WEBVTT - What's Wright - Thunder ESCAPE Timberwolves, Knicks WILD comeback vs. Pacers, DELUSIONAL Eagles takes

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in What's Driving the Great Episode three thirty four.

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>We are back on our regular schedule, and now is

0:00:11.840 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>also when I would remind you all if you could

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to like, rate, subscribe, review, do all that stuff, because

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that does not only help us out a ton, but

0:00:21.040 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>it also helps you guys out, because this time of year,

0:00:24.000 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we have varying schedules. You know when we're live,

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you know when the show's on the air. YouTube subscriptions

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:34.080
<v Speaker 1>doing great. iTunes and Spotify could serve to do a

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:36.560
<v Speaker 1>little bit better, So if you download us on both places,

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 1>be awesome. Also, next week taking the show on the

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>road kind of we're gonna do a show from Vegas.

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't really have any of those specifics locked in yet,

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and I told the producers about ninety seconds ago that

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that was happening. But next Thursday we will be live

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>from the World Series of Poker in Las Vegas, doing

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the show from there. Demands, how are.

0:00:57.920 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 2>You pretty good? Pops? You doing good to see you.

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm good to see you as well. I realized when

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I saw Demons, I was like, oh boy, I've not

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 1>actually spoken to Demonse since we signed off the pod

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.560
<v Speaker 1>last Wednesday. Not the best parenting job by me there

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>probably should check in see how you're doing. But we

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 1>have had I was in Indy, which we'll get into.

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Both of your aunts are in town and staying with us.

0:01:22.360 --> 0:01:24.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's a lot going on over here, a lot

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>going on in the sports world. And we know who's

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna win the NBA Championship. So all that is coming

0:01:30.640 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>up on the show. Here's what missed the cut. Denver

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>officially promotes Dave Adalman to the head coach position. Tim

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Shallomey sitting, that's a real fan going courtside to Indianapolis.

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I love that from him. And Alex Polow, my guy

0:01:47.160 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>wins the Indy five hundred. He's also a Chiefs guy.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>He's also you know, the racer of this generation. And

0:01:54.120 --> 0:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you the audience knows we brought in,

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, my goddaughter ci r Fidel to the f

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>one minute. I am not historically a motorsports guy. I

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>don't pretend to be a motorsports expert. I do, however,

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and this isn't pretending. Know that if you give me

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>an assignment with enough lead time, I can learn pretty

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 1>damn fast. And once we found out we were going

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to Indy. I was like, Okay, I'm gonna we're gonna

0:02:22.639 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>be interviewing people. We're gonna, you know, probably have Oh wait,

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.679
<v Speaker 1>this person wants to come on. So I got to

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>be prepared. So I went back to my roots of

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>when I was having to do postgame call in shows

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>for lacrosse. In college, we did postgame call in shows

0:02:39.440 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 1>for lacrosse for games that were road games that were

0:02:43.800 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>only on the radio, so you couldn't watch it, and

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>theoretically I didn't know the sport, and then I had

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to take people's calls about what happened in the game.

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I learned lacrosse, and so I kind of

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>tried to flex that muscle again to learn IndyCar and

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>now I mean, I'm basically an adopted member of the

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Andretti family. More on that later in the show, but

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 1>in the meantime, Demons, let's get to the game last night,

0:03:10.000 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>which was one of the best games of the playoffs

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and might have been the unofficial end of the playoffs.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:17.079
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead.

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so Minnesota had bounced back in Game three and

0:03:20.160 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 3>Okase responded with a win. Jada was cooking and looked

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 3>pretty tired out there. Yeah, so the Thunder took took

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 3>care of business. They're now of three to one. Like

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 3>you said before, do they now seem inevitable to win

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:35.080
<v Speaker 3>the finals.

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 2>Or this series?

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess at the very least no, No to both.

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>They listen and this isn't like a take that the

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:48.480
<v Speaker 1>moment the Lakers got eliminated, I said, I think Oklahoma

0:03:48.520 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 1>City's gonna win the championship. That I thought the Lakers

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>were the only team that could beat them. Now maybe

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that was wrong, maybe nobody could beat them. But I

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>have not been one of the people that has underrated

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 1>at Oklahoma City or that has thought their youth was

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be a death knell for them. And we

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>now now as we sit here today, and this is

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a team that is seventy nine and nine or eighteen

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>on the year, and a team that yesterday won a game.

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>It was such a weird game yesterday because there are

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 1>a couple buckets of stats that if I give you, you're

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like, oh, well, obviously team X one, And

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:39.880
<v Speaker 1>then a couple of buckets of stats that if I

0:04:39.920 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>give you'd say, oh, obviously team why one. So the

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 1>first one for the Thunder they're big three combined for

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety five points. Shay forty, JDub thirty four, Jet twenty one.

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Their big three combine for ninety five points. Meanwhile, the

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.720
<v Speaker 1>three highest paid guys on Minnesota, well, I mean they

0:05:11.720 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>don't really have one of them's go Bear. That's not

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 1>fair because he's not a scorers. Minnesota's top two scorers,

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Aunt and Julius combine for twenty one. You hear that

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and you say, okay, well that's a thunder route. Thing

0:05:27.640 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you on the flip side of that

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>is what if going into the game, I were to

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:38.239
<v Speaker 1>tell you, hey, Okc's bench is gonna go I'm sorry,

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's bench, pardon me, is going to go twelve of

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:52.279
<v Speaker 1>eighteen from three and combine for an incomprehensible sixty four points.

0:05:52.440 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna get sixty four points off the bench. You

0:05:56.760 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>would say, okay, well that's going too clearly be maybe

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>not only a Timberwolf win, but maybe a Timberwolf route instead.

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>Those two factors came together, the thunder Stars playing awesome,

0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the Timberwolves role players playing awesome, and it was a

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:21.159
<v Speaker 1>classic game. I know that, like we've had so many

0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>great games these playoffs that a game that one team

0:06:25.520 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of leads throughout and then ends up winning doesn't

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>feel like that should qualify as a classic. But the

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>shot making and degree of difficulty from anyone and everyone

0:06:38.000 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 1>involved in this game except for Minnesota's two best players

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>is really a was a sight to behold. And the

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 1>reason that I said right off the top of the

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 1>show and when Demonte asked me that this series is

0:06:58.560 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>over and this season is over, and that's with respect

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to the Pacers and the Knicks who will get to later,

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is OKC has now been on the ropes and has

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>now responded in such a way that I think this

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>counts as that extra step some people thought they needed

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>to take, Like, all right, you make the playoffs and

0:07:26.960 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>you get bounced in round two. Then you go on

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a deep run like the Celtics did to the finals

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and lose. Then you come back and win a championship,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>facing a Game seven against the best player in the

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>world and blowing them out, and then responding the very

0:07:45.360 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>next series by getting blown out like embarrassed. For the

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:55.560
<v Speaker 1>first time all year. They had only had one twenty

0:07:55.560 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>point loss all season. It was to the Lakers. In

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the regular season. They lose by forty it's their first

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>playoff loss as a group together by more than twelve points.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And then the very.

0:08:09.000 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Agree they took their foot off the gas there in

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 3>game three, though, right think that was like that was

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 3>chalked up like if that was a situation high leverage

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 3>and they needed that game, probably wouldn't have lost by that.

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:21.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm just saying, totally agree.

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, no, one hundred percent agree. But my point is,

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>not only did they lose that game, they get blown

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 1>out ants feeling good. Because they get blown out, the

0:08:35.400 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Timberwolves don't have to play you know they're and because

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not as deep of a team in theory, they

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have to play Aunt and Julius huge minutes. So

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>they should be able to come into Game four fresh

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and feeling like, you know what we about to make

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 1>this a series and all the Timberwolves others played out

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>of their mind and the OKC Big three Flatley said, Nah,

0:09:05.960 --> 0:09:10.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter. Shay, who will get more into later,

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely brilliant. Shae was brilliant, And I obviously have

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>been vocal about the flopping and the Jabbroni stuff of

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>hooking the arms and all that stuff you can hold

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>two thoughts in your head at the same time. One

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 1>is the free throw merchant stuff is a fair criticism,

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and I find it to be an unappealing brand of

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>basketball when he's doing that, while also believing even without

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 1>any of that stuff, he's a superstar. And last night

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it was both. He was getting to the line. There

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:02.520
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been as much flopping about by him since Game one,

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>and but in addition to getting to the line, he

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>was getting to the basket. His mid range was on point,

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>as it's been all year, and he just played an

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:25.280
<v Speaker 1>outstanding A plus MVP level game. And then Jalen Williams

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>added his twenty four or thirty four on twenty four shots,

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>and every time it felt like Minnesota had a chance

0:10:36.640 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to grab some momentum, there was Chet Holmgrench, either hitting

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:45.800
<v Speaker 1>a three or with a putback dunk or a big block.

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.640
<v Speaker 1>He was awesome. And so.

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.480
<v Speaker 2>I just you were nervous about Chet coming into this series.

0:10:54.200 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Too, absolutely, And I thought that the Julius piece of

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 1>this for the Timberwolves is pretty brutal, because he was

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>so good in Round one against the Lakers and so

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>good in Round two against the Warriors. He was so

0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>good he did something that I didn't know was possible,

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:23.640
<v Speaker 1>which is force honesty out of Draymond Green, like, no,

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>I got my ass kicked in that matchup like that,

0:11:26.480 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>which he did. And then he was the only guy

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 1>on Minnesota to really show up in Game one, so

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I was like, man, this he is just rewriting this

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>playoff narrative. And then in game two, in game four,

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>he's a combined three of eighteen from the field and

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 1>eleven points total and just brutal. And so yeah, I

0:11:55.480 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>thought that Julius versus Chet was going to strongly the Timberwolves,

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 1>even though I picked Oklahoma City to win the series.

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not what happened to her at all. And while

0:12:08.480 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I think we are, you know, I gave Danny a

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 1>hard time. Let me find the tweet I sent to

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Danny Parkins. Either last night or this morning, I don't remember,

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>but Danny tweeted, if I can get my phone to work,

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:30.560
<v Speaker 1>something about uh about the runway? That what the heck?

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:34.160
<v Speaker 1>This sucks? Twitter? Can I just say something Twitter sucks?

0:12:34.200 --> 0:12:34.400
<v Speaker 4>Now?

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:40.480
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't. I can't even find my own tweets. Danny

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>tweeted about the thunder having basically the next ten years

0:12:46.520 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>here's what he wrote. I found it. I feel sorry

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>for all the self professed NBA fans who say they

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>hate SGA's game. The next ten years or so of

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>hoops is gonna be pretty miserable for them. He's gonna

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>be in a lot of big games. And so I

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>replied to him, giving SGA the next ten years feel strong. Listen,

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>windows are never open as long as people think they

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to be in the moment, and every team

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:18.920
<v Speaker 1>that wins the championship, in the moment that they're winning

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the championship, it feels like, well, they're just gonna keep

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>winning championships, I guess. And obviously right now it feels

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that way with OKC. But it felt that way with

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Boston twelve months ago, and it felt that way with

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Denver twenty four months ago, And it felt that way

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.960
<v Speaker 1>with Milwaukee forty eight months ago, and it felt that

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.559
<v Speaker 1>way with the Lakers sixty months ago. The only team

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that he didn't really feel like they were about to

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>reel off a bunch was the Warriors, because they had

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>already reeled off their bunch, like that was the end

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>mark rather than what it felt like was a beginning. Well, yeah,

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Toronto obviously, but that was if Quiet stayed. No, but

0:14:02.200 --> 0:14:04.920
<v Speaker 1>if Quiet stayed, maybe people would have thought they were

0:14:04.960 --> 0:14:10.560
<v Speaker 1>going to keep winning. And so I'm not I'm not

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 1>ready to talk down the road for OKAC because that

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>ownership group as a doesn't have a tendency of paying

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the luxury tax. And I'm not sure. However, I know

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 1>they have a bunch of picks, and they have a

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>smart GM and all that stuff. What I am ready

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to say is nobody's fucking beating them this year. And

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it was there was a window where in that game

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>last night where it felt like, well, if Minnesota can,

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.240
<v Speaker 1>if they can win this game with Aunt and Julius

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>playing poorly, can they then win one of the next

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>two because Aunt and Julius go off, and then you're

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>in a game seven, and then you roll the dice.

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And even if they were to lose the game seven,

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>then OKASE goes into the finals coming off back to

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>back seven game series and maybe they're a little bruised,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a little battered, a little worn down. Instead, Okac's going

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to end this tomorrow night, and they are not going

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to demonte let their foot off the gas twice in

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>one series. They are critically going to be at home.

0:15:31.520 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Where what of the thunder done? Let me just look

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>at home this postseason. They beat Memphis by fifty one.

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>They then beat Memphis by nineteen. They lost to Denver

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in was that the game one against Denver? Yeah, that

0:15:53.920 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>was the Aaron Gordon game, the game winner, the game winner.

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So they lost to Denver. They then beat Denver by

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>forty three. They then beat Denver by seven. They then

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>beat Denver by thirty two. And now they have beaten

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota by twenty six and by fifteen, and they face

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 1>another one. So they have multiple victories at home by

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:28.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty plus and they have one loss and it was

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a buzzer beating dunk.

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 2>So it's been done. They could lose.

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 3>If Minnesota goes over there and Julius Randall and a

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 3>cook and they turn it around, what do you think

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 3>the chances of them pulling away, you know, bringing it seven,

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 3>winning the series on Minnesota.

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I think this is dead. I think this series ended

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>last night. I think that there is I think that

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>there is no no real way to convince yourself that

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the Timberwolves have a chance to win two in a

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.080
<v Speaker 1>row with one of them in Okac, much less three

0:17:08.119 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in a row, with two of them in okac Their

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>moment was last night, their moment to make it so

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>we can get to a game seven without ever having

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:21.639
<v Speaker 1>to win on the road and then see what the

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>hell happens. And I just give Oklahoma City a ton

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:31.000
<v Speaker 1>of credit. Man. They are obviously, and we've talked about

0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it all year, and not historically great but contemporarily great defense.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And they're young stars are all growing up in front

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:52.959
<v Speaker 1>of us. And so the one other piece of caution

0:17:53.720 --> 0:17:58.119
<v Speaker 1>that I would give to folks who are going to

0:17:58.200 --> 0:18:03.479
<v Speaker 1>get out ahead of the dinas deep part of it is, Man,

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that any team's ever looked more poised

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to go on forget a ten year run, a fifteen

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>year run in Oklahoma City in twenty twelve, when they

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>had Durant, Russ, and Harden all well under twenty five

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>years old. They might all been under twenty four years

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>old actually, and they were making their first finals and

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that's their only finals. Like and it's a you can say, oh, well,

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:43.720
<v Speaker 1>they traded Harden guys with this new CBA. I don't

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:46.600
<v Speaker 1>know how. I have no idea what teams are and

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.280
<v Speaker 1>aren't gonna stay the exact same year to year. What

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I do know is the Thunder winning the championship, and

0:18:55.440 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>they will be rightful champions. It will not be an

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>injury luck championship. It will not be ah look at

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>who they faced and root to it championship. It won't

0:19:08.240 --> 0:19:11.800
<v Speaker 1>be any of that. It's going to be from day

0:19:11.880 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>one of this season until the last day of the season,

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>they were the best team. They had the guy who

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>had the best season, and they were the deepest and

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 1>damn near impossible to blow out, and they're going to

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>finish the year. So they were I do this. I

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 1>did this on the fly, and then I thought I

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:42.520
<v Speaker 1>screwed it up. They were sixty eight and fourteen. They

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>have lost four times this postseason, so they are that's

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty eighteen losses. They have won eleven times this postseason. Yes,

0:19:52.960 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I had it right. They're seventy nine and eighteen, and

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go ahead and guess that they finished the

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>year eighty four and twenty. I think they lose two

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>more times the rest of the way and they go

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 1>into next year as big favorites, which again the defending

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>champ keeps going into the years the big favorites We'll

0:20:20.480 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>see how they do on that end. And I'm not

0:20:23.320 --> 0:20:28.159
<v Speaker 1>trying to put a period on this NBA season, but

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:31.640
<v Speaker 1>to me, this NBA season ended last night, and that's

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:40.280
<v Speaker 1>not a bad thing. That's not the it's well, it is.

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 2>It is what it is.

0:20:42.480 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>I know there's a lot of basketball to play, and

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm still and I'm super excited for the rest of

0:20:48.800 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern Conference Finals and the NBA Finals. To me,

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:56.880
<v Speaker 1>will be whomever. It is a real David versus Goliath situation,

0:20:57.320 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and you'll be excited to see, Hey, can something. Can

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:06.199
<v Speaker 1>Halliburton or Brunson have just a holy shit, what just

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 1>happened moment? Can one of those guys like do a

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Dirk Novitsky twenty eleven levitate above the game? Wildly outmatched?

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think so.

0:21:20.640 --> 0:21:24.720
<v Speaker 5>Blending Vice's signature dynamic storytelling with the high octane world

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:28.200
<v Speaker 5>of sports, Vice Sports brings an exciting and diverse range

0:21:28.200 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 5>of programming that goes beyond the game. From action pack

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:34.160
<v Speaker 5>live events to gripping behind the scenes documentaries, to hard

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 5>hitting investigative pieces and in depth profiles of athletes, coaches, teams.

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 5>Vice Sports captures the raw energy, drama and passion that

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 5>makes sports truly unforgettable. Catch live events and other exclusive

0:21:46.760 --> 0:21:51.200
<v Speaker 5>sports programs only on Vice TV. Go to vicetv dot

0:21:51.240 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 5>com to find your cable channel.

0:21:56.240 --> 0:21:57.719
<v Speaker 1>All right there, I know you have a bunch of

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>follow ups here and then we can get to the

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 1>next topic. But go ahead to many.

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 3>So Aunt looks super gas last night, and this is

0:22:04.560 --> 0:22:06.640
<v Speaker 3>right around the time that he got gas last year.

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.159
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that this is just who he is?

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't. It is surprising to me that Aunt accepts

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>passivity the way he has at times, and his comments

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.960
<v Speaker 1>after the game when he's like, listen, I don't think

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>I struggled. I made the right play again and again.

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.639
<v Speaker 1>And I guess you can make the argument. Listens teammates

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>wereritting shots. They scored one twenty six. He was still

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>busting his ass on defense. But when you're up against

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:55.119
<v Speaker 1>the MVP Demanse and you undoubtedly feel like I'm better

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:58.760
<v Speaker 1>than him. But listen, he's not better than Shay. But

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I guarantee you Ant believes he's better than Check. Yeah,

0:23:02.480 --> 0:23:05.680
<v Speaker 1>like that, he has to, like, that's how he's wired.

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Seeing him take two shots in the first half was shocking. Legitimately,

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:15.400
<v Speaker 1>shocking in a half. His team was trailing the whole time.

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>It's not as if, well, you know what I mean,

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:22.320
<v Speaker 1>everything's working great, whatever it is. And so he did

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>he said he ran out of gas in the last

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>year in the conference finals. But that was so different

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>because though I took that to be a physical and

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a mental thing, because beating the defending champ in round

0:23:42.760 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>two is a bit of a that's a huge favorite,

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a championship in and of itself.

0:23:49.640 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>We are kind of seeing it happened to the Knicks.

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The Knicks beat Boston and then exhaled, and by the

0:24:00.200 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>time they get their breath again, they're down two oh

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to Indiana. Right, So I thought last year ant and

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota have a shocking three two comeback, and then Game

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>seven comeback against Minnesota and then it's like, oh man,

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.600
<v Speaker 1>we got another that we're only halfway to the goal. Dallas,

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, you know, was a pretty well

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>oiled machine at that point, having just beaten OKC and

0:24:31.080 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>they're down three to zero. They being Minnesota before they

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>realize it's a fight. This year that wasn't at at all.

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota didn't even seem to really face any adversity in

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>round two or round one, and so I just think

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this is part of ant growing up. But for those

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of us that were like, hey, lead a team to

0:24:56.880 --> 0:25:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the finals before you turn twenty five, that's a pretty

0:25:00.080 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>the exclusive list. He has a chance to join it.

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>That's now done that that you know, and so at

0:25:08.040 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, just get better and better each year. But

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>he needs to find a way to be at his

0:25:16.280 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>best come late May, and that's yet to happen for him. Okay,

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh so there's go ahead and we can talk rules

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>before he talks Shay and Ann.

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, you think the team should be allowed to

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 3>foul up three as much as they want.

0:25:30.119 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 2>It might have made the game. It was a little

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 2>boring there at the end.

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 1>So okay, So I don't understand why teams or by

0:25:42.920 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the league listen free advice. There are three very simple

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:54.520
<v Speaker 1>rule changes that could be implemented in the offseason, and

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>there is close to zero downside for any of them.

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Rule one is the one I proposed on TV yesterday,

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:09.680
<v Speaker 1>self proclaimed take of the year. It's an unimpeachably great take.

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>The league could institute it immediately. There's no downside to

0:26:14.840 --> 0:26:19.679
<v Speaker 1>it whatsoever. And it would fix this immediately. Which is

0:26:21.040 --> 0:26:24.840
<v Speaker 1>just like, every player on the court at any time

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>can call time out, and if you go like this,

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>the referee grant you a timeout. Any player on the

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>court at any time can do the whoo the challenge signal,

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and the referee will grant that challenge. Okay, you have

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a challenge, you're challenging it. And within a week, demons,

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>every player on every team would have been drilled by

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the coaches. Don't You're not allowed.

0:26:53.760 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 2>To do that.

0:26:54.200 --> 0:26:55.800
<v Speaker 3>I was about to say that the coaches would not

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.200
<v Speaker 3>ride with that one. It's like, it's just my choice

0:26:58.240 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 3>if we're challenging it or not, you.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.119
<v Speaker 1>Know, correct, But it's also the coach's choice if we

0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>call time out or not. But the players can call it,

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and so it would no player would go rogue. Guys

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>would learn very quickly, Oh shit, that's binding. I better

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:22.440
<v Speaker 1>not do that. And added bonus, let's just say there

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 1>is a oh use joker as an example, a really

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>smart veteran player. It's late in the game. He knows

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>they have challenges in timeouts left, and he knows that

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>ball did not go off me, and he looks over

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.280
<v Speaker 1>at the bench and he's like, oh, man, the dude

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>dropped the tablet. They're they're they're about to inbound the ball.

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:48.479
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna get it in no challenge challenge. So

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:54.439
<v Speaker 1>it would reward smart players and discipline teams. It would

0:27:54.520 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 1>briefly penalize teams that have a bunch of dopes on them,

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and within a week you wouldn't immediately see an end two.

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Every time a ball goes out of bounds, players on

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>both teams are doing the twirl in the air. That's

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>rule change one. Rule change two. How do we get

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>rid of hack a player? Because people can say, oh,

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 1>make your free throws. Oh, it's a fine strategy. And

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>this is all a cousin of my tush push take,

0:28:27.080 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>which is that all sounds finding good except for when

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.119
<v Speaker 1>you remember these are just polar It's just polar bears

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>ice skating. It's just entertainment. There is no there, There

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 1>is no oh, a moral part of this or greater

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 1>good for the world. It's entertainment, and things that work

0:28:49.800 --> 0:28:54.440
<v Speaker 1>against the entertainment value should be eradicated when possible. There

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is nothing less entertaining than watching a basketball game grind

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to a halt because a team just wants to foul

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>away from the ball a bad free throw shooter. So

0:29:07.520 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>how do you fix that? Very simple, take a page

0:29:11.560 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>out of the NFL's book. Outside of the last two minutes,

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>because in the last two minutes you might need to

0:29:18.720 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>foul for to come back. Outside of the last two minutes,

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you can decline the foul. Just be like, no, we decline,

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll take its side out. That's all. Be like, oh, okay,

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>oh it's we can shoot for those. No, we decline,

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.080
<v Speaker 1>thank you, we appreciate it. We'll to go side out

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of bounce. That's all you make that. There's no doubts. Again,

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you can't do that the whole game. But you already

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 1>can't do haka inside the last two minutes. So we

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>already have made specific rules based on timing. You can't

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:57.720
<v Speaker 1>do haka inside the last two minutes. So it's that simple.

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And so those are these. Then we get to the

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 1>fouling up three. Oh my goodness, what are we gonna

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>do about this fouling up three? It's terrible for the league. Agreed,

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:15.680
<v Speaker 1>it's terrible for the viewer. Agreed. How do you fix it?

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Guys?

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the simplest fucking thing ever. If you commit a

0:30:22.160 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 1>foul with the shot clock turned off, meaning the final

0:30:29.240 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty four seconds outside of the three point line, it's

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a three shot foul, whether the guy is shooting or not. Yeah,

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's that simple. And then that's done. It's guys, it

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 1>is It is intuitive simple rule changes. Rule one is

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>just a fun one to penalize the whiners. The twirl

0:30:56.920 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is binding, and you're gonna your team's gonna be out

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of challenges within ninety seconds, your coach gonna be super pissed,

0:31:03.640 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>and you might then early in the season when you're

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>not used to it, also rack up technical fouls because

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you've done the twirls so many times and your team

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>is out of timeouts, and that's now a technical fine.

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>That'll fix itself.

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 2>Rule two.

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 1>In the instance of hacker Mitch Robinson coming into play

0:31:25.000 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the Knicks or any team subject to the hacka thing

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 1>can say, we would prefer to have the ball side

0:31:31.720 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>out of bounds rather than get free throws. That's all

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the foul counts, it goes all of it, but we

0:31:39.600 --> 0:31:41.800
<v Speaker 1>would prefer to have the ball side out of bounds

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>if we can decline the free throws. If you hack,

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>if you foul us in outside of the last two

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>minutes and the last one to end the scourge of

0:31:52.200 --> 0:31:57.920
<v Speaker 1>fouling up three. If the shot clock is turned off

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and you commit a foul outside of the three point line,

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it is not a two shot foul. It is a

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>three shot foul. That's all very simple.

0:32:14.720 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 2>The first one I go on board with.

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:21.239
<v Speaker 1>But the other, yeah, the take of the year. You

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 1>like when guys do.

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 3>This, I don't like it. I just like, I understand

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 3>how much they're going to be doing that. And I

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 3>know you're saying, I know you're saying, have some discipline,

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 3>don't do it.

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that.

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 3>I don't think it's a it's as annoying as you

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.600
<v Speaker 3>think it is when they will make it.

0:32:37.840 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Just like I would like to. It's it's it's that

0:32:42.440 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>it's annoying, but it's also that it is it's a

0:32:47.360 --> 0:32:52.400
<v Speaker 1>too much boy who cried wolf. It's they know that.

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>It's almost like they feel like they have to. Like yesterday,

0:32:56.320 --> 0:33:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you saw it on Alexander. I mean he slaps him

0:33:02.440 --> 0:33:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on the never a Doubt tattoo and he's like, no, yeah,

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean so, uh, But do you like my how

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>to get rid of foul?

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm totally on board with those other two ones. The

0:33:21.040 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 3>three three free throws outside of the three point line

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:24.040
<v Speaker 3>makes a lot of sense.

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and and again it's the you can't just say

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>any foul gets you three free throws because you don't

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>want all of a sudden, you know, teams down too

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and driving to the basket and then they you know they, uh,

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't want that, but it is it's an easy fix.

0:33:45.760 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 2>You know what.

0:33:46.760 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>You know now that we have a friend of the show,

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I know she's retired, but friend of the show Michelle Roberts,

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>former president of the NBA Player Association, who I see

0:33:56.400 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>almost every day because she lives on our block and

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I hang out out side. Now that the weather's nice,

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna I'm gonna ask.

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:06.560
<v Speaker 2>Her to pitch it, Adam or something.

0:34:07.160 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, something, or let me pitch it. I'm over. Like

0:34:11.640 --> 0:34:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought I would wanted to pitch get

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>me an NBA awards vote, But that ship has sailed.

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm never getting an awards vote.

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:34:18.680 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean, if you create a rule for the NBA.

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:26.919
<v Speaker 1>Rule, what a legacy, What a legacy this would be

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>if people are like in thirty years people, if you

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>see an amazing finish to a game. We see an

0:34:33.800 --> 0:34:35.440
<v Speaker 1>amazing finish of the game. People are like, you know,

0:34:36.719 --> 0:34:39.479
<v Speaker 1>we used to not get those game tying threes because

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>guys would foul. Really, Papa, what changed that? Well is

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>this guy named Nick Wright, he did a podcast with

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:51.760
<v Speaker 1>his son explained it. Yeah, yeah, I think that'd be exciting.

0:34:52.640 --> 0:34:54.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk more Shane.

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:58.640
<v Speaker 3>Uh so, yeah, you've you've been pretty vocal on SGA's

0:34:58.680 --> 0:35:00.839
<v Speaker 3>foul baiting. He saw how worked out the other day

0:35:00.880 --> 0:35:03.560
<v Speaker 3>when he got to the line four times. And also

0:35:04.160 --> 0:35:07.319
<v Speaker 3>Ant has this problem with fatigue late in the late

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:09.400
<v Speaker 3>in the year. Who do you think who do you

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 3>think's problem is bigger? As far as trying to be

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:13.840
<v Speaker 3>the face of the league type of guy.

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Well, listen, Shay's thing isn't a flaw. It's just irritating. Yeah,

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's listen it. People can debate about the skill

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>it takes and the I'm not gonna Shay the player,

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm just talking about the manipulating the reps it is.

0:35:39.440 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 1>And I was I'll be honest, I was shocked by

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 1>the number of people who pushed back on some of

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the Shay stuff like it was and there was a

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of you say this and you're a fan of

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>and then they either said Luca Lebron or Mahomes. So

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:08.800
<v Speaker 1>let me address each of those if I may. Luca

0:36:09.000 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 1>does not flop. Luca complaints. There is a distinction. Luca

0:36:15.239 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 1>finishes through contact. Luca is not flailing. Luca is whining

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:26.960
<v Speaker 1>at all times. Now you can find that irritating, and

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I totally understand that. I find it somewhat irritating.

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:33.120
<v Speaker 2>But he is here with SGA.

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 3>He also doesn't really complain to the refs, I think

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 3>because he gets froding advice to his house for Thanksgiving.

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>But but no, I mean, Luca is just yelling at

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:50.839
<v Speaker 1>the refs the entire game. When he gets a call,

0:36:51.000 --> 0:36:53.640
<v Speaker 1>he's angry he didn't get it faster when he doesn't

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:57.359
<v Speaker 1>get a call. So that that is that, you know,

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that to me, is uh a crazy comp to be on.

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Like they're just very Now you can say that's more irritating,

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you hate that more, that's fine, like that's a matter

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of preference. But Luca is never, never strong but close

0:37:15.440 --> 0:37:20.000
<v Speaker 1>to never trying to manipulate the officials. He's just trying

0:37:20.040 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to mother f the officials. So that's the first one.

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>Lebron gets less calls per drive to the basket, and

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.760
<v Speaker 1>almost any player in modern NBA history, certainly older Lebron

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:38.400
<v Speaker 1>and Lebron I know that over the course of a

0:37:38.440 --> 0:37:43.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty two year career. Whenever you see these Lebron flopping compilations,

0:37:43.960 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what you will see almost all the videos have in

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>common is he got hit. People just think he is

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>not supposed to be as hurt as he appears to be.

0:37:58.400 --> 0:38:04.759
<v Speaker 1>So what Lebron will do is sell how hurt he

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is or the violence or velocity of the impact. But

0:38:08.840 --> 0:38:12.960
<v Speaker 1>he is. Lebron is not like driving to the basket

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:17.839
<v Speaker 1>and then just falling or hooking your arm to try

0:38:17.840 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to get the call. Again, you can say I hate

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:27.279
<v Speaker 1>that one more, but those are different. Then there's Mahomes,

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:31.719
<v Speaker 1>which again the football basketball comps I never like at all,

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>but we can get into that if you'd like. Of

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>all the quarterbacks in the league, the idea that there

0:38:43.880 --> 0:38:49.279
<v Speaker 1>is any evidence whatsoever that Patrick Mahomes is more protected

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:54.880
<v Speaker 1>or does more flopping when Josh Allen exists is just

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:59.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the wildest things that I've ever heard anyone

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>put voice to. And while here would be my response

0:39:06.520 --> 0:39:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to the Mahomes SGA thing, because the Mahomes thing really

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:16.839
<v Speaker 1>hit a fevered pitch in the Texans playoff game. If

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:22.439
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes did what he did in the Texans playoff game

0:39:24.000 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>every single game all year long, then you would have

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the SGA comp for it. It was jarring because it

0:39:32.880 --> 0:39:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was so obvious what on two of those plays. Again again,

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it was two total plays he was doing. But that

0:39:41.200 --> 0:39:47.000
<v Speaker 1>was one game in the guy's career versus SGA. It's

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>made up an art form out of it. So the

0:39:51.120 --> 0:39:56.400
<v Speaker 1>now to answer your question, though, demonte uh And is

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to be eligible for Face of the You

0:39:58.560 --> 0:40:00.680
<v Speaker 1>can't be eligible. You're not gonna be Face the League

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:05.360
<v Speaker 1>until you're winning MVPs and or championships. And he's done neither.

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:15.080
<v Speaker 1>His game theoretically and personality is more attractive to fans

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and Face the League stuff, but he's got to be

0:40:16.920 --> 0:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>playing big games late late late in years SGA. I

0:40:26.040 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the I think the foul stuff is a

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>wave that has crested. I think he and the refs

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:40.800
<v Speaker 1>reacted to the criticism of Game one and he stopped

0:40:40.840 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>getting quite. He said, listen, he's look goting to line

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a ton but most of those are warranted. He's since

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>fall over. Correct. It's just the it. It's really just

0:40:53.680 --> 0:41:00.400
<v Speaker 1>two things we're talking about. One is falling over on purpose. Yeah,

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that's wait right, And the other one is the hook

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:09.759
<v Speaker 1>the like that, which is just a first cousin of

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Durant's ripped through. Like Durant got so good at the

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>ri you'd put your hand down and Durant would rip

0:41:16.120 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 1>through it and go up that they changed the rule

0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:22.680
<v Speaker 1>to where that's a non shooting foul, hardened than evolved

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.439
<v Speaker 1>it to you put your arm there, I will then

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:28.719
<v Speaker 1>hook you and then go up and it will be

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a shooting foul. And Shade does that brilliantly. So maybe

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>that is a rule tweak that I can't figure out. Again,

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I gave you three great rule changes and make the

0:41:37.120 --> 0:41:42.440
<v Speaker 1>NBA twice as good. I can't give you four. But uh,

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 1>but the it's really just the falling over. Like the

0:41:49.400 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 1>falling over is just so unbecoming and nobody likes it.

0:41:53.920 --> 0:41:55.479
<v Speaker 1>I know you have one follow up.

0:41:55.360 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 3>Here to Yeah, so you're you're heavily against his fallibating

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:00.120
<v Speaker 3>and you say it's been all year, but he is

0:42:00.160 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 3>your MVP guy.

0:42:02.000 --> 0:42:05.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so I think again, So I think that maybe

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>surprises people. They're like that I said, he was clearly

0:42:09.560 --> 0:42:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the MVP. He was clearly the MVP. He was the

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:19.959
<v Speaker 1>scoring champ, good, not great, but good defensively, unbelievable offensively

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:21.880
<v Speaker 1>for a sixty eight win team.

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:23.600
<v Speaker 4>He was.

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Listen, I hate the toush push. I don't come on

0:42:28.920 --> 0:42:33.840
<v Speaker 1>here and be like that plays no good. It's actually ineffective.

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Like I might not like some of the stylistically, some

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>of the way Shaye plays, but he was the MVP

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>of the league this year, and I would have voted

0:42:45.680 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 1>for him for it, like the it is. It is

0:42:52.320 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>odd to me that people are surprised that I can

0:42:57.200 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 1>hold both those thoughts in my head at the same time.

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:06.280
<v Speaker 1>All Right, the NBA Finals almost here, and every play

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>could be the one that changes everything. To the NBA Playoffs,

0:43:09.920 --> 0:43:13.439
<v Speaker 1>where heroes rise, legacies are built, and the action never

0:43:13.520 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 1>lets up them. With DraftKings Sportsbook, an official sports betting

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:19.960
<v Speaker 1>partner of the NBA, you don't just watch the madness,

0:43:20.360 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you live it. Back your favorite team, ride with your

0:43:23.200 --> 0:43:27.840
<v Speaker 1>clutch time killer, bet on the buzzer beaters, the breakout performances,

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the game winning threes, from player props to same game parlays.

0:43:31.760 --> 0:43:37.400
<v Speaker 1>This is how you take your fandom to the next level. Tonight,

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Pacers Knicks game four Pacers slight favorites. They win, you

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 1>gotta feel like they are in great shape to make

0:43:49.320 --> 0:43:52.879
<v Speaker 1>their first NBA Finals in a quarter century. Then Nicks win,

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you feel like they take back control of the series.

0:43:57.040 --> 0:43:59.600
<v Speaker 1>The my pick for the series, as you guys know,

0:44:00.239 --> 0:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>was the Knicks. For that to look good, they were

0:44:02.120 --> 0:44:05.360
<v Speaker 1>going to need to win tonight. If you're new to

0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the game, no sweat. Download the DraftKings sports book app.

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Bet just five dollars and if your bet wins, you'll

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:16.960
<v Speaker 1>score three hundred dollars in bonus bets. It's truly that easy.

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Download the DraftKings sports book app. Use code right Wright,

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that's code right for new customers to get three hundred

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:29.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars in bonus bets if your bet wins. When you

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:33.840
<v Speaker 1>bet just five bucks on DraftKings, the Crown is yours.

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Gambling problem call one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:42.000
<v Speaker 1>call eight seven seven eight hope in why or text

0:44:42.120 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>hope in why, which is four six seven three six

0:44:46.360 --> 0:44:50.200
<v Speaker 1>nine in Connecticut. Help is available for problem gambling call

0:44:50.360 --> 0:44:54.760
<v Speaker 1>eight eight eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven

0:44:55.120 --> 0:44:59.960
<v Speaker 1>or visit CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behal

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>half of Boothill Casino and resort in Kansas twenty one plus.

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Age and eligibility varies by jurisdiction. Void in Ontario. Bonus

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:13.680
<v Speaker 1>betts expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issuance.

0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:20.560
<v Speaker 1>For additional terms and responsible gaming resources, see DKNG dot

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>co slash b ball. All right, demonse, let's go to

0:45:24.400 --> 0:45:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern Conference.

0:45:25.520 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 3>All right, So we know that New York, I mean,

0:45:27.239 --> 0:45:29.359
<v Speaker 3>Indy stole the first two in New York and then

0:45:29.400 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 3>Game three, New York bounce back coming back from that

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:33.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty point win or twenty point deficit.

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:37.120
<v Speaker 2>It seems like something to do often. Now, will one

0:45:37.160 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 2>team pull away? Is anybody gonna no? Listen?

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is gonna be a seven game series.

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:44.640
<v Speaker 1>But in order for that to happen, the Knicks need

0:45:44.680 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to win tonight, and I think they are gonna win tonight.

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Brew and I disagreed on this yesterday, but I I

0:45:55.200 --> 0:46:00.720
<v Speaker 1>saw there there were some things that happen in Game

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:07.160
<v Speaker 1>three of that series that to me were at least

0:46:07.200 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>somewhat worrisome for the Pacers, which is it felt like

0:46:15.360 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Carlisle was forced to start reaching a bit. Now you

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:25.160
<v Speaker 1>might say shit, Thibodeau definitely was with Delon Right Landry

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 1>Shammitt playing minutes got it And this was the point

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:31.279
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to make on TV that I did

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:36.400
<v Speaker 1>a poor job of. But I'll try again here. The

0:46:36.480 --> 0:46:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Knicks are used to playing seven guys and getting contributions

0:46:42.840 --> 0:46:46.600
<v Speaker 1>from seven guys, so them all of a sudden potentially

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:51.960
<v Speaker 1>getting contributions from Guy eight and Shamit or Guy nine

0:46:52.040 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and Delon Wright is almost just like a bonus. The Pacers,

0:46:57.640 --> 0:47:03.520
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, are reliant on had been reliant

0:47:03.560 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 1>on Ben Matherin being good for them. I mean, this

0:47:07.080 --> 0:47:12.800
<v Speaker 1>guy was sixteen a game each of the last three years,

0:47:12.840 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 1>sixteen a game this year, and Carlisle seems to soured

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>on him in this series. Obi Toppin, who has been

0:47:23.239 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 1>really valuable to them in the since he's come over

0:47:29.680 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 1>there as like an energy guy and still getting you

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:37.640
<v Speaker 1>ten to eleven points, he has been somewhat ineffective this series.

0:47:38.120 --> 0:47:40.399
<v Speaker 1>That then leads to them all of a sudden being

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 1>like Tony Bradley, are you gonna give us some real minutes,

0:47:45.400 --> 0:47:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Ben Shephard, are you gonna give us some real minutes?

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And it feels a little more grasping. You then add

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:58.759
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that the Knicks were able to execute

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that comeback to Monday with Jalen Brunton playing really poorly

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>until the final two minutes of that game, and Karl

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Towns obviously was unbelievable in the fourth quarter. He

0:48:12.960 --> 0:48:16.759
<v Speaker 1>had four points going into the fourth quarter. So for

0:48:16.880 --> 0:48:20.040
<v Speaker 1>all those reasons, I just think the Knicks go into

0:48:20.080 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 1>tonight's game far better position. And I think that this

0:48:24.400 --> 0:48:30.000
<v Speaker 1>series was you can't be tied through three games, but

0:48:30.080 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>if you could be, this one would be like the

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Knicks in historic fashion Blue Game one, the Pacers in

0:48:41.360 --> 0:48:47.239
<v Speaker 1>much more gradual fashion Blue Game three, Game two. What

0:48:47.400 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>was that a one point? Was it a one point

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:53.760
<v Speaker 1>or three point game? With fifteen seconds left? Like that?

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna pull it up because I said that. That's

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:57.520
<v Speaker 1>another thing I said on TV. YESA I was like,

0:48:57.560 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 1>did I get that wrong too? No, I'm right. It's

0:49:02.960 --> 0:49:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's one ten, one oh nine with fifteen seconds left

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:09.120
<v Speaker 1>and the Knicks damn near steal the ball at mid

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:12.719
<v Speaker 1>court and just don't get it, and you know, the

0:49:12.760 --> 0:49:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Pacers end up Jalen misses the three at the end

0:49:15.560 --> 0:49:18.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Pacers win. So this is a dead even

0:49:18.960 --> 0:49:21.920
<v Speaker 1>series that I think, And this is one more thing

0:49:21.960 --> 0:49:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that then I'll get your take on it, Demonte. I

0:49:25.640 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>think that as devastating as Game one was for the Knicks,

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:34.640
<v Speaker 1>losing it in that fashion, game three is a different

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:41.439
<v Speaker 1>type of devastating for the Pacers because they are up

0:49:41.640 --> 0:49:47.920
<v Speaker 1>ten going into the fourth quarter to go to the finals.

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Because you go up three to zero, the series is over.

0:49:51.600 --> 0:49:56.280
<v Speaker 1>The Pacers had this series one if they play one

0:49:56.600 --> 0:49:59.800
<v Speaker 1>solid quarter of basketball, and they couldn't. So I wonder

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:05.360
<v Speaker 1>what type of impact that has on them emotionally. Similar

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to what we saw from the Knicks early in Game

0:50:07.640 --> 0:50:11.200
<v Speaker 1>two when they didn't seem to be there emotionally after

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:13.319
<v Speaker 1>blowing Game one the way they did. I know you

0:50:13.360 --> 0:50:14.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to say something.

0:50:14.160 --> 0:50:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, yeah, I got I got the Pacers at

0:50:16.440 --> 0:50:16.919
<v Speaker 2>six here.

0:50:17.000 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 3>I don't think there's any way they can feel like

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:22.520
<v Speaker 3>deflated or negatively. I know they might have had the

0:50:22.560 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 3>game in the reach and got to close out there,

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:27.040
<v Speaker 3>but they just took two in New York. I think

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:30.080
<v Speaker 3>they're gonna win today, and and I just like the

0:50:30.120 --> 0:50:31.280
<v Speaker 3>Pacers more than the Knicks.

0:50:31.600 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 2>It's no bad blood.

0:50:32.920 --> 0:50:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, it'd be better for the Knicks to win the finals.

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:37.720
<v Speaker 3>Are go farther because it'd make more sense. The Celtics

0:50:37.719 --> 0:50:41.360
<v Speaker 3>got knocked out, But the Pacers have a more consistent team.

0:50:41.760 --> 0:50:43.920
<v Speaker 2>I like the Pacers more than the Knicks.

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 1>And uh, well, so listen the Pacers. What is true

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:51.279
<v Speaker 1>about the Pacers this playoffs is they are zero to

0:50:51.360 --> 0:50:55.560
<v Speaker 1>three in game threes and ten and oher in every

0:50:55.600 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 1>other game. So the argument for them is they've gone

0:50:59.160 --> 0:51:03.040
<v Speaker 1>up too oh in every series and then lost you know,

0:51:03.239 --> 0:51:07.839
<v Speaker 1>game threes in every series. That the Knicks argument is

0:51:08.120 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 1>for tonight. They have been much better on the road

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:17.600
<v Speaker 1>than at home this postseason. They are They were three

0:51:17.600 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and oh on the road against Detroit, they were two

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:25.879
<v Speaker 1>and one on the road against both and now one

0:51:25.920 --> 0:51:28.799
<v Speaker 1>and oh against Indiana. So they are six and one

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:33.200
<v Speaker 1>on the road are the Knicks this postseason? And then

0:51:33.880 --> 0:51:36.319
<v Speaker 1>one and two Sorry I'm doing this on the fly,

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:39.959
<v Speaker 1>one in two, two and one, So three and three,

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:43.239
<v Speaker 1>three and five at home, six and one on the road,

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 1>three and five at home, which is really weird, but

0:51:46.239 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it is what it is.

0:51:48.239 --> 0:51:55.400
<v Speaker 4>I also, I I this is gonna sound funny because

0:51:55.440 --> 0:51:58.560
<v Speaker 4>of what game two was or Game one was.

0:51:58.680 --> 0:52:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Pardon me, but I like how the Knicks have held

0:52:02.920 --> 0:52:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Halliburton in check since game one. Game one, Halliburton was

0:52:06.960 --> 0:52:10.320
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable and executed, you know, one of the greatest comebacks

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in playoff history. Game two he had I think two

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:20.080
<v Speaker 1>points at halftime and finished with fourteen. Game three he

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:25.279
<v Speaker 1>had twenty and seven assists. Like, I think they have

0:52:25.400 --> 0:52:29.919
<v Speaker 1>to feel decent about what they've been able to do

0:52:30.200 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>against Halliburton. And so now this is maybe just priors

0:52:35.320 --> 0:52:38.320
<v Speaker 1>because I thought going into the series the Knicks were better,

0:52:38.880 --> 0:52:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and I thought that they were gonna win this series

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in seven games, and I still think that. I just

0:52:44.960 --> 0:52:47.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Is that what you said.

0:52:47.280 --> 0:52:49.919
<v Speaker 2>Seven games before? I remember the way you were talking

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:51.839
<v Speaker 2>about the Knicks. Go. It's not like you thought they

0:52:51.840 --> 0:52:53.560
<v Speaker 2>were gonna whirl through the Pacers.

0:52:53.800 --> 0:52:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh I didn't. Maybe I didn't give a games pace.

0:52:56.680 --> 0:52:59.919
<v Speaker 3>Ye I don't think you gave any four HS games

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.920
<v Speaker 3>yea seven the just did sond very convinced that the

0:53:02.960 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 3>Knicks We're gonna.

0:53:05.080 --> 0:53:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean I I once they beat the Celtics,

0:53:09.239 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of felt like this was the nixt

0:53:11.080 --> 0:53:17.319
<v Speaker 1>moment and if they can just you know, execute a

0:53:17.360 --> 0:53:20.600
<v Speaker 1>couple plays. At the end of Game one, we're feeling

0:53:20.719 --> 0:53:23.440
<v Speaker 1>very differently, but they listen. That's the playoffs, that's how

0:53:23.480 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>it works. I think they win tonight. If they lose tonight,

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:31.799
<v Speaker 1>I think they're cooked. But I think they win tonight. Uh,

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:34.640
<v Speaker 1>pardon me, all right, let's go to Halliburton.

0:53:35.000 --> 0:53:37.360
<v Speaker 3>At the very beginning of the playoffs. You know, the

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 3>poll came out of Halliburton say he was the most

0:53:40.120 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 3>overrated player.

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:41.480
<v Speaker 2>In the NBA.

0:53:42.640 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 3>And now fans, I think fans and the folks are

0:53:44.719 --> 0:53:46.800
<v Speaker 3>starting to swing very far in the other direction.

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you think of proper rating for Tyres? Haliburton

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:50.760
<v Speaker 2>is right now.

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:58.799
<v Speaker 1>Listen. Club Superstar opens tomorrow on the TV show Back

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to Back Conference Final. Clearly the best player on the team, clearly,

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:10.280
<v Speaker 1>incredibly Clutch is kind of an old school pass first

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:18.239
<v Speaker 1>point guard. I he's clearly Demonse one of the fifteen

0:54:18.320 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 1>best players in the league, and he has an argument

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:27.719
<v Speaker 1>that he's in that top twelve. I think that's I

0:54:27.800 --> 0:54:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think that like, who are the guys in the league

0:54:30.920 --> 0:54:37.280
<v Speaker 1>who are there is not even an argument better than him.

0:54:37.480 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So let me the let me maybe pull up a

0:54:43.480 --> 0:54:48.799
<v Speaker 1>first draft of Club Superstar. So, no, you cannot argue

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that Haliburton's better than this player. How long is the list?

0:54:52.800 --> 0:55:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Joker agreed, yeah, Jannis agreed, Shay agreed, Uh huh healthy,

0:55:01.760 --> 0:55:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Tatum agreed. Yeah, I mean the Achilles is weird, but

0:55:05.840 --> 0:55:11.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna keep Tatum where he is. Luca agreed, we're

0:55:11.560 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>at five. I think listen, I there are five more

0:55:20.160 --> 0:55:24.520
<v Speaker 1>players better than him. But as far as like it's

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 1>under you, there is no argument. Okay, now, guys who

0:55:30.040 --> 0:55:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you could make the argument he's better than but I

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:41.840
<v Speaker 1>don't agree with it. Steph Lebron, hold on, when I

0:55:41.880 --> 0:55:45.400
<v Speaker 1>did that whole thing? Did I say? Shay said was

0:55:45.400 --> 0:55:51.400
<v Speaker 1>like the fourth Movement got leave Shaye out, Steph Lebron,

0:55:53.880 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Brunson.

0:55:55.239 --> 0:55:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I was thinking Brunson like, but I was figured

0:55:57.800 --> 0:55:58.799
<v Speaker 3>like I was just thinking of my head.

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:02.160
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty debatable, but right, that is right.

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:05.680
<v Speaker 1>But I think Brunton's better than him, but it's clearly debatable.

0:56:06.480 --> 0:56:12.480
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, you're not sure.

0:56:13.280 --> 0:56:17.759
<v Speaker 2>I'd say, I mean, yeah, I think better than me.

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but it's it's close, right, And then you get

0:56:21.760 --> 0:56:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to I think two guys that are tough in how

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna rank them, Anthony Davis and Kevin Durant no

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 1>embiid and bid. Yeah, I mean it's just yeah, but

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Durant and Anthony Davis are I like, they both have

0:56:44.320 --> 0:56:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the Halliburton's way more available in those guys. They it

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:50.520
<v Speaker 1>feels like those guys have higher ceilings. But man, oh Man,

0:56:50.560 --> 0:56:55.399
<v Speaker 1>Halliburton has more playoff moments this postseason than either one

0:56:55.400 --> 0:56:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of those guys in the last half decade. So like

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:01.120
<v Speaker 1>there's and then there's I think he's Do you think

0:57:01.120 --> 0:57:02.919
<v Speaker 1>he's better than Donovan Mitchell.

0:57:02.960 --> 0:57:08.640
<v Speaker 3>I was thinking about Donovan Mitchell. Yes, actually I do. Yeah,

0:57:08.680 --> 0:57:09.239
<v Speaker 3>I do too.

0:57:09.840 --> 0:57:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think for I think when it comes to winning, like.

0:57:11.960 --> 0:57:13.320
<v Speaker 2>I think he's better exactly.

0:57:13.440 --> 0:57:18.800
<v Speaker 1>So I guess my answer is the absolute highest you

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:24.280
<v Speaker 1>could have him is sixth I think that would be irrational.

0:57:25.000 --> 0:57:30.920
<v Speaker 1>I think I have him eleventh, and I think the

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:34.840
<v Speaker 1>lowest you could have him is fourteenth. So I know

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that's that sounds like a bit of a cop out,

0:57:37.160 --> 0:57:40.960
<v Speaker 1>but like I think that is he's better than Devin Booker.

0:57:41.360 --> 0:57:43.200
<v Speaker 1>My answer is yes, yeah.

0:57:43.040 --> 0:57:45.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's just like skill set exactly. I was

0:57:45.560 --> 0:57:48.240
<v Speaker 3>just thinking, like, haller Burton's just more riable player than

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Donovan Mitchell or Devin.

0:57:52.160 --> 0:57:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Wimby's a tough one, but Wimby's so still something of

0:57:57.480 --> 0:58:00.360
<v Speaker 1>an unknown, you know. Wimby's almost as much of an

0:58:00.360 --> 0:58:05.520
<v Speaker 1>ideas he is a basketball player at this point. All right, people,

0:58:05.720 --> 0:58:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you go ahead and ask me about.

0:58:08.560 --> 0:58:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Mister Halliburton is allowed back into the stadium for the

0:58:12.000 --> 0:58:14.520
<v Speaker 3>Pacers home games, but he'll be in the booth for

0:58:14.600 --> 0:58:15.200
<v Speaker 3>game four.

0:58:15.840 --> 0:58:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Is there any.

0:58:19.040 --> 0:58:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I know that means he's on the call?

0:58:25.000 --> 0:58:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Is there is there any part of you that I

0:58:26.360 --> 0:58:28.360
<v Speaker 3>would like to see him on courtside?

0:58:30.160 --> 0:58:35.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, I I gotta tell you guys something. I

0:58:35.240 --> 0:58:38.080
<v Speaker 1>have a very what's going to be an unpopular opinion

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:38.400
<v Speaker 1>on this.

0:58:40.880 --> 0:58:41.480
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:58:43.400 --> 0:58:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm old enough to remember how every single one of

0:58:47.720 --> 0:58:53.479
<v Speaker 1>us felt the day after he came on the court,

0:58:54.120 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 1>mocked the honest, waved that flag in his face, and

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:03.040
<v Speaker 1>then the next day did a TV interview where he

0:59:03.120 --> 0:59:07.760
<v Speaker 1>had no remorse whatsoever and claimed he wasn't even looking

0:59:07.800 --> 0:59:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at you, honest. And so not only do I not

0:59:13.800 --> 0:59:17.840
<v Speaker 1>want him court side, I think he should still not

0:59:17.920 --> 0:59:22.440
<v Speaker 1>be allowed to go to the games. Okay, so I'm

0:59:22.520 --> 0:59:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the only person I think who feels like I felt

0:59:28.360 --> 0:59:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a whole two and a half weeks ago when we

0:59:32.160 --> 0:59:36.920
<v Speaker 1>all said he needs to be banned. Every single person

0:59:37.080 --> 0:59:41.320
<v Speaker 1>was like, you've gotta ban him, And then Halliburton hits

0:59:41.320 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a game winner, and Barkley's like, free John Halliburton, and

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:49.800
<v Speaker 1>now everyone's like, oh, yeah, in fact, sit him next

0:59:49.800 --> 0:59:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to Shalloman, like there is I have no reason to

0:59:54.120 --> 0:59:57.720
<v Speaker 1>believe that. I don't think this was too harsh of

0:59:57.760 --> 0:59:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a penalty.

0:59:58.840 --> 1:00:00.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't was it just be until the end of

1:00:00.840 --> 1:00:02.760
<v Speaker 2>this season. Was that the initial.

1:00:02.560 --> 1:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes? And then they and maybe they I thought

1:00:06.960 --> 1:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe the rational was the Pacers are going to lose

1:00:11.400 --> 1:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to the Cavs, so it's you know, it's all one

1:00:13.640 --> 1:00:18.040
<v Speaker 1>round and now they won. I would be open to

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>if they make the finals letting him back, but I

1:00:23.800 --> 1:00:28.640
<v Speaker 1>don't like it. I I thought, what he again? We

1:00:28.800 --> 1:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>are people, people have such short memories. We were all

1:00:35.520 --> 1:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>discussing how impressive it was that Yiannis didn't punch that

1:00:41.120 --> 1:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>guy in the face, and we were all talking about

1:00:46.760 --> 1:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what an impossible position he put Yannis in. Yeah, right,

1:00:53.040 --> 1:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>And now eight games later we're.

1:00:58.080 --> 1:01:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Like, ah, I think what you do it's probably just

1:01:03.160 --> 1:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, people, people's emotions and like seeing Halibird and

1:01:06.920 --> 1:01:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I are cooking, he's making a run, his dad's not

1:01:09.320 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 3>able to go to the games.

1:01:10.280 --> 1:01:12.479
<v Speaker 2>I also think people are starting to like Halivert more.

1:01:13.240 --> 1:01:15.720
<v Speaker 3>I certainly liked Tyree's Haliburton, not more than I liked

1:01:15.760 --> 1:01:16.480
<v Speaker 3>him two months ago.

1:01:17.320 --> 1:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Sure, that's fine. I like his dad less. And I

1:01:23.200 --> 1:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>don't I the there, I don't know.

1:01:27.200 --> 1:01:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I mean And when you when you said that he

1:01:29.240 --> 1:01:31.560
<v Speaker 3>said that he wasn't looking at honest, and you when

1:01:31.600 --> 1:01:33.320
<v Speaker 3>he said he was looking through him, did you think

1:01:33.360 --> 1:01:36.400
<v Speaker 3>he was being uh disingenuous? There are you saying? Do

1:01:36.400 --> 1:01:38.280
<v Speaker 3>you actually think that he wasn't trying to look at

1:01:38.320 --> 1:01:40.640
<v Speaker 3>you honest? Or I think that when he said he

1:01:40.680 --> 1:01:41.240
<v Speaker 3>was looking through.

1:01:41.160 --> 1:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Him, he was taunting honest. He tried to claim he

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>was not taunting.

1:01:46.600 --> 1:01:49.080
<v Speaker 2>Honest, okay, because you made it seem like he kind

1:01:49.080 --> 1:01:49.680
<v Speaker 2>of lied about it.

1:01:49.680 --> 1:01:51.480
<v Speaker 3>I thought when he said I was looking through him,

1:01:51.520 --> 1:01:53.280
<v Speaker 3>like he was saying like, yeah, I was looking at him,

1:01:53.320 --> 1:01:55.200
<v Speaker 3>like I was looking right through him type of deal.

1:01:55.360 --> 1:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>No, no, no, no, that that interview. Maybe I'm wrong.

1:02:02.880 --> 1:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I see it was him saying, oh, I didn't even

1:02:07.080 --> 1:02:10.200
<v Speaker 1>realize he was there. I was just in the moment

1:02:10.760 --> 1:02:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and that I was just I just picked that spot randomly,

1:02:14.840 --> 1:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>and he happened to be there, and I didn't pick

1:02:17.320 --> 1:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>up on it because I was looking through him. I

1:02:18.680 --> 1:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the crowd, and I'm like, that's not

1:02:20.280 --> 1:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy that feels bad.

1:02:21.680 --> 1:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, and so maybe I'm.

1:02:24.240 --> 1:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Miss interpreting it, but I didn't. I didn't like the game.

1:02:30.880 --> 1:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't love it. All right, Let's do one quick

1:02:33.240 --> 1:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL thing and then get to some listener questions.

1:02:35.800 --> 1:02:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Sakon Barkley told Red Blanket Ship and Cooper Degene on

1:02:39.200 --> 1:02:40.440
<v Speaker 3>their podcast that the.

1:02:42.920 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Man, did you hold on? Did you know this demand

1:02:45.520 --> 1:02:49.479
<v Speaker 1>before we even get to it? I bad news for us.

1:02:51.440 --> 1:02:54.760
<v Speaker 1>We're now competing with a Red Blanken Hip, Cooper de

1:02:54.880 --> 1:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Jene project. That's that's that's a nice tand my clear my, I'm.

1:03:01.400 --> 1:03:05.320
<v Speaker 6>Gonna have to catch up on the archives there all right, man,

1:03:05.320 --> 1:03:11.280
<v Speaker 6>oh man, I bet that's an insightful show. I'm excited

1:03:11.320 --> 1:03:11.880
<v Speaker 6>to listen.

1:03:13.680 --> 1:03:15.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay. Go ahead.

1:03:17.680 --> 1:03:20.120
<v Speaker 3>Told him that that that twenty twenty four Eagles team

1:03:20.600 --> 1:03:22.600
<v Speaker 3>the top five team in NFL history.

1:03:23.240 --> 1:03:26.400
<v Speaker 2>You're obviously a NFL historian, How true?

1:03:26.440 --> 1:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that not only is it not true, it's not even.

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>You can't even you can't even make a credible argument

1:03:36.520 --> 1:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>for like and by the way, Sakuon said they were

1:03:40.840 --> 1:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a top five team of all time and then listed

1:03:45.080 --> 1:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>five other teams in his top five, which then would

1:03:49.720 --> 1:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>make them, I guess, the top six team of all time.

1:03:52.880 --> 1:03:55.360
<v Speaker 1>But one of the teams he listed was the two

1:03:55.440 --> 1:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand Ravens, which is not a top twenty team of

1:03:59.280 --> 1:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>all time. Like, none of this makes sense, but the

1:04:04.480 --> 1:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>seventy two Dolphins that went undefeated had the number one

1:04:10.480 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>offense and the number one defense and beat teams by

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>an average of fifteen points a game. That's a top

1:04:15.840 --> 1:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>five team of all time. The eighty four Niners that

1:04:19.520 --> 1:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>went fifteen to one annihilated their postseason opponents start to finish,

1:04:25.080 --> 1:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>had a top two offense, top two defense. The eighty

1:04:28.280 --> 1:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>five Bears that everyone talks about the greatest defense of

1:04:31.320 --> 1:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>all time, which it had, but it also had the

1:04:34.640 --> 1:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>number two offense in the sport that year and beat

1:04:38.040 --> 1:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>their playoff opponents Demonse ninety one to ten is a

1:04:43.200 --> 1:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>top five team of all time.

1:04:45.280 --> 1:04:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Bears quarterback ever throw up for more than four thousand yards.

1:04:48.360 --> 1:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>I know because they had defense.

1:04:50.240 --> 1:04:51.200
<v Speaker 2>I guess it was amazing.

1:04:51.240 --> 1:04:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But okay, the defense was amazing. They had an amazing

1:04:54.000 --> 1:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>running game. They scored the second most points of any

1:04:56.160 --> 1:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>team in the league that year. The the who are

1:05:02.360 --> 1:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>the other teams? I'm leaving out an obvious one nine

1:05:05.640 --> 1:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to two Cowboys pretty good, seventy eight Steelers, which had

1:05:10.440 --> 1:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I think eleven Hall of Famers, They're pretty good. The

1:05:13.920 --> 1:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>seven Patriots didn't win the Super Bowl. The the greatest team

1:05:16.640 --> 1:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen, the twenty sixteen Patriots that went fourteen

1:05:21.280 --> 1:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and two and ran had a top two offense and defense.

1:05:24.800 --> 1:05:29.280
<v Speaker 1>They were pretty good. The ninety eight Broncos en route

1:05:29.320 --> 1:05:33.640
<v Speaker 1>to a back to back championship. Like listen, the Eagles

1:05:33.640 --> 1:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>had the number eight offense, number two defense, and were

1:05:38.480 --> 1:05:43.200
<v Speaker 1>in one score playoff games in rounds one in rounds two? Now,

1:05:43.760 --> 1:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>did the Eagles have a top five Super Bowl performance

1:05:47.320 --> 1:05:50.120
<v Speaker 1>because of what they did and who they did it to? Sure,

1:05:50.280 --> 1:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll listen to that. You want to say, did they

1:05:52.640 --> 1:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>have a top five all time final two games by

1:05:57.560 --> 1:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>just dismantling the Commanders and the dismantling the Chiefs. Sure

1:06:01.920 --> 1:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll listen to that. But top five? Yeah, but they

1:06:08.240 --> 1:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>still scored fifty five, you know what I mean, or

1:06:10.960 --> 1:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever they scored like the sure. But I just people, again,

1:06:19.960 --> 1:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone just leave the list to me. Your guys lists suck.

1:06:26.600 --> 1:06:31.360
<v Speaker 1>And again I just and he wouldn't even it was

1:06:31.400 --> 1:06:33.800
<v Speaker 1>so his top Here were his top five teams of

1:06:33.840 --> 1:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>all time for the record, seventy two Dolphins because they're undefeated.

1:06:39.040 --> 1:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Good job, eighty five Bears, good job, the two thousand Ravens,

1:06:45.080 --> 1:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>who it's not even a tenable opinion. And then he

1:06:50.800 --> 1:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>was like one of the Brady teams and one of

1:06:53.720 --> 1:06:57.760
<v Speaker 1>the Mahomes teams, like that's not even like a thing,

1:06:58.280 --> 1:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and so I just like whatever, Uh, all right, let's

1:07:02.960 --> 1:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>remember to everyone like rate, subscribe, review if you have

1:07:07.680 --> 1:07:11.640
<v Speaker 1>time to, you know, when you're not listening to the

1:07:11.720 --> 1:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Read Blank and Hip Cooper Degene podcast, if you want

1:07:14.320 --> 1:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to check out What's right with Nick? Right, we'd appreciate it.

1:07:16.880 --> 1:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You think I'm being rude there, Demansey.

1:07:20.480 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 3>Hey man on the podcast, It's gonna be very insightful,

1:07:25.320 --> 1:07:26.520
<v Speaker 3>and you know, I like.

1:07:27.160 --> 1:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go do a three cone drill after this

1:07:29.400 --> 1:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>after our pod. All right, what are some listener questions?

1:07:33.280 --> 1:07:33.440
<v Speaker 4>Uh?

1:07:33.520 --> 1:07:35.280
<v Speaker 2>Cale suggests another rule change.

1:07:35.640 --> 1:07:37.360
<v Speaker 3>What do you think about there being a timer on

1:07:37.480 --> 1:07:40.720
<v Speaker 3>replay reviews if the reps can't clearly overturn the call

1:07:40.760 --> 1:07:42.560
<v Speaker 3>in one minute call stands.

1:07:42.920 --> 1:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>That's how it was when they brought it to the

1:07:44.560 --> 1:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>NFL initially, and that's of course how it should be.

1:07:48.240 --> 1:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>There was a real timer, and the logic was within

1:07:52.120 --> 1:07:54.840
<v Speaker 1>thirty or forty five or sixty seconds, I don't remember.

1:07:55.600 --> 1:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>If we can't figure it out within this timeframe, then

1:07:59.320 --> 1:08:02.800
<v Speaker 1>whatever we then it's not clear and obvious. The whole

1:08:02.880 --> 1:08:08.680
<v Speaker 1>idea was. The idea behind replay was to fix egregious mistakes,

1:08:09.840 --> 1:08:15.919
<v Speaker 1>not to parse hundredths of a second, you know, through

1:08:16.000 --> 1:08:19.639
<v Speaker 1>zapruder film. That's not what it was there for. Let's

1:08:19.680 --> 1:08:20.599
<v Speaker 1>go on to the next one.

1:08:20.960 --> 1:08:23.360
<v Speaker 3>Jam as has there ever been a team that is

1:08:23.400 --> 1:08:25.439
<v Speaker 3>the youngest and best team in the NBA like this?

1:08:25.520 --> 1:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, see team well, I mean OKC in twenty twelve

1:08:31.240 --> 1:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>had a shot and people can be like, oh, they

1:08:34.439 --> 1:08:38.799
<v Speaker 1>weren't the best team. They were the favorites over Lebron's

1:08:38.840 --> 1:08:42.599
<v Speaker 1>heat in the finals. They were the favorites and they

1:08:42.640 --> 1:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>won Game one, so you know that was they had

1:08:47.720 --> 1:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>a real argument for it. They just you know, Lebron

1:08:51.880 --> 1:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and d Wade just weren't having it all right.

1:08:54.360 --> 1:08:57.559
<v Speaker 3>Next, Uh, Curtis, if you manage the MAVs, would you

1:08:57.640 --> 1:09:01.920
<v Speaker 3>rather have Luca and Brunson or Flag A D and Kyrie?

1:09:02.680 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Luca and Brunson. I mean, listen, Kyrie is coming is

1:09:08.320 --> 1:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>dealing with a catastrophic kne injury. Ad is thirty two

1:09:12.439 --> 1:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and has real injury questions. And I like the idea

1:09:16.920 --> 1:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of Cooper Flag But those other guys are two top

1:09:21.560 --> 1:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>eight players in the league. Uh, so that's not even

1:09:25.720 --> 1:09:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a question to me, do Luca?

1:09:27.160 --> 1:09:29.439
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I mean they did get traded away from

1:09:29.600 --> 1:09:30.960
<v Speaker 3>each other's teams for a reason.

1:09:30.960 --> 1:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Do those guys even work together like that? And considering

1:09:33.439 --> 1:09:34.200
<v Speaker 2>their play style?

1:09:34.360 --> 1:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't think so, but I do. I just

1:09:37.760 --> 1:09:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think you could, you know, figure out a way to

1:09:40.920 --> 1:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>make it work, figure out a way or flip one

1:09:44.000 --> 1:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>for a real bounty, not what they flipped Luca for,

1:09:47.000 --> 1:09:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you know all that stuff.

1:09:48.080 --> 1:09:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Right all right?

1:09:49.200 --> 1:09:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Next, Trey ass, what events are you playing in World

1:09:52.080 --> 1:09:53.160
<v Speaker 3>Series of Poker this year?

1:09:55.360 --> 1:10:01.479
<v Speaker 1>Great question? So I actually, uh, it's not at all

1:10:01.520 --> 1:10:05.680
<v Speaker 1>what you guys expect. So I and now some hopefully

1:10:06.400 --> 1:10:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I won't play in all of these because the final

1:10:10.439 --> 1:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>table for some overlaps with the other events. But theoretically

1:10:17.720 --> 1:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I am playing in the ten thousand dollars Dealer's Choice Championship,

1:10:25.160 --> 1:10:28.799
<v Speaker 1>which is an demons. It's an unbelieve. There are twenty

1:10:29.040 --> 1:10:35.400
<v Speaker 1>two different games and every seven hands, a different person

1:10:35.439 --> 1:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>at the table gets to pick which game they're playing

1:10:38.960 --> 1:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>for those seven hands. So like, so there's twenty two

1:10:43.080 --> 1:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>different variations, okay, from seven card stud to Badoogie badou

1:10:49.080 --> 1:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>se five card draw which is like the you know

1:10:53.720 --> 1:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>old school game regular nolamit hold them big. Oh, and

1:10:59.040 --> 1:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>so you have to be able to play and know

1:11:01.280 --> 1:11:05.439
<v Speaker 1>the rules and be sophisticated at all the games. So

1:11:05.479 --> 1:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that is that's the tournament I want to play, and

1:11:09.080 --> 1:11:13.719
<v Speaker 1>that's the tournament. So that so that's one. I'm also

1:11:13.920 --> 1:11:17.439
<v Speaker 1>going to play the fifteen hundred dollars Badugie. A lot

1:11:17.520 --> 1:11:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of this just has to deal with the tournaments that

1:11:19.160 --> 1:11:22.759
<v Speaker 1>are being played while I'm out there. I might play

1:11:23.880 --> 1:11:27.519
<v Speaker 1>what will be the most bananas tournament of the series

1:11:27.680 --> 1:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and the first time they've ever held it, the fifteen

1:11:30.280 --> 1:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred pot limit Omaha Double Board Bomb Pot Tournament, which

1:11:34.880 --> 1:11:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is just going to be billful and then I'm probably

1:11:40.240 --> 1:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>also going to play in the ten thousand dollars seven

1:11:42.800 --> 1:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Card stud Championship. So I'm not playing any traditional no

1:11:46.760 --> 1:11:51.840
<v Speaker 1>limit hold'ems, and I'm playing all these different mixed games

1:11:51.880 --> 1:11:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and i couldn't be more excited. So those are the

1:11:54.280 --> 1:11:58.040
<v Speaker 1>ones that those are the ones I'm playing in. All right,

1:11:58.080 --> 1:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>go to Eric's question before we.

1:11:59.400 --> 1:12:02.880
<v Speaker 3>Get out of the Drake May question here today, expectations

1:12:02.880 --> 1:12:05.120
<v Speaker 3>for Drake May this year feels like he used to

1:12:05.160 --> 1:12:06.679
<v Speaker 3>be higher on him, but have had.

1:12:06.479 --> 1:12:08.680
<v Speaker 2>A count counter.

1:12:08.479 --> 1:12:12.800
<v Speaker 3>Turbulence count counterbalance counter oh oh, counter turbulence is not

1:12:12.840 --> 1:12:13.160
<v Speaker 3>a word.

1:12:13.439 --> 1:12:15.600
<v Speaker 2>Counterbalance, Wild's optimism.

1:12:15.640 --> 1:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, I listen. I like I like Drake May coming

1:12:20.200 --> 1:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>out of school because he's very young and very big

1:12:23.439 --> 1:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and very strong. And that's how I like my top

1:12:26.200 --> 1:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>three picks.

1:12:26.880 --> 1:12:27.360
<v Speaker 2>I want him.

1:12:27.400 --> 1:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't want him to have sixty starts under their belt.

1:12:30.200 --> 1:12:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I want him to be young and six four and

1:12:33.520 --> 1:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>big and all that stuff. And I thought he was

1:12:35.960 --> 1:12:41.000
<v Speaker 1>fine last year. What the wild thing is that he's maddening,

1:12:41.720 --> 1:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and it is that he has just completely changed what

1:12:46.240 --> 1:12:49.960
<v Speaker 1>all of his rules ever were for grading quarterbacks were

1:12:50.000 --> 1:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>for this guy, and he is he is acting as

1:12:54.080 --> 1:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>if that he sees more in Drake May than he

1:12:58.400 --> 1:13:01.479
<v Speaker 1>saw in mac Jones, which he should because Drake Mays

1:13:01.520 --> 1:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>objectively better than mac Jones. But he loved mac Jones.

1:13:05.160 --> 1:13:08.479
<v Speaker 1>So to answer your question, yeah, I just got a

1:13:09.200 --> 1:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I I Wild. It's so yeah. Wild is just so

1:13:13.479 --> 1:13:15.719
<v Speaker 1>punch drunk on the fact that he has a quarterback

1:13:15.760 --> 1:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that can throw, you know, could throw a ten yard

1:13:19.400 --> 1:13:24.519
<v Speaker 1>out route through a couple plies of bounty, that he

1:13:24.560 --> 1:13:26.479
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know what to do with himself. So that's it,

1:13:26.560 --> 1:13:29.719
<v Speaker 1>all right, Everybody like rate subscribe review if you could.

1:13:29.760 --> 1:13:32.360
<v Speaker 1>It actually really does help us out a lot. Great job,

1:13:32.439 --> 1:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Demon's great job, Blue Dog, great job. Friends of the

1:13:35.120 --> 1:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Volume and DraftKings. And if the game tonight is insane,

1:13:41.240 --> 1:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe we'll do a show tomorrow, but the plan is

1:13:44.080 --> 1:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to probably just do a show on Thursday, and my

1:13:46.920 --> 1:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>guess is on Thursday we will be discussing the Knicks

1:13:50.880 --> 1:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>having tied the series two games apiece, and the Thunder

1:13:54.240 --> 1:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>advancing to the second finals in team history. See you guys, then,

1:13:58.200 --> 1:13:58.639
<v Speaker 1>what's right