WEBVTT - Tech News: US House of Reps Votes to Ban TikTok

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer at iHeart Podcasts and How the

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Tech are You? So? On Fridays, I typically will do

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a news roundup of the tech news that happened over

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the previous week, and today we're going to do something

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a little different. We're going to cover one story in

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>particular that really requires a lot more time and attention

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:41.120
<v Speaker 1>than what I would normally give, so we're gonna really

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>dive into it. Also, we will continue the story of

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>rooster Teeth. I do have at least two more parts

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>for that. I thought it was just going to be

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a two parter, but man covering what happened over the

0:00:52.400 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>last few years requires a lot more care and effort

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>as well. So let's get to today's topic, which of course,

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>is the United States ban on TikTok, which isn't a

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>sure thing yet. I want to be sure to say

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>that right up front, but the US House of Representatives

0:01:11.120 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>passed a bill this week that ultimately could lead to

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a ban on TikTok if the bill ends up being

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.759
<v Speaker 1>passed into law and there are a couple of steps

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that have to happen before that becomes reality. But there's

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a ton of stuff going on here, including things that

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to do with tech, but everything that happens

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>with money and politics. This is why you can't separate

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>tech out from those things. I know there are a

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who complain about news stories where they're like,

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.399
<v Speaker 1>just cover the tech, don't talk about politics. That's not

0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the way the world works. The world doesn't work with

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 1>everything being in these separate silos that have no connection

0:01:50.200 --> 0:01:54.560
<v Speaker 1>with each other. Politics and tech shape each other. Now,

0:01:54.920 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I would say that this particular story gets really gross because,

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, the entirety of this focus on TikTok

0:02:06.760 --> 0:02:10.239
<v Speaker 1>is misguided. I'm not saying that TikTok is good, I'm

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>not saying it's bad, but I am saying that this

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.960
<v Speaker 1>whole thing misses the point. In my opinion, I also

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>think it really exposes a ton of problems with America's

0:02:22.400 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>political system. But these aren't things that I think anyone

0:02:25.880 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>finds surprising. I think everyone, at least on some level,

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>is aware that America's political system has issues. But we're

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 1>going to get to all that first. What is this

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>bill and how did we get here? Well, the bill

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:45.399
<v Speaker 1>is h R. Seven five two one. It's also known

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>as the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act,

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And to quote the text of the bill directly, it

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is quote to protect the national security of the United

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:02.680
<v Speaker 1>States from I'm the threat posed by foreign adversary controlled

0:03:02.720 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>applications such as TikTok and any successor application or service,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and any other application or service developed or provided by

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Byteedance Limited or any entity under the control of byte

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Edance Limited end quote. So it's clear that this bill

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>specifically targets TikTok's parent company, Byteedance Limited, not just any

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese owned parent company or foreign owned company. However, the

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:34.840
<v Speaker 1>text of the actual bill does get far more general,

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately it does cover quote foreign adversary controlled applications

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>end quote. So it's not just for TikTok, but it

0:03:44.120 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>uses TikTok as sort of the primary example the paradigm,

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:53.440
<v Speaker 1>if you will. And foreign adversary in this context doesn't

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>just mean a country that is on particularly unfriendly terms

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>with the good old US of A. It's not just

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>countries we've got beef with. It covers any entity, person, organization, company,

0:04:05.440 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>et cetera that resides within the borders of such a country. So,

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.600
<v Speaker 1>while the phrase foreign adversary seems to suggest like a

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>nation or state controlled entity, it's actually more broad than that.

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>It's really any person or company that exists in such

0:04:26.080 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 1>a country that then would be identified in the context

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>of this bill as a foreign adversary. So essentially, the

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>bill would require any APP that ultimately belongs to an

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 1>entity that resides or exists within a country that had

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>been identified as a foreign adversary to the United States.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>And there's a whole code that explains how that designation happens. Well,

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>if this bill is enacted into law, then any such

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>app currently available within the United States would have one

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty days before a ban is imposed by

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the US government. To avoid the ban, the foreign adversary

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>can divest itself of the APP, that is, sell the

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 1>APP or some version part of the APP to some

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>other entity that is not a foreign adversary to the

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>United States. Also, in the future, should the US President

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>identify a new country as a foreign adversary, let's just

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>say that for some reason the President says that I

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know France is a foreign adversary. At that point,

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 1>then apps that originated out of France would have one

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty days to comply with this law before

0:05:40.320 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a ban would fall upon them like a bag of hammers.

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So how do you ban an app? How does that work? Well,

0:05:49.720 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this bill says the US would go after essentially the

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>distribution infrastructure for apps, like the app stores. In other words,

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:02.119
<v Speaker 1>Section A of this bill states that quote it shall

0:06:02.160 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 1>be unlawful for any entity to distribute, maintain, or update,

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or enable the distribution, maintenance, or updating of a foreign

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 1>adversary controlled application end quote, and then the section goes on.

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>But essentially this bill would target stuff like the iOS

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>app Store or the Android App Store. It also includes

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>internet hosting services that would allow for the updating and

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.799
<v Speaker 1>maintenance of those apps. So not only would the app

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>disappear from app stores within the United States, the apps

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:38.040
<v Speaker 1>would essentially lose all functionality because what the US is

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>saying is you can't allow traffic to go to these apps.

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>At the very least, you wouldn't be able to update

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the apps anymore within the United States, and presumably that

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.000
<v Speaker 1>would mean that you wouldn't get notifications you wouldn't be

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>able to access new material, et cetera. Now, if these

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>companies failed to comply with the law, they face a

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>fine of five five thousand dollars per US user of

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>that app. So for TikTok, that's more than one hundred

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million American users. So by my math, that's

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>like seven hundred and fifty billion dollars in fines, which

0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>means that obviously these companies that are largely US based,

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>would end all support for TikTok rather than face a

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>nearly one trillion dollar fine. The bill also calls for

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the foreign adversary controlled app to provide user data upon

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>request so that the user would be able to port

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>their information to some alternative application. Now I'm not entirely

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.559
<v Speaker 1>certain how that could be achieved in a reasonable way.

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I suspect that this from a technical perspective, is largely difficult,

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>at the very least possibly impossible to achieve so that

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>you could port your TikTok profile well to something else.

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't just work that way. It's not apples to apples.

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>To me, this seems like a pretty feeble attempt to

0:08:07.760 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>playcate TikTok users who would otherwise be really upset to

0:08:11.960 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 1>lose the content that they had created and consumed on

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>an app like TikTok. So the implication seems to be,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>don't worry, We've put in a legal requirement that TikTok

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>would have to give you all your stuff so that

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you can head on over to Instagram reels and do

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it all over there, or something like that. If the

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>foreign adversary fails to comply with this part of the law,

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:36.199
<v Speaker 1>then they would be fined five hundred dollars per active

0:08:36.240 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>user in the US, which is not nearly as hefty

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a hit obviously, but also I'm not sure how the

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>US would ever collect on that, because again, if it's

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a foreign adversary controlled app, I don't know that there's

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the leverage to force the foreign adversary to pay up

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the fine. You could definitely go off against the US

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.679
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure that the government would be able to do, at

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>least initially. I'm sure it would be immediately challenged in court,

0:09:05.320 --> 0:09:08.599
<v Speaker 1>but this bill would at least allow for that approach.

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how you would do it for a

0:09:10.240 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>foreign adversary, Like you could point to the company and

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 1>say you owe us X amount of money, and the

0:09:15.559 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>company says, okay, but we're over here, then you're over there,

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know. The bill goes on to single

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:26.000
<v Speaker 1>out TikTok and byte Dance again, but also states that

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the President can send a report to Congress identifying other

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>apps that meet certain criteria, including specific threats to US

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 1>national security, as well as what aspects of the app

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>would need to be divested in order to avoid a ban.

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>So if the President says, hey, this other app also

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to put under this same list of restrictions,

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 1>you would have to have the President send that message

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to Congress and say specifically how this app represents a

0:09:57.000 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>threat to national security. You can't just have a blank

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>it approach. Presumably after a public report and the detailed

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>account to Congress, the designation would then be acknowledged and

0:10:09.160 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the clock would begin to tick for that app. Now

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a bit more to the bill, including what measures

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a party can take to challenge the bill, but I

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's enough to have a conversation about this. By

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, the bill is just thirteen pages long, and

0:10:25.520 --> 0:10:27.679
<v Speaker 1>by thirteen pages long, I mean like you've got to

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>remember bills have lots of indented segments. So it's not

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>even a full page of material. It's a pretty easy read.

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, there's hardly any jargon in it. It

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't like one of those where you're like, whereas and

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>so forth and a fourthwith and et cetera, et cetera.

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't come across like that. So I urge all

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of y'all to check it out if you prefer to

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have firsthand knowledge of a text as opposed to just

0:10:52.440 --> 0:10:55.440
<v Speaker 1>relying on news articles and opinion pieces, some of which

0:10:55.440 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I suspect the writers never read the bill in the

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>first place. Again, that's Hr. Five two one, and yeah,

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a quick read. It's not a fun read, but

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>it is quick, So check it out now. For TikTok specifically,

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>this bill essentially says either Byte Dance sells TikTok to

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>some other entity, an entity that does not reside or

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>exist inside an adversarial country, or we will bring down

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the power of the US government on the distribution infrastructure

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for the app to make sure that no one in

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the US can get it or use it. That's a

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>pretty massive ultimatum, you know, divest TikTok or the TikTok

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>will face a national band. So how did we get here?

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Now that question is actually super complex because there are

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different reasons why various political leaders have

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>taken aim at TikTok in particular. Now, chief among them

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:58.959
<v Speaker 1>is that byte Dance is a Chinese company, and the

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government has been known to get very involved with

0:12:02.440 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Chinese enterprises. It's common in China for large companies to

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 1>reserve a spot at the highest levels of company oversight

0:12:09.960 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and governance for a representative of the Chinese Communist Party.

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:18.120
<v Speaker 1>So there's this perception that the Chinese Communist Party has

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>literally a seat at the table of all these massive

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>companies in China. Famously, China enacted a national intelligence law

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in twenty seventeen that compels Chinese citizens and organizations to

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>quote support national intelligence work end quote, and that the

0:12:36.400 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>government can actually demand cooperation that they do so. That's

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>covered under articles seven and fourteen of that twenty seventeen law.

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So one interpretation of this law is that the Chinese

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>government could go to byte Dance and demand that the

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>companies share all the data it has through an app

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>like TikTok, and byte Dance would be required by Chinese

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>law to do so. They would have have to hand

0:13:00.559 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>that data over to the Chinese Communist Party. Now, if

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.199
<v Speaker 1>that information included sensitive data that could compromise the national

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>security of the United States, that's a problem. If in fact,

0:13:10.960 --> 0:13:14.680
<v Speaker 1>this would serve as a type of espionage, that's a

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>huge issue. But that's a big if. And here's the thing.

0:13:18.679 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 1>If the possibility exists, unfortunately, that's enough. It's kind of

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>like trying to undermine democracy. You don't actually have to

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>compromise voting machines to undermine democracy. All you have to

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:37.320
<v Speaker 1>do is prove that it's possible to compromise a voting machine.

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>If you prove it's possible, well then you insert doubt

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>into the minds of citizens. Because if it's possible to

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>manipulate votes, well, then you can never be sure that

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the votes that came out actually reflect the will of

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the people, right, you can't be sure that the results

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of any election are legitimate, And by undermining the confidence

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>people have in the process, you undermine democracy itself. Democracy

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:11.560
<v Speaker 1>with a big d the doubt is all that's needed. So,

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's possible the Chinese Communist Party could force Byteedance

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to hand over gobs of data belonging to American citizens.

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>That's all that's needed to serve as a threat, even

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>if the actual scenario never happens. So you could argue, well, technically, yeah,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>it's possible, but it hasn't happened, and everyone at Might

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Dance has expressed that this would never happen. That's not

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>good enough, at least not in the eyes of the

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>leaders who are concerned about this. Okay, I've been ranting

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 1>for a bit, but we've got a ton more to

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>get through about this issue, So let's take a quick

0:14:50.720 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsors. Okay. So I was talking

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>earlier about how the perception of a threat is the

0:15:07.320 --> 0:15:11.080
<v Speaker 1>same thing as a threat in the eyes of politics,

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:14.360
<v Speaker 1>like it doesn't matter if the threat is real or not,

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 1>which is infuriating, but it's also unfortunately true. TikTok and

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Byte Dance representatives have said numerous times that China's Communist

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Party has never interfered, has never been able to access

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:32.800
<v Speaker 1>this information, and that in fact, TikTok has taken steps

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to make sure to prevent that eventuality. So, for example,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>TikTok moved all US citizen data to servers within the

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>United States that would not be accessible by Chinese Communist

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Party representatives. These servers belonged to the US company Oracle,

0:15:50.840 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>so the company that actually is overseeing the servers is

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>an American company that does not have ties to byte Dance.

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>This was all part of Project Texas. As TikTok explains,

0:16:04.080 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that project has five pillars that encompass independent governance, data

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>protection and access control, software assurance, content assurance, and monitoring

0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>and compliance. TikTok says, it quote spent the last two

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>years developing a framework through discussions with the Committee on

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Foreign Investment in the United States, and we've spent roughly

0:16:26.600 --> 0:16:31.480
<v Speaker 1>one point five billion dollars to date on implementation end quote.

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>So what TikTok is saying is, hey, we've been working

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in good faith with the US government for years now

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that this data remains safe and secure and

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>within the boundaries and borders of the United States. Part

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:47.800
<v Speaker 1>of those efforts included the formation of a subsidiary called

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>TikTok Us Data Security, which is quote an entirely independent

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 1>business entity tasked with managing all business functions that require

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>access to user data identified by the US god government

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>as needing additional protection and safeguarding the systems that deliver

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>content on the app in the US to ensure that

0:17:07.600 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it is free from foreign manipulation end quote. Now there's

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a ton more to say about TikTok's efforts to avoid

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>the situation that would fall on the company if this

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>bill were to get passed into law, but I urge

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you to check out TikTok's post on the matter. You

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>can find it at USDs dot TikTok dot com slash

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>USDs dash about. That's a lot, but that's where you

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>can read up on TikTok's policies here. Now, I will

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>also add there have been reports, whether you know, legitimate

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 1>or not, people in China allegedly accessing TikTok data, not

0:17:46.520 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>always US citizen data, but that in fact Byteedance employees

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>have been able to access user information through TikTok. So

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of conflicting reports about whether or

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>not TikTok's infrastructure is sort of air gapped from China

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>or not, and their conflicting reports about whether ByteDance has

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:16.920
<v Speaker 1>access to the information. That uncertainty has further fueled the

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 1>political scenario that we're in today. Now, why did Project

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Texas happen? In the first place. Well, it became a

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:30.000
<v Speaker 1>necessity because back in twenty twenty, the then US President

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump had identified TikTok as a threat to national security. Now,

0:18:35.000 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>in many ways, this was really a part of a

0:18:38.000 --> 0:18:41.959
<v Speaker 1>larger trade conflict that the United States had with China.

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>At that time, Trump and China had engaged in sort

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of a trade war with one another, and some argued

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>that Trump's reasoning was based more on a desire to

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>find leverage against China and not so much about responding

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to a perceived threat to national security. So some were

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>saying that the national security message was really just kind

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>of a front and that really this was more of

0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the trade situation. Others felt that this was just the

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>latest in a very long line of xenophobic positions that

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>various US leaders have taken over the years, and this

0:19:18.160 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>is not related to any specific party. This has happened

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 1>over and over with leaders across all different political ideologies.

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>That despite the fact that America is made up of

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a people who mostly come from other places, apart from

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Native Americans who were here before everybody else, there's still

0:19:37.720 --> 0:19:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a really healthy distrust among some circles of citizens of

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>anyone who comes from anywhere other than the United States.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>In order to really see this in action like highlighted

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to an absurd degree, just watch footage of any wrestling

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.520
<v Speaker 1>promotion from the nineteen seventies to the early two thousands

0:19:56.720 --> 0:20:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in which the foreigner gimmick was used to as establish

0:20:00.560 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a heel or a bad guy. You would get people

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>channing USA, USA, USA. It's the jingoism is ridiculous at

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that level, but it does kind of highlight something that

0:20:12.000 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>was present in other parts of society, just to an

0:20:15.040 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 1>absurd degree. But whatever Trump's motivation was, there were plenty

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>of critics who said there were very good reasons to

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>be concerned about TikTok, and right away the folks at

0:20:25.240 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 1>TikTok got to work creating a system that would attempt

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to mollify the concerns of US critics. Now, interestingly, this week,

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump has argued that a ban on TikTok would

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>be a bad idea. And we'll get into why he

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:43.439
<v Speaker 1>has reversed his position after he led the charge to

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>go after TikTok just four years ago. Spoiler alert, It

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 1>probably has a lot to do with gobs and gobs

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.919
<v Speaker 1>of money as well as an axe he has to

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>grind against one of TikTok's competitors, all right, So one

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>reason that US leaders have sought ban on TikTok has

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>to do with this perceived threat of Chinese espionage. Never

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Mind if it's a real threat or not, the perception

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>is all that matters. That American citizens, through their obsession

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and use of this app, would essentially be handing over

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>loads of information and intelligence to a foreign adversary, and

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>the United States would be weakened from a national security level.

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.360
<v Speaker 1>But that's not the only reason some leaders have their

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>sites set on TikTok. Another is a concern that the

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 1>app is manipulating users, particularly young users, either intentionally or

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:41.439
<v Speaker 1>otherwise by algorithmically sharing misinformation, propaganda, and harmful material. So

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:46.640
<v Speaker 1>if we assume there's an intentionality to this, that TikTok

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>is purposefully doing this, then there's a fear that TikTok,

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.720
<v Speaker 1>through influence from Byteedance and then by extension, the Chinese

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Communist Party, would use this app to deliver, say, Chinese

0:21:57.680 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>propaganda to US users. This is the someone please think

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:06.200
<v Speaker 1>of the children argument. Now, I would argue that even

0:22:06.359 --> 0:22:10.280
<v Speaker 1>if this were true, it's a dumb reason to specifically

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>target TikTok. In fact, it's a dumb reason to target

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>apps that are controlled by a foreign adversary. So why

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 1>do I think it's a dumb idea? Well, I think

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a dumb idea because China is already doing this

0:22:21.680 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 1>on all social apps out there. They are flooding social

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>apps with propaganda and misinformation. We've actually seen plenty of

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>cases in which Chinese backed agents have created and shared

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>misinformation across platforms that include Facebook and x formerly known

0:22:39.119 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>as Twitter, among others. China doesn't even need to have

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.000
<v Speaker 1>back end access to any of these platforms to do it.

0:22:46.080 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't have back end access to Meta or to X.

0:22:49.560 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 1>They don't own those platforms, but they don't need to

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:54.679
<v Speaker 1>in order to meet the goal of flooding social media

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>with misinformation in an attempt to disrupt or manipulate the

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>American public. Whether TikTok has a Chinese parent company or not,

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 1>in no way changes how China is using social media

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to target Americans. I guarantee you if this bill became long,

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and if my Dance was compelled to divest itself of TikTok,

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 1>that would not stop China from using TikTok to deliver

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>misinformation because they don't need back end access to do that.

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>They just post just like anybody else. So yeah, that's

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>a really dumb reason to single out TikTok. In my opinion,

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:35.160
<v Speaker 1>there's a legitimate concern that TikTok's recommendation algorithm can create

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:39.040
<v Speaker 1>a bad situation or make a bad situation way worse

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>than it was, because engaging with content on TikTok essentially

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 1>tells the app, hey, this is the kind of thing

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm into now. At that point, the app starts to

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>pull similar content to serve up to you. Like, people

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:55.360
<v Speaker 1>who like this typically like that, So let's serve that

0:23:55.720 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to this user now. And if you've indicated that you

0:23:59.000 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>like a particular kin of content, the app's going to

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>make sure to bring other stuff like that to your

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>attention because the app's goal is to keep you on

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the app for as long as possible, or to bring

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you back to the app whenever you stop to go

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:16.959
<v Speaker 1>do something else. So if the algorithm was just serving

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.959
<v Speaker 1>up random stuff and most of it didn't appeal to you,

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>well you would probably lose interest in the app and

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 1>you'd stop using it. That's not good for the app.

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you watch a video all the way through,

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and let's say that video promoted misinformation or an extremist

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>stance on a particular subject, well, you'd be more likely

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to see similar stuff in the future, and that could

0:24:38.680 --> 0:24:41.919
<v Speaker 1>be one factor that could help lead a person to

0:24:41.960 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>adopt more radical views of their own. I'm not going

0:24:44.920 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to suggest that TikTok on its own is responsible for

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>radicalizing populations of people, but it can be a contributing factor. However,

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.160
<v Speaker 1>this is the case with lots of recommendation algorithms, not

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:01.720
<v Speaker 1>just on TikTok, not just on on foreign controlled apps.

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Algorithms are amorl They don't judge the content. They're just

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for stuff that keeps you on the respective platform,

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>the stuff that keeps you engaged and your eyeballs glued

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to the screen. It doesn't matter to these apps if

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>the content happens to be cute puppies or you know,

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>like dude Bros who are pumping out a set of

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:27.120
<v Speaker 1>tricep dips, or if it's some random person complaining about

0:25:27.200 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, liberal politics or conservative politics. The algorithm doesn't

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>care what's in the posts. It just cares that you

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.920
<v Speaker 1>care and that's true on Facebook and other places, not

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.199
<v Speaker 1>just TikTok. So again, it makes no sense to single

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>out TikTok for this problem because it's not a problem

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>that's just a TikTok problem. This is a bigger issue.

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>So either way, singling out TikTok simply because it has

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:57.920
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese parent company is really short sighted. The problems

0:25:57.920 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>associated with recommendation algorithms are real. In my opinion, I

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>do think recommendation algorithms cause a lot of issues or

0:26:05.840 --> 0:26:09.160
<v Speaker 1>exacerbate a lot of problems. Maybe they don't cause them,

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think they can make them way worse. If

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>there's already a seed there, they can really make that

0:26:14.920 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>seed grow into a pretty toxic plant. They ignore international borders.

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 1>This is not something that's specific to Chinese owned companies.

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>It might be possible for Chinese interference to force Byteedance

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to in turn force TikTok to manipulate the recommendation algorithm

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>and skew it in some way, but that's not really necessary.

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>You don't need to go to that length. The skewing

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 1>just happens through the use of the app itself. However,

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:47.359
<v Speaker 1>just because there might be a possibility is all it takes,

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>because again it's the perceived threat that's important, not whether

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>or not the threat is real. Anyway, a ton of

0:26:53.320 --> 0:26:56.680
<v Speaker 1>politicians have expressed concerns that content on TikTok can be

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 1>mentally harmful to users, that it can promote dangerous activities

0:27:00.800 --> 0:27:04.120
<v Speaker 1>and stunts, and it can radicalize individuals, and it can

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 1>reinforce harmful self images, and I can't necessarily argue against

0:27:08.880 --> 0:27:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that other than to say the problem is much bigger

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.840
<v Speaker 1>than just TikTok. As for data collection, I've said this

0:27:15.960 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>on the show before too. Data collection can be a problem.

0:27:19.880 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>But again, it doesn't have to be a foreign owned

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.880
<v Speaker 1>app that creates this problem. All of these different apps

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and platforms are collecting huge amounts of information. Meta is

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>collecting truckloads of data on all of its users every

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>single day, and a lot of this information ends up

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>making its way to markets. There are companies that buy

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.919
<v Speaker 1>and sell information about people, and you don't have to

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>be the company behind the platform to access that information.

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 1>You can just purchase it on the market. So arguably

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't even have to have any interest in a

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.720
<v Speaker 1>particular app at all in order to take advantage of

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>how those apps are collecting data. You can just purchase

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:06.679
<v Speaker 1>data from data brokers, and that's a problem that is

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 1>independent of ownership of these platforms. So again, to actually

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>address the problem of data collection, you can't just look

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at the app itself. You've got to look at the

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>larger ecosystem. If all you're doing is stopping one app

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.119
<v Speaker 1>from being owned by a foreign company, you're plugging a

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>tiny leak in a dam that has a massive crack

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>all the way through the middle of it, and you're

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 1>not really helping again, in my opinion, Okay, we're not

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>done yet. We've got more to say about this whole situation.

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But before we get to that, let's take another quick

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsors. Okay, we're back. So some

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 1>US leaders are worried that TikTok report sense a data

0:29:00.960 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>collection tool for the Chinese Communist Party. Some leaders are

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>worried TikTok use is harmful on a more individual level.

0:29:08.440 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Some are worried that it's a misinformation delivery system. Some

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>are arguing that it's a combination of all of these things.

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what led to the House of Representatives in

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 1>the United States voting overwhelmingly in favor of passing this

0:29:22.160 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>bill that would ban TikTok unless it was divested from

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>byteedance if it becomes law, And by overwhelming, I mean

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>it passed three hundred and fifty two to sixty five,

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.040
<v Speaker 1>So three hundred and fifty two representatives voted in favor

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>of it, only sixty five voted opposed. Fifty of those

0:29:40.760 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>were Democrats, fifteen were Republican. Now that doesn't mean that

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 1>this automatically becomes law. That's not how it works here

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. So the bill then must go

0:29:50.400 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>to the US Senate, and the Senate has the opportunity

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>to debate the bill, potentially to make changes to it

0:29:56.720 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>before voting on it. And there's no guarantee that if

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the Senate does vote on this, because maybe they don't.

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But if they do vote on it, there's no guarantee

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to follow the lead of the House of Representatives.

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>President Joe Biden has indicated that he would sign such

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a bill into law if it makes it to his desk.

0:30:15.280 --> 0:30:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So if the Senate does vote in favor of this bill,

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>it's unlikely that Biden would veto it. It seems pretty

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 1>likely that he would sign it into law. But these

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 1>are still big ifs. And here's where we get into

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a whole bunch of politics. So, when this bill was

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>coming up for a House vote, TikTok urged some of

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:39.240
<v Speaker 1>its users to reach out to their local representatives to

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>urge them to vote against the bill, and reportedly tons

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>of young people followed that request, and many of them

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.720
<v Speaker 1>were under the age of eighteen. That means they're not

0:30:51.880 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>legally allowed to vote. You can't vote until you're eighteen,

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and that makes their voices carry far less weight. If

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm being honest, a politician will pay if constituents of

0:31:02.400 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>a voting age reach out to express an opinion about

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>a particular piece of legislation. This is because politicians, generally speaking,

0:31:09.840 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>liked to get re elected. But if constituents aren't legally

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>able to vote, well, there's not really any pressure there.

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Various folks in politics stated that kids were flooding office

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>phone lines about this upcoming band, and most of them

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>had no clue what Congress is, what the House of

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Representatives happens to be, what a representative is. There was

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ignorance being reported, and so staffers were

0:31:36.040 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 1>having to field all these calls from children who were

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 1>just upset that an app they liked was targeted, but

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 1>they clearly had little to no idea what they were

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>supposed to actually do, and so this plan backfired. A

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of representatives had this experience, and they said, see,

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you can see how this app is manipulating American children.

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>That proves that our concerns are valid. So womp womp.

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>TikTok's plan ended up kind of cementing one of the

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>perceived threats that leaders have about this app. However, that

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>being said, a whole bunch of TikTok's users are of

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>voting age, like it might have been all the kids

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 1>who are calling in, but that doesn't mean that only

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>kids are using TikTok. Like seventy five percent of TikTok's

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:24.760
<v Speaker 1>users at least are of voting age. This is according

0:32:24.800 --> 0:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to Explodingtopics dot Com, which has a page on TikTok's demographics,

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and it says one in four TikTok users are under

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the age of twenty, So even saying seventy five percent

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>is being conservative because obviously under the age of twenty,

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's eighteen or nineteen can still vote in the

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 1>United States, so some of that one in four statistic

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 1>are still a voting age, So at least seventy five

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>percent of TikTok users in America are of voting age.

0:32:52.880 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 1>The majority of users on TikTok are between the ages

0:32:55.840 --> 0:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen and twenty four. That is a lot of

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:01.800
<v Speaker 1>young people who are eligible to vote. So there is

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a worry among the US Senate that's supporting a bill

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>that would ban this app would in turn sour the

0:33:08.320 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>users who are in that age range. In an election year,

0:33:12.000 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>which it is here in the United States, with an

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:18.160
<v Speaker 1>uncertain outcome where you don't know who's going to come

0:33:18.160 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>out up front, you know, there's a gamble that you

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>would take to support a bill that would be incredibly

0:33:25.080 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>unpopular among young voters, and not everyone the Senate is

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.880
<v Speaker 1>really eager to take that gamble. So there's a real

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:37.560
<v Speaker 1>reason that a lot of Senators, a lot of Democrats

0:33:37.600 --> 0:33:41.040
<v Speaker 1>in particular, are not eager to go along with this

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.920
<v Speaker 1>bill because it could mean losing the support of young voters. Now,

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't mean that the senators necessarily disagree with the

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>premise of the bill. You know that TikTok could pose

0:33:51.400 --> 0:33:54.239
<v Speaker 1>as a potential threat to US national security. Maybe they

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:58.200
<v Speaker 1>actually believe that, but they wouldn't necessarily like the consequences

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that would come with supporting such a bill. There could

0:34:01.280 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>be a serious political backlash. So would young voters actually

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:09.120
<v Speaker 1>turn on leaders who voted in favor of banning TikTok?

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>That's hard to say. I suspect a lot of senators

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 1>worry that it's all it would take that just by

0:34:15.719 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>opposing this app it would make voters say, that's it,

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm switching to the other side, you know, forget all

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the other issues that I disagree with politically or ideologically.

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna swap because they ban TikTok. I don't know

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if that's actually true. That seems to me to not

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>give enough credence to individual beliefs, but I don't know.

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:44.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm also old, so who knows. But anyway, all of

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that discussion is really for a different podcast. So the

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>thought that senators would vote against their own convictions in

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:54.520
<v Speaker 1>order to preserve their political position is not very fun

0:34:54.560 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to think about. It kind of goes against the idealism

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that Americans are urged to adopt. But we all suspect,

0:35:03.239 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>or at least feel like this is something that happens

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit, and you could argue that a senator

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is actually just voting in line with their constituents. That

0:35:12.440 --> 0:35:14.920
<v Speaker 1>makes it a little bit easier to swallow. Right, If

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you vote against your own beliefs because the people you

0:35:18.640 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>represent believe something else, that seems far more noble than

0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you voting against your own beliefs just so that you

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>get re elected in the future. Now, let's get back

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to Donald Trump. As I said earlier. In twenty twenty,

0:35:31.320 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>he famously targeted TikTok. He issued an executive order quote

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:40.960
<v Speaker 1>addressing the threat posed by TikTok end quote. Now. That

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.760
<v Speaker 1>executive order demanded that byte Edance divest itself of TikTok

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and allow an American company to acquire it or else

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>face a ban, which sounds kind of familiar, right. Trump

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>cited concerns of Chinese interference in American affairs, including threats

0:35:56.160 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 1>to US economy and national security, as reasons for this order.

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:03.360
<v Speaker 1>The executive order never went into effect, partly because of

0:36:03.400 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 1>a legal challenge against the order that was brought in

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a federal court. But now Trump has reversed his position

0:36:09.719 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok. He has said that a ban on TikTok

0:36:12.440 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>would be a bad idea. So what gives what has

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>changed in the last four years that would cause such

0:36:18.920 --> 0:36:22.479
<v Speaker 1>a dramatic reversal. Well, a lot of the following would

0:36:22.480 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 1>be based on assumptions that various people have made, But

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 1>let's start with what Trump has said publicly. One thing

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>he has mentioned is that a lot of people love

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and that quote a lot of young kids on

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>TikTok will go crazy without it end quote. But you

0:36:38.520 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 1>know that was true in twenty twenty two. It's not

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.879
<v Speaker 1>like in twenty twenty. Also, I guess I should say

0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>not twenty twenty two, but it was true in twenty twenty.

0:36:47.080 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So that doesn't seem like it should be enough to

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>change his position unless over time he's developed more of

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:57.479
<v Speaker 1>an appreciation for how many people love their ding Dang

0:36:57.560 --> 0:37:02.959
<v Speaker 1>tiktoks like that. That was never in doubt. But here's

0:37:03.000 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 1>another potential reason for his change of heart. And that

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.360
<v Speaker 1>reason has a name, and that name is Jeff Yas.

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:13.719
<v Speaker 1>So who is Jeff Yas? He's a conservative billionaire and

0:37:13.760 --> 0:37:16.960
<v Speaker 1>by that I mean he's worth nearly thirty billion dollars

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:22.319
<v Speaker 1>and he's contributed significantly to multiple conservative political organizations. And

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>campaigns over the years. He's also a significant investor in

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Byte Dance. His investment firm reportedly owns a fifteen percent

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 1>stake in Byte Dance. Obviously, Bye Dance's value hinges largely

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.760
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok remaining available in the United States, So Trump,

0:37:40.120 --> 0:37:43.400
<v Speaker 1>as the presumptive nominee for the Republican Party in the

0:37:43.400 --> 0:37:47.720
<v Speaker 1>presidential election, has a very strong incentive to not upset

0:37:47.920 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Yas's apple cart. Yas has donated a lot of money

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to a political organization called Club for Growth, which earlier

0:37:55.680 --> 0:38:01.719
<v Speaker 1>actually opposed Trump's nomination as the Republican can and it's

0:38:01.719 --> 0:38:04.520
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of money trying to support alternative candidates,

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>but none of that worked because the voters didn't care.

0:38:08.440 --> 0:38:11.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'm pretty sure with a lot of grinding of teeth,

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the Club of Growth shifted its stance to align with Trump,

0:38:15.880 --> 0:38:19.359
<v Speaker 1>and Trump has said publicly quote we're back in love.

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.520
<v Speaker 1>In the quote in response, I'm not kidding about that.

0:38:22.560 --> 0:38:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm not paraphrasing. That's what Trump has said about his

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:30.480
<v Speaker 1>relationship with this organization. So you could argue that Trump's

0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 1>reversal instance has a lot more to do with him

0:38:33.680 --> 0:38:36.919
<v Speaker 1>aligning with money that would support him in his effort

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:40.440
<v Speaker 1>to become president again than it does with a fundamental

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>change of heart, and to me, it seems like a

0:38:43.719 --> 0:38:47.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty safe bet. But there are also other reasons. Trump

0:38:47.760 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 1>has said that one consequence of a ban on TikTok

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is that that would be incredibly beneficial to another company,

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.600
<v Speaker 1>namely Meta, and Trump has identified Meta as an enemy

0:38:58.719 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of the people. Now, a ton of the reason behind

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that deals with perceptions that Meta somehow interfered in the

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty election by perhaps suppressing information that would have

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:15.839
<v Speaker 1>helped Trump or promoting information that would harm Trump politically. Now,

0:39:15.880 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll note that there are Democrat leaders who feel that

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>the exact opposite scenario happened, that in fact, Meta was

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>responsible for promoting misinformation or promoting Trump and suppressing information

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that would have been critical. So it's interesting to me

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that from both political sides there are completely opposite views

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>as to what happened on Meta in the twenty twenty election.

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>There's also the whole element of foreign interference using platforms

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.480
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook to manipulate voters. We know that happens. We

0:39:49.560 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>know that Russia and China both have held massive campaigns.

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:56.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess really, what it boils down to is that

0:39:56.480 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Meda is a pretty lousy company from a political standpoint.

0:39:59.480 --> 0:40:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't matter what side of the aisle you're from, Medda's

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>not good. So part of Trump's reversal may have nothing

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to do with TikTok directly, but more to do with Meta. Now, personally,

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a fan of Zuckerberg or his company. I

0:40:13.400 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>think Meta has done a lot of shady things, and

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.440
<v Speaker 1>has over the years leaned very hard on the political

0:40:19.480 --> 0:40:22.400
<v Speaker 1>system to make sure these shady things didn't lead to

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:26.680
<v Speaker 1>negative consequences for the company. I don't necessarily believe that

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Meta has intentionally tried to sway politics one way or

0:40:30.520 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the other, apart from, you know, favoring Meda's business practices.

0:40:35.480 --> 0:40:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But I do think tons of parties with various motivations

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:43.080
<v Speaker 1>have leveraged Meta's platforms in order to manipulate voters, and

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Meta has not done enough to counter that anyway. It's

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:51.399
<v Speaker 1>interesting to see that Donald Trump hasn't addressed TikTok's link

0:40:51.440 --> 0:40:54.520
<v Speaker 1>to China, which of course is what he cited as

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:58.320
<v Speaker 1>his concern back in that executive order in twenty twenty.

0:40:58.520 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't talked about that really, at all. Instead, he's

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about how kids love the app and how TikTok's

0:41:04.680 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 1>absence would benefit META. It actually would be pretty easy

0:41:08.840 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 1>for Donald Trump to acknowledge TikTok's efforts to comply with

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:15.800
<v Speaker 1>US concerns, you know, with Project Texas. I think that

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>would actually go a long way to stop people from

0:41:18.160 --> 0:41:22.360
<v Speaker 1>asking how his view could change so dramatically in four years.

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:26.319
<v Speaker 1>And if he just said, look, TikTok took strides to

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:31.440
<v Speaker 1>protect US interests, like they spent more than a billion

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars to do so. If he said that, I think

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 1>that would go a long way to assuaging the concerns

0:41:37.280 --> 0:41:42.200
<v Speaker 1>about potential hypocrisy. And that's where we are. That's the

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>technical and political situation here in the United States with

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:48.320
<v Speaker 1>regard to TikTok. Will the Senate follow the House of

0:41:48.400 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Representatives lead and pass the bill. That's not certain. I

0:41:52.120 --> 0:41:54.600
<v Speaker 1>have my doubts because again, I think senators are going

0:41:54.640 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>to worry about the political fallout if they make that

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:01.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of decision. If it weren't an allection year, I

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:03.920
<v Speaker 1>think things could potentially go a lot differently. But because

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's an election year, because people are worried that would

0:42:07.040 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 1>have an impact on the elections. I'm not entirely sure.

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that this bill's going to go any further.

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 1>As for the idea of the US government stepping in

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to force a foreign owned company to divest itself of

0:42:18.680 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a property that is within the United States borders that

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>actually has a precedence, like, it might seem like that's

0:42:26.400 --> 0:42:30.600
<v Speaker 1>overstepping your bounds to like wrench assets from a company

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that is foreign based, but it's happened in America before. Famously,

0:42:35.640 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>during World War One, the United States Navy essentially took

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:43.360
<v Speaker 1>over civilian radio stations that belonged to the Marconi Company,

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>America's branch of the Marconi Company, which was based largely

0:42:46.920 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the UK, but also in other places. And

0:42:50.520 --> 0:42:55.200
<v Speaker 1>after World War One, instead of returning those stations to

0:42:55.280 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>the American Marconi Company, the Navy at first wanted to

0:42:59.320 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>retain cont of those radio stations. They were not allowed

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that, and so ultimately General Electric stepped in

0:43:07.080 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>and formed the Radio Corporation of America, and these previously

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:15.680
<v Speaker 1>foreign owned radio stations became American owned. There's an entire

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff episode about that in the archives if you

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:20.880
<v Speaker 1>want to learn more. About the Radio Corporation of America

0:43:20.960 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>or RCA. So yeah, there is precedence for this. It's

0:43:24.600 --> 0:43:29.160
<v Speaker 1>not like this kind of thing is completely unheard of. Again,

0:43:29.760 --> 0:43:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in my own personal opinion, although I'm not a fan

0:43:32.719 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of TikTok, I feel like it does a lot of harm.

0:43:36.480 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>I also have to admit one the ACLU argues that

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 1>TikTok has First Amendment rights and that a lot of

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:50.400
<v Speaker 1>this bill essentially is ignoring that, and so it's unconstitutional.

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I acknowledge that there are a lot of people who

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>make a living on TikTok, and it does seem unfair

0:43:56.200 --> 0:43:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to just deny them their living. I don't really like that.

0:44:00.400 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>And also, as I've said multiple times in this episode,

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the problems that leaders cite with TikTok are so much

0:44:07.120 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 1>bigger than TikTok, and they go so far beyond a

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 1>single platform and have nothing to do with you. Whether

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the ownership is domestic or foreign, it's such a smoke screen.

0:44:18.560 --> 0:44:21.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't really matter, because we have this much larger

0:44:21.960 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>issue with the way our data gets collected and bought

0:44:26.239 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and sold that have nothing to do directly with the

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:33.279
<v Speaker 1>platforms themselves. Apart from the fact that the platforms are

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:36.719
<v Speaker 1>sort of the siphon pulling all the data into the system.

0:44:36.960 --> 0:44:40.359
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think this bill's misplaced. And it's not

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:42.960
<v Speaker 1>because I'm a TikTok fan, but because I think it's

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not looking at the real issue. It's not looking at

0:44:47.200 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the big picture, and I worry that it'll be ages

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 1>before the United States takes a serious look at the

0:44:54.320 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>big picture, largely because a lot of the leaders in

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the US government are old and they don't have a

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>full understanding or appreciation for the tech ecosystem that exists

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:10.759
<v Speaker 1>that powers all of this, and it's going to take

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:13.920
<v Speaker 1>a while before you have folks who do have that

0:45:14.000 --> 0:45:18.840
<v Speaker 1>appreciation to be in seats of power. So yeah, pretty

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 1>rough week in tech from the US political perspective. And

0:45:24.160 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it'll be interesting to see how this plays out over

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the following months, whether or not senators will handle this

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>or back away from it like it's radioactive, if it

0:45:34.160 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 1>will have any impact in the actual election process later

0:45:37.360 --> 0:45:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in the year. But that's it. That was our one

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:43.719
<v Speaker 1>big news item for this week that I really wanted

0:45:43.760 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to tackle. I originally was going to put in some

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:48.440
<v Speaker 1>other news items at the end, but I realized that

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.240
<v Speaker 1>this was just such a huge topic that I wouldn't

0:45:51.239 --> 0:45:53.160
<v Speaker 1>really have space for it. But next week we should

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:56.239
<v Speaker 1>be back to doing other tech news episodes. We'll also

0:45:56.400 --> 0:45:59.480
<v Speaker 1>have parts two and three of the rooster Teeth story,

0:46:00.160 --> 0:46:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and my dog will hopefully apply to be an official

0:46:04.560 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>correspondent as opposed to just insisting that he be part

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of this. I hope you are all well, and I'll

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:21.640
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. Tech Stuff is an

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:27.240
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.