WEBVTT - Bloomberg Intelligence: Hyatt CEO Sees Positive Trends

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:15.080 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple Car playing Android.

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 2>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app.

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch

0:00:22.079 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>us live on YouTube.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk us a little c suite conversation here. We

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:30.159
<v Speaker 3>can do that with the hotel business. Mark Hopplomacian joins us.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.760
<v Speaker 3>He's a president and chief executive officer of Hyatt Hotels,

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 3>joining us via zoom. Hey, Mark, thanks so much for

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:39.880
<v Speaker 3>joining us here. I'm looking at your stock here, fifty

0:00:39.880 --> 0:00:42.479
<v Speaker 3>two week high. For those that don't know, H is

0:00:42.479 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 3>the symbol. It's cool to get that one of those

0:00:43.960 --> 0:00:46.879
<v Speaker 3>single letter symbols there. That's always pretty cool for us

0:00:46.880 --> 0:00:48.600
<v Speaker 3>Wall Street, Folcus. I've got a market cap at fifteen

0:00:48.640 --> 0:00:51.279
<v Speaker 3>point seven billion, stocks up about three tens a one

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 3>percent today. Mark, talk to us about your recent earnings

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 3>and kind of what was the messaging you needed to

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 3>get across to your shareholders.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 4>Of all, it's great to be back with you all,

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 4>and thanks for having me. I think that the the

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:09.200
<v Speaker 4>clear message was really centered around the fact that the

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 4>transformation of the company to asset lighter platform has now

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 4>shown up in the numbers in a very material way.

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:19.920
<v Speaker 4>We had the highest pre cash flow that in the

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 4>company's history. We also had the mix of our asset

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.480
<v Speaker 4>light earnings to our total earnings went up to seventy

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:32.039
<v Speaker 4>six percent five years ago.

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 5>That was in the in the mid forties.

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 3>Hey market, So, did describe for us what your asset

0:01:38.000 --> 0:01:40.680
<v Speaker 3>light strategy is? Is that relying more on franchisease.

0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:44.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so it's not really I wouldn't call it an

0:01:44.280 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 4>asset light strategy. I would call it an asset light program.

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 4>Where we were selling down. We had we had two

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 4>major drivers of our of our of our earnings. One

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.760
<v Speaker 4>was from real estate that we owned hotels, and the

0:01:53.800 --> 0:01:57.840
<v Speaker 4>other ones from management franchising hotels across the world. We're

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 4>primarily a management business, not a franchise businesusiness, but that

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.960
<v Speaker 4>those are the two businesses. So as we sell down

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 4>real estate, the proportion that's coming from real estate sourced

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 4>earnings has been dropping. We've concurrently reinvested in buying new

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:18.119
<v Speaker 4>platforms and new brands over the last five years, and

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 4>that has driven up our management and franchising fees. At

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 4>the same time, so the mix has shifted to much

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.760
<v Speaker 4>more in the management and franchise feed driven business, which

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 4>is very low capital intensivity and high margin and high

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 4>free cash floats conversion. So that was probably the key message.

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 4>The other thing that we did is we simplified our

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.680
<v Speaker 4>financial presentation because we have a business that's a subscription

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.839
<v Speaker 4>model membership business called Unlimited Ucation Club, and we sold

0:02:49.880 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 4>the majority interest in that business to a third party

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 4>which helped us simplify how we report our earnings and

0:02:56.320 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 4>that was very well received by investors.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 6>And Mark, that's you and the c suite managing all

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 6>of that. What about the demand side of the business,

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 6>What kind of pricing power do you have per room?

0:03:08.040 --> 0:03:09.960
<v Speaker 6>And what's the demand situation.

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:15.639
<v Speaker 4>Like actually demand, So we think about three different demand drivers.

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 4>One is leisure, which has been the leader of the

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:23.560
<v Speaker 4>recovery through post COVID period. We think about group business,

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 4>which is big meetings and conventions and things like that,

0:03:27.320 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 4>and we also have business travel individual business travel. All

0:03:30.960 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 4>three are showing signs of great momentum and positive outlooks.

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 4>So starting with leisure, in the first quarter of this year,

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 4>our pace meeting our bookings are up eleven percent for

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 4>our all inclusive resorts in the Pervian and.

0:03:50.640 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 5>Also up for our our resorts in the Americas.

0:03:57.640 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 4>But leisure travel has been really really solid in China.

0:04:01.920 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 4>We had a record year for Lunar in New Year.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 4>The spending amongst Chinese, both inside of China and other

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 4>destinations in Asia was at them all time high. So

0:04:11.600 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 4>that's leisure in group. Our pace into this year, that

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 4>is forward bookings are up eight percent, and so we're

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:24.520
<v Speaker 4>looking at another solid year of growth of growth in meetings,

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:28.839
<v Speaker 4>and I think corporations are increasingly resolved to make sure

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 4>that they prioritize those meetings. And then on business transient

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 4>the US is lagging, but the overall business transient category

0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 4>demand around the world is about seven percent the low

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.160
<v Speaker 4>where it was pre pandemic, So we're getting closer and

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:47.359
<v Speaker 4>closer to being a parody. Europe is fully recovered, and

0:04:47.400 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 4>then some China is fully recovered, and then some the

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:53.919
<v Speaker 4>United States is still lagging, and we're seeing signs of

0:04:54.680 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 4>positive signs of business transient travel increasing. So I would

0:04:58.400 --> 0:05:02.359
<v Speaker 4>say across all three major category we're seeing positive trends

0:05:02.360 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 4>into twenty four mark.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 3>Could you talked to us about m and A and

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of growth via acquisition. How does that figure into

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 3>your growth plans? What are you guys messaging to the

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 3>street about your willingness to engage in em ande because

0:05:14.520 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 3>I know you had to buy out recently of the

0:05:16.120 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Apple Leisure Group.

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 7>I want to see kind of your appetite is going forward.

0:05:20.360 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, So over the past five years, we've invested about

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 4>three point eight billion dollars in acquisitions, the biggest one

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 4>being Apple Leisure Group at two point seven billion, and

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 4>it's been tremendously beneficial to us because we've been able

0:05:35.120 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 4>to expand our customer base in the most in the

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.679
<v Speaker 4>highest growth and most relevant to US categories, which is leisure,

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 4>lifestyle and luxury. And so we've really done this in

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 4>a very deliberate way to move the company in that direction.

0:05:49.600 --> 0:05:52.000
<v Speaker 4>In the fourth quarter, I think we had fifty seven

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 4>percent of our total rooms revenue around the world was

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 4>leisure focused, which is up twenty points from the mid

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 4>thirties to the mid fifties pre pandemics on now, so

0:06:02.040 --> 0:06:06.920
<v Speaker 4>that the mix in the company is tremendously shifted, but

0:06:06.960 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 4>they also been very profitable and high value acquisitions. The

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 4>fees per room that we are earning today are materially

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:17.600
<v Speaker 4>higher than they were five years ago before we made

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 4>these acquisitions and evolved the company. Even as we have

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:27.360
<v Speaker 4>grown our select service brands, so we are expanding in

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.920
<v Speaker 4>lower price points, but our overall feed growth per room

0:06:31.360 --> 0:06:35.919
<v Speaker 4>has been growing, which is really I think part of

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 4>the equation of actually driving share holder value on.

0:06:38.800 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 5>An accelerated basis.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 4>In terms of our outbook, I think there will be

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 4>more opportunities for MNA in the future, but probably smaller scale.

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.680
<v Speaker 6>Mark Paul and I talked by the story yesterday for

0:06:48.720 --> 0:06:53.520
<v Speaker 6>the Journal reported that hotel parking fees are spiking because

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 6>of the fact that you know, you guys that on

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 6>hotels have to pay more and rent interest rates have increased.

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 6>Maybe there's a demand issue in certain pockets. You got

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 6>to increase prices where you can talk to me about

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.160
<v Speaker 6>how expensive it is to run your business, like where

0:07:08.200 --> 0:07:09.239
<v Speaker 6>a cost coming down?

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 8>Where cost going up?

0:07:11.840 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 4>You know, I think the primary look, first of all,

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 4>let's start with the biggest cost category, which.

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 5>Is people, yeah, at our hotels and in.

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.120
<v Speaker 4>Twenty twenty one non union markets, which is primarily in

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 4>the South, the Sun Belt, the smile of the United States.

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 4>I think our wage rates went up by twenty percent

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 4>over the course of that year, and that started to

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 4>mitigate or a millliarrate in twenty twenty two and twenty

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 4>twenty three, but we experienced a massively acute situation in

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 4>terms of supply of labor.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 5>That's really that's evened out. We were in the mid teams.

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 6>That's even out in that because we also talked about

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:54.440
<v Speaker 6>didn't we paul about cleaning services like not staffing housekeeping

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 6>because it just can't find the workers.

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:58.520
<v Speaker 8>So do you feel like you're at the right spot?

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 4>I would say that there are pockets where we still

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 4>have shortages, and I think part of that has to

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 4>do with the nature of the workforce at this point.

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 4>So we've got a lot of the byproduct of not

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:23.600
<v Speaker 4>having a really advanced immigration policy in the United States

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 4>and h t B visa program, is that for at times,

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 4>especially over the summer, where you have peak demand, we

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 4>don't have the right type type of labor that's willing

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 4>to take those jobs and uh and be happy to

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:42.480
<v Speaker 4>start their careers in those jobs. So I think this

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 4>they go together. A lot of the a lot of

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 4>the h t B people that come in on an

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 4>hub visa which is a temporary work visa they come

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 4>and they leave. Or the incidence of of immigration that

0:08:57.360 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 4>allows us to hire people who are coming in into

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 4>the workforce in the United States for the first time

0:09:03.360 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 4>has been has been under some pressure now. Having said that, overall,

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 4>our vacancy rates have gone from mid teens to mid

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.840
<v Speaker 4>single digits, so down ten points, which is extraordinary, and

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 4>that's over the last eighteen months. So we are having

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.200
<v Speaker 4>a better time finding labor, but there are definitely pockets

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 4>of constraints.

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 7>Yep, hear that from a lot of folks in the

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 7>service business.

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Mark, thanks so much for joining us, Mark Hopplomasian,

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 3>he's a president and chief executive officer at Hyatt Hotels,

0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 3>joining us from Chicago, Illinois via zoom. The company stock

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 3>h is the ticker all time high today. So how

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:43.600
<v Speaker 3>about that they had some pretty solid numbers recovering from

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 3>the pandemic. Look like we see a lot of other

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 3>entertainment and leisure spaces.

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:52.559
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on applecar.

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 2>Play and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business.

0:09:58.040 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon and Alexa from

0:10:00.760 --> 0:10:04.520
<v Speaker 1>our flagship New York station. Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven thirty.

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.520
<v Speaker 3>All right, ma, go in the terminal. Then I click

0:10:09.600 --> 0:10:11.719
<v Speaker 3>on time series and I go, got ten years. And

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 3>I just look at the graph of M and A activity,

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:17.160
<v Speaker 3>both in terms of dollar volume and number of deals.

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:20.680
<v Speaker 3>And man, really, since like I don't know, mid twenty

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 3>twenty two, there's been nothing going on in the MNA world.

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 3>My M and A banker buddies, I don't know what

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 3>they're living on these days. But let's check and see

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.079
<v Speaker 3>where we are on the M and A space kind

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 3>of where we can be going from here. I guess

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 3>that's what happens when rates go up five hundred basis points.

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 3>Ted Smith joins us. He's co founder and president of

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 3>Union Square Advisors, joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactive

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 3>Broker studio. So Ted, M and A activity, it's been

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 3>a little fallow over the last I don't know, eighteen

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 3>months or so.

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:46.960
<v Speaker 7>What are you guys seeing out there in terms of activity.

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 9>We're starting to finally see a little bit of a

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 9>thought out there, Paul. I want to be careful not

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 9>to suggest that it's getting overcooked. Anytime soon, but starting

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 9>to see the number of deals both and the quality

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 9>of deals start to come back. Strategical quirers are saying

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 9>they've kind of come out of their funk. They're ready

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:05.200
<v Speaker 9>to do things again where they hadn't been to your

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.720
<v Speaker 9>point for the last twelve to eighteen months. And private

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:10.440
<v Speaker 9>equity firms, which in technology where we apply our trade

0:11:10.480 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 9>are so important, have a lot of capital to put

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 9>to work, so they're anxious to Was.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.840
<v Speaker 3>It just interest rates going up that everybody just step

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.120
<v Speaker 3>back or is it global macro? What kind of caused

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 3>people to step back here? Because when I think about

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 3>M and A, I think I have to have a

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.600
<v Speaker 3>board and a c suite that has confidence in their

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 3>business to go out and make.

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 9>That kind of investment right. So on the strategic side,

0:11:29.160 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 9>I think it was more macro. It was like, we

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 9>don't know enough about where our business is going right

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 9>now that we can take a risk on another business.

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 9>I think in private equity land it was definitely, at

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 9>least in part by interest rates, And it was also

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 9>the fact that because even to your point in early

0:11:43.920 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 9>twenty twenty two, there hadn't been a lot of capital

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 9>returned to their limited partners, and so for every dollar

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 9>that they're investing, they're also thinking should I be giving

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:52.599
<v Speaker 9>that back to my limiteds And so there's been a

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 9>lot of tension in that part of the world.

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:58.199
<v Speaker 8>So I know tech might be your space, but just.

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 6>Person so, I'm really interested in what's happening with Exon

0:12:03.600 --> 0:12:06.440
<v Speaker 6>and Seinook trying to get in the middle of the

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 6>deal between Chevron and hess And the broad question is like,

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.880
<v Speaker 6>are we going to see weird territorial fights like this

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 6>in different sectors, where like one big company to stop

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.440
<v Speaker 6>another big company from buying a smaller company.

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 8>Is that normal.

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.040
<v Speaker 9>I'm not sure that it's normal, but it's certainly not

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 9>unheard of. And I think we think and again, in tech,

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 9>we see a lot of semi normal or even abnormal

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 9>potential buyers who see buying into the tech landscape as

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 9>being something that will help increase their growth, increase their margins,

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 9>put them into exposure of a sector that they previously

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 9>had not been. So I think we'll see some more

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 9>of that in tech, but more generally, to your question,

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 9>I'm certainly no expert on the energy sector, but I

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 9>think this is an environment where if you see that

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 9>smaller company that can really make a difference in your

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 9>business and accelerate intor granted growth. Buyers are not afraid

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.200
<v Speaker 9>to mix it up at this point because they've been

0:13:00.240 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 9>on the sidelines for a while and they need to

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:02.000
<v Speaker 9>get back in.

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 3>If I go to sand Hill Road with a really

0:13:05.000 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 3>good idea, can I find any money? Will?

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:07.839
<v Speaker 10>They will?

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 7>They invest in my company?

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 11>They will?

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 9>Valuations are obviously down from the peak in twenty twenty one.

0:13:13.760 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 9>You're gonna ask a lot of questions about what's your

0:13:15.880 --> 0:13:17.079
<v Speaker 9>AI strategy?

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 8>You know, where where exactly they got to saw something

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 8>for it?

0:13:19.960 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 7>Right?

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 8>Exactly?

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 9>Where are you going from here? The capital is available,

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 9>but it is certainly more limited than it was two

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 9>years ago and before that. Investors are being much more

0:13:31.640 --> 0:13:34.280
<v Speaker 9>diligent about what they're willing to put capital to work in.

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 9>And again, AI is obviously hot. That's blinding glimpse of

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 9>the obvious for your audience.

0:13:39.360 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 7>But what's different?

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 9>I think, can I compare this, because I've been doing

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:44.320
<v Speaker 9>this for a long time, I compare this to the

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 9>you know, the dot com era. Investors got to the

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 9>point really quickly where it wasn't just about it's AI,

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:55.240
<v Speaker 9>it's what's the defensible business model, what's the real enterprise

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:56.960
<v Speaker 9>use case and how are you going to make money

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.840
<v Speaker 9>with it? That came so much faster with AI than

0:13:59.880 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 9>it did in the dot com era, and that's what

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:02.839
<v Speaker 9>you're seeing on Santo Road.

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 7>Now, show me a full business plan that's going to

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:04.959
<v Speaker 7>make money.

0:14:05.120 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, how are valuations? Do you think that we're getting

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 6>overpaid things getting overpaid to be bought? Like, how hard

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 6>is it to come to price.

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 9>Better than it was in late twenty two and twenty three,

0:14:15.960 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 9>where we've had quite a bit of disparity, and that

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 9>was one of the reasons for not getting a lot

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 9>of M and A done with.

0:14:20.360 --> 0:14:22.680
<v Speaker 6>Have the buyers come down or have the seller Like, yeah,

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 6>the buyers come down, the seller's gun up or vice versa.

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:25.760
<v Speaker 7>Some of both.

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 9>I do think that the obviously the market has improved

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 9>overall over the course of late twenty three and twenty four,

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:34.040
<v Speaker 9>so valuations have ticked up off of their lows. But

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:36.480
<v Speaker 9>I also think seller expectations have tempered a bit. We've

0:14:36.480 --> 0:14:39.400
<v Speaker 9>been in this valuation, this down more down valuation environment

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 9>now for almost two years, and eventually you have to

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 9>realize this is the new normal.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that this I guess the question I

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 3>was asking a lot of IPO bankers is when is

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 3>that stigma of, you know, a down round.

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.720
<v Speaker 7>When is that going to kind of ease up off

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 7>the marketplace?

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 3>Because I felt like I didn't want to be one

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 3>of the first people to do an IPO at a

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 3>down round or would do a down run in the

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 3>private market.

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 7>So but it maybe more deals we get done, Maybe

0:15:03.840 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 7>that that that happens.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 3>So on the M and A space here, I mean,

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 3>how are you targeting your business, what your target sheheet

0:15:10.440 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 3>look like, what type of company are you calling on?

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 9>So we focus on late stage private companies and public companies.

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 9>We will represent either buyers or sellers. That's a little

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 9>different than other boutiques who tend to focus only on sellers.

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 9>We think it's important to be able to do both.

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 9>But opportunities in the one hundred million of enterprise value

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 9>all the way up to a billion and well beyond

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 9>is where we where we do our work. Might characterize

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 9>that as middle market, but there's a that's where you know,

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 9>under the M and A curve that's where the greatest

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 9>amount of area is. So there's a lot to do there.

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 9>We focus mostly on enterprise technologies. So again I mentioned

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.000
<v Speaker 9>the enterprise use case for AI. A lot of our

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 9>companies are then are selling two big companies themselves saying here,

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 9>here's how I can make you more efficient, how I

0:15:53.600 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 9>can help you drive more revenue. That's where we spend

0:15:56.200 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 9>most of our time. And there's a there's a lot

0:15:57.760 --> 0:15:58.960
<v Speaker 9>of great software companies in there.

0:15:59.000 --> 0:16:00.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, okay, I was in say Soft, where I feel

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 6>like there are gazillion software companies like this one reports

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 6>and some reports like it could snowflake. I have no

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.160
<v Speaker 6>idea the difference as like a general market person like,

0:16:08.200 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 6>are we going to have to see big consolidation within that?

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 9>I think we will see more consolidation. I'm not sure

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 9>it's going to be big to big. I think you're

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 9>going to continue to see the larger players acquire small

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 9>medium sized companies on a relative basis to their own

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 9>market caps. And that's, you know, certainly, that's what we're

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 9>counting on. We don't think because you touched up, Paul,

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 9>we don't think we're going to see a surgeon IPO activity.

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:31.520
<v Speaker 9>It'll be busier this year than it was last year,

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 9>but that's a very low bar. Obviously, Ultimately ninety five

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 9>plus percent of venture backed companies that get to an

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 9>exit get to an exit through EM and A.

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 7>And that's that's been true for literally decades.

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that's new, at least since I

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 3>was on the street, was this whole private credit market.

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 3>How does that impact your business to technology industry? Because

0:16:51.160 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 3>I would guess it's just another form of capital for

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 3>your companies, that's right.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 9>So it's it's been a boom for our business. We

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 9>brought in a team led by Mike Meyer Partner who

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 9>owns our capital markets businesses that actually is now our

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:05.800
<v Speaker 9>CEO has done a great job with that. That's almost

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 9>two trillion dollar asset class from private credit today and

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.840
<v Speaker 9>it's also available to technology companies earlier than it ever

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.439
<v Speaker 9>has been before. So to your point, we can go

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:17.920
<v Speaker 9>to our clients and say, let's talk about your capital needs,

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 9>the cost of capital that you're looking for, the flexibility

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.680
<v Speaker 9>you're looking for, and let's look across the entire debt

0:17:22.680 --> 0:17:25.679
<v Speaker 9>equity spectrum and find a solution for you. And you

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 9>can go to the private credit markets and find that

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:30.520
<v Speaker 9>tailored solution much easier than you can in the public markets.

0:17:31.359 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 8>What other ways are we financing deals here?

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:36.720
<v Speaker 9>Again, most of the large acquirers are going to finance

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:39.680
<v Speaker 9>at largely off their balance sheet. Okay, so I mean,

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 9>obviously if it becomes a really large deal, you might

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 9>see the bigger companies go into the market. But to

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 9>the point that Paul made earlier, right, that's a lot

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:49.399
<v Speaker 9>more expensive now, and so they prefer not to do

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 9>that if they don't have to. Occasionally we're seeing stock

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.560
<v Speaker 9>for stock deals those used to be de Reger not

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.840
<v Speaker 9>so much anymore amongst the larger buyers. But mostly this

0:17:59.920 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 9>is still a cash buyer's market, and so if you

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 9>don't have enough cash on hand, then you're going to

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.360
<v Speaker 9>have to go out and find it. And I think

0:18:06.400 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 9>we'll start to see a return to equity based financing,

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 9>convertible based financing again, a lot of the use of

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.400
<v Speaker 9>the private credit market with its flexibility. Will we'll back

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 9>some of the M and A.

0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 7>That's going to happen this year.

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.359
<v Speaker 3>I'm guessing in your middle market size, you don't have

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 3>to deal with regulators.

0:18:20.240 --> 0:18:21.120
<v Speaker 7>Too much approving deals.

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.040
<v Speaker 3>But boy, across the industry, if I'm a big ticket

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 3>M and a banker, I got to make sure I

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 3>got the right lawyers give me the advice because I

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 3>didn'tink the Department of Justice, the FTC, everybody's cracking down.

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:35.439
<v Speaker 9>It's true, and we think of it in terms of

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:37.879
<v Speaker 9>to whom are we going to be selling this company,

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 9>because if you're one of the Big seven, you're gonna

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 9>get scrutiny for almost every deal, right, and so we

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.080
<v Speaker 9>watch for that as as we bring opportunities forward and

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 9>think about what that might look like.

0:18:47.520 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 7>But you're right, it's really that group.

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 9>And let's face it, they have lived for a very

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 9>long time on asking for forgiveness, not permission, and I

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 9>think they're going to continue that activity. But by the way,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 9>it's not just the DJ here. We've seen a lot

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 9>more activity and scrutiny out of Europe and the UK

0:19:02.720 --> 0:19:04.760
<v Speaker 9>in particular, and we think that's going to continue for

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 9>a while.

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.600
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the UK, they get Brexit and then they realize, oh,

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:09.000
<v Speaker 3>we can have a seat at the table now.

0:19:09.080 --> 0:19:10.400
<v Speaker 8>Yeah yeah, yeah, Iah ex Oktay.

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Very good, All right, Ted, thanks so much for joining

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 3>us once again. Ted Smith, he is a co founder

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.960
<v Speaker 3>and president of Union Square Advisors. Joining us live here

0:19:17.000 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 3>in our Bloomberg Interactive Brokers to you're talking about the

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:22.200
<v Speaker 3>world of tech, the world of deal making again. The

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 3>past eighteen months, just looking at my MA function on

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg terminal, been much slower than maybe like the

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 3>ten year average, And I guess that can happen when

0:19:30.320 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 3>rates go up five hundred basis points.

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing and

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>broud Otto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on

0:19:46.880 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>YouTube PCE.

0:19:50.920 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 6>I kind of felt like it was a bit of

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 6>a nothing burger, Like it wasn't bad, it wasn't terrible,

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:57.920
<v Speaker 6>And I'm really wondering if we actually.

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 8>Learned anything today on inflation.

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.280
<v Speaker 6>So good thing that Ira Jersey is here, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 6>chief you as interest rate strategist.

0:20:05.119 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 8>Iira, did I learn anything today?

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 12>We didn't learn a whole lot from the PC report

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 12>on inflation. I mean, obviously the headline numbers were as expected.

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.320
<v Speaker 12>There were some details here and there that were kind

0:20:16.359 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 12>of interesting. Certainly the downward revisions for December turned a

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.040
<v Speaker 12>couple of heads here and there and helped contribute to

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:26.440
<v Speaker 12>the rally. What I found really interesting, and I think

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 12>something that people have been talking about this the personal

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 12>income number being so hot today. So that was up

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:36.719
<v Speaker 12>one percent, which was well above expectations, and that was

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:40.680
<v Speaker 12>driven in large part by two factors. One was massive

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 12>increase in government spending, so basically Social Security payments in

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.479
<v Speaker 12>particular were increased a lot in January. Part of that

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 12>was a cost of living adjustment, so that was up

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 12>three and a half percent in one month's you know,

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 12>that's massive and the most that we've had in the year.

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 12>And the other was actually dividend payments. So dividend payments

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 12>actually contributed about seventy five billion dollars to personal income

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 12>in annually. That's an annualized rate in the in January,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.880
<v Speaker 12>and that's a pretty big move do it normally it's

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 12>significantly less than that every month. So take that with

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 12>a little bit of a grain AsSalt too, and I

0:21:15.040 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 12>think the market looked through that, and that's why treasuries

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 12>have rallied a little bit since the since those data

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 12>came out.

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.680
<v Speaker 3>So, ira would it be bad form to give the

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:27.600
<v Speaker 3>Federal Reserve a little pat on the back here in

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 3>terms of their ability to bring inflation down?

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, maybe it might be a little bit early for that.

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 12>You know, when you still have two point eight percent

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 12>core inflation on a PC weighted basis, that's not at

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 12>their target yet. But certainly, you know, anything sub three

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 12>percent is better than five.

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 11>Percent for sure.

0:21:46.119 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 12>But when you look at some of the details there

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 12>there still are pockets of inflation that are very hot,

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 12>and they're in sectors that aren't particularly interest rates sensitive. Right,

0:21:55.560 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 12>so there are sectors like services excluding housing, and if

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 12>you consider those types of services, it's going to be

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 12>hard for inflation to keep coming down. So the Fed

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 12>obviously has tightened monetary policy quite a lot. There's certainly

0:22:13.680 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 12>certainly some room maybe for inflation to continue to fall.

0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:19.639
<v Speaker 12>So you know, we're going to continue to have this

0:22:19.720 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 12>debate as will the Federal Reserve cut interest rates before midyear?

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 12>If they don't cut by June, then are they going

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 12>to be able to cut because of the election cycle,

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 12>and you know, do they.

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:30.880
<v Speaker 11>Want to get in front of that.

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 12>So so that debate is going to continue right up

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 12>until the May and June meetings, I think, certainly into

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 12>the June meeting if they don't cut in May. So

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:44.199
<v Speaker 12>so you know, that's why you're going to have these gyrations.

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:46.399
<v Speaker 12>But they're going to be probably bounded where you're going

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 12>to see two year yields go from you know, four

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 12>fifty to five percent and probably probably hover in that

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 12>area depending on what the market's expectation for the Fed's

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 12>next move is.

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.159
<v Speaker 6>Well, I wondered if we learned anything about the reaction

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.399
<v Speaker 6>function of the market, because it looks like what we

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 6>learned is that we're going to sell the room or

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 6>buy the news this time round.

0:23:03.760 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 8>Is that fair to say, Well.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 12>The selling really came because European rates were selling off overnight,

0:23:10.080 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 12>and you know, so it was just a global rate

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 12>sell off a little bit. But the rally back I

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 12>think that there was it was pretty clear that some

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 12>people were short and thinking, hey, if we get a

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 12>you know, zero point four print on headline inflation, then

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:27.240
<v Speaker 12>that could be mean that we get meaningfully higher treasury yields.

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 12>With that not happening, I think that's the reason why

0:23:31.280 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 12>you had that pullback. That was a little bit of

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 12>a relief rally there in terms of the in terms

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 12>of the market reaction. So so you know, we knew

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 12>that that inflation was going to kind of be within

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 12>the range that it was just because PC doesn't diverge

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 12>that much directionally from CPI. So so the forecasts were

0:23:50.600 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 12>obviously reasonably good going into some of these numbers.

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:57.520
<v Speaker 7>All right, what do we look forward next? What's the

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:58.760
<v Speaker 7>market now? Looking forward?

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 8>May we just like snooze until May or something?

0:24:02.200 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 11>Well, I don't know if it's going to be a

0:24:03.320 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 11>snows fest.

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 12>I mean we are our duration scorecard that we put

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 12>out this morning and basically saying should you position long, short,

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.600
<v Speaker 12>or neutral? The Bloomberg Treasury Index says you should be

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 12>neutral because it's very things are that there's nothing particularly

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 12>rich or cheap about the market given the incoming data

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 12>that we've received. But next week's data it could be

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 12>market moving. Right ism new orders and the ism manufacturing

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 12>report that we get next week that is often market moving.

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 12>Plus we have payrolls coming up, right, So in order

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 12>to get the Fed Reserve to think that they're going

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 12>to cut early and aggressively, you really need to have

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.119
<v Speaker 12>the employment situation deteriorate much more than it has. So

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 12>that's one reason why that will continue to be a

0:24:45.600 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 12>key focus report for the market.

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:49.960
<v Speaker 6>Lots of people have the steepeners on. Then there was like,

0:24:50.000 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 6>oh gosh, the steepeners didn't make me money. I got

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 6>to take that off. And then it was like, now

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 6>we're going to say with the steepeners, what do I

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 6>do with the steepener?

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 7>Can somebody define steepener for this equity person?

0:24:58.320 --> 0:24:58.439
<v Speaker 11>Oh?

0:24:58.480 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 8>Okay, so let me try as like the person. Okay.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 6>It basically means when long end yields go higher than

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 6>short end yields, and the idea is the Fed's gonna cut,

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 6>so you're gonna buy the front end and then yields

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 6>in the back and go up.

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 8>Irah am I right? Did I pass?

0:25:11.880 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 12>So that is a that is a bear steepener. A

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:17.679
<v Speaker 12>bull steepener would be if say, front end yields rallied

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 12>a lot and yields went down and long term yields

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 12>just went down slower or didn't move at all.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 11>So so you can get a steepener either bull or bear.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.000
<v Speaker 12>But basically it's it's that long term yields don't move

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 12>as much as or stay higher than front end yields do.

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 12>That that's basically the.

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:38.400
<v Speaker 11>Definition of a steepener.

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 12>You know a lot of people thought that it would

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 12>be a bull steepener because they were expecting you know,

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:44.719
<v Speaker 12>we were just think about it a month ago, we

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 12>were thinking that the Federal reserve, the market was priced

0:25:46.840 --> 0:25:49.360
<v Speaker 12>with a federal reserve to cut interest rates by one

0:25:49.359 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 12>point five percent this year. So that's one reason why

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.280
<v Speaker 12>a lot of people were in those steepeners, because they

0:25:54.320 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 12>thought the two year yields, instead of being a four

0:25:56.600 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 12>point seven percent, they'd have a three handle now and

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 12>they don't. And so that's one reason why you've continued

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:05.880
<v Speaker 12>to see the curve kind of reinvert a little bit here.

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.119
<v Speaker 12>I don't know where we are at the moment, but

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 12>probably thirty nine or forty basis points inverted between the

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:14.400
<v Speaker 12>two year and the ten year. You know, we've been

0:26:14.520 --> 0:26:16.960
<v Speaker 12>we've had the call for quite a while that we

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 12>thought that the curve would remain inverted for most, if

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 12>not all, of this year and certainly the first half,

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:24.040
<v Speaker 12>and that seems to be playing out pretty well.

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 11>And that was predicated.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 12>On on our view that the Fed woulden't cut more

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 12>than three times this year. And now now we're priced

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 12>for three cuts, so you know, we have to reevaluate that.

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 11>Call right now, you know, based on the incoming data.

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 6>Obviously, thirty nine basis points is where we are. So

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 6>basically we just learned Paul. Is that IRA's right?

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:42.919
<v Speaker 11>Right?

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:44.119
<v Speaker 8>Ira said the stuff.

0:26:44.119 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 6>He's been saying this since I don't know, last summer

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:48.520
<v Speaker 6>and no one's listening, and now we're listening.

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 8>The markets up.

0:26:50.320 --> 0:26:55.679
<v Speaker 7>Oh, Paul, very good, Hey, Ira? I mean what I mean?

0:26:55.760 --> 0:26:58.160
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting here? What it is it May or June?

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.159
<v Speaker 3>Do we care whether it's May or June? When they

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:02.879
<v Speaker 3>start cutting rates? I feel like they gotta do it

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 3>before we get too much into the election season.

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 7>But I don't know.

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, big picture, it really doesn't matter. You know, it

0:27:09.440 --> 0:27:12.680
<v Speaker 12>matters to people who are trading June, who are trading

0:27:13.080 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 12>you know what we call, you know, very short term

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 12>interest rate contracts that people who are in money market

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 12>instruments like T bills, they care whether it's May or June, right,

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 12>because there's some incremental few basis points of pickup that

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.080
<v Speaker 12>you can get depending on what they do. But you know,

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 12>big picture, you don't care. Ten year yields don't really care.

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 12>Two year yields do care. So if they go, you know,

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.000
<v Speaker 12>the I think the big challenge is if they don't

0:27:37.000 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 12>go by June, what is there what is their propensity

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 12>to move in July or September? Right, around the political

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 12>party conventions and then obviously in the middle of the

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.919
<v Speaker 12>election season. You know, we don't have a lot of

0:27:51.720 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 12>experience with this because there's only a presidential election every

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 12>four years. But at least to date, the Federal Reserve

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 12>has never started a new activity, whether it's hiking or cutting,

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:04.960
<v Speaker 12>in the middle of an election season. They've continued policies

0:28:05.000 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 12>that they that they started prior to an election period,

0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 12>but they've never you know, they've never started at say,

0:28:11.880 --> 0:28:15.360
<v Speaker 12>the September before an election. But you know, so that's

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 12>one reason why, like, if one reason why I think

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 12>they it would behoove them if they were thinking about

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:22.960
<v Speaker 12>cutting at all, they should just cut one time and

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.840
<v Speaker 12>then they can skip a few meetings. So an outcome

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:27.439
<v Speaker 12>that would not surprise me at all is if the

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 12>Federal Reserve were to cut in June and then wait

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.159
<v Speaker 12>to cut again until after the election, and then if

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 12>they have to because the economy deteriorates meaningfully, then they

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 12>can cut again in July or September and just say, well,

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 12>there's a continuation of the policy that we started a

0:28:41.520 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 12>couple of months ago. Because you know, the unemployment rate's

0:28:43.880 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 12>gone up and inflations come down, like whatever whatever reasons

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 12>that they espouse for their initial cut.

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 6>You know what we had Bruce Richards on a marathon

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.000
<v Speaker 6>asset management yesterday on television. He called that the two

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 6>step yeah, which I was like, okay, I kind of

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 6>get that right, Like you move a little and then

0:28:57.920 --> 0:28:59.360
<v Speaker 6>you pause, and you move little and.

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 8>Then you pause. Hey, Ira, thanks a lot, Ira Jersey.

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 8>He is a chief US rate strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 6>He lost me after that, like two steps. I don't

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 6>know where you go after the two step, but you know,

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:10.520
<v Speaker 6>but that idea you move a little and then you hold.

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 7>Okay, I mean yeah, I mean may or June.

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:13.960
<v Speaker 3>I don't think again, as Iris said, I don't think

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 3>the market, generally speaking, cares that much. I'm you know,

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:19.560
<v Speaker 3>as an equity investor, having the anticipation of RAID cuts

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 3>is as good as having them, in my opinion, just

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 3>turn right now.

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 6>And they actually talk about that in terms of the

0:29:24.960 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 6>lag of monetary policy, that if it's just the expectation

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 6>of stuff, that changes what the lag of monetary policy

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 6>actually is because by the time you feel it, you're

0:29:33.280 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 6>already anticipating those cuts.

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 7>That's being said, I like to refinance the mortgage.

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I know, I know, not yet, not yet.

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.000
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on.

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Applecar Play and Android Otto with the Bloomberg Business.

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.440
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:58.840
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:30:00.280 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 6>It was interesting to get their earnings out yesterday from

0:30:02.160 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 6>Paramount because there was a little bit of good and

0:30:05.120 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 6>a little bit of bad. Right, you know, fifteen percent

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 6>decline in TV advertising, so that feels like that's not great,

0:30:10.680 --> 0:30:13.320
<v Speaker 6>but then streaming subscribers went up. I was one of

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:17.000
<v Speaker 6>those people, so real well comparing it's my weird addiction.

0:30:17.120 --> 0:30:19.920
<v Speaker 8>I have to Survivor. I know, which is because I

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 8>was paid for years.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 6>I know, too late, but I know I'm paying my

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 6>twenty money to Survivor.

0:30:25.960 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 8>It's still a million.

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 6>They didn't adjust aipulation, but one time it was two

0:30:28.720 --> 0:30:30.360
<v Speaker 6>million and they did Survivor All Stars.

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:33.719
<v Speaker 8>But that was back twenty nineteen.

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 6>But point is I was paying twenty five bucks a season,

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 6>so I just did the Paramount plus thing. But I

0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 6>think I'm gonna add more because the ads are.

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 8>Just so annoying. Really, Yeah, and I'm gonna be one

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 8>of those people that they love.

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 6>Yes, anyway, let's go to geta because she knows much

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 6>more than I do on this. It wrong enough then

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 6>and she covers US Media Bloomberg Intelligence senior industry analyst,

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:53.760
<v Speaker 6>hey Geet Debt. So there was like a little bit

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 6>of good, a little bit of bad. What's my broader

0:30:56.400 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 6>takeaway from that?

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:02.360
<v Speaker 13>Yes, you're absolutely right at like streaming was definitely a

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 13>key positive, and you're absolutely right in terms of the

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 13>subscriber numbers, those came in slightly ahead of estimates. The

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.400
<v Speaker 13>bigger positive was the r poo trends. So remember Wall

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 13>Street has now kind of shifted its focus away from

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:19.120
<v Speaker 13>subscribe just subscriber growth to revenue growth as well as profitability,

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 13>and they kind of scored pretty well on the revenue

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.719
<v Speaker 13>growth metrics as well. So urpoo increased about thirty percent

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 13>through the year, and that's on the back of a

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 13>price increase. And then the next thing, of course you

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 13>look at was profitability and their losses narrowed, so they're

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 13>obviously taking a step in the right direction. I think

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 13>what investors are kind of really cheering though, is that

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.320
<v Speaker 13>they did articulate some kind of strategy to kind of

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 13>get to profitability, and they outlined a timeframe as well.

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 13>So twenty twenty five is when they're expecting paramount plus profitability,

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 13>which is definitely I think good news. The question is,

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 13>I'm not sure whether it's enough.

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:54.440
<v Speaker 11>Yep.

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean the stock is a four point three percent today,

0:31:56.760 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 3>that's a good news. Of bad news is looks down

0:31:58.840 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty two percent year to day eight, and it's down

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 3>for about forty five percent over the last year. And Keith,

0:32:02.840 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 3>before we move forward here, we have a big discussion

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 3>internally here in the studio. Do you prefer the pronunciation

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 3>of your first name githa thh or Geeta with a

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 3>T It's it's th.

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 8>Boom told you John Tucker, thank you for schooling than

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 8>she told me years ago.

0:32:18.920 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 3>I was forget See, I've known Keith and I have

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 3>worked together for fifteen years, you know, and she just

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:25.200
<v Speaker 3>doesn't bother to correct me anymore.

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:27.480
<v Speaker 7>So I figured, you know, if it's I'm.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 8>Going to stick validating us.

0:32:28.840 --> 0:32:30.120
<v Speaker 7>What was the interview with Paul?

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:30.440
<v Speaker 10>Like?

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.920
<v Speaker 11>Was it intimidating when he interviewed you for your job?

0:32:33.880 --> 0:32:36.720
<v Speaker 7>I begged keith to join me. I begged Keitha to

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:38.719
<v Speaker 7>join me. She did and it was the best thing

0:32:38.760 --> 0:32:40.360
<v Speaker 7>we ever did, So Keitha.

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 3>I guess the bigger picture here with Paramount is what

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 3>does the ownership here want to do with the company.

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 3>It appears by all accounts that they're just not big

0:32:49.440 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 3>enough to compete against some of these big technology companies,

0:32:52.080 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 3>some of these big media companies like a Netflix, like

0:32:54.080 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 3>a Disney and boy, there's a lot of speculation around Paramount.

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:58.240
<v Speaker 7>Did they address that at all?

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:02.240
<v Speaker 13>They didn't. I mean the one thing though, that you know,

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:04.239
<v Speaker 13>I think Bob Beckish got out of the way was

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 13>they are going to do something that is good for

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 13>all shareholders. He kind of underlined that because there has

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 13>been this constant, you know, question about whether you know,

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 13>Sherry Redstone is kind of just going to cash out

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 13>and leave everybody else hanging, and so he wanted to,

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 13>you know, kind of get that out of the way.

0:33:20.800 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 13>But again, you know, I think the focus is going

0:33:23.320 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 13>to come, you know, the M and A options. Paul

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 13>and We've discussed this seemed to be shrinking at this point.

0:33:27.640 --> 0:33:30.960
<v Speaker 13>You know, Warner Brothers Discovery obviously said they're no longer interested.

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 13>Other firms have kind of come taken a look. Apollo

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 13>being one of them, said not interested. The only interested

0:33:36.920 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 13>party right now is sky Dance, controlled by David Ellison,

0:33:40.840 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 13>but again he's really not there's really no natural buyer

0:33:43.920 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 13>for all of the assets. He's not interested in controlling

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 13>some TV networks. He's only really looking at the studio.

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 13>So again, I'm not sure that Paramount Management necessarily wants

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:57.560
<v Speaker 13>to do kind of a part parts sale here. So

0:33:57.560 --> 0:33:59.040
<v Speaker 13>I think they're going to kind of go back and

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 13>focus on fundamentals. I think some of that those the

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 13>unrealistic M and A expectations are kind of going to

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 13>subside a little, but we're going to go back to fundamentals,

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 13>I think for the time being.

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:10.520
<v Speaker 6>Well to that point, then did they buy themselves some time?

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 6>Because I could make an argument that, okay, well the

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.040
<v Speaker 6>slowing and ad sales and maybe that's an industry wide thing. Okay,

0:34:15.080 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 6>other players are getting hit they did as streaming subscribers,

0:34:18.640 --> 0:34:20.759
<v Speaker 6>so they have some time now that they might not

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:22.799
<v Speaker 6>have had twenty four hours ago. Is that a real

0:34:22.800 --> 0:34:23.440
<v Speaker 6>statement or no?

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 13>I think so. I definitely think so, because with streaming,

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 13>what we're going to see is We're going to see

0:34:28.880 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 13>some sustained momentum in those ARPUH increases, so they're doing more,

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:37.799
<v Speaker 13>you know, international price increases. They've kind of integrated Showtime

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 13>into Paramount and with that they've been able to take

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:41.919
<v Speaker 13>some price increases. So we're going to kind of see

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.759
<v Speaker 13>that play out so pretty much most of twenty twenty four.

0:34:45.800 --> 0:34:48.040
<v Speaker 13>The question is what happens after twenty twenty four, But

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 13>they definitely have bought themselves sometime.

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 7>So what is the outlook for the studio here?

0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 10>Geita Studio.

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 13>Unfortunately, for twenty twenty four looks really bleak. So the

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 13>big movie, of course that everybody was kind of looking at,

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 13>was Mission Impossible. That's been pushed out to twenty twenty five.

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.120
<v Speaker 13>We do have a few movies here and there. I mean,

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 13>you have Quiet Plays that's coming out in June. There's

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 13>obviously some anticipation building there. But again, in general, Paul,

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 13>the box office outlook for twenty twenty four is just

0:35:18.920 --> 0:35:21.839
<v Speaker 13>pretty weak, and that's just because of all of those

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:24.759
<v Speaker 13>Hollywood strikes. Has pushed out a lot of movies into

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 13>twenty twenty five. It's kind of going to shave off

0:35:26.600 --> 0:35:28.840
<v Speaker 13>I think at least two billion dollars off of the

0:35:28.840 --> 0:35:29.799
<v Speaker 13>box office.

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 6>So presumably we're going to look through that, right, I mean,

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 6>presumably they're going to recoup that and they'll be pent

0:35:33.600 --> 0:35:34.759
<v Speaker 6>up in twenty twenty five.

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.520
<v Speaker 13>That is the big question, right, Yes, we've seen kind

0:35:39.560 --> 0:35:42.000
<v Speaker 13>of box office demand, you know, in general, kind of

0:35:42.040 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 13>come back, but it's still about twenty percent below pre

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:47.960
<v Speaker 13>pandemic level. So the big question is, Okay, when all

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:50.440
<v Speaker 13>of those big titles kind of hit the screens in

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:52.640
<v Speaker 13>twenty twenty five, are we kind of going to see

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:56.040
<v Speaker 13>a bigger resurgence. The jury is still out. I think yes,

0:35:56.080 --> 0:35:58.080
<v Speaker 13>it's definitely going to be better than twenty twenty four. Is

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 13>it going to be as good as it was? You know,

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:02.240
<v Speaker 13>and it's heyday? I'm not so sure.

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 3>So, Gith, how about the CBS television network and the

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 3>Viacom cable networks? You know, one point that was such

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 3>a big part of this company. Here, talk to us

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 3>about the advertising the television advertising market. What's kind of

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 3>the forecast for the next several years. Is it a

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.640
<v Speaker 3>growing business? Is it a declining business?

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.879
<v Speaker 13>It's a melting ice cube, Paul, just like you know,

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 13>just like the whole PayTV ecosystem, so you know, this

0:36:29.320 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 13>is this used to be back in the day about

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:33.600
<v Speaker 13>a sixty billion market. It's shrunk. It's going to probably

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 13>hit about forty five billion by the end of next year.

0:36:36.480 --> 0:36:38.600
<v Speaker 13>And really, you know, this is just kind of a

0:36:38.640 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 13>progression of where all the eyeballs are moving. So they're

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:43.680
<v Speaker 13>moving away from the linear TV networks to streaming, and

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 13>so we're seeing kind of those ad dollars follow those

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 13>eyeballs and going from you know, the TV medium to

0:36:50.560 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 13>what is now called connected TV, which is really all

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:55.200
<v Speaker 13>the streaming platforms and you know, you're using all your

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 13>connected TV devices, the rokus and the Google sticks and

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 13>all of that to kind of television, and that's where

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 13>all of the advertising is moving as well. Unfortunately, Paramount

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 13>doesn't have too much of a presence there. Yes, they

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:09.360
<v Speaker 13>do have you know, Pluto TV, which is their solution,

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.439
<v Speaker 13>but it's not going to be able to kind of

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 13>offset the leakage that we're seeing in the television ecosystem

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 13>and that is really a problem for all of these

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.080
<v Speaker 13>media companies, for Paramount a little bit more so.

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:22.440
<v Speaker 8>But here's the thing.

0:37:22.880 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 6>If they wind up just doing advertising on streaming, like,

0:37:26.320 --> 0:37:28.680
<v Speaker 6>isn't it going to be eventually kind of shake out

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:29.080
<v Speaker 6>the same.

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 13>So that has been kind of their hoole spiel. I mean,

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:36.240
<v Speaker 13>of course they're saying that, you know, they can reclaim

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 13>some of those lost dollars. The problem is the digital

0:37:39.480 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 13>ad space is getting really really crowded as well, and

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 13>so you know, again it depends on who has the

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:48.719
<v Speaker 13>most watch time. Netflix dominates. They have about two and

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 13>a half hours of viewing time every day. Disney Plus

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 13>is you know, follows very closely. And now the biggest

0:37:55.600 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 13>blow really to all of these players has been Amazon

0:37:58.080 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 13>because they just came out about a month ago and

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:04.600
<v Speaker 13>they introduced advertising on their Prime video service and that

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 13>is really kind of shaking up the whole digital ad market.

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.920
<v Speaker 13>So if you're a subscale player, chances are you're not

0:38:11.000 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 13>going to really be able to make a dent even

0:38:13.160 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 13>within the digital ad space.

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 3>Interesting, all right, Githa, thanks so much for joining us there.

0:38:18.000 --> 0:38:22.359
<v Speaker 3>Githa Raganathan, analyst on US media for Bloomberg Intelligence. Githa

0:38:22.440 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 3>Raganathan joining us from the headquarters of Bloomberg Intelligence, done

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 3>in Princeton, New Jersey. Boy, I don't you know that

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:30.960
<v Speaker 3>melting ice cub that's not good.

0:38:31.040 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, just do. That sentence wasn't good.

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's not good for them. And but I just

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know what they do. I don't know what the

0:38:35.600 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 3>endgame is here.

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 6>What's funny is this is a total side note, but

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.560
<v Speaker 6>my daughter grew up without commercials because.

0:38:41.280 --> 0:38:42.319
<v Speaker 8>We never had linear TV.

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.880
<v Speaker 6>We had to like Netflix, right, And now she's experiencing

0:38:45.880 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 6>commercials because all these streaming players have commercials, and so

0:38:48.800 --> 0:38:51.359
<v Speaker 6>now she like quotes all these She's nine, by the way,

0:38:51.480 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 6>so she can quote all these commercials now from and

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 6>she like likes them and wants to be with them,

0:38:55.960 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 6>and she rails.

0:38:56.719 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 8>Against car commercials.

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 6>Really, I don't know what that is. She's like, who

0:39:00.239 --> 0:39:01.200
<v Speaker 6>needs all these cars?

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 7>This is ridiculous.

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:03.919
<v Speaker 8>I don't want to see this.

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.279
<v Speaker 6>So I feel like I'm gonna have to pay up

0:39:06.600 --> 0:39:07.759
<v Speaker 6>for the non commercial one.

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:09.960
<v Speaker 7>Now, yeah, a lot of people do, a lot of

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:11.239
<v Speaker 7>people do well.

0:39:11.239 --> 0:39:13.960
<v Speaker 6>It just shaves time too, right, And they're only and

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 6>that that block between segments is only going to get

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:16.600
<v Speaker 6>more and more.

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 7>I'm thinking, yep.

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 3>And if you're on broadcasting cable television, what are the advertisers.

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:25.400
<v Speaker 3>They're not the car companies, they're not Coca Cola, they're healthcare.

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 3>You need this drug for this problem.

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 8>As my husband loves, He's like, I have all these problems.

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:32.800
<v Speaker 8>It's like I don't want to see this on TV exactly.

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:34.040
<v Speaker 8>That such a good point.

0:39:35.560 --> 0:39:39.439
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:39:39.520 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple.

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.839
<v Speaker 2>Car Play and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business Act.

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:47.799
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:53.160
<v Speaker 1>flagship New York station, just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.480
<v Speaker 8>Another sock weer're watching here is Hewlett Packard. So this

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:57.360
<v Speaker 8>is HPQ.

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 6>This is the company that makes PCs and printers reported

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:04.600
<v Speaker 6>or that stocks down by about one percent. It reported

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:06.840
<v Speaker 6>earnings that quite frankly, just show that there's still a

0:40:06.920 --> 0:40:10.960
<v Speaker 6>slowdown in the PC market. They seemed relatively more constructive

0:40:10.960 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 6>in the back half, but still I got some questions.

0:40:13.560 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 6>There's no one else to bring to and talk to

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.480
<v Speaker 6>about it. Then, as Woojin Ho, Bloomberg.

0:40:17.000 --> 0:40:20.879
<v Speaker 8>Intelligence Senior Technology analyst, Wujin what was your biggest takeaway here?

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, Look, the first quarter results were pretty week if

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 14>you if you look at the first quoter PC numbers, Uh,

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 14>they fell below consensus expectations, and you know, the the

0:40:33.080 --> 0:40:35.719
<v Speaker 14>the fact that they were able to maintain guidance on

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:39.200
<v Speaker 14>the revenue side for PCs as well as EPs side.

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 10>They're really hoping for that second half, as you were saying, Alex.

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:46.400
<v Speaker 7>And give us the drivers here, wouge for that second half.

0:40:46.960 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 7>What has to happen?

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 14>Well, there's a there's a couple of things, right. You

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 14>have a macro improvement and better consumer dollars. You have

0:40:55.000 --> 0:40:57.360
<v Speaker 14>the second half seasonality that's going to drive it up

0:40:57.400 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 14>back to school for the consumer side.

0:40:59.520 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.879
<v Speaker 14>But there's also a big Windows eleven upgrade cycle that's

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.280
<v Speaker 14>coming in and which is supposed to be a tailwind.

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 14>But I do have some doubts for for one big reason,

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:13.919
<v Speaker 14>corporate I spending has been fairly weak and that really

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:15.719
<v Speaker 14>needs to cooperate in the second half for.

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:19.720
<v Speaker 10>The PC numbers to materialize. For hp.

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.239
<v Speaker 8>Do my homework for me. We have the CEO of

0:41:23.360 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 8>HPQ tomorrow in the morning. Yeah, and we're going to

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 8>run it on the closed Show. What are the best

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:29.520
<v Speaker 8>questions to ask?

0:41:29.600 --> 0:41:31.759
<v Speaker 6>Because I'm really interested in kind of when they see

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 6>the trough really materializing, how how long that trough actually

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 6>may last.

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.640
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, So I think we are getting closer to the trough, right.

0:41:40.680 --> 0:41:43.800
<v Speaker 14>I think next quarter is going to be the trough

0:41:44.640 --> 0:41:48.919
<v Speaker 14>in terms of a PC revenue side. If we think

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 14>about it from from this perspective, you want to ask

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 14>along the lines of why are they so bullish on

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:58.279
<v Speaker 14>the second half? If I do my if looking at

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:00.799
<v Speaker 14>the back of the envelope math, it looks like they

0:42:00.840 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 14>need about ten percent second half growth versus first half growth.

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 14>Typically it's about five percent second half growth versus first half,

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:11.640
<v Speaker 14>So it's going to be well above seasonality.

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:13.040
<v Speaker 10>So some of those.

0:42:12.880 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 14>Drivers maybe, as they said on the call, is higher pricing,

0:42:17.040 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 14>so PC prices are going to come up as as

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:26.080
<v Speaker 14>as well as you know, possibly possibly some timing on

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:30.400
<v Speaker 14>the incremental contribution to to aipcs.

0:42:30.520 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 10>And I opened a tend door box.

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 3>I believe because I'm just looking at the PGO function

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 3>which kind of breaks down kind of their revenue where

0:42:37.719 --> 0:42:41.240
<v Speaker 3>it comes from. Commercial is a big part of their business.

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:43.400
<v Speaker 3>Talk to us about the buying cycle on on the

0:42:43.400 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 3>commercial side of the enterprise side.

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.520
<v Speaker 7>Which is it every two to three years? Is it predictable?

0:42:47.560 --> 0:42:51.719
<v Speaker 14>And where are we Yeah, so, so we're actually on

0:42:51.880 --> 0:42:56.560
<v Speaker 14>the beginning and the beginning or the start of the

0:42:56.680 --> 0:43:02.160
<v Speaker 14>PC refresh cycle from the pre COVID times right, Typical

0:43:02.200 --> 0:43:07.239
<v Speaker 14>refresh cycles for PCs are about four years and then

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 14>we get new ones. Now this lies into my concern.

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:16.680
<v Speaker 14>If the pieces are running okay and the budgetary dollars

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:20.520
<v Speaker 14>are the corporate dollars are still fairly tight, you know,

0:43:21.200 --> 0:43:23.640
<v Speaker 14>I would like to say that they would like to

0:43:23.840 --> 0:43:26.640
<v Speaker 14>hold on to those PCs for another six months to

0:43:26.719 --> 0:43:29.560
<v Speaker 14>a year, and that would fall into fiscal twenty twenty five.

0:43:30.120 --> 0:43:33.359
<v Speaker 14>The other thing that concerns me in terms of this

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:38.920
<v Speaker 14>particular PC cycle is the emergence of aipcs.

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 10>We don't know, Wait.

0:43:41.000 --> 0:43:42.440
<v Speaker 8>Real quick, what's an AIPC.

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 14>Well, an AIPC is a PC that has specific artificial

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:53.919
<v Speaker 14>intelligence chips provided by Intel or a MD and can

0:43:54.000 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 14>run AI functionality. That's actually there's a lot of hype

0:43:59.200 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 14>on AIPC starting from CEES even last year, and we're

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:05.040
<v Speaker 14>going to start seeing the ramp up at the second

0:44:05.080 --> 0:44:09.880
<v Speaker 14>half of this year and materialize even more in twenty

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 14>twenty five. So my issue with the AIPC wrap up cycle.

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 14>I do think it's going to materialize. It's just that

0:44:17.320 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 14>there's no application ecosystem to help support it right now,

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:23.319
<v Speaker 14>and if there's going to be buying decisions coming up

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 14>at the end of this year, I may want to

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 14>delay a quarter or two to see what the AIPC

0:44:29.239 --> 0:44:31.839
<v Speaker 14>can actually do and is it right?

0:44:32.239 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 10>Doesn't fit into my corporate workflow, that's interesting.

0:44:36.040 --> 0:44:39.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm looking at the stock absolutely unchanged on it

0:44:39.200 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 3>over the past year.

0:44:40.600 --> 0:44:42.040
<v Speaker 7>I look at the A and R functions.

0:44:42.040 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 3>I got eight buys, eight holds in three cells the street.

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 3>There's no conviction on this name here. When you talk

0:44:49.239 --> 0:44:51.880
<v Speaker 3>to clients, what are they saying about it?

0:44:52.560 --> 0:44:52.759
<v Speaker 11>Yeah?

0:44:52.760 --> 0:44:55.640
<v Speaker 14>And then it sounds about right right, So so the

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:59.360
<v Speaker 14>bulls are looking forward to that second half PC upgrade cycle.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 14>Have to look past twenty twenty four to get that

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 14>PC upgrade cycle to happen, And it's going to happen

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:09.360
<v Speaker 14>in twenty five, right regardless, because Windows is going to

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:12.399
<v Speaker 14>shut down Windows ten. Microsoft is gonna shut down Windows ten,

0:45:12.640 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 14>and it's going to really push that upgrade cycle regardless.

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:19.520
<v Speaker 14>My main concern is twofold, and I'm going to step

0:45:19.560 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 14>away from the PC segment for our moment here. That

0:45:23.080 --> 0:45:26.240
<v Speaker 14>printer segment is a cash goal. It's a twenty percent

0:45:26.680 --> 0:45:32.120
<v Speaker 14>nineteen to twenty percent operating margin business, and they really

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:35.200
<v Speaker 14>can't sell the hardware. And if you can't sell the hardware,

0:45:35.520 --> 0:45:37.560
<v Speaker 14>you're not going to be able to sell the higher

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:42.400
<v Speaker 14>margin supplies. So over the long term, the concern for

0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:46.279
<v Speaker 14>me is is that diminishing hardware sales is going to

0:45:46.320 --> 0:45:49.440
<v Speaker 14>impact the demand for supplies because no one's printing anymore,

0:45:49.480 --> 0:45:51.920
<v Speaker 14>everyone's digitizing, and then it's going to affect the long

0:45:52.000 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 14>term profitability.

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:54.200
<v Speaker 8>Interesting.

0:45:54.880 --> 0:45:57.040
<v Speaker 6>I just wonder though, for the refresh cycle, Like I

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:59.399
<v Speaker 6>hear you on the profitability part in the printer PERP

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:02.880
<v Speaker 6>and the refresh cycle, I mean, how dependent do you

0:46:02.880 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 6>think will actually be on that. I'm still waiting for

0:46:04.880 --> 0:46:05.800
<v Speaker 6>the iPhone.

0:46:05.440 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 8>Supercycle that I've been hearing in bouts in twenty sixteen.

0:46:09.280 --> 0:46:12.520
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, well, I want you to think about it this way, Alex.

0:46:13.520 --> 0:46:17.600
<v Speaker 14>We came off of a terrible, terrible twenty twenty three

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:21.080
<v Speaker 14>from from a uni volume perspective, right, and we're probably

0:46:21.120 --> 0:46:24.480
<v Speaker 14>still going to be bouncing along historic lows from unit volumes.

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:29.000
<v Speaker 14>And you know, people have not been upgrading their PCs

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:32.239
<v Speaker 14>and laptops for the last two three years since the

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:35.400
<v Speaker 14>beginning for COVID, so we're starting to get some tired

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:39.320
<v Speaker 14>PCs out there, and again more importantly for the corporate side,

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:44.040
<v Speaker 14>we have the Windows eleven forced upgrade and that is

0:46:44.120 --> 0:46:45.719
<v Speaker 14>going to force our upgrade cycle. Now.

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Now, to.

0:46:47.600 --> 0:46:53.880
<v Speaker 14>Give you a data point, normalized normalized volumes on an

0:46:53.880 --> 0:46:56.080
<v Speaker 14>annual basis is roughly around two hundred and sixty to

0:46:56.120 --> 0:47:00.000
<v Speaker 14>two hundred and seventy million PCs, and we're probably going

0:47:00.040 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 14>to be running around two hundred and sixty two million

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:06.719
<v Speaker 14>for this year, so we're still below average trend. And

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:09.879
<v Speaker 14>I think there's scope in twenty five that we are

0:47:09.920 --> 0:47:13.479
<v Speaker 14>going to get above to sixty five million units.

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:15.800
<v Speaker 10>Nahpiece is going to benefit from that as well.

0:47:16.239 --> 0:47:17.880
<v Speaker 6>All right, Rich, thanks a lot, which and hoo a

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:19.960
<v Speaker 6>Bloomberg Intelligence senior technology.

0:47:19.520 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 8>And a listener.

0:47:20.160 --> 0:47:24.680
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast, available on apples, Spotify,

0:47:24.880 --> 0:47:25.839
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere.

0:47:25.520 --> 0:47:26.959
<v Speaker 2>Else you will get your podcasts.

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Listen live each weekday ten am to noon Eastern on

0:47:30.280 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the

0:47:33.800 --> 0:47:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app. You can also watch us live every

0:47:37.040 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 1>weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg terminal