WEBVTT - Week 10: It's Too Soon For Turkey!

0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:24.120
<v Speaker 1>advice League dot Com. Here's your host. Welcome to Fantasy

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly, Week number ten. I am Paul Georgian by

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Coast Today or Brian Johnson and Matt Harrison. Hello, gentlemen,

0:00:31.920 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>double digit weeks. Let's go double digit weeks. Yeah, it's

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>not quite the home stretch, but you know we're getting down.

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Is this officially nut cutting time? And who goes around

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>cutting nuts anyway? I mean, other than like secans or

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:51.479
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Maybe I don't know, I mean you

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>cut them. Maybe can't you just eat the whole thing?

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that maybe to get the shell off you

0:00:55.640 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>must cut the shell. And so so I mean it,

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>it's pecan pie season rights, so that means it's so

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not cutting time to get ready for your pecan pies.

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.559
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather have the pecan pie than the pumpkin pie. Delicious.

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:10.479
<v Speaker 1>The nutcutter sounds like the horror version of the Nutcracker.

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather go to the Rocky Horror. Over the course

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of the show, you will find nine players upon whom

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>you can take a chance. We'll answer three tough questions,

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>will premature speculation, and we'll break down every game fantasy style,

0:01:26.200 --> 0:01:30.039
<v Speaker 1>beginning with the Eagles taking on the Giants. Brian, we're

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>finally going to see the Eagles offense. We were promised

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason. It's only taken ten weeks to get here.

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:41.800
<v Speaker 1>But we've got everybody healthy. Unless you're denying Zach existence,

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but yes, So let's start with Miles Sanders, who will

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:48.800
<v Speaker 1>make his return, and more importantly, or is of equal importance.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Right tackle Lane Johnson should also make his return for

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles. But I mean give Sanders a cautious be here,

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>but there is a upside uh. These teams, by the way,

0:01:57.320 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>played in Week seven, not long ago. We'll we'll reference

0:01:59.680 --> 0:02:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that Matt up for sure. Sanders had not playing that

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>first meeting. The Philly Backs, who were led by Boston Scott,

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 1>total six eight rushing yards on sixteen carries and fifty

0:02:09.440 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>eight receiving yards on seven catches. That's probably a floor

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for Sanders and this one on paper not a great matchup. Tho,

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the Giants have held the posing running backs to less

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 1>than three point nine yards per carry this year, so

0:02:21.400 --> 0:02:23.959
<v Speaker 1>B for Sanders again, but there is a upside here

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>based on volume odd to the past game. I'm gonna

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>start with Dallas Goddard, give him a B. The Giants

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>have been pretty good against tight ends, allowing allowing these

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.679
<v Speaker 1>seventh fewest catches and fifth fewest touchdowns to the position.

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Goddard has yet to score in four career games against

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 1>New York so far. But Dick rod Ricord Richard Rogers,

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>back up to the backup Philly tight end, had six

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>catches for eighty five yards against these Giants in Week seven,

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.679
<v Speaker 1>So I'm giving Goddard to be Now to the receiving game,

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>which is all of a sudden, very muddied. The waters

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>are very muddy, too much talent shock full of wide

0:02:59.760 --> 0:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>resus eivers now when they had none. We'll start with

0:03:01.960 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Travis Fulgum, who has earned the right to be called

0:03:04.600 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Philly's wide receiver one right now. Did pretty well in

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the first meeting, five catches for seventy three yards, primarily

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>draped in James Bradberry throughout that game. The Giants top corner.

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>But Philly has more weapons now that might take some

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>of that burden off Fulgham, so gonna get Fulghum a

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.400
<v Speaker 1>safe sea here as well as Jalen Reagor saw six

0:03:22.440 --> 0:03:25.119
<v Speaker 1>targets in his first game back. That was in Week eight.

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:27.520
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Philly is coming off thereby scored a

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown in that game. The Giants have surrendered a wide

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>receiver touchdown in four straight games, and that includes the

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Eagles game. The touchdown went to Greg Ward, who was

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the secondary receiver at the time. That is now Jalen Reagor.

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>So safe c for Reagor as well, and Alishan. Jeffrey

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.240
<v Speaker 1>is gonna make his season debut. I'm not gonna give

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>him a grade here, but we might talk about him

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a little later in the show. And lastly, for Philly,

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz bench grade a bench grade for Jef. I

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>refused to give Alshan a grade of any kind. That's right,

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>especially D. I will not give him. You make you

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>make guests every care with al Sean. Give a player

0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>at D on this show. But Carson Wentz be the voices.

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.560
<v Speaker 1>The masses have spoken. They don't want the D. The

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>letter grade, the D letter grade. We'll see. I don't

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>know I want it. Don't you want it? Man? Frankly,

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>you you brought it that YouTube do not matter. Carson

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Wentz not a B or A. D Wins gets a

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:30.920
<v Speaker 1>B three fifty nine and two passing in week seven,

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>also added a rushing touchdown this time around. He basically

0:04:33.800 --> 0:04:35.880
<v Speaker 1>has all his weapons back outside of zach ERTs, so

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a safety for Carson Wentz over to the Giant side.

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Not allow to talk about Davante Freeman a k A

0:04:41.200 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>DeVante Seamer. You go. He's been placed on I R

0:04:46.080 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>so he will not be playing. So Wayne Gallman and

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Alfred Morris left in the Giants backfield. I got him

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 1>both on the bench though Philly holding opposing backs under

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 1>three point four yards per carry, allowing just a hundred

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.039
<v Speaker 1>and eleven combo yards per game to the position. You

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>can go. Gallman if very desperate, but I don't expect

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>much from him. Darius Slayton not gonna expect much from

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>him either. He's on the bench, only two catches for

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty three yards in the first meeting. He should see

0:05:09.440 --> 0:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a ton of Darius slay again, who has returned to

0:05:12.200 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>for him. So Slayton is on the bench for me,

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.239
<v Speaker 1>but Sterling Shepherd is not. He scored in the first meeting,

0:05:17.279 --> 0:05:20.039
<v Speaker 1>also had six catches for yards, his best game of

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the year, and in the three games since he has

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 1>seen double digit targets twice. Golden Tate also scored, but

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>he heard his knee scored in the first game, heard

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>his knee in practice, and he's in the doghouse because

0:05:30.680 --> 0:05:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of his wife, so he's on the bench. Tate is,

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>but Shepherd gets a B. He will be uh in

0:05:36.440 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the slot where I'll see Nickel Robie Coleman, an old

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>friend of the show who was allowing a pass the

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>rating of a hundred and twelve in his coverage. And

0:05:43.640 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the last Giant who gets a starting grade is Evan

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Ingram six forty six in the first meeting, basically hit

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>his floor there. He's averaging roughly six catches and fifty

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>nine yards against the Eagles over his career, who are

0:05:55.160 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>also allowing the third most receptions and touchdowns to tight

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>ends this season. So a B for Angram and Daniel

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>Jones on the bench. This was the stumble game where

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>he fell on that. Yeah, we tackled himself. We're not

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna rushing yards like he had in the first meeting.

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>He did have two passing touchdowns with just a hundred

0:06:14.360 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and eighty seven yards, but Jones on the bench ye

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>and pretty much every week. Unfortunately, I was hoping for

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:21.799
<v Speaker 1>better this year. Let's move over to the Jaguars taking

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>on the Packers. Matt Weather, it could be a serious

0:06:24.200 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>issue here this game. If you believe the early forecast,

0:06:27.400 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>it appears this game looks a lot like that Viking

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>game from two weeks ago where neither team could pass. Yeah,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.719
<v Speaker 1>and I mean there's still some some pretty good offensive

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.600
<v Speaker 1>numbers put up in that game by running back by

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 1>a few guys. I would like to note randomly, I

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:48.559
<v Speaker 1>went to a Jaguars at Packers game in Lambeau Field

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>where Byron Leftwich beat the Packers. You're an experts, so

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.159
<v Speaker 1>there's nobody better than me to this matchup right here.

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with James Robinson of the Jaguars. I'm giving

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:02.559
<v Speaker 1>him a solid B grade in this one. The Vikings

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>showed the recipe for beating the Packers in Lambeau in

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>this weather run at them all day long, and since

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Robinson is a clear bell cow averaging twenty one touches

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>per game, he's got a shot. The Packers have had

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>issues against bell cow running backs every runner who has

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>had at least sixteen carries against Green Bay has recorded

0:07:23.520 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns in a game or more, and Alvin Kamara

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>did not hit that number with the rushing attempts, but

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 1>he scored twice through the air against Green Bay in

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a game where he had nineteen touches. So the only

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:37.560
<v Speaker 1>reason he's not an a the game script just might

0:07:37.600 --> 0:07:40.960
<v Speaker 1>get away from the Jaguars in this one, Jake Lewton,

0:07:41.160 --> 0:07:43.560
<v Speaker 1>although the game script gets away from the Jaguars in

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.240
<v Speaker 1>almost every game, and he's the game script has already

0:07:46.320 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>left the Jaguars. They haven't even got to Green Bay yet.

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>They are improv there's no script. They're like whose line

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is it? Anyway of the NFL while their points don't matter.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>That's true, uh, Jake Lewton, he's on your bench. Who

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.600
<v Speaker 1>had half to be a really deep two quarterback or

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>super flex league to start looting? To his credit, he

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>did beat the Texans for three four yards and a

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.120
<v Speaker 1>score last week. But the Packers aren't thrown on a bunch.

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>They're averaging only thirty one pass attempts per game, which

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>translates to an average of two or fifty yards against

0:08:15.480 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and just over a passing score. So Luton's on the

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>bench and the only receiver of his I'm going to

0:08:20.320 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 1>give a starting grade two is dj Chark, who only

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>gets a C. He's going to get the solo coverage

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 1>from JayR Alexander. Although let's know there's a chance Alexander

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't go in this one, and he's shaping up closer

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to a game time decision. Well, that would would help

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit help, That might bump him up to uh,

0:08:36.000 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 1>something between a CE something like that. Solid be a

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>liquid be. You'd definitely be a liquid be if the

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Alexander is out. That is solid B movement for DJR.

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's continue. The game script does favor the Packers getting

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>up early in this one, and then Chart should see

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>double digit targets like he did last week with Luton.

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>He converted those into seven catches a hundred and forty

0:09:00.760 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 1>six yards in a score that included a seventy three

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.920
<v Speaker 1>yard touchdown strike. And it was clear if you look

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:08.439
<v Speaker 1>back at this game, Luton only wanted to throw it

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to Chark. It was like, oh, that's my guy. Okay,

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>he did throw to one other guy though Chris Conley randomly, uh,

0:09:16.120 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And there's no consistency from week to week outside of

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Chark on this team, Um, everybody's getting to three targets

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 1>except Chris Connley, who had eight targets last And Connley

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.360
<v Speaker 1>is gonna start this game with UM with Laviska out,

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:30.280
<v Speaker 1>so Conny will be on the field again a lot.

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 1>And he wouldn't see jaire Alexander. You and if Alexander

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>goes a little known fact real quick, Chris Connolly, this

0:09:35.679 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>is the state of the Jaguars, by the way, is

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a captain of the Jacksonville Jaguars. Yes, I saw the

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 1>patch for myself. What didn't Chris Conley play for Wisconsin.

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just I think he did see if that rafted

0:09:51.800 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>by the Chiefs, we know that. I'll look into all right,

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Davante Adams. Let's go over to the other side. He's easily,

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh Church, we gotta get the art Vark. Sound so

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>owned out because Davante Adams is easily the art Vark

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this week, whether weather permitting. Hey guess what. He scored

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a handful of touchdowns in that game against the Vikings,

0:10:09.520 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>weather permitting. So Chris Connelly went to University of Georgia.

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 1>He's also not aren in Wisconsin. He was born in

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>at in cure Lack Air Base in Turkey, so it's

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>not at homecoming. Tricky for him to have the hole.

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>What if he plays on Thanksgiving in the future, Remember

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that is like the ultimate, that's the Thanksgiving game. Wow,

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad. We're glad we got that settled. Uh, Aaron,

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>we do not have We do not have a turkey

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>of all the animals that we now have on this thing. No,

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't have. We do not have a turkey in

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the system right now. Brianne is Brianne is feverishly looking

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:57.400
<v Speaker 1>for a feverishly um. Aaron Rodgers is also getting an

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>easy A grade. The Jaguars rank dead last in the

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.360
<v Speaker 1>league in Football Outsiders passing d v o A. Let's

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about his other receivers. Alan Lazard might return this week.

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>He's been practicing, but the Packers don't need to activate

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>him until next week. And I believe he was Churches

0:11:12.360 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>premature speculation last week correct well, and he was Scott

0:11:15.480 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fishes the week before that. He's not gonna play here,

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>so use him one more time this week. We could,

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.839
<v Speaker 1>but you probably want to pick him up. He did

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>make the trip to San Francisco last week and has

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>been practicing in a limited fashion. But I imagine that

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.839
<v Speaker 1>the Packers are going to exercise caution. They don't need

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>him to beat the Jaguars, you think, And it sounds

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like the plan is not to use Alan Lazard here. Yeah,

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:39.679
<v Speaker 1>and if he's not active, I think I'd give Marquees

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Veldez Scantling a C start dart in this one. That's

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the Chris Conley key right there. You know what's going

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to happen next week. Gonna sit down in front of

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>all of our sounders here and there a turkey. But

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>we should just label at Chris Conley, all right. Um.

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Robert Touny in he gets a C grade, but he

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>was added to the injury report on Friday and was

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.719
<v Speaker 1>very limited in practice with an ankle injury, and he

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>basically pitched a goose egg last week. He's done very

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>little since Davante Adams return from injury. But I do

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:16.080
<v Speaker 1>like him this week because the Jags are allowing the

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>third most yards and almost a touchdown per game to

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>the tight end position. If he doesn't go, I think

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I'd throw a dart at Jace Sternberger. Yeah, let's hope

0:12:25.559 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's hope it doesn't come to that. Let's hope not.

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, take a chance on me. Nine

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>players not normally in your starting lineup. These are all

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.080
<v Speaker 1>guys that you'll want to start this weekend. Many of

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:36.600
<v Speaker 1>them are are going to be available in the waiver

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 1>wire for you to pick up if you decide you

0:12:38.080 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>want to go that route. We'll tell you who those

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>nine players are when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Brian Johnson, Matt Harrison with you.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 1>This is take a chance on me. We begin with

0:13:15.360 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 1>three quarterbacks available on the waiver wire in most cases

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>that you can start. This week. We begin with Brian Johnson.

0:13:21.960 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I put on for my city Drew Lock again. Baby.

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm going back to the well came through last week.

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It was it was. It looked bad for a long time.

0:13:30.040 --> 0:13:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Maybe finishes like QV three on the week, So I'll

0:13:32.160 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>take it and I have like his chances again this

0:13:33.920 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>week at Las Vegas. Aside from the Raiders Typhoon game

0:13:37.840 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>in Cleveland a couple of weeks ago, they've allowed at

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>least passing yards and multiple touchdowns in four straight games.

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Lock should stay upright for the most part. Vegas is

0:13:47.760 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom five in sack percentage and quarterback hit rate, and

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this game should be a shootout. The over under is

0:13:53.120 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty point five, and each of Denver's last three games

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>went north of eight. Sorry, fifty eight points a lot,

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>a hell of a lot, Drew luck. All right, Matt,

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you'll take a chance at the quarterback. What time is it.

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>It's two o'clock. It's two o'clock. Ye to A looked

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 1>really good against the Cardinals last week. I thought he

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.880
<v Speaker 1>looked good. People, Okay, sorry, I'll take that. I'll take

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that really off. Their hyperbole has gone a little too

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>far onto his game. Well, he led the Fins to

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the second win and as many starts as a rookie quarterback,

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and they haven't really let him cut loose with the

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>offense yet. They've played things pretty simple, close to the vest.

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>But as he continues to feel comfortable, I think the

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Dolphins will feed him more of the playbook. And I

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>think that's this week when he plays a Chargers defense

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that people think is pretty legit. But they've allowed twenty

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>nine points or more in each of their last five games,

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and each of those five quarterbacks has either topped three

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>yards thrown for multiple scores or both. Plus with both

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of these teams sporting rookie quarterbacks and a severely injured

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>running game, I think this is one of those air

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>raid games that to a and air bear go after

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>each other. That's the one. Oh yeah, baby, Now that's

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a real that's a real animal. Listen, turkeys, that's a

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the kind of animal. Definitely not a Sad Trombone.

0:15:22.720 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Nick Foles has been so lackluster. If Sad Trombone Ski,

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>there we go wealthy. We would be talking about Sad

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Trombone Ski in this spot. But no, it's Nick Foles instead. Um,

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>he's folds to struggle badly and other normal circumstances. I

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.040
<v Speaker 1>don't recommend him. But the Vikings are expected to be

0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>missing up to four cornerbacks on Monday night. They always are.

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>They always even have that many cornerbacks to be missing.

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Cornerbacks one, three, four, and five are all expected to

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.960
<v Speaker 1>be missing this game. And as great as Mike Jimmer,

0:15:57.160 --> 0:16:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Zimmer has done with just scotch taping this set in,

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>they'rea together sooner or later. You can't keep trotting out

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>fifth stringer, six stringer, seventh stringers, against guys as good

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>as Allen Robinson. So I think here it catches up

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Vikings to some degree, and they have They

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>have given up pretty big passing games pretty universally. So

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this is an opportunity for Nick Foles. Let's go to

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the running back position. Brian, I like that Jimmer for

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>debt Frudian slip there. Like Mike Jimmer, I got Leonard

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>four Nett at Carolina. Now, the timeshare in the Tampa

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Bay backfield has been pretty frustrating this season, but over

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks, four Nett has seen twice as

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>many snaps as Ronald Jones. He is the proven third

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>down pass catching back. The Panzo Panthers have allowed the

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>most receptions in the fifth most receiving yards to running backs.

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Carolina also allows nine seven rushing yards and a rushing

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>touchdown per game two running backs. And oh yeah, Leonard

0:16:50.240 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Fournette had one hundred plus rushing yards and two rushing

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns when these teams met in Week two. And Ronald

0:16:56.560 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Jones is just bad. We'll talk more about him later

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>in the show, just about how bad he is. Okay,

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:03.920
<v Speaker 1>sounds good. Your take a chance to me. Running back

0:17:03.960 --> 0:17:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Matt If we want to talk about bad, let's talk

0:17:06.440 --> 0:17:13.000
<v Speaker 1>about Klin Blage. That is an excellent segue right there. Um.

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Klin Blage now plays for the Chargers, and in his

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Chargers debut last week, he was the lead back after

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jackson went down with an injury in the opening

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 1>seconds of the game. Blage ended up with seventeen touches

0:17:25.000 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>eighty four total yards in a score. Not a soul

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:31.960
<v Speaker 1>in the entire world saw any of those fantasy points.

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>There's not one person. This week, he faces a Dolphins

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.639
<v Speaker 1>defense that is allowing four point six yards per carry

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>on the season and was ranked the nine ranked rushing

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 1>defense by Football Outsiders d v o A. Also, Kyle

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>van Noy and Christian Wilkins were placed on the COVID

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>list and won't play this week. And oh, by the way,

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:56.720
<v Speaker 1>there's beef here. This is really a personal revenge game

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.639
<v Speaker 1>right here. The Dolphins traded Blage to Adam Gaze and

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 1>the Jets for a bag of donuts earlier this year.

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Then Balash failed the physical was sent back to Miami.

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>That had to be awkward, yes, and then the Jets

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>ended up cutting him. Now he gets to face off

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 1>against his old team. Oh, and he gets the Adam

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Gaze boost. Yes, the I've left Adam Gaze, so everybody

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>gets better. I'm going with J. D. Mick kiss Yes.

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I at this point, I I think I just gotta

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>call him. Do would you like to do an apology?

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta kiss up to make kiss it would? I

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>know you're a listener, Okay, I apologize for the inhumane

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:45.080
<v Speaker 1>treatment you've received. Maybe you gave him the motivation he

0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>needed on a week tweak basis. It's a good point

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 1>because he saw a scalding of the snaps last week,

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.240
<v Speaker 1>establishing an instant rapport with a new starter, Alex Smith.

0:18:54.720 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Catching nine of fourteen targets last week for sixty five yards.

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>They were all season highs with Alex Smith. He should

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.120
<v Speaker 1>be able to keep it going against a Lions defense

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that has been torched by opposing runners through the air.

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 1>They're allowing the fourth most receiving yards, the most receiving

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns per game to the position, with back scoring receiving

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns in three of the last four against Detroit. J D.

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>Mick kissing, let's go to the receivers, Brian, take a

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>chance of me white out Cleveland's Rochard Higgins at home

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Texans. UH only one catch for Richard on

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:37.399
<v Speaker 1>three targets in Cleveland's first full OH B J less game,

0:19:37.640 --> 0:19:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but that was the monsoon game against the Raiders. Is

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>not going to read too much into that and the

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>three games prior where Beckham was healthy for two and

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>a half of them, Higgins either scored a touchdown or

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 1>topped a hundred yards in all three. Houston is allowing

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>one and seventy plus yards per game to wide receivers.

0:19:53.320 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>They've already surrendered thirteen touchdowns to the position, that is

0:19:56.920 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>second most. So I like me some Richard Higgins this week. Okay, bat,

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 1>how about Mike Gassicki, who's by the way, fifty owned

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>in ESPN leagues, which I can't why at this point.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a tight end waste land out there, and I

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of like Gasicki here. Last December, Mike Gasicki was

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:16.560
<v Speaker 1>the tight end darling of the of the league. And

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gearing up for another one of those

0:20:18.440 --> 0:20:22.600
<v Speaker 1>because last year Preston Williams got hurt in Week nine

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and went on I R just like he did this year.

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>From Week ten on, Ghisicky became the de facto second

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>passing option on that team and averaged over seven targets

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>per game. This week, he gets a Chargers defense that

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>has allowed five touchdowns to the tight end position in

0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>just the last five weeks. Mike Gassicky, go pick him up.

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Remember last December when Gisicky and Higbee were they blew

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>up in December. We all roll into, you know, roll

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>into the next season. Like those guys. You know they're young,

0:20:52.240 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>they're both of them are on the waiver wire. They've

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>both been awful this year. Josh Reynolds has an uninspired,

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.880
<v Speaker 1>tired play, but he's on the field seventy eight percent

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of the team snaps. I am interested in any carbon

0:21:07.680 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>based life form that is on the field for sent

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>of a team snaps against the worst past defense in

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL history. How bad is Seattle? The Seahawks are on

0:21:17.880 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 1>pace to give up one thousand more passing yards than

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the next worst past defense of all time. Seattle allows

0:21:29.600 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>two d eighty passing yards to wide receivers, sixty more

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>than the next worst team. They're giving up a staggering

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty two receptions just to the wide out position, worst

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in the league, and Josh Reynolds has scored in two

0:21:45.119 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of the last three games, three out of the last four.

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Josh Reynolds. Here we go. I think it. I think

0:21:50.840 --> 0:21:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it all makes sense. Those some solid Reynolds wrap right there.

0:21:54.840 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh why didn't I think of that? I guess next next,

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>next week. There's always a chance for somebody to wrap

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:06.400
<v Speaker 1>their Josh Reynolds. I want to hear you drop some bars.

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>You do the beatbox Brian Ravens take on the Patriots.

0:22:10.440 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's begin with Lamar Jackson. This passing offense has not

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 1>been good. He hasn't top two touchdown passes in a

0:22:15.680 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>game since the opener. And even though Joe Flacco, of

0:22:19.760 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>all people, just roasted the Patriots secondary, don't let recency

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>bias make you forget that New England had gone three

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>weeks without allowing a passing touchdown before that. Now, Stephon

0:22:31.200 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>Gilmour probably misses this game, and that means to me

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Jackson is a pretty safe start. But I'm in a

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>note here. The Patriots are allowing just fifteen quarterback rushing

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>yards per game, so there is the opportunity for a

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 1>major flop here for Lamar Jackson, but he usually finds

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>his way to a decent not explosive game, so we

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>have just to be grade for Lamar Jackson his receivers.

0:22:56.560 --> 0:23:00.159
<v Speaker 1>Marquis Brown gets a C grade. New England said, can

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot of one yard receiver in three

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of the past four games, again mostly with Gilmore out

0:23:04.720 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and has they just surrendered a multi touchdown game to

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Brochard Payriman. Brown lines up on the right side most

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>often where he will face J. C. Jackson in coverage,

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>who allowed two scores in his coverage last week. So

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.440
<v Speaker 1>C grade for Marcus Brown. He's been a touchdown dependent

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>receiver to this point. What Mark Andrews, speaking of the

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>tight end waste land he's contributed, he has had. Out

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>of the eight games so far, he's had three good

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>games and five that have been straight up disaster grade games.

0:23:34.520 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>He's the guy you're not going to see on many

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:41.080
<v Speaker 1>playoff teams at this rate based on his ADP. He's

0:23:41.119 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 1>completely touchdown dependent well, and he's still the eighth ranked

0:23:44.640 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>tight end in the league right now, which is which

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:49.680
<v Speaker 1>says a lot about the tight end position. Andrews recorded

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>just two catches for twenty one yards against the Patriots

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.919
<v Speaker 1>last season, in a game in which the Ravens scored

0:23:54.960 --> 0:23:59.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven points. He had twenty one scoreless yards. Andrews

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>commands a thirty five percent share of the Ravens targets

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in the red zone, good good for third most league wide.

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>So hopefully you'll pay off in a touchdown. And that's

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a C grade for Mark Andrews. Now, everybody else is

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.120
<v Speaker 1>on the bench that you might be tempted to start,

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>including the running backs. Mark Ingram practiced on Friday, and

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>it looks like we're back to one of the league's

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:21.639
<v Speaker 1>messiest rotations. Over the last four games, the Patriots have

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>given up per game averages of a hundred thirty six

0:24:24.400 --> 0:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards and one and a half scores and five

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry to running back. So there's something will

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>probably get done here. But when you split that up

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>three ways, it's hard to feel confident about any of

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the three. J. K. Dobbins in particularly not chipping in

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>with the receptions like we thought he might, and nobody

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>else is really getting him either, and he's been held

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>under thirty four yards in five of the last six games.

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I've got them all on the bench, all right, let's

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>go to Let's go to the Patriots side, where I've

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>only got a couple of starters for you, Cam Newton.

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.680
<v Speaker 1>His is the rare rushing his quiz the rare rush

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown dependent quarter back. He's a running back playing quarterback. Basically, yes, um,

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to chase last week's two rushing touchdowns

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>because he's not playing the Jets. The Ravens are only

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>allowing sixteen quarterback rushing yards per game, although three quarterbacks

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>have found the end zone against the Ravens. And that's

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess why he's getting a C grade here for

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the hopeful the rushing score. His passing is awful and

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens are a very good past defense. Who his

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>arms gonna you just get a bonus on whatever his

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.440
<v Speaker 1>arms chip in? Uh. If he's gonna throw anything, it'll

0:25:26.480 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>go to Jacoby Myers. Myers will face Marcus Peters most often,

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and while Peters has been inconsistent, it's still not a

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>terribly favorable matchup here. The Ravens have allowed the eighth

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>fewest yards to wideouts and the third fewest touchdowns. Myers

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>runs from the slot a little bit, and if Marlon

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Humphrey can't go due to the COVID protocol, he's trying

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to get through that gives Myers a glimpse of hope,

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's why I've got a C grade on him.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, Myers hasn't done anything at all this year

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>on days where it wasn't his birthday. That's really a

0:25:54.640 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 1>very birthday dependent wide receiver Jacoby Myers. And lastly, C

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>grade on Damien Harris, and it's barely to see he's

0:26:04.040 --> 0:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a knee injury. Looks like he's gonna play.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Aside from one long mile Sanders run, Baltimore is held

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:13.680
<v Speaker 1>every back under seventy two rushing yards, Harris doesn't catch

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and his quarterback steals his goal line looks so you know,

0:26:16.840 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a C grade for the sixties scoreless guards that

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>I expect him to get in this game. James White

0:26:22.680 --> 0:26:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is on the bench. Baltimore has mostly handled other past

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 1>catching specialists niakem Hinz twenty yards last week, Boston Scott

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>five yards, j D Mkissic forty yards, Kareem Hunt nine

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 1>yards through the air. That's it. They've only given up

0:26:39.040 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown two running backs through the air this year,

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>that's all. And that's why you're not gonna start James

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>White in this game. When we come back Houston takes

0:26:50.840 --> 0:26:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on Cleveland. You'll find out about Duke Johnson's chances as

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the likely starter for the Texans as he goes up

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>against Cleveland. Did he used to play for the Browns? Media?

0:27:01.040 --> 0:27:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Could there be a revenge motivation during the break? We'll

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>do that when we come back. Be encourage you to

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:11.600
<v Speaker 1>stick around for that and final week to join a

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Guillotine League right here this weekend. It's not too late.

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>You can join a Guillotine League, the freshest new format

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and fantasy sports where every week the low scoring team

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 1>gets eliminated and all their players go to the waiver wire.

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 1>Last team standing wins. Learn more at Guillotine leagues dot com.

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Hi am Paul Churchy and

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:55.879
<v Speaker 1>at Paul Churching on Twitter. Brian Johnson is at b

0:27:56.440 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>t x J and Matt Harrison is at a Explosive Output. Matt,

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:04.760
<v Speaker 1>what's happening at Shock Fantasy? Oh? I got something to

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>reveal this week? Really and I do this this thing

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>that I've I've done the last few years. My Super

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Bowl prop bet game. Yeah, I have one coming out

0:28:14.200 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>next week for Thanksgiving and the Thanksgiving games, all three

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.280
<v Speaker 1>games in all three games in one tidy little sheet

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for you and your family to play it Thanksgiving. Even

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:26.840
<v Speaker 1>if you're not able to see your family this year,

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>print them off it. Do it from Afar. It's something

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.720
<v Speaker 1>to keep you guys together. I'm in fantastic um. Anything

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>that means that I don't have to talk to my family,

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I think is a bonus. Well, and it forces you

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:41.719
<v Speaker 1>to watch more football. If people say, Paul, come through

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>the dishes, you go, I gotta keep score on this

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>game over here. Yeah, I have to watch football. Houston

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>takes on Cleveland, and it looks like David Johnson will

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not clear the concussion protocol in time to participate in

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this game. So Duke Johnson, coming off the heaviest workload

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>of his entire career, goes back to Cleveland where it

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>all began. Yeah, the heaviest workload was sixteen carries and

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 1>that was only the fifth time in his career that

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>he's seen double digit carries for Duke Johnson, So this

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.959
<v Speaker 1>is like uncharted bell cow Territory, remember doing Isaiah Crowle

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>was stealing his touches. That's right, I forgot. We changed

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the changed changed the cow bell down to one bell

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like how it's the literal bell. Duke control the

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 1>bell a couple more times than that. It's not an

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:36.360
<v Speaker 1>amazing matchup. The Browns are coming off their by so

0:29:36.440 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the defense will be fresh. They're allowing a combo yards

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>per game drawnning backs and a touchdown per game. The

0:29:43.200 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>compoyards isn't great, but based on volume, Duke a safe b.

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Now to the past game, will Fuller gets an A.

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Now Will Fuller just playing in sixth straight games in

0:29:52.080 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the past was impressive, but now six straight games with

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. I don't even know what to say right now.

0:29:57.360 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm at a loss for words. I'm hard. I'll hark

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>and back as I as I, as I often like

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to hearken. You're a big Hearken fan, big hearkener known

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>from my hearkening um back to the preseason when we

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>said Will Fuller stays healthy, if you promised me he'll

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>play sixteen games, he will be a top ten wide receiver.

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a top ten wide receiver. Yeah, and you could

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>keep it rolling this week. Denzil Award is a great

0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 1>cornerback for Cleveland, but he's basically the last man standing

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in that secondary. Cleveland has allowed the fifth most catches

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and third most touchdowns to wide receivers who are also

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>very active in the red zone. Against the Browns, Cleveland

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>has yielded the most red zone targets and second most

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 1>red zone touches to the position. So in A for

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Fuller and in A for Brandon Cooks, who was universally

0:30:38.480 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>dropped essentially after Week four when he had zero catches

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>on three targets against the Vikings. Since then, he's seen

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>at least nine targets in four straight and has scored

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:47.680
<v Speaker 1>in three of those four games. So in A for

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Cooks and I don't give Darren Fells to see the

0:30:49.880 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Browns are allowing six catches per game to opposing tight ends,

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>who are also averaging two red zone targets per game.

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>That's the highest clip in the league. Bells has scored

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in two of his last three. So a CEE for

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Fells in the waste land and DeShawn Watson and easy

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>A for me. Cleveland has allowed multiple passing touchdowns in

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>five of eight games, at least three passing touchdowns in

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:13.240
<v Speaker 1>four of those five games, and in the three games

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:15.959
<v Speaker 1>they did not allow multiple passing scores. One was that

0:31:16.040 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Monsoon game that we keep referencing, and the other two

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:21.440
<v Speaker 1>were Ben Roethlisberger and Philip Rivers, who are not very

0:31:21.480 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>comparable to Deshaun Watson at this point in his career.

0:31:24.280 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So I love Deshaun Watson with an a over to

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the Cleveland side. Nick Chubb looking like he's going to

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 1>make his return. He is off, I r he will.

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. So we're looking at a fifty fifty

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>split maybe sixty forty. I think I think he goes

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>right back to he goes right back to what it was,

0:31:40.080 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>but that was not that was like, and I think

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it might be more. Maybe maybe Hunt is the sixty

0:31:46.720 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and Chubb is the forty. This week we can talk

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 1>more about Hunt and chubbing a little bit weekend. More importantly,

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.640
<v Speaker 1>they both get the return of right tackle Wyatt Teller

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>this week. Um, it's a great matchup as well. Houston

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>has surrendered the most rushing yards and running backs, and

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the Texans have also yielded the most red zone touches

0:32:02.880 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to opposing running backs and the second touches in gold

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to go scenarios to the position. They have only allowed. Uh.

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 1>The texting that Texans that is one score to running

0:32:12.680 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>backs through the air, and only one back was able

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to catch more than five passes against them. So I

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 1>do like Chubb more than Hunting this one, even if

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>Hunt sees more touches. But I'll give them both a

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>very safe sea. I suppose with B upside for both

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>uh stuff to gauge what's gonna happen here with with

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Chubb returning, UH, Jarvis Landry gets b saw Levin targets

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in his first game without oh. B J didn't do much,

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>but coming off the by probably the healthiest he's been

0:32:37.200 --> 0:32:40.720
<v Speaker 1>all year, should dominate slot corner Eric Murray, who owns

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a one passer rating in his coverage, Orchards Higgins. I

0:32:44.600 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>like him as well. Was my take a chance on

0:32:46.200 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>me wide receiver and Austin Hooper. Gonna give him a

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 1>B if he returns, which he should. The Texans are

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>allowing the eighth most receptions and seventh most yards to

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 1>opposing tight ends. Houston has also surrendered a tight end

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and two of their last four games, and that's notable

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>because the two teams that didn't score it tight in

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>touchdown during that span are actually one team. It was

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the Jaguars, who they played twice over the last four games,

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so B for Hooper and a B for Mayfield. Baker,

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Mayfield Houston who. Houston has allowed a three yard passing

0:33:14.440 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>game to Jake Lewton last week and prior to that

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:20.600
<v Speaker 1>they allowed four touchdown passes and back to back games

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>at least two touchdown passes in five of seven, so

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it was safe B for Baker. You don't really touch

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on the weather. I mean the weather in Cleveland right

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>now is dangerously high winds, so there's they're not going

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>to get the rain from the monsoon game. But they

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.080
<v Speaker 1>could very well have a game with wins that just

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>make it so you can't pass. Like it was a

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, there was like five win games. They

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>all came through on the over they except the Cleveland lost.

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>They did think the Vikings game didn't either. I can't believe,

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>but maybe it did. It did. No, there was another

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was a lot. I mean there were

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>points scored. Let's put it that way. Just don't fade

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 1>these games. The gales of November came early. Now, when

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.120
<v Speaker 1>you get to me, when you get wins in the

0:33:58.280 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 1>forty fifty, I don't want anything do with the passing game.

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 1>That's me, let's go to the Chargers taking on the Dolphins.

0:34:06.160 --> 0:34:14.760
<v Speaker 1>For the Chargers, it's all about quarterback. Justin Air Bear,

0:34:16.600 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>And I'd like to submit since I taught some kindergarteners

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week, justin Air Bear as a children's book,

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great idea. Here we go. The

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>air bear doesn't scare. Oh wait, you're not. You're not

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>suggesting you're doing here? It comes okay, he doesn't care.

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>He'll pass with flair. You know what's rare, an average

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>of three oh seven yards pair and T T D

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>passes maybe two point fair. The Dolphins d will surely

0:34:46.440 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 1>dare air Bear, but they should be aware because they're

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:53.560
<v Speaker 1>allowing to seventy five through the air and within their lair.

0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 1>In Miami Fair, three of fair quarterbacks have gone for

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>over three yards. So grab a chair and start to

0:35:02.480 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>air Bear without a care. Because he's in a grade

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I will share. That's it, okay, and now and now

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike will Yeah, and now Mike Williams and Jalen Guiton.

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:19.920
<v Speaker 1>As an erotic novel, Uh not really. The Dolphins have

0:35:20.200 --> 0:35:24.120
<v Speaker 1>two really good corners in Xavian Howard and Byron Jones.

0:35:24.560 --> 0:35:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They stay on the outside. That's where Williams and Guiton

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>will be. Keep them on your bench. But Keenan Allen

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:33.720
<v Speaker 1>runs almost exclusively from the slot. In the last three games,

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>teams have absolutely attacked the slot. Against Miami, Cooper Cup

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>had twenty one targets. The week before, Jamison Crowder had

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>thirteen targets and seven catches. Only Davante Adams has more

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.280
<v Speaker 1>targets per game on the season than Keenan Allen, who's

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:51.880
<v Speaker 1>averaging eleven per game. This is setting up as a

0:35:51.960 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>high volume game for Allen. I'm giving him an a. Also,

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Huntry Hunter. Henry, I'm giving him a be quietly ranks

0:35:58.360 --> 0:36:01.359
<v Speaker 1>third among tight ends with six point six targets per game.

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>The Dolphins have been pretty good against the tight end,

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but they did allow two touchdowns to the tight end

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:10.719
<v Speaker 1>position just last week against Arizona, and neither of them

0:36:10.719 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 1>were Dan Arnold. Brian probably feels bad about that one.

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>No doubt, the running game looks like a combo of

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Joshua Kelly and Klin Blage, as Justin Jackson and Troy

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Maine Pope are both if he at best due to

0:36:22.520 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>their injuries. I use Klin Blage as might take a

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:28.040
<v Speaker 1>chance on the runner and it made me feel great.

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Really air quotes there. Uh, if Jackson specifically is cleared

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to play, I'd probably move Blage to the bench grade

0:36:35.680 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and and move that back to Jackson as a C.

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>But Joshua Kelly is really also a C grade in

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>this one because Miami's pretty bad against the run. Flip

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>over to the Miami side where I talked about TOA

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.959
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Gasiki both take a chance on me. Participants

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>Davante Parker, I'm giving a C grade in this one.

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Preston Williams hit I R this week with a foot injury,

0:36:54.560 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>and they did trade away Isaiah Ford last week, So

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>five six Jachim Grant is your wide receiver two in

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>this offense? Or is it? Kasicki Parker gets the C

0:37:04.320 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 1>grade because the Chargers are a top eight defense against

0:37:07.600 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 1>both receiving yards and touchdowns allowed to the wide receiver position,

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and then the running back situation is gross because Matt

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Brito returns this week from a hamstring injury, but Miles

0:37:17.760 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Gaskin does not, so it's likely Burrito working between the twenties,

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Howard in at the goal line and Patrick Laird

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:29.160
<v Speaker 1>stealing some passing down work. So all of them are

0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on the bench, and if you need one, it's probably

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Howard because he's got the best chance at a touchdown. Yeah,

0:37:36.120 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to say Matt Brita would be

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.000
<v Speaker 1>startable in a pinch, but I I don't see it

0:37:41.040 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>coming together here. I don't either. Washington takes on Detroit.

0:37:45.400 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the passing game. Alex Smith and spot

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>duty has looked okay, let's call it inconsistent, but there's

0:37:52.120 --> 0:37:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a reason for optimism here. For the first time, he

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:57.760
<v Speaker 1>gets a full week of practice with the first team offense,

0:37:58.200 --> 0:38:00.440
<v Speaker 1>and he faces a dismal lie in set and Dary.

0:38:00.440 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Detroit ranks twenty six in passing touchdowns allowed. Pro Football

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Focus ranks their pass rush, their coverage at Terry mclaurin's

0:38:11.120 --> 0:38:16.760
<v Speaker 1>anticipated excess alone is Harry mccono matchup makes Alex Smith

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.720
<v Speaker 1>startable in this one. A C grade on Alex Smith,

0:38:19.960 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>So let's go over to Terry McLaren with his A grade.

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Over the past three games of McLaren averaging ten targets

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>ninety three yards, He's scored twice over those three games,

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and prior to the Lions break from facing a real

0:38:32.320 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>passing attack. The past two weeks against a washed up

0:38:35.200 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers and a run focused Vikings, Detroit had allowed

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 1>a receiver to top ninety yards and four straight games. Uh.

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 1>The only other part of the passing game you'd want

0:38:43.640 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to touch Logan Thomas tight end. His score touchdowns and

0:38:46.719 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>two of his last three weeks, the Lions have allowed

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>the fewest yards to tight ends, but they've given up

0:38:51.719 --> 0:38:55.279
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns, including three in the past two weeks, and

0:38:55.320 --> 0:38:57.399
<v Speaker 1>they've played no good tight ends as one other thing,

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.719
<v Speaker 1>and Logan Thomas isn't great, but he's on part with

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the guy just score touchdowns against Detroit, so we'll give

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:06.200
<v Speaker 1>him a B grade. Lastly, the running game, This is

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I believe your last chance to buy low on Antonio Gibson.

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:13.399
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna have a big game here and he's gonna

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:16.040
<v Speaker 1>have more of them coming forward. The Lions are allowing

0:39:16.080 --> 0:39:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the second most rushing yards the fourth most receiving yards

0:39:19.400 --> 0:39:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to the position for a league worst one eight seven

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>total yards and two touchdowns per game allowed to running backs.

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 1>It's been even worse lately, where they're giving up two

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty total yards and almost three touchdowns per game

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:38.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last three weeks. Antonio Gibson saw season lows

0:39:38.719 --> 0:39:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in rushing attempts and rushing yards last week as Washington

0:39:41.760 --> 0:39:44.840
<v Speaker 1>got out to an early early double digit deficit. But

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 1>they're not getting into a big deficit against the Lions,

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>so I think Gibson gets plenty of carries and he's

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 1>sitting on a big game B grade for Antonio Gibson.

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to Detroit where Matthew Stafford gets to

0:39:57.360 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>see grade. He's thrown exactly one touchdown in three of

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>last four games, and the other game was mostly stat

0:40:02.920 --> 0:40:05.839
<v Speaker 1>padding in a blowout loss. He has no Kenny Golladay here.

0:40:06.200 --> 0:40:09.239
<v Speaker 1>No quarterback has top two touchdowns against Washington all year,

0:40:09.600 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and five opposing teams have failed to even top two

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 1>twelve passing yards. So that's why Stafford only gets the

0:40:15.160 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>C grade. And I've only got one receiver with a

0:40:18.080 --> 0:40:21.759
<v Speaker 1>starting grade. That's his tight end T J. Hockenson. He

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 1>missed some time at practice this week, but appears to

0:40:23.880 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>be okay. Hockinson has recorded at least five targets and

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>receptions in three straight games and has scored in four

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>the last five. He's got a great opportunity keep it

0:40:34.000 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>rolling against the Washington unit that has allowed six touchdowns

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to opposing tight ends. We're gonna talk a little bit

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>more about t J. Hockenson shortly, and then the last

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:47.040
<v Speaker 1>starter is DeAndre Swift. After getting trounced by the Cleveland

0:40:47.080 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Backs in Week three, Washington has been pretty good at

0:40:49.760 --> 0:40:52.719
<v Speaker 1>keeping running backs in check since that game back in

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Week three. They've allowed ninety six rushing yards per game,

0:40:55.440 --> 0:40:58.360
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty good with no back topping even sixty

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>eight yards. Swift and have much value through the air,

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 1>as Washington has allowed the third fewest receptions and second

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>fewest receiving yards to opposing running backs, and that's where

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Swift has been helpful. He's chipped in a fair amount

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>of of receptions. But I don't think it happens here

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:16.520
<v Speaker 1>for Marvin Jones and Danny Amendola. They're out. They need

0:41:16.680 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they need easier starts, and this isn't one of them here.

0:41:19.000 --> 0:41:23.840
<v Speaker 1>And Marvin Jones, especially with a bad matchup Adrian Peterson. Also, well,

0:41:23.920 --> 0:41:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you thought maybe there'd be a revenge narrative for Adrian

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Peterson last week against the Vikings. That didn't come together,

0:41:30.280 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and so another revenge narrative. Yeah, but if he's going

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>to get the same light workload he's gotten over the

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 1>last month, you can't start him. Did they play Arizona

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and New Orleans coming up to Yeah, I think I

0:41:44.920 --> 0:41:46.440
<v Speaker 1>actually looked for that. I don't. I don't think he

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:51.320
<v Speaker 1>is going on the revenge tour unfortunately. UM at this stage,

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:53.319
<v Speaker 1>I've got three minutes left. If you can tuck in

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>one more matchup, Brian, you can do it. If not,

0:41:55.880 --> 0:41:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got some I got some things from the Thursday

0:41:57.719 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 1>night game. I'd love to talk to you guys about.

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>Let's go for it, all right, Tampa Bay at Carolina.

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 1>These teams met week two. Will reference that quick, even

0:42:04.320 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>though Tampa Bay is an entirely different teams, since they

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 1>uh what the ones were in Week two. Let's start

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>with the receivers. Overall, Atlanta has held I'm sorry, Carolina

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:18.480
<v Speaker 1>has held Atlanta's wide out scoreless twice this year. That's concerning.

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:21.040
<v Speaker 1>But over the last three weeks they've allowed four wide

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 1>receiver touchdowns in a hundred nine yards per game to

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the position. That's forty four yards more than on their

0:42:26.760 --> 0:42:29.720
<v Speaker 1>season average. So I'm gonna give us see Trantonio Brown

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans and Chris Godwin quick hitters on each. Antonio

0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Brown five targets in his Bucks debut, caught three for

0:42:36.400 --> 0:42:39.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty one scoreless yards. In week to Tampa Bay white

0:42:39.640 --> 0:42:42.240
<v Speaker 1>at white outs called eleven passes, seven went to Mike Evans,

0:42:42.280 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>but of course there was no Chris Godwin in that game.

0:42:44.160 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 1>No Antonio Brown in that game, so Evans gets to see.

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:49.919
<v Speaker 1>He had the seven catches a hundred and four yards

0:42:49.960 --> 0:42:51.799
<v Speaker 1>in a touchdown in that first meeting, but again there

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was no Godwin, there is no Brown, so temporary expectations

0:42:54.960 --> 0:42:57.319
<v Speaker 1>with Evans, he gets to seeing. Chris Godwin, probably the

0:42:57.360 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>safest option of wide receiver for Tampa Bay, missed the

0:43:00.600 --> 0:43:02.880
<v Speaker 1>first game, but in his two meetings against the Panthers

0:43:02.960 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>last year he had ten catches a hundred and fifty

0:43:05.480 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 1>one yards and then eight catches a hundred and twenty

0:43:07.640 --> 0:43:10.880
<v Speaker 1>one yards and a touchdown. He has the best matchup

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:14.919
<v Speaker 1>with slot corner Corn Elder. The dude's name is Corn Corn.

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:17.359
<v Speaker 1>So I like god when the most of these three,

0:43:17.400 --> 0:43:19.720
<v Speaker 1>but we gotta see what happens with all of them healthy.

0:43:19.760 --> 0:43:22.839
<v Speaker 1>So all sees for the Tampa Bay wide receivers over

0:43:22.840 --> 0:43:24.839
<v Speaker 1>to Gronk could give him a B. The Panthers were

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 1>just ripped by Travis Kelsey to the tune of ten

0:43:27.239 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>catches and a hundred and fifty nine yards. Travis Kelsey

0:43:30.520 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 1>used to be called baby Gronk. That's adorable right in

0:43:34.200 --> 0:43:37.480
<v Speaker 1>his day and age. Uh Gronk certainly lesser than Kelsey

0:43:37.560 --> 0:43:39.799
<v Speaker 1>these days, but he should be able to match the

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:43.480
<v Speaker 1>lines of Darren Waller, Hunter Henry and Hayden Hurst. Those

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:46.359
<v Speaker 1>three combined to average roughly five catches and fifty yards

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:49.360
<v Speaker 1>against the Panthers last year. Tom Brady easy be with

0:43:49.400 --> 0:43:51.480
<v Speaker 1>all those weapons. Leonard Fournette might take a chance to

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:54.600
<v Speaker 1>me running back bench. Ronald Jones Mike Davis is the

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:56.920
<v Speaker 1>only Panther you can start with confidence. He gets to be.

0:43:57.280 --> 0:44:00.480
<v Speaker 1>He had eight catches for seventy four yards against Tampa

0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>Bay after Christian McCaffrey got hurt. McCaffrey will miss this game.

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>B for Evans just to be for Robbie Anderson fifth

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and targets third and catch this this year. Then you

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.240
<v Speaker 1>got a bench d J Moore, Curtis, Samuel Teddy, Bridgewater.

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 1>It is a bad matchup for those guys. DJ more

0:44:15.320 --> 0:44:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like five targets per games. There is enough volume. He's

0:44:18.960 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 1>got to turn a couple of targets into a long

0:44:21.120 --> 0:44:23.439
<v Speaker 1>game if he wants to get anything done, and that's

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.200
<v Speaker 1>been a problem. Do you people are dropping DJ more outright?

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:29.000
<v Speaker 1>When we come back? Three tough questions? See if you

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:31.840
<v Speaker 1>can play along and go three and oh Fantasy Football

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Weekly Returns and Moments. Welcome back, Mannessy Football Weekly, Paul

0:44:48.680 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Charchi and Matt Harrison. Brian Johnson with you. It is time.

0:44:52.960 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Four Three tough questions. Tough question Number one? Is t J.

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:03.839
<v Speaker 1>Hockenson the best dynasty and or Empire league tight end

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:09.360
<v Speaker 1>to own? Brian? So we're in a startup league next year, right,

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>That's what we're going with this question exectively. Yes, you know,

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:14.640
<v Speaker 1>would you trade anybody if you are, if you're a

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:17.680
<v Speaker 1>t J. Hockenson owner in a dynasty or empire league,

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:22.400
<v Speaker 1>would you trade anybody for t J. Hockinson any existing

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:24.480
<v Speaker 1>tight end? Would you tried any tight end? One to one?

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:27.759
<v Speaker 1>So Ta Hawk turns twenty four in July. Gotta love that.

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.400
<v Speaker 1>From a dynasty perspective, here are the other guys are

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:34.080
<v Speaker 1>threatening him as the top empire tight end Dynasty Empire

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:37.960
<v Speaker 1>tight end Travis Kelsey thirty two in October, Darren Waller

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine in September, George Kittle twenty eight in October,

0:45:42.040 --> 0:45:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Mark Andrews in September, Noah Fanse former teammates of t J.

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:51.319
<v Speaker 1>Hockinson at IOWA twenty three in November. So I like

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Hockinson from the age perspective, but I still think you

0:45:54.840 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>can get through three or four years with Darren Waller,

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:03.760
<v Speaker 1>maybe even Travis Kelsey or George Kittle. And don't forget

0:46:03.920 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the incoming rookie tight end class is absolutely insane, led

0:46:07.920 --> 0:46:10.640
<v Speaker 1>by Kyle Pitts, who will all get to know very soon.

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:14.280
<v Speaker 1>So long story short, Hopkinson is not my top target

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:16.200
<v Speaker 1>at tight end because you can make do with some

0:46:16.239 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of the older guys who are gonna outproduce him in

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the near future because Hockinson is not seeing enough targets.

0:46:21.520 --> 0:46:24.960
<v Speaker 1>So no, no, he's not your top. So I'm not

0:46:24.960 --> 0:46:26.880
<v Speaker 1>sure what making do has to has to do with this,

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:30.400
<v Speaker 1>But okay, I mean you could start your Dynasty team

0:46:30.600 --> 0:46:32.359
<v Speaker 1>with someone else and I don't need to rely on

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Hopkinson for eight years. I know he's young, but he's different.

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:38.520
<v Speaker 1>To go out and get him based on his age alone,

0:46:38.600 --> 0:46:41.319
<v Speaker 1>is what I'm saying. So he's not the best tight

0:46:41.400 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>end to own. Somebody else is the best guy end

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to own? Basically all those other guys I talked about,

0:46:45.600 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>no a fan everybody else? You'd rather most guys? Yeah, okay,

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>let's move on. I don't even know what question you

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:56.160
<v Speaker 1>just answered. The other options I had to Hockinson the

0:46:56.200 --> 0:46:58.600
<v Speaker 1>best Dynasty or Empire League tight end to own, So

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought Travis Kelsey, George Kittle, and Mark Andrews were

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the only other ones that I think I'd consider above Hockinson.

0:47:05.280 --> 0:47:09.279
<v Speaker 1>Right now, I'm gonna put Hockinson above Andrews barely because

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:12.799
<v Speaker 1>it seems like Lamar Jackson's passing limitations maybe somewhat real,

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm a little bit afraid of Mark Andrews being

0:47:15.640 --> 0:47:18.799
<v Speaker 1>so touchdown dependent. Uh. You could make a case for

0:47:18.880 --> 0:47:23.000
<v Speaker 1>him above Kittle solely based on the quarterback situation. It's

0:47:23.040 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 1>not the injury, it's the QB. Jimmy g Is he

0:47:25.880 --> 0:47:29.319
<v Speaker 1>the answer next year? Are we sure? Probably not? Then?

0:47:29.360 --> 0:47:33.200
<v Speaker 1>What then? What's passing to George Kittle next year? But

0:47:33.239 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I can't put him there. I can't put him at

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:37.720
<v Speaker 1>number two, and I can't put him above Travis Kelsey.

0:47:37.760 --> 0:47:40.440
<v Speaker 1>He just turned thirty one. He's got the best quarterback

0:47:40.480 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in the league. He's probably noticed. How do you know

0:47:42.680 --> 0:47:45.480
<v Speaker 1>what's how Brian has at his age. He's thirty two

0:47:45.520 --> 0:47:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in October. Yeah, it's November, November. I have reason to

0:47:49.480 --> 0:47:55.960
<v Speaker 1>believe right now, if you're the next year, then uh,

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he might have the best quarterback in the history of

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 1>the game. It's still Travis Kelsey as the best tight

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:04.640
<v Speaker 1>end in dynasty. Uh. It is Travis Kelsey, who's got

0:48:04.640 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 1>two or three more elite years in him and then

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:11.160
<v Speaker 1>probably like another four more really good years after that.

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 1>And I want to win this year too. I mean,

0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:18.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't. I'm worried about but not a lot.

0:48:18.480 --> 0:48:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to win one. That would be kind of nice.

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>And really the clincher here for me is just this.

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't tell you who t J. Hockenson's quarterback is

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:31.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be next year. If I knew, if he had,

0:48:32.520 --> 0:48:35.640
<v Speaker 1>if he had a young, promising quarterback, I think it

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:37.880
<v Speaker 1>would be t J. Hockenson. I think he's got a

0:48:39.040 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 1>sure it's gonna be Matthew Stafford. I don't know. I mean,

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:44.439
<v Speaker 1>I think I get the feeling that any year could

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:46.279
<v Speaker 1>be Stafford's last, or he just is like, you know what,

0:48:46.360 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with this because that's what was right. And

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 1>he's old, He's taken a million hits. At some point

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna walk away. That worries me. Tough. Question Number two,

0:48:58.280 --> 0:49:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Nick Chubb is expected to return to the Browns on Sunday.

0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Going forward, is Kareem Hunt and RB one, r B

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 1>two flex or bench player Matt We begin with you.

0:49:11.520 --> 0:49:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Stats Wise, he's the number eight ranked running back in

0:49:14.880 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>most UH systems right now, so that makes him an

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:21.760
<v Speaker 1>RB one right now without Chubb for most of the season.

0:49:21.840 --> 0:49:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Chubb's a really good player, will probably be the high

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>end of the sixty split. But this is a Kevin

0:49:27.239 --> 0:49:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Stefanski run heavy, passed to the back scheme without Odell Beckham,

0:49:32.200 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think he's going to stay very involved. Last year,

0:49:35.040 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 1>in the games where both he and Chubb played, Hunt

0:49:38.080 --> 0:49:41.759
<v Speaker 1>averaged about fifty eight yards about five receptions per game,

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>pitched in a touchdown and every other That's good enough

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:47.120
<v Speaker 1>for a flex. But I see him as a slightly

0:49:47.160 --> 0:49:50.040
<v Speaker 1>better version of what he was last year this year,

0:49:50.320 --> 0:49:52.560
<v Speaker 1>so I'm gonna give him an RB two the rest

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:55.560
<v Speaker 1>of the RB two. All right, Brian, is Kareem Hunt

0:49:55.680 --> 0:49:58.160
<v Speaker 1>going forward now that Nick Chubb is healthy and RB

0:49:58.280 --> 0:50:01.600
<v Speaker 1>one r B two flex or punch? Yeah, we saw

0:50:01.640 --> 0:50:03.400
<v Speaker 1>this last year when they're both healthy, and it was

0:50:03.440 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>a flex floor for Hunt. And it's the third easiest

0:50:06.680 --> 0:50:09.399
<v Speaker 1>remaining schedule for running backs that Cleveland has. So I'm

0:50:09.400 --> 0:50:12.799
<v Speaker 1>with Matt, I'm going RB two. Uh. When Chubb was

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:14.799
<v Speaker 1>healthy for the three full games at the beginning of

0:50:14.800 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the year, Kareem Hunt was RB twelve overall in those

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.960
<v Speaker 1>three games. He's too good. He's just playing too good

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:24.759
<v Speaker 1>to be completely factored out of the offense. That's it.

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:26.719
<v Speaker 1>You know what's been really weird about Hunt. If they're

0:50:26.719 --> 0:50:29.120
<v Speaker 1>not throwing to him. I'm like, this is the obvious

0:50:29.160 --> 0:50:30.879
<v Speaker 1>thing to do with him is throw him the ball,

0:50:30.880 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 1>and they just they're not his His receiving numbers have

0:50:33.280 --> 0:50:36.520
<v Speaker 1>been strangely light. Um, it's a mixed schedule going forward

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:39.080
<v Speaker 1>for Kareem Hunt and the rest of the Browns, but

0:50:39.160 --> 0:50:42.360
<v Speaker 1>only one stopper game left on the schedule, that's Baltimore

0:50:42.400 --> 0:50:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Week fourteen. He'll be an RB two the rest of

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the way. Now, before we get to tough question, number three.

0:50:50.520 --> 0:50:52.239
<v Speaker 1>To help make sense of it a little bit, I'd

0:50:52.239 --> 0:51:02.400
<v Speaker 1>like to preface this with an explanation of the sabotage draw. Brian,

0:51:02.640 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>will you tell listeners what the sabotage drop is. It's

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 1>essentially dropping a big name player that will because I'll

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:15.760
<v Speaker 1>ruckus on the free agent waiver wire. But he's garbage.

0:51:16.200 --> 0:51:19.480
<v Speaker 1>He's garbage moving forward, he's fool's gold. That's right, and

0:51:19.560 --> 0:51:22.479
<v Speaker 1>you got you gotta do it right before a big

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:26.080
<v Speaker 1>waiver period as well or a good matchup. You can't.

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:30.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't. You can't sabotage dropped like on the weekend

0:51:30.400 --> 0:51:32.799
<v Speaker 1>because somebody. You need somebody to pay something to make

0:51:32.880 --> 0:51:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to pick up that player. You can't just get rid

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 1>of the worst player on your roster. We want you

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to have to use a high waiver claim, spend a

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:42.600
<v Speaker 1>bunch of fab on this player. That's the key to

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the sabotage drop. And that's your backdrop for this tough question.

0:51:47.360 --> 0:51:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Number three. If Ronald Jones flops this week against the Panthers,

0:51:51.600 --> 0:51:57.360
<v Speaker 1>should fantasy managers sabotage drop him? Brian, Yes, and I

0:51:57.360 --> 0:52:00.319
<v Speaker 1>would almost do it before the Panthers games. Again, man,

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:02.239
<v Speaker 1>you can't do it. On the weekend because nobody has

0:52:02.320 --> 0:52:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to pay anything to make the pickup. It's not a sabotage.

0:52:05.520 --> 0:52:10.560
<v Speaker 1>People could the people are using waiver wire priority incorrectly. Anyway,

0:52:10.680 --> 0:52:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I'll say yes after the Carolina game. I don't like

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:16.960
<v Speaker 1>him going into this game. Mentioned earlier, Leonard Fournett over

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the last three weeks has out snapped Jones two x.

0:52:20.920 --> 0:52:24.960
<v Speaker 1>During that same three week span, Jones has dropped four passes.

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:28.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot, especially for running back. He has managed

0:52:28.280 --> 0:52:31.160
<v Speaker 1>sixty six yards on twenty three carries. That's two point

0:52:31.160 --> 0:52:33.760
<v Speaker 1>eight seven yards per carry. And he had a costly

0:52:33.800 --> 0:52:36.400
<v Speaker 1>fumble against the Giants a couple of weeks ago that

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:38.640
<v Speaker 1>almost costs him the game. And when you go in

0:52:38.719 --> 0:52:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Arians doghouse, you're not coming out anytime soon. Leonard Fournett,

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:45.600
<v Speaker 1>barring injury, will be the lead back for the Bucks.

0:52:45.719 --> 0:52:50.319
<v Speaker 1>This is a pass first, team first and foremost. So yes,

0:52:50.640 --> 0:52:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop Ronald Jones whenever you want, my mind, don't

0:52:55.560 --> 0:52:58.200
<v Speaker 1>not whenever you want to do it. If you're a

0:52:58.320 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire prioritially do it now. Okay, never mind waivers

0:53:02.440 --> 0:53:07.239
<v Speaker 1>already Ran, You're right charge My bat Matt too is

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Jones a sabotage drop if he doesn't perform against

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. I was gonna say, to Brian's point, getting

0:53:14.880 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>out of bruce Arians doghouse is only as long as

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it takes for somebody else to get in, because last

0:53:23.200 --> 0:53:26.200
<v Speaker 1>year the Bucks didn't have a running back who led

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:30.439
<v Speaker 1>the team in touches in three consecutive weeks. Running back

0:53:30.480 --> 0:53:33.359
<v Speaker 1>only did it two weeks in a row, and then

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:35.800
<v Speaker 1>they switched and he was losing out on touches to

0:53:36.000 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Peyton Barber last year. Also to Brian's point, it doesn't

0:53:41.120 --> 0:53:43.920
<v Speaker 1>need to be a sabotage drop. You can just drop

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:48.920
<v Speaker 1>him because he sucks. And how about this, the sabotage

0:53:49.000 --> 0:53:52.320
<v Speaker 1>drop might be Leonard four Net. You don't want anything

0:53:52.360 --> 0:53:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to do with this Buck's running game. If you sabotage

0:53:55.440 --> 0:53:58.479
<v Speaker 1>drop Leonard four Net after a few weeks or after

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a great week against Carolina, that's gonna cause the ruckus

0:54:01.600 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>on your waiver wire right there. If you don't want

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:05.840
<v Speaker 1>anything to do with this Bucks running game, you sabotage

0:54:05.920 --> 0:54:11.800
<v Speaker 1>drop Leonard four Nett. So yes, don sabotage away, dude, Okay, alright,

0:54:12.560 --> 0:54:17.000
<v Speaker 1>vain He's like, oh my God, I guys can't answer

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the question. They're so tough, clearly says after he flops

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:29.319
<v Speaker 1>against the Panthers, Once you do drop him, Brian now said,

0:54:29.360 --> 0:54:34.920
<v Speaker 1>he's clearly gonna flop against If he flops against the Panthers,

0:54:35.719 --> 0:54:40.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna For four straight weeks, Ronald Jones has seen

0:54:40.160 --> 0:54:42.960
<v Speaker 1>as rushing attempts and rushing yards dropped. He's been out

0:54:43.000 --> 0:54:44.960
<v Speaker 1>snapped by four NET in every game since four NET

0:54:44.960 --> 0:54:47.680
<v Speaker 1>returned from injury. That's said, And you guys have touched

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:51.160
<v Speaker 1>on this. Bruce arians completely inscrutable with his running backs.

0:54:51.239 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And even if Ronald Jones has a great game here

0:54:54.840 --> 0:54:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and he outproduces Leonard Fournette, you couldn't even feel safe

0:54:58.120 --> 0:55:00.000
<v Speaker 1>put him in your your line up. The next week,

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:02.160
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be on your bench wing he does have

0:55:02.239 --> 0:55:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the great game too. Every time you start Ronald Jones,

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you are bracing for a two point game. So you're

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:12.480
<v Speaker 1>all that together we are sabotage dropping him. This is

0:55:12.480 --> 0:55:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the last chance, far as I'm concerned. And then the

0:55:14.160 --> 0:55:17.360
<v Speaker 1>sabotage drop is a very real thing that's headed his way.

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Let's work in one more matchup into this segment. I

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:24.120
<v Speaker 1>believe we left off on forty Niners taking on the Saints.

0:55:24.200 --> 0:55:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Matt for the forty Niners, we get Nick Mullins at

0:55:28.040 --> 0:55:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the Helm have a presumably Jerick McKinnon led running game.

0:55:34.360 --> 0:55:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I think so yeah maybe, Um so Nick Mullins. I'm

0:55:37.600 --> 0:55:40.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna start by giving him a bench grade. Last week

0:55:40.520 --> 0:55:42.640
<v Speaker 1>against Tom Brady was the first time the Saints did

0:55:42.640 --> 0:55:45.759
<v Speaker 1>not allow multiple passing scores in a game. But I

0:55:45.760 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 1>actually thought about him as might take a chance on

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback. Um. They still rank as one of the

0:55:50.120 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>better past defenses in the game. Unless it's garbage time.

0:55:53.920 --> 0:55:56.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you can trust Mullins for any points here,

0:55:56.360 --> 0:56:01.080
<v Speaker 1>although Mullins kind of sounds like a cock word for garbage.

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe so maybe it's Mullen's time. Yeah, I still on

0:56:04.680 --> 0:56:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the bench. I don't even know again, no idea what

0:56:06.560 --> 0:56:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about. He does get Brandon Ayuk back this week,

0:56:09.480 --> 0:56:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and it looks like Kendrick Borne may clear COVID protocol

0:56:12.320 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 1>before the game. But the Saints matchup I think is

0:56:14.160 --> 0:56:16.560
<v Speaker 1>just too tough. Um, with the wide receivers, I'll give

0:56:16.560 --> 0:56:20.040
<v Speaker 1>a Yuka. See, I'm gonna leave Kendrick Borne and Richie

0:56:20.160 --> 0:56:23.000
<v Speaker 1>James on the bench. Mullins has targeted no player more

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:25.640
<v Speaker 1>than Ayuk this season. He missed last week after a

0:56:25.719 --> 0:56:29.560
<v Speaker 1>close contact tested positive on the Niners. Ayuk was never sick,

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:32.720
<v Speaker 1>though Born did test positive. The team thinks it maybe

0:56:32.760 --> 0:56:36.680
<v Speaker 1>false positives though, and he might play this weekend. Okay

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:39.879
<v Speaker 1>either way. The Saints are a strange break but don't

0:56:39.960 --> 0:56:43.360
<v Speaker 1>bend defense. They have allowed the seventh fewest receptions to

0:56:43.400 --> 0:56:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the position, but a robust a hundred and seventy one

0:56:46.239 --> 0:56:49.239
<v Speaker 1>yards per game and the eighth most wide receiver touchdowns.

0:56:50.320 --> 0:56:52.880
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna leave Ross Dwelly and Jordan Read on the bench,

0:56:53.480 --> 0:56:57.400
<v Speaker 1>uh and Jerick McKinnon and Jamichael Hasty. Hasty can be

0:56:57.440 --> 0:57:00.200
<v Speaker 1>cut now. He's only he only saw fifteen s apps

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and six touches compared to forty two snaps in fifteen

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:06.560
<v Speaker 1>touches for McKinnon last week. It doesn't matter now watch

0:57:06.560 --> 0:57:09.040
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna flip it. Maybe, wouldn't it be? It would

0:57:09.040 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 1>be so Shannahanigans, It would be so shannahanigans. Just flip

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the script and go all hasty now that everybody's forgotten

0:57:15.840 --> 0:57:18.600
<v Speaker 1>about him and given up, McKinnon should be on your bench, though,

0:57:18.640 --> 0:57:21.080
<v Speaker 1>as the Saints are allowing only seventy rushing yards per

0:57:21.080 --> 0:57:23.440
<v Speaker 1>game to the position and only three point six yards

0:57:23.480 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>per carry. Let's go to the Saints side where I'm

0:57:25.880 --> 0:57:29.080
<v Speaker 1>giving Drew Brees a kind of a throwback A grade here.

0:57:29.600 --> 0:57:32.240
<v Speaker 1>He's got Michael Thomas back and the forty Niners have

0:57:32.320 --> 0:57:36.360
<v Speaker 1>been absolutely torched as of recent Aaron Jones or Aaron Jones,

0:57:36.400 --> 0:57:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Rodgers, and Russell Wilson each throw four touchdown passes

0:57:40.880 --> 0:57:43.439
<v Speaker 1>against the Niners in the last two weeks, and two

0:57:43.480 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of the three quarterbacks before them tossed multiple scores as well.

0:57:47.280 --> 0:57:50.720
<v Speaker 1>They're so incredibly injured throughout the entire defense that it's

0:57:50.760 --> 0:57:53.800
<v Speaker 1>just not the same. Michael Thomas and Alvin Kamara, they're

0:57:53.840 --> 0:57:56.680
<v Speaker 1>both getting A grades as well. Even though Thomas didn't

0:57:56.720 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 1>have a huge game last week against the Bucks, he

0:57:59.000 --> 0:58:02.439
<v Speaker 1>did co lead the team and targets and receptions with

0:58:02.520 --> 0:58:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Alvin Uh. We're not going as far as Latavious Murray

0:58:05.720 --> 0:58:07.600
<v Speaker 1>in this one, as the Niners have been pretty stout

0:58:07.640 --> 0:58:10.760
<v Speaker 1>against the run. Still, Uh, Kamara is just too versatile

0:58:10.800 --> 0:58:13.440
<v Speaker 1>to hold down. A couple more guys. I want to

0:58:13.480 --> 0:58:16.760
<v Speaker 1>mention tray Kwan Smith. He gets a C grade. Secondary

0:58:16.840 --> 0:58:22.240
<v Speaker 1>receivers as such as Marquez Valdez, Scandling, David Moore, and

0:58:22.360 --> 0:58:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Josh Reynolds have each scored against the Niners in the

0:58:25.400 --> 0:58:28.560
<v Speaker 1>last month, and tray Kwan Smith's worth a dart throw

0:58:28.640 --> 0:58:31.680
<v Speaker 1>just for that. Jared Cook gets a C grade as well.

0:58:31.920 --> 0:58:34.960
<v Speaker 1>He's totally touchdown dependent at this point, and the Niners

0:58:35.000 --> 0:58:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have only given up two tight end touchdowns on the season.

0:58:38.080 --> 0:58:42.280
<v Speaker 1>But still Cook is top twelve among tight ends in receptions,

0:58:42.360 --> 0:58:44.960
<v Speaker 1>yards and touchdowns per game. And if you have him

0:58:44.960 --> 0:58:47.200
<v Speaker 1>on your roster, you're probably starting him. You probably don't

0:58:47.200 --> 0:58:49.480
<v Speaker 1>have another tight end option. Yeah, that's a which, but

0:58:49.680 --> 0:58:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that's everybody right now. Yeah, you know half two thirds

0:58:52.400 --> 0:58:54.600
<v Speaker 1>of the league is bracing for a zero zero point

0:58:54.600 --> 0:58:56.360
<v Speaker 1>game out of their tight end. Yeah, you're just looking

0:58:56.360 --> 0:58:58.959
<v Speaker 1>for tight end touchdowns. Now, John Who? John Who? Runs

0:58:59.000 --> 0:59:01.280
<v Speaker 1>in a touchdown and you're like, oh, thank god, I

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:04.400
<v Speaker 1>got I got something out of it. Does nothing else? Yes, Well,

0:59:04.520 --> 0:59:06.440
<v Speaker 1>they threw him a bunchtimes and he was covered and

0:59:06.680 --> 0:59:10.680
<v Speaker 1>none of them, none of them ended up working. Very frustrating.

0:59:11.280 --> 0:59:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's take a break. When we come back, Seattle

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:17.640
<v Speaker 1>takes on the Rams and an epic matchup between dk

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf and Jalen Ramsey in this game. We'll tell you

0:59:21.560 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>about that. And is this the explosive Tyler Locket that

0:59:25.880 --> 0:59:29.080
<v Speaker 1>once a month explosive Tyler Lockett game. We'll talk about

0:59:29.120 --> 0:59:49.440
<v Speaker 1>that too when we come back. Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome

0:59:49.440 --> 0:59:53.120
<v Speaker 1>back Fantasy Football Weekly. It is the final weekend to

0:59:53.360 --> 0:59:58.600
<v Speaker 1>join a Guillotine League. The Guillotine League is a fresh

0:59:58.600 --> 1:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>new format where instead of head to head every week,

1:00:02.920 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the low scoring team gets cut and all of that

1:00:06.000 --> 1:00:09.640
<v Speaker 1>team's players go to the waiver wire or the rest

1:00:09.680 --> 1:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of the participants all feast on those players. All you

1:00:12.880 --> 1:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have to do is not be last, be the last

1:00:14.920 --> 1:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>team standing, and you win the whole thing. Guillotine leagues

1:00:17.520 --> 1:00:21.760
<v Speaker 1>dot com also all my player rankings available there for free.

1:00:22.520 --> 1:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>If you ain't last or first, that's right, that's all.

1:00:25.080 --> 1:00:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Just don't be last. That's all it takes. Yeah. Near

1:00:28.360 --> 1:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>death experiences are fine, they are. And I've I've had.

1:00:31.080 --> 1:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>I got one of my leagues. I've had four near

1:00:32.800 --> 1:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>death A second to bottom team. Yeah, and that team

1:00:38.400 --> 1:00:41.520
<v Speaker 1>has a j Brown and is one catch on Thursday

1:00:41.640 --> 1:00:44.640
<v Speaker 1>night going. It sounds like another near death experience for

1:00:44.800 --> 1:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that'd be a best case scenario. Credit him with two

1:00:47.480 --> 1:00:50.600
<v Speaker 1>drops some that long touchdown that it should have been

1:00:52.560 --> 1:00:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I was half jumped out of my couch and then no. Anyway,

1:00:56.520 --> 1:00:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Seattle takes on the Rams. Let's begin with Russell Wilson,

1:00:59.640 --> 1:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>who gets in a grade here. The Rams are a

1:01:02.280 --> 1:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>good defense. The Rams have held six of eight opposing

1:01:04.920 --> 1:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks to zero or one passing touchdown. But Wilson's just unbenchable.

1:01:09.880 --> 1:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, no matter what the stats say, no

1:01:12.400 --> 1:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>matter anything else he's on, he's m v P pace

1:01:15.200 --> 1:01:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and I still have an A grade on Russell Wilson.

1:01:18.120 --> 1:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about his matchup with DK metcalf It's fascinating.

1:01:21.840 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>So Metcalfe saw a bunch of elite cornerback T Davious

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>White last week, and when White was on him, White

1:01:30.920 --> 1:01:33.480
<v Speaker 1>held him to three catches and thirty yards. But then

1:01:33.520 --> 1:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>White gets knocked out of the game and they feed

1:01:36.240 --> 1:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>metcalf a bunch and he ends up with a big game,

1:01:38.560 --> 1:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>but it didn't come when term Davious White was on him.

1:01:42.240 --> 1:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Here comes another shut down cornerback, Jalen Ramsey, who was

1:01:46.120 --> 1:01:50.720
<v Speaker 1>allowing twenty seven yards per game in his coverage. That's all,

1:01:51.200 --> 1:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but on Friday, Ramsey said he's going to cover DK

1:01:54.920 --> 1:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Metcalf and he's gonna cover everybody else too, So it

1:01:59.120 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>sounds a lie if we believe he's going to cover

1:02:02.120 --> 1:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>multiple receivers at the same time. Play I got all

1:02:05.240 --> 1:02:07.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. He's like, Fred Smoot, you know how to

1:02:07.800 --> 1:02:11.360
<v Speaker 1>shut down Metcalf. He really shut down DK Metcalf. Just

1:02:11.400 --> 1:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>put three cones right in front of him. Okay, thank you. Wow.

1:02:14.920 --> 1:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Some people can't get over the combine. Just nothing he

1:02:17.640 --> 1:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>can do. Um, so you it's and Ramsey could just

1:02:23.400 --> 1:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>be lying, right, I mean, do you do you are

1:02:25.000 --> 1:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you gonna believe any player is gonna say anything publicly

1:02:27.240 --> 1:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that actually Friday before a game? Then actually is any

1:02:30.800 --> 1:02:34.080
<v Speaker 1>bearing on what's really gonna happen? Probably not. So point

1:02:34.160 --> 1:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>is it's an A grade for DK Metcalf because he's

1:02:37.160 --> 1:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>too good to not give an a grade to anything

1:02:39.760 --> 1:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>could happen. Maybe Ramsey doesn't go for And by the way,

1:02:43.320 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey doesn't usually go to the slot, and Metcalf does

1:02:45.440 --> 1:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>run a fair amount from the slot, so it's another

1:02:47.280 --> 1:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>way he can shake Ramsey a grade of Metcalf. So

1:02:50.440 --> 1:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>what about Tyler Lockett? Then he's been held under forty

1:02:53.960 --> 1:02:57.520
<v Speaker 1>five scoreless yards in four of the last six games,

1:02:57.760 --> 1:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>so if he doesn't give you the explosive game, Lockett

1:03:00.680 --> 1:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is killing you. Los Angeles is averaging the fewest allowed

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:08.600
<v Speaker 1>yards to receivers, just one four per game, and have

1:03:08.680 --> 1:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>only allowed four receivers to find the end zone all

1:03:11.520 --> 1:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>year long. Lock It should mostly avoid Ramsey, instead matching

1:03:16.360 --> 1:03:19.360
<v Speaker 1>up with slot cornerback Troy Hill. The boast often, but

1:03:19.480 --> 1:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Hill's really good. He hasn't allowed to touch down all season.

1:03:23.080 --> 1:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>The only angle here is that Hills a lot slower

1:03:25.920 --> 1:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>than lock It and could be on the wrong end

1:03:28.240 --> 1:03:30.600
<v Speaker 1>of a long pass, but that's just a C grade

1:03:30.600 --> 1:03:33.280
<v Speaker 1>for Locket. This feels way more dangerous than it does

1:03:33.360 --> 1:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>positive for Tyler Lockett um staying with the passing no

1:03:37.560 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>moving over to the running game, and then you don't

1:03:40.280 --> 1:03:43.240
<v Speaker 1>want to start any other secondary tertiary receivers. For Seattle,

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about Chris Carson, presuming he goes here, might

1:03:46.800 --> 1:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>see fewer carries due to the knee injury. Over the

1:03:49.000 --> 1:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>last five games, the Rams haven't allowed to single back

1:03:51.360 --> 1:03:54.280
<v Speaker 1>to top sixty five rushing yards and have only allowed

1:03:54.800 --> 1:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>one touchdown. It was the Miles Gaskin all the way

1:03:57.680 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll by the way, that's over the last five games.

1:03:59.640 --> 1:04:03.360
<v Speaker 1>It's a long time. Carson's average total yards per game

1:04:03.440 --> 1:04:06.479
<v Speaker 1>against the Rams throughout his career, and for the most part,

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:09.320
<v Speaker 1>any game that Carson starts and finishes, he's awfully good.

1:04:09.320 --> 1:04:12.600
<v Speaker 1>In a B grade for Carson. If he does not go,

1:04:13.080 --> 1:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>then DJ Dallas likely gets all the work here and

1:04:16.720 --> 1:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>he's just not good. So he would be a C

1:04:19.000 --> 1:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>grade and a dart throw at best in a tough matchup. Um,

1:04:23.440 --> 1:04:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it does not appear that well. I can just say

1:04:25.480 --> 1:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>carlos IDE's not going in this game, so it would

1:04:27.440 --> 1:04:30.120
<v Speaker 1>go back to d J Dallas in all probability. All right,

1:04:30.160 --> 1:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>so let's go to the ramp side. I'm worried Sean

1:04:33.960 --> 1:04:37.600
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh is too smart for his own good. All you

1:04:37.680 --> 1:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>have to do to beat Seattle is a band in

1:04:40.240 --> 1:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the running game and just pass all the time. Last week,

1:04:46.240 --> 1:04:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Josh Allen and the Buffalo Bills rolled the Seattle defense

1:04:51.240 --> 1:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>because they only handed off the ball eleven times in

1:04:53.840 --> 1:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the entire game. All the rest of it were past plays.

1:04:56.440 --> 1:05:01.480
<v Speaker 1>So will Sean McVeigh je throw the ball or is

1:05:01.480 --> 1:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>he gonna have to be too smart and try something else?

1:05:04.560 --> 1:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Established the rune on don't do it, don't do it.

1:05:08.160 --> 1:05:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's hope that's not the case here, And based on that,

1:05:11.480 --> 1:05:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I've got Jared Goff with an A grade. I know,

1:05:15.960 --> 1:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I never thought it would happen. Jared Goff through the

1:05:18.560 --> 1:05:21.360
<v Speaker 1>ball sixty one times last week. I'd like to see

1:05:21.400 --> 1:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that happen again here. Even if let's go fine, Seahawks

1:05:26.160 --> 1:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>are allowing a league worse three or seventy seven passing

1:05:29.200 --> 1:05:31.360
<v Speaker 1>yards per game, a pace that and on paste to

1:05:31.440 --> 1:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>shatter the all time in competency record. Every opposing quarterback

1:05:35.400 --> 1:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>has scored multiple touchdowns against the Seattle Seahawks. Cooper Cup

1:05:39.040 --> 1:05:41.480
<v Speaker 1>gets an A grade, Robert Wood gets Woods gets an

1:05:41.520 --> 1:05:43.800
<v Speaker 1>A grade for all of the same reasons that you

1:05:43.880 --> 1:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>already know, and cut by the way, has pounded this

1:05:47.560 --> 1:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>team in the past anyway, So a great opportunity for

1:05:50.880 --> 1:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>both Cup and Woods and Josh Reynolds was might take

1:05:53.880 --> 1:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>a chance on me a wide receiver, and you can

1:05:56.840 --> 1:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>use him in a pinch as well. Let's go to

1:05:58.880 --> 1:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Darrell Henderson, who gets a C grade. He's coming off

1:06:02.080 --> 1:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>his lowest usage game since Week one. He got out

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:08.440
<v Speaker 1>snapped by both Malcolm Brown and Cam Akers and the Rams. Really,

1:06:09.080 --> 1:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>if I have my choice, they won't even run the

1:06:10.840 --> 1:06:13.040
<v Speaker 1>ball in this game. Aside from being trampled by the

1:06:13.040 --> 1:06:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Backs, Seattle hasn't allowed to single back over fifty

1:06:16.120 --> 1:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>six rushing yards and they're allowing the third fewest rushing

1:06:19.120 --> 1:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>yards per game to the position. He's not much of

1:06:21.520 --> 1:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>a pass catcher, and the only reason I have a

1:06:23.320 --> 1:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>segret and Darrell Henderson is I think he finds his

1:06:25.520 --> 1:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>way to about fifties scoreless yards, and that's about all

1:06:28.040 --> 1:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you get when you get a C grade. Nobody else

1:06:30.960 --> 1:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>left to talk about on the Rams, including their tight ends,

1:06:33.280 --> 1:06:35.680
<v Speaker 1>who I do not trust in this game. Unless it

1:06:35.720 --> 1:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>turns out that either Higbie or Everett does not go

1:06:37.720 --> 1:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in this game, then you could flip to the other one.

1:06:39.600 --> 1:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But I think both are gonna play. All right, Let's

1:06:42.080 --> 1:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>go to our next matchup, which is the Bengals taking

1:06:45.440 --> 1:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>on the Steelers. Brian, this is a tricky matchup to

1:06:50.560 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>me in that the Steelers are Pro Football focus is

1:06:53.800 --> 1:06:58.840
<v Speaker 1>best pass rushing defense and the Bengals offensive line just stinks.

1:06:59.440 --> 1:07:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeahs with Joe Burrow, then it's gonna give him a C.

1:07:01.920 --> 1:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna take some hits in this game, but he's

1:07:03.840 --> 1:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna air it out to No quarterback has topped two

1:07:06.920 --> 1:07:10.800
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes against the Steelers this year, but every opposing

1:07:10.880 --> 1:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback has scored at least once, and even Garrett Gilbert

1:07:14.280 --> 1:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>posted Fantasy relevant numbers against the Steelers. Yes, borrow north

1:07:20.160 --> 1:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of forty past stemps for games, past dempsper games. So

1:07:23.280 --> 1:07:25.880
<v Speaker 1>we've got to give him a C here. I'm not

1:07:26.000 --> 1:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>going to give a C to Tyler Boyd, especially on

1:07:29.200 --> 1:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>his birthday Sunday B for the birthday boy Boyd had

1:07:36.240 --> 1:07:39.640
<v Speaker 1>one oh one receiving and a touchdown in his most

1:07:39.680 --> 1:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>recent matchup with Pittsburgh. That was last year. This is

1:07:42.200 --> 1:07:44.440
<v Speaker 1>their first meeting, by the way, these two teams. He

1:07:44.480 --> 1:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>has total three touchdowns in his last three games against

1:07:47.720 --> 1:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the Steelers as well, Boyd averaging nine targets seven catches.

1:07:51.080 --> 1:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Basically unbeenchable at this point. If Boyd is a Birthday

1:07:55.120 --> 1:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>B and he's our favorite B grade, we've got what

1:07:57.560 --> 1:08:00.560
<v Speaker 1>we we have our favorite A grade his the Fantasy

1:08:00.600 --> 1:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>yard Park. What's what do you mean? We're still we're

1:08:08.400 --> 1:08:11.040
<v Speaker 1>still working out the details of their fight to the

1:08:11.080 --> 1:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>death between an art park. Carry on, our favorite it's

1:08:16.400 --> 1:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna be at us. I'm pretty sure this kind of

1:08:20.960 --> 1:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>thing we do. We need more animals, Beyonce. I'm trying

1:08:24.760 --> 1:08:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to find another animal in the show. Continue Brian plus

1:08:28.760 --> 1:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>matchup for birthday boy Tyler Boyd against safety Cameron Sutton,

1:08:32.360 --> 1:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>who man's this lot for Pittsburgh allowed a season high

1:08:35.120 --> 1:08:37.280
<v Speaker 1>sixty six yards and his coverage last week. So do

1:08:37.360 --> 1:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>not bench Tyler Boyd, and don't bench Te Higgins or

1:08:40.000 --> 1:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>A J. Green either, and give them both a sea. Shockingly,

1:08:43.120 --> 1:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh has surrendered the ninth most fantasy points and the

1:08:45.760 --> 1:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>third most touchdowns to wide receivers this year. Higgins and

1:08:49.680 --> 1:08:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Green both in wide receiver three territory. This week, I

1:08:52.680 --> 1:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>will mention this is A J. Green's first game against

1:08:54.800 --> 1:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh's October. Oh you know, in Italy in October and

1:09:01.400 --> 1:09:03.880
<v Speaker 1>they found a beaver for the first time in six

1:09:04.000 --> 1:09:06.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. I heard that on some other show. It

1:09:06.400 --> 1:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly wasn't about fantasy football. The lastly, for the Bengals,

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Geo Bernard, you gonna give him the c Joe Mixon

1:09:13.000 --> 1:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>not looking like he will play Pittsburgh has Pittsburgh has

1:09:15.960 --> 1:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>only allowed five rushing touchdowns, but in the last two games,

1:09:19.439 --> 1:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Zeke and Tony Pollard combined for a hundred eight yards

1:09:21.960 --> 1:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>on the ground. The week before, Gus Edwards and j

1:09:24.160 --> 1:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>K Dobbin Dobbins combined for two hundred rushing yards on

1:09:27.040 --> 1:09:30.599
<v Speaker 1>thirty one carries. So Bernard is startable. There's not much

1:09:31.080 --> 1:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>angle from a passing game perspective here. The Steelers have

1:09:33.840 --> 1:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>allowed just one receiving touchdown to running backs this year,

1:09:36.640 --> 1:09:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and only see Kwon Barkley, remember him has caught more

1:09:40.200 --> 1:09:43.560
<v Speaker 1>than two passes at the running back position against the Steelers,

1:09:43.560 --> 1:09:45.759
<v Speaker 1>and that was in Week one. So just to see

1:09:45.800 --> 1:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>for geo Bernard over to the Steeler side, we'll start

1:09:49.400 --> 1:09:52.639
<v Speaker 1>with Ben Roethlisberger and give him a see it might

1:09:52.640 --> 1:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>be for Covid. I don't know. Yeah, well, we'll see

1:09:56.080 --> 1:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>if he works. I think I think he plays in

1:09:58.040 --> 1:10:00.679
<v Speaker 1>this game. We're gonna assume he plays in this one.

1:10:01.200 --> 1:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>I did a little I did a little Ben Roethlisberger

1:10:03.400 --> 1:10:08.040
<v Speaker 1>recon this past week. He has become a check down quarterback.

1:10:08.760 --> 1:10:13.479
<v Speaker 1>He is. He has the second lowest UH intended air

1:10:13.600 --> 1:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>yards and the second lowest I think third maybe it's

1:10:17.080 --> 1:10:20.479
<v Speaker 1>third lowest average distance of pass I mean depth of

1:10:21.200 --> 1:10:24.559
<v Speaker 1>four point five yards per completion. He's Teddy Bridgewater bar

1:10:24.640 --> 1:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>for Worthy for sure. Thirty percent of his passes of

1:10:27.880 --> 1:10:32.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty plus yards are more are going for completions awful. Yes,

1:10:32.520 --> 1:10:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the explosiveness is gone. It really it is. It's gone.

1:10:35.920 --> 1:10:39.920
<v Speaker 1>But basically every quarterback cobbles together two passing touchdowns against

1:10:39.960 --> 1:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bengals, right, But sadly that's Ben's ceiling in this one,

1:10:43.479 --> 1:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>although it is to be expected based on the Bengals

1:10:46.320 --> 1:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>being the Bengals. So a CEE for Roethlisberger, but keep

1:10:48.800 --> 1:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>your on him in case he doesn't play over his receivers.

1:10:52.000 --> 1:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Juju Smith Schuster gonna give him a B. He has

1:10:55.000 --> 1:10:57.519
<v Speaker 1>UH scored ind or logged a hundred yards and two

1:10:57.520 --> 1:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of his last three meetings against Cincinnati and should be

1:11:00.400 --> 1:11:03.599
<v Speaker 1>in line for similar success against slot corner Lashawn Simms,

1:11:03.880 --> 1:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>who's allowed four scores in his last five games, So

1:11:07.160 --> 1:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>would be for Juju just to see for Deonta Johnson

1:11:10.240 --> 1:11:13.519
<v Speaker 1>and Chase Claypool though it's a tough matchup against UH

1:11:13.760 --> 1:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>cornerback William Jackson for the Bengals, but Jackson can't cover

1:11:17.160 --> 1:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>both of these guys, and opposing boundary receiver duos have

1:11:21.400 --> 1:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>had recent success against the Bengals, uh Corey Davis and A. J.

1:11:25.000 --> 1:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Brown both scored. Davis went over a hundred yards and

1:11:28.200 --> 1:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>then the week before Richard Higgins topped a hundred yards

1:11:31.080 --> 1:11:34.799
<v Speaker 1>and Donovan People's Jones at fifty plus yards and a touchdown.

1:11:34.880 --> 1:11:38.200
<v Speaker 1>So I will start both Deonte Johnson and Chase Claypool

1:11:38.200 --> 1:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>with a C. Will also start Eric Ebron. He gets

1:11:41.040 --> 1:11:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a B. The Bengals have allowed the seventh most receptions

1:11:44.120 --> 1:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and third most yards and touchdowns to opposing tight ends.

1:11:47.760 --> 1:11:50.639
<v Speaker 1>At one point they allowed six touchdowns to tight ends

1:11:50.640 --> 1:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and three games in a three game span. And Eric

1:11:53.479 --> 1:11:56.759
<v Speaker 1>Ebron has already scored against the Bengals as a Lion

1:11:57.320 --> 1:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and a cult and it's coming as a steel oh

1:12:01.280 --> 1:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>B for Ebron. And lastly, James Conner. James Conner gets

1:12:05.000 --> 1:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to be. Cincinnati has let running backs rack up a

1:12:07.680 --> 1:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>whopping five point four yards per carry. They have only

1:12:11.080 --> 1:12:14.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed two scores to the position over the last seven games.

1:12:14.760 --> 1:12:17.439
<v Speaker 1>But you basically have to start James Conner and hope

1:12:17.439 --> 1:12:20.559
<v Speaker 1>he sees the bell cal volume, but be warned he

1:12:20.680 --> 1:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>normally doesn't. He has topped sixteen carries just four times

1:12:24.560 --> 1:12:27.800
<v Speaker 1>in his last twenty three games Matt The Bills take

1:12:27.880 --> 1:12:31.200
<v Speaker 1>on the Cardinals, Josh Allen coming off an explosive game

1:12:31.240 --> 1:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>after being after having no touchdown passes and two straight

1:12:34.360 --> 1:12:36.719
<v Speaker 1>The Cardinals look good on paper, but they have faced

1:12:36.720 --> 1:12:41.519
<v Speaker 1>some bad quarterbacking. Yeah, what do you think? UM? Vegas

1:12:41.520 --> 1:12:43.599
<v Speaker 1>certainly thinks that they're going to have a high scoring

1:12:43.640 --> 1:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>game implied totals of twenty eight for both teams in

1:12:46.840 --> 1:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>this one, So Josh Allen's getting an A in this one.

1:12:51.080 --> 1:12:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Similarly built Russian quarterbacks like Russell Wilson and Tua have

1:12:55.520 --> 1:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>faced the Cards over the last two weeks. Wilson had

1:12:57.960 --> 1:13:00.599
<v Speaker 1>three eight and three with another eighty four run shing yards,

1:13:00.920 --> 1:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to oh was to forty eight and two with thirty

1:13:03.120 --> 1:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>five rushing yards. And I think tah is a very

1:13:06.320 --> 1:13:08.160
<v Speaker 1>safe floor for Alan, but I think he'll have more

1:13:08.240 --> 1:13:11.519
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards than that. Uh, Stefan Diggs gets an A grade,

1:13:11.560 --> 1:13:15.639
<v Speaker 1>He'll get Patrick Peterson, but that's not as scary anymore. UM.

1:13:15.680 --> 1:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>What is scary that is that slot receivers have absolutely

1:13:19.560 --> 1:13:22.559
<v Speaker 1>torched the Cardinals, which is why Cole Beasley is getting

1:13:22.560 --> 1:13:25.479
<v Speaker 1>a very solid B and just the last month, Tyler

1:13:25.479 --> 1:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Lockett went for two hundred yards and three scores. Jamison

1:13:28.840 --> 1:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Crowder had eight for one sixteen in a score, so

1:13:32.080 --> 1:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Beasley's full. All systems go right here. I like it.

1:13:35.400 --> 1:13:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Even John Brown gets a C grade. He had eleven

1:13:37.600 --> 1:13:40.439
<v Speaker 1>targets last week against Seattle and came up with eight

1:13:40.479 --> 1:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>catches for ninety nine yards and was taggled at the

1:13:43.000 --> 1:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>one yard line, which really would have gave him, you know,

1:13:46.240 --> 1:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown plus the one yard bonus on DraftKings. I

1:13:49.760 --> 1:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder if that affected anybody's lineups out there. Nobody, nobody

1:13:54.080 --> 1:13:56.479
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's also a revenge game for John Brown.

1:13:56.560 --> 1:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Hey, there we go back when he

1:13:58.640 --> 1:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>was smoke. Now he's just fire wo Zack Moss and

1:14:03.240 --> 1:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Devin Singletary single Arry is on the bench until further notice.

1:14:06.280 --> 1:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>He had two carries for one yard last week. He

1:14:09.240 --> 1:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't get three catches for thirty three yards. Well, Zack

1:14:11.840 --> 1:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Moss only had eleven touches last week. He did gain

1:14:14.439 --> 1:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>more yardage and score a touchdown. Moss led the snap

1:14:18.000 --> 1:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>count thirty eight to thirty one, so I'll give him

1:14:20.040 --> 1:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a C grade. The cards are a decent matchup, allowing

1:14:23.280 --> 1:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and forty two total yards per game to

1:14:25.640 --> 1:14:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the position. I just worry that single Tarry takes that,

1:14:29.240 --> 1:14:32.479
<v Speaker 1>so Moss is just a See Kyler Murray gets an

1:14:32.479 --> 1:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>easy A grade, we don't need to talk about him.

1:14:35.080 --> 1:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And on pace, I saw this, this a story that

1:14:37.880 --> 1:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>emerged about Kyle Kyler Murray this week. He's on a

1:14:42.200 --> 1:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a higher scoring pace this year then Lamar Jackson was

1:14:46.600 --> 1:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>last year, and you know that was like, you know

1:14:48.840 --> 1:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the story of the story of the season last year.

1:14:51.560 --> 1:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Murray's like I think RB four right now and l

1:14:54.680 --> 1:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Jackson was like RB eight nine last year. Well, he's

1:14:58.160 --> 1:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>out out pacing him as crazy. To that point, the

1:15:00.360 --> 1:15:03.799
<v Speaker 1>Bills have allowed rushing touchdowns to Russ Cam Tannehill Goff,

1:15:03.880 --> 1:15:07.879
<v Speaker 1>and Kyler's averaging one rushing touchdown per game. DeAndre Hopkins

1:15:08.000 --> 1:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is an a uh. He's literally alternated huge games with

1:15:12.160 --> 1:15:15.519
<v Speaker 1>subpar yardage games all season. Over his last four one

1:15:16.040 --> 1:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in a score, then seventy three, then one oh one

1:15:19.080 --> 1:15:21.519
<v Speaker 1>on a score. Last week he only had thirty. He's

1:15:21.520 --> 1:15:24.439
<v Speaker 1>going over a hundred yards this week. He won't get there.

1:15:24.560 --> 1:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He will be beyond trade as White. But I think

1:15:27.160 --> 1:15:30.519
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins wins that matchup. Christian Kirk won't get trade

1:15:30.560 --> 1:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Avious White. He gets a B grade. He's leading the

1:15:33.439 --> 1:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>team in infrared zone target share, garnering garnering thirty six

1:15:37.880 --> 1:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>percent of the targets inside the ten, and coming up

1:15:40.720 --> 1:15:44.439
<v Speaker 1>with four touchdowns from inside the ten this season. Finally

1:15:45.040 --> 1:15:47.879
<v Speaker 1>Chase Edmonds. I'm giving him a B grade. It's possible

1:15:47.880 --> 1:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that Kenyan Drake returns this week. I think it might happen. Unfortunately,

1:15:51.880 --> 1:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>if that happens, that might downgrade Edmunds a little bit.

1:15:54.920 --> 1:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>But um, I like him. I think he's talented. It's

1:15:57.800 --> 1:16:00.599
<v Speaker 1>a good matchup. Team gives up four point four yards

1:16:00.600 --> 1:16:03.559
<v Speaker 1>per carrying a hundred and thirty six totally yards. That's good.

1:16:03.720 --> 1:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>My major concern is he doesn't get any touches inside

1:16:07.280 --> 1:16:10.519
<v Speaker 1>the ten, only one carry on the season. He's getting

1:16:10.600 --> 1:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>vultured by his own quarterback and Kenyan Drake. That happens unfortunately,

1:16:15.120 --> 1:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Kyler Murray eighth and rushing yards. Four guys ahead of

1:16:18.040 --> 1:16:20.639
<v Speaker 1>him have played one whole more game than him. Yeah,

1:16:20.680 --> 1:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>it's unbelievable. It's uh. You know, if you if you

1:16:24.160 --> 1:16:26.519
<v Speaker 1>punted quarterback, You're like, I'm so smart, I'm gonna wait

1:16:26.520 --> 1:16:29.920
<v Speaker 1>on quarterback. You got hammered this year. The strategy this

1:16:30.000 --> 1:16:33.440
<v Speaker 1>year mostly was Russell. You know, those mid range quarterbacks

1:16:33.720 --> 1:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>have been the way to go for the most part.

1:16:35.640 --> 1:16:38.599
<v Speaker 1>When we come back Premature Speculation. Three players you can

1:16:38.680 --> 1:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>pick up this week that everybody else will be trying

1:16:40.960 --> 1:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to get next week when we return. Welcome back Fantasy

1:17:01.280 --> 1:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly Reminder. If you missed any part of this

1:17:04.640 --> 1:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>show and you would like some advice on who to

1:17:07.080 --> 1:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>start at, all of my player rankings available for free

1:17:10.560 --> 1:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>at gateen leagues dot com gilloteen leagues dot com. This

1:17:16.040 --> 1:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is a segment we like to start off with in

1:17:19.280 --> 1:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Premature Speculation. These are three players that we believe you

1:17:22.560 --> 1:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>should pick up now that other people are gonna be

1:17:24.600 --> 1:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to pick up next week, and they're already on

1:17:27.040 --> 1:17:31.679
<v Speaker 1>your team. Brian, who is your premature Speculation player? Newcomer

1:17:31.800 --> 1:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver from the Eagles. His name is al Shan Jeffrey.

1:17:35.160 --> 1:17:36.559
<v Speaker 1>I don't know have you ever heard of him, but

1:17:36.640 --> 1:17:39.799
<v Speaker 1>he will make his season debut this week against the Giants.

1:17:39.840 --> 1:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't like his prospects a whole lot for this week,

1:17:42.800 --> 1:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but moving forward, he's got two great matchups in Cleveland

1:17:46.080 --> 1:17:49.559
<v Speaker 1>and Seattle. Now, Jeffrey only thirty years old, he should

1:17:49.560 --> 1:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>have some gas, and you would think so should be healthy.

1:17:53.080 --> 1:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So if he gets out of the Cleveland Seattle matchups,

1:17:56.120 --> 1:17:58.559
<v Speaker 1>then the next two are Green Bay in New Orleans,

1:17:58.560 --> 1:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>which is bad Alexander Marshawn Lattimore. But Latimore has been bad,

1:18:04.600 --> 1:18:08.120
<v Speaker 1>not against Mike Givans at least, But if he's seeing

1:18:08.120 --> 1:18:10.559
<v Speaker 1>shadow coverage from those guys, it's a good thing. Because

1:18:10.560 --> 1:18:13.559
<v Speaker 1>he popped off in the two weeks before against Cleveland

1:18:13.560 --> 1:18:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and Seattle, and then in weeks fifteen and sixteen Arizona

1:18:16.720 --> 1:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and Dallas for Philly. So if you're a wide receiver,

1:18:20.439 --> 1:18:24.519
<v Speaker 1>stash alshon Jeffrey, see what happens. I'm buying on the

1:18:24.560 --> 1:18:29.120
<v Speaker 1>whole Eagles offense. U Matt your premature speculation player. Let's

1:18:29.120 --> 1:18:32.400
<v Speaker 1>pick up another kind of a retread guy, Alex Smith,

1:18:32.520 --> 1:18:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback. He gets Detroit this week. I think he's

1:18:35.680 --> 1:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna do well against Detroit. I gave him a starting grade.

1:18:38.120 --> 1:18:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's follow that up with matchups against Cincinnati and Dallas.

1:18:41.360 --> 1:18:44.040
<v Speaker 1>That problem is really good. His only stopper left on

1:18:44.080 --> 1:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the schedule is Pittsburgh after that, But then he gets

1:18:47.960 --> 1:18:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Seattle in your semi final week of your fantasy playoffs.

1:18:53.160 --> 1:18:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Week fifteen. You want whoever's going against Seattle in your

1:18:56.920 --> 1:19:00.560
<v Speaker 1>fantasy playoffs, and Alex Smith has one of those schedules.

1:19:00.760 --> 1:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>That's in a two quarterback league. He's definitely startable in

1:19:04.120 --> 1:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>those weeks. All right, Well, I'm gonna begin by reiterating

1:19:07.720 --> 1:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the same name we've given three times now, and that's

1:19:10.160 --> 1:19:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Alan Lazard. Go get him. But also let's go to

1:19:13.880 --> 1:19:18.599
<v Speaker 1>a different player. Are you interested? Hey, Matt and Brian,

1:19:18.680 --> 1:19:22.040
<v Speaker 1>are you interested in a running back averaging almost seven

1:19:22.160 --> 1:19:26.840
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry who's getting an increasing workload in three

1:19:27.040 --> 1:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>straight games. I didn't get the script, but I'll say yes, Okay,

1:19:30.920 --> 1:19:34.559
<v Speaker 1>good sounds good to me. Let's keep going. He runs

1:19:34.760 --> 1:19:39.439
<v Speaker 1>behind and often injured starter. He plays for a run

1:19:39.600 --> 1:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>heavy offense on a playoff bound team, and we'll have

1:19:46.000 --> 1:19:49.439
<v Speaker 1>home games in weeks fourteen, fifteen, and sixteen. I'll take

1:19:49.479 --> 1:19:52.360
<v Speaker 1>three of them. I don't blame you. We're talking about

1:19:52.640 --> 1:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Davante Booker, the Las Vegas Raiders, a team that is

1:19:57.080 --> 1:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>playoff bound right now. The play iff the playoffs started today,

1:20:00.280 --> 1:20:04.679
<v Speaker 1>they'd be in He's arguably one of the most important

1:20:04.680 --> 1:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>handcuffs and fantasy football uh Las Vegas currently one of

1:20:09.439 --> 1:20:12.559
<v Speaker 1>just to g two games over five hundred. They run

1:20:12.600 --> 1:20:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the ball copiously. The seventh most that playoff schedule home

1:20:16.200 --> 1:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>home home one is the Colts. That is a tough matchup,

1:20:19.479 --> 1:20:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll admit that. But then Chargers Miami, you could be

1:20:22.920 --> 1:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>starting him there. And if Josh Jacobs breaks down this

1:20:25.800 --> 1:20:28.280
<v Speaker 1>year like he did last year, and he's already had

1:20:28.400 --> 1:20:32.640
<v Speaker 1>nagging injuries throughout this season, Davante Booker potentially sitting on

1:20:32.680 --> 1:20:35.639
<v Speaker 1>a nice spot later in the season, get him now.

1:20:35.760 --> 1:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Matt, because we'll get to the matchup soon.

1:20:38.600 --> 1:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>It's a revenge game for you know what. I think

1:20:42.040 --> 1:20:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it's the old team in the Brown goes correct. The

1:20:44.120 --> 1:20:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Monday Night game is the Vikings taking on the Bears

1:20:46.800 --> 1:20:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook's and obvious A. Obviously the Bears are going

1:20:49.840 --> 1:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>to sell out to contain Dalvin Cook, but so did

1:20:53.880 --> 1:20:56.040
<v Speaker 1>the last two teams. It didn't matter. You know, you

1:20:56.120 --> 1:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>know what the script is. You know you're gonna get

1:20:57.640 --> 1:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a heavy dose of Dalvin Cook, and more often than not,

1:20:59.880 --> 1:21:01.720
<v Speaker 1>A doesn't make any difference. Now, the Bears did just

1:21:01.840 --> 1:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>contain Derrick Henry last week, and so there is a

1:21:04.640 --> 1:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>scenario where they contain Dalvin Cook two But he's still

1:21:07.040 --> 1:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>in a grade. Let's go to the passing game, which

1:21:08.960 --> 1:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>has got a lot more interest I think for people.

1:21:11.360 --> 1:21:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Cousins remains an unreliable fantasy play because of his

1:21:15.400 --> 1:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>low volume, something that's likely to happen on Monday Night,

1:21:19.160 --> 1:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>but not an absolute lock to happen. Over cousins last

1:21:22.880 --> 1:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen games, his line of demarcation is thirty two attempts.

1:21:29.400 --> 1:21:33.360
<v Speaker 1>When he's under thirty two attempts, Kirk cousins average game

1:21:33.439 --> 1:21:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is just two hundred eleven yards and one and a

1:21:35.960 --> 1:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>quarter touchdowns. But what happens when he's over thirty two attempts?

1:21:40.880 --> 1:21:44.599
<v Speaker 1>He balloons to two eight one yards and almost three

1:21:44.640 --> 1:21:47.479
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes. If he can go over thirty two attempts.

1:21:47.920 --> 1:21:51.360
<v Speaker 1>The Bears have given up thirty two attempts six times

1:21:51.400 --> 1:21:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this year. Cousins could get there now. He's only thrown

1:21:55.160 --> 1:21:57.880
<v Speaker 1>over thirty two attempts twice this year. But there is

1:21:57.880 --> 1:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a scenario where it happens here, And if that happens,

1:22:00.400 --> 1:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>then I tend to like him a little bit more,

1:22:01.800 --> 1:22:04.880
<v Speaker 1>even against a good past defense. Justin Jefferson and Adam

1:22:04.920 --> 1:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>theland or see grades. Low passing volume is the problem.

1:22:08.040 --> 1:22:11.200
<v Speaker 1>That's plaguing them lately as well, and you add into

1:22:11.280 --> 1:22:14.400
<v Speaker 1>that a good Chicago past defense. The Bears allow the

1:22:14.439 --> 1:22:17.639
<v Speaker 1>fifth few yards to wide receivers, just one hundred forty

1:22:17.640 --> 1:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>four per game. Jefferson will likely see the better matchup

1:22:21.200 --> 1:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>more often, and that's against rookie cornerback Jalen Johnson. Feeland's

1:22:24.920 --> 1:22:28.680
<v Speaker 1>got the tougher matchup. That's Kyle Fuller, who's allowing him

1:22:28.680 --> 1:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>easily thirty yards per game in his coverage. Feeland's historically

1:22:32.800 --> 1:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>struggled against the Bears, failing to top sixty six yards

1:22:36.360 --> 1:22:38.679
<v Speaker 1>or find the end zone in the team's past seven

1:22:38.840 --> 1:22:42.360
<v Speaker 1>straight games, including by the way, Feeland put up a

1:22:42.439 --> 1:22:47.040
<v Speaker 1>six yard game against the Bears in the first meeting.

1:22:47.200 --> 1:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>Even that that's not right. It's first meeting. That is

1:22:50.160 --> 1:22:51.719
<v Speaker 1>not correct. They haven't met this year. I don't believe

1:22:51.800 --> 1:22:55.400
<v Speaker 1>that's my memories failing me. Um IRV Smith. He's got

1:22:55.400 --> 1:22:57.600
<v Speaker 1>a groin injury, um and you're probably not going to

1:22:57.680 --> 1:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>know his status before Sunday's kickoff if he gets ruled out.

1:23:02.280 --> 1:23:05.639
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rudolph becomes a fascinating places. The Bears really struggled

1:23:05.640 --> 1:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>against tight ends. But as it stands, right now is

1:23:07.960 --> 1:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>a Monday night game. You're probably not gonna know either way,

1:23:09.760 --> 1:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think you can count on IRV Smith

1:23:11.360 --> 1:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and we really it looks like a game time decision

1:23:13.160 --> 1:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>on the scrowing injury. All right, let's go to the

1:23:14.760 --> 1:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Bear side. Beginning with the passing game. Nick Foles was

1:23:19.160 --> 1:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>might take a chance on me quarterback. He has a

1:23:21.680 --> 1:23:25.559
<v Speaker 1>C grade in this game. Allan Robinson has an A grade.

1:23:25.880 --> 1:23:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Over the past three games, Robinson has inexplicably seen fewer

1:23:29.800 --> 1:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>targets than Darnell Mooney and Anthony Miller. But I think

1:23:32.840 --> 1:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that change is here. They Chicago's gotta change that. It

1:23:36.280 --> 1:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>gets a Vikings secondary allowing the fifth most yards to receivers,

1:23:39.920 --> 1:23:43.400
<v Speaker 1>and he's likely as playing on the outside. He's gonna

1:23:43.439 --> 1:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>see sixth and seventh stringers at cornerback, Chris Boyd and

1:23:47.640 --> 1:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Chris Jones. It's gotta be a good game for Allen

1:23:50.479 --> 1:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Robinson here. I've got to believe Darnell Mooney is coming

1:23:53.479 --> 1:23:55.759
<v Speaker 1>up in a loven target game and the Bears seemed

1:23:55.800 --> 1:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to trust him a lot more now than earlier in

1:23:57.600 --> 1:24:00.320
<v Speaker 1>the season, and this is his easiest matchup of a year.

1:24:00.400 --> 1:24:03.040
<v Speaker 1>He'll get whichever of Chris Boyd and and and Chris

1:24:03.160 --> 1:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Jones that Allen Robinson isn't on and then running out

1:24:06.280 --> 1:24:08.360
<v Speaker 1>of the slot. You can even start Anthony Miller. He'll

1:24:08.400 --> 1:24:11.160
<v Speaker 1>go up against Vikings rookie Jeff Gladden, who has allowed

1:24:11.200 --> 1:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>four touchdowns in the past three games. A C grade

1:24:14.360 --> 1:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on Anthony Miller, a B grade on Darnell Mooney, and

1:24:17.360 --> 1:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a B grade on Jimmy Graham. Vikings have only allowed

1:24:19.920 --> 1:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>three scores to opposing tight ends. However, t J. Hockenson

1:24:24.040 --> 1:24:26.320
<v Speaker 1>found the end zone against them last week. In Minnesota's

1:24:26.320 --> 1:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>allowing the fourth most yards to opposing tight ends, So

1:24:29.439 --> 1:24:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Graham potentially sitting on a pretty good game here. So

1:24:32.320 --> 1:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about David Montgomery. Um, he's in the concussion protocol.

1:24:36.760 --> 1:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>We think, we don't know. It's just it's too early

1:24:39.120 --> 1:24:40.479
<v Speaker 1>for us to know if he's gonna go or not.

1:24:40.560 --> 1:24:42.280
<v Speaker 1>But even if he can play, there isn't much to

1:24:42.320 --> 1:24:46.120
<v Speaker 1>like about this matchup. Since getting obliterated by Derrick Henry

1:24:46.120 --> 1:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>in Week three, no back against Minnesota has top seventy

1:24:49.400 --> 1:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>five rushing yards and only one has scored. They've given

1:24:52.920 --> 1:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>up nine receptions per game over the last two so

1:24:55.120 --> 1:24:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Montgomery could chip in a little something through the ground.

1:24:58.400 --> 1:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think that's probably the the way in which

1:25:00.760 --> 1:25:03.160
<v Speaker 1>he can be helpful. All right, let's go to our

1:25:03.200 --> 1:25:06.479
<v Speaker 1>final matchup, and that is the Broncos taking on the Raiders.

1:25:06.680 --> 1:25:09.360
<v Speaker 1>He already told us you like Drew Lock earlier in

1:25:09.400 --> 1:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the show, and he has you take a chance, I

1:25:10.880 --> 1:25:13.360
<v Speaker 1>mean quarterback. So let's talk about the running game for Denver.

1:25:13.439 --> 1:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the first meeting between these two division

1:25:16.000 --> 1:25:19.479
<v Speaker 1>rivals of the season, Melvin Gordon and Philip Lindsay get

1:25:19.520 --> 1:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>both get a c Last week. Gordon out snapped Lindsay

1:25:23.160 --> 1:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>six to thirty eight percent, but Lindsay saw more touches. Uh.

1:25:27.439 --> 1:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>This is one of the worst backfield platoons in all

1:25:29.360 --> 1:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of football, but a great matchup for both. Opposing backs

1:25:31.840 --> 1:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>are averaging four point seven yards per carry and nearly

1:25:34.920 --> 1:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>one fifty combo yards per game against the Raiders, who

1:25:38.040 --> 1:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>just surrendered touchdowns to lack backs. Those are charges running

1:25:42.000 --> 1:25:47.120
<v Speaker 1>backs Klin Blage and Gave Neighbors score touchdown. Gabe Neighbors,

1:25:47.160 --> 1:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>you said, Gabe Neighbors is a football player who scores

1:25:50.479 --> 1:25:54.759
<v Speaker 1>against He also was on Mr Rogers. Neighbors owns the Raiders.

1:25:56.080 --> 1:25:59.439
<v Speaker 1>The Raiders also placed inside linebacker Corey Littleton on the

1:25:59.479 --> 1:26:03.120
<v Speaker 1>COVID to Thursday, which would be huge for these backs

1:26:03.160 --> 1:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>catching the ball out of the backfield. One of the

1:26:04.720 --> 1:26:07.519
<v Speaker 1>best coverage linebackers in the NFL, so keep your eye

1:26:07.520 --> 1:26:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on Corey Littleton. Would also be huge for Noah fense,

1:26:10.160 --> 1:26:11.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about in a second. I will note quickly

1:26:11.960 --> 1:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Philip Lindsay, never scored against the Raiders, would be a

1:26:14.800 --> 1:26:18.719
<v Speaker 1>grounder air in his career. He's overdue over to Jerry Judy.

1:26:18.720 --> 1:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>You can give him a B. Now this is the

1:26:20.200 --> 1:26:23.240
<v Speaker 1>first of many. It's not a revenge game, but it's

1:26:23.280 --> 1:26:27.599
<v Speaker 1>a you should have drafted me instead of Henry Ruggs game. Yes,

1:26:27.640 --> 1:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it is so. Jerry Judy certainly motivated for this one

1:26:30.800 --> 1:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>against the Raiders, who have allowed four different wide receivers

1:26:34.040 --> 1:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>to top eighty yards over their last three games. Three

1:26:37.439 --> 1:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>of those wide receivers also scored a touchdown, so that

1:26:40.280 --> 1:26:43.280
<v Speaker 1>secondary has been very leaky and for that reason, I

1:26:43.320 --> 1:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>like Tim Patrick as well, returned from injury last week,

1:26:46.240 --> 1:26:49.960
<v Speaker 1>played in the snap, saw nine targets. He gets to

1:26:50.080 --> 1:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>be This game should be a shootout. The over under

1:26:52.880 --> 1:26:55.800
<v Speaker 1>his fifty point five points I mentioned earlier and each

1:26:55.800 --> 1:26:59.479
<v Speaker 1>of Denver's last three games went north of fifty eight points.

1:26:59.479 --> 1:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So I like Hatrick a lot here. I want to

1:27:01.960 --> 1:27:04.040
<v Speaker 1>like Noah Fant a lot, but just a little a

1:27:04.160 --> 1:27:06.280
<v Speaker 1>C for him. He's a little banged up, Yeah, the

1:27:06.280 --> 1:27:09.439
<v Speaker 1>ankle injury. He looked, he was clearly hobbled last week

1:27:09.520 --> 1:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and now there's no more alack and this is the

1:27:11.680 --> 1:27:13.479
<v Speaker 1>last time I'll mention him. I'm gonna try to pronounce

1:27:13.520 --> 1:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>his name Albert Oi kuai bunom and not I are

1:27:18.320 --> 1:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>will not be vulturing Noah Fanse in the red zone.

1:27:21.080 --> 1:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>But not a great matchup for fans. The Raiders have

1:27:23.000 --> 1:27:26.479
<v Speaker 1>allowed the ninth viewest receptions and yards the tight end position,

1:27:26.840 --> 1:27:29.599
<v Speaker 1>and since Week three the only tight ends to score

1:27:29.600 --> 1:27:33.120
<v Speaker 1>on Vegas where Kelsey and Gronk. Gronk always scores in Vegas,

1:27:33.200 --> 1:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, and Fant only had three catches for

1:27:35.840 --> 1:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>thirty three yards again in the two games against the

1:27:38.080 --> 1:27:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Raiders last year. So just a C for Noah Fanse,

1:27:40.760 --> 1:27:42.639
<v Speaker 1>but not for Drew Lock. He's might take a chance

1:27:42.680 --> 1:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on me quarterback. Would slap a be on him if

1:27:45.880 --> 1:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I had to over to the Raiders side. Josh Jacobs

1:27:49.640 --> 1:27:53.200
<v Speaker 1>b for him, should see a heavier normal workload this

1:27:53.280 --> 1:27:57.360
<v Speaker 1>week against the Broncos, who have allowed on one combo

1:27:57.439 --> 1:28:00.400
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown per game to running back over

1:28:00.439 --> 1:28:03.719
<v Speaker 1>their last three. Jacobs had a hundred plus combo yards

1:28:03.720 --> 1:28:06.599
<v Speaker 1>and two rushing touchdowns in his loan game against Denver

1:28:06.800 --> 1:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>last year, so a B for him, a A for

1:28:09.479 --> 1:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Darren Waller that matchup is not great. The Broncos have

1:28:12.800 --> 1:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>allowed just two touchdowns to opposing tight ends this year.

1:28:16.280 --> 1:28:18.879
<v Speaker 1>Both of those came in Week one against the Titans,

1:28:18.920 --> 1:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>by the way, but Atlantic tight ends did just combined

1:28:21.680 --> 1:28:24.599
<v Speaker 1>for eight catches and seventy four yards, and Waller played

1:28:24.600 --> 1:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>well against Denver last year, averaging seven catches and ninety

1:28:27.280 --> 1:28:30.719
<v Speaker 1>yards across both matchups. Benching Hunter, Renfro and Nelson Agil

1:28:30.760 --> 1:28:32.719
<v Speaker 1>are not gonna get into that too much. And lastly,

1:28:32.760 --> 1:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Derek Carr gets a B. Not in love with the

1:28:34.800 --> 1:28:37.599
<v Speaker 1>receiving options as a whole, but he has the individual

1:28:37.640 --> 1:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>weapons who spread it around. Denver has allowed three passing

1:28:40.360 --> 1:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and back to back games. Derek Carr has been

1:28:43.200 --> 1:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>shockingly competent from a fantasy standpoint. Definitely, yeah, I was.

1:28:47.680 --> 1:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>That's you know, it's odd to say, and I don't

1:28:50.040 --> 1:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>think we expected it, but he's uh. He looks like

1:28:52.360 --> 1:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a guy that might be able to help out in

1:28:53.840 --> 1:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>a pinch. If you miss any part of the show,

1:28:56.040 --> 1:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're listening over the air, we encourage you check

1:28:57.760 --> 1:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>out the podcast version of Fantasy Football Weekly. You can

1:29:00.160 --> 1:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>rewind it and you hear all the sailing parts of

1:29:02.120 --> 1:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the show that you might have missed otherwise. Thank you

1:29:04.760 --> 1:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>for listening, good luck in week ten, and we'll talk

1:29:06.800 --> 1:29:10.799
<v Speaker 1>to you next week. Bye bye, everybody. Fantasy Football Weekly

1:29:10.920 --> 1:29:13.559
<v Speaker 1>is a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcasts

1:29:13.560 --> 1:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>from my Heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

1:29:15.960 --> 1:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.