WEBVTT - Daybreak Weekend: Fed Preview, MS Conference, Tencent Earnings

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break Weekend, our global look at

0:00:12.640 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 2>the top stories in the coming week from our day

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Break anchors all around the world. Straight ahead on the program,

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 2>and look ahead to this week's Fedroll Preserve policy meeting.

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York.

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm callin Hetck in Lolton, where we're asking what is

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 3>the place of Europe's financial services sector in an increasingly

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 3>fragmented world.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 4>I'm dek Risner looking at what we may hear from

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 4>China's ten Cent when the company reports earnings in the

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 4>week ahead.

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>That's all straight ahead on Bloomberg Daybreak Weekend on Bloomberg

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven to three, Yeero, New York, Bloomberg ninety nine to one, Washington, DC,

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg ninety two to nine, Boston, DAB Digital Radio, London,

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Sirias XM one twenty one, and around the world on

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App.

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Good day to you. I'm Tom Busby, and we begin

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.240
<v Speaker 2>today's program with the Federal Reserve wrapping up a two

0:01:07.319 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 2>day meeting on Wednesday with its latest decision on interest

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 2>rates and for more on what this means and a

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.759
<v Speaker 2>new dot plot. We're joined by Michael McKee, Bloomberg International

0:01:17.800 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Economics and Policy correspondent. Well, Michael, A lot goes into

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 2>the Fed's decision, inflation, jobs, egg prices, economic growth, A

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.240
<v Speaker 2>lot of moving parts right now, especially coming out of

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>the White House. Is there just too much uncertainty for

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>the Fed to make any moved this week?

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 5>Exactly, They've all pretty much said Jay Powell said. John

0:01:36.959 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 5>Williams told me in an interview on Bloomberg, we just

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 5>can't move at this point, but we don't feel there's

0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 5>a need to because the economy is still growing well

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 5>and inflation is under control, and so there's no point

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 5>to moving if we don't have to.

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Now, let's talk about inflation, because we have seen still rising,

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 2>but it's certainly moderating.

0:01:58.520 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, we got mixed signals from CPI and from the

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 5>PPI this week. CPI was a little stronger than people anticipated,

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 5>and PPI was weaker than people anticipated, especially considering that

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 5>both of them feed elements into the PCE, the Personal

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 5>Consumption Expenditures Index, which is the fed's inflation target data point.

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 5>And so it looks at this point unfortunately the CPI

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 5>is going to overwhelm the PPI and it's going to

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 5>maybe push the PCE higher, which would keep the FED

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 5>on hold anyway, So we don't get that till the

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.520
<v Speaker 5>end of the month. But the Fed will be able

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 5>to do the same math that all the Wall Street

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 5>economists are doing, and they'll have a justification now besides uncertainty.

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, the last PCE we saw it did show the

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.040
<v Speaker 2>lowest level in seven months, right, so there was some

0:02:56.080 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 2>progress made.

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 5>There's been progress made, but it's been very, very slow.

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.040
<v Speaker 5>And now if we get a little bump up and

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't signal that inflation is going to break out again,

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 5>but it does show that the Fed has more work

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 5>to do.

0:03:08.639 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about one thing I know is a favorite

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 2>subject of yours, because egg prices.

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 5>Well it's not me, it was. It was the President

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.440
<v Speaker 5>who made a big deal out of it during the campaign.

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:23.959
<v Speaker 5>He's that I was elected to bring down egg prices,

0:03:24.560 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 5>and I'm sorry, but so far he's failed. In the CPI,

0:03:28.760 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 5>egg prices were up in February by ten point four percent,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 5>and in the PPI you're ready for this, they were

0:03:35.320 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 5>up fifty four percent for producers from the producers. I mean,

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 5>that's what the chickens are charging at this point. So

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 5>the egg crisis is not behind this yet.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>It's not going anywhere just yet until we figure this out,

0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 2>all right, So that's inflation. Let's talk about jobs, because

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:54.640
<v Speaker 2>we've seen of you know, not a spectacular number in

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>February solid, but of course that doesn't include tens of thousands,

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 2>tens of thousands of federal.

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 5>Workers, right, and we don't yet have a good handle

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 5>on how many. There are some estimates that maybe they've

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 5>let go about twenty thousand people between the layoffs and

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 5>the buyouts, but there's no good compilation of that. The

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 5>job is claims figures we got last week showed fifteen

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 5>hundred people filing because the federal workers are counted in

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 5>a separate category, and eight thousand on continuing claims. So

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 5>that's nowhere near the numbers. We expect those to go

0:04:35.440 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 5>up a lot. But then on Friday was the deadline

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 5>for all of the federal agencies under Trump to submit

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 5>plans to cut like half their workforce. So we could

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 5>see tens of thousands of people losing their jobs, but

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 5>we just don't know. So the FED has to kind

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 5>of stand by and see and then see what impact

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.000
<v Speaker 5>that has on the overall economy.

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's talk then about interest rates and how it

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 2>affects housing, because I mean, rates have steadily declined, not

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.360
<v Speaker 2>by a whole lot, though still about six point seven

0:05:08.360 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 2>percent on average for anyone buying a home. I mean,

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 2>is there any any green shoots in sight? And we're

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.799
<v Speaker 2>coming into the all important spring housing season right now.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 5>There may be a stray dandelion here and there, but

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:27.279
<v Speaker 5>we've seen mortgage applications rise a little bit with the

0:05:27.400 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 5>drop in rates, but on a percentage basis, it's from

0:05:30.960 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 5>very low to still quite low. It isn't in terms

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 5>of numbers, a lot of applications, and there's just not

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 5>a lot on the market these days. And there's also

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 5>a shortage of houses on the new home side, so

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 5>prices are still staying high even though we see interest

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 5>rates mortgage rates come down just a little bit. And

0:05:52.040 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 5>it's a conundrum because we never had this situation before

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 5>where interest rates had gotten so low that people are

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 5>now locked into their houses because they don't want to

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 5>buy up a mortgage that's four percentage points higher. And

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 5>nobody's quite sure how to make this work yet, and

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 5>the hope is that the FED can continue to bring

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 5>down rates and eventually we'll get to a point where

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 5>people want to move badly enough that they'll accept a

0:06:21.279 --> 0:06:24.800
<v Speaker 5>higher interest rate, a higher mortgage rate, and that builders

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 5>will be able to produce more homes. But a lot

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 5>of what's happening with them is on the local level

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 5>and zoning and things like that, So people in the

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 5>housing industry are not very excited about this spring selling season.

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh boy, Yeah, Well, the Federal Open Market Committee meeting

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 2>kicks off Tuesday, a decision expected two pm Wall Street

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 2>time on Wednesday. Our thanks to Michael McKee, Bloomberg Into

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 2>National Economics and Policy correspondent. We move next to corporate

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 2>earnings from the logistics and shipping giant FedEx reporting third

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 2>quarter results after the closing bill this Thursday, and for

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 2>more on how a lot of economic uncertainty may have

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 2>impact those results now President Trump's tariffs may impact the

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 2>company in the future. We're joined by Lee Glasgow. He's

0:07:06.720 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Transport, Logistics and Shipping analysts. Well, Lee,

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 2>thank you for joining us. What do you expect to

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 2>see in this earnings report?

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 6>Yeah? Hey, Tom, Well, earnings are going to be up.

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 6>It's really going to be driven by some margin improvement,

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 6>especially in their express business. You know, that's really just

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:31.760
<v Speaker 6>being fueled by a bunch of restructuring programs and productivity

0:07:31.800 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 6>programs that they have in place, something they call Drive

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 6>and Network two point zero. You know, what we're going

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.160
<v Speaker 6>to see though, is probably not the full benefit of

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.920
<v Speaker 6>these programs because volume is going to be relatively tepid.

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:50.400
<v Speaker 6>Could be you know, up one percent, down one percent

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 6>in the quarter, really really don't know. But you know,

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 6>when volumes start increasing with a better backdrop, you really

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 6>show the best it fits from these cost cutting and

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:08.720
<v Speaker 6>productivity inducing initiatives that they've undergne. You know, FedEx is

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 6>kind of going through somewhat of a transition. You know,

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 6>they've walked away from less or lower margin business like

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 6>from the US postal service. That will create somewhat of

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 6>a tougher headwind starting in April for you know, when

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:27.080
<v Speaker 6>when comparing year every year volumes.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Now, that's a reflection of consumers and businesses pulling back.

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 6>If you look at or listen to a bunch of

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 6>the large retailers their earnings call, they've been I guess

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 6>a little more cautious in terms of the appetite for consumers, uh,

0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 6>you know, the e commerce while it's still growing. You know,

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 6>if people have less money to spend and they're spending

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 6>more money at the grocery store, you know, they're gonna

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 6>they're gonna be buying less stuff, and therefore FedEx and

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:57.559
<v Speaker 6>ups are going to be shipping uh less freight to

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 6>people's doors. And also, you know that trend of you know,

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 6>e commerce and what we call B two C traffic

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 6>is a lot less profitable than you know, an envelope

0:09:09.640 --> 0:09:13.640
<v Speaker 6>going from one law firm to another, because that B

0:09:13.679 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 6>to B traffic tends to have a lot more shipments

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 6>associated with each of them. So, you know, if FedEx

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 6>a driver would go to a law firm and deliver

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 6>twenty packages and then probably pick up another twenty packages.

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 6>Where when they come to our house to deliver you know,

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:32.440
<v Speaker 6>a shirt that you ordered, they're probably only delivering one

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.760
<v Speaker 6>or you know, if they're lucky, to packages at the

0:09:34.760 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 6>same time. And those costs per packages are pretty high.

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:41.520
<v Speaker 6>And that's really why the company has been so actively

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 6>looking to improve its overall productivity to kind of deal

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 6>with the reality of this new normal for them.

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:50.839
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me ask you, if those costly home deliveries,

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>and certainly people are buying more on the internet, who

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 2>is making up that slack? Is it Amazon or are

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 2>there other players in the field.

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, obviously Ison, you know, is doing a lot.

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 6>If you know, there were some stats that there's that

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 6>said that they're the leader deliverer, but you know, they

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 6>are also delivering mostly their own stuff where FedEx and

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 6>GPS are going after the businesses outside of Amazon, and

0:10:19.160 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 6>that is still a large market that they can go after.

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 6>So you know, they are delivering it, and so is

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 6>the US Postal Service for that matter, So you know,

0:10:27.480 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 6>you there is competition within the market. You know what

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 6>I would also say, you know, not to pivot to

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 6>too hard on this, but you know they're their freight business,

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 6>which is their lesson truckload business. FedEx Freight is the

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 6>largest lesson truckload carrier in North America. That business is

0:10:43.320 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 6>under pressure too. The good news is that you know,

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 6>uh tonnage might be down by mid single digits, rates

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 6>will probably continue to increase by mid single digits. That's

0:10:54.679 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 6>a very consolidated market that has a pretty long history

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 6>of good price discipline, so it won't be too corrosive

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 6>to margins. Maybe you know, too corrosive to margins this time.

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:10.880
<v Speaker 6>And what I would also say on the pricing front

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 6>is that FedEx their express business, which is their parcel business.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:17.599
<v Speaker 6>You know, they've been doing a lot of things to

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:21.520
<v Speaker 6>improve the pricing on that business as well.

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Well, let me ask you back to that freight business.

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 2>Last time we spoke, they were talking about spinning that

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 2>off into a separately traded company. What's the status on

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 2>that and then how is that or will it help

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:33.800
<v Speaker 2>the signature parcel business.

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, a couple of months ago they said it is

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:39.040
<v Speaker 6>going to be an eighteen month process, so it probably

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 6>won't happen until twenty twenty six. Not quite sure why

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 6>it's going to take that long, but you know, that's

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 6>the outlook that they provided. The management has said that

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.840
<v Speaker 6>they're looking to hire a number of salespeople for that division,

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 6>so it looks like they're kind of getting prepared for

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 6>when that becomes a standalone company. So you know, and

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 6>the reason why they're doing that is probably twofold less

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:05.640
<v Speaker 6>than truckload carriers tend to have a higher multiple, so

0:12:05.679 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 6>they're trying to unlock some value there with that asset,

0:12:08.960 --> 0:12:11.439
<v Speaker 6>and then secondly, you know, it'll allow management to really

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:15.079
<v Speaker 6>focus on their parcel business, which is you know, can

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 6>be a very good business. But like I mentioned earlier,

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 6>it's an industry under transition, and you know, these companies,

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 6>whether it's FedEx or ups are kind of doing a

0:12:24.400 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 6>lot of things right now, whether it's investing in technologies,

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.959
<v Speaker 6>changing the way they deliver things, or even changing their

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 6>air network will probably you know, help them down the road.

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 2>FedEx Q three earnings out this Thursday are thanks to

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 2>Lead Glasgow Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Transport, Logistics and Shipping analyst,

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:45.360
<v Speaker 2>And coming up on Bloomberg day Break weekend, we'll look

0:12:45.360 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 2>at where Europe's financial services sector stands in an increasingly

0:12:49.440 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 2>fragmented world. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg. This

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 2>is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead at

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:08.920
<v Speaker 2>the top stories for investors in the coming week. I'm

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 2>Tom Busby in New York. Up later in our program

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 2>a look ahead to a rate decision from the Bank

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>of Japan and earnings from a top Chinese tech giant.

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.960
<v Speaker 2>But first, as the European Union prepares to square up

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:22.960
<v Speaker 2>to President Trump's tariffs, the future of the region's financial

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 2>sector remains uncertain. This week in London, Morgan Stanley hosts

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the European Financials Conference, where international trade and geopolitics are

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 2>likely to feature high on the agenda. Now for more,

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 2>let's go to London and bring in Bloomberg Daybreak Europe

0:13:37.240 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 2>anchor Caroline hepgar.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>Tom Trump tariff's economic growth and defense spending. There are

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 3>some major issues that bankers must reckon with on tariff's

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 3>European Commissioned President Ersina Vondelaine says the EU is not

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 3>the problem. That message came as she delivered a firm

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:58.080
<v Speaker 3>response to the Trump Administration's tariffs. EU duties on up

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 3>to twenty six billion eurosworth American goods after the US

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:06.920
<v Speaker 3>administration imposed twenty five percent tariffs on steel and aluminium imports.

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 3>The EU is also targeting goods from Republican led states,

0:14:11.240 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 3>according to a senior EU official, but it is also

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 3>leading to downgrades in economic growth for major European economies

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 3>such as France, and there may be further escalations with

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 3>EU metals tariffs that had been put in place during

0:14:26.680 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 3>Trump's first term and later suspended due to be reintroduced

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.240
<v Speaker 3>in full on the second of April, along with some

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 3>levees that have never previously been in force. So all

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 3>of this situation leaves Europe's economy in flux. Then there

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 3>is the need for greater defense spending amidst renewed efforts

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 3>to secure peace between Russia and Ukraine, and questions about

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 3>how that surge in military spending will be funded on

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 3>the continent. There are also more regular topics on the

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 3>minds of the leaders in European five finance who are

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 3>due to gather here in London for the upcoming Morgan

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 3>Stanley European Financials Conference. Think inflation, interest rates, and deregulation,

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:16.360
<v Speaker 3>for example, how much will sweeping US rollbacks affect bankers here.

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 3>In the past, this Morgan Stanley event has attracted CEOs,

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 3>including UBS's Sergio Amoti. Remember he used the gathering last

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 3>year to share part of the rationale behind his firm's

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:34.360
<v Speaker 3>acquisition of rival credit Sweese. So how are the giants

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 3>of the financial sector thinking about the future. It's a

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 3>conversation I've been having with Bloomberg's finance reporter Laura Noonan.

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's pretty much got all the big names. I mean,

0:15:45.160 --> 0:15:47.360
<v Speaker 7>they have a superb lineup every year, and this year

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 7>basically pretty much every important European bank CEO is going

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 7>to be there and is going to be speaking. So

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 7>you've got the likes of like Deutsche Bang CEO, Christian Sewing, Ubsser,

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 7>is Imati Santanderra's Exeter and Beteen Unicredits, Andrea Ortchell, who's

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 7>of course very interesting at the moment be in Pcos.

0:16:05.360 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 7>Basically everybody is going so we're expecting lots of news

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 7>out of this.

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, deregulation is surely going to be a big theme

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 3>for the financial industry this year. Do you think it

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 3>will come up doing the discussions?

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think the debate is really gaining pace here

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 7>in Europe now, so I think obviously what's happening in

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 7>the US is causing lots of banks to push quite

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 7>hard on this, and we're definitely seeing early signs at

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 7>the European Commission is listening and Europe at large is listening.

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 7>So we had a story earlier this week or possibly

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 7>late last week about them accelerating a review of the

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 7>competitiveness of European banking, and that's going to now happen

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 7>by the end of next year. They've also said that

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 7>they will remain alert. They're looking at what they can

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 7>do around the latest package of the bank capital rule.

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 7>So I think there's a big push and there is

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 7>some responsiveness. So I think now is probably the moment

0:16:56.280 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 7>when we're going to see the European banks take the

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 7>early signs indications that the EU is ready to act

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 7>and really try to drive home as much change as

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 7>they can. And certainly what's happening in the US is

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.359
<v Speaker 7>giving them a lot of power. The Europeans are big

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 7>fans at the level playing field, and if the banks

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:14.920
<v Speaker 7>can argue that banks in the US are getting concessions

0:17:15.000 --> 0:17:17.560
<v Speaker 7>and that they will be disadvantaged on the global stage

0:17:17.600 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 7>if they don't get the same, then that is going

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.399
<v Speaker 7>to be a persuasive argument. And the one thing I

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 7>will say as well as people often say this is

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 7>only an issue for the big banks who compete internationally,

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 7>but it's not. It's also an issue for the smaller

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 7>banks who are listed, who are competing for investment internationally.

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 7>So they can definitely inmit those arguments and they will.

0:17:36.359 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, but how has Europe's financial services sector them reacted

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.000
<v Speaker 3>to the tariff news I mean, if there's so much

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 3>of the influence of the US coming to the European

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 3>banking space, what are they thinking about when it comes

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 3>to Trump tariffs.

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 7>I mean, tariffs are bad in that tariffs a bad

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 7>for the overall economy, and banks are if you take aside,

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.760
<v Speaker 7>if you exclude the investment bank portion, which does do

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 7>well on volatility, banks are mostly pure plays on the economy.

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:04.359
<v Speaker 7>And if you take the view the tariffs at a

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 7>macro level hurt economic growth, then they are going to

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.479
<v Speaker 7>be bad for banks who are dependent on economic growth.

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.880
<v Speaker 7>They are especially bad for banks that do a lot

0:18:12.920 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 7>across border business in areas that could be affected by tariffs.

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 7>So I think tariffs are a net negative, but they're

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 7>also you know, when you're in banks, you think about

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 7>two things. There's the things that you can control and

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:25.840
<v Speaker 7>the things there's the things that you can't. And they're

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.359
<v Speaker 7>maybe at the very very senior level. Some of the

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 7>most senior bankers think that if they make big statements

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 7>they can help shape the narrative. But for most bankers

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 7>this is something which is outside of their control and

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 7>they'll just have to try to work around it as

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:39.920
<v Speaker 7>best they can.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 3>What about the geopolitics then obviously a big topic for us,

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 3>for people in business in general. But again, do you

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 3>think that's something that is driving trends or driving anythinking

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.439
<v Speaker 3>in the banking and financial services sector.

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 7>So I think banking has become more balganized, and that's

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 7>something we've seen from the two thousand and seven eight

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:05.000
<v Speaker 7>crisis onwards. Banks are less global than they were, and

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:07.719
<v Speaker 7>European banks in particular are a lot less global than

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.880
<v Speaker 7>they were, and in a sense that does lead them

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.919
<v Speaker 7>somewhat less exposed to geopolitical trends and they would have

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 7>been two decades ago.

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 6>Now.

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 7>It's not to say it doesn't matter at all, but

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 7>it doesn't matter as much. It will matter more to banks.

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:22.679
<v Speaker 7>You know, we've already seen some of the banks You've

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 7>had exposures to Eastern Europe and that has been a

0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:28.119
<v Speaker 7>challenging period for them as they've tried to navigate that.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:30.720
<v Speaker 7>I think banks, you have, big US businesses will be

0:19:30.760 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 7>waiting to see how they're positioned on that geopolitical tensions.

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 7>Then that hit the overall macro picture again for banks.

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 7>So much of this does come back to the macro picture,

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 7>and if and if you have geopolitical tensions spiking, say

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 7>oil prices, and if that leads to inflation and that

0:19:46.320 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 7>takes economy to a certain place, that's the impact that

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 7>they will you know, that will inevitably have an impact

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 7>on lots of these businesses. So yes, they're definitely thinking

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 7>very hard about this. But also the investment banks, the

0:19:57.160 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 7>trade banks, they will also spy an opportunity here. They

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:02.239
<v Speaker 7>will say, oh, we can help clients to navigate these

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.679
<v Speaker 7>unprecented times, and they will try to use that to

0:20:04.720 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 7>win advisory business. So probably a net negative, but with

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 7>some positives built in there too, if that.

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 3>Makes sense, Yes, absolutely. Meanwhile, of course factored into that

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 3>may be lead into that thinking will be the expectation

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 3>of increased defense spending. That's a huge issue for Europe.

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 3>Will helping to meet the funding deficit be on the

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 3>minds of financial services leaders in Europe?

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 7>So I think yeah, absolutely. I mean one of the

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 7>big questions is how much of this will be done

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 7>through public money versus how much have we done through

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 7>the private money? And then to the extent that it

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 7>is not public money, will it be bank lending, will

0:20:41.920 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 7>it be capital markets? As your listeners will know, the

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.159
<v Speaker 7>Capital Markets Union is very much tied into the strategic

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 7>need to fund raise around these things. At the same time,

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 7>we are seeing a sea change in terms of how

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 7>investors and private equity funds and even banks themselves view

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 7>defense assets. I mean, they have been assets that people

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 7>have not really wanted to get too deep in previously

0:21:03.680 --> 0:21:07.199
<v Speaker 7>because of ESG concerns, concerns that it looks bad. And

0:21:07.280 --> 0:21:11.320
<v Speaker 7>I think we're definitely seeing a change in defense looking

0:21:11.359 --> 0:21:14.000
<v Speaker 7>like something good to put money in versus something bad

0:21:14.040 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 7>to put money. And I think that's something. And I

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 7>was talking to someone about this yesterday who's in the market,

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 7>and they were saying, you know how they have traditionally

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 7>thought that, you know, they can't be seen to be

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 7>doing this, but now there's quite a lot of money

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 7>to be made here, and I think you will see

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 7>these kind of pragmatic shifts take place. But also because

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.959
<v Speaker 7>there's such a clear public narrative around defense is a

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 7>patriotic thing for Europe. But I think something that we

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:37.960
<v Speaker 7>are definitely seeing from the US trend is that there's

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 7>more of a Europe first, America first, and having a

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 7>common thing which we are different too. I mean, I'm

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 7>not going to say enemy, but having Europe kind of

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 7>galvanized as one. People are quite hopeful that could be

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 7>positive for European banks, for European policy, for capital markets union,

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 7>because it just makes everyone pull in the same direction.

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:59.440
<v Speaker 7>Often in Europe we suffer because people are all pulling

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:01.639
<v Speaker 7>in different You know, we have the EU, but it

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:03.959
<v Speaker 7>is essentially a lot of different member states and they

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 7>all want different things, whereas in this case that you

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 7>all want the same thing, and that can be a

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 7>powerful galvanizing force for the sector.

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 3>I think yes, well, defense being seen as far more

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 3>existential obviously, but also maybe more ethical, more necessary. Look

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:25.399
<v Speaker 3>these major issues aside, then how do you think about

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 3>the ECB ECB policy in all of this? In recent

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:33.080
<v Speaker 3>days we had the ECBN it watches an event in

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 3>Frankfurt with Christine Legard talking about, you know, the idea

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 3>of inflation, whether or not you know two percent is possible,

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 3>the pressures that they're are on getting to that two

0:22:43.760 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 3>percent goal. How does the European financial sector now think

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 3>about ECB policy?

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 7>So interest racist is always really interesting because there's this

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 7>kind of hypothetical theory around banking, which is banks do

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 7>better when interest rates they're high because the gap between

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 7>what you charge for lending and what you pay for

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 7>deposits increases, then the interest margin compression expansion. In theory,

0:23:05.720 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 7>it plays out a little bit differently. And what we

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 7>will have seen throughout the last cycle is that European

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 7>banks didn't take the kind of loan losses people expected

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 7>as interest rates rose, and there is hope. I think

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.880
<v Speaker 7>that if interest rates are now coming down in quite

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 7>a systematic way, that means that the pain that some

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 7>people thought was deferred will actually be just pushed out completely.

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.439
<v Speaker 7>Because people have managed to adjust to interest rates, they

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 7>haven't begun defaulting on their loans. There's always a time lag,

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 7>but if interest rates are now cruising down the way,

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:36.600
<v Speaker 7>maybe that lag default won't actually come through, which we'd

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 7>be beneficial for a bank. So structurally, if we move

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 7>to a lower interest rate environment, that is bad, but

0:23:43.200 --> 0:23:45.760
<v Speaker 7>I think in this case there are reasons to see

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 7>positives in it as well, because it does mean that

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.840
<v Speaker 7>those fears, because there's always been a fear about loan losses,

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 7>and it goes back to the crisis as well. Even

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 7>when loan losses are low, people are like, but are

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:58.800
<v Speaker 7>they actually that low? Are the banks hiding something? Are

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 7>we just waiting for misery around the corner. And I

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:05.719
<v Speaker 7>think some of those concerns about unrealized loan losses, our

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 7>loan losses we haven't actually recognized yet. I think some

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 7>of those are going to start to fade as we

0:24:10.880 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 7>see interest rates come down.

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 3>My thanks to Bloomberg's Laura Noonan, and we will have

0:24:15.400 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 3>full coverage of all the action for Morgan Stanley's twenty

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 3>twenty five European Financials Conference here on Bloomberg. I'm Caroline

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 3>Heapkeet in London. You can catch us every weekday morning

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 3>for Bloomberg Daybreak here at beginning at six am in London.

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 3>That's one am on Wall Street.

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 2>Tom, Thank you, Caroline. And coming up on Bloomberg day

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 2>Break weekend to look ahead to a rate decision from

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 2>the Bank of Japan. I'm Tom Busby and this is Bloomberg.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg day Break weekend, our global look ahead

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:55.399
<v Speaker 2>at the top stories for investors in the coming week.

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tom Busby in New York. We'll be following a

0:24:58.560 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 2>couple of stories out of Asia this wee week, including

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 2>a rate decision from the Bank of Japan and earnings

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 2>from Chinese tech giant ten Cent. For more, let's get

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 2>to the host of the Debreak Asia podcast, Doug Krisner.

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 4>Tom. This report will come after ten Cent unveiled and

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.359
<v Speaker 4>AI model last month. The company claims it outdoes the

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 4>chatbot from deep Seek. Now we know that China's AI

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 4>sector has been seeing rapid development, especially since last year's

0:25:24.320 --> 0:25:27.760
<v Speaker 4>splash from Deep Seek. So ten Cent will join Ali

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Baba and Byte Dance in this race to capture market

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:34.359
<v Speaker 4>share in artificial intelligence in China. For more, I'm joined

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 4>by Robert Lee. He is a senior tech analyst for

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence. Robert joining from Hong Kong. Robert, It's always

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.639
<v Speaker 4>a pleasure. Thanks for making time. Can we talk about

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 4>the hype right now that may be happening in certain

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 4>pockets of high technology in China? Are you seeing a

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of it? And is ten Cent getting caught up

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:51.840
<v Speaker 4>in it?

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:52.439
<v Speaker 6>So?

0:25:52.520 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 8>I think we need to divide this up into two

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 8>questions really, you know, one is relating to the progress

0:25:58.040 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 8>that China's making in high tech and AI particular, and

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 8>I think the evidence is clearly there, as exemplified by Deepseek.

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 8>You know, China is well positioned as the number two

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 8>globally behind the US in AI, and if anything, they're

0:26:10.200 --> 0:26:13.200
<v Speaker 8>actually narrowing the gap. It's perhaps a little bit meaningless

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:15.439
<v Speaker 8>to try and put you know, an actual time at

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 8>a six months behind, a year behind.

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:18.959
<v Speaker 9>They're very closely behind.

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 8>I think, you know, the evidence, there's more than enough

0:26:21.520 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 8>evidence there to suggest that.

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:24.720
<v Speaker 9>And obviously here.

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:27.520
<v Speaker 8>In China we've had the so called Two Sessions or

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 8>National People's Congress, where a lot of senior leaders stand

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.600
<v Speaker 8>up give their view, you know, where the future economic

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 8>plans are developed, and high tech and AI in particular

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 8>has been.

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 9>The core focus of that.

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 8>So if the weight of continued to state behind these companies,

0:26:44.240 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 8>you know, China's well placed to continue narrowing the gap.

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 9>So that's the first question. The second is how these

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 9>companies going to monetize? So I think this is.

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 8>A question that applies to all tech companies globally. At

0:26:54.920 --> 0:26:59.399
<v Speaker 8>the moment, the hyperscalers and others are spending you know,

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:02.679
<v Speaker 8>humonger amounts on capex. I think the last number that

0:27:02.760 --> 0:27:05.479
<v Speaker 8>was quoted for the big US tap platforms was around

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:07.160
<v Speaker 8>three hundred and fifty.

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 9>Billion US dollars in capex. Monetization is beginning.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.400
<v Speaker 8>To come through but it's at a very low level

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 8>at the moment. So Tyna into ten Cent. Ten Cent

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:19.040
<v Speaker 8>has a foundational AI model and a lot of submodels,

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.440
<v Speaker 8>and as you said in your preview, you know, it's

0:27:21.480 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 8>generating models almost week by week. There's a proliferation of

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 8>models out there at the moment. It's using those to

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 8>generate cost savings and synergies within its business, so that

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.920
<v Speaker 8>will help to support margins, etc. Going forward, But I

0:27:35.960 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 8>would argue it's you know, it's unlikely at this point

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:41.720
<v Speaker 8>to have a transformational impact on their business.

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 9>And then as the third question, or.

0:27:43.960 --> 0:27:47.680
<v Speaker 8>Related to what I just said, what about the outside monetization,

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 8>are there enterprise clients or consumer clients going to pay

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 8>for these things? Well, I think is most of us

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 8>understand at the moment the vast majority of AI tools

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 8>available to a consumer at the moment are free to

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 8>act us. So we need to overcome that in order

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:04.920
<v Speaker 8>to generate an ROI.

0:28:05.320 --> 0:28:08.399
<v Speaker 4>So I'm wondering whether there's an important differentiation that we

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 4>need to pursue. Here in the US, we have these

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:14.199
<v Speaker 4>advanced AI data centers that are being powered by the

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 4>GPUs manufactured by Nvidia. China is restricted from access to that.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Is that an important point to kind of tease out

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 4>a little bit here.

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 8>It absolutely is, but I think probably things have moved

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:28.800
<v Speaker 8>a bit beyond that now. So again, if we had

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 8>this conversation twelve months or so ago, well, which we

0:28:31.680 --> 0:28:36.679
<v Speaker 8>probably did, you know, there there were major worries on

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 8>the China front at that point that these export controls,

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 8>you know, would really forestall the AI developments you know,

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 8>of Chinese companies, and as we've already established, that hasn't

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 8>been the case. So why I think first of all,

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 8>these big platforms preemptively built stock before the sanctions, if

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.400
<v Speaker 8>you like, came into place. Also that you know, there

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 8>are still a large number of countries globally on friendly

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 8>terms with China, so I think, you know, I think

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 8>there's anecdotal evidence at the very least that China's pulled

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 8>in favors from friends. You know, it's very, very hard

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:13.959
<v Speaker 8>to enforce these controls. And then thirdly, you've got an

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 8>increasing supply of domestic supplied AI accelerators from the likes

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.719
<v Speaker 8>of Huawei. So combination of three factors have enabled Chinese

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 8>companies on the software side to continue their developments relatively unhindered.

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 8>So I think we're probably through the worst of the

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 8>uncertainty on that point.

0:29:32.920 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 9>You know, sure, Chinese AI.

0:29:34.600 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 8>Accelerators are still probably two or three generations behind Nvidia.

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:42.720
<v Speaker 8>But again going back to the Deep Sea announcement, this

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:48.080
<v Speaker 8>technological challenge, the potential shortage on chips has forced Chinese

0:29:48.080 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 8>engineers and developers to innovate more and they've moved towards

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 8>lower cost, less computationally intensive models that are more adept

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 8>at running on these lower spect local chips. So again

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 8>that's a with them to continue their developments. But the

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 8>main question I keep coming back to, how are they

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:07.320
<v Speaker 8>going to monetize.

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.920
<v Speaker 4>The ROI that we're all waiting for. Let's get back

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 4>to ten Cent. Compare the company's cloud performance and the

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 4>revenue that we're expecting on that front with some of

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 4>the things that ten Cent is known for like e

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 4>commerce and video games.

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 8>Well, the numbers have been changing over the last two years,

0:30:25.720 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 8>but ten Cent, over you know, the last two to

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 8>three years, has been well positioned as China's second largest

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:38.800
<v Speaker 8>cloud computing company. However, Tencent and Ali Baba have progressively

0:30:38.880 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 8>lost share over that period. The dynamics or competitive dynamics

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 8>of the China cloud market are very different to the US.

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 8>It's a far more fragmented market. And then obviously you've

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 8>got a lot of state involvement in the market, a

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:57.479
<v Speaker 8>lot of state owned companies or so called soees. So

0:30:58.120 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 8>what we've seen over the last two or three years

0:31:00.200 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 8>is these state aligned companies again Huawei, the national telco companies,

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 8>the big three China Telcom, China Mobile, China unicorm taking

0:31:10.960 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 8>share progressively from Ali Barbera and ten Cent. Now with

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 8>the new growth in AI, obviously that should help reignite

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 8>growth or Ali Barbara and ten Cent. But the issue

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 8>both of them have and there is incremental upside and

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 8>out side of the business. You know, for Ali Barba

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 8>the bulk of its earnings growth and earnings potential is

0:31:29.120 --> 0:31:32.280
<v Speaker 8>driven by e commerce, not cloud. And for ten Cent

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:35.520
<v Speaker 8>again the bulk of their earnings is in social media,

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 8>in video games and advertising. So the cloud business is

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 8>a relatively small portion of the business. So AI demand

0:31:43.720 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 8>and development should help drive incremental revenue on that, but

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.080
<v Speaker 8>I would argue it's not big enough portion of their

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 8>overall group revenue to really move the needle to again

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 8>to any significant degree.

0:31:54.880 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 4>So when we hear from ten Cent this week, do

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 4>you have a sense of how the company may guide

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 4>us in terms of expectations on CAPEX spending.

0:32:03.240 --> 0:32:06.760
<v Speaker 8>It's never a major feature for their business, and again

0:32:06.800 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 8>the reason for that is they're a software business and

0:32:09.560 --> 0:32:12.840
<v Speaker 8>they're not particularly capitally intensive, excluding.

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:13.760
<v Speaker 9>Their cloud business.

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 8>But absolutely, I'm sure the cloud spending, as we saw

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 8>Ali Barba is going to increase, whether it's going to

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:23.719
<v Speaker 8>increase to such a significant degree.

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 9>And then, just briefly for people who are not familiar.

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.800
<v Speaker 8>With that, at Ali Baba's results three or four weeks ago,

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 8>they disclosed they're going to spend over fifty billion US

0:32:33.840 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 8>dollars on CAPEX and cloud related spend over the next

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 8>three years.

0:32:38.440 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 9>So that amount.

0:32:39.320 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 8>Exceeds what they've spent in the last ten years. So

0:32:42.240 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 8>that is a significant acceleration and investment there. So I'm

0:32:45.640 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 8>sure we'll see something similar at ten Cent, but probably

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 8>to a lesser degree. And that ties into who they

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 8>are where they are. They're a very conservative company. They've

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.840
<v Speaker 8>been playing the long game in AI. They're not in

0:32:57.840 --> 0:33:01.040
<v Speaker 8>a rush, you know, they're doing taking a slow and

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:02.160
<v Speaker 8>steady approach.

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Robert, thank you so much for helping us understand what

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.800
<v Speaker 4>the issues are for ten Cent As we look ahead

0:33:07.840 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 4>to the company's earnings this week, Robert Lee, a senior

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 4>tech analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, we move from Hong Kong

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:17.160
<v Speaker 4>to Tokyo, where in the week ahead we'll get a

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 4>rate decision from the Bank of Japan. Now, recent data

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.600
<v Speaker 4>show the Japanese economy expanded in the final quarter of

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 4>last year at a slower pace than the preliminary report indicated.

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:30.720
<v Speaker 4>This may give the Bank of Japan reason to hold

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 4>policy steady for more. Let's bring in Paul Jackson. He

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 4>is Asia Economy editor for Bloomberg News. Paul joins us

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.200
<v Speaker 4>from our radio studio in Tokyo. Talk to me a

0:33:40.200 --> 0:33:43.560
<v Speaker 4>little bit about any concern that may be there in

0:33:43.600 --> 0:33:46.239
<v Speaker 4>the market right now in Japan given this move up

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 4>that we have seen in JGB yields.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 10>Well, I think the market concerns largely reflect the reality

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 10>that the boj has now pulled away a year ago

0:33:57.600 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 10>from protecting these yields, being a lid on them, so

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 10>they can kind of go up and up and up.

0:34:03.880 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 10>Now there has been an optick to the highest levels

0:34:07.880 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 10>in the benchmark yield, to the levels that we last

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:16.879
<v Speaker 10>saw during the global financial crisis before then. Even so,

0:34:17.040 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 10>these our levels that are are much higher than they

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 10>have been for a long time. That's causing some concern

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 10>amongst market players and also for policymakers. Don't forget that

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 10>Japan has the biggest debt load amongst advanced economies in

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 10>the world, so rising yields on benchmark bonds is a

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 10>problem for long term financing of the debt. And I

0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 10>think what we're seeing here from policymakers, not only from

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 10>the Central Bank governor Uda, but also from the Finance

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 10>Minister Kato, is that policymakers are trying to just reassure,

0:34:55.280 --> 0:34:58.959
<v Speaker 10>just say, hey, look, this is kind of natural. We're

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 10>back towards a kind of more market focused determination of

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 10>yield pricing, and there's no need to get too overly

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 10>concerned here. These market movements are normal.

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 4>And it seems logical that it would also would reflect

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.760
<v Speaker 4>expectations that the boj is going to begin raising interest

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 4>rates soon.

0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 10>Right, Yeah, I think we're going to continue seeing interest

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 10>rate rises in Japan. We've still got inflation. Inflation is

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 10>going to be above or in line with the boj's

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 10>target for We're getting close to three years now, so

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 10>those interest rates are going to keep going up now,

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:40.760
<v Speaker 10>They're not going to go nuts. It's not like every meeting.

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 10>It's not back to back at rate hikes. We're not

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:48.239
<v Speaker 10>expecting anything at the March meeting. But I think we

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:54.359
<v Speaker 10>are seeing, you know, pretty hard baked team expectations that

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 10>the Bank of Japan is going to be raising rates

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:58.600
<v Speaker 10>every six months or so.

0:35:59.000 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 4>We had the February reading on producer prices. You and

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:04.839
<v Speaker 4>I were talking a moment ago. This is pretty much

0:36:04.840 --> 0:36:06.960
<v Speaker 4>in line with what the market was expecting, right that

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 4>four percent a year on year increase in PPI.

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think so. I think that the main takeaway

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 10>from this is we've got high input prices coming in.

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 10>That means that's going to feed into inflation going forward.

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 10>So inflation isn't going to disappear anytime soon, and so

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.720
<v Speaker 10>that feeds into the idea that the Bank of Japan

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 10>will keep raising interest rates. Now. Is inflation like six

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:39.160
<v Speaker 10>or seven percent requiring urgent attention? No, So I think

0:36:39.200 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 10>we're going to see a continuation of gradual rate hikes.

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:46.640
<v Speaker 4>That is Paul Jackson, Asia Economy editor for Bloomberg News,

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 4>and I'm Doug Krisner. You can catch US weekdays for

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:54.919
<v Speaker 4>the Daybreak Asia podcast. It's available wherever you get your podcast. Tom, Well,

0:36:54.960 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 4>thank you Doug. And that does it for this edition

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.759
<v Speaker 4>of Bloomberg day Break Weekend. Join us again Monday morning.

0:37:00.000 --> 0:37:02.840
<v Speaker 4>I am Wall Street Time for the latest on markets overseas,

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 4>in the news you need to start your day. I'm

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:06.920
<v Speaker 4>Tom Buzby. Stay with us.

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Top stories and global business headlines are coming up right now.