WEBVTT - Tech News - Time Flies in VR

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>and a love of all things tech. And this is

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>the tech news for Thursday, May two thousand twenty one.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:26.920
<v Speaker 1>If I sound a little different, because I'm actually in

0:00:26.960 --> 0:00:31.319
<v Speaker 1>the studio today though I'm using my old equipment that

0:00:31.360 --> 0:00:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I use at home. But yeah, I'm in a different

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>recording environment. Just in case it sounds a little odd,

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the news. Just as in Tuesday's episode,

0:00:40.479 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>we will start today with some stories about global politics

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>and global tech companies. And as I mentioned earlier this week,

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies are really feeling pressure points from lots

0:00:50.159 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>of different sources due to global politics and policies. Now,

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that pressure comes from, you know, a government or

0:00:57.760 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>a group of governments, and sometimes it comes from advocacy groups.

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>This particular story is about the latter. Numerous groups have

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>urged Google to pull out from a cloud computing project

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in Saudi Arabia. The concern is that Google's efforts would

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:18.119
<v Speaker 1>help enable a regime that has committed human rights violations. So,

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>in other words, Google might make it easier for the

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Saudi government to hurt people. Those groups include Human Rights

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Watch and Amnesty International, and back in ten you might

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>remember the terrible story of the Saudi journalist Jamal ka Shoji,

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>who was murdered at the Saudi consulate in Instantabul, Turkey.

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh The CIA concluded that the Crown Prince Mohammed Ben

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Solomon ordered that assassination. That particular event drew a great

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>deal of attention towards Saudi Arabia and the Crown Prince,

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>and while by no means it was the only horrific

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>act attributable to the Saudi government, it is one that

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>stood out and the rights organizations argue that Google's cloud

0:02:02.920 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>product could allow the government to spy on its own

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>people as well as people visiting Saudi Arabia, It could

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>allow the government to limit freedom of expression, and it

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>could have a negative impact on due process. Humans Rights

0:02:16.800 --> 0:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Watch published a response from Google that said the company

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>had submitted its cloud project to an independent human rights

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>organization in order to identify possible points where that tool

0:02:27.720 --> 0:02:31.960
<v Speaker 1>could be abused, and that Google then quote took steps

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>to address matters identified as part of that review. In

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>the quote alright, I'm gonna chime in here now. Usually

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you could say that tools are neither good nor bad.

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.360
<v Speaker 1>It's all on how we use them. So a hammer

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>can be a useful construction tool, or it could be

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>used as a weapon. And while Google might identify obvious

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>points where they need to adjust their approach to try

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>and prevent abuse, the fact is that if someone gets

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.399
<v Speaker 1>hold of a tool and they want to use it destructively,

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>they typically will find a way to do that. And

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>usually it's a way that other folks just didn't anticipate

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 1>because they're looking at it from a preventive standpoint as

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>opposed to figuring out how you would use this to

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>actually attack someone. So my point is that I'm not

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>sure there is a way for Google to see this

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 1>project through while also maintaining, you know, a spotless image

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:30.280
<v Speaker 1>with regard to any abuses the saudiast might commit. It

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>feels a bit too close to them trying to assume

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>plausible deniability to me. But as of this recording, it

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>appears like that project is still for a go. It's

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>still still heading on. Moving over to Iran, the country's

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:48.800
<v Speaker 1>government has banned cryptocurrency mining for the next few months,

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in anticipation of increased demands in electricity usage. Iran has

0:03:54.080 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 1>issues with its electrical grid and has seen it's seen

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>it fail in the past due to high demand, so

0:04:02.440 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>they've had blackouts that have hit entire regions when energy

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>consumption was much higher than normal. They ban on bitcoin

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>mining and other cryptocurrency mining has already begun and it's

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.400
<v Speaker 1>going to last until September twenty two. Now, as I've

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 1>covered several times, cryptocurrencies that use a proof of work

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 1>approach to mining, which includes bitcoin, they suck up a

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of electricity. Now that's not necessarily by design. So

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>in the old days, a bitcoin was worth practically nothing.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 1>You might have heard the story about the guy who

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>used thousands of bitcoins to order a pizza, for example.

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Back in those days, the return on investment in bitcoin

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>mining was really low, so it didn't make sense to

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>have a big mining operation. You would spend more money

0:04:46.920 --> 0:04:50.040
<v Speaker 1>running it than you would in the proceeds you got

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>from mining. So a relatively small number of computers were

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.920
<v Speaker 1>actively mining on the bitcoin system. But as interest in

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the cryptocurrency grew, more people wanted to get in on it,

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and as demand increased. But the supply remains, you know,

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>pretty steady. Every ten minutes, some more bitcoins are released,

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>but it's not a huge amount. Well, that just meant

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>that the value of the currency grew, and as the

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>value went up, more people began to jump on board

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>to try and mind cryptocurrency because now mining was becoming profitable,

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and this led to the equivalent of a gold rush. Today,

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>massive computer networks attempt to be the first to mind

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the next block for the the bitcoins that are released

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:34.280
<v Speaker 1>when you verify a block of transactions. These computers are

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:38.159
<v Speaker 1>running on super fast processors. Typically they have state of

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the art graphics processing units or GPUs. That in turn

0:05:41.920 --> 0:05:44.240
<v Speaker 1>has had a big impact on the video game industry

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 1>because it becomes really hard to get the best graphics

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>card for your gaming rig because all the ding dang

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin miners are grabbing them. Add to that the energy

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.719
<v Speaker 1>needs you required to keep operations cool enough so that

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 1>your computers don't overheat, and you end up consuming more

0:06:00.160 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 1>electricity in bitcoin mining per year than the annual amount

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>of electricity used by some countries like Argentina. This has

0:06:08.520 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>been a big point in conversations about fossil fuels and

0:06:11.560 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>climate change, as not all bitcoin mining operations are dependent

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.040
<v Speaker 1>upon renewable energy sources, but it's also a strain on

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 1>utility infrastructure, as is the case with Iran, and according

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>to analytics firm Elliptic, around four and a half percent

0:06:26.360 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>of all bitcoin mining worldwide happens in Iran. With China

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 1>cracking down on cryptocurrency for various reasons which we covered

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, and now Iran putting the brakes on operations

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:41.359
<v Speaker 1>for several months, this could mean that the cryptocurrency market

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 1>will still have a few more bumps in the road

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>for you know, the near future. Now, let us pop

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>over to the UK where things are changing with regard

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>to Uber. For the first time, Uber has recognized the

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:57.840
<v Speaker 1>legitimacy of a union formed by UK workers who drive

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 1>for the company. The union g m B will be

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 1>able to stand as a representative for UK drivers and

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>negotiate deals with regard to stuff like earnings and benefits

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and pensions. This is a huge shift. Traditionally, Uber has

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>maintained that Uber drivers are not Uber employees, They're not

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Uber workers. Rather, Uber says these people are freelancers, their

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:27.560
<v Speaker 1>contract workers who work with Uber but not for Uber,

0:07:27.920 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and so argues Uber the company really only has obligations

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:35.679
<v Speaker 1>to provide benefits and such to corporate employees, the people

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>who work for Uber's offices. But several lawsuits have gradually

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:43.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of reshaped this issue, and the UK Supreme Court

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.880
<v Speaker 1>ruled that no, you know what, actually, Uber drivers should

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>be considered employees and they are thus entitled to those considerations.

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So now in the UK, the GMB and Uber will

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>meet every quarter to discuss driver issues and concerns, and

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Uber and GM will also meet to talk about Uber's

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>national living wage guarantee and what that looks like in

0:08:05.120 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the UK, as well as stuff like pensions. Drivers will

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have to sign up to join the union because membership

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is not automatic. Also, while this is potentially great news

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 1>for UK Uber drivers, the company has not made any

0:08:20.360 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>similar moves in other countries. There are a lot of

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 1>groups advocating for change, but I mean Uber actively campaigned

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>against that in California just recently. So so far, the

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>UK is the only spot where we're really seeing this

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of Uber working with you know, a union and

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and allowing their drivers to be known as employees. It's

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.760
<v Speaker 1>also good to remember the Uber is a company that

0:08:43.800 --> 0:08:47.959
<v Speaker 1>continues to lose money on a quarterly basis, in they

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>averaged at about a billion dollars per quarter. Actually, when

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>it was all said and done, they lost about six

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 1>point seven billion dollars in. Now, that was bad, but

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:59.839
<v Speaker 1>still better than twenty nineteen when they lost eight point

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>five one billion dollars. So yeah, Uper's future is one

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>that's really up in the air. The company keeps saying

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>that you know, they are on track for profitability. In fact,

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>up until the end of last year there was a

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:18.440
<v Speaker 1>hope that they were going to be able to to

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.680
<v Speaker 1>post a profit in but that did not happen, So

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe their year left to see. European rights organization including

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Privacy International, have filed complaints against a company called clear

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>View AI. That company specializes in facial recognition technology. The

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>complaints say that the company scrapes image data from various

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 1>websites and services and that this practice violates European privacy laws.

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:49.439
<v Speaker 1>Clear View AI has said that it has a database

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 1>of more than three billion facial images and the company

0:09:53.320 --> 0:09:59.079
<v Speaker 1>frequently scans content from sites and services like Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn,

0:09:59.320 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube. Then the company organizes that database and sells

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 1>access to it to various parties like other private companies

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>or with law enforcement agencies. So the advocacy groups say

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>that this practice goes far beyond what users expect when

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>they post on these websites, and that this leads to

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>not just an invasion of privacy concern, but the potential

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for harassment and wrongful accusations and more. This isn't the

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>first time groups have taken aim at clear View AI.

0:10:30.160 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>There are other inquiries and investigations going on in Australia, Canada,

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and the United States. Also, Hey, if you're curious, you

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>can actually go to clear views website and use tools

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to request any data that the company might have on you.

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You can also tell clear view AI if you want

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to have your face omitted from clients searches in the future.

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And if a lot of people did that, it would

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>really undermine the value of clear Views product. I'm not

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>telling you to do it, I'm just saying it's an option.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 1>On Tuesday, after our last tech News episode went live,

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.560
<v Speaker 1>which is always the way, vm Ware disclosed a security

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:17.199
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability in its v Center server tool, and simultaneously they

0:11:17.240 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>issued a patch to address that vulnerability. This tool lets

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>database administrators manage computer virtualization and let me give you

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:29.319
<v Speaker 1>a quick word on that in case you are unfamiliar

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>with that term. Virtualization allows you to virtually divide up

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the assets of a physical computer as if it were

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>more than one physical computer. Now, you might use virtualization

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so that your computer runs as if it were a

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>totally different type of computer running on a different operating system.

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:52.480
<v Speaker 1>That's one version of virtualization where you're not really dividing

0:11:52.480 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it up so much as you're having your computer kind

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of mimic a different type of machine because of this

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 1>virtual environment. Or you could use it to partition a

0:12:03.080 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 1>computer so that different partitions have no contact with one

0:12:07.280 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>another their siloed. This is important for the purposes of

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>data security and that kind of thing. Well, anyway, vm

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Whare says the vulnerability could mean that hackers would have

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to inject malware into servers running this kind

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.319
<v Speaker 1>of software. If there is a port on the server

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that connects out to the Internet, and a lot of servers,

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:29.200
<v Speaker 1>do you know, a lot of them connect out to

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.199
<v Speaker 1>the Internet in some way or another, So how bad

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is this vulnerability? Well, according to security analysts, if you

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>were to rank vulnerabilities on a scale of one being

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:44.320
<v Speaker 1>not very serious and tend being catastrophic. This one is

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:49.120
<v Speaker 1>a nine point eight. It is a critical vulnerability. Anyone

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.840
<v Speaker 1>who works on servers and uses this software that is

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the v Center Server tool should immediately get the patch

0:12:56.679 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and install it on those servers, or restrict access to

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>those servers, you know, disconnect them from the Internet until

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 1>they can be patched. It is that big of a deal.

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Instagram has been testing a feature in several countries for

0:13:12.480 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the past two years that it is now rolling out worldwide,

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's an option that users can select that lets

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>them hide the number of likes and views that they

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 1>get on any given post. For some on social media,

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>likes and views that's kind of like currency. For influencers.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It's a way to show relevance and potentially land sponsorship deals.

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 1>But judging your own value on how many likes or

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:41.480
<v Speaker 1>views you did or didn't get on a post isn't

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>necessarily healthy. I mean, I know, I have fixated on

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that a few times, and it's always been a bad idea.

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I mostly do it over on Twitter, where I'll make

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.559
<v Speaker 1>what I think was a great tweet and then I get,

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of grouchy when there aren't that many

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.560
<v Speaker 1>likes for it or shares or anything. Now, that's just

0:14:00.720 --> 0:14:05.079
<v Speaker 1>dumb of me to do that to myself. Now on Instagram,

0:14:05.080 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>people can choose to hide those numbers and just use

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the app to share photos without you know, thinking about

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.559
<v Speaker 1>whether the thing they posted was the best picture at

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the best time or whatever. And I think for a

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of users that's actually really helpful. Now, obviously, for influencers,

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>it's probably not something they're going to use very often,

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.280
<v Speaker 1>even though I think a few folks of the influencers

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>category might benefit from taking a break of quantifying their

0:14:33.000 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>own worth based on how people interact with their content.

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>But hey, I'm just a grumpy old dude who shakes

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>his fist at passing clouds. Right, I'm an old content

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.480
<v Speaker 1>creator who thinks sometimes it's good to kind of distance

0:14:46.520 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>yourself from that, because otherwise it can lead you down

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a pretty dark mental pathway. If you would like to

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:56.880
<v Speaker 1>activate this feature, then you can log into Instagram. You

0:14:56.920 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 1>can go to settings, You go to the posts section,

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and and you should see an option to hide like

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and view counts. Boom sordid. People will still be able

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to like and view your stuff, obviously, but you won't

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 1>have that number in plain sight, you know, mocking you

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>or nagging you to do better, which for me, I

0:15:17.640 --> 0:15:20.640
<v Speaker 1>mean that sounds ideal. It's not for everyone, but for

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 1>people like me, I think it's a great feature. Well,

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I've got a little bit more news to go, but

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>first let's take a quick break. We're back and hay,

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>do you use Twitter like a lot? And do you

0:15:42.680 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>rely on Twitter to do stuff like make connections, sell

0:15:46.600 --> 0:15:50.760
<v Speaker 1>your brand or try to get Neil Gaiman to notice you. Well,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>if you're like me, the answer to those things is yeah,

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and you probably feel a little sad about it, like

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I do. Anyway, Twitter has a new service coming aimed

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>just at people like you and me. It's their premium service,

0:16:06.200 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>so yes, that does mean you will have to pay

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to get access to these new features. Features like a

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:17.560
<v Speaker 1>bookmarking feature and an undo tweets feature, which sounds like

0:16:17.600 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>it's the closest thing we're ever going to get to,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>an edit button, and you know, there might be other

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.720
<v Speaker 1>features as well, but like, we don't know. Because all

0:16:25.760 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>this news comes from an app researcher named Jane man

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:33.240
<v Speaker 1>Chun Wong. She came across this information and shared it.

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Twitter itself has not yet commented on this planned service,

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>but apparently, at least right now, it has the name

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter Blue and the subscription is a low two dollars

0:16:44.880 --> 0:16:47.840
<v Speaker 1>n cents per month. This, by the way, is a

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>separate offering from the already announced subscription based service that

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is going to offer up that will allow you know,

0:16:56.480 --> 0:16:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Twitter users to set up a paid for tier of

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 1>access for their followers. So this would be like, if

0:17:04.160 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 1>I set this up, then followers who really liked me

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>could subscribe to this exclusive feed and get you know,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.440
<v Speaker 1>special data, special content that I'm only posting to that

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>version of my Twitter, and they're doing it for a

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>recurring fee, and Twitter takes a share of that subscription price.

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:26.679
<v Speaker 1>That's something you're not likely to see me use, because

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>let's face it, I'm not important enough and I would

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.720
<v Speaker 1>spend way too much time just trying to figure out

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.880
<v Speaker 1>what I could say in those like two dly characters

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>that would be worth paying for. But these efforts show

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>how Twitter is looking to diversify its revenue sources. The

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.840
<v Speaker 1>company has had issues attracting new users that that number

0:17:45.840 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 1>has kind of plateaued, which means it's tough to grow

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>revenue and generally speaking, in modern day business, that's a

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>bad thing. It's not good enough to make money. You

0:17:56.520 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>need to make more money than you made last year. Hi.

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:05.680
<v Speaker 1>Facebook has announced that the social media platform will begin

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.919
<v Speaker 1>to use its algorithm to counteract misinformation, which, you know,

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a nice change of pace, since that

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:17.199
<v Speaker 1>algorithm so far has really helped elevate and propagate misinformation.

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>The company says that now it will both label posts

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>appearing to contain misinformation and d prioritize those posts from

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>appearing in the feeds of other people, but it will

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>also lower the visibility of the users who are sharing

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>those posts. So if I start sharing posts that have

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 1>been found to contain outright lies and misinformation, what should

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>happen is that from that point forward, if I've done

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>it enough, all of my posts, not just the ones

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 1>containing misinformation, will start to show up in fewer feeds.

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So would be kind of like if I found myself

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in a glass cage of sadness that's sound proved, and

0:18:56.760 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>meanwhile that cage is in the middle of a big

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>old party, and that's going on all around me. I

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 1>could yell at the top of my lungs what's going on?

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Or you know I could I could try and spread

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 1>misinformation from inside my glass cage, or or even I

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>could just say I'm thinking of getting pizza tonight, and

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>folks around me wasn't here because Facebook's disincentivizing the spread

0:19:17.119 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of misinformation. There d prioritizing those messages so they don't

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>pop up for most people. And I actually feel like

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>this tactic, assuming the system works, is a pretty good one.

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>It helps cut down on the echo chamber effect, and

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>it means that the people who try and spread misinformation

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>purposefully are going to find their influence diminishing as a result. Now,

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.880
<v Speaker 1>the way this will work in practice is that Facebook

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.160
<v Speaker 1>will keep tabs on people who have repeatedly shared posts

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that Facebook fact checkers have flagged as containing misinformation, So

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>if you do that enough times, you'll find yourself essentially demoted.

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Do I think this is going to solve the problems

0:19:56.440 --> 0:20:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of misinformation spreading across on Facebook? Probably not. A lot

0:20:01.080 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>more has to happen for that to be a thing,

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>which might require a massive change in how advertisers work

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>with Facebook in order for that to come about, But

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be a step in the right direction. Possibly,

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll have to see how it actually plays out when

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>it's being put in use. Okay, let's go back to England,

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 1>shall we, because our penultimate story is one that's all

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:29.400
<v Speaker 1>about fusion. Stars are giant nuclear fusion reactors in which

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>elements fused together and in the process release enormous amounts

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>of energy. Or, as the somewhat apocryphal song goes, the

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>sun is a massive incandescent gas, a gigantic nuclear furnace

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>where hydrogen is built into helium and a temperature of

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:50.719
<v Speaker 1>billions of degrees. That's somewhat misleading, but still catchy. So

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 1>with with the son, you're talking about four hydrogen atoms

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that fused together to form a helium adam Well, scientists

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:00.840
<v Speaker 1>and engineers have been trying to make a sustainable, trollable,

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>usable fusion reactor here on Earth for years, and if

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they succeed, this could lead to an energy revolution. So

0:21:09.240 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>remember when I was talking about concerns about how much

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>electricity cryptocurrency requires, Well, if we have working fusion reactors,

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't be as big of a concern as long

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>as the actual infrastructure of power lines and transformers, you know,

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>all the physical stuff that conveys electricity. As long as

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that could hold up to the demand, we'd be pretty good.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Nuclear fusion, unlike nuclear fission, does not generate dangerous radioactive waste,

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>but nuclear fusion does have some big challenges. For example,

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:44.959
<v Speaker 1>to get fusion reactions, you're typically working with systems that

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>have to generate enormous amounts of heat and pressure. So

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about conditions that could be even more intense

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>than what you would find at the core of the sun.

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>That requires a lot of energy to do, which means

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that many prototype fusion reactors have encountered the problem that

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>it can take more energy to generate the fusion reaction

0:22:05.440 --> 0:22:07.840
<v Speaker 1>then you get out of the other side of it.

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Another challenge, one that some scientists in the UK think

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:14.879
<v Speaker 1>they've really overcome, has to do with exhaust gases that

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:18.679
<v Speaker 1>incredibly hot helium gas that gets generated as a result

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>of fusion. Now, these gases are in more than a

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred million degrees of celsius hot. I mean they are

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>insanely hot, hotter than the surface of the sun. Hot.

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>That means they're also going to cause a lot of

0:22:33.720 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 1>damage to elements of reactors as they exhaust out, like

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.880
<v Speaker 1>they come into contact with the sides of the reactor,

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:44.560
<v Speaker 1>they can start melting tiles, even tiles that are made

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:50.120
<v Speaker 1>out of very melt resistant materials like tungsten. So getting

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 1>fusion reactions efficient is one area of research and we've

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.080
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of progress there. And now finding a

0:22:56.080 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>way to cool those exhaust gases faster so that they

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>cause less where and tear is another big one. The

0:23:02.640 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>exhaust system the scientists developed has a cool name, which

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess that's fitting because it's cooling gas

0:23:09.600 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>and it is the super ex diverter. It diverts generated

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 1>helium from fusion reactions down a long pathway to cool

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and the cooling happens pretty fast. I mean like that

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 1>energy losses is quick, and because the helium is traveling

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>down sort of a straightaway, it's not banging into the

0:23:27.880 --> 0:23:31.280
<v Speaker 1>tiled sides of the reactor structure. And this is a

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>great step, but we're still looking at a long term

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:38.120
<v Speaker 1>implementation plan for fusion reactors. The estimate is that we're

0:23:38.160 --> 0:23:40.919
<v Speaker 1>not going to see a commercially viable fusion reactor for

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>at least another twenty years. So while they are promising

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.679
<v Speaker 1>and if they work out, they will transform the world,

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>we still have a lot of work to do to

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>address our energy needs in the meantime. Finally, let's talk

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about our perception of time. Now, we have all experienced

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we perceive time passing at different rates

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:07.200
<v Speaker 1>depending on what's going on. That our perception isn't a constant.

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>We're not like a reliable clock that is just ticking

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>down each second to incredible precision. So when you're in

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the middle of doing something that you don't really want

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to do, time just drags on. When you're enjoying yourself,

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 1>time zooms by I mean, we've got that phrase right.

0:24:23.760 --> 0:24:27.679
<v Speaker 1>Time flies when you're having fun. But now researchers have

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>seen through some experiments that in certain virtual reality experiences,

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a user's perception of time slows down, and the researchers

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:40.000
<v Speaker 1>believe that this is a fundamental aspect to the experience

0:24:40.000 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of VR that's not related to whether or not you're

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>enjoying yourself while you're in this virtual experience, but rather

0:24:47.440 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>it's the anchor point of the virtual reality experience itself.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, while you are in VR, you'll

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>perceive that a lot less time has passed for you.

0:24:57.640 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Then what the clock would tell you when you take

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the heads that off that lion clock. So here's how

0:25:03.400 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>they conducted the experiment. Test subjects were to complete a maze,

0:25:08.000 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, a virtual maze as a like a computer

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>game version of a maze. There was a VR version

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of this maze, and there was another one that used

0:25:15.400 --> 0:25:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just a classic computer display. And the users were supposed

0:25:19.040 --> 0:25:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to try and complete the maze, and then they were

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 1>supposed to tell administrators when they felt that five minutes

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:26.800
<v Speaker 1>had gone by. So, you know, they're working on the

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>maze and when they think, oh, I felt like about

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>five minutes, they'd speak up uh, And there was a

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 1>reminder for them to actually do this that would flash

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 1>on screen every eight seconds. However, the subjects were not

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>told the frequency at which this this reminder would flash,

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.239
<v Speaker 1>so if they had, they could have used that as

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a way to measure the passing of time. So they

0:25:48.080 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>just knew that this message kept popping up. They didn't

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.320
<v Speaker 1>know that it was, you know, an eight second delay

0:25:53.480 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>between messages. Anyway, at the end of it, the scientists

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>said that those who were using the VR version on

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>average suggested that five minutes had passed at around the

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>six and a half minute mark, or the way they

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>put it, was that quote an average of twenty eight

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.479
<v Speaker 1>point five percent more real time passed for participants who

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:16.399
<v Speaker 1>played the VR game than for those in the control group,

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:20.720
<v Speaker 1>with no difference in perceived duration end quote. Now, there

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:22.879
<v Speaker 1>have been other studies kind of related to this issue.

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Some of them have conflicting results that that sort of uh,

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, they don't align with this this experiments results.

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is by no means the definitive answer as

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to whether or not we perceived time to pass more

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>slowly in VR than in real life. Also, researchers have

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>noted that if you're talking about extended play sessions like

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:47.000
<v Speaker 1>half an hour or more, this effect has been seen

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:51.160
<v Speaker 1>not just in VR, but in all sorts of gameplay

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.880
<v Speaker 1>modes like traditional computer gaming and otherwise. So in other words,

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it does look like we get back to that time

0:26:58.680 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>flies when you're having fun, saying that there really is

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:04.000
<v Speaker 1>some element of truth to that, in the sense that

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 1>our perception of time is uh, is different while we're

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>having a good time and we think, oh, that was

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:12.240
<v Speaker 1>just five minutes, and then we look up and realize

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>we've been playing Civilization for four days straight. Just one

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>more turn, all right, that wraps up this episode of

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>text Stuff. If you have suggestions for topics I should

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:24.880
<v Speaker 1>cover in future episodes, reach out to me. The best

0:27:24.880 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>place to do that so we're on Twitter. You won't

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.159
<v Speaker 1>even need to subscribe because I'm not gonna do a

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:33.240
<v Speaker 1>subscription based thing. You won't even need the premium version

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter. Just regular old Twitter will do. And the

0:27:35.600 --> 0:27:38.800
<v Speaker 1>handle we use is text stuff H s W and

0:27:38.840 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk to you again really soon. Text Stuff is

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.200
<v Speaker 1>an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows