WEBVTT - Why Oil Didn't Hit $200

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Who's really happy is the market because the market's gone

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 2>up thousands of points over the last four or five

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:16.760
<v Speaker 2>days since hearing about it. And the Strait is going

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 2>to be opening, It's already partially opened, it's going to

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 2>be opening up.

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 3>I'm Stephanie Flanders, head of Government and Economics at Bloomberg,

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 3>and this is Trumpnonomics, the podcast that looks at the

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 3>economic world of Donald Trump, how he's shaking up the

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.360
<v Speaker 3>global economy and what on earth is going to happen next.

0:00:41.600 --> 0:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Now.

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:45.559
<v Speaker 3>We're recording this in London on Wednesday, the seventeenth of June.

0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 3>We don't know, may never know the exact detail of

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the agreement between the US and Iran that we expect

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 3>famous last words to be signed in Switzerland this coming Friday.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 3>But President Trump tells us the horn Mo is going

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 3>to be opening up, and for now investors and those

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:05.959
<v Speaker 3>closest to the oil industry seem to believe in But

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.000
<v Speaker 3>what does that mean from a practical standpoint, and why

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 3>there seem to be such wildly differing views inside and

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 3>outside the market on how long it will take for

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 3>the oil market to in some sense get back to normal.

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>I mean, depending on who you talk to, it's either

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 3>going to take months to demine the straight offol moods,

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 3>fix all those damage refineries, or the whole thing could

0:01:27.560 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 3>seem like a bad dream in a matter of weeks.

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 3>I want to get to the bottom of that today,

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.280
<v Speaker 3>but I also want to step back to ask how

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 3>this entire conflict since the end of February has changed

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 3>the course of the global economy compared with what we

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 3>might have been expecting on February twenty seventh. And if

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:46.840
<v Speaker 3>we get time, I'd also like to ask whether the

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 3>global oil market has also been changed for good. I

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 3>noticed the UAE said today it was working on completely

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 3>eliminating its reliance on the straight offoil moods over the

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.400
<v Speaker 3>next few years. Well, Javier blast is absolutely the man

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 3>to ask about all of that, and I'm glad to

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 3>say he's on the line.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Have you. Thank you so much, my pleasure, Thank you

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>for having me.

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:09.000
<v Speaker 3>Should remind people you're the Bloomberg Opinion, the Bloomberg Opinion

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 3>columnists covering energy and commodities after years and years covering

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 3>those markets as a reporter, and you're also the co

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 3>author of the world for sale, money power and the

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 3>traders who.

0:02:20.600 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Barter the Earth's resources.

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 3>But on the broader economic piece of the story, I'm

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 3>glad to say we also have in the studio here

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 3>in London, Jamie Rush, director of Global Economics at Bloomberg

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 3>and co author of the Price of Money. He's worked

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 3>before at the British Treasury, the New Zealand Treasury and

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 3>the UK Office for Budget Responsibility. Jamie, thanks for joining pleasure.

0:02:43.040 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Normally you're far too busy on all of our forecart

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:49.200
<v Speaker 3>and our modeling and our crack views on everything, so

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm glad I'm been able to get you into the studio.

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Have tell us what you understand by the opening of

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 3>the Ormond straight and what would that mean and relative

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 3>short term for oil prices and the oil market generally

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 3>oil supplies.

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's call the reopening of the Street of Hormones the

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 4>day that we see from the Persian Gulf region, so

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 4>that is Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Kubait

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 4>and Iran plaskatter more or less the same amount of

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 4>oil that we were seeing on February the twenty seven.

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 4>And the reason that they are so diverge in abuse

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:33.360
<v Speaker 4>is that never anything similar to what we are about

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 4>to witness has been ever done. The oil industry needs

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 4>to restart about Ghibet or take ten thousand oil wells.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 4>We don't know whether those wells are going to come

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 4>back into life with oil flowing. They're gonna be dry,

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.320
<v Speaker 4>They're gonna have problems. We don't know if the pipelines

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 4>are in good shape. What happens when you restart the machinery.

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 4>What comes out of an oil well is not all oil.

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 4>Is a bit of oil, a bit of water, a

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 4>bit of gas, and a bit of sand that needs

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.840
<v Speaker 4>to be separated. The industrial plants that do that separation

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 4>have been shut down for one hundred days. We don't

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 4>know what happened when you re start then you know

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 4>from the coal I sit on the optimis side, having

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 4>to spend some time in recent weeks talking to people

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:26.279
<v Speaker 4>who do a lot of maintenance in these oil fields

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 4>in the Middle East. My kind of expectation is that

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 4>fifty percent of the production capacity comes back into what

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 4>I call days, somewhere between five and ten days. We

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 4>get a significant chunk of production capacity coming back and

0:04:40.920 --> 0:04:44.800
<v Speaker 4>heating myself, But say somewhere between three and six weeks

0:04:44.880 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 4>you get to seventy five percent. Getting back the one

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:51.839
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent, that's a bit more difficult. The final bit

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 4>is going to take more time. I think that it

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.840
<v Speaker 4>takes perhaps months. Can it be that returning to one

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 4>hundred percent takes more than a year? Yeah, that's possible.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 4>But in some ways, and excuse me to put it

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:07.920
<v Speaker 4>this way, I care very little about the last two

0:05:07.960 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 4>percentage points of oil supplies coming back because two reasons. One,

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 4>oil demand is weaker than we were in February the

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:20.000
<v Speaker 4>twenty seven, so the market balance at a lower production level.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 4>And also, because the rest of the world has moved on.

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 4>You have American oil production scenes increasing significantly to an

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:31.720
<v Speaker 4>all time I may. You have Brazilian production app nearly

0:05:31.800 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty percent year on year. So we do not need

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:38.640
<v Speaker 4>to go back exactly to where we were on February

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 4>the twenty seven for the oil market to revalance. So

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.520
<v Speaker 4>I think that on that debate of how long it takes,

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 4>I am on the days and weeks rather than on

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 4>the months and years.

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:53.599
<v Speaker 3>Okay, And it's interesting there's various things embedded in that,

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:57.239
<v Speaker 3>and then that sort of relatively optimism, which I notice

0:05:58.000 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 3>relative to those who have sort of suggested it was

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:03.160
<v Speaker 3>all going to take a much longer. So there's a

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 3>question mark about what happens when you reopen the production facilities.

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 3>But they actual damage to those facilities, you know, the

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 3>talk of you know, years and years of repairs. You

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 3>don't think that's going to be a significant issue.

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:19.239
<v Speaker 4>No, the oil industry in the Middle East has suffered

0:06:19.400 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 4>relatively little damage in the oil side from the war.

0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:28.320
<v Speaker 4>What is on production facilities. There has been damage or

0:06:28.320 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 4>what we call the downstream side of the industry. That's

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 4>more the refining side where son refineries are going to

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 4>need significant repairs, and that's going to be measured more

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 4>into probably the end of the year or the beginning

0:06:42.120 --> 0:06:45.800
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty seven. But what is the production facilities,

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 4>or what we typically call in the oil industry the

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 4>upstream side, so that's the oil wells, the processing centers,

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 4>the pipelines, et cetera, et cetera.

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>There has been relatively very little damage.

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 4>Most of the damage that was sustained, particularly in Saudi

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.040
<v Speaker 4>Arabia and Kubay, has been repaired. And this is also

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 4>a very important question. I was asking a few weeks

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 4>ago to someone who does a lot of work in

0:07:12.000 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 4>the oil fields of the Middle East, and I said,

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 4>what you guys have been doing and they said, well,

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 4>we have been working the oil fields, burying a few

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:22.640
<v Speaker 4>missiles here and there.

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>But the oil.

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 4>Fields were not a battleground. They were not a war

0:07:27.680 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 4>vote over the oil field. This is very different to

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 4>Kube nineteen nineteen, nineteen ninety one, or Olivia during the

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 4>civil war in twenty eleven, where I was in the

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 4>oil fields and the different factions were fighting for the

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 4>controls of those oil fields. They were bombing the oil

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 4>fields and the facilities were damaged in some occasions. This

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 4>is a war that has not really affected the oil fields,

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 4>and maintenance have been taking place, and engineers have been

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 4>doing preventive war, so when the day comes that they

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 4>can't re esta the world, they can't do it.

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:06.000
<v Speaker 3>I did notice our chief merging market economists actually pointed

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 3>out that in some ways, if you're thinking about what's

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 3>the key constraint on oil while the strait still closed,

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 3>is it the sort of damage to the facilities, or

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 3>is it the strait itself. And he pointed out there's

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 3>kind of been a natural experiment that the attacks have

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 3>hit facilities on both sides of the Strait, but the

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:25.160
<v Speaker 3>non hill move sites have kept operating while the homo's

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 3>activity felt so the difference was clearly not about the

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:30.280
<v Speaker 3>attacks damaging the facilities, it was where their energy could

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 3>actually get out. Before I get onto Jamie on the

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 3>broader economics, I just want to sort of tick off

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 3>a couple more things with you have yet the other

0:08:36.840 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 3>things that people talk about, which again embedded in your

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 3>first answer, seemed to be not compelling constraints, the demining

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 3>of the Strait again talk of that taking months and months,

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:51.800
<v Speaker 3>and also that it's not an issue for the sort

0:08:51.800 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 3>of stability of the market and the pricing to have

0:08:55.480 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 3>all of those reserves having been run down over the

0:08:58.559 --> 0:09:01.560
<v Speaker 3>last few months. There's no expectation that all of these

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:04.840
<v Speaker 3>reserves have to be back up before you before prices

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 3>start to come down.

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:08.680
<v Speaker 4>Now, I think that we will need to rebuild some

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 4>of those inventories. Certainly, if we look at demand for

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 4>oil in twenty twenty seven, we need to assume that

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:16.880
<v Speaker 4>it's not the oil barrels that we are going to

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 4>consume or burn, but it's also the oil barrels that

0:09:19.640 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 4>we are going to put aside and put back into

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 4>a staategic reserves. So the demand may be a bit

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 4>a bit higher than we think. One constraint is going

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 4>to be the amount of vessels that they are available.

0:09:29.320 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 4>We need to reposition all the oil tankers back into

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East, and some one of those tankers are

0:09:34.120 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 4>now at the wrong location because they are picking up

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 4>crude oil, say in the Gulf of Mexico for Japan,

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 4>rather than picking up crude oil in the Middle East

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 4>the Persian Golf.

0:09:43.360 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So you have to recall some of those basons.

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 4>And we are starting to see diversions on some vessels

0:09:49.000 --> 0:09:52.560
<v Speaker 4>that they were close to turn around Africa into going

0:09:52.600 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 4>into the Atlantic. They are performing your turns and they're

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 4>going back to the Indian Olsa and heading back into

0:09:58.840 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East. So we are beginning to kind of

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 4>reposition all the vessels. That takes a bit of time.

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 4>These vessels they move at not that the speed of

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 4>a high speed train or a car.

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they make about twenty.

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 4>Five kilometers per hour or take if we put it

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 4>in card terms, So it takes time to move them around.

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 4>But there are about sixty seventy tank has already waiting

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 4>in the Gulf of Man, ready to go the moment

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 4>that the strade opens. I think that the mining is

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 4>a question. There are areas of the stradio hormones that

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 4>they are clear of minds, close to the Omani coust,

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 4>close to the Iranian cost, so that is a vailable

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 4>and I think that what we need is a proof

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 4>of concept the oil shipping industry. There are a number

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 4>of ship owners who have a reputation for being I

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 4>think that the sympathetic term is more adventurous at the

0:10:45.440 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 4>non sympathetic term is more buccaneering. But they will be

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 4>the first ones to cross the stradio hormones. They will

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 4>be the proof of concept that actually you can do it.

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 4>And when they do it, we will start with a trickle,

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 4>but the flood will follow very quickly.

0:11:01.480 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 3>So, Jamie, where is it that Bloomberg Economics thinks oil

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 3>prices or what are our kind of best guesses of

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 3>how quickly the oil market can adjust and what that

0:11:11.840 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 3>means for prices, Because obviously it doesn't seem like we're

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 3>going to get back to where we were before the

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 3>conflict anytime soon, but it's still going to fall.

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, I suppose we're using similar rules of

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 5>thumb to others. If you go into this into the

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 5>Iran conflict, what happened to oil prices when we lost

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 5>the supply, Well, that gives you a rough feel for

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 5>what might happen to prices. They go down right if

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 5>you use kind of these rules of thumb, they weren't

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 5>a bad guide on the way in. Let's just imagine

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.360
<v Speaker 5>that you get five million barrels a day, which is

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 5>very conveniently five percent of global supply, an elasticity of

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:49.160
<v Speaker 5>four So if you lose one percent supply, prices go

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 5>up by four percent. Well, that means you might get

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 5>a drop in prices of around about twenty percent, which

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 5>takes you from ninety dollars down to seventy to seventy five.

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:00.560
<v Speaker 5>So I think that's the kind of range you'd expect

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 5>oil prices to settle in if that's the kind of

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.080
<v Speaker 5>increase in supplied the BC over the over the next

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 5>month or so.

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I remember even a debate on this podcast, for we

0:12:09.360 --> 0:12:11.640
<v Speaker 3>had Ziad and Haveavier at the beginning of the conflict,

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>and you know, very focused on the significance of the

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 3>straight Orfom moves, and at that point and I remember

0:12:17.520 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 3>feeling that it maybe was on the low side. We

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:24.560
<v Speaker 3>had as our kind of dark downside scenario that the

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.760
<v Speaker 3>oil price would go to one hundred and ten, and

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 3>Havevier and many others were saying, surely that the downside

0:12:30.600 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 3>could be a lot higher than that, despite the fact

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.480
<v Speaker 3>that the conflict has continued so much longer than people

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 3>would have expected or hoped at that time from an

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 3>economic standpoint, why have they not gone as high as

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 3>some thought?

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'll punt it back to have and tell us

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 5>what is wrong. I mean, there are a couple of factors, well,

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 5>a couple of things to think about. One is as havier.

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 5>It set out that the adjustment that China has made

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:55.480
<v Speaker 5>to its importance of oil has been a big insulating factor.

0:12:56.240 --> 0:12:59.560
<v Speaker 5>More broadly, though, I think the oil market, its role

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 5>in the globe economy has changed immeasurably over the last

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 5>ten to fifteen years. So if you go back to

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 5>twenty eleven, which is the last time we saw a

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 5>sustained period of oil at one hundred dollars a barrel, well,

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 5>two things have happened since then. We've seen the price

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 5>of everything else has gone up by about forty percent,

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.200
<v Speaker 5>related to the price of oil, and the efficiency with

0:13:19.240 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 5>which we use oil has gone up by about twenty

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:26.320
<v Speaker 5>five percent if you put these things together, or to

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 5>get an oil price shock of one hundred dollars a

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.200
<v Speaker 5>barrel now or how it felt like in twenty eleven,

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 5>you'd actually need oil to move to one hundred and

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 5>ninety dollars a bowl. So just those two factors alone

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 5>explain part of the economy's resilience and also perhaps why

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 5>the oil price itself hasn't jumped quite so much.

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 3>And there's also this point about the demand destruction. But

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, as the price goes up, you're gotting reduced demand,

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:50.560
<v Speaker 3>which in turn prevents it from going higher and high.

0:13:50.800 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 3>But I should be fair to you, have you the

0:13:52.760 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 3>really high end numbers that you talked about was if

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 3>there were serious attacks on, for example, desalination plants, which

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 3>clearly didn't happen. So I don't think you were making

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 3>sort of super high productions if that didn't happen. But

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 3>it was certainly the case that a lot of people

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 3>thought that prices would go higher than they have, and

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 3>they've certainly been surprised at how long they've been under

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.839
<v Speaker 3>one hundred dollars in many cases, certainly in the last

0:14:15.920 --> 0:14:18.079
<v Speaker 3>few weeks. So what's your explanation.

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 4>It's quite interesting because I was sanguine on where prices

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 4>were going to go if unless we have an open war,

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 4>and we started, you know, seeing Iran and his rivals

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 4>start getting the oil fields, which really never happened.

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>The oil price surprise me.

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 4>To the downside, the steel which has been I will

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:42.880
<v Speaker 4>have expected that prices will have been more sustained over

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:45.560
<v Speaker 4>one hundred dollars. I think that Jamie allude to some

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 4>of the of the factors, and there are a number

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:50.800
<v Speaker 4>of them, but you have to say, well, you can

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:52.800
<v Speaker 4>only name one, and only one.

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Will be against China.

0:14:54.040 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 4>China surprised me because reduced oil imports by tanker by

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 4>forty five percent relative to pre war level, and we

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 4>don't really know how that happened. I mean, we have

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 4>our suspicions lower demands on shifts on refineries, but we

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 4>do think that some kind of inventory droughtdown happened, whether

0:15:14.920 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 4>that was commercial inventories or strategic inventories. You look at

0:15:19.720 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 4>India was important in May of twenty twenty six exactly

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 4>as much oil as it was important in May or

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty five. So the fact that China came down

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 4>allow a number of other economies in Asia to continue buying.

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 4>I think that the use of the state petroleum reserves

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 4>in the West, particularly the US in Japan, very early

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.200
<v Speaker 4>in the conflict was very important and a significant change

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 4>of how we have used the SPR in the past.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you look at the conflict of Livia, the

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:50.360
<v Speaker 4>kind of the previous time that we use the sat

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:54.400
<v Speaker 4>Patrolan reserves. It took about six months of civil war

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 4>for the West to decide that there was a time

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 4>to use the SPR. Similar situation in nineteen nineteen nine.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 4>In ninety one during the basis of Kubei here we

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 4>used the SPR before the second week of the conflict

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 4>have ended so very, very different. And there are a

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 4>number of other factors that I think that they're important.

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 4>By going to number name only two more one U

0:16:15.600 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 4>allude to it demand destruction. We saw a significant amount

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 4>of oil consumption just to disappear without really causing a

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 4>lot of damage to the global economy. Perhaps it's because

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 4>we are having this narration from the West and we

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 4>didn't suffer and this was more of a crisis that

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 4>affected the number of economies in Southeast Asia poor economies,

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 4>but people in Europe, in Japan, in certainly in the

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 4>US and Canada didn't have to change the day to

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 4>day way of living, driving, flying around.

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Nothing changed.

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 4>So that was very interesting how demand came down without

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 4>affecting those economies. And the other one is the fact

0:16:55.440 --> 0:16:58.960
<v Speaker 4>that the Estrado hormus was never really truly close. There

0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:03.400
<v Speaker 4>were two big pipelines that provide bypass routes around the

0:17:03.440 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 4>Straateia hormones, one through Saudi Arabia, the other one through

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 4>the United Arab Emi dates and also towards the very

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 4>end of the crisis, and let's hope that this is

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 4>the very end of the crisis. We saw whether started

0:17:17.560 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 4>that trick call one or two oil tankers a week

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.119
<v Speaker 4>crossing the straight of hormones, what we call dark modes,

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 4>or they're beacon the location beacon off at night, very

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 4>close to the coast, closer to the coast that typically

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 4>you see these big vessels with are about three hundred

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 4>and thirty meters long. And that started like one or

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 4>two a week, and very quickly by last week it

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 4>was one or two or even three a day. And

0:17:45.880 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 4>that makes a big difference because you only need five

0:17:50.520 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 4>or six a day, and you are pre war levels.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 4>When people say, oh, you know, before the war, about

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 4>sixty vessels were crossing the Straight of hormones every day.

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 4>That really include with every kind of vessel from from

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 4>the big oil tankers to a small fishing troller. For

0:18:06.119 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 4>the big tankers, we need about seven a day big

0:18:12.440 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 4>oil tankers to cross the Straight of hormones and we

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 4>are at pre war esport levels, so that's also important

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 4>to remember.

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 3>It's funny because we've been focused on this issue for

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 3>so long and there's still things that I haven't had before.

0:18:24.800 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 4>So the mats go as Basically, you need about fifteen

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 4>million borrowers a day of crude oil esports to go

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 4>back to pre war level through the Straight of hormones.

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.720
<v Speaker 4>Each of what we call a BLCC very large crew

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 4>carrier is two million barrels thereabouts, so it's about seven

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 4>seven and a big tankers gives you there. And if

0:18:44.760 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 4>you consider that, probably we are going to still see

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 4>those bypass pipelines working. Actually probably we only need to

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 4>cross through proper a stray hormos about ten million barrels,

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 4>which is five vessels a day. It is not a

0:18:59.520 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 4>huge even if you have to basically seek sag. I'm

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.200
<v Speaker 4>on the minds it's only five tankers a day. It

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 4>is not fifty sixty one hundred veersels a day.

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 3>I love that VLCC. There's very large containers. If I'm

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 3>just going to start referring to that, you know with

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 3>people who you have your VLC, you have your very

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>large car. Jamie. Have you mentioned about the sort of

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 3>relatively muted impact on activity, certainly in the more advanced economies.

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:41.080
<v Speaker 3>So I guess that sort of takes us to this

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of second piece of just okay, assuming that this

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 3>is some kind of turning point, some kind of reopening point,

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:52.600
<v Speaker 3>thinking about what path the global economy is on now

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 3>relative to what we would have expected in mid February

0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 3>or you know, even the beginning of the year. How

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.920
<v Speaker 3>has this conflict changed the world from an economic standpoint.

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:05.560
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think we take a step back and look

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 5>at kind of economic outlook over the past year as

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 5>it looked at each point. So let's think about the

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.600
<v Speaker 5>impact of tariffs, the uncertainty that cause, and the impact

0:20:15.600 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 5>that had on the economy. Well, the economy was in

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.800
<v Speaker 5>a pretty much global slowdown, in twenty twenty five. As

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 5>we got towards the end of twenty twenty five, though,

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 5>things were really changing. Uncertainty basically disappeared. We knew what

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 5>Trump's end game was roughly with tariffs, and the economy

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 5>was starting to really recover. You saw that in advanced economies,

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 5>you saw it in developing economies, and of course you

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.159
<v Speaker 5>had the AI boom sort of supercharging all of that.

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.040
<v Speaker 5>So things were really looking up. At the start of

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 5>the year February the twenty seventh, the global economy looked

0:20:42.560 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 5>great and it doesn't look like that now. So if

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 5>we've got a global GDP tracker, which kind of uses

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 5>machine learning methods to combine lots and lots of information

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 5>soft information, which is kind of very very timely, and

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 5>you can see that immediately after the straight shut the

0:20:58.640 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 5>global economy started down. There are a few reasons why

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.200
<v Speaker 5>that's the case. Right. One is that there's the direct

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 5>effects of oil prices being higher, squeezing consumers making it

0:21:07.320 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 5>harder for them to buy stuff. That's the direct effect.

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 5>Then you have the uncertainty how long is it's going

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 5>to last. The oil price is going to go buy more?

0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 5>Am I going to be able to fly somewhere. These

0:21:15.600 --> 0:21:18.480
<v Speaker 5>things will affect people's decision making. And then finally you've

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 5>got tighter financial conditions because central banks are waking up

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 5>to the risk that inflation will be higher. They're not

0:21:25.400 --> 0:21:28.639
<v Speaker 5>cutting or they're indeed hiking, and this, of course is

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:30.639
<v Speaker 5>making it harder for businesses to invest, it's making it

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 5>more costly, it's making more costly to borrow. So all

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.639
<v Speaker 5>of these things are coming together to act as a

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:37.800
<v Speaker 5>drag on the economy. And the question is how fast

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:40.080
<v Speaker 5>are all these things are going to go away? The deal

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 5>is signed, maybe the straight open straight away, Maybe uncertainty

0:21:43.280 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 5>diminishes really fast, But how long is it going to

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.959
<v Speaker 5>be before central banks change their mind? They were kind

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 5>of very slow to kind of acknowledge that this was

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 5>an inflation risk, and one imagines that it could be

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.480
<v Speaker 5>very very slow to appreciate that the risk has passed

0:21:57.480 --> 0:21:58.639
<v Speaker 5>because they've been burnt before.

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 3>But every time we've talked about this in the past,

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 3>we've pointed out that a higher oil price is a

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 3>rational mechanism, and the countries that end up with much

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 3>less oil are the ones that just can't afford to pay,

0:22:10.320 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 3>and they're the ones who are also going to have

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 3>the bigger impact via the cost of the difficulty of

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 3>getting fertilizers. So Jamie is just to complete that picture

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 3>in terms of what the global impact is. But thinking

0:22:22.160 --> 0:22:26.440
<v Speaker 3>about emerging market economies and specifically the developing countries, well.

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:28.199
<v Speaker 5>I guess I mean one thing hasn't changed, which is

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 5>that the losers in this are always the economies which

0:22:30.640 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 5>are at least able to pay. They've got the highest

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 5>elasticity of demand. They have to destroy their demand when

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 5>this happens, and so that there is suffering happening around

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 5>the global economy. And as Javier said, it's just not

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.919
<v Speaker 5>happening so obviously in the West where we are, and

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 5>of course it's compounding other other risks we've heard about

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 5>fertilizer about We know that food prices are going up

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 5>in some places. We know that the client itself is

0:22:53.800 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 5>also compounding risks to food costs, and when you put

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.720
<v Speaker 5>all work together, then you get a fair depressing picture

0:23:00.760 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 5>for the risk of additional conflicts spinning out elsewhere in

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 5>some of the lower economies. We have research on that

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 5>other terminal as well. So it's so the consequences are

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:13.359
<v Speaker 5>the same as as always in some sense. But I

0:23:13.359 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 5>guess what's different this time relative to twenty twenty two

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 5>is we don't have the compounding factor of the FED

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 5>hiking rates by a huge amount and compelling other emerging

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 5>market economies to do the same. So we should in

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 5>that in that respect be slightly better.

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:28.240
<v Speaker 3>And given that we have spent a lot of time

0:23:28.280 --> 0:23:30.280
<v Speaker 3>over the last few years talking about what constitutes are

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:34.639
<v Speaker 3>temporary versus the lasting impact on inflation, and if we

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 3>look through to the end of the year, if things

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.159
<v Speaker 3>do pan out broadly as we've discussed in terms of

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 3>old prices in most countries, you'll be looking at a

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 3>higher most developed countries, you're looking at a higher inflation

0:23:45.440 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 3>rate at the end of this year, right.

0:23:47.119 --> 0:23:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's right.

0:23:47.840 --> 0:23:50.679
<v Speaker 5>So I think with the US people expecting inflation to

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 5>be about a percentage point higher at the end of

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 5>the year than it would have been had we not

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 5>had this crisis. For the UK and Europe, where there's

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 5>much more reliance on natural gas and a very segmented

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 5>market in the global gas market, it's more like one

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 5>and a half percentage points higher, so a bigger problem.

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 5>And the GDP impacts well, it's worse for the UK

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 5>and the EU area because we don't produce any oil ourselves.

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.720
<v Speaker 5>For the US, it's pretty modest. So central banks have

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 5>to weigh these two things, and generally it looks like

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 5>we're expect basically lost three cuts from the FED. You've

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 5>got maybe two hikes from the ECB. And who knows

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:26.520
<v Speaker 5>what the Bank of Being is going to do, because

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:28.920
<v Speaker 5>they're in a very sticky position because they keep worrying

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 5>about inflation so much, because they're still fighting the last

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 5>crisis on inflation. So it's a bit of a mess.

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.159
<v Speaker 5>I mean, the labor market looks completely different now from

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.000
<v Speaker 5>what it did in twenty twenty two. There's the likelihood

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.680
<v Speaker 5>of second round effects, so that people pushing for higher

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.359
<v Speaker 5>wages because they see their gas prices going up, their

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 5>fuel prices going up. That that's a lot less likely

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 5>this time around, but central banks are very scared, and

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:51.639
<v Speaker 5>so we may all end up paying the price for it.

0:24:51.680 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it is striking. In fact, we have a

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:56.199
<v Speaker 3>little dashboard as a sort of market dashboard on the

0:24:56.240 --> 0:24:59.680
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg main website. We have like what's going on today.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 3>It's also just a nice little thing they've had since

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:05.120
<v Speaker 3>the end of February on how key prices have changed

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.320
<v Speaker 3>since February twenty seven. The US stock market's still up

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.520
<v Speaker 3>seven eight percent. I think the dollars a bit higher,

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 3>but there's more than thirty percent increase in the average

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:18.120
<v Speaker 3>price of petrol gasoline in the US since February twenty seventh.

0:25:18.640 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, have you I guess a sort of similar,

0:25:20.960 --> 0:25:24.120
<v Speaker 3>sort of oil related version of that question for you. Obviously,

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 3>supplies or reserves are going to be lower for quite

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 3>some time. But if you're just looking at the state

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.199
<v Speaker 3>of the global oil market or the global energy market

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 3>now and sort of the likely state by the end

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 3>of the year, how would you tell that the Iran

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:44.320
<v Speaker 3>conflict has happened? What are the sort of big changes

0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 3>in terms of prices and other things.

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 4>The way I look at the market, I see two

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 4>main changes. Two that they are bullish. We emerge from

0:25:54.640 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 4>the conflict with significantly lower strategic petroleum reserves in most countries,

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 4>those will need to be rebuilt over time. That means

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:09.119
<v Speaker 4>buying barrels out of the open market to put into

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:10.520
<v Speaker 4>the stockpile.

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 3>So, just to be clear, if you're sitting in the

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 3>your market, bullish means you're expecting prices to stay higher

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.000
<v Speaker 3>and demand for the rest of us if they feel.

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:22.159
<v Speaker 4>Bully pullice is it's good news if you are an

0:26:22.160 --> 0:26:25.639
<v Speaker 4>oil producer, so higher. Let's let's use the proper the

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 4>proper terminology. Higher oil prices for two reasons. One because

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 4>we need to rebuild the petroleum reserves in the case

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 4>of the United States, that they are the lowest in

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 4>forty plus years.

0:26:37.600 --> 0:26:39.960
<v Speaker 1>That needs to be addressed. That means that demand next

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:40.919
<v Speaker 1>year will be higher.

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 4>And also bullies because we can see the straight of

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 4>hormones close again at short notice.

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Nothing guarantees that this deal is going to hold.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:54.000
<v Speaker 4>And also it's a complete This war staff happens that

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 4>is unpredictable. So the straight of hormones may reopen from Friday,

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.760
<v Speaker 4>but it may close Monday, and we need to be

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 4>aware of that. Parish oil price. Lower oil prices. Why

0:27:07.720 --> 0:27:10.880
<v Speaker 4>a couple of other factors there, perhaps more long term one.

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 4>We have learned that China can add as a buffer

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:19.919
<v Speaker 4>against any supply disruption, reducing his own oil imports in

0:27:19.960 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 4>a way, in a magnitude and in a speed that

0:27:24.240 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 4>no one in the oil market have previously anticipated, and

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:32.960
<v Speaker 4>that perhaps lowers forever the risk premia or the geopolitical

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 4>risk premia in the oil market, because yes, we do

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:38.439
<v Speaker 4>know that there are significant risks for the supply of oil.

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.040
<v Speaker 4>But now we know that there is a country which

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:45.119
<v Speaker 4>happens to be the world's largest oil importer, who is

0:27:45.200 --> 0:27:49.680
<v Speaker 4>able to swing his imports up or down forty percent

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:54.680
<v Speaker 4>in response to an exogenous shock. And Barry is also

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 4>lower oil prices because I think that we have seen

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 4>pig hormus the most influential moment of hormos in the

0:28:03.760 --> 0:28:07.760
<v Speaker 4>oil market. Going forward, every oil producer in the Middle

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:10.960
<v Speaker 4>East is going to try to build or increase the

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 4>capacity of those bypass pipelines. The United Arab Emidays have

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 4>announced today that their ambition is zero hormus, that they

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 4>do not rely at all on the waterway for any

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:26.640
<v Speaker 4>of the oil esports. They have an oil pipeline already

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 4>that bypass the Strada Hormons. They are building as we

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 4>speak another one that they will be ready by mid

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:34.880
<v Speaker 4>of twenty twenty seven, and now they are thinking about

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 4>building a third one. Saudi Arabia is very likely to

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 4>do the same. Iraq Kuwai we may see more so

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 4>we may find ourselves that perhaps in the northeast and

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:49.720
<v Speaker 4>future and I'm thinking about two thy and thirty where

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 4>enough pipeline capacity has been built to make if not

0:28:56.000 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 4>the strado hormones, if relevant, at least why significant mitigated

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.959
<v Speaker 4>force in the oil market compared to what is today.

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting.

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:07.560
<v Speaker 3>I mean, have it so just the sort of suiting

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 3>so you've got the short term bullish in the sense of,

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, people are going to have to replenish their stocks,

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:16.520
<v Speaker 3>prices will stay high to some extra stent. Well, that happens,

0:29:16.800 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 3>but longer term that kind of more of a ceiling

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 3>to prices over time. Because of that fascinating point about

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 3>China as the sort of swing importer.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 4>To me, what China has done in this crisis is

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 4>complete awakening. Now we do really need to consider that

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 4>if anything similar was to happen, China can do it again.

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Why are they not talking about it? They have tended

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.600
<v Speaker 3>to not be slow to take credit when they're acting

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 3>as a shock absorber or as a sort of good

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.800
<v Speaker 3>economic global citizen. I'm intriguing that they haven't talked about.

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 4>It's Sephanie, you you absolutely arell on because as an

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 4>oil analyst, I was speaking over the last few hours,

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 4>say why is Beijing not bragging about these and telling us,

0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 4>you guys have been enjoying a relatively moderate oil prices,

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 4>thank you to our policies. We invested in estaday, petrol researve,

0:30:09.560 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 4>we invested in this and that and that, And one

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 4>of the problems that we have is we don't know

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 4>exactly what I mean. We know what the outcome of

0:30:17.640 --> 0:30:23.160
<v Speaker 4>whatever China did has been a significant reduction of oil imports,

0:30:23.400 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 4>but we don't really know how they did it. Why

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:30.640
<v Speaker 4>is Beijing not from every loud speaker saying we did

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 4>this for you.

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 5>They may not want to. A Asia economists, our chief

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 5>economists in China tells us that what we see is

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.280
<v Speaker 5>a significant reduction in the use of gasoline and diesel,

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 5>not just withdraw from from reserves. So if that's the case,

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.560
<v Speaker 5>that would flag an economic weakness to come, and that's

0:30:48.600 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 5>not something that the policy makers wish to brag about

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 5>on the global stage. So it may be that it's

0:30:54.440 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 5>not a deliberate policy choice. Rather, oil is very expensive

0:30:57.880 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 5>and they don't want to pay for it.

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 3>I do think that's probably an element of that. Jamie Moore, broadly,

0:31:02.560 --> 0:31:05.719
<v Speaker 3>I guess some of the things that Javier was saying

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 3>about building more pipelines to avoid horror moves. At the

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 3>same time, we also have countries have often now accelerated

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 3>some of their moves to net zero to reduce their

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 3>reliance on carbon. I guess both of those things again

0:31:20.480 --> 0:31:23.840
<v Speaker 3>kind of continue that move away from a world in

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 3>which you can have a big Middle East energy disruption

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 3>affect the global economy.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:31.960
<v Speaker 5>The great pleasures of my job is that I get

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 5>to have depressing conversations about oil and the very uplifting

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 5>conversations about the new technologies which are driving forward the

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 5>decarbonization of our economy. If you look at Bloomberging Energy

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 5>Finance their projections for the uptake of these new technologies, Well,

0:31:44.880 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 5>this is another nudge. It's a reminder. It's a market

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 5>based reminder, not a policy led reminder. There are sharp

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 5>incentives to get on with it. And so I think,

0:31:53.040 --> 0:31:56.000
<v Speaker 5>if anything, it does nudg just further down that road.

0:31:56.280 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, again, with your sort of global macro head on,

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:01.800
<v Speaker 3>we've also in the line few years become used to

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 3>thinking about there being more frictions, more question marks, more

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 3>geoeconomic risk actually embedded in global trade and embedded in

0:32:09.840 --> 0:32:11.800
<v Speaker 3>the global economy. And the straits of all moods. Although

0:32:11.800 --> 0:32:14.680
<v Speaker 3>it always featured in these kind of wargame scenarios, it

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 3>basically that the sort of safe passage through the straight

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:20.719
<v Speaker 3>upfe moves was not something that had been an issue

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:23.200
<v Speaker 3>up until now, and we hadn't talked about it in

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:25.560
<v Speaker 3>some of these other cases, like the straight of Malaca, whatever.

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:30.520
<v Speaker 3>All of those kind of question marks, risks, you know,

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 3>have increased yet again.

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 5>Indeed, and we've see there's already some action I think

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 5>and HAVEVMA know more. But there are some countries which

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 5>are already seeking storage outside of the strait and having

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 5>relationships that we could create more buffers outside of the middleast,

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 5>so that if this happens again, the buffer is outside

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 5>of the straight.

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 3>Will it now just be baked in for all the

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 3>people that you talk to, spend your time with in

0:32:56.600 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 3>the oil market, that they're going to pay a price

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 3>to pass through the state moves on a kind of

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 3>ongoing basis, whether it's called a fee or an arrangement

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 3>cost or toll.

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 4>I sense that acrossing the street of hormones is going

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.200
<v Speaker 4>to be more expensive going forward for at least the

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 4>foresever future, because sheep owners are going to be asking

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:17.320
<v Speaker 4>for more money for the rias that their.

0:33:17.160 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Vessels get trapped.

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 4>Insurers are gonna be also demanding more money the Straight

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 4>of Hormones or the Persian Golf.

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Just in mind that that's a.

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 4>London street which suddenly we have seen ten robberies in

0:33:30.880 --> 0:33:33.959
<v Speaker 4>the last six months. Every insurer is going to increase

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 4>their premium just because the rice have increased. So the

0:33:38.080 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 4>Straight of Hormones Street has seen ten robberies, some of

0:33:41.360 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 4>them very violent, and the insurer is going to say, well,

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 4>you want to ensure the house on that street, you

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 4>have to pay a bit more money.

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Will it be a fee at all?

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 4>I suspect that on the very early days and weeks,

0:33:56.200 --> 0:33:59.200
<v Speaker 4>I will not be surprised that we see some kind

0:33:59.280 --> 0:33:59.880
<v Speaker 4>of payments.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that we're going to use.

0:34:01.080 --> 0:34:04.920
<v Speaker 4>The word at all. But can we see some navigation fees?

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 4>I would not be surprised. They are similar fees in

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 4>other straits and the boss for us in Turkey, for example,

0:34:11.480 --> 0:34:15.719
<v Speaker 4>will it surprise me while you know mine Clarence contributes

0:34:16.040 --> 0:34:19.719
<v Speaker 4>fee for the disposal of all their weapons. I would

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 4>not be surprised. I don't think that that money will

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 4>reach the Iranian people. I think that they will reach

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.760
<v Speaker 4>some very influential people in the in the Iranian government.

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Have you ever Blass, Jamie Rush, thank you so much.

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:33.839
<v Speaker 3>I guess we still have to wait to see whether

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 3>that memoryment of understanding is signed, and then we wait

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 3>to see if we ever get to read an official

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 3>published versions. Not entirely clear yet, I feel like this

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 3>was the definitive guide to how this conflict is going

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 3>to affect the global economy getting forward. Thanks so much,

0:34:50.239 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 3>thank you, thank you, thanks for listening Trumpnomics from Bloomberg.

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 3>It was hosted by me, Stephanie Flanders and I was

0:35:03.800 --> 0:35:07.839
<v Speaker 3>joined this week by Bloomberg opinion columnist Tavier Blass and

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 3>Jamie Brush, director of Global Economics at Bloomberg. Trumponomics was

0:35:12.840 --> 0:35:15.760
<v Speaker 3>produced by Summer Study and Moss Andam with help from

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Amy Keen and sound design by Blake Maples and Kelly

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.959
<v Speaker 3>Gary And. To help others find the show, rate us,

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 3>review us extensively wherever you listen,