WEBVTT - The Clancy Case JUST CHANGED!

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:04.779
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, the latest doings in the Clancy case. The

0:00:04.820 --> 0:00:07.420
<v Speaker 1>new muscle that they've added to their legal team. And

0:00:07.520 --> 0:00:10.300
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Clancy, I know you've heard, is doing an interview

0:00:10.320 --> 0:00:14.310
<v Speaker 1>with 60 Minutes on Sunday. I talk to them. What

0:00:14.330 --> 0:00:24.530
<v Speaker 1>do you say? Help me. All the time. Another compliment.

0:00:24.610 --> 0:00:26.430
<v Speaker 2>There she is.

0:00:36.950 --> 0:00:39.940
<v Speaker 1>To hot mics you guys hello hello hello please hit

0:00:39.979 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 1>subscribe on youtube it is uh well we have a

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:47.019
<v Speaker 1>packed day today like you wouldn't believe matt murphy is

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:50.309
<v Speaker 1>going to join us the uh legendary prosecutor from orange

0:00:50.350 --> 0:00:53.290
<v Speaker 1>county we're going to talk about the caleb flynn trial

0:00:53.350 --> 0:00:58.150
<v Speaker 1>he is the ex-american idol contestant kid who was a

0:00:58.190 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>sweet youth pastor and and somehow uh he Today, he

0:01:02.190 --> 0:01:08.050
<v Speaker 1>stands trial on 11 counts of murder and witness intimidation

0:01:08.110 --> 0:01:10.810
<v Speaker 1>and on and on. It is a nightmare of a story,

0:01:10.830 --> 0:01:14.910
<v Speaker 1>but it finally gets underway. Amy Griffin is making a

0:01:14.990 --> 0:01:20.250
<v Speaker 1>huge move. She's finally speaking out publicly in the media.

0:01:20.709 --> 0:01:22.930
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure why, because from what I can tell,

0:01:23.069 --> 0:01:27.209
<v Speaker 1>content is being suppressed. That has to do with her.

0:01:28.550 --> 0:01:31.610
<v Speaker 1>Just a hunch, but I'm seeing it and feeling it.

0:01:31.850 --> 0:01:37.300
<v Speaker 1>It is literally palpable. Okay? We'll get to that. There

0:01:37.420 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>are some doings. A big article is coming out that

0:01:40.040 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>she's participating in. She's banking on this going very well.

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.140
<v Speaker 1>We're going to break a lot of new stuff today.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:53.100
<v Speaker 1>And I will defend a young, dumb boy. Okay? Okay?

0:01:54.310 --> 0:01:56.550
<v Speaker 1>But let's begin with the latest in the Clancy case

0:01:57.490 --> 0:02:01.390
<v Speaker 1>on this Thursday, which is ladies night. And what gets

0:02:01.450 --> 0:02:05.750
<v Speaker 1>the old the old engine running more than this handsome fella?

0:02:05.790 --> 0:02:09.790
<v Speaker 1>Do I speak for you, ladies? When you see Martin Weinberg,

0:02:09.810 --> 0:02:15.920
<v Speaker 1>do you say that's a hot man? Does he does

0:02:15.940 --> 0:02:20.700
<v Speaker 1>he get the engine running? Martin Weinberg has been added

0:02:20.780 --> 0:02:25.429
<v Speaker 1>to the Clancy defense team. He handled Karen Reed's double

0:02:25.490 --> 0:02:29.650
<v Speaker 1>Jeopardy fight. That didn't go well, by the way. No

0:02:30.650 --> 0:02:35.329
<v Speaker 1>offense to Martin. It was out of his hands. Corrupt

0:02:35.630 --> 0:02:40.470
<v Speaker 1>Norfolk County and its DA overwhelmed him, but he was

0:02:40.510 --> 0:02:43.510
<v Speaker 1>brought in. In the end, the second trial worked out

0:02:43.550 --> 0:02:47.370
<v Speaker 1>in Karen's favor. She was acquitted. But in comes Martin

0:02:47.410 --> 0:02:50.810
<v Speaker 1>to help Lindsay Clancy. The filing indicates that he will

0:02:50.870 --> 0:02:55.940
<v Speaker 1>represent her in connection with Kevin Reddington's dismissal motion. He's

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>going to try and basically prevent the second trial. Judge

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Sullivan in the case has, he's ordered that the identities

0:03:04.700 --> 0:03:10.750
<v Speaker 1>of the 12 jurors and the six alternates remain absolutely

0:03:10.830 --> 0:03:17.330
<v Speaker 1>private indefinitely. Too late. Your honor, the damage has been done.

0:03:18.250 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Is he not paying attention? Jesus. So Sullivan wrote in

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:26.780
<v Speaker 1>the order that he found a real and present risk

0:03:26.980 --> 0:03:30.700
<v Speaker 1>of personal harm to the jurors and to the integrity

0:03:30.740 --> 0:03:33.820
<v Speaker 1>of their service. He wrote in quotes, a risk of

0:03:33.910 --> 0:03:39.010
<v Speaker 1>immediate and irreparable injury. If the juror list were made public,

0:03:39.070 --> 0:03:41.010
<v Speaker 1>some of this, you know, some of these people are

0:03:41.070 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>in real jeopardy. Um, Of course, by the way, this

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:49.700
<v Speaker 1>doesn't prevent jurors from identifying themselves, and many of them have.

0:03:49.900 --> 0:03:51.620
<v Speaker 1>If they want to speak in the media, they can.

0:03:52.630 --> 0:03:58.890
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the outing of the holdout juror, it's

0:03:58.950 --> 0:04:03.230
<v Speaker 1>not Turtle Boy, as some are suggesting, right? And they're

0:04:03.250 --> 0:04:07.620
<v Speaker 1>also suggesting that, you know, Kevin Reddington is working with

0:04:07.660 --> 0:04:12.020
<v Speaker 1>Turtle Boy. By the way, Alan Jackson's communicated with Turtle Boy.

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:15.470
<v Speaker 1>Turtle Boy is CEO. He's like country music. Love him

0:04:15.610 --> 0:04:19.310
<v Speaker 1>or hate him, he's unavoidable when it comes to anything

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>going through a Massachusetts courtroom. Okay? Turtle Boy says he

0:04:24.260 --> 0:04:29.780
<v Speaker 1>did not out the holdout juror. He said it vocally first,

0:04:29.980 --> 0:04:32.620
<v Speaker 1>I believe. He's the first one to say the words

0:04:33.370 --> 0:04:37.890
<v Speaker 1>on the microphone. But did a little research here. Saturday,

0:04:37.970 --> 0:04:45.390
<v Speaker 1>September 12th at 3.46 a.m. The ex-account. belonging to Talkin' Strohs,

0:04:46.210 --> 0:04:51.849
<v Speaker 1>posted a mass courts docket screenshot naming the holdout juror.

0:04:52.850 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>His initials are MD, with the statement, this is the

0:04:57.150 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy case. Now, Talkin' Strohs

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 1>apparently worked backwards from the details that NBC10 in Boston

0:05:08.460 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>had reported without naming the juror. Listen, NBC10 did everything

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.310
<v Speaker 1>they could They laid every groundwork. They left every detail.

0:05:15.630 --> 0:05:20.219
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they basically took a knee on the two-yard line.

0:05:21.180 --> 0:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>And they knew Turtle Boy and whoever else would finish

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.820
<v Speaker 1>the job. They couldn't say the guy's name. But Talking

0:05:27.839 --> 0:05:31.390
<v Speaker 1>Strokes puts it up on the screen. Turtle Boy seconds

0:05:31.430 --> 0:05:34.350
<v Speaker 1>later says it. And now everybody knows it. I'm still

0:05:34.390 --> 0:05:37.710
<v Speaker 1>not saying it. I don't know. It just doesn't feel right.

0:05:39.080 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>But apparently Chris Cuomo talked to a guy who did

0:05:42.690 --> 0:05:45.429
<v Speaker 1>an interview. Harry, by the way, do a little search.

0:05:45.550 --> 0:05:48.370
<v Speaker 1>Talking to my producer, Harry. Do a little search to

0:05:48.430 --> 0:05:53.349
<v Speaker 1>see if the holdout juror, if this guy, I think

0:05:53.370 --> 0:05:57.510
<v Speaker 1>his name is Marcel, if he posted his interview with

0:05:57.529 --> 0:05:59.510
<v Speaker 1>the holdout juror because he says he spoke to him.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.940
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it was just all, you know, off camera. But

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we'll double check on that. If it's there, we'll bring

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:07.099
<v Speaker 1>it to you.

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:08.420
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:14.169
<v Speaker 1>Okay. So turtle boy. Yeah, not technically wasn't the technical doxer.

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:19.140
<v Speaker 1>He was definitely the amplifier. Patrick Clancy is on 60

0:06:19.140 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes this Sunday. Uh, it is going to be a

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:29.540
<v Speaker 1>massively watched, uh, episode. I'm sure he's being interviewed by Ross.

0:06:30.580 --> 0:06:34.410
<v Speaker 1>Is it do doubt doubt that I, uh, I, I

0:06:34.460 --> 0:06:38.690
<v Speaker 1>texted Ross to see if he'd come on. He didn't respond, but, um, Yeah,

0:06:38.830 --> 0:06:42.290
<v Speaker 1>Patrick's sitting down. They give a small teaser. I talk

0:06:42.310 --> 0:06:49.380
<v Speaker 1>to them. What do you say? Help me. All the time.

0:06:52.220 --> 0:06:56.940
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about his kids. He talks to Cora, Dawson,

0:06:57.220 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and Callan all the time. I think this is going

0:07:01.220 --> 0:07:05.730
<v Speaker 1>to be a powerful episode. He will address also the

0:07:05.770 --> 0:07:10.590
<v Speaker 1>TikTok social media conspiracy theories that are accusing him. This

0:07:10.650 --> 0:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>turnaround for him has been unbelievably well executed and deserved.

0:07:17.460 --> 0:07:22.100
<v Speaker 1>I think the man, maybe not father of the year,

0:07:23.180 --> 0:07:28.860
<v Speaker 1>but murderer he is not. And Kevin Reddington did a

0:07:28.880 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>great job leading that charge. So also, Lindsay Clancy, maybe

0:07:34.070 --> 0:07:36.950
<v Speaker 1>you've heard, is reported to just feel awful about what

0:07:37.010 --> 0:07:40.660
<v Speaker 1>Patrick has endured as a result of those accusations. And

0:07:40.860 --> 0:07:43.020
<v Speaker 1>it speaks well of her, right? I mean, how could

0:07:43.060 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>you have room to feel more awful? But she has

0:07:47.180 --> 0:07:51.780
<v Speaker 1>empathy for him. Massachusetts, we always say, look, whatever happens here,

0:07:51.800 --> 0:07:53.900
<v Speaker 1>if she goes to a state mental hospital or if

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:58.220
<v Speaker 1>she goes to jail or prison, I hope something happens

0:07:59.120 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to benefit women in crisis. and their mental health. I

0:08:03.070 --> 0:08:08.260
<v Speaker 1>hope the conversation, as we say, gets had. Well, Massachusetts

0:08:08.300 --> 0:08:14.380
<v Speaker 1>Governor Maura Healey is apparently proposing some new postpartum mental

0:08:14.400 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 1>health measures and putting money behind, including millions of dollars

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>for additional support as a result of this conversation. So

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:29.180
<v Speaker 1>something is underway. Now, there's always a villain. Congresswoman Nancy Mace,

0:08:29.220 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 1>who I don't think is running for reelection and has

0:08:31.930 --> 0:08:35.710
<v Speaker 1>officially given her final F, does not care at all,

0:08:36.610 --> 0:08:40.770
<v Speaker 1>called for Lindsay to be publicly executed. This from a

0:08:40.850 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>sitting congresswoman. She doubled down after Kevin Reddington responded and

0:08:46.650 --> 0:08:49.059
<v Speaker 1>called it abhorrent that she would do such a thing.

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:53.059
<v Speaker 1>She did one of those interviews with TMZ. TMZ DC

0:08:53.580 --> 0:08:56.170
<v Speaker 1>is a new part of our culture. It's a great

0:08:56.230 --> 0:08:59.350
<v Speaker 1>move on their part because these Congress people are dying

0:08:59.370 --> 0:09:02.810
<v Speaker 1>to be celebrities. They're dying to be jumped on. Nicole

0:09:02.850 --> 0:09:05.270
<v Speaker 1>Kidman doesn't want to talk to TMZ when she's underneath

0:09:05.290 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the garage and she's coming out of the dermatologist's office.

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:15.300
<v Speaker 1>Any congressman is dying to talk to them. It's like

0:09:15.340 --> 0:09:20.750
<v Speaker 1>those fashion things on social media. You know, the girl's

0:09:20.780 --> 0:09:22.690
<v Speaker 1>walking down the street and someone says, oh, excuse me.

0:09:23.170 --> 0:09:25.830
<v Speaker 1>And she goes, oh, I'm sorry. You're talking to me? Yeah, yeah, oh,

0:09:25.850 --> 0:09:27.569
<v Speaker 1>you look so beautiful. What are you wearing? Oh, this

0:09:27.650 --> 0:09:29.750
<v Speaker 1>is Chloe, and this is sort of Balenciaga, and this

0:09:29.809 --> 0:09:32.309
<v Speaker 1>is sort of... And then they, you know, give the description,

0:09:32.370 --> 0:09:35.790
<v Speaker 1>it's all meant to seem accidental. I mean, AOC the

0:09:35.809 --> 0:09:39.059
<v Speaker 1>other day walks right up to TMZ, and she just

0:09:39.100 --> 0:09:43.020
<v Speaker 1>can't stand it. Anyway, Nancy Mace doubles down on this

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:45.660
<v Speaker 1>whole thing. She says, to be publicly executed? I mean,

0:09:45.860 --> 0:09:51.330
<v Speaker 1>come on. Alan Jackson has called this case wildly overcharged.

0:09:52.330 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 1>He's a legend in these parts in Massachusetts. The prosecution

0:09:55.980 --> 0:09:59.970
<v Speaker 1>still has not publicly announced whether it intends to retry litigation.

0:10:00.350 --> 0:10:03.970
<v Speaker 1>There is a massive hearing on September 29th. It is

0:10:04.030 --> 0:10:10.050
<v Speaker 1>a very big day. Also, today is a big day.

0:10:10.650 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>If you're a true crime fan and you like pop culture,

0:10:14.540 --> 0:10:19.420
<v Speaker 1>Caleb Flynn Contestant on season 12 of American Idol. He

0:10:19.460 --> 0:10:22.810
<v Speaker 1>was a youth music pastor in his church. Spoke on

0:10:22.890 --> 0:10:25.070
<v Speaker 1>TV in the short amount of time they gave him

0:10:25.130 --> 0:10:29.329
<v Speaker 1>about loving God first. Loving the Lord is wrong. I

0:10:29.350 --> 0:10:33.010
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be right either. And also his beautiful wife,

0:10:33.370 --> 0:10:36.390
<v Speaker 1>who he said was like a brunette Carrie Underwood. He

0:10:36.429 --> 0:10:41.500
<v Speaker 1>was glowing about her. Look, he seemed to be a humble, kind,

0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:47.470
<v Speaker 1>morally centered young guy. And now he's facing 11 charges

0:10:47.610 --> 0:10:52.709
<v Speaker 1>of murder, felonious assault, staging a scene, tampering with evidence,

0:10:52.870 --> 0:10:57.770
<v Speaker 1>and witness intimidation. The witness intimidation would be of his

0:10:58.470 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>two daughters, 12 and 9, I believe. They were in

0:11:02.420 --> 0:11:06.020
<v Speaker 1>his custody for the three days after his wife was unalived,

0:11:06.460 --> 0:11:09.439
<v Speaker 1>before they arrested him. So imagine what he was telling

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:11.900
<v Speaker 1>them in those three days, those girls. And they're going

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:15.369
<v Speaker 1>to testify. against their father. This one is dramatic. It

0:11:15.429 --> 0:11:17.449
<v Speaker 1>is going to be public. It's going to be streamed.

0:11:19.990 --> 0:11:26.410
<v Speaker 1>His wife, Ashley, by all accounts, just the woman you

0:11:26.470 --> 0:11:29.630
<v Speaker 1>want as your neighbor, the woman you want teaching your

0:11:29.670 --> 0:11:32.670
<v Speaker 1>kids as she was, and a volleyball coach, and a

0:11:32.730 --> 0:11:38.990
<v Speaker 1>youth church leader. Everything you want in a human in

0:11:39.010 --> 0:11:44.270
<v Speaker 1>your community was this woman. And he Jesus, he seemed

0:11:44.340 --> 0:11:48.300
<v Speaker 1>to be. So, I mean, just really, really emotional. Uh,

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>buckle up. We have Matt Murphy is standing by, but

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.900
<v Speaker 1>buckle up. We're going to take this ride on this

0:11:52.960 --> 0:11:57.609
<v Speaker 1>trial together. All right. Joining us right now is Matt Murphy.

0:11:57.870 --> 0:12:01.790
<v Speaker 1>As the Caleb Flynn trial gets going, Matt, Matt, Matt, Matt,

0:12:01.850 --> 0:12:05.569
<v Speaker 1>this is a big one. People are very fascinated in

0:12:05.610 --> 0:12:11.820
<v Speaker 1>this trial. Jury selection is underway. Um, kind of exciting here. Um,

0:12:12.550 --> 0:12:14.530
<v Speaker 1>Maybe the next big thing, as they say in the

0:12:14.570 --> 0:12:18.530
<v Speaker 1>true crime world. I'm going to play this 911 call

0:12:18.570 --> 0:12:21.810
<v Speaker 1>for you because it's going to feature heavily in the trial,

0:12:21.850 --> 0:12:23.429
<v Speaker 1>and then I want to get your take on this.

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:27.179
<v Speaker 1>You've heard good ones, and you've heard bad ones. Let's

0:12:27.200 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>see how you feel about this.

0:12:29.980 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Oh, my God.

0:12:30.940 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 4>Miami County, 911.

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.780
<v Speaker 5>Somebody broke into my home.

0:12:36.140 --> 0:12:37.950
<v Speaker 1>Somebody broke into my home and killed my wife. Are

0:12:37.970 --> 0:12:38.770
<v Speaker 1>they still in there?

0:12:39.650 --> 0:12:40.069
<v Speaker 5>I don't know.

0:12:40.090 --> 0:12:41.870
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. Okay, what's the address?

0:12:41.870 --> 0:12:45.290
<v Speaker 3>932 Cunningham Court, Pittsburgh, Ohio.

0:12:45.929 --> 0:12:46.790
<v Speaker 1>Please, please hurry.

0:12:46.850 --> 0:12:48.430
<v Speaker 4>Please, please hurry.

0:12:48.550 --> 0:12:52.970
<v Speaker 1>What are you seeing? My wife, she's got two shots

0:12:53.030 --> 0:12:55.330
<v Speaker 1>to her head. There's blood everywhere. Oh, my God.

0:12:55.380 --> 0:12:55.840
<v Speaker 5>Oh, my God.

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my God. Sir, please, please. Ma'am, I need you

0:12:59.620 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to take a deep breath, okay? Do you still see

0:13:02.020 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>anybody in the house?

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 5>No, the door to the garage.

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.620
<v Speaker 1>Is wide open. Please, hurry, please.

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh, my God.

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:10.380
<v Speaker 1>Oh, my God. Oh, my God.

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:12.460
<v Speaker 5>My daughters are here.

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:14.300
<v Speaker 4>My daughters are here.

0:13:14.580 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 2>Where is she at?

0:13:17.020 --> 0:13:19.699
<v Speaker 1>She's in the bed. Your edit is sexy.

0:13:20.460 --> 0:13:22.340
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at her.

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes, please.

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.230
<v Speaker 2>Where are you guys at in the house? I'm in

0:13:26.260 --> 0:13:27.589
<v Speaker 2>the bedroom with her right now.

0:13:27.610 --> 0:13:29.270
<v Speaker 1>My daughters are in their room.

0:13:29.290 --> 0:13:32.970
<v Speaker 5>So you are not with the children?

0:13:32.990 --> 0:13:35.809
<v Speaker 1>I was with the children when it happened.

0:13:36.750 --> 0:13:39.250
<v Speaker 4>Okay, but you're not with them now? No, they're in

0:13:39.290 --> 0:13:39.670
<v Speaker 4>their room.

0:13:40.030 --> 0:13:40.910
<v Speaker 1>They're not even awake.

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 2>First of all, he's presumed innocent, right? I'm a practicing lawyer,

0:13:45.900 --> 0:13:46.460
<v Speaker 2>so I got to say that.

0:13:46.540 --> 0:13:47.140
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely.

0:13:47.380 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 2>Presumed innocent.

0:13:48.540 --> 0:13:52.670
<v Speaker 4>However, there's a reason why that guy's never stood on

0:13:52.710 --> 0:13:58.829
<v Speaker 4>an Oscar stage before, right? That sounds very performative, to

0:13:58.950 --> 0:13:59.740
<v Speaker 4>use your word.

0:14:00.900 --> 0:14:01.500
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:14:01.660 --> 0:14:01.819
<v Speaker 5>Look.

0:14:03.250 --> 0:14:05.090
<v Speaker 2>In a vertical unit, I work in a vertical.

0:14:04.850 --> 0:14:07.660
<v Speaker 4>Unit, which means we are assigned certain cities and we

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 4>would go to all of our own homicide scenes. So

0:14:10.340 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 4>I had Newport Beach, Costa Mesa, Laguna, and Irvine.

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.939
<v Speaker 2>And the vast majority of your call-outs, where you.

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:17.179
<v Speaker 4>Roll out in the middle of the night with your

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.780
<v Speaker 4>investigator and you go to the crime scene, were on

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:24.070
<v Speaker 4>domestic violence murders. And the bodies are found in two places.

0:14:24.170 --> 0:14:26.970
<v Speaker 4>They're found either in the kitchen, for whatever reason, or

0:14:27.010 --> 0:14:30.910
<v Speaker 4>the bedroom. And don't you just hate it when some

0:14:30.950 --> 0:14:33.390
<v Speaker 4>random guy breaks into your house and.

0:14:33.710 --> 0:14:35.650
<v Speaker 2>Shoots your wife in the head, even though you're there?

0:14:37.290 --> 0:14:40.060
<v Speaker 4>You know, and it doesn't apparently take anything.

0:14:40.220 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 2>There's no sexual assault motive.

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:45.700
<v Speaker 4>I hate it when that happens. That's my initial impression. Now, again,

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.739
<v Speaker 4>I don't know every detail of this case. I'm I

0:14:48.780 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 4>got no dog in this fight. But that 911 call, man,

0:14:53.300 --> 0:14:55.700
<v Speaker 4>it sounds like so many of the others that I've

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:56.100
<v Speaker 4>heard over.

0:14:56.910 --> 0:15:00.170
<v Speaker 1>You're a prosecutor. I mean, you hear that and you're like, okay.

0:15:01.290 --> 0:15:01.590
<v Speaker 4>Yes.

0:15:02.310 --> 0:15:03.530
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:15:04.050 --> 0:15:05.730
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it's like, what do you do when you

0:15:06.070 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 4>freak out? And the truth is you're in a giant

0:15:08.380 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 4>fight with your spouse. And by the way, I've had

0:15:10.180 --> 0:15:12.980
<v Speaker 4>women who've done this too, who shot their husbands or

0:15:13.020 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 4>boyfriends in the bed.

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:18.460
<v Speaker 2>What do you do when you've.

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 4>Got a body there that you've just created, basically?

0:15:23.830 --> 0:15:24.830
<v Speaker 2>You just killed your spouse.

0:15:25.330 --> 0:15:28.130
<v Speaker 4>And what they do is they go to the 911

0:15:28.130 --> 0:15:31.020
<v Speaker 4>call and they try to pretend like something terrible has happened.

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:34.260
<v Speaker 2>And that's why immediately it makes no sense.

0:15:34.580 --> 0:15:37.380
<v Speaker 4>So, you know, and again, I don't know. I don't

0:15:37.420 --> 0:15:39.710
<v Speaker 4>know this case, but I want to keep an open mind.

0:15:40.110 --> 0:15:42.390
<v Speaker 4>But that's my impression hearing that 911 call.

0:15:42.930 --> 0:15:45.870
<v Speaker 1>Let's hear it. This is the body... The body cam footage,

0:15:45.910 --> 0:15:51.110
<v Speaker 1>the cops arrive and also his mother shows up and

0:15:51.830 --> 0:15:54.390
<v Speaker 1>maybe things have gotten a little more real for him

0:15:54.930 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point. So, you know, I'll just say, I'll

0:15:58.300 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>wait for your, I guess you're on the Academy board now,

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.300
<v Speaker 1>your rating of this performance, but here it is.

0:16:07.020 --> 0:16:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Come on, honey. Come on. I don't know what to do.

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:16:19.020 --> 0:16:20.660
<v Speaker 4>What to do.

0:16:21.660 --> 0:16:21.900
<v Speaker 3>Either.

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what to do either.

0:16:53.780 --> 0:16:57.860
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Okay. What do you make?

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 4>So let's think about this for a second. So if

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.250
<v Speaker 4>some random guy just ran into.

0:17:04.109 --> 0:17:07.370
<v Speaker 6>His house and his daughters are there, okay, is his

0:17:07.570 --> 0:17:11.980
<v Speaker 6>first reaction, and got out of the house apparently, Why

0:17:12.060 --> 0:17:14.980
<v Speaker 6>is he not assuming that this guy isn't in the

0:17:15.020 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 6>bushes across the street?

0:17:16.420 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 4>Why isn't he assuming that this guy, or at least suspecting,

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.369
<v Speaker 4>that he still poses a risk to him, his mom,

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:25.609
<v Speaker 4>his kids? He brings his mom to the house with

0:17:25.630 --> 0:17:28.190
<v Speaker 4>the killer on the loose? Does that make sense? If

0:17:28.230 --> 0:17:31.190
<v Speaker 4>you really think about it, what happens a lot of times, Billy,

0:17:31.210 --> 0:17:34.490
<v Speaker 4>and again, presumed innocent, but what a lot of these

0:17:34.510 --> 0:17:37.530
<v Speaker 4>guys do is they go into acting mode and they

0:17:37.670 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 4>play the wrong role. They play the totally innocent guy like,

0:17:41.780 --> 0:17:44.960
<v Speaker 4>oh my God, how does, if he is innocent, some

0:17:45.020 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 4>stranger has just gone in and killed his wife. And

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:50.980
<v Speaker 4>he's right there in front of his house, apparently tracing

0:17:51.020 --> 0:17:54.179
<v Speaker 4>the footsteps of where the killer would be. And his

0:17:54.220 --> 0:17:56.510
<v Speaker 4>little girls are there. Why doesn't he say, Mom, stay

0:17:56.530 --> 0:17:58.850
<v Speaker 4>away from the house. There's a killer on the loose.

0:17:59.609 --> 0:18:02.770
<v Speaker 4>So the role he is playing, the prosecution can argue,

0:18:02.810 --> 0:18:08.270
<v Speaker 4>and immediately my admittedly somewhat biased viewpoint, having prosecuted so

0:18:08.290 --> 0:18:11.950
<v Speaker 4>many of these cases, my head goes directly to why

0:18:12.050 --> 0:18:14.129
<v Speaker 4>isn't he concerned about killer on the loose when he's

0:18:14.170 --> 0:18:15.330
<v Speaker 4>got daughters there?

0:18:15.810 --> 0:18:16.830
<v Speaker 2>Now his mother's there.

0:18:16.850 --> 0:18:19.310
<v Speaker 4>So this guy theoretically has just set up the rest

0:18:19.350 --> 0:18:22.010
<v Speaker 4>of his family for this random shooter to come in

0:18:22.050 --> 0:18:22.709
<v Speaker 4>and kill everybody.

0:18:23.190 --> 0:18:24.510
<v Speaker 2>That makes no sense.

0:18:25.810 --> 0:18:30.540
<v Speaker 1>Oh, we're talking to Matt Murphy, a prosecutor extraordinaire, tons

0:18:30.580 --> 0:18:35.650
<v Speaker 1>of experience in the Orange County office. And he hosts

0:18:35.780 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>co-hosts in the well with Mark Garagos for the MK true,

0:18:39.380 --> 0:18:45.100
<v Speaker 1>not true crime network. And just, just, just, Top of

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:47.260
<v Speaker 1>the line guy, as we say, top of the, a

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:50.590
<v Speaker 1>real prosecutor, a real mind in this whole thing. So

0:18:50.619 --> 0:18:53.230
<v Speaker 1>this is going to get, this is going to get going.

0:18:53.250 --> 0:18:55.370
<v Speaker 1>One of the biggest thing that jumps out to me

0:18:55.490 --> 0:18:58.969
<v Speaker 1>and anyone following this is these two misdemeanor counts of

0:18:59.150 --> 0:19:02.290
<v Speaker 1>witness intimidation. He's got daughters nine and 12. You hear

0:19:02.310 --> 0:19:04.570
<v Speaker 1>them on the call. Like, where are they? I don't know.

0:19:04.650 --> 0:19:06.090
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think they're in the house. I mean, like,

0:19:06.150 --> 0:19:09.609
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't your daughters be, Rushed out of the home.

0:19:10.109 --> 0:19:13.350
<v Speaker 1>You know, why wouldn't that be your first concern? And then,

0:19:13.530 --> 0:19:15.470
<v Speaker 1>holy shit, there's a killer on the loose. Once I've

0:19:15.510 --> 0:19:18.950
<v Speaker 1>secured them, get this guy, find this guy. You know,

0:19:19.570 --> 0:19:22.830
<v Speaker 1>he is just all about him in this moment. Him,

0:19:22.869 --> 0:19:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the victim, his loss. And I don't know what's happening.

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:30.780
<v Speaker 1>And oh, it doesn't play well. But the daughters witnessed intimidation.

0:19:30.820 --> 0:19:34.160
<v Speaker 1>He had them for three days before the cops came

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.109
<v Speaker 1>in and arrested him. You know, so for three days,

0:19:37.130 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the prosecution is going to say he was

0:19:43.260 --> 0:19:46.610
<v Speaker 1>telling them what to do, what to say. That's going

0:19:46.619 --> 0:19:49.100
<v Speaker 1>to be dramatic. They're not going to have their fate

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to testify apparently against their father but they

0:19:53.859 --> 0:19:56.459
<v Speaker 1>won't see their face they won't how do you handle

0:19:56.540 --> 0:19:58.720
<v Speaker 1>something like the daughters in all of this.

0:19:59.710 --> 0:20:03.030
<v Speaker 4>Yeah so this is a um that that's a tough

0:20:03.109 --> 0:20:06.510
<v Speaker 4>one okay when you have little kids or parents um

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.590
<v Speaker 4>and this is not a criticism, and I don't, I

0:20:10.670 --> 0:20:13.510
<v Speaker 4>wasn't in the meeting when the decision was made on

0:20:13.530 --> 0:20:16.310
<v Speaker 4>this case. A lot of people will see that and think,

0:20:16.450 --> 0:20:18.869
<v Speaker 4>what difference does it make? If he's looking at murder,

0:20:18.890 --> 0:20:21.570
<v Speaker 4>why would you charge misdemeanor for witness intimidation? And the

0:20:21.710 --> 0:20:24.110
<v Speaker 4>answer is, they want the jury to hear it. They

0:20:24.130 --> 0:20:25.950
<v Speaker 4>want the jury to hear the evidence that they have

0:20:25.990 --> 0:20:29.190
<v Speaker 4>indicating that he had pressured or in some way attempted

0:20:29.210 --> 0:20:29.670
<v Speaker 4>to have his.

0:20:29.609 --> 0:20:33.550
<v Speaker 2>Daughters testify falsely or provide false information.

0:20:33.109 --> 0:20:33.570
<v Speaker 5>To the police.

0:20:34.430 --> 0:20:36.820
<v Speaker 2>I always think, I always have a.

0:20:36.820 --> 0:20:40.100
<v Speaker 4>Tough time, again, not a criticism of the prosecution here

0:20:40.140 --> 0:20:44.369
<v Speaker 4>at all, but, Billy, I always hesitated to call kids

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:48.129
<v Speaker 4>against their parents because that can be brutal, you know,

0:20:48.150 --> 0:20:49.590
<v Speaker 4>and it can be really hard, and they're going to

0:20:49.670 --> 0:20:50.670
<v Speaker 4>live with the rest of their lives.

0:20:50.690 --> 0:20:53.190
<v Speaker 1>Maybe these two want to. Maybe they want to.

0:20:53.590 --> 0:20:56.790
<v Speaker 4>And if they want to, that's a different calculation. And, again,

0:20:58.330 --> 0:21:01.870
<v Speaker 4>this one is not my call to make. But I

0:21:02.190 --> 0:21:04.990
<v Speaker 4>but as far as the advanced sort of cross control

0:21:05.030 --> 0:21:08.260
<v Speaker 4>game of charging those misdemeanors to ensure that the evidence

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.359
<v Speaker 4>gets in, that's a good move, typically, because you want

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.439
<v Speaker 4>the jury to hear that not to solely the guy

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 4>or make him look like a bad guy, but to

0:21:16.460 --> 0:21:19.140
<v Speaker 4>show what's known as consciousness of guilt. If he's trying

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:23.050
<v Speaker 4>to get his daughters to provide false information that cuts

0:21:23.190 --> 0:21:25.970
<v Speaker 4>against this idea of an intruder and really.

0:21:25.830 --> 0:21:27.710
<v Speaker 2>Points the finger back at him. So it's not.

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:30.520
<v Speaker 4>It's not to dirty them up. It's a that's a

0:21:30.580 --> 0:21:33.780
<v Speaker 4>tactical move to ensure that the jury has the full

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:37.340
<v Speaker 4>palette of evidence from which to make the decision.

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Matt Murphy, Matt, you you you've obviously got, you know,

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:43.619
<v Speaker 1>as a prosecutor, your suspicion, but then you got to

0:21:43.660 --> 0:21:48.200
<v Speaker 1>back it up with evidence. And the digital footprint, I imagine,

0:21:48.270 --> 0:21:52.189
<v Speaker 1>will be a. The centerpiece of this, it always seems

0:21:52.270 --> 0:21:55.970
<v Speaker 1>to tell the story, right? The social media, the financial transactions.

0:21:56.330 --> 0:21:59.870
<v Speaker 1>He was the beneficiary of her life insurance policy. There

0:21:59.910 --> 0:22:04.629
<v Speaker 1>you go. There's a lane to travel down, his texts,

0:22:04.670 --> 0:22:09.260
<v Speaker 1>his emails. There is a rumor, uncorroborated at this point,

0:22:09.450 --> 0:22:13.679
<v Speaker 1>that he was having an affair with a 23-year-old pregnant woman,

0:22:13.900 --> 0:22:16.480
<v Speaker 1>innocent until proven guilty. Not saying that's the case, but

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:20.389
<v Speaker 1>also an alleged text at 1243 in the morning. It's

0:22:20.550 --> 0:22:26.409
<v Speaker 1>almost done, you know, a couple hours before. This footprint is,

0:22:27.820 --> 0:22:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to me, from what I'm feeling, I don't think this

0:22:30.720 --> 0:22:36.939
<v Speaker 1>thing lasts that long. But where do you look? Because

0:22:37.460 --> 0:22:42.359
<v Speaker 1>the motives for something like this are what? New life, right?

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Get rid of the old life, right?

0:22:46.330 --> 0:22:47.909
<v Speaker 2>Well, how many times have you seen this?

0:22:47.950 --> 0:22:52.630
<v Speaker 4>This goes back 300,000 years in human history, right? Sometimes

0:22:52.690 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 4>it's the woman killing the man. Sometimes it's the man

0:22:54.820 --> 0:22:58.060
<v Speaker 4>killing the woman. These are some of the oldest motives

0:22:58.100 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 4>that exist.

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Potentially financial gain, jealousy.

0:23:02.980 --> 0:23:07.100
<v Speaker 4>These are the good old-fashioned, it's almost like the seven

0:23:07.119 --> 0:23:12.629
<v Speaker 4>immortal sins of homicide motive. And it seems to check

0:23:12.690 --> 0:23:14.310
<v Speaker 4>a whole bunch of those boxes, but one of the

0:23:15.090 --> 0:23:18.050
<v Speaker 4>One of the fascinating things about the modern era is

0:23:18.210 --> 0:23:21.710
<v Speaker 4>now we have this, there was an old adage, there's

0:23:21.730 --> 0:23:24.970
<v Speaker 4>no machine where we can read somebody's mind. It's not

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 4>really true anymore because there is a machine and it's

0:23:27.420 --> 0:23:32.560
<v Speaker 4>called Google. And now these guys, these forensic, every detective knows,

0:23:32.580 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 4>especially in a domestic, They're going to get into the

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.000
<v Speaker 4>cell phones and they're going to get into the computers.

0:23:38.020 --> 0:23:40.480
<v Speaker 4>They're going to look at Google searches and all the rest.

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:45.060
<v Speaker 4>And most people still aren't sophisticated enough to cover their tracks.

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.960
<v Speaker 4>And I had one out of Newport where it was

0:23:49.020 --> 0:23:53.180
<v Speaker 4>a case where it was a lot of money. Newport Coast,

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:56.780
<v Speaker 4>these guys were neighbors of Kobe Bryant, not next-door neighbors,

0:23:56.820 --> 0:24:00.310
<v Speaker 4>but in the same neighborhood. And this guy murdered his

0:24:00.350 --> 0:24:04.619
<v Speaker 4>wife in the bedroom, actually the master bathroom in the bedroom.

0:24:05.660 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 4>And then came up with this crazy story and he

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:11.320
<v Speaker 4>dumped her body in Mexico or down in San Diego

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.090
<v Speaker 4>and said it was these Mexican guys that did it.

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 4>The story made no sense at all. And we got

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.070
<v Speaker 4>into the computers. And what I thought was a murder

0:24:18.090 --> 0:24:20.810
<v Speaker 4>for financial gain because they were having a lot of friction.

0:24:20.830 --> 0:24:22.850
<v Speaker 4>They had three boys, but it looked like they were

0:24:22.869 --> 0:24:26.670
<v Speaker 4>on the cusp of divorce. And we thought that there

0:24:26.690 --> 0:24:29.720
<v Speaker 4>would be some financial motive because he had so much money.

0:24:29.740 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 4>But when we got into the computers, we learned that

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:37.140
<v Speaker 4>their friction was largely the fact that this guy kept

0:24:37.160 --> 0:24:40.140
<v Speaker 4>going and having I want to use the right terminology here,

0:24:40.980 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 4>engaging in the services of sex workers. And he would

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.440
<v Speaker 4>do so, and he'd bring home STDs. And they had this,

0:24:47.619 --> 0:24:49.920
<v Speaker 4>and that's what you were mad about, which who could

0:24:49.940 --> 0:24:52.530
<v Speaker 4>blame her for that? And that was the tension. It

0:24:52.590 --> 0:24:56.050
<v Speaker 4>wasn't financial. This guy kept banging hookers and giving his

0:24:56.090 --> 0:24:59.929
<v Speaker 4>wife STDs. And that was the source of it. And

0:24:59.950 --> 0:25:03.290
<v Speaker 4>it became legally very significant because I charge murder for

0:25:03.350 --> 0:25:06.189
<v Speaker 4>financial gain with all the money that was at stake.

0:25:06.310 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 4>And as we looked into it, And that's a no

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.680
<v Speaker 4>bail hold, Billy, in California, which means he can't make

0:25:12.740 --> 0:25:13.580
<v Speaker 4>bail with all this money.

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't matter because I had a special circumstance that

0:25:15.859 --> 0:25:16.419
<v Speaker 2>I could allege.

0:25:16.960 --> 0:25:19.070
<v Speaker 4>And when we got into that, I learned that that

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:22.330
<v Speaker 4>was the source of their marital problems because this guy

0:25:22.369 --> 0:25:24.129
<v Speaker 4>was such a frigging weenie.

0:25:24.330 --> 0:25:26.370
<v Speaker 1>That- He was like, let me get rid of her, man,

0:25:26.390 --> 0:25:28.950
<v Speaker 1>because I just want to keep bringing these STDs home.

0:25:29.150 --> 0:25:32.469
<v Speaker 2>I like- Whatever his problem was.

0:25:32.510 --> 0:25:34.709
<v Speaker 4>But the thing is, is that as soon as we

0:25:34.750 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 4>got that information from the computers, I then had my

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:40.020
<v Speaker 4>own doubt that the motive was financial, but it was

0:25:40.060 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 4>this other thing.

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:41.300
<v Speaker 2>And I had an.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 4>Ethical obligation to dismiss the special circumstance right away, which

0:25:46.020 --> 0:25:50.899
<v Speaker 4>sucked because that means he was eligible for bail and

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 4>he had so much money. He made, I think we

0:25:53.920 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 4>had over a million dollars in bail, but he made

0:25:57.500 --> 0:25:59.220
<v Speaker 4>bail and then he fled to Mexico.

0:25:59.350 --> 0:26:02.169
<v Speaker 2>And I knew it happened legally.

0:26:02.450 --> 0:26:05.330
<v Speaker 4>It was so predictable and we did what we could

0:26:05.369 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 4>to kind of, keep tabs on them. And, and, but

0:26:08.140 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 4>he got, he got away and it took us years

0:26:11.020 --> 0:26:13.440
<v Speaker 4>to get that guy back. And ultimately he was brought

0:26:13.480 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 4>back and convicted for that murder. But no, no, the

0:26:16.380 --> 0:26:20.260
<v Speaker 4>electronic footprint is huge. Everything, you know, if, if Sherlock

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:23.379
<v Speaker 4>Holmes or, you know, it's fictional, but if the detectives

0:26:23.420 --> 0:26:26.810
<v Speaker 4>of Scotland yard in late 1800s only knew what we

0:26:26.850 --> 0:26:29.869
<v Speaker 4>had available in the modern day to catch these guys.

0:26:30.010 --> 0:26:32.130
<v Speaker 4>And some of the best stuff we get are text messages,

0:26:32.550 --> 0:26:35.810
<v Speaker 4>Google searches and stuff like that. And, um, My prediction

0:26:35.830 --> 0:26:38.430
<v Speaker 4>on this one is this guy will be, will go

0:26:38.490 --> 0:26:39.690
<v Speaker 4>down and go down hard.

0:26:39.730 --> 0:26:41.170
<v Speaker 2>But again, presumed innocent.

0:26:41.590 --> 0:26:41.950
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:26:42.010 --> 0:26:44.260
<v Speaker 4>This, this is the case, Billy. This is one of

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 4>those cases that makes me miss being a prosecutor.

0:26:46.900 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 1>If they had it back in. Yeah. If they had

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:51.700
<v Speaker 1>it in those fictitious times, Sherlock Holmes would not say

0:26:51.780 --> 0:26:56.260
<v Speaker 1>it's elementary Watson. He'd say it's electronic. It's electronic Watson.

0:26:56.720 --> 0:27:02.060
<v Speaker 1>Every single time. Don't waste your time doing anything else. Okay. Uh, Yeah,

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:06.100
<v Speaker 1>so this trial is, anyway, this will get going. The

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.919
<v Speaker 1>assistant DAs, they're going, you know, they raised the bond

0:27:10.020 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>to $ 3. 5 million from two. It counts from five to 11,

0:27:14.200 --> 0:27:17.140
<v Speaker 1>so you know they're coming hard at this guy. Matt

0:27:17.180 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Murphy with us. Matt, before, I mean, just while we're

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:24.899
<v Speaker 1>at it, I'm here in Los Angeles. Hayden Pennant, you're close.

0:27:24.940 --> 0:27:30.379
<v Speaker 1>You're right down the street. Hayden Pennantier. apparently the LAPD

0:27:30.619 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to get involved at some point but right

0:27:32.820 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it's the DEA and it's the Greenville South Carolina PD

0:27:36.820 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 1>she got the drugs likely here maybe it was what

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>is the deal do you happen to know what's going

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.830
<v Speaker 1>on with the prosecution of these drug dealers who are

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:51.490
<v Speaker 1>lacing you know medication that looks prescription with fentanyl and

0:27:51.530 --> 0:27:53.570
<v Speaker 1>all this shit and killing people I mean this needs

0:27:53.609 --> 0:27:56.870
<v Speaker 1>to be a priority because it's high profile this needs

0:27:56.910 --> 0:27:58.710
<v Speaker 1>to be a major priority Yeah.

0:27:58.750 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 4>So part of the problem here in L.A., where I

0:28:01.420 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 4>am right now, too, I grew up in L.A. And

0:28:03.900 --> 0:28:07.219
<v Speaker 4>what we had, Billy, for four years was a guy

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.330
<v Speaker 4>named George Gascon, who was our D.A. And George Gascon

0:28:10.369 --> 0:28:12.590
<v Speaker 4>was one of these guys that he was the former D.A.,

0:28:12.650 --> 0:28:13.730
<v Speaker 4>I'd say failed D.A.

0:28:13.750 --> 0:28:14.530
<v Speaker 2>Of San Francisco.

0:28:14.990 --> 0:28:18.770
<v Speaker 4>They let him run for office under the ballot designation

0:28:18.850 --> 0:28:22.800
<v Speaker 4>of criminal justice reformer in 2020, right after the Summer

0:28:22.820 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 4>of Love and George Floyd and all that. So this

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 4>complete failure gets elected because that looked great.

0:28:29.060 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 2>Back in that time. And he was an absolute disaster

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 2>for public safety.

0:28:33.040 --> 0:28:36.500
<v Speaker 4>And this is very similar to the Matthew Perry case, right,

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:40.780
<v Speaker 4>where you've got a drug dealer who's in a conspiracy

0:28:40.900 --> 0:28:42.900
<v Speaker 4>with some doctors who we can say that because they

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:43.550
<v Speaker 4>were convicted.

0:28:44.670 --> 0:28:46.050
<v Speaker 2>And look, there was.

0:28:46.010 --> 0:28:48.890
<v Speaker 4>No adult in the room for four years. Now we

0:28:48.930 --> 0:28:52.020
<v Speaker 4>have a much better DA in Nathan Hockman, thank God.

0:28:52.820 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 4>And he's starting to hold these people to account. And

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.420
<v Speaker 4>for that four-year period, Billy, a lot of those cases,

0:29:00.500 --> 0:29:04.219
<v Speaker 4>including the Matthew Perry case, were prosecuted by the feds

0:29:04.700 --> 0:29:07.410
<v Speaker 4>because the LADA wouldn't do it. He wanted to go

0:29:07.460 --> 0:29:12.140
<v Speaker 4>after cops and he wanted to eliminate cash bail. He

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:16.130
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't let his deputies oppose parole of lifers, murderers and

0:29:16.170 --> 0:29:18.950
<v Speaker 4>child molesters. He was a disaster for public safety. And

0:29:18.990 --> 0:29:21.590
<v Speaker 4>thank God he's gone. So that's a lot of what

0:29:21.630 --> 0:29:24.070
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing right now. For four years, those guys ran

0:29:24.130 --> 0:29:28.150
<v Speaker 4>amok in L.A. because of George Gascon and his ilk.

0:29:28.790 --> 0:29:31.690
<v Speaker 4>And we're still dealing with the aftermath of that right now.

0:29:31.850 --> 0:29:34.470
<v Speaker 4>And it is horrible every time. And there's look, there's

0:29:34.510 --> 0:29:37.740
<v Speaker 4>a split here. You know, people that are voluntarily engaging

0:29:37.980 --> 0:29:41.820
<v Speaker 4>in in, you know, in substance abuse like Matthew Perry.

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 4>It's a tragedy, but there they can be tough cases

0:29:45.080 --> 0:29:48.860
<v Speaker 4>to prosecute. But we we need a major correction right now,

0:29:48.980 --> 0:29:52.370
<v Speaker 4>because with fentanyl, there are over one hundred thousand Americans

0:29:52.470 --> 0:29:56.250
<v Speaker 4>dying every year because these nimrods that are that are

0:29:56.330 --> 0:29:59.870
<v Speaker 4>lacing stuff, it happens with cocaine. Like these are not

0:29:59.950 --> 0:30:04.670
<v Speaker 4>pharmaceutical grade drugs, guys. And fentanyl is is deadly. It's

0:30:04.670 --> 0:30:08.350
<v Speaker 4>100 times more potent than heroin. And that's why we

0:30:08.390 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 4>have people dying like that. Like like this poor young woman,

0:30:11.620 --> 0:30:15.860
<v Speaker 4>beautiful young woman that so many of us really like.

0:30:15.940 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 4>I was kind of I was a fan. You know,

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:20.940
<v Speaker 4>I think we all were. And this is a tragic ending.

0:30:21.260 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 4>But you're absolutely right. More needs to be done on

0:30:24.020 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 4>the people that are profiting from this because so many

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:27.720
<v Speaker 4>people are dying.

0:30:28.570 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be another look at the electronic

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:34.380
<v Speaker 1>and the digital footprint. I mean, you know, who was

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:38.620
<v Speaker 1>she texting? Who was she meeting? We interviewed her neighbor,

0:30:38.640 --> 0:30:42.320
<v Speaker 1>her next-door neighbor yesterday. She talked about the two shady

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.350
<v Speaker 1>women that would pull up in a car and they

0:30:44.370 --> 0:30:47.810
<v Speaker 1>would exchange packages and, you know, they weren't friends. But

0:30:47.850 --> 0:30:51.390
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is women. That stuns me. Immediately we think

0:30:51.410 --> 0:30:55.370
<v Speaker 1>of some piece-of-shit drug dealer, you know, feeding Hayden Panettiere

0:30:56.060 --> 0:31:00.690
<v Speaker 1>fentanyl-laced oxy. And you got some awful scraggly looking guy

0:31:00.730 --> 0:31:04.410
<v Speaker 1>in your mind. Wow. Right. Imagine two women. Final thing,

0:31:04.490 --> 0:31:09.810
<v Speaker 1>Nick Reiner, Nathan Hockman, the aforementioned D.A., tough on crime guy.

0:31:09.890 --> 0:31:13.210
<v Speaker 1>He did say in December of 25, right after this happened,

0:31:14.190 --> 0:31:17.890
<v Speaker 1>definitely first degree murder. Maybe, you know, life in prison

0:31:17.930 --> 0:31:22.830
<v Speaker 1>without parole, you know, for sure. Maybe the death penalty

0:31:23.170 --> 0:31:26.030
<v Speaker 1>he announced yesterday or excuse me, two days ago. No, no.

0:31:27.020 --> 0:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>death penalty. They're not going to seek it. Do you

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:34.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine that that comes down to the next of kin? Well,

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:35.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a.

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Whole bunch of factors.

0:31:35.940 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 4>I sat on Orange County's committee for 15 years that

0:31:39.060 --> 0:31:43.080
<v Speaker 4>determined which cases you'd recommend. And we sought it in

0:31:43.240 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 4>less than 4% of cases that were eligible. So just

0:31:47.980 --> 0:31:51.730
<v Speaker 4>to give the viewer an understanding, a very small percentage

0:31:51.930 --> 0:31:55.590
<v Speaker 4>of murder cases have order known as special circumstances. That'd

0:31:55.610 --> 0:31:58.580
<v Speaker 4>be Murder committed during the course of a rape. Murder

0:31:58.600 --> 0:32:02.420
<v Speaker 4>committed during the course of a burglary. There's a small

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:05.530
<v Speaker 4>percentage of murder cases qualified for what are known as

0:32:05.550 --> 0:32:10.430
<v Speaker 4>special circumstances. Special circumstances have the penalty of potential death

0:32:10.450 --> 0:32:12.590
<v Speaker 4>penalty or life without possibility of parole.

0:32:12.750 --> 0:32:16.190
<v Speaker 1>This is one of them, special circumstances. I'm sorry? This

0:32:16.300 --> 0:32:17.740
<v Speaker 1>is one of them, special circumstances.

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:22.580
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so this is a special circumstance case. This is L.A., L.A.

0:32:22.660 --> 0:32:26.540
<v Speaker 4>Traditionally has sought death in less than two percent of

0:32:26.700 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 4>eligible cases. So this was I did some commentary on

0:32:30.580 --> 0:32:34.100
<v Speaker 4>this with Mark Garagos and I on our pod a

0:32:34.160 --> 0:32:37.540
<v Speaker 4>year ago, I want to say, and and This has

0:32:37.600 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 4>never been.

0:32:38.020 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 2>A death case.

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 4>When it's inter-familial like this, these are almost never death cases.

0:32:42.940 --> 0:32:45.210
<v Speaker 4>I wouldn't have recommended death on this. So this comes

0:32:45.290 --> 0:32:47.950
<v Speaker 4>as no surprise to the professionals that actually do this,

0:32:48.010 --> 0:32:50.970
<v Speaker 4>that Nathan Hockman considered it. He put it through the

0:32:51.010 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 4>process and then announced yesterday that he's not seeking death.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:56.180
<v Speaker 2>100% in line. It's the right thing to do. I

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 2>totally agree with the decision.

0:32:58.590 --> 0:33:02.530
<v Speaker 4>However, I also agree with his decision to proceed going

0:33:02.590 --> 0:33:06.870
<v Speaker 4>forward with seeking LWOP against Nick Reiner for a thousand

0:33:06.890 --> 0:33:09.170
<v Speaker 4>different reasons. Maybe we can talk on another show.

0:33:09.260 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean? What's that LWOP?

0:33:11.680 --> 0:33:13.700
<v Speaker 4>Well, this is, look, the last one of these that

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 4>I had in Orange County, one of the last murder

0:33:15.900 --> 0:33:19.260
<v Speaker 4>cases I walked through was a case out of Newport

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 4>with a young man who had genuine organic mental illness.

0:33:24.140 --> 0:33:27.890
<v Speaker 2>In other words, not his fault. He had Schizophrenia.

0:33:28.090 --> 0:33:31.670
<v Speaker 1>He lacked criminal responsibility. But doesn't Nick Reiner have schizophrenia?

0:33:31.730 --> 0:33:32.370
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, no, no.

0:33:32.490 --> 0:33:35.740
<v Speaker 4>He didn't lack criminal responsibility. He was mentally ill, but

0:33:35.780 --> 0:33:38.420
<v Speaker 4>he killed his mother, his father and the housekeeper. And

0:33:38.580 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 4>even though he was mentally ill, we sought criminal full

0:33:41.500 --> 0:33:44.850
<v Speaker 4>criminal responsibility. They went he went with an insanity defense

0:33:45.130 --> 0:33:48.950
<v Speaker 4>and he was convicted. and found not insane under the

0:33:48.970 --> 0:33:49.670
<v Speaker 4>McNaughton rule in.

0:33:49.630 --> 0:33:52.380
<v Speaker 2>The state of California. Very different than Massachusetts and Lindsey Clancy.

0:33:52.390 --> 0:33:53.459
<v Speaker 2>It's a different standard.

0:33:53.780 --> 0:33:57.040
<v Speaker 4>So even though this guy was mentally ill organically, so

0:33:57.120 --> 0:33:59.590
<v Speaker 4>not his fault, he was held accountable for this murder

0:33:59.620 --> 0:34:02.330
<v Speaker 4>because even though he is a whack job, to use

0:34:02.690 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 4>lack of a better term, He murdered his parents. He

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:07.220
<v Speaker 4>knew he was murdering his parents, and he killed the

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:10.020
<v Speaker 4>housekeeper because they were trying to commit him. Nick Reiner

0:34:10.100 --> 0:34:13.140
<v Speaker 4>is a guy who drugged himself into mental illness. He

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:16.299
<v Speaker 4>was in rehab, I think, 17 times. And this is

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.799
<v Speaker 4>a guy that knew he was killing his parents, in

0:34:18.860 --> 0:34:22.049
<v Speaker 4>my view. Now, again, not my case. I have no

0:34:22.489 --> 0:34:25.270
<v Speaker 4>special inside view on the evidence in this. Nick Reiner

0:34:25.290 --> 0:34:28.129
<v Speaker 4>is a guy who appears to be that spoiled rich

0:34:28.170 --> 0:34:30.750
<v Speaker 4>kid that I grew up with in L.A. that just

0:34:30.770 --> 0:34:33.650
<v Speaker 4>couldn't launch from his parents. That's what it appears to be.

0:34:33.710 --> 0:34:36.549
<v Speaker 4>That's the call that Nathan Hockman has made. And he

0:34:36.570 --> 0:34:36.970
<v Speaker 4>was at a party.

0:34:36.989 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And they'll say he traveled to a hotel. He checked

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:41.460
<v Speaker 1>into the hotel. He stayed at the hotel. He took

0:34:41.540 --> 0:34:44.100
<v Speaker 1>a shower. He used his credit card. Yep.

0:34:44.380 --> 0:34:46.500
<v Speaker 4>All of that indicates a guy who is motivated by

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:49.900
<v Speaker 4>mental illness but knew the difference between right and wrong,

0:34:49.940 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 4>which under the not rule of the state of California

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:55.580
<v Speaker 4>means he should be held criminally responsible for what he

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 4>did based on what I've heard so far.

0:34:57.580 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Your friend and mine.

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.500
<v Speaker 1>Your friend of mine, Alan Jackson, thinks he can get

0:35:02.540 --> 0:35:06.420
<v Speaker 1>him off with Mentally Insane because Alan has got a

0:35:06.500 --> 0:35:14.930
<v Speaker 1>strong belief in himself. He's self-assured. That said, I can

0:35:14.969 --> 0:35:17.590
<v Speaker 1>see how difficult it would be. But Nick would also

0:35:17.630 --> 0:35:19.870
<v Speaker 1>need access to a million and a half dollars of

0:35:19.930 --> 0:35:23.730
<v Speaker 1>his trust fund. And they're saying he can't have that.

0:35:23.910 --> 0:35:26.390
<v Speaker 1>So pay Alan. He's not going to try. Yeah.

0:35:26.820 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 2>Look, Alan's a buddy of mine. We go back decades.

0:35:31.620 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 4>Alan and I were prosecuting murder cases together and had

0:35:34.180 --> 0:35:35.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot of dealings.

0:35:35.860 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 2>And he's been on my podcast. I love Alan.

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:43.400
<v Speaker 4>I think the world of Alan. Alan's a fantastic trial

0:35:43.420 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 4>lawyer and very talented. We don't see eye to eye

0:35:46.489 --> 0:35:52.150
<v Speaker 4>oftentimes on the cases. We always did when we were prosecutors.

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.370
<v Speaker 2>Now, you know, but I look, I respect that. And

0:35:55.410 --> 0:35:59.870
<v Speaker 2>I like Alan. I have a dinner coming up.

0:36:00.170 --> 0:36:02.990
<v Speaker 1>But lucky that the kid can't pay is what you're saying.

0:36:03.650 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Look, Alan, Alan and look, if Alan comes in on

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:09.660
<v Speaker 4>that case, Billy, they're going to be up against Alan

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 4>is incredibly good at trial work. But that doesn't mean

0:36:13.900 --> 0:36:18.549
<v Speaker 4>that in my view, Nick Reiner shouldn't be, you.

0:36:18.489 --> 0:36:22.219
<v Speaker 2>Know, held accountable for what he did. And in fact,

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 2>this would be a fun one.

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:25.120
<v Speaker 4>If I was the prosecutor on that, Alan and I

0:36:25.180 --> 0:36:28.319
<v Speaker 4>would go at each other like cats and dogs and

0:36:28.360 --> 0:36:31.580
<v Speaker 4>then shake hands in the hallway afterwards. But look, Nathan

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 4>Hoffman has some really good lawyers in that office. And

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:36.540
<v Speaker 4>the ones that have been involved in Nick Reiner, I

0:36:36.900 --> 0:36:39.480
<v Speaker 4>think are very good. I've never tried to case against

0:36:39.560 --> 0:36:41.529
<v Speaker 4>any of them, but this that's going to be a

0:36:41.570 --> 0:36:43.030
<v Speaker 4>hell of a trial for us to watch.

0:36:43.190 --> 0:36:45.489
<v Speaker 2>And I think it'll be very educational for a lot

0:36:45.510 --> 0:36:46.930
<v Speaker 2>of people. We can see.

0:36:46.830 --> 0:36:50.550
<v Speaker 4>Images or, uh, issues like mental illness that is organic.

0:36:50.590 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 4>That is versus somebody that drugs themselves into it versus,

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.700
<v Speaker 4>you know, wealth privilege. That's going to be a hell

0:36:57.719 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 4>of a trial to watch. And that thing's going to

0:36:59.260 --> 0:36:59.760
<v Speaker 4>go to trial.

0:37:00.500 --> 0:37:04.100
<v Speaker 1>I will, uh, and true crime Kalshi. Um, I would, uh,

0:37:04.280 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I would bet that life in prison without parole is

0:37:06.980 --> 0:37:11.529
<v Speaker 1>probably coming there, but, uh, We'll see. The last thing,

0:37:12.110 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>if Matt Murphy isn't appealing enough of a person and prosecutor,

0:37:17.969 --> 0:37:22.420
<v Speaker 1>take a look at this. Tell us what's happening here.

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:24.739
<v Speaker 2>So this is the day before yesterday. I do a

0:37:24.780 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 2>dive in Catalina every year. And this is what's known

0:37:27.980 --> 0:37:29.020
<v Speaker 2>as a little horn shark.

0:37:29.700 --> 0:37:33.259
<v Speaker 4>It's a local species. And I see this thing flopping around.

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.020
<v Speaker 4>I couldn't figure it out. And I dive down there,

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 4>and this poor, poor little dude has wrapped himself up

0:37:39.300 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 4>in somebody's old T-shirt that washed down some storm drain.

0:37:43.739 --> 0:37:46.460
<v Speaker 4>So I thought it was dead, and then I saw

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 4>some movement. So I unwrap it, and ta-da, there's a

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:53.760
<v Speaker 4>happy little horn shark swimming away.

0:37:55.020 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh, he saved a horn shark. wrapped up in an

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.050
<v Speaker 1>old T-shirt. That's unbelievable, man. I'd be scared to death.

0:38:01.260 --> 0:38:03.190
<v Speaker 1>I don't care how big that shark is. Even if

0:38:03.250 --> 0:38:06.109
<v Speaker 1>it's that big, I'm running. I'm scared.

0:38:06.170 --> 0:38:09.270
<v Speaker 4>You know, in a circumstance like that, they've got tiny

0:38:09.290 --> 0:38:11.989
<v Speaker 4>little teeth. I happen to have taken a bite. They're

0:38:12.010 --> 0:38:14.480
<v Speaker 4>harmless to humans, but if I were up in that

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:18.080
<v Speaker 4>little guy, if I got a little horn shark bite,

0:38:18.100 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 4>I would have been happy if that's the price it

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.339
<v Speaker 4>took to swim, send him back to his little horn

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 4>shark pals.

0:38:24.739 --> 0:38:26.700
<v Speaker 1>Wow, you're twice the man that I am for even

0:38:26.820 --> 0:38:30.340
<v Speaker 1>knowing that the shark was harmless. Matt Murphy, In the

0:38:30.380 --> 0:38:33.980
<v Speaker 1>Well with Mark Garagos. Great podcast on the MK True

0:38:34.020 --> 0:38:39.100
<v Speaker 1>Crime Network and prosecutor extraordinaire. Weighing in on this stuff

0:38:39.140 --> 0:38:41.110
<v Speaker 1>just means the world to us. We really appreciate it.

0:38:41.700 --> 0:38:43.620
<v Speaker 2>I love the pod, Billy. Have me back anytime.

0:38:44.340 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Great. Have a safe trip. I know you're heading out

0:38:46.480 --> 0:38:48.660
<v Speaker 1>to surfing and scuba and all that with your guys.

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:50.820
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Two more weeks.

0:38:51.390 --> 0:38:52.629
<v Speaker 2>I'm counting the days.

0:38:52.830 --> 0:38:54.330
<v Speaker 4>You said it before.

0:38:54.830 --> 0:38:57.629
<v Speaker 1>We got to do more living and less grinding and

0:38:57.770 --> 0:39:00.850
<v Speaker 1>you are taking 13 days to go in the water

0:39:00.910 --> 0:39:03.390
<v Speaker 1>and do your thing. And that is so good for

0:39:03.430 --> 0:39:07.609
<v Speaker 1>you in every other aspect of your life. So that

0:39:07.630 --> 0:39:08.589
<v Speaker 1>just hats off to you.

0:39:09.110 --> 0:39:09.549
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:39:10.790 --> 0:39:14.109
<v Speaker 1>Wow. You know what I mean, folks? That's what I said.

0:39:14.489 --> 0:39:23.670
<v Speaker 1>More living, less grinding. You know, I got to, I mean, Harry, Harry,

0:39:23.690 --> 0:39:25.940
<v Speaker 1>you there? I got to, I got to say, I

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:28.489
<v Speaker 1>think if I keep up with Matt Murphy like this,

0:39:28.630 --> 0:39:31.500
<v Speaker 1>I think Alan Jackson. Jackson is going to get very jealous.

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:34.299
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you something. If Alan doesn't come in

0:39:34.360 --> 0:39:37.259
<v Speaker 1>here next week, we are launching a new studio. We

0:39:37.280 --> 0:39:40.120
<v Speaker 1>have a whole new studio. It's gorgeous what this thing

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:44.069
<v Speaker 1>looks like. And if Alan is not my first in-studio guest,

0:39:44.090 --> 0:39:46.549
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't live that far away, then I'm just going

0:39:46.570 --> 0:39:48.590
<v Speaker 1>to have to take up with Matt. I don't know.

0:39:49.130 --> 0:39:49.920
<v Speaker 5>I don't blame you.

0:39:50.780 --> 0:39:50.940
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:39:51.300 --> 0:39:54.339
<v Speaker 5>Matt is amazing. I've been following, you know, he talks

0:39:54.380 --> 0:39:55.980
<v Speaker 5>about these kids. Like he talked about that case in

0:39:56.000 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 5>Mexico where the guy fled. I watched that. I've seen

0:39:59.340 --> 0:40:01.529
<v Speaker 5>every episode. I mean, I don't want to do this,

0:40:01.590 --> 0:40:04.410
<v Speaker 5>but I'm a bit of a fan boy with Matt.

0:40:04.650 --> 0:40:06.890
<v Speaker 1>I know you're, you know what, you know what, maybe

0:40:06.969 --> 0:40:08.730
<v Speaker 1>it's a split. You will let you, you know, you've

0:40:08.770 --> 0:40:12.710
<v Speaker 1>got Matt and, and I've got Alan, but although big

0:40:12.770 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 1>red is coming on strong, I got, I got to say.

0:40:17.400 --> 0:40:19.859
<v Speaker 5>Listen, I'm going to depart, but you, you go ahead.

0:40:20.590 --> 0:40:25.730
<v Speaker 1>By the way, let's talk about let's talk. Let's move

0:40:25.770 --> 0:40:30.590
<v Speaker 1>to Amy Griffin. Amy Griffin's article comes out on Monday.

0:40:31.930 --> 0:40:35.740
<v Speaker 1>She's participating in this article with this journalist. Some expect

0:40:36.260 --> 0:40:40.779
<v Speaker 1>she's obviously expecting some support here. OK, the journalist is

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Jessica Bennett, and she's going to release this on Monday

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:50.069
<v Speaker 1>in New York magazine. If Jessica Bennett delivers, Amy could

0:40:50.150 --> 0:40:53.460
<v Speaker 1>have what she needs to sue the New York Times.

0:40:53.620 --> 0:40:55.840
<v Speaker 1>All along, we've been saying, why isn't she suing the

0:40:55.880 --> 0:41:00.219
<v Speaker 1>New York Times? She says they've destroyed her. They made

0:41:00.300 --> 0:41:06.030
<v Speaker 1>up facts. They tried to coerce people in Amarillo, Texas,

0:41:06.170 --> 0:41:11.239
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Amy. and say disparaging things like, where's

0:41:11.280 --> 0:41:15.710
<v Speaker 1>the lawsuit? Well, the original New York Times investigation came

0:41:15.770 --> 0:41:21.050
<v Speaker 1>out September 25th, 2025. You got one year. The statute

0:41:21.070 --> 0:41:25.270
<v Speaker 1>of limitations is one year to file a defamation case

0:41:25.390 --> 0:41:30.109
<v Speaker 1>against them. What day is today? September 17th. What day

0:41:30.130 --> 0:41:34.280
<v Speaker 1>is this coming out? September 21st. You got that week.

0:41:34.980 --> 0:41:38.970
<v Speaker 1>So if this goes well for Amy, And this writer

0:41:39.489 --> 0:41:44.870
<v Speaker 1>does her a solid. That lawsuit could be filed by

0:41:44.930 --> 0:41:49.750
<v Speaker 1>Thursday and it might be being drafted now. Jessica, by

0:41:49.790 --> 0:41:53.150
<v Speaker 1>the way, the writer, her beat is gender, feminism, sexuality

0:41:53.330 --> 0:41:56.140
<v Speaker 1>and power and the way women are portrayed and treated

0:41:56.200 --> 0:41:59.880
<v Speaker 1>in contemporary culture. She was the New York Times first

0:42:00.140 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>gender editor. So remember, there's two women involved here and

0:42:06.060 --> 0:42:11.180
<v Speaker 1>I get it. One man talking about it. mansplaining um

0:42:12.460 --> 0:42:15.500
<v Speaker 1>two women one is a woman uh who is a

0:42:16.020 --> 0:42:19.820
<v Speaker 1>you know billionaire and very influential has an amazing roster

0:42:19.860 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of friends and the other is a small time woman

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:28.109
<v Speaker 1>who lives in a smaller city and uh and she's

0:42:28.150 --> 0:42:32.509
<v Speaker 1>making claims too right now illegally amy is locked in

0:42:32.550 --> 0:42:36.549
<v Speaker 1>dueling lawsuits and they're mired in procedural BS, right? It's

0:42:36.570 --> 0:42:40.270
<v Speaker 1>a delay in discovery at every turn. They're inching along.

0:42:40.830 --> 0:42:45.430
<v Speaker 1>For those needing a refresher, a woman from Amy's middle

0:42:45.469 --> 0:42:49.940
<v Speaker 1>school class in Amarillo, Texas named Jolene claims that Amy

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:54.280
<v Speaker 1>took details of her childhood sexual assaults by a gym teacher,

0:42:54.340 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I think, and appropriated them as her own experiences for

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:03.510
<v Speaker 1>her New York Times bestselling memoir, The Tell. And worse,

0:43:04.070 --> 0:43:10.240
<v Speaker 1>She obtained this private information and private details through someone

0:43:10.340 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>posing as a talent agent named Dominic Price, calling to

0:43:14.020 --> 0:43:18.900
<v Speaker 1>get information for maybe a television miniseries or something. Amy's

0:43:18.940 --> 0:43:21.879
<v Speaker 1>been silent the whole time. She claims in her book

0:43:21.900 --> 0:43:30.930
<v Speaker 1>that she was brutally SA'd and graped, roughed up, threatened,

0:43:31.540 --> 0:43:34.379
<v Speaker 1>From the ages of 12 to 16 by a middle

0:43:34.420 --> 0:43:38.040
<v Speaker 1>school teacher, a total wolf in sheep's clothing, a man

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:47.029
<v Speaker 1>that does deserve a public elimination if half of what

0:43:47.090 --> 0:43:50.089
<v Speaker 1>she says he did is true. She says it all

0:43:50.130 --> 0:43:53.830
<v Speaker 1>took place on school grounds, after school, during a school dance,

0:43:53.870 --> 0:43:56.260
<v Speaker 1>in the locker room, in a classroom, in a bathroom,

0:43:56.390 --> 0:44:00.900
<v Speaker 1>under the bleachers, everywhere. And it was violent, violent, violent.

0:44:01.980 --> 0:44:06.180
<v Speaker 1>Amy says the memories of abuse were recovered over 30

0:44:06.180 --> 0:44:12.320
<v Speaker 1>plus years later as an adult in 2020 through MDMA therapy,

0:44:12.420 --> 0:44:16.940
<v Speaker 1>psychedelic assisted therapy. I'm a fan. She has no witnesses

0:44:17.020 --> 0:44:21.060
<v Speaker 1>to the before, the during, or the after. Her parents

0:44:21.100 --> 0:44:24.299
<v Speaker 1>had no clue at the time. No friends, no teachers,

0:44:24.510 --> 0:44:28.710
<v Speaker 1>no coaches. The closest thing to corroboration is her connection

0:44:28.850 --> 0:44:32.710
<v Speaker 1>to a girl in her class that she thought may

0:44:32.750 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have endured the same thing. A quiet little girl named Claudia,

0:44:37.360 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>she writes about. And she describes her as a girl

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:45.520
<v Speaker 1>with blonde, short blonde, blunt cut bangs, who lived in

0:44:45.739 --> 0:44:48.730
<v Speaker 1>the foster care home that was in Amarillo and who

0:44:48.770 --> 0:44:51.070
<v Speaker 1>was driven to school every day in a white van

0:44:51.110 --> 0:44:54.109
<v Speaker 1>with other kids from the home by staff members. How

0:44:54.170 --> 0:44:58.839
<v Speaker 1>could there be anyone? How is there mistaking who this

0:44:58.880 --> 0:45:00.969
<v Speaker 1>person is in your class? I don't know how big

0:45:00.989 --> 0:45:04.070
<v Speaker 1>your middle school class was, but let's say it's 40.

0:45:04.070 --> 0:45:07.589
<v Speaker 1>You know, that's big for Amarillo. How could there be

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:11.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone else? Can there be two girls like that with blonde,

0:45:11.140 --> 0:45:13.000
<v Speaker 1>blunt cut bangs who are being driven in a white

0:45:13.060 --> 0:45:16.879
<v Speaker 1>van from a foster care home every day? Jolene says

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Claudia is absolutely her. Several other people in her class

0:45:21.700 --> 0:45:27.420
<v Speaker 1>have filed affidavits corroborating that account. That it's definitely her.

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:32.239
<v Speaker 1>And others... Others have filed affidavits corroborating her story of

0:45:32.280 --> 0:45:37.530
<v Speaker 1>horrific abuse from the classroom. Two accounts from the classroom

0:45:37.550 --> 0:45:40.850
<v Speaker 1>where Jolene says, you know, the teacher put a boot

0:45:40.930 --> 0:45:44.210
<v Speaker 1>in her back, tied her hands up with a bandana

0:45:44.290 --> 0:45:47.569
<v Speaker 1>behind her back as he did terrible things to her

0:45:47.890 --> 0:45:52.430
<v Speaker 1>and made verbal threats on her life as this essay

0:45:52.489 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>occurred in a bathroom. And then again, a separate event

0:45:55.739 --> 0:46:00.040
<v Speaker 1>at a school dance. This definitely did not happen. to

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:05.320
<v Speaker 1>two people by two different teachers. It's just that type

0:46:05.340 --> 0:46:10.129
<v Speaker 1>of coincidence cannot exist. But apparently the author of this

0:46:10.690 --> 0:46:14.790
<v Speaker 1>article that's coming out on Monday is interviewing a different

0:46:14.850 --> 0:46:20.170
<v Speaker 1>woman who Amy says is the real Claudia. I've spoken

0:46:20.190 --> 0:46:24.420
<v Speaker 1>to that. I've communicated with that woman. She will no doubt,

0:46:24.900 --> 0:46:29.130
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing, confirm that. amy's account uh she'll confirm that

0:46:29.190 --> 0:46:31.689
<v Speaker 1>amy showed up into her little town where she lives

0:46:31.750 --> 0:46:35.690
<v Speaker 1>now in tennessee and um she'll confirm that amy asked

0:46:35.730 --> 0:46:39.240
<v Speaker 1>her oh my god were you also abused uh just

0:46:39.300 --> 0:46:43.040
<v Speaker 1>imagine this woman's face right like uh no in the

0:46:43.080 --> 0:46:46.520
<v Speaker 1>book she's she's clear about it that the woman said

0:46:46.560 --> 0:46:48.359
<v Speaker 1>no i i don't know what you're talking about but

0:46:49.580 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you know hey great to have you here uh Thanks

0:46:53.180 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 1>for flying your Bombardier into my little town of, you know,

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>in the foothills of Tennessee somewhere. That's from an exhibit

0:47:03.700 --> 0:47:07.510
<v Speaker 1>right there. Amy posting up with the woman she says

0:47:07.570 --> 0:47:10.310
<v Speaker 1>she had coffee with in this little town in Tennessee,

0:47:10.530 --> 0:47:17.009
<v Speaker 1>Real Claudia. That's them. Anyway, I don't know what the

0:47:17.050 --> 0:47:23.630
<v Speaker 1>point of this exercise is, but Jolene... keep in mind,

0:47:23.710 --> 0:47:26.390
<v Speaker 1>says that she met Amy, too, also in a coffee

0:47:26.430 --> 0:47:29.910
<v Speaker 1>shop in her town. Not in Tennessee, but in Palm

0:47:29.969 --> 0:47:33.170
<v Speaker 1>Springs in 2019, where she was living at the time.

0:47:33.930 --> 0:47:37.250
<v Speaker 1>And they also had coffee. But they never spoke about

0:47:38.469 --> 0:47:40.700
<v Speaker 1>any type of abuse. They just exchanged. They had a

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>little catch up. Says Jolene, they exchanged postcards to write

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>each other afterwards. Here, here's a postcard. You write me

0:47:49.120 --> 0:47:53.420
<v Speaker 1>with yours and I'll write you with mine. Amy denies

0:47:53.480 --> 0:47:58.340
<v Speaker 1>this meeting. She says, I never met with Jolene in

0:47:58.380 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>a coffee shop in Palm Springs in 2019. It never happened. Well,

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:08.650
<v Speaker 1>I've read the tell, the book. It crescendos in the

0:48:08.730 --> 0:48:11.510
<v Speaker 1>end of the book. It builds up to the big finish,

0:48:12.330 --> 0:48:18.660
<v Speaker 1>which is Amy receiving this postcard mysteriously after that Pointless

0:48:18.700 --> 0:48:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Coffee with Real Claudia in Tennessee. And it says something

0:48:24.600 --> 0:48:28.160
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable like, I didn't want to say it then, but yes,

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:31.440
<v Speaker 1>something happened to me. It's sort of like confirmation, okay?

0:48:32.239 --> 0:48:34.460
<v Speaker 1>But Amy reaches out to Real Claudia and says, oh

0:48:34.480 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>my God, thanks for sending that postcard. And she goes, no,

0:48:37.140 --> 0:48:39.569
<v Speaker 1>I didn't send it. I still don't know what you're

0:48:39.590 --> 0:48:43.529
<v Speaker 1>talking about. And the postmark on the postcard is New

0:48:43.570 --> 0:48:48.670
<v Speaker 1>York City. It's New York. Doesn't the postmark So somebody

0:48:48.710 --> 0:48:51.930
<v Speaker 1>sent it from New York. The postmark resembles where you

0:48:51.989 --> 0:48:55.210
<v Speaker 1>sent from where you sent the postcard, not from where

0:48:55.230 --> 0:49:00.390
<v Speaker 1>it was received. So it's a total mystery. Was it

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a friend? Was it a sister or someone trying to

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:06.460
<v Speaker 1>give her closure? Was it her friend? It's all confusing.

0:49:07.739 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 1>But Jolene does claim that she also sent Amy a

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:20.419
<v Speaker 1>postcard of kids playing. Where is that postcard? Amy did

0:49:20.460 --> 0:49:25.900
<v Speaker 1>turn one into the New York Times, which is fascinating.

0:49:28.100 --> 0:49:32.859
<v Speaker 1>The one she turned into the New York Times was

0:49:32.900 --> 0:49:39.050
<v Speaker 1>from the artist Gary Winogrand. Okay? It's a postcard of

0:49:39.110 --> 0:49:45.239
<v Speaker 1>his work. And guess who was having a feature documentary

0:49:45.420 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>at the 2019 Palm Springs Film Festival? Gary Winogrand. Might

0:49:53.560 --> 0:49:57.260
<v Speaker 1>his postcards been in all the little cafes around town

0:49:57.340 --> 0:50:02.569
<v Speaker 1>promoting his movie and his work because he was in,

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:07.870
<v Speaker 1>but Amy says, look, hey, there's, I was not in

0:50:08.910 --> 0:50:11.009
<v Speaker 1>Palm Springs at all. I don't know this woman. Amy

0:50:11.050 --> 0:50:14.690
<v Speaker 1>says she recovered these memories, by the way, all these

0:50:14.750 --> 0:50:21.609
<v Speaker 1>memories of abuse long before anyone contacted Jolene. They're documented

0:50:21.830 --> 0:50:26.310
<v Speaker 1>in diaries post MDMA treatment through a first draft of

0:50:26.350 --> 0:50:28.110
<v Speaker 1>the tell. She wrote all about all this. So she

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:31.940
<v Speaker 1>has no idea, by the way, who this Dominic Price is.

0:50:32.340 --> 0:50:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And Dominic Price, who is a real person, filled out

0:50:35.560 --> 0:50:38.919
<v Speaker 1>an affidavit saying he doesn't know who Amy Griffin is either.

0:50:39.380 --> 0:50:42.759
<v Speaker 1>He never called Jolene, he says, to extract details of

0:50:42.800 --> 0:50:45.529
<v Speaker 1>her childhood abuse for use in Amy's book or any

0:50:45.590 --> 0:50:51.430
<v Speaker 1>other reason. She's asking people to, Amy's asking people to

0:50:51.550 --> 0:50:55.890
<v Speaker 1>believe conclusively that the memories were recovered during MDMA. No

0:50:55.950 --> 0:51:01.419
<v Speaker 1>chance of having toted around dramatic and destabilizing gossip about

0:51:01.460 --> 0:51:06.779
<v Speaker 1>another girl from her childhood for over 30 years. To me,

0:51:06.840 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it feels like more than possible that this is memory appropriation.

0:51:13.280 --> 0:51:18.230
<v Speaker 1>It could be innocent. I found a term called cryptomnesia,

0:51:19.050 --> 0:51:23.190
<v Speaker 1>remembering information while forgetting its source so it feels original.

0:51:23.270 --> 0:51:28.650
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's that. Also, I have space in here somewhere

0:51:28.710 --> 0:51:35.490
<v Speaker 1>that Amy believes 100% in everything she's saying. And thus

0:51:35.550 --> 0:51:40.070
<v Speaker 1>she's not a terrible person, right? Just confused. Copper Mountain

0:51:40.070 --> 0:51:43.250
<v Speaker 1>32 in the comment section says compulsive liar. I don't know.

0:51:43.989 --> 0:51:46.730
<v Speaker 1>I don't want her to be. I'm not, there's no

0:51:46.830 --> 0:51:52.020
<v Speaker 1>pitchfork and flame for me. Like take this woman down. No,

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I just am so in the mystery is

0:51:56.200 --> 0:51:59.860
<v Speaker 1>so deep. What's the motive? Where are all the people

0:51:59.940 --> 0:52:03.469
<v Speaker 1>who were promoting this? Why is no one else covering this?

0:52:05.020 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Why is, why? There is an article that was supposed

0:52:08.000 --> 0:52:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to come out in five chapters in another major publication.

0:52:11.100 --> 0:52:15.359
<v Speaker 1>It was killed at the last minute. Content, my own,

0:52:15.640 --> 0:52:18.029
<v Speaker 1>I believe, is being suppressed on this front. I really do.

0:52:19.610 --> 0:52:22.870
<v Speaker 1>I do. Because the number one thing people ask me

0:52:22.930 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>about is this. And it doesn't kill on YouTube. But

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:33.279
<v Speaker 1>it's the number one, wherever I go, this is what

0:52:33.300 --> 0:52:35.049
<v Speaker 1>they want to talk about. I'm like, really?

0:52:36.790 --> 0:52:37.029
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:52:38.250 --> 0:52:45.859
<v Speaker 1>Not saying that, but okay. What really complicates things is

0:52:46.020 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the teacher who Amy alleges, you know, abused her in

0:52:49.100 --> 0:52:57.070
<v Speaker 1>such horrible, horrible ways. I mean, he's been doxxed by

0:52:57.250 --> 0:53:01.850
<v Speaker 1>Amy's lawyers. That can't be an accident. Thomas Clare doesn't

0:53:01.870 --> 0:53:05.089
<v Speaker 1>make mistakes like that. He's Is she snuffing the guy out?

0:53:05.330 --> 0:53:07.890
<v Speaker 1>Is she so in belief of what she's saying? Like

0:53:07.930 --> 0:53:10.509
<v Speaker 1>she's so behind it. I'm going to dox this dude.

0:53:10.530 --> 0:53:12.210
<v Speaker 1>And then two days later, we're going to file a

0:53:12.290 --> 0:53:15.109
<v Speaker 1>motion to seal. Whoops, we made a mistake. We want

0:53:15.130 --> 0:53:17.469
<v Speaker 1>to seal that thing we said two days ago, which

0:53:17.530 --> 0:53:22.320
<v Speaker 1>reveals his name. In that case, she definitely believes it.

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Why this guy hasn't come forward? And speaking of the teacher,

0:53:27.340 --> 0:53:30.820
<v Speaker 1>why this guy has not come forward with a vociferous

0:53:31.060 --> 0:53:37.379
<v Speaker 1>self-defense of his own? And coupled with a counterpunch is

0:53:38.980 --> 0:53:42.759
<v Speaker 1>probably the strongest evidence that Amy has that these nightmare

0:53:42.940 --> 0:53:48.630
<v Speaker 1>memories are real in her favor. Now, I am told,

0:53:48.650 --> 0:53:54.930
<v Speaker 1>I believe, that the teacher will come forward at the

0:53:54.969 --> 0:54:02.660
<v Speaker 1>right time. And as we said, why hasn't Amy... sued

0:54:02.680 --> 0:54:05.799
<v Speaker 1>the new york times the teacher should be suing amy

0:54:06.560 --> 0:54:08.990
<v Speaker 1>and amy should be suing the new york times she

0:54:09.030 --> 0:54:13.430
<v Speaker 1>might she might a week from right now after this

0:54:13.510 --> 0:54:17.049
<v Speaker 1>article comes out on monday um because a lot is

0:54:17.110 --> 0:54:20.469
<v Speaker 1>riding on it and if this journalist has been given

0:54:20.530 --> 0:54:23.419
<v Speaker 1>enough clues or given enough you know rabbit food to

0:54:23.580 --> 0:54:26.640
<v Speaker 1>find her way to put some of these major pieces

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:31.310
<v Speaker 1>together and i assume you know Every lead she's getting

0:54:31.410 --> 0:54:34.890
<v Speaker 1>is from Team Amy. There's got to be. But it

0:54:34.930 --> 0:54:38.750
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter. If it leads to something real, then there

0:54:38.790 --> 0:54:44.310
<v Speaker 1>we go. So it's going to be... All eyes will

0:54:44.350 --> 0:54:49.250
<v Speaker 1>be on that article for sure. New York Magazine, Monday.

0:54:49.270 --> 0:54:57.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's finish with something in sports, but yet

0:54:57.400 --> 0:55:04.650
<v Speaker 1>also culture. Arch... Manning, the young quarterback from Texas, already

0:55:05.230 --> 0:55:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a Longhorn legend. Biggest moment of his life. He's the

0:55:10.219 --> 0:55:13.080
<v Speaker 1>talk of the town. He's the top dog in the league.

0:55:13.360 --> 0:55:18.260
<v Speaker 1>He's in the Heisman conversation. He knocks off as number four, Texas.

0:55:18.820 --> 0:55:23.040
<v Speaker 1>They knock off number one, Ohio State. The biggest moment,

0:55:23.489 --> 0:55:25.870
<v Speaker 1>all the hype about Arch Manning being the best of

0:55:25.930 --> 0:55:28.890
<v Speaker 1>all the Mannings. He's better than Eli. He's better than Peyton,

0:55:28.969 --> 0:55:32.700
<v Speaker 1>both his uncles. He's the best Manning there ever was.

0:55:33.550 --> 0:55:36.180
<v Speaker 1>The guy's taking a victory lap, and then he makes

0:55:36.239 --> 0:55:43.020
<v Speaker 1>the worst possible mistake you could possibly imagine. I mean,

0:55:44.160 --> 0:55:46.700
<v Speaker 1>he's at a Monday press meeting after the biggest win,

0:55:48.219 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 1>and he brings up an AI meme of the post-game

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:58.160
<v Speaker 1>interview between Holly Rowe of ESPN and Steve Sarkisian, the coach,

0:55:58.739 --> 0:56:02.340
<v Speaker 1>where all these memes went out and there's an AI

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:07.980
<v Speaker 1>one of, well, this one is the one. First of all,

0:56:10.500 --> 0:56:11.919
<v Speaker 1>here's what Arch was talking about.

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:16.820
<v Speaker 3>I've seen a few AI edits of stuff, but that's

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:19.440
<v Speaker 3>about it. I saw an AI edit of Sark's interview.

0:56:21.700 --> 0:56:24.270
<v Speaker 3>Y'all seen that one? How's it going?

0:56:26.590 --> 0:56:29.550
<v Speaker 2>Of him slapping Holly Roe?

0:56:32.630 --> 0:56:35.910
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the meme of him slapping Holly Roe of ESPN.

0:56:36.070 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>He's talking about this. We did it! You were amazing.

0:56:41.900 --> 0:56:42.439
<v Speaker 1>Kiss me.

0:56:42.460 --> 0:56:46.359
<v Speaker 4>Oh, God!

0:56:54.010 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 1>That's the one he's talking about. I meant to say

0:56:58.560 --> 0:57:02.100
<v Speaker 1>the kiss would have been funny. That's not funny. The

0:57:02.140 --> 0:57:05.460
<v Speaker 1>slapping of Holly Roe. But here's the thing about Arch.

0:57:05.560 --> 0:57:11.030
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. He's 19 years old. Is he 20?

0:57:11.210 --> 0:57:15.580
<v Speaker 1>Here's what he's guilty of. Immaturity. Immaturity and that's it.

0:57:16.100 --> 0:57:21.480
<v Speaker 1>He's not a misogynist. He's not an abusive person. He's

0:57:21.540 --> 0:57:27.570
<v Speaker 1>not anything that whatever people want to say. No. What

0:57:27.610 --> 0:57:33.530
<v Speaker 1>he did next after that terrible press conference deserves more

0:57:33.590 --> 0:57:37.820
<v Speaker 1>attention in my mind. He put out this statement. I

0:57:37.860 --> 0:57:41.030
<v Speaker 1>made an insensitive comment about an AI video. There's nothing

0:57:41.090 --> 0:57:43.480
<v Speaker 1>funny about it. It's easy to say I didn't mean it,

0:57:43.550 --> 0:57:46.010
<v Speaker 1>but I know my words and actions were hurtful to

0:57:46.050 --> 0:57:48.530
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people. I do not take that lightly

0:57:48.570 --> 0:57:51.390
<v Speaker 1>and I'm deeply sorry for that. I specifically want to

0:57:51.450 --> 0:57:54.990
<v Speaker 1>apologize to Holly Roe for what she personally had to

0:57:55.050 --> 0:57:57.990
<v Speaker 1>deal with because of my comments. I have a ton

0:57:58.030 --> 0:58:00.980
<v Speaker 1>of respect for her and appreciate her showing me grace

0:58:01.020 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in this moment. I need to do better and I

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:05.380
<v Speaker 1>will be more thoughtful going forward.

0:58:05.760 --> 0:58:05.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:58:08.610 --> 0:58:12.470
<v Speaker 1>Holly, a woman who's been around, works her ass off,

0:58:13.090 --> 0:58:17.470
<v Speaker 1>is very respected, says on Twitter, thank you, Arch. I

0:58:17.530 --> 0:58:21.550
<v Speaker 1>appreciate our conversation about this because he called her too.

0:58:22.150 --> 0:58:25.729
<v Speaker 1>That will remain private, she said. Apology accepted. We move

0:58:25.770 --> 0:58:29.440
<v Speaker 1>forward with respect and kindness for one another. Thank you,

0:58:29.500 --> 0:58:36.940
<v Speaker 1>Holly Rowe. And Arch, you know, you responded exactly the

0:58:37.000 --> 0:58:41.320
<v Speaker 1>right way. There's no way you go after a 19-year-old

0:58:41.400 --> 0:58:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and try to cancel him or this. And by the way,

0:58:43.520 --> 0:58:46.070
<v Speaker 1>there's no canceling the number one quarterback on the number

0:58:46.160 --> 0:58:49.150
<v Speaker 1>one team in the country. And winning is always going

0:58:49.170 --> 0:58:53.050
<v Speaker 1>to prevail. But what's more important is the guy made

0:58:53.090 --> 0:58:55.830
<v Speaker 1>a mistake. And what we want is a world where

0:58:55.930 --> 0:59:01.770
<v Speaker 1>we let young men, women, young people evolve. Let them

0:59:01.930 --> 0:59:05.880
<v Speaker 1>say dumb things, do dumb things. And even later in life.

0:59:06.120 --> 0:59:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean... And... It's not the sins. How do you

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:12.580
<v Speaker 1>respond to that sin? How do you make it better?

0:59:13.780 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 1>And I want a world where this boy isn't ruined.

0:59:17.020 --> 0:59:19.340
<v Speaker 1>Some other little boy who's not as popular as Arch

0:59:19.360 --> 0:59:23.180
<v Speaker 1>and a great quarterback isn't ruined because he thought he

0:59:23.220 --> 0:59:27.230
<v Speaker 1>was playing along to the band. There's echoes of this,

0:59:27.670 --> 0:59:29.950
<v Speaker 1>as you can probably have connected the dots in my

0:59:30.010 --> 0:59:36.840
<v Speaker 1>own life, right? But, you know, I always use the

0:59:36.860 --> 0:59:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Kimmel reference. The guy was on the man show.

0:59:40.000 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 1>He was wearing blackface. He was asking women if they

0:59:42.720 --> 0:59:45.480
<v Speaker 1>liked their butts tickled with feathers and doing all kinds

0:59:45.500 --> 0:59:49.430
<v Speaker 1>of weird shit. And then he became, you know, Big Jim,

0:59:50.210 --> 0:59:53.900
<v Speaker 1>the statesman. and the moral police, and many other things.

0:59:54.020 --> 0:59:56.780
<v Speaker 1>And I like Jimmy Kimmel. I think he's funny. But

0:59:57.700 --> 1:00:01.190
<v Speaker 1>there was grace for Jimmy. There should be grace for

1:00:01.310 --> 1:00:05.530
<v Speaker 1>Arch and every other person, male or female, who sticks

1:00:05.570 --> 1:00:08.630
<v Speaker 1>their dumb ass foot in their mouth. He's guilty of

1:00:08.770 --> 1:00:13.210
<v Speaker 1>one thing only, immaturity. But I'll say he grew up

1:00:13.270 --> 1:00:16.850
<v Speaker 1>a lot right there. What a big moment to write that,

1:00:17.050 --> 1:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>to call Holly, to own it, And move on. He'll

1:00:20.720 --> 1:00:23.460
<v Speaker 1>never make a mistake like that again. And he didn't

1:00:23.500 --> 1:00:26.540
<v Speaker 1>even believe it. You see, he was uncomfortable. I know

1:00:26.560 --> 1:00:30.060
<v Speaker 1>a thing or two about uncomfortably reacting to something and

1:00:30.080 --> 1:00:34.010
<v Speaker 1>then getting killed for it. But this guy was uncomfortable.

1:00:35.250 --> 1:00:38.010
<v Speaker 1>He was like, yeah, he was trying to play to

1:00:38.030 --> 1:00:40.070
<v Speaker 1>the band. He thought that would be funny and other people.

1:00:40.090 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But he's too stupid to realize. Uh-uh. Not funny. Anyway.

1:00:49.070 --> 1:00:52.930
<v Speaker 1>Little grace for Arch. Guys, I end today with something

1:00:53.150 --> 1:00:58.470
<v Speaker 1>that means more to me than anything so far in

1:00:58.490 --> 1:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>doing this show. I got a text from a friend

1:01:01.700 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>named Jen Levy. Her son, Braun Levy, was killed over

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>a year ago, May 25, after he was getting ready

1:01:14.120 --> 1:01:18.620
<v Speaker 1>to graduate, and he was hit by a a drunk driver,

1:01:18.760 --> 1:01:21.460
<v Speaker 1>a woman who was driving on a suspended license from

1:01:21.520 --> 1:01:25.360
<v Speaker 1>a DUI before. The unthinkable. He was 18 years old.

1:01:25.420 --> 1:01:32.050
<v Speaker 1>He was a tennis player. He was a great student,

1:01:32.720 --> 1:01:37.410
<v Speaker 1>a great tennis player. He was a leader, a real leader,

1:01:37.550 --> 1:01:40.410
<v Speaker 1>looking out for the kind of inclusive guy, the guy

1:01:40.430 --> 1:01:42.290
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to sit at the same lunch table

1:01:42.370 --> 1:01:46.150
<v Speaker 1>every day with the coolest, best-looking kids like him. He

1:01:46.860 --> 1:01:49.620
<v Speaker 1>moves it around. A set the tone kind of kid.

1:01:49.740 --> 1:01:55.479
<v Speaker 1>An absolute tragedy. It has destroyed this mother. She sends

1:01:55.520 --> 1:01:59.870
<v Speaker 1>me this text. Billy, thank you, thank you. I just

1:01:59.930 --> 1:02:02.490
<v Speaker 1>wanted you to know what your podcast has meant to me.

1:02:02.670 --> 1:02:05.590
<v Speaker 1>Every day when I'm walking the dogs, unloading the dishwasher,

1:02:05.650 --> 1:02:08.690
<v Speaker 1>folding laundry, all those normal mindless parts of life, I

1:02:08.750 --> 1:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>tend to get stuck in my own head. And for

1:02:11.760 --> 1:02:15.980
<v Speaker 1>a long time, that meant crying a lot. I'm tired

1:02:16.060 --> 1:02:19.950
<v Speaker 1>of crying every day. Now I put on your podcast

1:02:20.030 --> 1:02:25.030
<v Speaker 1>and somehow you fill that space with laughter, irreverence, absurdity,

1:02:25.410 --> 1:02:29.300
<v Speaker 1>factual knowledge, basically everything I need to get out of

1:02:29.360 --> 1:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>my own head, keep moving forward, and just try to

1:02:33.200 --> 1:02:36.830
<v Speaker 1>live my best life. You have helped me through more

1:02:36.910 --> 1:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>dark hours than you could You've helped me through more

1:02:45.580 --> 1:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>dark hours than you could possibly know. I just wanted

1:02:48.300 --> 1:02:50.530
<v Speaker 1>you to know that and to say thank you truly.

1:02:52.590 --> 1:02:57.270
<v Speaker 1>To which I respond, honestly, if I was doing this

1:02:57.890 --> 1:03:05.070
<v Speaker 1>show for just you, folding your laundry, you know, doing

1:03:05.090 --> 1:03:08.580
<v Speaker 1>what I, you know, mundane stuff. If I was doing

1:03:08.620 --> 1:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>this show just for you and you alone, I would

1:03:11.360 --> 1:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>not stop doing it. Um, There you go. How about that? Hey,

1:03:19.580 --> 1:03:22.260
<v Speaker 1>I just can't believe I received that. Anyway, guys, thank

1:03:22.280 --> 1:03:24.380
<v Speaker 1>you for being with us. I hope you join Jen.

1:03:24.400 --> 1:03:28.370
<v Speaker 1>You subscribe on our YouTube page, have an unbelievable weekend.

1:03:28.550 --> 1:03:31.770
<v Speaker 1>We'll see on social media throughout. We'll be updating everything.

1:03:32.010 --> 1:03:34.970
<v Speaker 1>And then we're back on Monday for the big article

1:03:35.350 --> 1:03:39.670
<v Speaker 1>and next week, our new studio and all that stuff. But, uh,

1:03:40.310 --> 1:03:43.350
<v Speaker 1>Be good to each other. Love you.