WEBVTT - Libby Cantrill, Managing Director: Public Policy at PIMCO Talks House And Senate

0:00:02.360 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>This is arguably the most important conversation of the day.

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>Libby Cantrell is with the Pacific Investment Management Company PIMCO,

0:00:15.160 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>and she is expert on Washington process, and she joins

0:00:20.640 --> 0:00:23.720
<v Speaker 2>us right now, the President elect's going to want to

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 2>run this from the White House with some form of

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 2>autocratic certitude. Who knows what it's going to be. Where

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 2>are the checks and balances if we presume a Republican

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 2>Senate fifty five senators back to two thousand and five,

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:43.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe a House maybe Democrat, maybe a Republican. Where does

0:00:43.600 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Libby Cantrell see the checks in the balances of our legislation?

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:50.479
<v Speaker 3>Yes, well, good morning.

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 4>So so the Senate looks almost definite that Republicans will

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 4>have a fifty three forty seven majority, and then to

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Nevada and Mission again depending on how those states are called.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 4>So you know, fifty three forty seven a bit of

0:01:05.200 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 4>a check, right. You need sixty votes still in the

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 4>Senate to pass major legislation, except for tax bills, which

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 4>can be passed by a budget reconscillation, which only requires

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 4>fifty votes. People's eyes glaze over, understandably, but it's actually

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 4>quite yes, I know, but it's actually but it is

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 4>actually quite important. The House, however, looks like it's going

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 4>to be very close. It will likely be kept in

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 4>the kind of the Republican column, but maybe they only.

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Have one two three seat majority with it.

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 2>That matters within American political punditry. Let's go like all

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 2>the TV networks in that is our legislation, our law

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be run out of sixteen hundred Pennsylvania Avenue.

0:01:47.200 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 2>How do you respond to that?

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 4>Look, I think from an economic perspective, there are many

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.559
<v Speaker 4>things that Trump can do unilatterly that he's already talked

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 4>about doing.

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 3>He will increase.

0:01:56.760 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 4>Tariffs, and I think our view is that this is

0:01:58.800 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 4>an ideology of his that has been you know, for

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 4>his entire public life. So we're expecting tariffs to go up.

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.320
<v Speaker 4>Now you know how much they go up, and what

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 4>that exact policy looks like, I think reminds to be seen.

0:02:12.800 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 4>Immigration he can do unilaterally in terms of slowing the

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 4>flow and basically you know, stopping stopping the border. But

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 4>outside of that, I think this is really quite important

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 4>from uh, you need the you need the Congress. So

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 4>the big, bigger majority in the Senate is important he

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 4>can get all of his folks confirmed.

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:30.799
<v Speaker 3>That's going to be very important for him.

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 4>But if he doesn't have a bigger majority in the House,

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 4>it's going he'll be able to pass things for sure,

0:02:36.520 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 4>but it's going to be a lot more of a

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.240
<v Speaker 4>negotiation than I think what maybe the market expects right

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 4>now about.

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:43.800
<v Speaker 1>The financial services industry. Talk about an industry that feels

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's has with maybe it's fair share of regulations.

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about the Trump administration and how

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>they view the financial services industry.

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I think a couple of things, just to

0:02:53.120 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, for folks listening, you know, there are a

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 4>few things that a few regulators that Trump can replace

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 4>basically date on one. That's the CFPB, the Consumer of

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Financial Protection Bureau, the FHFA, which oversees Fanny and Freddie,

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 4>the OCC and then he can likely nominate the new

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:15.720
<v Speaker 4>chairs of the SEC and the CFTC, but that will

0:03:15.760 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 4>take time.

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 3>The FED, however, it's.

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.640
<v Speaker 4>Pretty clear that he cannot do anything with Chairman Powell.

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 4>So Powell's here here to stay at least until twenty

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 4>twenty six when his termo's chair is over. So in

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 4>terms of like putting fingerprints on financial regulation. There are

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 4>areas where he absolutely can do this sort of day one,

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:36.119
<v Speaker 4>but basically everything else in terms of you're talking about

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 4>Basil three end game, that will take some time.

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 3>But to be clear here, the direction of travel is clear.

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.240
<v Speaker 4>There's going to be a softer touch on financial regulation,

0:03:43.320 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 4>and that's why financials are.

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I guess it's bipartisan. I mean, you know this Libby viscerally,

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 2>there's got to be a collegiality. Howard Baker talking to

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Sam Irvin. Is it gone?

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 3>Is it gone?

0:03:57.680 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I don't.

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 4>I mean I think Look, I think that that people

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 4>come to Washington in order to get things done. And

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 4>given that President Trump is coming to the presidency with

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 4>a very strong mandate and a pretty nice majority at

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 4>least in the Senate. I mean, the folks on the

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 4>Democratic side, if they want to see anything get done,

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.040
<v Speaker 4>they're going to have to work with, you know, with

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:21.039
<v Speaker 4>President Trump.

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 3>Now, I may they may have to hold their nose just.

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Based on kind of the Twitter reaction, but I think that, yeah,

0:04:28.120 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 4>people come to Washington and in order to govern and

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:32.080
<v Speaker 4>to govern, you know, it's a compromise.

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 2>It's a great insight the Truman and Dewey didn't have

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:37.360
<v Speaker 2>to worry about Twitter as well. And my all night

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 2>are gir again forcing me to have an all nighter.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 2>I neglected to say for Governor need Lamont that his

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 2>wife Annie Lamont is on the board of Bloomberg LP.

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 2>That was my folks, my major folks this morning.

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:52.320
<v Speaker 3>Hey Lebby.

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>If I'm an M and a banker, if I'm an

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>M and a attorney, I think I'm pretty happy here

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 1>because the concern here of the last number of years

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 1>has been, boy, it's tough to get deals through the

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:05.400
<v Speaker 1>regulatory particularly the Federal Trade Commission. There's been some calls

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>some change in leadership there. How do you think we

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.080
<v Speaker 1>may see that reflected in the Federal Trade Commission, maybe

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice.

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I think that An important thing to keep

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 4>in mind is actually that Lena Kahn's term was actually

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:23.560
<v Speaker 4>expired the third week of September, so effectively she is

0:05:23.560 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 4>a lamed duck. If Harris had been elected, she would

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 4>have had to either renominate her or nominate somebody else. Now,

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 4>of course Trump will not. He will he will choose

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 4>somebody else. So that is another regulatory change that he

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.160
<v Speaker 4>is going to be able to bring about you.

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Know, pretty much in short order.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 4>Now he's going to course have to get that person

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 4>confirmed by the US Senate and what have you.

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 3>But to your point, I mean, this is.

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely kind of risk positive in terms of well, folks.

0:05:50.440 --> 0:05:52.919
<v Speaker 2>I need some drama the day after an election. Is

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Libby Cantra willing to say MEGS seven regulation by Washington

0:05:57.160 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 2>goes away?

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 4>No, And I think this is actually quite important. So

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 4>executive orders will go away. But actually deregulation takes a

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of time. Usually it takes years. What I think

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 4>that the market is understandably and rightfully responding to is

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 4>the absence of new regulation and just a more you know,

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 4>just more clarity in terms of the regulatory landscape.

0:06:18.000 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>I mean the thing about President Biden.

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Even though he ran more as a centrist Democrat back

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 4>in tw twenty twenty, you know, he really nominated and

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 4>was able to get confirmed some pretty ideological folks on

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.359
<v Speaker 4>the regulatory side, and that is going to be a

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 4>big chef. But again we shouldn't expect necessarily deregulation. We

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 4>will see some executive orders unwound that will help traditional energy,

0:06:39.360 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 4>in particular the LG export pause, for instance, is likely

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 4>to go away kind of day one.

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 3>But outside of that, deregulation is it takes all? It

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:47.280
<v Speaker 3>takes much.

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>A mental Arguably the biggest issue for corporate Wall Street

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:53.600
<v Speaker 1>is taxation. What's your call on taxation under Trump?

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 4>Yes, so this is actually where again sort of my

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 4>nummy as it may be, where the.

0:06:57.960 --> 0:06:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Majority of the Chamber of majorities actually do matter.

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 4>So you know, assuming that the Republicans keep the House,

0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.000
<v Speaker 4>they will likely be able to get through an extension

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 4>of all of the Trump task cuts on the individual side. Now,

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 4>remember there are no no expiration on the corporate tax side,

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 4>so that is likely not going to change. I would

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 4>sort of fade the idea that it's going to decrease

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 4>significantly the deficits of six and a half percent. Unlikely that,

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:22.679
<v Speaker 4>you know, republic He's gonna be able to get Republican

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 4>unanimity to do something that actually you know, costs you know,

0:07:25.800 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 4>billions hundred billion.

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 2>Live me thirty eight seconds. John from New Jersey emails

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 2>in and says all I care about is assault text.

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 2>No Trump did it.

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 3>He should have to prep.

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 2>Then, right, But the salt text stays the.

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Salt, So the salt cap, which ten thousand. Yeah, so

0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.280
<v Speaker 4>if that expires and if Converse doesn't do anything that's

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.720
<v Speaker 4>fully reinstated, that is very unlikely. It cost about a

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollars over ten years. I do think that Trump

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 4>will have pressure to increase the cap. Maybe it's to

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 4>twenty thousand, maybe it's even higher, maybe it's to forty thousand.

0:07:58.880 --> 0:08:01.160
<v Speaker 3>So maybe you're called from New Jersey will be happy

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 3>with that.

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 4>But in terms of the reinstatement of the salt deduction,

0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 4>that is very unlikely. It is very expensive. It's about again,

0:08:08.040 --> 0:08:09.559
<v Speaker 4>about trillion dollars over ten years.

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 2>What a yields do in your space? Are yields inflation yields?

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Worry about the fiscal deficit? Is that a constraint for

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>this political revelution?

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.560
<v Speaker 3>That a constraint from Washington. I'm not sure that they

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 3>understand what a curf steepner is. For instance, I kind

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 3>of doubt it.

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 4>But obviously the bond market is reacting right, and that's

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 4>you know, the sting. Now again, we would have made,

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 4>I think, made the argument that regardless of whether it's

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 4>Harris or Trump, both would.

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 3>Have been bad for the deficit.

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 4>We were looking at high deficits regardless of who won,

0:08:38.960 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 4>so we would have said that the curse hast even regardless.

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Lily comeback the next time, the Denver Broncos win. Let

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 2>me cantrol a clinical there, wishing Laway would return at

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 2>some point