WEBVTT - Professor Scott Galloway: Masters in Business (Audio)

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:08.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Masters in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. Hi,

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this is Barry Ridholts. You're listening to the podcast portion

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.239
<v Speaker 1>of Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. I have a

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>fantastic guest today. And I know you guys are tired

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of hearing me say that each and every week, But

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>when you have a guest who is fantastic, you just

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:29.280
<v Speaker 1>have to say, this guy's fantastic. Scott Galloway, Professor of

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.639
<v Speaker 1>Digital Branding and Marketing at n y U Stern Graduate

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>School of Business. I found this. I found some of

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the work of of Scott Professor Galloway on YouTube and

0:00:41.880 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>he's done a number of really interesting videos. He does

0:00:45.680 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a weekly video. But but the most fascinating thing I

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:54.560
<v Speaker 1>saw of him was called the Four Horsemen of Technology, Apple, Amazon, Facebook,

0:00:54.560 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and Google. And he did this presentation at a conference.

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>It was thing like nineties slides in fifteen minutes, and

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:05.679
<v Speaker 1>it was really just a tour to force discussion of

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:11.039
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in branding, in retail, in technology, and

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it was really just an amazing um conversation. And so

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I saw this, I started doing some research. Uh, he's

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>right here in n y U use, you know, ten

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>minutes from from the Bloomberg studios, and so I invited

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.479
<v Speaker 1>him to be on the show, and to my great

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>uh surprise, he said yes, And so we had this

0:01:32.280 --> 0:01:36.680
<v Speaker 1>conversation and he is one of the most fascinating knowledgeable

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>people when it comes to those areas things like luxury

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>brands and marketing and the intersection of your your physical

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 1>stores with your online sites, with your social and mobile engagements.

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And it's really quite a fascinating um conversation. We we

0:01:54.800 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 1>covered so many different things. It's really so interesting and amazing.

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And as you'll hear, at a certain point, it shifts

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>from me, you know, doing the radio thing and asking

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>questions and having him answer to just a real conversation

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>about what is happening in the universe of technology and

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>retail and branding and Amazon and Apple and Google and

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and Twitter and everything else. So I I really

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:23.519
<v Speaker 1>had a great time sitting and chatting with him. He's

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.079
<v Speaker 1>the sort of guy you would love to pull up

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>next to um in a in a bar, sit down

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and have a beer and just talk about what's going on.

0:02:30.680 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's pretty much what we did. A little cappuccino

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and we were off to the races. So without any

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:41.399
<v Speaker 1>further ado, here is my conversation with Professor Scott Galloway

0:02:41.520 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>of n y U. This is Masters in Business with

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg Radio. My guest today is Scott Galloway.

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>He's a professor of Digital and Brands at and while

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you learn, is that the correct title professor of Marketing. UM.

0:03:05.560 --> 0:03:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg. So before we get started, you may

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.839
<v Speaker 1>not be well known to all of our listeners. Let

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>me go through your very very significant curriculum. Curriculum VITA

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>bachelor's from u c l A and then an NBA

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:25.239
<v Speaker 1>from Berkeley. Currently Clinical Professor of Marketing, n y U

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Stern School of Business. Author of the Digital i Q Index,

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a global ranking of prestige brands. Will talk about that

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in a little more detail. Named one of the world's

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:41.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty best business school professors, founder of numerous firms L two, rent,

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Envelope and Profit and named the World Economic Forums Global

0:03:46.560 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Leaders of Tomorrow, which is a hundred individuals under the

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>age of forty whose accomplishments have had an impact on

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the global level. You're also on the board or have

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>served on the board of Directors of Eddie Bauer, the

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, Gateway Computer, and Berkeley's Hot School of Business.

0:04:04.640 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Did I skip anything or is that No? That's great? Thanks.

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>So so let's talk a little bit about your background.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>First of all, why would you leave Sonny, California? For Yeah?

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>It makes it makes no sense, right, That's one of

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>those things. Every time you're flying back into l a

0:04:18.520 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>X and you look around, you're getting your convertible, you think,

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.800
<v Speaker 1>why did I ever leave? I just always wanted to

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:24.160
<v Speaker 1>live in New York. You know what it's like. This

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is if you're an energy, it's it's the center of

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the world. Yeah, the helm of the bob sled, the

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>tip of the spear of the greatest experiment. The density

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of culture, interesting people. Is a great place to live.

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I love San Francisco, did my graduate workout there. Start

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.159
<v Speaker 1>a bunch internet cominges. But it's a one industry town.

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 1>It's tech l as in one industry town, it's entertainment.

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>The thing one of the great things about New York

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is the currencies of power and success here are are multiple.

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of different ways to kind of get

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>your groove on here and just just love it here.

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh sure, business investing, theater, publishing, television, real estate is

0:04:57.480 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 1>just huge here, although it seems to be huge where

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:03.040
<v Speaker 1>if we're looking around the country. Yep. So you come

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to n y U as a professor, Um, what was

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>tell us a little bit about red envelope and profit

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.200
<v Speaker 1>do very different companies. Sure, So started out of Morgan Stanley,

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>only real job I've ever had, and then I actually

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>got kind of sick, and when you get sick at

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a young age, you reevaluate your forced maturity is kind

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>of forced on you and decided I didn't know what

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to do, but you I didn't want to

0:05:25.839 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>be an investment banker. So did what anyone who is

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:30.159
<v Speaker 1>fairly ambitious and doesn't know what they want to do.

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I went back to graduate school and then got very

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>inspired by a guy named David Ocker, who was considered

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.479
<v Speaker 1>the father of modern branding UH, and started coming called

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Profit of Brand Strategy Firm, focused on his principles. We

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:45.000
<v Speaker 1>grew that to about four people, really rewarding, but then

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>decided I didn't want to be in a services company.

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>I've always decided our thought of services company was really

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a young man's business. You're kind of on your clients schedule,

0:05:53.600 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and then was fortunate enough to get swept up in

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 1>the Internet era, started red Envelope, multi channel e commerce company,

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and then on the day of the I p O

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>said this is great. I have some opportunities and some

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 1>flexibilities with what I want to do with my life

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>and decided to pursue there's kind of lifelong passion or

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>dream and teach and change my life. Moved to New York,

0:06:12.200 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>join the faculty n y U, and here we are.

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 1>That's that's a huge, huge set of changes in a

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>very short period of time. Yeah, it's it's but it's

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of fun. So so you briefly were

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.720
<v Speaker 1>at Morgan Stanley, so you have some experience in the

0:06:25.720 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>real world. How long have you been an n y

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>U F I joined the Faculty n y U and

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and two, and it's been just it's been

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 1>thirteen great years. Just feel exceptionally, exceptionally fortunate to get

0:06:36.040 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to teach at such a fantastic university. It's been, it's

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just been wonderful. So let's talk a little bit

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>about the Digital i Q Index. This is something I

0:06:44.560 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>believe you were involved in creating. Was it two thousand

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>and ten. Is that right? Yeah, it's it was really accidental.

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>You can't get very far in academia without doing research,

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:54.799
<v Speaker 1>and my background was in the e commerce. I thought,

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>there's there are metrics for return on equity and UH,

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>price earnings, carc quality with JD Powers, how many people

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.360
<v Speaker 1>watch a program with Nielsen, But there really isn't a

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.919
<v Speaker 1>measure or a benchmark for how a brand is doing

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>across its entire digital footprint. So architect and an algorithm

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>of eight hundred and fifty data points across site, digital marketing,

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 1>social and mobile, and then applied it against a hundred

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:19.400
<v Speaker 1>brands and rank them, thinking it would be a piece

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of academic research. Within about forty eight hours of releasing

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>it heard from about forty of the brands saying who

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are you and why are you doing this? And recognized

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.480
<v Speaker 1>there was a commercial opportunity. So I asked the dean

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if we could spin out the I P and start

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a private enterprise called L two, and n y U

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>was very generous with us and and said fine, as

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 1>long as your support of M y U and UH.

0:07:39.240 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>And that's it was really the birth of an accidental

0:07:41.600 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>business and now L two works with everyone from PNG

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and Uni Leaver to Coach Tiffany, Nike, Samsung. So it's

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of fun. So you talk about looking

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:55.520
<v Speaker 1>at and evaluating a company across site, digital, social, mobile,

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty broad yet inclusive set of of data points.

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 1>It's the thinking behind that every place a consumer might

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>come into contact with a brand, so all the touchpoints

0:08:06.120 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>so and every brand has different strengths and weaknesses. And

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.559
<v Speaker 1>regardless of how much capital you have, the cruel truth

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of capitalism and investing in digital is you have to

0:08:15.400 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>pick your punches. So even a home depot or a

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Sephora or a Vitan, organizations you would think would have

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.480
<v Speaker 1>a ton of resources, have to pick their punches. And

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the issue is you know what lever you're gonna pull.

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>If you're really about increasing your percentage of sales online,

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna be more focused on side. If you're about

0:08:30.360 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>signaling innovation to a younger consumer, it's probably gonna be

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>around more around social. If you're trying to create a

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>loyalty program that has tremendous uses digital to connective tissue

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:41.800
<v Speaker 1>between your store and your site, that's more about a

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:44.560
<v Speaker 1>loyalty program and a mobile phone in the store, So

0:08:44.600 --> 0:08:47.319
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to create a benchmark sets the brands contract

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>their strengths and weaknesses relative of their competitive set and

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>help them shape the shape their digital roadmap and allocate

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>their human creative financial capital more efficiently. Because everyone agrees

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that a better investment in digital is probably gonna get

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>your great to return than did than investments in some

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>other areas right now, but they don't know what they

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know. They really don't know where to start. So

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>the ideas, how do you figure out how your digital

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 1>capital allocation foots your of all corporate strategy and how

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>do you drive stakeholder growth. I'm Barry rid Helps. You're

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:19.600
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Scott Galloway. He is a professor of

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Digital Brands and Marketing at n y U and I

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>love your conversations. By the way, the way I found

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>out about you was the Four Horsemen video which is

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>all over YouTube, and some of the conversations you've had

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:37.559
<v Speaker 1>about retail and the deep dive you do into that space,

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>which I find to be absolutely fascinating. So let's let's

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>jump into retail. I love this quote of yours. You

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>said retail stores are the new black explained so in

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the turn in the world of e commerce, I believe

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the pure play commerce has no future. That almost every

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.400
<v Speaker 1>pure play commerce company is either going to open stores

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:58.800
<v Speaker 1>or go out of business. That's a pretty radical position,

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.840
<v Speaker 1>isn't it. Well? I would defend I think it's defensible.

0:10:01.880 --> 0:10:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I would I would challenge anyone to name the pure

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.839
<v Speaker 1>plea e commerce company, and and and and let's talk

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>about whether this is a sustainable business or not. And effectively,

0:10:11.640 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the consumer always gets what she wants. And there's there's

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>three doors here. There's a great e commerce site that

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 1>just has an e commerce offering. There's a great retail

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>concept with just bricks and mortar or maybe a week

0:10:23.480 --> 0:10:26.120
<v Speaker 1>e commerce site. And then there's door number three, a Saphora,

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 1>william Snowmer and Macy's that have great stores, grat e

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>commerce and use digital as a connective tissue for around

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>a loyalty program, and the consumer wants door number three.

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the future looks more like Macy's and Williams

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Snowman than it looks like Amazon or not a Porte

0:10:40.160 --> 0:10:43.239
<v Speaker 1>or Guilt. And where does eBay fit into that? Ecosystem.

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't describe you as a pure play retail. I

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>think of them as a marketplace, just to get between

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:51.839
<v Speaker 1>a berness. They're not taking inventory there, They're they're a marketplace.

0:10:52.160 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of inventory, you another quote of yours. We

0:10:55.640 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>have these incredibly flexible, robust warehouses cold stores explain. So

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been a big fan of Amazon, and I'm actually

0:11:03.880 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going a little bit bearish on it because I think

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it's I think what Amazon has missed a little bit

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 1>is that in terms of consumer behavior, consumers value convenience

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.680
<v Speaker 1>over speed, and that is if you were to order,

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.520
<v Speaker 1>say you decided, I'm gonna spend more time outside at

0:11:20.600 --> 0:11:22.560
<v Speaker 1>my home in the North Fork and I need some

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.240
<v Speaker 1>some block, so I'm going to order Laroche Puss, which

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>is this fantastic und block. You neither order an Amazon

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and have it delivered to you in a day four hours,

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>two hours if they have their way, or you could

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>order it at sephora dot com and then bomb down

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the elevator here and pick it up with the Sephora

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>two blocks away anytime between the hours of ten and

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a PM. Click and collect or buy online pickup in

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>store is probably the biggest phenomenon retail in the last

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 1>couple of years, we didn't see a company it's coming.

0:11:47.360 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It sounds very base, but it's hugely convenient to order

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>online and pick up in store. And these if it's

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>in the store, why do I have to order online?

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Why could I just walk two blocks and do that?

0:11:57.440 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Because people like to get the information, they like to

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>do the brow saying. Emotional and intellectual purchasing has moved

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>from the store to online. So for traffic to retail

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.319
<v Speaker 1>down and five years by retail has grown two or

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.920
<v Speaker 1>three percent a year. But what happens the following The

0:12:14.040 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 1>browsing and buying has moved online, The fulfillment, the transaction

0:12:17.880 --> 0:12:20.760
<v Speaker 1>and the pickup is still in the store. Think about cars.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Think about when you and I were a kid, we

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:24.120
<v Speaker 1>used to go with our dad to that one area

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 1>town where we look at a car we'd actually kicked

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the tires, take a car and it's test drive, look

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 1>at those brochures and negotiate the transaction. The number of

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>people now who have actually skipped the test drive has

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>doubled just in the last five years. We can go online.

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Cargoes are prohibited from actually selling online, but effectively we

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>buy online. Now we go to a great configurator, we

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>start getting served ads by other automobile companies. We can

0:12:47.679 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>go to Audi dot com, build our a six down

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to the leather piping on the seat. We can find

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:54.080
<v Speaker 1>out how much the dealer paid for it. We can

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>get user reviews, and then we go into the dealership

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>armed with the exact car. We want the exact price range.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 1>We know we should. So car dealerships are no longer

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>selling cars. They're really just warehouses fulfilling and consummating the transaction.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a great metaphor for what's happening in retail. Browsing

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and decision making have moved online, even if the transaction

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and the pickup are happening in retail. But bricks and

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>mortar plays a great, you know, really important role. It's

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>a great way to pick up stuff. It's a great

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.960
<v Speaker 1>place to learn more about the transaction. It's a great

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>place to brand. These are powerful branding vehicles, these these

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>brick and mortar stores. So I think the new black

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and e commerce is stores. A lot of them are

0:13:32.880 --> 0:13:35.840
<v Speaker 1>opening bricks and mortar. So you talk about um, the

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>biggest challenger to Amazon is stores like Macy's and I've

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:44.079
<v Speaker 1>noticed over the past few years in terms of marketing

0:13:44.120 --> 0:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and displays within the stores. And I know they own

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a variety of other stores. I think they own Lord

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and Taylor or Bloomingdale's or some combination of um. But

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I've I've noticed that they've really gotten very savvy about

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 1>their online and you show up at store, Hey I

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>have I like this, but you don't have it in black,

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and you don't have it in a large They're like, oh,

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we'll ship it to you for free. That's a new

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 1>thing from them, that thinking like an e commerce company,

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>not like a well we'll get a delivery in six

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>months and you can come check us out. Then. Yeah.

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:17.400
<v Speaker 1>The most inspiring companies in retail for the last five

0:14:17.480 --> 0:14:21.240
<v Speaker 1>years haven't been Amazon or Netaporte. It's been Macy's in Nordstrom.

0:14:21.320 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>The crisis is a terrible thing to waste. Five years ago,

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I advise Hedgephones and a large read came to us

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the fund I was advising, and said, we want to

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>take a control position and Macy's or a large position,

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>and advocate for them to shut it down and sell

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>the underlying real estate, which is worth more than the

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>stock right now. They saw the future was not where

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>they were headed, and they made massive investments and leverage

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>their operational competence, their capital to cash flow to build

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>unbelievably strong e commerce offerings, connected that to their stores

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and have fantastic multi channel offerings. Macy Stock is outperformed

0:14:55.640 --> 0:14:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Amazon over the last one, three and five years. Nordstrom

0:14:58.520 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Stock is outperformed and Amazon the last several years. These

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>are incredible companies that have embraced the digital future and

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>have proven basically everybody wrong the future really is about

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>multi channel Macy's and Nordstrom's, I would argue most inspirational

0:15:12.560 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>retailers and have rewarded their shareholders of the last last

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.640
<v Speaker 1>several years. So much for first mover advantage, at least

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Amazon. Yeah, Leonard Lottar at est

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 1>lottor another unbelievable company, Uh you know said it the

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>second mouse off and gets the cheese if you really

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.080
<v Speaker 1>look at uh. Peter Golder, who's a where's a colleague

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>at Stern and now as a call as now as

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a colleague at Dartmouth is probably the best scholar under

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 1>the age of fifty on the world of innovation. We

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about Clay Christenson. We talk about but but Peter Golder,

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, is the kind of future of innovations

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>relates to academia, and the body of his study basically says,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>if you talk about return to stakeholders, it's not the

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>first mover, it's the second. The true innovator. The guy

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>or the gal that goes first usually doesn't serve shareholders

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that well. It's the person that comes in second. Apple.

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple has been second at most stuff. They're not a

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>true innovator in the definition of the word. They weren't

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the first into into object are in computing, they weren't

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the first MP three player. They weren't the first mobile phone.

0:16:05.240 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>But they look at something, they improve upon it. They wait,

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and they come in and make it more user friendly.

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>The department stores, the best retailers have often been the

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>second mover. So let's talk a little bit about brand

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>versus products. Because you've discussed this, you know what's easy

0:16:20.240 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>to fix a good product with a bad brand, or

0:16:22.800 --> 0:16:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a bad product with a good brand. I think it's changed.

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 1>I think and and I've devoted my life from a

0:16:28.440 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 1>majority of my professional life around brand. I've made a

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>nice living from it. But I think the sun has

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>passed midday on what I call the era brand the

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>eighties and nineties, the primary way to drive a lot

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of shareholder value, Barry, was to have an average to

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 1>good product and then hire the best talent around brand

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and create unbelievable intangible associations. Are a great brand, an

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>average shoe, an average cup of coffee, and the an

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>average beer and the best brand in the world. But

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 1>what do all these technological innovations and platforms allow us

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 1>to do? They allow us to share great ideas that

0:16:57.680 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this show is generally better than other shows. It's going

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>to spread faster than anything before. I'm Barry Ridholds. You're

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My special

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Professor Scott Galloway of n y U

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Stern School and L two Digital. Let's talk a little

0:17:13.720 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>bit about Amazon. Um, what is it that they're doing

0:17:17.680 --> 0:17:21.879
<v Speaker 1>wrong with their last mile strategy? So, first off, incredible

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>company and uh, Jeff Bezos arguably the best you have

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the last ten years. I think they're two. Primary advantage

0:17:27.880 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>that has cost some tens of billions of dollars to

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to erect have been this last mile, incredible last mile

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure such that they can supposedly within twenty four months

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>at about fifty percent of American households of everything they

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 1>buy within two or four hours, which is incredible. And

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 1>then one click paying. I think we we overlook what

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>an incredible innovation is to be able to just touch

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 1>something and know that it's on its way. However, very

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that some recent innovations erode those competitive advantages,

0:17:54.720 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>specifically Apple Pay. Some of the things Google is doing

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>are going to make want that one click payment advantage

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a road in value. I think other people are catching up.

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the most unusual or the thing that none

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of us are expecting and and there's still some time

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to see if it plays out, is actually believe Uber

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>is gonna give a lot of retailers the opportunity to

0:18:14.560 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 1>catch up very fast around the last mile without making

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>the same staggering investment Amazon has having to make it.

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>I think effectively, Uber has created a vascular system for business.

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.199
<v Speaker 1>And when you have someone a smart person inside their

0:18:27.240 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>own car that they have paid for it without a union,

0:18:29.720 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>without without a uniform, and by by the way, I'm

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>not sure that's a good thing without health insurance. You're

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>effectively giving every retailer and every business in the world

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:41.120
<v Speaker 1>that last mile competence that cost Amazon billions of dollars

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.239
<v Speaker 1>for a fraction of the cost. So in some I

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:48.359
<v Speaker 1>think the Amazon advantages, those two advantages are slowly being

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>eroded by other innovations. Let's talk a little bit about

0:18:51.720 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>both those things. I don't really see what the big

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>deal about one click is. I'll take the other side

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:00.639
<v Speaker 1>because I've been on Amazon for well almost twenty years,

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to say, and when I go to buy

0:19:06.920 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>something and I'm an Amazon Prime member, I kicking and screaming,

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>finally did it, and since then just love it the

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>past couple of years. So when I buy something, it's

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>which credit card am I paying? Is it the office

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is at home? Which of the home cards is it?

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to the office, is it going to

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the house. Is it going to a third destination? So

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>for me, one click really never because I always and

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:33.360
<v Speaker 1>what's the big deal? I select one of these four

0:19:33.400 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 1>credit cards, I select one of these four destinations. It's

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not terrible. I love the idea of Uber being

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that last mile. But let's think about that. The closest

0:19:43.840 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomingdale's to my house is. I live all the way

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:48.119
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of nowhere on the north shore from

0:19:48.119 --> 0:19:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Long Island, but it's still twenty minutes away. If I

0:19:51.359 --> 0:19:54.400
<v Speaker 1>order something from Amazon and with Prime, it's usually there

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>within two days. I don't know if they're gonna get

0:19:56.640 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>it there all that much sooner. But I'm hating, you know,

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I need something here? Does it's here in two days?

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing I need right now that I can't drive

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes and get so anything I'm watering, I'll get

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>here when it gets here. If I want something from

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomingdale's for them to send an Uber driver to my house.

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 1>If I was going to take an Uber ride to

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>my house, um, that would cost you know, thirty bucks

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>or so. So is there gonna be that much of

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>an infrastructure of deliveries that they're not just dropping off

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 1>one package, that dropping off ten things, and it's essentially

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>a rounding era to to a store like that. So

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the short answer is no. But I would argue Barry

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that the war of shareholder value isn't gonna be one

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>or lost over you. I think you're the anomaly, and

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:44.719
<v Speaker 1>that I think the majority of shareholder and wealth creation

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>is going to be around serving people in urban areas, because,

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>to be blunt, that's where the majority of the wealth

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.439
<v Speaker 1>is moving towards. I think we're creating a set of

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>supercities where the density of income and disposable income is

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.440
<v Speaker 1>aggregating around a small set of supercity. So I think

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Amazon still works for you. Quite frankly, I don't think

0:21:02.320 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it works for Amazon. I think it's gonna be expensive

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:06.680
<v Speaker 1>for them to deliver to you. They're Amazon's shipping costs

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>for six billion last year. They're going up a year.

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>They took him three billion in fees. That's not sustainable

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:15.920
<v Speaker 1>even with Amazon's cost cheap cost of capital. You want

0:21:15.920 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to see a celebrity deathmatch, wait till this holiday is

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.719
<v Speaker 1>as Walmart has announced a prime light competitor at fifty bucks,

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and they have stores. The thing that epitomizes this battle

0:21:25.320 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in the advantage Walmart right now will have over Amazon.

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.640
<v Speaker 1>As Amazon. Walmart has this great ad that says free

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:33.280
<v Speaker 1>delivery if you pick it up in store. And do

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you know a percentage of the population lives within a

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>drive of Walmart A lot that's not exactly delivery that's

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>going to the store and shopping. Yeah, but if if

0:21:41.840 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>it's waiting for you, it's packaged and you can bomb

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>right in and bomb right out. My prediction Amazon is

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.320
<v Speaker 1>going to buy a gas station company. As fossil fuel

0:21:49.320 --> 0:21:51.119
<v Speaker 1>has become less relevant in our life, we're used to

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>bombing in left and right. Just what's happened in London.

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>They took the ticket kios that where people no longer

0:21:58.000 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>sell tickets. People can order their grosser reas it a

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>tube station and have them waiting for them at their

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>destination tube station. People don't mind picking up stuff. Was

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 1>it a missed opportunity for Amazon not to have grabbed

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>radio Shack with their thousands of stores. I think that

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.720
<v Speaker 1>would have been a really interesting combination. But Amazon is

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>so smart, they have such such incredible access to capital.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to do something traumatic. I wouldn't

0:22:19.840 --> 0:22:21.479
<v Speaker 1>be surprised if they buy the post office or take

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a major investment in the post office. That's that's a problem.

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>Look what's happening. If you see job growth and job declines,

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>most of the A lot of the job declines are

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 1>coming out of municipal governments and government employees who are

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 1>under constant pressure. I wouldn't be surprised that Amazon strikes

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.120
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the government to take over their less

0:22:37.119 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>performing post offices. That would be astonishing. I'm Barry ritt Holts.

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Master's in Business on Bloomberg Radio. My

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:46.480
<v Speaker 1>guest today is Scott Galloway. He is a professor of

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Digital marketing and Brands at n y U Stern. I

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>really love the video you did talking about the four

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>horsemen of technology, and um, we already discussed Amazon. Let's

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>jump right into Facebook. You call um first. You note

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:06.119
<v Speaker 1>how Facebook has changed the taxonomy of relationships, which is

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.919
<v Speaker 1>very significant for the way people interact socially. But the

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:13.520
<v Speaker 1>question that I the statement I really liked was Facebook

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>has pulled off the greatest bait and switch in history.

0:23:17.119 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Explain what you mean by that? Oh? Absolutely. Facebook convinced

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest brands in the world to spend

0:23:21.560 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>tens of millions of dollars to build these communities, uh,

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, likes and fans, and these brands did it

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>because the notion was you'll get to own this community

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and they'll be captive. What an unbelievable asset. But Facebook

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.680
<v Speaker 1>then said, just kidding, put a walled garden around it

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and in the organic reach on Facebook, meaning the percentage

0:23:39.000 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>of messages that channelle puts out to their community that

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>actually reached the channel community is now six percent, meaning

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>only one in sixteen messages reached them unless barry, they

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>pay and they advertise. So this was an incredible bait

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>and switch. These are not These are not communities owned

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>by the brands. They're owned by Facebook. Same things happened,

0:23:58.560 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 1>It gonna happen on Instagram or right now. It's a

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>organic reach. They will figure out a way to put

0:24:02.960 --> 0:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a paywall around it. But I'm shocked there isn't more.

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>If you will outrage, I admire Facebook for being able

0:24:09.400 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to pull this off, but I think we forget how

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 1>important it is to be liked or cute as an organization.

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Steve Bomber and Bill Gates were not likable or cute,

0:24:17.800 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Sir again, Larry more likable, more cute. But the regulators

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:24.440
<v Speaker 1>are getting angry at them. Facebook lean in the hoodie.

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>They have gotten a ton of license from Corporate America

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and regulators. In my view, that has given them a

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of leeway. I think what they've done has been

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>exceptional in terms of their ability to say one thing

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 1>and then do another for the for the benefit of

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>their own shareholders. And by the way, I say that

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:42.200
<v Speaker 1>as an as an admirer, what they've done has been incredible.

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And yet there's been issues about privacy and issues about

0:24:45.440 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>people's data. How does that? How do they as a

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>company deal with that or do they just shrug it

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:52.360
<v Speaker 1>off and say, hey, man, get used to it. Privacy

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>is a thing of the past. Anyone who's talking about

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:58.040
<v Speaker 1>privacy is typically someone like you or me, a guy

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>over the age of fifty. Young people don't seem that

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>concerned with privacy. At the end of the day, the

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>consumer behavior indicates one thing that people like to have

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>their privacy violated as long as there's a coupon or

0:25:07.600 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>more relevant offering. At the end of it, we want relevance,

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>and part of that relevance is observing our data stream

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>and then and then responding with a more relevant offer. Now,

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.360
<v Speaker 1>the identity war is the secret war taking place online

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook is winning, and that is the ability to

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>attach a specific identity with specific actions that you can

0:25:25.880 --> 0:25:28.840
<v Speaker 1>serve more relevant ads and charge more for those relevant ads.

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Google cannot track specific identity on their core platform, the

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>search engine, and it makes sense. Neither you nor I

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 1>are comfortable with the idea of having our name and

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>our picture above a list of everything we have typed

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>into that query box. Right, all of us have typed

0:25:43.200 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 1>some crazy stuff into that box we would rather people

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 1>not know about. However, we're not as that's what the

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>incognito window. Yeah, that's where you're you know you you

0:25:51.080 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you you erase your cookies. But with Facebook, for some reason,

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>we're not as uncomfortable with Facebook attaching our actions to

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:01.720
<v Speaker 1>our specific identity on Facebook. So as a result, Facebook

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:05.119
<v Speaker 1>is now tracking more identity data than Google and is

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>able to use their platform across the wider reb web

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:12.439
<v Speaker 1>to serve more relevant targeted ads. Facebook is winning the

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 1>identity war now. I find I'll give you a perfect

0:26:15.320 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>example of something online that I find creepy and I

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know if other people find the same thing. So

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I were literally in a um florist

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 1>nursery um recently, and we see this hanging chair, beautiful

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 1>hanging chair. It's got cushions, it's really really odd, interesting

0:26:34.600 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>shape and scene price, and I just make note who

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>makes it? Necessarily let me look at it online? Where

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's a third cheaper and so okay. So now I

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>just want to get a sense of what the markup was.

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I know with this more or less should go for

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and I forget about it. Now wherever I go ads

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:54.840
<v Speaker 1>for that chair of popping up and it's like, no, no,

0:26:55.080 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with that. I'm moving on. Why are you

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>following me around the Internetive it gets annoying. It's contextual retargeting.

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>If you go to an Audie site, you're gonna start

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 1>getting served ads by Alexis and Mercedes because it looks

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>as if you're in the market for a car. Most

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>consumers actually like it. Most consumers rather have a relevant

0:27:10.840 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 1>ad on the right rail or their top. That's exactly

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 1>where most people. Most people actually like that. Embrace it.

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:20.000
<v Speaker 1>The thing you talked about. The The other point is

0:27:20.520 --> 0:27:22.400
<v Speaker 1>show rooming. That is going in and trying to find

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a different price. And there's been a lot of popular

0:27:24.520 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>press that this is bad for retailers. The majority of

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the research shows when people pull out their phone and

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>price compare, they not only end up buying, they often

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:33.879
<v Speaker 1>end up buying more because typically what they find, except

0:27:33.920 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>for the retailer you were in, they typically find they're

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>getting it around the best price for a good price,

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and then they start reading news reviews, finding more products. Actually,

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.919
<v Speaker 1>web rooming, being in a store and using your phone

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is a creative to the host retailer. Really, that's fascinating.

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that at one point in time best Buy

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>was a little discouraging them. Yeah, I think they've since

0:27:53.520 --> 0:27:56.360
<v Speaker 1>changed their tune. They have and only look at best Buy.

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>That's a great example of the war of how stores

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 1>are new black. If you order a flat screen TV,

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be it's gonna get to you faster if

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you order from best Buy, because they're going to fulfill

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:07.439
<v Speaker 1>it out of their store in East Hampton or some

0:28:07.600 --> 0:28:10.240
<v Speaker 1>some some store out there. Then Amazon will get it

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to you because they're using these unbelievably robust, flexible warehouses

0:28:13.600 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>called stores. That that's amazing. So now let's talk a

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>little bit about Google, and I love you quote about Google.

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>It's the closest thing to God. You ask a question

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:26.360
<v Speaker 1>and you get an answer. So how is Google losing

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>if we consider them God like? Sure? So when I

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>say God, you know, when what do you do? When

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you pray? You send up information or a question hoping

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that a higher source that's smarter than you will send

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it back an answer. Right, is my kid going to

0:28:39.080 --> 0:28:42.640
<v Speaker 1>be Okay? Now you go onto Google and say symptoms

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and treatment of croup, right, and it gives you back

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? So I think it is somewhat godlike. Now,

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>having said that, I think that Google is going to

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>decline in value and influence. Why because there are one

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>dimensional company that hasn't had any success branching out much

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:01.640
<v Speaker 1>beyond Android or Gmail nine percent of the revenues of

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the profit from the search platform. Also, at the end

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of the day, Bury the way it summarized it is

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that this rapid change to a mobile world is not

0:29:09.440 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>good for Google. On a mobile phone, of our time

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>done in app, were less likely to search when we're

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in app, which is not good for Google. A lot

0:29:17.840 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>of competitors popping up a billion queries a day on

0:29:20.200 --> 0:29:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Facebook of all products, searches now start on Amazon. So

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that's so there were dominant, their dominant market share starting

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to show some signs of weakness and cost per click

0:29:30.320 --> 0:29:32.680
<v Speaker 1>is going down and as a result, profits and revenues

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.560
<v Speaker 1>have their profit and revenue growth. If you will have

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.440
<v Speaker 1>have stalled, this is a one dimensional company, an unbelievable

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>revolutionary product. But I think my prediction is you're gonna

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>see a couple more minute earnings misses, and all of

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, that company is going to find focus again.

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>The self driving cars, the broadband blimps, the wearables are

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>going to go away. What about this new app cold Now,

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how familiar are with that that essentially

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>hovers over the whole operating system, and even within apps

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>brings up that exact sort of search behavior you would

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:09.120
<v Speaker 1>discuss them. So you could never count Google out. They're

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.280
<v Speaker 1>just they human capital, the people, the culture, just a

0:30:13.360 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 1>remarkably innovative company. But based on where they are now

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 1>relative their valuation in the marketplace, I think they have

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>some substantial competitive threats. And the thing about Google versus

0:30:23.000 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>an Apple or a traditional retailer is your one click

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>away from going to a competitor. So I think Google,

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on a risk adjusted basis, has greater risk than some

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of the other guys. And I think they're gonna leak

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>market share to Facebook. We didn't talk about YouTube everybody.

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>I just circled that question. Everybody talks about our YouTube

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:41.680
<v Speaker 1>is gonna disrupt TV. I think Facebook is going to

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>disrupt YouTube for the first time ever. There are now

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>more native videos uploaded to the Facebook platform than links

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to YouTube. I think you're gonna see Facebook start to

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>garner more and more share of our time in terms

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of how how we watch video. I think it's moving

0:30:54.280 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to Facebook. That's interesting since since you mentioned Apple as

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the fourth enforceman, let stalk a little bit about Apple,

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>which you call a luxury brand, not so much a

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>technology dent. It's been the worst, it's been the worst

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:09.719
<v Speaker 1>or the best house in the worst neighborhood for a

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>long time. And that's a tech hardware. That's just a

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 1>bad business, low margin. And they decided very Dell. Who

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.520
<v Speaker 1>else is in that space. I was on the board

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.200
<v Speaker 1>of Gateway Computer. I mean, it's just a difficult Our margins.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Our margins of Gateway were six percent. Try and operate

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a business on six percent margins. It's just computer hardware.

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just really difficult. They have effectively moved down the tour.

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>So we only do three things in business. We very

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we appeal to the brain, rational decisions, low margin, transportation, food,

0:31:36.760 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>basic shelter. We appeal to the heart choosing moms choose

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff P. And G figured out that we're social animals.

0:31:42.160 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>The biggest predictor of life expectancy is how many people

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in our life we love. It's not how fat or

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>how skinn you are. We how much we smoke. You take.

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>If you're new a new mother, you're gonna live. If

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>you're taking care of your parents, you're more likely to live.

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>P ANDNG figured that out post Worttle or two and said,

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.360
<v Speaker 1>if you wash your kids in clothes and tied detergent,

0:31:59.400 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you love them more. We have a need to love,

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and and CpG firms tapped into that and then just

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>move down to the tour. So you go to the

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>second most powerful instinct in the world, and that's reproduction,

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the self expressive benefit. The watch I'm wearing costs eight

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>hundred bucks. I paid a lot more to wear it

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>because I'm trying, in a vain attempt to intimate Italian

0:32:17.920 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>masculinity to the rest of the world, and on a

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>very base level, and I don't like to admit this.

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm trying to signal to the opposite sex

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that if you mate with me, your kids are more

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>likely to survive than if you mate with someone who's

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>wearing a Swatch watch, and I don't think in the

0:32:30.600 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>business world we're very honest or open about how strong

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>self expressive benefit is. Tesla is not an environmental car,

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>as an attempt to signal to the opposite sex. And

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you can afford a hundred dollar car. Women were ergonomically

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>impossible six d dollar shoes because they're trying to solicit

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 1>inbound offers from those same men. I realize how base

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and how awful that sounds, but it's the core of evolution,

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's what has driven the best sector in the world.

0:32:53.920 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Barry the luxury sector, Eschmont, larger market Captain, Deutsche Telecom

0:32:58.360 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Este Lot or larger market capped w p P. Apple

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is decided we want to be in that business, and

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they have. They are the only company in history that

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>is successfully migrated down the torso a better computer, rational decisions,

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>saying to our heart emotionally with songs, and now they

0:33:15.080 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 1>are the ultimate self expressive benefit. You no longer signal

0:33:18.280 --> 0:33:21.000
<v Speaker 1>with your watch or your hoodie. You signal with your iOS.

0:33:21.120 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>If you own an Apple phone, you were saying to

0:33:23.080 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the world, I am smarter, better educated, and have more

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>options in terms of who I mate with. The transaction

0:33:28.200 --> 0:33:30.880
<v Speaker 1>is complete to the Apple Watch. Apple is now the

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>ultimate luxury brand. It defines what it means to be

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a luxury brand, and they're going to be the first

0:33:35.000 --> 0:33:37.920
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar market cap company on the back of their

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:42.200
<v Speaker 1>successful transition down the Torso and it become a luxury brand. Scott,

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.600
<v Speaker 1>where can people find your work? What's the best way

0:33:44.600 --> 0:33:47.960
<v Speaker 1>for them? I know you have a YouTube channel for

0:33:48.200 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>L two. How do people find that? Other than thanks?

0:33:50.600 --> 0:33:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Plunching in Scott Galloway into YouTube. Thanks for asking L

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>two Inc dot com. Almost all our videos are there,

0:33:55.760 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>all right? That's great? And um be sure and check

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>out my daily column. I'm on Bloomberg View dot com.

0:34:01.720 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Follow me on Twitter at rid Holt Scott. Your Twitter

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 1>handle is proft Galloway proft Galloway at Twitter. I'm Barry Ridhult.

0:34:09.360 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business. I'm Bloomberg Radio. Welcome

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 1>to the podcast portion of our show where I take

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>my ear piece out and don't worry about time. Although

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting better at kind of pacing that I used

0:34:22.400 --> 0:34:24.720
<v Speaker 1>to be so awful with that, you have no idea

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>how thinking about how much time do we have? It's

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:32.320
<v Speaker 1>really a distraction and a and a disruption. So anyway, Scott,

0:34:32.320 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for doing this. I'm really I've

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I've fallen in love with your videos. My wife is

0:34:39.000 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>a teacher and there's one thing I wanted to ask

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 1>you about. So I first I showed her some of

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:45.719
<v Speaker 1>your video. She really she was like, Oh, that's kind

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of interesting, like passing interest in her husband's life. But

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:53.759
<v Speaker 1>then the letter, the email from the students, and she's like,

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.600
<v Speaker 1>who is this guy? This is awesome. She's a teacher

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and she has all sorts of headaches with kids like

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody else does. Um tell us the derivation of the

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:08.040
<v Speaker 1>get your s Together letter, which we can't curse over

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>the air waves. Um, how did that come about? You

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.879
<v Speaker 1>just never know when you're fifteen minutes are gonna gonna hit.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>And this was an email I got from a student

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:18.919
<v Speaker 1>who walked into my class late, and then I kicked

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>him out of class. I kicked as per your class.

0:35:23.320 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Also thing in general and gradgety school with coddle students

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>too much. And as a clinical professor, are you know

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>our mission is to try and prepare kids for the workforce,

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think part of that is giving them a

0:35:31.960 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of what the workforce is actually gonna be like

0:35:34.480 --> 0:35:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and trying to impost some standards on them. And one

0:35:36.920 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>of those is if you're late to my class, I

0:35:38.239 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>don't allow you in. And I didn't have late. Can

0:35:40.360 --> 0:35:42.359
<v Speaker 1>you show up two minutes late, five minutes or either

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.479
<v Speaker 1>on time or you're not allowed in. It's hard, hard

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:47.560
<v Speaker 1>military stuff. I have a theater seating for the kids

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 1>who work part time because I realized sometimes I can't

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>get downtown of time. At six fifteen, we let people

0:35:52.120 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>in for a theater seating, meaning meaning outskirts of the class. Yeah,

0:35:56.280 --> 0:35:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I know. At exactly six fifteen, we let in latecomers

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.360
<v Speaker 1>for the part time Okay, after the first after the

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>first part of the first act, but this kid came in.

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I kicked him out, and then he wrote a long,

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>snarky email to me about how we checked out three

0:36:08.680 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>other classes. Anyways, I got equally snarky back, and then

0:36:11.960 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it got forwarded, and then Within and then dead Spin,

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:16.799
<v Speaker 1>the sports blogging places picked it up. But it got

0:36:16.800 --> 0:36:18.360
<v Speaker 1>about half a million beaus, and at one point I

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think the dean of the school was getting an email

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:22.960
<v Speaker 1>either wildly in favor or wildly against what I had

0:36:22.960 --> 0:36:25.640
<v Speaker 1>done about every seven or eight seconds when it just

0:36:25.719 --> 0:36:27.959
<v Speaker 1>kind of blew up and it tapped into a vein

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 1>because one a lot of people feel as if, Okay,

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this millennial generation is entitled, and we're very supportive of

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>my response. At the same time, a lot of people

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>were said, look, these kids are paying six thousand bucks

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>to take your class. If they show up a few

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>minutes late, you just need to suck it up and

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:45.560
<v Speaker 1>deal with it. So it, like anything that goes viral,

0:36:45.640 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it tapped into a bit of a controversy

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:50.279
<v Speaker 1>of the time. It was about five or six years ago,

0:36:50.320 --> 0:36:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and every two years it gets fired up again. But

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that that is not what I had hoped or expected.

0:36:55.160 --> 0:36:57.800
<v Speaker 1>What you know is the piece of literary work that

0:36:57.840 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I would be known for. Well, you know, the generation

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and the offspring of the baby boomers, who you and

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I are really just on the other edge of that

0:37:06.280 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>where would be TwixT and between Gen X and and boomers.

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.440
<v Speaker 1>But um, you know, they get participation awards for showing up,

0:37:13.480 --> 0:37:16.640
<v Speaker 1>and I think my wife tells me that they come

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:20.680
<v Speaker 1>to school with that attitude, Hey I'm here, where's my trophy? No,

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you gotta do something to earn a trophy. It's it's

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:26.279
<v Speaker 1>a double edged sword. So about eighty people at LT

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.439
<v Speaker 1>right now, I'd say the average ages around twenty six.

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>So work a lot with millennials. And the downside is

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:32.719
<v Speaker 1>they are more entitled. Remember when we went to work,

0:37:32.760 --> 0:37:34.400
<v Speaker 1>If you can you imagine whyking your boss or your

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>first job and so I want to have a career talk.

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean they would have said, okay, work your work,

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.359
<v Speaker 1>your ass off, career talk over and get back to work.

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 1>And now these kids are very focused on their lifestyle balance,

0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:47.440
<v Speaker 1>things that we just wouldn't have had the guts to

0:37:47.480 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>bring up, having said, at least not till ten twenty years,

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:55.440
<v Speaker 1>until we had some currency, tho, some divorces, something something right,

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.759
<v Speaker 1>all of those things. But the flip side is there's

0:37:58.800 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of media tention on the net millennials, but

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the reality is the more talented than you and I

0:38:02.960 --> 0:38:05.719
<v Speaker 1>were at the village. Oh yeah, the tools they've grown

0:38:05.800 --> 0:38:08.799
<v Speaker 1>up with, the skills they have garnered, just some of

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 1>these kids are exceptional. We wouldn't put up with this

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:14.439
<v Speaker 1>otherwise these kids would have trouble getting job. The reason

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>they're can demand more of a balance in their life,

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the reason they can demand more talks around their career.

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 1>The reason they can demand, uh, you know, wanting to

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.360
<v Speaker 1>know what is the larger role that their job plays

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:27.000
<v Speaker 1>in the world is because a lot of these kids

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:30.600
<v Speaker 1>are outstanding that some of the some of the skills

0:38:30.680 --> 0:38:34.160
<v Speaker 1>they bring, the our ability to pull together information. Uh,

0:38:34.760 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't force maturity, So that's still the same, you know.

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:41.879
<v Speaker 1>But millennials are the most talented generation I have ever

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.759
<v Speaker 1>worked with. Hands down. It's going to be it's gonna

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 1>be inspiring to see what they're able to build over

0:38:47.800 --> 0:38:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the next ten or fifteen years. You know. The debate

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that that has been circulating about technology and robotics and

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:57.640
<v Speaker 1>what it's costing in terms of jobs. I speak at

0:38:57.640 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of schools, I give a lot of speeches

0:38:59.400 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>around and one of things I'll never forget We went

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to a wedding of my wife's cousin in Virginia and

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>we meet not only so I know the groom who

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.200
<v Speaker 1>from he's this toll to now he's getting married, and

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:14.239
<v Speaker 1>we meet some of his friends and the groomsmen. One

0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:18.760
<v Speaker 1>of the groomsmen created this perfect for college and Apple

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 1>iPhone case, the dumbest thing in the world. He has

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:25.560
<v Speaker 1>built into the back of it a bottle opener, so

0:39:25.600 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you could pop a beer you always have, right, Like

0:39:28.719 --> 0:39:31.400
<v Speaker 1>so obvious, And I'm like, oh, that's interesting. How are

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you gonna manufacture this? He's like, oh, we have a

0:39:33.640 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>company in China. They drop ship. It was sound about

0:39:35.640 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>forty units a month. There's a kid who's twenty in college, Like,

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and every time I go to a conference with young

0:39:43.239 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 1>kids with college students, that's sort of insane experience. They

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:53.040
<v Speaker 1>understand forget roy and loyalty, forget company loyalty. The company

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:55.240
<v Speaker 1>ain't gonna be loyal to you. They have no loyalty

0:39:55.280 --> 0:40:00.919
<v Speaker 1>back and they know that they're essentially um their independence.

0:40:00.960 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>They're they're you know, contract players, and they're aware of it. Yeah,

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it's we we get We get angry at them because

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.080
<v Speaker 1>most of us now are in principal positions where we

0:40:09.120 --> 0:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about loyalty because it serves our advantage.

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:14.319
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I wonder if

0:40:14.360 --> 0:40:16.759
<v Speaker 1>they've figured it out. And you've talked about this, your

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:18.879
<v Speaker 1>blogged the Big Picture, and we've talked about this a lot.

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of well publicized cases of these

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:24.200
<v Speaker 1>kids who can tap into global markets and have extreme

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:28.799
<v Speaker 1>wealth or success really quickly. There's a dark side of that, though,

0:40:28.840 --> 0:40:30.719
<v Speaker 1>and that is I think it's getting harder and harder

0:40:30.760 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 1>for these kids just to be solid citizens. Say they're

0:40:33.160 --> 0:40:35.440
<v Speaker 1>not geniuses, say they don't get lucky. I think it's

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 1>getting harder and harder just to punch out an average living.

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And and you know, it gets into income inequality. And

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I like a lot of the work that you've done

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 1>on this, and a lot of the work that your

0:40:44.239 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>past guest, Henry Blodge has done on this, but I

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:49.480
<v Speaker 1>would when I look at my class versus fourteen years ago,

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:51.440
<v Speaker 1>I got a hundred forty kids on every Monday night.

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:53.320
<v Speaker 1>I think it's never been easier to be a billionaire.

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>I think someone in my class will be a billionaire

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>either through alternative investments, are starting a tech company. At

0:40:57.960 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 1>the same time, it's never been harder to be a

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:01.200
<v Speaker 1>mill in there. And what I mean is to be

0:41:01.400 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 1>aggregate a million dollars, just be a middle class guy

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>or gal that aggregates some semblance of a living over

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>ten or twenty thirty years. The top, the most talented

0:41:09.600 --> 0:41:11.680
<v Speaker 1>people are going to aggregate wealth faster and in the

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:14.680
<v Speaker 1>velocity we've never seen before. But the rest it's going

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to be harder and harder just to be a solid

0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>citizen when you when you look at the state of

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the recovery as to what's been going on. You know,

0:41:22.080 --> 0:41:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I love the William Gibson quote the future is here.

0:41:24.520 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 1>It's just not evenly distributed. The same is true for

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the recovery. And it depends on what industry you're in,

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:34.080
<v Speaker 1>where you live in the country. You mentioned superurban centers,

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>so we travel around the country and visit clients. D

0:41:37.400 --> 0:41:40.120
<v Speaker 1>C is a house of fire. You go to Boston

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's in New York. Obviously that's this ghast. Seattle

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.080
<v Speaker 1>people tell me the recovery is terrible. Have you been

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:50.799
<v Speaker 1>to Seattle? Seattle? Austin is a little smaller. I think

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Austin is the fastest growing city in the country, but

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Seattle is number two, and it's a big city with

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot of industry and a lot of track. It's

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>most amazing. They're still actually fairly reasonable, at least compared

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco and Silicon Valley and and NAPA. That

0:42:08.640 --> 0:42:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that whole run of an hour north and an hour

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:15.280
<v Speaker 1>south of the city of San Francisco is utterly insane,

0:42:15.320 --> 0:42:17.960
<v Speaker 1>it's lost its mind. We're creating a small a small

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 1>number of elysium like environments where the life is just

0:42:21.440 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>incredible there if you can afford access in the opportunities,

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.760
<v Speaker 1>but most people can't afford it. In Europe it's London,

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.879
<v Speaker 1>you can't. It's London in the seven Dwarves. If you're

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>an unbelievable systems application developers, saying Baconi Italy er in Marinello,

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:36.319
<v Speaker 1>you end up in Milam within twelve months, and you're

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.719
<v Speaker 1>in London within thirty six months. There is Look at

0:42:39.719 --> 0:42:41.360
<v Speaker 1>how and you've talked a lot about this. You know,

0:42:41.400 --> 0:42:45.239
<v Speaker 1>the top top one percent aggregating, but this isn't a

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>one percent thing. This is really like of the professionals technology,

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:55.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a whole separate that the middle class has really

0:42:56.200 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 1>shrunk and the top one person. What's so differ today

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is the top one percent, in the top one percent

0:43:04.360 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 1>are so far ahead of anything we've seen previously. If

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you if you hold that aside, put put aside the

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 1>g fives and the hundred million dollar properties, just normal

0:43:16.120 --> 0:43:22.160
<v Speaker 1>insane wealth, hundred millionaires, that sort of top one percent,

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:27.000
<v Speaker 1>top ten percent, top this recovery. I actually left out.

0:43:27.080 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>The most significant factor if you have a graduate degree,

0:43:30.640 --> 0:43:34.800
<v Speaker 1>if you have a any specific technical skill and degree

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:39.399
<v Speaker 1>that goes with it. This recovery has been very, very tropic, right,

0:43:39.600 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 1>really good if you come out of college with an

0:43:42.400 --> 0:43:45.399
<v Speaker 1>English literature degree and you don't have a skill set

0:43:45.440 --> 0:43:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that you can take to one of those urban supercenters,

0:43:48.600 --> 0:43:51.399
<v Speaker 1>this has been a really terrible recovery. We were talking

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:54.840
<v Speaker 1>about Facebook. Look at the innovative companies of the past.

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:57.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, a Leaver a hundred and fifty billion dollar

0:43:57.280 --> 0:43:59.480
<v Speaker 1>market cap, has about a hundred and twenty five thousand

0:43:59.560 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 1>family being supported by Unilever, Intel more efficient, about a

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:05.799
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand people. A hundred fifty billion dollar market cap.

0:44:05.960 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Facebook two billion dollar market cap, nine thousand people. That's amazing.

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So you have more and more spoils going to fewer

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:16.560
<v Speaker 1>and fewer people. And Facebook is a good company. It's

0:44:16.560 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>great if you're on the Ferrari dealership and pala Alto.

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 1>It's great if you own real estate in San Francisco.

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:23.960
<v Speaker 1>It's great if you're serving the ecosystem of Facebook. But

0:44:24.000 --> 0:44:27.280
<v Speaker 1>I think these companies have so dramatically outpaced wealth creation.

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.600
<v Speaker 1>These companies, the four horsemen, Apple, Amazon, Facebook and Google

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>have the population of Lexington, Kentucky or Corpus Christi, Corpus Christie,

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:37.759
<v Speaker 1>and they have the GDP right the value of the

0:44:37.800 --> 0:44:41.560
<v Speaker 1>GDP of Spain or Australia. When you talk about and

0:44:41.640 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they've effectively, I think, legislatively and and operationally done to

0:44:46.920 --> 0:44:49.319
<v Speaker 1>the US with the South canow militarily, I think they're

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>seceding from the nation barrier. They're ultimate, they're incredible tax avoiders.

0:44:52.640 --> 0:44:55.560
<v Speaker 1>It's all legal, but they're licensing their IP overseas and

0:44:55.600 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>avoiding taxes. They're telling women will pay for them to

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>freeze their eggs. They're telling people that they'll do better

0:45:00.360 --> 0:45:03.359
<v Speaker 1>DNA testing. They're giving them their own municipal transportation back

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 1>and forth and work. They've effectively succeeded from the nation.

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 1>They've said, we're smarter, we're better, we can create more wealth.

0:45:08.880 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 1>We're going to create a society outside of the normal

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:14.600
<v Speaker 1>boundaries of the of the sovereign in the US, and

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:16.359
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna operate in the Netherlands. I think they were

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>effectively seceding from the US and well, when we look

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:22.440
<v Speaker 1>at Google as example, in San Francisco, a lot of

0:45:22.480 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>the complaints about the Google bus. You would think, who

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:27.399
<v Speaker 1>cares they have a bus? Is that much more room

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:30.840
<v Speaker 1>on on public transportation? But that's not the attitude in

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, is it. It's you have a lot of frustration.

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the civil unrest has taken

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>place is a lot about the individual acts of violence,

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:42.360
<v Speaker 1>but it's about frustration that there's just if you're in

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:45.439
<v Speaker 1>this uber class, you have the right skills, the right

0:45:45.440 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 1>work ethic, it's never been a better time. But if

0:45:48.920 --> 0:45:53.200
<v Speaker 1>you're the ninety eighty percent below that, it's just harder

0:45:53.239 --> 0:45:55.720
<v Speaker 1>and harder to be at the average Joe. The heirs

0:45:55.719 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to the Walmart portion the wall in the airs were

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>probably very decent. People have more wealth in the of America.

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:04.120
<v Speaker 1>If there's gonna be a revolution in this country, it's

0:46:04.120 --> 0:46:06.879
<v Speaker 1>probably gonna start an aisle five of the Walmart. I mean,

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>it's just that if you have the right skills, it's

0:46:10.400 --> 0:46:13.480
<v Speaker 1>never been a better time. But that that quote unquote

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>population of people the right skills is getting smaller and smaller,

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:19.319
<v Speaker 1>and more and more fruits have have act created to

0:46:19.320 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 1>those people. The good slash bad news is whenever this

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:24.319
<v Speaker 1>has happened in history, it usually self corrects in the

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:27.960
<v Speaker 1>form of war, revolution, or famine. That's the self correction.

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Well that's not very encouraged. That isn't encouraging. So and

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing is, you know, post War War two,

0:46:34.239 --> 0:46:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you could raise a family on a job as a

0:46:37.680 --> 0:46:42.000
<v Speaker 1>postman or a fireman, or or even a teacher or Hey,

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:44.440
<v Speaker 1>if you were an accountant or a lawyer, you were

0:46:44.440 --> 0:46:47.520
<v Speaker 1>in the uppercross. You were doing really well. Now that

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:52.799
<v Speaker 1>whole um low skilled jobs have have slid to the

0:46:52.800 --> 0:46:55.120
<v Speaker 1>bottom of the middle class and what used to be

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:58.839
<v Speaker 1>considered high skilled jobs lawyers are accountants. Maybe accountants are

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>doing better in the lawyers. I think we cranked out

0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 1>too many lawyers so sometime ago. But it seems like

0:47:04.360 --> 0:47:08.239
<v Speaker 1>the alignment and the strata has really changed. And it

0:47:08.280 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 1>comes back to the educational attainment. If you have the

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:15.160
<v Speaker 1>right degree, in the right focus, the right the right sector. Hey,

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:18.280
<v Speaker 1>these are great times. Everybody else is having having a challenge,

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But those fruits were increasingly only being able to be

0:47:20.920 --> 0:47:23.520
<v Speaker 1>picked by people who were either exceptional or come from

0:47:23.520 --> 0:47:27.040
<v Speaker 1>wealthy families. The bottom death style of households eight percent

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>of the kids will go to college, the top decile

0:47:29.040 --> 0:47:31.200
<v Speaker 1>eight percent. And this is This is a real point

0:47:31.200 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 1>of personal passion for me. I was raised by a

0:47:32.960 --> 0:47:35.040
<v Speaker 1>single mother who lived and died a secretary. We didn't

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:36.959
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of money, but we had a nice

0:47:37.000 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 1>life and I was able to go to public schools

0:47:38.920 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>all the way through undergrad US graduate school at Berkeley.

0:47:42.320 --> 0:47:45.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, if I didn't have the big handed government

0:47:45.600 --> 0:47:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and in very generous forward looking visionaries in the form

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 1>of the founders of the University of California, I just

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:53.719
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be here with you right now. That's the bottom line.

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 1>And those that same access. You know what my tuition

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 1>was UCLA in Berkeley was twelve hundred bucks a year.

0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:02.520
<v Speaker 1>And I'll beat you at I went to sunny stony Brook.

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You know. The joke was the Berkeley is the stony

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Brook of the West, and my tuition was four fIF semester.

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>And look and look at what it is now. It

0:48:10.320 --> 0:48:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is a it is a lot more and kids are

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.960
<v Speaker 1>taking on student debt, more student debt than than than

0:48:16.040 --> 0:48:18.839
<v Speaker 1>credit cards. It's it's hurting the housing crisis. It's giving

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:22.080
<v Speaker 1>them a huge, a huge head wind before they get out.

0:48:22.120 --> 0:48:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm worried that, you know, kids just aren't going

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:28.760
<v Speaker 1>to have the same unbelievable opportunities that I had, because

0:48:29.120 --> 0:48:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't seem as if the bottom of education is

0:48:31.880 --> 0:48:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the lubricant of upward mobility. My class and I this

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:36.879
<v Speaker 1>is a man in the mirror test barrier. We charge

0:48:36.960 --> 0:48:39.239
<v Speaker 1>kids six thousand dollars to take my class. Have a

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:42.239
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty kids or hundred forty kids on a Monday night,

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.960
<v Speaker 1>every time I walk into class. We're charging kids sixty

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars that night for one class, and the majority

0:48:48.440 --> 0:48:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of it is being paid for in debt. Something is

0:48:52.080 --> 0:48:54.800
<v Speaker 1>wrong here. We have to figure out a way and

0:48:54.840 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>now I'm really on my soapbox. We have to figure

0:48:57.120 --> 0:48:59.720
<v Speaker 1>out a way to give middle class kids with single

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.000
<v Speaker 1>mother is the same opportunity to be in this chair.

0:49:02.160 --> 0:49:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I U in public about this. I

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:07.960
<v Speaker 1>gave ten percent of my holdings in in my company

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:11.279
<v Speaker 1>to the University of California, Berkeley, Los Angeles and n

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:13.960
<v Speaker 1>y U because they've been so incredibly supportive. But I

0:49:14.120 --> 0:49:17.720
<v Speaker 1>really worry that our economy is under a huge threat

0:49:17.840 --> 0:49:20.200
<v Speaker 1>that the same number of people aren't gonna have access

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:22.960
<v Speaker 1>to the unbelievable education that you and I had at

0:49:22.960 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 1>the same price, and the amazing thing is a lot

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 1>of these schools have enormous endowments. And it's not just

0:49:29.040 --> 0:49:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the I vys. You look at Harvard, Gale, Stanford. That's

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>a hundred billion dollars in endowment just amongst those three.

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:39.359
<v Speaker 1>That's astonishing. So if they do nothing else, they're throwing

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:42.319
<v Speaker 1>off somewhere between five and ten billion dollars a year

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:46.560
<v Speaker 1>in revenue. That's insane, and how do they manage to

0:49:46.640 --> 0:49:49.280
<v Speaker 1>charge But the same thing is happening there, So winner

0:49:49.320 --> 0:49:51.920
<v Speaker 1>take all economy. It's the same things happening in education.

0:49:51.960 --> 0:49:53.839
<v Speaker 1>And used the operative term there was a hundred billion

0:49:53.840 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar endowments and three schools. The schools the top five

0:49:57.719 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>or seven endowments are growing at a much fast rate

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>than everybody else. In education, we're ripe to be disrupted.

0:50:03.000 --> 0:50:06.200
<v Speaker 1>We've tripled our tuition in the last fifteen years. Inflation

0:50:06.280 --> 0:50:07.719
<v Speaker 1>is kind of two or three percent yere. We are

0:50:07.800 --> 0:50:10.000
<v Speaker 1>so ripe to be disrupted. So people are looking for

0:50:10.040 --> 0:50:11.600
<v Speaker 1>a tech player to disrupt us. You know it's going

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:15.879
<v Speaker 1>to disrupt education. Harvard, Harvard and m I T did

0:50:15.920 --> 0:50:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the open open course uh the years. It's the same

0:50:19.520 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>effect that's taking place across the economy. The top, the top,

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:26.480
<v Speaker 1>top guys are gonna create more power than anyone has.

0:50:26.520 --> 0:50:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Harvarder said they could double their incoming freshman class without

0:50:28.960 --> 0:50:32.279
<v Speaker 1>sacrificing inequality. They're gonna take some of that endowment. They're

0:50:32.280 --> 0:50:35.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, take some technology, and I'm predicting they're gonna

0:50:35.160 --> 0:50:38.080
<v Speaker 1>say Harvard, m I T, Stanford, and Berkeley. At some point,

0:50:38.120 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the top schools are gonna say here's here's the deal,

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:43.960
<v Speaker 1>free and we're gonna triple quadruple, quintuple. And then what

0:50:44.000 --> 0:50:47.520
<v Speaker 1>does Indiana do? What does what does Fordham do? What

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>does the university in Miami do? What do they do

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:53.000
<v Speaker 1>when the best ten or twenty percent of the population

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:56.200
<v Speaker 1>has access to the best schools for free and every

0:50:56.239 --> 0:50:59.200
<v Speaker 1>every company worth its salt only recruits at those few schools.

0:50:59.360 --> 0:51:03.200
<v Speaker 1>So how does Harvard, with this much physical space triple

0:51:03.280 --> 0:51:07.200
<v Speaker 1>they're entering freshman classes it online only or people literally?

0:51:07.239 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Are they tripling the number of students in Cambridge? I

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be a hybrid. I think they're

0:51:11.480 --> 0:51:13.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to double the size of their

0:51:13.000 --> 0:51:15.000
<v Speaker 1>class in the next five years and triple it over

0:51:15.040 --> 0:51:17.720
<v Speaker 1>the next ten to twenty years because they'll make people

0:51:17.719 --> 0:51:20.279
<v Speaker 1>more efficient. Let them take a lot of their lectures. Right.

0:51:20.320 --> 0:51:22.759
<v Speaker 1>We talked about a flip classroom that actual teaching takes

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>place online and we come together to discuss. Every university,

0:51:26.040 --> 0:51:29.640
<v Speaker 1>including ours, is now building satellite campuses for all to

0:51:29.640 --> 0:51:32.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about online. We just opened a campus and now Abudhabi.

0:51:32.200 --> 0:51:35.880
<v Speaker 1>We opened a campus in Shanghai. Wharton's opening in Singapore,

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:38.719
<v Speaker 1>so we're opening all over the world. But it's like

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 1>every other category. Where there used to be fifty players

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:43.840
<v Speaker 1>eating out a good living, there's gonna be two or

0:51:43.880 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>three capturing of the profits. Unbelievable. That's interesting. Let's talk

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:53.240
<v Speaker 1>about some other sectors of the economy. Um, that that's

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:59.200
<v Speaker 1>right for disruption. Um. And I know we mentioned television earlier. Um,

0:51:59.480 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>do you watch a Silicon Valley on HP love such

0:52:02.719 --> 0:52:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a hilarious it's just it's just, you know, Mike Judge

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:11.640
<v Speaker 1>has done some interesting odd bowl stuff in the past.

0:52:12.080 --> 0:52:14.360
<v Speaker 1>This seems to be the first thing I'm trying to remember.

0:52:14.400 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 1>The future the name of the future show where everybody

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the movie he did, uh Idiocracy was a name of

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:23.480
<v Speaker 1>where everybody's just a blob sitting around TV wat sitting

0:52:23.480 --> 0:52:26.400
<v Speaker 1>around a couch watching TV. And it was really sophomoric

0:52:26.440 --> 0:52:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and goofy, And when I first saw the previews for this,

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking, Hey, is this guy grown up enough that

0:52:31.920 --> 0:52:34.400
<v Speaker 1>this is really going to be a serious and he

0:52:34.480 --> 0:52:38.239
<v Speaker 1>seems to be has the tone perfect. I mean, it's

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just every time I speak to anybody on the venture side,

0:52:42.120 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>on the private equity, totally totally dead on. And it's

0:52:47.080 --> 0:52:49.080
<v Speaker 1>amazing to think that there's a whole part of the

0:52:49.120 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 1>country where, for a hundred miles up the coast, that's

0:52:52.440 --> 0:52:55.640
<v Speaker 1>half of what's going on. Yeah, it's just I mean,

0:52:55.640 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 1>obviously it's an exaggeration, but I love Barely. Though it's barely,

0:52:59.480 --> 0:53:02.960
<v Speaker 1>it's everything's good and root and reality. It's an exaggeration,

0:53:03.000 --> 0:53:05.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's not like a gross parity. It's a slight exaggeration.

0:53:06.040 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>You see some crazy stuff. But the the other show

0:53:08.760 --> 0:53:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I always love to watch. I love Silicon Valley and

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I watched Girls, and I love Silicon Valley because I

0:53:12.560 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 1>can relate to it so much, and I love Girls

0:53:14.960 --> 0:53:17.280
<v Speaker 1>because I can't relate to it anyway. And I'm constantly

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:19.239
<v Speaker 1>is this what young people are really like? And I

0:53:19.239 --> 0:53:22.279
<v Speaker 1>find it so fascinating because I don't know if you've

0:53:22.280 --> 0:53:25.200
<v Speaker 1>ever watched Girls, but I've tried desperately and I just can't.

0:53:25.560 --> 0:53:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's literally wow, is this what kids are like?

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And the honest answers? I think it is, and so

0:53:30.520 --> 0:53:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating. It's almost like being a Vorior but Silicon Valley.

0:53:34.480 --> 0:53:36.839
<v Speaker 1>You know. It really shows how some of the sausages made.

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:40.239
<v Speaker 1>And there's a series of well publicized entrepreneurs. But what

0:53:40.360 --> 0:53:43.600
<v Speaker 1>people don't do is they don't realize we have a

0:53:43.600 --> 0:53:46.319
<v Speaker 1>tendency to romanticize entrepreneurship. Kids come to me because I'm

0:53:46.320 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>an entrepreneur and say I want to start a business,

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And I would say, if you have the skill set

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to go to a platform like a Bloomberg, like a Facebook,

0:53:53.480 --> 0:53:56.759
<v Speaker 1>like a Google and navigate the politics there, be be

0:53:56.920 --> 0:53:59.880
<v Speaker 1>effective as opposed to just being right. Something I've struggled

0:53:59.920 --> 0:54:01.759
<v Speaker 1>with my whole career is a difference between being right

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:04.759
<v Speaker 1>and being effective than on a risk adjusted basis, you're

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:07.680
<v Speaker 1>better off going to work for a platform. Entrepreneurs are

0:54:07.680 --> 0:54:09.440
<v Speaker 1>people who have no choice. It's like some being a

0:54:09.440 --> 0:54:11.520
<v Speaker 1>doctor is a terrible job now, but some people have

0:54:11.560 --> 0:54:13.359
<v Speaker 1>no choice. They just have to be doctors. Right. They

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:15.840
<v Speaker 1>were taking temperature since the age of six some people

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:18.520
<v Speaker 1>have to be in fashion. Entrepreneurship is the same way.

0:54:18.560 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that show gets across just how difficult, scary, insecure,

0:54:24.120 --> 0:54:27.759
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes you could kill yourself for seven or eight

0:54:27.840 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 1>years or ten years or longer and end up with

0:54:29.680 --> 0:54:32.400
<v Speaker 1>not only nothing, but less than nothing, you know, oh

0:54:32.480 --> 0:54:36.359
<v Speaker 1>in your parents, your family, everything. And we don't talk

0:54:36.400 --> 0:54:39.799
<v Speaker 1>a lot about that, but it happens more than it

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't happen. Well, that's the reality is that the vast

0:54:43.200 --> 0:54:46.640
<v Speaker 1>majority of startups, the vast majority of of new restaurants,

0:54:46.640 --> 0:54:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of new retail stores from new businesses, hey, two years out,

0:54:49.880 --> 0:54:52.640
<v Speaker 1>most of them are gone. That's just the simple numbers

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:56.399
<v Speaker 1>of it. And I'm glad the show isn't glorifying. Hey,

0:54:56.760 --> 0:54:59.040
<v Speaker 1>hang out a shingle and and everybody get I p

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:01.359
<v Speaker 1>O s at a billion dollars ours. They're really making

0:55:01.400 --> 0:55:04.279
<v Speaker 1>it clear that you could lose this company with one

0:55:04.280 --> 0:55:08.400
<v Speaker 1>wrong decision anywhere along the way. They the litigation was

0:55:08.480 --> 0:55:12.280
<v Speaker 1>really an insightful plot device, because you know that happens

0:55:12.320 --> 0:55:14.680
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Yeah, and just the kind of full

0:55:14.800 --> 0:55:17.440
<v Speaker 1>full body contact hardball that takes place. I worked with

0:55:17.480 --> 0:55:20.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of vcs who are very some are outstanding.

0:55:20.239 --> 0:55:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Some are super aggressive to some of the stuff you see.

0:55:23.080 --> 0:55:26.440
<v Speaker 1>It was really really rapacious. It's a it's a it's

0:55:26.480 --> 0:55:28.960
<v Speaker 1>a full body contact sport in terms of a startup,

0:55:29.000 --> 0:55:32.239
<v Speaker 1>specially a venture back startup. So so they there's one

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:36.440
<v Speaker 1>episode where they're doing their second round and suddenly they

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:40.800
<v Speaker 1>start getting they become more obnoxious to the vcs thinking

0:55:41.080 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>making it look like they already have funded and everybody

0:55:43.560 --> 0:55:46.480
<v Speaker 1>starts throwing money at them, and that leads to an

0:55:46.520 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting plot point, but it raises a question, what do

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:53.400
<v Speaker 1>you think about the valuations amongst startup these days? Is

0:55:53.400 --> 0:55:56.239
<v Speaker 1>that something you look at? And here we are in

0:55:56.320 --> 0:55:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the market where people have been talking about valuations being

0:55:59.600 --> 0:56:03.200
<v Speaker 1>too it for two years and the market just well,

0:56:03.400 --> 0:56:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the economists called the dot com crash perfectly. They just

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:10.920
<v Speaker 1>called and I'm on the board of several startups, and

0:56:10.960 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 1>what I'm telling them is raise raise money right now.

0:56:13.680 --> 0:56:15.400
<v Speaker 1>But you can't. Yeah, I don't know if it's I

0:56:15.400 --> 0:56:17.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is the best time to raise money,

0:56:17.880 --> 0:56:20.360
<v Speaker 1>but I am pretty confident it's not a bad time.

0:56:20.520 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And in general, I think acid prices across the board

0:56:23.160 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 1>because of low interest rates and things. You understand A

0:56:25.000 --> 0:56:28.600
<v Speaker 1>lot better than I do are really high. And my

0:56:28.719 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 1>senses you raise money when you don't need it, because

0:56:30.560 --> 0:56:32.400
<v Speaker 1>when you really need it, it's typically pretty hard to

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:37.080
<v Speaker 1>raise money. So everybody, anybody who owns something, I'm saying,

0:56:37.080 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 1>if you're in a position or for whatever reason, need

0:56:38.760 --> 0:56:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to sell, then sell. But because I think it's a

0:56:41.239 --> 0:56:43.120
<v Speaker 1>great time to sell almost anything. And if you're in

0:56:43.120 --> 0:56:44.719
<v Speaker 1>a position to raise money or you think you might

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:47.239
<v Speaker 1>need to raise money, I'm a l two is a

0:56:47.320 --> 0:56:50.759
<v Speaker 1>venture back company. We have fantastic nature cavalists firm called

0:56:50.760 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 1>General Catalyst. But we're even thinking we don't need the capital.

0:56:53.920 --> 0:56:56.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's just not a bad time to put another five, ten,

0:56:56.600 --> 0:56:58.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty million bucks in the tank right now because you

0:56:58.640 --> 0:57:01.880
<v Speaker 1>can get really solid evaluation, to say the least. Then

0:57:01.920 --> 0:57:05.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'll tell you what my theory is. What's driving it.

0:57:05.239 --> 0:57:06.960
<v Speaker 1>It has nothing to do with interest rates, it has

0:57:07.000 --> 0:57:10.439
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with the fed. Um. I'm a car guy.

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:12.480
<v Speaker 1>I've been a car first word I ever said was car.

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a car buff and my whole adult working life

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:19.480
<v Speaker 1>there are a series of cars I would like to own,

0:57:20.240 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and they're now starting to creep up as I oh

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I can afford to buy a two thousand five for

0:57:27.360 --> 0:57:30.800
<v Speaker 1>g T or a two thousand two BMW Z eight

0:57:31.240 --> 0:57:34.520
<v Speaker 1>because when they were seventy five dollars and I was

0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:38.080
<v Speaker 1>making sixty, I couldn't afford that. But the problem is

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:41.320
<v Speaker 1>that the Z eight is up to one seventy five,

0:57:41.400 --> 0:57:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the GT is up to three hundred. As my income

0:57:44.080 --> 0:57:47.080
<v Speaker 1>goes up, these cars go up. And the reason for this,

0:57:47.200 --> 0:57:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to bring it back to start up valuations, there are

0:57:50.600 --> 0:57:53.640
<v Speaker 1>only so many of them, and as we discussed before

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:57.360
<v Speaker 1>with the top one to there are so many people

0:57:57.440 --> 0:58:00.880
<v Speaker 1>with so much money who desire those things that they

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:03.080
<v Speaker 1>don't care. They'll bid one fifty for a car that's

0:58:03.120 --> 0:58:06.720
<v Speaker 1>really worth a hundred thousand dollars, or they'll bid fifty

0:58:06.760 --> 0:58:09.720
<v Speaker 1>billion for Uber because they have to show Uber in

0:58:09.800 --> 0:58:12.680
<v Speaker 1>their funds in order to make their limited partners happy.

0:58:13.040 --> 0:58:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And so there's a limited number of of these goods,

0:58:16.560 --> 0:58:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a limited number of these companies that at least appear

0:58:19.960 --> 0:58:22.520
<v Speaker 1>to have some shot at at being a home run,

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and so everybody piles into the same. Look, look at

0:58:25.960 --> 0:58:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the Ferrari market has gone insane. Like I've always thought,

0:58:29.280 --> 0:58:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the Ferrari to seventy five was a gorgeous car, from

0:58:33.200 --> 0:58:36.080
<v Speaker 1>one and later in the sixties the Dino. You could

0:58:36.080 --> 0:58:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have picked up a Dino fifteen years ago for fifty thousand,

0:58:39.720 --> 0:58:43.160
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand dollars. They're half a million dollars. Now why

0:58:43.200 --> 0:58:45.480
<v Speaker 1>because there aren't ten million of them. They made a

0:58:45.480 --> 0:58:48.120
<v Speaker 1>few thousand. Half of them were wrecked on the track

0:58:48.480 --> 0:58:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and the other half have been lovely restored and they've

0:58:50.640 --> 0:58:55.160
<v Speaker 1>just completely But it's I see the same people buying

0:58:55.200 --> 0:58:58.280
<v Speaker 1>those two seventy fives going to the art market and

0:58:58.360 --> 0:59:02.400
<v Speaker 1>picking up the Jack Meddi sculptures or a bran cusio

0:59:02.600 --> 0:59:05.760
<v Speaker 1>or whatever happens to float your boat, and piling into

0:59:05.840 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>these private equities the best returns, the best industry in

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the world the last five ten years is this market

0:59:11.200 --> 0:59:15.120
<v Speaker 1>surges has been the vanity economy. The vanity economy. Ferrari

0:59:15.200 --> 0:59:17.080
<v Speaker 1>is anything that makes you more attractive or makes you

0:59:17.120 --> 0:59:20.560
<v Speaker 1>feel more signaling to the opposite sex. Yeah, even even

0:59:20.680 --> 0:59:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of people say, well, Scott, that's not true.

0:59:22.800 --> 0:59:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm happily married. I just really like this ferrari and

0:59:25.280 --> 0:59:26.600
<v Speaker 1>I bought it and I kept in my garage. And

0:59:26.640 --> 0:59:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the questions, well, why does that make you feel good?

0:59:28.800 --> 0:59:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Or people will so women will say, you know, I

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:32.880
<v Speaker 1>wear laprola under my work clothes and no one's ever

0:59:32.880 --> 0:59:35.160
<v Speaker 1>going to see it. I'm happy. I'm in a monogous relationship.

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not trying to attract anybody. The question is, well,

0:59:37.400 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 1>why do you feel so good? It's because for the

0:59:39.000 --> 0:59:41.920
<v Speaker 1>last ten million years, it's been pounded into us that

0:59:41.960 --> 0:59:43.840
<v Speaker 1>we have this job to be more attractive to the

0:59:43.840 --> 0:59:46.120
<v Speaker 1>other sex, such that we can find someone stronger, smarter,

0:59:46.200 --> 0:59:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and faster than us to mate with. Such of the

0:59:48.360 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 1>next generation is smarter, stronger, and faster. And this vanity

0:59:52.400 --> 0:59:55.880
<v Speaker 1>economy the most successful people. There's a limited number of

0:59:55.920 --> 0:59:58.840
<v Speaker 1>these objects because scarcity is what are scarcity values? What

0:59:58.880 --> 1:00:00.640
<v Speaker 1>gives us the sense that it's sick? Those were really

1:00:00.680 --> 1:00:03.280
<v Speaker 1>successful when you can only only so many people can

1:00:03.280 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>buy and then long and ZN watch this unbelievably German

1:00:06.920 --> 1:00:09.919
<v Speaker 1>watch Makeground by Richemont, and the prices have just gone

1:00:10.200 --> 1:00:13.120
<v Speaker 1>just gone nuts, and it's totally irrational. And that's where

1:00:13.120 --> 1:00:14.360
<v Speaker 1>you want to be in business. You want to be

1:00:14.360 --> 1:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in an irrational part of the ecosystem because that irrational

1:00:17.480 --> 1:00:19.800
<v Speaker 1>translates into great margins. I love the work you do

1:00:19.840 --> 1:00:22.360
<v Speaker 1>on the signaling and the value of these different things.

1:00:22.480 --> 1:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>My my biology, my favorite biology discussion of what beauty

1:00:27.880 --> 1:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is my favorite rationalization is or description maybe not rationalization is, well,

1:00:34.200 --> 1:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>beauty is a function of symmetry, and symmetry is a

1:00:36.320 --> 1:00:39.120
<v Speaker 1>function of health, and that means that they'll be better

1:00:39.200 --> 1:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>able to reproduce the bare children. And so you're attracted

1:00:42.160 --> 1:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to these supermodels not because they're so special, but because

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>they meet all of the subconscious, instinctual inditia of health

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and the ability to procreate. And I don't know how

1:00:55.200 --> 1:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>solid the science is behind that, but I just love

1:00:57.880 --> 1:01:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that rationalization. It makes so much sense along the signaling

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>of the watches and all that other stuff. It really,

1:01:04.320 --> 1:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>when you put things in terms of evolutionary biology, suddenly

1:01:08.040 --> 1:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of irrational behavior starts to look less irrational. Yeah,

1:01:12.200 --> 1:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>it becomes highly irrational when you think about how important

1:01:14.640 --> 1:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>it is um that the next generation be better. That's,

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, Darwin, whatever you call it, the looks, what

1:01:20.880 --> 1:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we're attracting this looks. I do think it bifurcates, though

1:01:23.120 --> 1:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's basics. Certain types of looks are more

1:01:26.280 --> 1:01:29.400
<v Speaker 1>associated with infection or disease, and we have veered away

1:01:29.400 --> 1:01:32.240
<v Speaker 1>from people who have those common characteristics, and I'm always

1:01:32.240 --> 1:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>worried I'm gonna I'm gonna say something off color here,

1:01:34.680 --> 1:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's the quick end of my career, so I

1:01:36.160 --> 1:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>won't say what those things typically are. The second thing, though,

1:01:38.880 --> 1:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I do think, is man made, and that I think

1:01:40.760 --> 1:01:43.560
<v Speaker 1>clothes look better on people who are built like hangers,

1:01:43.560 --> 1:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>who are unutually thin, and because great organizations like Vogue

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>have consistently wanted to make clothes look fantastic, I think

1:01:50.800 --> 1:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>there has been a man made, a man made training

1:01:54.240 --> 1:01:57.439
<v Speaker 1>towards some unnatural body types. It's not like the days

1:01:57.520 --> 1:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of of the Rubenesque window, which when Rubenesque women, which

1:02:01.720 --> 1:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>were a signal of wealth that you can actually you

1:02:04.320 --> 1:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>could be a little overweights, which signaled hey I have more.

1:02:09.040 --> 1:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm a cross fitter. I don't know if

1:02:11.080 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>I've become one of these cross flash Yeah, there you go. Actually,

1:02:14.160 --> 1:02:15.520
<v Speaker 1>my knees are killing me, but I think that's more

1:02:15.560 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>function my age. But anyways, I think they tapped in.

1:02:18.200 --> 1:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they tapped into this underserved marketplace, and that

1:02:20.840 --> 1:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>as women who don't necessarily want to be thin. If

1:02:23.480 --> 1:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at the the the the workout industrial complex,

1:02:26.800 --> 1:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>it says to guys be ripped and be big, and

1:02:28.960 --> 1:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's always healthy, but I think there's

1:02:31.000 --> 1:02:32.800
<v Speaker 1>benefits to being strong. But I think what it says

1:02:32.840 --> 1:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to women is being naturally thin, and I think that's unhealthy.

1:02:36.160 --> 1:02:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Won't cross fit, by the way six cross fitters or

1:02:38.960 --> 1:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>women has said to women is be strong and being

1:02:41.840 --> 1:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>strong as women can mean that you can be five

1:02:43.680 --> 1:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>five fifty pounds and you can still be really strong,

1:02:46.200 --> 1:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's celebrated that and it has tapped into this

1:02:49.480 --> 1:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>wildly underserved population of women who are normal and strong.

1:02:54.120 --> 1:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Did you see the Times article about the new um

1:02:58.400 --> 1:03:01.920
<v Speaker 1>brands of cross fit? Close was so women who do

1:03:02.120 --> 1:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>cross fit they can't wear off the rack clothes if

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it strong enough, So you have these big

1:03:07.760 --> 1:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>muscular thighs and you're a little ripped on the shoulders

1:03:11.040 --> 1:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>and arms. Traditional women's clothes don't fit. I think it

1:03:14.440 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was the New York Times, but Wolf Jennal, I want

1:03:16.760 --> 1:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>to say Times about this whole new run of clothes

1:03:20.800 --> 1:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that are designed for the CrossFit female body and women.

1:03:24.680 --> 1:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>It was invented by a woman who was a cross

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>fit enthusiast, and it's become wildly successful. A real solid

1:03:31.760 --> 1:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>cross fitter female goes to the regular department store. Well,

1:03:37.200 --> 1:03:39.240
<v Speaker 1>you're starting to talk about one that one of the

1:03:39.240 --> 1:03:41.480
<v Speaker 1>best returns in retail have been plus size clothing. But

1:03:41.520 --> 1:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you're also starting to uh segueing into something that's a

1:03:45.160 --> 1:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>tectonic shift in the world of retail. And one of

1:03:47.720 --> 1:03:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why I think Nike is just gonna boom,

1:03:51.560 --> 1:03:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, what is athletic apparel? Or We've had

1:03:55.560 --> 1:03:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a tectonic shift in the third largest consumer market in

1:03:58.080 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the world, and that US. For the first time ever

1:04:00.000 --> 1:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and fourteen, people are spending more money

1:04:02.080 --> 1:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on sweatpants than on denim. You now see the denim

1:04:06.920 --> 1:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the denim generation. But year olds in my office are

1:04:10.120 --> 1:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>not wearing Rachel Strugrats, the technology reporter for w w D,

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>very fashionable woman. You know what she wears every day?

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Head to tell Nike. Really, people are spending more and

1:04:18.200 --> 1:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>more money that most the most the most popular brand

1:04:21.520 --> 1:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>among young wealthy millennials is Nike in apparel. People are

1:04:25.680 --> 1:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>showing up to work. The fabrics. It doesn't it's not

1:04:28.440 --> 1:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>just a bad pair of sweatpants. It says juicy on them,

1:04:30.640 --> 1:04:34.320
<v Speaker 1>but these are interesting fabrics that look good. You're going

1:04:34.400 --> 1:04:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to see athletic wear boom under armor Nike, they are

1:04:41.040 --> 1:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna They're gonna boom the next ten years. And it's

1:04:43.800 --> 1:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be and and God help Leavi Strauss and Company,

1:04:46.640 --> 1:04:50.800
<v Speaker 1>diesel Um any denim based company is going to be

1:04:50.960 --> 1:04:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to be pushing a rock uphill the next time. Well,

1:04:53.000 --> 1:04:56.720
<v Speaker 1>there's clearly far too many denim companies before this happened.

1:04:57.080 --> 1:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Now that this is gonna happen, it will be interesting

1:04:58.720 --> 1:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>to see what sort of what sort of consolidation there is.

1:05:02.960 --> 1:05:07.480
<v Speaker 1>So so let's talk about another UM signal out there, Twitter,

1:05:07.760 --> 1:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Twitter followers, etcetera. You know, I may be a little

1:05:10.520 --> 1:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>ovo weight, but I got seventy Twitter followers, so I

1:05:13.160 --> 1:05:15.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's worth thirty pounds or so. I could lose

1:05:15.720 --> 1:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty pounds or um. But you've talked about how far

1:05:20.640 --> 1:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is behind Facebook, and again for you and I

1:05:24.880 --> 1:05:26.959
<v Speaker 1>I would bet you're much more of a Twitter user

1:05:27.000 --> 1:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>than you are a Facebook. Yeah, you and I were

1:05:28.640 --> 1:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. Uh, you and I don't get Facebook.

1:05:31.160 --> 1:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>I would like to put a banner across my Facebook

1:05:33.760 --> 1:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>page that says there's a reason we haven't stayed in touch.

1:05:36.640 --> 1:05:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I just don't like it. I don't get it. But

1:05:39.120 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>as you don't care about your baby's doesn't interest done.

1:05:43.320 --> 1:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>It's but as Yoda said, you have to forget what

1:05:45.400 --> 1:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know. If you look at the numbers, Facebook's the

1:05:47.520 --> 1:05:50.800
<v Speaker 1>most successful product in the history mankind. That's lessful than God,

1:05:50.920 --> 1:05:53.760
<v Speaker 1>all a, Coca Cola, communism, whatever you want to call it,

1:05:53.760 --> 1:05:57.360
<v Speaker 1>as relationships, meaningful relationships with two point four billion people

1:05:57.400 --> 1:06:01.040
<v Speaker 1>across Instagram? What's happened Facebook? Anyways? Twitter? My basic rap

1:06:01.160 --> 1:06:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is on Twitter, and I love Twitter, no doubt. It's

1:06:03.800 --> 1:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a great company, no doubt. I think they've got a

1:06:06.240 --> 1:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>great management team. The question is are they worth worth

1:06:08.640 --> 1:06:12.040
<v Speaker 1>more than coach Tiffany and and you know, throwing Abercrombie

1:06:12.120 --> 1:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>or Clorox combined. I just think it's wildly overvalued. And

1:06:14.840 --> 1:06:16.400
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the user base, it appears to

1:06:16.440 --> 1:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>a flatline. And I would argue that their product innovation

1:06:19.880 --> 1:06:23.560
<v Speaker 1>hasn't been nearly as robust as facebooks or even seen

1:06:23.560 --> 1:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a way about. We tend to, as Americans, think of

1:06:26.200 --> 1:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>ourselves as being the home of innovation. Actually, if you

1:06:28.360 --> 1:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the product roadmap of a lot of the

1:06:30.080 --> 1:06:32.600
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms in Asia, we chat seen a way

1:06:32.600 --> 1:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>about Cow Cow talk line in um UH, South Korea

1:06:38.200 --> 1:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and Japan, respectively, their product roadmap is actually more innovative

1:06:41.400 --> 1:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>than what we're seeing here. But I don't think Twitter,

1:06:43.640 --> 1:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>quite frankly, is innovated. And and if you look about

1:06:47.880 --> 1:06:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll see that's exciting. Um I'm hedging because quite frankly,

1:06:52.360 --> 1:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know a lot about it. I think it's exciting.

1:06:54.480 --> 1:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Real time partner loves it, uses it all the time.

1:06:57.440 --> 1:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>He's on the air a couple of a couple of

1:06:59.120 --> 1:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>days a week, and he'll pull up periscope. I have

1:07:01.920 --> 1:07:03.520
<v Speaker 1>it on my phone. I have yet to set it up.

1:07:03.800 --> 1:07:05.600
<v Speaker 1>He'll pull up periscope and say, all right, we're about

1:07:05.640 --> 1:07:07.560
<v Speaker 1>to go on the air. He'll do a quick once

1:07:07.600 --> 1:07:10.880
<v Speaker 1>around the studio and then bang, that's it and he

1:07:10.920 --> 1:07:13.640
<v Speaker 1>gets real time back and forth. Another one you just mentioned.

1:07:13.640 --> 1:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>We're sitting here in Bloomberg and we're seeing all these screens,

1:07:15.720 --> 1:07:18.040
<v Speaker 1>these these headlines come across these big beautiful screens, and

1:07:18.040 --> 1:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>we just saw the Pinterest announces you can now purchase

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:25.120
<v Speaker 1>directly from pins. I think that if Instagram tomorrow releases

1:07:26.000 --> 1:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>Instagram uh and says look curated pages of specific topics

1:07:34.320 --> 1:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that you can pin your images too. I think Pinterest

1:07:37.120 --> 1:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to decline in value. I think Pinterest product

1:07:39.640 --> 1:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>development has been almost zero the last twenty four months

1:07:42.680 --> 1:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>and is wildly overvalued. Granted I said that they were

1:07:45.280 --> 1:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>at five billion. I think you have essentially social media

1:07:49.040 --> 1:07:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is basically Facebook in the seven doors right now. I

1:07:51.160 --> 1:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna see Facebook. And we said this during

1:07:52.960 --> 1:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the brig. I think Facebook is gonna be the most

1:07:54.600 --> 1:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>valuable company in the world within five years. Granted I

1:07:57.240 --> 1:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>said that five years ago. I was gonna say, I'd

1:07:58.800 --> 1:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>say ten years. It might take longer. I said it

1:08:01.760 --> 1:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>five years ago. The Facebook was going to become the

1:08:03.640 --> 1:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Internet of all time. Online is spent on Facebook. It

1:08:06.480 --> 1:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>goes to fifty one, and the Internet just the underlying technology,

1:08:08.920 --> 1:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook is the Internet. But when you look at

1:08:11.520 --> 1:08:14.520
<v Speaker 1>two and a half billion people, meaningful relationships dominating the

1:08:14.520 --> 1:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>funnel up and down, I just think they're an unbelievable

1:08:17.080 --> 1:08:19.080
<v Speaker 1>jargonaut and they're gonna start to take share from Google

1:08:19.120 --> 1:08:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and every other social media platform including Twitter. See that's

1:08:22.880 --> 1:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>really fascinating. Some of their advertising stuff. It's going to

1:08:26.080 --> 1:08:29.439
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see how they integrated because they have

1:08:29.560 --> 1:08:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the ability to do wondrous things. They're a b testing

1:08:34.040 --> 1:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if we'll get to that. Will

1:08:35.760 --> 1:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>will circle back later about that. But some of the

1:08:38.280 --> 1:08:41.719
<v Speaker 1>things I've been seeing that they do and hearing about

1:08:41.760 --> 1:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that they do are astonishing. And I don't know how

1:08:45.120 --> 1:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>other marketers slash advotarser is going to be able to

1:08:48.439 --> 1:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>match the infrastructure because they have more you. You alluded

1:08:52.320 --> 1:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>to this earlier. They have so much information about you,

1:08:56.320 --> 1:08:58.479
<v Speaker 1>who you are, what you do, you know. I love

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the story and this is way maybe there's some competition

1:09:01.479 --> 1:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>with Facebook. I love the story about target marketing to

1:09:06.320 --> 1:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the pregnant d and dad goes into the store and

1:09:09.240 --> 1:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>yells at the manager and how dare you? You know,

1:09:11.720 --> 1:09:13.599
<v Speaker 1>grows the paper, how dare you do this? And then

1:09:13.640 --> 1:09:17.480
<v Speaker 1>a month later shows up to apologize, Hey, guys, we're right.

1:09:17.760 --> 1:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Based on what her purchase history is through her credit card,

1:09:20.120 --> 1:09:23.479
<v Speaker 1>they can track her. If other retailers can do that,

1:09:23.920 --> 1:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>do they stand a chance against Facebook? Or is it

1:09:27.320 --> 1:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be Facebook and everybody else? So I think

1:09:29.880 --> 1:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>that's I think it's apples and oranges. I don't think

1:09:31.640 --> 1:09:33.639
<v Speaker 1>facebooks in the retail business. As a matter of fact,

1:09:33.680 --> 1:09:36.680
<v Speaker 1>social commerce has been one of the biggest head fix

1:09:36.760 --> 1:09:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in business the last five years. There were what do

1:09:38.840 --> 1:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you mean by that, well, a bunch of retailers in

1:09:40.960 --> 1:09:44.000
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twelve about seventeen retailers that whe track

1:09:44.120 --> 1:09:49.559
<v Speaker 1>open stores. On Facebook you could buy something. There were

1:09:49.600 --> 1:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>three Social When you're at a bar, you don't want

1:09:52.400 --> 1:09:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to buy. When you're looking taking your friends, you don't

1:09:54.240 --> 1:09:57.040
<v Speaker 1>want to buy. But it doesn't matter it even if,

1:09:57.040 --> 1:10:01.479
<v Speaker 1>even if these aren't platforms. Retail advertise is a huge market,

1:10:01.680 --> 1:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and Facebook is going to start to take share and

1:10:03.720 --> 1:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>market cap from every other media vehicle in the world.

1:10:06.920 --> 1:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna take it from ESPN, They're going to take

1:10:09.120 --> 1:10:11.639
<v Speaker 1>it from w PP, They're gonna take it from pinterest.

1:10:12.240 --> 1:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>This is back to the notion of a winner take

1:10:13.960 --> 1:10:17.040
<v Speaker 1>all economy. But you have top of the funnel with Instagram,

1:10:17.240 --> 1:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>would you could argue is already the most powerful platform

1:10:19.280 --> 1:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>in the world if you look at the community size

1:10:20.800 --> 1:10:23.519
<v Speaker 1>times the level of engagement that it inspires top of

1:10:23.520 --> 1:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the funnel, brand based, image based awareness. Then with Facebook

1:10:27.080 --> 1:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you have unbelievable targeting in the mid funnel at scale,

1:10:30.000 --> 1:10:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and then at the bottom you have What's app, which

1:10:32.200 --> 1:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is strong in every market that Facebook

1:10:34.439 --> 1:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>wasn't strong and right, it was very, very um complementary acquisition.

1:10:38.439 --> 1:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>They're jumping the silos. They're starting to figure out what

1:10:41.200 --> 1:10:43.559
<v Speaker 1>images you're looking at on Instagram and then and then

1:10:43.600 --> 1:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>target you on Facebook with more relevant ads, and at

1:10:45.880 --> 1:10:47.759
<v Speaker 1>some point they're gonna be able to target you locally

1:10:47.760 --> 1:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>based on where you are on What's app. We have

1:10:50.080 --> 1:10:53.960
<v Speaker 1>never seen, we have never seen anything like this. Very

1:10:54.040 --> 1:10:56.840
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the most successful product in the

1:10:56.960 --> 1:11:00.080
<v Speaker 1>history of mankind. It's nothing. It's a scene for a

1:11:00.160 --> 1:11:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Minority report where where Tom Cruise walks into the store,

1:11:04.760 --> 1:11:06.639
<v Speaker 1>they know who he is, they know what he's shopped at,

1:11:06.680 --> 1:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the ads pop up specifically for him. Facebook is approaching

1:11:11.200 --> 1:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that way. And look how smart they've been. Remember all

1:11:13.400 --> 1:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the grief that everybody gave Mark Zuckerberg for buying Instagram

1:11:16.479 --> 1:11:18.559
<v Speaker 1>nineteen people for a billion bucks. Now they say it's

1:11:18.560 --> 1:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>where billion dollars fantastic acquisition. Meanwhile, yeah, who goes and

1:11:22.360 --> 1:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>buy his tumber from one point one billion? And they

1:11:23.880 --> 1:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>never mentioned in earnings calls again, right, best acquisition in

1:11:26.439 --> 1:11:28.960
<v Speaker 1>tech the last five years, Instagram, worst acquisition in tech

1:11:29.040 --> 1:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the last five years, Tumbler, and then What's App perfectly

1:11:33.280 --> 1:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>complimentary every market they weren't strong, and this has been

1:11:37.040 --> 1:11:39.040
<v Speaker 1>This has been the most nimble company in the world.

1:11:39.160 --> 1:11:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Zero zero revenues from mobile thirty months ago, now two

1:11:41.760 --> 1:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>thirds of the revenue. And that's the huge shift once

1:11:45.240 --> 1:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>they cracked mobile, because I was skeptical about Facebook's valuation

1:11:49.800 --> 1:11:53.920
<v Speaker 1>pre mobile, I did a reversal once they basically said, Hey,

1:11:53.960 --> 1:11:56.320
<v Speaker 1>here's how much we're seeing and that was a huge,

1:11:56.360 --> 1:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>huge game change. Unbelievably nimble. Who's made better acquisition than Facebook,

1:12:00.800 --> 1:12:03.679
<v Speaker 1>who's being able to retain talent better. They've also got

1:12:03.720 --> 1:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the benefit of being seen as benign, so regulators aren't

1:12:07.240 --> 1:12:10.479
<v Speaker 1>yet coming after them. Uh yeah, I think they made

1:12:10.479 --> 1:12:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the most uh most valuable company in the world. That

1:12:13.880 --> 1:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that's incredible. That's ah. We'll see if they can

1:12:17.120 --> 1:12:22.080
<v Speaker 1>actually bypass Apple, And which raises the question how dependent

1:12:22.360 --> 1:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>is Apple on their next hit? I know that we've

1:12:25.320 --> 1:12:29.479
<v Speaker 1>had a long run of really successful products. Are they

1:12:29.560 --> 1:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a hit driven company or can they afford the watch

1:12:33.200 --> 1:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the eye watch to be a little uh maybe not

1:12:37.640 --> 1:12:40.200
<v Speaker 1>on iPhone or even an iPod for that matter. Yeah,

1:12:40.720 --> 1:12:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they have their next hit product, and I

1:12:42.720 --> 1:12:44.479
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's the watch. I think it's the iPhone

1:12:44.479 --> 1:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>sex Really, I don't know if you're an iPhone guy,

1:12:47.400 --> 1:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>But which one do you have? I got the six,

1:12:50.400 --> 1:12:53.559
<v Speaker 1>My wife has the big one. The big one is

1:12:53.560 --> 1:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>too big to put in my pocket. She looked. Now,

1:12:56.280 --> 1:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, not a tech person like getting her

1:12:59.240 --> 1:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to return voicemails like she texts. She she so totally

1:13:04.400 --> 1:13:07.679
<v Speaker 1>loves this phone. It's easy to read, it does everything.

1:13:07.720 --> 1:13:10.720
<v Speaker 1>It's the pictures, so she teaches a photography class. The

1:13:10.800 --> 1:13:15.360
<v Speaker 1>pictures that you do on that phone are just just astonishing. Yeah,

1:13:15.840 --> 1:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>it does the Apple Watch. Is the Apple Watch successful?

1:13:18.560 --> 1:13:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I think it is, but quite feely. I don't think

1:13:20.000 --> 1:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>it matters. I think the iPhone six is such an

1:13:22.800 --> 1:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>incredible product. And by the way, who loses Samsung? Oh

1:13:26.439 --> 1:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>my gosh, it's a Samsung killer. And you want to

1:13:28.960 --> 1:13:32.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about Android. There were more Apple Watches sold on

1:13:32.960 --> 1:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the first day of the Apple Watch and every Android

1:13:34.960 --> 1:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>device combined for the previous year. Really, Oh my gosh,

1:13:38.360 --> 1:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that's unbelievable. Realized that Apple store on Fifth Avenue with

1:13:41.280 --> 1:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the one below the General Motors building is going to

1:13:43.000 --> 1:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>do more sales in a year just that store than

1:13:44.880 --> 1:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the entire wearables market. By the way, everybody thinks that

1:13:47.400 --> 1:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the Apple watches evidence that the wearable's market is thriving.

1:13:50.280 --> 1:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>The wearables market is dead except for the Apple Watch.

1:13:54.400 --> 1:13:56.719
<v Speaker 1>And the Apple Watch isn't a wearable. It's a second

1:13:56.760 --> 1:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>screen for your phone that's going to take all the

1:13:58.760 --> 1:14:02.639
<v Speaker 1>discretionary income out of the wearable's market. Fit bit job

1:14:02.760 --> 1:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>on never going public, No way, the wearable's market is done. Aska.

1:14:07.479 --> 1:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Anytime you're with a hundred people or more in an audience,

1:14:09.960 --> 1:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>how many people about a wearable? They all raise their hand.

1:14:12.120 --> 1:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>How many people are wearing a wearable? You got? What

1:14:15.400 --> 1:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>are you wearing? Which one you have? Um, it's okay.

1:14:19.840 --> 1:14:22.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't love how poorly it sinks with the phone.

1:14:22.400 --> 1:14:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it does, sometimes it does in the battery last

1:14:25.000 --> 1:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>three days. I don't like the way this closes. If

1:14:27.960 --> 1:14:30.879
<v Speaker 1>I have a better, if I I have zero brand loyalty,

1:14:30.880 --> 1:14:33.559
<v Speaker 1>I've been using it because truth be told, I'm at

1:14:33.640 --> 1:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>nine thousand steps. Hey, I'm gonna make it to ten.

1:14:36.200 --> 1:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>And there are days when I'm doing fifteen and eighteen.

1:14:38.240 --> 1:14:40.439
<v Speaker 1>And you know the only reason I'm not three hundred

1:14:40.479 --> 1:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>pounds is because I'm so I'm running around constantly what right.

1:14:44.920 --> 1:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>If it wasn't for that, I'd be a Macy's float

1:14:47.560 --> 1:14:51.679
<v Speaker 1>um for Thanksgiving. But but, but I will tell you

1:14:52.040 --> 1:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the fascinating thing about Apple and the phones is, you know,

1:14:56.280 --> 1:14:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you see the Android market chair and how much Samsons

1:14:59.160 --> 1:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple's capture about the profits in the phone space. For

1:15:04.280 --> 1:15:06.439
<v Speaker 1>the first time in the history of South Korea or

1:15:06.479 --> 1:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>as long as it's been mobile phones, you're gonna have

1:15:08.320 --> 1:15:10.519
<v Speaker 1>a mobile phone from a non domestic carry I have

1:15:10.520 --> 1:15:13.519
<v Speaker 1>the number one market share, and that's the iPhone China

1:15:13.640 --> 1:15:15.479
<v Speaker 1>never having before. It's Westman Samsung, which by the way,

1:15:15.520 --> 1:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>is a great company, and you can't count them out.

1:15:17.040 --> 1:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I just think they're I mean, they're appliance as they

1:15:19.120 --> 1:15:22.479
<v Speaker 1>do an amazing job. So diplomatic I work with all

1:15:22.520 --> 1:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>these guys anyway, So uh, but you look at the iPhone.

1:15:26.320 --> 1:15:28.519
<v Speaker 1>There's gonna be more iPhone sold in China this year

1:15:28.920 --> 1:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>than in the US. And then just coming up in

1:15:30.720 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>the elevator here, I realized the upgrade cycle has such

1:15:33.360 --> 1:15:35.840
<v Speaker 1>traumatic potential because everyone has an iPhone, but they still

1:15:35.880 --> 1:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>have the five. So two things the iPhone, the successful

1:15:40.920 --> 1:15:42.920
<v Speaker 1>migration to a luxury brand. Apple is going to be

1:15:42.960 --> 1:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollar market cab company. It you have never

1:15:46.120 --> 1:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>realized one of the core the core pieces of I

1:15:49.479 --> 1:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>P in the world of academia, Academias per Halla out

1:15:51.840 --> 1:15:54.519
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago, this notion of core competents. Find one thing

1:15:54.560 --> 1:15:56.679
<v Speaker 1>you're really good at, then do everything an industry standard.

1:15:56.680 --> 1:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>That's how the majority of great companies operated. What does

1:15:59.120 --> 1:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>an Apple's core comp prounced the best retailer in the

1:16:01.280 --> 1:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>world to the best retailer in the world, best store,

1:16:04.320 --> 1:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>the numbers on a square foot basis, there's nothing even

1:16:07.360 --> 1:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>close to it. There number one in retail in the

1:16:09.160 --> 1:16:11.599
<v Speaker 1>world on a per square foot basis and five dollars

1:16:11.640 --> 1:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>per square foot. The number two is sifty at three thousand.

1:16:14.200 --> 1:16:18.479
<v Speaker 1>There's a new number two warby Parker at about granted,

1:16:18.520 --> 1:16:23.479
<v Speaker 1>small base, but what do they sells? But anyways, and

1:16:23.479 --> 1:16:26.639
<v Speaker 1>then design, who's a better you know hardware? I mean

1:16:26.800 --> 1:16:29.599
<v Speaker 1>this is a company with five or six core competence

1:16:29.680 --> 1:16:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is it's blown out the traditional notions of a go

1:16:33.120 --> 1:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to market strategy around business that we've ever had. We've

1:16:35.800 --> 1:16:38.799
<v Speaker 1>never seen a company like this. Google has one public

1:16:38.800 --> 1:16:42.120
<v Speaker 1>company search, Search and search right, nothing else could be

1:16:42.160 --> 1:16:45.960
<v Speaker 1>taken public at Google. You probably have four to six

1:16:46.600 --> 1:16:51.479
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollar plus companies within Apple that are distinct

1:16:51.520 --> 1:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of each other. You know, iTunes could go public, the

1:16:54.439 --> 1:16:59.120
<v Speaker 1>hardware company could go public. The iPhone you have so

1:16:59.160 --> 1:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>many company is operating on twelve cylinders in that company.

1:17:03.320 --> 1:17:06.599
<v Speaker 1>We've never seen anything like that. It's amazing. So so

1:17:06.680 --> 1:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>let's there was a question I had for you about

1:17:09.320 --> 1:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple earlier. How do you how do you compare Tim

1:17:13.240 --> 1:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>Cook to Steve Jobs? How good is Tim Cooked? He

1:17:16.840 --> 1:17:19.479
<v Speaker 1>may be one of the most underrated CEOs in the country.

1:17:19.600 --> 1:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he's I think it's fantastic. And you've run

1:17:22.080 --> 1:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>a company. I've run a company. You just see how

1:17:24.400 --> 1:17:28.360
<v Speaker 1>damn hard it is to create value, and how and

1:17:28.640 --> 1:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and and what both Steve Jobs, who has deservedly, you know,

1:17:33.120 --> 1:17:37.679
<v Speaker 1>kind of attained icon status. Tim Cook, Oh my god,

1:17:37.720 --> 1:17:40.400
<v Speaker 1>what unbelievably big shoes to fill. And he's slipped right

1:17:40.400 --> 1:17:43.960
<v Speaker 1>into him. So every year one Buffett walkhings off for lunch.

1:17:44.080 --> 1:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>It goes for three or four million dollars. Tim Cook

1:17:47.960 --> 1:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>does one each year, and I was like, I would

1:17:50.120 --> 1:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>love to do that. I can't. I can't pass away

1:17:52.280 --> 1:17:55.719
<v Speaker 1>two million dollars on lunch. You need that Ferrari, Right, Ferrari,

1:17:56.240 --> 1:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>it's two hundred thousand dollars. You can have lunch with

1:17:58.360 --> 1:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook to raise money for charity. How is that

1:18:02.360 --> 1:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>pop talk? That's what I mean by that's the most

1:18:05.240 --> 1:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>underrated CEO running the biggest company in the world. How

1:18:09.400 --> 1:18:12.639
<v Speaker 1>is that not a million dollar lunch? Crazy? I'm gonna

1:18:12.640 --> 1:18:15.599
<v Speaker 1>have lunch twice with them, crazy, great failure. That that's

1:18:15.600 --> 1:18:18.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. Um. So we talked about design, design and

1:18:18.880 --> 1:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>brand with Apple, So what else do they need to

1:18:21.640 --> 1:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>do to move the needle? Or is there installed platform?

1:18:25.800 --> 1:18:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Is there installed base so big that just that that

1:18:29.080 --> 1:18:31.120
<v Speaker 1>upgrade cycle is enough to keep them going for a

1:18:31.160 --> 1:18:34.559
<v Speaker 1>few years until the next hit comes along. My sense

1:18:34.640 --> 1:18:37.479
<v Speaker 1>is between the watch, which is really a second screen

1:18:37.520 --> 1:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>for the phone, and anything you could do with the phone,

1:18:39.320 --> 1:18:43.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it be you know, continue to approach on media.

1:18:43.040 --> 1:18:46.000
<v Speaker 1>They announced their streaming service today. We'll see what happens

1:18:46.000 --> 1:18:49.120
<v Speaker 1>with that. But there's so much opportunity there are there

1:18:49.160 --> 1:18:51.559
<v Speaker 1>every every one of these companies and moving towards one place.

1:18:51.600 --> 1:18:54.080
<v Speaker 1>They all want to be your global operating system hub

1:18:54.120 --> 1:18:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I called gosh. They all want to control more time

1:18:57.320 --> 1:18:59.479
<v Speaker 1>of your screen, time of your eyeballs, and your attention

1:18:59.520 --> 1:19:02.320
<v Speaker 1>than any other firm, and Apples and probably the best

1:19:02.360 --> 1:19:04.760
<v Speaker 1>position to do that among the people that matter most,

1:19:04.840 --> 1:19:07.439
<v Speaker 1>and that's effectively higher income households. If you did a

1:19:07.520 --> 1:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>heat map of the iOS mobile system, it's basically a

1:19:11.120 --> 1:19:14.559
<v Speaker 1>wealth map. If you're in Manhattan, you own uh, you

1:19:14.600 --> 1:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>own an iPhone and an iPad. If you're in on

1:19:18.720 --> 1:19:20.519
<v Speaker 1>the island and some of the lower income areas, you're

1:19:20.560 --> 1:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>out of Jersey and some of them income areas, your

1:19:22.360 --> 1:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Android and your PC. So Apple is effectively said and

1:19:26.720 --> 1:19:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Apples tapping into this. They're getting in front of this wave.

1:19:30.280 --> 1:19:33.000
<v Speaker 1>When we talk about unfortunately the wealthier aggregating more and

1:19:33.040 --> 1:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>more income. Apple only has what of a fifteen or

1:19:36.080 --> 1:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>tent market share, but they have share of mobile commerce

1:19:39.200 --> 1:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>because only wealthy people right now are shopping on their

1:19:41.200 --> 1:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>mobile phones. Wealthy people have iPhones. So who owns an iPhone?

1:19:45.880 --> 1:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Everyone that matters. And when I say everyone that matters,

1:19:48.240 --> 1:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean everyone that has a lot of disposing income

1:19:50.320 --> 1:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>and it is comfortable buying online and comfortable buying high

1:19:52.680 --> 1:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>margin products online. So I don't think I think all

1:19:55.800 --> 1:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>they need to do is keep improving the ecosystem for

1:19:58.479 --> 1:20:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone and they're gonna add hundreds of billions of

1:20:00.880 --> 1:20:03.120
<v Speaker 1>dollars in market cap. That's amazing. You know, in one

1:20:03.160 --> 1:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of your videos, you show the heat map of operating

1:20:06.240 --> 1:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>system and exactly what you described, so you could see

1:20:11.479 --> 1:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>in Manhattan, Proper and Park Slope and and Morristown, in

1:20:15.040 --> 1:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>parts of Nasca County it's iPhone and all in the

1:20:18.080 --> 1:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>lower or or even middle income spaces, it was um

1:20:23.840 --> 1:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the Android system. You also mentioned the purple areas that

1:20:27.000 --> 1:20:30.360
<v Speaker 1>are Jurassic Park. Let's talk about that. Yeah, we infectionately

1:20:30.360 --> 1:20:33.880
<v Speaker 1>called Midtown, which is purple lights up purple Jurassic Park.

1:20:33.920 --> 1:20:36.439
<v Speaker 1>While with where all the dinosaurs with their blackberries are.

1:20:36.560 --> 1:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know about you, but I missed my BlackBerry.

1:20:39.200 --> 1:20:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I absolutely salivate when you didn't love the black hated it,

1:20:42.880 --> 1:20:46.160
<v Speaker 1>hated it. And I'll tell you why, because my first

1:20:46.439 --> 1:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the iPhone comes out and it was a T and

1:20:48.800 --> 1:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>T only, and I went and I got the iPhone

1:20:51.080 --> 1:20:55.960
<v Speaker 1>and the first iPhone one was this beautiful, useless glass brick.

1:20:56.320 --> 1:20:59.479
<v Speaker 1>It was just it was great unless you wanted to

1:20:59.520 --> 1:21:02.519
<v Speaker 1>make up phone call. And back then, I supposedly a

1:21:02.560 --> 1:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>teen T is much better today, but back then it

1:21:05.040 --> 1:21:08.160
<v Speaker 1>was utterly worthless in this part of area, a part

1:21:08.200 --> 1:21:10.839
<v Speaker 1>of you know, New York and Essel County. You couldn't

1:21:10.840 --> 1:21:13.200
<v Speaker 1>make a call within New York. State allows you thirty

1:21:13.280 --> 1:21:17.679
<v Speaker 1>days to return a cellular country. So so the iPhone

1:21:17.680 --> 1:21:19.479
<v Speaker 1>went back and I swapped it for a black beer.

1:21:20.240 --> 1:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>And for two or three years I used the BlackBerry,

1:21:22.960 --> 1:21:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and I had the worst I'm a Mac guy since

1:21:25.400 --> 1:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>my classic, so I've been I've been a fanboy for

1:21:29.920 --> 1:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>a long time and I had the worst iPhone lust.

1:21:34.240 --> 1:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>But it was unusable for me, and I the whing

1:21:38.000 --> 1:21:45.720
<v Speaker 1>m call it um. The basic concept of G, I

1:21:45.840 --> 1:21:49.479
<v Speaker 1>really want this iPhone if only it would work for

1:21:49.520 --> 1:21:52.720
<v Speaker 1>me was really really you know, frustrating. And then when

1:21:52.840 --> 1:21:56.080
<v Speaker 1>finally it showed up on Verizon, that was it. It

1:21:56.120 --> 1:21:59.439
<v Speaker 1>was get rid of the BlackBerry. Every time I used

1:21:59.439 --> 1:22:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the BlackBerry was just reminded that it wasn't an iPhone.

1:22:03.040 --> 1:22:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It was very, very frustrating. Yeah, it's it's it's been.

1:22:07.200 --> 1:22:09.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm still I'm still envious of people who have their

1:22:09.439 --> 1:22:12.360
<v Speaker 1>black but I missed the tactile keys. But talk about

1:22:12.439 --> 1:22:16.519
<v Speaker 1>what's interesting is basically, in a two percent global growth economy,

1:22:16.560 --> 1:22:19.080
<v Speaker 1>when a company's increasing market cap, the way Apple, it's

1:22:19.120 --> 1:22:21.120
<v Speaker 1>increasing market cap. The question is, well, who's on the

1:22:21.160 --> 1:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>losing end of that? And we know they basically sucked

1:22:23.160 --> 1:22:25.799
<v Speaker 1>all the all the all the life in the blood

1:22:25.840 --> 1:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>out of Rim. They're doing the same thing to HP.

1:22:28.000 --> 1:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>They're about to do the same thing to Samsung. The

1:22:30.320 --> 1:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>question is who's next. I think Apple is going to

1:22:33.280 --> 1:22:35.479
<v Speaker 1>start to suck market cap out of the LVMH and

1:22:35.520 --> 1:22:38.280
<v Speaker 1>carrying to the world in the j cruise of the

1:22:38.280 --> 1:22:41.240
<v Speaker 1>world because there's only so much disposable income in the

1:22:41.280 --> 1:22:43.679
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem to go to products that costs between three hundred

1:22:43.720 --> 1:22:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and a thousand dollars and teen retailers who have been

1:22:46.720 --> 1:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>wrecked the last five years from a stock market perspective,

1:22:49.920 --> 1:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>staring at the navel is the product problems with the

1:22:51.880 --> 1:22:54.519
<v Speaker 1>brand problems of a brand problems prodctblem, it's neither. It's

1:22:54.520 --> 1:22:57.120
<v Speaker 1>an Apple problem. And that kids are now expressing their

1:22:57.160 --> 1:23:01.479
<v Speaker 1>identity through their phone specifically there Apple phone, specifically there

1:23:01.479 --> 1:23:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I found versus a hoodie. The hoodie, So the Abercromis

1:23:04.960 --> 1:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>of the world are no longer it. So let me

1:23:06.880 --> 1:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>show you why I don't really care about the BlackBerry

1:23:09.320 --> 1:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>anymore so. The speech to text feature which was awful

1:23:15.840 --> 1:23:19.720
<v Speaker 1>in the first year and then was pretty good in

1:23:19.760 --> 1:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the second year. Take a read of what I just did.

1:23:24.400 --> 1:23:28.240
<v Speaker 1>It's picture perfect. It's letter for perfect. I hardly type

1:23:28.240 --> 1:23:33.000
<v Speaker 1>anymore unless I'm on the subway, so it requires connectivity

1:23:33.000 --> 1:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>because it's basically checking. It takes what I say, it

1:23:36.080 --> 1:23:39.800
<v Speaker 1>converts it to a formula to math, essentially sends it

1:23:39.880 --> 1:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>up to the cloud, brings it back down, compares it

1:23:42.640 --> 1:23:47.080
<v Speaker 1>against a bajillion versions of this, finds out exactly what

1:23:47.439 --> 1:23:52.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying, and the quality is it's so much better,

1:23:53.120 --> 1:23:58.000
<v Speaker 1>um than it was. It's pretty usable. Typing on glass

1:23:58.040 --> 1:24:01.599
<v Speaker 1>not my favorite thing, isn't it's it's I will say

1:24:01.640 --> 1:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>that the android, this thing where you can just sort

1:24:04.400 --> 1:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of drag your fingers around. I think it is superior

1:24:07.160 --> 1:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>than the individual. But the the text dictation is now

1:24:12.439 --> 1:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>so accurate. The only problem is it's a different part

1:24:15.040 --> 1:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>of your brain to speak than to write. I find

1:24:17.400 --> 1:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>what I write is much better than what I say

1:24:19.960 --> 1:24:22.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's a different lobe. Yeah, that's well. Look at

1:24:22.800 --> 1:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the stories of different wornucks area, broke as area, the

1:24:25.560 --> 1:24:28.840
<v Speaker 1>different aphasias. People who lose the ability to speak but

1:24:28.960 --> 1:24:31.880
<v Speaker 1>can sing or can't read but can write. They just

1:24:31.920 --> 1:24:34.839
<v Speaker 1>can't read back what they wrote. That sort of stuff

1:24:34.880 --> 1:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>is really fascinating to me. And look, when I wrote

1:24:38.360 --> 1:24:40.519
<v Speaker 1>my first book, I thought, I'll just dictate, it'll take

1:24:40.560 --> 1:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>no time at all, and suddenly I discover, oh no,

1:24:43.200 --> 1:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that's a very different part of it's a very different

1:24:46.360 --> 1:24:48.439
<v Speaker 1>part of the brain, and it doesn't work nearly as well.

1:24:48.680 --> 1:24:51.120
<v Speaker 1>If I write something out and then integrate it into

1:24:51.160 --> 1:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>my speaking process, it sounds much better than when I'm

1:24:55.400 --> 1:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>just what does that quote? If I'd had more time,

1:24:58.439 --> 1:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I would have That's the thing about writing. I do

1:25:01.520 --> 1:25:03.479
<v Speaker 1>think you try harder and you're more thoughtful about what

1:25:03.520 --> 1:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>you're actually communicating. So we never got to talk about

1:25:06.080 --> 1:25:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the fifth Horsemen. Let's let's talk about that a little bit.

1:25:09.560 --> 1:25:11.240
<v Speaker 1>So what we attempted to do is look at what

1:25:11.280 --> 1:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>are the common the underpinnings of the four horsemen that's

1:25:14.320 --> 1:25:16.760
<v Speaker 1>enabled them to build these multi hundred billion dollar market

1:25:16.800 --> 1:25:19.599
<v Speaker 1>cap companies. And we found several things. One a truly

1:25:19.600 --> 1:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>differentiated product, I mean something that's surrounded by IP that

1:25:22.960 --> 1:25:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you couldn't replicate easily. You couldn't replicate Google Search Engine easily.

1:25:26.120 --> 1:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>You cannot replicate the phone, iPhone easily. You can replicate

1:25:29.760 --> 1:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's primary platform's I mean these are protected really unbelievably

1:25:35.280 --> 1:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>differentiated products. Then visionary capital and that as someone with

1:25:38.920 --> 1:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>a big vision of Jeff Bezos has said We're going

1:25:41.080 --> 1:25:43.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the world's biggest retailer. And then some progress

1:25:43.160 --> 1:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>against that vision that allows them to access capital at

1:25:46.000 --> 1:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>such a low cost that they can launch a phone,

1:25:49.200 --> 1:25:50.880
<v Speaker 1>spend a couple of billion bucks on it, have to

1:25:50.960 --> 1:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>be a dud, and it doesn't really matter. They can

1:25:53.760 --> 1:25:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have so much capital to go play in traffic and innovate.

1:25:56.840 --> 1:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I think control of the end user experience vertical than

1:26:00.840 --> 1:26:03.759
<v Speaker 1>luxury products are now sold through control channels. Your ability

1:26:03.800 --> 1:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to control the end used product and have your brand

1:26:06.280 --> 1:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>be in front of the consumer is really powerful vanity

1:26:09.560 --> 1:26:12.439
<v Speaker 1>uh self expressive benefit of brand that people want to

1:26:12.479 --> 1:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>associate with. So there's all these different factors. Maternal the

1:26:16.320 --> 1:26:18.839
<v Speaker 1>companies have outed the most market cap, treat their employees

1:26:18.920 --> 1:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>really well, they're great places to work. So if you

1:26:20.840 --> 1:26:23.519
<v Speaker 1>dook all those things and applied them to a bunch

1:26:23.520 --> 1:26:26.479
<v Speaker 1>of great companies, who comes up as potentially could be

1:26:26.880 --> 1:26:29.519
<v Speaker 1>the next big big thing. And some of the companies

1:26:29.600 --> 1:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we came up with that have some potential. We talked

1:26:32.000 --> 1:26:34.799
<v Speaker 1>about a couple of them. Nike has a lot of potential.

1:26:35.360 --> 1:26:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I think Ali Baba when you look at six of

1:26:37.760 --> 1:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>all packages being shipped through China are coming from Ali Baba.

1:26:41.040 --> 1:26:43.839
<v Speaker 1>When you get the product roadmap, you have a company

1:26:43.880 --> 1:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>that you know, is that kind of the best digital

1:26:46.400 --> 1:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>company in the fastest screen market in the world. That's

1:26:48.280 --> 1:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good combination. A company that most people might

1:26:51.160 --> 1:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>not think of as potentially being in that same breath,

1:26:53.439 --> 1:26:56.200
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's an amazing company. Is Starbucks? What

1:26:56.280 --> 1:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>are the twenties something thousand stores now? Two stores opened

1:26:59.240 --> 1:27:02.719
<v Speaker 1>every day for the last seven years. Also, I would

1:27:02.800 --> 1:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>argue a technology company that serves hor beverages, the largest

1:27:06.040 --> 1:27:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mobile payments company in the world. You have that. You

1:27:09.200 --> 1:27:12.439
<v Speaker 1>have a Starbucks app one five One in five dollars

1:27:12.560 --> 1:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>go through the mobile app. Now, that's unbelievable, more successful

1:27:16.120 --> 1:27:18.200
<v Speaker 1>than I've been using it for god knows how long.

1:27:18.920 --> 1:27:23.000
<v Speaker 1>It's flawless, more than any other company in the world

1:27:23.080 --> 1:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, and also incredibly maternal. They spend more money

1:27:26.800 --> 1:27:31.120
<v Speaker 1>on employee benefits and they spend on coffee beings fantastic

1:27:31.520 --> 1:27:35.240
<v Speaker 1>and not nine dollars and twenty three cents average order value.

1:27:35.240 --> 1:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>If they can figure out a way to get into

1:27:36.840 --> 1:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>food or into other things and get to twenty or

1:27:38.760 --> 1:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty bucks transaction, you're probably looking at a company that's

1:27:42.080 --> 1:27:44.920
<v Speaker 1>three to five billion dollar market cat. Starbucks is an

1:27:45.080 --> 1:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable company that has had, in my opinion, just made

1:27:50.680 --> 1:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we haveventimes sit with comes and say, well, we're not

1:27:52.760 --> 1:27:54.479
<v Speaker 1>a tech company. Were apparent we're never going to be

1:27:54.479 --> 1:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>a tech I'm saying, if Starbucks can be a tech company,

1:27:57.080 --> 1:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>or can use technology to drive tens of billions of

1:27:59.240 --> 1:28:02.639
<v Speaker 1>dollars in market appitalization, what's your excuse? No one would

1:28:02.640 --> 1:28:04.599
<v Speaker 1>say of Starbucks as a tech company. Yeah, they are.

1:28:04.760 --> 1:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>That's how they've had it, tens of billions of dollars

1:28:07.600 --> 1:28:10.040
<v Speaker 1>in market cap, the number one company or the company

1:28:10.080 --> 1:28:12.719
<v Speaker 1>based on what i'll call the subjective algorithm we've applied

1:28:12.760 --> 1:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>against it. In my view, if I was to say, okay,

1:28:15.280 --> 1:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>what company now is trading at less than a hundred

1:28:17.240 --> 1:28:19.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars but could be worth three to five d

1:28:19.240 --> 1:28:21.240
<v Speaker 1>billon dollars in five to ten years, I would pick Uber.

1:28:21.960 --> 1:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>I think it's become the vascular system for business. We've

1:28:24.640 --> 1:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>never seen anything like that. It's it's adopted this strategy.

1:28:28.520 --> 1:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the other things companies have had

1:28:30.280 --> 1:28:32.320
<v Speaker 1>in common that have added hundreds of billions of dollars

1:28:32.360 --> 1:28:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in market capit last few years, it is their parasites,

1:28:34.360 --> 1:28:37.559
<v Speaker 1>and that is they're they're feeding off another organism. Someone

1:28:37.640 --> 1:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>else is creating the content. You create the content for Facebook,

1:28:40.640 --> 1:28:45.400
<v Speaker 1>we create the content for Google. Uber is basically fed

1:28:45.640 --> 1:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>x ups without unions, without cap X. They buy their

1:28:50.080 --> 1:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>own car, without a uniform, without the right to strike,

1:28:53.760 --> 1:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>flexible labor meaning cheap labor. It's sort of a it's

1:28:58.040 --> 1:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>an a ran Darwinian dream from a shareholder standpoint. Uh,

1:29:02.439 --> 1:29:04.919
<v Speaker 1>and they could potentially get into all sorts of businesses.

1:29:05.000 --> 1:29:07.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Uber is a private drive, a private

1:29:07.800 --> 1:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>car company. I think Uber is effectively a last mass

1:29:11.160 --> 1:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>solution for millions of businesses that all are struggling with

1:29:15.120 --> 1:29:19.559
<v Speaker 1>last mile That's fascinating. Way do you put Netflix into

1:29:19.600 --> 1:29:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that ecosystem? Unbelievable company, I mean, but it's already it's

1:29:22.360 --> 1:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>already almost there. Right. What will be interesting is it's

1:29:27.720 --> 1:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a great lesson and it's something that my industry we

1:29:30.240 --> 1:29:32.439
<v Speaker 1>failed to learn that If you want to understand how

1:29:32.479 --> 1:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>likely you are to be disrupted. It's pretty easy. You

1:29:35.320 --> 1:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>just look at what is our prices relative to inflation,

1:29:38.280 --> 1:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, and if our prices have gone way more

1:29:40.120 --> 1:29:44.679
<v Speaker 1>inflation and there's no underlying innovation, Cable massive price increases,

1:29:44.680 --> 1:29:48.639
<v Speaker 1>no innovation, everybody gets into it. Netflix, Uh, my senses

1:29:49.160 --> 1:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>could be one of those company. The thing that's scary

1:29:51.000 --> 1:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>about Netflix is the dumb pipe of cable riders. They

1:29:54.160 --> 1:29:57.120
<v Speaker 1>still have a lot of power, and so even with

1:29:57.160 --> 1:30:01.080
<v Speaker 1>net neutrality more or less passing, but there new FCC rules,

1:30:01.120 --> 1:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>but they still own the pipe. Yeah, they still own

1:30:03.840 --> 1:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the pipe, right, so they can raise prices, I know.

1:30:08.560 --> 1:30:12.080
<v Speaker 1>So I wonder if Netflix, Netflix, in my opinion, has

1:30:12.160 --> 1:30:14.759
<v Speaker 1>one big hurdle that the other guys, the four Horsemen,

1:30:14.760 --> 1:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>don't happen to. That is they are not totally vertical.

1:30:17.120 --> 1:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't control their distribution. They still have to go

1:30:20.080 --> 1:30:22.920
<v Speaker 1>through someone else's pipe. By the way, how familiar are

1:30:22.920 --> 1:30:25.519
<v Speaker 1>you with the history of of the Apple stores, since

1:30:25.560 --> 1:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about controlling the vertical you you just made

1:30:28.800 --> 1:30:33.280
<v Speaker 1>me think of something from back in the when it

1:30:33.320 --> 1:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>looked like Apple wasn't gonna survive. Are you are you

1:30:36.080 --> 1:30:39.639
<v Speaker 1>plugged into the best buy Apple story? I'm not so.

1:30:39.760 --> 1:30:43.799
<v Speaker 1>The first Apple stores were this ghetto in the corner

1:30:43.800 --> 1:30:48.799
<v Speaker 1>of the PC section of Best Buy, because um, Apple

1:30:48.880 --> 1:30:52.599
<v Speaker 1>had a real hard time getting people to pay more

1:30:52.640 --> 1:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>money for computers that the staff wasn't really all that

1:30:56.280 --> 1:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>familiar with. Everybody knew how to sell a Windows machine,

1:30:59.360 --> 1:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>everybody know how to sell a Compact or an HP,

1:31:02.800 --> 1:31:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and so Apple cut a deal with best Buy. They

1:31:04.720 --> 1:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>set up these little I called them the Apple Ghetto

1:31:08.160 --> 1:31:10.639
<v Speaker 1>the Mac Ghetto, and so it was four or five machines,

1:31:10.680 --> 1:31:12.760
<v Speaker 1>some of which works, some of which were hooked up

1:31:12.760 --> 1:31:16.479
<v Speaker 1>in properly, they were dusty, It was just ignored. And

1:31:16.560 --> 1:31:19.439
<v Speaker 1>my thesis is that Steve Jobs walked into one of

1:31:19.479 --> 1:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>these places and said, you know what, making a gesture

1:31:24.280 --> 1:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>that we can't discuss here, and said, I'm gonna do

1:31:27.000 --> 1:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it myself, and I'm tired of being dependent on these,

1:31:31.360 --> 1:31:34.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, retail bumbs who don't want to sell my product.

1:31:34.600 --> 1:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>But what you're describing as the evolutional luxury in general,

1:31:37.360 --> 1:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>because effectively you had Rolex or you had Vitan. As

1:31:40.120 --> 1:31:44.640
<v Speaker 1>a better example, Toner Gucci going into Bullocks or Macy's

1:31:44.680 --> 1:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and saying, you know, they do a good job and

1:31:46.280 --> 1:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>not a great job. So I'm gonna start opening my

1:31:48.000 --> 1:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>own stores. So when did the Coach stores open up?

1:31:50.800 --> 1:31:53.120
<v Speaker 1>When did the Louis Vuitton stores open up? Well, Coach

1:31:53.160 --> 1:31:55.880
<v Speaker 1>has been has had more control their distribution, although sort

1:31:55.880 --> 1:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>of the dirty secret of Coaches at the majority of

1:31:57.720 --> 1:32:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the retail sales come to their outlets, the majority of

1:32:00.479 --> 1:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>their profits. But and their outlets isn't the same stuff

1:32:04.320 --> 1:32:06.559
<v Speaker 1>that's in the I believe it's custom product at a

1:32:06.560 --> 1:32:08.240
<v Speaker 1>lower price point. And there's a lot of brands that

1:32:08.280 --> 1:32:10.519
<v Speaker 1>do that. It's just trying to bandage that balance. But

1:32:10.600 --> 1:32:12.519
<v Speaker 1>with luxury where you have last years for the first

1:32:12.560 --> 1:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>time more luxury goods are controlled, are sold through controlled

1:32:15.200 --> 1:32:17.680
<v Speaker 1>vertical channels. If the way to summarize it as a

1:32:17.760 --> 1:32:20.680
<v Speaker 1>brand building has moved from broadcast in other words, pre

1:32:20.840 --> 1:32:24.120
<v Speaker 1>purchased advertising, PARNT trade shows. It's moved from there in

1:32:24.200 --> 1:32:26.439
<v Speaker 1>terms of effectiveness to the store. And the guy that

1:32:26.520 --> 1:32:28.680
<v Speaker 1>discovered that and created tens of billions of dollars in

1:32:28.760 --> 1:32:33.920
<v Speaker 1>value for shareholders is Mickey Drag Slour absolutely largest apparel

1:32:33.960 --> 1:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>company in the world by Stouston Company at seven billion.

1:32:37.160 --> 1:32:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Basic model was best advertising the world. Then stuff Army

1:32:40.720 --> 1:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Navy stores with pile highs of five oh ones and

1:32:44.880 --> 1:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>they had the best outs of the world. And Mickey

1:32:46.439 --> 1:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Jackson said, we can't afford to go tote toe, so

1:32:48.240 --> 1:32:50.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna put all of that money and branding into

1:32:50.240 --> 1:32:53.639
<v Speaker 1>the store. Bleachmond would more intelligent, attractive sales associates, bigger,

1:32:53.880 --> 1:32:57.519
<v Speaker 1>bigger dressing room, scented stores, better real estate. The branding,

1:32:57.640 --> 1:33:00.679
<v Speaker 1>he said, is moving to the store. Leave Strasson company

1:33:00.680 --> 1:33:03.479
<v Speaker 1>exploded from seven billion of four billion in that time period.

1:33:03.640 --> 1:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>The gap went from something like two billion to eight billion.

1:33:06.520 --> 1:33:08.439
<v Speaker 1>It's a huge shift. We don't give enough credit to

1:33:08.520 --> 1:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>him for. But branding is me from pre purchase into

1:33:10.960 --> 1:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the store. Starbucks took advantage of that, and Luxury has

1:33:13.960 --> 1:33:17.839
<v Speaker 1>seen that. You see Richmont making these staggering investments in stores,

1:33:18.400 --> 1:33:21.439
<v Speaker 1>so high end distribution. The Achilles feal for Nike becoming

1:33:21.479 --> 1:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>up one of the four four horsemen. They have to

1:33:24.240 --> 1:33:26.519
<v Speaker 1>control more of their distributions. They have a decent amount

1:33:26.560 --> 1:33:29.560
<v Speaker 1>of stores, but it seems like there's one store per city.

1:33:29.360 --> 1:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>One in Seattle, there is one in in San Francisco.

1:33:32.800 --> 1:33:35.519
<v Speaker 1>I think there's I know there's one here. Every now

1:33:35.560 --> 1:33:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and then we see one pop up. But it's not

1:33:38.360 --> 1:33:41.599
<v Speaker 1>like a giant chain. Yeah, it's I believe they only

1:33:41.600 --> 1:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>control about ten to fift of their distribution, so it's um,

1:33:45.880 --> 1:33:47.720
<v Speaker 1>they're going if you. The one thing you see in

1:33:47.720 --> 1:33:50.320
<v Speaker 1>common among these four horsemen is that they control the

1:33:50.479 --> 1:33:54.880
<v Speaker 1>end experience. Whether it's Google, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon, they

1:33:54.880 --> 1:33:57.679
<v Speaker 1>have vertical control. And that's that's because that, in my view,

1:33:57.680 --> 1:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that's a prerequisite to become quote unquote part of the

1:34:00.800 --> 1:34:05.160
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollar possible club. That's quite fascinating. All right, I

1:34:05.200 --> 1:34:07.479
<v Speaker 1>know I only have you for so many minutes left,

1:34:07.840 --> 1:34:10.679
<v Speaker 1>so let me get right to my favorite three questions

1:34:10.720 --> 1:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>or four questions, and I asked all my guests, and

1:34:13.040 --> 1:34:15.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll get you out of here at a reasonable time. First,

1:34:16.320 --> 1:34:18.760
<v Speaker 1>we have yet you talked about some of your mentors.

1:34:19.160 --> 1:34:21.799
<v Speaker 1>We have not talked about any of your favorite books.

1:34:22.800 --> 1:34:24.960
<v Speaker 1>What what sort of books do you really uh? Do

1:34:24.960 --> 1:34:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you really enjoy? God, I'm just I'm embarrassed to say this.

1:34:28.360 --> 1:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't read as much as as as I would

1:34:30.160 --> 1:34:31.760
<v Speaker 1>like or as I should as an academic, because I'm

1:34:31.760 --> 1:34:33.479
<v Speaker 1>reading all day, but I'm reading blogs like yours and

1:34:33.520 --> 1:34:37.439
<v Speaker 1>other people's. Um, some of the books that have had Yeah, yeah,

1:34:37.840 --> 1:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the basics like the Alchemist had an impact on me.

1:34:40.360 --> 1:34:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I love now I'm sending like I'm seven year eighty,

1:34:43.240 --> 1:34:45.519
<v Speaker 1>but I love reading books about military history. I find

1:34:45.520 --> 1:34:48.839
<v Speaker 1>them fascinating, you know, guns, the early light or Herman Wooks,

1:34:48.960 --> 1:34:51.519
<v Speaker 1>the wins of war. And then in terms of business,

1:34:51.560 --> 1:34:54.760
<v Speaker 1>my father introduced me to Peter Drucker, a young observations

1:34:54.760 --> 1:34:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of a bystander. Um, I find that stuff, uh really

1:34:58.720 --> 1:35:02.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting still time least irrelevant today? Oh gosh, I think so.

1:35:02.240 --> 1:35:04.479
<v Speaker 1>I think it is the father modern management. Is stuff

1:35:04.520 --> 1:35:07.559
<v Speaker 1>is more relevant than is today. Also love some of

1:35:07.600 --> 1:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the stuff from John Irving, you knowld according to guard

1:35:12.680 --> 1:35:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think it's just a lot of

1:35:13.960 --> 1:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>fun and just so strange. It's kind of I find

1:35:16.040 --> 1:35:20.559
<v Speaker 1>it really really um So say next question, So you

1:35:20.600 --> 1:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>deal with a lot of millennials, you deal with a

1:35:22.360 --> 1:35:25.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of people at the start of their career. What

1:35:25.479 --> 1:35:27.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of advice do you give to somebody starting out

1:35:28.320 --> 1:35:32.559
<v Speaker 1>in your space today? Find find a great platform, find

1:35:32.560 --> 1:35:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a place you're gonna learn and it's not aspirational, but

1:35:35.560 --> 1:35:37.679
<v Speaker 1>find some of your good at and work really really

1:35:37.680 --> 1:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>hard at it. Um and um. If you don't find

1:35:40.880 --> 1:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>yourself on a path, yeah, you're not if you're not

1:35:43.840 --> 1:35:45.800
<v Speaker 1>fortunateough to find yourself on a path where it's something

1:35:45.840 --> 1:35:48.400
<v Speaker 1>you love or you like. People say, find something you love,

1:35:48.439 --> 1:35:50.280
<v Speaker 1>find something you like. I was the way I would

1:35:50.280 --> 1:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>say that, because if you like it, you're gonna be

1:35:51.640 --> 1:35:54.360
<v Speaker 1>good at it. Um, think about graduate school. For all

1:35:54.400 --> 1:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the for all the noise about and all the publicity

1:35:57.080 --> 1:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>about people dropping out of college, I still think school

1:36:00.040 --> 1:36:02.439
<v Speaker 1>is a good plan. B. The Peter Field thing, you're

1:36:02.479 --> 1:36:04.920
<v Speaker 1>not a fan, I think that is so frightening and

1:36:04.960 --> 1:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>so scary. I just you know, I'd love to pick

1:36:09.200 --> 1:36:12.080
<v Speaker 1>ten kids at great public universities to match up against

1:36:12.439 --> 1:36:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the ten heat. Look, if you're Steve, if you're Steve

1:36:16.320 --> 1:36:20.519
<v Speaker 1>Jobs or Bill Gates, granted they're exceptional and and God

1:36:20.560 --> 1:36:22.280
<v Speaker 1>love you if you're one of those one of those

1:36:22.400 --> 1:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>rare people that can, you know, take a calligraphy class

1:36:24.880 --> 1:36:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and then drop out and start the start the MAC.

1:36:27.439 --> 1:36:30.120
<v Speaker 1>But for the rest of us, you know, college is

1:36:30.160 --> 1:36:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a pretty good plan. B. So, as we've seen in

1:36:33.960 --> 1:36:36.479
<v Speaker 1>this recovery, to say the least, get get a great

1:36:36.600 --> 1:36:39.519
<v Speaker 1>find a great platform, find something you think you like

1:36:39.760 --> 1:36:41.519
<v Speaker 1>or you're good at, work your ass off, and if

1:36:41.520 --> 1:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not working out in your mid twenties, think about

1:36:43.840 --> 1:36:48.800
<v Speaker 1>graduate school and you know good karma. The really successful

1:36:48.840 --> 1:36:50.360
<v Speaker 1>people what you find in the trade is they do

1:36:50.439 --> 1:36:52.120
<v Speaker 1>spend a lot of time thinking about how can I

1:36:52.160 --> 1:36:54.439
<v Speaker 1>help other people? Because it will come full circle. People

1:36:54.439 --> 1:36:57.400
<v Speaker 1>do remember that. Um, what do you've seen that have

1:36:57.720 --> 1:37:00.960
<v Speaker 1>changed in your industry and branding, him marketing, What are

1:37:01.000 --> 1:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the big shifts over the past decade. Oh gosh, I

1:37:04.960 --> 1:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say the death of creativity, but it's

1:37:07.040 --> 1:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>definitely revenge of the pocket pen protectors. And we've talked

1:37:09.720 --> 1:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>about Don Draper's dad. Created activity is not not a commodity,

1:37:13.560 --> 1:37:16.959
<v Speaker 1>but you've had, You've had. It's more important to understand

1:37:17.040 --> 1:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>how to operate sales source and a database and CRM

1:37:19.680 --> 1:37:22.000
<v Speaker 1>than to necessarily come up with the right copy or

1:37:22.040 --> 1:37:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the most beautiful, inspiring creative ads. So it's moving more,

1:37:26.160 --> 1:37:28.760
<v Speaker 1>much more towards zeros and ones than it is from tech.

1:37:28.800 --> 1:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the guys who are cool and we're black are

1:37:33.040 --> 1:37:36.560
<v Speaker 1>making less money, and it's it's it's the math and

1:37:36.600 --> 1:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the chess club. And now at the same time, we

1:37:39.200 --> 1:37:41.559
<v Speaker 1>have to produce people who understand have the maturity and

1:37:41.600 --> 1:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>management skills and the EQ and played with the right

1:37:43.680 --> 1:37:46.280
<v Speaker 1>toys to manage those people, and it's hard to find

1:37:46.280 --> 1:37:48.920
<v Speaker 1>them in the same body. But it's definitely headed towards technology.

1:37:48.920 --> 1:37:51.280
<v Speaker 1>In the world of marketing and branding, we talked about

1:37:51.320 --> 1:37:53.880
<v Speaker 1>brandings moved from pre purchased to purchase. Now it's moving

1:37:53.880 --> 1:37:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to post purchase CRM, contextual retargeting, taking behavioral data. Um.

1:37:58.760 --> 1:38:02.519
<v Speaker 1>But it definitely seems like tech is just eating eating

1:38:02.520 --> 1:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. So I'm not a technologist, but I'd like

1:38:05.040 --> 1:38:06.679
<v Speaker 1>to think I know enough about it to be dangerous.

1:38:06.680 --> 1:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>And I try and stay on top of stuff. So

1:38:08.880 --> 1:38:11.479
<v Speaker 1>if you're you know, if you're starting your career, are

1:38:11.560 --> 1:38:13.920
<v Speaker 1>guys like us, right, we're trying to stay relevant. You

1:38:14.000 --> 1:38:15.960
<v Speaker 1>gotta be on Facebook, you gotta figure it out. You

1:38:16.040 --> 1:38:18.360
<v Speaker 1>gotta go on Pinterest and start pinning stuff so you

1:38:18.360 --> 1:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>at least get it, or at least get it enough

1:38:20.120 --> 1:38:23.639
<v Speaker 1>to hate it. Right, And because most people just they

1:38:23.760 --> 1:38:27.080
<v Speaker 1>dismiss it. And when they dismissed, when they're dismissive something,

1:38:27.160 --> 1:38:29.320
<v Speaker 1>or when guys our age are dismissive of stuff, it's

1:38:29.360 --> 1:38:31.120
<v Speaker 1>basically their way of saying I don't get it, and

1:38:31.160 --> 1:38:33.000
<v Speaker 1>scares the hell out of it. The comment I always

1:38:33.120 --> 1:38:34.760
<v Speaker 1>get is like, I don't understand what do you do

1:38:34.840 --> 1:38:37.840
<v Speaker 1>with Twitter? And my answer is always, hey, here's here's

1:38:37.840 --> 1:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>what you do. Find five hundred of the smartest people

1:38:40.840 --> 1:38:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in areas that you're really interested in. I don't care

1:38:44.720 --> 1:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>if it's beer burgers in baseball, but follow those people

1:38:48.120 --> 1:38:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and you will know more about stuff that you like

1:38:50.800 --> 1:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and have access to more interesting stuff. It's like hiring

1:38:54.360 --> 1:38:57.599
<v Speaker 1>a full time men's a research team. What could be

1:38:57.600 --> 1:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>bad about that? And the final question, My final question,

1:39:01.439 --> 1:39:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I asked all my guests, what do you know about

1:39:04.080 --> 1:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>your field that you wished today that you wish you

1:39:07.040 --> 1:39:10.640
<v Speaker 1>knew when you were starting out? What do I know

1:39:10.680 --> 1:39:12.120
<v Speaker 1>about my field today that I wish to know I

1:39:12.240 --> 1:39:14.599
<v Speaker 1>started out, Um, I would have focused more on how

1:39:14.640 --> 1:39:16.439
<v Speaker 1>to learn how to build stuff. I would to learn

1:39:16.479 --> 1:39:19.280
<v Speaker 1>how to code. I would have learned more about industrial

1:39:19.680 --> 1:39:22.639
<v Speaker 1>engineering and design. I think the world the future belongs

1:39:22.680 --> 1:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>to the builders, not the browners. The people who know

1:39:25.200 --> 1:39:27.600
<v Speaker 1>how to actually make stuff. That can be making a website,

1:39:28.200 --> 1:39:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that can be figuring out how to edit radio show,

1:39:31.360 --> 1:39:33.880
<v Speaker 1>but the people who build things. As opposed to my

1:39:34.000 --> 1:39:37.200
<v Speaker 1>focus was always on the intangible associations and creating the theory.

1:39:37.280 --> 1:39:39.960
<v Speaker 1>I wish I'd learned more about how to build things.

1:39:40.000 --> 1:39:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So we've been speaking with Scott Galloway, professor at n

1:39:43.400 --> 1:39:46.960
<v Speaker 1>y U Stern and founder of L two Digital. UM.

1:39:47.200 --> 1:39:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Let's once again tell people where they can find you

1:39:49.400 --> 1:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, proft Galloway, proft Galloway and your website dot

1:39:54.040 --> 1:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>com L two ink dot com. Scott, thank you so

1:39:56.439 --> 1:40:00.760
<v Speaker 1>much than this was. This was really fascinating. I think

1:40:00.760 --> 1:40:04.640
<v Speaker 1>people really can enjoy this. If you enjoyed this conversation,

1:40:04.680 --> 1:40:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and I can't imagine anybody did not look an inch

1:40:08.040 --> 1:40:11.320
<v Speaker 1>upward or down on iTunes and you'll see the other

1:40:11.439 --> 1:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>forty seven or so uh such um conversations. Be sure

1:40:16.120 --> 1:40:18.559
<v Speaker 1>and check out my daily column on Bloomberg View dot

1:40:18.560 --> 1:40:23.120
<v Speaker 1>com and on Twitter follow me at Hults. I'm Barry Rihults.

1:40:23.160 --> 1:40:26.040
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.