WEBVTT - Cowboys Break: Is Help on the Way?

0:00:01.240 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Are you ready for

0:00:07.000 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>a break? Are you ready for a break? Absolutely ready

0:00:11.760 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 1>for a break? Yeah, and so much for that. It's

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>time for The Break on Dallas Cowboys dot Com with

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Nick Eatman, David Hellman, and bar Garcia and Derek Eagleton.

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It's Tuesday, October ninth, twenty eighteen, Season fourteen, episode number

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty six. Welcome to another edition of The Break, live

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>from the s WBC Mortgage Studios at the Star. We've

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of stuff to get into today. Yesterday

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:41.919
<v Speaker 1>was pretty explosive. Today may not be as explosive, but

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.720
<v Speaker 1>it'll be a day for some perspective. I think. I

0:00:44.760 --> 0:00:47.880
<v Speaker 1>think today will be the day when, instead of jumping

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 1>off the ledge, we will give you the reasons why

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe you shouldn't jump off the ledge and give some

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>perspective to what you're seeing so far this season through

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>five games where we export Oh, it was definitely, it was.

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>It was pretty It was definitely explosives. Talking cowboys. Cowboys.

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>That's because we all like each other and we get along.

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Talking cowboys gets contentious about whether or not it's raining outside,

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Like that's that's nothing new. Like we we disagree, but

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.360
<v Speaker 1>we disagree friendly, like we we're friends. We can have

0:01:18.400 --> 0:01:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a discussion that we disagree, Right, So let's get into it. Um.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess the first thing I want to get to

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>today is just talk a little bit about this NFC East.

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned it yesterday, um and as and I know

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Dave doesn't like this conversation because as bad as the

0:01:31.520 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys are, I don't think you like even mentioning the

0:01:34.240 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>fact of where they sit in a bad division. But

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>right now they are only half a game out of

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:43.119
<v Speaker 1>first place, UM in the NFC East right now watching

0:01:43.200 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>US two and two after they get blasted last night,

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.720
<v Speaker 1>which I don't know that anybody couldn't have seen that

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>coming to some degree when when Brady's I mean when

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>when Breeze is going for this record and and they're

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.480
<v Speaker 1>at home in New Orleans, just everything about that, as

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about in the pregame, I'm like, this

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>has a beat down written all over it, and that's

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly what they got last night. But it was cool

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to see Drew Brees get that record. That was really cool. Yeah. No,

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean I covered the Cowboys. I don't really. I

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know very much about the Saints anymore, but you know,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>I turned it on and I grew up watching Drew Brees.

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>It was super I mean I got a little emotional

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>watching him do it was cool. Yeah, a little missed it.

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's the most important athlete in New Orleans history.

0:02:22.360 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>And I know it's I said this on Twitter last night, like,

0:02:24.400 --> 0:02:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I know it's cheesy, but he really does mean a

0:02:26.720 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>lot to that city in a very non sports way.

0:02:31.200 --> 0:02:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it was cool. I mean it's weird to

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.080
<v Speaker 1>think that like one of the you know, handful of

0:02:36.120 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>greatest quarterbacks ever to play is came from the Saints.

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we don't think of the Saints as a

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>laughing stock anymore because of him, which we certainly did.

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>We certainly they certainly were for a long time. So

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it was cool. The moment with his son at Sons,

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I thought was pretty cool. That was that was pretty emotional,

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>just having that that opportunity to see him with his

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>sons during that time. But going back to the NFC,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:00.160
<v Speaker 1>East Washington loses last night. They're two and two and

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 1>two Cowboys at two and three are sitting in second place,

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>tied with the Eagles, but one game. I guess they

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 1>have the tie break over them at this point because

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.400
<v Speaker 1>they did win one division game against the Giants, and

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>nobody's any good I'm not trying to right, and then

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>the Giants are at one and four laying I know.

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>One point is that you know the two and three

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:21.399
<v Speaker 1>two into whatever, Like nobody's really running away with anybody.

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Like nobody looks to be explosive on any side of

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball. I think Washington's offense is Washington looks a

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>lot like Dallas to me with their offense. You know

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that they just don't have a lot of explosive players there.

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Their defense looks pretty aggressive, but they definitely got burned

0:03:39.000 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 1>last night. But like you said, that was kind of

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:42.600
<v Speaker 1>a hornessness that they were walking into there. There was

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 1>no way that Drew Brees and Sean Payton weren't going

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to get that job done. I don't know who number

0:03:47.160 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>ten is, but he looks like he's gonna be a

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>problem for a while. Trey Kwon Smith or see from

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>us you see f he's a third round pick, which

0:03:56.160 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>third picks abounds doing third round picks don't make me. Hey,

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't have Drew Brees. I guarantee if Michael Gallup

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>was streaping streaking down the sideline without a defender within

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:10.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty yards of thinking, that's a touchdown for him too.

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, that was ridiculous. But you look at

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>this entire division, it's pretty bad. I mean, you look

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>at this relative to the other division. It's the only

0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>division in football right now that doesn't have a team

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>with a winning record. The top team in the division

0:04:23.320 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>is at five hundred and uh and you look at

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>just a total number of wins. I think they're two games,

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>two wins less than the next closest team. Right now,

0:04:32.400 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>the NFC East looks pretty bad. Yeah, I mean I

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.279
<v Speaker 1>think he's still got to worry about the Eagles. I

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>mean they're gonna you know, Carson Wentz, he'll eventually I think,

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.560
<v Speaker 1>be okay ast a running back season. Well okay, well

0:04:45.600 --> 0:04:48.119
<v Speaker 1>the other three running backs they got a few, and

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think and sorry I did hear that

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>room up? Go ahead, yeah, Nick, nick Foles. I mean,

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it's it's no different than anybody else. I mean, just

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>like Dak and these other guys, these defensive cord I mean,

0:05:00.560 --> 0:05:02.640
<v Speaker 1>they are what they are for a reason they can

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, hit, I can straight gold for a little

0:05:05.320 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>bit and get hot and all that, But for the

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 1>most part of mean, he is what he is. And

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>so I think Philadelphia Wentz they play with Wins, I

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:15.280
<v Speaker 1>think they'll be the team to beat. Here's one thing

0:05:15.320 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>I do wonder though, and we've seen this happen before

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:20.359
<v Speaker 1>with this teaming with other teams. You change the coach,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you change the guy who's making the calls, and sometimes

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>things change up. Frank Ryk, who was calling their offensive

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>plays last year now the head coach in the Indianapolis Colts.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.479
<v Speaker 1>How much does that affect Wins and the monster run

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:34.600
<v Speaker 1>he was on last year? How much does that affect him?

0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I know Dave Peterson's I mean, I'm sorry David Doug

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Peterson really good coach and obviously a good offensive mind.

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But I wonder how much that can that can affect him.

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>And don't forget either that the Filippo, the guy who

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>calls the plays in Minnesota, now was his quarterbacks coach.

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.720
<v Speaker 1>So good point. Both of the guys that had their

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 1>hands on him the most are gone. And I agree

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with Nick, I think Wins is going to be fine.

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I would still give Philly the nod as the team

0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to beat. But also, like, the thing that troubles me

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>with them is not wins because he's coming back off

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in ACL. It's their defense. Honestly, that's classic Super Bowl

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.159
<v Speaker 1>hangover is you know, you let Vinnie Curry go, you

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>let um Who else did they kick off of that line?

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I know they let I think two of them are

0:06:17.000 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>in Tampa now. I can't remember Vinny Curry's going. They

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:22.760
<v Speaker 1>did relace, Yeah, no, they did, but it new pieces

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and then Rodney McLoud goes down with an injury, and

0:06:25.160 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>their secondary all of a sudden looks like it sucks.

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Mills is having his struggles. Malcolm Jenkins is a

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.440
<v Speaker 1>good player, but he can't do it all himself. So

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>there appear to be some really serious flaws there. Like

0:06:36.839 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I would guess they'll probably get it together, but they've

0:06:39.680 --> 0:06:41.360
<v Speaker 1>already lost as many games as they did all of

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:45.560
<v Speaker 1>last season. And you know, the Giants are, uh, they're

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting because you know, they went to Carolina and they

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>put up some points there late in the game of

0:06:50.440 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>me lost pretty well three yard field goal. I mean, like,

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they good enough to win, They've got issues

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>in locker room obviously with with Odell and talking and

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff. But I think they're gm.

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that the front office is starting

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.239
<v Speaker 1>to figure it out because they decided to part ways

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>with Eric Flower. So that makes me think that, you

0:07:09.800 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>know what, they're actually getting it there, because I don't

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>now they do think they can get a trade for it. No,

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they were just putting it out there like, hey,

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we're cutting this guy. Anybody wants him,

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if anybody wants him, just let us know.

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Otherwise we're cutting him. Yeah, who's gonna say, oh, I'll

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>take that. Oh? I don't know, But I think that

0:07:28.480 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>was kind of there. That was kind of their last

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>dit Jefford, just to say, yeah, we're making this move.

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>If anybody should happen to want him, it's anyone jumping

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>onto the mailbag with that, because any anybody that gets

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>put out there, they say, hey, what about the Cowboys?

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Did anyone do that? But Brian was giving me crap

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>about it this morning, like I'm not the mailbag guy anymore.

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 1>Rob's been doing it this season, And Brian was like,

0:07:50.680 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you haven't even looked in the mail bag this year,

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>have you? And I was like, no, Rob's on top

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 1>of it. Ware you go Rob so nice him And

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.600
<v Speaker 1>you came back and said, that's because I'm reading your

0:08:00.600 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>st Yeah. I was like, I was like, I do

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:04.760
<v Speaker 1>plenty of stuff, Like I'm sorry that I'm not doing

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the mail bag. Brian just loves to find ways to

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>needle me about things. One other questions about the East.

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>You think any chance that the Redskins at the end

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of the season are going to be at the top

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of this division? I mean the only team I don't

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 1>think the Giants will be at the top of the division.

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Everybody else I could see, which it's weird. That's what

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna say is I got to readjust my

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:29.640
<v Speaker 1>mindset because from Okay, the Cowboys were great in OH seven,

0:08:30.080 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and then the Giants won the Super Bowl, and then

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the Giants were like pretty good in O eight, but

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>not as good as they should have been. Probably the

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>same goes for the Cowboys, obviously, but then from like

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine to thirteen, you were just trading

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>one team having decent season and everybody else kind of sucking.

0:08:48.840 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And then from eleven to thirteen it was everybody sucked

0:08:52.800 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this makes I said this last night on Twitter.

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me of twenty thirteen. Cowboys were trading wins

0:08:58.120 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>and losses and they didn't look very good, but it

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>was like, well, who who else is any good? Like

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody else sucks too, so they're gonna beat each other up.

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Which but then from fourteen to seventeen it wasn't like

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>that because the Cowboys were great in fourteen, they were

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>terrible in fifteen, so we weren't even talking about this.

0:09:14.160 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>They were great in sixteen, and the Eagles started nine

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and one last year, so you haven't had this problem

0:09:18.720 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>where there wasn't a good team. But fifteen was very

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.280
<v Speaker 1>similar to this. As bad as the Cowboys were that year,

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they weren't out of it. They weren't very end who

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>won it and which, which I think they wanted at

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>like nine and seven though, like they weren't great. I

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:35.880
<v Speaker 1>just looked at that, at that offense, I just I

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>just don't see the guys there that all. You know,

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously they have holes in defense because they got you know,

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.280
<v Speaker 1>they got put up forty something points on them last night,

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>But I just don't think their offense is going to

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>be good enough to like win a bunch of games. Um,

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't really know what they're doing and

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>running back seems like and think different guys and receivers.

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 1>Nobody really scares you there, And I think I agree

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 1>with you, but I'm not ready to rule them out.

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no, no, And they've you know, they beat

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the Packers, not in the Packers look surprisingly bad too,

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.640
<v Speaker 1>So maybe that's not this amazing win. But we'll see.

0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>These division games will come down and it'll be interesting.

0:10:12.200 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of Division football games to be played.

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, am I wrong by saying that it's just

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Dallas and the Giants. Has anybody else played within the division?

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:21.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. But I think Eagles and Me

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.040
<v Speaker 1>play the Giants on Thursday night. Thursday night. I mean,

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:25.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think when you when you break it down

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the year, I think the teams

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>that are going to be the division that's going to

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>be one of the best in football, I think is

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be the AFC South. I do think Jacksonville

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>will be there. Tennessee looks pretty good. They've kind of

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.680
<v Speaker 1>taken Aldle step back. Well, Houston's yeah, that's truly lost

0:10:40.679 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>to the Bills in Houston. I think he's actually moving

0:10:42.840 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>up'll do it, um, you know, I'm just saying. And

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they have faced them a lot. This division has faced

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that division a lot this first month. I think the

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>NFCS North is going to be the toughest division when

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it's awesome. Thing. Wow, we all disagree. I think the

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>NFC North really yeah. I mean, the Bears are the

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.360
<v Speaker 1>hottest team in football, or well, the Chiefs, but the

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Bears are hot. The Packers have Rogers. I don't as

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>long as they got them out. Yeah, and then the

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are stacked so and the and the Lions are

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>not a pushover they never will be. I kind of

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>agree with that. But I think just because the Browns

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 1>are now actually playing decent football, I think you could

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>say the same thing across the board about the AF.

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 1>The Bengals look really good. Wait, I mean really, is

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the the NFC East one of the two or three

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>worst divisions of football? Maybe the worst? I mean, I'm

0:11:28.800 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>having other than maybe if you want to put the

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>NFC South in there. NFC South is having gets struggles.

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:37.199
<v Speaker 1>Outside of the Rams, they really got nothing. Sorry interesting West,

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry NFC West. If unless other than the Rams.

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.960
<v Speaker 1>They really got nothing else on another team of the

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>winning record that I would throw the AFC East in there.

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>They've been they have the best team in football, but

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they've been garbage for twenty years, Like that same team

0:11:51.920 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in that division is any good? And that's the thing

0:11:53.640 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>about it is right now everybody can just get their

0:11:56.440 --> 0:11:59.520
<v Speaker 1>ass kicked. Everybody can you who's the best team in football?

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>The paid tricks is that? Who? Just? Well I meant

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 1>over the last year and I agree with you one

0:12:03.000 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>d percent. That's who I thought you were talking about.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Two the same team. They got wrecked by the Lions,

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and the Vikings look pretty good, but

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the Bills smashed them. And you know, everybody's kind of

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 1>had one. And then is it this week that the

0:12:16.800 --> 0:12:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Chiefs and Rams play? No, it's next month, next month.

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's in Mexico. Yeah, yep, I thought I just

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>saw a promo for it. I didn't know if it

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 1>was this coming up or not. Unless you're a Chiefs,

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Rams or maybe Bengals fan, you don't have a And well,

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, because they've been they've played so much beingles

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>are gonna disappoint. They're gonna disappoint them why. I mean,

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton is why he's playing great. Okay, I'm just

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 1>saying they won. They've won that division like three out

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>of the last five. It's the playoffs where they have

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>their struggles. They do something. They not saying they're gonna

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>win a play about some things in a regular season.

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you on that. I just don't. You

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>just don't like him. No, I don't dislike him. I

0:12:53.080 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't ahead he come from any get no, where'd

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:57.880
<v Speaker 1>he come from? Where did he come from? I think

0:12:57.880 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>he's from Rockwall. No, where'd you go to college? I

0:13:00.600 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Not a fan. I think that has a

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I just know it doesn't that not that

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>point Amber pointed this out last. I mean, you gotta

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you can't. You can't use those preconceived notions in an

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:15.760
<v Speaker 1>NFL season because you said that about the Eagles last

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:18.280
<v Speaker 1>year and they went thirteen and three and won Super Bowl. Right,

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>let's put it. Let's put it out there. What the Bengals,

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's they're probably. I mean they already have

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>four wins. They're a ten win team, and that's that'll

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>get you to the playoffs. I don't know if that want,

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you just see what happens at that point, right, you

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 1>get to playoffs. Well, they be in the AFC Championship.

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I doubt it. I doubt it. But and that's just

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.560
<v Speaker 1>based on history sittings. That's just me taking the field, like, yeah, right,

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>who the hell knows. But the thing about that is

0:13:42.240 --> 0:13:46.800
<v Speaker 1>is that they they play in probably the most physical division.

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Ravens, the Browns have gotten their defenses

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.880
<v Speaker 1>really well. Yeah, and the Steelers, of course, it is

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.319
<v Speaker 1>tough to to do anything really from that division just

0:13:58.480 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>because they be each other up. So I just history

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>tells me that the Bengals probably won't sustain it. But

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna take our first break when we come back.

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna talk number one wide receiver Jerry and Stevens

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>certainly have and they had some interesting things to say.

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll let when we come right back. This is Dallas

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Radio. If you're like me and you love,

0:14:18.520 --> 0:14:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you have a thing, then cutting the

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 1>chord is scary. But then I found out I could

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 1>switch to DirecTV now and still get the live sports

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I love. No satellite needed, no bulky hardware, no annual contract,

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>just that the live sports you love. Tried DirecTV now

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>for ten dollars a month for three months. Visit DirecTV

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>now dot com direct tv now more for your thing

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>that's out a thing use called really limited time price

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a little little page. If three months when he's monthsay

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>at full price currently mad aimum forty dollars and less.

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Cancer prices may change. We subscribers on cancel any time.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Content varies by package and maybe limited strict supply. Star

0:14:46.760 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Sports Tours is the only official fan travel partner of

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages with

0:14:54.000 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sideline access and photo ops with current players, alumni and cheerleaders.

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>That's not all, though, You'll get to talk xs and

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>os with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will McClay and

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>of course with yours truly me, Brian broad Us. You

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.200
<v Speaker 1>can trust the official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.160
<v Speaker 1>and with us you'll travel like a pro. Visit Cowboys

0:15:12.160 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Travel dot com to book your travel package today. I

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:17.960
<v Speaker 1>want to use what the pros use. How about the

0:15:18.000 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>official men skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black.

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Right now you can get the Jack Black Playmaker, a

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.280
<v Speaker 1>curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites for just ten

0:15:27.320 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 1>bucks with free shipping. The Playmaker includes four Jack Black

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>skincare favorites, plus a full sized Intense Therapy lip bomb

0:15:34.440 --> 0:15:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and a Cowboys can cooler. Go to get Jack Black

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.680
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys and use the code word Cowboys.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 1>The Jack Black Playmaker ten bucks free shipping. While a

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>player can look good on paper, it's when he's out

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on the field that you really find out what he's

0:15:49.680 --> 0:15:52.440
<v Speaker 1>made of. That's why the Cowboys rely on more than

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>staffed some scouting reports when building their team. When picking

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>a tractor, it's why you should rely on more than

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>specs and features as well. You gotta take it out

0:16:00.920 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and put it to the test the Cowboys did when

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>they named John Deer their official tractor. To experience one

0:16:06.920 --> 0:16:10.280
<v Speaker 1>for yourself, visit your local Texas John Deer dealer or

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>go to my John Deer Dealer dot com slash football.

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Back to the Break, Welcome back. It is the second

0:16:17.720 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>segment of The Break live from the s WBC Mortgage

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>studios at the Star. We're gonna talk a little bit

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>about receivers. Number one wide receivers to be exact yesterday Nick,

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you had an interview that you did with Steven. We're

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna play a clip from that. But also this morning

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>on one on five dot three of the fan here

0:16:34.320 --> 0:16:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in Dallas, Jerry had his morning talk with the guys

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>over there and they were asked and Jerry was talking

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>about the wide receiver position and basically said, the Cowboys

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>haven't had a number one receiver for a couple of years,

0:16:48.280 --> 0:16:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a few years. Let's listen to that quote that you

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>and Steven had though, because I want to I want

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to dive into this conversation after we hear that there's

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>not a silver bullet here. We've got to go to work.

0:16:59.200 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>There's no number one receivers laying around on the street

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>out there, so we've just got to get to work.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>And give us the context of that Nick you were

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:09.919
<v Speaker 1>doing the interview I had asked him. I said, you know,

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>we talked about number one receivers all off season and

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.120
<v Speaker 1>that the thought was that you could get this done

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>by committee. After seeing the first five games and seeing

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>what Houston's number one receiver did single handedly, do you

0:17:24.480 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>still feel like you know that you don't have a

0:17:28.200 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 1>number one you need one? And he basically said doesn't

0:17:31.840 --> 0:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>matter because there's not one out there. And I think

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.160
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows exactly. I mean, if you're reading between the lines,

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>everyone knows what that means and what he's saying. I

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:47.239
<v Speaker 1>don't even know your name, but they forgot it. I

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.920
<v Speaker 1>think they have forgotten his name now or they don't

0:17:49.960 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>want to. I mean, basically, and let's go with what's

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.200
<v Speaker 1>what Jerry said too, I mean, and help us out

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>with that. But I mean they're basically saying Dez Bryant

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.320
<v Speaker 1>is not going to fix this problem. He is not

0:18:02.440 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a number one receiver. So don't don't bring up that.

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But do you have you have Jerry's quote written down? Um,

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the exact quote. It was Cowboys haven't

0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:14.119
<v Speaker 1>had a true number one bide receiver in years. That

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>was part of the quote. I actually, so that's you know,

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that for them, that's the gist of it, Yeah,

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>saying he's talking about yeah, and here's the deal. And

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>I went back and obviously you hear that, and at

0:18:25.600 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>first you raise your eyebrows, but really, if you go

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>back and you look at the numbers all the way

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>back until probably twenty fourteen or not, probably two thousand

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and fourteen was the last time Dez had numbers that

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>reflected a true number one wide receiver. I'm talking about

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten in categories. Did the math receiving

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and and and touchdowns and yards. I did the math

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>when I wrote the story about Jerry's comments. Over the

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>three years after he signed his seventy million dollars deal

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>after the fourteen season and the three years after that,

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.399
<v Speaker 1>he averaged fifty catches for six hundred and seventy eight

0:18:58.480 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>yards and six touchdowns per year, which those are great

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>numbers if you're not on a seventy million dollar contract. Yep.

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So I mean that's I kind of look at it like,

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, further, I would have loved to have

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:13.119
<v Speaker 1>seen them negotiate something with Dez where they brought his

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>number down and kept him here. I think he would

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>probably still be the best receiver on this offense. But yeah,

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that that it didn't raise my eyebrows that much because

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, well, yeah, like, obviously they feel that way.

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 1>They cut him when and his numbers bear it out too.

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Were what year was it. We sat there and we

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.959
<v Speaker 1>did the interview in his in Jerry's office, and they

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 1>signed him to the extension. When was that It was

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>the summer of fifteen, Okay, the summer of fifteen, So fifteen, sixteen,

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and seventeen, yes, so he said for the last three years,

0:19:41.800 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>so they he didn't specify years several years I was

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.680
<v Speaker 1>playing out. Those three years have been the three years

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that his numbers didn't reflect him being a number one receiver.

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Then you know what, You know that they paid him

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the money to be an elite player, and you know

0:19:57.640 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>they they've gotten in trouble with this way back in

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the late nineties of paying players for what they have

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 1>done and not for what they were projected to do.

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>And maybe they did project him to bed. No, I can't,

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't go there, I and I've I've said this before.

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>They signed Dez Bryant to a five year deal thinking

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>that he'd play most of, if not all, of that

0:20:19.480 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>with Tony Romo, and he played two more games with him,

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Like straight up, I mean, and I mean, there's no

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 1>way to say this without sounding like yours bashing Dak,

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:32.120
<v Speaker 1>which that's not my intention, But I think des Bryant

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>would probably still be on this team if Tony Romo

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 1>was the quarterback. I think if you put Dez Bryant

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>on a team like the Saints, he might not be.

0:20:39.760 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>He probably has dropped a couple notches from the Odell's

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Abs and the Julios of the world. But

0:20:46.040 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>he would be a much more productive receiver with a

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>quarterback like that who can do whatever he wants to

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.720
<v Speaker 1>than he would be on this team. And that's the point. That's, honestly,

0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the point that I'm trying to I've been trying to

0:20:57.920 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>make with regards to Dez Bryant is it's not that

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 1>Dez is no longer can no longer be a productive player.

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>It's that under the current circumstance with the quarterback that

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you have, and what we've seen since he's been with

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that quarterback is he's not that elite kind of receiver.

0:21:12.240 --> 0:21:14.680
<v Speaker 1>And guess what, the quarterback isn't going anywhere. So if

0:21:14.680 --> 0:21:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you have him here, you're gonna be paying him elite

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:20.360
<v Speaker 1>money to give you pedestrian production. And it's not worth it.

0:21:20.359 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 1>It's not worth having that guy in the building when

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>you're doing that. And I'm not trying to sound smartie,

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>but I feel like we covered all of this in

0:21:27.520 --> 0:21:31.119
<v Speaker 1>the offseason, like this isn't new information. And that's I

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>hate it so much. But the phrase Dak friendly is

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>basically Dez at this point last season had two hundred

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.920
<v Speaker 1>and something yards on like fifty targets. Like to get

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>him involved the way you want to in this offense

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>with this quarterback, you just got to target him fifteen

0:21:47.960 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>times a game. And that's not in their best interests.

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 1>So they so they got rid of him, I mean basically.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.120
<v Speaker 1>And I on it, like I said, I don't know

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>that it was like this terrible blunder because I think

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:02.919
<v Speaker 1>if Dez Bryant was here, it would look awfully similar. Well,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you this question. Go ahead. Well, I

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>just think that it's hard to just go back and

0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>say we covered this in the off season because the

0:22:10.880 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>offseason you expected, or at least you know, there was

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.879
<v Speaker 1>some hope from this team that the receivers. Right now,

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>after five games, it's like, well, now let's revisit this.

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>How bad was it? Because these guys aren't aren't making

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>plays for you either, you know, And so the negative

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>plays that you saw from Dez last year, you know,

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 1>drop passes that led to an interception in Denver and

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>things like that. You saw that kind of stuff, and

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You're like, Wow, that's a that's that's not great. These

0:22:40.040 --> 0:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>guys are doing it here without really making some des

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:47.400
<v Speaker 1>was making some plays for both teams. But I mean,

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 1>like Deontay Thompsons is not making a play for you know,

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.160
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys at all. I'm not sure Deontay Thompsons

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the one that's kind of weird here because what is

0:22:57.240 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>he He's a four two guy that can run. So

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 1>when if we seen him run down the field, no,

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:05.119
<v Speaker 1>we see him run like I mean, passes over the

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>middle and that Carolina, they put all of their eggs

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>in that basket. That he who hadn't practiced most training camp,

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and he got cut earlier and comes back and a

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:17.960
<v Speaker 1>fourth and ten or whatever runs an out that the

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>timing is going to be perfect between him and I mean,

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and that lost the game for him or that was

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the last play there, and then he had a couple

0:23:24.320 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 1>of I just don't understand why they're trying to make

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy into a wide receiver when he's never been.

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>When he's never been, I mean, he's a speed guy

0:23:30.760 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're not using them that way. They're trying to

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>use him as a possession guy. And I think his

0:23:35.320 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>hands are as good as ours well. But that's also

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the problem when you don't have when you're kind of

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>throwing everybody into one mosh pit and saying we'll just

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 1>kind of use them all rather than having guys like

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I got a guy that I know can stretch the field,

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I got a guy that I know runs great routes

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:51.120
<v Speaker 1>that can move the chains. Like there, I don't think

0:23:51.160 --> 0:23:53.440
<v Speaker 1>they have, or at least it doesn't seem like they may.

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't seem like they have really well defined roles

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>on what guys do well and getting him in them

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>in those situations most frequently. And that was fine in

0:24:01.600 --> 0:24:04.320
<v Speaker 1>the spring. It was actually it was kind of exciting

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 1>in the spring to be like, oh, like all ten

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>of these guys are doing a little bit of everything,

0:24:08.960 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>like they're really gonna try to see who does what

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the best. But like we're still kind of doing that

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 1>in October, which they've you know, they've tightened up the

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>rotation a little bit. I would guess I don't have

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the snap counts in my head, but I think it's

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a little more defined than it was. But yeah, still

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 1>like again for the like Alan Hearns seems like he

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>would be your best possession receiver. They don't. They use

0:24:30.840 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>him that way, but not enough in my opinion. They

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 1>don't use Tavon to his strengths. They haven't been using

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Deonte to his strengths. And you're quite frank the same

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>thing with Cole Like, I don't think. I think that

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that when you're on that fourth and one, that third

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and one him on a flare route, you're probably going

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>to have a good shot of completing that. I I

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.680
<v Speaker 1>know you guys Joe groan and called me the implier.

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not implying anything here. I'm saying everything. I'm saying

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>everything that I know. I think the Cowboys will get

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.159
<v Speaker 1>a wide receiver in here in the next Cup a

0:25:00.200 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>week or two that we have heard of. This won't

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>be Dez Bryant, but it'll be somebody that they're going

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to try to bring in here. And that's all that

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>I know would be available. I mean, I'm just saying

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.960
<v Speaker 1>there could be you could sign someone, you could try

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to trade for someone. I don't think it'll be anybody

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that's significant. I don't think anyone that will really really help.

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.159
<v Speaker 1>I do think they will try to do something. You

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 1>can't keep going with this Again, I'm not implying that's

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:27.119
<v Speaker 1>all that I know. That's what I think is going

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to happen in the next I would say week to

0:25:29.280 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>ten days, I'd be kind of shocked because I think, well,

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>if they bring in trying not get it, but if

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they're bringing in more of the same, it just clouds

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it even further. I would I would maybe go if

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I were them, I may go the route of saying,

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>tighten up my rotation even more, figure out the guys

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>that I really want to use on specific roles and

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 1>focus on using them in that role versus bringing another

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 1>guy and throwing them in the mix. And I just

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>got one more guy that's doing what everybody else is doing.

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:59.200
<v Speaker 1>If anybody, I'm sorry, anybody got kind of like excited

0:25:59.200 --> 0:26:01.320
<v Speaker 1>about that comment that I just may just remember the

0:26:01.400 --> 0:26:03.679
<v Speaker 1>last ten days, they also brought in a receiver that

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:06.360
<v Speaker 1>you've heard of before and he's done absolutely nothing, So

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean anything. They brought in Bryce Butler. I'm

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>saying it could be something like that. Heck they need

0:26:12.080 --> 0:26:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to use. If they're gonna do that, they probably do

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>better off just using Butler. If they're gonna bring somebody

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.479
<v Speaker 1>else in, that's probably the same ilk right. I don't know.

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>If they want to give Bryce a shot, that would

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 1>be great. Otherwise, like, if they're not gonna change anything,

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I would lean on Beasley. Hearns t well Tavon as

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the way Tavon should be used, not not sending him

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>down the field to catch twenty yard routes like Tavon.

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Use Tavon the way that the Texans use Kiki qt

0:26:39.920 --> 0:26:42.320
<v Speaker 1>like it. It doesn't seem like it should be that hard.

0:26:42.560 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Um I was gonna say, Gallop, I don't love saying

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.360
<v Speaker 1>that because I mean, you want to go to bat

0:26:48.359 --> 0:26:51.159
<v Speaker 1>for the draft pick. But he has done he has

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>done something to indicate that he's not ready for this

0:26:53.640 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in basically every game. So maybe Bryce. Yeah, Um, I'm

0:26:59.520 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm I need to ask around. I haven't, but

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we're getting We're coming up on when Noah Brown can

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:09.440
<v Speaker 1>start practicing, not playing, but after Actually I think maybe

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>he could practice this week if they wanted him too.

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't know, Like I said, I don't

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:16.640
<v Speaker 1>know if they have any intention of bringing him back.

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 1>If you do that, that's one of your IR spots

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.480
<v Speaker 1>that you can't use anymore. So can I answer that

0:27:21.600 --> 0:27:24.119
<v Speaker 1>question because I have asked around yeout that for the

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>answer is yes, they are intending on bringing him back.

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Right there you go. I would love to see that

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.720
<v Speaker 1>another case for your pre show meetings. Dare mmm, No,

0:27:32.920 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>I like we hash it out. Yeah, sure, bro's talking.

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we don't say and talk about Noah Brown

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:41.399
<v Speaker 1>all the time, but ye had since it came up.

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I do. I do think that he's a guy that

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>they are they would look to bring back here at

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 1>some point. I would. I would love to see it.

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I was impressed with him as a rookie, and nobody

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>else is making their case. So yeah, it's true. Noone's

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 1>running away from Yeah you're not like, well, well let's

0:27:57.960 --> 0:28:00.360
<v Speaker 1>give no a little more time, because these guys that's

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.280
<v Speaker 1>why to me, that's why Rico is here, you know,

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 1>none of the anything. Yeah, all right, we're gonna take

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>our final break when come back, I'm gonna ask these

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 1>guys the question is the threat of a guy at

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver that can make a big play just as

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 1>good as the production, or at least comparable to the production,

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>then when we come right back. This is Dallascowboys dot

0:28:20.240 --> 0:28:23.119
<v Speaker 1>Com Radio. While a player can look good on paper,

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it's when he's out on the field that you really

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:28.119
<v Speaker 1>find out what he's made of. That's why the Cowboys

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>rely on more than stats and scouting reports when building

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:34.119
<v Speaker 1>their team. When picking a tractor, it's why you should

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>rely on more than specs and features as well. You

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>gotta take it out and put it to the test

0:28:38.960 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys did when they named John Deer their official tractor.

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 1>To experience one for yourself, visit your local Texas John

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Deer dealer or go to my John Deer Dealer dot com.

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Slash football, it's time for tail game with the Autobox Boys.

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Atterbox the makers of those crazy protective phone cases so

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>one and only. They're also wild about protecting parking lot

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>parties from sad or. It's why they made elevation tumblers

0:29:01.920 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>room around the crock pot, as they're made from stainless

0:29:04.240 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 1>steel with a copper lining to keep temps hotter coal true.

0:29:07.560 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 1>They even coming seven different sizes up to sixty four ounce.

0:29:10.920 --> 0:29:14.440
<v Speaker 1>The growler I like cowaterbox drinks, I mean thinks, and

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>that's been tailgating with the Auterbox Boys. Check out all

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the colors and sizes of their elevation tumblers at auterbox

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.080
<v Speaker 1>dot com want to use with the pros use, how

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:26.320
<v Speaker 1>about the official men skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Jack Black. Right now you can get the Jack Black Playmaker,

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just

0:29:32.600 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>ten bucks with free shipping. The Playmaker includes four Jack

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Black skincare favorites, plus a full sized Intense Therapy lip

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>bomb and a Cowboys can cooler. Go to get Jack

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Black dot com, slash Cowboys and use the code word

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys the Jack Black Playmakers ten bucks free shipping. Star

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Sports Tours is the only official fan travel partner of

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys, offering exclusive game weekend travel packages with

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>sideline access and photo ops with current play alumni and cheerleaders.

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:03.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not all, though, You'll get to talk x's and

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>os with Senior Director of Player Personnel Will McClay and

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of course with yours truly, me, Brian broad Us. You

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>can trust the official fan travel partner of the Dallas Cowboys,

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and with us you'll travel like a pro. Visit Cowboys

0:30:15.760 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Travel dot com to book your travel package today. A

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>man's stepson doesn't just protect him from life's elements. It

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 1>projects an unstoppable and legendary spirit, just like the men

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>wearing silver and navy on the field every Sunday Sends

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.840
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixty five. Stetson Hats are American made with pride

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>right here in Texas. They are still the official crown

0:30:36.880 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of all self prospecting Cowboys, and Stetson is proud to

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>be on the field with America's team. Find Stetson Hats

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in the Pro Shop or at Stetson dot Com Today

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 1>back to the break, Even when your team is struggling

0:30:53.840 --> 0:30:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, maybe has a losing record, you're still

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 1>want to ride with the boys. You always want to

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>ride with your boys. It comes to underwear. Definitely, don't

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>want them writing up on your boys, you know what

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Dave. That's why we always wear Tommy John.

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I had to say we what

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Tommy John? But you know the revolutionary brand of underwear,

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>stay up waist bands that keep everything in place nice?

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Is that okay? I'll just say yeah, stay up waistbands.

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that? Is that something that's you don't want it

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to You don't want to fall on you do, Yeah,

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't want them to be loose. I always kind

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>of understand that, but like, isn't isn't that kind of

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 1>a given? Not necessary? Not if it's poorly made underwear.

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Not necessarily when I was a younger man and didn't

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>have enough money to pay for quality underwear. Stay up waistbands.

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:46.960
<v Speaker 1>That sucks. Yeah, you stretch out that elastic a couple

0:31:46.960 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of times, and all of a sudden, you know we're

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>supposed to Why Tommy John is so good because they

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>get they give you everything. They also keep them on

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>your waist, no adjustment needed. Shop Exclusive Cowboys Underwear Tommy

0:31:58.160 --> 0:32:02.760
<v Speaker 1>John dot Com Forward Slash Cowboys. Oh yeah, let's get

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:05.800
<v Speaker 1>into it underwear. I had a question for you guys

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.320
<v Speaker 1>right before the break. We're talking about the wide receiver position,

0:32:08.360 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>particularly talking about number one wide receivers. I had a

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>fan on Twitter before the show bring up what I

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thought was a very valid point, or at least a

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>point that was worth discussion, which is last year, despite

0:32:20.000 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>what you thought about the production from Dez Bryant, despite

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>what you thought about the production from from Jason Witten,

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>the fact is, when Jason Witten and Des Bryan are

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>on your offense, defenses have to account for them because

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:34.720
<v Speaker 1>if they don't account for them, they can make them

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>look silly. Right Is that a situation or should that

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>be something that should be considered here when you talk about, hey,

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys really don't need a number one. Does the

0:32:43.440 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>threat of having a Dez Bryan out there, even if

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>he's not a true number one, just the threat of

0:32:48.040 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the damage that he can do, is that enough to

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>still need to have him on a team like this one.

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I think there's there's a couple of ways to look

0:32:57.720 --> 0:33:00.800
<v Speaker 1>at that one, like, yeah, yeah, they miss him in

0:33:00.800 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the sense that they are good veteran players who you

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>can typically count on to do what they're supposed to,

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Like Jason Witten is gonna be there. He's gonna probably

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out a way to get open more often than not.

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Dez Bryant can still do des Bryant things. Nick brings

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 1>up the slant against the Giants all the time. You

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 1>have to cover him. But to go back to Jerry

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Jones's point, it's been a long time since I remember,

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it was fourteen. The count went like first

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>time we really thought those Cowboys were a good team.

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>They smashed the Saints here in at and T like

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>week four. I think like literally, the Saints put two

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>corners on him, and I'm not talking about like rolling

0:33:38.400 --> 0:33:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a guy over the top, like literally they had two guys. Yeah,

0:33:41.840 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>and Dads was literally standing on the sideline like are

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>y'all kidding me right now? Or I mean not this.

0:33:45.800 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>He was standing in place in the formation like okay,

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Like nobody was covering Dads like that in the last

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:54.160
<v Speaker 1>two years. So he's not to get that kind of

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a team. You got to account for him. And he

0:33:56.320 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>has a track record that makes him more dangerous than

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>any of these guys, but he's he's not He wasn't

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:06.720
<v Speaker 1>that guy in recent memory. I mean, you know the

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.359
<v Speaker 1>thing about it is it reminds me of like the

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:12.480
<v Speaker 1>last You're probably too young for this, but you know

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>the last I don't know, five or ten years of

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Mike Tyson. You know, it's like he wasn't what he was,

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:23.919
<v Speaker 1>but you're always worried about it. Why because he could.

0:34:24.040 --> 0:34:26.840
<v Speaker 1>He could knock you out with punch. He's got that,

0:34:26.920 --> 0:34:28.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's kind of what's happened here with

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>Dez in a little bit. It's like, yeah, you're not

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the same, and you don't have to cover him the same,

0:34:32.960 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>but you got to be careful with that. And it's

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>not just about Dez, it's about it's about Tavon as well.

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Look back to the first game or this last game.

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:43.439
<v Speaker 1>A couple of plays they had to touchdown and even

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the shovel pass that on third down that was important.

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:49.359
<v Speaker 1>It got him in there. Fake to Tavon, shovel to

0:34:49.360 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to Zeke, fake to Tavon and Zeke throw it to

0:34:52.680 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Herns in the end zone. You can keep faking it

0:34:55.600 --> 0:34:57.440
<v Speaker 1>all day, but at some point, you know, so the

0:34:57.480 --> 0:35:00.160
<v Speaker 1>threat of not having the ball, it sounds good, but

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>you do have to show him every once in a while. So, um,

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. You do have to show him

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that we can hurt you and then use that against them.

0:35:09.680 --> 0:35:11.879
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, that's the part I think that would hurt

0:35:11.960 --> 0:35:15.640
<v Speaker 1>this argument is I don't think enough times last year

0:35:15.760 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Dez actually hurt the opposing team. Now, there were a couple,

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.279
<v Speaker 1>but I don't think it happened frequently and frequently enough

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.640
<v Speaker 1>where teams wouldn't still walk into a game with the

0:35:23.680 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys this year and say the exact same thing they're

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>saying right now, which is, if you're gonna beat this team.

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:31.120
<v Speaker 1>You gotta stop Zeke. Dez is one thing, and we'll

0:35:31.160 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>deal with him. We could probably put one guy on him,

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and we will. We will be okay if we let

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 1>if he gets a big play on us, Like we're

0:35:37.880 --> 0:35:39.440
<v Speaker 1>okay with the idea he might get a big play

0:35:39.480 --> 0:35:41.879
<v Speaker 1>on us. Well, we can't let we can't let get

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>off is Zeke. And I think that's that doesn't change.

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:45.799
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't change where the Dez is on the team

0:35:45.880 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 1>or not. And that I mean, you know, I worry

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 1>about sounding like a homer, but like we saw Dez

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>do so much of the stuff we're seeing right now.

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.640
<v Speaker 1>You brought up the Denver game, the Seattle game last

0:35:56.719 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Year's burned into my brain forever, like, and he made

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:02.479
<v Speaker 1>some play and he would probably still be the best

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:05.400
<v Speaker 1>receiver on this team if he was here, but he

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>left a lot of stuff out there. I mean, you

0:36:07.560 --> 0:36:10.759
<v Speaker 1>can blame Dak if you want to. I'm lean more

0:36:10.760 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 1>toward thinking that if you make twelve million dollars a

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.160
<v Speaker 1>year to play receiver, you should have a DeAndre Hopkins.

0:36:16.440 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Those balls were not all accurate, and he mean, he's

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:21.439
<v Speaker 1>got a fifty foot catch radius. It doesn't matter where

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:22.799
<v Speaker 1>it is he's going to bring it in. You know,

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're paying twelve million dollars a year for. Right.

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>The thing about that is is that he keep going

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:33.239
<v Speaker 1>back to that statement that I agree with and Dave

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:35.239
<v Speaker 1>agrees because he just said it. I don't know if

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you do, but that Dez would be the best receiver

0:36:38.160 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>on the team if he was here. Think about any

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>other football team in the league, and any other position

0:36:44.560 --> 0:36:47.560
<v Speaker 1>other than maybe kicker, I don't know where else could

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you say if I signed this guy off the street,

0:36:50.080 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 1>he would be better than anyone else that I have

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>for all the problems of well, what he is in

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the locker room and all that. That's a that's a

0:37:00.280 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>statement that's needs I think needs to be addressed like

0:37:04.760 --> 0:37:07.400
<v Speaker 1>no one No other team can say that no other position.

0:37:07.480 --> 0:37:09.799
<v Speaker 1>You could say, there's nobody out there that would be

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the best of all of that, but he would be.

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 1>My question back to you, when you're saying that, you're

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>speaking purely from the point standpoint of just raw skill

0:37:19.120 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>as a receiver. You're saying he'd be the best one. Now,

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>let's factor in the other reasons, because there were other

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>reasons why he's not on this team. When you factor

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.960
<v Speaker 1>in those other reasons, is his ability that much greater

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>to where it's worth saying have him put him on

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.439
<v Speaker 1>this team? That's the issue well ahead any other team

0:37:36.440 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in any For any other team they had, they'd have

0:37:39.440 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>to deal with the part of Des learning the offense

0:37:42.160 --> 0:37:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and all that. I mean, so you got a guy

0:37:45.680 --> 0:37:47.879
<v Speaker 1>that would be talent wise, raw talent, like you said,

0:37:47.960 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>better than anyone you have. It's got more experience in

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>production than anyone else that you have. He's got an

0:37:53.520 --> 0:37:56.480
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the offense. May not be better than anyone

0:37:56.480 --> 0:37:58.279
<v Speaker 1>else you have, but he does have an understanding of

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:03.799
<v Speaker 1>the offense. And you know, I but don't you think

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 1>being cut and being on the street no one's signing you.

0:38:06.200 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, do you think that would change anything? Humble

0:38:08.960 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 1>him at all? Did not? I don't know. Do you

0:38:12.400 --> 0:38:15.839
<v Speaker 1>think it doesn't feel like he doesn't seem like Twitter

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:19.279
<v Speaker 1>activity does not indicate that it has um which the

0:38:19.360 --> 0:38:21.320
<v Speaker 1>other thing for me is okay, all of that is

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>very all of that is very important, and for how

0:38:23.960 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>good his relationship with Jerry Jones is. I'm sure Des

0:38:27.320 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>has burned several bridges in this building, in the locker

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>room and out of the locker room. But my thing is,

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 1>what how big is the difference in production? Really? Like honestly,

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean that because like Dez would definitely be leading

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>this team in catches and yards probably, I think he'd

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>also be far and away leading in targets because we

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.880
<v Speaker 1>saw it last year's Like, even though he is a

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>complimentary player in this offense, at this point in time,

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.960
<v Speaker 1>you have to plan for him, like he's a premier guy.

0:38:58.040 --> 0:39:00.319
<v Speaker 1>Like that's what they did. He had forty targets through

0:39:00.320 --> 0:39:03.120
<v Speaker 1>four games. That's why they did this. Is that Michael

0:39:03.160 --> 0:39:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Gallup isn't gonna say bup if he gets two targets

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>in the game. He's a rookie. Deontay Thompson is not

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>going to raise a stink about getting five targets in

0:39:12.120 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the game because that's probably a career high for it.

0:39:15.440 --> 0:39:22.320
<v Speaker 1>They're getting there. One, there's one guy that's ye're saying,

0:39:22.480 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they're they're getting there because everybody, well, what they're what

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:27.919
<v Speaker 1>what it sounds like they're doing. It sounds like they're

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>just saying it's not us, that's that's what. It's not

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.240
<v Speaker 1>so much give me the ball as much as they're saying, hey,

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>everybody out there is trying to point the finger at us.

0:39:36.120 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>It ain't us. That's what I'm here rich from there.

0:39:38.480 --> 0:39:42.080
<v Speaker 1>It's it is, but that's not. That's at least what

0:39:42.120 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>I think they're saying is it's not it's everything. It's everything.

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:50.040
<v Speaker 1>It's everything talking great, but they're not getting open. But

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that's why I say yesterday, there's only one of all

0:39:52.640 --> 0:39:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're talking about. There's only one or two positions

0:39:55.360 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 1>that our expectations were different than what we're seeing right now,

0:39:58.040 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's offensive line and running back. That's the we

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>had high expectations for. It's as easily needs to be

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the number three receiver on this team, and he's not.

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>He's the number one receiver, and that's the problem. He

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 1>needs to be number three. He needs to be the

0:40:09.760 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>guy that's the mismatch guy. But if teams want to

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 1>take him out of the game, they'll take him out

0:40:14.800 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of the game and then leaving you with what that's

0:40:18.239 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that's to me, that's I mean, that's what they've they've

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:25.720
<v Speaker 1>committed themselves to what we're gonna do when all else fails,

0:40:26.200 --> 0:40:28.279
<v Speaker 1>we fall back on our running it. Yeah, that's what

0:40:28.320 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they've committed to. It's funny, because I mean, it's it's

0:40:31.040 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the it's a tale as old as time this league.

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Every damn near every team in the league thinks it

0:40:35.520 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>has a shot at the playoffs when the season starts.

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>That's what's great about it. But so damn near every

0:40:40.200 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 1>team in the league feels really good about what they

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 1>did in the offseason, which in some cases it has

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:48.480
<v Speaker 1>worked out, Like the linebacker situation has worked out perfectly

0:40:48.760 --> 0:40:50.960
<v Speaker 1>with the way they planned it out, even it hadn't

0:40:51.000 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>been great. But safety has not sunk this team yet.

0:40:55.160 --> 0:40:56.919
<v Speaker 1>You could say the same thing about their defensive front.

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:01.880
<v Speaker 1>But having said all of that, they are currently getting

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>a big f for how that they decided to approach

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver, like none of the stuff that they thought

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 1>would happen, like we think we think Michael Gallup, we

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 1>think Alan Hearns will do this with you know, Diante,

0:41:13.080 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 1>he worked with sanjt Like none of it's working in

0:41:15.960 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>we think he can be this and and doctorserve some

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:20.759
<v Speaker 1>blame in that too, for that matter, because these are

0:41:20.800 --> 0:41:22.839
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be guys tailored to what he wants to

0:41:22.840 --> 0:41:25.360
<v Speaker 1>do and they might not be getting open. They certainly

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't getting open all the time, but he's missing throws

0:41:27.640 --> 0:41:29.759
<v Speaker 1>as well when he's having those opportunities. I just thought

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>about something, have you guys, Has anybody asked the question

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>what happened to the whole concept of Tavon being a

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.560
<v Speaker 1>web back. I don't think I've seen him line up

0:41:37.560 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>in the backfield at all. I don't like, I don't

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.320
<v Speaker 1>care where he lies. I'm what I take some offense

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:47.839
<v Speaker 1>to that because I've been yelling about it all season long.

0:41:47.920 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>They're not using him the way that he seems like

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.600
<v Speaker 1>he is screaming to be used. My point was that

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>was what was said on draft Day, and that's what

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they talked about there at the beginning, is that you

0:41:57.920 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>look at how the Rams were using him last year. Year.

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:02.239
<v Speaker 1>They lined him up in the backfield a lot. I mean,

0:42:02.239 --> 0:42:04.360
<v Speaker 1>he was getting carries quite a bit, probably more of

0:42:04.360 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a ball carrier than just a receiver for the Rams

0:42:07.239 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 1>last year. So my expectation from what they said was

0:42:10.440 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to be a guy that was

0:42:11.880 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>going to have the ball in his hands more frequently

0:42:14.480 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 1>as a as a runner, just as a runner. So

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 1>whether that's a bubble screen, whether that's a handoff, they

0:42:18.719 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>were gonna find ways just get the ball in his hand.

0:42:20.239 --> 0:42:22.600
<v Speaker 1>That's not necessarily as a receiver, because they made a

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:26.719
<v Speaker 1>point of saying web back versus wide receiver. At what

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:30.160
<v Speaker 1>point did that change and if so, why are they

0:42:30.239 --> 0:42:32.839
<v Speaker 1>not Did they decide to do that versus using him

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 1>more in that role? I know my question. I don't

0:42:35.280 --> 0:42:37.080
<v Speaker 1>care if he ever takes a single handoff out of

0:42:37.080 --> 0:42:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the backfield. But Josh Norris, who's a fantasy football guru,

0:42:40.840 --> 0:42:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I quote tweeted this last night. Key Key Qt's average

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.400
<v Speaker 1>depth of target of five yards is the lowest of

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:51.840
<v Speaker 1>any wide receiver in the league with twenty plus targets.

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:54.520
<v Speaker 1>You can spend it in a positive way because he's

0:42:54.520 --> 0:42:56.600
<v Speaker 1>got twenty two targets in just two games. Again, that's

0:42:56.600 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 1>what I said when we were previewing him last week.

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:01.560
<v Speaker 1>He never touches the ball all more than five six

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:05.360
<v Speaker 1>yards down field. He's still a crucial component of their offense,

0:43:05.440 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>which is my point. No, but I don't care if

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Tavon's lining up at running back. Just get him the

0:43:10.560 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 1>ball in shallow space where he doesn't have to make

0:43:14.239 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 1>this amazing grab to get the ball. Same thing. Yeah, No,

0:43:17.239 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we are, we are, but it's something I've been harping

0:43:19.640 --> 0:43:21.359
<v Speaker 1>on and will continue to harp on because I don't

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.320
<v Speaker 1>understand it right, and I would be interested to see

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.160
<v Speaker 1>what coaches have to say about that, seeing as though

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:29.239
<v Speaker 1>that seemed like that was the plan when he came in.

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Um and not to say this is the end all

0:43:30.880 --> 0:43:33.080
<v Speaker 1>be all, but it was funny because even on like ESPN,

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>on their fantasy game, he is listed as a running back,

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:38.000
<v Speaker 1>not as a wide receiver. If I had to guess,

0:43:38.040 --> 0:43:41.280
<v Speaker 1>they will give an answer that suggests that we're stupid

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 1>for suggesting it. I know they suggested it. Like they'll

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>say something that's like, well, you don't understand, but here's

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>why that's I'll I'll try to get a question in

0:43:50.120 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 1>for you. Let's see how goes. All right, appreciate you guys, Jonas.

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:53.600
<v Speaker 1>We'll back tomorrow. We're gonna get you guys ready for

0:43:53.640 --> 0:43:57.719
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys versus Jaguars. I have this again tonight. Yeah yeah,

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:00.799
<v Speaker 1>you guys are in the area, come check us out.

0:44:00.840 --> 0:44:03.360
<v Speaker 1>We'll be a concrete Cowboy tonight at six pm for

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the Happy Hour, and it'll it'll be US three plus

0:44:06.920 --> 0:44:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Shannon Gross. We'll see how that goes anyway. For Nick,

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>even Dave Hellman I'm Derek Eagles and this has been

0:44:11.280 --> 0:44:14.719
<v Speaker 1>the Break live on Dallas cowboys dot Com. Grady year one.

0:44:15.719 --> 0:44:18.600
<v Speaker 1>This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club.