WEBVTT - Record High Car Prices and C3 AI's New Air Force Partnership

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm Caroline Hinder Us and World headquarters in New York

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Mad Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 1>technology coming up. Evis help fuel inflation. We break down

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>today's CPI report and car prices record high, and we'll

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:30.640
<v Speaker 1>bring you the latest in the world of AI. C

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>three AI shares jump again Tuesday without an obvious driver.

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Chairman and CEO Tom Siebel joints to discuss what the

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>company is doing to justify the jump in its stock.

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Clus will speak to the CEO of semiconductor company weather

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Ring the chip slump as Tom Corfield. It's some global foundries,

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the CEO joining us with his outlook. All that and

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>so much more coming up, but let's dig into these markets.

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>It was a big macro picture kind of a day.

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>The CPI print coming in Holler than anticipate to six

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>point four year on year in terms of inflation should

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>be the NASTAC pushes on, throw it up six tents

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of a percent? Isn't the comments from certain FED members

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:08.199
<v Speaker 1>like Harkoh saying maybe we're nearer the end in terms

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of our inflation fighting tactics to yet yield, though it

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>listens more to the inflation override. They're worried about inflation,

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>still remaining hot, yields, boring costs rise almost tempera say

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.480
<v Speaker 1>ten basis points on the front end, looking at the

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>vix though dialing back. Maybe that's more about the geopolitics,

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that maybe those new UFOs or indeed items

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>are shut out of the sky by the United States,

0:01:30.280 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't Chinese. Maybe that dial backs some anxiety flicking on.

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>Were actually seeing a bit of a bounce back in

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.640
<v Speaker 1>terms of the new music around crypto. Look at that

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>sudden push higher in terms of bitcoin, some of the

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>regulatory risks. Maybe we're getting used to the men. Yeah,

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm also looking at inflation, but with I also on earnings,

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and that is a theme that continues to the technology

0:01:48.800 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>sector AIRB and ME breaching temper st gain now and

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>after hours a strong outlook for the fiscal first quarter

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that came in above expectation in terms of bookings and sales.

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Will continue to track that stock across the hour because

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the earning school, of course will happen, will bring you

0:02:02.480 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the key numbers. Earning is also a key

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 1>feature of the main session during Tuesday. Palanteer was one

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>stock that we're tracking really closely, really big jump, taking

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>it shares to the highest level since August. You can

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:15.359
<v Speaker 1>see that the one cent game and them saying they

0:02:15.400 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>recorded their first coarsely profit on a gap basis in

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the final three months of last year, but forecasting profit

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>for four year twenty three, which was kind of the

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.959
<v Speaker 1>key headline global Foundaries. As you said, Carrol up eight percent,

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>big jump, bucking the trend in the chip industry, forecasting

0:02:29.200 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>strong sales and elevated demand in some pockets of end markets.

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And the video interesting seen video. It's shares at April

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>highs right now. But this is largely about artificial intelligence,

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:43.799
<v Speaker 1>right There's a lot of momentum around it. The work

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that the video is doing in the field of AI,

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>a feel good or read through, I suppose from what's

0:02:49.160 --> 0:02:51.440
<v Speaker 1>happening in the rest of the sector. But otherwise a

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of the move is the individual names on the

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Nazak one almost conversely to what you'd expect moving higher

0:02:56.800 --> 0:02:58.679
<v Speaker 1>after that inflation print. And let's get back to the

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.079
<v Speaker 1>inflation story because in many ways said it's your favorite thing.

0:03:02.280 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>E v s behind some of the push high US

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>car prices in particular have had a record high the

0:03:06.840 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>average monthly payment for a new car here in the US,

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>it's now what a record seven dollars, nearly doubling from

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>the late uncles. Because electric vehicles cost about more than

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the average car, the shift of plugins is about to

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>make that affordability crisis even worse. Let's get to it.

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Blue Meg's Keith Norton and Keith it was a fascinating piece.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:30.679
<v Speaker 1>There's a big take on the Blueberg terminal on dot

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 1>com that is so well read about this rising issue

0:03:33.680 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of costs of cars. But it's a global issue, isn't it.

0:03:37.640 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>It really is Caroline and what it's doing is it's

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>putting the dream of car ownership out of reach for

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:47.200
<v Speaker 1>middle class buyers, which was always part of the you know,

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the contract with the middle croup class. You would you

0:03:50.240 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>would have a new car in the driveway and on

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>your own home. All of these things are coming out

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>of reach. The average price of a new car is

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>approaching fifty thousand dollars. That's up from nineteen It was

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>driven by the pandemic and the supply shortages. But you

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>know what, the automakers have discovered they can make more

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>money selling fewer cars at higher prices, so they don't

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 1>want to give it up. Yeah. The mantrack, Heath is

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>lean inventory, fat price tags on those vehicles. The tech

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>angle here is is the electric vehicle effect, right, And

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>some of the most interesting reporting in that piece was

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the price premium for e vs over combustion engine Cause

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>what did he find. Yeah, you know, at fifty dollars

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 1>is a luxury car price, right, Well, the average price

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>of electric vehicle is sixty one dollars and then actually

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>just came down a bit because Tesla did some across

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:47.720
<v Speaker 1>the board price cuts. Before that, it was approaching seventy dollars. Well,

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>that's really out of the reach of most people. And

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>so you know, the e V push and we're expected

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to be you know, at least half e V by

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the next decade is only going to

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>make car is less affordable. Okay, But Keith, a lot

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of the handwringing was about supply chain issues, chip shortages.

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:08.720
<v Speaker 1>We know that that sort of swung into reverse. Now

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to a certain degree, is there still a price input

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:16.120
<v Speaker 1>issue here? Yeah? You know. The interesting think Caroline is, Yes,

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we have the semiconductor shortage that left to dealer lots

0:05:19.080 --> 0:05:21.720
<v Speaker 1>empty that drove up prices. It's the old law of

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 1>supply and demand. But the automakers saw that and said,

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.279
<v Speaker 1>g I, I can, you know, have fewer people in

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the factory. I can have less inventory that I have

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to pay for. I can have lower marketing costs because

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to discount the cars to move the metal.

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's keep this inventory low and these prices high. That's

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.560
<v Speaker 1>what they'd like to do forever more, whether there's a

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 1>supply snag or not. Blue bes Keith Nort in terrific

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>reporting for the Bloombell Big take. Thank you so much.

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I want to stick with the story and bringing Cox

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Automotive executive analyst Michelle Crabs. Michelle, you just take such

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>a deep view of the auto industry. But I go

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>back to that question. I asked Keith, what is the

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>impact of electrification here in sort of boosting up the

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>average price of a new car across this nation and beyond. Well,

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Keith had it right. The the price of electric vehicles

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.839
<v Speaker 1>at one point it was the average price in our

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>calculations was about sixty six thousand dollars um. That's more

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>than the household income for most Americans. So um, we

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.479
<v Speaker 1>are seeing that come down a bit, some of that

0:06:26.600 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 1>because of Tesla's moves, but also because we are seeing

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>automakers start to introduce less expensive ones, and we should

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>see more of that. What is the permanency of this phenomenon?

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>If we're moving towards electric vehicles and it's a slow transition,

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>how long do prices stay elevated? I think for a while.

0:06:48.440 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we don't see them coming back down. And

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>I would quiverle with Keith a little bit. Uh. We

0:06:54.320 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>started seeing this trend long before the chip shortage. We

0:06:58.040 --> 0:07:02.239
<v Speaker 1>saw the domestic automakers get out of the car business,

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the traditional cars and those lower price cars, leaving that

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Asian automakers. And the Asian automakers have not

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>been able to produce them best enough to to appeal to,

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, people who are on budgets. So that's not

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>going to change, and we are moving more towards electric vehicles.

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know when the price parody gets there with

0:07:22.840 --> 0:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>ice vehicles, but I think we're in for some high

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>prices for a while. I just want to bring up

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what we've been asking our own audience about, Michelle, because

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.239
<v Speaker 1>I like the fact that you put it into context

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that six six thousand, like it's more than most Americans

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>bring in terms of their annual income. We asked, you

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>know what is more worrying for you at the moment

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the inflationary pressures? Is it the price

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of evs? Well, actually, generally it is only thinking that

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>it's more about the groceries. It's more about the price

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>of eggs. And I'm afraid we asked the cheeky one,

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the price of love of course today being Valentine's say,

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>forty six, and worried about that. And I'm sure they're

0:07:56.000 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>meaning the services, the idea of going out getting restaurant

0:07:58.840 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>bookings and drinks. But to that end, is there a

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>clever way that we can finance altos going forward that

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 1>it isn't quite so expensive on a monthly basis. Well,

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>I think we are going to see some experimentation because

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:16.120
<v Speaker 1>this business model just doesn't work for many Americans. I

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>think last week it was Hyundai announced a subscription service

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>where you pay for your EV They're doing it on

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>two models on a monthly basis. We may see that

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. Uh, something has to give if we're

0:08:29.720 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>going to go towards more e V s. I would

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>I would say that in your survey if you'd ask,

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 1>are you more worried about the general price of vehicles?

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>And that is what I hear from consumers in the

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>e V part just layers onto that I see. So

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of about the moment evs have deemed by

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>many a sort of luxury item. Oh, absolutely, well, competition

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:55.720
<v Speaker 1>change that. Oh, it already has. You know, Tesla has

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>done some discounting. They did some discounting at the end

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>of this year. They cut prices. We are seeing lower

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>priced models come under the market. So competition um will

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 1>certainly impact pricing, But will it really bring it back

0:09:10.440 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 1>down to the level that we're used to. Doubtful, Michelle.

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 1>We've focused really on the consumer in this conversation. I

0:09:17.800 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>want to focus on the automakers themselves, pure play like Tesla,

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 1>or the transition names like GM and Ford. How do

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>you summarize three when it comes to this transition to

0:09:28.640 --> 0:09:31.240
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles. What is it that you hope to see

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.720
<v Speaker 1>happen in the next twelve months. Well, I don't know

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>if i'd hope to see have it, but I think

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>what we are going to see is a much more

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>competitive environment. UM Tesla has dominated the EV market. It

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>still does, it still will, but we are starting to

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:51.760
<v Speaker 1>see some automakers make some inroads making their Tesla's market

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>share go down. So I think what we're watching for

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>is how much in roads do other automakers make with

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>ev s. Always great to catch up with you, Thank

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you so much, great expertise from Michelle crabs Cock's automotive

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.760
<v Speaker 1>executive analyst. Meanwhile, sticking with autos and in fact just

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>name checked them forward, they're actually gonna be cutting three thousand,

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>eight hundred jobs in Europe as the EV shift takes

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 1>hold of Ford is shifting its modern line up in

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Europe to battery only by and has previously said that

0:10:20.640 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the reduced time and effort to develop and make electric

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 1>cars was going to lead to smaller product development teams sufficiency.

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>There are yeah, a common story, and sticking with evis

0:10:31.040 --> 0:10:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Tesla It's workers in New York Carrow are launching a

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>unionization campaign. The employees who labeled data for Tessa's also

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 1>pilot technology at the plant in Buffalo, New York, send

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>an email to Musque today outlining their intents. Unionized employees

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 1>say they're seeking better pay and job security, alongside a

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 1>reduction in production pressures that they say has been harmful

0:10:54.040 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to their health. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology. I'm Karen

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Hide in New York, and we cannot let this day

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>go by without digging into artificial intelligence in some way,

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 1>shape or form. Yeah, and it's a familiar name that

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm tracking right C three AI. Another jump of ten

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>percent on the shares this Tuesday, no obvious reason, no

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>headlines on the Bloomberg terminal. And then you go to

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the year to date performance, we're up more than a

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent and under an eight percent including Tuesday session.

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.960
<v Speaker 1>But let's let's sort of zoom out for a moment

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and give some context of what's going on here. This

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is a company that I poded around forty two dollars

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>a share in December, all the way on the far

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>right hand side of that screen. We're at twenty three

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:46.680
<v Speaker 1>dollars a share right now ish nowhere near its peak

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.720
<v Speaker 1>immediately following the I p O. So what's driving this

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:52.360
<v Speaker 1>company and its valuation? There's all well and good saying

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:54.079
<v Speaker 1>we're up a hundred percent year to date, but we're

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>nowhere near that historic high. We're luckily carry as you know,

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got a conversation coming with exactly the right person

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and C three AI Chaman and CEO Tom cbol. So, Tom,

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you've had the preamble. You know, of course of your

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>stocks performance, does what C three AI actually does as

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.959
<v Speaker 1>a business justify the trading we've seen so far in

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:17.959
<v Speaker 1>three Well, we are C three AI. I think it's

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:24.079
<v Speaker 1>the world's leading provider of enterprise m AI enterprise applications software.

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Any of you think that that artificial intelligence is going

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.679
<v Speaker 1>to interprise is going to influence the enterprise in a

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>big way, then I think this represents a just a staggering,

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>large addressible market opportunity. Tom. It's interesting to bring that

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>up because we've been speaking to some vcs who will say, actually,

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>enterprise search is where they see real business model fit.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 1>At the moment for the likes to chat GBT, just

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>talk us through C three's generative AI for enterprise search.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>You're going to unveil it in March. I believe what

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 1>will it disrupt? Well, what the C three I have

0:12:59.360 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 1>planned for our represents about a billion and a half

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars of software engineering that we apply to manufacturing aerospace utilities,

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:11.359
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas. What have you? Now, with the combination

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of enterprise search, natural anguage processing, generative AI, reinforcement learning okay,

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and the C three AI platform allows us to fundamentally

0:13:24.559 --> 0:13:28.240
<v Speaker 1>change the nature of the human computer interaction model for

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>these important enterprise applications. So this is a this is

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a huge development, and it's brought you a lot of

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>attention to AI Okay in the last couple of months,

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>as we've seen a boy, hasn't it just and a

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of that attention has fallen upon initially Open AI.

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Then it moved to Microsoft that did the deal with them,

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and then it was of course it's what Google or

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a parent alphabet has us a bit up at sleeve.

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 1>But also interesting with C three AI is you're kind

0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of integrating all of those AI capabilities you're using. If

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm right, Open AI, Google Academia, what are those sorts

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of deals look like? How do you combine all of

0:14:01.920 --> 0:14:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the best learnings. We have close technology and market partnerships

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>with Google, with Microsoft, and with AWS, so as they

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>advanced these technologies as they will Okay in the coming years,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be immediately take advantage of all the

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>innovations that they provide in our underlying core architecture and

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>make those innovations available to our customers in our applications,

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 1>make our applications much more efficacious, much easier to use.

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>And so this is this is a is a big

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:37.040
<v Speaker 1>development and this could fundamentally change the nature of the

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:40.840
<v Speaker 1>human computer interaction model for enterprise applications. This is a

0:14:41.120 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this is genuinely a big deal. Toll my author audience

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, on LinkedIn before we came on the show,

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 1>what they would ask you, And actually, to be fair,

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>they just wanted to know what artificial intelligence competence to

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>see three have And to be fair, I think you've

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>answered that. But it raises a good question right when

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you think about you today performance your thoughts is AI,

0:15:01.640 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>and I just wonder what your take is on how

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 1>much of the trading is just retail investors trying to

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>buy in to find the next big thing in AI

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>without missing the opportunity. Well, honestly, and I don't really

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>track the market that closely. UM I think that you know,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>we've seen a market correction since that this huge technology

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>bubble we had that that peaked. I think about the

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>first quarter of UM. I think with C three A.

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I've had a dramatically undervalued security. I think when this

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>whole thing recovers C three A, I will be, if

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>not the one of the world's leaving providers of enterprise

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>AI applications. And UM, you know, I think that presents

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>a I think we still have an undervalued security and

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be a very promising opportunity. Tom.

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Noting that you've got more than eight hundred million dollars

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>on your balance sheet in terms of cash, will you

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>take advantage in the run up of the share of

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the share price and so anymore shows um, I think

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, we're so. Our focus is on growing

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the top line rapidly. Our focus is on uh and

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.240
<v Speaker 1>running a cash positive, profitable business, which we expect to

0:16:16.280 --> 0:16:19.920
<v Speaker 1>be doing next year. I don't expect our cash balances

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>at this time to go below seven million dollars in cash.

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're very well capitalized. We're in a position to

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 1>grow the business, advanced the technology okay okay, and deliver

0:16:31.640 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a cash positive, profitable business growing at a at a

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>very rapid rate. So I think about the time the

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>FED takes its foot off the brake, I think this

0:16:40.720 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>company is going to be blowing and going and we're

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>wait now and then we're just gonna run the business.

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Will you look to inorganic, quoth Tom, because you're a

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>man who knows M and A. In fact, your last business,

0:16:55.120 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>which you've found a Chiman CEO, was bolted by Oracle

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>back in the day. You understand, I'm name more than

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:04.040
<v Speaker 1>most when you buy all this and it's see and

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>when we were in our CEO of CBOL Systems, I

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 1>think we bought twenty or twenty three companies. I think it.

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>We're focused. So Caroline, it's a great question. We're focused

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:17.040
<v Speaker 1>on growing the business organically. And I think you know,

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:19.359
<v Speaker 1>we invested over a billion and a half dollars in

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:23.959
<v Speaker 1>the technology foundation over a decade. Okay, We've done a

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of hard work here, and I think this is

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to be you know, one of these sales

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Force type stories or Oracle type stories. We're going to

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>try to grow through acquisition were we we believe we

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have the technology foundation in place, We're going to grow

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the or the applicate of the technology of footprint organically.

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:48.439
<v Speaker 1>We have forty two turnkey enterprise applications today for utilities,

0:17:48.480 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>oil and cast, defense, airspace, manufacturing. You're gonna expect that

0:17:52.400 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>to grow to hundreds of enterprise applications in the years

0:17:56.160 --> 0:17:59.119
<v Speaker 1>to come. But you know, I'm not saying, you know,

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>never saying ever to an acquisition, but that that that's

0:18:02.680 --> 0:18:06.719
<v Speaker 1>not that's just not in the in the in you know,

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that's not a focus right now. So in terms of

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>how you make money from artificial intelligence, you've kind of

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>shifted right from subscription to consumption and I'm curious about

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 1>how that's worked out, the timing of it amid a

0:18:19.359 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>boom of interest in artificial intelligence. I think the timing

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 1>was perfect. Okay, And uh, you know, we've seen a

0:18:26.960 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>transition from first perpetual licensing to subscription licensing. Now it's

0:18:32.560 --> 0:18:35.480
<v Speaker 1>clear that the licensing standard for the cloud of a

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>cloud computing is consumption based pricing. This is the way

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:40.800
<v Speaker 1>that Google does it, Microsoft does it, Amazon does it,

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>Snowflake does it. Pretty much, this is the standard. This

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is the way the companies want to buy. They don't

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>need to make big up brunch investments. They can pay

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>as they go. And so it's, uh, we're finding it's

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>being very very very well received by the marketplace, by

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>our partners at Google and Microsoft, at Amazon bio customers

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.159
<v Speaker 1>and bio prospects. Come back, keep telling us about the

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>deals and about what you're doing to grow the business.

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:09.879
<v Speaker 1>C three AI Chairman CEO Tom c Bull. Then we

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 1>thank him now before we had to break C three AI.

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>It's actually we understanding binning for a contract to revamp

0:19:15.520 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the I T systems of the UK's at National Health Service,

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>challenging and offer from Peter Teal's Palenteer, according to reporting

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.720
<v Speaker 1>from The Telegraph. Now Palenteer shares we've got to get

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to it because they're jumping today after projecting its first

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>annual profit. So quite the move that we've seen. We

0:19:31.760 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>saw them after hours of course yesterday, Ed and you

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>recently spoke to the CEO of that business too. Yeah,

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they've really shifted from this kind of reliance and governments

0:19:39.320 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to commercial customers and clearly the market over a basis

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>believing in that story. So will continue to track that one.

0:19:46.640 --> 0:19:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Now coming up, we're going to bring you the latest

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 1>news in the world a VC back startups, with some

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>still managing to raise new funds in spite of this

0:19:55.080 --> 0:20:23.680
<v Speaker 1>global downturn. That's all next. This is Bloomberg time now

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:27.720
<v Speaker 1>for the VC roundup, starting with Indian fintech startup Insurance Deco,

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 1>which is just raised a hundred and fifty million dollars

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:33.720
<v Speaker 1>from a group of investors led by Goldman Sachs Asset Management.

0:20:33.760 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the largest ever Series A for an Indian insurance

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.440
<v Speaker 1>tech company. Will use the new capital to scale up,

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>expand to new markets, and grow the company's business with

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:46.560
<v Speaker 1>small and medium enterprises. Here's another fintech startup that's defying

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the market downturn, Singapore's Aspire, which has just raised a

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred million in a round that more than doubled its

0:20:52.760 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 1>valuation in a deal led by light Speed and Sequoia

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Capital Southeast Asia. Inspires used by businesses for a range

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of financial services, including making international payments and automating invoices.

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And finally, Capsule, the online prescription delivery service backed by

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>five Capital, is in talks to raise one hundred million

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars in a new funding round led by Cox Enterprises.

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:17.600
<v Speaker 1>That's according to the Information, citing sources who say the

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.880
<v Speaker 1>firm's looking to raise five million dollar valuation, down from

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 1>its previous valuation of one point to billion dollars. Carrot, Yeah,

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:27.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see a few down rounds in this environment,

0:21:27.960 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 1>I feel them welcome back to being big technology. I'm

0:21:38.320 --> 0:21:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Caroline had in New York and I med love Low

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco. Let's get to it. Let's get too

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>chips right now, one that's actually based right here in

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 1>New York, the state Global foundryes aid surging after earnings today,

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Now let's not at one point in fact, seeing as

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>big as Move says all the way back to November,

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.119
<v Speaker 1>taking shares to their highest level, as we've seen of

0:21:56.200 --> 0:22:01.119
<v Speaker 1>March two, once again earnings beating expectations. He did it

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.119
<v Speaker 1>in November, he delivered and actually said he's going to

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.600
<v Speaker 1>pose some sort of growth, looking positive for this year.

0:22:05.960 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 1>And as they wrap up the year, it looks as

0:22:08.000 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>though they're still feeling positive, still able to book in

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>those orders. How when the rest of the industry seems

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>to be going from boom to bust were Foundry CEO

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Tom cool Field is here to ask the questions. So, Tom,

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we ask you that question. When we're seeing a lot

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>of the other chip makers, although with different model business

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 1>models to yours, seeing the over supply, the ricochet coming

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>back from the lack of supply, why are you able

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:36.440
<v Speaker 1>to take on these headwinds. Well, I think the first

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of all, let me thank our team, Tom Carfild's atility

0:22:40.080 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>these results. Fourteen thousand people world will hide delivering these results.

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we position ourselves because we play in so

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>many diverse end markets that where there's strength, we can

0:22:50.960 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>flex some of our capacity to that strength. Where there's weakness,

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 1>we don't play in some of those markets, like personal

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>compute is probably the smallest market for us, or smallest

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 1>portion of our revenue, and that's been disproportionately heard in

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:07.480
<v Speaker 1>this particular downturn that we're going through. Okay, so perhaps

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>less of an exposure to a consumer. What about customers

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>their ability to commit right now in advance to use

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>your factories. That's kind of the interesting business model that

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you have, and many times you're getting them to help

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 1>put money down into the investment in future fabs as well.

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested Thomas to how they're able to tackle these

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:30.200
<v Speaker 1>sorts of macro headwinds too. Look, when when our customers

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about adding capacity, these are these are four or

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:37.719
<v Speaker 1>five year long projections they're making, and it's not the

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>temporal things that we're doing right now. And so when

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>customers look through this cycle and look for what their

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 1>growth potential is that their business. I don't think there's

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:50.920
<v Speaker 1>a single executive seal in the semiconduct industry that doesn't

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>believe that in the next decade this industry is going

0:23:53.520 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to double. They start to look through this macro economic

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 1>environment we're in to think about longer term and the

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 1>kinds of contracts that we're signing with our customers in

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the last quarter, a much longer range than the near

0:24:06.240 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>term the term Oh sorry, carry on. Yeah, These these

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I call them long term agreements that now the same

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>long term agreements that we signed two years ago, are

0:24:17.080 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>also creating a framework for us to work in partnership

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>with our customers. It's single source business. How do we

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>both make the best of the situation. How do we

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>work together to get through the this downturn at the

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:34.160
<v Speaker 1>same time honoring the economics of these contracts. Let's talk

0:24:34.160 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>about non cancelation type of agreements that you've wanted. You

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>want of guaranteeing your revenue streams. How willing enable all

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>your customers to do that at the moment. It's not

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>a question of willing or not willing. We sit and

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>work with them and there's a lot of different levels

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>we can use to find a common ground, but we

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>can We could trade in duration for these contracts, so

0:24:55.880 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>add extra years, we could remix their business. There may

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.679
<v Speaker 1>be segments where there's more demand and than than the

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.640
<v Speaker 1>segment they first signed up to. They could pay some

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:09.119
<v Speaker 1>modest underutilization fees for the temporal moment. The key is

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>how do we as partners position ourselves to get through

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>this inventory correction, but more importantly positioned our relationship for

0:25:17.160 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 1>growth when this industry does come back. Tom, I appreciate

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:25.639
<v Speaker 1>that response. Is it difficult right now, right now to

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.800
<v Speaker 1>get customers to sign new agreements, those that are coming

0:25:28.840 --> 0:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to an end, those that you want to onboard as

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.479
<v Speaker 1>new customers that you haven't done business with previously. How

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>much nervousness is there in that fresh field of business?

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>So one we reported we've signed some in the fourth quarter,

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>and very recently we signed when with general motives, So

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>it shows that this thing hasn't stopped. I think the

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>only hesitation for customers right now for longer range agreements

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is what the near term looks like and what what

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>they want to get now over the next year versus

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 1>longer term. And so for putting a little bit of

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 1>a pause in signing up for long term believen. They

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit more time to really get a

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.639
<v Speaker 1>better sense of the growth of capacity they'd like to

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:11.480
<v Speaker 1>put on. For us, is really with the period we're

0:26:11.520 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>going through right now. There's so much emphasis and interest

0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>on the on shoring of supply chains in this country,

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 1>on what the Biden administration has done in terms of

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.880
<v Speaker 1>dollar figures to support your industry, But do you actually

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 1>feel any of that right now? It's your top whole

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:33.199
<v Speaker 1>bottom line right now. No. But let me put this

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in perspective. The Chips and Science Bill solved one half

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of the equation, which was putting capacity on shore. The

0:26:40.720 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>other half is making sure there's demand to use that capacity.

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the story that still needs to

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 1>be written now. Having said that, there is an appetite

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:51.879
<v Speaker 1>in the will and the desire to bring more of

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor manufacturing to gf's global footprint, including the US. Typically,

0:26:56.920 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>with that, entails is not taking an existing design and

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>requalifying it. It's thinking about your next generation designs, your

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>next products, designing those into the supply chain of your future.

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And we're beginning to see something that come our way.

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about designing into the future with some

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of your partners. I think, in particular the GM arrangement

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that I think you announced just earlier this week with

0:27:18.280 --> 0:27:20.920
<v Speaker 1>new In terms of that, Tom, what fools like can

0:27:20.920 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you give us as to the way in which GM

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.640
<v Speaker 1>is thinking about its own supply chain. At the highest level,

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it's giving GM the capacity they need on the technology

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>platform that's durable for them where they want it at

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the best economics. And essentially what this means to all

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>audo the entire auto industry is the type of technology

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.480
<v Speaker 1>they use in semiconductor. As they think ahead of their

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 1>semiconductor content and that growth rate in cars, they don't

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:54.200
<v Speaker 1>see enough capacity on the on the platforms of technology

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and semiconductor that they're going to need, and they need

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 1>to today begin to engage with semi industry manufactor is

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>to create that capacity. By working directly with the manufacturers

0:28:03.840 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>like GF, they get to secure that supply again on

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the technology platforms they want and get it the best

0:28:10.200 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 1>economics because they'll share in that investment to create that capacity,

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:17.159
<v Speaker 1>and then that investment doesn't get marked up through the

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>rest of the supply chain when it comes back to

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 1>them in a finished component or electronic piece of equipment.

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>TOM respectfully Global Foundaries is a much smaller operation than

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>say TSMC or Samsung. That's just the reality, right, But

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>what are your advantages? What is it you can offer

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the chip makers and those direct customers like a GM

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>that those giants cannot. Well. I think there's a couple

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.480
<v Speaker 1>of things. First, we start with our our geographic footprint

0:28:45.560 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 1>where in Singapore, US and Germany and in many cases

0:28:49.880 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>we can qualify a single product continents away to give

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that supply chain flexibility. The second thing is some of

0:28:56.560 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>those competitors you mentioned, the vast majority there are d

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and kept and kept incapacity investments is on what I

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>call single digit animeter, where it's truly for high speed

0:29:06.720 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>digital compute compute intensive applications. We service a different part

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of the markets what we call feature rich semics conductors,

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>where we had you know, embedded memory features for secure

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the security and credit cards and secure transactions. We had

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>high voltage for display drivers, and so where we probably

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>we play in adding features to existing platforms that create

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:34.200
<v Speaker 1>differentiation that our customers need for their products. TOM have

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Tesla or any of the tect giants working on their

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>own designs engage with you about future opportunities. I don't

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>speak about customer engagements on a one to one unless

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>we've done something together in the press. But given how

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 1>important semiconductors are to the world economy and how semi

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>connective manufacturing in itself is so important, you can imagine

0:29:57.560 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that we speak to a lot of direct and you

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>there's about our capacity expansion point I can't imagine, And

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll ask you again next time. Global Foundry CEO Tom Caulfield,

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for giving Kara and I some

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>time on the show. Very welcome, Thanks for having me.

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Now coming out, we look at the stocks hedge funds

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 1>loved and hated last quarter as the thirteen F filings

0:30:18.200 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>roll out. Why many are feeling the burn more than

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that next character. Yeah, and meanwhile, let's get to some

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of the stocks that are being loved after hours, Airbnb

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>being one of them. Earnings they beat, They're seeing strength

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of resilience of people still wanting to travel

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>into this new quarter versus previous quarter. Last year was

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a record, and they obviously delivered a first full year

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>of profit. Notable that Branchski the CEO is talking about

0:30:40.000 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>price transparency had a neutral impact on workings, he says,

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and Stevenson, so I'm saying there's seeing slightly longer lead

0:30:47.000 --> 0:31:15.240
<v Speaker 1>times for bookings currently up a spring bag. Shopify was

0:31:15.280 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 1>among the first technology giants to slash its workforce during

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>last year's market route. Now some investors say it's stock

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>is poised to outperformed peers over the course of three

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>as those layoffs translate to lower costs, narrow losses, and

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of course better cash flow. Investors will see the results

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>when Shopify reports earnings tomorrow. Carot meanwhile, well, we're gonna

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>sick with stocks being rewarded unpunished. In equal tune, We're

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 1>going to turn to thirteen F filings basically funds. What

0:31:44.440 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>they're doing with them? Are they buying or selling technology, consumer,

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>discussitionary and communication sectors? They're actually selling all of them.

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Seems like anything else that happened in the fourth quarter.

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:55.160
<v Speaker 1>We've got just the person to speaked about it, just

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>before big tech, of course had to rebound. Some people

0:31:57.800 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>are being a bit of a pain trade Nali Ba,

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so I gus here to walk us through what the

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>big hedge funds were doing what the big buys were.

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.320
<v Speaker 1>So they're selling out of tech and communications were they buying. Yeah,

0:32:07.360 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting. Remember, even though they're selling out of Tech,

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>there are still certain traders that are actively buying into

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>or Shorty. We'll talk about that in a second. Big

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>tech names, and the reason they're selling so much is

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>if you look an aggregate, they still hold more Tech

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. So the way they're positioned into this year,

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 1>there is room to sell and they're still benefiting from

0:32:25.400 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that game in the NAZAC we've seen. Now listen, let's

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about the names themselves, because you see big divergences

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:32.560
<v Speaker 1>between the big hedge funds and the rest of the

0:32:32.600 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>investment industry. Because remember with these filings, although they're on

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a lag, you hear from family offices and pension funds

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:41.400
<v Speaker 1>as well. Tesla is one of the biggest position changes

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in the positive direction. And that's even as you see

0:32:44.400 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>some big names like Glenn Catt's Light Street get out

0:32:47.920 --> 0:32:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla in the same time frame, you see the

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>likes of black Rock, another bigger index funds, get into

0:32:53.400 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Tesla in that same time frame. So one of the

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest bias is Tesla. But you also see a one

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest bias, Caroline, it's kind of boring. You're

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing people get into tax exempt bond ETFs run by

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Van Guard but he developed You know, it is a

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of ets that show you how funds are trying

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to position. We were talking not just about the hedge funds,

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>but the family offices. I want to point out, for example,

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you have Stanley drucon Miller's Duquine getting out of Amazon

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.640
<v Speaker 1>as quickly as it did. You have Sorrows Fund Management

0:33:22.680 --> 0:33:26.160
<v Speaker 1>betting against silver Gate. Begin there because silver Gates obviously

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:28.920
<v Speaker 1>had a terrible turn of it, and the yes was

0:33:28.960 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>that short working at that point? When did he put

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it on? It's hard to know exactly when. The value, Yeah,

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 1>exactly Don Fitzpatrick's CEO to CEO to what you're alluding to.

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.440
<v Speaker 1>The market value the position is one point seven four million.

0:33:41.480 --> 0:33:44.640
<v Speaker 1>The one thing that was not disclosed about that wager was,

0:33:44.880 --> 0:33:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, what does it really do on the downside?

0:33:48.480 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>You know how low to silver Gate really go? Is

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>he still in the position now? A lot of the

0:33:53.520 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>news about silver Gate, including Bloomberg's own reporting, about the

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>inquiries it's getting from the Department of Justice came after

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:01.959
<v Speaker 1>the quarter. So the question is, you know, what did

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 1>these options, these are put options really look like in

0:34:04.880 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>terms of what Soros has been buying. And again one

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>point seven four million that's chump change for him. But

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:14.279
<v Speaker 1>again what the payoff will be is what we're interested in.

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Can we talk about some of the Tiger clubs here

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:25.400
<v Speaker 1>as well? It's worth noting that the Tiger you know,

0:34:25.520 --> 0:34:28.319
<v Speaker 1>the reason it matters is because it's a positioning question, right,

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And we look at what's happening over at Tiger Global

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and really what you're seeing is still a lot of

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>um selling rather than buying. And I think that's an

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>important dynamic to keep a hold of after some of

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>these funds were so heavily burned after the whip sawing

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of last year. These are big tech heavy funds. We

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>know their private investments have held up better for them.

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Do their private marks start to take bigger markdowns now?

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Especially as a lot of those companies don't make it

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>into public markets. The markets haven't opened yet for I

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.080
<v Speaker 1>p O S. I know you like thirty Night F

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:02.520
<v Speaker 1>season I like thirty n F Season two because I

0:35:02.560 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of names that I cover, right. Rivan

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is a great example the big names reducing or exiting

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:10.479
<v Speaker 1>their positions in Rivian, which was the worst or second

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>worst Foreman. Then that's that one last year. That's one example.

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>What are the big tech names that we kind of

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.759
<v Speaker 1>waiting for that we had some clues that there might

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>be some movement in ownership. Yeah, I think what's interesting

0:35:20.560 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>if you take a look at it, you're seeing a

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>big divergence on let's say fintech because you saw some

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:28.000
<v Speaker 1>buying in a master Card, but you saw on the

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 1>other end of things, you saw selling of PayPal. PayPal

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 1>was a big seller when it came to the hedge

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:35.759
<v Speaker 1>fund industry in particular, and of course when you look

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:37.359
<v Speaker 1>at it this year, there's a lot of changes at

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the top. They have an activist investor as well, and

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>so what is it going to take to bring kind

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:44.799
<v Speaker 1>of the fast money back into a stock like that.

0:35:45.360 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 1>You see master Card, I said, being bought in the

0:35:47.760 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>same time frame, there are were some tech buys. You

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:54.279
<v Speaker 1>saw Alphabet being largely bought in the time frame that

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:58.120
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about here, You're still seeing buying of more

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>financed names and tech than anything else. But I think

0:36:00.600 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 1>if you think about tech and you're watching people get

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:06.719
<v Speaker 1>into the card companies despite some of the issues we've

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>seen in the broader economic environment, more than they're buying

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>for example. You know, let's just take the note from

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>stan drugon Miller, the selling of Amazon so quickly, Bloombogctionnali, Bassic, Triffic,

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:19.640
<v Speaker 1>just dozens of headlines each hour hitting when the thirteen

0:36:19.719 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>f hit. So keeping track is quiet skill. I appreciate it.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much. Speaking of headlines on the Bloomberg terminal,

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 1>some news crossing and breaking. Ross Gerber, the Tesla shareholder,

0:36:30.600 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 1>has notified Tesla in a letter to its general council

0:36:34.719 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>that he is seeking a board seat. I'm just going

0:36:37.800 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to reiterate the Ross Gerber has notified Tesla formally in

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.319
<v Speaker 1>a letter to its general council that he's seeking a

0:36:43.320 --> 0:36:45.800
<v Speaker 1>board seat. You'll remember, Caroline, of course, you remember he

0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:49.680
<v Speaker 1>joined us on Twitter spaces Friday, where he made public

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:53.680
<v Speaker 1>his intention to be a friendly activist and pursue that

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 1>board seat. Well, this is it. Concretely, he's taken that step. Yeah,

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>left us rather shell shocked with at a moment silence

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:02.440
<v Speaker 1>as we took it in On his birthday, came on

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to announce that's the sort of step he's gonna be taking.

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And he's not your usual activist investing. He has them

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>built up an enormous stake in this company, but he's

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>got the backing of some really significant shareholders, hasn't he. Yeah, So, look,

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he's got four d and forty thousand shares at Gerber Kawasaki,

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>his wealth manager. That is zero point zero point zero

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:23.799
<v Speaker 1>point zero one percent of the company. But he says

0:37:23.840 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that he's got the backing of the biggest individual shareholder holder,

0:37:27.440 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>who has one percent. He also name drops some big

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>institutionals that he's friendly with and cooperative with. So we'll

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>see if it has any traction. As always, we've reached

0:37:35.520 --> 0:37:37.879
<v Speaker 1>out to Tesla, We've reached out to elon Mask, we've

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 1>reached out to the I R team. No responses yet,

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And notably, that's actually what he wants to stop happening.

0:37:44.080 --> 0:37:46.120
<v Speaker 1>He wants them to reach out more. He wants more

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>public relations, more media friendly discussion coming from Tesla to

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:52.759
<v Speaker 1>only talk about what they're doing. Fascinating and great that

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you've got those headlines in the middle of the show.

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:06.280
<v Speaker 1>So look, I ride a bike around New York City.

0:38:06.360 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm always trying to dodge the traffic. But perhaps there's

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>a slightly more glamorous way of doing it, the meal

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>a city bike, because you may soon have another option

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:16.759
<v Speaker 1>to reach a destination in style with a in the sky,

0:38:16.800 --> 0:38:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in fact, electric air taxi. Let's bring in Bloomberg's skylar

0:38:19.640 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Woodhouse for more. So talk to us about what this

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 1>was breaking new uncharted territory on here in New York. Yes,

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:30.000
<v Speaker 1>so Blade is already chartering flights. You can get on

0:38:30.040 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 1>a helicopter, you can charter a whole plane. You cannot.

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>They're they're also in the health organ transportation business. But

0:38:37.280 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 1>today there one step closer to launching their electric aircraft.

0:38:43.560 --> 0:38:46.760
<v Speaker 1>So basically we all know about the push behind e VS.

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:49.719
<v Speaker 1>So this will just soon be an electric aircraft that

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:54.439
<v Speaker 1>someone can ride in. Okay, so the Blades take off

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>very near where I commute up and down. Why would

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:00.040
<v Speaker 1>this be different? Why is this so much better? You

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 1>can see beautiful pictures of this. It looks kind of

0:39:02.280 --> 0:39:04.719
<v Speaker 1>like a helicopter. What's different? Yeah? So what about this

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is like we hear the helicopters and they're quite noisy,

0:39:07.000 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>just the regular ones that are flying around New York

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:11.319
<v Speaker 1>city are really anywhere, but this one in particular, it's

0:39:11.480 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 1>very quiet. And today when I was at the Westchester

0:39:13.840 --> 0:39:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Airport when it flew right by, you really couldn't hear much.

0:39:17.640 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So the way that they're designing this plane is all

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:23.799
<v Speaker 1>about also reducing the noise, so that way as these

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>become more normalized, you know, just kind of within this space,

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:28.719
<v Speaker 1>they won't be as noisy. To try and bring those

0:39:28.800 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 1>noise complaints down, Scarlet Woodhouse, your next dispatch for Bloomberg

0:39:32.920 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Technology is to report to us live from the air

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:39.280
<v Speaker 1>inside one of these are okay, you know, challenge accepted.

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>For me. What's interesting here is the reality of this.

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.279
<v Speaker 1>You know, so many players trying to literally pum the

0:39:46.280 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>punk get these off the ground. How real is this business?

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>When do we see it kind of widespread above Manhattan skylines? Yeah,

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:55.239
<v Speaker 1>so it's going to take some time. And you know,

0:39:55.239 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>when you look at Beta, like you know they're in

0:39:57.719 --> 0:39:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the process right now with the f A trying to

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:02.240
<v Speaker 1>get all all of these approvals. It's not just gonna

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:04.480
<v Speaker 1>appear tomorrow. So it's going to take a couple of years.

0:40:04.640 --> 0:40:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I think. Right now Beta saying they're hoping to get

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.880
<v Speaker 1>some sort of f A a a approval by four and

0:40:09.880 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Blade has been a little has been saying that their

0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:17.359
<v Speaker 1>customers could perhaps start to um start writing on these

0:40:17.360 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>types of aircrafts. And on that note, customer, how much

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is this going to cost me? If I'm visiting carol

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>over in New York, I'm just looking at the screen.

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Am I going to be able to afford this? You know?

0:40:27.800 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think you my dad, I mean it's going to

0:40:29.960 --> 0:40:33.280
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit cheaper um, you know, price point

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, taking one of these private helicopters. This is

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily an easy expense, but given the electric factor,

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it will reduce costs a little bit. So we'll have

0:40:42.160 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to see what the price point um becomes when they

0:40:44.719 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>roll out fascinating Blade Beta getting together. We'll see if

0:40:49.560 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that regulatory approval comes too great to have. You have

0:40:52.680 --> 0:40:55.880
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed Westchester skylo Woodhouse there. I mean, well, I mean

0:40:55.960 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>let's get back to something that I think was the

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.680
<v Speaker 1>first maybe for a Bloomberg in general, was some breaking

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>news on one of our spaces. After the spaces that

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:06.680
<v Speaker 1>we do, and we are now getting the reality the

0:41:06.719 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that Rosco but a relatively small shareholder in Tesla,

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 1>but a very discursive one and very out there talking

0:41:12.600 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 1>about Tesla. Big Bull is looking for a board team. Yeah,

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to know whether this is going to

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>work or not. Him being a friendly activist, he has

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a tiny position. He's sort of canvassing support of the

0:41:23.840 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>bigger retail investors. But we had him on to talk

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>about the activism behind Disney, right, and that the penny

0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of dropped in the moment and he was like,

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I'm just going to tell you guys,

0:41:33.120 --> 0:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm pursuing a board seat. But he's basically making some

0:41:35.719 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty practical recommendations, like what is the succession plan? Is

0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 1>Elon must spending enough time on Tesla or too much

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:44.840
<v Speaker 1>time at other companies. I've been speaking at other investors.

0:41:44.880 --> 0:41:47.920
<v Speaker 1>They have very mixed opinions about this, Caroline. Interesting. I

0:41:47.960 --> 0:41:50.000
<v Speaker 1>wonder what some of the reticence might be in terms

0:41:50.080 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of just his point being corporate governance. Many would say

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>when you're at a founder led business is sometimes a

0:41:55.719 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit more lacking than most, and when we know

0:41:58.160 --> 0:42:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that on the board of Tesla are an umber of

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>family members and the like. Yeah, it ranges from those

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that say there's nothing wrong with Elon Marsk to those

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:07.759
<v Speaker 1>that say Ross is inconsistent in his views, We'll will

0:42:07.800 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>track the story. I'm sure this is just the start

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a great bit of breaking while you're also doing the

0:42:12.440 --> 0:42:15.760
<v Speaker 1>day job of presenting a television show, is also sending headlines.

0:42:15.920 --> 0:42:18.280
<v Speaker 1>That does it. From this edition of Bloomberg Technology Tomorrow,

0:42:18.440 --> 0:42:20.000
<v Speaker 1>how Come I see you? Tom Latin is going to

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>be joining us or again it's about earning said yeah,

0:42:23.040 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and don't forget recap the whole show on the podcast

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I Heeart, Apple, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast. This

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg