WEBVTT - Surveillance: Market Plunge With El-Erian

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Ye, Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm term Keene

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course, on the Bloomberg good

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine, a good friend of the program, of course,

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and a gentleman then ignored the happy talk of the

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>v shaped recovery in the middle of February when the

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>equity market was hitting all time highs. A gentleman who said,

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.840
<v Speaker 1>do not buy that deep when many people ventured back

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in as we got that initial correction, I'm pleased to

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>say he joins us now. Mohammad al Arian, Alliance chief

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:51.440
<v Speaker 1>economic advisor and Bloomberg opinion columnist. Mohammed, Let's begin with credit.

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Why is that so much of a bigger focus on

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a morning like this morning, Because it is the way

0:00:56.320 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>in which the disruptions will transmit who are not just

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>market segments, but the real economy. Credit has been vulnerable

0:01:05.240 --> 0:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>because it has been very decoupled from the underlying fundamentals.

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 1>So when you shock it, as it's being shocked right

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>now by a combination of no economic anchor, no technical anchor,

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>and no policy anchor. What you're going to get is

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a liquidity price gapping and the closure of the primary

0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 1>issuance market. The primary has been seized that for a

0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. It opened a little bit last week.

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Let's some pick some of these different themes. I want

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to start with the parallel that we can draw at

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the moment. Clearly we've gone beyond December. It's fifteen sixteen,

0:01:42.160 --> 0:01:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the last time we had a crude route and a

0:01:43.880 --> 0:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>growth shark. Is that a decent playbook for you right now, Mohammed?

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Or is this radically different? It is decent because that

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>fall in oil prices was triggered by the same thing

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.559
<v Speaker 1>that this one was, which is the decision of Saudi

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Arabia to no longer play the swing producer role in

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 1>an attempt to imposet discipline on other oil producers. So

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>the cause is the same. However, the context is more difficult,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>first because global demand is slipping very quickly, and second

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>because now you need to Russia two turn around in

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a very humiliating fashion. So this one is going to

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit trickier for Saudi Arabia to achieve

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what is trying to achieve Muhamadalarian with his folks with aliens,

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>and of course writing for Bloomberg Opinion, of course joining

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Cambridge University here in the Autumn Folks. One of the

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>books you can read in this if you want to

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:42.680
<v Speaker 1>grab onto something is Dr Larian is The Only Game

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>in Town. Look for the movie fourth of July two

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:49.400
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty two. I believe Dicaprios in that movie Dr

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Larian in the Only Game in Town. Let me quote

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 1>from chapter one. Like ancient doctors who tried to explain

0:02:56.280 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 1>the causes of diseases while knowing nothing about germs or acteria,

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>academics sought to describe the functioning of developed economies, etcetera.

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>The great Ferdinando Giuliano who writes for Bloomberg Opinion as well.

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 1>How are we doing with the germs and bacteria this morning?

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:16.239
<v Speaker 1>How are our institutions doing and understanding where we are?

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.799
<v Speaker 1>But I'm starting to wake up to where we are? Um,

0:03:20.840 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>But they are having to play massive catch up. Tom,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>You and I have been discussing this for years. We've

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:32.919
<v Speaker 1>overrelied on central banks. Central banks themselves got caught hostage

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>by markets. We lost a lot of policy flexibility, and

0:03:37.520 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>most importantly, we did not invest in what genuinely produces

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>economic growth, so we have massive catch up to play.

0:03:44.480 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>It might be done, but it requires a complete change

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>in mindset. The single most important question Dr Larion at

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Davos was John Faraoh to a guy running a hedge fund,

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>and he said, the sickle the cycles out there, the

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>boom bus don't function the same at zero bound. We're

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>more at the zero bound than we were in January.

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.080
<v Speaker 1>In Switzerland, we're at the zero bound. Does a cyc

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>locality of the financial system still work? Oh? Absolutely, and

0:04:12.800 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna see it. We're gonna overshoot on the way

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>down because technicals are now in control. And the big

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>risk is not only do we converge quickly to the

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>most sluggish fundamentals from elevated asset prises, but we overshoot

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 1>them so well. Cycles were never dead. I think we

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>got complacent in so many ways, And the last eight

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>weeks illustrate to you how complacent we became. You had

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that comments out of Davos. We had a G twenty

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>meeting in which the coronavirus was hardly discussed. And now

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we're all waking up to the realities on the ground.

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.479
<v Speaker 1>Can we just talk about the economics affair just very quickly,

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Mahabted's something you've written about over the weekend, and I

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's something that would be of interest to our

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>audience as well. Walk us through that dynamic. It's very simple.

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.799
<v Speaker 1>When you are taking out of your comfort zone, behavioral

0:05:01.880 --> 0:05:06.320
<v Speaker 1>scientists will tell you two reactions are most likely paralysis

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and insecurity. And we are being taken out of our

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>comfort zone by the coronavirus, which means that we are

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:17.559
<v Speaker 1>paralyzed in terms of economic activity, which means we become

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so insecure that we become two risker verse. We exaggerate

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the probability of getting sick, and that results in demand

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>and supply destruction. I remember where the outset of this

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.560
<v Speaker 1>coronavirus sphere. I told you guys on the radio, and

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I remember exactly where I was. I was at an

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 1>airport when I told you. Remember the notion of economic

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>sudden stops. It doesn't occur in modern based economies. It

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 1>occurs mostly in fragile and sales states. But when it occurs,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>it is particularly dangerous because it destroys both demand and

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>supply and that is what we're living through right now. Mohammed,

0:06:00.040 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the salve to that culture of fear,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>that fear that we see pervading through markets, that we

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:07.800
<v Speaker 1>see when you go to the grocery store and you

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>see pure l being hoarded behind the counter with a

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>sign that says only three per customer. I want to

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.280
<v Speaker 1>talk about the FEDS role and Boston Feds. Rose and

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Gren on Friday came out and hinted at the potential

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for the FED to engage in e c B and

0:06:22.160 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Bank of Japan style asset purchases, saying, in a situation

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>where both short term interest rates conten your treasury rates

0:06:29.480 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>approach the zero lower bound, allowing the FED to purchase

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a broader range of assets could be important. Do you

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 1>foresee the possibility of the FED buying corporate bonds and stocks?

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>From here? I foresee whatever it takes policy approach that

0:06:45.680 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be both in central banks and government agency.

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>But having said that, it's important to understand what the

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>FET can and cannot do. The set can support balance feets.

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 1>It can do so, it can put money in people's

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>hands and support balances. It cannot restore the type of

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>confidence needed for economic activity to pick up. So the

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>FED has to understand that it's using policy ammunition in

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a very ineffective way, and it's got to make a

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>judgment as to when to use it. I was against

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the fifty basis point cut last week. I thought it

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>would do nothing at all and it would take away

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>policy flexibility. That's what happened. The most important thing for

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the said and this major responsibility to the system is

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to laser like focus on market market functioning, understand how

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>markets are functioning, better understand market technicals, and address the

0:07:45.800 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>pockets of liquidity that are going to arise and that

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>risk becoming systemic. That is what the fact you're doing.

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>It should not be trying to flood the system in

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a way that's gonna end up being very inefficient and

0:07:57.640 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>use up flexibility that we will need. Eater on Muhamdalarian

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>with us and he will continue with this in moments.

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Will have in a couple of minutes, I should say,

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>scheduled to Francisco, blanche a Bank of America and oil done.

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>What is at a general state, but that's the moving crude,

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>but the move in future obviously we're limited down so

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>we can get you an early read on the SMP

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>five hundred through the spider SMP five ETF, and we

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>are now session lows down a little more than seven

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 1>percentage points. I'd also know the German two year as well.

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Point nine seven five is one of those global litmus

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>paper thirty year bond a little better in the last

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes. Why don't you pick it up, John and

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Dr Man. Many people today, of course, will draw parallels

0:08:36.600 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 1>between now and two thousand and eight, and obviously for

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>many people we are nowhere near that situation. It was

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>a different world. But you just as concerned about corporate

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.440
<v Speaker 1>bannon sheets as you were about the household balad sheet

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>back then. I'm no drawn. I mean, ironically, this is

0:08:52.760 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>not two thousand and eight, which is both good and bad. Um,

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>It's not two thousand and eight in a good sense

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not worried about the bank, and therefore I'm

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>not worried about the payments and settlement system. Remember, the

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:07.319
<v Speaker 1>payments and settlement system is the nerve center of any

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>modern based market economy. If that is no longer functioning,

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 1>everything will stop. And that was the reality of two

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight. So there's a good way that we're

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>not similar to two thousand and eight. But there's another

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>way we're not similar to two thousand and eight, which

0:09:23.000 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I worried about, the extent of global policy coordination is

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:30.680
<v Speaker 1>much lower. And whether it's the coronavirus, whether the whether

0:09:30.720 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the excessive reliance on liquidity, whether it is markets

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 1>that have been miss priced for a long time, this

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>is a global problem that requires collective actions. So the

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>bad thing really to through thousand and eight is that

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to get a London summit quickly that

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>will allow to put an economic bottoming. We need advances

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>on the medical side, and that's going to require a

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>lot better global coordination. Mohammed. When does the sell off

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 1>that we're expecting to deepen in the high old bond

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:04.280
<v Speaker 1>market in credit markets more broadly, when does it become

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>a buying opportunity when you get distressed levels. So I'm

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>excited in a sense that as much as the next

0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>as the immediate peered ahead is going to be very treacherous,

0:10:19.559 --> 0:10:23.359
<v Speaker 1>as much as that we are going to have massive opportunities.

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>But understand where these opportunities are going to arise, They're

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to arise by buying a passive index and

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 1>just betting on the whole marketplace. It's going to be

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:36.800
<v Speaker 1>very selective. It's going to be in distressed credit, it's

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be instructured credit, it's going to be in

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.719
<v Speaker 1>relative value, and it's going to be in good companies

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>with strong balance sheets, high cash that are trading at

0:10:47.040 --> 0:10:50.480
<v Speaker 1>bargain prices. That is where the opportunities are going to arise.

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.840
<v Speaker 1>It's going to start selectively, and then when when we

0:10:53.920 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>start seeing high probability of medical advances to contain the

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.719
<v Speaker 1>spread of the virus, an increase immunities, vaccine, then we're

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>going to establish a bottom for the more general interesting

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>through in the index. By mommed before we let you go.

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Just the final question. Tom brought up your book The

0:11:11.480 --> 0:11:13.079
<v Speaker 1>Only Game in Town, And I know you were running

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>up a new addition and I was looking forward to

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it coming out later this year. Do you need to

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.560
<v Speaker 1>rewrite the start all over again and get back to it. Yeah,

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's a pain because the book is coming

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>out in just a few weeks. And the reason why

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to bring it out because when it came

0:11:26.559 --> 0:11:29.679
<v Speaker 1>out in sixteen it was too early. My timing was

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>way too early. People didn't realize what happens when you

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>rely excessively on central banks, that we were planting many

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>seeds of future economic and financial malaise. So so that's

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>why I wanted to bring it out again. Um, when

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>people have realized that that's where we are. But the

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.559
<v Speaker 1>coroner virus pressed fast forward on everything. Mamma got to

0:11:54.600 --> 0:11:56.120
<v Speaker 1>catch up with you and looking forward to the release

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of weeks time. I hammad all are

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in the alliance is chiefly can advise and Bloomberg opinion

0:12:01.360 --> 0:12:13.760
<v Speaker 1>columnist on the road ahead. Do you want to guess

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on the phone, I'm pleased to say, is Francisco Blanche

0:12:15.760 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Bank for America the lower head of commodities and derivatives research.

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.559
<v Speaker 1>What a pleasure privilege to have Francisco with us on

0:12:21.600 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the show in the morning, like this morning. Francisco, let's

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:28.080
<v Speaker 1>talk about the potential the Opeque glass together with Russia.

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:29.840
<v Speaker 1>You can get back together at some point in the

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>near future and strike a deal. Um, hey, John, thanks

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:38.520
<v Speaker 1>for having me on the show. Um, I'm not sure. Um,

0:12:38.760 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if they'll they'll come in and have

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a deal anytime soon, because it's not clear what the

0:12:43.840 --> 0:12:47.600
<v Speaker 1>russianale behind this last move has been um. I think

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>the Russians were very reluctant to cut the supply uh

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.199
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, to deal with this virus UM. They

0:12:54.240 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 1>made their position very clear to the Sudies. The Sudies, um,

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to kind a million a half barrel today

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.000
<v Speaker 1>are supplied. That's the proposal to Helen Table last week.

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And ultimately that either the talks broke down, which is

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what possibility, or maybe the Russians uh swaite houses and

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.599
<v Speaker 1>convince them that maybe you know, it's also about to

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>let the market running course and and ultimately clean up

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the US shell sector. Uh. That both have been wanting

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to do it for a while, and I guess this

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is the opportunity has ever I see in all the

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>research knows this morning from the sophisticates like yourself, Francisco,

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>everybody's talking about hedge exposure. Forget about like Russia loses,

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:36.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody wins, Brazil loses whatever that kind of macro maologna is.

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Explain the hedge exposure right now? Who loses the most

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 1>when you see a twenty move in something that's supposed

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>to be certain? Well, uh, I mean I think I

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.560
<v Speaker 1>think the people that will probably end up listening a

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 1>lot this is those that have hedging mismatches. So there

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 1>could be trading houses UM, traders, UH, potentially some some

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>broken dealers have exposure to this. UM. The principal exposure

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that is not if you're a broker, which if you're

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a broke dealer, UM and UM, and it could also

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be I mean and and Frankly, the biggest losers are

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be the oil companies themselves that have not hedged.

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And remember a lot of companies were underheaded because at

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the end of last year we had something called the

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Phase one US China trade deal, which was supposed to

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:30.720
<v Speaker 1>put the global economy back on track. We were supposed

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to see a restocking cycle of manufactured goods. We were

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:37.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to see a stronger economy. And I think a

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of people may have actually just lightened up on

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>their hedging heading into the first half, which which and

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>those are the ones that are gonna be heard the most. Now,

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:49.160
<v Speaker 1>who benefits UM, I think it's gonna be consumers benefiting here. Obviously,

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 1>consumers in many parts of the world are are not

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>really traveling that much because of the coronavirus but if

0:14:55.080 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>you are able to travel, you're going to get a

0:14:56.880 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>pretty good deal with with the drop in fuel prices

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that we're saying right now. Francisco, I'm looking right now

0:15:03.080 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>at the cash bond market, the high yield bond market,

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>which actually opened it eight on Wall Street, and we're

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>seeing just some violent moves in the shale debt. We're

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at forty moves lower, huge, huge kinds of shifts,

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering going forward, is this going to reshape

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 1>the shale industry profoundly and actually curtail production in the

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>US for the longer term. Um So, I think the

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>answer to those questions, both of those questions is yes,

0:15:32.040 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>we will see a car talent of production and we

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>will see a profound impact on the industry. Remember, this

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>industry has been already UM hit in all fronts. During

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>the industry, UH probably wasted about a hundred dollars of

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>investor money, both in terms of equity and debt issuance,

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>So very few investors actually want to own any any

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>energy to begin with. Um And I think this this

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>last low is going to hurt the particularly the levered players,

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the smaller players, those you mentioned high yield remember high

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:11.600
<v Speaker 1>yields UH characterized not only because it has a wider

0:16:11.600 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>differential to investment great debt, but also because has shorter maturity.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 1>Um So, a lot of this death is due in

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the next twelve eighteen months, and that's that's gonna that's

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna come to the front. And then the other thing

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna happen is banks are probably gonna look at

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:29.160
<v Speaker 1>their reserve based lending practices and reduced the money that

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>they land um that they lend the the the oil

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and gas developers against their assets. So so we're gonna

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>see a very meaningful reduction in capital right to where

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we were a month ago, which was already pretty bad.

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>RecA San Francisco, just to jump in with, we're exploring

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>different parallels. Just give me a snapshot of where we

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>are right now. The supply demand dynamic just quite simply

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>compared to where we were in fifteen sixteen when we

0:16:56.440 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 1>saw these kind of things plank out, Now in days

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>similar worse. What is it right now? Um So, So,

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think from a demand standpoint, this is definitely way worse.

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>We're going to see a global demand construction this year,

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.920
<v Speaker 1>most likely for oil and UH, and we haven't seen

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>one since put us on eighth plus and nine. So

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in terms of demand, it looks a little more like

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 1>eight or nine than definitely on it does like fifteen

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen. From a supply standpoint, it's unclear how much

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>this audis are going to be ramping up supplies here. Um,

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 1>they've aggressively is counted their crewed and uh, and there

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>is talk about South increasing production over ten million barrells

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a day, maybe over eleven million dollars a day. There's

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:40.560
<v Speaker 1>different numbers they're throwing around, but but you know, definitely, Uh,

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.399
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be it's going to be almost just

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 1>as battles fifteen sixteen. It's almost in a way it

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:47.919
<v Speaker 1>is a combination of eight and fifteen and sixteen pretty

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:49.760
<v Speaker 1>bad for oil prices. That's when we think we could

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:52.439
<v Speaker 1>go back into the twenties year for brand. What is

0:17:52.440 --> 0:17:56.119
<v Speaker 1>the ramifications going back into the twenties for brand and

0:17:56.160 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent seated West Texas Intermediate For America's will independence

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 1>do we sacrifice that is Permian Basin shuts down? Um, well,

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>we will definitely see a pullback in in supplies, and uh,

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>it will hurt American's energy independence. But here's the good news.

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.000
<v Speaker 1>We know we can create America's energy independence again at

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:20.640
<v Speaker 1>prices of forty forty five floors barrel, which are still

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 1>very very good for consumers. So um. While as while

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>as I'm certainly concerned about the industry and certainly concerned

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>about the potential fallout of this move, I will also

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>say that that that if prices were to rise lords barrel,

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we will get the industry back back up and running.

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So so I think, I mean, I think that it's, um,

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely gonna be a blow against the U S

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:52.119
<v Speaker 1>energy independence story. Um, But but it's the blow that

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>is is manageable for consumers. Um. The question we have

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to ask ourselves is going to be a big blow

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:00.160
<v Speaker 1>to some states in particular like Texas and Oklahoma. Who

0:19:00.200 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>was the last time or do they have a more

0:19:02.280 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>diversity of economy and they can hand a little better.

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's I think a big, big question mark

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:10.120
<v Speaker 1>out there. This has been wonderful. Franstance, good Burns, thank

0:19:10.119 --> 0:19:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you so much, greatly greatly appreciated with Bank of America.

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring a John Raith show, UBS, head of UK

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.359
<v Speaker 1>rate Strategy, joined us on the phone. John fantastic to

0:19:26.359 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>have you with us. I was up waiting for the

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>bond market to open up last night and just wow

0:19:31.080 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to see the long end come in forty three basis

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>points and dropped like a stone beneath one percent your

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 1>first stage, John, I mean, this is just a colossal

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.760
<v Speaker 1>flight to safety going on everywhere. Um. We haven't seen

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.439
<v Speaker 1>anything like this, of course in the past, and um,

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>and the reasons are well understood. You know, we're seeing

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>a perfect storm essentially, which is forcing huge waves of

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>money into the bond markets. Front end yields now everywhere, um,

0:19:57.359 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>sort of crashing down towards zero or even well but

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>low in certain markets. And as a result, money now

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of flooding further down those yeel curves as as

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, investors run for cover. So that's you know,

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:11.359
<v Speaker 1>everything going into the bond markets and pushing these yields

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to unprecedented levels. John, Lisa and I have been talking

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 1>about what we're modeling in the bond market. What are

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>we modeling now, zero race on FED funds, recession perhaps inevitably,

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>what are we talking about now? Yeah, I mean we're

0:20:23.040 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we're rapidly heading there. Certainly if you look at the

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>sid funds features. John, You know, you can see that

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the markets anticipating the rate getting very close to zero

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in in fairly short order, as it is um in

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>the UK. Clearly in the Eurozone we're already well into

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>negative territory and markets expecting to go deeper into that.

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing that's different. You know, we have

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>seen short yields at these levels in the past. If

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at see your treasuries for example, for all

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the sort of headlong fall, we're still fifteen basis points

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>or so above the levels we got to back in

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of two thousand and eleven UM. What's different is

0:20:57.160 --> 0:20:59.719
<v Speaker 1>these long yields. They've never been down at these levels um.

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:02.160
<v Speaker 1>And it is a sign that the markets think, essentially

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.439
<v Speaker 1>it's going to take even longer for any sort of

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.880
<v Speaker 1>recovery to build, and so people are happy to buy

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>longer bonds at these levels as well. John, What does

0:21:09.640 --> 0:21:14.040
<v Speaker 1>your world tell central bankers? Just very simply, if we

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>impute deflation in disinflation is suggests they're far far behind.

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>What does it tell them? And can we see central

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 1>bank action this morning? I mean, it's it's certainly possible, Tom,

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:29.840
<v Speaker 1>But I think what it tells them, or rather what

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 1>they'll use the market moves more precisely to tell fiscal

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>authorities is that they have done or are expected to do,

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>in the case of those who haven't already reached the

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 1>zero lower bound, everything in their power. You know, they

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:45.520
<v Speaker 1>will cut raps to the floor if if they haven't already,

0:21:46.200 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>they will engage in more asset purchases. But when yields

0:21:48.560 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>are at these levels, it's telling you, I think that

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 1>they have run out of road, or that they don't

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have tools which are going to materially change the trajectory here. Therefore,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the focus needs to turn to governments and the ability

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of fiscal the seed to try and um well at

0:22:02.520 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this stage, pushing the expected impact on demand, and then

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>try and sort of lift these economies and get them

0:22:07.359 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 1>moving forward again. I want to pick up exactly on

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.000
<v Speaker 1>that point, the idea that the market is implying that

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>central banks around the world are out of about of tools.

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Tom John, I'm looking right now fed funds futures pricing

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:22.080
<v Speaker 1>in basically zero interest rates in the United States over

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the next few meetings, and it's quickly coming in. And

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking meanwhile at the fact that the yield curves

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>are just collapsing. We are seeing an absolute flattening. The

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>implication here, John, no inflation, This is not going to

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>work period. So I think that's what we're seeing off

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the back of another massive move lower in crude. And John,

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:40.720
<v Speaker 1>there's another thing we've got to think about to the

0:22:40.760 --> 0:22:43.400
<v Speaker 1>dynamic that leads a just pictured for us, for our

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.679
<v Speaker 1>listeners on radio, when the Fed cuts rates, we're not

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just adjusting the front end to that reality. We seem

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to be pushing it right the way through the curve.

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So when the Fed comes down fifty basis points tens thirties,

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they start to rally too. We used to be able

0:22:56.480 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>to generate what's called that bull steam in a way,

0:22:58.440 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you start to aggressively pull down the run end and

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you get a little bit of a lift at the

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>back end. Why an't we seeing that this time around? Yeah?

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think part of this is the view

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>that you know that the market of concluding central banks

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>do not have the ability to lift inflation and medium

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>term growth forecast. I mentioned that, See, your treasury yields

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>are still above the levels they got to in in

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eleven. At that time, ten your treasury

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>yields were up close to two percents, a way above

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>where we are now. Because of that all steepening, as

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned, John, and some trust that, you know, the

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>measures taken by the central banks would reflate these economies

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>that seems to have gone um and they will do

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 1>what they can. They're obviously also provide liquidity measures and

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>try and avoid any sort of deterioration in the situation

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>as a result of a credit runch. But ultimately, you know,

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 1>as they deploy all of the tools in their in

0:23:48.000 --> 0:23:51.880
<v Speaker 1>their in their ammunition box, if that isn't enough, then

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy is going to have to come to the

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>rescue sooner rather than later. Let's talk about some of

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the other tools at central banks have. What are the

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.320
<v Speaker 1>key intervene since that we should be looking for at

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this point, given the fact that we are seeing stress

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>pick up in report markets and other key areas of

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:11.919
<v Speaker 1>the financial system. Well, interestingly, I mean, we were so

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 1>happens in the UK that we've got the budget coming

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in a couple of days in the middle of all

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of this and all the measures that are being discussed

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>now the focus has turned away from all the sort

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 1>of typical you know, fiscal measures and investment and infrastructure

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>plans and things, and towards the short term measures that

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to help in the anticipated situation confronting corporates.

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 1>That will certainly include the provision of liquidity and as

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I said, any survival business having access to credit at

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>fair and reasonable prices. As the banks sort of fight

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>on various different fronts, um, the governments are keen to

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>make sure that doesn't get passed on through higher borrowing

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>cost to companies. I think the governments are going to

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>bring in measures like giving companies longer to pay their

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>their their taxes and addressing sort of supply chain disruption

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>that comes about on the back of the pretent short

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>disruption coming from the coronavirus situation. As all of these

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>supply chains, um, you know, get get damaged along the way.

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So you know, the intent is for governments to do

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:11.879
<v Speaker 1>what they can and central banks of course as well,

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to try and ensure that any viable companies are able

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to continue functioning as well as possible and don't get

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>unfairly and you know, long term detrimentally impacted by by

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>these sort of short term problems coming down their supply chains.

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And through the banking system. John, stay close for our

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>listeners worldwide, just tune again. We will go commercial free

0:25:32.840 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>as much as we can over the next couple of hours.

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Right here on Bloomberg. Surveillance equity futures are limited down

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>so and I have a read for you there. Where

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 1>I do have a read is on the SMP five

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>spider et F and a pre market down around about

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>five point nine four for any of you thinking about

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the cash open now at nine thirty. The rules as

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>follows the SMP five hundred. This is a level one

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:56.600
<v Speaker 1>breach can drop seven percent from the previous close. This

0:25:56.680 --> 0:25:59.880
<v Speaker 1>is after fifteen minutes, and then trading will be halted

0:26:00.040 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>the fifteen minutes if you have a gap blow up

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.879
<v Speaker 1>of more than seven percent off the fifteen minutes. So

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of levels you've got to think about

0:26:07.640 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>today session. The kind of things that I didn't expect

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to be talking about at the beginning of twenty twenty,

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.720
<v Speaker 1>but here we are. They've been hugely debated over the

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 1>years and rarely used, particularly at that kind of fifteen

0:26:19.480 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>minute hall, but in today's day and age, I mean,

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 1>I get it a long time ago where it was

0:26:24.960 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>yelling and screaming on the floor and all the romance

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.199
<v Speaker 1>of the exchange today it seems almost quaint. Well actually,

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>some people are saying that it's actually exacerbated some of

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the price moves overnight and other markets, because you have

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the US market halted, and the implication to other markets

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>is that things are so terrible that things had to

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>be frozen, and that's sort of one concern people have.

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I'd let it go. Um, you know, my basic point

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 1>uh with it is it's quaint and it will be tested.

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 1>It will be interesting to see what we see this morning,

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>but the point is we will get when open the

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>vict I haven't even correlated where the vixes. There's some

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.199
<v Speaker 1>good no time there over the over the weekend, but

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>within the data check I'm looking at euroswissy one oh

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>five eight four four. George serve els with that incredibly

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:11.439
<v Speaker 1>important note for Deutsche Bank, and you know you wonder

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 1>here and that, where are the surprises going to be

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>given these market moves? John, what's the surprise you see?

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>We'll come back to John Wright in a minute. The

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>surprise for me was just saying the move in oil,

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 1>not that we didn't expect the move lower of course

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>we did. But to see crude gap lower by thirty

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>one percent is stunning and many of us, of course

0:27:26.960 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>got up early for the European open this morning just

0:27:29.160 --> 0:27:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to see this series of red headlines just crater through

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the bloomberg, the decks falling as much as seven point

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 1>four percent set to went to bear market, the stocks

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>fifty down four point seven percent set to enter a

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>bear market is stock six hundred the foot seat. These

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.679
<v Speaker 1>headlines just kept coming through the terminal at this brutal speed,

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>And when you see things lighting up that way, I

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>think at least it just adds to the panic of

0:27:50.960 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the moment, isn't it. Absolutely? Also the question is where

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 1>are the stress points? Again? I go back to, you know,

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the currency markets, in particular the

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>japan is yen very much in focus, with a dollar

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 1>plunging three versus the yen, raising questions about whether this

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is margin trades being unwound, whether this is sort of

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:13.160
<v Speaker 1>leverage currency bets uh and and sort of when does

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the Japanese government step in, given the fact that their

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>economy is not doing well and wasn't doing well ahead

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 1>of the coronavirus. Away from the major Paris, folks, and

0:28:21.000 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>this is inside baseball. But you look at dollar yen, yeah,

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>you look at euro yen yeah? How about something like

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:32.520
<v Speaker 1>yen Singapore dollar. It's eight standard deviations off trend. All

0:28:32.520 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you need to know is that's worse than a medical chart,

0:28:35.359 --> 0:28:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, I mean, eight standard deviations is a huge,

0:28:38.640 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>huge move. John, I look at these distortions in the market,

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sorry central bankers have to have to. I'll

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>give you a worse currency pair than that awaging CRONI

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>US at the Japanese yen at one point overnight, a

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>six percentage point move on a currency path. Unreal. Let's

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:54.800
<v Speaker 1>turn back to John right, Chann we and talk about

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the next central bank move. US had a UK right

0:28:56.880 --> 0:28:59.520
<v Speaker 1>strategy still with us, John. On Thursday, there's an a

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>c being meeting. Imagine President the Guard wanted a little

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more time to get a feed under the desk

0:29:04.120 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and get used to her surroundings. How difficult does it

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.960
<v Speaker 1>hurt for her right now to get that government council

0:29:09.080 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 1>on site to deploy something this Thursday? I mean unbelievably difficult,

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>because unlike the others, although everyone's rapidly heading that way,

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you know they have to a large degree and has

0:29:20.280 --> 0:29:22.000
<v Speaker 1>been the case for a world run out of ammunition.

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:24.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the markets expecting I think another sort of

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty five basis points of ETV easing over the sort

0:29:28.120 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>of of course of the rest of this year. But

0:29:30.520 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, given where they're starting from, it's really questionable

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>whether that's going to have any impact on anything. They

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>can obviously resume, step up intensify government bomb purchases, but

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.480
<v Speaker 1>they need to change issuer limits to be able to

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>do that in any significant way. John, this is so important.

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Mark they're being overcome by events in the event is

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>disinflation and outright deflation. I mean, how does central banks

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>act to the impulse of disinflation that we're living right now?

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>This is more me Um. Well, and you know if

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>they'd had ammunition then clearly that they would they would

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>be under pressure to deploy in a very significant way,

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:09.480
<v Speaker 1>which is why we're pricing in what we are for

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the FED for example, and to a degree the Bank

0:30:11.720 --> 0:30:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of England in terms of ray cuts and Kewie and

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>so on. As I say, the ETP is already there,

0:30:15.480 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 1>so um that the sort of pressure on fiscal policy

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be even more significant and come even earlier.

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>There then you have the problems of course in the

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Eurozone of the fiscal Compact and the either unwillingness or

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 1>inability of governments to borrow within those rules. So you know,

0:30:31.560 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 1>the problems there are even more intense at a time

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.239
<v Speaker 1>when monetary policy has its foot to the floor, and

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.520
<v Speaker 1>yet we are now being assailed by this perfect storm

0:30:41.520 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of events all pushing in the same direction in a

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>very severe and almost unprecedented way. I mean, it really is,

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, emergency stations for all of these central banks

0:30:51.000 --> 0:30:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and governments, and in the case of the the Eurozone,

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the monetary policy makers are pretty much run out of road,

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and the fiscal policy makers are constrained are these rules.

0:31:00.720 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's probably an even more severe situation and

0:31:03.440 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>even more worrying one there than elsewhere. I would argue, John,

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we would saw this morning two year in five year

0:31:10.000 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>UK rates fall below zero for the first time, and

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what is the prospect of negative rates over

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>in the United Kingdom as well as potentially even the

0:31:20.400 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 1>United States. Yeah, I mean, we had guilt yields. They're

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 1>back out sort of zero or slightly above now, but

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>we did have as you say, short to Sam guilty

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>eels drop below zero. They can certainly go lower. Still,

0:31:31.880 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you know there is this this mantra now that it's

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 1>about the return of capital, not the return on capital,

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>and short dated sovereign bonds of well rated issues are

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are the safest status out there, so people will keep

0:31:43.520 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>buying them even at negative yields in this sort of environment.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:50.080
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the swaps, market rates are still

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>some way above zero in the UK in the US

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and likely to stay there as long as both the

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.120
<v Speaker 1>central banks say, you know we can cut, we will

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>cut towards zero. Going negative brings counterproductive consequences by squeezing

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>banks margins excessively. The markets, the financial markets so far

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>have leaved that um that line, and therefore swap rates

0:32:12.320 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>I think have a very hard floor somewhere around twenty

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.960
<v Speaker 1>five basis points or so, which we're sort of rapidly

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>heading towards. But I don't think they can go negative

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 1>unless negative policy rates becomes more realistic. I think we're

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 1>still some way from that in markets like the UK

0:32:28.000 --> 0:32:30.560
<v Speaker 1>in the US, John Greater catch, you appreciate your time

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:32.680
<v Speaker 1>on such a busy morning. This morning, John right there

0:32:32.960 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 1>of Ubs, Gina Martin Adams running all of Bloomberg Intelligence

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>equity for US as well. Corporations after price and disinflation

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 1>deflation as well, do they have sector to sector with

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>your vast team that you've got, folks that takes up

0:32:56.080 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a football, it's like a football field of securities research.

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 1>You look at your team. Do corporations have the elasticity,

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the malee ability to adjust to what we see on

0:33:07.120 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 1>our screen? You know? I think it depends on what corporations.

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Obviously energy companies are at the center of weakness, but

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:17.760
<v Speaker 1>if you look at you look at consumer staples companies,

0:33:17.800 --> 0:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at healthcare companies, you look at even technology companies,

0:33:21.080 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a completely different ball game. So I think what

0:33:23.440 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you need to do is be a bit discerning in

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>within your equity market exposure. Obviously, the value in high

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.480
<v Speaker 1>vall stocks are going to continue to suffer. Obviously the energy,

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the industrials and materials names are going to

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>continue to suffer. But there are potential beneficiaries. And I

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:40.800
<v Speaker 1>think over the course of this day, you're going to

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>see some cooler heads start to prevail, and you're going

0:33:43.560 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to see people start to think about Okay, what do

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.440
<v Speaker 1>zero percent interest rates and thirty dial dollar oil prices

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:54.640
<v Speaker 1>really mean for behavior longer term and function functionally? They

0:33:54.720 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 1>mean it's effectively a tax cut for the U. S.

0:33:57.120 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Consumer once we get through coronavirus. It's very supportive and

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>very stimulative. It's hard to see in an environment of

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>panic and an environment like this, but the reality is

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in this cycle, we've dealt with a lot of shocks.

0:34:11.040 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Two thousand eleven, we had a contraction in GDP growth

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for a quarter. We almost had a contraction in GDP

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:20.160
<v Speaker 1>growth as well. So I do think that markets are very,

0:34:20.239 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>very volatile in the short run, but ultimately typed. This

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:28.040
<v Speaker 1>type of panic behavior creates an opportunity for investors. What's

0:34:28.040 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>the panic in the bank stocks? As John was talking about,

0:34:31.719 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 1>what's that implying? I mean, it's the bank stocks are

0:34:34.719 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 1>also value stocks, right, values getting thrown completely out. We

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.000
<v Speaker 1>got and we did a little bit analysis of the

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:44.560
<v Speaker 1>momentum relative to value trade. It's very typical that what

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you see in an environment of markets following value stocks

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.280
<v Speaker 1>fall the most. It also is a function of interest

0:34:50.360 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>rates are falling, right, the yield curve is still very flat.

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Interest rates are falling, so there's an assumption that interest

0:34:55.520 --> 0:34:59.120
<v Speaker 1>margin is going to get squeezed. Obviously, capital markets activity

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be very very light for the first

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>quarter at the very least, because there's no activity their

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:07.400
<v Speaker 1>high beta, so they also are going to fall faster

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>than the market. So they're unfortunately just in a bad

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 1>position sort of structurally. Now, big big stocks like JP Morgan,

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 1>big companies like that, they're just getting diseaser babies that

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are getting thrown out with the bathwater. And I'm looking

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:22.680
<v Speaker 1>John at JP Morgan, I'm trying to do the math now.

0:35:22.680 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's down twenties something from the peak from

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>thee on the year basis. You know, from the peak

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:33.319
<v Speaker 1>it's trading at nineties seven right now. Dividend the north

0:35:33.320 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of three percent on JP Morgan, on the likes of

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Will's far north of five percent. Obviously, in an environment

0:35:39.920 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>like this, the dividendials are gonna look nice because the

0:35:42.480 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>stock is adjusting so quickly, and the dividends may well

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>change on some of these big energy players, on some

0:35:47.080 --> 0:35:48.960
<v Speaker 1>of the big financials as well. I also think it's

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 1>always worth emphasizing that point. But income in equities right now,

0:35:53.800 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 1>it must look ridiculously attractive China. It is, though, I

0:35:57.040 --> 0:35:59.399
<v Speaker 1>think you again have to pick your spots carefully because

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>if you'd of segment the income stream the dividend income

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>payers in the SMP five D, you look at the

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:08.120
<v Speaker 1>highest yielders, they're actually becoming higher and higher beta stocks.

0:36:08.120 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean many of them are energy companies. Many of

0:36:11.560 --> 0:36:15.319
<v Speaker 1>them are you would qualify them as near junk the risk, right,

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's the risk. So you want to be really

0:36:17.080 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>careful on the divenand sustainability as you make that point.

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I actually don't think the financials difendstainable sustainability is an

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>issue at all. I think it's very sustainable. The financials

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.800
<v Speaker 1>never took on leverage this cycle. They're very low leverage,

0:36:28.880 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>especially relative to where they were in the last cycle. However,

0:36:32.080 --> 0:36:34.479
<v Speaker 1>the energy companies are certainly at risk, and you're seeing

0:36:34.480 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>that reflected in energy stocks. I mean, small cap energy

0:36:36.560 --> 0:36:39.080
<v Speaker 1>stocks dropped ten percent on Friday. They're going to get

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>absolutely crushed again. What are they going to stay in business?

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Do they have the solveigncy liquidity issues that Lisa Bramwitz

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 1>is talking about some of the small caps probably not,

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:50.120
<v Speaker 1>And we've already seen a bankruptcy and small cap energy.

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>This year we'll probably see a couple of more because

0:36:52.800 --> 0:36:55.479
<v Speaker 1>it's not sustainable. At a level of thirty dollars twenty

0:36:55.520 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>five dollars, these companies will not be able to stay

0:36:57.480 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in business. Uh, John the two year German zero point

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>nine seven three straight down, No no capture yet, absolutely incredible.

0:37:06.440 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Jenne Fan Tansy to catch out with you. What a

0:37:08.239 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 1>morning busy for everyone, and thank you very much for

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>being by the Sumple impact right he out. If you're

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.719
<v Speaker 1>fighting for a wild card spot and you go out

0:37:25.760 --> 0:37:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to the West Coast and you play the three patsy

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>teams of the National Hockey League and you go L

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 1>L L, that's not a good thing. We thought he'd

0:37:36.480 --> 0:37:38.920
<v Speaker 1>be out today, not with the virus, but just suffering

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:42.200
<v Speaker 1>with the Toronto maple Lea's Luke Kawa joins us this morning.

0:37:42.239 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean before they went out into the West Coast swing,

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that's supposed to be www, right, I mean, but like

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:50.799
<v Speaker 1>whenever anyone goes on the West Coast swing, they was right,

0:37:50.800 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Like the Penguins just did that West Coast swing right

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>before the leaves and they went and three too. But yeah,

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>if I if I had to stay at home with

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>a broken ego. I'd be at home every day. So

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we're we're in the office again today. Look how with us?

0:38:02.680 --> 0:38:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And he was exceptionally strong over the weekend. Look, you

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:11.080
<v Speaker 1>put out a spectacular chart of the volatility of the

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>ten year yield, and are you willing to say we're

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>back to Lehman territory? Oh no, we're We're above that.

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>It's like the the t y VIX, which is the

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>it's the same construction methodology as a VIX, So it's

0:38:23.520 --> 0:38:26.399
<v Speaker 1>actually measuring the volatility of the price and the ten

0:38:26.480 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 1>year note rather than rather than the yield. So you

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:31.960
<v Speaker 1>you could say just because of base effects, uh, you know,

0:38:32.040 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you should be thinking you're getting jump here as we

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 1>approached zero. But yeah, that we got as high as

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:41.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially fourteen seven five I believe this morning. What that

0:38:41.640 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>means in practical terms is essentially you're betting for the

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:48.360
<v Speaker 1>tenure note to move about one percentage point per day,

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>which is just a crazy degree of volatility in bonds expected.

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:56.040
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, that's that's happened when you draining electricity in

0:38:56.080 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Manhattan and loaded up the three Bloombergs this morning, what

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 1>did you see on the screen. Oh, when I loaded

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:03.920
<v Speaker 1>up this morning. The main thing that saw that you know,

0:39:03.960 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>freaked me out and is freaking and everyone out, is

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the the extent to which how quickly this became credic

0:39:09.840 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>centric concern. So last week you had a really odd

0:39:13.400 --> 0:39:17.399
<v Speaker 1>dichotomy where you had cd X investment grade and high

0:39:17.480 --> 0:39:21.239
<v Speaker 1>yield widening by you know, meaningful amounts, and stocks were

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:25.319
<v Speaker 1>still up. The amount of that discrepancy was very, very rare,

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and the last time we saw anything like everything exploded.

0:39:30.560 --> 0:39:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Like right now, if you're looking at high yield or

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:37.640
<v Speaker 1>investment grade c d X relative to its three month average,

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>it's we're getting into the six sigmas, to which I

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>know you folks, this is the protection of credit to

0:39:46.480 --> 0:39:51.799
<v Speaker 1>false swaps against all of these troubled debt securities. And

0:39:51.840 --> 0:39:54.919
<v Speaker 1>they're on a trend, and then when they get off

0:39:54.960 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the trend, they go out one or two standard deviations.

0:39:59.120 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Three is normal, four is ugly, and the medical business

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:06.480
<v Speaker 1>six standard deviations is ugly. In this check the late Jack, well,

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:10.040
<v Speaker 1>just six sigma, isn't it. Yeah? That's that's yeah. I

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't I certainly couldn't do it any better. And yeah,

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the this is the yeah, so like this is essentially

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is a lot of this has to

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 1>do obviously with energy and energy being a focal point

0:40:22.520 --> 0:40:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in the high yield universe, but the extent to which

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>this is also in investment grade also really makes you

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>think this is about more generalized credit stress and people

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.479
<v Speaker 1>kind of all jump into the same place at once.

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Which makes these product weird is that everyone's loved hedging

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:40.440
<v Speaker 1>with I, G C, d X, just because you know,

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 1>when everything hits the fan, you know, it has that convexity,

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:45.839
<v Speaker 1>it gets a real jump. But what the what that

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:48.120
<v Speaker 1>means though, is if is if this is the one

0:40:48.160 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 1>that everyone wants to own, it also is the one

0:40:50.400 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that dealers are the most short. So you have the

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:55.319
<v Speaker 1>effect of buying this back just to kind of had

0:40:55.360 --> 0:40:58.840
<v Speaker 1>your exposure. Let me translate this. You own something and

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you want to protect. Shouldn't have guessed it, So you

0:41:01.280 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>hedge with this fancy pants investment, great security. It's gone

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.239
<v Speaker 1>bad in the last twenty four hours, right, Oh it's

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you've if you've hatched with this, it's

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.319
<v Speaker 1>gone good. Your hedge has gone good. The you know,

0:41:12.360 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the underlying market itself definitely not good. But you know,

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the hedges, the hedges performing in a way I think

0:41:18.960 --> 0:41:22.760
<v Speaker 1>people would expect it to at a time like this, which, uh,

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are a lot of things out there

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>that haven't necessarily done that. So look if you as

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.799
<v Speaker 1>you look across asset classes here as the equities kind

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of limited down, uh, the yield curve below one percent

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>for the first time ever, oil falling out of bed.

0:41:36.160 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it panic in the market right now? Is this

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>different than maybe last week? Yeah, I'd say the main

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>thing to watch for, like your your clear sign of panic.

0:41:45.600 --> 0:41:47.520
<v Speaker 1>And I remember this from when I was talking with

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:52.359
<v Speaker 1>Tom on the morning of February and I believe we

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.239
<v Speaker 1>were wondering, like, why the heck this is huge risk off.

0:41:55.239 --> 0:41:57.760
<v Speaker 1>We just had the biggest one day jumping volcualty on record.

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Why are short term treasury yields growing up? And Tom said, oh,

0:42:01.040 --> 0:42:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that's easy there. You know, they're being used as a

0:42:02.719 --> 0:42:05.800
<v Speaker 1>source of funds. Once the treasury market starts to become

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a source of funds, then that probably means we're we're

0:42:09.120 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>in true, true panic. However, things look, you know, I

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 1>you can't not call this panic, but things can get

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:18.120
<v Speaker 1>panicky or panicky or looking at gold here a little

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 1>bit of a bid there that continues that trajectory. So

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>that's just your traditional flight to quality. Look yeah, I

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:27.200
<v Speaker 1>mean the flight to quality message is actually used. Something

0:42:27.239 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>you see very uniformly cross markets. If you look at

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>factors in the equity market, what's held up the best

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:36.239
<v Speaker 1>the profitability factor. If you look at a basket of

0:42:36.280 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Goldman stacks stocks that have strong balance sheets relative to

0:42:40.200 --> 0:42:42.799
<v Speaker 1>the weak ones, that's at its best level since two

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.080
<v Speaker 1>thousand twelve. So this is where people are hiding. It

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to yield, and it's in quality. And although the energy

0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:51.240
<v Speaker 1>companies have one in the yield, they don't have the other. Okay,

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:52.680
<v Speaker 1>well we're gonna do Here's do a data check in

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the market opening. We're thrilled to Mr Kawa and his

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.440
<v Speaker 1>entourage will stay with us through the market opening and

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:01.520
<v Speaker 1>will continue this really sophistic gig conversation, trying to get

0:43:01.520 --> 0:43:05.520
<v Speaker 1>convexity into every third minute discussion as well. Convexity, folks,

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is when you have to get out. It's the acceleration

0:43:08.160 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 1>of trade going the opposite uh way. What you need

0:43:12.360 --> 0:43:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to know right now is many of these safe havens

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 1>have moved and moved abruptly forty five seconds away from

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the market open. Gold up thirteen dollars sixty six ounces,

0:43:22.560 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and critically, Japanese yen right now is testing the strength

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:31.600
<v Speaker 1>that we saw at three a m. And somewhat near

0:43:31.680 --> 0:43:34.480
<v Speaker 1>where we were at eleven pm last night in the

0:43:34.520 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 1>early Asia morning. The en right now, Paul Sweeney one

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:41.600
<v Speaker 1>oh one eighty four, Yes, search for it, as Lucas

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:43.919
<v Speaker 1>is mentioning search for safe haven. We see that again

0:43:43.960 --> 0:43:46.960
<v Speaker 1>at one one eight five. Uh. It's interesting here at

0:43:46.960 --> 0:43:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this looking at crewed here off even here thirty two

0:43:50.560 --> 0:43:53.359
<v Speaker 1>dollars sixty seven cents for w t I right here.

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>So clearly that supply demand issue really weighing on the

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>markets here given the Saudi news. This is Bloomberg Radio World.

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Why we welcome here from New York and Bloomberg eleven

0:44:02.320 --> 0:44:06.000
<v Speaker 1>three oh Sirius XM channel one nineteen Bloomberg one oh

0:44:06.080 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>six one in Boston are special coverage today. We are

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:12.840
<v Speaker 1>commercial free, and we thank our sponsors very much for

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>allowing us to do this today. The Dow opens off

0:44:16.719 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>seventeen hundred points. There's variant limit constraints as well. Paul,

0:44:21.160 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll pick it up here as you look at the data.

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:26.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's something to say, we're down five thousand plus

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:29.200
<v Speaker 1>points from where we were not that long ag Yeah,

0:44:29.400 --> 0:44:31.280
<v Speaker 1>three weeks ago, Tom, we were you know, talking about

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about daily highst almost every day here. So

0:44:34.040 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>what's changed here, Well, what's changed is you know that

0:44:37.000 --> 0:44:40.680
<v Speaker 1>just the outlook for global GDP growth driven by the

0:44:40.719 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 1>pronuct of virus probably picked up as well. The d

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:46.359
<v Speaker 1>X why that blended index ninety four point eight zero,

0:44:46.480 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the yen one two rounded up euro dollar one one

0:44:51.120 --> 0:44:55.120
<v Speaker 1>fourteen sixty four itself. We're down seventeen hundred, make it

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:58.200
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundred points in the dow and we'll settle out

0:44:58.200 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 1>in over the next fifteen minutes or so. The levels

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:06.719
<v Speaker 1>standard and poors five seven zero to seven seven zero

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and did doubt thousand thirty five right now our opening

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 1>bell always brought to you by SEI. Today's competitive marketplace

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:21.520
<v Speaker 1>requires asset managers to become more operationally adept. See how

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you can transform your business with SEIS Global Platform at

0:45:26.280 --> 0:45:30.960
<v Speaker 1>s e I C dot com slash i M S

0:45:31.120 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>as well Brazilian Real looking at e M that's out

0:45:34.200 --> 0:45:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the new levels four point seven seven even Turkish leer

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 1>with all the idiosyncrasies there of the border and with

0:45:41.120 --> 0:45:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Syria and Russia, Turkish lire a week or today, as

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:47.920
<v Speaker 1>well as six point one one Mexican pays one point

0:45:47.920 --> 0:45:50.640
<v Speaker 1>one two, and I bringing up South African rand but

0:45:50.840 --> 0:45:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I can't because Mike my terminals on fire here. Well,

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I I can't remember if I've ever seen a negative

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:02.759
<v Speaker 1>one eight zero zero rowe, no doubt, no I have not.

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:05.320
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're down seven percent here across the equity

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.400
<v Speaker 1>indices right here. Uh, look as we look at the

0:46:08.400 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 1>opening here a couple of minutes into it, you know again,

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>equity markets now just kind of opening up here. How

0:46:14.080 --> 0:46:16.360
<v Speaker 1>do you think? What do you think of these expectations

0:46:16.400 --> 0:46:18.319
<v Speaker 1>for on the average trading desk out there? You are

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:20.960
<v Speaker 1>they saying, hey, we gotta step in here and provide

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:23.719
<v Speaker 1>some support, or are they just kind of saying this

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is really outside of all of our models. Let's stay

0:46:26.520 --> 0:46:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on the sidelines, unless you know, we really have to

0:46:28.480 --> 0:46:31.240
<v Speaker 1>get in there. The main thing I've heard from people

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:33.320
<v Speaker 1>who I've been talking to you over the weekend, because

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone who's been anyone has been in over the weekend

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:40.160
<v Speaker 1>gaming out like what our vulnerabilities, etcetera, etcetera. That's the

0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>main concern. Nobody is trying to get greedy right here,

0:46:43.200 --> 0:46:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Like there's that line when the time comes to buy,

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you won't want to. That's very much the order of

0:46:47.800 --> 0:46:50.760
<v Speaker 1>the day right now. Folks are mainly interested in, Okay,

0:46:50.760 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>where's our leverage, where's our vulnerable positions that are going

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:56.359
<v Speaker 1>to be tough to exit, and let's make sure we

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:59.239
<v Speaker 1>do that now. Look, how can you stay with us

0:46:59.239 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>for a few more minutes, Luke? You've got a pressing

0:47:02.000 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>day calendar as well, Apple Computer negative twenty one. That's

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 1>a seven point five percent move added up over three

0:47:09.000 --> 0:47:11.799
<v Speaker 1>days seven eight eleven. I'm gonna call twelve percent down

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple Computer. How about JP Morgan is another indicator of

0:47:16.560 --> 0:47:20.480
<v Speaker 1>where we are down thirteen percent uh plus nine make

0:47:20.520 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a ten over the last uh two days, So in

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:27.600
<v Speaker 1>three days, that's twenty two ish percent on JP Morgan

0:47:28.120 --> 0:47:30.720
<v Speaker 1>as well, am I as you go with another high flyer,

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Luke Howard driving that big machine that he drives, Tesla

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:38.759
<v Speaker 1>down thirteen percent plus six makes an eighteen nine over

0:47:38.760 --> 0:47:41.480
<v Speaker 1>the last three days. Some of the indications that we

0:47:41.520 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 1>see out there in negative eighteen fifty five on the

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:47.239
<v Speaker 1>down Paul, we haven't. We haven't captured a big yet

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 1>on the opening, have we? No, we really haven't. Here Again,

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we've been sitting down here, you know, Tom down about

0:47:52.200 --> 0:47:54.560
<v Speaker 1>seven percent here and again it's a term that we've

0:47:54.640 --> 0:47:56.160
<v Speaker 1>used a little bit over the last couple of weeks,

0:47:56.160 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>and we've heard some of our strategist talk about it,

0:47:58.200 --> 0:48:01.120
<v Speaker 1>which is price discovery. Here. There's so many new variables

0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace, and we're seeing it on the up

0:48:03.239 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>end down moves. Uh, kind of investors looking for some

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:09.759
<v Speaker 1>levels here. You know, look what a flows ben in

0:48:09.760 --> 0:48:14.719
<v Speaker 1>our our institutions flush with cash right now. That's been

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:16.959
<v Speaker 1>a difficult thing to get a handle on. I think

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:20.359
<v Speaker 1>you know that's Eric ball Tunas, our senior et f

0:48:20.360 --> 0:48:23.240
<v Speaker 1>A strategist, can probably give you a lot better handle

0:48:23.280 --> 0:48:25.520
<v Speaker 1>on that. I I do subscribe to the theory though

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:28.040
<v Speaker 1>that in general coming into this, if you just look

0:48:28.080 --> 0:48:31.320
<v Speaker 1>at kind of notional exposure uh that you would estimate

0:48:31.480 --> 0:48:34.799
<v Speaker 1>through your SMPE, many's kind of the the build up

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in those contracts, etcetera, uh NASDAC to those were those

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:41.239
<v Speaker 1>are relatively high across the asset management space, and it

0:48:41.280 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 1>does suggest you know that We were going into this

0:48:43.960 --> 0:48:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a little a little happier about risk that we had

0:48:46.200 --> 0:48:48.640
<v Speaker 1>been in several years. Look, you can leave. We have

0:48:48.680 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a trading halt. Look here, well this is a level

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:58.880
<v Speaker 1>one trading halt. These have been put in place ages ago,

0:48:59.280 --> 0:49:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and Lee is you know, not to make light about it,

0:49:02.400 --> 0:49:06.359
<v Speaker 1>but this is for the good of discovering market stability

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in our indiscoverable pricing call, isn't it look Howard thinking.

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:49:16.360 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:49:21.719 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio.