WEBVTT - Elon's Exit from Trump Administration + Amanda Litman on Recruiting the Next Democratic Leaders

0:00:03.279 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, good morning, happy Monday. At least that I'm hoping

0:00:06.280 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that's when you're listening to this. I'm taping on a

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Sunday evening. Here give you a quick rundown of everything.

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I've got to have a little open here for you

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.239
<v Speaker 1>about the end of Elon Musk in Washington, and I'll

0:00:18.239 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>get to that in a minute. My guest today Amanda Littman.

0:00:21.920 --> 0:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>She runs an organization called Run for Something. It's geared

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>more towards Democrats or people on the left side of

0:00:28.760 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the aisle, although they will work with people that are

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking about running as independents. It's basically an organization that

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>number one is trying to encourage younger people to run

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>for office, but also trying to be a resource for

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>people that don't, because if you're younger, you usually don't

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>have as much of a network, You may not have

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>as many rich friends. You get the picture here if

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and you'll hear me make these comparisons during the interview.

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Back in the eighties and nineties, you had go Pack

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>on the right. That was a similar organization that was

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to get conservatives who were not connected, essentially with

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the tools to figure out how to run for local office,

0:01:08.520 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is you know, maybe Emily's list, you'll hear

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:15.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of that, but it's about trying. And

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>clearly the Republicans have done a much better job over

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty or thirty years encouraging folks to run

0:01:21.240 --> 0:01:24.319
<v Speaker 1>for local office. Democrats have been a bit too focused

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>on the presidential big big offices and don't think about

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.479
<v Speaker 1>the smaller stuff than they were. You know, arguably it's

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 1>why they're getting crushed on the issue of schools and

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.319
<v Speaker 1>funding of schools and the privatization of the public school system.

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>You've had a lot more activist parents on the right

0:01:43.319 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>get involved in school board politics, and you've had activist

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>parents on the left, pure and simple. And it is

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>those type of outcomes that I think are making some

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>people reassess and decide where to where to participate. If

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you've ever thought about running for office and didn't, I

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.760
<v Speaker 1>actually think you'll enjoy this conversation. If you thought about

0:02:02.800 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>running thinking about running for office now, regardless of your

0:02:06.520 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 1>politics left or right, I think you will hear some

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:12.959
<v Speaker 1>interesting advice and to do that, so you I hope

0:02:12.960 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>you'll do that. I've had a tremendous weekend. I had.

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I had a lot of fun and I want to

0:02:16.960 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>showcase a neighborhood I used to work in. It's called

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.760
<v Speaker 1>del Rey. Basically, this a neighborhood in Alexandria, just on

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the border of Arlington and Alexandria. Back in the in

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the Hotline days before we were moved to the Watergate

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. The Hotline was headquartered out in Orlandria,

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>literally this little pocket of northern Virginia in between Arlington

0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and Alexandria, right on the border there. Well, some good

0:02:43.880 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>friends of mine are very active in that business and

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>civic association, and so they asked me to be the

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 1>judge at their annual It's basically a restaurant contest. So

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>both the people come for the for the food festival

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>put on by the Delray Business Association, and I got

0:02:59.919 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to play judge. So there was two awards mine whoever,

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>I decided we're the three best bites of food that

0:03:07.880 --> 0:03:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I had versus the people. If you will, and I

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:16.360
<v Speaker 1>just if you are, this is probably our hippiest and

0:03:16.440 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>coolest food neighborhood that you can have in the Northern

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>Virginia area. There might be others will argue in h

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Street and some other places in the district. Don't get

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>me wrong, but if you're a Food Network fan, you

0:03:27.400 --> 0:03:30.880
<v Speaker 1>would have There's a couple of restaurants in that participated

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>in this where that have been featured on Food Network,

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of chefs that have been featured on Chopped.

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I do want to shout out my winner, Bella Napoli,

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>who made a chicken brunello that was amazing. You're eating

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>outside in a little cup and you're like, it's fantastic.

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Lena's was my second place. She made a terrific Cuban

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>beurrea taco, just awesome, and of course, being a Miami guy,

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be partial to anything like that. And there

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>was a ton of gaspachos. But the folks at Tako

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:05.119
<v Speaker 1>a poblanomado a good spat show that was not red

0:04:05.120 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>tomato based, so it was a different It had a

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>green color to it if you were a green yellow

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>color to it, and it had shrimp in it, and

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it was just it was sort of it felt more

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>like a Savie Chase soup, if that's possible. So anyway,

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>I just want to give a shout out to them.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 1>My friend Pat Miller he's been the unofficial mayor of

0:04:22.520 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>del Rey for decades now and an old friend of mine,

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Maureen Schweer's really appreciate you guys getting me involved. I'm

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>still full from the process and the way I digested

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>that had been obsessed over college baseball. This week, it's

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.760
<v Speaker 1>been an amazing baseball weekend for my household. The Nats

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>have been on a roll, in fact, over the last

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:49.720
<v Speaker 1>fifteen games, best record in baseball, So take that, everybody literally.

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>We were all starting to rail on the Nats front office,

0:04:54.480 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>and sure enough they go on this role. Who knows

0:04:57.720 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 1>if the pitching can hold up, but James Wood is

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:03.640
<v Speaker 1>proving that he was every bit the one Soto trade,

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:06.520
<v Speaker 1>which is given the Nats these starters James Wood, c

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:10.919
<v Speaker 1>j Abrams, Mackenzie Gore, and Robert Hassel the third. I

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>still miss Soto, don't get me wrong, but it wasn't

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a bad return and James Wood is doing a pretty

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 1>impressive one Soto impersonation. But I gotta even shout out

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:23.200
<v Speaker 1>to my friends at ESPN. I like to give them

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of grief for how they've ruined college football

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in their partnership with the SEC. Sometimes, however, ESPN Squeeze Play,

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>which is the college baseball tournament, and there happened in

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.800
<v Speaker 1>all Granted my house, Miami and Florida State are in

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>my house, so we care about what's going on here

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>in both. Mimi in Florida State been doing well so

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>far in this tournament. He's been Squeeze Play. It's the

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:46.159
<v Speaker 1>red zone for college baseball. I just have two requests.

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Can we please get rid of the metal bats? It's silly.

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>We've got these major programs can afford wood bats. That's

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>number one. Number two, how you determine who's the home

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 1>team at these sites is ridiculous. Just use records, then

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>highest seat? Is it that difficult? This bizarre rotation that

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they do. Literally go look it up in the internet.

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a five step process, all right. So I've probably

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>given more about my personal weekend plans than perhaps my

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>family wishes I did. But hey, isn't that what we're

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>all doing now? We're supposed to overshare. And I did

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>want to give a good shout out to my friends

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>in Delray, But look, let me move on to starting

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.359
<v Speaker 1>my week because we do. We ought to mourn the

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:32.840
<v Speaker 1>departure of Elon Musk and out of Washington, and I'm

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>not saying it's going to totally disappear. In fact, as

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I was coming back from that from that food festival

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>where I got to judge, I drove right by a

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.039
<v Speaker 1>Tesla dealership where there was a very active protest still

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:51.120
<v Speaker 1>against Elon Musk and against Tesla, which is probably the

0:06:51.160 --> 0:06:54.480
<v Speaker 1>why he has accelerated his exit. And technically he can

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>say he was exiting at the time that he always

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>intended to exit, but let's be honest, he is leaving

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Washington with his tail between his legs, and you know

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it's This is one of those where I hope the

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>idea doesn't get thrown out with the bathwater, because the

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>problem with what Musk was doing was how he went

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. It wasn't the idea itself. But if you

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>try to run government like a disruptive tech startup, you're

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna fail. It was a masterclass in misalignment, if you will.

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>The approach was haphazard, it was discombobulated. It treated government

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>like a badly managed Silicon Valley startup. Musk was or

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is intentionally ignorant of the complexities of public administration, and

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that impatience coupled with his short attention span, and I'm

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>not even going to comment on what he may or

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>may not have been on if you will when we

0:07:49.320 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>got all that story about his prolific drug use, both

0:07:52.920 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>legal and illegal, but all of it seemed to be

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the ingredients that led to some chaotic attempts at policy

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>make But I don't want to miss the force through

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the trees to beat up a cliche like that. Musk

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>and Trump ended up these strange bedfellows together because they

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>do share some key traits. They're incredibly impatient, and they

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 1>prefer quick, sweeping actions over the slow, meticulous work that

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the federal government often requires. They couldn't be more mismatched

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for the job. The mentality was great for headline grabbing moves,

0:08:26.440 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>but it was disastrous for actually sustaining this idea of

0:08:30.320 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>cutting government. And it's a cautionary tale for the dangers

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of trying to apply a tech disruptor mindset to the intricate,

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:42.240
<v Speaker 1>slow moving machinery of government. There is no less qualified person.

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:45.679
<v Speaker 1>The worst phrase I hear is we've got to run

0:08:45.720 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 1>government like a business. Bullshit. If you run government like

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a business, you will not do the stuff that doesn't

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>pay big dividends. That is not how government works. Everybody

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>has to get a service. If you ran the postal

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 1>service like a business, nobody in Alaska would get mail

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 1>more than once a week. Okay, that is not When

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you're providing services, and you're a country that claims to

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:09.080
<v Speaker 1>be for equality, then the service you give to a

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>citizen that chooses to live in Alaska, it's got to

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.560
<v Speaker 1>be the same than the services you give somebody that

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 1>lives in New York, Virginia or Maryland. And that is

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the problem, right, it is. Frankly, if you could run

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>government like a business, you could make a lot of

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.440
<v Speaker 1>changes that would make the government's balance sheet look better

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.480
<v Speaker 1>and would completely be unpopular and would be a complete

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 1>disaster that set for all the horrendous ways that Musk

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>went about this, for the stupid, incompetent way that the

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration went about this, it doesn't mean the idea

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 1>was bad, right, And in fact, this should be there's

0:09:47.360 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity here, particularly for somebody on the left, to

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>pick up this, to pick up this chalice and go

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on with it. Here's the opportunity. Must failure cannot mean

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that the idea of reforming government is a bad idea.

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You just have to understand it was poorly executed. He

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>was the worst possible person to put in charge with this,

0:10:08.080 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>completely temperamentally unqualified to do it. But if there is

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a leader out there that is willing to put country

0:10:13.440 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>over party, there's a real chance to pick up where

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>this experiment failed and to do it right, thoughtfully, legally,

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.160
<v Speaker 1>with a coalition of serious reformers. There's even a chance

0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>to build a bipartisan effort around restructuring and modernizing these institutions.

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:31.559
<v Speaker 1>That's what's so frustrating here. It was it was Trump's

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>obsessiveness and musk subscessiveness to look like they were being

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>moving quickly and being successful, that they failed to actually

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>do this the right way. And again, what the most

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>likely result of all this is that this experiment will

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 1>actually cost taxpayers more money than it saves. The amount

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>of government contractors that will successfully sue the government or

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>get their contract monument and probably get restitution is going

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to only grow. And that's why this to execute it

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the way they did was complete chaos and a mess.

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that there isn't an opportunity here. Look,

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got one of my long held ideas is that

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>every government agency should be vote should be sunseted every

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years, forcing Congress to reauthorize and justifies its

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>existence or reform it to meet the current modern needs.

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>This is the kind of reevaluation that could help ensure

0:11:24.640 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that government is actually relevant and effective. This is the

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>type of reform that somebody ought to tackle. This isn't

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.880
<v Speaker 1>something the left has seated. This to the right for

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>some god forsakered reason. The middle of the political middle

0:11:36.360 --> 0:11:40.319
<v Speaker 1>of this country would like to see some responsible reform.

0:11:40.520 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>And what it really is, it's modernization in the same

0:11:43.360 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>way we finally decided, Hey, maybe the bridges we built

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty five ought to be the same bridges we

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>drive over with today's vehicles, Right, maybe we ought to

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:55.440
<v Speaker 1>build a new bridge or update the new bridge. Well,

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the same thing with government, Okay, what we you know,

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Defense that was developed in the fifties

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>is not the same department we should be running today.

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>And instead, what we do with these government agencies, and

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the reason we ought to sunset them every twenty five

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>years and then reauthorize them, is they end up becoming

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>like the you know, there's always one house in every

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood where that people don't have enough money to knock

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>it down and build something new, so instead they do

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit at a time, and it's a Frankenstein house. Well,

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 1>that's what every government agency that's more than twenty five

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>years old has become. It becomes like a Frankenstein agency.

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Instead of doing maybe rehabbing something within the agency, they

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 1>literally tack on an annex, or tack on a special committee,

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 1>or tack on a special sub agency to do some

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>work that they think, oh, maybe this falls under Commerce

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>rather than falling under the Department of Defense or something

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:50.239
<v Speaker 1>like that. You know, I mean, in fact, some of

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:54.599
<v Speaker 1>our departments couldn't have weirder combinations of things, right, A

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Department of Commerce also happened. The largest department within agency

0:12:59.000 --> 0:13:02.559
<v Speaker 1>within Commerce is Noah. Right, Why is basically our weather

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 1>office in Commerce? Right? The two Yes, weather can impact commerce,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>but okay, but other than that, what's it doing in there?

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>You could argue that weather belongs in the Department of Defense,

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or the weather Noah belongs in Homeland Security. If FEMA's

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in Homeland security, why is it Noah in Homeland security?

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Point is that there's a lot of actual good work

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to be done here in this reform. And and you know,

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the fear that I think some real reformers have is

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that Musk's failed effort, in Trump's failed effort, because it

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't get done in the haphazard way that they did it,

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>that they're just going to give up on it. And

0:13:41.080 --> 0:13:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what somebody ought to do is pick up this mantle

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and carry it and make it their own and do

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it the right way. Get Congress involved. You can actually

0:13:48.360 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>do this speaking of of sort of musk and tail

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 1>between his legs. So it was as if, as if

0:13:58.200 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>as if his humiliation of Washington couldn't get worse. Right

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the day he leaves, the Times drops this story about

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>his obsession, his what appears to be excessive drug use,

0:14:12.080 --> 0:14:14.520
<v Speaker 1>uppers and downers, whatever it is that needs to meet.

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:18.680
<v Speaker 1>The moment his handpick guy that he wanted for NASA,

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump decides to boot because somebody drops some appo on

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 1>this nominee for NASA. Apparently he had given to Democrats

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 1>in the last couple of cycles. And Donald Trump, he is,

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>even though he himself is given to quite a few

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Democrats in his political career, doesn't believe that somebody in

0:14:37.440 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the last four years giving to Democrats is anything other

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>than an affront to himself. This is again, this is

0:14:47.000 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a moment where if this is how he's really making decisions, right,

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>we already see that pardons and this, and my gosh,

0:14:56.480 --> 0:15:00.400
<v Speaker 1>it is breathtaking. What is happening on this pardon front.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:03.640
<v Speaker 1>It is, I mean, and this is the numbness that

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we often describe when it comes to Donald Trump. Here

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is behavior that in any other president would be impeachable.

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:14.040
<v Speaker 1>This guy's been impeached twice. What kind of appetite is

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.200
<v Speaker 1>our political system going to have for a third impeachment?

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But what he's doing on pardons, that alone, isn't it.

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>The partons are for sale. It's plainly obvious these his

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 1>pardons are for sale. It's sitting in front of us.

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>It's the quid pro quo. Other than him showing us

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:36.000
<v Speaker 1>the ledger sheet itself that keeps track of the quid

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>pro quot. That's about the only piece of evidence that's missing.

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know you had the one whe of the

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>person shows up at a million dollar fundraiser. A couple of

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>days later, her husband and her relative gets out of

0:15:48.200 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>gets what he wants out of this. So it is

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>alarming how easy it is. Everybody has figured it out.

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And this gets it to why foreign governments are all

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>willing to do some form of business with him, because

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>they all know how transactional he is, and if he

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get what he wants, he may do what he

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>just did to musk Here it looked like he cut

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a deal with musk heye NASA's yours. You get to

0:16:10.520 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>decide who runs it. And then he decided, oh no,

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got to make sure that I'm gonna if I

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 1>allow anybody in that gave to Democrats in the last

0:16:19.880 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>four years. Then it means there are other nominees that

0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>he essentially has already, other people that he has actually

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>fired from the National Security Staff and from the Pentagon

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>who also had made supposedly, I mean apparently, if you've

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>given money to Liz Cheney is the equivalent of giving

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.880
<v Speaker 1>money to a Democrat as far as Donald Trump's concern

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 1>So that is among the other things that are out there.

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 1>So this is how he's running the government, which means

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:49.400
<v Speaker 1>it's not being run with the best people. It's simply

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.800
<v Speaker 1>being run based on who's the most loyal to him

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and to him personally. I know none of this for

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>many of you that are listening his news, but this

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is terrible governance. This is bad for the by the way,

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this is bad if you care about the Republican Party.

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>It's bad. He is so corrupting the Republican Party right

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>now because there is no difference between Trump's party and

0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it, you know, those there's a lot

0:17:12.800 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 1>of good Republicans have walked away. There's some Conservatives who

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 1>are uncomfortable but have stuck it out, believing they are

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>better operating on the inside on the outside, but the

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:25.840
<v Speaker 1>stain that they're receiving, you know, it's really interesting. There's

0:17:25.840 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways to look at Jony Ernst, the

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Republican senator from Iowa whose comments about well, we're all

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>going to die son, you know, and how they went

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>viral and how frustrated. But that s back to me

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of somebody who's had to carry a ton of water

0:17:42.520 --> 0:17:45.439
<v Speaker 1>on ideas that she's not in favor of, but she

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>has no choice but to support because if she doesn't

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>do it, she will lose any political support she has

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>in Iowa. Because the Maga movement is that popular in Iowa.

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>It felt like the type of line somebody says when

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>they realize they're just sort of frustrated with where they are. Look,

0:18:02.920 --> 0:18:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not going to be here. I'm not

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>here to tell you that I was going to be

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that competitive of a state in twenty twenty six. Although

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:12.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be more competitive than it's been

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:14.879
<v Speaker 1>the last cycle. I think it's going to be more

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.320
<v Speaker 1>like twenty eighteen, and who knows. I certainly think Rob

0:18:18.400 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 1>sand has a very good chance of becoming governor. I'm

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:23.160
<v Speaker 1>not going to sit there and tell you Joni Arn's

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Senate race should be moved to toss up just yet.

0:18:27.520 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>But that is a line that will stick with her.

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>She strikes me as somebody I'm not put it this way.

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:38.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually going in another direction. She doesn't look like

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's running for reelection. Yes, she went through the

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:44.159
<v Speaker 1>town hall, which wasn't a great exercise for her, but

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that I'll just say this, I have a I still

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>believe she's the hegg Seth backup. I'm not sure Pete

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>hagg Seth is going to survive. It's clear that the

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Pentagon and he's not been able to you know, his paranoia.

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.480
<v Speaker 1>You know he sees a spy around every corner. I mean,

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.720
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, he's so restricted press access at somebody from

0:19:03.720 --> 0:19:06.159
<v Speaker 1>Owa n seem to complain about it, right, That tells

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you something. My guess is the only reason she hasn't

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>snapped at the Republican party itself is that she would

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>like to be Defense secretary. And she's probably the Pete

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Hake seth backup plan, and at this point, I'm sure

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>she'd prefer to do that then to try to carry

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump's water in a midterm election in Iowa at a

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>time when there's not going to be a lot of

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>this because this big, beautiful bill is turning out to

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>be a big piece of let's just say, of a

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.800
<v Speaker 1>big piece of rock that they got to carry around

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>because remember, it does not have a tax cut. It

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>just is preventing a tax hike. There is no deliverable

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that Republicans have for the people. They can't say, here's

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>a check, here's a tax cut, here's something you're going

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from this. Instead, this thing is already to

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>have been defined by what it takes away, not what

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it gives. That is a bad place to start, and

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Trump's going to try to find out how

0:20:10.240 --> 0:20:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to write checks under his name to people in some

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.480
<v Speaker 1>form or another. Maybe it's these baby bonuses, whatever he's

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>going to try to do. But right now this bill

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>is I don't see any political upside on this bill

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:26.159
<v Speaker 1>as it stands, and if anything, the impact on the

0:20:26.200 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 1>bond market because of the debt this thing could be

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.399
<v Speaker 1>considered in the same way. What I think we all

0:20:33.440 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 1>thought was, Look, I will confess I thought the first

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Biden tranch of money was going to be something that

0:20:40.080 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>would be positive for him. He got those two thousand

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>dollars checks to them, Well, it turned out to be

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>probably something that shouldn't have been done. It was blamed

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:54.479
<v Speaker 1>for helping to accelerate the inflationary problems that we already

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>were having because of the supply chain, and it really

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of tarnished all of his bills, and the public

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't see it as a net positive. I think this

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>is a situation that Trump is going to find himself in.

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 1>This bill is not a positive at all for him.

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Not many good deliverables to give to the voters to

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>say hey we've lowered cost or hey we've done this,

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and oh, by the way, he's still got the terrified

0:21:19.080 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that the more the courts say no, the more determined

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.119
<v Speaker 1>he seems to be to have it, which of course

0:21:23.600 --> 0:21:28.120
<v Speaker 1>only does more damage to the economy. All right, I

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>will I think I've said enough. The conversation with the

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 1>man a litment. Again, if you've ever once thought about

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.600
<v Speaker 1>running for office, or you know somebody, particularly if there's

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody under the age of forty who's been thinking about it,

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>take a listen. It's a fascinating conversation and regardless of

0:21:45.640 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 1>whether you're left or right. Well, my guest right now

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 1>is Amanda Littman. She runs an organization called Run for Something.

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It is primarily an organization trying to recruit more diverse

0:22:03.600 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>set of candidates to run, particularly on the left side

0:22:06.480 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle, Progressives, Democrats, and I'm going to ask

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>her about her opinion on things like Dan Osborne and

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>whether that's the profile of finding more Dan Osborne's as well,

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>who didn't run as a member of any major party,

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>but certainly ideologically certainly was on the left side of

0:22:23.440 --> 0:22:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the asse. So Amanda, thanks for coming on the.

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Podcast, Thank you for having me. I'm very excited.

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So all right, let's do some basics here. Run for Something,

0:22:33.600 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>When did it start? And explain the motivation.

0:22:38.600 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 2>So I worked for Hillary for two years. I was

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 2>her presidential campaign's email director for that and worked for Obama.

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 2>I worked with Florida Governor's race. I worked for OFA

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 2>for a bit. But about a week after the election

0:22:49.440 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 2>in twenty sixteen, I started hearing from friends I'd gone

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 2>to high school and college with, Hey, Amanda, You're the

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 2>only person I know that works in politics. I want

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.440
<v Speaker 2>to run for office because if trumpku president, seems like

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.239
<v Speaker 2>anybody can do this. What do I do? And at

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the time, if you were young, I was in my

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 2>mid twenties, and you were newly excited about politics and

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 2>you wanted to do more than vote and more than volunteer,

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.159
<v Speaker 2>there was nowhere you could go that would guarantee to

0:23:11.200 --> 0:23:13.280
<v Speaker 2>take your call. So I reached out to a whole

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 2>bunch of people with an idea, what if we started

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 2>an organization that could be this on ramp for folks

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 2>who might want to run for office. One of them

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 2>became a co founder. We wrote a plan, we built

0:23:22.760 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 2>a website, and then we launched Run for Something on

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:27.960
<v Speaker 2>Trump's first inauguration day, thinking it would be really small,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 2>we'd get one hundred people who want to run in

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the first year, because at the time nobody wants to

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 2>run for office. We have a thousand people signed up

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 2>in the first week. As of this moment, we're up

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 2>to about two hundred and ten thousand young people all

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 2>across the country who've raised their hands to say they

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:43.120
<v Speaker 2>want to run.

0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Define young. By the way, when you say young people,

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm now in my fifties, so everybody's under fifties young

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to me now, no, So what is your definition of.

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.359
<v Speaker 2>We focus our political program on folks forty and under.

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, especially in the Democratic Party, is very young,

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 2>and we've helped elect more than fifteen hundred people, all

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 2>millennials and gen z across nearly every state, all to

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 2>state and local office. So we only do state House,

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.800
<v Speaker 2>state senate, city council, school board, library board. That kind

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 2>of like building blocks of the of the party.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.480
<v Speaker 1>You know. It's interesting. There are two sort of organizations

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>that I guess loosely if I were in your shoes

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>that you would I might look back on and see

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:25.439
<v Speaker 1>how they did it. On the right side of the aisle,

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 1>it was a it was an organization called go Pack,

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if you've heard the history of gopack,

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:33.119
<v Speaker 1>but it was literally it's what New Gingridge got involved

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>with before you ever got into Congress. And I've run

0:24:36.280 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>into Republican candidates to this day. He goes, oh, yeah,

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he sent cassette tapes like how to speak to reporters

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and how to talk to you know this, and this

0:24:43.640 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>was back. And what was funny about go pack is

0:24:46.480 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it reminds me, in fact, exactly of what you are.

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>And I'll get to the other organization a minute that

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of. But at the time, it was Republicans

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 1>who thought, you know, the Democrats are in power on

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the local level. All Republicans were doing was winning presidentials, right,

0:25:03.480 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>they knew how to do that, but they didn't know

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>they needed a grassroots And what's interesting is is it

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:11.600
<v Speaker 1>was a twenty year plan, but it did pay off

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>for them, and it was meticulous and it was sort

0:25:15.119 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>of they started very you know, and it's funny to

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>me how political parties from the national level let this

0:25:23.560 --> 0:25:26.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff atrophy. There was nobody in the national Republicans thinking

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>about this. And I'll be honest, I think, you know,

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity that Barack Obama had and the DNC had

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>in nine and they just blew it. In hindsight, I

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:37.240
<v Speaker 1>guess right.

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I have heard stories that after the two

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 2>thousand and eight campaign and the DNZ took over the

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Obama email list, a volunteed Obama email list, and they

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 2>asked in folks out of survey that was like what

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 2>do you want to do next to win a volunteer?

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to do X Y Z? And one

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:53.399
<v Speaker 2>of the questions they asked was do you want to

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 2>run for office? And I've been told about fifty thousand

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:02.239
<v Speaker 2>people said yes, and the DNZ did nothing with that.

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Improve I'm just shocked, you know. It's like you're shocked

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 1>that there's gambling going on. I mean, of course the

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:11.080
<v Speaker 1>DNC did nothing. This is the It is just anyway,

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 1>well we might I might let you rant more about

0:26:13.640 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 1>d NC if you'd like.

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 2>Well we can get there if you'd like. But I

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.240
<v Speaker 2>would say, it's like, it is so telling to me

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 2>that there was no place for people to go. It

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 2>was just there wasn't And it's when I was thinking, like,

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:27.239
<v Speaker 2>when we started this thing, it was not even that

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 2>there was like apples to oranges on the Republican side

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 2>versus Democrats side, it was apples on the Republican side,

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 2>go back back then. Now Leadership Institute has a i

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 2>think at this point fifty million dollars a year annual budget.

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 2>They do candidate training and operative training.

0:26:40.880 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 1>They've been doing it with Charlie Kirk's building too. I

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>think that has turned into a candidate factory as well.

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 2>And on the left it's run for something. And our

0:26:50.600 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 2>budget this year is about eight million if I could

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 2>raise it like it is just it's not even apples

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 2>to oranges, it's apples to.

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Like apple seeds, which is a college Democrats do? What

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>do they do?

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 2>I think they do some organizing on college campuses. They

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.399
<v Speaker 2>don't quite do campaign stuff. And I will say, like,

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 2>part of the reason nobody had done this before is

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.199
<v Speaker 2>because it's hard, and you also you have to be

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 2>willing to engage in primaries, which is what makes it

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:17.479
<v Speaker 2>a little tricky. Why I do kind of understand why

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 2>the DNC didn't do it at that point, because we

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:21.800
<v Speaker 2>get a lot of people who want to sign up

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:23.439
<v Speaker 2>with us and say I want to run, and they

0:27:23.480 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 2>want to run against a Democratic incumbent. We're like, great,

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:28.720
<v Speaker 2>let's do it. Let's try. We'll see what happens. But

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 2>I can see why some of the more official institutions

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 2>are a little more wary about it.

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:39.439
<v Speaker 1>Obviously, the other the other organization that I would assume

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 1>you've built a blueprint on, and you've already name dropped

0:27:42.040 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a few people, at least in our private conversation. That

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:46.160
<v Speaker 1>makes me think this is you know, I was there

0:27:46.160 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at the creation or near the creation of Emily's List,

0:27:48.800 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that's right, back in the late eighties. And really ninety

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 1>two was to me the year they took off, right, Yeah,

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety two was the first year of the Woman if

0:27:56.320 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you will, the election of Patty Murray and Barbara Boxer

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.960
<v Speaker 1>dying find it. That was the heart of that movement,

0:28:04.320 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and then they became it was candidate training that was something.

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>And I have to tell you I remember, you know,

0:28:11.760 --> 0:28:14.480
<v Speaker 1>I worked at something called the Hotline back in the nineties,

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:16.399
<v Speaker 1>and I'd have people asking me, well, I want to

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.480
<v Speaker 1>run for office, how do I do it? I bought

0:28:18.480 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a magazine at the Barnes and Noble called Campaigns and Elections.

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Well that teld me how to run for office. And

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>it's like, will not not really, but I didn't know

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>what else to do, and then Emily's List, you know,

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:33.960
<v Speaker 1>had this candidate training and go pack. That's what I

0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.360
<v Speaker 1>would say. I'm like, go to go pack. But Emily's

0:28:36.359 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>List was only for one gender, like it was. There

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>wasn't any place else on the Democratic side that was

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:43.640
<v Speaker 1>akin to a go pack.

0:28:43.680 --> 0:28:46.239
<v Speaker 2>For instance, one of the things I did when we

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 2>were thinking about starting run for something and actually spurred

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>the sort of creation of it, was I read Ellen

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 2>Malcolm's book about the creation of Emily's List, which was

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a really depressing read right after we'd lost the twenty

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.680
<v Speaker 2>sixteen election. A little bit of a masochist, but like

0:28:58.720 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 2>thinking about how they created it to be an entry

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 2>point for women who were not seeing virable candidates. Young people,

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 2>people forty and under have not been seen as people

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 2>to ask to run for office because we can't make money,

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 2>we're risky.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Like it. Meanwhile, how old is the Vice President of

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States right now?

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Oh, forty three?

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I think you know he's forty. I think he's forty.

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.560
<v Speaker 1>That's my point. Like they're the like they got younger

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>people right, Like. It is weird to me that in

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>some ways AOC's an outlier.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 2>I know, I mean the Max Frost is an outliner,

0:29:29.600 --> 0:29:32.040
<v Speaker 2>Maxell Frost. You got a couple other millennial women. You

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 2>got Laura Underwood, Sarah Jacobs. You know, I think John

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 2>assaf is the millennial in the Senate. But it is bleak,

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 2>bleak when you look at the bench of Town now.

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I think it's changed a lot in the last eight years,

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 2>and I'm really proud that Run for Something's been a

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 2>big part of that. But we are working off against

0:29:48.880 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 2>a very old institution that we're trying to change.

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, it's interesting you say that, I'm curious what you

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>make of the David Hogg controversy in that back and forth.

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm pretty cynical about the you know, it's

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of out and I'll just going to lay it

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>out there, set it before, so I might as well

0:30:07.200 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>make sure you've heard it so that I don't look

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>like I'm contradicting myself, which is Look, do I think

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>once you're once you're you've become an elected leader of

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the DNC, that you know you shouldn't be attacking fellow

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>members of the club that you've chose to lead hard stop.

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Do I think the way the DNC is handling this

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>revote situation in some manufactured way that they claim has

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:31.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with what he's doing. Is also right.

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm sitting here going, you know, I'm not sure.

0:30:34.400 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's any good guys here in how

0:30:36.640 --> 0:30:41.080
<v Speaker 1>everybody's behaving. But I understand the motivation that Hog has here,

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>because in some ways it's very similar. I think what

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>you're driving at now.

0:30:44.320 --> 0:30:46.760
<v Speaker 2>No, when David wanted to create Leaders We Deserve, I

0:30:46.880 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 2>talked to him for hours about how run for something works.

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 2>When he decided to run for share a flag for him, Hey,

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 2>you might not be able to engage in primaries if

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 2>you do this, he said, he'd think interesting. I think

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 2>what Leaders we Deserve does is good, and I think

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:04.280
<v Speaker 2>engaging in primaries is good. I think doing them on

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 2>generational lines is good. And I think it's really really

0:31:09.000 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 2>important that the DNCB scene is a neutral actor, especially

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 2>as they go into setting up what is the most

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 2>important thing the DNC does setting up the presidential primary

0:31:17.320 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 2>in twenty twenty eight. We know it's going to be

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 2>a very rowdy, open race. The DNC is going to

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 2>be at the calendar. They might move around states, they

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 2>might rethink about criteria like, it's so so important that

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>DNC and especially DNC leadership be trusted to be good

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:36.680
<v Speaker 2>actors here, and I think it is very frustrating that,

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, what David is trying to do in good

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 2>measure with leaders we deserve, might actually undermine that effort

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 2>when we need him most.

0:31:44.160 --> 0:31:46.239
<v Speaker 1>So No, it does seem as if that he if

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to do this, he shouldn't have run for fister.

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Everyone's going to make their own choices, and now this

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 2>is the DNC's choice to deal with as they see fit.

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it seems bad all around.

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>But let me also posit it wasn't a secret what

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 1>he was going to be at vacating and he won anyway,

0:32:01.640 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>So what message should that send to the leadership of

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the DNC.

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure if if everyone quite understood that he

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 2>was going to keep his pack going.

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh is that right? You think it was a little yeah,

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>well you assumption.

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean historically DNC leadership has always stayed neutral in primaries, right,

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 2>And I think it is even interesting to me now

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 2>that the first candidate that he's chosen to work with

0:32:22.320 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 2>is Robert Peters, who is a run for something alone

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:26.840
<v Speaker 2>running for Congress in Illinois. We worked with him in

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 2>his state Senate race a couple of years ago. He's

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:31.000
<v Speaker 2>not primary and an older leader. It's in an open race.

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Interesting, let's talk about generational, because if it's generational, then

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a should is he going to recruit a primary challenge

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at to Bernie Sanders?

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I think we should.

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, well, explain that because there's generational and I

0:32:49.200 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's code for ideological, tell me why I'm I'm not.

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't be cynical and assume that when I hear

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the phrase generational change in the Democratic Party that it

0:32:58.840 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is really not just cover for us ideological.

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's just ideological. I think it is

0:33:03.520 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 2>about tone and approach to the opposition, more so even

0:33:07.600 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 2>than it is about any singular ideology. Yes, millennials and

0:33:11.280 --> 0:33:13.320
<v Speaker 2>gen Z are a little bit further to the left

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:18.440
<v Speaker 2>than Gen X or boomers. Certainly, even with the discourse

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 2>now about how younger voters are changing, they are still

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 2>more to the left. They're just not as left as.

0:33:23.680 --> 0:33:25.600
<v Speaker 1>They're certainly right. I was just going to say, there's

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly the gen Z. Even Look, I've got a gen

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>z pocus group of two kids Okay, that both went

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>through COVID, slightly different experiences, two different genders, which means

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>they have two different feeds. And yes, I see, I

0:33:39.000 --> 0:33:43.400
<v Speaker 1>see this. And also as much as you know, I

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>see the interest in a Dave Portinoy, it doesn't mean

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>my son doesn't believe government doesn't have a role in

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.480
<v Speaker 1>these things, right, So that's so I absolutely agree. I

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:57.800
<v Speaker 1>think he's culturally not crazy about some of the don't

0:33:57.840 --> 0:34:01.680
<v Speaker 1>tell me how I'm supposed to speak, but there's agreement

0:34:01.880 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>on hey, what should the role of government be and

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 1>that can you disaggregate those things?

0:34:07.520 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think this is where it matters that you

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.959
<v Speaker 2>have younger leaders who can speak speak that language, because

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the way that we have seen generally speaking

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 2>millennials and gen Z elected officials. I think AOC and

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 2>Maxwell Frost are really good examples of this, but they're

0:34:21.200 --> 0:34:24.840
<v Speaker 2>not the only ones. Is that you can straddle the

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:29.680
<v Speaker 2>line between wanting government to work for people and wanting

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 2>to change it a way that it works better for

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 2>more people and wanting to fight it from within. They also,

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 2>I think, really clearly understand who the Republican Party is

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 2>in a way that I think some of the older

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Democrats don't. This is in part I think if you

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 2>came of age politically in the last ten years, like

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 2>it's the Party of Trump all the way down, if

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.040
<v Speaker 2>you didn't, I was just seeing something this earlier today,

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Like ten years ago, Mike Johnson was a state legislator

0:34:56.640 --> 0:35:00.560
<v Speaker 2>in Louisiana, like most of the Republican members of Congress

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 2>were not yet there. They were just about to enter,

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 2>Like the Republican Party has changed very very quickly over

0:35:06.719 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 2>the last decade. And if you've been serving longer than that,

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 2>or been in politics longer than that, you might misremember

0:35:12.480 --> 0:35:15.239
<v Speaker 2>or misunderstand who your opponent is. This is not George W.

0:35:15.320 --> 0:35:18.560
<v Speaker 2>Bush's part of your John McCain's Romney all the way.

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Down, Amanda. I worry about this with my own, my

0:35:20.920 --> 0:35:23.920
<v Speaker 1>own analysis. I try to ground myself in that I

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>came of age, Okay. I went to my freshman year

0:35:26.360 --> 0:35:29.120
<v Speaker 1>in college was a year after the Berlin Wall fell. Yeah,

0:35:29.160 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>what does that mean? I went in believing we're right,

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:36.239
<v Speaker 1>they're wrong. We won. And by the way, I came

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.839
<v Speaker 1>of age in that time when America was still succeeding

0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 1>at these things, right, the perception that hey, we're still

0:35:42.000 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the ones inventing stuff. We're still the right way to govern.

0:35:45.640 --> 0:35:49.360
<v Speaker 1>People were winning right. And I always try to remind

0:35:49.360 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>myself that if you're thirty five or younger, you have

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of failure by the US government. Some

0:35:58.000 --> 0:35:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of it was not the government's fault. Nine to eleven

0:36:00.560 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Iraq War was a self inflicted the financial crisis was

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a self inflicted one. We've seen this sort of Now

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to conclude here's the other sort of I

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>think very and at this point would be a controversial

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is a little strong of a word, but sort of

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 1>a debatable point here. But I do think that if

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>you're fifty or older, you know, you look at politics

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:27.719
<v Speaker 1>still through the prism of the Cold War, even though

0:36:27.760 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't even though you know it's over. And it's

0:36:31.160 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>very possible that the seventy year period between World War

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Two essentially and nine to eleven, let's just take that chunk,

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is an outlier period in American history, and that the

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 1>country's default political setting is polarization. Because if you extract

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that seventy years out essentially from you know, FDR to

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to to the end of Bill Clinton. If you extract

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that out, all of the other elections look a lot

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>more similar to each other. We've had. We've had three

0:37:01.280 --> 0:37:03.759
<v Speaker 1>straight one term presidents. Guess what, we had five straight

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:05.760
<v Speaker 1>one term presidents at the end of the twentieth century.

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>We've had all this, And so that's where I accept

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:14.400
<v Speaker 1>the premise that generational change is beyond ideological. Meaning Schumer

0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>knows and even myself right anywhere a Corey Booker to

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Chuck Schumer, Right, Corey Booker's a little bit older than

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:23.759
<v Speaker 1>I am, but not much. We grew up in a

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 1>certain type of politics, with a certain type of Republican Party,

0:37:27.520 --> 0:37:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and what the Republican Party sort of was morphing into, right,

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.200
<v Speaker 1>there were sort of two there were two parties almost simultaneously.

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Pat Buchanan in some ways Gingrich was straddling the fence

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 1>between Buchanan and Bush, and we saw where that was developing,

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and you still sort of had the Eisenhower wing was

0:37:45.040 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>what Bush was sort of carrying on. And then Iraq

0:37:48.080 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>collapsed it right like that, that was their collapse. So

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm rambling here a little bit on that,

0:37:56.040 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>but I think it I'm trying to sort of accept

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the premise that this isn't ideological. Is what I'm selling

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:03.560
<v Speaker 1>it and I think like it.

0:38:04.120 --> 0:38:06.719
<v Speaker 2>It is an understanding of who the opposition is. And

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 2>then the ways in which people get information now that

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 2>has also changed so quickly. Like I think a lot

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:16.919
<v Speaker 2>about how many members of Congress like have never run

0:38:16.960 --> 0:38:20.439
<v Speaker 2>their own Instagram account, which feels really silly to say

0:38:20.440 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 2>out loud, But when you think about how people get

0:38:23.160 --> 0:38:25.839
<v Speaker 2>information and how we use the internet, how we consume things,

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 2>that the way in which we we're doing a podcast

0:38:29.920 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 2>that is also a video that people will probably watch

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:33.879
<v Speaker 2>or listen to on their phones, like while they're doing

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 2>other stuff. You know, there's a very different way in

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.560
<v Speaker 2>which you engage with the media and what the media

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:41.880
<v Speaker 2>is has blown up in a way that if the

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:45.760
<v Speaker 2>last time you were like a normal person was early

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 2>two thousands, right, maybe, like if you didn't have someone

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 2>curating information for you, which most lucted leaders do at

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:54.239
<v Speaker 2>this point. You know, they get their clips, they're told

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 2>what's going on, they get briefed. It is so different,

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 2>and that that faculty with the communication tactics of twenty

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 2>twenty five, you got to be born of the Internet

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:05.239
<v Speaker 2>to know how to navigate it.

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 1>All. Right, let's take me through the process of being trained.

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>If I run for something, I call you up. I

0:39:11.640 --> 0:39:13.600
<v Speaker 1>live in and I'm going to just pick an area

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that I know pretty well. I live in Miami Dade County.

0:39:17.960 --> 0:39:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I live in a community that leans the other direction,

0:39:22.880 --> 0:39:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and I'm third generation. My grandparents are are are Cuban exiles.

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>So walk me through the process of finding me an

0:39:35.239 --> 0:39:39.080
<v Speaker 1>office to run four or how you sort of work

0:39:39.160 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 1>through that candidate. Maybe it's twenty seven to twenty eight,

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>or she's twenty seven to twenty eight, lives lives in Higalia.

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:48.319
<v Speaker 1>And I'm going to be very specific for those that

0:39:48.400 --> 0:39:51.719
<v Speaker 1>care that much, but Miami Dade County in a largely

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Latino district.

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:56.600
<v Speaker 2>So you probably went to run for what dot net

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and you looked up what office to run for. Maybe

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 2>you found us via Instagram at Maybe you saw some

0:40:01.960 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 2>interview I did. Maybe someone from our team happened to

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 2>shoot you a text when we're doing broad scale recruitment.

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you went to a local event that we did

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:10.839
<v Speaker 2>with partners on the ground. Maybe we were at near

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 2>your college campus. And however you found us or we

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 2>found you, you entered the candidate pipeline. You then might

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:18.600
<v Speaker 2>join a conference call which we do every month to

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:20.320
<v Speaker 2>talk about why you might want to run for office

0:40:20.360 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 2>and answer some basic questions every first time candidate has,

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 2>like how do I pick an office? How do I

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 2>figure out how to raise it?

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I just do this monthly. You have monthly conference calls

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 1>for anybody or do you have to like sign up?

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there a little bit of membership of run for something?

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:35.320
<v Speaker 2>You have to give us your information to get access

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 2>to like the zoom link. But we have two thousand

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.879
<v Speaker 2>people regularly RSVP for these calls every month. This year,

0:40:42.840 --> 0:40:45.640
<v Speaker 2>you then will start getting information from our team guides

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 2>that we've put together, stuff the partners have put together,

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 2>Invites to trainings either online or in person. You might

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 2>get more like videos about candids we've worked in the past.

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 2>Let's say that you're like, all right, I know I'm

0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking about running in the next couple years, but

0:41:00.760 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure exactly what for or when. We would

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 2>start working with you, either over email, we'd connect you

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:08.480
<v Speaker 2>with one of our team members or volunteered to help

0:41:08.520 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 2>you sort of winnow it down. What's the problem you

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 2>care about solving, what's the office that will give you

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 2>power to solve it? And why would voters want you

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 2>to win, which is different than why you want to win.

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:19.680
<v Speaker 2>You want to win because winning is great and losing sucks.

0:41:19.880 --> 0:41:21.359
<v Speaker 2>Voters want you to win because you're going to do

0:41:21.360 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 2>something for them. So maybe you say, you know what,

0:41:23.640 --> 0:41:26.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm really pissed about the Don't Say Gay bill in Florida.

0:41:26.440 --> 0:41:28.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm really pissed about the book bands. I'm thinking about

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 2>running for school board in Miami Dade County, which Run

0:41:31.280 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 2>for Something has helped elect a number of members of

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Miami Dade school Board. Great, let's get to it, so

0:41:36.560 --> 0:41:38.239
<v Speaker 2>we'll help you. We've got guides to help you figure

0:41:38.280 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 2>out how to file. Once you have gotten on the

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:43.160
<v Speaker 2>ballot and you've used our materials to set up your campaign,

0:41:43.200 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 2>you thought about how much money you need to raise.

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:47.319
<v Speaker 2>All of that you can apply for our endorsement. We

0:41:47.360 --> 0:41:50.680
<v Speaker 2>do background checks, we screen your your grap suits contact plan.

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:52.879
<v Speaker 2>That's where we do a values alignment to make sure

0:41:52.880 --> 0:41:55.480
<v Speaker 2>that we're fully aligned on our broad progressive values. But

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 2>because we work both in Miami Dade and also.

0:41:59.480 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Thousands of right now, I mean, look, Miami Dade's politics

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:05.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit different than Burlington Vermont's. Right, we want to.

0:42:05.280 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 2>Make sure that we're being really accommodating, and we want

0:42:09.239 --> 0:42:11.080
<v Speaker 2>to know, like, how do these values show up in

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:12.960
<v Speaker 2>the race you're in and in the place you're in,

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:14.959
<v Speaker 2>and what does it mean to reflect your community there.

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Once we've endorsed you, which we endorse about half the

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.080
<v Speaker 2>people we apply, you're going to work directly with our staff.

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:22.879
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we'll help you find vendors that you can't get

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 2>access to, Maybe you'll use some of the discounts.

0:42:24.960 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>That we got in that sense, very similar, that's how

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Emily's List worked once they once they identified you as

0:42:30.120 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>an endorsed candidate.

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:33.439
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right. So we really want to make sure

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:36.720
<v Speaker 2>that we are leveraging our national relationships on your behalf.

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 2>So we endorse. I think this year our goal is

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 2>to endorse about three hundred candidates. Our biggest year has

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 2>been about seven hundred and fifty candidates, and that's who

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 2>we track through to election day. So when I talk

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 2>about the fifteen hundred people we've helped elect, it's from

0:42:48.600 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 2>that broader endorsed pool.

0:42:54.880 --> 0:42:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Is there a litmus test and what would be give

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:01.279
<v Speaker 1>me an example of something that would surprise me that

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you would support a candidate that had exposition.

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 2>We have a set of values you really want to

0:43:08.040 --> 0:43:11.400
<v Speaker 2>align with, you know, pro choice, pro quality to a

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:15.279
<v Speaker 2>pro tolerance pro reducing gun violence. They'll take gun violence

0:43:15.320 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 2>as an example here. The way that a Iowa State

0:43:19.520 --> 0:43:22.880
<v Speaker 2>legislative candidate is going to talk about gun safety is

0:43:22.880 --> 0:43:25.799
<v Speaker 2>going to be very different than maybe a Miami Dade

0:43:25.800 --> 0:43:28.359
<v Speaker 2>school board candidate, which will be very different than maybe

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:31.239
<v Speaker 2>like an Alabama state legislative candidate or a New York

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 2>City state council candidate. We know that we can't have

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 2>a strict policy position or like a platform because it

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 2>doesn't make sense the way that we engage these races.

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 2>But as long as all of our candidates have a

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:46.160
<v Speaker 2>vision for how they're going to reduce guns in our

0:43:46.160 --> 0:43:49.160
<v Speaker 2>streets and make it safer, lots of different ways you

0:43:49.160 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 2>can get at the same goal.

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So, you know, take let's take transports. With the transports issue,

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.359
<v Speaker 1>I easily can see a candidate saying I really want

0:43:58.400 --> 0:44:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to protect yeah, the trans community, and I also believe

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>trans people shouldn't be competing against women in sports. Is

0:44:08.440 --> 0:44:09.840
<v Speaker 1>that a disqualifier or not?

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 2>It would really depend on the race they're running in

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:15.000
<v Speaker 2>and the community they're in. We do expect all of

0:44:15.000 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 2>our candidates to really stake out a strong pro LGBTQ position,

0:44:18.680 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 2>a pro equity position, and we know that in a

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 2>lot of spaces like this is a conversation happening on

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the now.

0:44:24.440 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look at Gavin Newsom, right, who has come

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>out against right. He's pretty This is the guy who

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:34.720
<v Speaker 1>nobody issued marriage licenses before him. Right, So he's got,

0:44:34.760 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, an incredible history, and he is pretty

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 1>loudly now against the idea of trans women competing in

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>women's sports.

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:47.719
<v Speaker 2>I think the idea that he wants to be synctown

0:44:47.800 --> 0:44:49.840
<v Speaker 2>to the role of being a high school sports referee

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:51.720
<v Speaker 2>is sort of beyond me. I don't know why anyone

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 2>would want to take on that position.

0:44:53.520 --> 0:44:56.600
<v Speaker 1>That's a good point there. But you see where I'm going.

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>You see where I'm going here, just because this is

0:44:59.239 --> 0:45:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I think a challenge right now for progressives.

0:45:01.600 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 2>No, it is, and I say, I say like it is. Actually,

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:07.120
<v Speaker 2>we've worked with hundreds of school board candidates over the years.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 2>The issues that they are talking about in these races

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 2>are teacher pay and book bands and facilities funding. They

0:45:14.640 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 2>are so eager to get back to the kind of

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:19.120
<v Speaker 2>stuff that people really do care about, which is can

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 2>my kids read? Can my kids go to a safe school?

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:24.640
<v Speaker 2>They want to talk about bullying and mental health, Like

0:45:25.680 --> 0:45:27.960
<v Speaker 2>for all of the discourse around even like trans kids

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 2>in sports, that's not what these races are about.

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 1>No, I take let me well, And that was another thing.

0:45:33.600 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 1>How often do you have a candidate says, look, my

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:41.520
<v Speaker 1>passion is this, but I don't you know, and you

0:45:41.640 --> 0:45:42.960
<v Speaker 1>have to tell them, you know what, Look, it's a

0:45:42.960 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>great passion. You're not going to win an election on

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that issue. You really need to be talking about this one,

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:51.640
<v Speaker 1>this one, and this one. And at the same time,

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I know that I would be torn because I'm you know,

0:45:54.480 --> 0:45:57.000
<v Speaker 1>as somebody given advice too, it's like, look, you got

0:45:57.040 --> 0:45:59.040
<v Speaker 1>to be who you are, don't try to be something

0:45:59.080 --> 0:46:02.799
<v Speaker 1>you're not. So how do you navigate that where you're like, well,

0:46:02.840 --> 0:46:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know that that issue is just not a voting issue.

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I wish it were, you know, you know, for the

0:46:07.560 --> 0:46:09.600
<v Speaker 1>left that's campaign finance reform and for the right it's

0:46:09.640 --> 0:46:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the debt. I always say, those are these two issues

0:46:11.800 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>that I know there are people that care about them,

0:46:13.800 --> 0:46:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, yeah, you know who doesn't the voters?

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Because if they did, we'd have done something about it

0:46:17.560 --> 0:46:17.879
<v Speaker 1>by now.

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I think this is where it's fun working on local races,

0:46:20.920 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 2>because the issues that you run for in a local

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 2>race are so personal to people, and you tend to

0:46:26.600 --> 0:46:28.839
<v Speaker 2>be able to find things that get voters really fired up,

0:46:28.880 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 2>whether it's you know, schools, roads, water, cleanliness, even We've

0:46:35.280 --> 0:46:38.400
<v Speaker 2>had candidates who ran on like city budgeting process, but

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 2>because they were able to explain to people why they

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:43.719
<v Speaker 2>should care about that, Like you really need to care

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:45.800
<v Speaker 2>about the city budgeting process because right now you're getting

0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 2>screwed out of services. You deserve that. I think that

0:46:49.239 --> 0:46:50.879
<v Speaker 2>ability to connect it.

0:46:50.680 --> 0:46:53.359
<v Speaker 1>Just connected to people's lives. Yeah, you can figure out

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:54.280
<v Speaker 1>how to connect it.

0:46:54.280 --> 0:46:56.319
<v Speaker 2>It's I mean, it gets back to that third question

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:58.560
<v Speaker 2>I made earlier. It's like, why should voters want you

0:46:58.640 --> 0:47:00.319
<v Speaker 2>to win? What are you going to do for them?

0:47:00.760 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Make it about them, not about you. That's the key.

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Bertie Sanders is not advocating people necessarily to run as Democrats, right,

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:17.239
<v Speaker 1>He's like, hey, you know, and he's proudly an independent progressive.

0:47:17.280 --> 0:47:20.160
<v Speaker 1>You've had Dan Osborne and there's a there's a gentleman

0:47:20.200 --> 0:47:22.319
<v Speaker 1>I know that that helped recruit Dan Osborne. That's we're

0:47:22.360 --> 0:47:26.360
<v Speaker 1>trying to recruit more Dan Osborne's to you know, possibly

0:47:26.440 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>run as independence maybe where the Democratic Party brand is weak.

0:47:30.600 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Where do you guys sit on that as run for Something?

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:40.759
<v Speaker 1>And is is how much responsibility do you think you

0:47:40.880 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>have an improving the Democratic brand versus getting just getting

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:45.880
<v Speaker 1>people elected.

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm glad you asked this. So we just launched a

0:47:49.200 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 2>partnership with Senator Sanders where when he was asking all

0:47:51.760 --> 0:47:53.799
<v Speaker 2>of his you know, community members and followers to run

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 2>for office, everyone was eligible for Run for Something's program

0:47:57.239 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 2>got transferred over it to us, and we're working really

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:01.600
<v Speaker 2>closely with him. It's thousands of people who signed up

0:48:01.600 --> 0:48:05.399
<v Speaker 2>because Bernie asked them to working with them great. We

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:09.279
<v Speaker 2>specifically endorse people who are running as Democrats or who

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:11.560
<v Speaker 2>if they're in nonpartisan elections, which a lot of these

0:48:11.640 --> 0:48:15.480
<v Speaker 2>rates are. What alignment at a local level? Right, we're

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:18.959
<v Speaker 2>exploring whether it makes sense to engage with independence too,

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, I've asked the team make a recommendation.

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Let's think about it. How does that look practically? There's

0:48:24.480 --> 0:48:27.000
<v Speaker 2>a lot of about access reasons why it's really hard.

0:48:27.560 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 2>You know, I think there's people who imagine it.

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Look, it's my frustration with the duopoly. I do think,

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and I'm curious if you run across is I think

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:40.319
<v Speaker 1>one of the barriers that people have to running for

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:42.120
<v Speaker 1>office is that they think, well, I have to pick

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:45.680
<v Speaker 1>small or large, right, I wear a medium, or I

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>wear extra large or I wear small. You know, I've

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>always joked that we would hate it if they're only

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 1>offered two sizes of T shirts, you know, right, And

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I assume you run into that, like people, Hey, I

0:48:58.920 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>want to run for some I'm mostly agreeing on this,

0:49:02.600 --> 0:49:04.480
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if I want to pick a party.

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:07.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we really try to work with folks through the

0:49:07.280 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 2>practicalities of that. Like, Okay, if you want to run

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:12.240
<v Speaker 2>as an independent, how do you get on the ballot,

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 2>how do you get access to the voter file? How

0:49:14.280 --> 0:49:16.200
<v Speaker 2>are you going to tell people? Like break through with

0:49:16.200 --> 0:49:18.880
<v Speaker 2>folks about what you believe, because in a lot of

0:49:18.880 --> 0:49:20.760
<v Speaker 2>places it might make sense, and a lot of places

0:49:20.800 --> 0:49:23.360
<v Speaker 2>they'll see independent and assume crazy. So like, how do

0:49:23.400 --> 0:49:24.320
<v Speaker 2>you navigate that?

0:49:24.960 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>True?

0:49:25.520 --> 0:49:27.760
<v Speaker 2>And we want to be really like on the level

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 2>with folks about why you might pick a partisan identity

0:49:30.719 --> 0:49:32.880
<v Speaker 2>because for a lot of voters, like the d or

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:35.000
<v Speaker 2>R is sort of how they know who to vote for.

0:49:35.840 --> 0:49:37.520
<v Speaker 2>We want to make sure that if that's a choice

0:49:37.560 --> 0:49:40.799
<v Speaker 2>you're going to make, you know how to how to

0:49:40.840 --> 0:49:43.680
<v Speaker 2>like literally do it. And I think we might change

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 2>our minds on this going into twenty twenty six. It's

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:48.160
<v Speaker 2>something we're exploring. I actually don't know where we'll land

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:51.640
<v Speaker 2>because I think the details really matter here.

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask a very sort of parochial questions. Doesn't

0:49:56.280 --> 0:49:58.319
<v Speaker 1>mean I want to run for office, but if somebody is,

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, in a I'll give you an example. They're

0:50:04.880 --> 0:50:08.440
<v Speaker 1>in their mid fifties, they had a really successful twenty

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:13.160
<v Speaker 1>five year career working at the FDA, at NIH You

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:15.680
<v Speaker 1>see where I'm going. Yeah, and they say, you know,

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't really like what's happening. I want to do

0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:22.360
<v Speaker 1>something about it. Now. You just said you're primarily focused

0:50:22.360 --> 0:50:25.160
<v Speaker 1>on the forty and under. But I imagine there's a lot

0:50:25.160 --> 0:50:28.799
<v Speaker 1>of former government workers that are suddenly interested who never

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:32.680
<v Speaker 1>thought they were going to be a political servants. They

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:34.880
<v Speaker 1>always saw themselves truly as public servants.

0:50:35.320 --> 0:50:35.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not.

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Where are you channeling these folks energy? When I'm guessing

0:50:41.719 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 1>they You are getting inquiries from people that are older

0:50:44.880 --> 0:50:48.280
<v Speaker 1>than forty that maybe have the background I just suggested.

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 2>We have gotten thousands of them who love them. All

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 2>of our pipeline material is like basically everything up until

0:50:54.560 --> 0:50:57.279
<v Speaker 2>we endorse is public or like public. People in the

0:50:57.280 --> 0:50:59.719
<v Speaker 2>pipeline like you will get access to it. It's not

0:51:00.719 --> 0:51:04.400
<v Speaker 2>our endorsement program is that's we really want to focus

0:51:04.480 --> 0:51:07.040
<v Speaker 2>on people who've been traditionally left out of power, which

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 2>you only need to look around at the Democratic Party

0:51:09.239 --> 0:51:12.279
<v Speaker 2>and see young people have left out of power. But

0:51:12.440 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 2>everything else is welcome to anyone, and we work with

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:18.400
<v Speaker 2>so many partners who tackle different pieces of a community.

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:20.600
<v Speaker 2>So if you're an older woman, great, We've got lots

0:51:20.640 --> 0:51:22.799
<v Speaker 2>of partners who work with older women. If you're an

0:51:22.800 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 2>older man, great, we have partners who do that. You're

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:29.480
<v Speaker 2>in Latino or African American or LGBTQI, like, lots of

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:32.400
<v Speaker 2>different groups engage with different sort of sub segments of

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:35.640
<v Speaker 2>people for us young folks. But that's why we've got

0:51:35.680 --> 0:51:36.840
<v Speaker 2>a big ecosystem.

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:39.400
<v Speaker 1>But what you're saying is if if somebody were in

0:51:39.440 --> 0:51:41.960
<v Speaker 1>their mid fifties and is trying to just understand the

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:45.400
<v Speaker 1>process of running for office, you're more than willing to

0:51:45.440 --> 0:51:47.320
<v Speaker 1>be the essentially to be the classroom.

0:51:47.560 --> 0:51:50.240
<v Speaker 2>They can come to the classroom happily, happily apply.

0:51:52.160 --> 0:51:55.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, are you one of the things that I

0:51:55.800 --> 0:51:59.040
<v Speaker 1>believe we need? You know, I joke that we've we've

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:02.120
<v Speaker 1>we just passed the big physical infrastructure build over the

0:52:02.160 --> 0:52:04.640
<v Speaker 1>last couple of years to fix roads and bridges and

0:52:05.800 --> 0:52:08.760
<v Speaker 1>someday bring broadband to rural America, which we've been promising

0:52:08.800 --> 0:52:12.520
<v Speaker 1>for twenty five years, which one day, yeah, someday we'll

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:16.000
<v Speaker 1>get it. Is that we also need to update the

0:52:16.000 --> 0:52:18.680
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure of the democracy, right. I think it's you know,

0:52:19.040 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm an advocate of doubling the size of Congress. I

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:23.759
<v Speaker 1>think that Congress has become out of reach and out

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:26.920
<v Speaker 1>of touch. So I think if we uncap the House,

0:52:27.120 --> 0:52:30.239
<v Speaker 1>that would help. I know other people that are advocating

0:52:30.239 --> 0:52:34.680
<v Speaker 1>for all party primaries, right, no more partisan primaries. Does

0:52:34.800 --> 0:52:38.560
<v Speaker 1>run for something? Get involved with the infrastructure debates these

0:52:38.640 --> 0:52:41.240
<v Speaker 1>days of you know, how should elections be run? Who

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:45.160
<v Speaker 1>you know those sort of things and if you don't,

0:52:45.200 --> 0:52:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you what does a mandilipment think of these ideas?

0:52:48.760 --> 0:52:52.440
<v Speaker 2>The organization as a institution does not a lot of

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 2>our candidates are pushing for all kinds of different things,

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:59.120
<v Speaker 2>from termplements to different ways of funding campaigns campaign finance.

0:52:59.160 --> 0:53:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Are you surprised that term limits is popping up as

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:05.080
<v Speaker 1>as such a progressive idea? Now? I mean, it's funny.

0:53:05.840 --> 0:53:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an advocate of it at all. I tell people,

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:12.480
<v Speaker 1>i'd say every state legislature that's had term limits, all

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it does is in power lobbyists, because I always say,

0:53:14.719 --> 0:53:17.840
<v Speaker 1>guess who isn't Guess who doesn't have term limits? The lobbyists.

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>But it's fascinating to me that what was a conservative

0:53:22.640 --> 0:53:26.120
<v Speaker 1>talking point for two decades is suddenly becoming a progressive

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:26.719
<v Speaker 1>talking point.

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:28.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's because it feels like the only

0:53:28.560 --> 0:53:30.960
<v Speaker 2>way to get changeover in leadership when I don't think

0:53:30.960 --> 0:53:33.319
<v Speaker 2>that's true, but I think that's feels free.

0:53:33.400 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 1>It shouldn't be, But I get that, like, well, Chuck

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Schumer's never going to leave, so you better have term limits,

0:53:38.120 --> 0:53:38.560
<v Speaker 1>right yeah.

0:53:39.440 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The thing that I, on my personal capacity, really

0:53:42.640 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 2>am pushing for is increasing the pay the legislators. I

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:47.520
<v Speaker 2>think we've got to make these higher paid positions and

0:53:47.600 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 2>like Congress, yes, but also most of these state legislators

0:53:51.000 --> 0:53:54.319
<v Speaker 2>pay basically peanuts. The New Hampshire state legislature I think

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:57.680
<v Speaker 2>pays maybe four hundred dollars a year. That's not like

0:53:58.080 --> 0:53:58.680
<v Speaker 2>four hundred.

0:54:00.080 --> 0:54:02.239
<v Speaker 1>It's a part time legislature and most of.

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Them are, but they're not actually working part time. There's

0:54:05.040 --> 0:54:08.040
<v Speaker 2>serve a lot, and they're respect to do constituent services.

0:54:08.280 --> 0:54:10.959
<v Speaker 2>And I think the pay is one of many things

0:54:10.960 --> 0:54:13.920
<v Speaker 2>that makes these really hard for if you're not wealthy

0:54:14.040 --> 0:54:17.440
<v Speaker 2>or retired or married to someone wealthy, you can't do it.

0:54:17.840 --> 0:54:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Use you can't do it, and I want to. I

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 2>think that's one of those things where if you want

0:54:21.200 --> 0:54:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to change that kind of people who run, you've got

0:54:23.520 --> 0:54:25.879
<v Speaker 2>to change the structure that they're running to join.

0:54:27.520 --> 0:54:29.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, I thought about the pay issue as being

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:31.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the impediments to getting people under forty to

0:54:31.920 --> 0:54:34.399
<v Speaker 1>run for office. And I was wondering, you know, one

0:54:34.400 --> 0:54:36.680
<v Speaker 1>of the one of the I think positive changes that

0:54:36.760 --> 0:54:40.319
<v Speaker 1>took place with the FEC over the last decade was

0:54:40.360 --> 0:54:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this idea that candidates could pay themselves a salary. Yeah,

0:54:43.640 --> 0:54:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I think some people were worried about abuse.

0:54:47.160 --> 0:54:49.520
<v Speaker 1>There's always going to be any system, there's abuse, but

0:54:49.640 --> 0:54:52.000
<v Speaker 1>for the most part, and I think it's I think

0:54:52.040 --> 0:54:54.399
<v Speaker 1>it's worked out pretty well, because by the way, it's

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:56.400
<v Speaker 1>all public, so if you're abusing it, it becomes a

0:54:56.440 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 1>problem for your own campaign. So I think it is

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:03.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of self correct. Are there things if you thought

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:06.440
<v Speaker 1>about that run for something could sort of you know,

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 1>supplement income or incubate or provide you know, are you

0:55:11.640 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure out a way to provide outside source resources.

0:55:14.640 --> 0:55:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's childcare. I'm just spitballing here, but these are

0:55:18.160 --> 0:55:21.439
<v Speaker 1>the various real life impediments to somebody under forty running

0:55:21.480 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>for office.

0:55:22.000 --> 0:55:23.919
<v Speaker 2>I've got a Google doc running back the last eight

0:55:24.000 --> 0:55:27.520
<v Speaker 2>years of like all kinds of crazy ideas, from ways

0:55:27.560 --> 0:55:30.359
<v Speaker 2>we could fund people to support them while they run,

0:55:30.440 --> 0:55:33.600
<v Speaker 2>to cover childcare, cover security costs, which has become a

0:55:33.680 --> 0:55:37.000
<v Speaker 2>more now a bigger thing, ways in which you can

0:55:37.040 --> 0:55:40.440
<v Speaker 2>support candidates families like. A lot of this are some

0:55:40.520 --> 0:55:42.719
<v Speaker 2>campaign finance law that makes it really hard, but in

0:55:42.760 --> 0:55:45.680
<v Speaker 2>some states and in some places it might be doable.

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:48.440
<v Speaker 2>And if I ever got the money for it, I

0:55:48.440 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 2>think it'd be really fun and more importantly, I think

0:55:50.560 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 2>it'd be really impactful.

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 1>And I am curious what has been what do you

0:55:54.680 --> 0:55:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what are the top three or four reasons why you

0:55:58.200 --> 0:56:02.200
<v Speaker 1>can't convince somebody under forty that has I would like

0:56:02.320 --> 0:56:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to do it, but they can't. How often is it financial?

0:56:05.040 --> 0:56:07.600
<v Speaker 2>It's financial both in terms of they don't necessarily have

0:56:07.680 --> 0:56:10.880
<v Speaker 2>the money, like to their job is in necessarily stable,

0:56:10.880 --> 0:56:13.759
<v Speaker 2>but also they probably can't quit their job or they'd

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:17.280
<v Speaker 2>have a job that has like conflict of interest problems.

0:56:18.239 --> 0:56:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Second big thing is especially for millennials and true for

0:56:22.560 --> 0:56:25.680
<v Speaker 2>gen Z too. Kids. If you have young kids hard,

0:56:26.800 --> 0:56:28.680
<v Speaker 2>really hard, and I like I have, I have two

0:56:28.760 --> 0:56:31.400
<v Speaker 2>kids under two and a half. I cannot imagine running

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:32.279
<v Speaker 2>for office right now.

0:56:32.560 --> 0:56:38.120
<v Speaker 1>It feels look one of the There's a young Republican

0:56:38.200 --> 0:56:41.319
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress who just retired out of Kansas. He's

0:56:41.320 --> 0:56:43.399
<v Speaker 1>in his mid thirties, Stake Litturner, and this is why

0:56:43.440 --> 0:56:45.840
<v Speaker 1>he did it. It's like I got small kids, I'm

0:56:46.280 --> 0:56:48.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm tired of being the parent that's not at the game.

0:56:48.440 --> 0:56:52.919
<v Speaker 2>I think that's totally understandable. We've definitely had a bunch

0:56:52.960 --> 0:56:54.920
<v Speaker 2>of our folks work with Vote Mama, which is a

0:56:54.920 --> 0:56:58.640
<v Speaker 2>great organization that helps people navigate using campaign funds for childcare.

0:56:58.920 --> 0:57:02.799
<v Speaker 2>But we need that. There are some folks who are

0:57:02.800 --> 0:57:05.960
<v Speaker 2>fearful about security, which I think especially if you are

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:10.439
<v Speaker 2>a woman in person of color like LGBTQ, there's even

0:57:10.480 --> 0:57:14.400
<v Speaker 2>more hate threats coming your way. I think the final

0:57:14.480 --> 0:57:17.800
<v Speaker 2>big thing is this sense, in particular, if you are

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:20.760
<v Speaker 2>not a homeowner, that you don't deserve a say in

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:22.880
<v Speaker 2>the future of the community. So this is one of

0:57:22.920 --> 0:57:25.120
<v Speaker 2>my projects that we're launching later this year. You are

0:57:25.280 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 2>c three run person thing civic. So does you want

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:30.680
<v Speaker 2>to get more renters to run for office one? Because

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:32.920
<v Speaker 2>the housing market is a nightmare, and if you are

0:57:32.920 --> 0:57:35.360
<v Speaker 2>in your twenties or thirties, you think about it very

0:57:35.400 --> 0:57:37.400
<v Speaker 2>differently than if you're someone who bought your house in

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:40.600
<v Speaker 2>the eighties and are now sitting on well but two.

0:57:42.000 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 2>Renters make up about thirty five percent of the American

0:57:45.600 --> 0:57:49.440
<v Speaker 2>people and about seven percent of all elected officials nationwide.

0:57:50.080 --> 0:57:52.240
<v Speaker 2>In the New York State legislature, there are more.

0:57:52.640 --> 0:57:54.520
<v Speaker 1>That's the type of diversity we don't tell. I mean,

0:57:54.560 --> 0:57:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it's an e socio economic diversity. This is my beef

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:02.080
<v Speaker 1>with newsrooms. People talk to me about diversity and newsrooms

0:58:02.080 --> 0:58:06.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, I want geographic and socioeconomic. Give me

0:58:06.080 --> 0:58:10.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody whose parents never went to college, who lived you know,

0:58:10.200 --> 0:58:13.560
<v Speaker 1>understand that life versus a lot. You know, it's just

0:58:14.280 --> 0:58:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the socioeconomic diversity, and you're right, Congress does not have it.

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Congress doesn't have it. The New York State legislature. New York,

0:58:19.720 --> 0:58:21.240
<v Speaker 2>a state where I think at least in New York

0:58:21.320 --> 0:58:23.560
<v Speaker 2>City something like sixty five percent of people are renters,

0:58:23.600 --> 0:58:28.200
<v Speaker 2>maybe more, has more landlords than it does. Tens currently

0:58:28.240 --> 0:58:31.240
<v Speaker 2>serving California has I think five renters and at one

0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:33.800
<v Speaker 2>point had zero, Connecticut zero. A number of these state

0:58:33.880 --> 0:58:39.200
<v Speaker 2>legislators zero. It is no wonder that we have basically

0:58:39.280 --> 0:58:42.480
<v Speaker 2>no federal law that helps renders outside of some of

0:58:42.520 --> 0:58:45.360
<v Speaker 2>the stuff around like you know, public housing Section eight.

0:58:45.400 --> 0:58:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But where's my man? The rent is too damn high.

0:58:48.280 --> 0:58:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Party were rich tax.

0:58:50.560 --> 0:58:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Deductions, first time home buyer credits, all of that for

0:58:53.200 --> 0:58:56.720
<v Speaker 2>homeowners that I'm thirty five years old, I am paying

0:58:57.000 --> 0:58:59.720
<v Speaker 2>thousands of dollars a month in child care expenses. I

0:58:59.760 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 2>am never going to be able to own a home,

0:59:01.520 --> 0:59:05.520
<v Speaker 2>at least not in the next ten years. It feels un.

0:59:05.680 --> 0:59:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hope that's wrong, right, And I get the.

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:10.440
<v Speaker 2>Feels unimaginable though, And I think when you were in

0:59:10.480 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 2>your twenties or thirties, that is a very common sense.

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:15.760
<v Speaker 2>It feels like the American when we talk about the

0:59:15.760 --> 0:59:18.720
<v Speaker 2>American dream, feels out of reach. How ma, I were

0:59:18.720 --> 0:59:19.480
<v Speaker 2>supposed to buy home?

0:59:20.920 --> 0:59:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You know how? No, it's funny and I had not

0:59:24.160 --> 0:59:26.680
<v Speaker 1>heard it more directly. What you just the point you

0:59:26.800 --> 0:59:29.720
<v Speaker 1>just made, And I really want to make sure this

0:59:29.880 --> 0:59:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is a clip that gets highlighted. I'm like saying it

0:59:32.040 --> 0:59:35.640
<v Speaker 1>out loud, because you know, we talk about the number

0:59:35.680 --> 0:59:39.400
<v Speaker 1>one issue that voters ask about. I've had this, have

0:59:39.480 --> 0:59:43.120
<v Speaker 1>done this survey of unofficially of members of Congress. I'm like, hey,

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:44.960
<v Speaker 1>when you go home, what's an issue that you get

0:59:45.000 --> 0:59:49.680
<v Speaker 1>asked about that that that we don't cover? And it

0:59:49.680 --> 0:59:51.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter if it's a Republican or Democrat. They all

0:59:51.920 --> 0:59:56.280
<v Speaker 1>say housing. It's always housing. And it's like it was

0:59:56.320 --> 0:59:57.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of like you just did the It was one

0:59:57.760 --> 1:00:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of those well duh, when you have no no wonder,

1:00:01.040 --> 1:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>nobody has it as a priority in front of their face.

1:00:04.480 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>And that's a that's as good of an explanation as

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I've heard of why we have terrible housing policy in

1:00:11.120 --> 1:00:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this time.

1:00:11.520 --> 1:00:14.240
<v Speaker 2>And I think there's a bunch of other factors here,

1:00:14.360 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 2>including like much housing policy is made on the local level,

1:00:17.360 --> 1:00:20.560
<v Speaker 2>which again there's no renters there either. But and a

1:00:20.600 --> 1:00:24.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of the places where we really need to affect affordability,

1:00:24.600 --> 1:00:26.439
<v Speaker 2>Like you know, I think about one of the many

1:00:26.480 --> 1:00:28.760
<v Speaker 2>reasons why a lot of stuff swung right, like New York,

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:32.040
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey, everywhere sung right in the last election, in

1:00:32.120 --> 1:00:36.360
<v Speaker 2>part because of the affordability crisis, in part because how

1:00:36.440 --> 1:00:41.120
<v Speaker 2>many Democrats in these blue states sent money to Wisconsin

1:00:41.160 --> 1:00:43.280
<v Speaker 2>and Michigan and Pennsylvania and have never engaged in a

1:00:43.320 --> 1:00:49.480
<v Speaker 2>local election where they live and therefore have not actually participated.

1:00:49.600 --> 1:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>This gets back to where we began. It gets back

1:00:52.880 --> 1:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to where we began. Go Packs got started because they

1:00:56.880 --> 1:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>concluded the Republicans were too worried about the national politics

1:00:59.720 --> 1:01:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and looking in their backyard. And you're basically this is

1:01:03.760 --> 1:01:08.600
<v Speaker 1>now two generations flip where the Democrats have become it's

1:01:08.640 --> 1:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the presidency your bust.

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Mm And like we can't. You can't just win at

1:01:12.520 --> 1:01:15.600
<v Speaker 2>the top and expect everything else to follow. Trickle down politics,

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:19.120
<v Speaker 2>much like a trickle down economics, does not work, and

1:01:19.160 --> 1:01:22.200
<v Speaker 2>we can't count on that. One of the things that

1:01:22.240 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I love about what we do is we work in

1:01:23.920 --> 1:01:27.080
<v Speaker 2>all fifty states. We've elected candidates in forty nine. I'm

1:01:27.160 --> 1:01:29.560
<v Speaker 2>just missing Idaho and I'm gonna win a waste there. Eventually,

1:01:30.600 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>I get pushed back on this all the time of like,

1:01:32.840 --> 1:01:35.600
<v Speaker 2>why are you wasting resources in a red state?

1:01:36.040 --> 1:01:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, wasting resources. I hear that a lot.

1:01:39.080 --> 1:01:41.440
<v Speaker 2>It's not a limited resource, but money and politics, for

1:01:41.520 --> 1:01:43.160
<v Speaker 2>better or for worse, keeps going up and up and up,

1:01:43.160 --> 1:01:46.480
<v Speaker 2>where there will always be unfortunately more money to spend

1:01:46.480 --> 1:01:48.600
<v Speaker 2>in this work. It is not a waste of a

1:01:48.640 --> 1:01:51.800
<v Speaker 2>resource to try and keep white nationalists from running Idaho

1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:55.240
<v Speaker 2>as an example. I think that's a good thing, both

1:01:55.280 --> 1:01:57.560
<v Speaker 2>because it is good for Idaho, but also because we

1:01:57.640 --> 1:01:59.720
<v Speaker 2>have seen over and over and over again what happens

1:01:59.760 --> 1:02:02.240
<v Speaker 2>in these red states does not stay in these red states.

1:02:02.760 --> 1:02:06.280
<v Speaker 2>And Republicans, sure shit, are spending a ton of money

1:02:06.320 --> 1:02:08.880
<v Speaker 2>to try and flip over blue states.

1:02:08.920 --> 1:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Right, No, it is, it's the it look at just

1:02:12.920 --> 1:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I always look at national politics. As you know,

1:02:15.360 --> 1:02:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump goes out of his way to campaign in

1:02:17.400 --> 1:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the bronx versus. I didn't see Kamala Harris going out

1:02:21.200 --> 1:02:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of her way to campaign in Idaho, right, But I

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>did see Barack Obama do that. I think, and you

1:02:27.320 --> 1:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>know it I know people sit there and laugh at it,

1:02:30.760 --> 1:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's like, here's the thing. You may not even

1:02:33.000 --> 1:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>win to vote another extra voter in Idaho, but somebody

1:02:35.920 --> 1:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>in rural Virginia might say, oh, I see, he might

1:02:39.680 --> 1:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>he might not ignore my my issues if he cares

1:02:42.920 --> 1:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>about their That's right.

1:02:44.320 --> 1:02:46.320
<v Speaker 2>And like, I think about how many candidates we've worked

1:02:46.320 --> 1:02:49.120
<v Speaker 2>with over the years who have never who are the

1:02:49.240 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 2>first or only Democrat to run in their district, sometimes

1:02:52.800 --> 1:02:56.200
<v Speaker 2>ever or for decades. Like, think about all the voters

1:02:56.200 --> 1:02:58.280
<v Speaker 2>in that place who have never met a Democrat running

1:02:58.280 --> 1:03:01.280
<v Speaker 2>for office before, who've never had the opportunity to vote

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:02.360
<v Speaker 2>for a Democratic candidate.

1:03:02.600 --> 1:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, this to me is the brand issue. I mean

1:03:05.040 --> 1:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it is. And let me ask you, and let's close

1:03:07.520 --> 1:03:11.720
<v Speaker 1>off on this topic, which is you obviously believe that

1:03:11.760 --> 1:03:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have to improve their brand. You can't you're not

1:03:17.520 --> 1:03:19.040
<v Speaker 1>ready to say I'm going to go with the Forward

1:03:19.080 --> 1:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Party and dump the Democrats right like, and I think

1:03:21.440 --> 1:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>some people are thinking about it. Do you have to replace?

1:03:23.760 --> 1:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Is the brand so broken that you it's too toxic?

1:03:28.120 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Like what could be like what happened to the Israel

1:03:30.800 --> 1:03:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Labor Party? What would you be doing if you could

1:03:35.440 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>wave a magic wand at the DNC right now to

1:03:38.280 --> 1:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>do some brand improvement.

1:03:39.800 --> 1:03:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't do it from the DNC, I think. But

1:03:44.160 --> 1:03:46.760
<v Speaker 2>I think what we are doing now, which is getting

1:03:46.840 --> 1:03:50.360
<v Speaker 2>tens of thousands of people to run for office, Like,

1:03:50.400 --> 1:03:52.800
<v Speaker 2>if you want to change the Democratic Party, change the

1:03:52.840 --> 1:03:57.200
<v Speaker 2>people who are out in front as Democrats. Yeah, Like

1:03:57.560 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>for the last four years, the number one Democratic communicator

1:04:01.360 --> 1:04:06.680
<v Speaker 2>was President Joe Biden, who was not the most effective communicator.

1:04:06.320 --> 1:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Not a communicator, not a cadicator, right, I mean that

1:04:08.960 --> 1:04:09.120
<v Speaker 1>was that.

1:04:09.200 --> 1:04:11.880
<v Speaker 2>Was the issue. So yeah, I don't blame people when

1:04:11.880 --> 1:04:13.560
<v Speaker 2>they think this party is old and out of touch

1:04:13.600 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 2>and doesn't care about me because they didn't hear from

1:04:15.280 --> 1:04:17.320
<v Speaker 2>someone for most of the last four years.

1:04:17.480 --> 1:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>By the way, the other two spokespeople were Nancy Pelosi

1:04:19.880 --> 1:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and Chuck Schumer, who were basically not great.

1:04:23.560 --> 1:04:25.480
<v Speaker 2>I think what we are doing now and this is

1:04:25.720 --> 1:04:28.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, a tipping point in the Democratic Party. But

1:04:28.480 --> 1:04:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I think it's not just in Democrats. I mean this,

1:04:30.400 --> 1:04:31.920
<v Speaker 2>you know, I have a new book out what we're

1:04:31.960 --> 1:04:34.360
<v Speaker 2>in charge. It's also all about like generational changing in

1:04:34.440 --> 1:04:37.080
<v Speaker 2>leadership across all kinds of sectors. But we're going to

1:04:37.120 --> 1:04:41.640
<v Speaker 2>see it everywhere the people in charge are gonna look

1:04:41.680 --> 1:04:46.160
<v Speaker 2>and sound different. It's going to be so consequential for

1:04:46.240 --> 1:04:49.439
<v Speaker 2>both for the Democratic Party or how these community spaces feel,

1:04:49.440 --> 1:04:50.760
<v Speaker 2>for how these governments run.

1:04:51.360 --> 1:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>It is.

1:04:53.240 --> 1:04:55.840
<v Speaker 2>The most important thing I think we need. Even this

1:04:55.920 --> 1:04:58.040
<v Speaker 2>conversation about like, oh we need like a Joe Rogan

1:04:58.080 --> 1:05:00.520
<v Speaker 2>of the left, we need more media, It's like, yeah, yeah, maybe,

1:05:00.520 --> 1:05:03.840
<v Speaker 2>but who's going to go on those shows? Name me

1:05:04.040 --> 1:05:07.439
<v Speaker 2>the half dozen current elected Democrats who could go into

1:05:07.440 --> 1:05:09.480
<v Speaker 2>a non political space and have a normal conversation.

1:05:11.080 --> 1:05:13.320
<v Speaker 1>You want to see You want to Chuck Schumer and

1:05:13.360 --> 1:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Joe Rogan up. How do you think?

1:05:14.920 --> 1:05:15.640
<v Speaker 2>As on my.

1:05:15.640 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Front November twenty twenty sixth, what does success look like

1:05:22.360 --> 1:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>for Run for Something?

1:05:23.840 --> 1:05:26.560
<v Speaker 2>My expectation is next year we will probably work with

1:05:26.760 --> 1:05:29.360
<v Speaker 2>five or six hundred candidates. I would hope that most

1:05:29.360 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 2>of them will win. I expect we will see run

1:05:31.960 --> 1:05:34.560
<v Speaker 2>for Something alone who win seats in Congress and the

1:05:34.640 --> 1:05:37.520
<v Speaker 2>United States Senate and governorships. We already have a bunch

1:05:37.520 --> 1:05:40.960
<v Speaker 2>of them running. Mallory McMorrow, Eli Sappat is running for

1:05:41.000 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 2>AG and Michigan. A bunch of folks running for state

1:05:43.040 --> 1:05:47.080
<v Speaker 2>wide office in Colorado and Congress in Texas and Georgia

1:05:47.080 --> 1:05:51.800
<v Speaker 2>and elsewhere. I think it is going to be a

1:05:51.840 --> 1:05:55.360
<v Speaker 2>transformative election for the Democratic Party because no.

1:05:55.240 --> 1:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Matter what heppened, you think it'll be some massive generation shift,

1:05:58.720 --> 1:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>a generational leadership.

1:06:00.160 --> 1:06:02.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, I think that can be either a handing of

1:06:02.840 --> 1:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>the baton or a taking of the baton.

1:06:05.360 --> 1:06:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Y yanking. Yeah, like either way, handing of the baton

1:06:08.480 --> 1:06:09.480
<v Speaker 1>or yank taking the.

1:06:09.480 --> 1:06:10.960
<v Speaker 2>By the way, someone else is going to be holding

1:06:11.000 --> 1:06:11.400
<v Speaker 2>it when all of a.

1:06:11.360 --> 1:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Sudden done, amand alipman, Uh, this is a great conversation.

1:06:17.360 --> 1:06:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And uh what I hope I know you know if

1:06:20.600 --> 1:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>you're people trying to figure out how do you run

1:06:23.040 --> 1:06:24.880
<v Speaker 1>for office? That's why I wanted you to go through

1:06:24.920 --> 1:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that process. And who knows, maybe maybe a handful of

1:06:27.920 --> 1:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>people will come come check out one for something. I

1:06:30.160 --> 1:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you going, you got. I hope you enjoyed that

1:06:36.680 --> 1:06:39.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation with a man elipment. By the way, if if

1:06:40.280 --> 1:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the left side of the aisle is not where you

1:06:41.960 --> 1:06:45.120
<v Speaker 1>want to be running for office, do know. I did

1:06:45.120 --> 1:06:48.040
<v Speaker 1>an interview that'll be dropping this week with Lindsay Draft.

1:06:48.440 --> 1:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>She is the CEO of the Forward Party. That's a

1:06:52.000 --> 1:06:54.320
<v Speaker 1>party that is now the combination of the efforts of

1:06:54.400 --> 1:06:58.200
<v Speaker 1>former Democratic presidential candidate Andrew Yang, who left the Democratic

1:06:58.240 --> 1:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Party to start this party, and or Republican Governor of

1:07:01.120 --> 1:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey, Christy Whitman. They've put their efforts together. It's

1:07:04.320 --> 1:07:08.280
<v Speaker 1>still it's all under the umbrella of forward, but it

1:07:08.320 --> 1:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>will be another avenue in another way that people who

1:07:14.480 --> 1:07:18.480
<v Speaker 1>are frustrated, particularly by the two parties in ability to

1:07:18.520 --> 1:07:23.640
<v Speaker 1>work with each other, might find this appealing later this week,

1:07:23.920 --> 1:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>So be on the lookout for that drop. So with that,

1:07:27.560 --> 1:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>let me do a couple of ass chucks before I

1:07:31.760 --> 1:07:36.680
<v Speaker 1>send you on your way to to go about your day.

1:07:38.040 --> 1:07:41.080
<v Speaker 1>First question, been struggling on how to word this for

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:44.920
<v Speaker 1>a few First of all, this comes from Bill s Newberg, Oregon,

1:07:46.200 --> 1:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and as he puts in parentheses, it's a liberal state

1:07:48.600 --> 1:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that all that's also football crazy, yes, and it's also

1:07:53.160 --> 1:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>at least in Corvallis, they love their college baseball as well.

1:07:56.320 --> 1:08:00.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, shout out to my friend Nathan Zalez,

1:08:00.520 --> 1:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>who is an Oregon State rabid Oregon state guy. But

1:08:03.760 --> 1:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>here's the question from Bill in Oregon. Been struggling on

1:08:07.800 --> 1:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>how to word this for a few weeks now. But

1:08:10.640 --> 1:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate question is, quote, are the two major parties

1:08:13.120 --> 1:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in this country essentially equivalent in your eyes? I asked,

1:08:16.040 --> 1:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>because you've said you're a character voter. You've also said

1:08:18.720 --> 1:08:21.479
<v Speaker 1>that both parties had become cults of personalities, meaning Trump

1:08:22.200 --> 1:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>on one hand, Obama and the other. But if I

1:08:24.040 --> 1:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>put those two politicians next to one another, the difference

1:08:26.320 --> 1:08:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in character is just inescapable. I wonder if this dovestails

1:08:29.720 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>at all with the toxic branding of the Democratic Party.

1:08:32.880 --> 1:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>According to Pew and others, being a party that promotes

1:08:35.400 --> 1:08:38.040
<v Speaker 1>good character often means putting the right thing above the

1:08:38.120 --> 1:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>expedient thing, and sometimes even above winning. The Republicans being

1:08:42.160 --> 1:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the party of selfishness. I either current tax bill seem

1:08:45.200 --> 1:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>to be let off with a boys will be boys

1:08:47.960 --> 1:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>type of excuse. You've often said that you essentially hold

1:08:50.800 --> 1:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats to a higher standard because they ask you to.

1:08:54.000 --> 1:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Isn't having a higher standard to sign a better character

1:08:56.240 --> 1:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in the first place? Our folks in the media sometimes

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>buying into a false equivalency because essentially being of good

1:09:01.840 --> 1:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>character is often also boring, I e. Know, drama Obama,

1:09:05.560 --> 1:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>How does one teach their children how to be of

1:09:08.080 --> 1:09:11.200
<v Speaker 1>good character when the bad characters keep being chosen and

1:09:11.240 --> 1:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>allowed to act with impunity. That is the most important question.

1:09:16.120 --> 1:09:18.360
<v Speaker 1>How does one teat how do let me repeat this,

1:09:18.479 --> 1:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>how does one teach their children how to be of

1:09:20.800 --> 1:09:24.000
<v Speaker 1>good character when the bad characters keep being chosen and

1:09:24.040 --> 1:09:29.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed to act with impunity. Look, I don't know other

1:09:29.400 --> 1:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>how to react to your question other than you're right?

1:09:33.520 --> 1:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Do I do not currently see the two parties as

1:09:35.840 --> 1:09:41.679
<v Speaker 1>their run as equivalent parties? I do, and and oddly enough,

1:09:41.680 --> 1:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm somebody who holds the Democrats more accountable because they,

1:09:47.280 --> 1:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, I do. I look at this, particularly Joe Biden,

1:09:50.600 --> 1:09:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that his poor leadership is why Donald Trump is back right,

1:09:53.880 --> 1:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>why voters didn't want to kick Trump to the curb.

1:09:57.560 --> 1:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>If Biden had been a better leader, they wouldn't looked

1:10:00.120 --> 1:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>backwards for Trump. The Republican Party would have looked for

1:10:03.200 --> 1:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a new candidate. This is the first time in over

1:10:05.160 --> 1:10:08.000
<v Speaker 1>one hundred years that a party decided to go to

1:10:08.040 --> 1:10:11.320
<v Speaker 1>go backwards rather than forwards with who their nominee was.

1:10:12.280 --> 1:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And the question is is that on the Republicans? Is

1:10:15.880 --> 1:10:18.479
<v Speaker 1>that on the Democrats? And the answer is yes to both. Right,

1:10:18.960 --> 1:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>why has the Republican even been an answer well, because

1:10:24.320 --> 1:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a desperation of one part of the electorate to

1:10:29.000 --> 1:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>really shake up government and to have government sort of

1:10:33.080 --> 1:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>understand that we've been living in this I guess I

1:10:40.320 --> 1:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>think that the anger is over. It feels like we

1:10:43.160 --> 1:10:45.519
<v Speaker 1>live in a two tiered system where it's impossible for

1:10:45.600 --> 1:10:48.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody stuck in one tier to jump to the other tier.

1:10:49.320 --> 1:10:52.519
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that's the feeling that's out there now.

1:10:52.600 --> 1:10:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I can point to individual examples and say this isn't true,

1:10:55.560 --> 1:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and then I wish people didn't see it that way.

1:10:57.400 --> 1:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>But there is this sense of the rungs to the

1:11:01.160 --> 1:11:03.599
<v Speaker 1>ladder are missing, right. They're like, yeah, you can get

1:11:03.640 --> 1:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>up five or six rungs, but if you're trying to

1:11:05.920 --> 1:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>get up to run fifteen, ten through fourteen are gone, right,

1:11:10.200 --> 1:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to somehow get lucky to go somehow

1:11:12.720 --> 1:11:14.479
<v Speaker 1>and grab it, or you've got to risk your life

1:11:14.520 --> 1:11:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in order to jump up the economic ladder. So I

1:11:18.760 --> 1:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>get that frustration. I think it's a lot having to do.

1:11:22.760 --> 1:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>People don't know what they want, but they do know

1:11:25.720 --> 1:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>what they don't like, right, And on the issue of character,

1:11:30.520 --> 1:11:33.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is something that I vote on character,

1:11:33.800 --> 1:11:36.439
<v Speaker 1>but I'm in the minority. And I've said I spent.

1:11:36.880 --> 1:11:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a big, long column about the transactional versus

1:11:40.040 --> 1:11:43.479
<v Speaker 1>the aspirational voter in twenty twenty four. You can go

1:11:43.520 --> 1:11:47.960
<v Speaker 1>find it in the NBC website. Because the aspirational voter

1:11:48.080 --> 1:11:51.479
<v Speaker 1>versus the transactional voter. A transactional voter looks and says, Okay, well,

1:11:51.720 --> 1:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>who's going to benefit me. The aspirational voter says, what's

1:11:56.760 --> 1:12:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in the You know, who's going to benefit the country?

1:12:00.720 --> 1:12:02.719
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we hear all this put in country first,

1:12:02.880 --> 1:12:06.640
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. The fact is most people do

1:12:06.760 --> 1:12:09.200
<v Speaker 1>vote for what's in their own best interests, right, And

1:12:09.240 --> 1:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a form of it you get. If you're voting

1:12:13.000 --> 1:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in the country's best interests, it usually means you have

1:12:15.320 --> 1:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>the luxury to do that. Right usually means you're personally

1:12:17.920 --> 1:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>well off or you feel pretty stable, so you can

1:12:20.840 --> 1:12:23.680
<v Speaker 1>look at the bigger picture. Right, if things are unstable

1:12:23.680 --> 1:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in your life, you look at things very binary. Who's

1:12:27.040 --> 1:12:30.040
<v Speaker 1>good for me, who's bad for me? And I think

1:12:30.120 --> 1:12:32.519
<v Speaker 1>what we have with the working class is as a

1:12:32.560 --> 1:12:36.599
<v Speaker 1>large group of voters who are not seeing what's good

1:12:36.680 --> 1:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>for me. In the moment, Donald Trump is really good

1:12:39.760 --> 1:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>at sounding responsive in the moment, and you had, you know,

1:12:43.840 --> 1:12:46.920
<v Speaker 1>in Barack Obama the ultimate, hey, let's play the long

1:12:46.960 --> 1:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>game type of politician. And you know, I think it's

1:12:51.280 --> 1:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly what people wanted in O eight after the experience

1:12:54.840 --> 1:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>with Bush. But between the financial crisis, how long it

1:13:01.320 --> 1:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>took Obamacare to get up and running right, how many

1:13:04.320 --> 1:13:07.479
<v Speaker 1>fits and starts it had, the broken website, it was

1:13:07.520 --> 1:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a sense of, Okay, maybe Democrats have good ideas, but

1:13:09.840 --> 1:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't know how to execute them. They're bad on

1:13:12.000 --> 1:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>the leadership front, if you will. So whether that was

1:13:16.640 --> 1:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>the reason for the turn to Trump.

1:13:20.200 --> 1:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Is.

1:13:21.080 --> 1:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going to be studying this for fifty

1:13:23.360 --> 1:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>years and then I think I've joked about this before.

1:13:25.560 --> 1:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>I hope I live long enough to find out how

1:13:28.560 --> 1:13:31.680
<v Speaker 1>historians fifty years from now assess the Trump era. I

1:13:31.680 --> 1:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be a much smaller part in

1:13:34.479 --> 1:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>our history than it feels in the moment. You know,

1:13:37.840 --> 1:13:40.559
<v Speaker 1>we always have recency bias as a society, and thinking

1:13:40.600 --> 1:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be momentous in the history books,

1:13:43.320 --> 1:13:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you realize that's a page, that's a half

1:13:45.960 --> 1:13:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a page that might not even be more than one

1:13:49.080 --> 1:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>sentence right. I mean, just look at the look I

1:13:52.760 --> 1:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>bet you when Grover Cleveland run his second non consecutive

1:13:56.160 --> 1:13:58.799
<v Speaker 1>presidential term, there was a thought, Wow, this is historic.

1:13:59.000 --> 1:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>This is something that's going to be taught in schools

1:14:01.400 --> 1:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>all the time. How much were you taught about Grover

1:14:04.080 --> 1:14:07.960
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland in school? So it's very likely that this is

1:14:08.280 --> 1:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of thought of that. What Trump is a part

1:14:10.680 --> 1:14:13.719
<v Speaker 1>of that. This is part of this larger I think

1:14:14.360 --> 1:14:17.240
<v Speaker 1>impact that we're having. Right we're in the middle of globalization,

1:14:18.000 --> 1:14:23.479
<v Speaker 1>a transition from industrial attack, a rising global economy. We've

1:14:23.520 --> 1:14:26.799
<v Speaker 1>never had this many people engaged in the free market

1:14:26.880 --> 1:14:29.679
<v Speaker 1>than we have today, So there's a lot more potential

1:14:29.680 --> 1:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>winners and losers across the globe. Right in the twentieth

1:14:32.120 --> 1:14:34.920
<v Speaker 1>century of the United States had more say over who

1:14:34.960 --> 1:14:37.320
<v Speaker 1>won and lost on the economy. And guess what, we're

1:14:37.320 --> 1:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>having to share that share that now with more and

1:14:40.240 --> 1:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>more countries, and this is the growing pains of it.

1:14:43.360 --> 1:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm one of those long term optimists short term pessimists

1:14:47.000 --> 1:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>in this. But to get at the nut of your questions,

1:14:50.120 --> 1:14:53.320
<v Speaker 1>are the two parties the same? In my eyes, they're not.

1:14:54.200 --> 1:14:56.679
<v Speaker 1>Right now, the Republican Party has been I think hijacked

1:14:56.720 --> 1:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>by Trump and trump Ism. This is not a conservative

1:15:00.760 --> 1:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>party by the definition of conservatism that we've we've I

1:15:05.320 --> 1:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>think on culture, this is in some ways a recognizable uh,

1:15:11.320 --> 1:15:14.559
<v Speaker 1>part of the Republican Party compared to before, But on

1:15:15.080 --> 1:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to economic policy, it's unrecognizable and it's

1:15:17.880 --> 1:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>not conservative. It's a reactionary party in many ways. So

1:15:22.800 --> 1:15:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know, when I when I look

1:15:25.479 --> 1:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>at a guy like George Will, right, that's you know,

1:15:28.200 --> 1:15:31.479
<v Speaker 1>for me, that was the face of conservatism as a kid. Okay,

1:15:31.560 --> 1:15:35.080
<v Speaker 1>George Will and Ronald Reagan and Donald Trump doesn't fit.

1:15:35.120 --> 1:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>He feels like, like I said, a bizarro superman, you know,

1:15:38.200 --> 1:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>compared to Reagan. If you will, You're like, huh, you

1:15:41.800 --> 1:15:45.519
<v Speaker 1>kind of look like a Republican, but you behave almost

1:15:45.600 --> 1:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the exact opposite of the type of Republicans I grew

1:15:48.479 --> 1:15:52.320
<v Speaker 1>up with. And that's, you know, especially on the character front.

1:15:52.479 --> 1:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the Republican Party always prided itself on being

1:15:55.000 --> 1:15:59.439
<v Speaker 1>the party of of of proper character, whatever that meant

1:15:59.479 --> 1:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in society in any given moment. But certainly you wouldn't

1:16:03.200 --> 1:16:06.719
<v Speaker 1>expect it to be, you know, the party of serial

1:16:06.760 --> 1:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>marriages out of wedlock. Children all over the place, like

1:16:11.080 --> 1:16:14.479
<v Speaker 1>an Elon Musk, who may or may not you know again,

1:16:14.680 --> 1:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just think about ten years ago. Imagine

1:16:17.200 --> 1:16:20.559
<v Speaker 1>if one of the closest listen on Matt Eric Schmidt

1:16:20.640 --> 1:16:23.040
<v Speaker 1>was was in some ways the type of advisor to

1:16:23.120 --> 1:16:27.519
<v Speaker 1>Obama that Elon Musk became to Donald Trump. Somebody who's

1:16:27.520 --> 1:16:31.040
<v Speaker 1>successful in Silicon Valley, trying to trying to help the

1:16:31.080 --> 1:16:34.600
<v Speaker 1>government understand the Silicon Valley mindset. You know what, I

1:16:34.600 --> 1:16:37.040
<v Speaker 1>don't think Eric Schmidt did bring around a drug kit

1:16:37.920 --> 1:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for everybody to have it. And if he did, it

1:16:40.880 --> 1:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>would be either probably would be oversight, you know, hearings.

1:16:45.360 --> 1:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>There would probably be Congress would want to find out

1:16:50.360 --> 1:16:53.680
<v Speaker 1>where did these drugs come from? Right? Are we going

1:16:53.760 --> 1:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to have anything like that with Elon Musk? I think

1:16:56.920 --> 1:16:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you know the answer to that. So I would say

1:16:59.800 --> 1:17:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that this is the part where I'm just a believer

1:17:05.000 --> 1:17:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that eventually bad character does get punished by society. The

1:17:10.240 --> 1:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>voters eventually sniff that out because we eventually realize people

1:17:14.320 --> 1:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>with bad characters do bad things, and while they may

1:17:18.400 --> 1:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>accidentally do some good things that maybe make sense. I mean,

1:17:21.400 --> 1:17:23.479
<v Speaker 1>you know, take what he's you know what Trump's trying

1:17:23.479 --> 1:17:28.679
<v Speaker 1>to do in the Middle East is in some ways

1:17:28.800 --> 1:17:31.559
<v Speaker 1>very good. What he's trying to do with Iran Syria.

1:17:32.320 --> 1:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>You know, he's trying to sort of put BB a

1:17:35.520 --> 1:17:38.639
<v Speaker 1>little bit back in his place. But how he's going

1:17:38.680 --> 1:17:40.960
<v Speaker 1>about it and his motivation to do it is all

1:17:40.960 --> 1:17:44.679
<v Speaker 1>about the self enrichment business deals, as he's been doing

1:17:44.680 --> 1:17:47.839
<v Speaker 1>with the Gulf State guys. So there's such a corrupt

1:17:48.040 --> 1:17:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you know here he's doing something that trades actually and

1:17:50.920 --> 1:17:54.519
<v Speaker 1>is pragmatic, but he only got it got there in

1:17:54.600 --> 1:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a corrupt be a corrupt means. And the question is,

1:17:59.200 --> 1:18:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you know that never holds. And so I guess I

1:18:03.360 --> 1:18:05.479
<v Speaker 1>would say to you long windy answer there for you,

1:18:05.560 --> 1:18:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Bill is from Oregon, is simply, Look, character counts. Just

1:18:12.880 --> 1:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't always count when you want it to count, but

1:18:15.680 --> 1:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>eventually character will count. Look, I would argue that in

1:18:20.439 --> 1:18:25.679
<v Speaker 1>some ways Bill Clinton's character flaws eventually costs the hurt

1:18:25.720 --> 1:18:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party in two thousand and cost Hillary Clinton

1:18:28.880 --> 1:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the presidency in twenty sixteen. So the point is is

1:18:32.000 --> 1:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>that you know a lot of people thought, oh, Bill

1:18:33.720 --> 1:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Clinton got away with something. Eventually he didn't. I know

1:18:37.880 --> 1:18:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think Donald Trump's getting away with something.

1:18:41.479 --> 1:18:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Eventually he won't all right with that. I was going

1:18:44.680 --> 1:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to do a second question. I'll save it. Got a

1:18:47.320 --> 1:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>great week of shows coming up for you, I promise.

1:18:49.200 --> 1:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope you've enjoyed this episode. Can't wait to talk

1:18:52.080 --> 1:18:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to you again until I upload again.