WEBVTT - Why Bitcoin is Schmuck Insurance

0:00:04.600 --> 0:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So the big question is this, how do investors like

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.800
<v Speaker 1>us get access to the ideas, information, and most importantly,

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the right people that give us the tools and information

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>we need to make informed and educated decisions to have success.

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>That is the question, and this podcast will give us

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the answers. This is Mark Moss, your host. Let's get

0:00:25.480 --> 0:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>this started. Hello, and welcome to another episode of the

0:00:28.040 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Market Disruptors podcast. Today I am sitting down with Mark

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Usko from Morgan Creek and his experience working with institutions

0:00:36.600 --> 0:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and endowments through what he calls alternative investments, as well

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>as his amazing view of the macro the global economic

0:00:44.120 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>view leed do some very interesting conversations. We talked about

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of bitcoin growing to mascual adoption. We talked

0:00:51.640 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>about the current state of the global economy, what's going

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on with that. We talked about what he's what he

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>calls China playing go, and then we talk about big point,

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>where does it fit into all of this? UM, how

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:06.399
<v Speaker 1>people should be approaching it, risk levels, etcetera. UM. Some

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:08.680
<v Speaker 1>really good conversations I really enjoyed. Let's go ahead and

0:01:08.680 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>just jump right into it. Hey, everyone, welcome to another

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:13.919
<v Speaker 1>episode of the Market Disruptors podcast. Today, I am sitting

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.640
<v Speaker 1>down with Mark Usko from Morgan Creek Capital and I

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>am super honored to be with him. He's one of

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the hardest working guys in the space and so welcome Mark. Well,

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me and great to be with you.

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I'll try to live up to the hardest

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>working title. Uh, it's a big shoes to fill, but

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. Well, you're you're definitely doing your part.

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 1>So Mark, Um, for those that aren't aware, I want

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you to just tell us a little bit about like

0:01:39.800 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>what you've been doing and how you got here and

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing right now. Yeah. So the short version

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously I don't do short well, but the short version is, uh,

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, I came out of the investment world that

0:01:49.720 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>we're an insurance company and asset management firm, got into

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>endowment management back at my alma moderate Notre Dame, spent

0:01:57.120 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 1>five years there's the number two. Then it took over

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>as the head of University of North Carolina. This is

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a long time ago, back twenty one years ago, but

0:02:05.240 --> 0:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen years ago, spun out on my own and form

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Creek and the whole idea about morgan Creek was

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to bring alternative investments to lots of investors, so, you know,

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:20.520
<v Speaker 1>build products and services that would allow people to integrate

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this idea of alternative investments into their portfolios. And how

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>little did I know that it would come full circle

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>here today? Uh, you know, back from hedge funds twenty

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>years ago in private equity and venture capital and and

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>now we're talking about crypto assets and cryptocurrency so pretty

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>exciting stuff. Yeah, yeah, really alternative now. Yeah, And you know, look,

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:45.519
<v Speaker 1>morgan Creek today is a resure investment advisor. We've got

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 1>just under a couple of billion dollars of assets, a

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:51.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of that in private investments, and then a year

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>ago we launched a new subsidiary called morgan Creek Digital

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and we've raised a venture fund around that to invest

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>in infrastructure and crypto it self. And just excited about this,

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>this new set of opportunities and how it all fits

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>together in the big world in which we all have

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>to deploy capital into today. Yeah. So I'm super interested

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>to hear your viewpoint on this because of where you sit,

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>having previously worked with endowments and now today kind of

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with more incre digital, working with institutions and whatnot. So um,

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I think uh, bitcoin's emergence has been a little bit

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>different in a sense where it started retail, but really

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to kind of get to mainstream at some point, if

0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we believe it's going to be this store of value,

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>there's probably gonna be this this evolution um that it

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>has to go from maybe a collectible where it's at today,

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>speculative asset into a store of value. And I think

0:03:43.200 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>that it has to probably go through the institution's first

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>before it hits mainstream. Would you agree with that? Yeah, look,

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree it, and I think evolution used exactly

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the right word. I wrote a letter about this a

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>few quarters ago on on kind of financial natural selection

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:09.560
<v Speaker 1>or the evolution of of technology revolutionary. I mean, there's

0:04:09.560 --> 0:04:14.400
<v Speaker 1>nothing really revolutionary about the ideas of distributed ledger technology,

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and in triplentiary accounting. There is some revolution in in

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.160
<v Speaker 1>solving the double spend problem UH and getting getting a

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>new technological application a use case for d LT. But

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think that the evolution is is more appropriate

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:33.600
<v Speaker 1>and and to your point, the big money is controlled

0:04:33.640 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>by institutions and the institutions of God. To get comfortable

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.880
<v Speaker 1>with anything for it to become really part of of

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the fabric of of the investment landscape. I mean, go

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>back fifty sixty years. Most endowments, institutions, foundations, pensions were

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>prohibited by charter in many cases from investing in stocks.

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean think about that. They were mostly in fixed

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>incomes securities. And then stocks were the new news. There

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>were the alternative investment. And then it was international stocks

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>with Arissa back in the seventies. Oh my gosh, you're

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna invest outside the borders of the United States. How risky?

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Not risk you at all. But uh. And then it

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>was you know, twenty plus years ago, when I was

0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>back at Notre Dame, it was hedge funds and and

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>junk bonds. You know, first time we brought distress securities

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to the board. There you can't invest in junk bonds.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, wait a second, fifty five per cent of

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the fund is in equity, which is junior to even

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the worst debt. So think about it that way in

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of unsecured claims. And then when we tried hedge funds, like,

0:05:38.400 --> 0:05:40.280
<v Speaker 1>oh no, you can't invest in hedge funds because that's

0:05:40.279 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>where all the bad people are. Like what are you

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about the right, Well, they charge these high fees, like, well,

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>in what business do you know, does the best person

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.719
<v Speaker 1>not charge the highest feet right? Dr lawyer, football coach,

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:55.680
<v Speaker 1>basketball player. That's the way the world works. So and

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>then it was private equity and venture capital and all

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>these assets of actually become mainstream because, as you point out,

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the institutions finally become comfortable, and it's not until that

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>time when the rest of the investment landscape and particularly

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the firms. Right here's the crazy thing. There are asset

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.719
<v Speaker 1>management firms. I was just having a conversation with my

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:19.520
<v Speaker 1>wife last night. She's got a little bit of capital

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>she's investing, and uh, you know, I was talking about, hey,

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should put some exposure to to bitcoin in there.

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's just buy GBTC because it's easy. Oh yeah, you know,

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the brokerage firm that that we work with for her account,

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>they prohibit ownership of GBTC. That's just silly. And it

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>goes further. There's one firm out there. Won't name names,

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>but it's the biggest one broken jus from not only

0:06:45.040 --> 0:06:47.919
<v Speaker 1>do they not let your own g BTC, they won't

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>let a financial advisor take a new client if their

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>wealth was created by crypto. Wow, that is absolutely insane

0:06:56.320 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>on every level. Yeah, that's insane. So, uh you've seen this.

0:07:01.960 --> 0:07:04.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess you've seen this where you had to kind

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.160
<v Speaker 1>of go back to these um funds or these endowments

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and tell them over and over, hey you should look

0:07:09.040 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>at this, or so you kind out this history of

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 1>breaking new assets or risk your assets in So I

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:18.239
<v Speaker 1>guess you've seen this this playout before, and so today

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you're they're kind of pitching these guys now saying, hey,

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this is the new thing that you need to consider. Yeah, Okay,

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big movie buff, seen this movie before. Uh,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>this is not the first time, it won't be the

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>last time. Look, innovation is scary, you know for the

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>ok the name of your your pod, right, you know

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>market disruptors. Uh, it's all about disruption and disruptive innovation.

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 1>And every incumbent fears disruption, as they should. And you know,

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the street sweepers passed out pamphlets saying that if you've

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>got an automobile, you die. And you know, the candle

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:58.720
<v Speaker 1>makers passed out stuff saying, you know, you go blind

0:07:58.760 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 1>if you look at that. You know, lowing or that

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Mr Edison created or my, my, my, uh my grandfather

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in laws parents, you know, chastised him from leaving the

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>safe job at the railroad to take the risky job

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>at that American airlines company. And uh, you know, because

0:08:18.360 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>people really believed that if you got in an airplane

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>and you went faster than a certain miles per hour,

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>that your body would cave in on itself. So there's

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.080
<v Speaker 1>all this fear, uncertainty, and doubt around disruption, and it

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>occurs in every disruptive phase, whether it's technology, whether it's innovation,

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's custom and thinking about Galileo, poor Galileo, right,

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like, you know, guys, my data says that the

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>earth um actually revolves around the Sun, not vice versa.

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>And they labeled on a heretic and you wanted to

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>burn him at the State. But it is dangerous to

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:58.439
<v Speaker 1>have a view different from the masses. But that's where

0:08:58.440 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 1>all the great wealth is created. That's my pin and

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>tweet on Twitter, right, is great wealth is created by

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>investing in something that you believe in before everyone else

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>even understands. So having seen this movie before, um, if

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you have a perspective there, but you're also on the

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>front lines talking to them about it. Where are we

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm guessing over the last year you've seen

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are starting to warm up to

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this idea. I mean we've seen, you know, maybe the

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Yell and Diamond Fund dip their toe in the water

0:09:27.320 --> 0:09:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like so where are we with that? Yeah? Look,

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean Yale got a lot of pressed, but they

0:09:32.640 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>barely dip the tip of their toe nail. I mean,

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the amount of assets they put in the fun relative

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of their total access was was teeny tiny. The guys

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>actually get credit is Harvard. Harvard put in some real money.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.720
<v Speaker 1>They went big into the fund, about ten times as

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.240
<v Speaker 1>much as Yale put in, and then they went into

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to a direct deal. Um. So that that's pretty exciting. Uh.

0:09:54.080 --> 0:09:56.800
<v Speaker 1>And ARV is a great ceio over there at Harvard.

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you think about what's going on, we're still

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>in that you know, early early adopter phase. You know,

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we haven't even gotten into the early majority. And I'll

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>say in the individual world, the retail world, we're probably

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>in the early majority, but we're just at the very

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>knee of the S curve. You know, we're probably going

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>from like eight percent to eleven or twelve in terms

0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of adoption, and we've got a long way to go

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.520
<v Speaker 1>before we've got got full adoption. And and there's the

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.719
<v Speaker 1>couple of things at work here. One, there's the fear. Right.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got you got people of influence like

0:10:34.720 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamond or Warren Buffett or Charlie Munger you know,

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.320
<v Speaker 1>calling it bad names, a fraud or you know, Warren

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:42.920
<v Speaker 1>calls it rat poise and I always say, well, how

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>do you know what rap poise? And taste like um?

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 1>And then you got Charlie saying it's like trading, you know,

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>harvested baby brains. And my really w t f Charlie

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>seriously brains. So why do those guys want you to

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.319
<v Speaker 1>fear it? Well, Fort of Berkshire Hathaway as in financial services.

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Financial services are at risk of being disrupted by this

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>new technology and so they're they're gonna say bad things

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. And one of the things that's important for

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>institutions is to consider the source, right. Don't listen to

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>people who are shilling projects that have no you know,

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>foundation or basis in in the future. You know, you

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>look at I don't I don't like the term, but

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>you know, people call them shiit coins, right, and they're

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>not even coins right there, their utility tokens. They are.

0:11:31.280 --> 0:11:35.600
<v Speaker 1>They're basically precede and seed stage venture capital projects which

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>have a loss ratio, which should not be surprising to anybody.

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Most companies fail. And there's only about a dozen or

0:11:43.080 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>so cryptocurrencies that actually should be called cryptocurrencies. Everything else

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.200
<v Speaker 1>should be called utility token and call it what it is,

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>preseed stage venture. So focusing on the differences and not

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>conflating terms and getting information right is is going to

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.440
<v Speaker 1>help this thing is. Don't listen to the fomo either.

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got the people who are, oh, we're

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna miss it, We're gonna miss you gotta get it. No, no, right,

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>there's plenty of time, plenty of time to you know,

0:12:09.559 --> 0:12:12.960
<v Speaker 1>have a plan, find good people to work with, find

0:12:14.000 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a logical step wise progression. You know, you don't have

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 1>to just invest in cryptocurrency. You can invest in venture

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>capital and infrastructure. You can invest in lending, you can

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>invest in in uh certain forms of cryptocurrency or even

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>derivatives related to cryptocurrency. There's lots of things that are

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>evolving for institution to look at and the smart ones,

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and we've fortunately found a handful of the smart ones

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>are doing just that. So you're talking about and not

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just buying coins, but buying in like infrastructure place so

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>like for example Microsoft is has been and probably will

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>be a big benefitiary you could look at like in

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>video making video cards for mining to stuff like that. Yeah, look,

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>there's there's all the way to that extreme that you're

0:12:55.880 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Which are the existing companies that support the

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:03.839
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing development, and you know, the challenges is finding

0:13:03.880 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the right ones. It's like like IBM, IBM, what they're

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>doing in blockchain is really interesting, but it's such a

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>tiny piece of their overall dying business that it probably

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.199
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't buy that stock. Microsoft a little bit different, a

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit better, something like a m D or in video,

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a m D in particular, where you've got

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>so much of the exposure of their business to this

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this evolving technology. I like it a lot. Now it's

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:31.599
<v Speaker 1>gone up a lot, and I think it's it's a

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.320
<v Speaker 1>little richly priced today. Um, but that's just you know,

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:37.000
<v Speaker 1>how you do it. You buy the dips and you

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>hold for for long periods of time on those those

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>companies that are helping to build out the instruction. But

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 1>when I talk about infrastructure, I mean the private investments

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>in the private businesses that truly are building out you know, exchanges,

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>software tools, um, you know, education and resources. You know,

0:13:56.600 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody is going to create the bloomberg of peptoe. We

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>think we've tested in that that firm digital asset data,

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see yeah great, so um, we're we're in

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that evolution stage. It's happening. Um, But it seems like

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>there's stuff going on globally that's seeming like it wants

0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to accelerate that. Right. It's like almost like all these

0:14:18.480 --> 0:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>like global macro policies are like just wanting people to

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>buy a bitcoin or adopted alternative system. And I know

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>you've talked a lot about You've tweeted a lot about

0:14:27.520 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like quee um, zombie companies, negative interest rates, right, and

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>so these are all things that possibly could be these

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>black swan events or really push this is that what

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you think? Look, you know absolutely, you know the macro

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>is lining up and has been lining up for a

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:50.160
<v Speaker 1>decade now. It's not a coincidence that bitcoin in particular

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>as a use case for blockchain technology and specifically about

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>monetization of value or money or stores of value. Uh

0:14:59.440 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>came a out in two thousand nine. Right, that that's

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>not a surprise, A trough of the goal financial crisis,

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, the genesis block refers to the chancellor second

0:15:11.280 --> 0:15:14.320
<v Speaker 1>bail out of the banks. Uh. And and everything that's

0:15:14.360 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>gone on in the last decade from central banks becoming

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>very very kind of omniscient godlike uh people. You know,

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a friend of mine says the best, Right, I remember

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a time. I'm old enough, I remember a time when

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know the names of central bankers. I long

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for those days to to return, and you know they aren't.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>The The idea that if if it was easy to

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:41.280
<v Speaker 1>create wealth by printing money literally by pushing a button

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and printing money literally physically printing printing press kind of

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>physical notes and coins or you know, ones and zeros

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in a bank account, if it were that easy, then

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't everybody do it? Wouldn't every country just print as

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>much currency as they possibly could. They'll try, and they

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>do try, right, and we've seen the outcome. Right, We've

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>seen in the hyper inflationary outcome in places like Zimbabwe

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>or Venezuela. You know, a cup of coffee a year

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>ago cost you know, nine cents. Today it costs you

0:16:09.080 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>know what is the fourteen thousand dollars or something um

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:18.080
<v Speaker 1>four thousand percent um monthly inflation. So now that's the

0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>hyper inflation side. The thing that I'm more worried about

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is the deflationary side, which is you've got bad demographics. Right,

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You've got too many old people, meaning sixty day five

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and sixty five year old people don't spend as much

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>as five year old people. They're not as productive. Then

0:16:34.920 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got too much debt. You've got all the developed world, Japan, US, Europe,

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, most developed world drowning in debt and overspending.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And we were a trillion dollar deaths in the United

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>States because of the silly Tax to Formact that we

0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 1>passed a year and a half ago. And then on

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>top of that, you've got deflation. So deflation is essentially

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>put us in this place where we feel compelled as

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.720
<v Speaker 1>governments to print more currency and devalue our currency in

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a race to the bottom to try to inflate our

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>way out of the debt. But it's not working. And

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>so what the problem is that we have is you

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>have this you said, the perfect storm for a fixed

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:21.440
<v Speaker 1>supply hard currency or sound money like bitcoin to come

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:23.959
<v Speaker 1>in and say, wait a second, if I want to

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:28.400
<v Speaker 1>opt out of the fiat currency system, or the Fiat

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.240
<v Speaker 1>fiasco as I like to call it, uh, if you

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 1>want to opt out of that and have a little

0:17:33.080 --> 0:17:35.560
<v Speaker 1>bit of chaos heads or a little you know, schmuck

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>insurance as somebody called it, I should be in kredit.

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>I can't remember who said it, but the schmuck insurance.

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, we got scho leaders all around the world

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>doing stupid stuff. Whether it's bad policies like trade wars,

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>whether it's bad decisions like you know, trade dept or

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>budget deficits spending, whether it's bad things like que all

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:01.880
<v Speaker 1>of that is leading to this devavaluation and this depreciation

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>of the value of these assets. And look, if I

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>were them, and I were the dictator, I would do

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the same thing. Well, actually I wouldn't because I have conscience.

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>But dictators go by the dictator playbook, right. They amass

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the assets, then they devalue the currency. That's the way

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>it works, and that's exactly what's happening today. And the

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>problem is the average person, right everage person in America

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't hold a stock. People in this country have no stock,

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>not one not They're four when Caplin, they're a pension fund.

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.560
<v Speaker 1>They don't own stock directly. They are not benefiting by

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the increase of real assets, financial assets. They would benefit

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>from holding a sound monetary um aggregate like like yeah,

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's why we have this growing divide between the

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>rich and the poor. The richer inflating their assets. The

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:58.200
<v Speaker 1>poor don't have assets. And because there because their money

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is becoming less value, it's there. Their wages have gone down,

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>their producing power has gone down at the same time.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>So it's like this this growing gap. Well, it's the

0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:09.480
<v Speaker 1>worst since the nineteen thirties. It's the worst income and

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.360
<v Speaker 1>wealth inequality in the history of the United States. We

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:15.480
<v Speaker 1>were doing better from kind of nineteen thirty through the

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:20.320
<v Speaker 1>late sixties, and really since nineteen seventy one when we

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>did you know, the Fiat fiasco. We went off the

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.840
<v Speaker 1>gold standard, and and some would say, well, you know,

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>all of this isn't working. You know, the QUEI is

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>not working, the change of the goals. No, it's working

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly as they planned. If if you actually stopped for

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 1>a second and say, wait, the haves like being haves

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and they would like to have a greater percentage of

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.959
<v Speaker 1>what they have, then it makes perfect sense. And they

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 1>have not don't seem to. But I don't understand is

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>they have not seemingly vote for the policies that are

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>making them less rich. Well, I think it's not. We're

0:19:56.400 --> 0:19:59.120
<v Speaker 1>an election cycle, so it's not. Uh, I don't think

0:19:59.160 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to understand why. And if you look

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 1>at the debates that are going on, someone's promising freeification,

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>someone's been promising free reparations, promising free thousand dollars a month.

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Someone's promising I mean and so q E pays for that, right, Like,

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that that pays for that. So it's it's not

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.399
<v Speaker 1>a big it's not a big stretch to see how

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that gets in. But we don't want to jump into

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>politics because we could go crazy there. But um, we

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 1>do have these narratives in bitcoin, right, and so we're

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>always talking about uh it seems like it drives this.

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And so one narrative I see is like and people

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>have last onto this is we talked about the economy

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is good. The economy is good. The economy is good

0:20:37.160 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>because the stock market is high. But the stock market

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>being high doesn't mean the economy is good, especially for

0:20:43.760 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the little guy, right, that's what you're saying, not at all. Now.

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you bring up one of the most important

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:51.159
<v Speaker 1>points is the economy is not the stock market. The

0:20:51.200 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>stock market is not the economy, and there are lots

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.360
<v Speaker 1>of examples. Right. The fastest growing economies in the world

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>over the last two decades have not had the best

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>performing stock markets. Right. The best performing stock market in

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 1>the world the last two years is Venezuela. Their economy

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>is in the hitner. I mean, I hate to use

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>that word, but that that's where it is. But it's

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the best performing stock market because on a nominal value, uh,

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, the price of of things goes up and

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.439
<v Speaker 1>the dictators takes all the assets because they own all

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the assets. So to your to your point, everyone points to, oh,

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the economy is great, Well, the economy is actually not good.

0:21:25.600 --> 0:21:28.800
<v Speaker 1>The economy is good on some measures. You can say, well,

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are working. Well how are they working?

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Are they underemployed or they fully employed? You know, if

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you lose your job as a manager at a T

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and T and you take a job as a barista,

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.160
<v Speaker 1>you still show up as employed. Now, I would argue

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>your life is less good unless maybe you want more

0:21:47.359 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>free time. But then the other problem you have is

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>every day someone turns sixty five, they get taken out

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 1>of the workforce or workforce participation rate drops. Then you

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 1>got this other crazy thing called the birth death ratio

0:21:59.440 --> 0:22:02.359
<v Speaker 1>that occur is when the BLS, the Bureau of Labor

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>and Statistics, makes up data based on where we are

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in the length of the economics cycle, and they said

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:10.960
<v Speaker 1>this many companies should be born, this many should die,

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>so we have this many new jobs. Well did you

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>actually count the jobs? Oh? Well no, Well you do

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.600
<v Speaker 1>realize that this risk recovery is half as strong as

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>previous recovery. Sure you're justing for that, right, Well no, okay,

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 1>So all of that, you know, indications of oh, people

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>point to um, you know, uh, consumer confidence. Well, of

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.040
<v Speaker 1>course people have consumer confidence because they read the headlines

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>every day at the stock market is great. Wow, a

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>president tweets about the tweeter in chief every day, woks up.

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>When the market goes down like today, he won't be

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>tweeting today about the market. But said, like you said,

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the people own no stock so what do they even care?

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 1>What makes sense the economy. We just had the worst

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>ten years of economic growth the United States in history.

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Now part of that as figures lie in the liar's figure,

0:22:57.960 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that it is the law of large

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:03.040
<v Speaker 1>non verse and it is harder to grow a very

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>large economy at a high rate, although China is doing

0:23:05.359 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good job of doing that. It was so

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>it's made up. Well, I love about that is people say, well,

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese data is made up, You mean more made

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 1>up than our data. It's actually the same amount of

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>made up. And in fact, Bloomberg tried to show how

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>much the data was made up in China. So they

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>created a thing called the Lee Kua Kong Index, which is,

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, using electricity and employment and money flows, and

0:23:27.960 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>they calculated what they thought the GDP growth was, and

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>it turned out that number was actually saying that China

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.400
<v Speaker 1>was understating because they don't want to freak people out.

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>So it is possible to grow quickly, you have to

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:44.600
<v Speaker 1>have a different type of of command economy as opposed

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to appear democracy. Uh. And some people would argue against that,

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>but the bottom line is, you know, our growth United

0:23:50.800 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 1>States is not high. Growth in Europe is not high.

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.679
<v Speaker 1>Growth in Japan is not high. It's demographic problem. It's

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.919
<v Speaker 1>a debt problem. And all that comes together back to

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>your original point, it creates this perfect storm where the

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:06.879
<v Speaker 1>macro suddenly has there's a there's a role as a

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>macro hedge or a safe haven. And I've gotten great debate.

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>It can't be a safe haven, it's too volatible. Well,

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>if you define safe haven simply as volatility of an asset,

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 1>you're missing the point. The point of a safe haven

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>is what do I feel comfortable and secure in holding

0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>a portion of my assets if there's chaos someplace else.

0:24:30.200 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And one of the best things about cryptocurrency and bitcoin

0:24:32.840 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>in particular, it's not seizable right in some ways it

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>can actually be um not um recordable, meaning people don't

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:45.120
<v Speaker 1>know where you have it or where you're storing it.

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>It can be moved globally instantaneously. You know, all the

0:24:48.680 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>things that we think about to say here, like gold

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:54.199
<v Speaker 1>is really hard to to move around. It's heavy, you know,

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to divide. You've got to pay someone to

0:24:57.320 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>ensure it or store it. Um you crypto has some

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>huge advantages, and that's why I think bitcoin has digital

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>gold as its first use case is really quite interesting. Yeah,

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.000
<v Speaker 1>so let's talk about that for a minute. Um, so

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have this perfect storm. You you kind

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.879
<v Speaker 1>of frame that up for us really really well. Um,

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 1>demographics and you know, inflation, deflation, these things, and we

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>have this case set. So traditionally gold has been that.

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Um when when when currencies inflate, people can go to

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 1>gold because it's not inflatable, can't be inflated. Um, potentially

0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:34.000
<v Speaker 1>right with gold is called digital gold or I'm sorry

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is being called digital gold. But uh, in an

0:25:38.080 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>inflationary environment, gold should work really well. But we saw

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight that gold actually got hammered

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>at the same time as the financial crash. However, it

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>did bounce back right away. So it almost seems that, um,

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you have this deflationary move that happens first, right, this

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>debt de leveraging, which pushes gold down, but then all

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden they're gonna start printing to try to

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>reinflate it, which pushes it back up. So is that

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of what you see? Absolutely? Well, the thing about gold,

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:09.159
<v Speaker 1>it's the only asset in the world until bitcoin was

0:26:09.160 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>created that acts both as a currency and a commodity,

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and so you think about there are lots of commodities,

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:21.439
<v Speaker 1>and commodities can do, you know, very poorly in an

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:24.800
<v Speaker 1>economic downturn. Global financial crisis was certainly an economic downturn,

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people thought of gold in its

0:26:27.000 --> 0:26:30.919
<v Speaker 1>commodity form first and they sold. Then it turns to

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 1>currency or store of value, and then people are, oh, geez,

0:26:34.960 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's gonna be this fed reaction or this

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>this central bank reaction, and I'm gonna need uh an

0:26:40.119 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>inflation heads. The problem is we haven't had any inflation.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.280
<v Speaker 1>We've had deflation. And so gold does have this really

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting history, and you know, people say, well, has it

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>has uh you know, people have faith in it. We'll

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:55.879
<v Speaker 1>know what they have is its custom, right, It's been

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a custom for five thousand years. It's a long time

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that one ounce of gold has bought a fine man's suit.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And so despite all the ups and downs of currency

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and other than seven or seventy five paper currencies in

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the history of the world, three quarters of them no

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>longer exist, and the rest of them will go away

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>over time too, because paper currency will always go away

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>because not backed by anything it's FIA, and so ultimately

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>gold does act as that store. But the reason that

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>it has is custom Now, what's interesting is in the

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:30.800
<v Speaker 1>last ten years there's been this new customary asset Bitcoin,

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:35.879
<v Speaker 1>where people, particularly young people, say, huh, it's more portable,

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it's more easily stored, it's more easily divided. It may

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.399
<v Speaker 1>actually have another use case as a method of payment

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 1>at some point, although it's pretty slow to do that.

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:49.719
<v Speaker 1>I'll probably a second layer like lightning. But the bottom

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.119
<v Speaker 1>line is, if you ask the average thirty five year

0:27:52.160 --> 0:27:55.199
<v Speaker 1>older younger how much gold you are, well, none. Why

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>would I have your own gold? If you ask him

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>how much bitcoin they have, the answers might surprise you some.

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:08.360
<v Speaker 1>And that is a a difference in other assets. And

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I really really love about bitcoin,

0:28:11.160 --> 0:28:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and one of the things that reasons I think institutions

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>will adopt it sooner rather than later, is Look, I've

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>been doing this a long time. I got white hair

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to prove it. Although my son said, you know, this weekend, Dad,

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:24.040
<v Speaker 1>you're your hair still black in the back. I'm like, well, yeah, okay,

0:28:24.080 --> 0:28:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but um, I've been around long enough to see all

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 1>of these promises of alternative investments that are going to

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:35.359
<v Speaker 1>give you a better return or lower correlation or diversify

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>diversification benefit. And you know in national stock correlated hedge

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>funds correlate, even bonds correlated, so they don't give you

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this perfect correlation. Hedge Bitcoin, interestingly, through the ups, through

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the downs, good bad, is only fifteen point one five correlated,

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and in some cases, like May and today, it actually

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>has negative correlation. So I'm not saying it's gonna be

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>negatively correlated all the time. It's not gonna be a

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>perfect head, but that point one five correlation is really important.

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>And where does it come from. It comes from the

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that stocks, bonds, commodities, traditional assets all derive their

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>value from the same thing economic growth, interest rates, and

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>central bank policies. Bitcoin derives its value from very different

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:29.240
<v Speaker 1>things technology, regulatory changes, millennial usage, and this this need

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>for an alternative store of value, so it moves differently

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and independently, which is a huge advantage when you build

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>it into a portfolio. So when you're building that into

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio, you want to take you want to take

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>into consideration the volatilely that it has, which is kind

0:29:44.480 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of the risk that it has um. So with bitcoin,

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>we have this huge asymmetric upside with you know, a

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>smaller downside, but it's also way more volatiles, which you

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>know has a risk adjusted basis. So then when you're

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>putting it into whatever portfolio, whether that's being institute portfolio

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>or retail portfolio, you should try to consider that. And

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>how does someone look at that? We definitely have to

0:30:05.960 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>consider it. But here's the problem with volatility. Volatility is

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 1>not risk, right, risk is risk of absolute loss or

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>permanent impairment of capital. The intersestant thing is Harry Markuts.

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big Harry Marquts fan. Of fact, I got

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>to have dinner with him once, and you know, I

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>got to ask him this question, and I had heard

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that he said once that he wouldn't have used volatility

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>for the capital asset pricing model. What do you semi variants?

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Because you should only penalize an asset for downside volatility.

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>We all want upside volatilly, that's what we crave. In fact,

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>we should want as much upside volatility as we can

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>possibly get, of course, and I said, would you is

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it true that you said I would use semi variants?

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>But the math was too hard, and he said, well,

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of course, and I wouldn't have won the Nobel price.

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>I really want to win the Nobel prize. So when

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.920
<v Speaker 1>you penalize an asset for upside volatility, that's a perversion

0:30:57.000 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of the whole idea of assets. What we want our

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:03.320
<v Speaker 1>asset that have asymmetric upside, and we're willing to accept

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>some downside risk, but we can hedge most of that

0:31:06.000 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>downside risk away with other assets or with position sizing.

0:31:11.080 --> 0:31:13.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I use this example over the last five years,

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>so five years of reasonable time, because at that point

0:31:16.960 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>you could have put one percent of endowment assets into bitcoin.

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:22.480
<v Speaker 1>So our last five years, if you had taken one

0:31:22.600 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 1>percent and put it in bitcoin, half percent from stocks,

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:29.479
<v Speaker 1>half percent from bonds, and endowments over the last five

0:31:29.560 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>years made seven point two percent, that one person allocation

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin would have taken it to nine point two

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Had that one percent gone to zero, you would have

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>only gone to nine to seven percent. So point two

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>percent downside two bases points of upside. That's a ten

0:31:45.040 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>to one asymmetry. So we should embrace that upside volatility

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and be mindful of downside volatility and risk. But the

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing about it is the risk of total loss

0:31:58.560 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 1>is very low at this point because of lots of

0:32:01.320 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>things related to Metcalfe's law and the Linda effect. The

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>longer something survived, the longer it's likely to survive. And

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the way Satoshi San, whoever Sotoshi San is, or the

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>people or they or them or whatever, whoever designed it

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>was genius in the sense that there are these embedded

0:32:22.360 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>advantages for its longevity. Right, because as the price declines,

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 1>more people are gonna want to own it. As the

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:33.760
<v Speaker 1>price declines, the difficulty adjust in the mining algorithms, and

0:32:34.120 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>so more people are uh are incented to mine. And

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so there's this beautiful uh ying and yang about the asset.

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>And I would say the miracle was it went from

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 1>zero to ten dollars ten to a hundred to a thousand,

0:32:49.560 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand to ten thousand, ten thousand a million. That's not

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a miracle, that's just increased usage and increase adoption. The

0:32:55.800 --> 0:33:00.080
<v Speaker 1>miracle was that it survived getting usage at all all

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>and became a custom where we could exchange it for value.

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And I survived that that first really bad bear, that

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:08.680
<v Speaker 1>bear crash, that bear market, So whant to survive that

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>one it was like, Wow, this thing is resilient. Now

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it survived a couple of them, which makes it even

0:33:12.920 --> 0:33:15.719
<v Speaker 1>more resilient. So the investors should look at it as

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>a total loss and not just the downside or the

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:20.440
<v Speaker 1>temporary downside. I guess if you're looking out over a

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.520
<v Speaker 1>long enough time timeframe as well, right, well, look at it.

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 1>What is it? Ninety seven percent of all days that

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been in existence, you've made money. So if you

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>bought it other than like one or two percent of days,

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you've made money. So yeah, if you chased it on

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>December eight, two thousand seventeen, you pay twenty year down.

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.479
<v Speaker 1>But other than a handful of days, it's a it's

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>been a positive basset. And the thing that people focus

0:33:48.760 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>on that I think is improper is they focus on

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the peak price. Price is a liar, right. The value

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:59.400
<v Speaker 1>of any asset is the value the price is just

0:33:59.480 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>with two both decided to exchange some unit uh in

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the current period. And so when assets get above their

0:34:06.600 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>fair value, they tend to fall back to fair value,

0:34:09.160 --> 0:34:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and they get blow fair value to tend to go

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>back up to fair value. And so when we look

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>at it, we look and say, mmm, well, making meaning

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.239
<v Speaker 1>attractive or unattractive. But what we should really look at

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>as a diversifying asset is each year over the ten

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:30.680
<v Speaker 1>years the low has been higher. That's incredible. That means fundamentally,

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>more people are using it, more people are holding it,

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 1>more people are looking for additional use cases. And if

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that trend continues and every year we get higher lows,

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's very positive for the future. Yeah. Yeah, and uh,

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like you said, the price is a liar.

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Really we have valuations which is difficult to price because

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:52.799
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know exactly what it is. I've been

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I've been having fun watching these macro guys like Raoul

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Paul uh and Dan Tapirero is starting to talk about

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.359
<v Speaker 1>this and um, they have a different perspective that makes

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.359
<v Speaker 1>it seems so much bigger than it is. And there

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:05.800
<v Speaker 1>was another article that I saw you talk about that

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>was like, uh, something about he was talking about the

0:35:09.239 --> 0:35:12.319
<v Speaker 1>volatility um something and then nothing at all or whatever,

0:35:12.400 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and he just said, Hey, we have this global transfer

0:35:16.960 --> 0:35:20.799
<v Speaker 1>system of transferring value peer to peer, Like, what's that worth?

0:35:21.160 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that worth two billion? I guess we're a lot

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 1>more than two billions. We're a lot more than two

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>and look what people aren't capable of of understanding yet.

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's not a criticism of anybody, it's it's just

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>this is how big technological evolutions happen. Right when the

0:35:39.719 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Internet was founded, there were very very few people, right

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:49.239
<v Speaker 1>myself included, who saw the incredible upside potential. Now, we

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:51.480
<v Speaker 1>made some good investments, you know, we invested in Google

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:53.479
<v Speaker 1>and we made you know, two hundred times our money,

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 1>and we invested in Sycamore and and Sienna and a

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>whole bunch of other things. We made a bunch of money,

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't buy you know, Amazon on the I

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>p O and hold it to today, and you know,

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't even have to work so because it was

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>hard to see the upside potential because when when Netflix

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 1>came out, it was a crappy little company. Those discs

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>got broken, they got lost, they were hard. And then

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it was gonna be video on demand. Well you couldn't

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:24.920
<v Speaker 1>do video on demand motives, and so that business was

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:26.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna die. And then Blockbuster was going to put him

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>out of business. And and then suddenly what happened, Well,

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>South Korea gave us broadband. Now, when broadband came like

0:36:33.680 --> 0:36:36.480
<v Speaker 1>whoa whoa, Now we can do streaming. We don't call

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>video on demanding, We're called streaming. And what people weren't

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>capable of understanding is just how many people would cut

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the cord and transfer to streaming instead of cable. And

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the same thing is true with the mobile net. Right

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:53.280
<v Speaker 1>when I remember two thousand ten being in Craig McCaw's

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>house up in Seattle for a party, and you know,

0:36:56.960 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>talking to the head of his family off was Reginal

0:37:00.320 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>investors in in mobile telephony, And I asked this guy, so,

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>what you know, do you think the mobile net will

0:37:05.719 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 1>be as big as the Internet? He's like, Mark, you

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:10.239
<v Speaker 1>kidding me? Yes, people fifteen years ago if they want

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a computer, like what do I want a computer in

0:37:12.239 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>my house for? Yes, people today if they want a

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>cell phone, like, well, already got to probably don't need

0:37:17.040 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>another one, butter and do more to be awesome. And

0:37:21.120 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>then ten years ago the iPhone, or eleven years ago

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone comes out, and suddenly our world has changed.

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:29.000
<v Speaker 1>And now we all got sore thumbs and crooked nits

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:30.880
<v Speaker 1>and these bolts on the back of our head from

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 1>leaning over too much. But you know, we can't comphend

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the change. That's gonna occur. And when you take money

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and value and all the assets in the world and

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you think about what will be done to them, the

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>same thing that the Internet did too, or what email

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:53.759
<v Speaker 1>did to information, or what the internet did to commerce.

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really incomprehensible. And I think that's why people

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>struggle with getting exposure and make an investment because they

0:38:01.000 --> 0:38:04.640
<v Speaker 1>can't see the future because the future has been tomorrow.

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna happen over a decade or fifteen or twenty years.

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:11.440
<v Speaker 1>But think about this. Forget digital gold, right, that's a

0:38:11.520 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 1>seven seven a half trillion dollar market. What about money

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>marketing accounts? What about just instead of having a bank

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>money where the bank could take assets like they did

0:38:21.239 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>in Cyprus, what if I had an unseizable asset like

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:26.720
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and I could have that being my money market.

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's pretty interesting. That's why the government and Libra

0:38:30.640 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 1>is not even a cryptocurrency, right, it's a centralized corporate

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 1>digital asset. But it's still could be the largest money

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:42.480
<v Speaker 1>market in the world by a factor of ten if

0:38:42.520 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 1>they instantly distributed it to all their their clients. So yeah,

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:49.240
<v Speaker 1>governments don't like that. Drains asked in the banking system.

0:38:49.280 --> 0:38:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Think about this. Ali Baba created a money market account

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>back five ago, maybe seven years ago, and in nine

0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>months there'd eighty bi billion dollars, became the third largest

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:05.200
<v Speaker 1>money market in the in the world in nine months.

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Took forty years for Van Garden Fidelity to get up

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 1>to a hundred billion dollars, And the p BOC said,

0:39:11.280 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>whoa time out, we're changing the banking laws. You can't

0:39:13.680 --> 0:39:17.160
<v Speaker 1>do this because you're siphoning assets out of our banking system. Today,

0:39:17.280 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>that account without any new app for two hundred billion

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars by far the largest money market in the world.

0:39:24.680 --> 0:39:28.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's what can happen with new technology. And so

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 1>then we go from there too, Well, what about currencies.

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Do we really need all the different currencies around the world.

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:38.920
<v Speaker 1>What about a borderless currency It's possible, that's eighty six

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar market. Well what about real estate that's three

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 1>times as big. How about that two billion dollars I'm sorry,

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars, six trillion, a billion um on. So so

0:39:53.680 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 1>then then you go to total private businesses and total

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:02.240
<v Speaker 1>total assets. We're talking seven hundred billion dollars of assets

0:40:02.320 --> 0:40:06.400
<v Speaker 1>that will be digitized. That will be traded free. Seven

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 1>they will be owned in a fractional basis. I mean

0:40:09.520 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the few is so big it's almost too big to comprehend.

0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 1>And that's why people just don't do anything. Yeah, boy,

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it is too big to comprehend. The big risk that

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 1>we have those, as you said, these disruptive technologies. Companies

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>don't like that. Blockbuster obviously didn't like getting taken out

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:29.440
<v Speaker 1>by Netflix. But now we have sovereigns Now we have government,

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So the p BOC says, hey, no, Ali baba, you

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 1>can't do that. So now we don't really have this

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>free market anymore. A nowly of a sudden, we have

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.839
<v Speaker 1>like governments that maybe we'll shut it down. I think

0:40:40.880 --> 0:40:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that adds an element of risk in addition to just

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>like new technology risk. I mean, we have government regulation risk. Now.

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:52.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a really really important point. And uh and that's

0:40:52.120 --> 0:40:54.600
<v Speaker 1>not new in the sense that you know, the government

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.720
<v Speaker 1>tried to regulate the Internet, and you know they tried

0:40:57.800 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to regulate cell phones and you know, look, we got all.

0:41:02.640 --> 0:41:08.399
<v Speaker 1>All of these things occur when interested parties feel their

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:12.040
<v Speaker 1>dominance slipping right. Financial service institutions don't like the idea

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:15.600
<v Speaker 1>that you and I can exchange value today directly, and

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't need a bank. You don't need a bank account.

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't need an account. I get in transfer value instantaneously,

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and let's do that across borders. Well, that's the problem

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.880
<v Speaker 1>is today Western Union charges twelve if I want to

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:29.480
<v Speaker 1>send money to my mother in law and Brazil, I

0:41:29.520 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have the mother in lawn present I did, and

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to send her money. It costs me twelve.

0:41:34.520 --> 0:41:36.839
<v Speaker 1>But my mother in law's in Tulsa, Oklahoma, doesn't cost

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 1>money to send money there. But the key is that

0:41:39.600 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>if I cont across borders, you know, the Rothchild's like

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the fact that their two banks get paid and they

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:50.360
<v Speaker 1>don't want that to go away. So over time, disruptive

0:41:50.560 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>innovation is going to dominate and and there's no putting

0:41:55.200 --> 0:41:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the genie back in the bottle here. We're going to

0:41:58.120 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 1>see increasing and increase you stage, We're gonna see different

0:42:01.400 --> 0:42:04.640
<v Speaker 1>use cases. We're going to see government push back, we're

0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 1>going to see regulatory But the key is in a

0:42:07.440 --> 0:42:11.160
<v Speaker 1>borderless world, in a decentralized world, or de central land,

0:42:11.239 --> 0:42:13.959
<v Speaker 1>which one of the terms I like in de central land,

0:42:14.560 --> 0:42:18.440
<v Speaker 1>if the US makes it really hard to open businesses

0:42:18.600 --> 0:42:21.560
<v Speaker 1>around this new technology. What will happen. They'll open up

0:42:21.600 --> 0:42:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in Russia, They'll open up in China, open up in Argentina,

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 1>they'll open up in the Bahamas or Cayman, and the

0:42:29.520 --> 0:42:34.839
<v Speaker 1>will have question is going to happen? And then, well,

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>can people then make it criminal to own the asset?

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>People forget it was against the law to own gold

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen thirty three to ninetevent literally against the law

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States to own. Plenty of people on gold,

0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>so it's got to be enforced, it's got to be monitored.

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So all these things become tougher in a decentralized world

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:59.600
<v Speaker 1>where you know, you literally can store your bitcoin in

0:42:59.640 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>your head. It right, You don't have to have it

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 1>on your computer and have it on your phone. You

0:43:02.719 --> 0:43:04.520
<v Speaker 1>can have your seed phrase in your head and and

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:10.800
<v Speaker 1>just be happy. Now, will they start carrying gating you? Absolutely,

0:43:11.320 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>But people will figure out a way around that. I

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:16.160
<v Speaker 1>heard one guy say, well, I just wipe my computer

0:43:16.800 --> 0:43:22.040
<v Speaker 1>before I go through plank computer. You're more suspect than

0:43:22.080 --> 0:43:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the guy who has, you know, a coin based account

0:43:25.080 --> 0:43:29.359
<v Speaker 1>on his computer. So we'll all figure it out. Yeah, yeah,

0:43:29.840 --> 0:43:32.800
<v Speaker 1>all right, Well, um, such such good information that I

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:34.560
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate taking the time well ahead and try and

0:43:34.600 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 1>wrap this up. I'm just curious. Um. Now we've talked about, uh,

0:43:38.560 --> 0:43:42.000
<v Speaker 1>this global stage that's setting up to to um create

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>this perfect storm to push this uh lots of risk

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:49.080
<v Speaker 1>in the world where uh, you know, all these accounts

0:43:49.120 --> 0:43:52.000
<v Speaker 1>are overvalued and potentially you know, Marcus could come crashing

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:53.759
<v Speaker 1>down at any point. But at the same time we

0:43:53.840 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>have this new asset class. How how do people uh

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:58.799
<v Speaker 1>look at this? I mean, where where are the safe

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:02.680
<v Speaker 1>places for people to go by bitcoin and buy gold? Keep? Okay,

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I love it. It's the it's the ultimate softball question

0:44:05.880 --> 0:44:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for my favorite hashtag, which is hashtag get off zero.

0:44:09.719 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Ten years from now, we're gonna look back and it

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>will be fiduciarily irresponsible for anyone individual institution, For investor

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to have zero exposure to crypto assets and particularly bitcoin

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>will be irresponsible. And why is that? It's because when

0:44:27.160 --> 0:44:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you look around in the world is did you just

0:44:28.760 --> 0:44:32.920
<v Speaker 1>summarize perfectly, Uh, just about every asset class is in

0:44:33.000 --> 0:44:36.160
<v Speaker 1>a bubble. Real estates in a bubble. Stocks are in

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a bubble. Government bonds are in the greatest bubble in

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the history of bubbles. I mean the fact that the

0:44:42.360 --> 0:44:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Greek tenure trades below treasuries absolute insanity. The fact that

0:44:47.160 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Italian interest rates or single digits insanity. So with a

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 1>buyer of last resort is a government entity that can

0:44:55.880 --> 0:44:58.480
<v Speaker 1>print money at a whim to buy assets, and they

0:44:59.360 --> 0:45:03.200
<v Speaker 1>economic reasons to own. Yeah, we get bubbles. And it

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is irresponsible to own debt of corporations that wildly over levered.

0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>It's irresponsible to own equity of companies like Tesla where

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:16.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't have enough money to pay back their debt holders,

0:45:16.960 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>let alone the equity holders. So I think what's gonna

0:45:20.080 --> 0:45:22.600
<v Speaker 1>happen over time is people are gonna wake up. They're

0:45:22.600 --> 0:45:25.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, oh, there are these diversifying assets, and they're

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:28.680
<v Speaker 1>gonna start with one per cent, then two, then five,

0:45:28.800 --> 0:45:31.600
<v Speaker 1>then eight and ten, then fifteen, then twenty. And the

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 1>younger you are, the more you should have because you've

0:45:34.480 --> 0:45:38.560
<v Speaker 1>got this wonderful thing like a pseudo fixed income instrument,

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:41.279
<v Speaker 1>which is your future earnings potential. Right, a young person

0:45:41.320 --> 0:45:44.839
<v Speaker 1>should have zero bonds, none, Right, Their bond is their

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 1>future earnings from jobs they're gonna have in in over

0:45:48.520 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the years. And so you should have as much private

0:45:51.600 --> 0:45:55.319
<v Speaker 1>investments take advantage aliquidity. Premium should have as much Diversifying

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 1>assets are asymmetric assets like bitcoin in your portfolio when

0:45:59.600 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>you're young, because you've got more time to make up

0:46:02.719 --> 0:46:05.880
<v Speaker 1>for your mistakes. And so you know, Michael Steinhard had

0:46:05.880 --> 0:46:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a great lines, and make all your mistakes when you're young, Okay.

0:46:09.400 --> 0:46:11.920
<v Speaker 1>And that's how we should think about investing, is we

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:16.040
<v Speaker 1>should be pushing. And so I went on vacation last

0:46:16.080 --> 0:46:18.440
<v Speaker 1>week and I sent out a post a picture on

0:46:18.520 --> 0:46:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter of me water skiing and someone said, uh, falls

0:46:22.719 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>question mark, And I said, if you're not falling, you're

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:28.640
<v Speaker 1>not skiing. So if you're not falling down occasionally, if

0:46:28.640 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>you're not having a loss occasionally, if you're not having

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.560
<v Speaker 1>a setback occasionally investing, that you're not investing. You're not

0:46:33.680 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>taking enough risk. And one of the things that people

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:39.359
<v Speaker 1>don't like to be wrong, so they don't put their

0:46:39.480 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>their opinion out there. They don't put positions on where

0:46:42.960 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>they could be wrong or lose money. Well, the whole

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:49.960
<v Speaker 1>purpose of this business is sometimes being wrong, because you're

0:46:50.040 --> 0:46:53.120
<v Speaker 1>only gonna be right mathematically about half the time. And

0:46:53.200 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not whether you're right or wrong, it's how much

0:46:55.480 --> 0:46:56.960
<v Speaker 1>money you make when you're right, now much money you

0:46:57.000 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 1>lose when you're wrong. And Sorrow says it best. I'm

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:03.200
<v Speaker 1>only rich because I admit my mistakes faster than other people,

0:47:04.000 --> 0:47:08.640
<v Speaker 1>and I cut my losses. And so good investors, great investors,

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:13.360
<v Speaker 1>are wrong way more than bad investors, because bad investors

0:47:13.680 --> 0:47:16.799
<v Speaker 1>are paralyzed by fear of being wrong, and so they

0:47:16.840 --> 0:47:19.440
<v Speaker 1>sit in cash or bonds and don't do anything. And

0:47:19.560 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 1>great investors make investments, take views, make you know, wild

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:26.759
<v Speaker 1>assertions like I do all the time, saying, Hey, I

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 1>actually think there's gonna be a value here. I think

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 1>this asset is going to take off. He said, well,

0:47:31.760 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 1>what if you're wrong. I'm wrong all the time. So

0:47:34.520 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I make a mistake, I change it, fix it, go

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:40.319
<v Speaker 1>on to the next idea. So the key to all

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>of this is adopt a portion of your assets in

0:47:44.960 --> 0:47:49.920
<v Speaker 1>these diversifying assets, particularly crypto assets, reduce your exposure to

0:47:50.000 --> 0:47:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the overvalued assets around the world, and prepare for an

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:57.360
<v Speaker 1>environment at which stuff is gonna go on sale. So

0:47:57.520 --> 0:47:59.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a reason the very best investors in the world

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to day have the highest cash positions they've ever had.

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Like one of my mentors Julian Robertson, guys always invested.

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 1>He's basically fully in cash. He's got a lot of longs,

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of shorts, but net he's basically neutral because

0:48:13.800 --> 0:48:17.880
<v Speaker 1>he knows that assets are overvalued. He's shortly overvalued assets.

0:48:18.200 --> 0:48:19.839
<v Speaker 1>He's long with a few things that he thinks are

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:22.520
<v Speaker 1>are undervalued, and he's waiting with a lot of cash

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:26.600
<v Speaker 1>to buy the assets when they get cheap. Just timing

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:28.880
<v Speaker 1>it is the problem, all right, A Japan's kept it

0:48:28.920 --> 0:48:31.239
<v Speaker 1>going for twenty thirty years? How long can this game

0:48:31.320 --> 0:48:35.520
<v Speaker 1>go on? Right? Absolutely? And the markets can behavior rationally

0:48:35.560 --> 0:48:38.919
<v Speaker 1>longer than the rational investor can remain solve it only though,

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:42.279
<v Speaker 1>that only applies if you lever If you don't lever up.

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Cash is like valium. It keeps you calm and it

0:48:46.160 --> 0:48:48.880
<v Speaker 1>lets you wait out. But if you put a lot

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>of leverage on your assets, yeah you're gonna get stopped

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:54.440
<v Speaker 1>out at precisely the wrong time. Leverage can never make

0:48:54.480 --> 0:48:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a bad investment good, but it can make a good

0:48:56.680 --> 0:48:59.919
<v Speaker 1>investment bad. And so today you want to have max

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:05.480
<v Speaker 1>some flexibility, You want to have a focus on constantly rebalancing,

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, could this game go on longer than I

0:49:09.280 --> 0:49:12.239
<v Speaker 1>think it can. Of course, well, central banks do everything

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they can to keep it going. Of course, Well the

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 1>elites do everything they can, including passing stupid laws. Of course.

0:49:20.000 --> 0:49:23.680
<v Speaker 1>But at the end, I believe gravity rules right, Newton

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:26.840
<v Speaker 1>was right, and assets returned to their fair value and

0:49:26.880 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>even go below. And if you wait long enough, um,

0:49:30.360 --> 0:49:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you get to buy him it with a margin of safety,

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:35.960
<v Speaker 1>which is the key to life. Yeah, awesome, So that's

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. You're definitely a wealth of knowledge. I appreciate

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:43.399
<v Speaker 1>you sharing that with me in the audience conversation. Um,

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 1>so anybody listening told definitely be following you on Twitter

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 1>because you put out a lot of good information, a

0:49:48.000 --> 0:49:49.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of retweets. I don't know how you get any

0:49:49.680 --> 0:49:53.000
<v Speaker 1>work done. My wife asked me the same thing. She

0:49:53.520 --> 0:49:56.720
<v Speaker 1>she thinks I'm a Twitter holic. But Twitter is awesome

0:49:56.880 --> 0:50:00.719
<v Speaker 1>because one, it's an engaged community, and I've made some

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:04.279
<v Speaker 1>incredible relationships around the world, been introduced to some some

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:07.400
<v Speaker 1>really cool opportunities. Uh. The second thing I love is

0:50:07.440 --> 0:50:10.319
<v Speaker 1>I get instant feedback, right, And when I put out

0:50:10.360 --> 0:50:12.279
<v Speaker 1>an idea and everybody hates on it, and like, oh,

0:50:12.360 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty good idea. If I put it out

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 1>an idea and everybody loves it. I'm like, oh, maybe

0:50:16.200 --> 0:50:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that's already in the price, So great instant feedback. Um.

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 1>But the thing I really like about it is it's

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a way to to build and grow a community

0:50:27.320 --> 0:50:30.239
<v Speaker 1>of like minded people in different areas, whether it be

0:50:30.280 --> 0:50:34.359
<v Speaker 1>crypto or finance or China. Um. So we didn't even

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>get talking about China. May will do that next time,

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 1>But there's so much going on in the world today. Uh.

0:50:39.400 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>And one thing I really like about about twitters it's instantaneous.

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to wait for a producer to review

0:50:46.120 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 1>a journalist article and eight hours later I get, you know,

0:50:49.880 --> 0:50:52.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody's view of what happened. I can watch a periscope

0:50:52.560 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>live of people standing in the polling place in Argentina

0:50:56.520 --> 0:50:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and get a sense that mockery is gonna win and

0:50:58.719 --> 0:51:01.800
<v Speaker 1>good things are gonna happen. So very cool stuff. Is

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:04.640
<v Speaker 1>there anywhere else that anyone should follow you to you write?

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:06.759
<v Speaker 1>You write like blogs or do you have anything else?

0:51:06.800 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 1>And just follow you on Twitter? Our our website is

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Creek cap c ap dot com and we've got

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of quarterly letters that I've written over the years. Uh,

0:51:17.160 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>a number of them on on bitcoin and crypto of

0:51:20.719 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>the last of the last couple of years, kind of

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 1>on the origins. And then we've also got a YouTube

0:51:25.640 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 1>channel called Around the World with us Go, and I've

0:51:28.760 --> 0:51:31.399
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of presentations about forty five minutes each

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:35.200
<v Speaker 1>with audio that we do on this on a monthly basis.

0:51:35.320 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 1>We post those, and I've got a number on on

0:51:37.600 --> 0:51:41.440
<v Speaker 1>crypto and China and energy and stocks and you name

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:44.520
<v Speaker 1>a topic, it's out there. Cool all right, Well, thanks

0:51:44.560 --> 0:51:46.240
<v Speaker 1>so much for taking the time to share the information

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>with you. Appreciate it, all right, Thanks, take care. Hey,

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if you like this episode of the Market Disruptors Podcast,

0:51:52.400 --> 0:51:54.759
<v Speaker 1>please help us take this to the top of the

0:51:54.840 --> 0:51:57.680
<v Speaker 1>podcast charts. Just please do me a favor and rate,

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>review and subscribe. Taking fish teen seconds to just leave

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a quick review goes a long way in helping us

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:06.760
<v Speaker 1>reach more people and disrupt more markets. I really appreciate

0:52:06.800 --> 0:52:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you listening and I'll see you next time on the

0:52:08.880 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Market Instructors Podcast.