1: wearing a mask. I don't see some wearing a mask
Speaker 1: and think less of the number. Maybe they're right, maybe
Speaker 1: it's good for them. Maybe you know, we should. My
Speaker 1: problem is the state arresting people for it. My problem
Speaker 1: is the state determining who can and can't go about
Speaker 1: their lives, open their businesses. That's my issue. But civil disobedience,
Speaker 1: I've never really I've never really thought I had to
Speaker 1: be in a place to even consider it before. But
Speaker 1: I'm considering civil disobedience on this myself. Thanks for listening
Speaker 1: to The Buck Sexton Show podcast. Get the latest news
Speaker 1: and information from Buck by heading to buck Sexton dot com.
Speaker 1: So how has this whole fight against COVID nineteen gone
Speaker 1: so far? What have we learned? And what should we
Speaker 1: do going forward? Critical? Absolutely central, This and the election
Speaker 1: outcome the two biggest most important stories at this juncture
Speaker 1: in America, no question about it. We got somebody with
Speaker 1: a particular and worthy point of view on this one.
Speaker 1: He's writing a book about just what I mentioned. David Marcus,
Speaker 1: who is the New York correspondent for The Federalist. He
Speaker 1: writes the Federalist dot com, he's got a book coming
Speaker 1: out on this called Charade. I can only assume that
Speaker 1: means he's actually been paying attention to all the bs
Speaker 1: we've been subjected to. David. Good to see it. It's
Speaker 1: great to see you, Bud. So let's let's start with this.
Speaker 1: We got Biden telling us today one hundred days of masking.
Speaker 1: We got Fauci saying the same stuff that he's been
Speaker 1: saying for nine months now, basically eight months. Now, where's
Speaker 1: your head on all of this? And you're a fellow
Speaker 1: New Yorker, So we've been through the worst of this
Speaker 1: of any place in the country. And I'm I'm actually
Speaker 1: considering I was just saying this for I'm actually considering
Speaker 1: civil disobedience for the first time my life. Like I
Speaker 1: think I actually need to get arrested over the COVID lockdowns.
Speaker 1: That's where I'm at. Yeah, look, it's pretty close to that.
Speaker 1: And you know, we saw that happen this weekend on
Speaker 1: Staten Island. As far as the hundred day mask mandate.
Speaker 1: I mean, according to polling, some are in the neighborhood
Speaker 1: of eighty five or nine of Americans are wearing masks.
Speaker 1: You walk around New York City, they're fairly ubiquitous, even
Speaker 1: beyond what the CDC has called for. Uh. You know,
Speaker 1: we also look back to that New New England Journal
Speaker 1: of Medicine article from the spring that really clearly made
Speaker 1: the point that in most quick interactions, the mask doesn't
Speaker 1: do any good. That that, you know, that is sort
Speaker 1: of meaningless because you need to be having a long,
Speaker 1: like four minute interaction to catch it. And that clarified
Speaker 1: by the by the authors, but it never got corrected.
Speaker 1: They never said oh no, no, no no, no, that's not true.
Speaker 1: They said, no, you should, you should go wear your mask.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I mean, this is literally the least that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden can do. It's amazing that so many people
Speaker 1: think this is almost a revolutionary call from the would
Speaker 1: be next president, Joe Biden. It's it's almost like he's
Speaker 1: taking a page from the Fauci book, which is just
Speaker 1: keep saying the same thing and then there's no way
Speaker 1: to gauge it one way or the other. And when
Speaker 1: it doesn't work out, then just say, well, people didn't
Speaker 1: do it well enough. Because David, I'm looking at this
Speaker 1: now day to day the data we said, we said
Speaker 1: a new you know, it's terrible, we said, a new record,
Speaker 1: unfortunately of deaths from COVID in twenty four hours in
Speaker 1: the United States. Cases over two hundred thousand a day
Speaker 1: confirmed this week. And I look around that, I say, Okay,
Speaker 1: in what world does this look like we had figured
Speaker 1: out how to stop this spread by doing all these
Speaker 1: things we've been doing. I just don't understand how anyone
Speaker 1: can come away with that conclusion. No, I don't. I
Speaker 1: don't think you can. I mean, look, the fact is
Speaker 1: that this is an extraordinarily contagious virus. When I interviewed
Speaker 1: doctor Slowie from my book, who's the head of Operation
Speaker 1: Warp Speed, he explained to me that if you had
Speaker 1: a disease that was as infectious or contagious as COVID
Speaker 1: and as deadly as a bowl, he described that as
Speaker 1: something that would be an extinction level situation. I felt
Speaker 1: a little child bill up my spine. Right, So, I mean,
Speaker 1: this is a very contagious disease, and you're absolutely right,
Speaker 1: our efforts to mitigate it really haven't seemed to make
Speaker 1: a whole lot of difference. And every time the government
Speaker 1: sticks its finger in a hole in the dam, the
Speaker 1: virus starts coming through something else. So it's restaurants, or
Speaker 1: it's Thanksgiving dinner, or it's the schools, and yeah, it's
Speaker 1: it's been helpless at best. So in your research for Charade,
Speaker 1: you just mentioned you you interviewed doctor Slowie. What part
Speaker 1: of this has been Let's start with your title. What
Speaker 1: part of this do you feel has been asia? Ye, well,
Speaker 1: there there's a lot, a lot of it has The
Speaker 1: book is basically broken down into chapters where I explore
Speaker 1: um one myth in each of the chapters. So I
Speaker 1: think maybe the biggest lie or a myth of the
Speaker 1: lockdown period was we're all in it together, right, This
Speaker 1: this sort of became the advertising slogan. This sort of
Speaker 1: became the way that politicians made us feel that, you know,
Speaker 1: we couldn't disobey them, or we were somehow, you know,
Speaker 1: harming the collective, and we were all going through it,
Speaker 1: and obviously we weren't. I mean, I was very aware
Speaker 1: of the privileged position that I was in, being a
Speaker 1: journalist who had all basically already worked from home that
Speaker 1: I kept my income right, I even got the stimulus money,
Speaker 1: and meanwhile I'd walked to the grocery store and see
Speaker 1: food lines. We were never in this together. Another is,
Speaker 1: you know, follow the science. And as we just talked
Speaker 1: about with the mess, will I mean the science changes.
Speaker 1: Jay Batiara, who's a Stanford Professor of Medicine at Stanford,
Speaker 1: he made the point recently that science can't operate if
Speaker 1: you have what I like to refer to as pandemic correctness.
Speaker 1: Science can only operate if everybody's ideas are able to
Speaker 1: be explored, and that clearly didn't happen. We saw that
Speaker 1: with that New England Journal of Medicine article where they
Speaker 1: were scolded and then they were cowed. Yeah. I got
Speaker 1: throttled on social media for sharing the Danish mask study
Speaker 1: because you're only allowed to share it. And remember now
Speaker 1: they actually will shut you down for things because they
Speaker 1: claim it lacks context, which is just a fancy way
Speaker 1: of saying, we don't like your editorial bent on this,
Speaker 1: even if it's accurate, we don't like your conclusions, so
Speaker 1: we're going to say that it's not fair and offer
Speaker 1: something like this to the data. Even though it's sharing
Speaker 1: actual data. I've had to go through that, which has
Speaker 1: been quite a truly Orwellian experience. People overuse that term,
Speaker 1: but it actually does apply here. And I just think
Speaker 1: that in New York City in particular, and some of
Speaker 1: these large urban areas across the country, David, there's been
Speaker 1: an unwillingness to question any of this because I do
Speaker 1: believe it just got wrapped up in anti Trumpism. And
Speaker 1: now I know there's still this election recount, lawsuits and
Speaker 1: all this going on. But every Democrat I know thinks,
Speaker 1: and I know a whole bunch of them, thinks that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden is the president and this is all a joke.
Speaker 1: And they kind of look at me like, okay, so
Speaker 1: now you're going to stop pointing out the hypocrisy with
Speaker 1: the lockdowns when people who are, as you mentioned, the elites,
Speaker 1: aren't affected by this. We're not on this together. They
Speaker 1: are literally sending stay at home, don't see anybody orders
Speaker 1: from their vacation spots in Mexico, as the mayor of
Speaker 1: Austin did, right like, don't go anywhere. I'm flying private
Speaker 1: to Mexico. I point this out still, and some of
Speaker 1: them are looking like well, no, but this isn't about
Speaker 1: Trump anymore. And I'm looking at them and saying exactly,
Speaker 1: it was never actually about Trump, you lunatics, although I
Speaker 1: usually leave the lunatics part out right. No, you're absolutely,
Speaker 1: we'd be very lucky if this was about Trump. My
Speaker 1: fear is that this is less about Trump and more
Speaker 1: about people like emberor Cuomo getting a taste of absolute
Speaker 1: power and decided, hey, this, this tastes pretty good. And
Speaker 1: I still have an excuse to tell people that, you know, now,
Speaker 1: for ten months, I have to operate under the emergency
Speaker 1: powers that were given to me by the state legislature.
Speaker 1: That's happening all over the country, by the way, that's
Speaker 1: happening by the same people who accused Trump of being
Speaker 1: a authoritarian. I mean, what's going on? Yeah, it can't
Speaker 1: it can't be all these things we're speaking of. David Marcus,
Speaker 1: who is the New York correspondent for the Federalists. You
Speaker 1: write to the Federalist dot com. So David, what do
Speaker 1: you think is coming? I mean, I made a prediction.
Speaker 1: I've been making a pred that you're going to see
Speaker 1: if the Biden mask mandate, which I mean, you can't
Speaker 1: fly right now without a mask they will actually not
Speaker 1: fly and they will boot you off the airline permanently.
Speaker 1: That's what they threaten to do to people, and they've
Speaker 1: actually done it, I think a few times now if
Speaker 1: you don't mask up. So it's just adding to this.
Speaker 1: But my belief is that they're going to have that
Speaker 1: They're going to try and have this renewed sense of lockdown,
Speaker 1: and I mean that with the stay at home orders
Speaker 1: and the masking alongside vaccine distribution, and then as if
Speaker 1: we're all a bunch of idiots, they're going to turn
Speaker 1: around and say, in right right around March, when the
Speaker 1: cases God willing, I think they will are cratering and
Speaker 1: everything's working. They'll say, see, yeah, the vaccine was kind
Speaker 1: of helpful, but it was really all those fauciesque orders
Speaker 1: that got it done. I think that's what's going to happen.
Speaker 1: It may well. And look, part of the reason that
Speaker 1: I wanted to write the book is because the history
Speaker 1: is already so skewed and so wrong about what's happened
Speaker 1: that I believe you're right that that'll continue to be
Speaker 1: the case. The very first chapter, the very first myth
Speaker 1: that I bust in this book is this idea that
Speaker 1: January and February were wasted months by the Trump administration,
Speaker 1: that they just weren't doing anything, and then all of
Speaker 1: a sudden in March, and it's it's an absolute fabrication.
Speaker 1: As Alex Azer pointed out just the other day, it
Speaker 1: was January ninth when the nih started working with Moderna
Speaker 1: on a vaccine. To put that in perspective, that's before
Speaker 1: China admitted that there had been a single death. That's
Speaker 1: before the World Health Organization said that there was human
Speaker 1: to human contact and that is why we have that
Speaker 1: particular vaccine today. So you know, and that was the story, right,
Speaker 1: how often did you hear that, Oh, well, Trump didn't
Speaker 1: do anything in January and February. The media just repeated it.
Speaker 1: And it's a blatant lie. I was on show in February,
Speaker 1: as this audience knows, and was laughed at and sneered
Speaker 1: at by that audience, which happens if your conservative doesn't
Speaker 1: matter who you are, what you do, that's what then. Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: that's the deal. But you got to go into the
Speaker 1: lines then sometimes and it was because they had already
Speaker 1: decided that Trump had failed, and this was before a
Speaker 1: single American had died from COVID. He was already a
Speaker 1: catastrophic failure on COVID, So it was all baked in
Speaker 1: before anything even happened. It didn't matter, And I think that,
Speaker 1: you know, tragically, unfortunately, from a political perspective, I think
Speaker 1: it was largely effective. I mean, this should not have
Speaker 1: even been a close election if it weren't for COVID,
Speaker 1: and here we are still counting ballots. Well, look, I
Speaker 1: think the news that just broke about Nancy Pelosi is
Speaker 1: just about the most horrible thing I can imagine a
Speaker 1: politician doing. I mean, she just announced this morning that
Speaker 1: now because Biden is going to be president, she'll accept
Speaker 1: a smaller stimulus package. I mean, millions of people have
Speaker 1: been suffering who need that money, millions of businesses who
Speaker 1: you know, who need that support. And the fact that
Speaker 1: she's just blatantly admitting that the only reason that she
Speaker 1: wouldn't do it was because she wanted Joe Biden to
Speaker 1: be president. I mean, by to me, right, tell me
Speaker 1: it's because cases are spiking. Say anything else, Don't blatantly
Speaker 1: tell me that you plunge people into misery for the
Speaker 1: sake of winning an election. It's it's a shocking admission.
Speaker 1: Do you think New York has had Is it fair
Speaker 1: or what would be your calculation about whether we could
Speaker 1: say New York specifically has had the worst leadership. We've
Speaker 1: certainly had the worst outcomes, but is it fair to
Speaker 1: say we've had the worst leadership during the COVID outbreak?
Speaker 1: I don't know, Man. I was in Chicago last week,
Speaker 1: and my understanding is that they those kids haven't been
Speaker 1: back in school at all, and that it's basically like
Speaker 1: all remote, at least for the public schools. Their restaurants
Speaker 1: are and man, November in Chicago, trying to eat a
Speaker 1: steak outside under a heat lamp. Uh, that's just about over. Uh.
Speaker 1: You know, I wasn't able to manage it. But that's
Speaker 1: just about done right. Um, So that's been pretty bad.
Speaker 1: As you met in. Garcetti has been bad. Newsome hasn't
Speaker 1: look it's a competitive category. But I'm like, you know,
Speaker 1: I'm like you. I always want to give New York
Speaker 1: number one, so we can give a number one than
Speaker 1: a But I agree with you, Garsetti. I love that
Speaker 1: with Garsetti. He says he has said the quote is canceled.
Speaker 1: Everything but podcasting which near and dear to my heart.
Speaker 1: Podcasting is an essential activity. So if you have to
Speaker 1: leave your home or take some risks for that one, okay,
Speaker 1: good to know because he's got buddies. You know, he's
Speaker 1: got celebrity friends that want to keep doing their their
Speaker 1: podcasts and going to their studios. David Marcus, he's got
Speaker 1: a book. It's not when's it coming out, David. It
Speaker 1: comes out in March, but it's available for pre order
Speaker 1: at all the you know, Amazons and Barns of Note,
Speaker 1: you know, all the all the companies that are taking
Speaker 1: up of the world and stomping their foot on small business.
Speaker 1: So you know, I wouldn't blame anyone for waiting to
Speaker 1: try to buy it at a bookstore. But it will
Speaker 1: be out in March. David Marcus of the Federals everyone, David,
Speaker 1: thanks so much man, have a good one. Thanks for
Speaker 1: having me.