WEBVTT - John Frusciante Returns, Part 2

0:00:15.436 --> 0:00:22.716
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin. Today, we're excited to bring you the next installment

0:00:22.756 --> 0:00:26.316
<v Speaker 1>of our John Fuschante interview series. John first came on

0:00:26.316 --> 0:00:29.676
<v Speaker 1>the podcast back in April for the release of Unlimited Love.

0:00:30.396 --> 0:00:32.076
<v Speaker 1>Then he was back a few weeks ago to pick

0:00:32.156 --> 0:00:35.356
<v Speaker 1>up where they left off discussing Chili Pepper history one

0:00:35.396 --> 0:00:38.556
<v Speaker 1>album at a time. This is part two of that

0:00:38.636 --> 0:00:41.756
<v Speaker 1>conversation and it's shaping up to be a little bit

0:00:41.876 --> 0:00:44.876
<v Speaker 1>different this time around. Instead of talking Chili Pepper history,

0:00:45.236 --> 0:00:47.676
<v Speaker 1>John picks up his guitar to walk Rick through his

0:00:47.796 --> 0:00:50.996
<v Speaker 1>pre show warm up. He also demonstrates how he came

0:00:51.076 --> 0:00:53.596
<v Speaker 1>up with a now classic major to minor chord changes

0:00:53.836 --> 0:00:57.076
<v Speaker 1>on Under the Bridge. They of course talk Return of

0:00:57.116 --> 0:01:00.676
<v Speaker 1>the Dream Canteen, their second number one album in six months,

0:01:01.236 --> 0:01:03.796
<v Speaker 1>and they also discussed how John was able to overcome

0:01:03.836 --> 0:01:07.076
<v Speaker 1>his desire to impress others with his guitar plane while

0:01:07.076 --> 0:01:13.796
<v Speaker 1>recording Stadium Arcadium. This is broken record line of notes

0:01:13.836 --> 0:01:17.596
<v Speaker 1>for the digital age. I'm justin Mitchell, here's Rick Rubin

0:01:17.636 --> 0:01:21.556
<v Speaker 1>and John Fuschante from Shangola. So there's a new Chili

0:01:21.556 --> 0:01:25.116
<v Speaker 1>Pepper album that just came out. Yeah, second one in

0:01:25.436 --> 0:01:30.116
<v Speaker 1>a year, Yeah, a second one. Six months. We really

0:01:30.116 --> 0:01:31.876
<v Speaker 1>think of them as kind of two halves of the

0:01:32.036 --> 0:01:35.396
<v Speaker 1>same thing, because we recorded them all at the same time.

0:01:35.476 --> 0:01:40.876
<v Speaker 1>And I think the second ones probably like the more eccentric,

0:01:40.996 --> 0:01:44.036
<v Speaker 1>kind of strange one, if I had to generalize. But

0:01:44.436 --> 0:01:45.996
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at a list the other day that

0:01:46.036 --> 0:01:48.036
<v Speaker 1>I've made when we were trying to figure out what

0:01:48.076 --> 0:01:50.196
<v Speaker 1>songs are going to make it on, you know, and

0:01:50.236 --> 0:01:53.716
<v Speaker 1>what songs aren't, And I had a list like, songs

0:01:53.756 --> 0:01:56.316
<v Speaker 1>that feel like to me, like my image of the

0:01:56.356 --> 0:01:59.556
<v Speaker 1>second album, you know, and songs that sound like what

0:01:59.676 --> 0:02:02.956
<v Speaker 1>I'm picturing the first album feeling like. And while most

0:02:02.956 --> 0:02:05.236
<v Speaker 1>of those songs were on the album that they were on,

0:02:05.276 --> 0:02:08.036
<v Speaker 1>there were songs that were the second album Vibe that

0:02:08.076 --> 0:02:10.196
<v Speaker 1>we wound up putting on the first album, and first

0:02:10.196 --> 0:02:12.596
<v Speaker 1>album five that we wound up putting on the second album.

0:02:13.276 --> 0:02:17.516
<v Speaker 1>So to me, they seem pretty balanced between the two things.

0:02:17.596 --> 0:02:20.476
<v Speaker 1>But but I think the new one goes to further extremes,

0:02:20.476 --> 0:02:24.036
<v Speaker 1>both in like heaviness and in softness and in like

0:02:24.516 --> 0:02:27.196
<v Speaker 1>weirdness and all that. And the first some of my

0:02:27.236 --> 0:02:30.356
<v Speaker 1>favorites were on the second one, but I like songs

0:02:30.396 --> 0:02:34.476
<v Speaker 1>on both. Yeah, that was really the problem was was

0:02:34.516 --> 0:02:38.116
<v Speaker 1>like seventeen songs just born enough to satisfy any of us,

0:02:38.116 --> 0:02:40.716
<v Speaker 1>like like, and some of your favorite ones didn't even

0:02:40.756 --> 0:02:42.436
<v Speaker 1>make it on the second one, and those were those

0:02:42.436 --> 0:02:46.516
<v Speaker 1>were some of your very favorite ones. Yeah, so it

0:02:46.556 --> 0:02:49.996
<v Speaker 1>was really it was really hard to like to satisfy everybody,

0:02:50.396 --> 0:02:52.836
<v Speaker 1>you know. So so it seemed essential to us to

0:02:52.916 --> 0:02:55.916
<v Speaker 1>at least have have the two records. Yeah, because the

0:02:56.036 --> 0:02:59.036
<v Speaker 1>making is similar, it's same, it's they were all record

0:02:59.076 --> 0:03:01.516
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Yeah, it's hard to talk about

0:03:01.556 --> 0:03:04.396
<v Speaker 1>and interviews when they're the when they were made at

0:03:04.436 --> 0:03:07.036
<v Speaker 1>the same time. But as it turns out, the second

0:03:07.036 --> 0:03:08.916
<v Speaker 1>one has a to me, has a sort of a

0:03:08.956 --> 0:03:11.036
<v Speaker 1>few feeling in the sound that it could have been

0:03:11.076 --> 0:03:14.276
<v Speaker 1>recorded at a completely separate time, Like it has a

0:03:15.196 --> 0:03:18.076
<v Speaker 1>to me, it has a spirit of brightness and fun,

0:03:18.636 --> 0:03:23.876
<v Speaker 1>where Unlimited Love has kind of a darkness and a seriousness.

0:03:24.876 --> 0:03:26.636
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of the tunes that stood out

0:03:26.636 --> 0:03:30.196
<v Speaker 1>to us as being like important sounding songs were some

0:03:30.236 --> 0:03:32.876
<v Speaker 1>of the darker, more serious ones, and some of the

0:03:32.876 --> 0:03:36.356
<v Speaker 1>ones that we felt more comfortable We're saving have like

0:03:36.396 --> 0:03:40.596
<v Speaker 1>a light vibe that's not absent of meaning or anything,

0:03:41.956 --> 0:03:45.396
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, more playful. Yeah, I see the second one

0:03:45.516 --> 0:03:50.076
<v Speaker 1>is I hear it as being a brighter vibe and

0:03:50.156 --> 0:03:54.356
<v Speaker 1>a more fun vibe. I remember I was classifying songs

0:03:54.396 --> 0:03:59.036
<v Speaker 1>as like I did. Think I just said pop, funk, art.

0:03:59.316 --> 0:04:01.196
<v Speaker 1>I think I just made it as simple as that.

0:04:02.076 --> 0:04:04.156
<v Speaker 1>And there was the most of pop, there was, the

0:04:04.196 --> 0:04:07.356
<v Speaker 1>middle of was funk, and the smallest amount was art.

0:04:07.516 --> 0:04:10.756
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, and I just think we even the distributed them.

0:04:10.796 --> 0:04:13.396
<v Speaker 1>But I think we got better at the mixing process

0:04:13.516 --> 0:04:15.516
<v Speaker 1>as time went by, and that sort of gave the

0:04:15.516 --> 0:04:18.956
<v Speaker 1>second record to me, like production wise, sound wise, it's

0:04:19.436 --> 0:04:22.516
<v Speaker 1>it's got a distinct sound to it. I would also

0:04:22.556 --> 0:04:25.756
<v Speaker 1>say that if anyone liked the first album, they're gonna

0:04:25.756 --> 0:04:28.756
<v Speaker 1>like the second album. It's like the same diary entry,

0:04:29.036 --> 0:04:32.036
<v Speaker 1>you know that. That however long two years of writing.

0:04:32.116 --> 0:04:34.716
<v Speaker 1>You guys are writing for about two years. Oh no,

0:04:34.796 --> 0:04:38.156
<v Speaker 1>we wrote for nine months, only nine months, amazing. Yeah,

0:04:38.196 --> 0:04:43.036
<v Speaker 1>and then the recording I think for like fifty tracks

0:04:43.156 --> 0:04:46.876
<v Speaker 1>we did, we did the basic traction three weeks of

0:04:48.116 --> 0:04:51.116
<v Speaker 1>everything we did pre production though in the studio before

0:04:51.156 --> 0:04:54.516
<v Speaker 1>we started right recording for real, right, yeah, there was

0:04:54.596 --> 0:04:58.356
<v Speaker 1>about a month of that. Yeah, yeah, because then by

0:04:58.356 --> 0:05:02.476
<v Speaker 1>the time we did the real recording, it was more

0:05:02.516 --> 0:05:05.196
<v Speaker 1>focused on just getting the performance. We weren't working, we

0:05:05.196 --> 0:05:07.276
<v Speaker 1>weren't really working on the songs. It was just more

0:05:07.276 --> 0:05:10.036
<v Speaker 1>of the feel in the performance. Yeah, it's true, and

0:05:10.116 --> 0:05:12.556
<v Speaker 1>I think that's historically the way we've we've always done it.

0:05:12.556 --> 0:05:15.196
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, usually when we're recording, we kind of

0:05:15.236 --> 0:05:17.596
<v Speaker 1>know what we're doing by then. Yeah, it was it

0:05:17.676 --> 0:05:19.716
<v Speaker 1>was different in that we were for me and that

0:05:19.756 --> 0:05:22.676
<v Speaker 1>we were in a studio, even though we were just

0:05:22.756 --> 0:05:25.756
<v Speaker 1>basically there to work out arrangements with you, Like usually

0:05:25.796 --> 0:05:28.396
<v Speaker 1>you would have been in the rehearsal studio with us,

0:05:28.396 --> 0:05:31.076
<v Speaker 1>and instead we were here at Changer Law. Yeah. Yeah,

0:05:31.476 --> 0:05:36.436
<v Speaker 1>How did you decide to release the second album so

0:05:36.436 --> 0:05:39.316
<v Speaker 1>soon after the first album? Well, I think our our

0:05:39.316 --> 0:05:44.196
<v Speaker 1>original idea just wasn't possible. I at Anthony and Fully

0:05:44.276 --> 0:05:48.076
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to just release a giant album. It would

0:05:48.076 --> 0:05:51.556
<v Speaker 1>have been like a four everything, four records set and

0:05:51.676 --> 0:05:55.316
<v Speaker 1>to double CD, and they were really big on that idea,

0:05:55.356 --> 0:05:58.276
<v Speaker 1>and it just turned out that wasn't going to be

0:05:58.316 --> 0:06:01.676
<v Speaker 1>possible mixing wise, we didn't have enough time to get

0:06:01.716 --> 0:06:05.116
<v Speaker 1>an album out before the tour was scheduled. In order

0:06:05.116 --> 0:06:07.716
<v Speaker 1>to do that, not to mention the record company wasn't

0:06:07.716 --> 0:06:10.316
<v Speaker 1>crazy about that idea. It seemed like a pretty wild

0:06:10.796 --> 0:06:12.916
<v Speaker 1>thing to do, but I think they liked the idea

0:06:12.996 --> 0:06:16.916
<v Speaker 1>just because nobody does that. So the second best idea,

0:06:17.076 --> 0:06:21.156
<v Speaker 1>which I'm pretty sure Anthony even wanted. When he found

0:06:21.156 --> 0:06:22.676
<v Speaker 1>out we couldn't do that, he was like, well, could

0:06:22.676 --> 0:06:24.716
<v Speaker 1>we have any other album come out two months later?

0:06:25.156 --> 0:06:27.756
<v Speaker 1>It was a big Basically as soon as possible was

0:06:27.796 --> 0:06:30.996
<v Speaker 1>the yeah idea. So six months wound up being the

0:06:31.036 --> 0:06:35.236
<v Speaker 1>reasonable thing and the possible thing because mixing wise, we

0:06:35.276 --> 0:06:37.996
<v Speaker 1>needed that extra six months. Oh, let's talk about the covers.

0:06:38.116 --> 0:06:39.676
<v Speaker 1>I don't know anything about this, but I know that

0:06:39.716 --> 0:06:43.316
<v Speaker 1>the cover of the first album is one kind of

0:06:43.356 --> 0:06:45.956
<v Speaker 1>image and the cover of the second album is a

0:06:46.076 --> 0:06:48.996
<v Speaker 1>very different kind of image. Yeah, and I felt like

0:06:49.196 --> 0:06:51.636
<v Speaker 1>that wound up being good at wound up reflecting the

0:06:52.036 --> 0:06:54.716
<v Speaker 1>musical difference that I feel in the two albums as well,

0:06:54.796 --> 0:06:57.556
<v Speaker 1>and kind kind of a heavy thing. Yeah. The first

0:06:57.556 --> 0:07:02.036
<v Speaker 1>cover came from Anthony had an idea that the asterisk

0:07:02.516 --> 0:07:06.156
<v Speaker 1>with a black background would be the basic idea in

0:07:06.196 --> 0:07:09.996
<v Speaker 1>some kind of neon light. But what he was getting

0:07:10.036 --> 0:07:15.196
<v Speaker 1>from the record company wasn't fulfilling his vision, and so

0:07:15.276 --> 0:07:19.276
<v Speaker 1>he passed it on to Marcy, my wife, and they

0:07:19.396 --> 0:07:24.716
<v Speaker 1>started talking about it and we started taking these references.

0:07:25.116 --> 0:07:28.836
<v Speaker 1>There's this Christian church that you see from the freeway

0:07:29.076 --> 0:07:32.276
<v Speaker 1>going into Hollywood from the valley. It's a it's a

0:07:32.276 --> 0:07:34.636
<v Speaker 1>big sort of neon sign, and that wound up being

0:07:34.916 --> 0:07:37.756
<v Speaker 1>kind of the basis. Then we Marcy got to help

0:07:37.836 --> 0:07:41.076
<v Speaker 1>some help from somebody she knows, designing what the sign

0:07:41.116 --> 0:07:42.876
<v Speaker 1>would look like, and then it got passed on to

0:07:43.036 --> 0:07:47.676
<v Speaker 1>some other people who actually built the sign to be photographed.

0:07:47.676 --> 0:07:51.636
<v Speaker 1>Then we had people to move the sign somewhere where

0:07:51.636 --> 0:07:54.636
<v Speaker 1>it would be good to to shoot it. That might

0:07:54.676 --> 0:07:59.356
<v Speaker 1>have been the top of the Roosevelt Hotel. So there's

0:07:59.356 --> 0:08:04.996
<v Speaker 1>a physical there is a physical object exactly. So yeah,

0:08:05.036 --> 0:08:07.556
<v Speaker 1>So that was the first that was the first cover,

0:08:07.756 --> 0:08:12.316
<v Speaker 1>and then the one we had done a video with

0:08:12.356 --> 0:08:18.196
<v Speaker 1>these animators that Marcy knows, these French animators Tammy and Julian,

0:08:18.796 --> 0:08:24.036
<v Speaker 1>who did a video for poster Child and a song

0:08:24.116 --> 0:08:27.396
<v Speaker 1>from the first record, and they didn't have much time

0:08:27.436 --> 0:08:29.796
<v Speaker 1>to do it. It winds up looping at a certain point.

0:08:29.836 --> 0:08:33.756
<v Speaker 1>It was because releasing two records and so quickly like

0:08:33.876 --> 0:08:37.276
<v Speaker 1>this in succession, we've had to rush through several stages

0:08:37.316 --> 0:08:39.596
<v Speaker 1>of the process, and I feel like we came up

0:08:39.636 --> 0:08:42.156
<v Speaker 1>with good things under the pressure, but it was it's

0:08:42.156 --> 0:08:44.916
<v Speaker 1>been hard. Like it's just now that this record is out,

0:08:44.996 --> 0:08:48.076
<v Speaker 1>like starting to feel like lightning up, even though we've

0:08:48.076 --> 0:08:49.956
<v Speaker 1>just got off five months of tour. But that whole time,

0:08:49.996 --> 0:08:54.716
<v Speaker 1>there's been constant stuff going on other than is preparing

0:08:54.716 --> 0:08:57.716
<v Speaker 1>the second Yeah, and her and Anthony had actually had

0:08:57.756 --> 0:09:01.756
<v Speaker 1>the same idea independently of each other. Used the animators

0:09:01.876 --> 0:09:04.996
<v Speaker 1>to make a cover that has a lot of different

0:09:05.676 --> 0:09:08.716
<v Speaker 1>images and that's colorful, and that our main reference. We

0:09:08.876 --> 0:09:13.236
<v Speaker 1>were thinking of covers like Funkadelic Cosmic Slop cover, but

0:09:13.596 --> 0:09:16.156
<v Speaker 1>there's several covers that I can think of, ones we

0:09:16.156 --> 0:09:18.316
<v Speaker 1>weren't even using but that I think have been in

0:09:18.356 --> 0:09:20.756
<v Speaker 1>that same category. Like Frank Zapp and the Mothers of

0:09:20.756 --> 0:09:23.396
<v Speaker 1>Invention had an album called One Size Fits All. It's

0:09:23.436 --> 0:09:25.516
<v Speaker 1>got like a couch and it's got a cigar, and

0:09:25.556 --> 0:09:29.116
<v Speaker 1>it's got you know, some outer space themes, like just

0:09:29.196 --> 0:09:31.916
<v Speaker 1>these kind of cartoon like covers, and so yeah, it

0:09:32.516 --> 0:09:34.796
<v Speaker 1>seemed like that idea fit in really well with what

0:09:34.836 --> 0:09:36.996
<v Speaker 1>the vibe had turned out to be of the second album,

0:09:37.076 --> 0:09:40.116
<v Speaker 1>kind of more colorful, so they put that together and

0:09:40.116 --> 0:09:42.836
<v Speaker 1>we actually made two covers. There's one for the indie

0:09:42.876 --> 0:09:45.996
<v Speaker 1>record stores that there's a limited amount of, and then

0:09:46.036 --> 0:09:50.156
<v Speaker 1>there's the cover for the normal cover, and those are

0:09:50.156 --> 0:09:53.556
<v Speaker 1>two completely different covers. How do you think about sequencing

0:09:53.556 --> 0:09:55.836
<v Speaker 1>an album? Yes, I think of it on a lot

0:09:55.836 --> 0:09:57.716
<v Speaker 1>of levels. Like it was. That's why we had to

0:09:57.756 --> 0:10:00.156
<v Speaker 1>do the voting that we did, was just because like

0:10:00.596 --> 0:10:03.436
<v Speaker 1>we'd recorded like forty eight songs that we had finished

0:10:03.916 --> 0:10:09.596
<v Speaker 1>vocals too, and I knew that at the most, you know,

0:10:09.676 --> 0:10:11.836
<v Speaker 1>only like thirty four we're going to be able to

0:10:11.876 --> 0:10:16.516
<v Speaker 1>be released on two you know, double record sets. So

0:10:16.556 --> 0:10:18.356
<v Speaker 1>that was really hard when you don't even know what

0:10:19.396 --> 0:10:21.716
<v Speaker 1>songs the two albums are going to consist of, you know.

0:10:22.276 --> 0:10:25.716
<v Speaker 1>But for sequencing an album, I have certain things like

0:10:25.756 --> 0:10:27.676
<v Speaker 1>the first song has to sound like a first song,

0:10:27.796 --> 0:10:30.476
<v Speaker 1>the last song has to sound like a last song,

0:10:31.036 --> 0:10:32.916
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the middle of the album should feel

0:10:32.916 --> 0:10:34.876
<v Speaker 1>like the middle of the you know, the it should

0:10:34.916 --> 0:10:37.956
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's gradually revealing something. And it's always worked

0:10:37.996 --> 0:10:40.636
<v Speaker 1>out working in collaboration with you and with the other

0:10:40.676 --> 0:10:43.116
<v Speaker 1>guys that like, some of my favorite songs have gone

0:10:43.156 --> 0:10:46.156
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of albums, even though we do try

0:10:46.196 --> 0:10:48.156
<v Speaker 1>to stick some of the best songs in the front.

0:10:48.756 --> 0:10:50.796
<v Speaker 1>Like I always feel like the end of an album

0:10:50.876 --> 0:10:53.716
<v Speaker 1>should really be delivering things that you didn't expect from

0:10:53.756 --> 0:10:55.956
<v Speaker 1>the whole rest of the album. There it should still

0:10:55.956 --> 0:10:59.436
<v Speaker 1>be revealing itself on the fourth side. When you think

0:10:59.476 --> 0:11:01.156
<v Speaker 1>of it in vinyl, when you think of it as

0:11:01.196 --> 0:11:04.716
<v Speaker 1>four sides, it's not the end of the you know, yes,

0:11:04.756 --> 0:11:07.316
<v Speaker 1>it's the end of the album, but it's the beginning

0:11:07.556 --> 0:11:11.556
<v Speaker 1>of the last part. Because of the experience of the vinyl. Yeah,

0:11:12.276 --> 0:11:15.316
<v Speaker 1>vinyl changes everything. Yeah, I always thought of you know,

0:11:15.436 --> 0:11:18.036
<v Speaker 1>growing up with vinyl, I always thought of albums as

0:11:18.076 --> 0:11:21.436
<v Speaker 1>two sides, and you know, there's the first side has

0:11:21.436 --> 0:11:23.996
<v Speaker 1>an ending, and then the second side starts, and then

0:11:23.996 --> 0:11:28.316
<v Speaker 1>that has an ending. And in streaming, it's not like that.

0:11:28.356 --> 0:11:31.036
<v Speaker 1>It's just one lie album. Yeah, And it's just different.

0:11:31.036 --> 0:11:33.356
<v Speaker 1>It's just a different way of thinking about it. And

0:11:33.396 --> 0:11:36.996
<v Speaker 1>but the way most people digest it now is the

0:11:37.076 --> 0:11:40.756
<v Speaker 1>streaming way. But there is something to the art of

0:11:41.316 --> 0:11:45.596
<v Speaker 1>the sequence based on the vinyl. There's like a tried

0:11:45.676 --> 0:11:49.516
<v Speaker 1>and true feeling about that. Most of the things that

0:11:49.596 --> 0:11:54.356
<v Speaker 1>I stream that I originally heard on vinyl I don't

0:11:54.396 --> 0:11:57.316
<v Speaker 1>mind that there's not a sidebreak, you know, from the

0:11:57.356 --> 0:12:00.356
<v Speaker 1>A side to the B side of the album, but

0:12:00.396 --> 0:12:04.996
<v Speaker 1>there's still things that help you sequence the digital version

0:12:05.996 --> 0:12:08.956
<v Speaker 1>about vinyl, like the halfway point, Like the end of

0:12:08.956 --> 0:12:11.956
<v Speaker 1>the second side is usually the end of the halfway point. Yeah,

0:12:12.076 --> 0:12:15.076
<v Speaker 1>And so it's cool if the album sort of feels

0:12:15.116 --> 0:12:18.516
<v Speaker 1>like it restarts halfway through. It's a good effect for

0:12:18.636 --> 0:12:22.476
<v Speaker 1>the last song on the second side to feel like

0:12:22.996 --> 0:12:25.756
<v Speaker 1>an ending and for the first song on the third

0:12:25.756 --> 0:12:29.076
<v Speaker 1>side to feel like a beginning. And if it's a

0:12:29.116 --> 0:12:32.916
<v Speaker 1>CD or a digital download version that you still sort

0:12:32.956 --> 0:12:35.436
<v Speaker 1>of get that by the album just seems to rejuvenate

0:12:35.476 --> 0:12:39.756
<v Speaker 1>itself about halfway through. Yeah. It's interesting for artists who've

0:12:39.796 --> 0:12:43.276
<v Speaker 1>never worked on vinyl, they probably have a whole different

0:12:43.556 --> 0:12:46.116
<v Speaker 1>relationship to a sequence. And I imagine some of them

0:12:46.116 --> 0:12:49.236
<v Speaker 1>who really grew up on playlists don't even think of

0:12:49.236 --> 0:12:51.916
<v Speaker 1>a sequence as anything. It's just a bunch of songs

0:12:51.996 --> 0:12:53.756
<v Speaker 1>because you can kind of make your own you know,

0:12:53.836 --> 0:12:56.156
<v Speaker 1>you can make your own version of it in any

0:12:56.156 --> 0:12:59.476
<v Speaker 1>way you want. But there is some magic to it.

0:12:59.836 --> 0:13:02.596
<v Speaker 1>When you hear songs in a certain order, you relate

0:13:02.636 --> 0:13:05.036
<v Speaker 1>to them in a different way, and sometimes you know,

0:13:05.076 --> 0:13:08.836
<v Speaker 1>the wrong song in gives you an impression of an

0:13:08.836 --> 0:13:11.916
<v Speaker 1>album them that doesn't start you off on the right

0:13:11.916 --> 0:13:14.876
<v Speaker 1>foot or the opposite. You can hear, you can hear

0:13:14.916 --> 0:13:16.876
<v Speaker 1>a great song, then if you don't like the second song,

0:13:16.956 --> 0:13:19.156
<v Speaker 1>then it's like a feeling of like, oh, maybe it's

0:13:19.156 --> 0:13:20.996
<v Speaker 1>just one song that I like of this band. You know,

0:13:21.036 --> 0:13:23.076
<v Speaker 1>that's the first thought that I would have if if

0:13:23.116 --> 0:13:24.756
<v Speaker 1>I love the first song, then I don't like the

0:13:24.796 --> 0:13:28.036
<v Speaker 1>second song. That's there's already a red flag of like

0:13:28.716 --> 0:13:32.876
<v Speaker 1>I might not listen as open mindedly to the third song. Yeah,

0:13:32.996 --> 0:13:37.196
<v Speaker 1>after not liking the second song. Yeah. Interesting. Just the

0:13:37.236 --> 0:13:40.996
<v Speaker 1>psychology of the order of songs. How does that relate

0:13:41.036 --> 0:13:44.956
<v Speaker 1>to doing it live? How does sequencing work live? And

0:13:45.076 --> 0:13:47.876
<v Speaker 1>is there ever does it ever not work? Like do

0:13:47.916 --> 0:13:50.356
<v Speaker 1>you ever decide on an order to play the songs

0:13:50.356 --> 0:13:52.356
<v Speaker 1>and then you do it and it just doesn't feel right.

0:13:52.636 --> 0:13:55.156
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's a big difference in our band is

0:13:55.196 --> 0:13:59.796
<v Speaker 1>because live, Anthony's always been completely in control of the

0:13:59.836 --> 0:14:03.356
<v Speaker 1>set list. The rest of us might make comments. He

0:14:03.476 --> 0:14:06.076
<v Speaker 1>might even show it to me before we get the

0:14:06.076 --> 0:14:09.356
<v Speaker 1>copies printed out, just to get approval or some thing,

0:14:09.996 --> 0:14:12.196
<v Speaker 1>but we pretty much let him be the master of

0:14:12.316 --> 0:14:15.436
<v Speaker 1>the set list, and that's just always been how it's been.

0:14:15.436 --> 0:14:19.916
<v Speaker 1>Whereas when we're making a record it's more collaborative. It's

0:14:19.996 --> 0:14:22.276
<v Speaker 1>kind of impossible for a large group of people to

0:14:22.396 --> 0:14:25.396
<v Speaker 1>make a sequence because it kind of requires still more

0:14:25.636 --> 0:14:30.396
<v Speaker 1>person A lot of my memories of doing it, like

0:14:30.636 --> 0:14:32.836
<v Speaker 1>in the old days of me and you would would

0:14:32.876 --> 0:14:35.516
<v Speaker 1>drive around and you would have me in control of

0:14:35.516 --> 0:14:39.996
<v Speaker 1>the CD player going from this song this end. Yeah,

0:14:40.116 --> 0:14:44.276
<v Speaker 1>feeling what works? Is the transition work? Does the feeling work? Yeah,

0:14:44.276 --> 0:14:46.076
<v Speaker 1>there's so many things to keep on your mind. I

0:14:46.076 --> 0:14:48.396
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's a real multi level thing. Yeah, the

0:14:48.516 --> 0:14:50.756
<v Speaker 1>end of one song has to sound good going into

0:14:50.836 --> 0:14:53.396
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of another. You might make a set list

0:14:53.436 --> 0:14:55.516
<v Speaker 1>that on paper seems like it would work really well,

0:14:55.556 --> 0:14:56.876
<v Speaker 1>and then as soon as you hear it, it's like

0:14:56.956 --> 0:14:59.596
<v Speaker 1>none of these transitions are making any sense you. Yeah,

0:14:59.956 --> 0:15:02.716
<v Speaker 1>that's an interesting thing about Anthony too, And it makes

0:15:02.716 --> 0:15:09.676
<v Speaker 1>sense because of everyone's job. Because he's relying on his voice,

0:15:10.276 --> 0:15:13.756
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a pacing that makes it able for him

0:15:13.796 --> 0:15:16.476
<v Speaker 1>to get through a show that no one else has

0:15:16.516 --> 0:15:20.276
<v Speaker 1>that same consideration. Yeah, I'm just thinking there's so many

0:15:20.316 --> 0:15:23.636
<v Speaker 1>new songs to play. There's seventeen new songs that is

0:15:23.676 --> 0:15:26.276
<v Speaker 1>new to the audience, there are the seventeen songs that

0:15:26.316 --> 0:15:29.516
<v Speaker 1>the audience has heard six months ago, and then there's

0:15:30.756 --> 0:15:34.916
<v Speaker 1>the forty years of music that the Chili Meppers have made. Yeah,

0:15:34.916 --> 0:15:39.276
<v Speaker 1>how do you keep a balance of playing things that

0:15:39.356 --> 0:15:42.996
<v Speaker 1>people are you know, expecting to hear and all the

0:15:42.996 --> 0:15:46.996
<v Speaker 1>things you want to play? And how are new songs

0:15:47.316 --> 0:15:51.236
<v Speaker 1>received compared to old songs live? How does that all work?

0:15:52.156 --> 0:15:54.596
<v Speaker 1>I think compared to other bands who have a history

0:15:54.836 --> 0:15:57.756
<v Speaker 1>like we have, the new songs get a really good response,

0:15:58.276 --> 0:16:02.236
<v Speaker 1>but especially Black Summer, Like I can't always tell because

0:16:02.236 --> 0:16:04.916
<v Speaker 1>in my in ears, I don't have the audience super

0:16:05.236 --> 0:16:08.516
<v Speaker 1>loud like like they might be might be a large

0:16:08.556 --> 0:16:11.716
<v Speaker 1>percentage audience plotting, And just because of where the mics

0:16:11.756 --> 0:16:15.196
<v Speaker 1>are that I get the audience from, I might not

0:16:15.316 --> 0:16:17.156
<v Speaker 1>even hear it, you know. I take the inn ears

0:16:17.196 --> 0:16:20.916
<v Speaker 1>out and it's always like much more deafening screaming and

0:16:20.996 --> 0:16:23.876
<v Speaker 1>stuff than than I can hear. But yeah, the new

0:16:23.916 --> 0:16:27.276
<v Speaker 1>songs go over good. But like there's there's certain songs

0:16:27.316 --> 0:16:29.996
<v Speaker 1>off Unlimited Love that I really wish we were playing

0:16:30.516 --> 0:16:33.756
<v Speaker 1>that just were some of the more challenging ones to

0:16:33.916 --> 0:16:36.316
<v Speaker 1>do when we were rehearsing, and we never took the

0:16:36.436 --> 0:16:38.716
<v Speaker 1>risk to play them live. And there's other ones that

0:16:38.756 --> 0:16:41.396
<v Speaker 1>we did take the risk to play live and only

0:16:41.396 --> 0:16:43.916
<v Speaker 1>played them a couple of times and then gave up,

0:16:44.276 --> 0:16:47.116
<v Speaker 1>sticking to the ones that were working better. You're not

0:16:47.156 --> 0:16:50.436
<v Speaker 1>worried about mistakes live in front of people. I'm actually

0:16:50.436 --> 0:16:52.596
<v Speaker 1>way more worried about mistakes when I'm in the studio

0:16:52.996 --> 0:16:56.996
<v Speaker 1>or even when I'm rehearsing live. You're not super worried

0:16:57.036 --> 0:16:59.716
<v Speaker 1>about mistakes. And at the same time, the feeling of

0:16:59.716 --> 0:17:03.436
<v Speaker 1>a song not working is fine when you're at rehearsal

0:17:03.476 --> 0:17:06.516
<v Speaker 1>because you know it's it's leading somewhere and you're everybody's

0:17:06.516 --> 0:17:09.036
<v Speaker 1>figuring at Flice figuring this thing out, Chad's figuring that

0:17:09.196 --> 0:17:12.316
<v Speaker 1>thing out. I'm figuring out another. But to have that

0:17:12.396 --> 0:17:15.956
<v Speaker 1>experience live when the four elements aren't functioning as a

0:17:15.996 --> 0:17:19.356
<v Speaker 1>single unit, it really stands out in a show and

0:17:19.396 --> 0:17:21.916
<v Speaker 1>it makes you feel really crappy to be up there

0:17:22.636 --> 0:17:25.116
<v Speaker 1>when they're not aligne when you're playing them next to

0:17:25.676 --> 0:17:28.996
<v Speaker 1>these songs like Californication or other Side that you have

0:17:29.116 --> 0:17:30.836
<v Speaker 1>played a lot, and you can really have fun with

0:17:31.036 --> 0:17:36.156
<v Speaker 1>and everything's always locked together no matter what. So that's

0:17:36.156 --> 0:17:38.476
<v Speaker 1>why it's good we have this week of rehearsal coming up,

0:17:38.516 --> 0:17:42.836
<v Speaker 1>so we can start. We can work on things that

0:17:43.036 --> 0:17:46.676
<v Speaker 1>we were not feeling up for taking the risk to play,

0:17:46.756 --> 0:17:49.716
<v Speaker 1>but try to get them together from Unlimited Love and

0:17:50.556 --> 0:17:54.156
<v Speaker 1>Return of the Dream Canteen and better and luckily we

0:17:54.196 --> 0:17:56.556
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of hits. I guess that's what helps

0:17:56.556 --> 0:17:58.836
<v Speaker 1>at this point is that you tend to want to

0:17:59.436 --> 0:18:02.116
<v Speaker 1>mainly make it about playing the hits when you're playing

0:18:02.156 --> 0:18:05.236
<v Speaker 1>the fifty thousand people a night and stuff. But the

0:18:05.316 --> 0:18:09.476
<v Speaker 1>new songs are definitely accepted, and Black Summer gets pretty

0:18:09.516 --> 0:18:14.076
<v Speaker 1>much equal response to any of the hits we've had before.

0:18:14.356 --> 0:18:17.836
<v Speaker 1>So people who were there often common to me after

0:18:18.236 --> 0:18:21.276
<v Speaker 1>the show, like, Wow, people are cheering for your new

0:18:21.316 --> 0:18:23.876
<v Speaker 1>songs just as much as the old ones, And so

0:18:23.956 --> 0:18:26.396
<v Speaker 1>I can't always tell, but but I have got that

0:18:26.556 --> 0:18:30.476
<v Speaker 1>gotten that feedback from people. Cool. Yeah, did you play

0:18:30.516 --> 0:18:35.036
<v Speaker 1>songs from the new album on the five month tour? No,

0:18:35.476 --> 0:18:39.716
<v Speaker 1>we just started playing our first song from from Return

0:18:39.796 --> 0:18:43.716
<v Speaker 1>of the Dream Canteen. We just started playing it just

0:18:43.756 --> 0:18:47.156
<v Speaker 1>a few shows ago. We've played it like three times, Eddie,

0:18:47.516 --> 0:18:51.356
<v Speaker 1>but we rehearsed those a lot when we were rehearsing

0:18:51.396 --> 0:18:55.076
<v Speaker 1>before the tour started, But after five months of being

0:18:55.116 --> 0:18:58.756
<v Speaker 1>on tour and not playing those songs, it just felt

0:18:58.756 --> 0:19:01.076
<v Speaker 1>too risky to start playing them. We wanted to start

0:19:01.156 --> 0:19:05.356
<v Speaker 1>playing them when the album was announced, but it just

0:19:05.516 --> 0:19:07.596
<v Speaker 1>and when the first single came out and stuff, but

0:19:07.796 --> 0:19:09.516
<v Speaker 1>it just felt like we would have been and taking

0:19:09.516 --> 0:19:12.116
<v Speaker 1>too big of a risk for the energy flow. We

0:19:12.276 --> 0:19:13.996
<v Speaker 1>just need to be as good as it could be. Yeah,

0:19:14.036 --> 0:19:16.876
<v Speaker 1>we want we want them to sound good. So it

0:19:16.916 --> 0:19:18.676
<v Speaker 1>won't take us a lot of rehearsing to get them

0:19:18.716 --> 0:19:21.236
<v Speaker 1>back under our fingers. But we're going to take like

0:19:21.276 --> 0:19:24.716
<v Speaker 1>a week before we go on tour again. Great makes sense,

0:19:24.796 --> 0:19:28.836
<v Speaker 1>Just again the volume of material. There's so many songs. Yeah,

0:19:29.036 --> 0:19:32.516
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to keep everything straight. It's impossible. Yeah, and

0:19:32.636 --> 0:19:35.556
<v Speaker 1>just live, You've got to find your voice. When I'm

0:19:35.556 --> 0:19:40.116
<v Speaker 1>singing harmonies on the record, that could be like twenty voices,

0:19:40.316 --> 0:19:42.356
<v Speaker 1>and then I've got to do it live in one voice.

0:19:42.556 --> 0:19:45.276
<v Speaker 1>You've got to figure out, Okay, what's which one do

0:19:45.356 --> 0:19:46.996
<v Speaker 1>I do at this chorus? Which one do I do

0:19:47.076 --> 0:19:49.436
<v Speaker 1>at the second choruse you know, you try what kind

0:19:49.476 --> 0:19:51.076
<v Speaker 1>of voice do I sing and then maybe it's not.

0:19:51.236 --> 0:19:53.716
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's completely dissimilar voice to what I did on

0:19:53.756 --> 0:19:57.036
<v Speaker 1>the record at all, just to make it make it

0:19:57.076 --> 0:20:00.676
<v Speaker 1>work in the live context. So are there other things

0:20:00.716 --> 0:20:04.076
<v Speaker 1>like that? Tell me about things that can happen on

0:20:04.156 --> 0:20:07.676
<v Speaker 1>record that have to be rethought to be able to

0:20:07.716 --> 0:20:11.596
<v Speaker 1>do it live. I guess for me, multiple guitar parts

0:20:11.676 --> 0:20:14.596
<v Speaker 1>is often a thing. It's not usually too hard for

0:20:14.636 --> 0:20:18.276
<v Speaker 1>me to figure out, but that's always something to consider,

0:20:18.476 --> 0:20:23.036
<v Speaker 1>whether to duplicate the effects. Sometimes it's better live to

0:20:23.156 --> 0:20:25.876
<v Speaker 1>just not have any effects. And maybe on the record

0:20:25.916 --> 0:20:29.276
<v Speaker 1>I did some modular synth treatment to the guitar that

0:20:29.796 --> 0:20:31.916
<v Speaker 1>worked really well for the recording but might not be

0:20:32.036 --> 0:20:34.876
<v Speaker 1>necessary for live, Like it might not even be able

0:20:34.916 --> 0:20:36.916
<v Speaker 1>to hear it through the nature of a big sound

0:20:36.996 --> 0:20:41.636
<v Speaker 1>system outside. Yeah, it's like it's much it's louder, but

0:20:41.716 --> 0:20:45.116
<v Speaker 1>it's lower resolution, I think, Yeah, and there's a lot

0:20:45.156 --> 0:20:48.316
<v Speaker 1>more natural ambience, so things. Yeah, you know, on the

0:20:48.356 --> 0:20:51.476
<v Speaker 1>record we're doing all kinds of fancy reverbs and things,

0:20:51.516 --> 0:20:54.996
<v Speaker 1>and on the guitar and certain drum hits and little

0:20:54.996 --> 0:20:57.636
<v Speaker 1>things like that. Like live, we've got so much natural

0:20:57.676 --> 0:21:02.596
<v Speaker 1>reverberation playing generally, we're playing stadiums that I have reverb pedals,

0:21:02.636 --> 0:21:04.516
<v Speaker 1>I don't even I think I turned them on like

0:21:04.556 --> 0:21:07.356
<v Speaker 1>twice per show or something, and I would and I

0:21:07.756 --> 0:21:09.636
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of like slap back because I was

0:21:09.676 --> 0:21:11.676
<v Speaker 1>listening to a lot of fifties music when we made

0:21:11.716 --> 0:21:16.156
<v Speaker 1>the two records, so good percentage of songs had slap

0:21:16.196 --> 0:21:19.756
<v Speaker 1>back delay on the basic track of the guitar. But live,

0:21:19.836 --> 0:21:23.476
<v Speaker 1>there's just no point, like, yeah, the arena creates a

0:21:23.516 --> 0:21:27.796
<v Speaker 1>slap yeah, and you can't control the speed of it. Yeah,

0:21:27.916 --> 0:21:30.836
<v Speaker 1>So I got real used to playing the songs dry,

0:21:31.236 --> 0:21:33.556
<v Speaker 1>you know, and like I have a big pedal board,

0:21:33.756 --> 0:21:37.116
<v Speaker 1>and it's generally because there are certain songs that I

0:21:37.156 --> 0:21:39.756
<v Speaker 1>would like to have the option of using a certain

0:21:39.796 --> 0:21:41.676
<v Speaker 1>pedal board if we would do that song. So I'll

0:21:41.676 --> 0:21:43.836
<v Speaker 1>have a pedal that's just in case we play one

0:21:43.876 --> 0:21:47.996
<v Speaker 1>particular song, but generally, like that's how Jimmy Hendricks was

0:21:48.036 --> 0:21:51.516
<v Speaker 1>live on the records. There's all kinds of signal processing

0:21:51.596 --> 0:21:54.516
<v Speaker 1>to the guitar and stuff and and to the whole

0:21:54.516 --> 0:21:59.596
<v Speaker 1>band really and live it's just either distortion or semi

0:21:59.636 --> 0:22:03.436
<v Speaker 1>distorted clean sound and the rest you do with your

0:22:03.556 --> 0:22:06.396
<v Speaker 1>energy and you're you know, you have a whole added

0:22:06.516 --> 0:22:09.396
<v Speaker 1>energy that goes into what you play live. That and

0:22:09.556 --> 0:22:12.796
<v Speaker 1>the visual part of it, the movement and the energy

0:22:12.836 --> 0:22:15.756
<v Speaker 1>transference with the audience that like, I feel like all

0:22:15.756 --> 0:22:19.316
<v Speaker 1>that you use effects and things on a recording to

0:22:19.396 --> 0:22:22.236
<v Speaker 1>make the recording feel like it has a lift to

0:22:22.396 --> 0:22:25.116
<v Speaker 1>it that those other things bring that left live and

0:22:25.196 --> 0:22:28.876
<v Speaker 1>you don't need to use those decorations. Tell me more

0:22:28.876 --> 0:22:31.956
<v Speaker 1>about the energy transference with the audience, because it's a

0:22:31.996 --> 0:22:35.196
<v Speaker 1>really interesting feeling. Most of us who don't get on

0:22:35.196 --> 0:22:37.916
<v Speaker 1>a stage and play in front of, you know, tens

0:22:37.916 --> 0:22:40.516
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of people, don't know what that feeling is. Like.

0:22:40.596 --> 0:22:43.676
<v Speaker 1>How would you describe the difference if you guys are

0:22:43.676 --> 0:22:47.716
<v Speaker 1>playing in the afternoon in the same venue empty and

0:22:47.876 --> 0:22:51.236
<v Speaker 1>then when it's packed with screaming people. How does it

0:22:51.316 --> 0:22:54.876
<v Speaker 1>feel different? For one thing, you're hearing everything at a

0:22:54.916 --> 0:22:57.996
<v Speaker 1>slower speed than you're actually playing it because you've got

0:22:58.036 --> 0:23:01.276
<v Speaker 1>adrenaline going. I see you think you're playing at one

0:23:01.316 --> 0:23:05.276
<v Speaker 1>tempo and you're actually playing at a faster tempo than that.

0:23:05.916 --> 0:23:08.796
<v Speaker 1>And so it's something that I remember early on when

0:23:09.116 --> 0:23:10.916
<v Speaker 1>I was in the band in like eighty nine, we

0:23:10.956 --> 0:23:14.196
<v Speaker 1>started really zoning into it, listening to watching videotapes of

0:23:14.196 --> 0:23:18.276
<v Speaker 1>ourselves or listening to cassettes, and we realized, wow, okay,

0:23:19.436 --> 0:23:22.716
<v Speaker 1>let's yeah, everything's too fast, Like let's let's let's figure

0:23:22.756 --> 0:23:25.396
<v Speaker 1>out like how we can how it can sound right

0:23:25.436 --> 0:23:28.436
<v Speaker 1>to us on stage, how to bridge that gap between

0:23:28.996 --> 0:23:32.236
<v Speaker 1>between what it appears to be live and what it

0:23:32.276 --> 0:23:36.116
<v Speaker 1>actually is. Taking into consideration the audience has probably also

0:23:36.196 --> 0:23:39.356
<v Speaker 1>got some adrenaline going, so you don't need to try

0:23:39.436 --> 0:23:41.876
<v Speaker 1>too much to slow it down. But you've got to

0:23:41.916 --> 0:23:44.516
<v Speaker 1>make sure not to get carried away with yourself live

0:23:44.636 --> 0:23:47.876
<v Speaker 1>to be conscious of like going. If it feels even

0:23:47.916 --> 0:23:51.476
<v Speaker 1>a little fast, you're probably going very very fast, you know.

0:23:51.996 --> 0:23:55.236
<v Speaker 1>So that's one difference is every you're hearing everything different.

0:23:55.436 --> 0:23:57.076
<v Speaker 1>I noticed that for the first time. When I was

0:23:57.116 --> 0:24:00.396
<v Speaker 1>a kid. I used to go running and I'd be

0:24:00.436 --> 0:24:03.196
<v Speaker 1>listening to music all day, and then I'd go running,

0:24:03.236 --> 0:24:06.076
<v Speaker 1>and then i'd come back to my room and be

0:24:06.196 --> 0:24:09.116
<v Speaker 1>doing like situps and stuff. And I put a record

0:24:09.156 --> 0:24:13.396
<v Speaker 1>it on and it sounded too slow, and I couldn't

0:24:13.396 --> 0:24:15.596
<v Speaker 1>account for it. I didn't understand what it was that

0:24:15.756 --> 0:24:18.396
<v Speaker 1>was happening. But then I remembered it later when we

0:24:18.476 --> 0:24:21.996
<v Speaker 1>noticed that live everything was faster, so it's you're going

0:24:22.196 --> 0:24:27.756
<v Speaker 1>faster than your normal perception of time. So that's one difference.

0:24:27.836 --> 0:24:31.996
<v Speaker 1>And I think you also play you play harder, and

0:24:32.516 --> 0:24:35.516
<v Speaker 1>like I've always played completely differently live than I do

0:24:35.596 --> 0:24:39.076
<v Speaker 1>on records, on records like Californication and by the way,

0:24:39.076 --> 0:24:42.476
<v Speaker 1>in particular, like I was really playing in this style

0:24:42.556 --> 0:24:45.836
<v Speaker 1>that I felt served the songs well and that I

0:24:45.916 --> 0:24:48.516
<v Speaker 1>felt like I was doing something with rather than a

0:24:48.796 --> 0:24:51.996
<v Speaker 1>blues kind of basic sense of melody or a rock

0:24:52.036 --> 0:24:55.316
<v Speaker 1>basic sense of melody. I was listening to synthpop a lot,

0:24:55.516 --> 0:24:57.876
<v Speaker 1>and I see that style of melody that sort of

0:24:57.916 --> 0:25:00.836
<v Speaker 1>begins with Kraft Work and continued into the eighties with

0:25:01.116 --> 0:25:04.196
<v Speaker 1>depeche Mode and things like that, being its own specific

0:25:04.396 --> 0:25:07.116
<v Speaker 1>form of melody, and I was trying to apply that

0:25:07.156 --> 0:25:08.916
<v Speaker 1>a lot to the music that we were doing while

0:25:09.356 --> 0:25:13.036
<v Speaker 1>having a rock energy, And so I was playing in

0:25:12.676 --> 0:25:14.676
<v Speaker 1>a in a way that it had a kind of

0:25:14.676 --> 0:25:16.956
<v Speaker 1>a simplicity in common with that kind of music. You

0:25:16.996 --> 0:25:20.956
<v Speaker 1>play melodies that try to sail out with every note

0:25:20.956 --> 0:25:23.876
<v Speaker 1>being in it's perfect place, but creating a sort of

0:25:23.876 --> 0:25:28.516
<v Speaker 1>a shape with the notes and not so much putting

0:25:28.676 --> 0:25:31.116
<v Speaker 1>a lot of expression into the notes, but trying to

0:25:31.156 --> 0:25:34.756
<v Speaker 1>find notes that paint a sort of a good picture

0:25:35.036 --> 0:25:37.756
<v Speaker 1>in the song, and carry on for the melody with

0:25:37.836 --> 0:25:41.276
<v Speaker 1>another when he's not singing, carry that on with another

0:25:41.356 --> 0:25:44.916
<v Speaker 1>melody that's just as catchy as what he's doing. But

0:25:45.076 --> 0:25:48.516
<v Speaker 1>live throughout those times, particularly by the way I was

0:25:48.556 --> 0:25:51.996
<v Speaker 1>playing live like in a very like flashy, putting a

0:25:51.996 --> 0:25:55.796
<v Speaker 1>lot of expression into it way. It's just that's what

0:25:55.916 --> 0:25:59.316
<v Speaker 1>the audience brought out of me. I couldn't keep the

0:25:59.356 --> 0:26:02.716
<v Speaker 1>same kind of restraint live that I that I could

0:26:02.876 --> 0:26:06.716
<v Speaker 1>for the studio. We have to pause for a quick break,

0:26:06.796 --> 0:26:09.036
<v Speaker 1>and then we'll be back with more from John Fashonte

0:26:09.356 --> 0:26:16.116
<v Speaker 1>and Rick Rubin. We're back with more from Rick Rubin

0:26:16.276 --> 0:26:20.276
<v Speaker 1>and John f Shante. What is your pre show ritual? Like?

0:26:21.156 --> 0:26:26.076
<v Speaker 1>I have all these ways of doing scales that are creative.

0:26:26.436 --> 0:26:28.116
<v Speaker 1>When I was a teenager, I would just play them

0:26:28.116 --> 0:26:29.836
<v Speaker 1>in the normal way you play them, or a couple

0:26:29.876 --> 0:26:33.516
<v Speaker 1>of variations of that. But as I've gotten older, it's

0:26:33.556 --> 0:26:37.276
<v Speaker 1>a way of putting my creativity into my instrument that

0:26:37.396 --> 0:26:40.796
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with the sound that comes out

0:26:40.956 --> 0:26:43.916
<v Speaker 1>because my playing. I'm I really believe in the philosophy

0:26:43.956 --> 0:26:48.156
<v Speaker 1>of you plays what sounds good, you don't you don't

0:26:48.156 --> 0:26:52.276
<v Speaker 1>play something because it's physically interesting or anything like that,

0:26:52.396 --> 0:26:56.036
<v Speaker 1>or impressive or anything like that. So I have these

0:26:56.596 --> 0:26:59.516
<v Speaker 1>warm ups that are really based on Okay, let's forget

0:26:59.516 --> 0:27:02.516
<v Speaker 1>about the sound that the instrument makes. What's what's doing

0:27:02.676 --> 0:27:05.876
<v Speaker 1>something unusual with the fingers that they're not accustomed to doing.

0:27:05.996 --> 0:27:08.756
<v Speaker 1>And how can I play games with my brain with

0:27:08.836 --> 0:27:11.796
<v Speaker 1>the exercises that teach me things about the nature of

0:27:11.836 --> 0:27:15.036
<v Speaker 1>the twelve note system that we all use. That's going

0:27:15.116 --> 0:27:17.436
<v Speaker 1>to be challenging for my fingers as well as for

0:27:17.556 --> 0:27:21.276
<v Speaker 1>my brain. And so over the years, just because I

0:27:21.916 --> 0:27:23.516
<v Speaker 1>do it all the time, I did it a lot

0:27:23.556 --> 0:27:26.036
<v Speaker 1>even when I wasn't in the band for the ten

0:27:26.116 --> 0:27:29.276
<v Speaker 1>years that I wasn't in it. It's just it's interesting

0:27:29.316 --> 0:27:31.596
<v Speaker 1>to me to look at the notes in these various ways.

0:27:31.596 --> 0:27:34.076
<v Speaker 1>So I've come up with a whole series of things

0:27:34.116 --> 0:27:37.236
<v Speaker 1>that are challenging and that I always learned from having

0:27:37.276 --> 0:27:41.516
<v Speaker 1>to do with the organization of notes in relationship to

0:27:41.636 --> 0:27:45.116
<v Speaker 1>scales and different kind of scales. And I'm just always

0:27:45.116 --> 0:27:48.356
<v Speaker 1>improving on it. No, I'll get little inspirations from it

0:27:48.436 --> 0:27:52.716
<v Speaker 1>from like I'll watch, you know, a guitar instruction thing

0:27:52.796 --> 0:27:56.996
<v Speaker 1>by John McLoughlin or Allen Holdsworth. I watched one John

0:27:57.076 --> 0:27:59.196
<v Speaker 1>McLoughlin thing. I think that got me through like six

0:27:59.276 --> 0:28:01.996
<v Speaker 1>years of practicing. And then and then when Allen Holdsworth

0:28:02.116 --> 0:28:05.356
<v Speaker 1>thing like went to the next five years, like I see,

0:28:05.556 --> 0:28:07.516
<v Speaker 1>I see what they're talking about in there, and then

0:28:07.556 --> 0:28:11.356
<v Speaker 1>it makes me think of new ideas about about how

0:28:11.356 --> 0:28:15.516
<v Speaker 1>to approach scales and exercises just from little thing, one

0:28:15.516 --> 0:28:18.236
<v Speaker 1>little thing they say might might give me a whole

0:28:18.236 --> 0:28:20.356
<v Speaker 1>stream of ideas that like, I'm doing the same thing

0:28:20.356 --> 0:28:22.396
<v Speaker 1>every day, and a year later, I get the idea.

0:28:22.996 --> 0:28:24.636
<v Speaker 1>But what if I did it this way? What if

0:28:24.796 --> 0:28:27.756
<v Speaker 1>what if I add what if I twist it in

0:28:27.796 --> 0:28:30.356
<v Speaker 1>this direction or something? You see, if we give you

0:28:30.356 --> 0:28:33.756
<v Speaker 1>a guitarget, you give me a demonstration of just how

0:28:33.796 --> 0:28:37.556
<v Speaker 1>that works, I could try. Yeah, let's try. I'm curious

0:28:37.556 --> 0:28:42.356
<v Speaker 1>to hear it. Okay, So here's an example with scales.

0:28:42.676 --> 0:28:44.876
<v Speaker 1>If we if we do something like take four notes

0:28:47.556 --> 0:28:51.316
<v Speaker 1>and I'm playing them now with no accents. It's four notes.

0:28:51.556 --> 0:28:53.996
<v Speaker 1>But if now I'm going to start accenting it in threes,

0:29:02.316 --> 0:29:04.996
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at that, the accents once you

0:29:05.036 --> 0:29:08.796
<v Speaker 1>start doing that pattern, the accents went lowest note highest, note,

0:29:09.156 --> 0:29:12.076
<v Speaker 1>second highest note, third highest note, fourth highest note. It

0:29:12.196 --> 0:29:14.476
<v Speaker 1>creates a pattern. You've got four notes, and let's call

0:29:14.516 --> 0:29:17.476
<v Speaker 1>this one one, two three four, But if you play

0:29:17.516 --> 0:29:21.996
<v Speaker 1>them in threes, the pattern winds up being four one

0:29:22.116 --> 0:29:25.836
<v Speaker 1>two three four one two three, And that's just something

0:29:25.876 --> 0:29:28.196
<v Speaker 1>that exists in nature having to do with the relationship

0:29:28.276 --> 0:29:31.516
<v Speaker 1>of rhythm and melody. Cool. So, so if we take

0:29:31.556 --> 0:29:35.476
<v Speaker 1>the same four notes and instead play them in fives,

0:29:35.476 --> 0:29:49.596
<v Speaker 1>like it's so it's four notes, but we go so again,

0:29:49.756 --> 0:29:52.836
<v Speaker 1>we wound up with the same accenting pattern of it

0:29:52.876 --> 0:29:55.076
<v Speaker 1>went from this note, this note to this note to

0:29:55.156 --> 0:29:57.196
<v Speaker 1>this note to this note. It keeps going kind of

0:29:57.236 --> 0:30:00.316
<v Speaker 1>in a circle, you know. And again if we take

0:30:00.356 --> 0:30:02.876
<v Speaker 1>three notes and divide it into sevens, then we go

0:30:09.276 --> 0:30:12.996
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, it's hard, yeah, like that it seems exhausting.

0:30:13.036 --> 0:30:16.276
<v Speaker 1>Also yeah, so so so that's just that's trying to

0:30:16.316 --> 0:30:20.876
<v Speaker 1>show like show it in in one in one position. Yes, um,

0:30:20.916 --> 0:30:23.036
<v Speaker 1>so you do that in scales just what I do.

0:30:23.116 --> 0:30:25.476
<v Speaker 1>So I'll take like a series of notes, like say,

0:30:25.596 --> 0:30:33.156
<v Speaker 1>going down in sevens. So that's just going down in sevens.

0:30:36.956 --> 0:30:39.396
<v Speaker 1>And there's a certain interval jump if you're going if

0:30:39.396 --> 0:30:42.236
<v Speaker 1>you're playing a seven note scale, and you're going down

0:30:42.236 --> 0:30:45.476
<v Speaker 1>in sevens, you're always jumping up at six interval, whether

0:30:45.516 --> 0:30:51.716
<v Speaker 1>it's a minor or major six up to six, up

0:30:51.716 --> 0:30:55.116
<v Speaker 1>to six. So there's this shape that you see in it.

0:30:59.516 --> 0:31:03.756
<v Speaker 1>That's the distance that you're that you're that you're jumping

0:31:03.836 --> 0:31:06.236
<v Speaker 1>up every time you go down in sevens on a

0:31:06.316 --> 0:31:09.596
<v Speaker 1>seven note scale. That's you know, in this case, a

0:31:09.716 --> 0:31:12.956
<v Speaker 1>major based on a major scale. So now I'm gonna

0:31:12.996 --> 0:31:17.116
<v Speaker 1>go down in sevens, but I'm gonna I'm gonna accent

0:31:17.196 --> 0:31:39.316
<v Speaker 1>in fives. So so it's so difficult, especially with numbers

0:31:39.356 --> 0:31:43.196
<v Speaker 1>like fives, where it's not like the even numbers seem

0:31:43.276 --> 0:31:47.676
<v Speaker 1>to feel more comfortable. Yeah, if you do in twos

0:31:47.836 --> 0:31:52.156
<v Speaker 1>or threes or fives, your picking hand is going is

0:31:52.156 --> 0:31:55.276
<v Speaker 1>going down for accent, then up for an accent, then

0:31:55.316 --> 0:31:56.996
<v Speaker 1>down for an accent, up for an accent. So that's

0:31:57.036 --> 0:31:59.196
<v Speaker 1>another good part of it, is to get your upstrokes

0:31:59.236 --> 0:32:03.036
<v Speaker 1>feeling like as solid accents as as your down strokes.

0:32:03.676 --> 0:32:05.676
<v Speaker 1>So that's like a good example of the kind of

0:32:05.716 --> 0:32:08.596
<v Speaker 1>things that I do. But you know, it gets harder

0:32:08.596 --> 0:32:13.316
<v Speaker 1>and harder the larger the distances and the bigger the numbers. Are,

0:32:13.356 --> 0:32:16.796
<v Speaker 1>Like I generally when I practice, I'm probably staying in

0:32:16.916 --> 0:32:22.996
<v Speaker 1>numbers under ten, both in terms of maybe eleven, but

0:32:23.116 --> 0:32:26.276
<v Speaker 1>it's it's hard to go like go down eleven notes

0:32:26.556 --> 0:32:30.916
<v Speaker 1>and and accent in thirteens. There's a pattern to it,

0:32:30.956 --> 0:32:33.556
<v Speaker 1>but it's much it's it's really hard to do. It

0:32:34.076 --> 0:32:37.796
<v Speaker 1>fucks you up. You start hearing the notes as as

0:32:37.876 --> 0:32:41.236
<v Speaker 1>dictating the rhythm. And that's what the exercise in general

0:32:41.916 --> 0:32:45.476
<v Speaker 1>helps you not do, is to for a moment while

0:32:45.516 --> 0:32:49.996
<v Speaker 1>you're practicing, disconnect the rhythm from the pitch. Don't let

0:32:49.996 --> 0:32:53.396
<v Speaker 1>the pitch determine the rhythm. I'm pretty sure from all

0:32:53.396 --> 0:32:55.716
<v Speaker 1>the music that I've learned and everything that melodies that

0:32:55.756 --> 0:33:01.676
<v Speaker 1>are interesting and melodies that don't just feel average have

0:33:01.956 --> 0:33:06.676
<v Speaker 1>interesting ways of acting in a way that's rhythmic separately

0:33:06.836 --> 0:33:11.196
<v Speaker 1>from the from them, that the two areas are sort

0:33:11.236 --> 0:33:16.036
<v Speaker 1>of functioning independently of each other, yet in harmony that catchy.

0:33:16.116 --> 0:33:18.076
<v Speaker 1>It's not. It's not just the order of the notes.

0:33:18.076 --> 0:33:20.316
<v Speaker 1>It's an order the order of the notes and where

0:33:20.316 --> 0:33:23.236
<v Speaker 1>the accents are yeah, and and and how the rhythm

0:33:23.316 --> 0:33:26.756
<v Speaker 1>relates to the note. When you think of like songs

0:33:26.756 --> 0:33:29.916
<v Speaker 1>like Mary had a Little Lamb or something it's almost

0:33:29.956 --> 0:33:33.836
<v Speaker 1>like the notes and the rhythm are just one hundred

0:33:33.876 --> 0:33:37.396
<v Speaker 1>percent like lined up with each other. Yeah, and when

0:33:37.436 --> 0:33:40.836
<v Speaker 1>you get more you know, melodies like the Beatles or

0:33:40.876 --> 0:33:44.156
<v Speaker 1>something like that, where where you wonder where this melody

0:33:44.236 --> 0:33:46.836
<v Speaker 1>came from. It's because it doesn't have such an obvious

0:33:46.956 --> 0:33:50.316
<v Speaker 1>relationship between the rhythm and the notes. There's something creative

0:33:50.356 --> 0:33:53.756
<v Speaker 1>going on in their spin on it. So so that's

0:33:53.756 --> 0:33:56.756
<v Speaker 1>why I feel like those exercises do have an effect

0:33:56.796 --> 0:34:01.196
<v Speaker 1>on one sense of melody and one's awareness of because

0:34:01.236 --> 0:34:03.876
<v Speaker 1>you normally you can't you don't. A note is the

0:34:03.956 --> 0:34:06.316
<v Speaker 1>rhythm and the note, and it's where it falls in

0:34:06.356 --> 0:34:08.676
<v Speaker 1>the in the bar and where what bar that is

0:34:08.676 --> 0:34:12.076
<v Speaker 1>in the song? All those things make a note. What

0:34:12.116 --> 0:34:14.996
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like to us? Yeah, Like I said, it's

0:34:15.036 --> 0:34:18.716
<v Speaker 1>not music. It's purely for the physical part and the

0:34:18.796 --> 0:34:22.596
<v Speaker 1>brain's conception of the relationships notes to each other and

0:34:22.636 --> 0:34:26.876
<v Speaker 1>the relationship also of rhythm two notes. Yeah. To me,

0:34:27.116 --> 0:34:31.556
<v Speaker 1>practicing and making music, they're these two completely separate things.

0:34:31.636 --> 0:34:34.996
<v Speaker 1>I don't feel that you need to use what you

0:34:35.036 --> 0:34:37.636
<v Speaker 1>practice in your music or apply it in any way.

0:34:37.716 --> 0:34:40.076
<v Speaker 1>It's really they're two separate art forms. And I think

0:34:40.116 --> 0:34:42.756
<v Speaker 1>you should look at practicing as its own sort of

0:34:42.956 --> 0:34:45.876
<v Speaker 1>cool art forms. So when you do your rehearsals, do

0:34:45.876 --> 0:34:48.596
<v Speaker 1>you do with an acoustic or an electric electric? Electric?

0:34:48.676 --> 0:34:50.556
<v Speaker 1>Because it's the guitar you're going to be playing, or

0:34:51.636 --> 0:34:54.076
<v Speaker 1>like the guitar I'm gonna be playing. So I start

0:34:54.116 --> 0:34:59.396
<v Speaker 1>out with various exercises and scales, and then I move

0:34:59.476 --> 0:35:02.116
<v Speaker 1>on to playing along with things that I like. And

0:35:02.156 --> 0:35:04.796
<v Speaker 1>I try to play along with certain things because they're

0:35:04.796 --> 0:35:08.596
<v Speaker 1>good for rhythm guitar, certain things because they're good for

0:35:08.836 --> 0:35:12.316
<v Speaker 1>band ending and doing vibrato, things that have solos, so

0:35:12.356 --> 0:35:14.596
<v Speaker 1>I like playing along with. I have a lot of

0:35:14.636 --> 0:35:18.276
<v Speaker 1>things memorized right now that are They're mostly things that

0:35:18.356 --> 0:35:23.756
<v Speaker 1>people improvised on a record or live, and so I

0:35:23.836 --> 0:35:27.116
<v Speaker 1>have these solos by some of my favorite rock guitar players.

0:35:27.956 --> 0:35:31.836
<v Speaker 1>And usually in my life, I just learn a stream

0:35:31.876 --> 0:35:34.516
<v Speaker 1>of things, and I gradually forget things as I learn

0:35:34.716 --> 0:35:37.156
<v Speaker 1>new things. But at the moment, it seemed best for

0:35:37.276 --> 0:35:40.676
<v Speaker 1>my fingers if I were to only on show days

0:35:41.036 --> 0:35:43.556
<v Speaker 1>play things that I know really well that I can play,

0:35:43.596 --> 0:35:45.756
<v Speaker 1>that I should be able to play without making mistakes.

0:35:46.116 --> 0:35:48.636
<v Speaker 1>So I've got a number of things memorized that I

0:35:48.676 --> 0:35:51.076
<v Speaker 1>can do that with and I like to spend a

0:35:51.076 --> 0:35:54.036
<v Speaker 1>couple hours doing that before this show. Nothing is as

0:35:54.116 --> 0:35:56.116
<v Speaker 1>crazy as what I do on stage, because a lot

0:35:56.116 --> 0:35:58.276
<v Speaker 1>of what I do on stage, I wouldn't even know

0:35:58.316 --> 0:36:02.916
<v Speaker 1>how to figure it out myself, just pure a pure

0:36:03.196 --> 0:36:05.996
<v Speaker 1>energetic transmission. Yeah, a lot of people would call it

0:36:06.076 --> 0:36:08.636
<v Speaker 1>sloppy because you can't hear It doesn't so much sound

0:36:08.636 --> 0:36:12.996
<v Speaker 1>like noe noe, noe, noe noe. A lot of the

0:36:12.996 --> 0:36:15.316
<v Speaker 1>time there's some weird noise that you're like, well, I'm

0:36:15.356 --> 0:36:17.796
<v Speaker 1>not sure where his fingers were there, but like I

0:36:17.876 --> 0:36:19.676
<v Speaker 1>really like the sound of those things, and I like

0:36:19.796 --> 0:36:22.796
<v Speaker 1>playing like that. You know, if you would listened to it,

0:36:23.036 --> 0:36:27.516
<v Speaker 1>could you tell what you were doing or maybe? And

0:36:27.516 --> 0:36:29.436
<v Speaker 1>I can do it with a most any guitar playing,

0:36:29.476 --> 0:36:32.356
<v Speaker 1>like like Frank Zappa is a guitar player who I

0:36:32.356 --> 0:36:34.156
<v Speaker 1>would put in that category. Like a lot of what

0:36:34.276 --> 0:36:37.556
<v Speaker 1>he plays, I think it's a matter of opinion what

0:36:37.676 --> 0:36:40.156
<v Speaker 1>he's actually playing. Two people could figure it out and

0:36:40.196 --> 0:36:42.836
<v Speaker 1>do it two different ways. A lot of it's just

0:36:42.956 --> 0:36:44.996
<v Speaker 1>not clear enough, some of it is, and then he

0:36:45.036 --> 0:36:47.796
<v Speaker 1>goes into a section where it's just like, well, we

0:36:47.836 --> 0:36:49.716
<v Speaker 1>can only guess what he's doing at that pen and

0:36:49.836 --> 0:36:53.036
<v Speaker 1>in his case, does it always sound intentional or no.

0:36:54.076 --> 0:36:57.156
<v Speaker 1>He definitely would admit to making what he called mistakes.

0:36:57.636 --> 0:37:01.996
<v Speaker 1>To me, there's no mistakes. The sound he made is

0:37:02.036 --> 0:37:05.676
<v Speaker 1>the music, and there's nothing it should have been, you know, yeah, yeah,

0:37:05.836 --> 0:37:08.516
<v Speaker 1>but he may have been trying to do something different. Yeah,

0:37:08.556 --> 0:37:11.276
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to do something different and he doesn't

0:37:11.316 --> 0:37:14.636
<v Speaker 1>quite make it. And that happens with these guitar players

0:37:14.636 --> 0:37:17.836
<v Speaker 1>who go out on a ledge, like Jimmy Page, Jimmy Hendricks.

0:37:17.876 --> 0:37:20.996
<v Speaker 1>They all have sections like this that it becomes hard

0:37:21.036 --> 0:37:23.796
<v Speaker 1>to be sure exactly what they're doing. But I try

0:37:23.796 --> 0:37:25.996
<v Speaker 1>to learn things like that. But a lot of what

0:37:26.076 --> 0:37:28.316
<v Speaker 1>I'm playing live is stuff that there's no level of

0:37:28.356 --> 0:37:31.916
<v Speaker 1>confusion about it, and it just it's a little beneath

0:37:31.996 --> 0:37:34.556
<v Speaker 1>the level of what I'm going to do when I

0:37:34.556 --> 0:37:36.676
<v Speaker 1>get on stage. But I find that if I do

0:37:36.716 --> 0:37:39.356
<v Speaker 1>it for a couple hours, that prepares me. It's like

0:37:39.396 --> 0:37:41.756
<v Speaker 1>a meditation. And it's like if I find that I'm

0:37:41.836 --> 0:37:45.316
<v Speaker 1>making mistakes on something that I've played a zillion times

0:37:45.316 --> 0:37:48.836
<v Speaker 1>perfectly and I'm forgetting it to some degree or my

0:37:48.876 --> 0:37:51.316
<v Speaker 1>fingers aren't cooperating with me, it shows me I need

0:37:51.356 --> 0:37:55.556
<v Speaker 1>to bring an extra focus to that thing. So cool. Yeah,

0:37:55.596 --> 0:37:58.876
<v Speaker 1>they're so interesting. Yeah, I asked, because some of the

0:37:58.876 --> 0:38:02.956
<v Speaker 1>craziest solos that I've ever seen somebody transcribe. And this

0:38:02.996 --> 0:38:04.556
<v Speaker 1>is how I learned how to read music when I

0:38:04.596 --> 0:38:06.476
<v Speaker 1>was a kid, was because I was so fascinated by

0:38:06.476 --> 0:38:09.036
<v Speaker 1>the rhythms in them, where Steve had done these trends

0:38:09.116 --> 0:38:11.716
<v Speaker 1>scriptions of Frank Zappa's guitar solos. There was a whole

0:38:11.756 --> 0:38:14.276
<v Speaker 1>book of them, and I had no interest in reading music.

0:38:14.316 --> 0:38:16.356
<v Speaker 1>But when I learned that there was this way of

0:38:16.356 --> 0:38:18.996
<v Speaker 1>writing down when people are speeding up and slowing down

0:38:19.076 --> 0:38:22.236
<v Speaker 1>across the bar line and when they're going into grooves

0:38:22.276 --> 0:38:25.676
<v Speaker 1>that seemed completely separate from what the drummers doing but

0:38:25.756 --> 0:38:28.476
<v Speaker 1>do have a relationship, it was fascinating to me. And

0:38:28.516 --> 0:38:30.996
<v Speaker 1>it was really the only way to learn a lot

0:38:31.036 --> 0:38:33.716
<v Speaker 1>of franksz Appa's written music was to understand how it

0:38:33.756 --> 0:38:36.156
<v Speaker 1>was written down, because he would use those kind of

0:38:36.196 --> 0:38:38.756
<v Speaker 1>rhythms both in his playing and in his writing. So

0:38:38.996 --> 0:38:40.916
<v Speaker 1>I learned how to read. I just went directly to

0:38:40.996 --> 0:38:43.796
<v Speaker 1>what turned out to be like the hardest stuff to

0:38:44.116 --> 0:38:46.636
<v Speaker 1>you know, to sight read, and consequently I never learned

0:38:46.636 --> 0:38:50.316
<v Speaker 1>to sight read but I asked Steve fi because I

0:38:50.396 --> 0:38:52.316
<v Speaker 1>think a lot about polyrhythms. I used them a lot

0:38:52.316 --> 0:38:54.796
<v Speaker 1>of my electronic music. I have machines I can program

0:38:55.036 --> 0:38:58.836
<v Speaker 1>where you're playing like five against four or evenly or

0:38:59.196 --> 0:39:04.036
<v Speaker 1>seven against three, or these strange ways of rhythmically relating

0:39:04.076 --> 0:39:06.636
<v Speaker 1>to the other instruments. So I'd given a lot of

0:39:06.676 --> 0:39:09.076
<v Speaker 1>thought to it for so many years. And I asked them,

0:39:09.156 --> 0:39:12.716
<v Speaker 1>as you think of them as objectively accurate? And he

0:39:12.796 --> 0:39:16.756
<v Speaker 1>said it was a matter of interpretation. When you're writing

0:39:16.836 --> 0:39:19.836
<v Speaker 1>rhythms like that and the drummer is not playing to

0:39:19.876 --> 0:39:23.356
<v Speaker 1>a click, but he himself is slightly speeding up and

0:39:23.396 --> 0:39:26.036
<v Speaker 1>slowing down all the time, it's very hard to say

0:39:26.796 --> 0:39:30.356
<v Speaker 1>the rhythm right here is the rhythms are all based

0:39:30.396 --> 0:39:36.436
<v Speaker 1>on thirteen evenly across four quarter notes. There's no way

0:39:36.436 --> 0:39:40.276
<v Speaker 1>to accurately to be able to objectively say, yes, that

0:39:40.396 --> 0:39:42.796
<v Speaker 1>is the rhythm. Because as long as when you're dealing

0:39:42.876 --> 0:39:47.476
<v Speaker 1>with rhythms that are that delicate to play accurately, the

0:39:47.596 --> 0:39:50.676
<v Speaker 1>slightest little bit of timing change in the drummer, even

0:39:50.716 --> 0:39:54.236
<v Speaker 1>a really good type drummer, makes the difference to where

0:39:54.396 --> 0:39:58.796
<v Speaker 1>it's not what you conceived it to be. I think

0:39:58.836 --> 0:40:01.356
<v Speaker 1>all that studying of Frank Zappa's music that I did

0:40:01.356 --> 0:40:03.236
<v Speaker 1>when I was a teenager did a lot of good

0:40:03.276 --> 0:40:06.636
<v Speaker 1>for me, because it showed me that not everything needs

0:40:06.636 --> 0:40:09.436
<v Speaker 1>to line up perfectly rhythmically with everybody else the way

0:40:09.436 --> 0:40:13.796
<v Speaker 1>most people tend to play, and melodies don't have to

0:40:13.876 --> 0:40:17.596
<v Speaker 1>be this straightforward thing in order to be accessible or

0:40:17.636 --> 0:40:21.116
<v Speaker 1>to be catchy. That that that you can be doing

0:40:21.156 --> 0:40:24.036
<v Speaker 1>little twists with them all the time and taking all

0:40:24.036 --> 0:40:27.676
<v Speaker 1>those liberties that he was taking, like and studying them.

0:40:27.716 --> 0:40:30.916
<v Speaker 1>I just I just feel like gave me a sort

0:40:30.956 --> 0:40:36.636
<v Speaker 1>of unique outlook for a pop musician on you know,

0:40:36.716 --> 0:40:39.836
<v Speaker 1>on what notes are there for and what you're able

0:40:39.836 --> 0:40:41.436
<v Speaker 1>to do with them. I feel like, even in the

0:40:41.476 --> 0:40:45.156
<v Speaker 1>simplest things that I do, I feel like that familiarity

0:40:45.196 --> 0:40:48.036
<v Speaker 1>I have with doing things in an unusual way winds

0:40:48.116 --> 0:40:51.076
<v Speaker 1>up making the melodies unusual, you know, in some weird way.

0:40:51.596 --> 0:40:53.836
<v Speaker 1>Do you feel like if it happened that you were

0:40:54.076 --> 0:40:57.476
<v Speaker 1>playing a concert and it came time for solo, and

0:40:57.516 --> 0:41:00.756
<v Speaker 1>if for some reason something happened where the audience could

0:41:00.756 --> 0:41:03.716
<v Speaker 1>still hear you perfectly, but you couldn't hear yourself at all,

0:41:04.676 --> 0:41:08.436
<v Speaker 1>could you play a solo without hearing yourself at all,

0:41:08.756 --> 0:41:12.036
<v Speaker 1>and it be coherent for the audience, I think. So

0:41:12.116 --> 0:41:14.756
<v Speaker 1>you know that that kind of happened at the LA

0:41:14.836 --> 0:41:17.556
<v Speaker 1>show that we did a few months ago. I got

0:41:17.556 --> 0:41:20.076
<v Speaker 1>out on stage and there was nothing in my ear

0:41:20.156 --> 0:41:22.796
<v Speaker 1>monitors at all. They were they were silent, and so

0:41:22.836 --> 0:41:24.836
<v Speaker 1>I went over to the side of the stage and

0:41:24.876 --> 0:41:27.396
<v Speaker 1>it just sounded like a mess up there. Because we

0:41:27.436 --> 0:41:31.156
<v Speaker 1>all used in air monitors, what it actually sounds like

0:41:31.196 --> 0:41:34.196
<v Speaker 1>on stage is pretty incoherent. So I went to the

0:41:34.236 --> 0:41:36.436
<v Speaker 1>side and was telling my guitar tack, telling the sound

0:41:36.516 --> 0:41:39.236
<v Speaker 1>man what's going on. They're watching them try to solve

0:41:39.236 --> 0:41:43.036
<v Speaker 1>the problem, and I went into playing a two handed

0:41:43.036 --> 0:41:47.796
<v Speaker 1>tapping Eddie van Halen style solo. Barely could hear what

0:41:47.836 --> 0:41:51.396
<v Speaker 1>I was doing. But after the show, my wife's cousin

0:41:51.516 --> 0:41:55.076
<v Speaker 1>said that solo at the beginning of the show incredible.

0:41:55.276 --> 0:41:57.236
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I could barely hear what I was doing.

0:41:57.276 --> 0:41:59.516
<v Speaker 1>But I do that kind of thing when i'm It's

0:41:59.556 --> 0:42:01.796
<v Speaker 1>part of my practicing that when I warm up, I

0:42:02.116 --> 0:42:05.796
<v Speaker 1>also do things like that, like just doing this at

0:42:05.836 --> 0:42:10.476
<v Speaker 1>every part of the neck that I just doing these

0:42:11.196 --> 0:42:14.396
<v Speaker 1>trills like everywhere that I can did Eddie actually invent

0:42:14.436 --> 0:42:18.876
<v Speaker 1>that technique. No, he invented that use of it, like

0:42:18.956 --> 0:42:21.876
<v Speaker 1>nobody did it sounding like what he sounded like doing it.

0:42:22.116 --> 0:42:30.676
<v Speaker 1>There's certain details about patterns, like like like nobody was

0:42:30.716 --> 0:42:34.756
<v Speaker 1>doing that, but Steve Hackett from Genesis was doing that

0:42:35.436 --> 0:42:38.996
<v Speaker 1>using his right hand finger to tap notes, and Frank

0:42:39.076 --> 0:42:41.436
<v Speaker 1>Zappa was doing the same thing but using the pick

0:42:42.956 --> 0:42:45.796
<v Speaker 1>rather like that's what it sounds like with your finger,

0:42:49.116 --> 0:42:51.116
<v Speaker 1>that's with a pick, And so he was calling that

0:42:51.196 --> 0:42:54.036
<v Speaker 1>bagpipe guitar and that was a good Both those examples

0:42:54.036 --> 0:42:59.556
<v Speaker 1>were good. Three years before Van Hilen influenced Eddie, Like

0:42:59.636 --> 0:43:01.316
<v Speaker 1>did he hear those and then come up with his

0:43:01.356 --> 0:43:03.156
<v Speaker 1>way of doing it? He claimed he came up with

0:43:03.236 --> 0:43:06.076
<v Speaker 1>his on the toilet while he was taking a ship.

0:43:06.196 --> 0:43:09.596
<v Speaker 1>Good story, But he went backstage at a Steve Hackett

0:43:09.636 --> 0:43:11.636
<v Speaker 1>show and told Steve Hackett that he got the idea

0:43:11.676 --> 0:43:14.476
<v Speaker 1>for it from being at a Genesis show and saw

0:43:14.556 --> 0:43:17.836
<v Speaker 1>him doing it. So I tend to believe that. But

0:43:18.196 --> 0:43:21.156
<v Speaker 1>Steve Hackett's definitely doing it. On selling England by the Pound,

0:43:21.156 --> 0:43:24.596
<v Speaker 1>the Genesis album, He's definitely doing that technique. You can

0:43:24.636 --> 0:43:28.396
<v Speaker 1>hear it, Yeah, when you're soloing live. How much do

0:43:28.436 --> 0:43:32.636
<v Speaker 1>you take into account the recording version of the solo.

0:43:33.556 --> 0:43:37.636
<v Speaker 1>Usually not at all. Yeah, Like sometimes if I'm in

0:43:37.676 --> 0:43:41.116
<v Speaker 1>a certain mood, I'll do a variation of it. I'll

0:43:41.116 --> 0:43:43.836
<v Speaker 1>do the same basic idea, or I'll start with the

0:43:43.916 --> 0:43:46.436
<v Speaker 1>same idea. But usually that's even how it is on

0:43:46.476 --> 0:43:48.756
<v Speaker 1>the record. Like people think of the solo on a

0:43:48.836 --> 0:43:51.316
<v Speaker 1>record as being the one, but it was actually I

0:43:51.396 --> 0:43:53.276
<v Speaker 1>had an idea of how I would start it, and

0:43:53.316 --> 0:43:54.956
<v Speaker 1>that was all I had, and that was the one

0:43:54.996 --> 0:43:57.076
<v Speaker 1>that you picked that day, or may have been the

0:43:57.116 --> 0:43:58.756
<v Speaker 1>only one you played. In some cases, like just to

0:43:58.796 --> 0:44:01.076
<v Speaker 1>be prepared for the studio, I often have an idea

0:44:01.156 --> 0:44:03.156
<v Speaker 1>for a beginning and I figured the rest I'll just

0:44:03.196 --> 0:44:05.356
<v Speaker 1>get through and it'll be reflected in the vibe of

0:44:05.436 --> 0:44:09.356
<v Speaker 1>the moment. So live a lot of the time, I

0:44:09.436 --> 0:44:11.276
<v Speaker 1>might start that the same way that I did in

0:44:11.316 --> 0:44:14.676
<v Speaker 1>the studio, start with something that that's pre written, and

0:44:14.716 --> 0:44:18.196
<v Speaker 1>then go off in another direction, because it's always going

0:44:18.236 --> 0:44:20.876
<v Speaker 1>to feel differently depending on the groove of how Fully

0:44:20.916 --> 0:44:23.556
<v Speaker 1>and Chat are playing. To play the same solo, it

0:44:23.596 --> 0:44:26.316
<v Speaker 1>seems like it would be unnatural when you have a

0:44:26.396 --> 0:44:29.076
<v Speaker 1>song in your head. Let's say you're bringing a song

0:44:29.116 --> 0:44:31.956
<v Speaker 1>into the band you've worked on at home. Has there

0:44:31.996 --> 0:44:35.156
<v Speaker 1>ever been a case where you come up with a

0:44:35.516 --> 0:44:37.876
<v Speaker 1>like a part that you're going to play a rhythm

0:44:38.196 --> 0:44:41.036
<v Speaker 1>a rhythm piece, and you play it for the band

0:44:41.356 --> 0:44:45.436
<v Speaker 1>and they join in, and when they join in, it

0:44:45.556 --> 0:44:48.676
<v Speaker 1>instigates you to change what your original part was based

0:44:48.676 --> 0:44:52.996
<v Speaker 1>on what they're playing. Oh, yeah, completely. And Anthony's always

0:44:53.036 --> 0:44:56.076
<v Speaker 1>the last part of that, like, like, I don't really

0:44:56.116 --> 0:44:58.556
<v Speaker 1>know exactly what I'm going to do and how it

0:44:58.756 --> 0:45:01.876
<v Speaker 1>can be, how the groove is going to be put

0:45:01.916 --> 0:45:05.876
<v Speaker 1>into it and all that until I hear what he's thinking.

0:45:06.316 --> 0:45:08.116
<v Speaker 1>But there is a certain amount if I bring in

0:45:08.156 --> 0:45:12.156
<v Speaker 1>a song, if the drums that Chad aren't playing don't

0:45:12.316 --> 0:45:14.996
<v Speaker 1>sound right, I might not have any idea of what

0:45:15.036 --> 0:45:17.156
<v Speaker 1>the drums are supposed to be going in, but when

0:45:17.196 --> 0:45:19.636
<v Speaker 1>I hear the wrong thing, Yeah, it feels like this

0:45:19.716 --> 0:45:22.836
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make this thing do what it wants. Yeah, you

0:45:22.836 --> 0:45:26.156
<v Speaker 1>know we often experiment. Yeah, we work on that, and

0:45:26.356 --> 0:45:29.716
<v Speaker 1>so there's there's always a lot of healthy exchange with Chad.

0:45:29.916 --> 0:45:32.916
<v Speaker 1>With Flea that that's been more difficult. We've had rough

0:45:33.076 --> 0:45:36.276
<v Speaker 1>patches of working together because I had an idea of

0:45:36.276 --> 0:45:38.516
<v Speaker 1>what I thought should be the low note of the

0:45:38.596 --> 0:45:40.676
<v Speaker 1>chord and that kind of thing, and he just hears

0:45:40.676 --> 0:45:44.236
<v Speaker 1>a difference and yeah, but you know, we managed to

0:45:44.316 --> 0:45:46.596
<v Speaker 1>work that out. Always, when he brings in a song,

0:45:46.676 --> 0:45:51.436
<v Speaker 1>either on piano or on bass, do you immediately know

0:45:51.516 --> 0:45:55.116
<v Speaker 1>what to play? Quite often, especially if it's a sort

0:45:55.156 --> 0:45:58.516
<v Speaker 1>of modal, funk based kind of thing that doesn't involve

0:45:58.556 --> 0:46:01.156
<v Speaker 1>chord changes. A lot of the time, the first thing

0:46:01.196 --> 0:46:03.676
<v Speaker 1>I play when when I come in is what winds

0:46:03.756 --> 0:46:07.316
<v Speaker 1>up being on the record. But with piano, with with

0:46:07.356 --> 0:46:09.556
<v Speaker 1>those songs that he's brought in on piano, I I

0:46:09.636 --> 0:46:11.756
<v Speaker 1>definitely have to like put some thought into it and

0:46:11.836 --> 0:46:14.636
<v Speaker 1>ask him what the chords are. We had a real

0:46:14.716 --> 0:46:17.236
<v Speaker 1>nice exchange because in the old days, neither of us

0:46:17.276 --> 0:46:20.716
<v Speaker 1>really communicated having anything to do with theory. It was

0:46:20.756 --> 0:46:23.516
<v Speaker 1>more showing the person what you're playing and then responding

0:46:23.556 --> 0:46:26.436
<v Speaker 1>to that. But as time has gone by and he

0:46:26.476 --> 0:46:29.916
<v Speaker 1>went to music school and stuff for this new stuff,

0:46:29.956 --> 0:46:32.476
<v Speaker 1>we would talk about the chord. He would if he

0:46:32.476 --> 0:46:34.196
<v Speaker 1>didn't know the name of the chord, or one of

0:46:34.236 --> 0:46:36.876
<v Speaker 1>us doesn't know the name of the chord, we tell

0:46:36.916 --> 0:46:38.596
<v Speaker 1>the other one what the intervals that it has in

0:46:38.716 --> 0:46:42.236
<v Speaker 1>it are, and when it's what it involves chord changes,

0:46:42.276 --> 0:46:46.436
<v Speaker 1>that's really where the trouble, Where it involves more it's

0:46:46.436 --> 0:46:48.676
<v Speaker 1>just you got to figure it out. Yeah, you've got

0:46:48.676 --> 0:46:51.636
<v Speaker 1>to take some time. But yeah, Usually the songs that

0:46:51.916 --> 0:46:54.636
<v Speaker 1>are jam style song, songs that come from us just

0:46:54.756 --> 0:46:58.436
<v Speaker 1>jamming with each other, that's usually pretty automatic. And but

0:46:58.556 --> 0:47:00.556
<v Speaker 1>sometimes you know, like some songs on the new album,

0:47:00.556 --> 0:47:03.796
<v Speaker 1>we're like, we did a jam and the first thing

0:47:03.796 --> 0:47:06.316
<v Speaker 1>we played is one song, and what we went into

0:47:06.356 --> 0:47:09.476
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes later wound up being a completely other like

0:47:09.556 --> 0:47:12.876
<v Speaker 1>we'd landed on something through playing the first thing that

0:47:12.956 --> 0:47:16.476
<v Speaker 1>wound up being a whole other tune. So so there's

0:47:16.516 --> 0:47:20.316
<v Speaker 1>this automaticness of fitting together when it's when it's things

0:47:20.356 --> 0:47:23.636
<v Speaker 1>that are in one key, but when it's moving around

0:47:23.676 --> 0:47:26.436
<v Speaker 1>a lot, it requires some thought both for him to

0:47:26.436 --> 0:47:28.436
<v Speaker 1>come up with bass parts, for me to come up

0:47:28.476 --> 0:47:35.796
<v Speaker 1>with guitar parts. If there's a difficult chord progression presented

0:47:35.836 --> 0:47:39.636
<v Speaker 1>to you on piano, would your instinct first to be

0:47:39.876 --> 0:47:42.836
<v Speaker 1>thinking about how to interact with it, or would it

0:47:42.876 --> 0:47:45.916
<v Speaker 1>be to play along with it, like to double it first,

0:47:46.396 --> 0:47:48.996
<v Speaker 1>to know what to do off of it from piano.

0:47:49.076 --> 0:47:51.636
<v Speaker 1>I can't do that because she's got he can play

0:47:51.676 --> 0:47:54.236
<v Speaker 1>more notes than I can on my guitar. On piano,

0:47:54.276 --> 0:47:57.516
<v Speaker 1>it's so easy, for instance, to play a chord that's

0:47:57.916 --> 0:48:00.196
<v Speaker 1>almost everything in it is a whole step away from

0:48:00.196 --> 0:48:03.316
<v Speaker 1>each other, if a very close distance. Yes, guitar, you

0:48:03.396 --> 0:48:06.076
<v Speaker 1>just can't do it. You can't. You've got to take

0:48:06.076 --> 0:48:07.876
<v Speaker 1>notes out of the chord in order to be able

0:48:07.916 --> 0:48:10.916
<v Speaker 1>to physically play it. I see. So you can't really

0:48:11.036 --> 0:48:13.956
<v Speaker 1>duplicate it on the guitar, you do, right, Yeah, not

0:48:14.036 --> 0:48:15.716
<v Speaker 1>if it has too many notes in it. He's doing

0:48:15.756 --> 0:48:17.716
<v Speaker 1>a lot of chords that have ten notes in him,

0:48:17.836 --> 0:48:20.516
<v Speaker 1>I see, don't even have that many strings or that range.

0:48:20.796 --> 0:48:23.636
<v Speaker 1>And it comes down as always to doing what you

0:48:23.716 --> 0:48:26.716
<v Speaker 1>hear in your heads, you know. But for chords to

0:48:26.876 --> 0:48:28.956
<v Speaker 1>do what you hear in your head, you have to

0:48:28.996 --> 0:48:31.676
<v Speaker 1>have a good idea of that's because that's one of

0:48:31.716 --> 0:48:34.556
<v Speaker 1>the things I was thinking was when you hear something

0:48:34.716 --> 0:48:37.996
<v Speaker 1>and you respond to it, are you responding with the

0:48:37.996 --> 0:48:41.516
<v Speaker 1>guitar first or are you humming it in your head

0:48:41.636 --> 0:48:44.956
<v Speaker 1>and then playing it? Would the singing version be faster

0:48:45.116 --> 0:48:49.876
<v Speaker 1>than the guitar version to sing the idea or no? Yeah,

0:48:49.916 --> 0:48:52.276
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting question because it comes back to that

0:48:52.796 --> 0:48:55.196
<v Speaker 1>thing that we touched on in the last episode having

0:48:55.236 --> 0:48:57.636
<v Speaker 1>to do with that period of time where I was

0:48:57.876 --> 0:49:01.156
<v Speaker 1>seeing music very clearly in my head with synesthesia or

0:49:01.196 --> 0:49:03.956
<v Speaker 1>some form of synesthesia. And even though I don't have

0:49:04.036 --> 0:49:06.756
<v Speaker 1>that the way I did when I was, you know,

0:49:07.596 --> 0:49:10.556
<v Speaker 1>in my early twenties, I do see things and I

0:49:10.596 --> 0:49:13.556
<v Speaker 1>can see, for instance, like if I'm playing live the

0:49:13.596 --> 0:49:16.396
<v Speaker 1>beginning of a guitar solo, I'm not humming it. I

0:49:16.516 --> 0:49:19.316
<v Speaker 1>just see it. Wow. When you say you see it,

0:49:19.356 --> 0:49:23.116
<v Speaker 1>you don't see it like written music. No, would you

0:49:23.156 --> 0:49:26.036
<v Speaker 1>describe it as shape? How would you describe it? That's

0:49:26.076 --> 0:49:29.596
<v Speaker 1>the funny thing about it is it's not visual, at

0:49:29.676 --> 0:49:32.316
<v Speaker 1>least I don't think it is. But it's in an

0:49:32.356 --> 0:49:35.636
<v Speaker 1>instant like I might see two bars of a of

0:49:35.676 --> 0:49:38.436
<v Speaker 1>a guitar solo, of the way I'm going to start

0:49:38.516 --> 0:49:41.116
<v Speaker 1>the solo. I might see the first two bars in

0:49:41.156 --> 0:49:45.316
<v Speaker 1>my head as a single picture, like as a How

0:49:45.316 --> 0:49:48.356
<v Speaker 1>would you describe a single instant? I see those two bars.

0:49:48.516 --> 0:49:50.636
<v Speaker 1>But when you say see the two bars, tell me

0:49:50.676 --> 0:49:53.476
<v Speaker 1>what you're like. Describe what you're seeing. What do the

0:49:53.476 --> 0:49:57.596
<v Speaker 1>bars look like? I don't know how. I really it's

0:49:56.756 --> 0:49:59.396
<v Speaker 1>there for me because it's interesting. It's one of those

0:49:59.436 --> 0:50:01.556
<v Speaker 1>things that because I could do this kind of thing

0:50:01.636 --> 0:50:03.996
<v Speaker 1>so good when I was when I was like twenty,

0:50:04.036 --> 0:50:06.516
<v Speaker 1>and I was literally seeing everything like as a movie

0:50:06.556 --> 0:50:08.956
<v Speaker 1>that like you'd ask me, like you'd have the idea,

0:50:08.996 --> 0:50:11.276
<v Speaker 1>like we would be working on Sold to Squeeze, and

0:50:11.276 --> 0:50:13.516
<v Speaker 1>I remember you saying you should write a guitar intro,

0:50:13.636 --> 0:50:17.556
<v Speaker 1>just a guitar only intro for this song, and I

0:50:17.556 --> 0:50:19.636
<v Speaker 1>would just see a picture in my head, like a

0:50:19.716 --> 0:50:23.116
<v Speaker 1>visual picture like a movie of the song, and I

0:50:23.156 --> 0:50:25.156
<v Speaker 1>would think, Okay, what would be the right movie for

0:50:25.716 --> 0:50:27.956
<v Speaker 1>the intro? And then I would just see the movie

0:50:27.996 --> 0:50:30.596
<v Speaker 1>and then play the feeling of that like the school,

0:50:30.836 --> 0:50:34.236
<v Speaker 1>like you're scoring an image. Yeah, but it's not an

0:50:34.236 --> 0:50:38.076
<v Speaker 1>image that you could necessarily describe it not necessarily, but

0:50:38.116 --> 0:50:40.516
<v Speaker 1>it very well could have been. In those days they

0:50:40.596 --> 0:50:42.636
<v Speaker 1>were were there were things that were very clear, but

0:50:42.676 --> 0:50:46.796
<v Speaker 1>they always there was this interaction between the music and

0:50:46.876 --> 0:50:49.756
<v Speaker 1>the visuals in my head to where if I was

0:50:50.036 --> 0:50:53.916
<v Speaker 1>hearing music, I saw a visual that perfectly represented that music.

0:50:53.956 --> 0:50:57.956
<v Speaker 1>And it could be abstract shapes in black and white,

0:50:58.156 --> 0:51:02.156
<v Speaker 1>or it could be color just like a movie, or

0:51:02.636 --> 0:51:05.716
<v Speaker 1>you know it was And so as time went by

0:51:05.756 --> 0:51:09.516
<v Speaker 1>and I went Californication time I start making music again,

0:51:09.556 --> 0:51:13.556
<v Speaker 1>but without that clear visualness, I still have the same

0:51:13.796 --> 0:51:16.876
<v Speaker 1>ability to see the feeling of music in my head.

0:51:16.996 --> 0:51:18.796
<v Speaker 1>Yet there was no picture to it, but I could

0:51:18.836 --> 0:51:21.996
<v Speaker 1>see it. I can only describe it as seeing because

0:51:22.716 --> 0:51:26.716
<v Speaker 1>it's there in my head and it's clear, and I

0:51:26.756 --> 0:51:28.916
<v Speaker 1>see the connection between that and what I would play

0:51:28.956 --> 0:51:32.916
<v Speaker 1>to do that feeling. Yeah, but sometimes there's a visual thing,

0:51:33.116 --> 0:51:37.156
<v Speaker 1>but it's more like spaces than it is like objects. Okay,

0:51:37.476 --> 0:51:40.836
<v Speaker 1>And when you say spaces, do you mean spaces between

0:51:40.956 --> 0:51:46.076
<v Speaker 1>things or a visual space like a location. I'm not

0:51:46.116 --> 0:51:48.836
<v Speaker 1>really saying that. It's anything that I could expect anybody

0:51:48.916 --> 0:51:51.516
<v Speaker 1>to be able to draw or something. Yeah, it's just

0:51:51.556 --> 0:51:56.356
<v Speaker 1>the absence of objects I see as opposed to objects.

0:51:56.196 --> 0:51:59.836
<v Speaker 1>It's it's something like you've seen what's missing? You don't

0:51:59.836 --> 0:52:02.756
<v Speaker 1>have something? What I'm curious you just guys, you're asking

0:52:02.756 --> 0:52:04.956
<v Speaker 1>me these questions. You must have something like, No, I

0:52:04.956 --> 0:52:06.876
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm trying. I'm trying to visual I'm trying

0:52:06.876 --> 0:52:09.916
<v Speaker 1>to visualize what you're experiencing, right, And I'm just looking

0:52:09.916 --> 0:52:12.036
<v Speaker 1>for any clues to I want to see it, you know,

0:52:12.036 --> 0:52:13.756
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to I want to see it. Yeah,

0:52:13.956 --> 0:52:16.196
<v Speaker 1>pretty mysterious. I think I told you. I think I

0:52:16.236 --> 0:52:18.716
<v Speaker 1>told you when I was gassed at the dentist's office.

0:52:18.756 --> 0:52:21.756
<v Speaker 1>I told you that story a long time ago. Needle phobic,

0:52:22.116 --> 0:52:24.716
<v Speaker 1>I got gassed to have a blood test and I

0:52:24.756 --> 0:52:27.036
<v Speaker 1>was listening to music and they gassed me and I

0:52:27.076 --> 0:52:30.916
<v Speaker 1>could see the music. I could see three D images,

0:52:30.956 --> 0:52:33.276
<v Speaker 1>and I remember thinking, oh, now I know how to

0:52:33.316 --> 0:52:36.356
<v Speaker 1>do this, because like now that I've been exposed to it, Yeah,

0:52:36.396 --> 0:52:38.316
<v Speaker 1>I don't need laughing gas to do this. I see

0:52:38.316 --> 0:52:40.916
<v Speaker 1>what this is, right. And then I've never been able

0:52:40.916 --> 0:52:43.356
<v Speaker 1>to do it again, even not on laughing gas. I can't.

0:52:43.356 --> 0:52:45.436
<v Speaker 1>I've never been able to do it again. But in

0:52:45.716 --> 0:52:50.316
<v Speaker 1>that first time, I was able to clearly see and

0:52:50.356 --> 0:52:53.236
<v Speaker 1>it was so cool. It was so cool to be

0:52:53.276 --> 0:52:56.956
<v Speaker 1>able to see it. Yeah, that's how it was for me, real, consistently,

0:52:57.076 --> 0:53:02.716
<v Speaker 1>from like nineteen ninety two. It's mysterious to me that

0:53:02.716 --> 0:53:05.316
<v Speaker 1>that I was able to make music just as colorful

0:53:05.396 --> 0:53:12.396
<v Speaker 1>and and emotional and shapely and all these things without it.

0:53:12.956 --> 0:53:16.396
<v Speaker 1>And I can only say that even though I don't

0:53:16.436 --> 0:53:20.156
<v Speaker 1>see the visuals like I did, they must be there

0:53:20.276 --> 0:53:24.156
<v Speaker 1>just below the level of consciousness, because the effect of

0:53:24.196 --> 0:53:27.516
<v Speaker 1>what that did remained with me. When you could see it.

0:53:27.636 --> 0:53:32.836
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it was almost like training wheels, like it had

0:53:32.876 --> 0:53:36.716
<v Speaker 1>to be that clear for whatever it was that was

0:53:36.756 --> 0:53:39.236
<v Speaker 1>showing it to you for you to be able to

0:53:39.276 --> 0:53:44.836
<v Speaker 1>see it, and then once you built the ability to

0:53:45.156 --> 0:53:50.076
<v Speaker 1>see it, you could still see it without the visual there. Right. Yeah,

0:53:50.116 --> 0:53:52.236
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me that that is that that is

0:53:52.276 --> 0:53:55.596
<v Speaker 1>what happened. And I'm sure there are people who just

0:53:55.716 --> 0:53:58.476
<v Speaker 1>go on seeing it their whole lives, but it didn't

0:53:58.476 --> 0:54:00.476
<v Speaker 1>work that way for me. But yeah, there are a

0:54:00.516 --> 0:54:03.996
<v Speaker 1>lot of ideas, don't you get it safe. For instance,

0:54:04.516 --> 0:54:07.116
<v Speaker 1>you're looking through movies, you're thinking of watching a movie

0:54:07.596 --> 0:54:13.076
<v Speaker 1>and you look through your DVD collection. There's nothing, nothing's

0:54:13.116 --> 0:54:15.316
<v Speaker 1>leaping out at you all of a sudden, one DVD

0:54:15.756 --> 0:54:18.036
<v Speaker 1>that's the one you want to watch. Yes, what happens

0:54:18.036 --> 0:54:20.916
<v Speaker 1>in your head at that moment? I would say it's

0:54:21.316 --> 0:54:25.836
<v Speaker 1>it's a feeling of the energy in my body raises.

0:54:26.196 --> 0:54:29.836
<v Speaker 1>It's similar to when we're playing in the studio and

0:54:29.956 --> 0:54:33.236
<v Speaker 1>it goes from a okay take to a great take.

0:54:33.396 --> 0:54:37.196
<v Speaker 1>There's this feeling of just like I feel this lift

0:54:37.236 --> 0:54:40.276
<v Speaker 1>of energy in my body that makes me want to

0:54:41.356 --> 0:54:44.076
<v Speaker 1>sometimes makes me want to laugh. Sometimes it makes me

0:54:44.076 --> 0:54:47.916
<v Speaker 1>want to lean forward and like listen closer. I would

0:54:47.916 --> 0:54:51.916
<v Speaker 1>say it's interest. It's like you could be sitting around

0:54:51.956 --> 0:54:57.196
<v Speaker 1>and like mindlessly not thinking, and then something grabs my attention.

0:54:58.436 --> 0:55:00.676
<v Speaker 1>Nothing changed, volumes, not any louder, you know. It's like

0:55:00.676 --> 0:55:03.316
<v Speaker 1>it's not like the music came on. Music has been

0:55:03.316 --> 0:55:06.196
<v Speaker 1>playing for hours, but all of a sudden, like my

0:55:06.316 --> 0:55:11.516
<v Speaker 1>attention gets drawn to this thing, right, and it's this

0:55:11.636 --> 0:55:13.596
<v Speaker 1>wave of energy, I guess is the way to say

0:55:13.636 --> 0:55:17.796
<v Speaker 1>it right and see for me, that's a part of it.

0:55:17.836 --> 0:55:21.436
<v Speaker 1>But another part of it is there's something that presents

0:55:21.476 --> 0:55:24.036
<v Speaker 1>itself to my mind that it's as if it's a

0:55:24.036 --> 0:55:28.076
<v Speaker 1>condensed form of the feeling of that thing. Yeah. So

0:55:28.156 --> 0:55:32.356
<v Speaker 1>like if if I'm looking through my movies and good

0:55:32.356 --> 0:55:35.436
<v Speaker 1>Fellas is the movie I want to watch, the feeling

0:55:35.476 --> 0:55:39.836
<v Speaker 1>of good Fellas comes over me in my head. Before

0:55:40.036 --> 0:55:41.876
<v Speaker 1>when I saw things visually, that would have been a

0:55:41.996 --> 0:55:47.196
<v Speaker 1>much more extreme like somehow visual concoction that that I

0:55:47.236 --> 0:55:50.316
<v Speaker 1>literally see. But in this case, I don't see it,

0:55:50.356 --> 0:55:53.076
<v Speaker 1>but I feel it in my brain. Yes, I'm going

0:55:53.156 --> 0:55:57.116
<v Speaker 1>to next time that I'm choosing something to watch, I'm

0:55:57.116 --> 0:55:59.316
<v Speaker 1>going to really pay attention to what's going on in

0:55:59.356 --> 0:56:02.836
<v Speaker 1>my body to try to understand what I'm feeling. You know,

0:56:02.916 --> 0:56:05.236
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know the feeling of where I get excited.

0:56:05.276 --> 0:56:08.396
<v Speaker 1>Oh there it is, yeah, that feeling. Yeah, I'm going

0:56:08.476 --> 0:56:11.636
<v Speaker 1>to try to tune into that more. It's interesting that

0:56:11.676 --> 0:56:14.836
<v Speaker 1>you say in my body, because it's just for me.

0:56:14.916 --> 0:56:17.196
<v Speaker 1>It's more like it's more my head. Yeah, for me,

0:56:17.276 --> 0:56:20.596
<v Speaker 1>it's not. It's definitely not in my head, right, It's

0:56:20.636 --> 0:56:25.116
<v Speaker 1>not a thinking thing for me. It's a whole body

0:56:25.316 --> 0:56:30.476
<v Speaker 1>feeling draw interesting. Yeah, yeah, so that's what makes me

0:56:30.556 --> 0:56:33.316
<v Speaker 1>think it's still leftover. Simple things like that. When I'm

0:56:33.356 --> 0:56:36.156
<v Speaker 1>looking through my record collection, I see the record that

0:56:36.196 --> 0:56:38.396
<v Speaker 1>I want to hear, the feeling of that record is

0:56:38.436 --> 0:56:41.196
<v Speaker 1>produced in my head as if in one moment, I

0:56:41.236 --> 0:56:45.636
<v Speaker 1>were feeling the entire listening experience of listening to that record,

0:56:45.676 --> 0:56:51.996
<v Speaker 1>the sum of that, where each any aspect of it

0:56:52.036 --> 0:56:56.316
<v Speaker 1>contains the whole. Yeah. Yeah. So so that ends up

0:56:56.756 --> 0:56:59.436
<v Speaker 1>relating to what we were talking about in terms of

0:57:00.276 --> 0:57:03.316
<v Speaker 1>when Fleet plays a bassline, I see in my head,

0:57:04.156 --> 0:57:06.916
<v Speaker 1>what would be the counter to that, what would be

0:57:06.996 --> 0:57:11.116
<v Speaker 1>the balancer to that? Where the holes in that and

0:57:11.516 --> 0:57:13.476
<v Speaker 1>I see a picture of it in my head of

0:57:13.556 --> 0:57:17.796
<v Speaker 1>what would balance his baseline, and I just start playing,

0:57:17.836 --> 0:57:21.516
<v Speaker 1>and that balance is what I play. So I'm not

0:57:21.916 --> 0:57:25.676
<v Speaker 1>thinking of notes in advance, but sometimes I do. But

0:57:25.716 --> 0:57:27.836
<v Speaker 1>it's in that way that I that I was saying,

0:57:27.836 --> 0:57:31.676
<v Speaker 1>where like I see them, but it's faster than real time.

0:57:31.716 --> 0:57:34.196
<v Speaker 1>I see the whole pattern that I'm going to repeat

0:57:34.316 --> 0:57:38.756
<v Speaker 1>in an instant. You know, we're only really taking note

0:57:38.756 --> 0:57:41.116
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening consciously all the time. But I think

0:57:41.796 --> 0:57:44.716
<v Speaker 1>just as much as dreams are this world that we

0:57:44.756 --> 0:57:48.476
<v Speaker 1>don't really understand, I think everything in life is that

0:57:48.516 --> 0:57:53.396
<v Speaker 1>there's some sort of subconscious echo that's taking place to

0:57:53.516 --> 0:57:56.356
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing consciously. Absolutely, and I think what we're

0:57:56.356 --> 0:58:00.676
<v Speaker 1>seeing consciously barely scratches the surface of what's going on. Yeah,

0:58:00.836 --> 0:58:04.036
<v Speaker 1>there's too many data points. We can't take it all in. Yeah.

0:58:04.076 --> 0:58:07.316
<v Speaker 1>And you know that period of time that I mentioned

0:58:07.316 --> 0:58:09.756
<v Speaker 1>in the last show where I had months when I

0:58:09.796 --> 0:58:13.276
<v Speaker 1>first got off drugs completely of just being kind of bored.

0:58:13.956 --> 0:58:17.436
<v Speaker 1>During that period of time when nothing was happening, I

0:58:17.516 --> 0:58:19.796
<v Speaker 1>was seeing the music that I might make with the

0:58:19.796 --> 0:58:22.756
<v Speaker 1>band in my head. I guess in some cases I

0:58:22.796 --> 0:58:25.316
<v Speaker 1>might have actually been hearing music in my head. But

0:58:25.396 --> 0:58:28.556
<v Speaker 1>a lot of it was just the overall concept of

0:58:28.556 --> 0:58:30.636
<v Speaker 1>the way that the things would relate to each other.

0:58:30.756 --> 0:58:34.036
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just bored, like just sitting there, like not

0:58:34.516 --> 0:58:40.076
<v Speaker 1>doing anything, not excited about life or anything. But oftentimes

0:58:40.316 --> 0:58:44.276
<v Speaker 1>when there's nothing going on, You're subconscious reveals itself to

0:58:44.316 --> 0:58:46.356
<v Speaker 1>you in these ways, Like that's the time when it

0:58:46.396 --> 0:58:49.316
<v Speaker 1>does it. If you're constantly having information in front of

0:58:49.316 --> 0:58:52.156
<v Speaker 1>you all the time, or constantly doing things to entertain

0:58:52.196 --> 0:58:56.876
<v Speaker 1>yourself or to combat that. Yeah, like oftentimes you're not

0:58:56.916 --> 0:58:59.956
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to be in touch with the

0:59:00.036 --> 0:59:03.556
<v Speaker 1>subconscious that has its own movement and that has its

0:59:03.556 --> 0:59:07.556
<v Speaker 1>own reality. And a lot of the time, it seems

0:59:07.556 --> 0:59:10.316
<v Speaker 1>like in that particular case like period that I thought

0:59:10.956 --> 0:59:13.516
<v Speaker 1>nothing was happening with me, my life was going nowhere,

0:59:13.956 --> 0:59:18.436
<v Speaker 1>it actually had a huge effect on something very productive

0:59:18.476 --> 0:59:20.876
<v Speaker 1>that I did, which was making that record. You know,

0:59:21.076 --> 0:59:24.596
<v Speaker 1>would you describe it as a premonition, I guess so.

0:59:24.716 --> 0:59:26.396
<v Speaker 1>I guess I've had a lot of a lot of

0:59:26.396 --> 0:59:31.356
<v Speaker 1>those in my life. Like you can imagine something and

0:59:31.396 --> 0:59:34.076
<v Speaker 1>then it ends up coming to pass. Yeah, Like I

0:59:34.116 --> 0:59:37.516
<v Speaker 1>see something. Sometimes I see things and things that they

0:59:37.516 --> 0:59:38.956
<v Speaker 1>have nothing to do with me, and then all of

0:59:38.996 --> 0:59:40.756
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, I see the real thing, or I hear

0:59:40.796 --> 0:59:43.476
<v Speaker 1>the real thing. I realized, Oh my god, I heard

0:59:43.516 --> 0:59:46.796
<v Speaker 1>that in my head like ten years ago, Like that

0:59:46.916 --> 0:59:48.596
<v Speaker 1>Dice album that you brought over to my house to

0:59:48.716 --> 0:59:51.476
<v Speaker 1>day Laughter Died Part two. Yeah, there's moments on that

0:59:51.476 --> 0:59:52.956
<v Speaker 1>that I swear I heard in my head when I

0:59:52.996 --> 0:59:56.116
<v Speaker 1>was fourteen years old, like seven years before it came out.

0:59:56.436 --> 0:59:58.676
<v Speaker 1>I know, I understand that feeling, because sometimes I'll hear

0:59:58.756 --> 1:00:00.756
<v Speaker 1>something and they'll be and I know I've never heard before,

1:00:00.836 --> 1:00:04.036
<v Speaker 1>or it wasn't even possibly here before. But there's such

1:00:04.236 --> 1:00:08.116
<v Speaker 1>a feeling of remembrance when I'm listening to it, or

1:00:08.236 --> 1:00:12.036
<v Speaker 1>just a sense of yeah, that's how it goes. Do

1:00:12.036 --> 1:00:14.396
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, like like I already know it, yeah,

1:00:14.476 --> 1:00:17.396
<v Speaker 1>A knowing this. Yeah, there's and there's some kind of

1:00:17.396 --> 1:00:24.036
<v Speaker 1>connection between memory and creativity. There's a connection between them. Yet,

1:00:24.316 --> 1:00:27.396
<v Speaker 1>creating something new isn't the same thing as remembering something.

1:00:28.076 --> 1:00:31.756
<v Speaker 1>But in some ways that's that's it's useful that it's

1:00:31.836 --> 1:00:34.356
<v Speaker 1>not the same because we remember something and then we

1:00:34.396 --> 1:00:35.956
<v Speaker 1>make it and then we realize that that's not what

1:00:35.996 --> 1:00:38.636
<v Speaker 1>it was at all. It's like it is something new. Yeah,

1:00:38.676 --> 1:00:41.676
<v Speaker 1>But there's a connection between the functions in the brain

1:00:42.076 --> 1:00:46.076
<v Speaker 1>and it shows sometimes, Like the Beatles had that thing

1:00:46.116 --> 1:00:48.276
<v Speaker 1>with Ringo. They would make fun of him because every

1:00:48.276 --> 1:00:50.156
<v Speaker 1>time he tried to write a new song it was

1:00:50.196 --> 1:00:53.116
<v Speaker 1>a song that already existed. He thought he was writing

1:00:53.116 --> 1:00:55.396
<v Speaker 1>a new song, and they would start falling on the

1:00:55.396 --> 1:00:58.596
<v Speaker 1>floor laughing because it was it was a Jerry Lee

1:00:58.636 --> 1:01:00.876
<v Speaker 1>Lewis song or whatever, and he just didn't realize it was.

1:01:01.316 --> 1:01:04.476
<v Speaker 1>And oftentimes, when when I get an idea for writing

1:01:04.476 --> 1:01:07.396
<v Speaker 1>a song, it feels like I'm remembering something. It doesn't

1:01:07.516 --> 1:01:11.116
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm coming up with something new. What's turned

1:01:11.116 --> 1:01:13.556
<v Speaker 1>out to be the most beneficial kind of practicing for

1:01:13.636 --> 1:01:15.796
<v Speaker 1>me is that I'm just creating a sort of an

1:01:15.876 --> 1:01:19.636
<v Speaker 1>encyclopedia of what has been done, yes, and that's all

1:01:19.716 --> 1:01:22.916
<v Speaker 1>being stored in my subconscious I learned if I like

1:01:23.036 --> 1:01:25.916
<v Speaker 1>a song, I learned how to play the guitar of it.

1:01:25.996 --> 1:01:28.076
<v Speaker 1>I might even learn how to play the keyboard of

1:01:28.076 --> 1:01:30.556
<v Speaker 1>it and the base of it. And this information is

1:01:30.596 --> 1:01:33.916
<v Speaker 1>all stored in my head. So when I write, I'm

1:01:33.996 --> 1:01:38.636
<v Speaker 1>drawing from that storeroom of all the stuff that of

1:01:38.636 --> 1:01:42.596
<v Speaker 1>all the combinations that you've ever heard over the course

1:01:42.596 --> 1:01:44.796
<v Speaker 1>of your life and that you get to a stage

1:01:44.796 --> 1:01:46.436
<v Speaker 1>where Okay, I have this and I want to go

1:01:46.476 --> 1:01:51.636
<v Speaker 1>to this, and there's somewhere and you, maybe conscious or unconscious, Yeah,

1:01:52.156 --> 1:01:57.036
<v Speaker 1>like this sound, going to this sound feel satisfying. Yeah,

1:01:57.076 --> 1:02:00.956
<v Speaker 1>And maybe that's because there's a something you heard twenty

1:02:00.996 --> 1:02:04.076
<v Speaker 1>five years ago that you liked and lodged, but don't

1:02:04.436 --> 1:02:07.196
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't remember the specifics of it. Yeah. Like

1:02:07.276 --> 1:02:10.516
<v Speaker 1>if you eat a good meal, you feel satisfied. Yeah,

1:02:10.556 --> 1:02:12.516
<v Speaker 1>and the same when you hear a good piece of music.

1:02:12.756 --> 1:02:17.516
<v Speaker 1>There's this feeling of satisfaction. And you know, the different elements,

1:02:17.556 --> 1:02:20.076
<v Speaker 1>all of the elements over the course of your life

1:02:20.516 --> 1:02:23.996
<v Speaker 1>that have given you that feeling of satisfaction are all

1:02:24.036 --> 1:02:26.836
<v Speaker 1>at your disposal to draw from. Whether you remember them

1:02:26.916 --> 1:02:31.756
<v Speaker 1>or not, they're somehow in there. Yeah. They change us. Yeah.

1:02:31.796 --> 1:02:34.676
<v Speaker 1>For me, that's the productive thing is just to have

1:02:34.796 --> 1:02:37.596
<v Speaker 1>them all in there. And you're like doing this mixing

1:02:37.636 --> 1:02:41.196
<v Speaker 1>and matching thing. It's really more you're subconscious doing it

1:02:41.196 --> 1:02:44.076
<v Speaker 1>because like, for instance, like we were talking about under

1:02:44.076 --> 1:02:46.876
<v Speaker 1>the Bridge, like when Anthony had that vocal and I

1:02:46.996 --> 1:02:49.996
<v Speaker 1>basically had the idea to just do something starting with

1:02:50.076 --> 1:02:52.356
<v Speaker 1>them in a major key, just because what he was

1:02:52.396 --> 1:02:54.996
<v Speaker 1>doing seemed sad, and I wanted to cheer it up

1:02:54.996 --> 1:02:57.516
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, because, aside from it being soft, that

1:02:57.596 --> 1:02:59.596
<v Speaker 1>was another aspect to it that was weird for us.

1:02:59.716 --> 1:03:02.796
<v Speaker 1>Our music was generally uplifting. Yeah, and it was a

1:03:02.836 --> 1:03:05.836
<v Speaker 1>sad song. Yeah. If I sang the melody of that song,

1:03:06.276 --> 1:03:09.876
<v Speaker 1>you hear the chords in your subconscious you'd hear the

1:03:09.916 --> 1:03:12.436
<v Speaker 1>melody now, you know, now that you know what it's

1:03:12.436 --> 1:03:14.636
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be. But when he was first singing it,

1:03:14.676 --> 1:03:17.356
<v Speaker 1>we didn't know it wasn't it wasn't super clear whether

1:03:17.396 --> 1:03:21.636
<v Speaker 1>it was yeah, And so I know that that was

1:03:21.716 --> 1:03:25.036
<v Speaker 1>my thought going into it, aside from the Jimi Hendricks thing,

1:03:25.116 --> 1:03:28.436
<v Speaker 1>was just the thought like, let's lighten this up a

1:03:28.436 --> 1:03:31.316
<v Speaker 1>little bit, you know, And when it moved to a

1:03:31.356 --> 1:03:34.876
<v Speaker 1>minor key for the chorus of the song, and the

1:03:34.916 --> 1:03:38.316
<v Speaker 1>idea to have that part start on the later than

1:03:38.356 --> 1:03:41.436
<v Speaker 1>the one instead of the one I drew from this

1:03:41.476 --> 1:03:44.316
<v Speaker 1>song that I knew in my head at that moment.

1:03:44.356 --> 1:03:45.996
<v Speaker 1>I could have thought of any song, but I thought

1:03:46.036 --> 1:03:48.036
<v Speaker 1>this would be a nice little moment to have this

1:03:48.156 --> 1:03:50.556
<v Speaker 1>space right before the course, you know. In a lot

1:03:50.596 --> 1:03:52.316
<v Speaker 1>of ways, That's why I think learning a lot of

1:03:52.316 --> 1:03:55.956
<v Speaker 1>songs is really the only way to develop your skill

1:03:55.996 --> 1:03:59.036
<v Speaker 1>doing it, because when it's happening, it's not like a

1:03:59.196 --> 1:04:02.196
<v Speaker 1>skill that you you know how to use the hammer

1:04:02.236 --> 1:04:05.076
<v Speaker 1>in this particular way, so you use it. The skill

1:04:05.316 --> 1:04:09.516
<v Speaker 1>is like sort of giving your subconscious the ability to

1:04:09.556 --> 1:04:11.156
<v Speaker 1>be able to offer you the right thing at the

1:04:11.236 --> 1:04:13.876
<v Speaker 1>right time, yes, you know, and sometimes giving it and

1:04:13.956 --> 1:04:18.156
<v Speaker 1>giving it loads of options to choose from, exactly loads

1:04:18.196 --> 1:04:21.556
<v Speaker 1>of options. Do you remember the song that inspired you

1:04:21.596 --> 1:04:23.636
<v Speaker 1>to want to put that in under the bridge? Right?

1:04:23.796 --> 1:04:33.116
<v Speaker 1>Do you remember what it was? Yeah? Can you play it? Okay? So, um,

1:04:33.276 --> 1:04:35.236
<v Speaker 1>do you mind if I play a whole verse and

1:04:35.276 --> 1:04:38.756
<v Speaker 1>anything you want? I can do it instrumentally if it's

1:04:38.756 --> 1:04:43.316
<v Speaker 1>no good that way, but but it seems I'm anything

1:04:43.356 --> 1:04:47.836
<v Speaker 1>you want to play. It's fun. I'm gonna try this. Um.

1:04:47.836 --> 1:05:10.476
<v Speaker 1>So that Joe Jackson song goes one to f The

1:05:10.836 --> 1:05:21.956
<v Speaker 1>guy who knows upstairs is a nator. They say, maybe

1:05:21.996 --> 1:05:32.796
<v Speaker 1>words the same. He changed his name because someone with

1:05:33.436 --> 1:05:44.596
<v Speaker 1>the same name made it first. His girlfriend comes to stay.

1:05:45.596 --> 1:05:54.396
<v Speaker 1>We hear her screams and think that they rehearse. So

1:05:54.756 --> 1:06:14.236
<v Speaker 1>maybe a play and maybe someone's really geting you prown

1:06:14.836 --> 1:06:24.596
<v Speaker 1>every home town every na souse, every fair dealing, every

1:06:25.156 --> 1:06:46.196
<v Speaker 1>good job, every swaming, every dream night. Okay, now I'm

1:06:46.196 --> 1:06:51.476
<v Speaker 1>just gonna play it once, just guitar one, two, three,

1:06:51.596 --> 1:07:24.796
<v Speaker 1>four one. Is it that long? Yeah, it's a long,

1:07:25.396 --> 1:07:29.876
<v Speaker 1>long break. Yeah. It's also interesting the phrasing the bum

1:07:29.876 --> 1:07:34.516
<v Speaker 1>bum bum after space sounds like it's answering something. It

1:07:34.556 --> 1:07:38.116
<v Speaker 1>doesn't sound like it's saying something. Yeah, that's that's the

1:07:38.116 --> 1:07:40.236
<v Speaker 1>way that that chorus generally goes. With his, it's a

1:07:40.276 --> 1:07:44.956
<v Speaker 1>long um, it's just a stop and then goes into

1:07:44.996 --> 1:07:51.516
<v Speaker 1>the chorus. But with ours, it's uh, it's a sustain right, yeah, yeah,

1:07:51.556 --> 1:07:55.636
<v Speaker 1>we hold, we hold the chord which came from this

1:07:56.356 --> 1:07:59.636
<v Speaker 1>which even that in itself came from another song. There's

1:07:59.676 --> 1:08:02.156
<v Speaker 1>this t Rex song called rip Off that goes like

1:08:02.476 --> 1:08:05.116
<v Speaker 1>it's funny. It's called It's funny, it's called I Really

1:08:05.396 --> 1:08:07.156
<v Speaker 1>at the time that was a joke in my mind,

1:08:07.236 --> 1:08:09.116
<v Speaker 1>like it would be cool if I ripped off rip off.

1:08:09.516 --> 1:08:12.556
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, like it has this cycle in the verse

1:08:12.636 --> 1:08:33.836
<v Speaker 1>that goes like uh hm, so, so I always thought

1:08:33.916 --> 1:08:37.396
<v Speaker 1>that was cool that the verse had this break in

1:08:37.436 --> 1:08:40.276
<v Speaker 1>it where the guitar just played this major seven chord.

1:08:40.916 --> 1:08:43.236
<v Speaker 1>So in ours, when we got to the end of

1:08:43.276 --> 1:08:51.316
<v Speaker 1>the to the to the verse and that's the happy verse. Yeah.

1:08:51.756 --> 1:08:53.836
<v Speaker 1>And then when he got to the end of the singing,

1:08:53.916 --> 1:08:58.156
<v Speaker 1>rather than just going straight into the chorus, when we

1:08:58.156 --> 1:09:10.596
<v Speaker 1>went and then the Joe Jason Yeah, but instead of

1:09:10.596 --> 1:09:21.156
<v Speaker 1>doing that, I went it sounds more to me that

1:09:21.156 --> 1:09:25.756
<v Speaker 1>that sounds more introspective than the verse did. Yeah. Yeah,

1:09:25.836 --> 1:09:28.516
<v Speaker 1>like like it was almost like in the in the

1:09:28.556 --> 1:09:32.996
<v Speaker 1>writing of that song, we we brought in the darkness gradually,

1:09:33.076 --> 1:09:44.996
<v Speaker 1>like to me the end of the song that that's

1:09:45.036 --> 1:09:47.836
<v Speaker 1>the darkest part of the song. Yeah, you know, like

1:09:47.836 --> 1:09:51.716
<v Speaker 1>like that was the feeling to me when Anthony first

1:09:52.436 --> 1:09:54.956
<v Speaker 1>brought it in, but you got to it instead of

1:09:54.996 --> 1:09:59.996
<v Speaker 1>opening with exactly like like gradually, and which gave it

1:10:00.036 --> 1:10:03.396
<v Speaker 1>the effect of somehow feeling triumphant rather than feeling like

1:10:03.676 --> 1:10:06.076
<v Speaker 1>you or a release, some kind of a release, yeah,

1:10:06.156 --> 1:10:08.796
<v Speaker 1>rather than feeling some kind of rather than it feeling

1:10:08.836 --> 1:10:11.036
<v Speaker 1>like a down or it made the whole thing made

1:10:11.036 --> 1:10:14.716
<v Speaker 1>it made the chorus felt like an uplifting thing. We

1:10:15.076 --> 1:10:18.556
<v Speaker 1>had another song earlier on the first album that I

1:10:18.556 --> 1:10:24.036
<v Speaker 1>did with them, knock Me Down, where that it was like,

1:10:24.076 --> 1:10:31.836
<v Speaker 1>as I might not be in the right key, so

1:10:37.156 --> 1:10:39.836
<v Speaker 1>we had. We had this thing that went major chord

1:10:39.876 --> 1:10:42.036
<v Speaker 1>to minor chord, and it's just one of those things

1:10:42.036 --> 1:10:44.476
<v Speaker 1>that I've not There's a lot there's certain songs in

1:10:44.596 --> 1:10:48.316
<v Speaker 1>history where somebody does that where I just noticed that

1:10:48.316 --> 1:10:51.956
<v Speaker 1>that that it's a good feeling, and uh, that's another

1:10:51.996 --> 1:10:54.196
<v Speaker 1>thing I can't because I know how to play so

1:10:54.236 --> 1:10:56.756
<v Speaker 1>many songs. I have things categorized in my head to

1:10:56.796 --> 1:11:00.076
<v Speaker 1>where there's all these sort of chord progressions. There's a

1:11:00.076 --> 1:11:02.756
<v Speaker 1>lot of songs that have similar chord progressions, and so

1:11:02.796 --> 1:11:05.836
<v Speaker 1>I have them sort of on some level, maybe not

1:11:05.876 --> 1:11:08.156
<v Speaker 1>to where I can just play them right off the bat,

1:11:08.196 --> 1:11:12.436
<v Speaker 1>but they're the principles at work. Yeah, they're they're categorized

1:11:12.476 --> 1:11:14.836
<v Speaker 1>in my head is being oh, that's that type of chord.

1:11:14.876 --> 1:11:17.236
<v Speaker 1>It's rare that in a rock song from history, I

1:11:17.276 --> 1:11:18.916
<v Speaker 1>would hear a chord progression that I would go, oh,

1:11:18.956 --> 1:11:21.716
<v Speaker 1>that that doesn't fall into any category, you know, but

1:11:21.756 --> 1:11:25.316
<v Speaker 1>there are some, especially in progressive rocks and stuff. So yeah,

1:11:25.396 --> 1:11:28.156
<v Speaker 1>like under the Bridge was just another attempt at doing

1:11:28.196 --> 1:11:33.076
<v Speaker 1>the major to minor chord but taking time with it.

1:11:33.156 --> 1:11:35.756
<v Speaker 1>And I think Beatles did that too, know, the major

1:11:35.796 --> 1:11:38.956
<v Speaker 1>to the minor. I'm sure they Yeah, they definitely did. Like,

1:11:39.516 --> 1:11:41.756
<v Speaker 1>like let's see, I was playing along in one the

1:11:41.796 --> 1:11:45.236
<v Speaker 1>other A lot of the time it's like they already

1:11:45.236 --> 1:11:48.076
<v Speaker 1>went to a F chord, say Laren C, and then

1:11:48.116 --> 1:11:51.636
<v Speaker 1>they went to an F and then and then they

1:11:51.676 --> 1:11:53.436
<v Speaker 1>went back to C. And then next time they do

1:11:53.476 --> 1:11:59.796
<v Speaker 1>an F it's minor, and all of a sudden, that

1:11:59.836 --> 1:12:01.676
<v Speaker 1>gives you a different feeling, like it's a chord you've

1:12:01.676 --> 1:12:03.876
<v Speaker 1>already heard as a major chord, but then the second

1:12:03.876 --> 1:12:06.956
<v Speaker 1>time they go to it, it's a it's a minor

1:12:07.036 --> 1:12:11.276
<v Speaker 1>chord and it changes. Yeah. We'll be right back with

1:12:11.316 --> 1:12:13.916
<v Speaker 1>the rest of John F. Shaunte and Rick Rubin's conversation.

1:12:14.356 --> 1:12:21.196
<v Speaker 1>After a quick break, we're back with Rick Rubin and

1:12:21.276 --> 1:12:24.076
<v Speaker 1>John F. SHAWNTA. Can you think of any songs that

1:12:24.476 --> 1:12:28.636
<v Speaker 1>from the exercise that you showed earlier of the notes

1:12:28.676 --> 1:12:31.916
<v Speaker 1>and rhythm? Yeah, any songs that you've written that have

1:12:32.076 --> 1:12:36.956
<v Speaker 1>come from something related to that notes and rhythm technique? No,

1:12:37.196 --> 1:12:40.556
<v Speaker 1>definitely can't. Like I said, I really I think of practicing.

1:12:41.316 --> 1:12:43.916
<v Speaker 1>You think if it's separate, it's completely separate. I'm not

1:12:43.996 --> 1:12:46.436
<v Speaker 1>trying to connect the two things. I do know that

1:12:46.956 --> 1:12:50.396
<v Speaker 1>when I'm playing on stage it's not going to stop

1:12:50.436 --> 1:12:52.796
<v Speaker 1>me from doing a certain thing that I want to

1:12:52.836 --> 1:12:54.516
<v Speaker 1>do in my solo. If all of a sudden I

1:12:54.556 --> 1:12:58.956
<v Speaker 1>have to do upstrokes and accent those rather than accenting

1:12:58.996 --> 1:13:02.156
<v Speaker 1>the down strokes, like I'll be able to say whatever

1:13:02.196 --> 1:13:04.276
<v Speaker 1>that thing is I wanted to say. Or if I

1:13:04.316 --> 1:13:06.756
<v Speaker 1>want to fit a strange amount of notes in the bar,

1:13:06.836 --> 1:13:09.036
<v Speaker 1>if I want to do if I want to fit

1:13:09.196 --> 1:13:11.876
<v Speaker 1>seven notes into the four four instead of eight notes

1:13:11.996 --> 1:13:15.036
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, like it's natural for me to do that.

1:13:15.556 --> 1:13:18.116
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, I figure it just it gets

1:13:18.156 --> 1:13:21.436
<v Speaker 1>in there somehow, But I don't know how for sure. Okay,

1:13:21.436 --> 1:13:23.756
<v Speaker 1>this is a good question based on that, you want

1:13:23.756 --> 1:13:26.356
<v Speaker 1>to get seven notes into a four you're doing a solo.

1:13:27.196 --> 1:13:32.036
<v Speaker 1>What happens you're hearing the music, you start the solo,

1:13:33.436 --> 1:13:37.116
<v Speaker 1>what dictates what where the next note? It goes like

1:13:37.556 --> 1:13:43.316
<v Speaker 1>what's happening? Yeah, no, it's yeah, Like like I'm like,

1:13:43.396 --> 1:13:46.876
<v Speaker 1>you can explain it after why yeah, but not in

1:13:46.916 --> 1:13:52.036
<v Speaker 1>the moment? Yeah, no, time. Yeah. I think of it

1:13:52.076 --> 1:13:55.036
<v Speaker 1>as you're placing yourself in a few points in time

1:13:55.076 --> 1:13:58.196
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. Like I think if you can

1:13:58.236 --> 1:14:00.116
<v Speaker 1>do all three of those things at once, be in

1:14:00.156 --> 1:14:04.276
<v Speaker 1>the past, being the present, and be in the future. Yeah,

1:14:04.316 --> 1:14:07.356
<v Speaker 1>that that's something like the ideal frame of mind to

1:14:07.476 --> 1:14:09.516
<v Speaker 1>be to have some kind of a preconcept and about

1:14:09.556 --> 1:14:12.556
<v Speaker 1>what you're about to do. Yes, to be in the moment,

1:14:12.596 --> 1:14:15.356
<v Speaker 1>listening to what everybody else is doing right right in

1:14:15.396 --> 1:14:19.956
<v Speaker 1>the moment at every point, and also listening to what's

1:14:19.956 --> 1:14:23.036
<v Speaker 1>just happened. Yeah, I think it's It involves like a

1:14:23.076 --> 1:14:25.996
<v Speaker 1>balancing of sort of being in those three points in

1:14:26.036 --> 1:14:28.996
<v Speaker 1>time at the same time. If a lot of the

1:14:28.996 --> 1:14:32.716
<v Speaker 1>time you're only able to listen to what's just happened

1:14:32.716 --> 1:14:34.716
<v Speaker 1>and you're just judging it every step of the way,

1:14:34.756 --> 1:14:38.476
<v Speaker 1>you're just going, oh, that sucked, Oh that was terrible, wow,

1:14:38.676 --> 1:14:42.436
<v Speaker 1>like and you can't get out. Yeah it's bad. That's

1:14:42.436 --> 1:14:44.916
<v Speaker 1>what it's like. When I'm having a bad show. I'm

1:14:44.916 --> 1:14:47.756
<v Speaker 1>just listening to what's already happened. I don't have any

1:14:47.796 --> 1:14:50.596
<v Speaker 1>idea of what I'm about to do, not in the moment.

1:14:51.316 --> 1:14:54.276
<v Speaker 1>I'm listening to what's already come out, and I'm judging it.

1:14:54.596 --> 1:14:58.196
<v Speaker 1>I see. But ideally you're in a balance between between

1:14:58.236 --> 1:15:00.636
<v Speaker 1>those three points in time. How often does that happen? Though?

1:15:00.716 --> 1:15:02.876
<v Speaker 1>Bad show like for you, a bad show like that

1:15:03.196 --> 1:15:05.916
<v Speaker 1>I feel like that doesn't I've never seen that, but

1:15:05.956 --> 1:15:09.516
<v Speaker 1>how you probably have seen me. Really. I remember even

1:15:09.556 --> 1:15:12.276
<v Speaker 1>when we were doing the basic tracks to Stadium. I

1:15:12.396 --> 1:15:14.356
<v Speaker 1>was kind of in that state of mind while we

1:15:14.356 --> 1:15:16.516
<v Speaker 1>were doing the basic tracks for a week or two,

1:15:17.196 --> 1:15:20.436
<v Speaker 1>and you just kept telling me, like I kept telling

1:15:20.476 --> 1:15:23.156
<v Speaker 1>you what I was experiencing, that everything's sounding bad to me,

1:15:23.196 --> 1:15:26.956
<v Speaker 1>and you were like, you're playing great, sounds great, you know,

1:15:27.636 --> 1:15:30.756
<v Speaker 1>but but like so, it's just the it's your interpretation

1:15:30.796 --> 1:15:34.116
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening. It's what's happening inside. It's yeah, I

1:15:34.156 --> 1:15:36.276
<v Speaker 1>was judging everything as I was doing. It was so

1:15:36.316 --> 1:15:38.036
<v Speaker 1>important to me to play in a certain way that

1:15:38.076 --> 1:15:40.516
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to play on that record. I was trying

1:15:40.516 --> 1:15:42.836
<v Speaker 1>to have a little more of the looseness of lives

1:15:42.836 --> 1:15:45.796
<v Speaker 1>than I'd had on any of our records before, and

1:15:45.836 --> 1:15:49.156
<v Speaker 1>the energy of the live playing. And I think I'd

1:15:49.156 --> 1:15:51.796
<v Speaker 1>put too much pressure on myself to where most of

1:15:51.796 --> 1:15:54.076
<v Speaker 1>the records float out really nicely. But the first week

1:15:54.196 --> 1:15:57.796
<v Speaker 1>or two I was experiencing a really negative thing where

1:15:58.196 --> 1:16:02.116
<v Speaker 1>I was just judging every moment as it happened successively,

1:16:02.276 --> 1:16:05.716
<v Speaker 1>and I wasn't able to get into the groove. I

1:16:05.756 --> 1:16:07.716
<v Speaker 1>wasn't able to anticipate it. I wasn't able to be

1:16:07.756 --> 1:16:10.156
<v Speaker 1>in the moment. And what do you think shifted it?

1:16:10.276 --> 1:16:11.836
<v Speaker 1>Because he said it was for the first few weeks

1:16:11.916 --> 1:16:15.476
<v Speaker 1>the meditation thing I did, Yeah, because there was a

1:16:15.516 --> 1:16:18.196
<v Speaker 1>bad feeling in my stomach that was associated with the

1:16:18.236 --> 1:16:23.236
<v Speaker 1>mental state. And I did a guided meditation with somebody.

1:16:23.916 --> 1:16:26.316
<v Speaker 1>First I meditated on this thing in my stomach, and

1:16:26.356 --> 1:16:29.796
<v Speaker 1>then I meditated on He said, there's a secondary part

1:16:29.956 --> 1:16:33.636
<v Speaker 1>where where you're feeling a similar kind of unease, similar

1:16:33.716 --> 1:16:36.316
<v Speaker 1>kind of pain. Try to figure out. Let's get off

1:16:36.356 --> 1:16:38.916
<v Speaker 1>the phone and figure out where in your body is that.

1:16:39.276 --> 1:16:41.236
<v Speaker 1>And I found that it was this spot right here,

1:16:41.356 --> 1:16:45.836
<v Speaker 1>just my wrist. On the opposite side is the palm

1:16:45.876 --> 1:16:49.516
<v Speaker 1>of my hand, yeah, and back of the left wrist. Yeah.

1:16:49.476 --> 1:16:52.276
<v Speaker 1>It might have been both risk but it was very subtle.

1:16:52.316 --> 1:16:53.996
<v Speaker 1>I would have never even noticed that there was a

1:16:53.996 --> 1:16:56.476
<v Speaker 1>feeling there, But when I tried to separate myself from

1:16:56.476 --> 1:16:59.396
<v Speaker 1>the feeling in my stomach, it was there. And so

1:16:59.476 --> 1:17:01.556
<v Speaker 1>I meditated on that for a long time, and then

1:17:01.756 --> 1:17:03.196
<v Speaker 1>I got on the phone with him again, and then

1:17:03.236 --> 1:17:06.076
<v Speaker 1>he said, there's a third point. You know. I can't

1:17:06.076 --> 1:17:08.636
<v Speaker 1>remember what it was, but I want to what maybe

1:17:08.636 --> 1:17:11.436
<v Speaker 1>it was the road or something, whatever it was, And

1:17:11.556 --> 1:17:15.276
<v Speaker 1>eventually a whole explosion of thoughts came out about a

1:17:15.316 --> 1:17:20.116
<v Speaker 1>friendship that I'd had when I was young that went bad. Wow.

1:17:20.236 --> 1:17:22.516
<v Speaker 1>That was followed by a period of time of me

1:17:22.596 --> 1:17:25.516
<v Speaker 1>intensely trying to play guitar in a way that impressed people.

1:17:26.116 --> 1:17:28.356
<v Speaker 1>And the way I intended to play on that record

1:17:28.436 --> 1:17:31.996
<v Speaker 1>had a connection with that point in time. That's what

1:17:32.036 --> 1:17:35.356
<v Speaker 1>I was lodged in your body, Yeah, and so I'd

1:17:35.396 --> 1:17:38.756
<v Speaker 1>some the thing up in that way. All of a sudden,

1:17:38.876 --> 1:17:41.916
<v Speaker 1>all these memories came back of this friendship that went

1:17:42.036 --> 1:17:46.036
<v Speaker 1>bad and the desire to impress people that was followed.

1:17:46.116 --> 1:17:48.796
<v Speaker 1>Like before that, I was just more already just being creative.

1:17:48.916 --> 1:17:51.236
<v Speaker 1>After that, I had a determined thing like I'm going

1:17:51.276 --> 1:17:53.436
<v Speaker 1>to play in a way that's going to impress people,

1:17:53.436 --> 1:17:55.076
<v Speaker 1>and that nobody's going to be able to tell me

1:17:55.116 --> 1:17:57.596
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a good guitar player, and all this stuff like,

1:17:57.836 --> 1:18:01.116
<v Speaker 1>which isn't possible. Like I've heard the people talk shit

1:18:01.196 --> 1:18:04.596
<v Speaker 1>about the greatest guitar players ever, whether it's Jimmy Hendricks,

1:18:04.676 --> 1:18:07.996
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Page, Alan Holdsworth, that Evan Helen, Like I've heard

1:18:08.436 --> 1:18:11.116
<v Speaker 1>loads of people say that they're bad guitarists, you know,

1:18:11.236 --> 1:18:13.356
<v Speaker 1>like so you can't escape it. So I don't advise

1:18:13.396 --> 1:18:16.836
<v Speaker 1>anybody to every Also, if you have that, if you're

1:18:16.876 --> 1:18:19.676
<v Speaker 1>doing something new or going out on a limb, if

1:18:19.716 --> 1:18:24.836
<v Speaker 1>you're really going forward, there are always people who resist. Yes, yeah,

1:18:25.036 --> 1:18:27.796
<v Speaker 1>they have no context for it. Yeah. So with everything

1:18:27.796 --> 1:18:30.676
<v Speaker 1>I'd learned about making music for how it sounds and

1:18:30.756 --> 1:18:33.436
<v Speaker 1>going with your feelings and supporting the your bandmates and

1:18:33.516 --> 1:18:35.556
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff, when we went in the

1:18:35.636 --> 1:18:39.316
<v Speaker 1>studio to do Stadium, I was just kind of like

1:18:39.956 --> 1:18:41.876
<v Speaker 1>I had this idea that I was going to play

1:18:41.916 --> 1:18:44.316
<v Speaker 1>in a way that was going to draw more attention

1:18:44.396 --> 1:18:47.596
<v Speaker 1>to the guitar playing, and I think I really had

1:18:47.636 --> 1:18:49.116
<v Speaker 1>to get my ego out of the way of it.

1:18:49.796 --> 1:18:52.876
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like that's where the conflict came from,

1:18:53.396 --> 1:18:56.396
<v Speaker 1>that caused the pain. Yeah, I had to reel it

1:18:56.476 --> 1:18:59.476
<v Speaker 1>in a little bit and just get inside the feeling

1:18:59.556 --> 1:19:04.036
<v Speaker 1>of the songs and not worry about like the playing

1:19:04.076 --> 1:19:05.916
<v Speaker 1>in a more flashy wave was going to have to

1:19:06.036 --> 1:19:09.556
<v Speaker 1>just come naturally, couldn't. I had to get that because

1:19:09.596 --> 1:19:12.356
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what you're doing anytime that you're that

1:19:12.476 --> 1:19:15.116
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking of a reaction that you want from people,

1:19:15.156 --> 1:19:18.436
<v Speaker 1>separate from the feeling. It's just it never works. Yeah,

1:19:18.476 --> 1:19:22.396
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work. And so so that's where I had

1:19:22.516 --> 1:19:25.876
<v Speaker 1>some intelligent part of me telling myself, you know this,

1:19:26.876 --> 1:19:28.836
<v Speaker 1>you can't go down this path. So it was a

1:19:29.076 --> 1:19:32.436
<v Speaker 1>little conflict. But once I had that memory and saw

1:19:32.596 --> 1:19:35.636
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between those two things, losing that friend and

1:19:36.716 --> 1:19:40.596
<v Speaker 1>focusing on being impressive to other people, I was able

1:19:40.676 --> 1:19:43.636
<v Speaker 1>to go back into the record with my stomach feeling relaxed,

1:19:43.756 --> 1:19:46.276
<v Speaker 1>with being able to be completely in the moment, without

1:19:46.316 --> 1:19:48.516
<v Speaker 1>worrying about what people were going to think of it

1:19:48.676 --> 1:19:53.996
<v Speaker 1>or anything, and just doing what came naturally. Cool. Yeah,

1:19:54.756 --> 1:19:56.756
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to say if we want to start talking

1:19:56.836 --> 1:20:00.916
<v Speaker 1>about the other albums or whether it's better to stop

1:20:01.076 --> 1:20:03.156
<v Speaker 1>and do another one, because I feel like, again, it's

1:20:03.196 --> 1:20:06.076
<v Speaker 1>going to be long, and I feel like we've covered

1:20:06.116 --> 1:20:08.956
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good ground. Now what do you think? Yeah,

1:20:09.196 --> 1:20:11.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm and you're around for a few weeks, right, I'm

1:20:11.516 --> 1:20:13.156
<v Speaker 1>here for a few weeks and we can do another

1:20:13.196 --> 1:20:16.596
<v Speaker 1>one before I leave town. Oh okay in person? Sure,

1:20:17.396 --> 1:20:20.076
<v Speaker 1>no mind coming out, not at all. Okay, great, because

1:20:20.116 --> 1:20:22.436
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there's so much. Again, it's you know,

1:20:22.556 --> 1:20:24.596
<v Speaker 1>I never know in the beginning, but once you start talking,

1:20:24.636 --> 1:20:26.916
<v Speaker 1>it's like there's a lot to talk about. It's funny

1:20:26.956 --> 1:20:31.556
<v Speaker 1>that we don't when we're working on stuff, there's not

1:20:31.916 --> 1:20:35.756
<v Speaker 1>much talk of you know, we don't philosophy as much.

1:20:35.876 --> 1:20:37.836
<v Speaker 1>We're you know, we have a job to do and

1:20:37.876 --> 1:20:41.876
<v Speaker 1>we're focused on doing the job, so we rarely just

1:20:42.236 --> 1:20:45.556
<v Speaker 1>talk about stuff. Yeah, it's fun. Yeah, Well, thank you

1:20:45.636 --> 1:20:48.476
<v Speaker 1>so much for doing this. Yeah. Again, always a pleasure

1:20:48.556 --> 1:20:51.236
<v Speaker 1>talking to you. I always learned something's fun. Yeah, it's

1:20:51.276 --> 1:20:53.356
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun talking to you. Cool. So we

1:20:53.436 --> 1:20:58.716
<v Speaker 1>do this again soon. Okay cool. Thanks to John F.

1:20:58.796 --> 1:21:01.316
<v Speaker 1>Shante for stopping by. Shang a lot to chat with you.

1:21:01.956 --> 1:21:03.596
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to keep an eye out on our feed

1:21:03.716 --> 1:21:06.556
<v Speaker 1>for their next conversation. You can hear all of our

1:21:06.596 --> 1:21:09.516
<v Speaker 1>favorite Chili pepper songs on my playlist at broke Record

1:21:09.556 --> 1:21:12.636
<v Speaker 1>podcast dot com. Be sure to subscribe to our YouTube

1:21:12.716 --> 1:21:16.236
<v Speaker 1>channel at YouTube dot com slash Broken Record Podcast. We

1:21:16.356 --> 1:21:19.356
<v Speaker 1>can find all of our new episodes. You can follow

1:21:19.436 --> 1:21:22.636
<v Speaker 1>us on Twitter at broken Record broken Record. It's produced

1:21:22.636 --> 1:21:27.196
<v Speaker 1>with help from Leah Rose, Jason Gambrell, Ben Holiday, Eric Sandler,

1:21:27.596 --> 1:21:32.116
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Sanchez, Our editor Sophie Crane. Our executive producer is

1:21:32.236 --> 1:21:36.196
<v Speaker 1>Mia LaBelle. Broken Record is a production of Pushkin Industries.

1:21:36.676 --> 1:21:39.076
<v Speaker 1>If you love this show and others from Pushkin, consider

1:21:39.156 --> 1:21:43.276
<v Speaker 1>subscribing to Pushkin Plus. Pushkin Plus is a podcast subscription

1:21:43.396 --> 1:21:46.956
<v Speaker 1>that offers bonus content an uninterrupted, ad free listening for

1:21:47.116 --> 1:21:50.036
<v Speaker 1>four ninety nine a month. Look for Pushkin Plus on

1:21:50.116 --> 1:21:53.676
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast subscriptions, and if you like our show, please

1:21:53.716 --> 1:21:56.636
<v Speaker 1>remember to share, rate, and review us on your podcast staff.

1:21:57.076 --> 1:21:59.836
<v Speaker 1>Our theme musics by Kenny Beats on Justin Richmond