WEBVTT - Sparkly & Tight

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:19.849
<v Speaker 1>George Washington Broadcast Center. Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. Armstrong

0:00:19.930 --> 0:00:36.019
<v Speaker 1>and Getty. And now, here's Armstrong and Getty. We have

0:00:36.060 --> 0:00:38.769
<v Speaker 1>the same two rules for the Armstrong and Getty show

0:00:38.850 --> 0:00:42.830
<v Speaker 1>that Dolly Parton had for clothing, she said. Sparkly and tight.

0:00:43.229 --> 0:00:46.250
<v Speaker 1>That's what we are. Sparkly and tight. Welcome to another

0:00:46.690 --> 0:00:49.470
<v Speaker 1>live presentation of the Armstrong and Getty program, deeper than

0:00:49.490 --> 0:00:53.410
<v Speaker 1>the bowels of the Armstrong and Getty communications compound. And

0:00:53.430 --> 0:00:55.810
<v Speaker 1>today we're toiling under the title of the show. I

0:00:55.850 --> 0:01:03.880
<v Speaker 1>struggled with how to express this most succinctly and persuasively.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:09.540
<v Speaker 1>Title number one. Mom, the flag, apple pie, and Dolly.

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>On a less life-affirming note, I hate politics. Oh, I

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:19.780
<v Speaker 1>hate politics so much. I'm sure we'll get to that

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.780
<v Speaker 1>soon enough and for the next however many years. As

0:01:23.819 --> 0:01:27.420
<v Speaker 1>long as we live in this godforsaken system. So what's

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:30.940
<v Speaker 1>your explanation? I can't wait. I'm going to go through

0:01:32.120 --> 0:01:37.650
<v Speaker 1>all of the different people and entities. That came out

0:01:37.730 --> 0:01:41.919
<v Speaker 1>with their, you know, tip of the hat to Dolly Parton.

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:44.990
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they vary more than any crowd I've ever

0:01:45.030 --> 0:01:49.490
<v Speaker 1>seen in my life. Agreed. It's unbelievable. Like, from the

0:01:49.650 --> 0:01:54.420
<v Speaker 1>Parliament of Ireland to Eminem to, I mean, it's just incredible.

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:56.820
<v Speaker 1>What's your explanation for that? And I feel like I

0:01:56.860 --> 0:01:59.500
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard that discussed much. People keep talking about how

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.180
<v Speaker 1>many hits she had. Okay, fine. And she was a

0:02:03.180 --> 0:02:05.340
<v Speaker 1>good musician, no doubt about it. But there's lots of

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.070
<v Speaker 1>good musicians that pass along, and they don't get a

0:02:09.210 --> 0:02:15.750
<v Speaker 1>hundredth of this sort of attention. So what was her thing? Yeah, accepting, stipulating,

0:02:15.790 --> 0:02:18.209
<v Speaker 1>as they say in the courtroom, that she was a

0:02:18.350 --> 0:02:23.769
<v Speaker 1>very well-known and successful entertainer. I think it was that

0:02:23.870 --> 0:02:28.590
<v Speaker 1>she radiated goodness and kindness. I think so, too. And

0:02:28.669 --> 0:02:33.489
<v Speaker 1>people respond to that, even as they go about their

0:02:33.590 --> 0:02:37.870
<v Speaker 1>cynical lives in their snarky 21st century ways. There is

0:02:37.910 --> 0:02:40.970
<v Speaker 1>something called riz, charisma, and maybe she just had it

0:02:41.150 --> 0:02:44.399
<v Speaker 1>on a level that one and a two billion have

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.239
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to just like lots of charisma she was

0:02:47.340 --> 0:02:52.330
<v Speaker 1>utterly disarming yeah it's hard to imagine the kind of

0:02:52.370 --> 0:02:59.190
<v Speaker 1>human being that wouldn't like her right she was just

0:02:59.270 --> 0:03:05.350
<v Speaker 1>so about kindness and generosity and and and an enormous

0:03:05.950 --> 0:03:10.269
<v Speaker 1>star while being completely unassuming i mean if that doesn't

0:03:10.310 --> 0:03:12.369
<v Speaker 1>appeal to humans you have a different point of view

0:03:12.389 --> 0:03:16.570
<v Speaker 1>than me And we cannot be friends. I mean, she

0:03:16.610 --> 0:03:20.050
<v Speaker 1>gave away hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of millions of

0:03:20.090 --> 0:03:23.050
<v Speaker 1>dollars to charity over the many, many years. She'd be

0:03:23.070 --> 0:03:25.590
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire if she hadn't given away so much money

0:03:25.630 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>to charity. So that'll buy a lot of goodwill. And

0:03:29.419 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean that in a cynical way. That just

0:03:33.100 --> 0:03:36.780
<v Speaker 1>makes people happy. Sure, fair enough. A great deal of

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 1>it devoted to childhood literacy, which is... It's difficult to

0:03:41.500 --> 0:03:44.180
<v Speaker 1>surpass as a wonderful idea, given that if a child

0:03:44.380 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 1>learns to read, A, and B, becomes capable at it,

0:03:47.690 --> 0:03:50.910
<v Speaker 1>that changes their life. Unfortunately, as a nation, we've decided

0:03:50.950 --> 0:03:54.390
<v Speaker 1>to give up on that. But, yeah, well, she's old.

0:03:54.570 --> 0:03:58.690
<v Speaker 1>So she grew up in a time and place where

0:03:58.710 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>that was really a big thing. I mean, her dad

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:07.980
<v Speaker 1>couldn't read or write. One of 12 in a one-bedroom shack?

0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Holy crap. No electricity or running water. To global superstardom

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:21.250
<v Speaker 1>and stayed normal. Yeah, that's not easy. And got there

0:04:21.270 --> 0:04:25.070
<v Speaker 1>pretty fast. So when she was graduating high school, she

0:04:25.130 --> 0:04:28.430
<v Speaker 1>says right before they left. And the day she graduated

0:04:28.470 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>high school, she moved to Nashville. But before she graduated

0:04:32.950 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>high school, like right before they did the whole, you know,

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you want to be when you grow up?

0:04:37.260 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>She said, I'm going to be a star, very matter-of-factly,

0:04:39.230 --> 0:04:42.090
<v Speaker 1>and everybody laughed. She's just one of those people that

0:04:42.110 --> 0:04:44.590
<v Speaker 1>just knew, you know, that's what I'm going to do.

0:04:44.610 --> 0:04:47.089
<v Speaker 1>I'm cut out for that sort of thing, you see.

0:04:47.930 --> 0:04:48.110
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:48.610 --> 0:04:51.770
<v Speaker 1>As a hack musician, and I don't want to focus

0:04:51.830 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 1>on this, but her public image with the rhinestones and

0:04:57.620 --> 0:05:02.110
<v Speaker 1>the hooters and all that, And the Hooters. Well, that's

0:05:02.150 --> 0:05:08.170
<v Speaker 1>the first not completely respectful comment of the Dolly Parton Memorial.

0:05:08.990 --> 0:05:12.050
<v Speaker 1>Nor was she. I'm echoing her feelings. I just, I

0:05:12.110 --> 0:05:13.750
<v Speaker 1>always found it. She used the term Hooters, though. It's

0:05:13.790 --> 0:05:16.540
<v Speaker 1>the term. It's not the body part. Half the world

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>has the body part. All right, breasts, for God's sake.

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:25.020
<v Speaker 1>Memory glands. What do you want? I like the term figure. Oh, bosom.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:32.540
<v Speaker 1>Her prodigious bosoms. is. No, I always found it mildly

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:37.740
<v Speaker 1>annoying because I thought she was so wonderful. And, you know,

0:05:37.779 --> 0:05:41.500
<v Speaker 1>as a songwriter, as a musician, as a thinker and

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:45.530
<v Speaker 1>a businesswoman and the rest of it, I was like,

0:05:45.610 --> 0:05:49.910
<v Speaker 1>you could be wearing anything, looking like anything. But, you know,

0:05:50.110 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 1>she had her thing. She had her her, her, uh,

0:05:52.839 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, her groove and she stuck with it. So

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.300
<v Speaker 1>I got to read from one of the New York,

0:05:57.420 --> 0:06:00.060
<v Speaker 1>the New York times articles that I got into because

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:02.690
<v Speaker 1>they kept hyperlinking to various things. And one of them

0:06:02.730 --> 0:06:06.770
<v Speaker 1>was about her look and how they, uh, tried to

0:06:06.830 --> 0:06:10.450
<v Speaker 1>change her look and it became a real problem. Like it, um,

0:06:11.120 --> 0:06:15.089
<v Speaker 1>she had to break with, uh, the management company that

0:06:15.130 --> 0:06:17.830
<v Speaker 1>was launching her. She said, I'm not, I just can't,

0:06:18.100 --> 0:06:20.820
<v Speaker 1>I can't. Cause she, she kind of broke right when

0:06:20.880 --> 0:06:25.990
<v Speaker 1>the woman thing was changing to like tight slacks and

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.370
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of shirt and flat hair and just

0:06:28.410 --> 0:06:30.570
<v Speaker 1>a different look. And she did that for like a day.

0:06:30.630 --> 0:06:32.430
<v Speaker 1>And so I, this is not me. I can't do this.

0:06:32.490 --> 0:06:33.790
<v Speaker 1>And went back to the giant hair and they said, well,

0:06:33.810 --> 0:06:35.510
<v Speaker 1>we can't market you that way. And okay, I guess

0:06:35.529 --> 0:06:37.310
<v Speaker 1>we're not, I guess we have to agree to disagree.

0:06:37.690 --> 0:06:40.310
<v Speaker 1>So she really was looking for a more Helen ready-ish

0:06:40.390 --> 0:06:43.690
<v Speaker 1>approach to exactly. You're old enough to remember that. That's

0:06:43.730 --> 0:06:46.710
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they're trying to do. Google it. As usual,

0:06:46.750 --> 0:06:49.790
<v Speaker 1>the people that run these kinds of show business industries,

0:06:49.830 --> 0:06:53.240
<v Speaker 1>having no imagination whatsoever, we'll just do exactly what everybody

0:06:53.250 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 1>else is doing. I hate them, too, along with politics,

0:06:57.339 --> 0:06:59.609
<v Speaker 1>but go on. And assume nobody with the talent can

0:06:59.670 --> 0:07:02.530
<v Speaker 1>possibly figure this out on their own. They need the

0:07:02.610 --> 0:07:04.270
<v Speaker 1>suits to tell them how to be good at what

0:07:04.290 --> 0:07:08.270
<v Speaker 1>they do. Yes. Even though they've never done it. No.

0:07:08.370 --> 0:07:11.750
<v Speaker 1>They've watched other people do it, so they think they.

0:07:11.590 --> 0:07:14.230
<v Speaker 2>Know, but they don't.

0:07:14.740 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 1>How much money do you suppose she made off of

0:07:17.140 --> 0:07:19.180
<v Speaker 1>I Will Always Love You? Just that one song. If

0:07:19.220 --> 0:07:21.060
<v Speaker 1>that's all she'd ever done was written that song and

0:07:21.080 --> 0:07:22.860
<v Speaker 1>Whitney records it, I wonder how much money she would

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.150
<v Speaker 1>have made. That was back when people were still buying

0:07:25.670 --> 0:07:30.470
<v Speaker 1>physical media, so zillions. She would have been insanely wealthy

0:07:30.490 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>with just that one song. It was number one for

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>11 weeks, 13 weeks, something like that. It was a

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>number one hit for her and then for Whitney Houston,

0:07:37.260 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>so it made a lot of money. Number one hit

0:07:38.700 --> 0:07:42.480
<v Speaker 1>for her twice on the country charts. Right. Yes. And

0:07:42.500 --> 0:07:44.850
<v Speaker 1>it was on the same album as Jolene. That was

0:07:44.880 --> 0:07:46.810
<v Speaker 1>a good album. She said, I must have something going

0:07:46.830 --> 0:07:49.030
<v Speaker 1>that night. Holy crap. She wrote those two songs in

0:07:49.050 --> 0:07:53.210
<v Speaker 1>the same night. That's funny how that works with the artists,

0:07:53.290 --> 0:08:00.210
<v Speaker 1>isn't it? That's incredible. Yeah, I know it is. Yeah,

0:08:00.250 --> 0:08:02.390
<v Speaker 1>but we got some more flashbacks and retrospects and all

0:08:02.420 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff. I used to say this should

0:08:07.860 --> 0:08:10.500
<v Speaker 1>have a PhD-level study, but that's back when I used

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>to have respect for PhD-level studies of any kind. Third

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:17.540
<v Speaker 1>thing I hate. Yes, go on. There should be some

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:23.610
<v Speaker 1>sort of study on her ability to To appeal to everyone.

0:08:23.810 --> 0:08:29.410
<v Speaker 1>That's an incredibly rare thing. Right, right. And I think

0:08:29.430 --> 0:08:31.450
<v Speaker 1>people know this about us, but I want to make clear,

0:08:31.530 --> 0:08:37.630
<v Speaker 1>as a cynic, a celebrity passes. I don't, I generally

0:08:37.710 --> 0:08:41.930
<v Speaker 1>don't have all that much interest in... in showing out

0:08:42.150 --> 0:08:45.130
<v Speaker 1>about that. I just, I don't. I admired their work.

0:08:45.270 --> 0:08:47.850
<v Speaker 1>They lived a good life. I feel for their family.

0:08:48.030 --> 0:08:51.590
<v Speaker 1>It's that. But as we started to discuss at the beginning,

0:08:52.830 --> 0:08:56.600
<v Speaker 1>what it is about Dolly and her life and her

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>manner that was so universally beloved, I think is, I

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:06.460
<v Speaker 1>think it's important. And I think it's worth contemplating for

0:09:06.500 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a minute, particularly in a world where We're surrounded by,

0:09:09.900 --> 0:09:16.150
<v Speaker 1>you know, hateful, divisive politics, bizarro movements. Everybody's angry. Everybody's

0:09:16.210 --> 0:09:20.630
<v Speaker 1>distracted constantly by the Internet. It's one of the few common— well,

0:09:20.350 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>my title was— my proposed title, Mom, the Flag, Apple Pie,

0:09:23.380 --> 0:09:26.900
<v Speaker 1>and Dolly. This is one of the few commonalities we

0:09:26.940 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>have left.

0:09:28.260 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:29.030 --> 0:09:30.990
<v Speaker 1>And it's worth, anytime we run into one of those,

0:09:31.070 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>it's worth everybody saying, I like that, and you like that,

0:09:34.520 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and I do too. Let's think about that. That's exactly

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.079
<v Speaker 1>why I wanted to get into that. That is a

0:09:40.240 --> 0:09:44.780
<v Speaker 1>very unique thing. Katie is nodding her head along. I'm

0:09:44.800 --> 0:09:46.750
<v Speaker 1>glad to hear we have your agreement, Katie. She was

0:09:46.780 --> 0:09:49.130
<v Speaker 1>a woman. I think that helps. If we're having the

0:09:49.190 --> 0:09:52.670
<v Speaker 1>argument about what a woman is, Dolly Parton. Oh, I see, yeah.

0:09:52.710 --> 0:09:54.369
<v Speaker 1>You know what? I love that, Cause you know, a

0:09:54.390 --> 0:09:57.250
<v Speaker 1>guy I'll say, no, that's a man or, or in

0:09:57.429 --> 0:10:00.750
<v Speaker 1>a Yiddish slash German mensch means that's a complete man.

0:10:01.050 --> 0:10:05.100
<v Speaker 1>That is, that is somebody worth admiring. Yeah. Yeah. She,

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>she went with that cartoonish hair and, uh, breast augmentation,

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:15.300
<v Speaker 1>but she started from a base of Very attractive. But

0:10:15.320 --> 0:10:19.620
<v Speaker 1>through all of that, she remained classy. Yeah. How she

0:10:19.679 --> 0:10:25.310
<v Speaker 1>did that without ever being smutty, slutty, trashy, how do

0:10:25.350 --> 0:10:29.570
<v Speaker 1>you pull off that line? We've left out her fantastic

0:10:29.610 --> 0:10:33.410
<v Speaker 1>sense of humor and her refusal to take herself overly seriously.

0:10:34.429 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Which helps a lot. Wisdom, in short. She had a

0:10:39.059 --> 0:10:43.340
<v Speaker 1>ridiculous smile, so that helps, too. That helps. And looked

0:10:43.400 --> 0:10:45.140
<v Speaker 1>sincere to me. Yeah. Yeah.

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think she's just like really digging, you know, whatever

0:10:49.110 --> 0:10:51.550
<v Speaker 1>she was doing or whoever she was talking to, which

0:10:51.590 --> 0:10:54.490
<v Speaker 1>I never worked a day in her life. Right. I

0:10:54.510 --> 0:10:57.750
<v Speaker 1>can't pull off for an hour enjoying who I'm talking

0:10:57.790 --> 0:11:00.940
<v Speaker 1>to her. If you don't look homicidal for five minutes,

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a victory.

0:11:01.580 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:11:02.160 --> 0:11:05.309
<v Speaker 1>Um, Yeah, well, if you look at where she came

0:11:05.350 --> 0:11:08.380
<v Speaker 1>from and what she went through, that will give you wisdom.

0:11:08.550 --> 0:11:10.679
<v Speaker 1>That will give you perspective. Do we know anything about

0:11:10.700 --> 0:11:14.260
<v Speaker 1>her other 11 brothers and sisters? Are they all really cynical, angry,

0:11:16.100 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>troll-like people? Exactly. She got all the joy. All the

0:11:20.660 --> 0:11:23.980
<v Speaker 1>joy went to Dolly. That's right. Well, let's start the

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>show officially. Got to get a clip for you. I'm

0:11:26.350 --> 0:11:28.690
<v Speaker 1>Jack Armstrong. He's Joe Getty. On this, it is Wednesday,

0:11:28.750 --> 0:11:31.849
<v Speaker 1>August 26th, the year 2026. We're Armstrong and Getty, and

0:11:31.870 --> 0:11:34.450
<v Speaker 1>we approve of this program. Let's begin the show officially then,

0:11:34.490 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>according to FCC rules, regs at mark. Okay, the category tonight,

0:11:38.900 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>top ten Dolly Parton pet peeves. Dolly, are you all set?

0:11:41.100 --> 0:11:45.370
<v Speaker 1>Here we go. Number three. Okay, smart-ass emcees who introduced

0:11:45.410 --> 0:11:48.050
<v Speaker 1>me by saying, and now here they are, Dolly Parton.

0:11:52.700 --> 0:11:57.260
<v Speaker 1>Number two. When the Super Bowl is over, winner never says, hey,

0:11:57.380 --> 0:11:58.099
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to Dollywood.

0:11:58.140 --> 0:11:58.900
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:11:58.940 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>And now, the number one Dolly Parton pet peeve. Nobody

0:12:04.740 --> 0:12:12.610
<v Speaker 1>notices I've got a great ass, too. Wow. That is

0:12:12.710 --> 0:12:15.950
<v Speaker 1>not a person who takes herself overly seriously. How do

0:12:15.970 --> 0:12:20.230
<v Speaker 1>you get a shout out from John Fogerty and Eminem?

0:12:21.900 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 1>Heavy D and Steven Pinker. I mean, the list I've

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 1>got here is absolutely amazing. Heavy D and Steven Pinker.

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:32.140
<v Speaker 1>That may be the first time those two have ever

0:12:32.179 --> 0:12:36.100
<v Speaker 1>been mentioned in the same sentence. Wu-Tang Clan and Larry Gatlin,

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.120
<v Speaker 1>for those of you who know who that is. I mean,

0:12:38.140 --> 0:12:45.829
<v Speaker 1>it's just, it's insane. Wow. Robert Reich and every living president.

0:12:47.770 --> 0:12:52.630
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. There's something going on there. The only

0:12:52.690 --> 0:12:55.790
<v Speaker 1>time you will hear this sort of outpouring again from

0:12:55.809 --> 0:12:58.329
<v Speaker 1>the world of music, well, from the entire world, will

0:12:58.370 --> 0:13:01.870
<v Speaker 1>be when Paul McCartney passes. But he was a foreigner.

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:05.780
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you know, he had similar attributes

0:13:06.059 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of just disarming, you know, not taking himself seriously, etc.

0:13:12.210 --> 0:13:16.150
<v Speaker 1>And monumental talent. What Dolly Diab? I didn't get into that.

0:13:16.170 --> 0:13:17.850
<v Speaker 1>I didn't read or watch any of this stuff where

0:13:17.870 --> 0:13:21.010
<v Speaker 1>they got into the last days. Officially a brief bout

0:13:21.050 --> 0:13:24.250
<v Speaker 1>of cancer. Okay. We got headlines on the way and

0:13:24.270 --> 0:13:26.500
<v Speaker 1>lots to talk about today. Lindsey Graham's sister. I hope

0:13:26.530 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>she's smarter than I think she is. And I hope

0:13:28.679 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>she is willing to learn.

0:13:30.059 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Hater.

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.620
<v Speaker 1>You hate her? You hate her. You're a hater. I

0:13:34.380 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>don't hate her. I just don't think she probably should

0:13:36.740 --> 0:13:37.179
<v Speaker 1>have been a U.S.

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:37.460
<v Speaker 2>Senator.

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.700
<v Speaker 1>But she's going to be. So let's get over it.

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:47.890
<v Speaker 1>Headlines on the way. Stay here. Armstrong and Getty. Shaboozy,

0:13:48.490 --> 0:13:51.630
<v Speaker 1>Brook Shields, and Motley Crue all weighing in with their

0:13:51.690 --> 0:13:57.450
<v Speaker 1>tributes to Dolly Parton. I mean, what? Never thought I'd

0:13:57.470 --> 0:14:00.630
<v Speaker 1>hear that combo. I know. I got many of those.

0:14:00.710 --> 0:14:05.380
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable. Well, I'm going to that festival, by the way. Yeah,

0:14:05.420 --> 0:14:07.370
<v Speaker 1>I know. And then outside the world of music, like

0:14:07.380 --> 0:14:12.650
<v Speaker 1>you said, Steven Pinker, the great defender of enlightenment and humanism, blah, blah, blah.

0:14:12.690 --> 0:14:14.530
<v Speaker 1>More to come on a million different topics, but let's

0:14:14.550 --> 0:14:16.750
<v Speaker 1>figure out who's reporting what. It's the lead story with

0:14:16.850 --> 0:14:17.550
<v Speaker 1>Katie Green.

0:14:17.610 --> 0:14:20.950
<v Speaker 2>Katie. So, not to waste time, all the Alphabet Network's

0:14:20.970 --> 0:14:21.590
<v Speaker 2>Dolly Parton.

0:14:22.890 --> 0:14:23.470
<v Speaker 1>Non-stop.

0:14:23.830 --> 0:14:28.630
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Apparently, a brief battle with cancer. Man, it seemed

0:14:28.650 --> 0:14:31.989
<v Speaker 2>to happen fast, which is... Well, you know what? She

0:14:32.010 --> 0:14:35.230
<v Speaker 2>canceled a bunch of shows, like... Six months ago?

0:14:36.630 --> 0:14:41.210
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, but they put together that whole residency thing

0:14:41.250 --> 0:14:44.590
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas, which she would have been huge. And, you know,

0:14:44.610 --> 0:14:47.970
<v Speaker 1>they booked that. She booked that thinking she was healthy, obviously.

0:14:47.990 --> 0:14:48.970
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't that long ago.

0:14:50.510 --> 0:14:54.490
<v Speaker 2>From the Wall Street Journal, years late, billions over budget.

0:14:55.650 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 2>California's high-speed rail hasn't laid a track.

0:14:59.610 --> 0:15:02.710
<v Speaker 1>Who's reporting on that? Wall Street Journal. Yeah, we'll get

0:15:02.750 --> 0:15:07.530
<v Speaker 1>into that. Get another. I mean, it's like retrying John

0:15:07.570 --> 0:15:11.610
<v Speaker 1>Wilkes Booth for killing Lincoln. There's no need. The state

0:15:11.670 --> 0:15:15.250
<v Speaker 1>is guilty of enormous theft, and yet the punishment is

0:15:15.330 --> 0:15:18.430
<v Speaker 1>not forthcoming. USA Today.

0:15:19.130 --> 0:15:23.260
<v Speaker 2>Shopping malls are charging for prime parking, and it's not

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:23.900
<v Speaker 2>going well.

0:15:28.540 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>All right. First of all, shopping malls are still open

0:15:31.180 --> 0:15:34.460
<v Speaker 1>in various places, apparently. Are they talking about big box

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.479
<v Speaker 1>hell shopping malls or traditional malls?

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.410
<v Speaker 2>Like traditional malls. But I know that a lot of

0:15:40.430 --> 0:15:43.870
<v Speaker 2>people use them as a safe place to walk. Right.

0:15:43.970 --> 0:15:46.730
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, true. That's what my parents used to do. That's

0:15:46.750 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they're charging us now. Park farther away,

0:15:49.890 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>you numbskulls. Heartless Joe. What? New York Post.

0:15:55.740 --> 0:16:01.420
<v Speaker 2>Chucky Masked Sicko, who terrorizes Philadelphia citizens, is captured in Vegas.

0:16:01.660 --> 0:16:05.260
<v Speaker 1>Oh, they caught him in Vegas. Wow. After a two-week manhunt.

0:16:05.280 --> 0:16:06.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you saw in those videos. They

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>were chilling. Just a sick effort.

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.070
<v Speaker 2>Thought he was being funny or something. Well, as someone

0:16:13.090 --> 0:16:15.780
<v Speaker 2>who loves horror, did not love this.

0:16:15.870 --> 0:16:18.870
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no. Nobody loves that stuff in real life. Right. Right.

0:16:20.140 --> 0:16:21.940
<v Speaker 1>Study finds, had a sleepless night?

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.750
<v Speaker 2>Study suggests that exercising protects your memory as much as

0:16:26.810 --> 0:16:27.270
<v Speaker 2>a nap.

0:16:28.930 --> 0:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Hmm, cool. Babylon B.

0:16:33.710 --> 0:16:39.150
<v Speaker 2>Apocalypse draws near as last remaining universally loved human passes away.

0:16:39.350 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I wonder about that. Was she the last universally

0:16:42.770 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>loved human? We'll see. We ain't gonna have many more.

0:16:48.470 --> 0:16:50.369
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about various titles we could give the

0:16:50.410 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>show today, and one I was toying with the idea of,

0:16:53.450 --> 0:16:55.950
<v Speaker 1>here comes the Civil War. The last thing that held

0:16:56.030 --> 0:16:57.390
<v Speaker 1>us together has passed.

0:16:57.730 --> 0:16:58.090
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:16:59.090 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Thank God she never weighed in on Trump or anything. No,

0:17:02.670 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 1>she was too smart for that. Yes, she was. I

0:17:05.940 --> 0:17:08.460
<v Speaker 1>sure would love to have seen her behind closed doors

0:17:08.500 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 1>making business decisions. There had to be that side of her.

0:17:12.780 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh, yeah.

0:17:13.060 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 1>You don't become a billionaire by accident.

0:17:15.619 --> 0:17:15.840
<v Speaker 2>Nope.

0:17:16.580 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Nope. Um, we got a lot of the news of

0:17:19.020 --> 0:17:20.540
<v Speaker 1>the day that we need to get into and some

0:17:20.600 --> 0:17:22.890
<v Speaker 1>other interesting stuff about Dolly Parton that is worth talking

0:17:22.910 --> 0:17:24.730
<v Speaker 1>about too. Um, if you miss a segment, get the

0:17:24.750 --> 0:17:32.410
<v Speaker 1>podcast Armstrong and Getty on demand. Armstrong and Getty. What

0:17:32.430 --> 0:17:35.570
<v Speaker 1>would you tell your younger self? Well, that's a tricky question.

0:17:35.750 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>It was my dream to do it. But I would

0:17:37.890 --> 0:17:40.420
<v Speaker 1>just probably, looking back, I would just say, girl, you

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>better buckle up because you're in for the ride of

0:17:43.180 --> 0:17:45.270
<v Speaker 1>your life. You're going to have to take a lot

0:17:45.290 --> 0:17:46.970
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. You're going to have to give a lot

0:17:47.010 --> 0:17:49.870
<v Speaker 1>of stuff. And you're going to have to stand by

0:17:49.910 --> 0:17:52.770
<v Speaker 1>your guns, believe in yourself, stay true to yourself. I

0:17:52.810 --> 0:17:54.770
<v Speaker 1>heard some interview, this just popped into my head, where

0:17:54.810 --> 0:17:57.890
<v Speaker 1>she's talking about, I created a persona which is mostly

0:17:57.950 --> 0:18:01.460
<v Speaker 1>not me. And I thought, well, that's really interesting. Because

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.859
<v Speaker 1>one of your appeals is coming off so insanely genuine.

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:08.699
<v Speaker 1>And you're saying your persona is mostly not who you are.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.620
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to know more about that.

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:10.740 --> 0:18:17.909
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Anyway, we can talk more about that later. We

0:18:17.930 --> 0:18:20.649
<v Speaker 1>got a couple of texts, a conversation about the passing

0:18:20.670 --> 0:18:25.389
<v Speaker 1>of Dolly Parton and the amazing variety of different people

0:18:25.470 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that spoke out about that yesterday in positive ways. And

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.979
<v Speaker 1>somebody texted, don't forget big boobs. Everyone likes those. So

0:18:33.000 --> 0:18:35.070
<v Speaker 1>thanks for that. That's a good point, yes. But we

0:18:35.109 --> 0:18:36.590
<v Speaker 1>got this. You have any idea what this is about?

0:18:38.020 --> 0:18:40.379
<v Speaker 1>The Hooters comment was not even close to the holy

0:18:40.460 --> 0:18:44.020
<v Speaker 1>crap moment. You're a seriously disgusting person, Jack. I hope

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you get to taste holy C word. And for that matter,

0:18:48.720 --> 0:18:51.030
<v Speaker 1>you have no idea what the word holy means or

0:18:51.090 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 1>what holy is. I hope you get a mouthful of

0:18:53.140 --> 0:18:59.470
<v Speaker 1>holy C dot dot dot. You jerk. I think they're

0:18:59.490 --> 0:19:04.390
<v Speaker 1>accusing you of being blasphemous by saying holy crap. What?

0:19:04.790 --> 0:19:09.500
<v Speaker 1>As far as I can tell. I don't know. The

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>rantings of the kooky are often difficult to interpret. If

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.900
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to spend eternity in hell with a mouthful

0:19:16.920 --> 0:19:19.690
<v Speaker 1>of holy sea, I should know why. Probably burning hot,

0:19:19.750 --> 0:19:21.629
<v Speaker 1>holy crap, yes. I should know why.

0:19:22.109 --> 0:19:22.369
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:19:22.450 --> 0:19:24.270
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, that would be nice. Maybe it's on the

0:19:24.310 --> 0:19:28.470
<v Speaker 1>forum somewhere. Also, let the revolution begin, or not the revolution,

0:19:28.490 --> 0:19:31.450
<v Speaker 1>the Civil War, as our old friend Mike the Attorney

0:19:31.490 --> 0:19:34.970
<v Speaker 1>points out, when Trump posted that the flags would be

0:19:35.050 --> 0:19:38.850
<v Speaker 1>flown at half-mast in honor of Ms. Parton. And her life,

0:19:40.300 --> 0:19:44.580
<v Speaker 1>the online world exploded with anger. What? Of course, because

0:19:44.619 --> 0:19:48.659
<v Speaker 1>it was Trump, I guess. But online anything It's a

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:54.700
<v Speaker 1>cesspool of radioactive effluvium. What a way to spend your life.

0:19:55.790 --> 0:19:58.750
<v Speaker 1>Flaming sewage. How about the fact that the Empire State

0:19:58.790 --> 0:20:01.490
<v Speaker 1>Building turned itself whatever color in honor of Dolly Parton

0:20:01.510 --> 0:20:04.850
<v Speaker 1>last time? I like that. Rhinestone-y. Yeah, that's amazing. So

0:20:04.970 --> 0:20:08.690
<v Speaker 1>on a slightly more serious note, golly gee, this is something.

0:20:09.109 --> 0:20:15.070
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates... has issued the occasional messages on how he

0:20:15.150 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>sees AI and its development and what it might bring

0:20:18.780 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 1>in the future. And his latest is a 12-page humdinger,

0:20:23.380 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>by golly. Gates issued a stark warning about AI's risks

0:20:27.820 --> 0:20:31.100
<v Speaker 1>to employment in the human condition, saying that companies were

0:20:31.140 --> 0:20:34.260
<v Speaker 1>barreling ahead with the technology and with no larger plan

0:20:34.300 --> 0:20:37.930
<v Speaker 1>for the massive upheaval it would cause. Quote, even under

0:20:37.950 --> 0:20:41.050
<v Speaker 1>the best circumstances, the transition to this new AI era

0:20:41.070 --> 0:20:43.430
<v Speaker 1>will be one of the most turbulent times in human history,

0:20:43.490 --> 0:20:46.590
<v Speaker 1>he wrote in a 12-page essay. Right now, we are

0:20:46.609 --> 0:20:49.230
<v Speaker 1>not preparing for it. I don't see evidence that leaders, experts,

0:20:49.290 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and communities are confronting the challenges adequately. One of the

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.740
<v Speaker 1>most turbulent times in human history is a heck of

0:20:55.760 --> 0:21:00.790
<v Speaker 1>a thing to throw around. Mm-hmm. He decided to weigh

0:21:00.850 --> 0:21:03.830
<v Speaker 1>in now, apparently, because he believes that there is not

0:21:03.930 --> 0:21:06.990
<v Speaker 1>much time to prepare for the transition. That's what I

0:21:07.030 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was wondering when he says that. What's he feel like

0:21:10.460 --> 0:21:16.460
<v Speaker 1>the horizon is? I don't think he was very, very specific.

0:21:16.540 --> 0:21:18.580
<v Speaker 1>If he has been, I haven't come across it. But

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.510
<v Speaker 1>he's going to D.C. like now. He says he wants

0:21:22.570 --> 0:21:24.669
<v Speaker 1>to talk to lawmakers. Quote, you have a chance to

0:21:24.790 --> 0:21:28.629
<v Speaker 1>act now. Before unemployment rises sharply, communities are hurting and

0:21:28.690 --> 0:21:34.510
<v Speaker 1>public trust has eroded. Eroded further? Yikes. That's interesting what

0:21:34.570 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 1>he said there about the companies having no plan. That's

0:21:40.220 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>not really their job? Or arena? I mean, how could they? So...

0:21:50.609 --> 0:21:53.060
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think of an example, but when the

0:21:53.100 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 1>car industry came along, when cars became really popular, there

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>was a very big concern that all of a sudden

0:21:59.780 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we had mobile bedrooms and people were going to be

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.300
<v Speaker 1>able to make out and have sex in cars. For

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:06.219
<v Speaker 1>the first time ever, you got a mobile bedroom. You

0:22:06.290 --> 0:22:07.949
<v Speaker 1>used to have to either get a hotel or be

0:22:07.970 --> 0:22:11.010
<v Speaker 1>at home. That was just like swept the nation. I've

0:22:11.030 --> 0:22:12.610
<v Speaker 1>read a bunch of articles about that from way back

0:22:12.770 --> 0:22:14.830
<v Speaker 1>in the 40s and 50s. It's really kind of hilarious

0:22:14.869 --> 0:22:18.590
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect. But it wasn't the car industry's duty to

0:22:18.650 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 1>come up with a plan for that. That was a

0:22:21.580 --> 0:22:25.199
<v Speaker 1>byproduct of this new invention. Isn't it the same with AI? Yeah,

0:22:25.220 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm vending this AI. It's a computer thing. It can

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:30.500
<v Speaker 1>learn itself, whatever like that. What's it going to do

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>to people working? I don't know. You figure it out. Right.

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:38.869
<v Speaker 1>And boy, this leads to an incredibly important tangent that

0:22:38.900 --> 0:22:41.090
<v Speaker 1>I'll try to keep kind of brief. But yeah, let

0:22:41.270 --> 0:22:46.090
<v Speaker 1>the companies pursue their self-interest because it's when government gets

0:22:46.150 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>involved and mixes some politician's view, opinion on what the

0:22:51.180 --> 0:22:53.820
<v Speaker 1>public interest is with the private interest, that all of

0:22:53.859 --> 0:22:57.830
<v Speaker 1>a sudden the free market gets completely skewed, government itself

0:22:57.930 --> 0:23:02.550
<v Speaker 1>becomes screwed up, and you're better off letting the free

0:23:02.609 --> 0:23:07.450
<v Speaker 1>market function and then government stepping in where government should. Yeah,

0:23:07.570 --> 0:23:09.310
<v Speaker 1>I like Bill Gates weighing in on this because I

0:23:09.350 --> 0:23:11.540
<v Speaker 1>think we've all gotten bamboozled a little bit on this,

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>including myself. Like the AI, the people making these things,

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>like Altman and Elon and Emoti, it's their job to

0:23:21.380 --> 0:23:24.439
<v Speaker 1>figure out how humanity is going to adjust to it. No,

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:29.050
<v Speaker 1>it's not. Right. And the only reason they're spinning it

0:23:29.109 --> 0:23:33.730
<v Speaker 1>positively is so people will continue to invest and support it. Right.

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:35.340
<v Speaker 1>But they don't need to come up with a plan.

0:23:36.130 --> 0:23:39.669
<v Speaker 1>A few more specifics, because it's good to start the

0:23:39.710 --> 0:23:43.690
<v Speaker 1>day with existential angst. Much of his essay focused on jobs,

0:23:43.750 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>noting that entry and mid-level jobs are most at risk

0:23:46.540 --> 0:23:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of being eliminated. He argued that AI will soon also

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:53.139
<v Speaker 1>affect blue-collar work, and the breadth and speed make it

0:23:53.180 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 1>different from other workplace transitions. And he cites the move

0:23:56.340 --> 0:24:01.290
<v Speaker 1>from agriculture to office work, and that took generations. But

0:24:01.410 --> 0:24:04.590
<v Speaker 1>that sectors like law, customer service, software, and manufacturing will

0:24:04.630 --> 0:24:07.450
<v Speaker 1>feel AI's impact over the course of a single decade.

0:24:08.109 --> 0:24:12.690
<v Speaker 1>And when AI can produce error-free work, if ever, it

0:24:12.730 --> 0:24:14.490
<v Speaker 1>will be able to function on its own without a

0:24:14.530 --> 0:24:17.250
<v Speaker 1>human checking in on it. And companies will have very economic,

0:24:17.690 --> 0:24:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, every economic incentive to let it. Need a strong,

0:24:21.650 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 1>much stronger safety net. And he points out when factories closed,

0:24:25.820 --> 0:24:29.510
<v Speaker 1>many locals saw more opioid deaths. Imagine similar pressures on

0:24:29.550 --> 0:24:34.879
<v Speaker 1>both white-collar and blue-collar workers nationwide. And then one more note.

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Both of my kids are going to be living in

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.460
<v Speaker 1>my house for the rest of my life. That's correct.

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:44.030
<v Speaker 1>Get a bigger house. If you can afford it. Gates

0:24:44.210 --> 0:24:47.170
<v Speaker 1>stressed the risk of cyber attacks on the grid, hospitals,

0:24:47.270 --> 0:24:52.940
<v Speaker 1>and banks. Fraud and surveillance will be widespread. AI will

0:24:52.980 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>also enable governments to use deadly force without a human's input. Yeah,

0:24:56.720 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. We have a tendency to talk about AI

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:05.710
<v Speaker 1>and the Chinese robots in warfare. Then we talk about

0:25:05.850 --> 0:25:08.270
<v Speaker 1>AI and what it's going to do to the workplace.

0:25:08.710 --> 0:25:11.470
<v Speaker 1>Then we talk about AI and criminals' abilities to hack

0:25:11.510 --> 0:25:14.910
<v Speaker 1>into everything and act like those all three aren't going

0:25:14.950 --> 0:25:18.180
<v Speaker 1>to be happening at the same time. It's not like

0:25:18.220 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>those aren't separate entities at separate eras. They're all going

0:25:22.300 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to be happening at the same time. It's not a checklist.

0:25:25.100 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a flood. Yeah. One more thought. On relationships, Gates,

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think he's right, stressed that AI can be

0:25:33.260 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>an echo chamber, which could have profound effects on children.

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:42.950
<v Speaker 1>Chatbots are addictive and can be a source of friction-free companionship,

0:25:43.430 --> 0:25:47.449
<v Speaker 1>unlike humans, and can worsen critical thinking. This would be

0:25:47.490 --> 0:25:49.949
<v Speaker 1>the worst possible time for humans to lose their critical

0:25:50.010 --> 0:25:52.880
<v Speaker 1>thinking skills. In an era of deep fakes and misinformation

0:25:52.890 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that can be tailored to you individually, the ability to

0:25:55.900 --> 0:25:57.679
<v Speaker 1>tell what is true from what is not becomes an

0:25:57.740 --> 0:26:01.250
<v Speaker 1>essential life skill. Well, that's easy for you to say.

0:26:01.290 --> 0:26:05.409
<v Speaker 1>He's a super genius. He's called for taxes on AI tokens.

0:26:05.510 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you familiar with the term token? It's a unit

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of computing power.

0:26:09.700 --> 0:26:09.820
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.580
<v Speaker 1>So I've got my little AI company, and I pay

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>one of the many companies that is building the data

0:26:16.420 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>centers for a certain number of tokens so I can

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:22.190
<v Speaker 1>do my AI stuff. Okay, Bill Epstein Gates. And this

0:26:22.290 --> 0:26:24.790
<v Speaker 1>money the government gets from these tokens, what are they

0:26:24.810 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 1>going to do with this? What's the genius plan for that? Well,

0:26:28.619 --> 0:26:33.110
<v Speaker 1>these tokens, these taxes could delay companies' rush away from

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.170
<v Speaker 1>human labor, and those taxes could also fund a social

0:26:36.210 --> 0:26:40.030
<v Speaker 1>safety net for restraining people whose jobs won't exist. Retraining,

0:26:40.070 --> 0:26:41.929
<v Speaker 1>not restraining. So part of it is a punishment to

0:26:41.970 --> 0:26:45.490
<v Speaker 1>slow them down. Nobody's slowing down China. And then the

0:26:45.570 --> 0:26:47.770
<v Speaker 1>other end is a safety net, which, you know, I

0:26:47.810 --> 0:26:50.910
<v Speaker 1>don't have a lot of optimism on crafting safety nets, so.

0:26:51.990 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>That part I didn't like of the Bill Gates spiel. Yes,

0:26:56.200 --> 0:26:58.340
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure what the alternative is, and neither does

0:26:58.400 --> 0:27:02.189
<v Speaker 1>anybody else. Well, when the robot apocalypse comes, you and

0:27:02.210 --> 0:27:04.609
<v Speaker 1>your dog will still have each other, right? I got

0:27:04.650 --> 0:27:06.889
<v Speaker 1>another comment on that, but first, yes, Rough Greens. A

0:27:06.970 --> 0:27:09.920
<v Speaker 1>wagging tail and a lolling tongue and a tennis ball

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:11.820
<v Speaker 1>thrown will still bring joy to our hearts, won't it?

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:13.760
<v Speaker 1>But you want your dog to live as healthy and

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 1>as long as possible, and that's where Rough Greens comes in.

0:27:16.420 --> 0:27:19.740
<v Speaker 1>It's America's number one dog supplement. You know who liked dogs?

0:27:19.780 --> 0:27:22.020
<v Speaker 1>Dolly Parton. I'm going to tie her into everything. And

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:25.180
<v Speaker 1>that's why she would probably appreciate you using Rough Greens.

0:27:25.460 --> 0:27:29.149
<v Speaker 1>Can her estate sue me like she's endorsing this product? Yes, indeed, yes.

0:27:29.470 --> 0:27:32.389
<v Speaker 1>Rough Greens is something you sprinkle on your dog's current food.

0:27:32.450 --> 0:27:36.170
<v Speaker 1>Live probiotics, digestive enzymes, omega oils, over 20 vitamins and minerals,

0:27:36.270 --> 0:27:38.250
<v Speaker 1>all natural, made right here in the United States. And

0:27:38.270 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you can try it for nothing, which is really, really cool.

0:27:40.619 --> 0:27:42.619
<v Speaker 1>Try it for free. Just pay the shipping. Go to

0:27:42.660 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 1>roughgreens.com right now. Grab your free Jumpstart trial bag. You

0:27:45.580 --> 0:27:48.500
<v Speaker 1>only cover shipping at ruffgreens.com. You've got to use the

0:27:48.540 --> 0:27:54.300
<v Speaker 1>code ARMSTRONG. Again, roughgreens.com. That discount code is Armstrong at checkout.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:59.139
<v Speaker 1>Roughgreens.com code Armstrong. Roughgreens doesn't replace your dog's food. It

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:03.760
<v Speaker 1>makes it better. I don't know why this hadn't occurred

0:28:03.780 --> 0:28:08.439
<v Speaker 1>to me before. Maybe I'm the only one, but it's almost...

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Funny that the industry, the heavyweights discussing how we're going

0:28:13.980 --> 0:28:15.659
<v Speaker 1>to handle the problem of AIs are the people that

0:28:15.700 --> 0:28:20.100
<v Speaker 1>are making it. They didn't need to do that at all.

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.380
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates, when you invented the Internet, I don't remember

0:28:22.820 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>people putting out big pieces, you putting out a big

0:28:25.540 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>piece about how the Internet was going to destroy people's lives.

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you didn't understand that. But it made all kinds

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:33.379
<v Speaker 1>of stuff bad and good. But you didn't. Was it

0:28:33.400 --> 0:28:36.030
<v Speaker 1>your job to figure out the bad stuff? Why is

0:28:36.090 --> 0:28:38.450
<v Speaker 1>it AI's job to figure out the bad stuff? That's

0:28:38.470 --> 0:28:42.540
<v Speaker 1>an interesting philosophical and governmental question, because if you are

0:28:42.580 --> 0:28:48.150
<v Speaker 1>putting out a product that is just patently dangerous, then yes,

0:28:48.310 --> 0:28:50.290
<v Speaker 1>you need to figure out how to make your product

0:28:50.350 --> 0:28:53.690
<v Speaker 1>less dangerous. But if it's dangerous because of how productive

0:28:53.760 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 1>it is, we're into a weird gray area. And again, dislocation,

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of you I know, and I want

0:29:01.900 --> 0:29:04.540
<v Speaker 1>to tip my cap to your opinion, think, dudes, this

0:29:04.600 --> 0:29:07.410
<v Speaker 1>is like the steam engine and the cotton gin and

0:29:07.470 --> 0:29:11.350
<v Speaker 1>everything else. It will create jobs. It will not remove them.

0:29:11.490 --> 0:29:13.370
<v Speaker 1>I hope you're right. I don't think you are. I

0:29:13.950 --> 0:29:18.060
<v Speaker 1>am not. voicing that so they are part of the discussion.

0:29:18.460 --> 0:29:20.959
<v Speaker 1>I pray they're right. And I always thought I have

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:23.500
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good imagination, but maybe I just lack imagination

0:29:24.700 --> 0:29:27.260
<v Speaker 1>as to how that will look. But friends, here is

0:29:27.360 --> 0:29:31.370
<v Speaker 1>the rub. Even if you believe that, that in spite

0:29:31.390 --> 0:29:36.290
<v Speaker 1>of the massive amount of change, we can adjust and

0:29:36.390 --> 0:29:38.690
<v Speaker 1>reallocate resources and labor and the rest of it, it's

0:29:38.750 --> 0:29:43.940
<v Speaker 1>the pace of change that will be so mind-blowing. And

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.860
<v Speaker 1>it's the sort of thing governments have never had to

0:29:46.940 --> 0:29:52.020
<v Speaker 1>deal with. I mean, hell, slow-paced demographic change they suck at.

0:29:52.700 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, a great piece, Holman Jenkins, Wall Street Journal today,

0:29:55.620 --> 0:30:00.290
<v Speaker 1>he was talking, his message was essentially, hey, socialists, we've

0:30:00.510 --> 0:30:04.410
<v Speaker 1>already run out of other people's money to spend. Look

0:30:04.450 --> 0:30:07.610
<v Speaker 1>at the United States. Look at our budget. The budget

0:30:07.710 --> 0:30:10.470
<v Speaker 1>is the safety net. Everything else is a minor part

0:30:10.490 --> 0:30:13.790
<v Speaker 1>of the budget. With rising interest rates, we've already run

0:30:13.870 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>out of money for our social safety net. Tax the billionaires,

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.940
<v Speaker 1>the oligarchy, we know. But anyway, if they're that bad

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:26.180
<v Speaker 1>at adjusting to the Very slow graying of America. Picture

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:28.850
<v Speaker 1>if all that S happens in a month and a half.

0:30:29.730 --> 0:30:32.590
<v Speaker 1>So is all this talk from Elon about we won't

0:30:32.630 --> 0:30:34.590
<v Speaker 1>need money in the future and it'll we'll have 10

0:30:34.590 --> 0:30:36.530
<v Speaker 1>times the economy or 30 times the economy or whatever.

0:30:36.590 --> 0:30:38.580
<v Speaker 1>And the same thing from the other big leaders. Is

0:30:38.620 --> 0:30:41.460
<v Speaker 1>that all just to try to have some positive news

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.300
<v Speaker 1>out there about AI? Because without that, it would be

0:30:44.340 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>all negative. Well, to your question specifically, Elon is absolutely brilliant,

0:30:51.100 --> 0:30:55.160
<v Speaker 1>but he has huge blind spots, too. And this might

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.550
<v Speaker 1>be one of them, the socioeconomic realities that he's talking about.

0:30:58.930 --> 0:31:02.370
<v Speaker 1>One of his biggest blind spots is everybody ain't like you, dude.

0:31:04.470 --> 0:31:07.930
<v Speaker 1>We're not all super geniuses who only care about, you know,

0:31:08.110 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 1>working and getting to Mars. Right. I work really hard

0:31:11.620 --> 0:31:14.260
<v Speaker 1>on that because as an iconoclast, also known in some

0:31:14.300 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 1>quarters as a weirdo, I've tried to understand that, okay,

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.540
<v Speaker 1>my perception is different than a lot of people's. Wow.

0:31:23.140 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a completely new perspective of this whole thing

0:31:25.180 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>now because of that Bill Cage piece, and I can't

0:31:27.530 --> 0:31:31.310
<v Speaker 1>believe that I didn't notice this. It's not the industry's

0:31:31.430 --> 0:31:35.170
<v Speaker 1>job to figure out the downside. When has it ever been? No,

0:31:35.950 --> 0:31:37.390
<v Speaker 1>we need to depend on government.

0:31:37.410 --> 0:31:37.510
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, us, we need to depend on us. We're the government. Oh, boy.

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.940
<v Speaker 1>The idea of taxing them to the point that they're

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:48.780
<v Speaker 1>too slow that we can figure it out, that's a

0:31:48.900 --> 0:31:54.900
<v Speaker 1>terrible idea. That's a terrible idea, Bill. Sorry. You think?

0:31:55.100 --> 0:31:59.459
<v Speaker 1>Spent too much time on the island. Wow. That was

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>out of line. I recuse myself. We've got mailbag next.

0:32:03.180 --> 0:32:10.790
<v Speaker 1>Stay here. Armstrong and Getty. Both Dan Sullivans won up

0:32:10.810 --> 0:32:14.290
<v Speaker 1>in Alaska? Is that going to be the race? No,

0:32:14.350 --> 0:32:17.370
<v Speaker 1>but they've advanced to the final X number in the

0:32:18.550 --> 0:32:22.240
<v Speaker 1>ranked vote. So still both Dan Sullivans are competing against

0:32:22.260 --> 0:32:25.460
<v Speaker 1>each other? Both in the game, yes. The real Dan

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:30.500
<v Speaker 1>Sullivan and the fake Republican Dan Sullivan. Yeah, beautiful. Here's

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:32.700
<v Speaker 1>your freedom-loving quote of the day. I chose this because

0:32:32.740 --> 0:32:34.570
<v Speaker 1>I've got a lot of information on this topic. I

0:32:34.630 --> 0:32:36.550
<v Speaker 1>hope we'll get to it, but it was said not

0:32:36.590 --> 0:32:40.600
<v Speaker 1>by Christopher Hitchens. who is often credited with this, but

0:32:40.900 --> 0:32:46.000
<v Speaker 1>writer Andrew Cummins, quote, Islamophobia is a word created by

0:32:46.100 --> 0:32:51.980
<v Speaker 1>fascists and used by cowards to manipulate morons. Very good time.

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:55.540
<v Speaker 1>Islamophobia is a word created by fascists and used by

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:59.180
<v Speaker 1>cowards to manipulate morons. God, I wish Christopher Hitchens was

0:32:59.220 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>alive today to take on this DSA crowd. Particularly the

0:33:03.860 --> 0:33:07.410
<v Speaker 1>Islamofascist part. Yeah. He'd be so good at that. Yeah,

0:33:07.450 --> 0:33:13.890
<v Speaker 1>a valuable voice. Lost. Shouldn't have smoked. Mailbag. Drop us

0:33:13.930 --> 0:33:18.350
<v Speaker 1>a note. Mailbag at armstrongandgetty.com. On the topic of Dolly.

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.980
<v Speaker 1>MR writes, one of the correspondents on TV said Dolly

0:33:24.020 --> 0:33:26.220
<v Speaker 1>was the only entertainer in his lifetime that always led

0:33:26.280 --> 0:33:31.780
<v Speaker 1>with love. A lovely tribute and so true. It's simply true.

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:36.050
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for writing. A totally different topic, JT and Livermore.

0:33:36.690 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Jack's chatbot told him that Jack had earned the chatbot's honesty? Right! Um, WTF?

0:33:43.620 --> 0:33:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Did the chatbot just admit that it isn't honest with

0:33:45.980 --> 0:33:47.860
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us? And or is it saying that

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to earn the honesty we assumed was supposed

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:57.900
<v Speaker 1>to be there? Troubling. Greg from Sunnyvale with quite the

0:33:57.960 --> 0:34:03.750
<v Speaker 1>note on, uh... Abdul Al-Said's appearance on the Jesse Waters show.

0:34:03.950 --> 0:34:06.890
<v Speaker 1>He also put out a tribute to Dolly Parton last night.

0:34:08.270 --> 0:34:11.489
<v Speaker 1>Al-Said did that? Oh my God, is he dangerous? And

0:34:11.830 --> 0:34:14.290
<v Speaker 1>he points out a number of different ways that Jesse

0:34:14.350 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>was just a terrible interrogator and or expresser of, you know,

0:34:20.280 --> 0:34:22.860
<v Speaker 1>the view that a lot of what Al-Said believes is abhorrent.

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:28.790
<v Speaker 1>He really did a poor job. But then he says, lastly,

0:34:28.810 --> 0:34:32.410
<v Speaker 1>I was further disappointed with Jesse when I saw him

0:34:32.450 --> 0:34:35.930
<v Speaker 1>on the Fox's The Five. After the panel discussion about Al-Said,

0:34:35.969 --> 0:34:38.830
<v Speaker 1>Jesse said he liked Abdul, which had agreements by all

0:34:38.850 --> 0:34:41.110
<v Speaker 1>the others on the panel. This is concerning because he

0:34:41.170 --> 0:34:44.140
<v Speaker 1>is so dangerous. He's using his charm to minimize his

0:34:44.180 --> 0:34:46.300
<v Speaker 1>true goal or to mask it. Once he and others

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.460
<v Speaker 1>get control, they will no longer be charming to those

0:34:48.500 --> 0:34:51.259
<v Speaker 1>who disagree with them. They will no longer show friendship

0:34:51.300 --> 0:34:54.460
<v Speaker 1>to you and others. in their way, and I think

0:34:54.500 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a mistake to verbalize to anyone like you like him.

0:34:56.960 --> 0:34:59.990
<v Speaker 1>He's lying and using his charm for deception. I would

0:35:00.030 --> 0:35:06.489
<v Speaker 1>agree completely, yeah. Let's see. Yeah, trust me. The DSA

0:35:06.590 --> 0:35:09.450
<v Speaker 1>put out a statement about Dolly Parton, one of the great,

0:35:09.489 --> 0:35:12.270
<v Speaker 1>we love her, blah, blah, blah. The DSA did. And

0:35:12.590 --> 0:35:15.810
<v Speaker 1>George Bush. I mean, like I said, the range of

0:35:15.890 --> 0:35:18.830
<v Speaker 1>people is quite amazing. Yeah, I believe one of them

0:35:18.850 --> 0:35:22.310
<v Speaker 1>was sincere and one was not. Joe in Manteca writes

0:35:22.450 --> 0:35:25.469
<v Speaker 1>on the topic of McCarthyism, interestingly. It's interesting how during

0:35:25.489 --> 0:35:28.230
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War, Senator McCarthy was so concerned about communists

0:35:28.650 --> 0:35:31.720
<v Speaker 1>infiltrating our government and country. At the same time, people

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>seem much more aware of the threat of communism. Today,

0:35:34.180 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it seems like we don't care as much. What do

0:35:35.660 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you think? Well, A, we clearly don't care as much

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.319
<v Speaker 1>because we have forgotten the horrific lessons of communism. But

0:35:41.340 --> 0:35:44.060
<v Speaker 1>I think more importantly, and I didn't realize this until

0:35:44.080 --> 0:35:47.430
<v Speaker 1>later in life, the left in education, which is a

0:35:47.469 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of education, really hammered McCarthyism and made that the

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:59.660
<v Speaker 1>face of anti-communism, trying to teach children that anti-communism was irrational,

0:35:59.719 --> 0:36:03.060
<v Speaker 1>it was bigoted, it unfairly hurt a bunch of people,

0:36:03.100 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and there was certainly some truth to that.

0:36:05.080 --> 0:36:05.319
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.540
<v Speaker 1>When you think about that era and the communist scare,

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 1>it's all about the overreach as opposed to the fact

0:36:11.700 --> 0:36:14.489
<v Speaker 1>that there were actually lots of communists that had gotten

0:36:14.550 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>into our government and our press. Yeah, exactly. Yeah, they

0:36:17.940 --> 0:36:22.510
<v Speaker 1>were absolutely teeming in the State Department, especially in our media.

0:36:23.330 --> 0:36:26.370
<v Speaker 1>So that was an intentional strategy to make Joe McCarthy

0:36:26.410 --> 0:36:31.129
<v Speaker 1>look like anti-communism. No, he was a self-aggrandizing nutjob, but

0:36:31.530 --> 0:36:35.610
<v Speaker 1>the communism part was absolutely real. So the 60 Minutes

0:36:35.670 --> 0:36:38.280
<v Speaker 1>reran their segment on the California bullet train. The Wall

0:36:38.300 --> 0:36:40.180
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal has an article about it today. It's one

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:45.960
<v Speaker 1>of the great government awfulnesses of our lifetimes. Armstrong and Getty.