WEBVTT - Boeing Max Is Back, Cash Generation to Return in 2021: Ferguson

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. Well, I know what keeps

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Boeing flying higher, and that is the Boeing Max, which

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 1>has been cleared to fly by the f A A.

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>George Ferguson, let's bring you in senior aerospace, defense and

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>airlines analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. You know what, twenty months

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in the making, and there were a few hurdles along

0:00:36.520 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the way. But twenty months is that good enough time frame?

0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Is that sort of reasonable? Booing would have opted for

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a much shorter time frame, So I don't know. Hopefully

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>things like the Max grunning don't become regular occasions, so

0:00:52.920 --> 0:00:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we have I guess timing for it. I think Bowing

0:00:56.640 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 1>again would have wanted to be much shorter. And frank

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>I think if if they would have been more focused

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 1>on the problem in earlier days, it wouldn't have taken

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>as long, George, what does it mean from a cash

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>respective here to get this thing approved? It's my understanding

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that Bowing doesn't get paid until they deliver the aircraft. Yeah,

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>so you know, we think that what this UH could

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:22.479
<v Speaker 1>provide up is a chance for going to be cash positive. Uh.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 1>You know what we're anticipating as boone could deliver up

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the thirty matches a month, so probably deliver maybe three

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>and sixty airplanes next year. I think you need to

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>see China authorized the airplane and Chinese airlines be willing

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to take some airplanes because Chinese air travels bouncing back

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 1>faster than any around the world. Bowing has four and

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 1>fifty of these airplanes on the ground right now. We

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.480
<v Speaker 1>estimate the cash value of those airplanes, besides the deposit

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>they've already received from airlines, is north of twelve billion dollars.

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So from a cash generation standpoint, this this really changes. UH,

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this changes the cash Outlooking Bowing, how many were ordered,

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>how many will be delivered, and how many orders were canceled? George,

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>So we've seen some cancelations. I don't have all those

0:02:10.880 --> 0:02:13.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers for the right the tip of my fingers here,

0:02:13.040 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>but we've seen some cancelations, but largely from less soars.

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Less oars are usually the people to cancel if they

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.639
<v Speaker 1>have any sort of out because less oars by airplanes

0:02:23.639 --> 0:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>in the hopes that there's not going to be enough

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 1>airplanes in the world and they can come in when

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>they when they buy speculative and they come in, then

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they offer those airplanes to airlines that are need to

0:02:31.960 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>lift that world just doesn't exist for the next bunch

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>of years. And so if you're a less or and

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>he would a shot to cancel, you did. We're more

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.920
<v Speaker 1>concerned about deferrals right. Airlines will definitely ask bowing to

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>slow down deliveries to the airlines. You don't see that um,

0:02:47.680 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, and sort of as cancelations because those are

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>quiet discussions they're having behind behind the scenes, and but

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>we know those are going on. We've heard even companies

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:00.359
<v Speaker 1>like Southwest pushing out some of their deliveries and that's

0:03:00.360 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>why we think, you know, if Boling could deliver thirty

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:08.160
<v Speaker 1>months of max is, that still would be a little

0:03:08.160 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>bit less than sorry, a little bit more than half

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 1>of what there toptic delivery rates would have been back

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>inten when they're planning to go to fifty seven, so

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that the pain is still large, that the industry is

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>nowhere near sort of those heavy days of night. But again,

0:03:28.639 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the real authorization gets them back into the

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>business of delivering their most important cash generating airplane, which

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>is which is very important. George, you mentioned China. Where

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.760
<v Speaker 1>are we in terms of or where is bowling in

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of getting approval to fly in China because you

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:47.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned their air traffic is coming back more so than

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world. So we haven't seen any

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>reports out of the Chinese authorities about what they're ready

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.680
<v Speaker 1>to whether they're ready to let the Max fly again

0:03:56.720 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in China. And I suspect that this part of this

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>question maybe wrapped around trade issues as well. Right you know,

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>China and the US not really very happy with each

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>other right now on the trade front, and so one

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:13.400
<v Speaker 1>of the things we're looking at is as a as

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a the president potential administration looks like it's going to

0:04:17.440 --> 0:04:21.280
<v Speaker 1>change in Washington. You could have a Biden presidency. Is

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a potential approachment with the U S and China that

0:04:25.279 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>could allow airplanes to start get delivered back into China.

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.600
<v Speaker 1>You remember, there's a there's a trying to trade deal

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that was signed by the Trump administration. The Chinese don't

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>look like they were fulfilling the purchases that they said

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>they would. Seems impossible for them to do it now.

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>We also wonder if that trade deal might not get

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of re energized and pushed a year, and that

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.960
<v Speaker 1>as well could be could be a spur to get

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 1>more airplanes delivered into China. The Chinese absolutely need to

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.680
<v Speaker 1>be taking gooing airplanes to meet the terms of that

0:04:56.760 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>trade deal. But right now that trade deals in some

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of dove land. Sarah Pontac, who is still with

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Wilson Studio, the Chinese yuan is trading off shore at

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>six fifty seventy. We've literally seen it full off a

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>fifth in the last you know, a few weeks. It

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 1>was at seven but higher than seven seven twenty at

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:20.280
<v Speaker 1>some point earlier this year. What's behind this water Stratagists saying, right,

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>we really have the lowest sense about June. Just to

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>put this in historical perspective, what strategists are saying is

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that some of this does have to do with the

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>outcome of the presidential election. Sure, we are still dealing

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>with the contested election, but the idea that you're going

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to have a Biden presidency and a return more so

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>to geo political status quo, and where we still might

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>have some tensions back and forth with US and China,

0:05:44.560 --> 0:05:47.400
<v Speaker 1>even on the trade front, it likely will not look

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like it did under the President Trump administration. So that

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>is really coming to gear on this also just the

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:58.160
<v Speaker 1>fact that if we look at the Chinese economy, we

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.240
<v Speaker 1>have seen a lift late. They do seem to have

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:05.960
<v Speaker 1>gotten the virus under control more so than Western countries

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:08.400
<v Speaker 1>like Europe in the US as well, that could be

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>playing playing a role to But mostly what I typically

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>here is bringing it back to geopolitical tensions and the

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:18.960
<v Speaker 1>results of the election to hey, George. Longer term for Boeing, here,

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>what's the hit to you know, their reputation in the marketplace,

0:06:23.760 --> 0:06:26.160
<v Speaker 1>their competitive position in the marketplace. I mean, I know

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it's essentially a duopoly air Bus and Boeing, But as

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>some permanent or maybe at least some long term competitive

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 1>damage been done to the Boeing company and its products,

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I think for for sure for the next bunch of years.

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>You know this hurts for reputational standpoint, I guess in

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>time it sort of it seems like all things sade,

0:06:47.240 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know. I think a bunch of years ago before

0:06:49.440 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the Max with the n G and the air Bus

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>CEO for those of us that do inside baseball on airplane,

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.919
<v Speaker 1>that's the that's the immediate predecessors to the latest airplanes.

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 1>The seven thirty seven looked like it had a slight

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>advantage over the old Airbus CEO. They had a couple

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of extra seats and their efficiency seemed to be a

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit better, and so they look like they had

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a slight advantage. In the world we're in now, it

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>looks like Airbus might have a slight advantage and the

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 1>narrow body air aircraft arena with the three Neo, which

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>had larger fan sizes, a little better efficiency, and it's

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>prepared to take those bigger fan sizes in the future.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think bowings at a point where they really

0:07:33.360 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>need to think about the competitiveness of the seven thirty seven,

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and they need to guard their reputation, and so I

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>think that they got to start thinking about how they're

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna come forth with a new narrow body seven thirty

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>seven and one that can be maybe get another leg

0:07:49.440 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>up on Airbus. Of course, Airbus won't let that go

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>without a without a fighting shore. George, who is responsible

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>for getting people into the plane. Is that the airlines

0:07:57.440 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>who have already ordered and used the on Pready seven Max.

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Or is it up to Bowing to put a campaign

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 1>into the works that makes it seem like it's a

0:08:04.960 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>great airplane to write on. I think it will be

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>both right. There's some airlines that are absolutely bowing customers.

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>They fly all bowing fleets. It's absolutely in their interest

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>to get customers comfortable with the Max, their buyers of

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the Max. To even switch to the to an airbust

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>product would would sort of, you know, create a lot

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of upheaval these companies, companies like Southwest, companies like Ryan Air.

0:08:26.840 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, Boeing, even though they're one

0:08:29.440 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>removed from the flying public, they really need to bolster

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the reputation of this airplane, and the airplane has really

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 1>been reviewed extensively by the f a A. I think

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:43.079
<v Speaker 1>they've got to bring that forward to the consumer. And

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the training regiment for getting pilots back in the cockpit

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>on the Max is a little more intense, and it

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 1>would be for a typical what we call typewriting um

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>type similar typewrated airplane, and so I think Bowing Boeing

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.079
<v Speaker 1>and the airlines need to bring forth this information to

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the flying public could be comfortable flying the airplane again

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and they don't suffer any demand problems because of that. Hey, sir,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:08.959
<v Speaker 1>I just want to brought more broadly, what do you

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>think are the kind of next catalyst for investors? What

0:09:12.559 --> 0:09:14.320
<v Speaker 1>are the investors looking at? Now? We've kind of gotten

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>through you know, some we've gotten through earnings, we kind

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>of know where the FED is, where you've got some

0:09:19.240 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>idea of the vaccine timing. What do you think the

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:24.240
<v Speaker 1>market's looking at? I'd say, as of right now, likely

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what's going to be the next catalyst for any maybe

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>short term moves in the market would be the development

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:33.319
<v Speaker 1>in the trajectory of COVID nineteen cases and restrictions. We

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>have not gotten to the point where restrictions have really

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 1>been ramped up to the point where we're going to

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 1>see a drastic effect on an economy like we saw

0:09:41.040 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>back in March. But what's going to happen as we

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>get into the winter months. Granted though you are able

0:09:47.120 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>to look further out, knowing that there is a vaccine,

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>there and on that front, that means there are very

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>high expectations for a growth rebound, not just on the

0:09:55.280 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>economic front, but when it comes to earnings too. If

0:09:57.559 --> 0:10:00.839
<v Speaker 1>you look at expectations for one off its Q one

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Q two. Granted you have much easier comps because we

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>saw numbers just fall off a cliff this year in

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the wake of the coronavirus in that first quarantine. But

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:12.559
<v Speaker 1>if we do not see markets, especially cyclical areas of

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the market, because that's where the most year over year

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 1>growth is really expected, if that doesn't live up to expectations,

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>that could certainly provide a catalyst for some volatility and

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>some moving around here. At the point that we got

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>inventories crude oil inventories that came in much much less

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>than expected. The market was looking for one point two

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>four million barrels. We got seven sixty nine, and that's

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 1>giving another little boost to the price of oil zero,

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>which is now you know, close to forty two dollars

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>a barrel. But we're really just in this range, and

0:10:41.040 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I guess OPAK is the next catalyst there. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.439
<v Speaker 1>When we look at oil, it's pretty amazing to see

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:48.920
<v Speaker 1>we have a third day of gains today w t

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I crude oil up more than one also on track

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.240
<v Speaker 1>for a third week of gains. So we have seen

0:10:54.280 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>this sustained move higher. Right now we look at w

0:10:56.360 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>t I crude oil barrel that's the highest and September.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.959
<v Speaker 1>So we have not been able to completely break out,

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but it does seem as though OPEC and its allies

0:11:06.320 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>do at least they're aware of the issues right now

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on the table as it relates to demand. However, again

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>there is just plenty of optimism and the focus really

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 1>here on that is on the positive side. Okay, Sarah contact,

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us. We always appreciate

0:11:23.160 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on the markets from a cross asset perspective.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Pontac cross As reporter for Bloomberg News and George Ferguson,

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Senior Aerospace and Airlines Analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. We get

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>up to speed on the Boeing News. We appreciate you.

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>We've heard a lot about Sparks this year. They've become

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the vehicle of choice for people to raise and then

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 1>hopefully look for a company to go public with. Well,

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>one of those companies that went public via a successful

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.440
<v Speaker 1>spak yesterday, it was EOS and it is trading today

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:57.480
<v Speaker 1>on the NAZAC. E O s E is the ticker

0:11:57.920 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's of more than eleven percent right now. So

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>EOS Energy Enterprises is the full title and the CEO

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>is Joe mastra Angelo. So Joe explained to what first,

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>what EOS Energy Enterprises does. Yeah, so thanks for the

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>time today. We're we're a stationary energy storage company that

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>focuses on helping take out the intermittency of renewables and

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the power grid, micro grid applications and eventually a residential

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>um system. Just to clarified, do you mean it like

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a battery company, Yes, we're bad. We're battery company that

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we build zinc bromean based batteries for stationary energy storage. Alright,

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 1>so zinc based energy storage battery. That's different from what

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I think most of the markets used to, which is

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 1>um you know, a lithium ion battery. Tell us the

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>difference between the two and maybe the advantages of your

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 1>product versus the traditional I guess lithium ion batteries. Yes, so,

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:56.599
<v Speaker 1>so first off, you start off with the with the

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>with the raw materials that go into the battery, which

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>are all earth abundant no conflict materials, no rare earths,

0:13:02.920 --> 0:13:06.080
<v Speaker 1>no toxic materials in the battery widely available so very

0:13:06.160 --> 0:13:10.320
<v Speaker 1>limited um supply chain constraints. The battery is not only

0:13:10.840 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>sustainable throughout its lifetime, where it can operate from temperatures

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>as low as minus twenty degree C up to fifty

0:13:18.360 --> 0:13:21.680
<v Speaker 1>degrees C, so very wide operate upbrating range without any

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:25.000
<v Speaker 1>um incremental heating or cooling. And then lastly, at the

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>end of its useful life in fifteen to twenty years,

0:13:27.559 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the battery is fully recyclable back back to its original

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 1>components to be reused in something else. Sounds pretty phenomenal.

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Why did you decide to go public via a spack

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.839
<v Speaker 1>and you know who's involved in the spat Yeah, so

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>so so it's a great question. So we um were

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>were We worked with b Riley Financial. We went through

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the you know, we were we were in the midst

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of a fundraising round and had met with the team

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.679
<v Speaker 1>from b Riley and we really found a good, a

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.160
<v Speaker 1>good mesh up in what they saw the strategy of

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 1>our company, in the capital that we could get to

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>to grow the company. So as we looked the options

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:03.079
<v Speaker 1>in front of us, this was the best way for

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>us to get the story out about how we're going

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to grow the company for the future. Have a partner

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:10.680
<v Speaker 1>and sponsor who believed in the strategy of the company

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and coming out of this back now we have enough

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>capital to grow the company over the long term and

0:14:14.679 --> 0:14:17.880
<v Speaker 1>take it to profitability and casual positive So, Joe, when

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:20.280
<v Speaker 1>people think of, you know, battery storage, sometimes I think

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla. Is Tesla a potential customer of years or

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>a competitor of yours? How did they How do you

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of position yourself visa be Tesla? Yeah, so, so

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>when you think about Tesla UM, we we both compete

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>in the same space. It's a it's a very wide

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>space when you look at the applications UM that we

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 1>go after. You know, when you think about lithium IAM,

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:43.600
<v Speaker 1>which is the core of the of the of the

0:14:43.680 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Tesla product, and other and other competitors out there, very

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.239
<v Speaker 1>competitive when you when you're under two hours of discharge

0:14:50.240 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>from from the system, So using the system to charge

0:14:53.040 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>up and then putting that power back on the system

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>in zero to two hours beca my entighly competitive. The

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>way our company was founded and the way our technology

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>is developed over the last twelve years. Is we do

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:06.480
<v Speaker 1>longer duration discharge, so we can do anything from three

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>hours up to twelve hours of energy usage. And when

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you get above the four hour mark, we're highly competitive

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 1>against any other technology out in the marketplace. It's a

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of it's almost like a series of churches, right

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>You you belong to one or you belong to the other.

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>You sort of pick your poison and that's it. Right. Well,

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, the energy the energy industry is always

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>going to have a mix of technologies to be able

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>to deliver the demands that you know that we all

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 1>that we all expect from modern life. And we're one

0:15:36.800 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of those technologies that fits into a very large segment

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of the market. So I think you could see both.

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think it's it's a it's a

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's an either or at an end. So Joe who

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>gives a sense of kind of who your customers are? Right? So,

0:15:51.920 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>so we we we we have systems in the field

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>now with some of the um per eminent utilities in

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States. We have test systems with energy. We're

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>working with PFC and g so we work across utilities landscape.

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 1>We also do work with renewable renewable power companies company

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>called pecka t. We just announced a large agreement with

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>them a couple of weeks ago. And then we also

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>do micrograde applications. You know, we're we're doing a micrograde

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>application working through the Shell Foundation in Nigeria where we

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.800
<v Speaker 1>really see the technology being great in that application because

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:26.800
<v Speaker 1>of the safety and operability of it to be able

0:16:26.840 --> 0:16:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to power remote villages and be able to bring power

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 1>to the people in the world that don't have it. Joe,

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>final questions, we don't have much time, but what will

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you do with the money where I eased in particular,

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>so uh go from a company that has a proven

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>product in the manufacturing process to a scale company. So

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot we'll go into scaling up our factory in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania,

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>where we're gonna we're gonna increase the throughput of that facility,

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>building out our team both on the commercial side and

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>also on the project side, and then lastly financing projects

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>where we look at this is a big opportunity to

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.680
<v Speaker 1>be able to accelerate the application of energy storage in

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:06.199
<v Speaker 1>the marketplace by bringing our own financing to the projects. Hey, Joe,

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much. For joining us to really appreciate congratulations

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>on getting public Joe Master Angelo, CEO of EOS Energy

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 1>Enterprises that went public yesterday via US back Dog Duncan

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>almost a funny amail to talk a little bit about

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 1>these housing numbers which have been on fire today and

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.440
<v Speaker 1>also most recently, so Doug talked to us, how do

0:17:27.560 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>we continue to have such demand when people are, you know,

0:17:31.960 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>out of a job to the tune of ten million

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of them. The job loss has been heavily concentrated in

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>work categories which are hourly wage workers in the service sector,

0:17:43.640 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 1>particularly in areas that are discretionary spending by middle and

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>upper income households. Those UH workers tend to be more

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>heavily concentrated in apartments as opposed to ownership. So if

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.879
<v Speaker 1>you are a person with a salary UH and that

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:04.760
<v Speaker 1>job has been stable, you're not in the service sector.

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:07.480
<v Speaker 1>With the interest rates where they are, this is a

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>great time to consider locking in a long term, very low,

0:18:10.960 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>historically low interest rate and and buy a house. So, Doug,

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>are we revising up our view of or your your

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>view of kind of just housing starts and and just

0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole housing market, because it just seems to be

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>an extraordinarily bright spot and an otherwise very difficult economy. Yeah,

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:33.320
<v Speaker 1>there's two or three things going on. One is the

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.680
<v Speaker 1>millennials are at peak home buying and they tend to

0:18:36.760 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>be more in the salaried space, so they're younger, they've

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>been a building families. They're now thinking about buying homes

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 1>moving out of apartments. Second one is that to the

0:18:47.920 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>extent that you live in an apartment in a densely

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>populated area and you have concerns about the continuing related

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.119
<v Speaker 1>to the virus, this might be a great time to

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>be moving toward the suburban markets and less density. And

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>then the third is if you're an older household that

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>already owns a home and could conceptually sell that house,

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>you might not be so anxious to do that today

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>because people would come to visit the house walk through

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>carrying the virus, and you might be on a higher

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>risk category. So to supply in the existing homes is

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:25.399
<v Speaker 1>actually at historic lows, leading to very strong starts and

0:19:25.560 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>construction of new homes to meet that shift in demand.

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Are we beginning to see that slowed down? Was today

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the first sign of that where we saw building permits

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>come in flat for October, much less than the one

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 1>pot anticipated, and September's number was revised lower to four

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:46.480
<v Speaker 1>point seven. So building permits obviously the first sign of

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>future building. Yes, I think that's that's an accurate assessment.

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>One thing to recall is that the virus really hit

0:19:55.680 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the economy in the March April time frame, which is

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 1>typically the peak homebuying season in the year. So we

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>moved what's the normal cyclical peak back in the year

0:20:07.200 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to the to the late summer and early fall. So

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>we've been writing that shift of the of the demand cycle,

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and now I think we're starting to see the work

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:22.160
<v Speaker 1>off of that. To your point about the flattening out

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of permits, Doug, how's the mortgage original origination market today?

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>Are lenders writing mortgages? How tough is it to get

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage? How's that looking? Well? The criteria to qualify

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for a mortgage have been tightened with the concern about

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:47.480
<v Speaker 1>employment characteristics, but not not dramatically tightened, and the volumes

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of business that are being done are going to be

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>all time records. From a nominal dollar perspective, we expect

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 1>in four point one trillion dollars of mortgage production uh.

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course lot of that, about two point six

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:05.960
<v Speaker 1>trillion of that will be refinancing activity. That is, people

0:21:06.000 --> 0:21:08.240
<v Speaker 1>who already have a mortgage who have taken advantage of

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>these historically low interest rates to refinance it at a

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>lower rate. That will continue into next year. The total

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 1>numbers will fall up, but they will still be at

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>very high levels. And one thing to bear in mind

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.439
<v Speaker 1>is even if pen your treasury rates were to move up,

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>which they have a little bit recently, the spreads in

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>that market suggests that lenders could narrow the spreads and

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>hold mortgage rates where they are, which would continue the

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>benefits to consumers and through next year. Doug, what's happening

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to credit quality out there? Well, the one question on

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the credit quality front is relates to the forbearances for

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>those who do have a mortgage and did lose a

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>job or saw a serious truncation of their income through

0:21:59.040 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>reduced overtime time our bonuses. So there was an initial

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:07.520
<v Speaker 1>surge in people who applied for the very easy terms

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to take forbearance. Actually a lot of those folks were

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>doing that on a precautionary basis. We've done some surveys

0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of them and they said well, we we took it

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:19.800
<v Speaker 1>because it was easier to take on the chance that

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we might lose our job. But now the job seems

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.960
<v Speaker 1>to be stable, so we've we've become current again. There's

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 1>still a segment of borrowers who are in forbearance have

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>lost jobs or truncated income that we will start to

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>see play out in the first quarter of next year,

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 1>and in many cases, if they can't bring a current

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the loan will be modified to payment terms that they

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 1>can that they can maintain. Dog thank you for the updates. Housing,

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>of course always on our mind. Dug Duncan, Chief columnists

0:22:49.080 --> 0:22:54.040
<v Speaker 1>add Funny May joining us there. Well, as we all

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>work from home, learn from home. It's putting additional focus

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 1>on cyber security, and our next guest says that quantum

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:06.600
<v Speaker 1>technology is going to accelerate that concerned. Alan Mechler, managing

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.440
<v Speaker 1>partner for Asamam Adventures, also CEO of three d R Holdings,

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 1>joins us here. Alan talk to us about quantum technology

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.679
<v Speaker 1>and kind of what that is and what that may

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:26.160
<v Speaker 1>mean for cybersecurity going forward. It's quite complicated. Okay, we've

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:31.680
<v Speaker 1>got seven minutes here. Yes, Well, the the the quantum

0:23:31.760 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>revolution is upon US, I should say quantum technology revolution.

0:23:36.280 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>The word quantum could be obviously used for a lot

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of things, but quantum computing and quantum technology are going

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 1>to be able to do calculations and solve problems and

0:23:51.240 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for industries um but also will cause problems because the

0:23:55.480 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>computing power is um, almost science fiction like in terms

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>of how much it can do compared to the largest

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:10.480
<v Speaker 1>supercomputer today and what that means of course from cybersecurity

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 1>and particularly financial security keywords, passwords or whatever, uh cyber

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>cyber Uh, there's tremendous worry about what what could happen

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>when when these computers so to speak come online, which

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 1>still is several years away. What about now? What is

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the situation right now? Well, right now there technically is

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>not a quantum computer as what is in terms of

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>what's projected. The basis for defining a quantum computer or

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>the ability for it to do whatever it needs you

0:24:54.440 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do, is based on the number of cubits,

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 1>which is a measurement um in terms of what bits

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>were bits are to a computer today which I think

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we're all familiar with. Cubits are what are the equivalent

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>for a quantum computer. It is estimated that at least

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a thousand cubits would have to be created or programmed

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>from any manufacturer for a quantum computer to be online

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and ready to go at this particular point in time.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Company like IBM, for example, UM has as it's working

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 1>towards creating a quantum computer, has about fifty to sixty

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that have been have been programmed. UM. Now, one can

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>do things with that, but until you get to a thousand,

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>which probably according to IBM and recently chatting with Bob Sutter,

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>who who runs the program up at IBM, UH, that's

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 1>probably projected for them two thousand twenty three UM to

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>get to a situation where a quantum computer would be

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>totally online, ready to go, we're projecting two thousand, uh,

0:26:20.840 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>two thousand thirty, so you know, ten years from now.

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 1>So Alan, what we've seen over the last I don't

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:30.360
<v Speaker 1>know decade or so, but certainly accelerated over the last

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>four years is is kind of a cold technology cold

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>war between China and the West as it relates to

0:26:38.359 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>quantum technology. Is that something that is also developing upon

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>those lines. Actually, I'd say it's terrifying um in terms

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>of what China is supposedly doing compared to what we're

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:57.560
<v Speaker 1>doing or other so called Western countries um neutral countries

0:26:57.600 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>around the world. We obviously so they don't have complete

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:05.639
<v Speaker 1>information about China's investment, but we do know that they

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>have created the equivalent of campuses or universities, I think

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:15.080
<v Speaker 1>tanks just just to study what what what what they

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>can do or what could be done with quantum. My

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>understanding is they've invested well north of five to ten

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars already and are literally driven to dominate in

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>this area. And unfortunately, um forgetting whatever your politics, my politics,

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>or anyone's politics might be. Instead of worrying about you

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>know which side of the fence turon a Democrat Republican,

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this country should be worrying more about what the Chinese

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>are doing in uh quantum technology and and uh we

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:59.040
<v Speaker 1>should really get cracking. I know that the Biden administration

0:27:59.200 --> 0:28:04.159
<v Speaker 1>is already an bounced several hundred million dollars towards further

0:28:04.600 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>research into quantum um, but that's a really just a

0:28:10.000 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 1>pittance in terms of what's probably needed compared to what

0:28:13.640 --> 0:28:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese are Because whoever has dominance in quantum or

0:28:17.800 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>gets their first could really raise havoc with um being

0:28:23.440 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>able to crack computer systems, financial networks and and the like.

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So needless to say, that's pretty terrifying. If in fact

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese have saved years and years and years and

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>developed developing fighter planes stealth technology. Just think what they

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>can do if they come up with this next type

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>of computing power um, which they will at this point

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>way before we will in this country. Well, you have

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to tell us what you're invested in so we can

0:28:55.600 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>watch out for the future. All right, Well, it's it's

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>definitely uh. As I say, the press hasn't really picked

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>us up yet at all. You know, what companies are

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you invested in? Alan Well? Um. In terms of myself,

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I do two things. I create a research in this

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>area called Inside Quantum Technology, and we also do events.

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.440
<v Speaker 1>We just had an event with six people from thirty

0:29:28.480 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>countries around the world with the seventies speakers UM. But

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of investing, the the investing that I do

0:29:37.400 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>on a venture capital basis, it's a different thing for

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 1>quantum because any anyone who is and and there are

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.280
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions being invested every month in this uh

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in this in this area. But you really have to

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.760
<v Speaker 1>look out ten you know, ten fifteen twenty years if

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you make an investment and venture capital. H So, while

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>I cover this from a media perspective, I'm not really investing,

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:07.160
<v Speaker 1>although certainly I'm I'm watching because my horizon is more

0:30:07.280 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like five years or seven years, not ten fifteen twenty years.

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, And for anyone interested, there is a list

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of the types of companies that you do invest in

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of private equity in sort of an exitent

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:23.360
<v Speaker 1>fight ten years at your website, asimov Ventures dot com.

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to you for joining us today. Fascinating discussion

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>there with Alan Mecker of Asimov Adventures and decades of

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:36.600
<v Speaker 1>experience in the most modern elements of computing and computing technology.

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:48.120
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at

0:30:48.160 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:54.800
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio.