Speaker 1: Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to
Speaker 1: the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. Hey, like most of you,
Speaker 1: I had not have had trouble sleeping, but I sleep
Speaker 1: better than ever. And you know what, It's all because
Speaker 1: of a pillow. Mike Lindell's My Pillow has changed my
Speaker 1: life for the better and it works. What makes my
Speaker 1: Pillow so different is their patented adjustable phil Now you
Speaker 1: can adjust a patent and filter your exact individual comfort
Speaker 1: need and get the support you absolutely must have, and
Speaker 1: that means you fall asleep faster, you stay asleep longer.
Speaker 1: It just works. Millions of people have already discovered that
Speaker 1: my Pillow works for them, and now it's time for
Speaker 1: you to experience my Pillow for yourself. Just go to
Speaker 1: my pillow dot com, use the promo code Sean, and
Speaker 1: when you do, Mike Lindell will give you his best
Speaker 1: offer ever. By one my pillow, get another one absolutely free. Now.
Speaker 1: My pillows, made in the USA has a ten year
Speaker 1: warranty and a sixty day unconditional money back guarantee, so
Speaker 1: you have nothing to lose. So get started and get
Speaker 1: to sleep. You crave and deserve my pillow dot com
Speaker 1: promo code, Hannah, and get Mike Lindell's special two for
Speaker 1: one offer. That's my pillow dot com promo code, Sean.
Speaker 1: I don't even know where to begin because the information
Speaker 1: is shocking and more spectacular by the minute, in the hour,
Speaker 1: and uh, we've got a lot of ground to cover today.
Speaker 1: Is just one way to uh say all of this.
Speaker 1: We're learning that apparently Comey shared all his information with
Speaker 1: Muller and was brought in early in the Comy is
Speaker 1: the guy that leaked to the Columbia professor to get
Speaker 1: his buddy Mueller appointed special counsel in the first place.
Speaker 1: Comey is the guy that made it possible by writing
Speaker 1: well first, when he first wrote the exoneration, he's admitting
Speaker 1: Hillary committed numerous felonies about how she mishandled classified information,
Speaker 1: destroyed classified information, how not having her email server in
Speaker 1: a secure place, how it resulted in foreign entities and
Speaker 1: agencies being able to capture the information, and probably the
Speaker 1: thirty three thousand emails. He's the guy, he was the
Speaker 1: one that worked with Struck. And now it gets worse
Speaker 1: from there. And you know, now we've got Struck in
Speaker 1: page discussing how to remove the text messages. We've got
Speaker 1: five months, critical months of text messages between Peter Struck
Speaker 1: and his mistress lawyer girlfriend at the FBI Lisa page
Speaker 1: on how to remove messages, and this it shocks and
Speaker 1: should shock the conscience of every single person. By the way,
Speaker 1: the Judicial Watch chief is urging Sessions to seize FBI computers.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's a bad idea at this hour.
Speaker 1: I think that's actually a pretty good idea, because who knows,
Speaker 1: God knows how long they're gonna last until somebody gets
Speaker 1: in there and takes them out. Um. Now we've got
Speaker 1: talk of a secrets society and the FBI meeting the
Speaker 1: day after all of this, and I'm like, you can't
Speaker 1: make this up in a novel. It's getting so bad.
Speaker 1: You're looking at the biggest abuse of power in the
Speaker 1: history of the United States of America and we still
Speaker 1: don't even have the memo. And the memo, I'm told,
Speaker 1: is the tip of the spear in the tip of
Speaker 1: the iceberg here, and there's so much more that is
Speaker 1: going to be coming, which shows that we really need
Speaker 1: to get to the bottom line of all of this,
Speaker 1: because it's the Constitution that is now in play here.
Speaker 1: You know, when we first had ten thousand texts, now
Speaker 1: we know there are fifty thousand texts between you know,
Speaker 1: Trump hating Hillary, loving Peter Struck and love birds Peter
Speaker 1: Struck and Lisa Page are now under a review by
Speaker 1: the Office of the Inspector General. But we still have
Speaker 1: the five months of missing text messages. How did they
Speaker 1: go missing? How would they not recover a ball later on?
Speaker 1: We've got Bill Benny's gonna join us. He's He's the
Speaker 1: guy that has told us, after thirty or four years
Speaker 1: of the n s A that every text, every email,
Speaker 1: every phone call is metadata stored. Philip Hainey, he was
Speaker 1: the author of Say See Something, Say Nothing. He's another
Speaker 1: guy with thirty plus years experience and a whistle blower,
Speaker 1: and he's the guy that said, oh, when Well Obama
Speaker 1: became president, I was told to destroy all the intel.
Speaker 1: Is one of the founding members of the Department of
Speaker 1: Homeland Security. So you know, we've got the FBI losing
Speaker 1: five months of text messages during v key period, when
Speaker 1: the dossier came out, when Flynn was investigated, when Comey
Speaker 1: was fired, when the Special Council was appointed, when the
Speaker 1: President uh said, yeah, it looks like I was spied upon.
Speaker 1: He was. And we first broke this story almost a
Speaker 1: year ago. That's how long this goes on. And for
Speaker 1: those of you that have been frustrated, why don't we
Speaker 1: get to the conclusion, because it's not how literally they
Speaker 1: don't want us to get to the conclusion. They don't
Speaker 1: want this to unravel the way it's been unraveling here.
Speaker 1: They don't want to be caught in their nefarious and
Speaker 1: illegal activities. But what you have is, and why this
Speaker 1: is so profoundly different and so much bigger than Watergate,
Speaker 1: is we have a group of people that are trying
Speaker 1: to rig and fix pretty much everything, and it starts
Speaker 1: with Hilary yourself. I cannot to this day understand why
Speaker 1: more people were not outraged when Donna Brazil writes a
Speaker 1: book saying she rigged the primary election. How is that
Speaker 1: not huge news? If I'm a Bernie supporter, I'm apoplectic,
Speaker 1: I'm angry, I'm frustrated. Now. I do have a sidebar
Speaker 1: that there were people that were frustrated and angry and
Speaker 1: tried to do something about it, But that's a different
Speaker 1: story for a different day. I would be livid, and
Speaker 1: now we've got the smoking on evidence. And I go
Speaker 1: back to where we were yesterday with Loretta Lynch. Now
Speaker 1: she's in the loop knowing that in fact, Hillary was
Speaker 1: gonna be exonerated and the fix was in. I'll get
Speaker 1: to that in a minute. And then they have Hillary
Speaker 1: with the doscie. What is the doscie really all about?
Speaker 1: Dossier spending twelve million dollars Hillary Clinton campaign money funneled
Speaker 1: through one lawyer, d n C, money that she's controlling,
Speaker 1: according to Donna Brazil, the d n C chair at
Speaker 1: the time, going to the same lawyer, full of lies, propaganda,
Speaker 1: salacious details, unproven, unchecked, never mind unproven, and that is
Speaker 1: to influence the general election, and then being shopped to
Speaker 1: the news media and coordination with Glenn Simpson and the
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton campaign. Okay, so you rigged the primary, why
Speaker 1: not try to rig the general with phony information from Russia?
Speaker 1: I thought the very thing the have said that they
Speaker 1: hated so much. And in the process, the only reason
Speaker 1: you get to remain candidate is because the FBI rigged
Speaker 1: their investigation into you. And they've got the smoking gun
Speaker 1: evidence that James Comey, Peter struck and now appears, others,
Speaker 1: probably Andrew McCabe. Then we got Bruce Oars issues. Then
Speaker 1: we've got Loretta Lynch brought into this and that she
Speaker 1: knew that it was never gonna happen. And the timeline
Speaker 1: for them is devastating. No wonder five months of critical
Speaker 1: text messages disappeared because they're not following any rule of
Speaker 1: law in all of this. You know, I agree with
Speaker 1: Judicial Watch. They're now urging sessions sees the FBI computers
Speaker 1: do it now. I mean, you know, asked Paul Manafort,
Speaker 1: by the way, because FBI investigators seldom hesitated in collecting
Speaker 1: evidence when when they want it, why not do it now?
Speaker 1: At this point, Congress is investigating in the Department of Justice,
Speaker 1: they'll have nothing the FBI, they will have no communications
Speaker 1: with them because they are believing at the highest levels
Speaker 1: in Congress that all of this was abused, you know.
Speaker 1: And then we've got this story out today that you know,
Speaker 1: while FBI Gate, that's the bombshell one after another exploding
Speaker 1: that the manner at the center of the worst scandal
Speaker 1: in the bureaus history. James Comey, Well, he's busy tweeting
Speaker 1: away because you know, Congressman John Ratcliffe tweeted quote that
Speaker 1: thousands of tacks that Trey Goudy and I reviewed today
Speaker 1: revealed manifest bias among top FBI officials against President Trump
Speaker 1: both before and after President Trump was elected. We know
Speaker 1: that they hated both Struck and at Lisa Page hated him,
Speaker 1: you know, f Trump and the rest of it. The
Speaker 1: text between them. But the text then talk about Struck
Speaker 1: in Page referencing a secret society. What's the secret society?
Speaker 1: And a little more than three hours later, the s
Speaker 1: graced that BHI director James Comey appeared to respond to
Speaker 1: Ratcliffe's tweep with a cryptic message, good to read reports
Speaker 1: of people standing up for what they believe in. The
Speaker 1: ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands
Speaker 1: in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands
Speaker 1: at times of challenge and controversy. MLK, which begs the
Speaker 1: question call me the chairman? Was he's a chairman of
Speaker 1: this secret anti Trump society. You know he's so high
Speaker 1: for Lutin thinks he at the end of the day,
Speaker 1: him giving Hillary the pass, him giving her the pass
Speaker 1: meant that she got to continue to run for president.
Speaker 1: They cleared the way for her. If it was Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: he would have been arrested and charged. I mean, it's unbelievable. Anyway,
Speaker 1: you may think back if you remember call Mey's testimony,
Speaker 1: remember was specially it was closely coordinated with the Special Council.
Speaker 1: Remember that a source close to James call me told
Speaker 1: Fox News at the time that the former FBI director
Speaker 1: senate testimony had been closely coordinated with Robert Mueller. Robert
Speaker 1: Mueller didn't have this job, but for James Comey. I mean,
Speaker 1: all of this is so incestuous and so inanely corrupted.
Speaker 1: It should take your breath away in all of this,
Speaker 1: I mean, let me just go over some of the
Speaker 1: more interesting details here, because it's almost like a novel
Speaker 1: being written that you can't believe. And I'll take i
Speaker 1: will say this, And in terms of vindication, I've been
Speaker 1: telling everybody the media is wrong. How could the media
Speaker 1: missed the biggest story of their lifetime, so much bigger
Speaker 1: than Watergate, as they've been focused on a phony Russia
Speaker 1: collusion story. I mean, it's it's you got the Attorney
Speaker 1: General now, the the messages that the FBI is claiming
Speaker 1: to have lost them from a critical time in all
Speaker 1: of this, the fourteenth of December to the seventeenth of May,
Speaker 1: the day that the Special Council gets appointed. Then magically
Speaker 1: the next day they show up again. Now remember and
Speaker 1: that was when Trump thought that he was being wire tapped,
Speaker 1: all these other issues coming up, and James Camey being fired,
Speaker 1: the Special Counsel being named. So the message is missing
Speaker 1: from the entire period when all of this is going down,
Speaker 1: probably would reveal a lot. And now the question is
Speaker 1: how do we retrieve these text messages? How do we
Speaker 1: get them back? Where is the phone? Is it meant
Speaker 1: a data store? Do they have any backups? How long
Speaker 1: is it gonna take? And why does this keep happening?
Speaker 1: Lois learned? Oops? Missing the emails up? Cellary Clinton Ups.
Speaker 1: I deleted them, my bleach bit them, my ass would
Speaker 1: wash them. I broke up my devices up Stebbie Wassonman
Speaker 1: Schultz is I t guy has busted up our drives
Speaker 1: in his garage. It all reeks of lawbreaking, conspiracy and
Speaker 1: obstruction of justice. And that's laughable. They trying to blame
Speaker 1: Samsung for all of this and a mis configuration. Really, Samsung,
Speaker 1: how about instead of making excuses. They do their job.
Speaker 1: You know, this is all part of a much larger
Speaker 1: pattern in all of this. It happens all the time.
Speaker 1: You know, the FBI, remember they destroyed the laptops of
Speaker 1: Clinton aids with immunity deals. Who destroys evidence like that?
Speaker 1: Another corrupt deal in the making. You know, the FBI
Speaker 1: wouldn't be able to look at possible obstruction. They destroyed
Speaker 1: the evidence. Nobody makes that deal within law enforcement and
Speaker 1: Clinton and Clinton broke the law was playing and simple.
Speaker 1: Everybody knew it. And the only reason she got to
Speaker 1: continue was because of this cabal of Lisa Page, Peter Struck,
Speaker 1: James Collmey, Andrew McCabe. Let's find out what Bruce Oars
Speaker 1: involvement in all of this is. His wife was the
Speaker 1: one putting that dossier together for Fusion GPS. He's meeting
Speaker 1: with Glenn Simpson and Fusion GPS. Uh. Fusion GPS never
Speaker 1: corroborated any of the dossier's false elaceous information. You know,
Speaker 1: then you got the text messaging from Struck in Page
Speaker 1: that shows them. Now the Attorney General is brought into this.
Speaker 1: I remember and may Callmey Struck. Another top officials started
Speaker 1: drafting the Clinton exoneration before investigation. Now, Loretta Lynch at
Speaker 1: that point was meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac.
Speaker 1: You know, at the end of June, we still haven't
Speaker 1: talked to Hillary Clinton at that point or the key
Speaker 1: players in that investigation. And then just days later, Lynch
Speaker 1: said she'd stepped beside, she'd accept the FBI's conclusion, and
Speaker 1: then struck text page, Remember struck in page saying we
Speaker 1: needed an insurance policy. Now at this point, struck his
Speaker 1: writing while the timing meaning of the meeting with Clinton
Speaker 1: and and Loretta Lynch on the tarmac looks awful. And
Speaker 1: then Paige says, yeah, it's a real profile encourage and
Speaker 1: she knows no charges will be brought. That's before they
Speaker 1: ever interviewed Hillary Clinton. The fix was in. It was rigged.
Speaker 1: Everything in this case was rigged. It's it's despicable. It
Speaker 1: is we are corrupting the entire constitutional process in this
Speaker 1: country if this is allowed to go on without major
Speaker 1: ramifications for the people involved and jail time for these
Speaker 1: people involved. All right, I'm gonna try and just take
Speaker 1: the time and go through this slowly and explain everything
Speaker 1: to you in light of what we are discovering kind
Speaker 1: of hour by hour and day by day here. Now
Speaker 1: we've there's got to be a way to get these
Speaker 1: five crucial months of text. I know a lot of
Speaker 1: you on Twitter, you're like, all right, release the memo.
Speaker 1: Here's what I've heard about the memo. Let me tell
Speaker 1: you what my sources are telling me. Um. There was
Speaker 1: a letter that was signed by let's say, good Lad,
Speaker 1: Devin Newness, and Trey Goudy that was going to be
Speaker 1: hand delivered to the Department of Justice. Then the Republican
Speaker 1: Party in caucus session decided apparently unanimously that no, we're
Speaker 1: not going to the FB, We're not going to the
Speaker 1: Department of Justice. We're investigating the Department to Justice. We're
Speaker 1: investigating what has gone on here, especially in light of
Speaker 1: the struck Page memos and the missing critical five months
Speaker 1: we've got here. It happened with Loess Learner two years
Speaker 1: before we ever got those emails up. We can't find them.
Speaker 1: Hillary's thirty three thousand deleted emails, acid Wash, bleach bit
Speaker 1: breaking with hammers, with devices, no sim cards, and then
Speaker 1: of course broken up hard drives, and Debbie Wash, theman
Speaker 1: Schultz's I T Guy I guess the lesson here is,
Speaker 1: and don't quote me. If you're in trouble, break everything,
Speaker 1: destroy everything, get rid of everything. Now, forensic people, really
Speaker 1: smart people, are telling me there are ways to recover this.
Speaker 1: It took two years to get lowest learners emails back.
Speaker 1: But the reason they're covering up is because what you
Speaker 1: have is an attempted coup. What you have as an
Speaker 1: attempt to allow the tools of the intelligence, those powerful tools,
Speaker 1: to be used to influence a presidential election, coupled with
Speaker 1: a bought and paid for phony Russian propaganda dossier, and
Speaker 1: then it was used also in the court system, the
Speaker 1: spy on a presidential opposition party in opposition candidate and
Speaker 1: an incoming administration and a president elect. This makes Watergate
Speaker 1: look like, you know, stealing a Snickers bar from your
Speaker 1: local candy store. It's that big, it's that corrupt, it's
Speaker 1: that deep, it's that profound. It should be to everybody.
Speaker 1: And I don't care if you're a liberal, conservative, Republican, Democrat, libertarian,
Speaker 1: you should care because this they've shredded the Constitution, They've
Speaker 1: shredded the Fourth Amendment, and the deep state thought they
Speaker 1: knew better than the American people. Now it's coming. America's
Speaker 1: chickens are coming home to roost all right now till
Speaker 1: the top of the hour one shaunas Or told free
Speaker 1: telephone number. Want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: There's so much to get to here. Um, We've got
Speaker 1: a history. I'm not sure if I ought to end
Speaker 1: up going through all of this, but the history of
Speaker 1: Comey sharing memos with Muller, and you know, I'm telling
Speaker 1: you right now this is stinks to high heaven, and
Speaker 1: I want to go through this a little bit more slowly,
Speaker 1: especially in light of now we have struck in page
Speaker 1: discussing how to get rid of their texts. Um, because
Speaker 1: this is problematic because now you're talking about full on
Speaker 1: obstruction of and probably destruction of evidence, which is part
Speaker 1: of a pattern of Obama administration officials from low as Learner,
Speaker 1: and you know, the officials that we're leading the charge,
Speaker 1: you know, unfairly going after Conservatives with using the power
Speaker 1: of the I R S in that case and the
Speaker 1: I R S so well, the emails are lost because
Speaker 1: of a system crash. Now they're blaming Samsung in this
Speaker 1: particular case. Every time the walls are closing in on
Speaker 1: anybody Obama administration related. Just key evidence just seems to
Speaker 1: magically disappear at just the right time, you know, when
Speaker 1: it keeps happening. You know, it defies logic to believe
Speaker 1: this crap, and it is a bunch of crap, and
Speaker 1: it's a bunch of lies. And you know, there's what
Speaker 1: we're talking about here is this is their go to
Speaker 1: m O. When they are cornered, they destroy Dedie Washsonmon Schultz,
Speaker 1: the I T Aide scandal with the you know, the
Speaker 1: smashed hard drives in the garage. Of course the AIDS
Speaker 1: lawyer denies it. But okay, then you got these newly
Speaker 1: released text messages Peter Struck, Lisa Page, Hillary loving, Trump
Speaker 1: hating you know, individuals, Lisa Pages, the council working closely
Speaker 1: with Andrew McCabe. They're the three that talk about an
Speaker 1: insurance policy. God forbid if Donald Trump wins the election.
Speaker 1: I think we now know what the insurance policy is.
Speaker 1: And then we learned from the text messages yesterday. You
Speaker 1: know that before they even interview Hillary Clinton, that Lauretta
Speaker 1: Lynch knew there was not gonna be any type of
Speaker 1: charges brought against Hillary Clinton. And then you add to
Speaker 1: that what she did, which was so wrong, meeting on
Speaker 1: the tarmac with Bill Clinton. But all you can conclude
Speaker 1: here is that there was a circle of individuals that
Speaker 1: decided that Hillary Clinton had the right to be the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party's choice for president because if the rule of
Speaker 1: law were equally applied to Hillary, she violated numerous laws
Speaker 1: and committed numerous felonies, not the least obstruction of justice,
Speaker 1: destroying subpoena emails, thirty three thousand, acid washing, bleach bit
Speaker 1: mishandling classified information, destroying classified information. You see how it's
Speaker 1: all beginning to tie together here. This is all this
Speaker 1: house of cards is now in the process of crumbling.
Speaker 1: And I know it's taken a long time, and I
Speaker 1: know it gets confusing for a lot of people. I'm
Speaker 1: I'm studying this full time, and I'm telling you I
Speaker 1: can get con used in the middle of this, and
Speaker 1: I'm doing my my best to make sure that everybody
Speaker 1: can fully completely grasp and understand it and reading everything
Speaker 1: possible so I can break it down so we can understand. Here,
Speaker 1: they knew Hillary Clinton wouldn't be prosecuted for the crime
Speaker 1: she committed because they put the fix in struck call
Speaker 1: me exonerating before investigating. Apparently Loretta Lynches in the loop,
Speaker 1: Lisa Pages in the loop, and it appears McCabe is
Speaker 1: in the loop. Alright, So all of those people, now,
Speaker 1: as I've been saying, all these people need to be
Speaker 1: fired and then they need to be investigated, and then
Speaker 1: I would imagine charges need to be brought in these cases.
Speaker 1: That's what That's what I'm suggesting to everybody here. Back
Speaker 1: in May. Remember it was Struck an other top FBI
Speaker 1: officials writing the exoneration statement if they hadn't interviewed Hillary
Speaker 1: or seventeen other key witnesses in the case. I've never
Speaker 1: heard of an exoneration letter being written before the investigation
Speaker 1: has even begun. For the most part, it means it's rigged.
Speaker 1: It means the fixes in Now we learned yesterday the
Speaker 1: Attorney General Loretta Lynch meeting Bill Clinton on the tarmac
Speaker 1: forty minute meeting. They weren't talking about their grandchildren for
Speaker 1: forty minutes at this crucial moment in this timeline here,
Speaker 1: they were talking about exonerating Hillary so that she didn't
Speaker 1: get arrested before the general election. At that point, because
Speaker 1: she was already pretty much had the oh, we knew
Speaker 1: the fix was in. Now we knew that the fix
Speaker 1: was in from the beginning. And then Lynch also told Comey, hey,
Speaker 1: don't call this investigation an investigation, call it a matter.
Speaker 1: You see how it all begins to tie together. And
Speaker 1: then days later, when Lynch said she would step away
Speaker 1: from the email investigation, she says, and this is a
Speaker 1: key moment, she would accept whatever the FBI's conclusion is
Speaker 1: because she had the right to override that. All right,
Speaker 1: So now you got Comy and Struck writing the exoneration.
Speaker 1: Now you got the Attorney General signing off on the
Speaker 1: deal that they exonerate Hillary. And then we learned that
Speaker 1: it's a profile encourage of Loretta Lynch. Two. Uh, it
Speaker 1: was bad timing though, her meeting Bill Clinton on the tarmac,
Speaker 1: But it was a profile encourage considering she knew that
Speaker 1: there wouldn't be any charges brought against Hillary. That's July one.
Speaker 1: They didn't interview Hillary Clinton to the fourth of July weekend.
Speaker 1: It all it was all determined in advance. It was
Speaker 1: a dog and pony show. The fix was in. I
Speaker 1: think about the consequence and what if you fixed a
Speaker 1: race in um in horse racing, and they're big consequences
Speaker 1: for fixing races. What if this point shaving uh for
Speaker 1: betters in basketball games or football games never hear about
Speaker 1: those scandals. Well, what if the fixes in to allow
Speaker 1: somebody that should have been indict and likely put in jail.
Speaker 1: You put the fix in with the highest ranking law
Speaker 1: enforcement officials in the country, the a G and the
Speaker 1: FBI director, to allow one candidate to break laws, they
Speaker 1: cover up for this individual, to allow that candidate to
Speaker 1: defeat the candidate that all of them are on record hating.
Speaker 1: And then in the process of all of this, you
Speaker 1: ignore she rigged the primary election, You fixed her illegal activities.
Speaker 1: Then she buys a phony Russian dossier, and then the
Speaker 1: phony Russian dossier designed to influence the general election, and
Speaker 1: then the dossier full of lies is used to get
Speaker 1: a FISA warrant to spy on the opposition party in
Speaker 1: the lead up to the election and set a trap
Speaker 1: for the president elect and knows around him after the election.
Speaker 1: And you're thinking, Hannity, you've just jumped the shark. All
Speaker 1: of that now is provable. All of that happened in
Speaker 1: the United States of America, and of Lisa Page For example,
Speaker 1: if you're Struck in Page and Lynch, all new charges
Speaker 1: weren't gonna be recommended against Clinton. You've got to imagine
Speaker 1: that Mr Insurance policy discussion, Andrew McCabe himself that he
Speaker 1: knew Hillary was gonna go free. Only people that didn't
Speaker 1: know know it were were us. I guess we're the
Speaker 1: suckers in this game because we're the ones that believe
Speaker 1: in free and fair elections. We don't think the top
Speaker 1: people in our Department of Justice and our FBI are
Speaker 1: gonna betray us this way and put the fix in
Speaker 1: this way. But that's what's happened. We we also need
Speaker 1: to know what Rod Rosenstein's rolling all of this is.
Speaker 1: But if you're counting the characters here, Lisa Page, Peter Struck,
Speaker 1: why are they still working for the FBI? Why is
Speaker 1: Andrew McCabe still working for the FBIO don't care for
Speaker 1: He's retiring in March. Fire him now? And then it
Speaker 1: raises questions about bre Sore. He's meeting with Fusion GPS
Speaker 1: before and after the election. His wife, Nellie is literally
Speaker 1: one of the people hired by Fusion GPS to put
Speaker 1: the salacious phony Russian propaganda dossier together. Why are they
Speaker 1: still working? Why is why is Bruce or still working?
Speaker 1: Where's Rod Rosenstein? I want to know Rod Rosenstein. I
Speaker 1: want to know whether or not he extended the FISA
Speaker 1: warrant when he got into a position of power because
Speaker 1: of Jeff Sessions were recusal in all of this, And
Speaker 1: then the message between Struck and Page and talks about
Speaker 1: a change to Comey's Clinton exoneration letter. I remember the
Speaker 1: statement and the exoneration before investigation originally referenced Clinton's emailing
Speaker 1: President Obama when she was quote on the territory. In
Speaker 1: other words, she was overseas and she is emailing on
Speaker 1: our private server, Barack Obama the president. Now the part
Speaker 1: that mentioned Obama was then altered to say a quote
Speaker 1: senior government official. Okay, Obama does classify as a senior
Speaker 1: government official, but he was the president of the United States.
Speaker 1: Obama had to have known Clinton was using a private
Speaker 1: email server, which he denied. So now he's up to
Speaker 1: his eyeballs in this. And in terms of other developments,
Speaker 1: we've got Republican efforts to release the the memo. You
Speaker 1: gotta keep pressuring your members of Congress release the memo.
Speaker 1: Stay on Twitter, Facebook and all of the and and
Speaker 1: go out there. By the way, I don't except for
Speaker 1: tweeting out aspects of my show. I'm not communicating anymore
Speaker 1: on social media. After we have how many times have
Speaker 1: we been hacked? Now, I mean too many to count?
Speaker 1: Or or what you say? It really takes my voice
Speaker 1: away first of all, say first of all, first of all,
Speaker 1: what the bat you or what you miss me tomorrow?
Speaker 1: I just ordered you to stay home tomorrow. Let's miss me, okay,
Speaker 1: I said you must stay home tomorrow. It's not an
Speaker 1: option to come into work. Is that? Who you're calling yourself?
Speaker 1: Sounds more like a seal to me. So we've been
Speaker 1: hacking and now and now the Turkish whoever this band
Speaker 1: of Turkish hackers have been out there hacking. Everything's actually
Speaker 1: pretty serious. I mean, the cyber warfare that they're reaching
Speaker 1: against people, and I'm really, I'm really it's it's shocking
Speaker 1: how little and Twitter is doing it in more details
Speaker 1: so we can understand. Let me get into greater detail,
Speaker 1: so that the universe cannot hear words. All right, we'll we'll,
Speaker 1: I'll stop being mean. Everyone's gonna say this is me alright.
Speaker 1: So the Republicans are demanding the release of the four
Speaker 1: page We need the release of the memo, and I'm hurt.
Speaker 1: It's gonna shock the conscience. And the release of the memo,
Speaker 1: by the way, is only the tip of the spear
Speaker 1: there too. And now you also have to ask another question,
Speaker 1: where is your media been a year chasing a rabbit
Speaker 1: around a track of a false narrative, of false story
Speaker 1: with breathless and hysterical reporting that came to nothing nothing.
Speaker 1: There's never been any Trump Russia collusion in this, but
Speaker 1: there is. Hillary Clinton bought and paid for Russian lines
Speaker 1: in this, all designed to influence an election, and that
Speaker 1: phony lying documents she paid for used as a a
Speaker 1: predicate to to and as they as the excuse to
Speaker 1: get a FISA warrant at court was lied to with
Speaker 1: with Russian lines that Hillary paid for. It's so corrupt.
Speaker 1: It's one of the biggest scandals in American history. In
Speaker 1: our colleagues and the media missed the whole thing. It's
Speaker 1: gonna be interesting to see and they can't admit their
Speaker 1: own now. They're so they're so married to their own
Speaker 1: phony narrative. You know, words like shock king, jaw dropping, alarming,
Speaker 1: shredding the constitution. People will go to jail. That's all
Speaker 1: the stuff that I hear about those that have seen
Speaker 1: the memo. Why isn't it out handed? It's we're pushing
Speaker 1: to get it out. My sources are telling me probably
Speaker 1: not until next week, but maybe this week. That's what
Speaker 1: they're telling me. And I'm I'm talking to people. I'm
Speaker 1: pushing it every day. There are people in the House leadership.
Speaker 1: They won't even respond anymore to me because I've literally
Speaker 1: I sent text to Paul Ryan. He will not respond anymore.
Speaker 1: He's probably like, oh, telling people, get Hannity off my back.
Speaker 1: He's a pain in my ass. I don't care if him.
Speaker 1: If I want the truth, we need to see the memo,
Speaker 1: release the memo, find the text messages, do your jobs.
Speaker 1: Don't believe We need to know the truth about this
Speaker 1: abuse of power, the weaponization of the powerful tools of intelligence,
Speaker 1: the abuse of FISA warrants, and how the Clinton bought
Speaker 1: and paid for phony dossier was used to spy on
Speaker 1: the Trump campaign. You know, call to oh two two
Speaker 1: to one, Call your members of Congress, although half of
Speaker 1: them are home. You know, when you look at Clinton
Speaker 1: fixed the primary I mean, it's I just keep telling you,
Speaker 1: you know, I don't want to pat This is not
Speaker 1: about patting myself on the back. Everything that we have
Speaker 1: been reporting since last year has now turned out to
Speaker 1: be true, and it's even worse than we thought. And
Speaker 1: there's still so much more to come. And there's so
Speaker 1: many different investigations were involved in now, I mean, it's
Speaker 1: hard to keep them straight. Now, this is only about
Speaker 1: the dossier and the email server scandal and trying to
Speaker 1: fix you know, abusing FISA warrants and trying to fix
Speaker 1: an election and covering it all up, and how corrupt
Speaker 1: the highest members of our intelligence community and our d
Speaker 1: J and our FBI are. But this doesn't even touch
Speaker 1: uranium one, and that may turn out to be a
Speaker 1: much bigger scandal when all said and done. So much happening,
Speaker 1: so much to get to, so little time. All right,
Speaker 1: We've got new gig Ridge coming up today. We've got
Speaker 1: our our experts, Bill BILLNY, Bill BILLNY, and uh Phil Haney,
Speaker 1: you're gonna join us today also, Jim Jordan stops by
Speaker 1: today and much more alright, fighting harder than ever to
Speaker 1: get to the truth. And we're making progress together and
Speaker 1: full vindication is on its way, and I I want
Speaker 1: the memo released. We deserve the memo is the beginning.
Speaker 1: For some of you, you think the memos is the
Speaker 1: end the mount no new, new, new new. I don't
Speaker 1: want you to get your expectator. The memo will show
Speaker 1: widespread abuse of FISA surveillance and other issues, and it
Speaker 1: will name names Beyond that. We've got a long way
Speaker 1: to go from there, but it's full vindication that I
Speaker 1: can tell you. All right. We got new Gang Ridge,
Speaker 1: we got Bill Benny, we got Phil Haney, we got
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan's and Steve Ronaback is back. He lost his
Speaker 1: son three years ago yesterday to a dreamer. We'll continue.
Speaker 1: He learned today in in the thousands of text messages
Speaker 1: that we reviewed, that perhaps they may not have done that.
Speaker 1: There's certainly a factual basis to question whether or not
Speaker 1: they acted on that bias. Were we know about this
Speaker 1: insurance policy that was referenced in trying to prevent uh
Speaker 1: Donald Trump from becoming president. We learned today about information
Speaker 1: that after in the immediate aftermath of his election, that
Speaker 1: there may have been a secret society of folks within
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice and the FBI to include Page
Speaker 1: and Struck that would be working against him. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying that actually happened, but when folks speak in those terms, uh,
Speaker 1: they need to come forward to explain the context with
Speaker 1: which they use those terms. Katy, do you want to
Speaker 1: expound on the secret society idea? Sure? I wish I could.
Speaker 1: I wish I had been the one who either set
Speaker 1: that sent that text, or received it. You have this
Speaker 1: insurance policy in the spring of ten, and then the
Speaker 1: day after the election, the day after what they really
Speaker 1: really didn't want to have happened. There's a text exchange
Speaker 1: between these two FBI agents, these two supposed to be objective,
Speaker 1: fact centric FBI agents, saying perhaps this is the first
Speaker 1: meeting of the secret Society. So of course I'm gonna
Speaker 1: want to know what secret society are you talking about,
Speaker 1: because you're supposed to be investigating objectively the person who
Speaker 1: just won the electoral college Hamersman Gouty With regard to
Speaker 1: these new texts and the idea that there could be
Speaker 1: a special counsel, a second special council requested to look
Speaker 1: into this, how are you pursuing that, Well, these texts
Speaker 1: are incredibly important model for a number of reasons. Uh,
Speaker 1: both what's there and what's not there? So lay aside
Speaker 1: this glaring five month gap and text that the world's
Speaker 1: premier law enforcement agency somehow miss. Lay that aside what
Speaker 1: we have seen, what Johnny and I saw all today,
Speaker 1: it was a text about nay pink text. We saw
Speaker 1: more manifest bias against President Trump all the way through
Speaker 1: the election into the transition. And I saw an interesting
Speaker 1: text that Director Comey was going to update the President
Speaker 1: of the United States about an investigation. I don't know
Speaker 1: if it was a Hillary Clinton investigation because remember that
Speaker 1: had been reopened in the fall of TWI, or whether
Speaker 1: it was the Trump investigation. I just find it interesting
Speaker 1: that the head of the FBI was going to update
Speaker 1: the President United States, who at that point would have
Speaker 1: been President Obaba. Al right, that was Trey Goudy and
Speaker 1: Congressman Ratcliffe. And what what is the secret society within
Speaker 1: the d o J and the FBI that they're talking
Speaker 1: about that convened after the election. Now we have more
Speaker 1: struck and page text messages, and then of course the
Speaker 1: five missing months during the key period of time when
Speaker 1: we'd want to know things. Now we're beginning to put
Speaker 1: together a scenario here. Remember the first batch of struck
Speaker 1: In and Page text messages. They go on to say,
Speaker 1: I want to believe the path you throughout for consideration
Speaker 1: in Andy's office. We believe Andrew McCabe that there's no
Speaker 1: way he, meaning Trump, gets elected. But I'm afraid we
Speaker 1: cannot take that risk. It's like an insurance policy in
Speaker 1: the unlikely event you die before your forty Okay, Now
Speaker 1: we put that together with the text message that came
Speaker 1: out yesterday, and in one exchange, Struck in Page or
Speaker 1: talking back and forth, and they're specifically discussing Loretta Lynch's
Speaker 1: announcement that she's gonna accept the FBI's decision on the
Speaker 1: Clinton email investigation. And anyway, then the story about Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton meeting Loretta Lynch on the tarmac comes up, and
Speaker 1: Struck text page, Uh, the timing looks like hell, and
Speaker 1: then she writes this is awful timing. In a later exchange,
Speaker 1: he adds it's a real profile encourage and she knows
Speaker 1: no charges will be brought. Now we already know that
Speaker 1: Struck and James comey, we're writing an exams narration of
Speaker 1: Hillary months before they ever investigated Hillary Clinton. And if
Speaker 1: you look at the timeline of that text that I
Speaker 1: just mentioned, well that was July one. Hillary Clinton was
Speaker 1: an interviewed till the weekend of the fourth of July,
Speaker 1: three days later, and then this gap of we have
Speaker 1: a five month gap in Oops they're missing, Oops they're gone. Oops,
Speaker 1: we can't find them. Well, at that time, very key
Speaker 1: things happened. The dossier happened, the Flynn interview happened. We
Speaker 1: know that Callmey was fired at that time. Special counsel
Speaker 1: Muller was appointed May the seventeenth, and all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: the text pick up again on May eighteen, so we
Speaker 1: lost five months of text messaging. They ramped up their
Speaker 1: investigation after Trump won the nomination. Now we're hearing about
Speaker 1: a secret society meeting the day after the election and
Speaker 1: Trump actually won, and the FBI edited out communication between
Speaker 1: President Obama and Secretary Clinton and Comey's draft July fifth
Speaker 1: exoneration statement. Why wouldn't it let the public know that?
Speaker 1: And the attorney how did the Attorney General, added Peter Struck,
Speaker 1: How did James call me Hodd to Lisa Page and
Speaker 1: Andrew McCabe all know that they were never going to
Speaker 1: bring charges in Hillary's email investigation, joining us now with
Speaker 1: his insight, former Speaker of the House, Fox News contributor
Speaker 1: new King Ridge. Um, there's a lot to absorb here,
Speaker 1: But as the historian, I've got to ask you to
Speaker 1: look at this from the Watergate perspective. You know, we
Speaker 1: found our eighteen and a half eighteen and a half
Speaker 1: minute gap apparently, and it's a five month gap of
Speaker 1: text messages. Look this, this whole thing. You know, you
Speaker 1: couldn't write a novel like this because it wouldn't be
Speaker 1: believable if if you believe that the text they were
Speaker 1: sending each other was accurate and candid. There there's a
Speaker 1: smoking gun. First of all, that they believe that the
Speaker 1: Attorney General knew that Hussinton would not be charged with
Speaker 1: anything before she was interviewed, which may explain where the
Speaker 1: interview was not under oath, because the whole thing was
Speaker 1: a charade. It also suggest to you that when the
Speaker 1: Attorney General met with President Clinton on that airplane in Arizona,
Speaker 1: and they both probably already knew that they were going
Speaker 1: through a dance but nothing was going to come of it.
Speaker 1: You now have, I mean this idea of four and
Speaker 1: a half months. You know, part of what I don't
Speaker 1: understand is Hillary Clinton's people had to take a hammer
Speaker 1: and bleach in order to try to make sure they
Speaker 1: couldn't find information. Surely somewhere, either the n s A
Speaker 1: or the FBI or somebody is going to be able
Speaker 1: to track down all of these text messages. Um Is,
Speaker 1: there's almost beyond belief that two key players happened to
Speaker 1: lose four and a half months of text months. Wait
Speaker 1: a minute, but but it happened with Lois Larner. Lois
Speaker 1: Learners was gone for two years and then we found them.
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton deleted thirty three thousand subpoena emails, and then
Speaker 1: she acid washed the hard drives with bleach, bleach pit,
Speaker 1: and then she had one of her you know, employees
Speaker 1: smashing any mobile devices with hammers. Debbie Wasson and Schultz's
Speaker 1: I T guy, well, he had broken smashed hard drives
Speaker 1: in his garage, government hard drives. It seems like this
Speaker 1: is now the go to option, just destroy everything. Well,
Speaker 1: and what that, As I've said before talking to you
Speaker 1: both on radio and TV, this is clearly, by any
Speaker 1: plausible standard, the most corrupt senior Justice Department and senior
Speaker 1: FBI we have ever seen in American history. Uh, and
Speaker 1: it's frightening. I mean, here you had the people who
Speaker 1: are supposed to enforce the law who are engaged in a
Speaker 1: a conspiracy to undermine the new president, to protect the
Speaker 1: Democratic nominee, and this there seems something that they're not
Speaker 1: going to possibly avoid having an independent council go go
Speaker 1: into this whole thing, and that you're gonna have comey
Speaker 1: at risk. You're gonna have Remember the deputy who they
Speaker 1: are referring to, whose office they were meeting in, his
Speaker 1: wife had been a candidate for the step for the
Speaker 1: state Senate and I believe got nine hundred thousand dollars
Speaker 1: in donations from the Democrats. So you have a whole
Speaker 1: issue there of whether he should have at a minimum
Speaker 1: recused himself from anything involved. And it's because it's pattern obvious,
Speaker 1: but you know, bias involved. Um, every time you turn
Speaker 1: around in this case, something new comes out and it's
Speaker 1: it's ironically, after all the attacks on Clinton Trump, all
Speaker 1: of the real evidence is coming out about the Democrats.
Speaker 1: And you you will notice one of the texts that
Speaker 1: was not lost was the one where Struck says, you know,
Speaker 1: I really don't want to do the Muller thing because
Speaker 1: I know, as the guy who's been the dead happen,
Speaker 1: there's nothing, there's nothing there there. Well, what about the
Speaker 1: fact that what do you make of the secret society
Speaker 1: that they're discussion discussing here and they're discussing struck and
Speaker 1: page how to remove text messages before the text messages
Speaker 1: went missing. In other words, they have a text out
Speaker 1: there about about eliminating the text that sounds like obstruction
Speaker 1: to me. Well something and then and what you have
Speaker 1: to ask yourself is um whether or not there was
Speaker 1: ever a true secret society? Who did they think was
Speaker 1: in the secret society? Do they think that the deputy
Speaker 1: head of the FBI was and it was his office
Speaker 1: they were talking, And did they think Comey was? He's
Speaker 1: the guy who basically exonerate Hillary Clinton and refuses to
Speaker 1: ask your questions under oath. I mean, just go down
Speaker 1: the list and you have to say to yourself that
Speaker 1: there there is more than enough here already to justify
Speaker 1: a full blown investigation and the just off I'm bringing
Speaker 1: in an the Deployment Council. Here's what I need to
Speaker 1: ask you. This is a very important question. Now, this
Speaker 1: is Now you're right, you couldn't write this in a novel.
Speaker 1: But you have Hillary Clinton. We now know, uh, Donna
Speaker 1: Brazil told us rigged the primary election. Bernie Sanders supporters
Speaker 1: had no shot. It was rigged from the get go.
Speaker 1: Then you've got now evidence that in fact, comey and struck.
Speaker 1: And it looks like Loretto Lynch is in the loop somehow.
Speaker 1: And I've got to believe Andrew McCabe that the fixes
Speaker 1: in on the email server investigation by them. And it's
Speaker 1: profound because they're writing the exoneration before the investigation, which
Speaker 1: you know, they didn't even interview Hillary till July fourth.
Speaker 1: They're doing this in May and and they even take
Speaker 1: away the legal standard gross negligence out of it. They
Speaker 1: take the foreign entities actually hacked into Hillary's email server.
Speaker 1: Then you've got Hillary and her campaign paying twelve million dollars,
Speaker 1: funneling it through a lawyer she's running the d n C.
Speaker 1: According to Donna Brazil, that money is funneled through the
Speaker 1: same lawyer to produce a dossier with Russian propaganda and
Speaker 1: lies so that they can kind of rig the general election. Now,
Speaker 1: then that phony dossier is used to get a FISA
Speaker 1: warrant to spy on an opposition candidate presidential candidate and
Speaker 1: an election year, and then they spy on the candidate,
Speaker 1: and then they spy on the president elect and his team,
Speaker 1: all of which is illegal, and especially fundamentally, she was
Speaker 1: guilty as hell in terms of mishandling classified top secret
Speaker 1: special access program information and destroying such all of that.
Speaker 1: Had she not gotten the past from Come and Company,
Speaker 1: she wouldn't have been the nominee and it would have
Speaker 1: put the party in chaos. So they made a decision
Speaker 1: to put her above the law. I mean, you can't
Speaker 1: write that, and and what I'm saying is indisputable at
Speaker 1: this point. I look, I think you're exactly right. I
Speaker 1: think what you had here is a decision. And this
Speaker 1: goes back to the entire corruption of the Clinton system,
Speaker 1: corruption of the Compty Foundation, the sheer scale of money
Speaker 1: that these people were engaged in, um the degree to
Speaker 1: which they were learning to do things. They basically believed
Speaker 1: that there was no law as far as Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: and Bill Clinton were concerned, and they had an intern
Speaker 1: network of people who came to share this same belief.
Speaker 1: And I mean, that's that's the conclusion I reached is
Speaker 1: that this this was a degree of absolute not even
Speaker 1: thinking about the law. They thought that their job was
Speaker 1: to run America, and if that meant that they had
Speaker 1: to break the law and they had to try to
Speaker 1: destroy Trump, and they had to do a variety of
Speaker 1: the things they were going to do it. And I
Speaker 1: also do you I think the person in some ways
Speaker 1: who has the greatest grievance here has to be Bernie Sanders,
Speaker 1: because it is so clear and he actually accepted it
Speaker 1: and went along with it. All right, let's stay right there,
Speaker 1: Former Speaker of the House, New king Rich is best
Speaker 1: selling book of vengeance. Right as we continue, Former Speaker
Speaker 1: of the House, New king Rich, as we now continue
Speaker 1: our investigation into what has now become a colossal mess
Speaker 1: um the danger here. I want you to I want
Speaker 1: you to put your historian hat on. Watergate was a
Speaker 1: third rate break in to get opposition information, steal information
Speaker 1: in the course of a presidential campaign, and then it
Speaker 1: was about a cover up. Now we're talking about weaponizing
Speaker 1: the powerful tools of intelligence and lying in the process,
Speaker 1: using bought and paid for Russian lies to go after
Speaker 1: a presidential candidate, influence the electorate and basically try and
Speaker 1: steal on an election with that phony information, and in
Speaker 1: the process have the government do the spying and the
Speaker 1: leaking and and be involved in all of this. How
Speaker 1: much worse on a scale compared to Watergate is us, Well,
Speaker 1: they're not at all comfortable. I mean water Gate was
Speaker 1: in some ways part of the old order in which
Speaker 1: Nixon felt like he was constrained by the law, and
Speaker 1: ultimately the people around him were constrained by the law.
Speaker 1: These are people who are latently rigging the game at
Speaker 1: every level, and who I think had had Clinton won,
Speaker 1: we would have learned nothing of the scandal, and it
Speaker 1: should scare people. I mean, you're talking here about elements
Speaker 1: of the Justice Department, elements of the federal view of investigation,
Speaker 1: deciding that they would break the law in order to
Speaker 1: stop the American people's choice from becoming president. Think about
Speaker 1: any of that. It's just totally different, I think than
Speaker 1: the later game problem. This this is really a very
Speaker 1: profound threat because if we don't get to the bottom
Speaker 1: of this, and if we don't make it clear that
Speaker 1: you see, you simply can't do things like this, we
Speaker 1: are on the risk of eventually, over time, people deciding
Speaker 1: that they're just going to randomly enforce the laws they
Speaker 1: care about and will begin to resemble one of those
Speaker 1: Third world dictatorships where the power of the state props
Speaker 1: up the rich and the powerful and crushes dissent. Uh
Speaker 1: and done, as well as being a current very painful example.
Speaker 1: And I think that this is truly I know no
Speaker 1: occasional Americans in fact that how challenge our audience to
Speaker 1: email you if they come up with one. I know
Speaker 1: of no acation in American history where we have seen
Speaker 1: the power of the government and the power of the
Speaker 1: police forces us. Let me ask this here. This is
Speaker 1: the biggest political scandal in my lifetime and maybe even
Speaker 1: when all is said and done, in the history of
Speaker 1: the country. You've had the left wing media in this
Speaker 1: country fixated on Trump Russia collusion. They have ignored the
Speaker 1: biggest story of their lives. They are complicit in a
Speaker 1: lot of ways, because you would think that there are
Speaker 1: some journalists now looking at all this saying, oh my god,
Speaker 1: what has happened? Where are they in this in this
Speaker 1: moment when you would think they're better cells are called
Speaker 1: to greatness, sir, Thank you. We'll see on TV. I
Speaker 1: think tonight thank you, former Speaker of the House, New
Speaker 1: king Ridge. A hundred nine for one, Shawn is a
Speaker 1: toll free telephone number. We have Congressman Jim Jordan, he's
Speaker 1: been railing about all of this. Also, Bill Binny will
Speaker 1: be joining us in Phil Haney and how can we
Speaker 1: recover this information. Steve Ronabac, who lost his son Grant Ronaback,
Speaker 1: is going to talk about the immigration debate and much
Speaker 1: more straight ahead. A couple of interesting emails. One was
Speaker 1: November fourteen, two thousand sixteen, right after the election, where
Speaker 1: Lisa Page text Strack and says, God being here makes
Speaker 1: me angry. Lots of high flute and national security talk. Meanwhile,
Speaker 1: we have our task ahead of us now our is capitalized.
Speaker 1: I mean, are they talking about implementing their plan so
Speaker 1: that that's in November? And then on May nineteenth again
Speaker 1: we've got a big gap, five month gap. And now
Speaker 1: the text begin again. This is two days after Mueller.
Speaker 1: Mueller was just appointed Special Council Strock Rights. There they're
Speaker 1: they're talking back and forth about their futures, the FBI
Speaker 1: and the recent appointment in Mueller, talking about, you know
Speaker 1: what what they ought to do, and it indicates that
Speaker 1: they're considering joining that Mueller Special Council investigation. Strock says, quote,
Speaker 1: you and I both know the odds are nothing. If
Speaker 1: I thought it was likely, I'd be there, no question.
Speaker 1: I hesitated in part because of my gut sense and
Speaker 1: concern there's no big they're there. In other words, Peter Strock,
Speaker 1: who was the FBI Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division,
Speaker 1: the man who had a plan to do something because
Speaker 1: he just couldn't abide. Donal Trump being president, is saying
Speaker 1: that his gut sense is that there's no big they're
Speaker 1: there when it comes to the Mueller Special Counsel investigation.
Speaker 1: That doesn't know what he really wants to join that
Speaker 1: because his gut senses there's no big they're there. I
Speaker 1: think that's kind of John d alright now till the
Speaker 1: top of the hour, one sewn you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. By the way, those of
Speaker 1: you wondering, well, how are we ever gonna retrieve the
Speaker 1: five months of missing texts, We'll check in with our
Speaker 1: security experts, Bill Benny and fell Heiney coming up later
Speaker 1: in the program today joining us now, he's been amazing
Speaker 1: in trying to chip away at this now it is
Speaker 1: a huge, massive scandal. Um as Congressman Jim Jordan of
Speaker 1: of the Great State of Ohio, Um, did you hear
Speaker 1: Trey Gaudy and Congressman Ratcliffe talking about a secret FBI society?
Speaker 1: What the hell? What? What is it? Who knows? That's
Speaker 1: why we gotta you know, we gotta talk to Struck,
Speaker 1: we gotta talk to Page, and hopefully we'll gotta find
Speaker 1: these five months of missing text messages. But you know
Speaker 1: what's funny too, is is Sean what Senator Johnson was
Speaker 1: saying that there's no there there? What what Peter Struck
Speaker 1: was texting back to Lisa Page. Yet he still joined
Speaker 1: the team. He still went on. You know, he doesn't
Speaker 1: think there's anything there, He doesn't want to do it,
Speaker 1: but he does. Now, why does he do that? Is
Speaker 1: it to implement their quote insurance policy that they talked
Speaker 1: about before the election when they were trying to put
Speaker 1: their finger on the scale and help Secretary Clinton be
Speaker 1: the next president and hurt Donald Trump? Is it part
Speaker 1: of their insurance policy that he still goes on the
Speaker 1: team even though he doesn't think anything there, that there's
Speaker 1: anything there. That's what we need to find out as well,
Speaker 1: what is this insurance policy did they prefer in previous text?
Speaker 1: All about? Okay? I think though, if we go to
Speaker 1: the insurance policy and then take it a step further,
Speaker 1: I think we're beginning to understand. Now one other thing
Speaker 1: to add to that. We've got now Struck in page
Speaker 1: discussing how to remove text messages before the text went missing.
Speaker 1: So I think I think that's pretty pretty interesting. But
Speaker 1: you're right, if we go to the original text message.
Speaker 1: I want to believe the path you throughout for consideration
Speaker 1: in Andy's office, that has to be Andrew McCabe that
Speaker 1: there's no way he gets elected meeting Trump. But I'm
Speaker 1: afraid that we can't take that risk. It's like an
Speaker 1: insurance policy and the unlikely event you die before your
Speaker 1: forty And then what we received yesterday I think is
Speaker 1: very very clear. And remember they didn't interview Hillary Clinton
Speaker 1: until July four. Peter Struck and James Collmey, we're writing
Speaker 1: the exoneration back in early May, and and they took
Speaker 1: out the gross negligence standard. They took out the foreign
Speaker 1: entities had hacked and gotten the emails and top secret
Speaker 1: Special Access Program information anyway, and then we had the
Speaker 1: whole issue being exposed of of Loretta Lynch meeting Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton on the tarmac. Now this new text comes in
Speaker 1: its stated July one, three days before they interview, the
Speaker 1: FBI interviews Hillary Clinton. But the exonerations already written. And
Speaker 1: so anyway, Peter Struck writes Lisa Page, the timing looks like,
Speaker 1: hell yeah, it's awful timing, she says, and then adds
Speaker 1: it's a real profiling courage. And since she knows no
Speaker 1: charges will be brought, so Struck knows it, and Page
Speaker 1: knows it. Loretta Lynch, they're saying knows it, and I
Speaker 1: got to assume a cabe knows it. Yeah, the top
Speaker 1: people knew it. You know, the Clinton investigation was the
Speaker 1: fix was in from the get go. That's what all
Speaker 1: the evidence suggests. They went through the motions to make
Speaker 1: it look like they ran a real investigation. And then
Speaker 1: you have you have the text messages during the campaign
Speaker 1: that say, we can't take the risk of Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is going to be elected by the American people. We
Speaker 1: need an insurance policy. You have the text message of
Speaker 1: the day after the election. Now we need to implement
Speaker 1: our plan. Lisa Page says, to Peter Struck and then
Speaker 1: you have this text message says even though there's no
Speaker 1: there there and even though I don't want to join
Speaker 1: Mueller's team, I'm going to he went ahead and did it.
Speaker 1: Why did he do it? Teems logical to say he
Speaker 1: did it to implement their plan, whatever that was. Well,
Speaker 1: doesn't it suggest when they're discussing, you know, how, they're
Speaker 1: going to remove the text messages and get rid of
Speaker 1: them or doesn't that sound like an effort to obstruct
Speaker 1: justice at some point and hide something? Sure sounds like it,
Speaker 1: but we'll have to see. What we need to find
Speaker 1: out is these uh, these five five months of missing messages,
Speaker 1: which you know and I know you talked about this yesterday.
Speaker 1: Where where are the phone? Where are the phones? Where
Speaker 1: are the physical phones? I assume the Justice Department still
Speaker 1: has it. We don't have an answer. I talked with
Speaker 1: Senator Johnson staff people today, who are great staff people,
Speaker 1: and said, do we know where the phones are? They said,
Speaker 1: we don't, but we're gonna find out. So does the
Speaker 1: FBI have them? Does the Justice Department have them? Did
Speaker 1: they give him back to the carrier? I don't know.
Speaker 1: Let's hope have those devices, the actual physical phones themselves,
Speaker 1: so we can figure out what's there. And let's hope
Speaker 1: that we're also going to and I believe that talking
Speaker 1: with Senator Johnson's team, they're gonna they're gonna ask the
Speaker 1: carriers to give the information to help us figure out
Speaker 1: where these missing five months are. All right, So this
Speaker 1: gets even more strange because while one FBI scandal after
Speaker 1: another is being exposed here and I'm not talking about
Speaker 1: rank and file, I'm talking about people like McCabe and
Speaker 1: and call Me and Struck and Page and Uh and
Speaker 1: a bunch of others. Looks like Rod Rosenstein. I want
Speaker 1: to know his role in all of this. Um it appears.
Speaker 1: So last night, Congressman Ratcliffe tweets out the thousands attacks
Speaker 1: the trey Goudy and I reviewed today revealed revealed manifest
Speaker 1: bias among top FBI officials against President Trump. The text
Speaker 1: between Struck and Page referenced a quote secret Society. A
Speaker 1: little more than three hours later, Uh, disgraced x FBI
Speaker 1: director James call Me appeared to respond to Ratcliffe's tweet
Speaker 1: with a crip took message saying, well, good to read
Speaker 1: reports of people standing up for what they believe in
Speaker 1: the ultimate measure of a man is not where he
Speaker 1: stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he
Speaker 1: stands at times of challenge and controversy. Quoting mL K,
Speaker 1: which begs the question was called me the chairman of
Speaker 1: this FBI secret anti Trump society. We don't know, but
Speaker 1: we do know. Like like you said, Sean, there are
Speaker 1: top people whose names keep coming up. Why did Jim
Speaker 1: Baker General Counsel the FBI get reassigned just four weeks ago?
Speaker 1: Andrew McCabe's name comes up all the time. Andrew McCabe,
Speaker 1: who him and his wife met with Terry mcculliffe while
Speaker 1: his wife's running for state Senate. He met with Terry
Speaker 1: mccaulliffe at the same time Terry mcculloffs under investigation. For
Speaker 1: goodness sake, Andrew McCabe, Peter Struck, Bill Prestep, Jim Baker,
Speaker 1: and Lisa Page. These key names keep coming up all
Speaker 1: the time, and then you get some context to it
Speaker 1: when you start looking at all these text messages back
Speaker 1: and forth between Miss Page and Mr Struck. So all
Speaker 1: these people, we've interviewed Mr mckaye, We've interviewed Mr RIBICKI who'
Speaker 1: chief to staff at the FBI when this was all happening.
Speaker 1: But we need to get to these other people and
Speaker 1: find out how would this keep happening. I mean Lois
Speaker 1: Learner's emails were missing for two years. Hillary Clinton was
Speaker 1: subpoenaed by Congress to hand over thirty three thousand emails.
Speaker 1: She deletes them, then she acid washes and bleach bits
Speaker 1: the hard drive. Then she has a somebody that works
Speaker 1: for bust up the devices with hammers. Uh. Then you
Speaker 1: got Debbie Wasson and Schultz's I T guy would busted
Speaker 1: up hard drives in his garage. You know, at some
Speaker 1: point here there's a pattern, and you know, what what
Speaker 1: are we going to do? And how quickly are we
Speaker 1: going to hire the people that can recover this information forensically. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we're gonna do all we can. But but you're right,
Speaker 1: I mean it maybe if it was Jesse I R S.
Speaker 1: You could say, you know, you expecting confidence at the
Speaker 1: I R S. But remember this, Oh we found those
Speaker 1: emails two years later. Yeah, they found him and then
Speaker 1: they destroyed the backup tapes at the facility in Martinsburg,
Speaker 1: West Virginian and and John Coskin and didn't tell us
Speaker 1: about it when he testified. By the way, But remember
Speaker 1: this is Peter Struck, Deputy head of counter Intelligence at
Speaker 1: the Federal Bureau of Investigation. This is not Lois Learners,
Speaker 1: some bureaucrat in the I R S. Who who did?
Speaker 1: Who has to plan to come after us? Understand, But
Speaker 1: this is Peter Struck, Deputy head of counterintelligence at the FBI.
Speaker 1: And suddenly five months in a critical time period, December fourteen,
Speaker 1: when all the unmasking is taking place, when there's all
Speaker 1: this this back and forth between the intelligence community and
Speaker 1: President elect Trump, when all that's happening, that's when it
Speaker 1: starts December fourteen, and oh, just so happens to end? Okay,
Speaker 1: let's talk about Let's talk about all the events that
Speaker 1: occurred after that day, because this is the critical time period.
Speaker 1: The timeline matters here, you know. And if we look
Speaker 1: at the timeline, what do we have. That's when the
Speaker 1: Steel dossier comes out, uh and as released by BuzzFeed,
Speaker 1: that's when Flynn is interviewed. Flynn's interviewed by Peter Struck.
Speaker 1: Peter Struck as an anti Trump bias and and you know,
Speaker 1: I would think that General Flynn's lawyers have to be
Speaker 1: reconsidering this guilty plead alling to the FBI, especially because
Speaker 1: we I believe that in fact, they knew the answers
Speaker 1: to questions ahead of time, because they had illegally surveiled
Speaker 1: and uh unmasked and then leaked raw intelligence. So they
Speaker 1: knew the answers would either he misorremembered allied. They would
Speaker 1: have known, and that's why they got them there. And
Speaker 1: then they threatened to go after his son. From what
Speaker 1: I can gather, and then January eleventh, Comey is fired.
Speaker 1: We don't have the text messages. Then January I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: May seventeen, uh is when the Special Council is appointed.
Speaker 1: Comey's fired May nine, and then all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: so we hadn't seen one text from December. It's what sixteen,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry, December fourteen to May seventeen, the day that
Speaker 1: Special Counsel Mueller is appointed. That seem a little odd
Speaker 1: and and convenient to know it's for that to be
Speaker 1: a coincidence. You gotta I mean, you gotta be kidney
Speaker 1: and and remember the broader framework, And I think this
Speaker 1: is important. Chuck Schumer, the head of the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: Chuck Schumer says on January third, seen just a few
Speaker 1: days before President Trump is going to be inaugurated as
Speaker 1: the next president. Chuck Schumer says, when you get in
Speaker 1: a fight with the intelligence community, they have six Ways
Speaker 1: to Sunday to get back at you. So is all
Speaker 1: these deleted text messages? Might they have something to do
Speaker 1: with the six Ways to Sunday? The intelligence community is
Speaker 1: trying to attack and target President Trump. Might it have
Speaker 1: something to do with that? Did they suddenly disappear? Because
Speaker 1: it was it was how they were targeting and trying
Speaker 1: to get back six Ways to Sunday to the president
Speaker 1: elect of the United States, and then after the president
Speaker 1: elect of the United are the president of United States.
Speaker 1: That's what concerns me. That should never be said by
Speaker 1: the one of the top officials in our government is
Speaker 1: talking about the Intelligence Committee getting back at the person
Speaker 1: the American people elected president. It doesn't work that way
Speaker 1: in this country. But that that's what I want to know.
Speaker 1: What or why why I want to see these five
Speaker 1: months of missing text messages? Well, I mean, how quickly
Speaker 1: expeditiously are we gonna get on this? I've got to
Speaker 1: imagine I'd bring the FBI should, or at least somebody
Speaker 1: in law enforcement has the best people that are capable
Speaker 1: forensically pretty much recovering anything. Right, Yeah, they should be right.
Speaker 1: This is the FBI. This is not a bunch of
Speaker 1: hacks in the in the bureaucracy f I R S.
Speaker 1: This is the FBI. And the guy we're talking about,
Speaker 1: his deputy head of counterintelligence. He's supposed to be this genius.
Speaker 1: He he fancies himself as the James Bond of the FBI.
Speaker 1: So come on, all right, stay right there, more with
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan in just a second, one sean toll free
Speaker 1: telephone number. You want to be a part of the program. Now,
Speaker 1: we gotta talk to our computer experts, Bill Benny. He's
Speaker 1: gonna join us Phil Haney later in the top of
Speaker 1: the next hour. All right, as we continue, Jim Jordan's
Speaker 1: is with US Congressman Ohio, and uh we can't can
Speaker 1: you imagine him? Where we are here? How did we
Speaker 1: get to the point? Hillary Clinton riggs a primary. Hillary
Speaker 1: Clinton has comey struck, exonerating her without even investigating the case,
Speaker 1: because she would have been arrested, she would have been
Speaker 1: indicted on the crimes that she committed on the email service,
Speaker 1: So they're basically protecting her because they've decided they want
Speaker 1: her over Trump. Then you've got Loretta Lynch apparently playing
Speaker 1: a role according to these new struck page texts. Then
Speaker 1: you've got that phony Russian dossier Hillary Clinton bought and
Speaker 1: paid for with lies to really rig and fix the
Speaker 1: general election with lies against Donald Trump. And that phony
Speaker 1: bought and paid for Hillary dossier, Russian propagandas used against
Speaker 1: Trump to get a FISA warrant to spy on an
Speaker 1: opposition candidate in an election year. And then a president
Speaker 1: elect is he coming into office and sabotage him? And
Speaker 1: apparently now we have a special team of you know,
Speaker 1: FBI people and d o J people that are organizing
Speaker 1: meetings to depose of the will of the people. Garry,
Speaker 1: isn't it? And on top of all that, is there
Speaker 1: anything I'm saying that's wrong? There five months of missing
Speaker 1: messages and imagine this Sean Sean Hannity is being investigated
Speaker 1: by the FBI and suddenly important information on on your
Speaker 1: phone you just delete it. Can you imagine what the
Speaker 1: FBI would do? I R s IS and and looking
Speaker 1: into one of your many listeners out there, and they're
Speaker 1: looking at them, and they have documents that destroyed that
Speaker 1: are by the way, this is under a preservation order.
Speaker 1: They're in big trouble. But yet it continues to happen
Speaker 1: with folks who are in the Obama administration, in the
Speaker 1: bureoxy during the Obama administration. All right, thanks Jim Jordan,
Speaker 1: Congressman Ohio eight nine for one sewn. You want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program House Intel Committee. Republicans
Speaker 1: refuse to share the secret memo with the FBI and
Speaker 1: the Justice Department. Why because they're investigating them. They have
Speaker 1: no choice, they can't trust them. Quick break right back.
Speaker 1: We'll continue. Can we retrieve those missing text messages? Will
Speaker 1: check in with two experts, Bill Benny and Phil Haney
Speaker 1: coming up next. These texts are incredibly important model for
Speaker 1: a number of reasons. Uh, both what's there and what's
Speaker 1: not there. So lay aside this glaring five month gap
Speaker 1: and text that the world's premier law enforcement agencies somehow miss.
Speaker 1: Lay that aside. What we have seen, what Johnny and
Speaker 1: I saw today, it was a text about not keeping text.
Speaker 1: We saw more manifest bias against President Trump all the
Speaker 1: way through the election into the transition, and I saw
Speaker 1: an interesting text that Director Comey was going to update
Speaker 1: the President of United States about an investigation. I don't
Speaker 1: know if it was a Hillary Clinton investigation, because remember
Speaker 1: that had been reopened in the fall of s or
Speaker 1: whether it was the Trump investigation. I just find it
Speaker 1: interesting that the head of the FBI was going to
Speaker 1: update the President United States, who at that point would
Speaker 1: have been President Obama. You and I both know the
Speaker 1: odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I'd
Speaker 1: be there, no question. I hesitated, in part because of
Speaker 1: my guts say concern. There's no big there there all right,
Speaker 1: to get stranger and stranger. Now they're talking about an
Speaker 1: FBI secret society at this point, which Comey has got
Speaker 1: a lot of explaining to doing. Apparently Comey well, he
Speaker 1: himself actually went before the Special Council. Now he helped
Speaker 1: appoint the special counsel. He purposefully leaked to get the
Speaker 1: special counsel. And then he's handing over notes to Robert
Speaker 1: Mueller with his obvious pious involved in this. And we
Speaker 1: got the news today that this guy, Rebecki is leaving
Speaker 1: the FBI, and uh, he was Comy's chief of staff,
Speaker 1: and by virtue of his position and his closeness to
Speaker 1: the director, all that would mean he probably was involved
Speaker 1: in the Bureau's investigation in the Clinton's private email server
Speaker 1: all the classified documents contained therein the mysterious reason why
Speaker 1: Comy chose not to charge Clinton with various crimes after
Speaker 1: initially deciding to do so, and for months the FBI
Speaker 1: and the Department of Justice stonewalled all efforts to force
Speaker 1: Ribicki to appear on Capitol Hill to testify about what
Speaker 1: he knew on these matters, and while dodging Congress for
Speaker 1: Bicky did speak with the Office of Special Counsel, an
Speaker 1: independent federal agency that handles whistleblower disclosures under legal protections
Speaker 1: against reprisals, and he reportedly informed the Office of Special
Speaker 1: Counsel of Comey's initial draft statement that Hillary did in
Speaker 1: fact commit crimes and the subsequent change the language announcing
Speaker 1: the exact opposite, in other words, the exoneration that took
Speaker 1: place before the investigation anyway. A partial transcript of an
Speaker 1: augusten letter from the Senate Judiciary Committee to Chris Ray
Speaker 1: in which Grassley and Graham excoriate Comey for pre judging
Speaker 1: the Clinton kys with his exoneration statement before the investigation anyway,
Speaker 1: where Bicky was also privy to how the FBI appeared
Speaker 1: to have exploited the anti Trump dossier that was funded
Speaker 1: by the Democratic Party, as well as the extent to
Speaker 1: which the agency used it as a vehicle to launch
Speaker 1: the investigation of the Trump uh and wire tapped his campaign,
Speaker 1: and he testified last Thursday before two congressional committees behind
Speaker 1: closed doors. So it's pretty interesting that now he calls
Speaker 1: it quit quits here. I don't believe it's a coincidence.
Speaker 1: And again, this is now gonna be unfolding quickly. Now
Speaker 1: the question is what do we do about the fifty
Speaker 1: thousand missing text messages in this crucial period of time,
Speaker 1: And that would be between Peter Struck and Lisa Page. Well,
Speaker 1: you know, they both thought they had an insurance policy
Speaker 1: in case Trump won. And now we know that that
Speaker 1: they both knew that there would never be an indictment
Speaker 1: of Hillary Clinton. And that also means that I guess
Speaker 1: Bruce or probably knew him, McKay probably knew, and Comy
Speaker 1: probably Comey did know. And now we find out that
Speaker 1: it's likely Loretta Lynch knows because of the text messages.
Speaker 1: But how do we get the fifty other text messages,
Speaker 1: which probably would be the most explosive. Just guessing here.
Speaker 1: Bill Benny is the former technical director of the n
Speaker 1: s A World Geopolitical and Military Analysis, This and Reporting Group,
Speaker 1: and Philip Piney is the author to See Something Saying
Speaker 1: Nothing and a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security. Combined,
Speaker 1: they have nearly eighty years experience in working in national
Speaker 1: security issues for this country. Welcome back, both of you,
Speaker 1: Thank you, thank you very much. Bill Benny, once on
Speaker 1: this program, well actually many times on this program, you
Speaker 1: said to me that every text, every phone call, every
Speaker 1: email is captured metadata stored in some of these metadata
Speaker 1: centers like in Utah and elsewhere. Wouldn't that suggest that
Speaker 1: the text messages between Struck and his girlfriend, mistress Lisa Page,
Speaker 1: can be found. Yes, they can, if n s A
Speaker 1: hasn't totally destroyed them by now. In other words, if
Speaker 1: the FBI wants to destroy information, they have to do
Speaker 1: it in two places, once at their offices and also
Speaker 1: at n s A, because n s A captures that too.
Speaker 1: And that's just coming out in recent in a recent
Speaker 1: FISA court order that was released. So uh, and it
Speaker 1: talks about all the collection and the upstream program and
Speaker 1: things like that, and what the FBI is involvement in
Speaker 1: that too certain degree is not the full story yet.
Speaker 1: But what would that be something that you'd have to
Speaker 1: manually go to maybe the metadata center at the n
Speaker 1: s A and do And wouldn't there be a record
Speaker 1: of somebody going in there and destroying it, destroying certain things? Oh? Yeah,
Speaker 1: that would be there too, So I mean that could
Speaker 1: clearly show up and show culpability in a cover up.
Speaker 1: Let me ask you, Philip Haney, great to have you back.
Speaker 1: What is your take on all of this? Well, you
Speaker 1: remember a couple of years ago when we started talking
Speaker 1: what was the main subject, deletion of information from the
Speaker 1: law enforcement databasis. This has actually been going on in
Speaker 1: one form or another for quite some time. It reminds
Speaker 1: me of a cynical game of musical chairs. No one
Speaker 1: wants to get caught when the music stops, and so
Speaker 1: people move around to protect himself from the consequences of
Speaker 1: their aggregation of constitutional duty. But what really struck me,
Speaker 1: Sean about all this, It's like we had two ropes
Speaker 1: tangled together, and it's one of the reasons why it's
Speaker 1: hard for us to follow all this. We have two
Speaker 1: major things going on, the use of true information for
Speaker 1: partisan political purposes to hurt people, and the creation of
Speaker 1: false information for the same reason. So they're blended together,
Speaker 1: and it's hard to tell where the true information is
Speaker 1: and the false information begins. But from their side there
Speaker 1: they allow themselves permission to use whatever means necessary to
Speaker 1: destroy the lives and people of people of politicians. But
Speaker 1: this is a law enforcement off. But this is how
Speaker 1: profound this is. And we talked about Watergate. Water Gates
Speaker 1: nothing compared to what we're discovering here. Because you've got
Speaker 1: one candidate who rigs the primary. You've got now it's
Speaker 1: obvious that the decision was made long before an investigation
Speaker 1: that they were going to exonerate one political candidate that
Speaker 1: had come at crimes. So the investigation into Hillary's email
Speaker 1: server was rigged and they had already drawn a conclusion
Speaker 1: to exonerate her before they do the investigation. Then Hillary
Speaker 1: goes ahead, I guess, if you fix the the primary election,
Speaker 1: why not try to fix the general election? And she
Speaker 1: does that by hiring fusion GPS that puts together a
Speaker 1: phony Russian propaganda dossier that was full of lies, that's
Speaker 1: to influence the American people in the general election. And
Speaker 1: then it's used as a means of obtaining a Fizer
Speaker 1: warrant with fake, phony partisan information to spy on the
Speaker 1: opposition candidate and the lead up to the election, and
Speaker 1: then post election a presidential a president elect. Now if
Speaker 1: that's not and then on top of it, and then
Speaker 1: on top of it, you've got all these plans in place,
Speaker 1: an insurance policy apparently put in place if God forbid,
Speaker 1: Trump wins. And then it gets even worse than that,
Speaker 1: because they were prepared, they saw it, but they got
Speaker 1: caught off guard. They blinked for half a second and
Speaker 1: in that moment, tron Trump on the election, and they
Speaker 1: got caught off guard, just like getting blindsided in football.
Speaker 1: So they left all these crumbs behind. But I've got
Speaker 1: to believe that the you know, now there's fifty text messages,
Speaker 1: but in the key period of time, the critical period
Speaker 1: of time where so much is happening at once, you know,
Speaker 1: when the stacier comes out, when General Flynn is investigated,
Speaker 1: when Comey is fired, when the special uh council is appointed.
Speaker 1: All that period, there's no text messages. But the day
Speaker 1: after Robert Mullis appointed special counsel, that next day they
Speaker 1: start texting again. Doesn't that seem a little curious to you,
Speaker 1: Bill Benny, that that that five critical months of information
Speaker 1: is missing. Actually it it smells like a chip in
Speaker 1: the field, you know, if you if you, if you're
Speaker 1: a country boy like me, I'm pretty pretty uh used
Speaker 1: to pick picking out a chip in the field a
Speaker 1: mile away so you don't step in it, you know.
Speaker 1: And that's basically what's going on here. This is this
Speaker 1: just smells to high heaven. I mean, try to figure
Speaker 1: the random probability of the critical information to an investigation
Speaker 1: being deleted over and over again. That's been what's been
Speaker 1: going on at CIA, FBI, n s A. This is
Speaker 1: happening throughout the intelligence community, law enforcement. I mean, this
Speaker 1: shows the corruption. This is where this is, in my mind,
Speaker 1: the thing, the main thing we have to face. The
Speaker 1: Attorney General has got to stand up and do this
Speaker 1: because if he doesn't, I mean, we have no judicial process.
Speaker 1: That's that's worth anything anyway. I Mean, it's just saying
Speaker 1: that the law applies to everybody except certain few. And
Speaker 1: that's basically what's been going on here. Well, I mean,
Speaker 1: how do we get to the bottom of it. How
Speaker 1: are we ever going to recover, Philippenny, these fifties, these
Speaker 1: missing five months of text messages? You have to have,
Speaker 1: You have to some people with technical smarts to go
Speaker 1: into the n s A and have and go in
Speaker 1: to see if if they haven't destroyed the equipment, they
Speaker 1: could perhaps recover a lot of them from that, not
Speaker 1: much like the FBI would do if they had, uh,
Speaker 1: you know, somebody's computer who had tried to erase stuff
Speaker 1: but didn't fully do the job, then you could get
Speaker 1: recover it that way. Why there maybe back up somewhere
Speaker 1: in NSA that even n s A didn't know about,
Speaker 1: and they could get it from there. I mean, it's
Speaker 1: just not it doesn't pass the smell test, Philippiney. And
Speaker 1: then you hear about the secret FBI society meeting after
Speaker 1: Trump is elected because they didn't expect this to happen.
Speaker 1: You're right, because just the admission that they lost the information,
Speaker 1: don't they realize how compromise, how incompetent they make themselves
Speaker 1: look to the American public, who are we are our
Speaker 1: secret clearance information. We just got notified for the third time, Sean,
Speaker 1: that it was hacked. Who are we supposed to trust
Speaker 1: that the federal government and national security agents aren't even
Speaker 1: capable of of safeguard. I've said this for the longest time.
Speaker 1: I mean, everybody doesn't like that Julian Assans was able
Speaker 1: to get information on us. But it's the same guy
Speaker 1: that hacked into the into NASA and the Department of
Speaker 1: Defense when he was sixteen. He's now in his forties.
Speaker 1: You know, if at some point it's got to be
Speaker 1: shame on you, Shame on you. But at some point,
Speaker 1: now that you know all these people are doing this,
Speaker 1: when does it become shame on me for allowing them
Speaker 1: to get through. Well, we've come up to the breach,
Speaker 1: we come up to the ABYSS, and Congress needs to
Speaker 1: go forward and not shrink back from it. When they
Speaker 1: investigated me, Sean, they scoured through my emails and my
Speaker 1: phone calls for years before the actual date of the investment.
Speaker 1: You know, the event that precipitated the investigation, which was
Speaker 1: the Boston bombing. And why did they do that? They
Speaker 1: were doing trying to do the same thing to me
Speaker 1: as they did to General Flynn, find some point where
Speaker 1: I contradicted my testimony, and then hammer me into the
Speaker 1: ground with it. I mean, these are unbelievable times, all right,
Speaker 1: So where can we start in terms of the search
Speaker 1: to try and get these missing text messages? I mean,
Speaker 1: I've got to believe that the phone would be the
Speaker 1: first place. Yeah, I would think you need to have
Speaker 1: you can go go to the phone companies and see
Speaker 1: what they've got stored. You could do it. Let's assume
Speaker 1: for a minute they don't have it. Yeah yeah, okay,
Speaker 1: Well then you have to go to n s A
Speaker 1: and have somebody with the authority to go right into
Speaker 1: their database and look and find the data. And it
Speaker 1: could do that basically from virtually any analysts terminal if
Speaker 1: they've got I see reach or excuse score very routines,
Speaker 1: they can get into that data there and and recovered
Speaker 1: rather quickly. I mean, it shouldn't be a major wouldn't
Speaker 1: if they have the phones, wouldn't they most likely forensically
Speaker 1: be able to pull that off the phone. I mean,
Speaker 1: in other words, I'm always told nothing you're raised has
Speaker 1: ever really erased. Well, I was talking I was talking
Speaker 1: about actually getting the transcripts of the phone calls or
Speaker 1: actually the audio of the phone calls. Yeah, well agreed.
Speaker 1: I mean, well, these are text messages. I mean, this
Speaker 1: is what people don't understand. They have such advanced equipment
Speaker 1: that literally they translate conversations you're having on the phone
Speaker 1: in real time into words, so you can read a
Speaker 1: printed a real time print out of what you're talking about. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and so if you go, if you go, also you
Speaker 1: would get the text messages also because the phone number
Speaker 1: you pull, yeah, you would get all of that at once. Yeah,
Speaker 1: all right, we'll take a breakfast. Thing to consider, Sean
Speaker 1: is that this is assuming that they were the only
Speaker 1: two in the conversation. There had to be other people
Speaker 1: in some of those conversations. That means other phones were involved. Well,
Speaker 1: we know that they discussed how to remove the text
Speaker 1: messages and hide them anyway. I mean, it's like they
Speaker 1: knew what they were doing was wrong, and that's an
Speaker 1: admission they knew what they do were doing is wrong.
Speaker 1: I will take a break more with Phil Haney and
Speaker 1: Bill Benny on the other side A nine one. Shaun
Speaker 1: is on number and we'll come back and more with them.
Speaker 1: Straight ahead, Hannity A big show tonight at nine. We'll continue,
Speaker 1: all right, as we continue with Bill Benny and Philip Haney.
Speaker 1: All right, so if we have the real phones, is
Speaker 1: it possible that it's still on there? Isn't that what
Speaker 1: we're always told, Philip Painey, you never erase anything. That's
Speaker 1: the cardinal rule of intelligence agencies. And that's the point
Speaker 1: these are. This is the premier law enforcement and or
Speaker 1: intelligence agency in the entire country, and we're supposed to believe, oops,
Speaker 1: we lost them. Well, what about all the other data
Speaker 1: that is being generated by the entire um FBI and
Speaker 1: the agency that operate in the field. They have to
Speaker 1: have a safeguard. What if your phone, you drop your
Speaker 1: phone in the bathtub, or you run over it or anything.
Speaker 1: They have to have a backup for it. And what's
Speaker 1: your take, Bill Benny, Well, yeah, I would say that
Speaker 1: even the Records Act requires them to keep those kinds
Speaker 1: of information. Uh, nobody keeps. Nobody stays by the Records Act.
Speaker 1: I mean, that's the least of the laws they're going
Speaker 1: to bring, I know. But internally, in NSA, for example,
Speaker 1: this is the one I know, they have procedures that
Speaker 1: automatically do that, So it's not a question of of
Speaker 1: deleting just one file. You have to make sure you
Speaker 1: delete multiple backups too. And there's stories facilities that retained
Speaker 1: it for for many decades. So it's it's not I
Speaker 1: don't I don't think. I don't think even n s
Speaker 1: A knows where all the copies are. So I think
Speaker 1: that that's possible to see, even even in spite of
Speaker 1: any effort they might make to erase it, it's impossible
Speaker 1: to recover it, all right, Bill, Benny Philippiney, thank you both.
Speaker 1: Grant was boy. He was just my buddy from the
Speaker 1: mante he was born. He just brightened everybody, my family,
Speaker 1: my friends, he h, he was everything. Altermanto had come
Speaker 1: in and wanted advice cigarettes. Alter Moranto then pulled a
Speaker 1: gun and pointed at Grant. Grant immediately offered up to
Speaker 1: cigarettes and alter Moto and shut him point blank in
Speaker 1: the face. My son's death was completely providable upon our
Speaker 1: Altera Mourato had been in the country illegally since he
Speaker 1: was fourteen. He was a self proclaimed member of the
Speaker 1: Sinaloa drug cartel and the Mexican Mafia. He had previously
Speaker 1: been arrested for sexually assaulting a woman, breaking into her
Speaker 1: house and sexually assaulting her and holding her captive for
Speaker 1: a week. Let me thank my friend, my colleague, and
Speaker 1: our leader on the Democratic side for his passionate personal
Speaker 1: commitment to this issue involving the Dreamers and DACA. He
Speaker 1: has been by my side and I've been inspired by
Speaker 1: his leadership from the start. And let me thank my colleagues.
Speaker 1: So many of you cast vote. It was very hard
Speaker 1: and very difficult because you believed, as I did, that
Speaker 1: the issue of immigration, the issue the dreamers, the civil
Speaker 1: rights issue of our time. You're stuck in next and said,
Speaker 1: I'm willing to go on record, even if it's gonna
Speaker 1: be hard to explain back home, and I will never
Speaker 1: forget that, all right, tick durban And now Chuck Schumer,
Speaker 1: just earlier today he withdraws the offer on Trump's wall
Speaker 1: after he got so embarrassed, I guess by the shutdown
Speaker 1: the buckle of the Democrats. The Schumer shutdown was a
Speaker 1: Schumer dud eight nine one Shawn as auto free telephone number.
Speaker 1: The other tape you heard was that of Steve ranna Back.
Speaker 1: He's the father of Grant ranna Back and his twenty
Speaker 1: one year old son was murdered. He was working overnight
Speaker 1: at a convenience store in Mesa, Arizona, and Rna Back's
Speaker 1: killer wasn't an illegal alien who was released by ice
Speaker 1: and twenty thirteen after conviction for burglary and kidnapping involving
Speaker 1: drug dealing. Apparently it kept this woman hostage for a
Speaker 1: week and all sorts of crimes were committed. Anyway, Ronabeck
Speaker 1: took to social media this weekend to express Joe how
Speaker 1: hard it is to see the so called leaders elected
Speaker 1: officials in the US protecting DOCTA recipients over American citizens,
Speaker 1: and he writes, so I sit here reading about the
Speaker 1: government shutdown, and all I think about is the three
Speaker 1: year anniversary of Grant's murder. It's Monday, yesterday, and as
Speaker 1: everyone remembers, Grant was murdered by a DOCCA recipient and
Speaker 1: the monster executed Grant and cold blood. He was a dreamer,
Speaker 1: brought here when he was fourteen. I have never once
Speaker 1: said all the illegal immigrants are bad, but a lot
Speaker 1: of them are criminals. I missed my son every single day.
Speaker 1: My family has been devastated and ripped apart. So let
Speaker 1: me have my say, and I'll take the consequences without
Speaker 1: a wall on the southern border and extreme tightening of security,
Speaker 1: arrest and deportation of illegal aliens coming across the southern border.
Speaker 1: DACA is an issue that can be dealt with in
Speaker 1: March or even later in the year. Yes, DOCA is important,
Speaker 1: but again, we need to stop the flow of the
Speaker 1: importation of drug and humans and illegal goods and criminals
Speaker 1: and prior convicted felons that have been previously deforded. Steve
Speaker 1: Ronobeck joins US now as well as Jessica Vaughan, director
Speaker 1: of Policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies. Oh,
Speaker 1: I don't have to venture a guess that these have
Speaker 1: been the three worst years of your life. And I
Speaker 1: don't know if it gets any better. Oh no, Sean,
Speaker 1: it doesn't. And uh, you know, I just the audacity
Speaker 1: of the Democrats, especially Chuck Schumer, to sit out at
Speaker 1: the bargaining table and and basically saying we want it
Speaker 1: all and you get nothing, and then to turn around
Speaker 1: and pull the one thing that they said, Okay, well
Speaker 1: we'll compromise on. It's ridiculous. It's I just don't understand
Speaker 1: how they can they can do this and stonewall our
Speaker 1: president at every turn. You know, we're talked about civil rights,
Speaker 1: the civil rights, what is the civil rights, uh problem
Speaker 1: of the century. Well, you know, grant was constitutionally guaranteed
Speaker 1: the right to freedom and happiness and and you know,
Speaker 1: the pursuit of happiness. Well, where's my son's rights? They
Speaker 1: were violated. His son's doing everything right, he's working, he's
Speaker 1: twenty one years old, he's in a convenience store, he's
Speaker 1: advancing in his life. And over a pack of cigarettes,
Speaker 1: a guy that had held a woman hostage for a
Speaker 1: week and put in jail on I forget how many
Speaker 1: years he gets released only to go out and then
Speaker 1: over a pack of cigarettes kill your son. Well, you know, Sean,
Speaker 1: he didn't even do a day in prison, not one day. Uh.
Speaker 1: He qualified for felony probation because he was able to
Speaker 1: plead down the charges. But wasn't the charge that he
Speaker 1: had held this woman hostage for a week. No, he
Speaker 1: was able to because they filled her full of heroin
Speaker 1: for the week. Um, he was able to just plead
Speaker 1: that down to felony agree because she was not a
Speaker 1: competent with witnessed unbelievable, because he humped her full of
Speaker 1: heroin and she doesn't have recollection um on. On average,
Speaker 1: the Department of Homeland Security apprehends over people a day. Uh,
Speaker 1: with December marking the eighth month in a row of
Speaker 1: an increase in apprehensions. On January four, the DHS saw
Speaker 1: the number of apprehensions, you know, at four hundred. Now
Speaker 1: the d H d HS refuses entry to known was
Speaker 1: suspected terrorists every day, fifty every week, every year, and
Speaker 1: yet we have this threat to our homeland. When I
Speaker 1: sat through a security briefing in Texas, Jessica Vaughan, I
Speaker 1: was shocked to learn in a seven eight year period
Speaker 1: six crimes, including some murders or perpetrated against the people
Speaker 1: of Texas. That's just one state. That's over a short
Speaker 1: period of time. I would think everybody's united on this issue.
Speaker 1: Why not protect our borders? President and said, we can
Speaker 1: have a door in the wall, and we can vet
Speaker 1: people and they can come in as long as we
Speaker 1: know that they're not going to be committing crimes against
Speaker 1: our fellow citizens. That's right. This isn't hard to understand.
Speaker 1: Americans understand it. Uh, We're all heartbroking to hear stories
Speaker 1: like Steve's about his son Grant. It's a tragedy, but
Speaker 1: one that was preventable, and that was all due to
Speaker 1: policy into our failure to secure the borders. And that's
Speaker 1: why it's so frustrating to hear people like Senator Durban
Speaker 1: and Senator Schumer say that it's the The emergency is
Speaker 1: finding a solution for for the Dreamers. Uh, that's really
Speaker 1: not a solution to our immigration problems. The President has
Speaker 1: laid out a very good plan. It was put together
Speaker 1: by senior officials. That's all the immigration agencies saying what
Speaker 1: needs to be done to secure the border, to stop
Speaker 1: the influx of illegal aliens from Central Americas, and a
Speaker 1: company of miners and their families, to fix the broken
Speaker 1: asylum system, to implement mandatory everify, to reduce chain migration,
Speaker 1: end of these a lottery, build some barriers at the wall,
Speaker 1: and um, prevent gang members from getting green cards and
Speaker 1: so on. A very fine list of things, and that
Speaker 1: ought to be a starting point. That's fixing the problem. Um,
Speaker 1: you know, doing an amnesty for the Dreamers is really
Speaker 1: a sideshow to this, or it should be in terms
Speaker 1: of our priorities. The only piece of legislation on the
Speaker 1: table right now that accomplish it, that would accomplish what
Speaker 1: the President has said needs to be done and what
Speaker 1: his career officials say needs to be done. And that's
Speaker 1: the health bill introduced by Representative good Lad. And you
Speaker 1: know we ought to be doing that before any amnesty.
Speaker 1: We need to make sure all those things are working
Speaker 1: before an amnesty is enacted. We need to take care
Speaker 1: of sanctuary cities before a sanctuary state. I mean, it
Speaker 1: doesn't get any right, California, Yes, it's it's outraged all.
Speaker 1: And now there's this judge in California has now said
Speaker 1: that that the federal government needs to keep issuing renewals
Speaker 1: of DOCTA work permits. Well, that's an opportunity for Congress
Speaker 1: and say, okay, I guess there's no firm deadline. Why
Speaker 1: don't we do this to do list first of enforcement
Speaker 1: needs and and and fixing the glaring problems in our
Speaker 1: immigration system that most Americans want to see fixed and
Speaker 1: agree need to be fixed, and then we'll talk about
Speaker 1: an amnesty. Unfortunately, they're rushing to do the amnesty. Look,
Speaker 1: they always they always want to give you the tax
Speaker 1: increase or the spending increase. You never get the tax cut,
Speaker 1: you always get the amnesty, the consideration, and you never
Speaker 1: get the border security. It's just the way it is, Um.
Speaker 1: And they know that. That's why they're still coming in
Speaker 1: increased numbers at the border. As you mentioned, it's because
Speaker 1: of all this talk about amnesty. Three points six million Dreamers,
Speaker 1: not eight hundred thousand as previously thought. Um, what do
Speaker 1: you want the Republicans to do? Uh, Steve? I mean,
Speaker 1: I know your testimony is powerful. You're not the only
Speaker 1: parent that I have interviewed over the years, especially in
Speaker 1: the last year and a half, that has lost a
Speaker 1: son or a daughter because of illegal immigration and killed
Speaker 1: by illegal immigrants. I mean, it's story after story. And
Speaker 1: I know maybe some people that think they want to
Speaker 1: be compassionate and do the right thing, I've got to
Speaker 1: wonder in my heart if they would be Uh, if
Speaker 1: they that thought process would change after you lose a
Speaker 1: member of your family, because I can't think of anything
Speaker 1: more devastating. No, and there's not. I mean, the Republicans
Speaker 1: have to stand for the Republicans have to come together, um,
Speaker 1: and sports the president and his policies. Again, like Jessica said,
Speaker 1: you know DOCCA is pretty much a moot point. It
Speaker 1: really is. At this point in the game. It is
Speaker 1: a moot point without border security. Even if we deport
Speaker 1: DOCUM members or the criminals that are DOCUM members, they're
Speaker 1: gonna come back. They're going to head to California, They're
Speaker 1: going to head to Chicago. We have to have the
Speaker 1: border security. It's you're going to see more and more
Speaker 1: of this happening if we don't get it fixed. And
Speaker 1: it's not only that. It's the sexual assaults against children,
Speaker 1: it's the heroine, it's the other drugs that are coming
Speaker 1: across the border. I can't understand why the American people
Speaker 1: think that that all of these DOCUM members are just
Speaker 1: wonderful people and they're just coming here for a better life. Yes,
Speaker 1: some of them are. But what about the criminals, What
Speaker 1: about the murderers, the drug dealers, um, the sexual deviance
Speaker 1: that are coming across our border. The MS thirteen that
Speaker 1: is coming across our border. How many of the MS
Speaker 1: thirteen have we deported? How many of them are already
Speaker 1: back in our country. It's a good point, I mean,
Speaker 1: it just doesn't stop with chain migration. Yes, eight hundred
Speaker 1: thousand DOCU members with chan migration. You're looking, like you said,
Speaker 1: at eight point six million because of chain migration. It's
Speaker 1: just ten percent of those documents of those chain migration
Speaker 1: are criminals. Ten percent. It's unbelievable. Let's unbelievable. Listen. I
Speaker 1: want to wish you the best. I know this is
Speaker 1: a tough week for you. It's the third anniversary since
Speaker 1: you lost uh, your son Grant, and you're in our
Speaker 1: thoughts and prayers. Uh. You're a powerful voice uh explaining
Speaker 1: to people the dangers here. And we thank you so
Speaker 1: much for being with us, and Jessica, thank you for
Speaker 1: joining us as well. We appreciate it so hard. I
Speaker 1: can't think anything worse than losing your child anything. And
Speaker 1: then you think, oh, they had this guy in custody
Speaker 1: and they let him go. It just makes it worse.
Speaker 1: There's culpa bill of the on the part of those
Speaker 1: that allowed that to happen. Otherwise, if we followed the law,
Speaker 1: it never would have happened. Just followed the law. Let's
Speaker 1: get to our busy phones here. Joe is in West Virginia. Joe,
Speaker 1: you're on the Sean Hannity Show. High Who there? How
Speaker 1: are you? I'm good, sir, how are you super? What's
Speaker 1: on your mind today? Well, I just wanted to make
Speaker 1: a comment or two. We've heard all this about the
Speaker 1: five months and specific days or text messages that were missing.
Speaker 1: And I know you talked about this sum yesterday. But um,
Speaker 1: I used to work for a wireless carrier for about
Speaker 1: twenty five years. I'm retired down, but I've worked at
Speaker 1: alais onto large government accounts for business accounts and also
Speaker 1: law enforcements, and I got subpoenaed many many times, not personally,
Speaker 1: but requested subpoen because that had to go to legal departments.
Speaker 1: But many many cases, records were subpoenated for murder cases,
Speaker 1: for uh graphic corruption cases in the government. I could
Speaker 1: go on and on about that. But they they got
Speaker 1: their text messages, and it was much It was weeks
Speaker 1: or months past whenever the text messages were generated. It
Speaker 1: wasn't a three day cap like I heard yesterday. Well,
Speaker 1: I had heard from different sources and I'm getting mixed
Speaker 1: messages that there might be records of text that took place,
Speaker 1: but they may not be the text messages themselves. Oh,
Speaker 1: there there'd be a record of the number that texted
Speaker 1: to and from right, But it's the details we need,
Speaker 1: the information on what's on those texts. Um. I agree
Speaker 1: the content would have been in those Now, every carrier
Speaker 1: may have their own policy, but the carrier I work
Speaker 1: for was one of the two largest carriers in the country,
Speaker 1: and they kept detailed records. They had a very large
Speaker 1: legal department, and these guys always got what they needed.
Speaker 1: Like I said, one was the murder case. They were
Speaker 1: graphed in crushing cases and these were important bits of
Speaker 1: evidence they had to have and they were there for them. Yeah. Well,
Speaker 1: we appreciate your call, sir, thank you for being with us. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we can get this information somehow. It's out there somewhere.
Speaker 1: Took two years to get lower learned lowest learners emails.
Speaker 1: We can find him a right, Hannity Tonight nineties on
Speaker 1: the Fox News Channel. All right, we bring back tonight
Speaker 1: Sarah Carter, Jim Jordan's going to join us, Jay Sekulo,
Speaker 1: Damn Bongino, Jesse Waters versus Jessica tar Love and a
Speaker 1: one on one against Vicente Fox. How did Mexico treat
Speaker 1: people from Central America? I will ask him tonight at
Speaker 1: nine and the latest on the huge scandal that we
Speaker 1: are breaking nine Eastern. See you back here to morrow,
Speaker 1: See tonight at night