WEBVTT - Judging Sam: The Case Against SBF

0:00:15.316 --> 0:00:15.796
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:18.516 --> 0:00:21.476
<v Speaker 2>Hey there, it's Michael Lewis. Before we get to this episode,

0:00:21.596 --> 0:00:23.116
<v Speaker 2>I want to let you know that you can listen

0:00:23.116 --> 0:00:26.316
<v Speaker 2>to each episode of Judging Sam The Trial of Sam

0:00:26.356 --> 0:00:30.516
<v Speaker 2>Bankman Freed ad free by becoming a Pushkin Plus subscriber,

0:00:30.996 --> 0:00:34.076
<v Speaker 2>and with your subscription you'll also get exclusive access to

0:00:34.116 --> 0:00:38.676
<v Speaker 2>ad free and early bingeable podcasts like Paul McCartney's new podcast,

0:00:38.836 --> 0:00:43.636
<v Speaker 2>McCartney A Life and Lyrics, Malcolm Gladwell's revisionist history, The

0:00:43.676 --> 0:00:47.516
<v Speaker 2>Happiness Lab from Doctor Lorie Santos, and tons of other

0:00:47.596 --> 0:00:51.116
<v Speaker 2>top shows from Pushkin. Sign up an Apple Podcasts or

0:00:51.116 --> 0:00:56.636
<v Speaker 2>at Pushkin, dot fm, Slash Plus. Welcome to Judging Sam,

0:00:56.836 --> 0:01:01.836
<v Speaker 2>The Trial of Sam Bankman Freed. I'm Michael Lewis. Sam

0:01:01.916 --> 0:01:04.996
<v Speaker 2>is the founder of a cryptocurrency exchange called ftx that

0:01:05.036 --> 0:01:08.316
<v Speaker 2>at one point was worth forty billion dollars. Some thought

0:01:08.316 --> 0:01:11.836
<v Speaker 2>that he'd bring cryptocurrency into the mainstream. Others thought that

0:01:11.876 --> 0:01:15.116
<v Speaker 2>he might save the world with his philanthropy. But instead

0:01:15.116 --> 0:01:18.116
<v Speaker 2>his fortune is gone and he's been charged with financial

0:01:18.156 --> 0:01:20.076
<v Speaker 2>crimes that could put him in prison for the rest

0:01:20.076 --> 0:01:22.556
<v Speaker 2>of his life. I spent a year and a half

0:01:22.596 --> 0:01:25.076
<v Speaker 2>reporting on Sam. I was there for the good days,

0:01:25.116 --> 0:01:28.156
<v Speaker 2>which were astronomically good, and I was there for the

0:01:28.196 --> 0:01:33.036
<v Speaker 2>catastrophic collapse. While Sam was under house arrest, I visited

0:01:33.076 --> 0:01:35.476
<v Speaker 2>him often, and I wrote a book about it all.

0:01:35.596 --> 0:01:38.756
<v Speaker 2>It's called Going Infinite, The Rise and Fall of a

0:01:38.796 --> 0:01:41.636
<v Speaker 2>New Tycoon. You can hear more about the book in

0:01:41.676 --> 0:01:45.076
<v Speaker 2>Sam's Backstory in our last episode. But now we're picking

0:01:45.156 --> 0:01:47.236
<v Speaker 2>up where the book left off and following the trial

0:01:47.276 --> 0:01:50.756
<v Speaker 2>that will decide Sam's fate. I won't be able to

0:01:50.756 --> 0:01:53.996
<v Speaker 2>go every day, but producer and reporter Lydia Jane cottwill

0:01:54.516 --> 0:01:56.756
<v Speaker 2>and she and I will be talking regularly about the

0:01:56.796 --> 0:01:59.516
<v Speaker 2>twists and turns of the proceedings and will bring you

0:01:59.556 --> 0:02:04.236
<v Speaker 2>more like interviews with experts, eyewitnesses, and sources I've developed

0:02:04.276 --> 0:02:08.516
<v Speaker 2>throughout my time reporting on Sam. In this episode, lydia

0:02:08.556 --> 0:02:11.596
<v Speaker 2>Jene has questions for me and Rebecca Mermelstein, a defense

0:02:11.636 --> 0:02:15.676
<v Speaker 2>attorney at the law firm Omelvini and Myers. We'll talk

0:02:15.716 --> 0:02:18.356
<v Speaker 2>about what we can expect to happen today, which is

0:02:18.396 --> 0:02:22.196
<v Speaker 2>the first day of Sam's trial. So, Lydia Jean, what's

0:02:22.236 --> 0:02:22.916
<v Speaker 2>on your mind?

0:02:23.836 --> 0:02:27.676
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Michael, and welcome Rebecca. We're recruiting this on September

0:02:27.716 --> 0:02:30.396
<v Speaker 1>twenty six. But it's exciting to think that when this

0:02:30.476 --> 0:02:33.836
<v Speaker 1>episode comes out, Sam's trial will be underway. As I'm

0:02:33.836 --> 0:02:35.716
<v Speaker 1>getting ready to report on it. I have a few

0:02:35.796 --> 0:02:38.756
<v Speaker 1>questions for both of you. Michael, I'm going to start

0:02:38.756 --> 0:02:42.556
<v Speaker 1>with you. So, I was wondering if maybe we could

0:02:42.556 --> 0:02:45.996
<v Speaker 1>go back to the beginning of this chapter of Sam's life.

0:02:46.556 --> 0:02:49.516
<v Speaker 1>Where were you when you heard that Sam Makmin Freed

0:02:49.596 --> 0:02:50.316
<v Speaker 1>had been indicted?

0:02:51.596 --> 0:02:53.756
<v Speaker 2>God, you know, it's funny. I don't remember where I

0:02:53.916 --> 0:02:57.836
<v Speaker 2>was then because the trouble had been brewing for so

0:02:58.036 --> 0:03:01.676
<v Speaker 2>long before then. I spread God, I might have been

0:03:01.676 --> 0:03:04.196
<v Speaker 2>in the Bahamas. I was back and forth for this period,

0:03:04.236 --> 0:03:09.916
<v Speaker 2>from the point that FTX collapsed in November of last

0:03:09.996 --> 0:03:14.836
<v Speaker 2>year to the point when he's extradited in end of December.

0:03:15.556 --> 0:03:17.796
<v Speaker 2>I was in Bahamas at least half the time.

0:03:18.116 --> 0:03:19.916
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And what were you thinking when all of this

0:03:20.076 --> 0:03:23.316
<v Speaker 1>was beginning? How did you process it at the time.

0:03:23.476 --> 0:03:26.516
<v Speaker 2>And unravel so quickly? It went from being a company

0:03:26.556 --> 0:03:29.876
<v Speaker 2>that venture capitalists were valuing at forty billion dollars to

0:03:29.956 --> 0:03:32.636
<v Speaker 2>a company that was bankrupt in like three days. And

0:03:33.356 --> 0:03:36.716
<v Speaker 2>when that happened, I had a couple of thoughts at once.

0:03:36.796 --> 0:03:39.396
<v Speaker 2>Some of them. Several of these thoughts I had were ignoble.

0:03:39.556 --> 0:03:42.116
<v Speaker 2>The ignoble thought was I wasn't quite sure how I

0:03:42.156 --> 0:03:43.436
<v Speaker 2>was going to write this book, And now I know

0:03:43.476 --> 0:03:45.036
<v Speaker 2>how I'm going to write this book, and the story

0:03:45.116 --> 0:03:47.156
<v Speaker 2>is unbelievable, and I can't believe I'm sitting in the

0:03:47.196 --> 0:03:49.716
<v Speaker 2>middle of it and getting to watch it. The immediate

0:03:49.756 --> 0:03:53.196
<v Speaker 2>thought was the incredulity at the panic in the air

0:03:53.316 --> 0:03:56.956
<v Speaker 2>that there were hundreds of employees of FTX in the

0:03:56.956 --> 0:04:01.076
<v Speaker 2>Bahamas who just ran for the airport, and it was

0:04:01.116 --> 0:04:05.996
<v Speaker 2>this wonderful quiet where it was just me and Sam,

0:04:06.076 --> 0:04:09.436
<v Speaker 2>and Sam's parents and Sam's therapists and one or two

0:04:09.556 --> 0:04:14.076
<v Speaker 2>brave souls from FTX who hadn't fled. I also thought

0:04:14.756 --> 0:04:17.996
<v Speaker 2>how curious it was the speed with which it went

0:04:18.036 --> 0:04:24.956
<v Speaker 2>from this pretty widely admired and reputable operation to being

0:04:25.036 --> 0:04:28.516
<v Speaker 2>viewed as this vast criminal enterprise without there being a

0:04:28.556 --> 0:04:31.956
<v Speaker 2>whole lot of new data except for the fact the

0:04:31.996 --> 0:04:34.116
<v Speaker 2>money was in the wrong place. The money wasn't there.

0:04:34.276 --> 0:04:36.996
<v Speaker 2>There was supposed to be fifteen billion dollars inside of FTX.

0:04:37.036 --> 0:04:39.276
<v Speaker 2>That and a lot of that was not inside of FTX.

0:04:39.316 --> 0:04:41.676
<v Speaker 2>It was clearly inside of Sam's hedge foot, but before

0:04:42.036 --> 0:04:45.356
<v Speaker 2>the most important executives in the place could explain what

0:04:45.476 --> 0:04:47.676
<v Speaker 2>had happened or had any idea what had happened, everybody

0:04:47.756 --> 0:04:50.236
<v Speaker 2>changed their mind all at once, So there was it

0:04:50.276 --> 0:04:52.756
<v Speaker 2>was It's just like how fast it went from one

0:04:52.876 --> 0:04:54.316
<v Speaker 2>judgment to another judgment.

0:04:54.996 --> 0:04:58.116
<v Speaker 1>Was there a part of you that was like maybe

0:04:58.116 --> 0:05:01.036
<v Speaker 1>this swall blow over or were you like this, there's

0:05:01.036 --> 0:05:03.316
<v Speaker 1>a before and there's an after, and now this is

0:05:03.396 --> 0:05:05.276
<v Speaker 1>an after. Thanks will never be the same?

0:05:07.036 --> 0:05:11.316
<v Speaker 2>That's a good question. No, I thought things would never

0:05:11.356 --> 0:05:13.996
<v Speaker 2>be the same. Sam thought for the first five or

0:05:13.996 --> 0:05:16.916
<v Speaker 2>six weeks that he was going to revive the exchange

0:05:16.956 --> 0:05:20.476
<v Speaker 2>with the help of some aging crypto people and that

0:05:21.076 --> 0:05:24.716
<v Speaker 2>this was all resolvable. I couldn't really see that path,

0:05:25.516 --> 0:05:29.036
<v Speaker 2>and that the things run on trust and it went

0:05:29.076 --> 0:05:32.516
<v Speaker 2>from being very trusted, like nothing in crypto is that trusted.

0:05:32.836 --> 0:05:36.756
<v Speaker 2>But as things going, Crypto maybe the most trusted. I mean,

0:05:36.756 --> 0:05:40.956
<v Speaker 2>it's brand was trust to being completely not trusted, and

0:05:41.116 --> 0:05:43.396
<v Speaker 2>once that happens, it's very hard to kind of get

0:05:43.436 --> 0:05:45.316
<v Speaker 2>it back. So I didn't think. I didn't think he

0:05:45.356 --> 0:05:47.116
<v Speaker 2>was coming back. It was interesting to watch him flop

0:05:47.156 --> 0:05:49.196
<v Speaker 2>around trying to figure out how to get it back.

0:05:50.876 --> 0:05:53.196
<v Speaker 2>The other thing I remember, and Rebecca could speak to this.

0:05:53.956 --> 0:05:55.996
<v Speaker 2>The lawyers came in and out. His lawyers came in

0:05:56.116 --> 0:05:58.276
<v Speaker 2>a couple of times, and I remember talking to them

0:05:58.556 --> 0:06:03.276
<v Speaker 2>early December, mid December, how long it would take before

0:06:03.756 --> 0:06:07.356
<v Speaker 2>the United States government actually felt it had its case

0:06:07.756 --> 0:06:09.996
<v Speaker 2>and it was strong enough that they wanted the Bahamas

0:06:10.036 --> 0:06:13.476
<v Speaker 2>to extradite him and then bring him to the States.

0:06:13.916 --> 0:06:16.356
<v Speaker 2>And I remember the lawyers thinking they had many months

0:06:16.676 --> 0:06:18.476
<v Speaker 2>like that. They didn't think this was going to happen

0:06:18.556 --> 0:06:20.636
<v Speaker 2>that fast because it's too complicated and everybody needed to

0:06:20.716 --> 0:06:24.036
<v Speaker 2>understand what happened first, and that was it. So that

0:06:24.156 --> 0:06:27.236
<v Speaker 2>was a shock to everyone, even the pros, like how

0:06:27.356 --> 0:06:30.116
<v Speaker 2>fast they got him out of there and how fast

0:06:30.116 --> 0:06:30.916
<v Speaker 2>they got him here.

0:06:32.236 --> 0:06:36.076
<v Speaker 1>Rebecca, could you maybe just summarize what exactly Sam has

0:06:36.076 --> 0:06:36.756
<v Speaker 1>been charged with?

0:06:37.356 --> 0:06:42.276
<v Speaker 3>Sure, I think they largely fall into really three related issues.

0:06:42.676 --> 0:06:46.116
<v Speaker 3>The first is there's an allegation that he defrauded the

0:06:46.196 --> 0:06:49.956
<v Speaker 3>investors in FTX basically by lying, right, And that's going

0:06:49.996 --> 0:06:52.036
<v Speaker 3>to be a theme here again and again and again

0:06:52.196 --> 0:06:56.196
<v Speaker 3>about misrepresentation. So there's some charges that relate to lies

0:06:56.316 --> 0:07:01.436
<v Speaker 3>and defrauding of investors in FTX, there are alleged lies

0:07:01.476 --> 0:07:04.756
<v Speaker 3>to lender. So there's were loans that had been made

0:07:04.796 --> 0:07:07.196
<v Speaker 3>to his entities, and there's allegations that he lied to

0:07:07.236 --> 0:07:10.396
<v Speaker 3>those lenders both to get money from them and then

0:07:10.436 --> 0:07:12.476
<v Speaker 3>to keep money from them to keep them from taking

0:07:12.516 --> 0:07:16.356
<v Speaker 3>their money back. And then of course lies to FTX customers,

0:07:16.396 --> 0:07:20.396
<v Speaker 3>to people who were sending a currency right dollars yen

0:07:21.116 --> 0:07:24.876
<v Speaker 3>lira two accounts that were purportedly held at FTX, it

0:07:24.876 --> 0:07:27.116
<v Speaker 3>turns out they were largely held at Alameda, it's part

0:07:27.116 --> 0:07:29.836
<v Speaker 3>of the problem. And then stealing that money from his

0:07:29.876 --> 0:07:33.236
<v Speaker 3>customers without their knowledge. So that's the big framework. I

0:07:33.236 --> 0:07:35.956
<v Speaker 3>think those are the three areas you're going to hear

0:07:36.076 --> 0:07:39.116
<v Speaker 3>the most about at the trial. That breaks down into

0:07:39.196 --> 0:07:42.356
<v Speaker 3>seven different charges in this case. Often you're going to

0:07:42.356 --> 0:07:45.436
<v Speaker 3>see a what we call a substantive offense that he

0:07:45.476 --> 0:07:47.956
<v Speaker 3>did a certain crime, he committed a certain crime, and

0:07:47.996 --> 0:07:51.076
<v Speaker 3>also a conspiracy, which is a companion to it. Right,

0:07:51.076 --> 0:07:53.556
<v Speaker 3>it's a separate crime to agree to commit the crime

0:07:53.596 --> 0:07:55.036
<v Speaker 3>with other people, and so you're going to see those

0:07:55.036 --> 0:07:57.276
<v Speaker 3>go together a lot. So you have a wire fraud

0:07:57.476 --> 0:08:00.556
<v Speaker 3>on the FTX customers and a conspiracy to do that

0:08:00.636 --> 0:08:04.676
<v Speaker 3>same thing. You have a wire fraud on Alameda's lenders,

0:08:04.916 --> 0:08:07.716
<v Speaker 3>you have a conspiracy to do that same thing, and

0:08:07.756 --> 0:08:11.556
<v Speaker 3>then you have conspiracy to commit securities fraud in relation

0:08:11.836 --> 0:08:17.116
<v Speaker 3>to FTX investors, a conspiracy to commit commodities fraud on

0:08:17.316 --> 0:08:21.596
<v Speaker 3>FTX customers, and finally money laundering, which basically is an

0:08:21.596 --> 0:08:24.316
<v Speaker 3>allegation that he was hiding the money he was stealing.

0:08:24.716 --> 0:08:28.316
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting to me if a lay person reads the charges,

0:08:28.796 --> 0:08:33.796
<v Speaker 2>there's no they can't visualize the crime. I think of

0:08:33.836 --> 0:08:36.116
<v Speaker 2>the problem is like all one big problem. The money

0:08:36.156 --> 0:08:38.956
<v Speaker 2>was in the wrong place, and that's pretty simple, like

0:08:39.036 --> 0:08:41.556
<v Speaker 2>money that should have been in cold storage and FTX

0:08:41.636 --> 0:08:44.676
<v Speaker 2>was in hot little hands of alimeter research. And then

0:08:44.676 --> 0:08:47.516
<v Speaker 2>it gets framed with all these complicated words and in

0:08:47.876 --> 0:08:50.556
<v Speaker 2>kind of abstract terms like why are fraud? How does

0:08:50.596 --> 0:08:52.916
<v Speaker 2>that even come about as an idea that we're going

0:08:52.996 --> 0:08:56.116
<v Speaker 2>to charge him not with the money being in the

0:08:56.156 --> 0:09:00.556
<v Speaker 2>wrong place, but in him sending electronic messages that hide

0:09:00.556 --> 0:09:02.516
<v Speaker 2>the fact that the money is in the wrong place.

0:09:03.116 --> 0:09:05.076
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's a great question. I think it's really a

0:09:05.156 --> 0:09:08.996
<v Speaker 3>quirk of the federal system, which is to say, some

0:09:09.236 --> 0:09:12.836
<v Speaker 3>thing happens, everyone has the feeling it's a crime. You

0:09:12.916 --> 0:09:14.756
<v Speaker 3>have to match it to a statute. There has to

0:09:14.836 --> 0:09:18.116
<v Speaker 3>be something that makes it a crime. But the reason

0:09:18.276 --> 0:09:23.116
<v Speaker 3>wire fraud is a federal crime is because after you

0:09:23.156 --> 0:09:26.596
<v Speaker 3>have to have the misleading statement and the effort to defraud,

0:09:26.636 --> 0:09:30.156
<v Speaker 3>you have to have an interstate or international wire, and

0:09:30.196 --> 0:09:33.316
<v Speaker 3>that gives the federal government the power to regulate it,

0:09:33.356 --> 0:09:36.076
<v Speaker 3>and it gives federal prosecutors the power to prosecute it.

0:09:36.276 --> 0:09:37.756
<v Speaker 3>So it's a little bit of a funny quirk.

0:09:39.396 --> 0:09:41.956
<v Speaker 1>If Sam is found guilty on all seven counts that

0:09:42.036 --> 0:09:44.716
<v Speaker 1>he's been charged with, how long could he go to prison? For?

0:09:45.516 --> 0:09:47.716
<v Speaker 3>The maximum as a matter of law is a little

0:09:47.716 --> 0:09:49.596
<v Speaker 3>over one hundred years. Is that likely?

0:09:49.636 --> 0:09:49.836
<v Speaker 2>Though?

0:09:49.876 --> 0:09:51.796
<v Speaker 1>Would you serve them consecutively?

0:09:51.996 --> 0:09:54.676
<v Speaker 3>It's a great question, so you can structure a sentence

0:09:54.876 --> 0:09:57.756
<v Speaker 3>a lot of different ways. Will he actually get one

0:09:57.796 --> 0:10:00.396
<v Speaker 3>hundred and ten years in prison? It would be a

0:10:00.556 --> 0:10:03.916
<v Speaker 3>very extraordinary sentence for a white collar defendant, even a

0:10:03.956 --> 0:10:08.356
<v Speaker 3>white collar defendant at this scale. I think it's unlikely.

0:10:08.436 --> 0:10:10.756
<v Speaker 3>The statute'd say this is the most amount of time

0:10:10.876 --> 0:10:13.236
<v Speaker 3>a judge could give him in jail, But the sentence

0:10:13.236 --> 0:10:17.676
<v Speaker 3>and guidelines are a very complicated algorithm that gives judges

0:10:17.876 --> 0:10:21.436
<v Speaker 3>a recommended range for someone, and in a fraud case,

0:10:21.556 --> 0:10:25.636
<v Speaker 3>the overwhelming the most important factor is the loss amount

0:10:25.716 --> 0:10:28.316
<v Speaker 3>in the case, and this one's obviously off the charts. Yeah,

0:10:28.316 --> 0:10:30.436
<v Speaker 3>and so his guidelines range here, I haven't looked at it,

0:10:30.476 --> 0:10:33.116
<v Speaker 3>but I'm almost certain will be life in prison, which

0:10:33.196 --> 0:10:35.836
<v Speaker 3>is not very useful as a recommendation to a judge.

0:10:35.956 --> 0:10:37.796
<v Speaker 3>So I would say, he's looking at a lot of time,

0:10:37.916 --> 0:10:40.476
<v Speaker 3>but you shouldn't use the statutory maximum sentence as a

0:10:40.516 --> 0:10:41.876
<v Speaker 3>presumption about what he's looking at.

0:10:42.316 --> 0:10:46.236
<v Speaker 1>Sam's now in jail at the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn,

0:10:46.676 --> 0:10:49.236
<v Speaker 1>and his lawyers have been saying that the fact that

0:10:49.316 --> 0:10:51.956
<v Speaker 1>he's held there has been making it hard for them

0:10:51.996 --> 0:10:54.556
<v Speaker 1>to work with him. You've had clients at the Metropolitan

0:10:54.596 --> 0:10:55.316
<v Speaker 1>Detention Center?

0:10:55.396 --> 0:10:56.356
<v Speaker 3>Is that right I have?

0:10:56.756 --> 0:10:59.236
<v Speaker 1>Can you describe what it's been like to work with them?

0:10:59.716 --> 0:11:03.476
<v Speaker 3>There's no question it's extraordinarily harder to help someone prepare

0:11:03.516 --> 0:11:06.356
<v Speaker 3>for trial or even for any part of their case

0:11:06.516 --> 0:11:08.876
<v Speaker 3>when they're in prison. For any number of reasons. Prisoner's

0:11:08.916 --> 0:11:12.436
<v Speaker 3>by and large can't make phone calls. They do have

0:11:12.476 --> 0:11:15.916
<v Speaker 3>some access to phone time. Those phone calls are recorded.

0:11:16.196 --> 0:11:19.916
<v Speaker 3>In every instance, there is inmate email. Again, the government

0:11:19.996 --> 0:11:22.836
<v Speaker 3>has access to that they are almost certainly reading Sam

0:11:22.876 --> 0:11:25.356
<v Speaker 3>Bankman's freed'ze emails, and you don't want to risk that

0:11:25.396 --> 0:11:27.076
<v Speaker 3>they're going to look at something you're saying to your client.

0:11:27.436 --> 0:11:29.956
<v Speaker 3>So if you think about what that means about visiting

0:11:29.996 --> 0:11:32.196
<v Speaker 3>your client, that means every time you want to see

0:11:32.196 --> 0:11:34.596
<v Speaker 3>your client, you have to go out to Brooklyn, MDC

0:11:34.756 --> 0:11:36.916
<v Speaker 3>is kind of a little bit in the middle of nowhere,

0:11:36.956 --> 0:11:39.276
<v Speaker 3>relatively speaking. It's not an easy place to get to.

0:11:39.796 --> 0:11:41.956
<v Speaker 3>You have to go through prison security, You have to

0:11:41.996 --> 0:11:43.876
<v Speaker 3>lock your possessions in a locker, you have to go

0:11:43.956 --> 0:11:46.636
<v Speaker 3>through a metal detector. That are very strict rules about

0:11:46.676 --> 0:11:49.396
<v Speaker 3>what colors you can wear. You can't wear colors that

0:11:49.436 --> 0:11:52.836
<v Speaker 3>are the colors of inmate uniform, so no khaki, no orange.

0:11:53.476 --> 0:11:55.956
<v Speaker 3>And then there's a lot of waiting. There's a lot

0:11:55.956 --> 0:11:58.636
<v Speaker 3>of bureaucracy, and you are really at the mercy of

0:11:58.676 --> 0:12:01.436
<v Speaker 3>a bop prison guard who's not all that interested in

0:12:01.516 --> 0:12:03.636
<v Speaker 3>being helpful, and so you wait, You wait to be

0:12:03.716 --> 0:12:05.316
<v Speaker 3>let into the visiting room, You wait for them to

0:12:05.316 --> 0:12:08.356
<v Speaker 3>bring your client down. Twice a day inmates are counted.

0:12:08.436 --> 0:12:10.956
<v Speaker 3>That is, the whole prison shuts down so that every

0:12:10.956 --> 0:12:13.916
<v Speaker 3>single person can be counted and nobody can leave or

0:12:14.036 --> 0:12:16.436
<v Speaker 3>enter at that time. Sometimes it takes an hour, so

0:12:16.476 --> 0:12:18.716
<v Speaker 3>you could get stuck. You're done but you can't leave,

0:12:19.076 --> 0:12:20.676
<v Speaker 3>or the other way you could be waiting to get in.

0:12:20.916 --> 0:12:25.356
<v Speaker 3>So everything is very, very very slow and without seeming

0:12:25.436 --> 0:12:27.596
<v Speaker 3>rhyme or reason. There's often just a shut down and

0:12:27.636 --> 0:12:29.476
<v Speaker 3>you get there and you can't go in, so it's

0:12:29.516 --> 0:12:31.636
<v Speaker 3>extremely frustrating, as you might imagine.

0:12:31.916 --> 0:12:35.156
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I actually tried to visit the MDC yesterday a

0:12:35.236 --> 0:12:38.116
<v Speaker 1>half an hour uber and they were doing prisoner account

0:12:38.316 --> 0:12:40.556
<v Speaker 1>and I wasn't allowed in and they made me stand

0:12:40.596 --> 0:12:43.236
<v Speaker 1>in this basically bus stop area where I couldn't see

0:12:43.276 --> 0:12:46.316
<v Speaker 1>anything that was happening at all, and I gave up

0:12:46.396 --> 0:12:46.956
<v Speaker 1>and went so.

0:12:47.276 --> 0:12:48.956
<v Speaker 2>Did you actually knock on the door and say can

0:12:48.996 --> 0:12:49.476
<v Speaker 2>I come in?

0:12:50.036 --> 0:12:52.636
<v Speaker 1>I stood in front of the door, and then a

0:12:52.636 --> 0:12:54.036
<v Speaker 1>guard came up to me and asked me what I

0:12:54.076 --> 0:12:55.876
<v Speaker 1>was doing, and I said I was a journalist, and

0:12:55.916 --> 0:12:57.756
<v Speaker 1>he said, you can't come in.

0:12:58.716 --> 0:13:00.956
<v Speaker 2>You had no one to see though, you're no purpose.

0:13:00.596 --> 0:13:02.116
<v Speaker 1>There, I know, I just wanted to see how far

0:13:02.156 --> 0:13:02.596
<v Speaker 1>I lead got.

0:13:04.716 --> 0:13:06.836
<v Speaker 2>You're the only one in America trying to get into jail.

0:13:07.556 --> 0:13:09.836
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I did not make a very I made it

0:13:09.916 --> 0:13:11.996
<v Speaker 1>right to the front steps.

0:13:13.196 --> 0:13:24.276
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back. Welcome back to judging Sam the

0:13:24.356 --> 0:13:25.836
<v Speaker 2>trial of Sam Bankman.

0:13:25.596 --> 0:13:27.036
<v Speaker 3>Freed, Rebecca.

0:13:27.076 --> 0:13:28.876
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering if you could give us a preview

0:13:28.876 --> 0:13:30.796
<v Speaker 1>of what we should expect to happen on the first day.

0:13:31.436 --> 0:13:34.156
<v Speaker 3>Sure. So the first day I expect will largely consist

0:13:34.276 --> 0:13:37.836
<v Speaker 3>of jury selection, which is to say that people will

0:13:37.836 --> 0:13:41.556
<v Speaker 3>be brought in in a veneer thirty forty fifty people

0:13:41.556 --> 0:13:44.716
<v Speaker 3>at a time typically, and these are people who live

0:13:44.916 --> 0:13:47.356
<v Speaker 3>in the New York City area. So it's going to

0:13:47.396 --> 0:13:51.676
<v Speaker 3>include Manhattan, the Bronx, Westchester, and a few of the

0:13:51.716 --> 0:13:55.316
<v Speaker 3>southernmost counties of the Southern District of New York. And

0:13:55.356 --> 0:13:57.236
<v Speaker 3>they're going to have received a summons in the mail

0:13:57.276 --> 0:13:59.196
<v Speaker 3>that tells them to come in. They won't know that

0:13:59.196 --> 0:14:02.276
<v Speaker 3>they're coming in for any particular case. And actually there'll

0:14:02.276 --> 0:14:04.316
<v Speaker 3>be hundreds of people sitting in a main room called

0:14:04.396 --> 0:14:06.996
<v Speaker 3>up one of the you know, in groups to whatever

0:14:07.036 --> 0:14:08.956
<v Speaker 3>courtroom needs to pick a jury that day. It may

0:14:09.036 --> 0:14:12.676
<v Speaker 3>not only be Sam bankman Fried next week. And then

0:14:12.836 --> 0:14:16.436
<v Speaker 3>the judge will ask a series of questions, some of

0:14:16.436 --> 0:14:19.276
<v Speaker 3>which are virtually standard for every single criminal trial, and

0:14:19.396 --> 0:14:21.516
<v Speaker 3>other of which the parties have asked the judge to

0:14:21.516 --> 0:14:24.396
<v Speaker 3>ask and he's agreed that are specific to this trial.

0:14:25.036 --> 0:14:27.956
<v Speaker 3>To try to ascertain a few things, is this a

0:14:27.996 --> 0:14:30.716
<v Speaker 3>person who can sit at this trial or any trial?

0:14:30.796 --> 0:14:33.636
<v Speaker 3>For example, if you don't speak English fluently, then you

0:14:33.676 --> 0:14:36.716
<v Speaker 3>can't be a jur right, if you have a medical

0:14:36.716 --> 0:14:38.476
<v Speaker 3>condition that means you can't sit for a long period

0:14:38.476 --> 0:14:40.076
<v Speaker 3>of time in a chair, you can't be a jur

0:14:40.396 --> 0:14:42.116
<v Speaker 3>Do you have a small child at home and you're

0:14:42.156 --> 0:14:44.636
<v Speaker 3>not able to stay until five o'clock because you have

0:14:44.676 --> 0:14:45.956
<v Speaker 3>to do school pickups. So you're going to get a

0:14:45.996 --> 0:14:47.996
<v Speaker 3>lot of people who just say I can't be here

0:14:47.996 --> 0:14:50.556
<v Speaker 3>for logistical reasons, some of them really can't, and some

0:14:50.596 --> 0:14:51.876
<v Speaker 3>of them just don't want to be on a jury.

0:14:52.396 --> 0:14:54.556
<v Speaker 3>And then you're going to get people who have strong

0:14:54.596 --> 0:14:57.716
<v Speaker 3>opinions about facts that are related to this case that

0:14:57.756 --> 0:14:59.796
<v Speaker 3>they are going to say or the parties are going

0:14:59.836 --> 0:15:03.316
<v Speaker 3>to determine make them unable to be an impartial juror

0:15:03.356 --> 0:15:06.156
<v Speaker 3>if you lost money in the FTX bankruptcy, you probably

0:15:06.196 --> 0:15:08.596
<v Speaker 3>can't be a juror on this case. If you are

0:15:09.116 --> 0:15:11.596
<v Speaker 3>be friends with Chris Everdale, who's one of Sam Bankman's

0:15:11.596 --> 0:15:14.276
<v Speaker 3>Freed's lawyers, then you probably can't be on this jury,

0:15:14.316 --> 0:15:16.396
<v Speaker 3>and so you'll have a long process of trying to

0:15:16.436 --> 0:15:20.236
<v Speaker 3>weed through people who can really be impartial and sit

0:15:20.316 --> 0:15:23.036
<v Speaker 3>in a fair way and listen to the facts and

0:15:23.116 --> 0:15:25.516
<v Speaker 3>learn them for the first time and not be affected

0:15:25.556 --> 0:15:28.436
<v Speaker 3>by what they may have heard other places and decide.

0:15:28.836 --> 0:15:31.596
<v Speaker 3>And I could be wrong. Judge Caaplin's a very efficient judge,

0:15:31.636 --> 0:15:33.916
<v Speaker 3>but that is very likely to take the whole first day,

0:15:33.956 --> 0:15:35.996
<v Speaker 3>and that will be all that happens. And it's a

0:15:35.996 --> 0:15:37.556
<v Speaker 3>little interesting for a few minutes, and then it gets

0:15:37.556 --> 0:15:38.316
<v Speaker 3>a little repetitive.

0:15:38.676 --> 0:15:41.716
<v Speaker 2>Is it possible it goes on for a much longer time?

0:15:41.956 --> 0:15:42.236
<v Speaker 2>Can it?

0:15:42.276 --> 0:15:42.436
<v Speaker 1>Case?

0:15:42.556 --> 0:15:46.676
<v Speaker 3>Certainly could. I would say it's not unusual for it

0:15:46.676 --> 0:15:49.676
<v Speaker 3>to spill into a second day. It would be pretty

0:15:49.716 --> 0:15:53.596
<v Speaker 3>unusual for it to spill into a third, but it could.

0:15:54.076 --> 0:15:57.436
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned that Judge Coplin is pretty efficient. So yeah,

0:15:57.436 --> 0:15:59.556
<v Speaker 1>the judge in this case, his name is Lewis Caplan

0:15:59.836 --> 0:16:02.516
<v Speaker 1>And Rebecca, you're a former prosecutor in the Southern District

0:16:02.516 --> 0:16:04.556
<v Speaker 1>of New York. That's the office that's bringing this case

0:16:04.556 --> 0:16:05.156
<v Speaker 1>against Sam.

0:16:05.236 --> 0:16:05.676
<v Speaker 3>That's right.

0:16:05.836 --> 0:16:07.356
<v Speaker 1>What can you tell us about Judge Coplin?

0:16:07.596 --> 0:16:09.796
<v Speaker 3>So I never tried a case in front of Judge Caplin,

0:16:09.876 --> 0:16:12.436
<v Speaker 3>But I would say his reputation is as someone who

0:16:12.516 --> 0:16:16.876
<v Speaker 3>is very smart, very confident in his own decision making.

0:16:16.956 --> 0:16:21.156
<v Speaker 3>He makes decisions quickly. Some judges have a reputation that

0:16:21.476 --> 0:16:24.356
<v Speaker 3>whoever spoke last kind of convinces them. I don't think

0:16:24.396 --> 0:16:27.436
<v Speaker 3>that's true with him, and I think on balance he's

0:16:27.436 --> 0:16:29.876
<v Speaker 3>seen as someone who's a good judge for the government,

0:16:30.476 --> 0:16:34.036
<v Speaker 3>both because I think he's friendly to the government's purpose,

0:16:34.436 --> 0:16:36.676
<v Speaker 3>which is not to say that he's not impartial, but

0:16:36.876 --> 0:16:40.116
<v Speaker 3>he's not an aunt, doesn't have an anti prosecutor bent,

0:16:40.996 --> 0:16:43.076
<v Speaker 3>and at the end of the day, I always felt

0:16:43.076 --> 0:16:44.876
<v Speaker 3>as a prosecutor and now I still feel this way

0:16:44.876 --> 0:16:48.676
<v Speaker 3>as defense lawyer, that judges who are rigorous about enforcing

0:16:48.716 --> 0:16:52.756
<v Speaker 3>the rules of the court room, about enforcing limitations on

0:16:52.796 --> 0:16:55.796
<v Speaker 3>what's admissible and the rules of evidence, are better for

0:16:55.836 --> 0:16:58.276
<v Speaker 3>the government because the government is more likely to be

0:16:59.236 --> 0:17:01.756
<v Speaker 3>playing by the book, and as defense lawyers, we often

0:17:01.796 --> 0:17:04.156
<v Speaker 3>are trying to find a little more wiggle room, and

0:17:04.196 --> 0:17:06.036
<v Speaker 3>so a judge who doesn't allow that is better for

0:17:06.076 --> 0:17:07.516
<v Speaker 3>the government than for the defense.

0:17:07.996 --> 0:17:11.076
<v Speaker 1>Right It's like the rule followers versus the rule breakers.

0:17:12.516 --> 0:17:13.796
<v Speaker 3>I don't know that I like to think about myself

0:17:13.836 --> 0:17:15.556
<v Speaker 3>now as a rule breaker, But it's a fair point

0:17:16.116 --> 0:17:19.156
<v Speaker 3>the rural skeptics, Yes, the rule skeptics. I think that's right.

0:17:19.476 --> 0:17:21.396
<v Speaker 3>And of course, the other thing that's interesting about Judge

0:17:21.436 --> 0:17:24.156
<v Speaker 3>Capelin here is that the defendant has really pissed him

0:17:24.156 --> 0:17:27.996
<v Speaker 3>off by his pre trial antics, if you will. And

0:17:28.236 --> 0:17:30.036
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that Judge Kaplin is going to let

0:17:30.036 --> 0:17:33.476
<v Speaker 3>that affect the way he handles the trial itself. But

0:17:33.516 --> 0:17:35.836
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a bad sign for sentencing ray.

0:17:35.876 --> 0:17:38.276
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, in a case like this,

0:17:38.476 --> 0:17:41.356
<v Speaker 1>what difference does who the judge is make? Because at

0:17:41.356 --> 0:17:42.836
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, right, it's the jury that

0:17:42.876 --> 0:17:44.596
<v Speaker 1>decides whether Sam is guilty or innocent.

0:17:44.756 --> 0:17:46.556
<v Speaker 3>Oh, but I think the judge makes an enormous amount

0:17:46.556 --> 0:17:49.556
<v Speaker 3>of difference in lots of ways. The first is that

0:17:49.956 --> 0:17:52.836
<v Speaker 3>there are lots of evidentiary rulings that could go either

0:17:52.836 --> 0:17:56.156
<v Speaker 3>way that reasonable minds can disagree, And trial judges have

0:17:56.196 --> 0:17:59.676
<v Speaker 3>an enormous amount of discretion to control the flow of

0:17:59.716 --> 0:18:03.196
<v Speaker 3>evidence in their courtroom. Some judges, even though they tell

0:18:03.236 --> 0:18:05.876
<v Speaker 3>a jury, you shouldn't read anything into my questions, you

0:18:05.916 --> 0:18:08.716
<v Speaker 3>shouldn't read anything into how I rule on objections. I

0:18:08.756 --> 0:18:12.396
<v Speaker 3>don't have an opinion. Juries love judges. They watch judges

0:18:12.476 --> 0:18:15.636
<v Speaker 3>for signs and they interpret every single thing the judge

0:18:15.716 --> 0:18:18.676
<v Speaker 3>is doing. So again really matters. And then judges have

0:18:18.756 --> 0:18:23.236
<v Speaker 3>an enormous amount of discretion at sentencing. And so if

0:18:23.236 --> 0:18:25.596
<v Speaker 3>you can they're actually our statistics published on this, you

0:18:25.636 --> 0:18:28.476
<v Speaker 3>can see some judges are really light sentencers, some are

0:18:28.476 --> 0:18:30.596
<v Speaker 3>really harsh sentencers. Again, it really matters.

0:18:30.756 --> 0:18:33.996
<v Speaker 1>Okay, another question for you, Rebecca. Let's move forward to

0:18:34.156 --> 0:18:37.036
<v Speaker 1>opening statements. If you were to make a bingo card

0:18:37.596 --> 0:18:40.236
<v Speaker 1>for what you would expect the prosecution and the defense

0:18:40.316 --> 0:18:42.916
<v Speaker 1>to say in their opening statements, what would you put

0:18:42.956 --> 0:18:45.356
<v Speaker 1>on those cards. Let's start with the prosecution.

0:18:45.436 --> 0:18:48.556
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's a fun question. You'll see. I predict that

0:18:48.796 --> 0:18:51.796
<v Speaker 3>the government's opening will have the same form it always does.

0:18:51.836 --> 0:18:54.716
<v Speaker 3>It's going to have what's called a grab, a quick, pithy,

0:18:54.956 --> 0:18:57.836
<v Speaker 3>kind of interesting way to grab the jury's attention, and

0:18:57.876 --> 0:19:00.036
<v Speaker 3>then they'll kind of pause. They're going to explain what

0:19:00.276 --> 0:19:03.156
<v Speaker 3>happened here. They're going to tell the story of the

0:19:03.156 --> 0:19:06.196
<v Speaker 3>downfall of FTX, and then they'll talk about how they're

0:19:06.196 --> 0:19:08.356
<v Speaker 3>going to prove that to the jury. Who's going to

0:19:08.436 --> 0:19:10.316
<v Speaker 3>come talk to them what kind of documents they're going

0:19:10.396 --> 0:19:12.036
<v Speaker 3>to say, So they're going to talk about lies. They're

0:19:12.036 --> 0:19:15.396
<v Speaker 3>going to say, lie lie lie, lie to FDx investors,

0:19:15.796 --> 0:19:18.956
<v Speaker 3>lied to customers, lied to lenders. I think there's a

0:19:18.996 --> 0:19:23.556
<v Speaker 3>possibility that you'll hear some kind of victim vignettes, right,

0:19:23.636 --> 0:19:27.916
<v Speaker 3>the little lady in Topeka who lost her life savings

0:19:27.996 --> 0:19:30.756
<v Speaker 3>in the downfall, right, because it puts a human element

0:19:30.796 --> 0:19:33.316
<v Speaker 3>on it. Otherwise it's a little abstract, and you want

0:19:33.316 --> 0:19:37.156
<v Speaker 3>to really say, these are real people. This wasn't monopoly money.

0:19:37.196 --> 0:19:41.756
<v Speaker 3>It mattered. So I expect you'll hear about victims. I

0:19:41.756 --> 0:19:46.316
<v Speaker 3>think you'll hear the word victim. I wouldn't be surprised

0:19:46.356 --> 0:19:49.356
<v Speaker 3>if you surprised if you heard things like greed, right.

0:19:49.756 --> 0:19:53.596
<v Speaker 3>And I guess that's not enough words for a BINGO card,

0:19:53.916 --> 0:19:57.076
<v Speaker 3>but I think that's probably the top ones i'd pick.

0:19:57.236 --> 0:19:59.756
<v Speaker 3>And if you're the defense, you're going to hear a

0:19:59.796 --> 0:20:03.076
<v Speaker 3>lot about cooperators. I predict, as I think has been

0:20:03.316 --> 0:20:05.996
<v Speaker 3>sort of widely published at this point, there are people

0:20:06.036 --> 0:20:09.036
<v Speaker 3>who have pled guilty and agreed to cooperate in this trial,

0:20:09.596 --> 0:20:10.916
<v Speaker 3>and so the defense is going to have to go

0:20:10.956 --> 0:20:13.116
<v Speaker 3>on the offense there and You're going to hear a

0:20:13.156 --> 0:20:16.596
<v Speaker 3>lot about why those people can't be trusted, what their

0:20:16.636 --> 0:20:20.516
<v Speaker 3>incentives were to cooperate, and why they're lying. I also

0:20:20.556 --> 0:20:22.516
<v Speaker 3>think you're going to hear a lot about a rush

0:20:22.556 --> 0:20:26.516
<v Speaker 3>to judgment. This moved really fast, and so it moved

0:20:26.516 --> 0:20:28.796
<v Speaker 3>so fast in ways that the jury won't actually get

0:20:28.796 --> 0:20:31.396
<v Speaker 3>to hear about that. Charges had to be dropped because

0:20:31.436 --> 0:20:33.916
<v Speaker 3>they weren't brought fast enough and the government got over

0:20:33.956 --> 0:20:35.796
<v Speaker 3>at Skis. And you're going to want to say they

0:20:35.796 --> 0:20:38.996
<v Speaker 3>don't understand what happened. They saw this thing, these young

0:20:39.116 --> 0:20:42.196
<v Speaker 3>hungry prosecutors wanted to make a name for themselves, and

0:20:42.276 --> 0:20:45.196
<v Speaker 3>they jump the gun and they don't really understand it.

0:20:45.516 --> 0:20:47.276
<v Speaker 3>And I think tied to that theme is going to

0:20:47.276 --> 0:20:50.476
<v Speaker 3>be complexity. Right, this stuff is hard to understand. It's

0:20:50.516 --> 0:20:53.796
<v Speaker 3>easy to make a mistake, either that the government has

0:20:53.836 --> 0:20:56.796
<v Speaker 3>made a mistake or that Sam Bankmin freed himself. Didn't

0:20:56.916 --> 0:20:59.436
<v Speaker 3>understand certain things I would expect to be part of

0:20:59.436 --> 0:21:00.116
<v Speaker 3>the defense theme.

0:21:01.316 --> 0:21:03.676
<v Speaker 1>For a final question, it's for both of you. You

0:21:03.716 --> 0:21:06.116
<v Speaker 1>both have talked about how on the trial, right the

0:21:06.196 --> 0:21:09.396
<v Speaker 1>prosecution is going to say a story about whether Sam

0:21:09.476 --> 0:21:11.836
<v Speaker 1>is guilty or innocent, and the defense is going to

0:21:11.916 --> 0:21:14.636
<v Speaker 1>say a story about whether Sam is guilty or innocent,

0:21:15.276 --> 0:21:17.996
<v Speaker 1>And Michael, you called it a story war. I guess

0:21:18.036 --> 0:21:20.356
<v Speaker 1>I wonder what do you think the bigger story is?

0:21:20.396 --> 0:21:23.076
<v Speaker 1>Like why should listeners care or why do they care

0:21:23.156 --> 0:21:25.836
<v Speaker 1>so much about Sam's skilter innocence.

0:21:27.596 --> 0:21:32.756
<v Speaker 2>It's a great question that it's puzzled me. Like I

0:21:32.836 --> 0:21:35.876
<v Speaker 2>thought when all this thing, when it blew up in November,

0:21:36.236 --> 0:21:38.796
<v Speaker 2>that I thought by January everybody'd be bored with it.

0:21:38.876 --> 0:21:41.756
<v Speaker 2>The culture moves so fast from one story to the next,

0:21:41.956 --> 0:21:45.796
<v Speaker 2>and its memory is so short. This story has not

0:21:45.956 --> 0:21:51.316
<v Speaker 2>done that. People have had an enduring interest, consuming interest

0:21:50.636 --> 0:21:56.996
<v Speaker 2>in FTX and Sam Bankman freed. My first guess that's

0:21:57.116 --> 0:21:59.596
<v Speaker 2>why that is is they don't feel like actually, no

0:21:59.636 --> 0:22:02.836
<v Speaker 2>matter what they say on Twitter, they don't feel they

0:22:02.876 --> 0:22:06.036
<v Speaker 2>actually understand it. So it hasn't resolved itself in their

0:22:06.076 --> 0:22:11.276
<v Speaker 2>minds as a completely clean story. There's a tendiness to oh,

0:22:11.636 --> 0:22:14.076
<v Speaker 2>crypto crook. He was a crypto crook from the beginning.

0:22:14.116 --> 0:22:16.956
<v Speaker 2>You know, we already fooled everybody. That story's kind of

0:22:16.996 --> 0:22:20.836
<v Speaker 2>a boring story. They know it's more interesting than that.

0:22:20.876 --> 0:22:23.556
<v Speaker 2>They just don't know that they don't know and that

0:22:23.676 --> 0:22:27.236
<v Speaker 2>they don't know bothers them, do you know, I think so.

0:22:28.116 --> 0:22:30.396
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think his best is I've tried to

0:22:30.436 --> 0:22:32.876
<v Speaker 2>describe it. I hope the reader puts down the book

0:22:32.876 --> 0:22:36.196
<v Speaker 2>and feels their own conviction about what happened. But it's

0:22:36.236 --> 0:22:39.636
<v Speaker 2>never died down. You know, Sam Bagman Freed is discovered

0:22:39.676 --> 0:22:42.236
<v Speaker 2>to be living on peanut butter and bread in the

0:22:42.556 --> 0:22:45.836
<v Speaker 2>in the Metropolitan Detention Center in Brooklyn, and it's front

0:22:45.876 --> 0:22:49.596
<v Speaker 2>page news in the New York Times. People can't get

0:22:49.676 --> 0:22:52.316
<v Speaker 2>enough of it. And I think it's because they don't.

0:22:52.676 --> 0:22:54.556
<v Speaker 2>They think they don't completely understand it.

0:22:54.716 --> 0:22:56.556
<v Speaker 1>There's something about this story that's not adding up.

0:22:56.716 --> 0:22:57.116
<v Speaker 2>That's right.

0:22:57.156 --> 0:23:00.556
<v Speaker 1>We're bothered by that. We want to know. Yes, what

0:23:00.556 --> 0:23:01.676
<v Speaker 1>do you think, Rebecca, Well.

0:23:01.596 --> 0:23:04.396
<v Speaker 3>It's interesting because you ask two questions, which is why

0:23:04.436 --> 0:23:07.556
<v Speaker 3>should we care and why do people care? And actually

0:23:07.556 --> 0:23:09.876
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure we should care as much as people do.

0:23:10.836 --> 0:23:15.356
<v Speaker 3>You know, this is in some ways just one of

0:23:15.396 --> 0:23:17.996
<v Speaker 3>so many crimes, and you know, especially when we talk

0:23:18.036 --> 0:23:20.356
<v Speaker 3>about something like the food at the MDC. And I

0:23:20.356 --> 0:23:22.756
<v Speaker 3>think you've seen some statements in the press by the

0:23:22.756 --> 0:23:25.796
<v Speaker 3>federal defenders saying like we hope this press attention on

0:23:25.836 --> 0:23:29.276
<v Speaker 3>this one person will actually motivate change for everyone, because

0:23:29.276 --> 0:23:32.116
<v Speaker 3>these are not new things, right, Lots of these things

0:23:32.196 --> 0:23:35.156
<v Speaker 3>are true for every person who's in jail, and MDC

0:23:35.316 --> 0:23:38.076
<v Speaker 3>is a jail for people, by and large awaiting trial,

0:23:38.156 --> 0:23:40.396
<v Speaker 3>So every single one of them has not yet been

0:23:40.436 --> 0:23:43.516
<v Speaker 3>found guilty and they're subject to these conditions. And why

0:23:43.556 --> 0:23:46.836
<v Speaker 3>should we care so much about this one person? Why

0:23:46.876 --> 0:23:48.636
<v Speaker 3>do we care? I think part of it is an

0:23:48.796 --> 0:23:51.036
<v Speaker 3>Icarus story, right, there's a shot and freud to it,

0:23:51.076 --> 0:23:54.676
<v Speaker 3>which is, here's this boy, wonder King who seemed to

0:23:54.716 --> 0:23:59.116
<v Speaker 3>be using his you know, brain to just print money

0:23:59.396 --> 0:24:01.556
<v Speaker 3>and become so successful. And there's a little bit of

0:24:02.036 --> 0:24:04.636
<v Speaker 3>human nature to say, kind of good, right, I knew

0:24:04.636 --> 0:24:06.716
<v Speaker 3>it couldn't be that easy. If it were that easy,

0:24:06.756 --> 0:24:08.796
<v Speaker 3>we'd all be doing it. And it must have been

0:24:09.196 --> 0:24:10.596
<v Speaker 3>must have been a fraud. And I'm glad to see

0:24:10.636 --> 0:24:12.516
<v Speaker 3>him kind of get what's coming. And so I think

0:24:12.516 --> 0:24:14.956
<v Speaker 3>that creates kind of an interest in it. And then

0:24:14.996 --> 0:24:19.156
<v Speaker 3>of course it is important because I think for a

0:24:19.156 --> 0:24:21.276
<v Speaker 3>lot of people, Crypto felt like an area where you

0:24:21.316 --> 0:24:24.516
<v Speaker 3>could print money, where anybody could make money, and it's

0:24:24.516 --> 0:24:27.956
<v Speaker 3>important for people to understand sort of what the cost

0:24:28.036 --> 0:24:31.356
<v Speaker 3>is of having an unregulated currency. It's more and more regulated,

0:24:31.396 --> 0:24:35.436
<v Speaker 3>of course, but the dangers of crypto writ large are

0:24:35.476 --> 0:24:37.796
<v Speaker 3>a little bit on display when you talk about how

0:24:37.836 --> 0:24:40.676
<v Speaker 3>this could fail so spectacularly. Whether it was a crime

0:24:40.756 --> 0:24:42.836
<v Speaker 3>or not, it certainly failed spectacularly.

0:24:43.076 --> 0:24:44.916
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in a minute with one last thing.

0:24:53.796 --> 0:24:56.836
<v Speaker 1>And we're back with one last thing. Our one last

0:24:56.836 --> 0:25:00.996
<v Speaker 1>thing today is about a lawsuit against Sam's parents. Recently,

0:25:01.156 --> 0:25:03.836
<v Speaker 1>lawyers for FTX sued them in an attempt to get

0:25:03.876 --> 0:25:08.516
<v Speaker 1>money back to repay their creditors. In this suit, FTX

0:25:08.556 --> 0:25:13.036
<v Speaker 1>alleges that Sam's parents either knew or willfully ignored signs

0:25:13.036 --> 0:25:18.476
<v Speaker 1>that Sam was quote orchestrating a vast fraudulent scheme. I

0:25:18.516 --> 0:25:21.116
<v Speaker 1>should also note here that my boyfriend is a lawyer

0:25:21.156 --> 0:25:24.036
<v Speaker 1>at Sullivan and Cromwell. That's one of the firms that's

0:25:24.076 --> 0:25:28.076
<v Speaker 1>been representing FTX in the bankruptcy, but not Sam Bankman Freed.

0:25:28.836 --> 0:25:31.036
<v Speaker 1>He and I have a firewall up about this case,

0:25:31.476 --> 0:25:33.956
<v Speaker 1>and Sullivan and Cromwell is not involved in this particular

0:25:34.036 --> 0:25:38.116
<v Speaker 1>lawsuit against Sam's parents. Rebecca, I wonder what stood out

0:25:38.116 --> 0:25:40.196
<v Speaker 1>to you most about this suit against Sam's parents.

0:25:40.876 --> 0:25:42.756
<v Speaker 3>I should preface it by saying that I am not

0:25:42.796 --> 0:25:45.036
<v Speaker 3>a bankruptcy lawyer. This is really sort of outside of

0:25:45.076 --> 0:25:48.476
<v Speaker 3>my area of interest. But I think one question it

0:25:48.556 --> 0:25:51.196
<v Speaker 3>raises for a lot of people outside the law is

0:25:51.396 --> 0:25:53.396
<v Speaker 3>are they next right? Are they going to be charged

0:25:53.396 --> 0:25:54.036
<v Speaker 3>with a crime?

0:25:54.156 --> 0:25:54.356
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:25:54.516 --> 0:25:57.236
<v Speaker 3>And what can we interpret from the fact that this

0:25:57.396 --> 0:26:00.116
<v Speaker 3>lawsuit was brought? And I think the short answer is

0:26:00.396 --> 0:26:02.556
<v Speaker 3>not that much. And I should say that I did

0:26:02.556 --> 0:26:04.356
<v Speaker 3>some homework for this one and spoke to one of

0:26:04.396 --> 0:26:06.836
<v Speaker 3>the partners at my law firm, a Melvini named Daniel Shama,

0:26:06.876 --> 0:26:09.476
<v Speaker 3>who's an expert in bankruptcy. So here's what I learned

0:26:09.516 --> 0:26:11.876
<v Speaker 3>that was really interesting, which is there's something called a

0:26:11.956 --> 0:26:16.076
<v Speaker 3>clawback in bankruptcy, which is, once a bankruptcy happens, you

0:26:16.116 --> 0:26:19.076
<v Speaker 3>can clawback. You can take back money from people who

0:26:19.236 --> 0:26:22.156
<v Speaker 3>got money from the entity that went bankrupt. And there's

0:26:22.196 --> 0:26:24.396
<v Speaker 3>rules about how that works. There's time limits, there's all

0:26:24.436 --> 0:26:26.716
<v Speaker 3>kinds of things, but the one that's the most relevant

0:26:26.876 --> 0:26:31.396
<v Speaker 3>here is called a fraudulent transfer. And what that means

0:26:31.476 --> 0:26:33.756
<v Speaker 3>is that within a window of a number of years

0:26:33.796 --> 0:26:36.836
<v Speaker 3>before the bankruptcy, you can take back money from people

0:26:36.836 --> 0:26:40.316
<v Speaker 3>who got it. If two different kinds of things happened.

0:26:40.876 --> 0:26:46.036
<v Speaker 3>One is that there was an actual intent to defraud creditors.

0:26:46.156 --> 0:26:48.236
<v Speaker 3>That's the legal language. And what I mean by that

0:26:48.356 --> 0:26:51.156
<v Speaker 3>is you knew the ship was sinking, so you gave

0:26:51.196 --> 0:26:52.996
<v Speaker 3>a lot of money to your parents so that it

0:26:53.036 --> 0:26:54.876
<v Speaker 3>would be there for you. Right, that would be a

0:26:54.956 --> 0:26:58.116
<v Speaker 3>fraudulent transfer because you were doing it to keep the

0:26:58.116 --> 0:27:00.796
<v Speaker 3>money away from creditors in the bankruptcy people who were

0:27:00.796 --> 0:27:05.116
<v Speaker 3>owed money. The other one is when it might have

0:27:05.196 --> 0:27:07.356
<v Speaker 3>been that the person who got money didn't even know

0:27:07.396 --> 0:27:10.916
<v Speaker 3>that they were doing anything wrong, but they received something

0:27:11.396 --> 0:27:15.916
<v Speaker 3>for quote less than reasonably equivalent value or fair consideration.

0:27:16.396 --> 0:27:18.516
<v Speaker 3>So what does that mean? If I give you a

0:27:18.596 --> 0:27:22.556
<v Speaker 3>monet right from my company and I only charge you

0:27:22.596 --> 0:27:25.476
<v Speaker 3>a dollar for it, you have not paid reasonable consideration

0:27:25.596 --> 0:27:28.076
<v Speaker 3>for it. Right. It's another way of getting the money

0:27:28.156 --> 0:27:30.716
<v Speaker 3>out of the entity before the ship sinks.

0:27:30.796 --> 0:27:32.756
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is still you you gave me the

0:27:32.756 --> 0:27:35.516
<v Speaker 1>monet because you wanted the money to be safe.

0:27:35.956 --> 0:27:37.876
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't have to be that. That's why, In other words,

0:27:37.996 --> 0:27:40.756
<v Speaker 3>if I gave it to you and it wasn't really justified,

0:27:41.236 --> 0:27:44.436
<v Speaker 3>even if there wasn't necessarily a nefarious intent, there can

0:27:44.476 --> 0:27:48.396
<v Speaker 3>be enough for a clawback. And so you know, you

0:27:48.396 --> 0:27:53.636
<v Speaker 3>can Imagine, for example, you know, the person who delivers

0:27:53.756 --> 0:27:57.076
<v Speaker 3>copy paper to FTX realizes things are not going well

0:27:57.076 --> 0:27:58.556
<v Speaker 3>and they say, we'd like you to pay our bill

0:27:58.596 --> 0:28:01.796
<v Speaker 3>in full right now instead of normally gets paid every

0:28:01.796 --> 0:28:04.996
<v Speaker 3>sixty days. That's not there's nothing fraudulent about that. But

0:28:05.236 --> 0:28:07.436
<v Speaker 3>now this creditor might have gotten more than their fair

0:28:07.476 --> 0:28:10.356
<v Speaker 3>share than someone else, right, So that's another kind of

0:28:10.396 --> 0:28:12.716
<v Speaker 3>place where you'd have a clawback. You'd say, well, wait

0:28:12.716 --> 0:28:14.316
<v Speaker 3>a minute, we have to get all the money back

0:28:14.396 --> 0:28:16.916
<v Speaker 3>on place and give everyone their fair share. You don't

0:28:16.916 --> 0:28:19.236
<v Speaker 3>get to paid in full, right. So I think the

0:28:19.316 --> 0:28:23.916
<v Speaker 3>question with Sam's parents here is, you know, were these

0:28:23.956 --> 0:28:27.556
<v Speaker 3>fraudulent transfers? And obviously the allegation is yes, that they

0:28:28.196 --> 0:28:30.716
<v Speaker 3>knew or should have known that this money that came

0:28:30.756 --> 0:28:34.836
<v Speaker 3>to them was not legitimate. What's the punchline? That is

0:28:34.956 --> 0:28:38.596
<v Speaker 3>just a totally different standard than a criminal standard to

0:28:38.676 --> 0:28:41.876
<v Speaker 3>say that they should have understood that something was awry

0:28:42.116 --> 0:28:45.036
<v Speaker 3>or that they got money that they didn't really deserve. Right,

0:28:45.356 --> 0:28:47.516
<v Speaker 3>did they earn that for some reason? What were they

0:28:47.556 --> 0:28:52.276
<v Speaker 3>doing that justified these huge payments. That's different than they

0:28:52.476 --> 0:28:56.436
<v Speaker 3>knowingly participated in the crime, and they themselves did things

0:28:56.476 --> 0:28:58.756
<v Speaker 3>in further owns of it. So I don't think you

0:28:58.796 --> 0:29:01.996
<v Speaker 3>can read from this civil lawsuit that charges against them

0:29:02.116 --> 0:29:06.076
<v Speaker 3>are likely, But I also don't think it's impossible. There

0:29:06.076 --> 0:29:09.956
<v Speaker 3>are allegations that Sam's mother in particular, told him to

0:29:10.076 --> 0:29:15.076
<v Speaker 3>hide certain donor identity information in connection with campaign contributions.

0:29:15.436 --> 0:29:17.716
<v Speaker 3>That's a little if that's true, that's kind of a

0:29:17.716 --> 0:29:20.556
<v Speaker 3>suggestion that she committed a crime. And of course his

0:29:20.636 --> 0:29:24.076
<v Speaker 3>father was involved in the business itself. So could they

0:29:24.116 --> 0:29:26.556
<v Speaker 3>be charged. I think time will tell, but I wouldn't

0:29:26.556 --> 0:29:27.716
<v Speaker 3>read too much into this lawsuit.

0:29:29.316 --> 0:29:33.436
<v Speaker 1>Well, michaelis Rebecca Ramolstein. I am excited to cover the

0:29:33.476 --> 0:29:34.956
<v Speaker 1>trial and check in with both of you.

0:29:35.156 --> 0:29:37.076
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Alja anytime.

0:29:38.756 --> 0:29:41.716
<v Speaker 2>This episode of Judging Sam was hosted by Lydia, Jean Kott,

0:29:42.996 --> 0:29:47.076
<v Speaker 2>Catherine Gerardeau and Nisha Venken produced this show. Sophie Crane

0:29:47.156 --> 0:29:50.476
<v Speaker 2>is our editor. Our music was composed by Matthias Bossi

0:29:50.636 --> 0:29:54.396
<v Speaker 2>and John Evans of stell Wagons Symphonette. Judging Sam is

0:29:54.396 --> 0:29:57.756
<v Speaker 2>a production of Pushkin Industries. Got a question or comment

0:29:57.796 --> 0:30:01.836
<v Speaker 2>for me, There's a website for that ATR podcast dot com.

0:30:02.276 --> 0:30:07.996
<v Speaker 2>That's atr podcast dot com to find more Pushkin podcasts.

0:30:07.996 --> 0:30:12.076
<v Speaker 2>Listen on the iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen

0:30:12.116 --> 0:30:15.756
<v Speaker 2>to your podcasts. If you'd like to access bonus episodes

0:30:15.916 --> 0:30:18.596
<v Speaker 2>and listen ad free, don't forget to sign up for

0:30:18.636 --> 0:30:22.596
<v Speaker 2>a Pushkin Plus subscription at pushkin dot fm, slash Plus,

0:30:23.036 --> 0:30:29.756
<v Speaker 2>or on our Apple Show page