WEBVTT - Everybody Burns Out Eventually. Here’s How You Can Fight It

0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Ug another cold open. I am so over this, I

0:00:06.680 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>am so burnt out. This week on game Plan, we're

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about burnout, how it happens and how we can

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>get over it. Hi, I'm Rebecca Greenfield and I'm Francesco Weavie,

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And this week on game Plan, we are talking about

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>burnout and I agree with your sentiment very ug. Well. Yeah,

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.239
<v Speaker 1>so when we talk about burnout, everyone everyone uses the

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>expression now and then I'm so burnt out right, Yeah,

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like I say it to my friends, I'm so burned

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>out of this thing. But it's actually a specific thing

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>with a history and a meaning. There was this great

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>episode of Planet Money that went into the history of

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>burnout that talked about this man, Herbert Freudenberger, who coined

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the term. Okay, so what is it if it's not

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>this general term that we all use. According to him,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it's a response to stress and frustration and a demand

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:10.800
<v Speaker 1>on yourself that you feel like you can't ever meet,

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>like a perfectionism and a drive, and you feel like

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.080
<v Speaker 1>you're you can't get there, so you feel burnt out.

0:01:15.600 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>And there are you were saying, there are certain professions

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that are more prone to burn out. I think doctors

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>are really prone to burnout. There was a business Seek

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>article from a few years ago about doctor burnout and

0:01:27.720 --> 0:01:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the dangers of it, because obviously you don't want like

0:01:29.920 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>a surgeon, you don't want out. You don't want to

0:01:31.760 --> 0:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>burntout doctor. No. No, there's a fifty percent chance then

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a doctor is burnt out, which is ten percent higher

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>than the general working population. That's terrifying. And you can

0:01:40.959 --> 0:01:43.440
<v Speaker 1>see why, Like they're in a high stress field and

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>they want, you know, they always want to do the

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>best for their patients ideally, right. It's associated with not

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 1>only people who work hard, but people who are in

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>fields where they work a lot with people, right, and

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>have kind of a lot of emotional investment in their job. Yeah.

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Another example in that Planet Many episode was customer service workers.

0:02:01.880 --> 0:02:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess I know there's a very high turnover rate

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:06.920
<v Speaker 1>at call centers because it's a really high stress job

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and you're failing you right, Your whole job is just

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to hear people's file and anger at you. And if

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you think about it's kind of these jobs where you

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 1>can't ever do it perfectly. There's always going to be

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>somebody who's mad at the customer service person. There's always

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be a problem and with a patient. It's

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>not just like you know, you're filling out some spreadsheet

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and you do it and you're done and yeah, you finished.

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Although that's a nice segue into the more general use

0:02:34.160 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>of the term, because you can feel burned out in

0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in any kind of job, right Like, you don't have

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to be a humanitarian on the front lines or service

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>employee who's dealing with people all day. You can you

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 1>can get burnt out of that spreadsheet job. Is there

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>something you'd like to share with that ever in a

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>moment you felt burnt out? I have. I definitely feel

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.079
<v Speaker 1>like I usually just like hit a point in time

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>after being at any job for about like two years

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>where I hit some kind of wall and I start

0:03:03.120 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to feel a little burnt out, even if the job

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.919
<v Speaker 1>hasn't changed that much. I think, especially if the job

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.360
<v Speaker 1>hasn't changed that much, and then you know, you either

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>push through it or you kind of re evaluate whether

0:03:13.800 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the job for you. But it does seem to

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>be like a creeping thing that happens to me over time.

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, do you do you ever feel burnt out?

0:03:22.120 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>So I think people who work in online media, like

0:03:25.000 --> 0:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>we do do get burnt out pretty easily because the

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Internet is so all consuming and stressful and you feel

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:32.760
<v Speaker 1>like there's always a news story that you have to

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:36.880
<v Speaker 1>be responding to and the internet doesn't sleep. Yeah, it's

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>very demanding, and you're you're like only as good as

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>your last I mean as a reporter or an editor,

0:03:42.080 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you're kind of only as good as your last story,

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the last thing that you produced, and so it's not

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>like you can ever really rest on your your laurels. Yeah.

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I felt the most burnt out in my first writing job,

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>which was one of those like NonStop blogging jobs. Um,

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that was just like you wrote sex posts today and

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>went home and did it all over again, and that

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>seemed unsustainable. Yeah, it's really hard, And I think that

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the thing about burnout is that it's to me, it's

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:11.240
<v Speaker 1>like a feeling. You know, it can lead to other

0:04:11.360 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>things that can lead to you not being as good

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>at your job, or you're not trying as hard, or

0:04:15.720 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, because that lack, you know, you can feel

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 1>less committed to it and then less inclined to try

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>really hard at it. But it starts as just like

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of like a nagging feeling in the in the

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>back of your mind where you used to be more

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.799
<v Speaker 1>excited to get up in the morning and go to work,

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and then it slowly builds up, Like the longer you

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>go without dealing with it, the more it's likely to

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>actually affect your work. And that's the problem, right, Like

0:04:39.560 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the problem with the doctor burnout, for example, is you know,

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>then they make more mistakes and nobody wants to be

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in that position. But yeah, and then I want to

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>turn out doctor or airline pilot. No, but and then

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>like the stakes are lower for someone like us, but yeah,

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>then I start writing less. My stories are not as

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>good ideas or anybody in any office. You know. There's

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the this term that hr people love engagement, which I

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>hate that term, but yeah, it's it's a buzzy word

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for just like how emotionally invested in your job you are,

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and the more people are engaged, the better companies tend

0:05:12.480 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>to do. So I imagine if you're burnt out, your

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 1>engagement is pretty low. Right, Engagement is important, and so

0:05:18.640 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>is not doing more than you can handle doing. And

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>sometimes it's really hard at jobs because so many demands

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:27.240
<v Speaker 1>are put on you. But then there's like a type

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of person that puts a lot of demands on themselves

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and ends up burnt out. And it's actually what our

0:05:34.080 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 1>guest today has written extensively about and done tons of

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 1>research on. Yeah. So, Adam Grant as our guest today,

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>and he is a wark and professor and the author

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>of a super popular book from a few years ago,

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Give and Take and and It. He talks about the

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 1>two general types of people at work, the givers and

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>the takers. The givers tend to be better workers and

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.760
<v Speaker 1>better for companies. And you can imagine they're the type

0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.719
<v Speaker 1>of people who give in an office, Like you said,

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>they might be prone to burn out because they overextend themselves.

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 1>And that is what Adam has done follow up research

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>on that we are going to talk about with him today.

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us, Adam, Thank you for having me. Yeah. So,

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you've found that givers tend to be better workers than takers.

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>But after you published your book, you've got a lot

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of feedback from givers who suggested it wasn't that simple.

0:06:28.640 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>Can you tell us some of the things that you

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 1>learned from the people who reached out to you. Yeah,

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's funny because I guess at some

0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.160
<v Speaker 1>level it's an indication that people don't always read a

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>book from start to finish. Oh yeah, we're familiar with

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 1>that phenomenon. Never happened to anyone here, right, of course,

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.640
<v Speaker 1>we read your book from start to finish, but others

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 1>other people do that. Um. You know, it was funny

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>because I originally read the book, you know, with this

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>paradox as the as the hook, and I said, look,

0:06:57.040 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you compare givers and takers, and you know,

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>most people falling somewhere in the middle, as as matchers saying,

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, I try to trade favors evenly, and I'll

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>do something for you if you do something for me. Um.

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>What I'd found across studying engineers and salespeople and medical

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>students was that the givers were actually the worst performers

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and the best performers, and they tended to be overrepresented

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>on both extremes. And I started the book with that paradox,

0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and then, you know, originally had written the second chapter

0:07:27.000 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>about why so many givers burn out? And the consistent

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>feedback then was that it's that people read to be

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>inspired and uplifted, and they really don't want to open

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a book talking about burnout. So I moved it to

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>chapter six, and then a bunch of people didn't read

0:07:42.560 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>chapter six, which was all about the differences between you know,

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:47.559
<v Speaker 1>why some givers burn out and others are on fire.

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:50.679
<v Speaker 1>So when that feedback came in, I was like, please

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>skip ahead a few chapters, so can you tell us

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>why givers burnout? I think there are three systematic mistakes

0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that the givers make, and this is where my thinking

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>scotten refined quite a bit since writing the book. So

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 1>if I had been clear about it, then I would

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have said, basically, the differences are about who you help,

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>how you help, and when you help. So what we

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>see with with failed givers is that they want to

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>be generous and they end up helping all the people

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>all the time, with all the requests, which is a

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.480
<v Speaker 1>great way to exhaust yourself completely right. You never have

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>time to get any of your own work done. You're overextended.

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.520
<v Speaker 1>As you start helping, you get a reputation for being

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a nice person, and then pretty soon no goodtied goes unpunished.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>And so what we see with successful givers is that

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>they make thoughtful choices about who they want to help.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 1>So they say, look, you know, I'm not gonna help

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody equally. There are takers out there, and they're willing

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>to take as much as I'm willing to give, regardless

0:08:51.520 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of whether that's fair. So if somebody has a history

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>or reputation of selfish behavior, I'm going to be more

0:08:57.040 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 1>cautious with them and reserve. You know, my biggest act

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:03.439
<v Speaker 1>of generosity for people who are generous are fair themselves.

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:06.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's kind of the first distinction that's critical, right,

0:09:06.679 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>don't help everyone equally. I was curious if it matters,

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>because it sounds like, you know, one of the key

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>things is deciding whom you want to give to. Um.

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Does it matter why you give? Like, does it matter

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're doing it for totally altruistic reasons, if you

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>just love the idea of helping other people, or if

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you're if you're doing it like, will you be more

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>burnt out if you're giving for one reason versus another? Yeah?

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>So this actually is a nice segue to the second factor.

0:09:35.720 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So the people who give out of a sense of

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>obligation or out of a sense of altruism are much

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>more likely to burn out than the ones who who

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>give because they enjoy it and because they care about

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the people that they're trying to help. And so, you know,

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I think that that altruism turns out to be a

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:56.439
<v Speaker 1>huge mistake because people just end up sacrificing themselves for

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.440
<v Speaker 1>others and they say, yeah, you know, I realized that

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this might hurt me, but it just it helps other

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:05.720
<v Speaker 1>people so much. And the sad reality is that the

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 1>more altruistically you give, the less you're able to give,

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 1>because you end up exhausting yourself. And the people who

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 1>gave the most consistently were the ones who said, look,

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna zoom in on the two or three ways

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of helping that I enjoy an excel ad so that

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>giving becomes more energizing than exhausting, but also so that

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm making a unique contribution and I'm helping in a

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:30.280
<v Speaker 1>way that's it's meaningful and effective relative to my knowledge

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and skills. And when they did that, they were able

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to sustain their energy, they had more to give, they

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:39.240
<v Speaker 1>gave in ways that had a bigger impact, and they

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>also had a different reputation because instead of being known

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:44.240
<v Speaker 1>as a jack of all trades, somebody that you could

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>bother any time, they got known as somebody who had

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>really specific expertise, and you only wanted to go to

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>them when you were seeking something that they could offer

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that was really valuable. In a regular work environment, it

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like you can get pigeonholed. And it's not even

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>necessarily about selfness. Listen, like, if people realize that you're

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>good at something, they're going to ask you to do

0:11:06.360 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>more of that thing that you're good at, and that

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>might not be your favorite thing to do. So how

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.280
<v Speaker 1>can people in their jobs make their jobs more about

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>doing what they want to do and there thereby steer

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>themselves away from burnout? But I think the key is

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to figure out the overlap between what you enjoyed giving

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and what other people need. And it's not always the

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>first set of request that you get right. So you know,

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>especially if you look at the data, women are particularly

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:37.320
<v Speaker 1>likely to get stuck with the office, housework, the taking notes,

0:11:37.440 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the planning meetings. And the sad reality of that is

0:11:42.360 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that I don't know very many people who enjoy doing

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>that work. But when you're new and you come in

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know maybe you're the lowest status or most

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.319
<v Speaker 1>junior person in the group, you know that that has

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.160
<v Speaker 1>tense to fall to you and then people find that

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>you're organized and meticulous, and then you just get stuck

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with it. Right. There's also like a sense of obligation

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to sometimes when you see something isn't being organized, well,

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>you just want to go in and fix it. And

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>then everyone's like, oh, that person is the organizer. But

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:08.079
<v Speaker 1>it could just be that kind of that kind of

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.559
<v Speaker 1>obligatory selflessness you were talking about that you you kind

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:14.160
<v Speaker 1>of want to avoid. Yeah, I think that there there

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>are a few ways to try to get around that.

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>One is it's always easier to say no when you

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have another offer to make, right, So if you if

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you follow Adam's lead. You know, I see this really

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 1>frequently in my own daily inbox, which is, you know,

0:12:27.880 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>people will reach out all the time for career advice

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and I'll write back and say, look, I don't I

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:34.719
<v Speaker 1>don't even feel comfortable giving advice to people that I know.

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think that if you're interested in help,

0:12:39.080 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>here are the three ways that I feel like I

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>have something to offer. And if you have that list,

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.079
<v Speaker 1>handy people respond pretty favorably, you know, because because you're

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.679
<v Speaker 1>not being rude, you're not being unwilling to help, You're

0:12:49.720 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>just trying to redirect what you have to add. I

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>think a second thing you can do is you can

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>go to the people that you've helped in the past

0:12:57.360 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and ask them to pay it forward. So you know,

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>all too often we end up, you know, if you,

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>let's say you get known as the organizer, you end up,

0:13:05.760 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, doing that for a bunch of people, and

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>then you get more and more of those requests piling up. Well,

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 1>the first thing you should do is you should go

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to the people that you've helped organize things in the past,

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and you should ask them then if you know, if

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>they're willing to step up and pay it back, if not,

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>pay it forward. Um. I think maybe a third thing

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>that that I would like to see more people do

0:13:27.640 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>is when requests come in, you should start looking at

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at trying to batch them together. So you might have

0:13:33.040 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight people ask for your insight on the

0:13:35.800 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>same topic, and instead of having one on one conversations

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>with each of them, you should invite them all to

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>lunch and answer all their questions. And not only are

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>you then having the conversation once as opposed to many times,

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>you're also connecting them together and trying to build a

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>community of people who are interested in, you know, in

0:13:51.440 --> 0:13:54.719
<v Speaker 1>tackling the same problem which can help them even more.

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>One thing that interested me from your work is that

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>you talk about how sometimes that type of giving that

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>we like to do and that we do a lot of,

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>can actually lead to bad outcomes. And you did a

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.160
<v Speaker 1>study on that with teachers. Can you get into that

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.480
<v Speaker 1>so short version of the story is Red Reveilly and

0:14:13.480 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I did this study with that with a group of

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 1>teachers across the United States where we served them on

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>how selfless they were. And the general assumption and teaching

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is the more selfless, the better, right, That's that's what

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>this job is all about. You're supposed to put your

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>students first. It's all about service, and you're there to

0:14:32.320 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>make a difference. And yet we found that of course,

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, most teachers are givers, they're passionate about helping

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and they care a lot about the success their students.

0:14:43.000 --> 0:14:45.960
<v Speaker 1>But the more selfless they were, the worst their students

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>did unstandardized achievement test and that was particularly true for

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:54.200
<v Speaker 1>teachers whose students had struggled the previous year. So what

0:14:54.280 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>happens is, you know, when when teachers are really motivated

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to help students um And it's especially when there's students

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>have been you know, underperforming, they end up doubling down

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and saying, I will do whatever it takes to make

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>students successful and to help them solve their problems. And

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that means that they do all of this one on

0:15:11.480 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 1>one helping and firefighting. Sometimes they end up helping students

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>who aren't even in their classes. Sometimes you know, they're

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>burning the midnight oil handling requests from you know, administration,

0:15:22.440 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>and that takes away from time that they could invest

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>in energy they could put into improving their lesson plans

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>and helping their students as a group. And yeah, the

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.320
<v Speaker 1>sad reality of that is when we track what happens

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to the teachers, then they're less engaged in their everyday

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>classroom work when coaches come in to observe them and

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 1>evaluate them and give them feedback. And so, you know,

0:15:44.320 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that that this is how so many people

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>justify it being generous, right is well, you know, but

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the benefits to you know, to my students outweigh the

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>cost to me or the contributions that I make to

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the school, you know, are are worth all the sacrifices

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm making and our data show that's not true. Actually,

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>that that if you can set some boundaries right and

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of take the airplane analogy as far as it

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>can be stretched and say, look, if you can take

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 1>the advice we're always given on an airplane seriously and

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>secure your oxygen masks before helping others, you feel like

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>you're contributing less, but you're actually doing more good that way.

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>The teachers who were able to put their own lessons

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 1>plans first, who focused primarily on making sure that their

0:16:28.080 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>students as a group were able to learn everything they

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>needed to know, we're less likely to burn out, more

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>likely to stay engaged, and had a greater impact that way.

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a lesson we can probably all

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>apply to our work lives. Yeah. Sometimes I think we

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like doing the things that make us burn out. I

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>know I do, like I'm think, and then I convince

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>myself that it's good for my job. But I think

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>your research is really interesting to show us that it's

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>it's not the best way to get your work done always. Yeah,

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think for most people that just

0:16:57.560 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>means taking a step back and saying, you know, what

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>impact to my trying to have and then making sure

0:17:03.080 --> 0:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not just doing the things that I enjoy,

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:08.960
<v Speaker 1>uh that you know that divert from that. That's that's

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>another trap that we see failed givers running into, is

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>they forget to think about organizational goals and about who

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.959
<v Speaker 1>they're really trying to help um. And you know, if

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 1>if you make sure that what you enjoy is better

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>aligned with what you're actually trying to accomplish, it becomes

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>much more sustainable that way. One thing I'm curious about,

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:30.879
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if your research has really gotten

0:17:30.880 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>at this that much, but can you It seems to

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:38.240
<v Speaker 1>me that burnout is something that most people experience at

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>some point or another in their career to some extent.

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if you can still get burnt out

0:17:43.280 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>even if you do make all the right choices about

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>how to allocate your time and whom to help and

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>not to help, Like, is there an element of burnout

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>that just has to do with time? Like you do

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>something long enough and you start to feel burnt out? Yeah?

0:17:57.119 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I think so, I think it depends. Let me let

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>me think about actually what the what the data would

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>say about this? So in general, people don't burn out

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>because they're giving too much. Time wise, they tend to

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:12.800
<v Speaker 1>burn out when they feel like they're giving a lot,

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>but they don't think it's having an impact. So I

0:18:16.400 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 1>saw this, for example, with with fundraising callers, people who

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>are trying to raise money for their university. So this

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>is you know, not the easiest or most enjoyable job

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>for for a typical fundraiser, but it is really meaningful.

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And the consistent finding was that fundraisers didn't know where

0:18:35.520 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the money they were raising actually went, and they had

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>no sense of what good they were doing, and so

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.159
<v Speaker 1>they were dropping like flies. And I found in a

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>series of experiments that if we just connected them to

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>one scholarship student who benefited from their work and got

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to see, you know, here's where this money is really

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.159
<v Speaker 1>making a difference, there was a dramatic spike in their motivation.

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>So we saw a hundred forty increase in weekly minutes

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>on the phone and a hundred increase in weekly money

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>raised caller by caller, And you know, in some ways

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you could say they were already making all the right choices.

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:11.919
<v Speaker 1>They were making the calls they were supposed to do,

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>they were applying the strategies that were most effective for

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>collect connecting with alumni, but they just didn't feel like

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:20.159
<v Speaker 1>they were able to connect the dots and answer the

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>question of you know, why is this important and how

0:19:23.200 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>is this work really going to influence other people's lives?

0:19:26.400 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>And once they saw that, you know, it's not like

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>they they actually approached their calls differently. It was just

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>that they were able to think about the purpose of

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>their work differently. That instead of harassing alumni, now they're

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.800
<v Speaker 1>getting on the phone and thinking about this is making

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>scholarships possible for students who are in need. And yeah,

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's that's a shift that that applies to

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>so many different jobs, right, Yeah, that's that seems like

0:19:50.320 --> 0:19:54.200
<v Speaker 1>you could make that work for you in almost anything,

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Like even if you don't have the data to prove

0:19:57.560 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that what you're doing as a direct effect, you can

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:03.120
<v Speaker 1>just sort reframe your thinking even a little bit too

0:20:03.480 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>make your day to day job connect to some larger cause.

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:07.919
<v Speaker 1>If you just remind yourself of that, it might help

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>with burnout. Yeah. That was actually a follow up experiment

0:20:10.760 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>that Jane Dutton and I did. We had people just

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>keep a journal for four days, fifteen minutes a day

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>about the contributions they made that day, So who did

0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you help? How did your work have an impact? And

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>after that, we saw a major increase in the amount

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of effort that people brought to their jobs and they

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>ended up significantly increasing in the sense that their work

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>was valued by others. And you know that's not just

0:20:35.680 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>clients or customers, right, It could be the co workers

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that benefit from the work that you do. It could

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>be your boss's boss that you don't see every day. Um.

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes those small reminders of of why you're doing what

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 1>you're doing and who it ultimately helps can be a

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:52.200
<v Speaker 1>huge factor in helping to prevent or overcome burn up.

0:20:52.720 --> 0:20:55.919
<v Speaker 1>So I follow you and your work, and I know

0:20:55.960 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that you do a lot. I'm wondering if you learned

0:20:58.800 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>anything about yourself this research and how you avoid burnout? Me? Yeah,

0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>or maybe you're burnt out and you want to talk

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it out on the show. Well, I think I think

0:21:10.800 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>burnout is definitely something that will acts in weighns in

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>my life, and it's it's largely a function of whether

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I've been careful about following my own advice, which I

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>don't always do. So you know, I think I think

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.639
<v Speaker 1>for me what matters most is this this third choice

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that we didn't talk about yet. So we we talked about,

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, being careful about who you help and how

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you help. I feel like I've gotten pretty clear about

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 1>my priorities there. So you know, I put family first,

0:21:40.800 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>student second, colleagues third, and everyone else fourth. And you

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>know that's led to some hard choices, right If if

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you ask some of my colleagues, they'd probably say I

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>was less of a giver than my students would. And

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I had to realize that I don't have

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>enough hours in the day to help everybody who asks,

0:21:58.040 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and so, you know, when I have to make the choice.

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>I didnt become a professor to help other professors. I

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>became a professor because I wanted to have an impact

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>on students. Um So that part is clear, you know,

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how I help, I've you know, I

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.120
<v Speaker 1>basically identified two things that I love to do. One

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is that I really enjoy sharing knowledge about work in psychology,

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 1>and I spend way too many hours reading esoteric journal

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>articles about you know, studies. And I feel like if

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 1>somebody has a question like has anybody ever done research

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on if that has to do with work or human behavior,

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a good chance to run across it at some point,

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>and it makes me feel like I'm not wasting my

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>time reading, you know, reading these arcane pieces of data.

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Um and then the others. I also really enjoy making introductions.

0:22:43.320 --> 0:22:44.960
<v Speaker 1>If there are two people that can help each other,

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I get to you know, I end

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>up connecting with a lot of industries, and very frequently

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I can find somebody in you know, in a field

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 1>or in an organization that somebody else is excited to

0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>learn from and vice versa. The place where I feel

0:22:58.640 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>like I often struggle is the question of of when

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I help. So you know, I've learned over and again

0:23:05.960 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in my own research, and there are lots of other

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 1>scholars who have documented this as well, that successful givers

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>set aside blocks of time where they're going to get

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.080
<v Speaker 1>their own work done and they don't allow interruptions, right,

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>no no calls, no meetings, no answering email during periods

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>where they're trying to be productive, and then they have

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>separate when windows set aside to try to be helpful.

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>And the way that that I've tried to manage that is,

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I basically only go into campus when I'm

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>teaching or I have an event, and the other days

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I work from home and that helps a lot, but

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:41.719
<v Speaker 1>even then there's still lots of requests for you know,

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for phone calls, for interviews, for podcast interviews, yeah occasionally,

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.439
<v Speaker 1>and then there's also you know, the challenge that when

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I am on campus, there are more requests than I

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>have time for in the day. So what I often

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 1>end up doing is just expanding office hours on those days,

0:23:57.000 --> 0:23:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and that means, you know, after our kids go to school,

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.440
<v Speaker 1>I leave the house, so you know, I might head

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in to campus around eight am, and I'll stay there

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>into the afternoon, and I don't even have a minute free,

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>um forgetting any lunch. I have a minute free to

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like to check my email or find out if there's

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 1>anything I need to catch up on. And so I

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>get home at night after our kids are asleep, and

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I have three or four hours of emails to answer

0:24:18.160 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>and then you know, I basically playing catch up the

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:22.320
<v Speaker 1>whole next day as opposed to doing the work that

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I was supposed to do. And so I think what

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:26.160
<v Speaker 1>I need to do moving forward is is be more

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:29.359
<v Speaker 1>proactive about saying, look, I need to schedule you know,

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 1>stop times as well as start times for meetings. I

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>need to make sure that you know, I have time

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 1>set aside even during those you know, busy days Paul

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Graham would call them manager days as opposed to make

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.320
<v Speaker 1>your days, you know where you're back to back in meetings.

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I need time to check email, um, and to you know,

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>sort of firefight day by day. And then I probably

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>also need to have like some calibration on how many

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>hours in those days I can handle for meetings, which

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not good at forecasting at all. That all sounds

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>very stressful and I am shocked that you're not more

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>burnt out, um, And really thank you for taking the

0:25:05.960 --> 0:25:08.679
<v Speaker 1>time to make time for this. Yeah, this was really helpful.

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.639
<v Speaker 1>One thing that really struck me about that interview was

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Adam talking about how useful it can be to write

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.720
<v Speaker 1>down who you helped that day. I feel like that

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:25.880
<v Speaker 1>resonated with me because that's something that you can do

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.679
<v Speaker 1>even if nothing about your actual job is going to change.

0:25:28.800 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Like for me, I can feel burnout creeping in, you

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:35.600
<v Speaker 1>know about jobs that I was once really excited about,

0:25:35.640 --> 0:25:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and it's just like the passage of time and doing

0:25:37.440 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>them every day, you know, you get more and more

0:25:39.920 --> 0:25:43.120
<v Speaker 1>removed from the rewards of the job. And if you

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>just make a little point of doing this exercise where

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, oh, I I helped like three people the

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>following way, I feel like that could really benefit almost

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>anybody who's feeling burnout. It's funny because when I heard

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>him talking about that, in my head, I was like, oh, so, basically,

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you're just telling me not to become synuncle about my job,

0:26:02.280 --> 0:26:05.600
<v Speaker 1>which that sounds great, but it's really hard. Yeah, that's

0:26:05.600 --> 0:26:10.479
<v Speaker 1>totally impossible. Yea. And not everyone's job has purpose. But

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 1>that's the thing. It's like, you can you can probably

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>find it, and most people aren't taking the time to

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>look for it that hard, and it might not be

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>in the obvious ways that you're thinking of, Like, yes,

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna keep having the frustrations that you have about

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>your job, and your job is not always going to

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>feel that important, and not every job is as important

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 1>as every other job. But I could sit down and

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>write down like today I helped another editor come up

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>with a headline for a story, and I don't know,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>probably two of those things, but then they wouldn't have

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.680
<v Speaker 1>been things that I normally think about at the end

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of the day. And like pat myself on the back. Four.

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>So maybe just like building up those little bits of

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>self feedback over the time would be enough to to

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of reset my thinking about it. I don't know,

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>I haven't tried it, all right, I'll try not to

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 1>be so negative about this Strategyca, be more like Adam,

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Be more like Adam. All right, and now it's time

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for hat big takes, happy fake takes. All right, Francesca,

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>what is your not fully formed idea for this week? Okay,

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>my half big take is a modest proposal. Perhaps you've

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 1>heard of summer Fridays. I have, yeah, the leeway some

0:27:15.400 --> 0:27:18.360
<v Speaker 1>people get during the summer months to take the occasional

0:27:18.359 --> 0:27:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Friday afternoon off. Well, I have a possibly even better

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:27.400
<v Speaker 1>idea than summer Fridays. It's called winter Mondays go on

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>for many many professionals were now entering a stretch of

0:27:30.520 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the winter that is not only like the bleakest time

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>of the year weatherwise, but it is this long period

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.479
<v Speaker 1>where President's Day has just passed and we don't get

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 1>any real like federal holidays off until um Memorial Day.

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>Possibly some people get good Friday out, but anyway, it's

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it's a bad time, there's like a lot of cold,

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of hours to work, and no holidays. If

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you have vacation days, use them for at least two

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Mondays during the stretch, and you will reward yourself with

0:28:02.200 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>a couple of long weekends you can look forward to

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>during this very sad time of year. And they should

0:28:07.520 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>be Mondays and not Fridays, because that's a double reward.

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>You get back to work and you only have to

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>work four days winter Mondays. Think about it. I think

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you could really take off what Pecca is your decent idea.

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not that great. I love your half big take,

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:25.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way, thank you, because I love vacation. My

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>half big take is um an amendment on an old

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>half big take that I did already. Okay, so I

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>don't remember if you were around for this, but I

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>had a half big take about how you have to

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have a strategy when choosing a stall in the bathroom

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>remind remind us. So basically I was like, if you

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:45.720
<v Speaker 1>have a stall, like I have a strategy where like

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll go to the end one on certain occasions, in

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the middle one on other occasions, and try to space

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it out. My amendment is that it is rude. If

0:28:55.600 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>you are going into the bathroom and there are many

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>stalls available to sit next to me, right next to

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.240
<v Speaker 1>me in the stall that I picked, pick ustall, that's

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:08.200
<v Speaker 1>at least one away. Yeah, that's a it's an invasion. Yeah,

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.480
<v Speaker 1>don't do that. So that's my like the buffer stall up. Yeah,

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the buffer st all you need to have, you mean

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a buffer stall. So that's my I guess, like refining

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of a hat pick take. Yeah, you're becoming quarter. It's dangerous,

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 1>like getting close to a take. Yeah, okay, I'll stop.

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:24.080
<v Speaker 1>You'll stop right there. No more on that, otherwise you're

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to actually write a story about it. Oh man, Okay,

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>And that was half big Takes, half Baked Takes. Thank

0:29:33.800 --> 0:29:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you for listening to another episode of game Plan. You

0:29:36.000 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>can find me on Twitter. I'm at RZ Greenfield and

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm at Francesca today. You can tweet your half Bake

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Takes two at game Plan or you can call our

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>brand spanking new half Bake hotline at two and two

0:29:49.120 --> 0:29:52.640
<v Speaker 1>six seven zero one six. And if you like the show,

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>please head on over to iTunes or wherever you listen

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to podcasts to rate and review and subscribe. We read

0:29:58.280 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>every single one of them. There was a new one recently.

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>We loved it. It was great. We loved it. This

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>podcast was produced by Liz Smith and Magnus Hendrickson. Head

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of Podcasts is Alec McCabe. And we'll see you next week.

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Bye two one to six one seven oh one six six.

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I stold that it's a half baked hot line. Yeah,

0:30:35.440 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>I love it.